Dr. Christof Plothe: COVID “Vaccines” Destroying Human Fertility

From [HERE] The COVID injections have been reckless at best, violent at worst. 

Among the 1,500 disease states that follow the injections, women’s menstrual irregularities and both male and female infertility rates are alarming. People are being sterilized.

Highlights

• Pregnancy last 9 months, yet these “vaccines” were approved in in just 108 days. How can any claim of safety in pregnancy be made? Normally vaccine approval takes ten years.

• Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials, yet the injections were declared safe for pregnant women. Based therefore on nothing!

• 270 women did get pregnant during the Pfizer trial ; of those 238 were not reported, and only one normal birth was reported.

• Polyethyleneglycol which is a component of the pegylated nanoparticle used to deliver the genetic material into the human cells was known to be a fetal toxin before since before covid was launched.

• Moderna and Pfizer-biotech studies on 44 rats for just 42 days demonstrated a doubling of preimplantation loss of pregnancy, and 295% increased rate of birth defects. There was no evaluation of next generation effects, and the researchers were riddled with conflicts of interest that they tried to hide.

• Fertility requires long term studies. These have not been done.

• By sept 2021 tens of thousands of menstrual problems in women were reported following the jabs, with heavy bleeding 8000 times normal!

• Japan study of biodistribution showed extensive distribution with profound concentration in women’s ovaries.

• Potential mechanisms of fertility harm include pegylated nanoparticle toxicity, spike protein toxicity , immune response to SP , autoimmune attack on SP producing ovaries, and immune attack on an essential reproductive protein syncytin-1 which is structurally similar to SP.

• Moderna “vaccine” uses a higher dose of 100 mcg than Pfizer’s 30 mcg dose. Pfizer stopped the higher dose due to even higher toxicity, but moderna still uses it.

• The injected mRNA persists in most victims for 2 months, and stimulates spike protein production with SP persisting 15 months. SP damages male testes with dramatic reduction in spermatogenisis

• An Israel study showed sperm count and male fertility decreased with just one shot, then the study was ended. So what happens with repeat doses?

• USA VAERS reveals massive infertility issue reports, accounting for 95% of all infertility reports in the 30 years of reporting for all vaccines combined.

• Around the world, wherever the “vaccines” are rolled out, birth rates drop dramatically nine months later. This is unprecedented, and includes Ireland, Germany, Australia, UK, Switzerland, Sweden, Canada, Hungary and others.

• The most injected countries have the biggest drops in birth rates.

• In comparison with influenza vaccines, these injections have a 1500% higher associated miscarriage rate.

• Some studies show polyethylene glycol causing next generation infertility. Perhaps injected people will have sterile children.

• We need long term controls, but drug companies injected the control subjects after the brief study periods, thus eliminating long term controls. The closest thing we have is the countries where people have best resisted the forced injections.

• Stop the Vaccines. Stop suppressing ivermectin and promote safe covid treatment. Stop the persecution of the doctors who have been scientifically and ethically correct from the beginning. These doctors must be exonerated and returned to serving the people who need us now more than ever.

• Dr Plothe explores the possibility of this genetic modification of humans to produce toxic viral spike proteins, being inherited and the implications that may have for the children.

• Presentation ends at 24 min and Will’s questions start:

• Iron Will raises issues of malpractice, intention, misrepresentation, fraud, compromised journals, persecuted good doctors, and the CDC hiding deaths having removed 50,000 deaths from the VAERS data base and reclassifying them.

• Unknowns include: will this genetic experiment result in inheritable poison SP production in humans? Will there be future generations?

• Dr Plothe is seeing many covid “vaccine” damaged patients daily in his practice and he relates some of these experiences.

• Dr Plothe reminds us how science really works, and calls to end the suppression and have open forums. “Lets go back to science; today, not tomorrow.” [MORE]

Peer Reviewed Study Proves Claims that COVID Shots are “100% safe/effective,” prevent infection/transmission with no known Serious Side Effects were Lies. Confirms Excess Risk of Adverse Side Effects

From [HERE] A landmark peer-reviewed study appears to be the first of its kind to provide hard data on the “excess risk” of adverse side effects of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines in an independent “randomized clinical trial.”

The results of the accepted scientific study confirm that the concerns that many patients had about the mRNA vaccines were well-founded.

“In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants),” the study found.

“In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants),” the study added.

The study was published on ScienceDirect on August 31, 2022. The authors include researchers from Stanford University, the University of Maryland, and UCLA. The study provides the following list of confirmed adverse events (or side effects) of the respective mRNA vaccines. It also provides the risk ratios versus Covid-19 (over 1 is a factor increase, under 1 is a factor decrease). This is the list for Pfizer:

And the following are the adverse events for Moderna:

The study also provided known complications for Covid-19.

“Although the randomized trials offer high level evidence for evaluating causal effects, the sparsity of their data necessitates that harm-benefit analyses also consider observational studies,” the authors state. “Since their emergency authorization in December 2020, hundreds of millions of doses of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines have been administered and post-authorization observational data offer a complementary opportunity to study AESIs. Post-authorization observational safety studies include cohort studies (which make use of medical claims or electronic health records) and disproportionality analyses (which use spontaneous adverse event reporting systems).”

“In July 2021, the FDA reported detecting four potential adverse events of interest: pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation following Pfizer’s vaccine based on medical claims data in older Americans.” the researchers add. “Three of these four serious adverse event types would be categorized as coagulation disorders, which is the Brighton AESI category that exhibited the largest excess risk in the vaccine group in both the Pfizer and Moderna trials. FDA stated it would further investigate the findings but at the time of our writing has not issued an update.”

“Our study examining mRNA vaccine serious adverse events study is now peer-reviewed in the Journal Vaccine,” Fraiman wrote. “Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults.”

Thus, the objection to Americans’ concerns that the mRNA vaccines may have adverse side effects has come to a close, despite the initial advertisements that the vaccines were “100% safe and effective,” prevented infection and transmission, and had no known serious side effects.

Attorney: 'Government Coercion, Censorship and Misinformation about the Safety/Effectiveness of COVID Shots Destroyed Informed Consent. Red Flags about COVID Shots are Being Ignored by the Government'

Dr Yeardon and Dr Blynd: Authorities Own the Minds of Sheople who Believe “The COVID Lies." The False Narratives are Enemy Outposts in the Believer's Mind, Giving Rise to More Coercive Political Systems

From [DR MALONE]

By John Allison, J.D. Updated July 18, 2022

Introduction.

Most Americans have long assumed that they have a fundamental right to make decisions about their own bodily health and the medical treatments they receive. Informed consent is the ethical and legal principle by which that fundamental right is enforceable. To be able to give informed consent a person needs to be informed about the risks and benefits of, and alternatives to the proposed treatment.

The fundamental right to informed consent is particularly important with respect to the COVID-19 vaccines which are available in the United States pursuant to Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs). Under the federal EUA statute, people are entitled to be informed about their right to accept or refuse administration of these vaccines, the consequences (if any) of refusing vaccination, and the benefits and risks of alternatives to the vaccines. The manufacturers of EUA vaccines, and the people and organizations administering them, are immune from liability suits. People who suffer severe adverse effects after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine will not be able to recover compensation, for their monetary and emotional distress damages, from the vaccine manufacturers or from the people who vaccinated them. Similarly, the family members of people who die after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine will not be able to recover compensation for their loss.

Qualifications and Experience.

I am a retired lawyer, licensed to practice in Washington State and the District of Columbia, with extensive private law firm and in-house experience. Most of my law practice was devoted to the litigation of cases involving medical, toxicological, industrial hygiene and product safety issues. In my in-house role I was Assistant General Counsel in the legal department of a Fortune 100 company with overall responsibility for product liability, environmental and commercial litigation. I was also the lawyer for the company’s Medical Department, including Corporate Toxicology, Epidemiology and Product Responsibility.

This memorandum presents the results of research I performed and my opinions based on that research. This memorandum is not intended to give legal advice. People who want legal advice on the issues raised in this memorandum should consult with a lawyer licensed to practice in their jurisdiction.

Opinions.

Based on the results of my research to date, I have arrived at the following opinions with respect to the COVID-19 vaccines currently authorized or approved for use in the United States:

1. Government misinformation about the safety and effectiveness of the COVID- 19 vaccines, censorship of credible scientific and medical information about the risks of death and serious adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccines, and vaccination coercion, are depriving people of their ability to give informed consent to vaccination. Unless the limited effectiveness of the vaccines and the risks of death and serious adverse effects described in this memorandum are disclosed to people before they are vaccinated, informed consent has not been obtained.

