"No Deaths Can be Said to Have Been Averted Due to Vaccination." According to a Study of Data from All States in All Age Groups, COVID Injections Had No Impact on Reducing Deaths from COVID

COVID-Period Mass Vaccination Campaign and Public Health Disaster in the USA. From age/state-resolved all-cause mortality by time, age-resolved vaccine delivery by time, and socio-geo-economic data

By Denis G. Rancourt PhD, Marine Baudin, PhD, Jérémie Mercier, PhD

ABSTRACT

From [HERE] and [HERE] All-cause mortality by time is the most reliable data for detecting and epidemiologically characterizing events causing death, and for gauging the population-level impact of any surge or collapse in deaths from any cause. Such data is not susceptible to reporting bias or to any bias in attributing causes of death. We compare USA all-cause mortality by time (month, week), by age group and by state to number of vaccinated individuals by time (week), by injection sequence, by age group and by state, using consolidated data up to week-5 of 2022 (week ending on February 5, 2022), in order to detect temporal associations, which would imply beneficial or deleterious effects from the vaccination campaign. We also quantify total excess all-cause mortality (relative to historic trends) for the entire covid period (WHO 11 March 2020 announcement of a pandemic through week-5 of 2022, corresponding to a total of 100 weeks), for the covid period prior to the bulk of vaccine delivery (first 50 weeks of the defined 100-week covid period), and for the covid period when the bulk of vaccine delivery is accomplished (last 50 weeks of the defined 100-week covid period); by age group and by state.

We find that the COVID-19 vaccination campaign did not reduce all-cause mortality during the covid period. No deaths, within the resolution of all-cause mortality, can be said to have been averted due to vaccination in the USA. The mass vaccination campaign was not justified in terms of reducing excess all-cause mortality. The large excess mortality of the covid period, far above the historic trend, was maintained throughout the entire covid period irrespective of the unprecedented vaccination campaign, and is very strongly correlated (r = +0.86) to poverty, by state; in fact, proportional to poverty. It is also correlated to several other socio-economic and health factors, by state, but not correlated to population fractions (65+, 75+, 85+ years) of elderly state residents.

The excess all-cause mortality by age group (also expressed as percentage of pre- covid-period all-cause mortality for the age group) for the whole USA for the entire covid period through week-5 of 2022 is:

The corresponding fatality risk ratios are relatively uniform with age (non-exponential and non-near-exponential with age; and even skewed towards young adults), which holds essentially for all states, and for all examined periods within the covid period. This fundamental result implies that a dominant cause of excess mortality could not have been assigned COVID-19, which consistently has been measured to have a strong near-exponential infection fatality ratio with age. The implication is further corroborated by the absence of correlation between all-age-group-integrated excess mortality and age, by state. COVID-19 was not a dominant cause of excess mortality during the covid period in the USA

All of our observations can be coherently understood if we interpret that the covid-period socio-economic, regulatory and institutional conditions induced chronic stress and social isolation among members of large vulnerable groups (individuals afflicted and co- afflicted by poverty, obesity, diabetes, high susceptibility to bacterial respiratory infection [inferred from pre-covid-period antibiotic prescription rates], old age, societal exclusion, unemployment, drug and substance abuse, and mental disability or serious mental illness), which in turn caused many of these individuals to be more and fatally immunocompromised, allowing them to succumb to bacterial pneumonia, at a time when a documented national pneumonia epidemic raged and antibiotic prescriptions were systemically reduced; in addition to possible comorbidity from COVID-19 vaccine challenge against individuals thus made immunocompromised, under broad and hastily implemented “vaccine equity” programs. [MORE]

'Yes, Whatever You Say Master.' Obedience and Citizen Compliance with Trivial Demands: A Masktard Compilation Covering the Past 2 Years

According to FUNKTIONARY:

citizens – those who instinctively seek permission or ask themselves whether or not they are allowed to do anything before they act. Citizens (serfs, subjects or slaves), possess a “ruled” mind-virus mentality. 2) the hapless residents of the great democracy whose Constitution deliberately throttled democratic rule. (See: Citizenship, Plutocracy & Slavery)

obedience – a Self-Other irreversible relationship in which there is only communication (mind-to-mind), i.e. no contact, and an imbalance of power. 2) the highest form of the power-fear systemic. 3) slavery sold to both children and adults alike deceptively packaged in a respectfully sounding label. 4) reverse terrorism. You can compel obedience but you cannot compel responsibility or respect. Everyone should have a say in waking-up to (or waking up from) whatever they have been programmed to obey. It is difficult to reduce to obedience anyone who has no wish to command. If you can’t read very well and follow it up with the absence of critical thinking skills, then obey your masters and oppressors until you can—for your own survival. Life is more trouble-free when you obey. If you speak TV-English, by all means obey the beast, if you like freedom of movement with your slavery. TV’s ought to have warning labels: “Use of this device can be hazardous to your freedom.” How can you take a man seriously who watches T.V. obediently, drinks habitually and desires freedom too? The historian Howard Zinn is clear on the role obedience has played on our conditions throughout the centuries. “[Civil disobedienc] is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions of people have been killed because of this obedience. …Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is people are obedient while the jails are full with petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.” More atrocities are commited in the name of economics than in the name of hate, ideological or religious intolerance. (See: Authority, God, Atrocities, Conditioning, TV, War, The COMB, Control, Power, Violence, Religion, Should, Duty, Hatred, Other, Inhumanity, Communication, Programming, Indoctrination, Poverty, Gangbanking, Education, Unlearning, Force, Orderlies, Police, Force Continuum, Judicial Tyranny, Residency, Labor, Property, Servitude, Critical Thinking, Holodeck Court, Questioning, Pulpit, TUFF, Authenticity, Fear & Authoritarians)

disobedience – thinking for oneself—deciding for oneself what to do and not to do. 2) the refusal of services of those in power—to deny their alleged authority over you. The Beast allows you to be disobedient or ignorant but not both. Disobedience is the only crime—all others are offshoots. (See: Prometheus, Rights, Thinking, Thought & Rebel)

disobedient – master over one’s thoughts and acting on same relative to the dominating recidivism of authoritarian culture.

While Corpse Biden Fights for the Power to Reinstate His Moronic Mask Mandate Whenever He Wants, a Group of Physicians and Surgeons Argue Mask Mandates Violate Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Travel

From [HERE] The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed its amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit on Friday against the Biden Administration’s mask mandate on airplanes and other public transportation. The court is hearing Biden’s appeal from the April federal district court decision that invalidated his mask mandate.

“Mask mandates are tyrannical, and Congress never authorized the CDC to require travelers to wear masks,” stated Andrew Schlafly, General Counsel of AAPS. “Mask mandates infringe on two fundamental rights: freedom of speech and freedom of travel,” he argued in AAPS’s amicus brief.

