Igor Chudov: Pfizer Injection Causes COVID Reinfections, Disables Natural Immunity

/

From [HERE] Reinfections in vaccinated (vs unvaccinated) people were never proven in a large official randomized controlled trial, until now. As you know, randomized controlled trials offer the gold standard of evidence: randomize people between a vaccine group and a placebo group, and see if the vaccine group does better than the placebo group. 

Fortunately, we have data from Pfizer’s own official trial submitted to the FDA. This randomized controlled trial concerns vaccinating young kids and proved beyond doubt that vaccination causes repeated reinfections. Look at Page 38:

What is that page saying? There were a total of 12 kids-participants who managed to get two COVID infections within the time frame of the trial. 11 of them were vaccine recipients and only one received no vaccine!

Say that again?

Out of 12 kids who had two COVID infections, only ONE was in the never-vaccinated group! 

Mind you, as the above passage says, all of these 12 reinfected children, never had Covid prior to the trial. So what caused vaccinated children to develop a disproportionate amount of repeat infections? The vaccine, of course. It is a randomized controlled trial, after all.

Thanks to Pfizer, we finally know that Covid reinfections are real and that their vaccine causes them by disabling natural immunity.

A little caveat is that Pfizer made the trial purposely complicated (because it is a resuscitated FAILED trial where they added one more booster dose and more kids). Pfizer vaccinated the control group. This complication somewhat affects the 6-23 months age category, but still shows obvious vaccine failure. 

The 2-4-year-old group is much less complicated: all reinfections happened in the vaccinated participants, five of six were from the first-vaccinated group. “All of these participants received 3 doses of assigned study intervention, except for one participant in the BNT162b2 group who received two doses”. We have a smoking gun that reinfections are vaccine driven. [MORE]

Court Ordered Release of Documents Used by the FDA to Approve COVID Vaccine Shows that Pfizer Classified Nearly All Severe Adverse Events (including deaths) During Trials as ‘Not Related to Shots’

/
Court Ordered Release of Documents Used by the FDA to Approve COVID Vaccine Shows that Pfizer Classified Nearly All Severe Adverse Events (including deaths) During Trials as ‘Not Related to Shots’

The latest release by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19vaccine documents reveals numerous instances of participants who sustained severe adverse events during Phase 3 trials. Some of these participants withdrew from the trials, some were dropped and some died.

The 80,000-page document cache includes an extensive set of Case Report Forms (CRFs) from Pfizer Phase 3 trials conducted at various locations in the U.S., in addition to other documentation pertaining to participants in Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trials in the U.S. and worldwide.

The FDA on June 1 released the documents, which pertain to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the vaccine, as part of a court-ordered disclosure schedule stemming from an expedited Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in August 2021.

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT), a group of doctors and public health professionals, submitted the FOIA request.

CRFs show deaths, severe reactions to the vaccines during Phase 3 trials

The CRFs included in this month’s documents contain often vague explanations of the specific symptoms experienced by the trial participants.

They also reveal a trend of classifying almost all adverse events — and in particular severe adverse events (SAEs) — as being “not related” to the vaccine.

Read More

Do You Understand Racism? For the Past 140 Years 98% of All Black Individuals Have Worked for White Owned or Controlled Business, Government or Non-Profits. Serving Whites, Enriching Their Communities

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Racism White Supremacy - psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." -Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, MD. Hate and oppression can never reign. Only love is supreme.

Racism -  White Degeneracy wrongly cast as Supremacy. Racism—a psycho-socio-economic reality based on a pseudo-scientific biological myth—is a power group dynamic, i.e., a defined group cooperatively via legacy institutions exerting structured and enforced institutionalized and systemic injustice, oppression and power over another group. Racism is not individualistic, but institutional, cultural, economic, political, linguistic, self-perpetuating and systematic. Racism is economic discrimination by one group over and against another for the purposes of subjugation and/or maintaining the imbalance of power through cooperative control, misinformation, indoctrination, genocide and oppression. Racism is the socioeconomic and cultural bequest of colonialism, neo-colonialism and the vestiges of the transatlantic trafficking of enslaved Afrikans and their descendants. Racism has its bio-physiological origins in the immune response of primitive life-forms to foreign matter and has its geo-psychological roots in the response of primitive humans encountering more intelligent ones based on the meme of scarcity and the fear of genetic annihilation through genetic assimilation. "Racism destroys men—and women—as much by what it denies them as by what it metes out to them." -Isaiah Thomas. "It is pathological for Blacks to keep attempting moral suasion on a people who have no ethics or morality where race is a variable." -Bobby Wright.

"If you can't keep something but you can't give it up, you have to render it unrecognizable; racism has been defined out of existence and repackaged so that whites could retain its perks, especially the psychological ones. It has undergone existential plastic surgery. To keep it buried alive in its unholy grave, a host of Strangelovean anti-intellectualisms have been developed and honed." -Debra J. Dickerson. Racism White Supremacy is a virus in the mind, a malignant meme that has both the host of the virus and the whole society sick. White Supremacy (Degeneracy) is socially engineering Black Consciousness and/or also responsible for the falsification of Black consciousness. "If you don't understand racism white supremacy, everything else you think you know will only confuse you." -Neelly Fuller, Jr. (See: White Supremacy, Yurugu, Park Day, Declaration of Endependece, Ma'afa & Caucasion). 

Senate LegisTraitors Advance bipartisan gun control law Making It More Difficult for Law Abiding Citizens Under 21 to Defend Themselves Against Uncontrollable Government Authority or Criminals

/

From [HERE] The US Senate Tuesday advanced a gun safety measure aiming to address and prevent gun violence by a vote of 64-to-34, clearing the way for further consideration of the bill.

The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act aims to enact a variety of measures, including enhanced background checks for gun purchasers under 21 years of age, the implementation of state crisis intervention programs, and millions of dollars for school safety funding. It will also close the “boyfriend loophole,” which allowed people convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence that did not live with their victims to retain ownership of firearms.

Republican US Senator Pat Toomey spoke in support of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, stating that “[t]his bipartisan gun safety bill protects the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens while taking steps to make our communities safer.”

Similarly Republican US Senator Lindsey Graham said, “will help us avert a mass killing [rather] than prevent a law-abiding citizen from losing their constitutional right to keep and bear arms.”

The bill will still need to pass both the US Senate and House of Representatives and be signed by the President in order to become law.

Avoid Hertz. Class Action Claims Hertz Keeps Falsely Accusing Its Customers of Car Theft and Issued Arrest Warrants To Cut Costs. 1 Plaintiff Spent 3 Months in Jail and Lost His Home and Business

/

From [HERE] and [HERE] New Jersey contractor Hanna “John” Ayoub paid $2,309 to extend the rental of a Dodge Ram from Hertz Car Rental at the Wilmington, Del., train station in April 2019. Unfortunately, in a twist that isn’t as rare as one might think, the transaction resulted in three months of jail time for Ayoub – along with the loss of his home, business and tools – after Hertz accused him of stealing the truck. 

“They said that they had no record of the extension on the vehicle despite speaking to them a day before and receiving confirmation,” Ayoub said. “Everything just turned into a nightmare from that point onward.”

Along with more than 180 former Hertz customers, Ayoub is now suing the company for $529.7 million in federal bankruptcy court. The plaintiffs claim that they were detained by police, arrested and sometimes sent to jail for “stealing” cars that they had legally rented. Hertz filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May 2020 to restructure its business and unload $19 billion in debt after the pandemic left the company with a fleet of 700,000 cars that nobody wanted to rent.