2. Safe and effective drugs on the market for many years, such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, have been proven by reputable doctors to be successful in the early treatment of COVID-19. If those affordable drugs had been allowed to be more widely used in the United States before people needed to be hospitalized, many tens of thousands of people who died from COVID-19 would probably be alive today.

3. The COVID-19 vaccines authorized or approved for use in United States do not meet established criteria for establishing their short-term and long-term safety and efficacy. Serious safety signals – red flags – about these vaccines have been ignored, and continue to be ignored, by the FDA and the CDC. The EUAs for the Pfizer-BioNTech, the Moderna and the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen COVID-19 vaccines, and the FDA’s approval of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine and Moderna’s Spikevax vaccine, should be revoked. All of these vaccines should be taken off the market immediately.

• SARS-CoV-2 is the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. Distinctive spike proteins on the surface of the virus enable the virus to penetrate cells and cause infection. The spike proteins mutate, producing the Delta variant which became the dominant form of the virus by the middle of 2021. Continuing mutations of the spike protein produced the Omicron variant which became the dominant form of the virus by the end of 2021. We are now dealing with sub- variants of Omicron.

• The first confirmed case of COVID-19 in the United States was reported in mid-January, 2020. The pandemic spread. COVID-19 vaccines were not available until the middle of December 2020 when the FDA granted emergency use authorization for the Pfizer- BioNTech and the Moderna vaccines. In February 2021 the FDA granted emergency use authorization for the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccine. Early in 2021 these vaccines became widely available in the United States and mass vaccination programs began. By the middle of 2021 millions of Americans, including workers in many different occupations, were fully vaccinated.

• The COVID-19 vaccines do not produce immunity to COVID-19 because they are not designed to trigger an immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Instead, the vaccines are designed to trigger an immune response to the spike proteins on the surface of the original virus.

• A number of studies demonstrate that the vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of COVID-19. Fully vaccinated people can become infected and can also spread the SARS-CoV-2 virus to other vaccinated people and to unvaccinated people.

• According to data on the CDC website, in the United States there were 385,670 deaths attributed to COVID-19 in 2020, before the vaccines were widely available. In 2021, when vaccines were widely available and mass vaccination campaigns took place, there were 463,210 deaths attributed to COVID-19 – an increase of 20.1%.

• When the Delta and later the Omicron variants became the dominant form of the virus, government studies in different countries show that most COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths occur among fully vaccinated people.

• Now that the Omicron variant is the dominant form of SARS-CoV-2, the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) diminishes significantly over just a few months. According to a Danish study, which has not yet been peer reviewed, vaccinated people, more than 90 days after vaccination, are more likely than unvaccinated people to be infected by Omicron.

• The COVID-19 vaccines contain genetic instructions that cause the body to produce enormous numbers of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins in order to provoke an immune response to the spike proteins. Unfortunately, it turns out that the spike proteins, themselves, are toxic to cells. For example, endothelial cells line the inside of arteries to make blood flow smoothly. Damage to the endothelial cells caused by spike proteins increases the potential for microscopic blood clots to form. Those microscopic blood clots can travel to the lungs, increasing the risk of developing arterial hypertension which is a serious progressive condition that overtaxes and weakens the heart. There is no known cure for that condition.

• In the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna the genetic instructions that cause the body to produce spike proteins are encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles. A preclinical study on laboratory animals conducted by Pfizer shows that the lipid nanoparticles and mRNA genetic instructions enter the bloodstream and accumulate in several organs, including the spleen, bone marrow, liver and adrenal glands, and concentrate in the ovaries. The body then starts producing spike proteins wherever the mRNA genetic instructions happen to land.

• A number of serious medical conditions have been associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, including blood clotting disorders, cardiac emergencies, myocarditis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, autoimmune disease, spontaneous miscarriages, nervous system disorders and female infertility.

• The COVID-19 vaccines also interfere with the natural immune system, making a person more susceptible to viral infections and cancer. This may explain why most COVID-19 symptomatic infections, hospitalizations and deaths are now occurring among fully vaccinated people.

• A recent laboratory study in Sweden indicates that the Pfizer- BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine is able to enter a human liver cell line where it is reverse transcribed into DNA within a matter of hours. As a result, the possibility that the COVID-19 vaccines affect DNA cannot be ruled out.

• The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines also contain problematic ingredients. Both the Pfizer and the Moderna vaccines contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) as an active ingredient. An Expert Panel assessing the safety of PEG recommended against using PEG in ointments applied to damaged skin because some burn patients treated with a PEG-based antimicrobial cream experienced renal tubular necrosis and died of kidney failure. The PEG used in the Moderna vaccine matches the description of a PEG product manufactured by Sinopeg, a company in China. According to the Sinopeg website, that product is for “research use only.” The Moderna vaccine also contains a lipid known by the trade name SM-102. The Pfizer vaccine also contains a lipid known by the trade name ALC-0315. According to the safety information on the website of Cayman Chemical Company, which manufactures SM- 102 and ALC-0315, both of those products are “for research use – Not for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic use.” Yet, in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, PEG, SM-102 and ALC-0315 are being directly injected into people’s bodies.

• Because no long-term clinical studies were performed, there is no way of knowing whether or not vaccinated people will suffer severe adverse side effects in the future. This is a significant concern, since the vaccines increase the potential for developing cardiovascular disease and autoimmune disease, which can both take months or years to develop.

• In 1990 the government established the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) which is co-managed by the CDC and the FDA. It is intended to be a national early warning system to detect possible safety problems with vaccines in the United States. The number of serious adverse events and deaths that have been reported in VAERS for the COVID-19 vaccines is many times greater than the serious adverse events and deaths reported in VAERS for all other vaccines combined. As of July 1, 2022 more than 29,200 deaths, and more than 212,600 serious injuries, following administration of one of the COVID-19 vaccines have been reported in VAERS. Yet the CDC and the FDA continue to ignore these serious safety signals.

• In contrast, in 1976 the federal government conducted a mass vaccination campaign against the swine flu. After roughly 25% of the population in the United States had been vaccinated, the government terminated the vaccination program due to reports of 25 deaths and 550 cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome following vaccination.

• According to a mortality analysis by the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, 98.9% of all the people in the United States with a confirmed case of COVID-19 survived the disease. Most COVID-19 deaths occurred in elderly people who were in poor health with multiple comorbidities.

• The Society of Actuaries collected and analyzed claims data from twenty life insurance companies that provide group term coverage in the United States, representing roughly 90% of the employer-based group term life insurance industry. All-cause mortality data for the pandemic period (April 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021) was compared to all cause mortality data for the baseline period (2017 through 2019). The analysis reveals a dramatic spike in deaths from all causes during the third quarter of 2021 (July 1 through September 30). During that quarter, excess mortality for all policyholders was more than 30% above baseline. The spike in deaths was even more dramatic for working-age people. Excess mortality for people ages 25 to 34 was 81% above baseline, excess mortality for people ages 35 to 44 was 117% above baseline, excess mortality for people ages 45 to 54 was 108% above baseline, and excess mortality for people ages 55 to 64 was 70% above baseline. The dramatic increase in deaths from all causes during the third quarter of 2021, particularly among working age people, undermines the claim that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective [MORE]

Operation "Shrivelization" is Going On Right in Your Face: 'Global Overt Depopulation strategies, programs and efforts designed and implemented by the pathological elite' - FUNKTIONARY

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Shrivelization – world-wide covert and overt depopulation strategies, programs and efforts designed and implemented by the pathological elite—specifically the deliberate and diabolical shrinking (reduction) of non-white populations globally through, genthanasia, genocide, eugenics, internecine scarce-resource-based ethnic conflicts, plandemics, richcraft (billionaires Soros, Gates, Rockefeller types) funding and rolling out voodoo vaccinations, Neo-Crony colonialism, government social credit systems, surveillance capitalism, free-range slavery, Geo-fencing, socialist distancing, and food desert starvation, etc. (See: Genthanasia)

Joel Smalley: ‘It is Indisputable that Deaths Across All Ages are Substantially Higher Since the "Vaccine" Rollout.’ Social Security Administration Data Shows that COVID Injections are Causing Death

JOEL SMALLEY reports “The mRNA experiment will go down as the most heinous crime against humanity ever witnessed. Those that persist in its support or even its promotion would do well to look at the data that unequivocally demonstrates that the novel gene therapy is not Safe or Effective™.”

