"Mowing the Lawn." IsrAlien Terrorcrats Slaughter Defenseless Civilians in Gaza w/Airstrikes in Ongoing Operation to Eradicate Palestinians and Expand "Improperty." At Least 15 Children Murdered
/From [HERE] The Israeli army continued its offensive campaign on the Gaza Strip into the night of 5 August, killing at least 10 people and injuring dozens more.
Palestinian resistance groups allegedly launched dozens of rockets in retaliation, targeting Israeli settlements bordering Gaza. Several of these projectiles were intercepted by the Iron Dome air defense system.
According to Hebrew media, red alert sirens have been wailing across the illegal settlements, while public bomb shelters were activated in Tel Aviv under official instructions.
Tensions boiled over earlier on Friday after Tel Aviv bombed a civilian building in the heart of Gaza City, killing several, including a five-year old child.
Among the dead were also three commanders of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) resistance group, including the leader of the Al-Quds Brigades — the military arm of the PIJ.
The initial airstrikes by Tel Aviv targeted the seventh floor of Palestine Building, a residential block in the heart of Gaza City.
“We’ve just had Friday lunch and my children were playing. Suddenly a huge explosion hit the tower in which we live … We were very shocked as the place is full of civilians. I saw many casualties that were evacuated,” a resident of the building told Al Jazeera.
Ahead of Friday’s barrage, Israeli authorities imposed a unilateral closure of all crossings into Gaza, restricting the movement of aid, goods, and people.
The Gaza-based PIJ saw its influence grow over recent months in Jenin, where the Israeli army carries out routine raids to allegedly weed out resistance members.
During one of these raids, an Israeli sniper shot Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Aqla in the head, despite her wearing body armor and clear press markings.
Photo is from yesterday 8/7/2022. IsrAlien authorities “sardonically call these operations “mowing the lawn.” Israel’s policies toward Gaza are an extension of its ambitions to remove and replace Palestinians living on historic lands they have stolen. [MORE]
ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:
Israel – the name of the most successful and vicious terrorist groups that ultimately became a nation (Corporate State) on the heels of the British government controlled United Nations mandate. 2) Occupied Palestine—preoccupied by Palestinians prior to the time in history when there weren’t any Hebrews living on the dusty tiny strip of land on the western edge of the Asian continent erroneously referred to as the Middle East. 3) the name created by combining two Khemetic gods Isis, Ra with a Semitic one El. Israel or Is it Real? (See: Zionism, Twelve Tribes of Israel, Jews, Terrorism, Racism White Supremacy, Caucasian, Israeliens & Thugs)
improperty – claims or rights to ownership of land, resources or wealth that was achieved through deception, fraud, force, manipulation, coercion, threat, duress or unethical means. For example, the USA is the Improperty of the Native Americans; the State of Israel is the Improperty of the people of Palestine—as the 12 Tribes of Israel mentioned in the Bible is an allegory and not historical whatsoever. Misunderstood mythology is responsible for so much of the violence and bloodshed carried out in the name of both truth and religion—especially religious truth. (See: Tradition, The Bible, Twelve Tribes, Violence, Religious Truth, Religious Virus, Chosen People, Israel, Greed & Racism White Supremacy)
According to International Middle East Media Center, On Sunday afternoon, in a new wave of Israeli airstrikes, 12 civilians, including children, were killed.
Several airstrikes targeted the al-Faluja area in the northern Gaza Strip, killing 5 people.
3 other Palestinians were killed as a result of a missile targeting a civilian car near the Samer Junction on Al Wahda Street in Gaza.
In Al-Bureij, the Israeli airforce dropped a bomb on a family home, killing a father and his 3 children.
The bodies of the family members were taken to the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah.
Among the children who were killed in the Israeli air strikes, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health:
– 3 brothers from Al-Nabhin family
– 4 siblings from Al -Nejm family
– 2 brothers from Al-Nirb family
Some of the children killed during Israel’s onslaught on Gaza since Friday:
-Alaa Qaddoum, 5yo
-Ahmad Alnairab, 11yo
-Momen Alnairab, 5yo
-Mohammed Hassouna, 14yo,
– Khalil Abu Hamads, 17yo.
-Hazem Salem, 12yo According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, since Friday, Israeli forces have killed 43 Palestinians, including 15 children and 4 women, and wounded 311 civilians, many of them severely. That is the death toll as of 9:15 pm on Sunday August 7th.
Palestinian negotiators have called for a ceasefire, but Israeli forces continue to pound the Gaza Strip, one of the most overpopulated places on earth (made up mainly of refugees from what is now Israel, who were forced into refugee camps by Israeli forces who took their land and homes). [MORE]
The following are the most significant developments:
17:55 on Saturday, 06 August 2022: a girl was wounded after an Israeli drone targeted an empty land with a missile in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza Strip.
20:45: a girl was wounded after an Israeli warplane targeted an empty land with a missile near Al-Jazaa’eri Mosque in Jabalia.
21:30: the IOF’s warplanes fired 6 missiles at a 3-storey house, which includes rented apartments, in Rafah refugee camp, without prior warning, destroying a house over the heads of its residents and 7 neighboring houses.
As a result, 7 persons, including a child and two women, were killed, and 35 others, including 18 children and 12 women, were wounded.
The Civil Defense and Municipality crews continued to recover the bodies of the dead and the wounded from the rubble until 05:00 on Sunday, 07 August 2022. IOF declared the airstrike had targeted Khaled Saeed Mansour (47), the commander of Al-Quds Brigades in the southern Gaza Strip. Mansour was pulled out of the rubble with his two companions: Ziad Ahmad Khalil Al-Mudallal (35), and Raafat Saleh Ibrahim Al-Zamili (Sheikh Eid)( (41.
The rest of the victims were only civilians living in the same building or in the neighboring houses and were identified as: Mohammad Iyad Mohammad Hassouna (14), Ismail Abdul-Hameed Mohammad Salama/Dweik (30), and his mother, Hana’a Ismail Ali Dweik (50), and Alaa’ Saleh Abdul Mohsen Al-Mallahi (30).
04:45 on Sunday, 07 August 2022: IOF’s warplanes launched a missile near a house in Al-Nasr village, northern Rafah, injuring 9 residents of the house and their neighbors, including 3 children and 2 women.
05:15: IOF’s warplanes fired two missiles at a 200-sqm house belonging to Muhammad Musa Muhammad ‘Arada in Al-Tanour neighborhood in Rafah and destroyed it completely, rendering a family of 5 homeless. However, no casualties were reported.
07:10: 2 Palestinians were wounded by shrapnel of a missile fired by IOF’s warplanes on an agricultural land in Qarara village, east of Khan Yunis.
17:00: IOF fired an artillery shell at a landfill belonging to the Jabalia Municipality. As a result, a worker was wounded, and a garbage truck was badly damaged
PCHR’s fieldworkers and lawyers continue to document, investigate, and monitor all incidents and violations resulting from the ongoing IOF attacks.