Hertz files roughly 3,365 stolen car reports on those who rented cars from the company each year. According to an Inc. report, Hertz released this number on Feb. 10 after the company lost a court motion to keep the records sealed to avoid a “competitive disadvantage.” The disadvantage Hertz is referring to is not that people might hesitate to rent cars from the company because of a potential theft charge. Instead, the company is worried that other rental car companies will use the information to figure out how it manages its inventory, the complaint alleges. 

As Hertz VP Michael Severance put it in court: 

I can imagine a scenario where, let’s say, they know the number of annual police reports that they file and now they know ours. Let’s say they file more or less than us, so they could interpret that to mean we have better front-end controls, for example, preventing thefts, and they could look for ways to improve their abilities to reduce thefts.

However, bankruptcy judge Mary Walrath was not impressed, and she demanded that Hertz release the number of theft-by-conversion reports it files on customers.

Most of these alleged “thefts” happen when a rental customer decides to extend their rental. According to the lawsuit, when the customer calls Hertz to request the extension, the company places a temporary hold on the card the customer used to rent the car. If the hold fails to go through because the customer is close to their credit card limit or has yet to pay their bill, Hertz reports the car stolen “by conversion.” 

However, unbeknownst to anyone other than Hertz, after the customer pays the bill and returns the car, the company does not withdraw the theft report, does not release the information to the public, and never notifies the customer that there was ever a problem. In addition, Hertz failed to validate and verify the information for arrest reports to reduce costs, essentially “letting the police find the cars it has lost,” according to the lawsuit.

That’s what happened in 2007 to Pennsylvania salesman Brent Williams, who rented a Ford Mustang from Hertz in Florida. After driving the car for two months, he was arrested for theft, even though he had proof that he had paid $600 a week to use the car. When no lawyer showed up to represent Hertz at the court hearing, Williams assumed that the matter had been dropped until 2016, when a trooper found the outstanding warrant for the theft of the Mustang when he pulled Williams over for a traffic violation in Pennsylvania. After he spent 30 days in jail the charges were finally dropped, but Williams received no apology from Hertz. “They kept me shackled the entire time,” he said. “It’s almost like being kidnapped.”

Hertz says it cares deeply about its customers, but apparently finds it less expensive to pay settlements than to fix a computer system that fails to track rental payments and instead lands dozens of customers in jail. Hertz insists that only a very small – “tiny, tiny” – fraction of its police reports results in the arrest of innocent people. However, lawsuits have been piling up against the company related to conversion arrests for over a decade, meaning that thousands of customers could have been arrested and jailed for no reason other than legally extending their rental agreements with Hertz.

Speaking Through Their Wooden Dummy The Pathocracy Announces Another Plandemic: Biden Told the Media, “We Need More Money for the “2nd Pandemic.” Slave Like Dems [dummies] Afraid to Inquire

/

From [HERE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

dummy – a wooden puppet or programmed dupe that only speaks when spoken through. 2) one seeming to act independently but in reality controlled by another. ~Webster’s Dictionary. I know it’s hard for most people to imagine themselves as dummies, but the reality of our circumstances painfully underscore this sad fact. How else could it be that for eons, centuries, and even up to this day, that the elite few rule, fool, divide and terrorize the many? If we imagine that we are free, we won’t ever suspect or imagine we are dummies. Seeming to be free and actually experiencing, i.e., load testing, your alleged freedom are two different things altogether. As long as we seem to be free (despite all the facts to the contrary), it is most trivial to be manipulated and conned into doing the will of another against your own vital interests. If and whenever one is willing to overcome denial and accept his or her apparently free condition as false or an abject delusion, then the strings of control that have been (mis)guiding you will begin to become noticeable or perhaps even felt. What part of you has been complicit in “pulling the strings” of the puppet master as the fat lady sings another stanza from the starspangled banter? (See: Politician, Borg, Zombie, Proxymoron, Jehovah’s Witness Protection Program, Dummy Return, True Believer, Perceptions & Disciple)

dummies – creatures that obliviously accept and protect the parameters imposed on them by their unavowed or avowed enemies. (See: Cowards, Dupe-lification, Dummy Return, Reality Boxes, Knowledge Vacuums & Orglings)

New Study Links Mask Mandates to Increased COVID Death Rates. Places w/mandates had a higher death rate than places without mandates; corroborating 2 other studies

/

From [MERCOLA] Data from Kansas show counties with mask mandates had a higher death rate than counties without a mask mandate; two other large studies found similar results, one that gathered data in Europe only and the other from 69 countries

  • According to a study in early 2021, face masks increase your daily inhalation of microplastics; another study released in April 2022 found microplastics similar to that used in face masks in lung tissue sampled during surgery. Some were found in the deepest parts of the lung

  • Data show that masks can collect antibiotic-resistant pathogens and trigger a cluster of symptoms called Mask-Induced Exhaustion Syndrome (MIES) that negatively impacts your immune system, and causes carbon dioxide retention, skin irritation, headaches, difficulty breathing and decreased cardiopulmonary capacity

  • It is crucial that accurate data are gathered and communicated to provide a strong foundation for developing local public policy before the next plandemic creates a scenario in which government officials attempt to mandate masking and lockdowns

Fiona Lashells is an 8-year-old second grader who lives in Florida. She made the local1 and national news2 when she was suspended an outrageous 38 times for standing up for her right to do something that isn't supported by data or science in a school system — wearing a mask.

The New York Post described Lashells as a “recalcitrant student,”3 who apparently knew and exercised her rights better than most. July 30, 2021, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis4 issued an executive order ruling that school districts could not require students to wear masks. However, in defiance of authority, the Palm Beach County School District where Lashells lives reinstated their mask mandate.5

After DeSantis’s executive order was issued, Lashell's mom told her she didn't have to wear the mask for the upcoming school year. Lashell had been complaining about fatigue from wearing the mask during the last school year. At first, she was made to eat lunch alone in the hallway outside the office of an administrator. Soon, in-school suspensions began and were quickly followed by out-of-school suspensions.

After 38 suspensions, the school district repealed its mask mandate November 8, 2021. Out of the mouth of an 8-year-old came these words, “I’m not wearing a mask because you touch it, and you have germs on your hand. And then you put it on your face and breathe in all the germs.”6

Mandating masks for school children have been an unprecedented public move that has not been scientifically validated. Instead, CDC data7,8 show school children have the least risk from the virus and national data9 gathered before the pandemic show children who experience relational and social risks have a four times higher likelihood of having mental, emotional or behavioral problems.

In other words, the government mandated masks on a population who had the least risk of illness and the greatest long-term risk from wearing the mask. Several journals have finally begun publishing data gathered during the pandemic revealing that while prevention efficacy is minimal or not evident,10 wearing masks increases your risk of death if you do get sick.11

Death Rate Rises in Counties With Mask Mandate

German physician Dr. Zacharias Fögen12 found no published evidence that masking could effectively reduce the severity of the disease or had an influence on case fatality.

Fögen used demographic data from the state of Kansas to run an analysis on a county-wide level comparing counties that mandated mask-wearing and those that didn't. The data suggested that using a mask could present a greater threat to the user, making it a “debatable epidemiological intervention.”13

The death rate in counties where masks were mandated was higher by 85%. After an analysis that accounted for confounding factors, the mortality rate remained 52% higher in counties that mandated masking.

Further analysis showed that 95% of the effect “can only be attributed to COVID-19, so it is not CO2, bacteria or fungi under the mask.”14 In other words, while the pathogens or CO2 buildup may have weakened the immune system, it was COVID-19 that caused the deaths.

He named this the “Foegen Effect,” referring to the reinhalation of viral particles trapped in droplets and deposited on the mask, which worsens outcomes. In the journal article, he writes:15

“The most important finding from this study is that contrary to the accepted thought that fewer people are dying because infection rates are reduced by masks, this was not the case. Results from this study strongly suggest that mask mandates actually caused about 1.5 times the number of deaths or ~50% more deaths compared to no mask mandates.