Over 55s

In the over 55s, even the most basic summary statistics clearly show that deaths in the COVID era (Feb ‘20 to present), are higher than expected according to historical trend:

Comparing periods running from August to July each year (since this is the observed seasonal mortality pattern), 2019-20, the year of the COVID epidemic, results in 6% more deaths than expected.

In 2020-21 and 2021-22, the post-mRNA experiment years, deaths are respectively 15% and 12% higher than expected. The unusual spikes in deaths occur coincidentally with the start of the mass mRNA injection campaign1:

18 to 55s

In the 18 to 55s, the basic summary statistics again clearly show that deaths in the COVID era, are higher than expected according to historical trend:

2019-20 results in 9% more deaths than expected. In 2020-21 and 2021-22, deaths are an unprecedented 26% and 34% higher than expected. 

Once again, the unusual spikes in deaths occur coincidentally with the start of the mass mRNA injection campaign:

The recent trend of declining mortality is reversed ever so slightly in 2019-20, with deaths 5% higher than expected. However, deaths are respectively 11% and 21% higher than expected in the subsequent two-year periods.

The correlation between deaths and mRNA adverse event reports are strongest in this age group:

Conclusion

Whilst correlation does not equal causation, it is an indisputable fact that deaths across all ages are substantially higher (in absolute terms and relative to expectation) in the post-mRNA experiment era than they were during the COVID era prior to the start of the experiment.

In terms of overall public health, in the absence of any other plausible explanation (which is not apparent), it is safe to conclude that the mRNA experiment is not associated with lower mortality overall. 

In fact, it is quite the contrary, with the severity of the increase in mortality in the post-mRNA experiment era being more heavily felt in the age groups under 55, who were less affected by the natural virus when it first emerged. [MORE]

Report from a Group of Independent German Scientists says ‘COVID Injections Must Be Stopped 'to Avert a Direct and Imminent Danger to Human Life.' Claims Toxic Substances were Found in COVID Shots

From [HERE] A group of independent German scientists found toxic components—mostly metallic—in all the COVID vaccine samples they analyzed, “without exception” using modern medical and physical measuring techniques.

The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis says that some of the toxic elements found inside the AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna vaccine vials were not listed in the ingredient lists from the manufacturers.

The following metallic elements were found in the vaccines:

• Alkali metals: caesium (Cs), potassium (K)
• Alkaline earth metals: calcium (Ca), barium (Ba)
• transition metals: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti)
• Rare earth metals: cerium (Ce), gadolinium (Gd)
• Mining group/metal: aluminum (Al)
• Carbon group: silicon (Si) (partly support material/slide)
• Oxygen group: sulphur (S)

These substances, furthermore, “are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, can only partially be explained as a result of crystallization or decomposition processes, [and] cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process,” the researchers found.

They declared the findings as preliminary.

The report states,

The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. The group consists of independent scientists, including physicians, physicists, chemists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and alternative health practitioners, supported by lawyers, psychologists, analysts and journalists. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis uses modern medical and physical measuring techniques, the results of which have confirmed and complemented each other: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), Mass Spectroscopy (MS), Inductively Coupled Plasma Analysis (ICP), Bright Field Microscopy (BFM), Dark Field Microscopy (DFM) and Live Blood Image Diagnostics, as well as analysis of images using Artificial Intelligence. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis continues to work in close cooperation with several international groups that are carrying out similar investigations and who have obtained results consistent with our own. The results from our analysis of the vaccines can, consequently, be regarded as cross-validated. There are questions that need to be satisfactorily answered by the vaccine manufacturers and, in Germany, by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (the agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health responsible for the regulation of vaccines in that country). Possible causal links between the vaccines and fatalities need to be investigated.

In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the COVID-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately. [MORE]

Liberal NYC Chills the "Free Speech" of Black Protest by Failing to Prosecute Any Cops who Violently Silenced Protestors in 2020. DA Dismisses its Only Case Against a Cop Who Pushed Woman to Concrete

From [HERE] The lone NYPD officer criminally charged in connection with use of force during the 2020 George Floyd protests will have the charges dismissed after he completes conflict-resolution training and other measures, according to a disposition reached Thursday.

The dependent media explained “the outcome in Brooklyn Criminal Court means the case against officer Vincent D’Andraia will be dismissed and sealed in six months if he stays out of trouble.” On video the large white authoritarian shoved Dounya Zayer, a small woman, like an offensive lineman pulling on a running play and caused her to hit her head against the street. He yelled out loud, “fucking bitch” while he did so. Said massa’ media pretends that Dounya Zayer is the only victim in this matter. The dependent media also falsely pretends that persons harmed by crimes like Zayer make prosecutorial decisions about what crimes to charge, what sentence to request or what pea deals to offer. The liberal media explains

“prosecutors with the office of Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez said Zayer “had chosen the restorative justice approach, focusing more on repairing harm than on doling out discipline.”  “Based on her beliefs, [she] went through the restorative justice process, which allowed the defendant to take the classes and to do what was necessary to make amends for what happened there,” Assistant District Attorney Daphney Gachette said in Brooklyn Supreme Court on Thursday.”

Said statements are inaccurate and mischaracterizations. Sometimes “victims” are given input in the prosecutorial decision making process but only when authorities request it. The restorative justice was a choice presented to her by authorities among other specific options they believed to be acceptable. Such prosecutorial decisions are made in accordance with the priorities and goals they set for themselves and upon their value choices. As explained by Professor Angela Davis, “Like the charging decision, the plea bargaining process is controlled entirely by the prosecutor and decisions are entirely within her discretion. A criminal defendant cannot plead guilty to a less serious offense unless the prosecutor decides to make a plea offer. While the defense attorney may attempt to negotiate the best possible offer, the decision is ultimately left to the prosecutor's discretion.” [MORE] There is also little a judge can do where a prosecutor decides to withdraw its own prosecution.

Importantly, the white liberal media and its prosecutors have decontextualized this matter by pretending that the harm done here was done primarily to Ms. Zayer. A mainstream media outlet called “The City” stated, “A Brooklyn law enforcement source said the resolution and penalty in the case were not unusual for third degree assault by a person with no prior criminal history.”

Dr. Amos Wilson and Neely Fuller explain that decontextualization is a most effective deception in the system of racism white supremacy. Dr. Wilson states,

The bane of the African community is the exploitative White American community which projects a so-called civilized, fraternal, egalitarian, liberal face while concurrently seeking to maintain White supremacy. This means that the White American community must maintain African subordination while not appearing to do so. It must cannibalistically sacrifice the vitality, autonomy, and if need be, the life of the African American community while posing as its benefactor and savior. It pleads innocence while washing its hands of the blood of African people.

Here, by focusing on Ms. Zayer we are led to believe that the only real harm done was to one white lady and dismissal of the charges is the remedy she wanted, so case closed. (Let’s be clear here; when we say liberal NYC we mean that NYC is a mecca for democrats, liberals, gays and Blacks. In fact, there are more Blacks and gays in NYC than in any other US city. Democrat authorities control all levels and branches of NYC government.)

Although liberal authorities and their media treat the incident with Ms. Zayer like a common assault that occurred between two citizens in front of a 7-11, in real life it involved a police officer and a citizen during a nationwide wave of ongoing political protest and riots over the police murders of George Floyd and others. Said protest occurred in front of a captive tv audience during bogus COVID shelter in place lockdowns. In most places authoritarians treated protesters like criminals. According to the CCRB, at least 318 complaints were made against NYPD officers for misconduct during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. Of those, the CCRB has recommended the highest level of discipline, which includes suspension or termination, against 47 officers and less severe discipline for 33 others. Only 3 were disciplined and as stated, none were prosecuted. [MORE] In the context of reality the individual remedy for Ms. Zayer was provided to her in tort law. Accordingly, she filed a lawsuit against the NYPD which was settled for $387,000 earlier this year under an agreement that compelled Officer D’Andraia to pay $3,000 out of his own pocket as well.

The crime is against the public, particularly Black people and those who protest against authority and racism. The harm done to Black protesters and individuals who consider engaging in protest against police brutality in the future is real; where authorities choose not to hold police accountable after they violently silence the speech of protesters, they officially encourage the cops’ right to remain violent and chill so-called “1st Amendment rights.” The message from authorities to Blacks and Latinos is, ‘if you protest against police brutality we can degrade and harm you and nothing will be done about it.’ The message from massa’ media is ‘when authority brutalizes you during protest we will make sure said white lawlessness is understood as nothing other than public order.’