The Biden Administration did not attempt to reinstate its mask mandate for travelers after it was blocked by a federal judge, amid widespread public opposition to the mandate. But Biden appealed to the 11th Circuit to seek authority to reinstate the mask mandate at any time, Mr. Schlafly explains.

Neither the government nor the parties filing briefs supporting it demonstrate effectiveness to Biden’s mask mandate, Mr. Schlafly argued in the brief. He cited multiple recent articles admitting to the ineffectiveness of mask mandates in different regions of our country.

According to their court brief;

Mask mandates infringe on two fundamental rights: freedom of speech and freedom of travel. The ability to see another’s demeanor while he is speaking is often as important as the content of what he says. Historically many American states and towns prohibited the wearing of masks, in order to avoid the harm they cause. See, e.g., N.Y. Penal Law § 240.35(4) (predecessor enacted in 1845, then reenacted in 1965, and then repealed amid Covid-19 in 2020). Determinations of credibility essential to courtroom trials are just as important in everyday life, as millions of decisions are made daily, based on not merely what one says, but on how he is perceived as saying it.

Whether and how government may impose a mask mandate on travelers is a substantial issue involving a major question, and the recent adoption by the Supreme Court of “major questions doctrine” requires affirming the decision below. On June 30, 2022, after Appellants filed their opening brief, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in the consolidated case of West Virginia v. EPA, 142 S. Ct. 2587 (2022), and expressly embraced major questions doctrine for the first time. It requires invalidating agency decision-making on major questions in the absence of express congressional authorization. Such is the case here.

Mask mandates are more politics than science, and politics is to be sorted out in the halls of Congress rather than at a politically unaccountable administrative agency. Congress uses a time-proven process that includes public hearings, feedback by constituents, vigorous public debate, and political accountability. All of these elements are essential before a burden as draconian as a traveler mask mandate is imposed, and yet none of this exists for agency decision-making by the CDC. The Constitution protects against government controlling what people say, and likewise protects against government controlling how people look when they say it. What is said with a slight smile can often mean something entirely different from what is said with clenched teeth. The CDC incorrectly insists that it should have immense unchecked power to decide what to allow on this, without any express congressional authorization.

As further explained by Justice Neil Gorsuch in his concurrence in West Virginia v. EPA, “major questions doctrine” is not new. Courts have rejected many prior agency attempts to grab breathtaking authority never authorized by Congress, as the CDC attempts here. Nothing in the relevant statute or its prior implementations remotely support the mandate that all travelers wear masks, let alone require ineffective mask-wearing. As a “major question” this is one for Congress to decide as part of the political process, not for agency employees to impose without hearings and meaningful public debate.

The amicus brief submitted by the AMA fails to cite or address a single legal authority. The amicus brief submitted by the Public Health amici cites only four legal precedents other than the decision below, one of which is a 1925 Georgia Supreme Court decision concerning the meaning of the word “sanitation”, along with numerous citations to various dictionaries. All the amici in support of the government fail to address major questions doctrine and the long line of Supreme Court precedents that led to its formal adoption in West Virginia v. EPA.

Just as glaring is the failure by the government’s amici to provide any justification for the travelers’ mask mandate. Mask mandates failed to work during the 1918 flu pandemic, and yet the briefs submitted by the government’s amici cite their unsuccessful use then as a reason to mandate them again. The medical briefs could have cast some scientific light on the matter at hand, but there is no science in support of requiring intermittent use of porous masks by travelers. In the briefing by the government amici, only one paragraph in each of their briefs even alludes to any general scientific support for a travelers’ mask mandate, and those allusions do not survive scrutiny.

Finally, with respect to the nationwide relief, it is necessary because travel is not an isolated activity. People travel with friends and family, and it would be senseless to hold that merely one within such a group is free of an unauthorized mandate, while the others within the group must still comply with what is unauthorized. The nationwide scope of the relief below was proper. [MORE]

"Masks Are a Super Freeway for the Virus to Come and Go." Engineer and Certified Industrial Hygienist Says Masks Don't Work on COVID and Are Harmful. [Everything you wanted to know about masks/COVID]

From [JOEL SMALLEY] Masks have not ever been and cannot be an effective control for airborne virus control. Engineering controls (air filtration/circulation and destruction) have been the solution for 80 years with good reason.

Stephen Petty:

1. Certified industrial hygienist;

2. Certified safety professional;

3. Professional engineer;

4. 45 years in the field of health and safety, trying to protect workers and the public from toxins;

5. Named/testified in over 400 legal cases related to exposure control and personal protective equipment (PPE);

talks us comprehensively through 50 years of evidence showing the ineffectiveness of masks in mitigating SARS-Cov-2, the COVID virus.

Naomi Wolf Says Emails Prove the CDC Consider People Criminals If They Raise Questions about the Safety of COVID Injections. Government Colluded w/Big Tech to Conceal Dangers of Deadly Shots

From [HERE] On May 10, 2021, Carol Crawford from the CDC press office sent an email stating the CDC’s intention to “establish COVID BOLO meetings on “misinformation’ and invite all Big Tech platforms to join the meetings.” Six days later, Ms. Crawford emailed Todd O’Boyle at Twitter asking him to participate in these “ BOLO Meetings” and gave him examples of tweets from misinformers from whom she was telling O’Boyle to censor on behalf of the CDC.

 Journalist and best-selling author Naomi Wolf was targeted as one of these so called  “misinformers a screen grab of a  tweet/thread of hers was used as an example in the BOLO Meetings emails that went out.

Dr. Naomi Wolf was permanently banned from Twitter days later.

 BOLO is a law enforcement term for “be on the lookout” for criminal suspects. Clear evidence that the CDC considers American journalists criminals if they raise questions about the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 injections.

Dr. Wolf stated:

“This morning I learned that our federal government violated the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by directing Big Tech to censor and deplatform me as a citizen and journalist in their desperate attempt to control the COVID vaccine narrative on behalf of their Big Pharma donors. So much for the big lie that “social media companies are private companies not bound by the First Amendment.”

The unavoidable truth is that social media companies are simply cut-outs for Washington D.C. big government bureaucrats, and I intend to pursue all legal remedies available to me to ensure this federal government abuse of American’s scared freedoms and Constitutional Rights is halted and all Government officials, involved are held to account, which may well include personal civil liability.” [MORE]

"Whenever Doctors Join Forces with Government and Deviate from their Commitment to "Do No Harm" Medicine Can Be Perverted from a Healing, Humanitarian Profession to a Murderous Operatus."- Vera Sharav

President of Costa Rica Drops COVID Injection Mandate and Mask Mandate

From [DAVIDICKE] On Wednesday, the new President of Costa Rica, Rodrigo Chaves, and the Minister of Health, Jocelyn Chacón, confirmed that the vaccine against covid-19 will not be mandatory in Costa Rica.

Chaves had promised that when his term began on 8 May he would end the mandatory Covid injection policy. In his first decree after taking office, Chaves dropped his country’s mask mandate and the requirement that public employees get vaccinated.