The mask mandates themselves have increased the CFR (case fatality rate) by 1.85 / 1.58 or by 85% / 58% in counties with mask mandates. It was also found that almost all of these additional deaths were attributed solely to COVID-19.

This study revealed that wearing facemasks might impose a great risk on individuals, which would not be mitigated by a reduction in the infection rate. The use of facemasks, therefore, might be unfit, if not contraindicated, as an epidemiologic intervention against COVID-19.”

Fögen notes two other large studies that found similar results with case fatality rates. The first was published in the journal Cureus16 and found no association between case numbers and mask compliance in Europe but a positive association with death and mask compliance.

The second study17 was published in PLOS One and demonstrated there was an association between negative COVID outcomes and mask mandates across 847,000 people in 69 countries.

Masking Increases Other Health Risks

These conclusions were similar to those reached in a preprint study18 posted August 7, 2021, that challenged the prevailing belief masking could slow the spread of the virus. They found mask-wearing could:

  • Promote facial alkalinization

  • Encourage dehydration, which enhances barrier breakdown and raises the risk of bacterial infection

  • Increase headaches and sweating

  • Decrease cognitive precision, which can lead to medical errors

Many of the mask mandates were initiated to stay in line with CDC guidelines at the time. The data were gathered over multiple seasons using information the CDC gathered, from which the researchers originally concluded, “Mask mandates and use are not associated with slower state-level COVID-19 spread during COVID-19 growth surges.”19 They subsequently revised the paper and wrote:20

“The sudden onset of COVID-19 compelled adoption of mask mandates before efficacy could be evaluated. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that greater public mask use decreases COVID-19 spread. As masks have been required in many settings, it is prudent to weigh potential benefits with harms. Masks may promote social cohesion during a pandemic, but risk compensation can also occur.”

According to a study by Chinese scientists posted in January 2021, wearing a face mask can increase your daily inhalation of microplastics.21 In April 2022,22 a team of scientists from Hull York Medical School published findings that showed 39 microplastic particles in 11 of 13 lung tissues sampled during lung surgery.

According to the lead author, microplastics have been found in autopsies in the past, but this is the first study to demonstrate they are found in the living. Interestingly, these microparticles were also found in the lowest parts of the lungs, which researchers had once thought they could not possibly reach.23

The study authors found the subjects had 12 types of microplastics and the most abundant were polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET).24 This finding points to the recent ubiquitous use of blue surgical masks during the pandemic as PP is the most used plastic component in those masks.

Expert Says COVID Face Coverings Are Not Masks

One 2021 study25 looked at the risks of wearing blue surgical face masks and inhaling microplastics. The researchers found that reusing masks could increase the risk of inhaling microplastic particles and that N95 respirators had the lowest number of microplastics released when compared to not wearing a mask.

They wrote, “Surgical, cotton, fashion and activated carbon masks wearing pose higher fiber-like microplastic inhalation risk …”26 And yet, according to Chris Schaefer, a respirator specialist and training expert, what health experts have been calling masks are not really masks at all.27

Schaefer calls these “breathing barriers” as they “don't meet the legal definition” of a mask. He was emphatic that the surgical masks used by consumers throughout Canada, the U.S. and the world are shedding microplastics small enough to be inhaled.28

“A [proper] mask has engineered breathing openings in front of the mouth and nose to ensure easy and effortless breathing. A breathing barrier is closed both over the mouth and nose. And by doing that, it captures carbon dioxide that you exhale, forces you to re-inhale it, causing a reduction in your inhaled oxygen levels and causes excessive carbon dioxide. So, they’re not safe to wear.”

He encourages people to cut one open and look at the loose fibers that are easily dislodged within the product.29

“The heat and moisture that it captures will cause the degradation of those fibres to break down smaller. Absolutely, people are inhaling [microplastic particles]. I’ve written very extensively on the hazards of these breathing barriers the last two years, I’ve spoken to scientists [and other] people for the last two years about people inhaling the fibres.

If you get the sensation that you’ve gotten a little bit of cat hair, or any type of irritation in the back of your throat after wearing them. That means you’re inhaling the fibres.”

He went on to note that anyone exposed to these types of fibers in an occupational setting would be required to wear protection. Instead, people are using products that increase the risk of inhaling fibers that "break down very small and, well, what that’s going to do to people in the form of lung function — as well as toxicity overload in their body — I guess we’ll know in a few years."30

Mask Policy Influenced by Two Hair Stylists, Not Science

In the early days of the pandemic, there was a rush on masks, causing supplies for health care practitioners to dwindle. At the time, health officials were adamant that people should NOT wear masks. In February 2020, Christine Francis, a consultant for infection prevention and control at the World Health Organization, said, “Medical masks … cannot protect against the new coronavirus when used alone … WHO only recommends the use of masks in specific cases.”31

Those specific cases include if you had a cough, fever or difficulty breathing. In other words, you should wear them only if you’re actively sick and showing symptoms. “If you do not have these symptoms, you do not have to wear masks because there is no evidence that they protect people who are not sick,” she continued.32

Also in February 2020, U.K. health authorities advised against the use of masks, even for people working in community or residential care facilities.33 In March 2020, U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams publicly agreed, tweeting a message stating, “Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS!” and going on to say that they are not effective in preventing the general public from catching coronavirus.34

Fast forward one year and CDC’s mask policy appears to have been determined solely on observational studies, not randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that are the gold standard in science.

“In general, observational studies are not only of lower quality than RCTs but also are more likely to be politicized, as they can inject the researcher’s judgment more prominently into the inquiry and lend themselves, far more than RCTs, to finding what one wants to find,” explained Jeffrey Anderson, former director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in a review published by City Journal.35

The CDC has relied on an observational cohort study published in July 2020, of two hair stylists from a Missouri beauty salon.36 The stylists tested positive for COVID-19, developed symptoms, but continued to see 139 clients until they received the positive test. They and their clients wore masks during this time.

The data showed that 67 of the clients tested negative and the other 72 did not report symptoms. From this, the CDC concluded that the “face covering policy likely mitigated the spread of SARS-CoV-2.”37

Anderson explained the study had major limitations, “The apparent lack of spread of COVID-19 could have been a result of good ventilation, good hand hygiene, minimal coughing by the stylists, or the fact that stylists generally, as the researchers note, ‘cut hair while clients are facing away from them.’”38

Another important limiting factor is the lack of a control group. Would the results have been different if the stylists or the clients were not wearing masks? No one knows. But what has become apparent is the consistent lack of quality in studies and information on which public policy has been based since the start of the pandemic.

Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens and Mask Exhaustion Syndrome

The featured study looked only at the raw numbers from Kansas and did not delve into what may have been behind the increasing severity of disease and death in the people who wore masks.

For example, when researchers from the University of Antwerp, Belgium, analyzed the microbial community on surgical and cotton face masks from 13 healthy volunteers after being worn for four hours, bacteria including Bacillus, Staphylococcus and Acinetobacter were found — 43% of which were antibiotic-resistant.39

Researchers from Germany similarly questioned whether a mask that covers your nose and mouth is “free from undesirable side effects” and potential hazards in everyday use.40 It turned out they were not and instead posed significant adverse effects and pathophysiological changes, including the following, which often occur in combination:41

This cluster of symptoms is referred to as Mask-Induced Exhaustion Syndrome (MIES).42 The researchers warned that people who are sick, suffering from certain chronic conditions, pregnant women and children may be at particular risk from extended mask-wearing. Short-term effects may include microbiological contamination, exhaustion, headaches, carbon dioxide retention and skin irritation.