In the context of reality, last week liberals in NY made it unlawful to carry or bear arms during any kind of political protest no matter the location. As such, citizens wishing to protest against police brutality also have no meaningful right to defend themselves against the unlawful conduct of cops like Officer Vincent D’Andraia. The undeceiver Jeremy Locke states,

“The objective of the control of speech is making sure that those who were compelled to bend to the will of authority never gain the courage to look back.”

FUNKTIONARY describes the situation where you only have adherent rights which can be turned on and off like a light switch by authorities and where you are prohibited by authorities from defending yourself is totalitarianism, a form of reverse terrorism in a fascist society disguised as a democracy. FUNKTIONARY further states,  “totalitarian Patriotism – terrified silence created through the suppression of principled cognitive dissent under the First Amendment and the Declaration of Independence. 2) allowing the officers of so-called “government” to become free from the limits of law.”

It is a shame that Black psheep go on enthusiastically supporting white liberals as they go about destroying various freedoms and devaluing black life right in their faces. The right to protest and to carry and bear arms in case of public confrontation and to prevent tyranny are unalienable rights that have even less meaning in NYC and many other liberal places where Blacks live.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” The Declaration of Independence quoted in FUNKTIONARY

The message to liberals and their government should be FUCK WHITE SUPREMACY and FUCK AUTHORITY.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Psheep – the silence of the lames. 2) people as the mass herd-sheep (the “P” is as silent as the sleepwalking psheople are). 3) the assembled masses. 4) the couch-bound talk-show vortexed voyeurz. The Psheep Song: Sing along—Some contemplate their navel, others contemplate their gold—some stray to other pastures, while most stay within the fold. (See: Mass, Sheople, Groupentity, WASSUP, Sheep, Thoughtforms, Religion, Absolute Truth, Finitude & Reification)

lawless society – a socio-juristic human-relation configuration where law is upheld, codified, and deified over humanity. If you fear or worry about its advent, you’ll certainly never recognize its presence. 2) a Police State of the Overruling Class.

Larken Rose: The Belief in Authority, that Certain People Have the Right to rule over others who are legally obligated to obey is Irrational and Insane

According to FUNKTIONARY:

authority - (from the root word author)—which means to originate. Only you have authority over your Self...anything else. i.e.. to accept any authority external to one's Self once of discriminating age, is the very definition of irresponsibility. There is no freedom in the presence of so-called authority, i.e. outside of one's Self and Self-Nature.) 2) the handmaiden of autonomy. 3) internal power. 4) Nommo. All authority, like the kingdom of heaven, is within. Be an authority unto yourself as all authority should come from your own authentic experience—that is the only source or wellspring of authority. Authority is the means by which society uses to control its population. Ignoring or belittling authority does not mean people are either good or bad, whether or not they are punished for their insubordination. Healthy people do not need authority figures to tell them what to do, but only the knowledge of themselves. You can teach a parrot to quote from either scripture or statute, but a parrot is not an authority. Only by you becoming truth do you have authority to speak—and then only on your behalf (i.e., your inner truth), your innerstanding. An authority is an eyewitness or an I-witness. and to picture the dynamic truth no proofs or negatives are needed nor possible—as reality isn't certain or static. When you are dead to sin and Alive to the God-Self-Divine, you become the Buddha, the Christ, the true authority within. (See: Obedience, Predictive Programming. Autonomy, Anarchy, Nommo, Sin, Alive. Authentic, Responsitivity, Dharma, Follower, Spontaneity, Conditioning, Conditions, Freedom & Responsibility) [MORE]

In a Credibility Contest btw an Accused White Cop and 5 Black Witnesses who Will a Jury of White Sheeple Believe? Wichita Cop Not Liable After Shooting Black Marine to Death in Front of His Family

An experienced trial attorney will tell you that it is very difficult to get a white juror to believe a white cop is lying, especially if the client is Black.  Reality or anything too real (such as racism) in court is simply unbelievable to judges and jurors in the fake world created in court. Many cops are sophisticated, masterful liars who are taught how to testify and create persuasive, detailed police reports. Mixing actual facts with nonsense sounds & looks real in court. White DA's, judges, jurors and the white media are also eager and programmed to believe anything foul cops say about Blacks. A testilying racist suspect cop only needs to presents facts in accord with the appetite of the racist suspect listener, not in accord with actual reality. 

In a case that concerns whether use of force was reasonable, like this one, the evidence simply consisted of a credibility contest between a sworn white police officer and several Black adult witnesses. According to news reports from the white media the accused cop never explained how exactly he faced imminent danger from the Black man who had a pocket knife down at his side. All he had to say was ‘a shirtless, muscular, Black marine with an aggressive look in his eye was coming toward me.’ Why would a cop make it up? Because white sheeple will believe it and use their imaginations to fill in the details. As explained by Osho Rajineesh, 'A mind that is filled with belief is a mind which can project anything according to that belief.' And most whites believe Black men are inherently criminal or a threat to their existence.

WHITE COPS’ PHOTO HIDDEN BY WHITE MEDIA TO PROTECT THE SYSTEM OF AUTHORITY AND RACISM/WHITE SUPREMACY. From [HERE] A white Wichita police officer was acting in self defense when he shot and killed a 26-year-old Marine veteran in front of the man’s family eight years ago, a jury decided Wednesday.

The family of Icarus Randolph had sued the officer, Ryan Snyder, and the city of Wichita seeking $5 million for wrongful death and other allegations in the July 4, 2014 shooting.

But an eight-day trial ended Wednesday afternoon when a jury took less than an hour to find in favor of the officer.

“I wish I could say I was amazed or shocked,” said William Skepnik, lead attorney for the family. “It’s hard for me to not see a racial component in this. I do not believe that a white man or a white family would have been treated this way. These people were treated as people that don’t matter.”

Steven Pigg, lead attorney for the officer and city, said: “The jury system works. ... This is justice.”

Over the course of the past week, the jury heard accounts from family members who witnessed the fatal shooting and from Snyder, the crisis intervention-trained officer who shot Randolph four times in the chest after he used a Taser on him.

Randolph’s mother, Beverly Allen, called 911 in the afternoon to request mental health treatment for her son, who suffered from PTSD after serving as an infantry rifleman in Iraq for three years. Randolph had been hospitalized two months earlier for a similar episode. The family believed loud fireworks on the night of July 3 triggered his PTSD.

Snyder and fellow Wichita officer Danny Brown were talking with family members in front of the house when they heard a loud bang from inside. Randolph then kicked through a sliding screen in the den doorway and emerged into the front yard.

Exactly how events unfolded in the next five to seven seconds varies based on who’s giving the account.

Everyone agreed Randolph was shirtless and wearing camouflage Marine capris. They agreed he was holding a pocket knife with an almost 4-inch blade by his side — the same knife he had been holding in his hand since he woke up that morning.

The white cops told the white jury that a shirtless, muscular Black man had an “aggressive” look in his eyes and “zeroed in” on Snyder, power-walking directly toward him with tensed muscles and clenched fists.

In direct contrast Randolph’s family members said he was staring off into the distance with an unfocused gaze and walking slowly toward a neighbor’s house with the knife at his side when Snyder moved into his path and initiated contact, first deploying his Taser and then switching to his handgun when Randolph continued to advance.

Randolph’s face was blank, sister Elisa Allen testified. “Like he was looking at something that wasn’t even there.”

Neither Snyder nor Brown issued verbal commands to Randolph before Snyder shot him. He was not suspected of any crimes. While it is clear that the white officer wanted him stop walking in his front yard, It’s not clear how exactly the officer was facing an imminent threat of death when he shot him to death. Clearly, he was not under arrest.

“It wasn’t just a head in the clouds situation. It was a determined assault situation,” Snyder testified.

Snyder said he remembers pointing his Glock 17 only at Randolph that day and that Randolph’s mother, sisters, nieces and nephews were comfortably outside of the line of fire when he shot. [he only remembers that he didn’t do anything unlawful. lol]

The family says Elisa Allen was standing directly behind her brother when Snyder fired his weapon and that he then pointed it at Randolph’s mother when she tried to approach her son after the shooting.

Snyder told the jury he was 5 to 7 feet from Randolph and backpedaling when he shot him with both the Taser and the handgun. Brown told police investigators the day of the incident that Snyder and Randolph were 10 to 15 feet apart.

Sedgwick County District Attorney Marc Bennett, a racist suspect (pictured above) decided in 2014 not to pursue criminal charges against Snyder, a 17-year veteran of the Wichita Police Department who is now a community police officer in northeast Wichita.

In what has been a seven-year court battle, the civil lawsuit was reopened in 2020 after the Kansas Court of Appeals reversed a Sedgwick County District Court’s dismissal of it.