In November 2021, Costa Rica became the first country in the world to announce it would make Covid injections mandatory for children. Costa Rica has long mandated vaccines, and such requirements are supported by the country’s laws. However, three months after the announcement, Costa Ricans were still bitterly divided over mandatory Covid injections for children.

“Today [3 August] vaccines are no longer mandatory and any action against someone who does not want to be vaccinated is a violation of the law,” the president emphasised.

The announcement came after almost 93% of Costa Ricans had their first dose, 87% had a second, 51% a third and 10% a fourth dose, according to the Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social – the Costa Rican Social Security Fund which is in charge of most of the nation’s public health sector.

As well as the immediate end to compulsory vaccination Chaves said that there will be an investigation into the contracts signed by the previous government as he believes excessive amounts of doses were purchased.

Japanese Surgeon Calls for Suspension of COVID Boosters

From [JOEL SMALLEY] In a letter to the peer-reviewed journal Virology, a Japanese cardiovascular surgeon, Dr. Kenji Yamamoto, has called for the discontinuation of COVID-19 booster shots. “As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued,” Yamamoto wrote. Among his urgent concerns are the fact that the COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, which, in some cases, has been lethal to patients.

[…]

It is rare for a cardiac surgeon to get involved in government vaccination policy. It is even rarer for a practicing medical doctor to express an opinion like this that flies in the face of the medical status quo in a prestigious medical journal, and for the medical journal itself to publish the opinion.

South Carolina "Whichcraft" Law Challenged: Court Hears Expert Evidence On Execution Law that Forces People to Choose between Authorities Murdering Them by Electrocution or Firing Squad

From [EJI] A Richland County court heard expert evidence last week in a lawsuit challenging a law that forces people facing execution to choose between electrocution and firing squad. 

The plaintiffs—four people sentenced to death in South Carolina—argue that both methods violate South Carolina’s constitutional prohibition against cruel, corporal, or unusual punishments. 

“The electric chair and the firing squad are antiquated, barbaric methods of execution that virtually all American jurisdictions have left behind,” the plaintiffs alleged in their lawsuit.

In 2021, South Carolina passed a new law providing that, if the department of corrections determines that lethal injection is not available, the person will be electrocuted in South Carolina’s 110-year-old electric chair unless they elect death by firing squad. The person is required to make that election in writing before the execution date.

Richard Moore was scheduled to be executed on April 29, 2022. South Carolina corrections officials said they could not obtain lethal injection drugs, which forced Mr. Moore to elect death by firing squad to avoid the electric chair.

“I believe this election is forcing me to choose between two unconstitutional methods of execution,” Mr. Moore said in a written statement on April 15, “and I do not intend to waive any challenges to electrocution or firing squad by making an election.”

The state supreme court issued stays of execution for Richard Moore and Brad Sigmon, who faced a May 13, 2022, execution date, which allowed their lawsuit to proceed to a hearing.

Electrocution and Firing Squad Both “Painful and Excruciating”

At the hearing in Richland County last week, South Carolina Department of Corrections director Bryan Stirling and Colie Rushton, director of security and emergency operations, testified about their knowledge of execution protocols—or lack thereof.

As the Greenville News reported, Mr. Stirling said he did not know the age of the state’s electric chair and was not involved in any testing of the chair. Both Stirling and Rushton, who has worked at SCDC for nearly five decades, said they did not know why a specific three-phase voltage and timing sequence is used in electrocutions.

Mr. Rushton testified that he developed the state’s firing squad protocol based on information from Utah—one of four states where the firing squad is legal—and the internet.

John Wikswo, a Vanderbilt Univeristy professor with expertise in molecular physiology and biomedical engineering, testified that no scientific evidence shows that electrocution causes instantaneous or painless death. He added: “The animal husbandry community, after intense work, has concluded that they would not do to an animal in the slaughterhouse what is done in South Carolina in the death penalty.” 

On Wednesday, forensic pathologist Dr. Jonathan Arden joined three expert witnesses for the State to testify about the effect of electrocution on the  brain, heart, and skin and how quickly someone may lose consciousness when shot directly in the heart by a firing squad, the Greenville News reported.

Dr. Arden testified that, “As long as the person is still conscious when that person would be perceiving the high voltage of electricity through his or her body, that in and of itself would be painful and excruciating.”

“I’m sorry to have to say this so plainly, but you get the effects on parts of the body, including internal organs, that’s the equivalent of cooking,” he said.

In firing squad executions, “bullets have to break through soft tissue and bones to reach the heart, where sharpshooters are aiming,” Dr. Arden testified. “If someone were to be shot like that and then have a brief period of consciousness and were to breathe or move, that person would be experiencing excruciating pain.”

Dr. D’Michelle DuPre, a former police officer and medical examiner, said that the firing squad would be “very rapid” and painless—but only if the shooters have the requisite level of marksmanship skill. She admitted on cross examination that she’d seen nothing in the protocol requiring a certain level of marksmanship for the shooters. 

And even purportedly qualified marksmen have failed to hit their target. Wallace Wilkerson suffered for 27 minutes after a Utah firing squad shot him in the torso and arm, shattering the bone; and in 1951, another Utah firing squad shot Eliseo Mares in the hip and abdomen, rather than the heart, and he bled to death painfully over the course of several minutes.

Closing arguments completed the hearing last Thursday. The court has 30 days to issue a decision, according to the state supreme court’s order.

2 Racists who Murdered Ahmaud Arbery Get Additional Life Sentences in Prison and Other Racist Gets 35 Yrs for Fed Hate Crimes

From [HERE] The father and son convicted of murdering Ahmaud Arbery were both given an additional sentence of life in prison Monday on federal hate crime charges, while their neighbor was sentenced to 35 years in prison.

A judge also required that Travis McMichael, 36, Greg McMichael, 66, and William “Roddie” Bryan, 52, serve their sentences in state prison, not federal prison as had been requested by their attorneys.

"A young man is dead. Ahmaud Arbery will be forever 25. And what happened, a jury found, happened because he’s Black," U.S. District Judge Lisa Godbey Wood said during Greg McMichael's sentencing. 

The McMichaels and Bryan, who are all white, were found guilty in February on federal hate crime charges in the killing of Arbery, a Black man who was running in their neighborhood when the defendants confronted him in February 2020. The three men were convicted of all of the federal charges against them, including hate crimes, attempted kidnapping and the use of a firearm to commit a crime.

Prosecutors sought life sentences for all three men.

However, Godbey Wood said she thought it was necessary to distinguish Bryan from the McMichaels, in part because unlike his neighbors, he did not bring a gun with him when the men chased Arbery.

"It is not lost on the court that two men brought guns to that situation that had their worst effect and you weren’t one of them," she said. She added, however, that Bryan was “still deserving of an awfully long sentence." 