However, long-term effects can lead to chronic issues triggered by “a chronic sympathetic stress response induced by blood gas modifications and controlled by brain centers. This in turn induces and triggers immune suppression and metabolic syndrome with cardiovascular and neurological diseases.”43

Research is needed to determine if the severity of disease and increased death rates in those who wear masks is related to the antibiotic-resistant bacteria that collect on the masks, the impact MIES has on your immune system and the potential dehydration chronic mask wearers may experience, or something else.

Accurate data must be gathered and communicated to provide a strong foundation for developing local public policy before the next plandemic creates a scenario in which government officials attempt to mandate masking and lockdowns — again.

- Sources and References

Destroying Informed Consent Biden Lied to the Public About the Availability of Approved COVID Shots. None are Available in the US. All are Emergency Authorized and Thus Have Immunity for Harm Caused

/

Quality of Black Citizenship Low, Freedom of Movement Limited: Cops Seize and Search Dr Umar Johnson During Bullshit Traffic Stop on his Way to a Juneteenth Celebration in the Free Range Prison

/

COMPULSORY PUBLIC “SERVICE” FROM UNCONTROLLABLE PUBLIC MASTERS. Brazen cops so frequently abuse their power that no Black shopper, pedestrian, motorist, juvenile, adult or Black professional of any kind—could make a compelling argument that so-called constitutional rights provide Black people any real protection from cops or the government in general. Legal scholar Charles Epp states, “The investigatory stop is such a racially framed, institutionally supported practice. It is supported by scholarly research, numerous individual departmental policies, state-level training regimens, professional association resolutions, federal agency support, and judicial approval all the way up to the Supreme Court and is widely viewed in policing as a quintessentially professional practice.” Rationalized legal nonsense (bullshit) enable racist authoritarians to use such stops to place Black people in greater confinement and as tools to control them in the free range prison, a legal system based entirely on physical coercion and manufactured social relations. Obey or go to jail. “The lie of tyranny is that you will maintain the freedom of life by obeying authority. The choices it offers you are a lifetime of obedience or death.“ [MORE]

The only thing upholding the 4th Amendment is your belief in it. You only have rights if an authority says that you do. Your possession of "rights” given to you by a magical government, which functions as your master, is cult belief. Rights are myths. As stated by Dr. Blynd,  “There is no freedom in the presence of so-called authority.” The belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality, and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed. Rather than being a force for order and justice, the belief in “authority” is the arch-enemy of humanity.” [MORE]

No one has acquired the right to rule you. If you believe that then you are losing your mind and have some unlearning to do. FUNKTIONARY explains, “Only you have authority over your Self…anything else, i.e., to accept any authority external to one’s Self once of discriminating age, is the very definition of irresponsibility.”

FUNKTIONARY further states:

“rights” – useful fictions declared in order to make agents of another type of fiction (“government”) have to play along in their deadly theatrical (tragicomedy) game. 2) mere fictions, the contemplation of which leads only to a progressive social, personal, racial and jurisprudential separation from reality. Discussion and debates about “rights” merely evades the FAQ, i.e., the frequently avoided question of who is to enforce any “right” and who will benefit from the pretense. “Rights” are separated into two categories—those flowing from “negative liberties” and those flowing from “positive liberties.” In law, rights are remedies and if a person is without a remedy (as is with citizens of the United States) he is without a right, and only a ‘thing’ is without rights. (See: Negative Liberties, Positive Liberties, Bill of Rights, Liberty, Freedom, Civil Rights, Human Rights, Ma’at & Justice)

Statism – the belief “citizens” and “states” exist and the memetic thought patterns supporting such beliefs. 2) the religion of oppression and domination coupled with the science of exploitation and sociopathic control. 3) the opiate of the so-called Elites. 4) a philosophy that idealizes majority rule gang force (authority) over individual authenticity (autonomy). 5) servitude over liberty and statutes over humanity. So long as “states” are viewed and accepted as natural, normal, reality-based and inevitable, they will continue to violently abstract humans into extinction. Statism is mind control; people both unwillingly and willingly surrender their property (labor being one’s most inviolable property) to men and women pretending to be “governors,” “commissioners,” and “presidents” etc. because they believe they are “citizens” of a so-called “state” and must pay their proverbial “fair share” to support such abstractions or fictions of law. Just using statism against itself proves bureaucrats never have a case regardless of what they “charge” someone with. “Statism and it’s supporting political theology do not exist in people’s minds to promote freedom or protect ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness;’ it’s pure mind control to divert our attention away from the actions of antisocial individuals (sociopaths) who are so desperate to “protect” us they are willing to kill us and steal our property.” ~Marc Stevens. (See: DOME, Beliefs, Landmine Legislation, $crapitalism, Standing, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Judicial Victimization, States, Holodeck Court, Allegiance, Anarchy, Society, Individuality, Civilization, Citizens, Monopoly Capitalism, The Golem, Government Paradox, Granfalloons, Corporate State, Government, Servitude, Stalinize, Property, Standing & Monopoly)

Dr Mercola: In an Effort to Conceal the Reality of Deaths Caused by COVID Injections the Dependent Media Has Started Highlighting a Medical Phenomenon called “sudden adult death syndrome” (SADS)

/

From [MERCOLA PDF] In recent weeks, media outlets around the world have started highlighting a medical phenomenon called “sudden adult death syndrome,” or SADS, in what appears to be a clear effort to obscure the reality of COVID jab deaths. Sad on steroids indeed

  • Underlying factors for SADS include undiagnosed myocarditis, inflammatory conditions and other conditions that cause irregularities in the electrical system of the heart, thereby triggering cardiac arrest

  • While SADS has been known to occur previously, what’s new is the prevalence of this previously rare event. In Australia, the Melbourne Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute is setting up a new SADS registry “to gain more information” about the phenomenon

  • Data compiled by the International Olympic Committee show 1,101 sudden deaths in athletes under age 35 between 1966 and 2004, giving us an average annual rate of 29, across all sports. Meanwhile, between March 2021 and March 2022 alone — a single year — at least 769 athletes have suffered cardiac arrest, collapse, and/or have died on the field, worldwide

  • Among EU FIFA (football/soccer ball) athletes, sudden death increased by 420% in 2021. Historically, about five soccer players have died while playing the game each year. Between January and mid-November 2021, 21 FIFA players died from sudden death

In recent weeks, media outlets around the world have started highlighting a medical phenomenon called “sudden adult death syndrome,” or SADS, in what appears to be a clear effort to obscure the reality of COVID jab deaths.

SADS is also short for “sudden arrhythmic death syndrome,”1 which was first identified in 1977. Underlying factors for SADS (both the sudden adult death and sudden arrhythmic versions) include undiagnosed myocarditis, inflammatory conditions and other conditions that cause irregularities in the electrical system of the heart, thereby triggering cardiac arrest.2,3,4 While SADS has been known to occur before, what’s new is the prevalence of this previously rare event.

Historical Prevalence of SADS

According to the British Heart Association, there are about 500 cases of SADS in the U.K. each year.5 The British Office for National Statistics, on the other hand, show far fewer cases.6 The ONS lists a total of 128 cases of SADS (all age groups, whether listed as cardiac-related or unknown) in 2016, 77 cases in 2017, 70 in 2018, 107 in 2019 and 139 cases in 2020.