The trial, in 18th Judicial District Court Judge Deborah Hernandez Mitchell’s courtroom, was delayed more than three months after lawyers representing the city claimed news coverage of the Wichita Police Department’s racist text messaging scandal, first reported by The Eagle, would “inject race” into the killing of Randolph, a Black man.

THANKS FOR SERVICE NGHR. “He wanted to serve his country. He felt it was the right thing to do,” Elisa Allen said.

He didn’t like to talk much about his three years in Iraq, even to his closest family members.

“He felt uneasy about the things he participated in (in Iraq) that didn’t sit right with his soul,” Ida said.

When he was experiencing an acute PTSD episode, he would sometimes go “catatonic,” family testified, saying July 4, 2014 was one such day when he remained in an unresponsive stupor as they tried to assess his wellbeing.

July 4

In a 911 call seeking an ambulance to take her son to Ascension Via Christi St. Joseph for mental health treatment, Beverly Allen told dispatch Randolph had something in his hand but that he didn’t have a weapon. Pigg argued that officers may have handled the entire call differently if they had been aware Randolph had a knife before he emerged from the house.

“I certainly didn’t want a confrontation with police with my son in that state,” said Beverly Allen, who watched a Wichita police officer fatally shoot her father in front of the family home when she was 7 years old.

“I seen my brother fall and I seen him die with his face in the dirt,” Alford said.

“We have to live with, we made the call that killed him,” sister Ida Allen said.

No Right to Be Left the Fuck Alone in Free Range Prison: LAPD Shot a Black Man in the Back as He Walked Down the Street Holding a Car Part, Threatening Nobody. White Liberal Media Analyze the Car Part

From [HERE] and [HERE] When two Los Angeles police officers confronted Jermaine Petit on an evening in July, one of them quickly realized that reports Petit was carrying a gun were inaccurate.

“It’s not a gun, bro,” the officer told his partner about the metallic object in Petit’s hand, according to video of the incident from officers’ body-worn cameras that the Los Angeles Police Department made public Thursday.

But that realization wouldn’t matter. Less than half a minute later, Petit would be shot multiple times by an LAPD sergeant firing from inside his vehicle and the officer’s partner, who failed to hear the warning that Petit was unarmed, according to the videos and information released by the department.

Petit was taken to a hospital with serious injuries but has since been released, according to this family. No officers were injured.

On July 18, a man called 911 to report he had confronted a man who appeared homeless and was behind his house in the city’s Leimert Park neighborhood, according to the recordings released by the LAPD. The man refused to leave and had pulled a “pistol” on him, the homeowner said.

Officers were dispatched and, as they were looking for the man, another 911 caller said an armed man was walking up Degnan Boulevard, just north of Obama Boulevard. A short time later, two officers pulled up alongside Petit, who matched the description the callers had given, as he walked on Obama Boulevard. The LA Times misleads here to rationalize or normalize cop conduct- cops don’t answer 911 calls. They receive info from dispatch. At any rate, all law enforcement must seek to corroborate details in order to establish probable cause or reasonable ARTICULABLE suspicion otherwise they cannot stop, search or arrest- if cops get a call for a fat, old white man wearing a tuxedo with white a beard stealing a car when they come upon a suspect they must corroborate said details and determine whether a crime is occurring right now in this moment and whether he is involved in it, that is, if you believe in such things. Actually, lets go over their statist truths here just for kicks:

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, although only one sentence long, protects people against unjustified detentions by the government. It reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

In order for the police to stop you the Supreme Court has ruled that police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and the person detained is involved in the activity. 

In order to frisk you the Supreme Court has ruled that the police must have independent reasonable articulable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous before they may touch you (a cursory patdown for weapons). Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. [MORE]

Clearly these rules are only intended for white people. Non-whites are stopped, shot and then frisked because they are Non-white. This does not happen to white folks. It happens to Black and Latino people regardless of income, education, political affiliation or skin color.

Of course police cannot stop people because they have unknown black objects in their hand. There is no black object exception to so-called 4th Amendment - but racists might disagree with regard to stopping Blacks.]

The officer riding in the passenger seat quickly got out of the vehicle and ordered Petit to “come here.”

Petit continued walking away on the sidewalk, nervously turning back every few steps while repeating something unintelligible without stopping, the video shows. Again, the LA Times reporter misleads - if there is no reasonable ARTICULABLE suspicion to stop the Black man then police cannot lawfully stop him. Question here is, when they ordered him to stop, did the cops have articulable reasons to believe he had committed a crime? If so, what crime?

The officer walked after him with his gun drawn, telling him repeatedly to “take your hands out of your pockets, bro,” while his partner, who was identified by the LAPD as Officer Daryl Glover, drove ahead and stopped beside Petit, according to the video.

Glover exited the vehicle and, as he was pointing his weapon at Petit from a few feet away, the first officer told him that the object in Petit’s hand was not a gun.

The two officers broke into a jog to follow Petit and Glover asked, “What is — bro, you said it’s not a gun?”

The officer’s response was muffled and Glover didn’t hear it. “Huh?” he asked. So the cop was informed it was not a gun - that’s what he actually heard.

Immediately after the exchange, Glover shouts at Petit, “Hey, drop it!.” About three seconds later, the first of three shots were fired.

The videos released by the LAPD do not make clear who fired the first shot. In the days following the shooting, the LAPD said that two officers had fired their weapons, and identified them as Glover and Sgt. Brett Hayhoe, a supervisor who had arrived at the scene as Glover and his partner were chasing after Petit.

With regard to the possession of guns by Black people the bottom line here is that blacks are prohibited from possessing guns in the system of racism white supremacy. Whether the black individual posed a threat or possessed it unlawfully or lawfully is beside the point; no guns allowed for blacks. Any black person in possession of a gun or a black object in their hand or physically near a gun or black object or any black person says they ‘have a gun,’ can be executed anytime by cops. Particularly white liberal citizens, media and professionals in white liberal cities like LA, DC, Chicago, NYC, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Seattle and many more go on enforcing their hypocrisy of white lawlessness as law and order. Apparently, they just hope sleeping Blacks never notice.

In response to questions from The Times, Capt. Kelly Muniz, a department spokeswoman, clarified that Hayhoe fired first, shooting Petit while he was still inside his vehicle. Glover then fired. It is not clear from the videos if Hayhoe or Glover shot twice. The fact that Hayhoe fired from his vehicle was first reported by Sahra Sulaiman, a writer for StreetsBlog L.A.

As Petit writhed on the ground and moved his arm, Glover and his partner yelled at him to “Stop moving!” and “Stop reaching for it!” in reference to the magical black object he had been carrying. Hayhoe exited his vehicle and ordered the officers to back up and take cover behind a car.

The object was a black metal “latch actuator,” a part of a car door’s locking mechanism, which is shaped somewhat like a small handgun.

The case garnered attention after a police spokesman at a news conference the night of the shooting lied and said Petit had been carrying a “weapon” and then Police Chief Michel Moore corrected the obviously false claim the following day, saying Petit was holding the car part.

Anger flared again at a virtual community meeting several weeks later, which was cut short after a police captain lied again and said Petit was carrying as a “nonfunctioning firearm.”

Before the release of the video, relatives and friends of Petit had spent weeks pressing the Police Department for more information about the case, which has received attention on social media and among elected officials. Congresswoman and mayoral candidate Karen Bass said in a post on her Facebook page that the reports surrounding the shooting were “increasingly alarming,” while calling for a “full and transparent” investigation.

Police are seeking a misdemeanor charge of possession of an imitation weapon to be filed against Petit. A spokesman for the city attorney’s office said Thursday that a decision had not been made on whether to prosecute Petit.

The LAPD’s decision to pursue a criminal case has drawn strong condemnations from neighbors, activists and academics, who see the department’s response as an attempt to deflect scrutiny from its officers’ actions.

Nichole Jones, the mother of Petit’s daughter, said Petit is an Air Force veteran.

Civil rights groups/Sharpton Meet w/Feds to Discuss Dietary Racism and Milk Consumption. The Collapse of Public Education or the Servant Training Provided to Black Kids in Liberal Cities Not Addressed

From [HERE] and [MORE] Twenty-eight civil rights and health care groups announced Tuesday they have requested that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) address “dietary racism” in national school lunch programs, raising concerns to the federal agency about forcing millions of minority children to drink cow’s milk without allowing them a healthier alternative.

In a letter to the USDA’s Equity Commission, the groups said the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) only incentivizes dairy milk, a policy they called “inherently inequitable and socially unjust” because children of color are more likely to be lactose intolerant — meaning they cannot fully digest sugars in dairy and can suffer from adverse effects after consumption.