PCHR fears that there will be more civilian casualties in an area considered among one of most densely populated areas in the world and where there is not any form of protection, including public and private shelters or even safe corridors.
PCHR brings to mind that in recent offensives on the Strip, civilians and civilian objects were always under IOF’s attacks as a way of exerting pressure on the Palestinian armed groups.
PCHR emphasizes that these airstrikes violate the principles of necessity and proportionality while conducting directed attacks against densely populated areas and use of weapons based on collective punishment is a grave breach of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and amount to war crimes.
PCHR calls upon the international community to take immediate action in order to stop the Israeli crimes and avoid any further deterioration of the humanitarian situation.
With No Gun "Rights" Freedoms Can Be Shut Off Like a Light in Canada/Ireland/UK/New Zealand. Historical Analysis Shows Disarmed Formerly Free People Have No Defense Against Slavery or Govt Violence
/
From [HERE] All of the ten major tyrannical regimes of the twentieth century and beyond confiscated the weapons of the populations they planned to murder or terrorize en masse.
The ten regimes are listed below:
Ottoman Turkey
USSR
Nazi Germany
China
Guatemala
Uganda
Cambodia
Rwanda
Yugoslavia (the former)
Of the ten regimes, not one announced its intentions to its victims. All the victims were deliberately fed disinformation until the last minute in order to preclude resistance. In the 20th Century:
Governments murdered four times as many civilians as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined.
Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals.
How could governments kill so many people? The governments had the power - and the people - the victims - were unable to resist. The victims were unarmed.
“The democratic protections of the formerly free nations of the world — Canada, the Republic of Ireland, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand — have been shut down with the ease of someone switching off a light, and with almost no resistance from citizens. Yes, there have been protests, and there have been petitions, and innumerable complaints online; and a few brave legislators have spoken up, if only to echoing chambers.
But the fact remains that when the unidentifiable police or mercenary forces, as in Canada, are violent, and the protesters have nothing but the moral high ground with which to deter their violence, then even the bravest of resistances is fleeting.
In Australia, citizens are now arrested when they seek to escape forcible quarantine. This happened so easily. Australians yielded 650,000 privately owned guns in 1996-7 [https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback]. Australians can now offer little deterrence to this kidnapping by the state.
The unarmed people of Shanghai have nothing which which to deter their mass incarceration. Neither can the unarmed citizens of China as a whole deter the transportation of ethnic minorities into detention camps, or organ harvesting or forced abortions.
You can hate guns. I have hated guns most of my life. I hate violence. I hate gun violence. I hate the slaughter of innocents. I am a peaceful person.
But it is becoming obvious even to us pacifists, vegans, and tree huggers, that formerly free people who are unarmed are defenseless against the criminal tyrannies exerting massive violence and control upon them.
And it is becoming obvious that similar tyrannical moves against the people of the United States have been thwarted in advance or deterred - and only state by state — pretty much only because the people of the United States have the right to own and carry weapons, and because many do so.
This question of who has access to firearms has become all the more serious as the war against the US and the free world is ramping up. The mostly-Bill Gates- and CCP-funded WHO planned at the end of May to try to drain sovereignty from sovereign nations, in the name of “Global Health” and the prospect of “future Pandemics”; in the interest of “Global Health Security”.
This power grab was delayed. It is not off the table.
Who then will be the armed men at your door? They can easily be global private mercenaries, sent by Tedros Ghebreyesus; mercenaries sent to lock you in your home, or take you to a quarantine camp against your will, under the guise of a “public health emergency.” [MORE]
Dumbocrats Don't Care Whether Banning 'Assault Weapons' Is Constitutional
/From [HERE] Unfortunately for them, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held otherwise, ruling that the government may not prohibit law-abiding Americans from keeping handguns at home or carrying them in public for self-defense. The Court also has said the Second Amendment covers bearable arms "in common use" for "lawful purposes," which presents a problem for Democrats who want to ban many of the most popular rifles sold in the United States.
On July 22, U.S. District Judge Raymond P. Moore, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, issued a temporary restraining order that bars Superior, Colorado, from enforcing its ban on "assault weapons." The city defines that category to include semi-automatic center-fire rifles that accept detachable magazines and have any of four features: a pistol grip, a folding or telescoping stock, a flash suppressor, or a barrel shroud.
Two gun-rights groups argued that Superior's ordinance, which also bans magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, violated the Second Amendment. Moore concluded that they had "a strong likelihood of success on the merits."
Moore noted that the plaintiffs had cited statistics to support their claim that the guns and magazines targeted by Superior's ordinance "are commonly used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes." He also mentioned an earlier case in his court where both sides had stipulated that "semiautomatic firearms are commonly used for multiple lawful purposes, including self-defense," and that "lawfully owned semiautomatic firearms using a magazine with the capacity of greater than 15 rounds number in the tens of millions."
Under the Supreme Court's test, Moore said, those facts mean that "the right to possess, sell, or transfer" the arms covered by Superior's ordinance is "presumptively protected." The burden is therefore on the city to show that its ban is "consistent with the Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."
That will be a formidable challenge, Moore suggested. "The Court is unaware of historical precedent that would permit a governmental entity to entirely ban a type of weapon that is commonly used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, whether in an individual's home or in public," he said.
Like Superior's ordinance, the bill that the House narrowly approved last Friday covers "large capacity" magazines and includes a general definition of "assault weapons," although its list of prohibited features is slightly different. It also bans many specific models by name.
During the debate over the bill, Democrats said the rifles they want to ban are "the weapon of choice for mass shooters," which is not true: Most mass shooters use handguns. Democrats said the features targeted by the bill make rifles especially deadly, which also is not true: With or without those features, a rifle fires the same ammunition at the same rate with the same muzzle velocity.
Even while implying that the rifles covered by the ban are good for nothing but mass murder, Democrats emphasized that the bill would exempt the 24 million or so "assault weapons" that Americans already own. They refused to grapple with the constitutional implications of banning guns that millions of people use for lawful purposes.
When confronted by that reality, Republicans noted, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D–N.Y.) said "the problem is that they are in common use." Rep. David Cicilline (D–R.I.), the bill's sponsor, likewise had no patience for Second Amendment arguments, saying, "Spare me the BS about constitutional rights."
Unlike Nadler and Cicilline, federal judges like Moore cannot ignore the constitutional issue raised by this sort of legislation. Democrats will have to comply with the constraints imposed by the Second Amendment, no matter how much they might wish that it did not exist.
Video of an Armed Store Owner Preventing an Armed Robbery Defies Jesusized, Liberal Clogic that; 'You’re More Safe Unarmed than Armed' or 'Guns Don't Make You Safer'
/Guns don’t keep you safe? dial 911? No right to shoot back???