While data on SADS incidence for 2021 and 2022 are hard to come by, incidence has apparently risen sufficiently enough to cause concern in some countries. Before the pandemic, SADS was the acronym for sudden arrhythmia death syndrome, which was rare and with scant research on it except to mention that it accounted for about 30% of unexpected cardiac deaths among young people.7

But today, it’s no longer rare and SADS is virtually on steroids as the numbers of sudden deaths in young adults pile up around the world. The numbers are so concerning that in Australia, for example, the Melbourne Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute is setting up a new SADS registry “to gain more information” about the phenomenon.8,9

According to a spokesperson, there are approximately 750 SADS cases per year in Australia. In the U.S., the average annual death toll from SADS is said to be around 4,000.10

Since the rollout of the COVID jabs, the news has been chockful of reports of young, healthy and often athletic people dying “for no reason” and doctors claim to be “baffled” by it. Doctors and scientists in Australia are even urging everyone under the age of 40 to get their hearts checked, even if they’re healthy and fit.11

Any thinking person, on the other hand, can clearly see the correlation between the shots, which are now well-known for their ability to cause heart inflammation, and the rise in sudden death among young and healthy people.

Hundreds of Athletes Have Collapsed and Died Post-Jab

Among athletes, sudden death incidence has historically ranged between 1 in 40,000 and 1 in 80,000.12 An analysis13 of deaths among competitive athletes between 1980 and 2006 in the U.S. identified a total of 1,866 cases where an athlete either collapsed from cardiac arrest and/or died suddenly. That’s 1,866 cases occurring over a span of 27 years, giving us an annual average of 69 in the U.S.

Data14 compiled by the International Olympic Committee show 1,101 sudden deaths in athletes under age 35 between 1966 and 2004, giving us an average annual rate of 29 sudden deaths, across all sports. Meanwhile, between March 2021 and March 2022 alone — a single year — at least 769 athletes have suffered cardiac arrest, collapse, and/or have died on the field, worldwide.15

Among EU FIFA (football/soccer ball) athletes, sudden death increased by 420% in 2021.

Good Sciencing, which is keeping a running total of athletic deaths post-jab puts the current number of cardiac arrests at 1,090 and total deaths at 715.16 Several dozen more are pending confirmation that the athlete had in fact received the shot.

Among EU FIFA (football/soccer ball) athletes, sudden death increased by 420% in 2021.17Historically, about five soccer players have died while playing the game each year. Between January and mid-November 2021, 21 FIFA players died from sudden death.

COVID Jab Clearly Associated With Heart Injury

An opinion piece in Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, published in April 2022, highlights the correlation between COVID jab-induced heart inflammation and sudden cardiac death in athletes:18

“Increased COVID-related SCD [sudden cardiac death] appears to be due, at least in part, to a recent history of infection and/or vaccination that induces inflammatory and immune impairment that injures the heart. 

An unhealthy lifestyle that may include poor diet or overtraining may likely be a contributing factor. The seeming increased incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis during COVID-19 and in the post-vaccination period, and SCD, poses a serious risk to not only athletes but all others and is a cause for alarm. 

As the population ages and the popularity of running, cycling, and other endurance sports increases, the burden of SCD risk can potentially grow as well. A strong focus on both health and fitness should be a loud and clear public health message.”

The Signal That Cannot Be Silenced

In a June 13, 2022, Substack article, Dr. Pierre Kory also commented on this latest effort to explain away COVID jab deaths:19

“I recently posted a deeply referenced compilation20 of evidence detailing the historic humanitarian catastrophe that has slowly unfolded within most advanced health economies across the world. Caused by a global mass vaccination campaign led by the Pharma masters of BMGF/WHO/CDC that illogically (but profitably) targeted a rapidly mutating coronavirus. 

They did it with what turned out to be the most toxic protein used therapeutically in the history of medicine. In vials mixed with lipid nano-particles, polyethylene glycol and who knows what else. 

I cited studies and reports showing massive increases in cardiovascular deaths and neurologic (and other) disabilities amongst working age adults, beginning in 2021 only. 

A disturbing signal screaming from the original clinical trials data,21 VAERS data,22 life insurance data,23 disability data,24 reports of cardiac arrests of professional athletes,25 rises in ambulance calls for cardiac arrests in pre-heart attack age young people,26 and the massive increases in illnesses and data manipulations27 in Department of Defense databases. 

As these events become more and more recognized by the average citizen (and occasional journalist), a new pathetic ‘Disinformation Campaign’ was launched in response trying to blame all the young people dying as simply a need for increased awareness of the rare condition called Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS), rather than examples of the legions dying from the vaccines. 

The fact checkers also came out in support of this narrative, branding anyone who thinks the vaccines are the cause of SADS as a conspiracy theorist ...

What is nauseating is the tone of purported good intention within these articles, informing folks that if you are related to someone young who died suddenly you should go see a cardiologist to make sure you don’t have an abnormal EKG. 

After it turns out normal, they will assuredly tell you to get vaccinated, an absurdity atop a mountain of absurdities caused by our bio-medical-media industrial complex over the past 2+ years.”

Diseases ‘Suppressed by COVID’ Make Comebacks

Media are also trying to write off increases of other diseases as something other than COVID jab-related. “Diseases Suppressed During COVID Are Coming Back in New and Peculiar Ways,” CNBC reported June 10, 2022.28

The article goes on to discuss how viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 are now “rearing their heads in new and unusual ways.” Influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, tuberculosis and monkeypox have all “spiked and exhibited strange behaviors in recent months,” CNBC notes.

No mention is made, however, of the fact that the COVID jab has been linked to vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency (lowered immune function), rendering you more susceptible to infections and chronic diseases of all kinds, including autoimmune diseases.29 MIT research scientist Stephanie Seneff explains the mechanisms for this in “COVID Vaccines and Neurodegenerative Disease.”

The COVID jab has also been shown to activate latent viruses, including hepatitis C,30cytomegalovirus,31 varicella-zoster32 and herpes viruses.33 Not surprisingly, Moderna is now working on a new vaccine for “latent cytomegalovirus prevention.”34

This is yet another case of a drug company creating a “remedy” against a health problem their own product was responsible for creating in the first place. CNBC, meanwhile, cites “health experts” who attribute lowered immunity to COVID lockdowns, mask wearing and missed childhood vaccinations.35

Amputations of arms, legs, fingers and toes — consequences of post-jab blood clots — are also being written off as something else.36 In this case, media are blaming it on high cholesterol,37 totally ignoring the fact that high cholesterol has been prevalent for decades, and only now are people losing their extremities in shocking numbers.

Spikes in blood clots and strokes, meanwhile, are being blamed on smoking, pregnancy and contraceptives,38 even though blood clots and strokes are among the most common side effects of the COVID jab. Most ridiculous of all, however, is the claim that a “newly-discovered, highly reactive” chemical in the earth’s atmosphere is suspected of triggering heart disease.39

To anyone with half a brain, it’s clear that government authorities and media are doing everything they can to shift blame away from what is the most obvious culprit, namely the COVID shots.

All the diseases and conditions they’re now blaming on everything from cholesterol to mysterious atmospheric chemicals are known side effects of the jab. The elephant in the room is so gigantic, you can’t even get around it anymore. It’s pressing us against the walls.

Nursing Reports From the Frontlines

In his June 13, 2022, Substack article,40 Kory also shares insider information from a senior ICU and ER nurse who suffered blood clotting injuries, spontaneous unstoppable bleeding and cervical lymph node enlargement following her second Pfizer dose.

She filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which has since vanished. The batch numbers for the shots she received were associated with bad neurological responses and clotting. She also lost her hematologist-oncologist to vaccine injury.

While only in his early 40s, he’s now too injured to practice. “He was a ‘true believer’ and in denial until it was him who was the injured patient,” she told Kory.

The major cancer hospital where she works now have caseloads “in the thousands,” she says, whereas before the average caseload was between 250 and 400 in any given quarter. They don’t even have enough beds or infusion space to treat them all, and radiation treatments are backlogged.