"By the time you serve your federal sentence, you will be close to 90 years old. But again, Mr. Arbery never got the chance to be 26," she said. "I determined that the sentence imposed is a very lengthy summary and it is one that has been earned."

Prosecutor Tara Lyons called the sentencing hearings “the end of at least one chapter in an excruciatingly painful journey for Ahmaud Arbery’s family, for his community and for an entire nation that has wept for Ahmaud.” 

The men were sentenced separately, in back-to-back trials on Monday.

Amy Lee Copeland, Travis McMichael’s attorney, asked during his sentencing that the judge allow her client to serve his sentence in federal prison because, she said, he had received “hundreds of threats” and would probably be killed in state custody. A.J. Balbo, an attorney for Greg McMichael, told the judge he was medically "not fit" to serve his sentence in state prison.

Rent Prices are Soaring in these 5 US Metro Areas

From [HERE] As rising interest rates and surging property values prevent more families from buying a home, the demand for rentals has soared, with the highest rent prices in the sunniest states.  

Rent prices for single family homes swelled during the first half of 2022, hitting a national average of $2,495 a month — a 13.4% increase compared to the same period in 2021, according to a new report from national real estate brokerage HouseCanary.

While cities in warmer climes like California and Florida dominated the list of highest median rent prices, midwestern states such as Ohio earned the top spots for most affordable rent, the report found.

5 U.S. metros with most expensive monthly rents

These U.S. metropolitan real estate markets had the highest median single-family monthly rents during the first half of 2022:

1. Los Angeles; Long Beach, California; Anaheim, California: $4,664

2. San Diego; Carlsbad, California: $4,617

3. Bridgeport, Connecticut; Stamford, Connecticut; Norwalk, Connecticut: $4,352

4. San Jose, California; Sunnyvale, California; Santa Clara, California: $4,294

5. Oxnard, California; Thousand Oaks, California; Ventura, California: $4,259

5 U.S. metros with least expensive monthly rents

These U.S. metropolitan real estate markets had the cheapest median single-family monthly rents during the first half of 2022.

1. Youngstown, Ohio; Warren, Ohio; Boardman, Ohio: $861
2. Madison, Wisconsin: $1,000
3. Little Rock, Arkansas; North Little Rock, Arkansas; Conway, Arkansas: $1,153
4. Flint, Michigan: $1,243
5. Davenport, Iowa; Moline, Illinois; Rock Island, Illinois: $1,313

List of 11 Big Companies that Have Announced Layoffs Within The Last 2 Weeks

From [HERE] When the economy slows down, layoffs inevitably happen.  We witnessed this on a very large scale in 2008 and 2009, and now it is happening again.  U.S. economic numbers are rapidly getting worse, and companies all across America don’t want to get caught with bloated payrolls as we plunge into a recession.  As you will see below, many of the firms that are laying off workers are either in the real estate industry or the tech industry.  Those are two industries that were on the leading edge of the “boom times”, and now it appears that they will also be on the bleeding edge as the economy crashes.

It is always a tragedy whenever any hard working American is forced out of a job.  Unfortunately, what we are witnessing right now is just the beginning.  The following is a list of 11 big companies that have announced layoffs within the last 2 weeks…

#1 Ultratec Inc. says that it will be laying off more than 600 workers.

#2 Electric truck maker Rivian will be laying off approximately 840 workers.

#3 7-Eleven has announced that it will be eliminating 880 corporate jobs.

#4 Shopify is laying off about 1,000 people.

#5 Vimeo says that it will be eliminating 6 percent of its current workforce.

#6 Redfin will be reducing the size of its workforce by 8 percent.

#7 Compass will be reducing the size of its workforce by 10 percent.

#8 RE/MAX will be reducing the size of its workforce by 17 percent.

#9 Robinhood will be reducing the size of its workforce by 23 percent.

#10 It is being reported that Ford “is preparing to cut as many as 8,000 jobs in the coming weeks”.

#11 Geico has closed every single one of their offices in the state of California, and that will result in vast numbers of workers losing their jobs…

GEICO, one of the largest insurance companies in the United States, reportedly closed all 38 of it’s California offices on Monday, resulting in hundreds of workers being laid off.

According to the company, GEICO would not be leaving outright, and will still be offering policies directly online, with all insurance functions continuing as normal. Buying directly through agents by phone, however, will not be possible.

“We continue to write policies in California, and we remain available through our direct channels for the more than 2.18 million California customers presently insured with us,” said GEICO in a statement on Monday.

On top of everything else, Amazon has announced that it reduced the size of its workforce by approximately 100,000 workers in just one quarter…

With recession fears mounting — and inflation, the war in Ukraine and the lingering pandemic taking a toll — many tech companies are rethinking their staffing needs, with some of them instituting hiring freezes, rescinding offers and making rounds of layoffs.

Amazon.com Inc. was one of the latest companies to discuss its belt-tightening efforts this week. During its quarterly earnings call Thursday, the e-commerce giant said it’s been adding jobs at the slowest rate since 2019. After relying on attrition to winnow its staff, Amazon now has about 100,000 fewer employees than in the previous quarter.

You could fill up two very large football stadiums with 100,000 workers.

Eventually, this wave of job losses will become a tsunami, and millions of Americans will suddenly find that they are unable to continue paying their bills.

Meanwhile, our new housing crash is starting to pick up speed as well.

In fact, we just witnessed an absolutely massive spike in the number of Americans that are searching for the term “sell my home fast” on Google…

Within hours of the latest GDP report on Thursday, which raised fears that the United States could be entering a recession, online search volume for “sell my home fast” spiked a whopping 2,750%.

Shortly after the Commerce Department released the report on July 28, revealing that the economy showed negative growth for a second straight quarter — shrinking by an annual pace of 0.9% — home sellers hoping for higher housing prices to continue are now concerned.

Just like in 2008 and 2009, a lot of Americans that bought near the peak of the market are going to end up underwater on their homes.

We didn’t learn from history, and so now we are repeating it.

And things are going to get worse and worse for the housing market as the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates.

Of course it isn’t just the U.S. that is going to be suffering in the months ahead.

The whole planet appears to be heading for a major downturn, and one of the largest shipping companies in the entire world has just confirmed that global economic activity is really starting to slow down…

AP Moller-Maersk on Wednesday predicted a slowdown in global shipping container demand this year amid weakening consumer confidence and supply chain congestion.

The Danish shipping and logistics company — one of the world’s largest and a broad barometer for global trade — said it loaded 7.4% fewer containers onto ships in the second quarter when compared to the same period in 2021, prompting it to revise the full-year outlook for its container business. [MORE]

Jury awards $33.5M for Dolton Police Car Crash. 1 Black Man Died and Another Has Permanent Brain Injury after Cops Led a High Speed Chase (80mph) through Neighborhood to Enforce a Stop Sign Violation

From [HERE] A Cook County jury late Wednesday handed down against the village of Dolton what an attorney said was the largest personal injury judgment in the county, awarding more than $33.5 million in damages in connection with a 2016 police car chase that ended with a fatal crash.