According to FUNKTIONARY:
clogic – clogged logic—closed-circuit logic—clueless logic—locked in an endless loop of flawed axioms and paradoxical premises that prevent describing or relating to reality in alignment with its attributes. Using “clogic” is like being trapped in a hall of mirrors in which the two (self and world) endlessly reflect and determine one another in a dualistic duel that shape and dominate each other and with erring inaccuracy keeping us overruled and fooled (through dim and gross reflections that distort the world and ourselves) that is, until Shatterday arrives. (See: Shatterday, Psycholesterol, Wholesight, BLYND, Axioms, Logic, Truth, Belief Systems, Conclusion, Proof, Experience, Objectivism, Third Sight & Suffering)
Jesusize – to believe in something (or someone—real, mythologized or imagined) or even worship it, based on little (scant and sketchy) to no evidence in support of it (single-source propaganda), and uncorroborated accounts that fly in the face of known history, facts and science. 2) to turn fiction or fictional accounts into fact and history through propaganda, indoctrination, coercion and violence. Just because a man called “Jesus” did not exist in history does not mean that you cannot become the Christ you are awakening in (or at least to) the Divine Mystery. (See: Jesus Seminar)
Dumbocrats Seek $80 Billion to Hire Agents, Auditors, Criminal Investigators and Lawyers to Shake Down Working Class "Taxpayers." Only 4% to 9% of Those Targeted Make More than $500K a Year
/
From [HERE] A new Democratic spending package will expand the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in an attempt to raise government revenues and fight inflation. The WSJ stated, Progressives want Joe Biden to unleash what they call “beast mode” executive power, and the Schumer-Manchin tax bill supplies the cash to turn the Internal Revenue Service into Wolverine. [MORE]
In a bill that Democrats call “The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022,” the size of the IRS could substantially grow as part of a wider effort to ramp up “taxpayer compliance,” according to the bill’s text that references a 2021 U.S. Department of the Treasury report. The bill will raise IRS spending by nearly $80 billion over the next 10 years, adding to its current $13.7 billion budget, to hire thousands of new IRS agents as well as expand the agency’s operations, facilities and services.
The $80 billion is more than six times the current annual IRS budget of $12.6 billion. The money will be ladled out over nine years and comes with few strings attached. The main Democratic command is for the tax agency to bring the hammer down on taxpayers.
The main targets will by necessity be the middle- and upper-middle class because that’s where the money is. The Joint Committee on Taxation, Congress’s official tax scorekeeper, says that from 78% to 90% of the money raised from under-reported income would likely come from those making less than $200,000 a year. Only 4% to 9% would come from those making more than $500,000.
The IRS knows the super-wealthy employ lawyers and accountants who make litigation time-consuming and risky. It also knows that Democrats would howl if the agency pursues fraud in the earned-income tax credit program, despite what the IRS has estimated are $18 billion in improper payments each year. [MORE]
The IRS will be given $45 billion to hire more auditors and lawyers to increase its ability to collect taxes and punish those who fail to pay what they owe. The service will also be spending over $25 billion to cover its increasing operations expenses including office rent and transportation costs.
However, in a testimony to the Senate Finance Committee in April, IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig said that over half of the agency’s employees work full time from home. Additionally, the service’s fleet of vehicles was already deemed to be bloated and the federal agency was unable to certify that its vehicles were only used for official business purposes, according to an Inspector General Report from 2021.
The spending package will also carve out an additional $5 billion and $3 billion for “Business Systems Modernization” and “Taxpayer Services.” The move is intended to generate $124 billion through improved “tax enforcement” measures and fight inflation, according to the Democrat summary of the bill.
Democrats are looking to raise government revenues to fund their spending package that will cost a total of $430 billion amid a period of economic malaise and declining audit rates. [MORE]
According to the American Psychiatric Association Only 2% of All Psychiatrists are Black in the US
/
ABOVE IS THE GREAT REBEL AND BLACK PSYCHIATRIST DR. FRANCES CRESS WELSING. SHE IS THE AUTHOR OF THE COLOR CONFRONTATION THEORY AND THE DEFINITION OF RACISM/WHITE SUPREMACY, must reading for any guerilla seeking to destroy the system of racism white supremacy and master-servant relations. With respect to black people’s mental health she stated,
“It is imperative that all Blackp eople understand they are not in a benign environment of benevolence and support, and that the surrounding highly structured environment is deadly; a very specific warfare is being waged against Blacks and other people classified as non-white in this social system. Further, all must understand that the specific war is racism for the purpose of white genetic survival -by any and all necessary means, inclusive of chemical and biological warfare.” [MORE]
From [HERE] There is a lack of Black mental health professionals, according to data shown by the American Psychiatric Association.
As of 2021, only two percent of the estimated 41,000 psychiatrists in the US are black. According to the US Census, black people make up 14 percent of the USA population. [MORE]
Elie Mystal says Republicans Love Dumb Negroes Like Herschel Walker b/c He Will Do What He's Told. But What About Dumbocrat Step-and-Fetchit, Golden Retriever SNiggers like Kamala, Cory or Kentaji?
/
According to FUNKTIONARY
golden retrievers – a dysphemism describing a variation of the old “Step-N-Fetchit” racist caricature to be revived (in the very near future) in a labor context vis-à-vis Afrikan-Americans and other majorities (so-called minorities).
SNigger ---a sold-out snitching-smiling Sambo-Negro. 2) a South-Bender offender. SNiggers smile for nothing except an empty mind while selling-out their own kind. They typically have an intellectual base yet are devoid of intelligence, thus promoting the on-going smiling face. They also often giggle and have a frivolous conception of society and scant knowledge of the vestiges of the trans-Atlantic slave trade that even brought their sorry-ass selves to shore. SNiggers are traitors and pawns of the downpressors.
On Saturday, the Nation contributor Elie Mystal accurately asserted on MSNBC’s "The Cross Connection" with Tiffany Cross that Georgia's Republican candidate for Senate Herschel Walker was “unintelligent” and bereft of “independent thoughts.” He explained Republicans back Walker because he “is going to do what he’s told ... That’s what Republicans want from their negroes: to do what they’re told.” [MORE]
Probably all true. Walker was an excellent fullback but he is a shenanigger who obviously would handle matters important to Black life with frivolity. As explained by Dr. Blynd, ‘beware of those who don’t read, never let them lead.’ Nevertheless, as FUNKTIONARY explains, all such choices in the Free Range are false (to be discussed infra)
But in what ways are non—threatening rolebots like Kamala Harris and Cory Booker bucking the party line to advance Black people’s interests? And don’t Dems expect OpporTomist Ketanji Brown to function just like Herschel? Judge Brown was selected apparently for her lack of experience and her neutrality to Black criminal defendants, not her pro-Blackness or independent judicial philosophy. [MORE] White liberals don’t approve of that kind of Blackness and prefer to impose members of The Mo-Tea-Suh Tribe (MoreTeaSir?) onto Blacks. Is there a lot of independent Black thought coming out the Congressional Black Caucus, NAACP, Urban League, Sharpton etc., whom all fall in line with Dems like butter or mindless borgs? Even BLM, despite their image of being radical, essentially petition authorities to hold cops accountable and encourage voting for Democrats. Protesting to authorities against conduct that is already illegal or advocacy to uphold the status quo through the enforcement of existing laws is actually tame politics. Black dems like Mr. Mystal should stop bullshitting and look in the mirror.