The NSLP covers 30 million children in 100,000 schools across the U.S., a program the civil rights groups said children of color are historically overrepresented in.

“If Black lives matter, so does our health and nutrition, but the National School Lunch Program has consistently failed children of color,” said Milton Mills, a Washington, D.C., urgent care physician who has researched the topic, in a statement. “Either schoolchildren drink the milk they’re given and suffer in class while they’re trying to learn, or they go without a nutritionally significant portion of their meal.”

The letter was signed by leading national groups such as Progressive Democrats of America, the Maryland chapter of the NAACP, Switch4Good, the Center for a Humane Economy and the National Action Network Washington Bureau, which was founded by civil rights leader the Rev. Al Sharpton.

The USDA reimburses schools covered under the 76-year-old NSLP if they provide fluid milk during meals, which does not cover soy milk or other types of organic milk. Dairy milk must be served with every meal. [MORE]

ARTILLERY IS FROM Kevin “Rashid” Johnson and “Defying the Tomb: Selected Prison Writings and Art of Kevin "Rashid" Johnson featuring exchanges with an Outlaw”

According to FUNKTIONARY:

"education" - word-generated opinions combined with force for control over competent hue-mans. 2) coercive persuasion. 3) indoctrination and regimentation. 4) braindraining. 5) developing the powers and faculties of a person. "Developing the powers" means de-veloping, or dis-veloping the powers, which means to negate, or have a privative, or reversing force on the powers. •"The invisible capital which enables its possessors to remain, or to climb on, the backs of the uneducated and to fill their heads with prejudices useful for the maintenance of either the old or the new status quo. It's Squid Pro Row, baby. -Austin Powers. The whole machinery of "education" is to make you mechanical—devoid of intelligence—reduced to an academented drone or a conforming clone for the marketplace of "society." "True education is that which is experienced, tested and digested. What can be counted and recorded is not education." -Vinoba Bhave. What passes for "an" education is second-hand experiences, misconceptions filtered through memories and lies sold in units. True education is transformative, fluid and lifelong. (See: De-education, Experience, Academented, Knowledge Scrolling, Pedagogy, Democracy, Dead Knowledge, Transformative Education, Efficiency, Language, Develop, Envelope, School, Devotion & Learning)

Public Fool System - a place where children are having unprotected education. 2) a syndromatic exercise in conformity and blind obedience to so-called "authority" (disguised repression). 3) systematic planned violence meted out on children and young adults—held hostage and hostile—daily, hourly, quarantined from the natural rhythm of things in life through Pavlovian bells and shrink-wrapped prefabricated and curriculum and distorted history. 4) a training boot camp for life-long slavery and indentured servitude to gangbankers and the Corporate State in a society created and based in violence, governed by fear, propaganda, psychogenic money and power.

Another Video Catches White and Black High School Students Mocking the Police Murder of George Floyd. Blindly Obedient Drone Kids Act Out Master-Servant Roles as Conditioned in MI Public Fool System

From [HERE] “I can’t believe kids are doing this,” parent Jaimie Nasceif told local outlet Fox 2 Detroit. “I think it’s ridiculous and something completely unacceptable.”

According to Fox 2, the video was recorded during an off-campus breakfast in August for players from Stevenson High School’s football team.

In the video, reposted to Instagram earlier this week by @metrodetroitnarc, white ninth-grade students in football jerseys stand in a circle on an outdoor patio. They surround a Black student, who kneels on the ground. The Black student wears all black clothing, except for a cloth that acts as a blindfold, and he places his hands behind his back as if he’s been arrested. The white students point water guns at him.

“I dare you to shoot him,” one of the white students says.

The white students shout a noise resembling a gunshot and tell the Black student to fall to the ground. One of the students even pushes him as a signal to fall.

“Shoot him in the head,” a student says after the Black child hits the ground.

Then, the circle of boys pretend to stomp and kick him while laughing. One of the white teammates tells the Black student to “go back to Africa.”

In a separate clip, white football players with water guns approach a Black teammate outside. (It is unclear if he is the same football player from the previous scenario.) They holler at him to “stop resisting” while pointing their guns. Then, one of the white students ends the fake arrest by tackling the Black kid.

At the video’s conclusion, someone within the group mentions George Floyd.

After the video circulated on social media, Stevenson High School Principal Kenneth L. Cucchi III told parents that it was inspired by a TikTok trend “based on the tragic death of George Floyd,” Detroit Metro Times reported. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY

Public schools - the instrument of Hidalgo (the "Greater System") and the "State" whereby readers, writers and counters are produced who are certified as qualified to understand orders and obediently carry them out... the tenth gang-plank of the Communist Manifesto. (See: Compulsory Schooling, Indoctrination & Formal Education)

Public Fool System - a place where children are having unprotected education. 2) a syndromatic exercise in conformity and blind obedience to so-called "authority" (disguised repression). 3) systematic planned violence meted out on children and young adults—held hostage and hostile—daily, hourly, quarantined from the natural rhythm of things in life through Pavlovian bells and shrink-wrapped prefabricated and curriculum and distorted history. 4) a training boot camp for life-long slavery and indentured servitude to gangbankers and the Corporate State in a society created and based in violence, governed by fear, propaganda, psychogenic money and power. [MORE]

New UK Report Finds that More than 120,000 Non-White Workers Quit Jobs b/c of Racist Degradation

From [HERE] and [HERE] More than 120,000 workers from minority ethnic backgrounds have quit their jobs because of racism, suggests a landmark study that has found workplace discrimination is sapping the confidence of a large part of the UK workforce.

More than one in four workers from black and other minority ethnic backgrounds have faced racist jokes at work in the last five years and 35% said it left them feeling less confident at work, according to what is believed to be the largest representative survey conducted of the UK’s 3.9 million minority ethnic workers. Eight per cent of victims left their job as a result of the racism they experienced, according to the study by the Trades Union Congress.

“Many told us they experienced racist bullying, harassment – and worse,” said the TUC general secretary, Frances O’Grady. “And alarmingly, the vast majority did not report this to their employer … Ministers need to change the law so that employers are responsible for protecting their workers and preventing racism at work.”

One black Caribbean lecturer in the south-west of England told researchers: “I drive a nice car and one member of staff asked me if I was a drug dealer, because how else could I afford [it]?” When she reported the incident she was told ​​“it’s because of the area of the country we live in, which is predominantly white”.

A British Indian woman from London, who was told she was overlooked for a job because the company didn’t want front-facing staff wearing “funny clothes”, said she had never reported a racist incident because she was afraid she would lose her job. The survey found only 19% of those who had experienced harassment reported the most recent incident to their employer. Almost half feared it would not be taken seriously.

Dr Halima Begum, the chief executive of the Runnymede Trust, a race equality thinktank, said the findings showed many employers lacked “accountable structures supporting employees to report racist incidents”.

“Without adequate action from employers the pervasiveness of racism mounts, and it’s this lack of accountability which tips any single accusation within a workplace from an individual ‘bad apple’ to an institutional problem.”

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, which represents human resources professionals, said the 1,750-person survey was a “stark reminder that far too many black and minority ethnic workers still face discrimination in the workplace on a regular basis”. It said the findings should provide fresh impetus for the government to introduce mandatory ethnicity pay reporting.

Examples of racism given in focus groups ranged from children asking a teacher with a non-British accent where she is from, to people being told to “go back to your country”. Workers aged 18 to 24 were significantly more likely to say they had experienced racism than older workers. [MORE]

How Racists Use Race to Affect Your Credit Score

From [HERE] When looking at the numbers, you can't ignore the racial disparity in credit scores.

Rates of subprime credit scores in majority-Black, Hispanic and Native American communities are at least 1.5 times higher than in majority-white communities, according to a 2022 report from the Urban Institute, a nonprofit think tank. FICO defines subprime as poor or fair credit scores that fall below 670.

A low credit score or no credit history can make borrowing difficult and expensive. If you can't access good credit products, you may struggle to build wealth. Here's how discrimination can affect credit scores and what you can do to build and protect your credit.

How Credit Scores Are Developed

Your credit scores are derived from data in your credit reports compiled by the three major credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion.

Scoring systems are based exclusively on the information in those reports, says credit expert John Ulzheimer, formerly of FICO and Equifax. "Race is never on the report and is not considered in a score," he says. "Neither is your address or a ZIP code where racial diversity is different."

Lenders supply the credit bureaus a steady stream of consumer credit information, such as the date you opened an account, the balance and whether the account is paid on time.