John Kyles and Duane Dunlap were passengers in a car driven by a third man, who sped off when police in the south suburb tried to pull over the vehicle for rolling through a stop sign. During the ensuing chase, police vehicles sped faster than 80 miles per hour and drove through multiple stop signs before the car crashed.

Kyles died at the scene and Dunlap suffered brain injuries that will require “permanent residential care,” attorney Jon Loevy said at his West Loop office Thursday at a press conference with the men’s families.

“I miss John so much. No amount of money could bring him back,” said Aja Seats, Kyles’ sister. “I appreciate the jury holding the village of Dolton accountable for my brother’s death.”

Over a weeklong trial, lawyers for Kyles’ and Dunlap’s families argued the village offered poor training and had a history of allowing officers to engage in reckless high-speed pursuits despite numerous wrecks, Loevy said.

The verdict was the largest ever awarded by a Cook County jury, Loevy said.

“This chase was unnecessary and tragic,” Loevy said. “It didn’t have to happen.”

Kyles’ estate will receive $10 million and the Dunlap family will get $23.5 million.

The lawsuit stated that one of the officers involved in the chase, Sgt. Lewis Lacey, had been involved in six previous chases that resulted in injuries, including one that took place on the same stretch of Greenwood Road as the one that claimed Kyles’ life.

Village records showed Lacey had filed a workman’s compensation claim against the village over injuries suffered in a wreck and had totaled multiple police vehicles, the lawsuit stated.

A second officer involved in the chase was 22-year-old probationary officer Ryan Perez, who had been involved in four high-speed chases during just 11 months on the job, according to the lawsuit.

In all, Dolton police had been involved in 50 chases from 2011 to 2016, half of which caused injuries, property damage or fatalities, the lawsuit states.

Village officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Although Blacks Make Up Only a Fraction of White Liberal Seattle, They Are Far Likelier to Be Held at Gunpoint by Cops than Whites. Suit says Cops Stalked, Threatened to Kill Black Man Leaving 7-11

From [HERE] Anthony Sims was making an early morning delivery to a downtown Seattle 7-Eleven on May 17, 2020, when he noticed a Seattle police cruiser following him. As he parked and stepped out of his car, the cruiser's emergency lights activated and an officer, weapon drawn, ordered him back into his car.

Within minutes, seven additional officers, guns out, surrounded Sims, who is Black. He was ordered to walk backward toward the officer who stopped him and told to lift his coat and spin around to show he wasn't armed.

"It may be a misunderstanding," said the officer who conducted the stop.

It was. Sims had done nothing wrong and was released within minutes of the encounter.

The incident exemplifies findings by the Seattle Police Department's federal monitor earlier this year, and an independent study in 2021, showing Black people — and other people of color — are far likelier to find themselves at police gunpoint in Seattle than white people, even though Black people make up a fraction of the city's population.

That discrepancy holds for the use of force by officers on the city's residents, even though the data shows white people are more likely to be armed when confronted by officers. Sims had no weapon when he was stopped.

Sims has sued the Police Department over the stop, alleging the officer followed him for several blocks and detained him on a pretext because he's Black.

"The only apparent reason [the officer] would have stopped Mr. Sims was his race," the lawsuit alleges.

The federal monitor, appointed after the Department of Justice sued Seattle police in 2012 and the city entered into a consent decree, noted in a May assessment of the department's progress on court-mandated reforms that officers' use of force had "decreased significantly" over the past decade, including incidents where officers pointed their guns at people — considered a "Type I" use of force, the lowest category.

The Justice Department lawsuit alleged Seattle officers routinely used excessive force when making arrests and found evidence of biased policing.

Despite the overall improvements, the court-appointed monitor said Seattle police's data — which was unnecessarily incomplete — continues to show Black and Native American people "are disproportionately stopped, detained, and/or subjected to force by Seattle police," including the use of deadly force.

While instances of pointing guns at Black people were down 66% between 2015 and 2021, the data showed they were still "most likely to be the subject of a firearm pointing despite being the subject of force less frequently than White subjects or subjects of unknown race."

"Having a gun pointed at you is traumatic," said Antonio Oftelie, the monitor. "Over time, these practices erode the trust of the community."

Oftelie's findings bolstered a July 2021 report from the Center for Policing Equity, which found that among subjects of police use of force, Black people "were overrepresented at a rate several times their 7% share of the city population."

When it came to being held at gunpoint, 45% of the total instances involved Black people, the report found.

Sims, who delivers for an app-based service, said the incident that May morning two years ago left him deeply shaken.

"When Seattle police ordered me out of my car at gunpoint, I was terrified of being shot. I felt violated," he said. "The police targeted me because I had the audacity to drive while Black in Seattle. I do not feel safe driving in the city knowing that this is how SPD operates."

Sims' attorney, Nathaniel Flack, said officers endangered his client's life "without justification ... as part of a well-documented pattern of unlawful stops and excessive force against people of color."

According to Seattle police documents and an internal investigation by the Office of Police Accountability, the incident began when acting Lt. Robert Brown spotted Sims traveling east on Marion Street at 5:08 a.m. Brown noted in his report that Sims' headlights were off, "despite it being dark."

Brown ran the plate on his in-car computer and received a hit on a possible stolen vehicle out of Snohomish County. Brown radioed that he had a "possible rolling stolen" vehicle. While he was waiting for confirmation, according to the OPA report, the car pulled over outside the convenience story on First Avenue and Cherry Street, and Sims got out of the vehicle.

That's when Brown turned on his overhead lights, drew his weapon, got on the car's public-address system and ordered Sims back into the vehicle, according to the reports. At the same time, several nearby officers responded and prepared to conduct what Seattle police refers to as a "high-risk vehicle stop." Seven additional officers were on the scene within minutes, surrounding Sims' vehicle. The officers all exited their cruisers with weapons drawn, some pointing their guns at Sims, while others displayed theirs in the less-threatening "Sul" position — held close to the chest but pointed downward.

In his OPA interview, Brown said he could not tell the race of the driver when he first spotted the vehicle. The lawsuit notes Brown didn't activate his emergency lights and initiate the high-risk stop until after Sims stepped out of the car.

With the other officers watching, Brown ordered Sims out of the car and told him to show his hands. Brown then ordered Sims to spin around with his coat raised to show he did not have a weapon and walk backward toward his voice.

According to the report and a review of dash- and body-worn camera video, a baffled Sims complied with the officer's orders.

Even as he ordered Sims at gunpoint, Brown can be heard telling him, "I have no doubt that's your vehicle," and "sometimes there's a misunderstanding."

According to the lawsuit, by that point Brown and the other officers had been told by dispatch that the plate was legal and the car registered to Sims. The OPA investigation determined Brown transposed the last two digits of the plate when he input the number into his cruiser's computer.