The democratic and republican parties are both plantations. Both parties also function as white parties - owned and run by elite whites who set the political agenda and messaging. Since the 1970’s Black politics has gone from being aggressively results oriented to being activity channelled into voting for the Democratic Party and its grimacing white liberal and black rolebotic or HNIC candidates. With regard to Blacks over the past 25-30 years Democratic party politics can be described as generic, symbolic politics carried out through the appointment, selection or election of Blacks to political positions on many levels. The goal of these SNAG’s, HNIC’s or Strawbosses is to vicariously empower Blacks solely by their existence or personality while delivering nothing of tangible value to Blacks and serving the needs of white Dems. Dumbocrat party politics and its “unintelligent” Black agendas have had no effect on the system of racism white supremacy. For example, in liberal cities like NYC, D.C., Oakland, Chicago and St Louis the quality of Black citizenship stays low, as Black people are; trained with a servant education, harmed and surveilled, stopped and searched by cops as they go about their daily business. There are only a few ways that Americans can meaningfully exercise their citizenship; enlisting in the military, running for national office, voting, serving on a jury and walking/driving (freedom of movement). Yet Black folks are routinely struck from juries, prevented from voting and subjected to policies such as stop, search and frisk rendering their 4th Amendment rights meaningless in reality. Black people in liberal cities own almost nothing in their communities, are underworked in McJobs, live in substandard housing and fill up the liberal criminal courts, jails and homeless shelters, etc.
Nelly Fuller correctly describes Blacks as “the powerless class.” He states "in a socio-material system dominated by elite racists, all major decisions involving Black people are made by elite racists. Elite racists are their bosses, their masters, and their major decision-makers.’ In urban areas Black people such as BOHICANs Muriel Bowser or Eric Adams may be on the face of things but elite racists are the underlying power controlling commerce, utilities, jobs and all important resources. Dr. Amos Wilson explains, ‘To live under the power of white people is to be created by white people. To be rewarded or punished by white people is to be created by white people. We are living under them as the result of the exercise of the power of white people over us. Therefore, if we wish to change this situation (i.e., the conditions under which we live), then we must change the power relationships. If we are to prevent ourselves from being created by white people and are to engage in the act of self creation, then we must change the power relations.’ [MORE] So, Mr. Mystal is only half-right. Does he think he is serving his own people when he cheerleads for white liberals? Consensual, voluntary master-servant relations, which are the gravamen of racism white supremacy, is something Black people can control and such relations must be destroyed at once.
Elite whites maintain both plantations for all people. Black people on these plantations (or free range prisons) are constantly under anxiety and forced into greater confinement. At any rate, all statists (Dems, GOP, libertarians, green) want and need a master to obey and to be responsible for them on their respective plantations. The real question is why have any master in the first place, why be on anybody’s plantation?
FUNKTIONARY explains,
Statism - the belief "citizens"' and "states" exist and the memetic thought patterns supporting such beliefs. 2) the religion of oppression and domination coupled with the science of exploitation and sociopathic control. 3) the opiate of the so-called Elites. 4) a philosophy that idealizes majority rule gang force (authority) over individual authenticity (autonomy). 5) servitude over liberty and statutes over humanity. [MORE]
Undeceiver Larken Rose explains, “There is a big difference between striving for a new, wiser, nobler master, and striving for a world of equals, where there are no masters and no slaves. Likewise, there is a big difference between a slave who believes in the principle of freedom, and a slave whose ultimate goal is to become the new master. And this is true, even if that slave truly intends to be a kind and generous master . . . As long as the people believe in the myth of “authority,” every downfall of one tyrant will be followed by the creation and growth of a new tyrant.“
Larken Rose further explains;
"Among those who vote Democrat or Republican – or for any other party – no one recognizes the underlying problem, and as a result, no one ever gets any closer to a solution. They remain slaves, because their thoughts and discussions are limited to the pointless question of who should be their master. They never consider – and dare not allow themselves to consider – the possibility that they should have no master at all. As a result, they focus entirely on political action of one kind or another, But the foundation of all political action is the belief in “authority,” which is the problem itself So the efforts of statists are, and always will be, doomed to fail.
Unfortunately, this is also true of the less mainstream, supposedly more pro-freedom “political movements,” including Constitutionalists, the Libertarian party, and others. As long as they think and act within the confines of the “government” game, their efforts are not only completely incapable of solving the problem but actually aggravate the problem by inadvertently legitimizing the system of domination and subjugation which wears the label of “government.”
The Rules of the Game
Even most people who claim to love liberty and to believe in “unalienable” rights allow the superstition of “authority” to drastically limit their effectiveness. Most of what such people do, in one way or another, consists of asking tyrants to change their “laws.” Whether activists campaign for or against a particular candidate, or lobby for or against a particular piece of “legislation,” they are merely reinforcing the assumption that obedience to authority is a moral imperative.
When activists try to convince politicians to decrease “taxes,” or repeal some “law,” those activists are implicitly admitting that they need permission from their masters in order to be free, And the man who “runs for office,” promising to fight for the people, is also implying that it is up to those in “government” to decide what the peasants will be allowed to do. As Daniel Webster put it, “There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern; they promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.” Activists spend huge amounts of time, money and effort begging their masters to change their commands. Many even go out of their way to stress the fact that they are “working within the system,” and that they are not advocating anything “illegal.” This shows that, regardless of their displeasure with those in power, they still believe in the myth of “authority,” and will cooperate with “legal” injustice unless and until they can convince the masters to change the rules – to “legalize” justice. While the intended message of dissenters may be that they disapprove of what the masters are doing, the actual message that all political action sends to those in power is “We wish you would change your commands, but we will continue to obey whether you do or not.” The truth is, one who seeks to achieve freedom by petitioning those in power to give it to him has already failed, regardless of the response. To beg for the blessing of “authority” is to accept that the choice is the master’s alone to make, which means that the person is already, by definition, a slave.