All kinds of cancers are showing up — brain, lymph, stomach, pancreas, blood and even EYE cancers, “especially in younger people recently vaxxed.” Strokes are also “way up” in people with no risk factors or comorbidities. In an email to Kory, she wrote:41

“Ask me anything. I'll tell you inside scoop from the floors and suites. This has to stop. They need to admit the fraud and crime and STOP. The liability must be lifted, mandates ended. They KNOW NOW and many KNEW THEN. 

Don't know if you'll even read this, but I follow all of you on substack and Twitter — those not banned yet! — and read ALL the data. I've been a lab rat myself from an issue from a car accident years back — I know the process. So much fraud.”

In a follow-up email, the unnamed nurse continued:

“Lost 4 practitioners to serious side effects of ‘strongly encouraged’ boosters. 2 hospitalized, one in MICU ... All in early 30s to mid-40s. They had no need for boosters ... All had COVID previous, N antibodies fully measurable.”

Cardiac Anomalies Abound

Her colleagues in the cardiac unit also report “many anomalies ... that never existed before,” including massive thrombi that fill the entire artery. Some embalmers have documented this never-before-seen phenomenon.42 They also can barely keep up with the unprecedented number of cardiac arrests. Kory writes:43

“She told me ... that on some night shifts, nurse teams are seeing more cardiac arrests in a single shift than ever before and in unprecedented younger age patients. 

On some shifts, they have had so many that the ‘crash carts’ are rolled straight from one arrest to another because pharmacy, especially on night shifts, are not able to re-stock fast enough. This situation has happened maybe once in my whole career, when two arrests happened on the same floor or unit within a short time period.”

And, while medical staff still are not speaking out publicly, the reality of the situation appears to be dawning inside the hospital walls, in private conversations between staff. Even there, however, nurses speak in code for fear of reprisal, referring to COVID jab injuries only as “that issue.”

The nurse pointed out that, now, the vaccination status is clearly marked at the top of the first screen of the patient’s medical record when the shot is suspected or known to be related to the patient’s “mysterious” or “complex” problem. Perhaps this is a sign that the dissociation from reality may be slowly breaking. I sure hope so.

Sources and References

Warren Buffett Donated about $4 Billion to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust to Further Its Efforts on Eugenicide, Genthanasia and Create Human Dependency on Deadly "Vaccines"

/

From [HERE] Warren Buffett on Tuesday donated about $4 billion to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust and four family charities, part of the billionaire’s pledge to give away nearly all of his net worth.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc., which Buffett has run since 1965, said the donation comprises about 14.4 million of its Class B shares, whose closing price on Tuesday was $277.64.

Eleven million shares will go to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and 1.1 million will go to the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, named for Buffett’s late first wife.

Another 770,000 shares will also go to each of three charities run by Buffett’s children Howard, Susan and Peter: the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, the Sherwood Foundation and the Novo Foundation.

Since 2006, the 91-year-old Buffett has donated more than half of his Berkshire shares, with the donations worth about $45.5 billion at the time they were made.

Despite the donations, Buffett still owns approximately 16% of Berkshire and controls about one-third of its voting power.

Both percentages have been fairly stable in recent years because Berkshire has aggressively repurchased its own stock.

Buffett has built Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire into a more than $600 billion conglomerate, owning dozens of businesses such as the BNSF railroad and Geico auto insurance, and stocks such as Apple Inc. and Bank of America Corp.

He and Bill Gates also pioneered “The Giving Pledge,” where more than 200 people like Michael Bloomberg, Larry Ellison, Carl Icahn, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg committed at least half their fortunes to philanthropy.

Pfizer Has No Plans to Make Its FDA Approved COVID Vax. Unbeknownst to Sheople All Approved COVID Vax Remain UNAVAILABLE and Legally Distinct from Emergency Use Shots, which are Immune from Liability

/

From [HERE] It’s official – Pfizer’s “fully approved” and experimental mRNA vaccine, dubbed “Comirnaty,” was nothing more than a head-fake.

Earlier this week, the notorious experimental vaccine maker quietly submitted an update to the CDC, admitting that its originally licensed “Comirnaty” vaccine will never be distributed for use.

In other words, Pfizer has exclusively been supplying its version of the experimental vaccine that was granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA – aka, zero Pfizer-branded vaccines given in the US have been “fully approved.”

From the Pfizer update, via independent journalist Jordan Schachtel:

“Pfizer received initial FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename. These NDCs will not be manufactured. Only NDCs for the subsequently BLA approved tris-sucrose formulation will be produced.”

The “silent” update, which was posted –  unannounced – on the CDC’s website, comes after months of posturing by Pfizer and US public health officials, who all claimed the vaccine was “fully approved” and, therefore, you should take it.

In reality, there was as much a “fully approved” vaccine as there was proof of bigfoot – but the jab had the credentials it needed. Even more concerningly, the FDA deceptively sent out two letters regarding the separate jabs (Comirnaty and EUA) which helped confuse the public and aided in the fake-news media’s manipulation.

Until the FDA’s announcement in August 2021, Millions of Americans had been hesitant to take the vaccine because of its temporary approval status – as many as 30% of the unvaccinated, according to polling cited by Anthony Fauci at the time. Because of this, the Biden Regime capitalized on the FDA’s decision in an effort to increase uptake and quell vaccine hesitancy, and, sadly, it worked.

Not only did the FDA’s fake approval also serve as the catalyst for a massive wave of mandates, both by Biden federally and by Democrat tyrants alike, but the deceptive move also increased overall vaccine uptake by a massive 36% (minus the mandates), according to one study published in the Journal for American Medicine Association (JAMA).

Unsurprisingly, researchers found that series-completing vaccinations (2nd & 3rd dose etc.) saw the largest increase of all, with a 77% uptick post-‘approval’.

The FDA’s decision also sent shockwaves around the world, compelling hesitant citizens of other western nations to also take the vaccine. Millions were misled by the ‘experts.’ Is that not criminal medical malpractice, at the very, very least?

Unfortunately, any hope of accountability for this is a long shot right now. In addition to the treasonous Biden Regime holding the keys, Pfizer is completely exempt from damages related to its experimental mRNA vaccine thanks to its status under EUA. As Dr. Robert Malone – the inventor of mRNA technology – has said for months, if Pfizer doesn’t give out its ‘fully approved’ version, they keep the immunity, and, that’s exactly what they’ve done.

From Dr. Malone:

“It’s called Comirnaty… and it’s not yet available, they haven’t started manufacturing it or labeling it, and that’s the one that the liability waiver will no longer apply to. So the one that’s actually licensed is not yet available, and when it does become available it will no longer have the liability shield. In the interim, the one that does have the liability shield is the Pfizer product.”

However, fraus omnia corrumpit (fraud corrupts all), as the saying goes. The actions of all parties involved are enough to trash any legal protections afforded to them, so, all we need are some serious people back in DC.

2 New Polls Show Biden at His Lowest Levels: Only 39% Approve and 47% "Strongly Disapprove." Despite Daily Whining by Dems, for the First Time in his Presidency Biden Trails Trump

/

USA TODAY POLL. A new USA TODAY/Suffolk Poll shows the country in a funk and one that sets a problematic political landscape for Democrats in the November elections that are approaching fast.

  • Only 39% of Americans approve of the job Biden is doing as president. A stunning 47% "strongly" disapprove; just 16% "strongly" approve. Academic studies have shown that presidential approval is one of the most reliable predictors of what happens in midterm elections, and a rating this low would traditionally signal significant losses for the president's party.

  • More than 7 in 10, 71%, say the United States is "on the wrong track;" 16% say it's headed in the right direction. Even most Democrats say the country is on the wrong track, 46%-34%. Three of 4 independents and nearly every Republican agree. [MORE]

YAHOO NEWS POLL. From [HERE] As inflation keeps rising and recession fears loom, a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll shows that Joe Biden is currently in the worst shape of his presidency.