Even so, according to the lawsuit, three of the officers approached Sims' car with guns up and searched its interior and trunk "without any probable cause or justification."

The officers, the lawsuit alleges, "could see that Mr. Sims was African-American and were motivated to use unnecessary force by conscious or unconscious bias."

The lawsuit alleges Brown's initial decision to run the plate was motivated by bias and used as a pretext to stop Sims. According to the OPA investigation, sunrise that day was expected at 5:27 a.m., and the Seattle Municipal Code states headlights should be turned on a half-hour before sunset and can be turned off a half-hour before sunrise.

Brown began following Sims at 5:08 a.m.

And while the OPA investigator and Brown's report state it was "dark" when Brown spotted the car, the dash-camera video clearly shows the sky lightening with the impending sunrise.

None of the officers were disciplined. But OPA's director at the time, Andrew Myerberg, wrote a "Management Action Recommendation" suggesting the department provide training and "guidance on the requirements and limitations of [high-risk vehicle stops], including when it is appropriate for officers to conduct felony-level stops" with firearms drawn.

Sgt. Patrick Michaud, a Seattle police spokesperson, said he could locate "no formal policy for a high-risk vehicle stop."

TX Cops were Looking for Teens [Hunting All Blacks in General] When They Stopped an Elderly Black Couple, Ordered Them to Get On Their Knees at GunPoint, Searched Car, Broke Dialysis Port. Suit Filed

From [HERE] An elderly Texas man and his partner say in a lawsuit filed Thursday that they were held at gunpoint and subjected to a painful and illegal traffic stop that left him with a broken dialysis port.

Michael Lewis, 67, and Regina Armstead, 57, allege in a federal civil rights lawsuit that they were driving back home in Rosenberg, Texas, after picking up lunch when they were pulled over by police. The lawsuit says that Rosenberg police officers, who were searching for a group of teens that had allegedly brandished a gun, held the couple at gunpoint, handcuffed and detained them, unlawfully searched their car and seized Armstead's phone, and destroyed a life-saving medical device installed in his arm, all despite the couple obviously not being teenagers.

The lawsuit, filed on Lewis and Armstead's behalf by lawyers with the National Police Accountability Project (NPAP), is seeking damages for violations of the couple's Fourth Amendment rights and reforms of the Rosenberg Police Department.

According to the suit, Rosenberg officers trained their guns on the elderly couple, forced them to throw their keys out the window and get onto their knees, and handcuffed them. Lewis tried to explain to the officers that he had a stint in his hand for regular dialysis treatment and that his doctor had instructed him not to place any pressure on it, but the officers ignored him.

Police also confiscated their cell phones and searched their car, the suit says. The couple was detained for 45 minutes before they were finally released. According to the lawsuit, "as a result of the handcuffing during his arrest, Mr. Lewis's medical device in his wrist malfunctioned. This resulted in three separate medical procedures to replace his fistula."

Lewis and Armstead had to contact the police department to retrieve Armstead's cell phone and discovered that the key fob for their car had been destroyed in the altercation. The police department refused to compensate them for the fob.

The lawsuit says the treatment of the couple is just part of a string of similar incidents involving the Rosenberg Police Department. "Dozens of civilians have reported that stops by RPD officers left them feeling traumatized and disrespected," the suit says. "Many others suffered physical injuries that required medical attention as a result of their encounters with RPD officers."

Lauren Bonds, one of the attorneys representing the couple, says that complaints against the Rosenberg police that NPAP lawyers received through a public records request ran a gamut of illegal policing: unreasonably long detentions without probable cause, unlawful searches of vehicles' trunks, and frequent claims that officers smelled marijuana in order to justify searches.

But the most striking thing, Bonds says, "was people with medical vulnerabilities who were brutalized and subjected to excessive force."

In 2016, video footage showed Rosenberg officers violently arresting a couple, Christine Saenz and her husband. Saenz and her husband were sitting in their truck after an argument when Rosenberg officers pulled them out of the truck, slammed them to the ground, and began pummeling both of them. Saenz was a cancer patient who had a portable catheter installed in her chest. Both were diagnosed with concussions, according to an excessive force lawsuit filed by them against the city. That lawsuit was later settled.

There are frequent instances across the country of police treating frail and elderly suspects with unreasonably excessive force. For example, Reason reported on the case of Karen Garner, a 73-year-old Colorado woman with cognitive issues who was violently arrested by a police officer for allegedly shoplifting $13 of merchandise from a Walmart. LaDonna Paris, a 70-year-old woman with bipolar disorder, was tackled and bloodied by Tulsa police officers after she refused to leave a bathroom inside a Habitat for Humanity store. The officers' body cameras showed them taunting and laughing at the woman prior to arresting her.

Bonds says Lewis and Armstead have not previously had any negative interactions with the police, but since the incident, they have struggled with the trauma of being held at gunpoint and humiliated.

"They really did try and resolve this amicably," Bonds says. "They went to the police to get the fob replaced and an apology. It wasn't until the police were completely resistant that they started thinking about filing a lawsuit. Our clients aren't vindictive people looking for a payout, they were just trying to get some assurance that this won't happen again."

The Rosenberg Police Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

[In The Free Range Prison You Either Comply or Go to Jail. "Rights" are Theater for Your Mind] WV Slave Catcher Cops Arrest Black Man for Failing to Disprove that Marijuana Near His House is Not His

NO RIGHT TO BE LEFT THE FUCK ALONE, EVEN IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE IN THE FREE RANGE PRISON. From [HERE] What you’re about to see here is outrageous body cam footage that has never before been seen by anyone, other than law enforcement. It shows what happened to my clients, Jason Tartt, the property owner and landlord, as well as Donnie and Ventriss Hairston, his innocent and mistreated tenants, on August 7, 2020, when they were subjected to civil rights violations by two deputies with the McDowell County Sheriff’s Office, Dalton Martin and Jordan Horn. 

Today we filed a federal civil rights lawsuit, which is posted below. But you can watch the footage for yourself. Before the body cams were turned on, what you need to know is that there was a complaint received that an abandoned church, in an overgrown parcel of land not owned by any of these individuals, apparently had four marijuana plants growing there, among the thick brush. Crime of the century, right? The perpetrators must be one of the elderly African American residents nearby, of course. Instead of treating them as human beings, let’s accuse them first thing, then mistreat, harass, and retaliate against, them if they dare to get uppity, or not know their place. 

Donnie and Ventriss Hairston were sitting on the front porch of their rural home, when two deputies approached and began to harass and intimidate them. Their landlord, who lives next door, joined them shortly afterwards and began to ask questions. When they asserted their opinions and rights, retaliation ensued. The landlord, Jason Tartt, was seized and arrested. The Hairstons were shoved into their home against their will. This is never before seen footage, outside of law enforcement of course. Take a look and form your own opinion about what happened.