One who begs for lower “taxes” is implicitly agreeing that it is up to the politicians how much a man may keep of what he has earned. One who begs the politicians not to disarm him (via “gun control”) is, by doing so, conceding that it is up to the master whether to let the man be armed or not. In fact, those who lobby for politicians to respect any of the people’s “unalienable rights” do not believe in unalienable rights at all. Rights which require “government” approval are not unalienable, and are not even rights. They are privileges, granted or withheld at the whim of the master. And those who hold positions of power know that they have nothing to fear from people who do nothing but pathetically beg for freedom and justice, However loudly the dissenters talk about “demanding” their rights, the message they actually send is this: “We agree, master, that it is up to you what we may and may not do.”
That underlying message can be seen in all sorts of activities mistakenly imagined to be forms of resistance. For example, people often engage in protests in front of “government” buildings, carrying signs, chanting slogans, sometimes even engaging in violence, to express their displeasure with what the masters are doing. However, even such “protests,” for the most part, do little more than reinforce authoritarianism. Marches, sit-ins, protests, and so on, are designed to send a message to the masters, the goal being to convince the masters to change their evil ways. But that message still implies that it is up to the masters what the people may do, which becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: when the people feel beholden to an “authority,” they are beholden to an “authority.” Those in “government” derive all of their power from the fact that their subjects imagine them to have power.
Legitimizing Oppression
The harder people try to work within any political system to achieve freedom, the more they will reinforce, in their own minds and the minds of anyone watching, that the “system” is legitimate. Petitioning politicians to change their “laws” implies that those “laws” matter, and should be obeyed. Nothing better shows the power of the belief in “authority” than the spectacle of a hundred million people begging a few hundred politicians for lower “taxes.” If the people truly understood that the fruits of a man’s labor are his own, they would never engage in such lunacy; they would simply stop surrendering their property to the political parasites. Their trained-in desire to have the approval of “authority” creates in them a mindset not unlike the mindset of a slave: they literally feel bad about keeping their own money and making their own choices without first getting the master’s permission to do so. Even when freedom is theirs for the taking, statists continue to grovel at the feet of megalomaniacs, begging for freedom, thus ensuring that they will never be free.
The truth is, one cannot believe in “authority” and be free, because accepting the myth of “government” is accepting one’s own obligation to obey a master, which means accepting one’s own enslavement. Sadly, many people believe that begging the master, via “political action,” is all they can do, So they forever engage in rituals which only legitimize the slave-master relationship, instead of simply disobeying the tyrants. The idea of disobeying “authority,” “breaking the law,” and being “criminals” is more disturbing to them than the idea of being a slave.[MORE]
Gov DeSantis Appoints a Black Woman to Florida Supreme Court. White Liberal Media Ignores, b/c She’s Not Their Type of NGHR
/From [HERE] The Palm Beach County Judge was just shy of meeting the Supreme Court bench requirements last time.
As expected, Gov. Ron DeSantis made a second try at appointing Judge Renatha Francis to the state Supreme Court Friday, making her the second Black woman to serve on the state’s highest court.
She will replace Florida Supreme Court Justice Alan Lawson, who is stepping down in August after 20 years. It makes the current Supreme Court a majority of DeSantis-appointed Justices.
Francis, a Jamaican-born immigrant, was the Governor’s first choice for a vacancy on the court in 2020, but the Florida Supreme Court ruled she was four months shy of having 10 years’ membership in the Florida Bar, which is a constitutional requirement for sitting on the state Supreme Court.
“I think she’ll be a source of inspiration for a lot of folks out there who are younger, who are studying hard,” DeSantis said, dismissing the previous rejection of her nomination as “disputable and a disputed point of law.”
Francis choked up with emotion as she introduced her mother, who had not completed high school as she came from a small family farm in Jamaica. [MORE]
Justice Thomas Told GW Law he is 'unavailable' to Teach Constitutional Law After Outcry from White Liberal Students who Don’t Like NGHRS like him
/
From [HERE] U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas won’t be teaching a constitutional law seminar at the George Washington University Law School after thousands of students asked the school to oust him.
Thomas told GW Law that he is “unavailable” to teach the fall seminar, according to a statement by the school and an email message to students in the class. The school released no additional information on whether Thomas would teach classes at later dates.
The GW Hatchett broke the news. Other publications with stories include the Associated Press, Reuters and Law.com. How Appealingalso noted news coverage.
Thomas was part of the Supreme Court majority that overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization on June 24. In a separate concurrence, he argued that it was time to reconsider all the court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold v. Connecticut (finding a right to contraception in marriage), Lawrence v. Texas (overturning a sodomy ban) and Obergefell v. Hodges (finding a right to same-sex marriage).
GW Law had refused to fire Thomas last month after an outcry by students, saying debate is essential to the school’s mission.
Fifty student leaders wrote an open letter last month that said they were “profoundly outraged” by Thomas’ positions in the Dobbs case, and the school should rethink its decision not to remove him. An online petition calls Thomas’ employment by the school “completely unacceptable.” It had more than 11,600 signatures as of Friday morning.
Thomas was going to teach the class with Judge Gregory Maggs, a judge with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Maggs said he will teach the seminar alone. [MORE]
Black Man Says Gentrifying White Liberals in Chicago Use Government Authority to Shut Down Successful, Lawful Black Businesses Like His ("Dinner and a Movie") because They are Black Owned
/
ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY
"authority" - (so-called)—a cartoon, an alleged image of the Law. 2) a cartoon clothed in flesh and blood. 3) the notion of an implied right and application of that "right" of individuals or groups of same to control or exercise external power over others, which has no meaning in reality. 4) power over...which is thoroughly institutionalized. 5) ruling through coercion. So-called "authority" is the justification for remaining impotent. The real threat to "authority" is the masses overcoming info-gaps and verigaps through self-knowledge and the proliferation of symbols of opposition, not crime or destruction of property. [MORE]
From [HERE] A Chicago restaurant owner is speaking out after the city yanked his license amid a battle over whether the place was an eatery or a nightclub.
Fox Chicago reports Rashad Bailey opened Dinner and a Movie last year in Chicago’s Lincoln Park. The establishment served waffles, alcohol, movies and music catering to class reunions and birthday parties in a celebration of Black love and gatherings according to Bailey.
However, the location has been littered with complaints from neighbors about the noise and the restaurant has been the scene of several fights and a shooting that took place in June 2021.
The Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection revoked Dinner and a Movie’s business license last Friday after a months-long battle saying the restaurant acted more like a tavern and failed to take steps to correct nuisance complaints.
Bailey however says his business was targeted by police as soon as he opened.
“This year (during hearings with the city), I found out I had about 10 undercover officers in my restaurant within a week’s time of me opening with no incidents happening,” Bailey told Fox.
The Dinner and a Movie owner added the Chicago police have harassed his business by frequently showing up in large numbers unannounced. A video a month after the shooting took place shows police breaking into Dinner and a Movie after a shooting took place across the street. The restaurant, however, was closed when the shooting took place.