The survey of 1,541 U.S. adults, which was conducted from June 10-13, found that if another presidential election were held today, more registered voters say they would cast ballots for Donald Trump (44%) than for Biden (42%) — even though the House Jan. 6 committee has spent the last week linking Trump to what it called a “seditious conspiracy” to overturn the 2020 election and laying the groundwork for possible criminal prosecution.

President Biden outside the White House on Tuesday. (Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

Since Biden took office, no previous Yahoo News/YouGov poll has shown him trailing Trump (though Biden’s most recent leads have been within the margin of error, like this one is for Trump). One year ago, Biden led Trump by 9 percentage points. In 2020, Biden won the White House by more than 7 million votes.

Yet Biden’s job approval rating has been atrophying for much of the last year, and the new survey shows that it has never been weaker. A full 56% of Americans now disapprove of the president’s performance — the highest share to date — while just 39% approve. Three weeks ago, those numbers were 53% and 42%, respectively.

On average, Biden’s job approval scores are now a few points worse than Trump’s were at the parallel stage of his presidency.

Among all Americans, Trump (43%) now has a higher personal favorability rating than Biden (40%) as well. Meanwhile, nearly two-thirds of independents (64%) have an unfavorable opinion of Biden, and just 28% say they would vote for him over Trump.

The bad news for Biden comes as prices continue to increase at the fastest pace in 40 years, upending expectations and overshadowing other concerns. According to the poll, 40% of registered voters (up from 33% last month) now say inflation is “the most important issue to you when thinking about this year’s election” — more than four times the number for any other issue.

Politically, this is crippling for Biden. A full 61% of voters disapprove of the president’s handling of the economy (up from 58% last month), and Republicans now hold a 15-point advantage among voters on the question of which party would do a better job handling the economy (up from 11 points last month).

In recent days, a series of stories questioning whether Biden will run for reelection in 2024 — and quoting concerned Democratic sources — have surfaced in the press. The concern isn’t limited to party officials. Just 21% of Americans — down from 25% three weeks ago, and the lowest number to date — say Biden should run again. But perhaps more strikingly, a greater share of 2020 Biden voters now say he shouldn’t run again (40%) than say he should (37%). Last month, those numbers were reversed.

In contrast, a clear majority of Trump voters (57%) say Trump should mount another bid. Just 21% say he shouldn’t. And while 57% of independents say Trump shouldn’t try to make a comeback in 2024, far more — a full 76% — say the same about Biden.

______________

The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,541 U.S. adults interviewed online from June 10 to 13, 2022. This sample was weighted according to gender, age, race and education based on the American Community Survey, conducted by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, as well as 2020 presidential vote (or nonvote) and voter registration status. Respondents were selected from YouGov’s opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.9%.

Study Finds Racial Bias in Louisiana’s Death Penalty. Cases with white victims—especially those with Black suspects are much more likely to lead to harsher outcomes

/

From [EJI] A new study by leading death penalty researchers looking at the outcomes of homicide cases in Louisiana found that cases in which a Black man was accused of homicide involving a white female victim were more than five times as likely to lead to a final capital charge or a death sentence, compared to cases involving Black suspects and Black victims.

“The Louisiana death penalty system is heavily weighted by a tendency to seek the harshest penalties in those cases with white female victims,” researchers Tim Lyman, Frank R. Baumgartner, and Glenn L. Pierce determined. “Our powerful and consistent findings of racial and gender-based disparities hold in a multivariate analysis and are inconsistent with the equal protection of the law or any common understanding of equality or justice.”

For Race and Gender Disparities in Capitally-Charged Louisiana Homicide Cases, 1976-2014, published in the Southern University Law Review, the researchers reviewed more than 6,500 homicides in Louisiana from 1976 through 2014. Of those, prosecutors filed capital charges in 1,822 homicide cases and later reduced those charges in all but 385 cases. Ultimately, 107 cases resulted in death sentences.

The study found dramatic changes in racial characteristics as cases moved through the filters of the capital prosecution process.

Cases with white victims—especially those with Black suspects1 —are much more likely to lead to harsher outcomes, the authors wrote. Homicides with Black suspects and white victims were relatively rare, comprising just 11.4% of all homicides. But 41% of all death sentences were imposed on Black defendants in cases with white victims.

In contrast, as the researchers illustrated in the chart below, crimes with Black suspects and Black victims get winnowed down at each step of the process, from 62.7% of all homicides to just 26.2% of death sentences.

The findings are consistent with prior studies by the study authors and other established researchers that show “a strong and persistent pattern of disparities” in Louisiana’s death penalty and demonstrate that these disparities are strongly correlated with the victim’s race and gender, the authors wrote.

The race of the victim played a particularly salient role in outcomes. Having a white victim doubled the probability of a death sentence for a white suspect, the study found. Black suspects in cases with white victims were 8.6 times more likely to be sentenced to death than those suspected of killing a Black victim.

But while both Black and white defendants were more likely to be sentenced to death when the victim was white than when the victim was Black, cases with white victims and Black defendants were almost three times more likely than cases with white victims and white defendants to end with a death sentence.

The new study also examined the impact of race at earlier stages of capital prosecutions, starting with initial charges. It found that “the decision to bring capital charges, even if they are later reduced or dropped, is subject to strong disparities based on racial factors.”

Indeed, cases with Black suspects and white victims were 2.4 times more likely to have charges of first-degree murder than cases with Black suspects and Black victims, and were twice as likely to have a charge of first-degree murder as cases with white suspects and white victims.

From initial charges stage to the final charging decision made before trial starts or before a plea agreement is accepted, the study found that homicides with Black suspects and Black victims have about a 10% chance of proceeding to final capital charges. But that chance increases to 40% in cases where a Black male is accused of killing a white female victim, even when other variables are held constant.

Overall, crimes with white victims have much higher rates of final capital charging than crime with Black victims, the researchers found. [MORE]

First Circuit Court of Appeals Vacates Black Man's Murder Conviction because the Only Black Juror was Unlawfully Struck from the Jury

/

From [HERE] During jury selection in a murder trial of a Rhode Island man - a Black man - the only Black prosective juror was excused.

Juror 103: Judge, I work at a state hospital and I'm concerned that, if I vote guilty, I'll get blowback at work from patients who are inmates. But my fear will not affect my verdict and I can "absolutely" be a fair and impartial juror.

Prosecutor: We want to strike this juror using a peremptory challenge because Juror 103, being Black, is concerned that if he holds the Black defendant guilty, he'll get blowback at work.

Man: Objection!

Trial judge: Objection overruled. Prosecutor's reason is race-neutral. No Batson violation.

R.I. Supreme Court: Agreed. Sounds like a race-neutral explanation to us.

First Circuit(link is external): But not to us. Quite frankly, the Batson violation "leaps of the page". The prosecutor's reason was inherently discriminatory and not race-neutral. Retry the defendant within 90 days or let him go.

The case is Porter v. Coyne-Fague(link is external), 21-1333 (1st Cir. May 31, 2022).

Bexar County Liberal DA is Still Reviewing, Sorting Thru Lies, Bullshitting 1 Week After a San Antonio Cop Murdered a 13 Year Old Latino Child by Wildly Shooting Into a Car Filled w/Unarmed Teens

/

From [HERE] A lawyer representing the family of a 13-year-old boy who was killed by a San Antonio police officer earlier this month called for the officer’s arrest and indictment.

Lee Merritt said it is clear in video of the shooting that there was an “unjustified use of force” by officer Stephen Ramos when he shot Andre Hernandez Jr. while the teen was inside a car with two other teenagers. Andre died from his injuries at a hospital. Ramos has been placed on paid administrative duty. 