POSSESSION CAN BE ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE. CONTRABAND NOT ON YOUR PROPERTY CANNOT BE ACTUAL. "CONSTRUCTIVE POSSESSION REQUIRES PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT A DEFENDANT KNEW OF THE CONTRABAND’S LOCATION; HAD THE ABILITY TO EXERCISE DOMINION AND CONTROL OVER IT; AND INTENDED TO EXERCISE SUCH DOMINION AND CONTROL." SO, IT’S NOT EVEN CLOSE HERE - COPS HAVE NO FACTS, JUST THEIR IMAGINATIONS.

IMPORTANTLY, WV COPS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DEMAND ID UNLESS THE INITIAL SEIZURE OF THE PERSON WAS CONSTITUTIONAL - MEANING THAT COPS HAVE REASONABLE, ARTICULABLE, AND PARTICULARIZED SUSPICION THAT THE PERSON IS ENGAGED IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. COPS HAD NO SUCH BASIS, ONLY A STUPID GUESS THAT PLANTS IN THE VICINITY MIGHT BELONG TO SOMEONE IN THE HOUSE. MORE ON SO-CALLED “RIGHTS” BELOW.

HERE WE ALSO SEE MORE ACCUSATIONS OR ALLEGATIONS THEMSELVES AS THE ACTUAL PROOF. REVERSING THE ENTIRE PREMISE OF THE LEX-ICON IN THE SPECTACLE, “GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT” (BURDEN SHIFTING). SAID FASCIST TENDENCY HAS APPEARED IN MANY CONTEXTS LATELY IN THIS SYSTEM OF LAW OVER HUMANITY AND AUTHORITY WORSHIP. FOR INSTANCE, ALL FALSE FLAGS OPERATE ON SAID PRINCIPAL; AUTHORITIES MAKE THE ALLEGATION AND DARE YOU TO DISAGREE. ALSO THE “ME 2” MOVEMENT AND THE JAN 6TH HONKEY-KONG ALLEGATIONS COMMITTEE. NO NEED TO PROVE ANYTHING WITH EVIDENCE IN AN ADVERSARIAL FORUM, JUST ACCUSE.

SUCH HYPOCRISY IS NOT NEW TO BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT SLEEPING. DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINS, “THE PERPETUAL DOMINATION OF AFRICAN AMERICANS BY WHITE AMERI­CANS PSYCHICALLY REQUIRES THE WHITE AMERICAN CRIMINALIZATION OF THE AFRICAN MALE, I.E., THE WHITE AMERICAN PERCEPTION OF THE AFRICAN MALE AS INHERENTLY CRIMINAL. IN THE CONTEXT OF WHITE AMERICAN DOMINATION THERE IS NO INNOCENT BLACK MALE, JUST BLACK MALE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE NOT YET BEEN DETECTED, APPREHENDED OR CONVICTED. “

Rights are myths. Did “Rights” protect the Black people in the video? Perhaps they “had rights” only after another authoritarian retroactively makes that determination in the future. Surely, the attorney above is competent and will hopefully obtain an excellent result. But at the moment authority began ordering them to do things where were the Rights? Clearly the slave catcher cops didn’t agree that there were some rights. The back and forth between the cops and the Black people is merely a pretense of civility by barbarians. The cops preferred consensual compliance to forced compliance. Such a preference is to only maintain the illusion of freedom where there is none. If the Black man goes along with it (obeys), it will be better for his mind but he never had a choice in the matter. He probably still disagrees, but that’s mind control (the purpose of government). FUNKTIONARY explains,

“rights” – useful fictions declared in order to make agents of another type of fiction (“government”) have to play along in their deadly theatrical (tragicomedy) game. 2) mere fictions, the contemplation of which leads only to a progressive social, personal, racial and jurisprudential separation from reality. Discussion and debates about “rights” merely evades the FAQ, i.e., the frequently avoided question of who is to enforce any “right” and who will benefit from the pretense. “Rights” are separated into two categories—those flowing from “negative liberties” and those flowing from “positive liberties.” In law, rights are remedies and if a person is without a remedy (as is with citizens of the United States) he is without a right, and only a ‘thing’ is without rights. (See: Negative Liberties, Positive Liberties, Bill of Rights, Liberty, Freedom, Civil Rights, Human Rights, Ma’at & Justice)

rights – fantasmatic or fictitious objects having no reality in actuality by those imagining as an identity being in possession of them. Rights are cultural gratuities perceived through various fantasy frames, recognized, and sometimes even created, by man’s system of law to provide a modicum or pretense of civility under a system whereby their very undermining and violation is vouchsafed. Rights are merely rites unless you know how to assert and defend them in order to enjoy them. 2) things people are free to do whether they are able to or not. 3) conditions of existence required by hue-man’s nature for their potential survival (primarily against the cartoon that kills, i.e., the wholly unconscionable entity called the “State”). It is a mistaken notion that rights are enjoyed by one at the expense of the many—that is the realm of privilege. Enjoyment of rights in a neo-imperialistic world controlled by Yurugu through the Greater System (Symbolic Order), paradoxically, entails not only a recognition of their inevitability but, equally, their impossibility. How can we be endowed with rights, or even know what rights are when they are based on binary considerations? Rights, as ontological ephemera, cannot be universally observed, recognized, realized or enforced—and paradoxically, act also as its own eternal source for its assertion and vessel for its fulfillment in our imaginary enjoyment of them. [MORE]

Cincinnati Cop Blows Her Cover: Says She "Fucking Hates Niggers.” [Why Do Racists (the Permanent Enemies of Black People) Join Police Forces in Cities w/Large Black Populations? To practice racism]

A Nigger is a Non-White Person who is Subject to White Supremacy According to FUNKTIONARY:

Neuropeans - (Neurotic Europeans) - neurotic, ignorant, narcissistic and self-deluded white supremacist Caucasians operating at the mythic and rational levels of consciousness only. 2) Fascists. (See Weitko Disease, White Supremacy and Yurungu.)

Neuropeons - neurotic, stupid and self deluded poor white trash. 2) skin heads 3) Nazis, neo-Nazis and Theo-nazis (See KKK, WOTAN, Weitko Disease, Fasxism, Racism White Supremacy, Stupidity, Ku Klux Klan & Yurungu).  

From [HERE] The Dependent Media reports that A racist Cincinnati police officer caught on tape saying “F---ing N-----s, I f---ing hate them,” now claims that she overstated her case.

Officer Rose Valentino made those remarks while stuck in traffic outside Western Hills University High School, Cininnati.com reports. She claims that she said she hated all niggers because she was provoked by a Black male high school student who stuck up his middle finger while walking past her car. The officer’s remarks were picked up on her body camera.

Valentino has been suspended pending an investigation, City Manager John Curp said.

Local outlet News 12 reports that the officer told police investigators her use of the N-word “was not intended to refer to all African-Americans,” but only to the teen who flashed her an obscene gesture.

Valentino herself has reportedly been at odds with the law, including a 2020 arrest for allegedly punching her sister and brother-in-law and vandalizing her sister’s car. There were also three occasions where failed to activate her bodycam, including two chases.