‘Bailey told Block Club Chicago the city’s business department began investigating the restaurant shortly after it opened for selling liquor beyond its license. At the time the department revoked Dinner and a Movie’s privileges to serve lunch and operate past midnight. Additionally, Bailey blamed the restaurant’s closing on neighbors who made fake complaints due to the restaurant’s large Black customer base.
Yelp reviews for the establishment say the restaurant had a small menu, security pat-downs at the entrance and a cover charge. Bailey said he is done fighting city hall and instead will leave the Windy City calling the situation racism.
“This is racism,” Bailey told Chicago Block Club. “They’re putting crime and the problems of the city on me. … They see Black music, Black people, and they think that’s the problem.”
Chicago Police Continually Fail to Protect Black People: At Least 50 Shot, 6 Fatally, So Far This Weekend
/
[MORE] How does a reasonable, law-abiding non-white citizen living in a city run by elite white liberals measure the effectiveness of police? it seems logical to conclude that if a high number of crimes took place in Black neighborhoods then it means that police failed a high number of times to do their job of preventing crimes or protecting people in Black neighborhoods. If it occurs frequently it would seem then that police in general fail to do fulfill their perceived role of protecting Black people. Nevertheless, the Dependent media, which functions as “government media” in The Spectacle, always upholding authority, parroting police rationalizations no matter how ridiculous or factually unsupported and parroting facts from police perspective while assigning less credibility to civilian witnesses and perspectives, report crime numbers as if the police are helpless to do anything about crime. Often times the dependent media portrays cops as victims. We are made to believe that police are primarily engaged in actual police work and are aggressive crime fighters acting on behalf of people to fulfill their legal duty to Black citizens pursuant to the social contract, an agreement whereby citizens voluntarily agree to obey government authority in exchange for police protection and other services from the government.
Yet, in reality, crime data demonstrates that police don’t protect Black and Latino people and are not really involved in ‘police work’ in our communities. Rather, authorities use the perception and reality of crime to stalk, surveil, manage, control and kill Black and Latino people. Any beneficial “public service” provided by cops is random, incidental or done only under the most egregious or convenient circumstances and even then, it is done primarily to maintain manufactured public relations and provided on a compulsory, involuntary basis. Professor Alex Vitale states, “It is largely a liberal fantasy that the police exist to protect us from the bad guys. As the veteran police scholar David Bayley argues,
“The police do not prevent crime. This is one of the best kept secrets of modern life. Experts know it, the police know it, but the public does not know it. Yet the police pretend that they are society’s best defense against crime and continually argue that if they are given more resources, especially personnel, they will be able to protect communities against crime. This is a myth.”
Bayley goes on to point out that there is no correlation between the number of police and crime rates.” Vitale states, ‘the police have never really been about public safety or crime control.’ FUNKTIONARY states, “People who are awake see cops are mercenary security guards that remind us daily, through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate state - colonized, surveilled and patrolled by the desensitized and lobotomized drones of the colonizers.” [MORE]
The Rewards and Punishments of White Supremacy: Black Cop Once Charged in Freddie Gray Case Gets Promoted
/
BOTH SIDES OF THE FENCE. Don’t Black Cops Realize that the Black People who they surveil, torture and murder on behalf of racism white supremacy & Government look just like their mother or father?
Anon explains, ‘it is rare for a black police officer to use excessive force against a white person. In fact, in the history of modern law enforcement there have been only a handful of instances of a black police officer shooting or killing an unarmed white person. This is not surprising but it is absolute proof that the black individual operating within a system of white supremacy cannot mistreat whites even if he or she is wearing a uniform, a badge, and carrying a gun." [MORE]
Scholar Alex Vitale explains, “there is now a large body of evidence measuring whether the race of the individual officers affects their use of force. Most studies show no effect. More distressingly, a few indicate that black officers are more likely to use force or make arrests, especially of Black civilians.”
Black cops are obedient black rolebots plugged into doggy's operating system. they worship rules, government and logic within the parameters of the lex-icon. Not all, but many Black cops probably possess what Dr. Blynd calls “double consciousness”
From [HERE] One of the six police officers who faced charges in the 2015 deadly arrest of Freddie Gray has been promoted from lieutenant to captain.
The Baltimore Sun reports that Alicia White will serve as captain of the department’s Performance Standards Section, which conducts audits and inspections to make sure the agency is properly following its policies. She served in a similar role before her promotion Friday.
Gray, who was Black, died after suffering a severe spinal cord injury inside a police van. His death prompted days of unrest.
White was among six officers charged in the Gray case by Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby. Three of the officers were acquitted, and Mosby dropped the charges against the remaining three, including White.
Federal prosecutors declined to bring charges following an independent Justice Department investigation.
In a 2016 interview with the Sun, after her state charges were dropped, White defended her actions.
“I still believe that, when I went to work that day, I did everything that I was trained to do,” she said. “Unfortunately, that day someone lost their life. But I feel like everything I was trained to do, I did.”
White responded to the scene after Gray was already in police custody, to investigate complaints about the arrest, officials have said. Mosby said White was responsible for investigating the arrest but only “spoke to the back of Mr. Gray’s head.” Mosby said White failed to summon a medic or properly assess his injuries. [MORE]
According to the FUNKTIONARY,
lex-icon - “law as image - the appearance of justice (the form) over the substance of justice via truth and law over humanity.”
probot - a propagandizing programmed robot. (An official representative from an organization, agency or institution whose assignment is to make prepared statements and answer "cooked" (prepared) questions at news conferences, briefings and the like. A probot is a proxymoron who conveys programmed disinformation in computerized language and bureaucratese jargon. A probot is one who disseminates lies, distortions and convenient mass truths composed by a superior overruling elite.
double consciousness - the sense of looking at one's Self through the eye's (axiology) and distorted mirrors of others. 2) the psycho-mismanagement of one's neurosis. 3) intimately involved with what you hate, and torn apart from who you (think you) are. You cannot learn to use that which you refuse to acknowledge, i.e., one's heritage, roots, or asili. (See: Matah, Inauthentic, "Wille-Chip," Power, Anxiety, Anguish, LEARN & Asili.)
Will a White Man Lose His Right to Sleep Well at Night? Racist who Murdered Ahmaud Arbery Fears He’ll be Killed in State Prison, Attorney Files Motion to Remain with Feds
/
From [HERE] The white man who fatally shot Ahmaud Arbery after chasing the running Black man in a Georgia neighborhood says he fears he will be killed by fellow inmates if he's sent to a state prison to serve a life sentence for murder.
Travis McMichael, 36, faces sentencing Monday in U.S. District Court after his conviction on federal hate crime charges in February. His defense attorney filed a legal motion Thursday asking the judge to keep McMichael in federal custody.
Attorney Amy Lee Copeland argued McMichael has received “hundreds of threats” and won't be safe in a Georgia state prison system that is under investigation by the U.S. Justice Department amid concerns about violence between inmates.