For revolving credit products, such as credit cards, the amount of the credit line will show up on your credit report. Collection agencies and courts also provide data to the credit bureaus, which means collection accounts and bankruptcies appear.

Credit scoring companies, such as FICO and VantageScore, use proprietary algorithms that emphasize different factors to create scores of between 300 and 850. Higher numbers predict lower credit risk, and scores can change as credit reports are updated.

To have a credit score, you first need to use credit products that are reported to the credit bureaus. But to develop a good credit score, you must use those products responsibly for a long time.

So, in theory, credit scores should not be affected by race. But an individual's credit is built on his or her history, and for Black Americans, that history may well include a lack of generational wealth partly because of past discriminatory practices like redlining, which denied mortgages in minority neighborhoods. Though redlining was outlawed in the 1960s, Black homeownership still lags; the National Association of Realtors reported that, as of 2020, homeownership rates were about 72% for white households, 62% for Asian, 51% for Hispanic and 43% for Black.

Average Credit Score by Race

Credit scores differ vastly when broken down by race. The credit card processing company Shift found these average FICO scores in 2021:

• Asian, 745.

• White, 734.

• Hispanic, 701.

• Black, 677.

Then there's the issue of credit invisibles, or people with no credit history or report at any of the three bureaus. If you don't do business with companies that report to the credit bureaus, you will be penalized when applying for credit. A thin credit file appears riskier to lenders, resulting in credit denials or higher interest rates for the borrower.

Roughly 15% of Black and Hispanic consumers are considered credit invisible, compared with 9% among white and Asian consumers, according to the most recent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau data. An additional 13% of Black and 12% of Hispanic consumers have unscored records, compared with 7% of white.

How Lending Discrimination Affects Borrowing Opportunities

Lending discrimination prevents qualified borrowers from seeking homes in certain neighborhoods and building wealth through homeownership.

Ulzheimer points to a recent case of lending discrimination affecting borrowing opportunities. The CFPB and the Department of Justice found that Trident Mortgage Co. intentionally discriminated against families living in majority-minority neighborhoods in the Philadelphia area and ordered the company to pay more than $22 million in damages.

Tiffaney Williams, an Atlanta credit educator with a doctorate in business from Trinity International University, has seen lending discrimination firsthand.

"I've had clients with the exact same scores and financial situations almost mirrored," Williams says. "The minority was rejected. My white client's credit request was accepted on the same exact day."

She adds: "It also weighs heavy on the client's confidence to build credit and wealth, making them back away from their goals."

Other Race-Related Factors That Hurt Credit Scores

Disparities in wealth, student loan debt and financial literacy are factors that can hurt credit scores for different racial groups. Much of the problem with credit scores stems from the income gap, says Ramona Ortega, founder of My Money My Future, a financial services firm helping millennials of color build wealth.

The difference between "the average wealth of a white family and that of a family of color is huge," Ortega says. "That alone impacts credit scores. If you have a higher income, you are more likely to pay your bills on time and are offered higher credit limits."

The median income in 2020 for Black households was $45,870, compared with $55,321 for Hispanic, $74,912 for white and $94,903 for Asian households, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Regardless of income after graduation, Black households carry more student debt, which can hurt their creditworthiness, reports the Brookings Institution. Student loans can be problematic for credit scores, Ortega says.

Black college graduates owe an average of $25,000 more in student loan debt than their white counterparts, according to a 2022 report by the Education Data Initiative.

Misinformation about credit also can work against communities of color, Ortega says. The sense is that "all credit is bad," she says, which leads to avoidance of traditional credit products.

Some types of credit favored by Black borrowers, such as payday loans, aren't factored into credit scores. Black and Latino consumers are more likely than white consumers to depend on high-interest financial services such as payday lenders and check-cashing counters because their neighborhoods have fewer banks, according to a Brookings Institution analysis. [MORE]

San Jose Removes “Bascom” from Buildings and Streets as Records Reveal the Bascom Family Bought Slaves, Unjustly Enriched Themselves

From [HERE] For decades, the Bascom family name has adorned one of San Jose’s busiest thoroughfares, a bustling light rail station and prominent buildings around the city.

But now the California pioneers whose lineage in the area dates back to the Gold Rush era are the latest historical figures to come under scrutiny over their ties to the slave trade.

Spurred by county health workers who questioned the family’s past, Santa Clara County has decided to remove the name from Valley Health Center Bascom — an outpatient clinic established in 1985 — replacing it with “San Jose.”

“I think it’s about time,” said Herbert G. Ruffin, a historian who has investigated the Bascoms’ history, about the county building name change. “This is just the beginning.”

According to records, Dr. Louis Hazelton Bascom, who came to the city with his wife and seven children in 1849 from Kentucky, bought an unidentified Black man upon his arrival to be his cook for four years — a troubling account that prompted the health workers to seek to have the name removed.

The move places the Bascoms on a long list of historical figures around the Bay Area and beyond whose names have stirred debate amid a reckoning of the country’s racist past.

It also may put a wide variety of sites around San Jose that bear the Bascom name on the chopping block, most significantly a 158-year-old, 5-mile-long avenue that runs through both San Jose and a small chunk of Campbell. The Bascom name also appears on a San Jose community center, light rail station and public library, which came under fire a year ago when a petition was created to change the name for the same reasons, though the effort has so far gone nowhere.

Santa Clara Valley Medical Center CEO Paul Lorenz said county health workers approached him in April about removing the family’s name.

“When the history of the Bascom family, including slave ownership, became known, we listened to the thoughtful and constructive opinions of our physicians and staff,” said Lorenz in a statement. “By doing so, and by changing the clinic’s name, we uphold our beliefs and commitment to our community, employees, and patients.”

On Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to rename the hospital. The vote was part of a wider rebranding effort that included a handful of other health centers at a cost of around $250,000.

At the center of the Bascom controversy is a May 1887 article penned by historian M.H. Field in The Overland Monthly, a now-defunct national magazine once based in California.

“It was not till spring that Doctor (Bascom) found a black man who could cook,” wrote Field in a larger story about the family’s arrival in San Jose. “He paid $800 for him.”

Still a mystery are the exact circumstances surrounding the cook’s arrangement, as well as what eventually happened to the man after a four-year period with the Bascoms, as additional documentation hasn’t come to light.

Ruffin, whose 2014 book “Uninvited Neighbors: African Americans in Silicon Valley” mentions the Bascoms, said that the history of slavery in California around the time of the Gold Rush was complicated and murky. Though California was established in 1850 with statewide legislation banning the practice, localities such as the then-capital San Jose did not enforce the law for roughly five years. This meant that a free person could be sitting in the same room as someone who was enslaved.

Field makes mention of this in the 1887 article. “Folks said (the cook) wouldn’t stay — for, of course, he was free in California — but he did,” he wrote.

Ruffin says that the evidence that the Bascoms purchased the man — combined with similar stories he’s investigated around that time in California — indicates the cook was a slave.

“A free person does not get purchased for $800,” said Ruffin, an associate professor of African American studies at Syracuse University.

Louis Bascom and his wife, Anne Marie, are both buried at the Oak Hill Funeral Home in south San Jose. Described as “early California pioneers” on their gravestone, their home was known as a “center of activity” within the community. Louis practiced medicine but liked to farm, the gravestone states, and he and his wife eventually moved to Santa Clara near where Bascom Avenue is located.

Local historian Frank Maggi said that a number of early Californians also were slaveowners, including the state’s first governor Peter Burnett, whose name was taken off of a San Jose middle school in 2019 and replaced with the title of a local Native American tribe because of the politician’s racist past. James Reed, who has a street named after him in San Jose and was one of the organizers of the ill-fated Donner Party, also was a slave owner.

NY AG Fines Keller Williams Reality for Steering White Property Buyers Away from Black/Latino Areas and Directed Non-Whites into Areas with Fewer White Residents

From [HERE] After being accused of racial discrimination, three Long Island brokerages are to pay $115,000 in a settlement with New York State.

According to an announcement from the New York State Attorney General’s office released on Tuesday, Keller Williams Greater Nassau, Keller Williams Realty Elite, and Laffey Real Estate will pay the penalty as part of a settlement. The three brokerages were implicated for racial discrimination in a Newsday investigation in 2019. The New York Office of the Attorney General opened an investigation into these brokerages and several others after the Newsday exposé.

“Efforts to discriminate against any New Yorker’s fair access to housing cannot, and will not, be tolerated,” Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. “These investigations have uncovered a pervasive culture of allowing unlawful discrimination and violations of every New Yorker’s right to fair housing. These settlements should send a clear message: if you discriminate and deny New Yorkers their basic right to housing, we will take action.”