“Stephen Ramos committed a crime on June 3 when he shot without provocation or without a proper justification into a vehicle full of children wounding and killing AJ Hernandez,” Merritt said on Tuesday. “Although we understand the investigation is ongoing, when there exists probable cause that a crime has occurred in the jurisdiction, the prosecutor’s office has the authority to issue arrest warrants.”

In a statement to NBC News, the district attorney’s office said the “incident is under an internal investigation by San Antonio police who will hand over their findings to the Bexar County District Attorney’s office.” The office said its civil rights division “will do a thorough review of the incident and then present it to a Grand Jury, which will determine whether there is sufficient evidence to send the case to a trial court.”

Merritt said Ramos should be charged with murder because pointing a “weapon at a 13-year-old suspect who represented no threat to anyone and pulling the trigger is consistent with a murder charge or some level of homicide indictment.” 

San Antonio City Attorney Andy Segovia fired back at Merritt's assessment.

"Of course without waiting for the facts, Mr. Merritt will say the shooting was not justified, he is advocating for his client," Segovia said in a statement. "We also expect any information shared publicly by Mr. Merritt concerning the video will be calculated to advance his perspective."

According to earlier police statements, Andre intentionally crashed the car he was driving into a police vehicle, prompting Ramos to shoot into the teen’s car because he feared other officers would be struck.

Suit Says Instead of Taking Cedric Lofton to Mental Evaluation KS Cops Put the 135lb Black Teen in a WRAP Straitjacket and Took Him to Jail where Authorities Piled On Top of Him, Crushed Him To Death

/

“Y’all are here to protect me, right?” said Cedric Lofton. Dr. Blynd explained: "The child who is taught to believe the law will be his protection is the child who will become the victim of its own beliefs."

From [HERE] Y’all are here to protect me, right?” The family of Cedric Lofton has filed a lawsuit in federal court following his death in September of 2021.

“More than anything we want to see prosecution. We want to show That you can’t get away with this. That the police can’t get away with what they did,” said Marquan Teetz.

The lawsuit filed in federal court aims to hold individual officers, supervisors and both Wichita and Sedgwick counties responsible for Lofton’s death.

Attorneys and activists called for a separate Department of Justice investigation into what happened. The complaint overview states,

“17-year-old Cedric Lofton is dead because of the actions, inaction, conscious disregard, willful and wanton, and depraved behavior of officers in Sedgwick County and the Wichita Police Department. This is a civil rights action to recover for Cedric’s tragic, unnecessary, and untimely death.”

The complaint sets forth the following facts:

In the early morning hours of September 24, 2021, Cedric returned to his foster home after leaving without notice a day earlier. Cedric’s grandmother had recently passed away and upon Cedric’s return, his foster father was concerned about Cedric’s mental health.

Seeking guidance with concern, Cedric’s foster father called the Kansas Department of Children and Families (“DCF”). DCF told him to call the police and to not let Cedric in the home. The purpose of this instruction was to obtain a mental health evaluation and treatment for Cedric. This is why the Wichita police were called. Cedric had committed no crime; he was a child returning innocently home.

WPD officers arrived and encountered Cedric outside his foster home. Cedric was tired and afraid. He showed no signs of violence and presented no harm or danger. It was immediately clear that he was experiencing a mental health crisis, telling WPD officers that he was worried people were trying to “kill” him and that all he wanted to do was to go inside his home and go to sleep. Cedric asked the officers, “Y’all are here to protect me, right?”

This foster child needed help. But rather than provide it, WPD officers physically confronted him, unnecessarily escalated a benign scenario, arrested him, and entombed him in a WRAP restraint system — effectively a full-body straitjacket. The use of the WRAP predictably and inexcusably exacerbated Cedric’s fear and paranoia.

Worse, WPD did not then take Cedric to a hospital for mental health evaluation and treatment. Instead, they brought him to Sedgwick County’s Juvenile Intake and Assessment Center (“JIAC”)—a kind of juvenile detention—and locked him in a holding room still in the WRAP restraint. In other words, even though the entire point of WPD’s involvement was to get Cedric help and even though he had committed no crime, WPD refused to obtain help and treated Cedric like a violent criminal. This despite the fact that one officer admitted: “For me, I think we should have taken [Cedric] to [the hospital at] St. Joe [for treatment].”

Worse still, when confronted with JIAC’s intake questioning about whether Cedric required medical treatment, WPD intentionally falsified their response and swore that he needed no such treatment, knowing that was exactly what was needed and required. Indeed, a JIAC intake officer witnessed a WPD officer change his response to the intake form when he learned it would trigger WPD’s obligation to transport Cedric for treatment. As such, the officer prioritized his own convenience at the expense of this child’s welfare. And JIAC officials knowingly permitted it.

Within a few hours, Cedric was dead. Following a brief altercation, Cedric died after several JIAC officers forced him to the floor in the prone position and pinned him on his stomach for 39 uninterrupted minutes until he stopped breathing. The smiling child photographed above was condemned to die hooked to life-supporting tubes in a hospital bed, shown here:

Cedric posed no threat to anyone — not least of which the five able-bodied, adult officers who cycled-in and out of the room during Cedric’s slow death. These JIAC officers perpetrated a prolonged and abhorrent case of excessive force on a 135-pound, shoeless, shackled, and unarmed juvenile in the obvious throes of a mental health crisis.

Months later, the Sedgwick County medical examiner determined that Cedric was killed as a result of this incident and concluded that Cedric’s death was a “homicide.”

Governor Kelly directed DFC to “thoroughly investigate his case to ensure policy and procedures were properly followed, and to determine if these procedures need to be changed or refined.” The Sedgewick County prosecutor declined to press charges saying Kansas “Stand Your Ground” law allows people to protect themselves.

At least in regard to white citizens, “Stand your ground” law would be inapplicable here as “A person is justified in the use of deadly force under circumstances where a person reasonably believes that such use of deadly force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to such person or a third person.” [MORE] Here, no facts have been alleged that the black teen posed an imminent threat of death to jail authorities as he was crushed to death for 39 minutes while prone on the floor.

Chicago Strawboss says the White Cop who Dragged a Black Woman Out of a Car by Her Hair and Sat on Her Neck Should Be Fired. The Other 8 Cops Who Stop, Seized and Searched w/o Probable Cause Not Fired

/

From [HERE] Chicago police Superintendent Black Strawboss David Brown has filed disciplinary charges with the Chicago Police Board against an officer who is accused of dragging a woman by her hair out of a car and kneeling on her neck in 2020.

Brown this month recommended that Officer David Laskus be fired from the Police Department and charged him with violating various rules, including disobedience of an order, maltreatment of any person, engaging in any unjustified verbal or physical altercation with any person, making a false report and unnecessary use or display of a weapon, according to police board records.

The case will now go to the board, which will decide whether Laskus should be fired. An attorney for the officer could not immediately be reached late Wednesday.

Around 3 p.m. May 31, 2020, Laskus detained Mia Wright near the Brickyard Mall, 2600 N. Narragansett Ave., without probable cause, according to the records. He used “unreasonable force” by grabbing her hair, pulling her to the ground and kneeling on her neck while she was on the ground. He also damaged the car she was in by breaking its windows with his baton.

A relative who was with Wright took a video of the arrest. Wright was charged with disorderly conduct, though the charge was later dropped.

In March, the Chicago City Council authorized a $1,675,000 taxpayer-funded settlement to be shared by Wright and four others who were with her that day after they sued the city in 2020, alleging excessive force by police.

Wright and family members had said when they arrived at the mall, they discovered that it was closed due to civil unrest that occurred across the city in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder by a Minneapolis police officer.

Officers said they thought some members of Wright’s group were attempting to break into a store at the mall to steal goods, according to city lawyer Caroline Fronczak, but the officers also acknowledged nobody in the group matched the descriptions of the suspected looters.