On Feb. 23, 2020, McMichael and his father, Greg McMichael, armed themselves with guns and jumped in a pickup truck to chase Arbery after he ran past their home just outside the port city of Brunswick. A neighbor, William “Roddie” Bryan, joined the chase in his own truck and recorded cellphone video of Travis McMichael blasting Arbery with a shotgun.
The killing of Arbery became part of a larger national reckoning over racial injustice amid other high-profile killings of unarmed Black people including George Floyd in Minneapolis and Breonna Taylor in Kentucky.
In Georgia, the McMichaels and Bryan were sentenced to life in prison after being convicted of Arbery's murder in a state court last fall. They have remained in a county jail in custody of U.S. marshals since standing trial in February in federal court, where a jury convicted them of hate crimes. Each defendant now faces a potential second life sentence.
Once the men are sentenced Monday by U.S. District Court Judge Lisa Godbey Wood, protocol would be to turn them over the Georgia Department of Corrections to serve their prison terms for murder. That's because they were first arrested and tried by state authorities.
For Travis McMichael, “his concern is that he will promptly be killed upon delivery to the state prison system for service of that sentence,” Copeland wrote in her sentencing request. “He has received numerous threats of death that are credible in light of all circumstances.”
Copeland said she has alerted Georgia's corrections agency, “which has replied that these threats are unverified and that it can securely house McMichael in state custody.”
Greg McMichael, 66, has also asked the judge to put him in federal rather than state prison, citing safety concerns and health problems.
Arbery's family has insisted the McMichaels and Bryan should serve their sentences in a state prison, arguing a federal penitentiary wouldn’t be as tough. His parents objected forcefully before the federal trial when both McMichaels sought a plea deal that would have included a request to transfer them to federal prison. The judge ended up rejecting the plea agreement.
“Granting these men their preferred choice of confinement would defeat me,” Arbery’s mother, Wanda Cooper-Jones, told the judge at a hearing Jan. 31. “It gives them one last chance to spit in my face.”
A federal judge doesn't have the authority to order a state to relinquish its lawful custody of inmates to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, said Ed Tarver, an Augusta lawyer and former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Georgia.
“She can certainly make that request," Tarver said of the judge, "and it would be up to the state Department of Corrections whether or not they agree to do that.”
Copeland's court filing refers to a prior agreement between the judge, prosecutors and defense attorneys to keep the McMichaels and Bryan in federal custody "through the completion of the federal trial and any post-trial proceedings.” She argued that means Travis McMichael should at least remain in federal custody through appeals of his hate crime conviction.
Supreme Court to Hear College Admission Affirmative Action Case in October [the ultimate affirmative action is the System of Racism/White Supremacy]
/From [HERE] The nation’s highest court will hear arguments on whether current admission practices’ at some of the most elite universities in the country are unconstitutional.
If and after the plaintiff is successful, and the Supreme Court endorses its position, millions of incoming college students may find that their race and ethnicity are no longer a part of the credentials that they use to compete with their peers to get into their dream schools.
Current admission practices at universities like Harvard University treat White and Asian-American students with stricter admission standards—a practice some call reverse discrimination—Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) alleges in its case against Harvard, currently before the Supreme Court.
The plaintiff is also seeking to overturn Grutter v. Bollinger, a 2003 Supreme Court decision that ruled the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit American colleges from using race as a factor in admitting students.
An impressive list of supporters has stood behind Harvard University, including legal institutes, U.S. lawmakers, and even the United States Department of Justice’s top lawyer who’s a Harvard Law graduate herself, Solicitor-General Elizabeth Prelogar. Non-profit organizations and state attorney generals have backed SFFA by submitting amicus briefs.
The Supreme Court will hear the arguments for the case starting Oct. 31, according to a case calendar the court released on Wednesday.
The Supreme Court consolidated the Harvard case with a separate case in which SFFA sued the University of North Carolina.
Race in Admissions
The plaintiff argues that Grutter was “grievously wrong,” in that it “departs from the Constitution’s original meaning, contradicts other precedents, has eroded over time, and has no true defenders.”
“The Amendment, according to its framers, enshrines the principle that ‘free government demands the abolition of all distinctions founded on color and race,’” the plaintiff said, citing the Fourteenth Amendment. “That principle was not new: the self-evident truth that ‘all men are created equal’ was a cornerstone of the American founding.”
Yet, according to the SFFA, “Harvard uses race at every stage of the admissions process.”
“To begin, Harvard recruits high-school students differently based on race,” the plaintiff wrote. “African-American and Hispanic students with PSAT scores of 1100 and up are invited to apply to Harvard, but white and Asian-American students must score a 1350.”
“As admissions decisions are made, Harvard monitors the racial makeup of each class through ‘onepagers,’” the plaintiffs added, alleging that Harvard monitors its racial makeup with “meticulous attention” and has kept it “remarkably stable” across incoming classes.
The plaintiff further claims that Harvard gives “substantial” preferences for African-American and Hispanic applicants in its admissions.
“For example, an Asian American in the fourth-lowest decile has virtually no chance of being admitted to Harvard (0.9%); but an African American in that decile has a higher chance of admission (12.8%) than an Asian American in the top decile (12.7%),” the plaintiff’s petition reads.
Harvard, in its response (pdf), says SFFA’s petition offers a “thoroughly distorted presentation of the record” from lower courts. Harvard rejects the SFFA’s contention that the college “‘automatically’ awards ‘enormous’ preferences to all African and Hispanic applications,” and says that it factors in the race of an applicant in the admissions process “only in a flexible and nonmechanical way.”
The plaintiff further called for the overturning of Grutter, saying the case’s holding “that universities can use race in admissions to pursue student-body diversity” satisfies all the criteria that this Court considers when overruling precedents.”
“Despite reaffirming that ‘all’ racial classifications must satisfy strict scrutiny, Grutter held that ‘student body diversity’ can ‘justify the use of race in university admissions,’” the plaintiffs wrote. “That holding departs from the Constitution’s original meaning, contradicts other precedents, has eroded over time, and has no true defenders.”
“Grutter’s diversity rationale is not only uncompelling; it flouts basic equal-protection principles,” the plaintiff added. “Although Grutter praised the ‘educational benefits’ of student body diversity writ large, its assumption that a university can predict, based solely on race, an applicant’s ‘views’ or ‘experience[s]’ is little more than racial stereotyping.” [MORE]
Federal Court Rules a Landlord in Jackson (MS) Discriminated Against Prospective Black Tenants after Black Testers were Denied Property Tours while White Testers were Invited to Apply for an Apartment
/From [HERE] A federal judge ruled a Jackson, Mississippi, landlord discriminated against prospective Black tenants in a suit brought by the federal government after Black testers for the Louisiana Fair Housing Action Center were denied property tours while white testers were invited to apply for an apartment. The ruling is [HERE]
Michigan Supreme Court Restricts Excessive Sentences for Youth
/From [EJI] In four decisions last week, the Michigan Supreme Court held that sentencing courts must consider how youth up to age 19 are constitutionally different from adult offenders for purposes of sentencing—and not just when they are subject to a life-without-parole sentence. Because of their “diminished culpability and increased prospects for reform,” the court explained, children are ineligible for the most severe punishment unless the prosecution proves otherwise by clear and convincing evidence.