According to the release, the penalties will fund fair housing training for agents and the enforcement of fair housing laws in Suffolk and Nassau Counties on Long Island. Laffey will pay $30,000 to the state and $35,000 to Suffolk County to conduct unannounced fair housing training of any Laffey agent at any Laffey Branch. Both Keller Williams franchises are required to pay $25,000 to Suffolk County and spend $25,000 on fair housing training for its agents, according to the attorney general’s office.

“Real estate professionals in New York state have an obligation to provide fair and equitable services to all,” Robert J. Rodriguez, New York’s Secretary of State, said in a statement. “Housing discrimination is illegal, and the Department will not tolerate New Yorker’s rights being violated. This comprehensive fair housing settlement demonstrates that New York’s leadership is making sure every New Yorker has equal access to housing. The penalties and agreements with these real estate companies educate their agents about housing laws to ensure New Yorkers are protected.” 

Discrimination uncovered by Newsday

The discriminatory practices were discovered in a 2019 Newsday investigation. The publication found that “numerous” Long Island real estate agents tried to steer white property buyers away from minority neighborhoods, and directed minorities into areas with fewer white residents.

As part of the investigation, actors went into real estate offices posing as prospective homebuyers. Diane Leyden, a manager at Laffey Real Estate in Great Neck, was captured on a hidden camera steering a actor posing as a Hispanic homebuyer away from whiter areas, and lecturing him on viewing properties outside of his budget, without any insight into his finances. On the other hand, in Leyden’s interactions with a white actor, she was seen not offering any of the same warnings on budgeting, and guiding the buyer towards whiter neighborhoods.

“Do you want your kids to be in school with kids that they relate to?” she asked the white actor, according to the attorney general’s investigation.

Another Laffey broker, Nancy Anderson, asked a Black actor for proof that he had been pre-approved for a mortgage before agreeing to show him any properties, a step she did not make any white actors take.

Over at the Keller William franchises, the investigation stated that agent Le-Ann Vicquery of steering a Black homebuyer into the minority neighborhood of Brentwood, while warning a white tester to research gang violence in the neighborhood.

As a result of the Newsday investigation, Vicquery and 22 other agents were sued by the New York Department of State. After initially winning her case, Vicquery ended up having her real estate license suspended for 30 days after the state won an appeal.

The majority of the brokers named in the investigation have not admitted to any wrongdoing. When asked to appear at a New York State Senate hearing in December 2019, only one of the 68 agents asked agreed to appear. In addition, the Keller Williams branches have strongly denied that they ever steered anyone away from certain neighborhoods based on their race.

Keller Williams Greater Nassau, Keller Williams Realty Elite, and Laffey Real Estate had not returned requests for comment by the time of publication.

Google Unveils New Rules to Ban Smartphone Apps that Provide Info Contrary to Big Pharma in Uncle Brother's Latest Attempt at "Single Source Propaganda" for its Deadly Vaccines and Harmful Drugs

From [HERE] Google Play, the Android smartphone-based app store, has unveiled sweeping new rules that ban apps deemed to contain or promote “misleading health claims that contradict existing medical consensus, or (that) can cause harm to users.”

Issued on August 31, Google Play’s new “health misinformation” policy is an in-app censorship sweep that targets any and all apps that even so much as question official health policy about vaccines, including the idea that “vaccines can alter one’s DNA.”

Google is also going after apps that advocate for “harmful, unapproved treatments” such as vitamin C, vitamin D, ivermectin, or any number of other remedies that the government has deemed to be “misinformation.” (Related: Google no longer allows any mention of covid vaccines in Google Surveys.)

According to Google, “conversion therapy” is another “harmful health practice” that cannot be advocated for in any apps available on Google Play. One wonders if this means that Bible apps are now forbidden since the Holy Word addresses unnatural homosexual behavior.

Big Tech is the government’s Ministry of Truth

The timing of this new policy change coincides with a major shift in the government position on things like masking and even vaccinating. Suddenly, the government is no longer pushing these things like it once was, which begs the question: Will Google be able to keep up with accurate censorship?

In 2020, Tony Fauci was insistent that Pfizer’s mRNA (messenger RNA) injection was 90 percent effective against the Fauci Flu, which he called extraordinary. Fast-forward to 2022 and now Deborah Birx is basically admitting that she, Fauci, and others lied about the shots.

The newest claim is that everyone “knew” that Chinese Virus injections were not effective at preventing infection. They all just lied about it to pad the pockets of Big Pharma and complete Operation Warp Speed.

Big Tech, meanwhile, has struggled to get the narrative right at any given time. On one day, social media and tech platforms are having to silence people for saying that the shots are ineffective, while the next the government itself is saying they are ineffective.

Still to this day, Facebook is banning users of notoriety who claims that covid injections might not keep a person safe from infection. YouTube is doing the same thing, even going against World Health Organization (WHO) directives about the shots.

“Even after the consensus changed and some of the censorship rules were quietly dropped, most of the censored posts and channels weren’t reinstated,” reports Reclaim the Net.

“The new health misinformation rules add to Google Play’s extensive set of existing misinformation rules which prohibit apps containing ‘election misinformation’ and ‘misleading’ content. Google Play has already removed thousands of apps under these existing rules.”

Rockefeller Foundation Funds Behavioral Scientists to Push Genocidal COVID Injections in Africa and the Americas

From [HERE] An initiative funded in part by the Rockefeller Foundation is investing an initial $7.2 million in behavioural research focused on convincing more people to get the Covid-19 injections, the foundation announced last week.

The initiative is called The Mercury Project, run by the Social Science Research Council (“SSRC”). In September 2021, the SSRC received a three-year $7.5 million grant from the Rockefeller Foundation toward the costs of launching a research consortium to drive acceptance and uptake of Covid-19 vaccination efforts and provide insights to counter health misinformation and disinformation. The grant will fund research through 31 August 2024.

The Rockefeller Foundation is a globalist organisation founded by oil magnate and robber baron John D. Rockefeller in 1913. Since then, the Foundation has influenced many of the world’s largest and most powerful institutions, including the World Health Organisation and the National Institutes of Health.

An initiative funded in part by the Rockefeller Foundation is investing an initial $7.2 million in behavioural research focused on convincing more people to get the Covid-19 injections, the Foundation announced last week. 

The initiative is called ‘The Mercury Project’, run by the Social Science Research Council (“SSRC”). In September 2021, the SSRC received a three-year $7.5 million grant from the Rockefeller Foundation “toward the costs of launching a research consortium to drive acceptance and uptake of Covid-19 vaccination efforts and provide insights to counter health mis- and dis- information.” The grant will fund research through 31 August 2024. 

The Rockefeller Foundation is a globalist organisation founded by oil magnate and robber baron John D. Rockefeller in 1913. Since then, the Foundation has influenced many of the world’s largest and most powerful institutions, including the World Health Organisation and the National Institutes of Health.  

The Foundation’s $7.5 million grant to SSRC for The Mercury Project remains the lion’s share of a total $10.25 million also granted by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. 

“The Social Science Research Council (SSRC) announced it will provide an initial USD 7.2 million in direct research funds to 12 teams working in 17 countries in order to better understand how health mis- and disinformation spreads, how to combat it, and how to build stronger information systems, while increasing Covid-19 vaccination rates,” said the Rockefeller Foundation in a statement. 

The SSRC last week announced its first cohort of “social and behavioural scientists from around the world to generate much-needed new research on locally tailored solutions in Bolivia, Brazil, Côte D’Ivoire, Ghana, Haiti, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, United States, and Zimbabwe.” 

Each team on The Mercury Project will receive over $600,000 to research such topics as “Combatting health misinformation with community-crafted messaging: Developing a scalable community-driven approach in Latin America and the United States.” Teams will also study how to “harness influencers to counter misinformation” and censor dissenting viewpoints on social media through “network-transforming interventions for reducing the spread of health misinformation online.” 

In addition to research, the Rockefeller Foundation joins George Soros’ Open Society Institute (“OSI”) in funding local community efforts to inject residents with Covid-19 injections. 

Earlier this month, Frontline News revealed earlier this month that the Orthodox Jewish community in Baltimore has unknowingly been the target of an injection campaign funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Open Society Institute. The campaign is run by fellow resident Laura Kurcfeld and her team of five vaccine evangelists, who are funded by VALUE Baltimore’s BMoreVaxxed initiative. VALUE Baltimore, in turn, is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and OSI.