Investigators said Valentino insists she does not harbor prejudices that effect her work and, according on one officer, she claimed she’d been “desensitized to racially offensive language” by hearing music and conversation on the street where such talk is used. [MORE]

And Only a NGHR or a racist would believe or attempt to rationalize that.

It is constructive when white people reveal to us who is white supremacist - as it can be difficult for non-white people to determine who is a racist, and who is not- as it is impossible to monitor (or judge) all the individual actions and words of any white person at all times. According to Neely Fuller, identifying racists is an important step, toward counter-acting and eliminating or neutralizing Racism. He explains that Racism is primarily carried out by deception and/or violence. All white people are not racist. So it is great deception for racists to conceal themselves amongst non-racist whites. Logically however, we know that most white people are racist. Otherwise there would be no global system of racism white supremacy. Contrary to liberal disinformation, being white supremacist really has nothing to do with membership in some clownish organization like the KKK, the Nazi Party, White nationalists, Aryan Nation and racists are not necessarily white countrified hillbilly’s covered with tattoos. Anon explains, it has nothing to do with income, title, or status. A white supremacist is a white person who practices racism against non-whites. A white supremacist can be a soccer mom, a businessman, or a US Senator if they are practicing racism against non-whites. Another term for a white supremacist is “racist white man” and “racist white woman.” [MORE] Also, there are differing ways of practice white supremacy. FUNKTIONARY explains,

 “A racist regulates the withholding, distribution and redistribution of resources between two or more groups through the actual or threatening use of force, deceit and/or power.”  “Racists” are “upholders, supporters and perpetrators of the institution of the White Supremacy Dynamic.”

Most importantly, racism is not primarily about bigotry - mean words or name calling by white people, minor inconveniences such as trouble catching a cab, standing in a long line to vote or stereotypes or bad conduct . Rather racism/white supremacy is about the superior, dominate position of whites and vast unequal power, conditions and opportunities and maintaining that imbalance of power through your cooperative control and oppression.  Belief that racism is only bigotry is a vital part of false programming sold to you by the vested interests for your cooperation and submission to your own oppression. Such belief is whitenology sold by elite whites - publishers, scholars, professionals and government representatives and also promoted by showcase Blacks who parrot such false consciousness programs in various styles. FUNKTIONARY states,  “Caucasians can be racists, but racism is systematic (collective institutional) oppression.”

In 2020, 3 NC Cops Were Fired After Being Caught on Camera Fantasizing About "Slaughtering Fucking Niggers," "Wiping'Em Off the Map." [Racists Believe They Must Control or Murder Blacks to Survive]

From [HERE] and [HERE] *Three white police officers in Wilmington, North Carolina were fired in 2020 after being caught on their own dashcam video fantasizing about killing black people. Apparently, they forgot that their dashcam videos are routinely audited. Wilmington Police Department chief Donny Williams identified the three officers as Michael “Kevin” Piner, James “Brian” Gilmore, and Jessie E. Moore II during a Wednesday press conference, confirming that all three had been terminated from the force.

Apparently the video was never released - in the interest of manufacturing false relations maintaining the system of racism white supremacy and system of authority.

During an audit on June 4, a Wilmington PD Sgt. Heflin discovered that the dashcam on Officer Michael “Kevin” Piner’s car had been accidentally activated, and had captured conversations Piner had with Cpl. Jesse Moore and Officer James “Brian” Gilmore. In those two conversations, the officers anticipated and even glorified the prospect of a racial civil war and looked forward to indiscriminately murdering Black people, among other racist comments.

“Piner tells Moore later in the conversation that he feels a civil war is coming and he is ‘ready,’” Piner said, according to documents released by police Wednesday. “Piner advised he is going to buy a new assault rifle in the next couple of weeks. A short time later Officer Piner began to discuss society being close to ‘martial law’ and soon ‘we are just gonna go out and start slaughtering them fucking [n-words]. I can’t wait. God, I can’t wait.’ Moore responded that he would not do that. Piner stated, ‘I am ready.’”

Piner then told Moore that a civil war was needed to “wipe ’emoff the f**king map. That’ll put them back four or five generations.” Moore responded, “You’re crazy.”

Wilmington police chief Donny Williams, a Black veteran of the department who had been named its permanent chief on the previous day, said at a press conference that he would have zero tolerance for the behavior recorded by the dashcams. In addition to firing the three officers, Williams said he would notify the North Carolina Education and Training Standards Commission because “these individuals should not be allowed to practice law enforcement again,” according to the report.

The officers denied that they were racists.

Williams said he also plans on consulting with the District Attorney’s Office regarding the officers being used as witnesses in cases and reviewing any previous cases they might have testified in to determine any bias that might have been exhibited.

Read the full police summary below:

Wilmington Police Summary by Law&Crime

WAR ON BLACK PEOPLE. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explained that racism is a behavioral system of survival. Racists believe they must dominate and control non-white people to survive. She stated,

In his struggle against white supremacy, the great leader of the Chinese-speaking non-white people, Chairman Mao Tse-Tung, accurate­ly stated as recorded in The Collected Works of Mao Tse-Tung, "It is well known that when you do anything, unless you understand its actual circumstances, its nature and its relations to other things, you will not know the laws governing it, or know how to do it, or be able to do it well."

With this in mind, all Black people everywhere must begin to under­stand the exact and specific nature of the war that is being waged against the Black collective. All Black people must begin to understand in depth why we are witnessing Black males being shot dead almost daily by white males in uniforms and why it will soon escalate to more than one per day. Without the specific understanding of why we are seeing this behavior, we are unable to organize behaviors to meet this war strategy effectively.

Furthermore, Black people everywhere must begin to understand why the Black collective, and Black males in particular, have been under intensive attack for the past 2,000 years. Indeed, Jesus was a Black male who was lynched by uniformed white male Roman soldiers 2,000 years ago, as a result of the same war that has continued into the present day extension of the same Roman (white) empire.

Whenever there is a sense of increased vulnerability within the local and/or global white collective - as, for example, caused by inflation (currency devaluation), unemployment, loss of a war or counter-struggle by non-white peoples (e.g., Arabs controlling and limiting oil supplies, Iranians taking white hostages, Black guerillas struggling in southern Africa and the loss of the Vietnam War) - there will be an increase of the ever-present "normal" daily slaughter and murder of Black and other non-white males by those both legally and illegally authorized to do so. This murder and slaughter will be logically viewed as justified within the specific logic framework of the fear of white genetic annihilation.

Within the historic framework of Western civilization and culture (the civilization and culture organized to prevent white genetic annihilation), all white peoples have the spoken or unspoken mandate to participate actively in their collective struggle for global white genetic survival. This specifically means, of necessity, the murder and slaughter of Black and other non-white males whenever it is felt within the white collective to be necessary and, therefore, justified. [MORE]