Life Without Parole Is Presumptively Disproportionate for Children
A decade ago, the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. Alabama struck down mandatory life-without-parole sentences for children under 18, holding that life without parole is an unconstitutionally excessive sentence for children whose crimes reflect “transient immaturity.”
The Court in 2016 reiterated that life without parole “is a disproportionate sentence for all but the rarest of children” and must be reserved only for those “whose crimes reflect irreparable corruption.”
In response, Michigan lawmakers enacted a new statute that eliminates mandatory life-without-parole sentences for children. Under that law, if a child is convicted of certain offenses, the prosecutor may file a motion seeking to have them sentenced to life without parole.
Last week, the Michigan Supreme Court in People v. Taylor held that this law established “a rebuttable presumption against the imposition of juvenile LWOP sentences in Michigan.”
So when a sentencing court considers a prosecutor’s motion to sentence a child to die in prison, the court held, it must “start from the premise that the juvenile defendant before them, like most juveniles, has engaged in criminality because of transient immaturity, not irreparable corruption” and cannot, therefore, be sentenced to die in prison.
It is the “prosecutor’s burden to overcome the presumption that LWOP is disproportionate” by “demonstrating facts that support their extraordinary request” to sentence a child to life without parole. The prosecutor “must prove facts and circumstances that rebut the presumption against LWOP by the well-known standard of clear and convincing evidence.”
If the prosecution fails to meet this burden, the court must impose a statutory term of years. [MORE]
At Sentencing in Parkland Case [there was no trial], Judge Makes Videos/Photos of “Massacre” Unavailable to Public. With False Flags Its Always About Reaction and Belief, Actual Evidence Rarely Exists
/
SEEING IS NOT BELIEVING, IT IS KNOWING. A media hoaxed NYT reporter writes, “To shield heartsick families from the most macabre details of how their loved ones were murdered in a mass school shooting in Parkland, Fla., the court handling the gunman’s sentencing trial has taken an extraordinary step: Graphic videos and photographs are shown only to the jury, so that victims’ relatives and others in the courtroom gallery do not have to endure them." Such is the nature of public, criminal trials- enduring through actual evidence, weighing its value and discarding lies. Here, Like most mass shooting episodes no trial took place - a guilty plea was accepted by the court after facts were read from a document out loud in the courtroom. Nikolas Cruz, plead guilty to 17 murders and 17 attempted murders. Now the case has entered into the sentencing phase where it will be determined whether he gets life or the death penalty. [MORE]
Due to the contrived nature of the Parkland narrative, voluntary confession, many fake looking/sounding media interviews with in-credible witnesses providing inconsistent facts, a lack of corroborating forensic evidence, a lack of cell-phone video from high school students, miraculously quick medical recoveries by kids shot in the chest, books that deflected bullets and more, many consider Parkland a false flag operation or cover story. Belief isn’t needed to come to such a conclusion- go watch the many videos online about it. On the other hand however, belief is needed to conclude that an actual massacre occurred because the evidence has never been seen. We must believe cops and whatever emotional words the media put before our eyes. It takes absolutely no intelligence to believe.
The fact that there was no trial only strengthens the doubt of persons who don’t blindly believe whatever the media says. In all microwave terror episodes the media simply parrot whatever police say from a crime scene closed to the public in an instantly open and shut case. To be clear here, no criminal trial means no contested, adversarial proceeding in which the government would have to establish facts beyond a reasonable doubt with actual, admissible, authenticated evidence and credible witness testimony that is subjected to rigorous cross -examination, rules of evidence, discovery, Brady disclosures and the defendant’s right to face to face confrontation with his accusers. What better way could there be to drop any doubt as to whether this fake looking bullshit ever took place?
instead of a real trial the public continues to get, ‘but wait there’s more’ emotional reaction from the media and probotic authorities. If authorities made all this shit up would they be truthful about it? They make it up because sheeple believe whatever authorities and their media tell them to believe. Let’s be clear about the meaning of “belief” here: According to FUNKTIONARY:
Belief- the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome reality-entanglement. 2) a construction of approximate truths, absolute truths, mass truths and primary myths, based on genetic predisposition, and environmental and socio-psychological conditioning. 3) the institutionalization of the unknowable, i.e., a conviction that is not necessarily based upon any empirical, direct-mind or experiential knowledge. 4) a non-physical surviving thought-form. 5) any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought. 6) an intellectual rationalization surrounded by (based on) "'proofs," reasons and arguments. 7) that which springs out of cultural ideology. 8) the greatest fiction. 9) a trick of the mind to repress doubt. 10) a mental doubt-suppression tactic. A suppressed doubt is neither faith nor even trust. 11) repressed doubt. 12) an explicit or implicit assent to dogmatic propositions (with or without overgrown religious foliage) on someone else's authority. 13) reverential blindness that thwarts fresh perception and intuitive apperception. 14) a prejudice without any experience to support it. 15) a peculiar blend of fatiloquent assertion on one hand and adamant denial on the other. 16) a manic flirtation with the terminally unprovable. 17) certainty based in the unknown. 18) having another "see" it for you while seeing him see it (for you)—in effect being for another. 19) a conclusion without the verification of direct experience—make-believe made real. 20) the inability or unwillingness to master the requisite logic or reason to counterbalance (or overcome) the willingness to be misled. 21) the abnegation of internal authenticity for outside authority. 22) ego-consoling faith. 23) acceptance of a statement, tenet or creed with available verification and substantive evidence to its contrary. [MORE]
Like folks selling invisible hairpins, the NYT reporter explained that actual photos, videos and forensic evidence aren’t available to the public but stories about it are, “But the horrifying particulars, conveyed in emotional witness testimony, chilling audio recordings and dispassionate forensic accounts, are impossible to avoid altogether. How a teacher at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School tied a baby blanket around a wounded student’s arm as a tourniquet. How the gunfire from a semiautomatic rifle boomed inside a classroom under attack. How the high-powered bullets ravaged children’s bodies and so on…” Exactly there was no trial, so we must just believe what we are told.
Sheeple: ‘But I don’t see any hairpins in the box’
Authority/Media: ‘Of course not, they are invisible’
Sheeple: ‘Really?’
Authority/Media: Yes, out of stock for 7 days but we are still selling them. They are absolutely invisible.’
As explained by Osho Rajineesh, “When things are invisible, you can go on selling, promising. There is no need to deliver the goods, because in the first place they are invisible, so nobody can ever detect them.” [MORE]
