Supreme Court shields border agents from lawsuits over excessive force

From [HERE] and [HERE] The Supreme Court on Wednesday shielded federal border patrol agents from being sued over allegations of unreasonable searches and the use of excessive force.

In a 6-3 decision, the court’s conservatives said that in nearly all instances federal agents may be not held liable for violating constitutional rights unless Congress has authorized such lawsuits for damages.

“Our cases have made clear that, in all but the most unusual circumstances, prescribing a cause of action is a job for Congress, not the courts,” wrote Justice Clarence Thomas for the court in the majority opinion.

While the Constitution sets out the rights of individuals against the government — including protection “against unreasonable searches and seizures” — it did not say how those rights were to be enforced.

After the Civil War, Congress authorized lawsuits against state and local officials, including the police, who violate the rights of people that are “secured by the Constitution.” But no such broad measure authorizes lawsuits against federal agents.

The case before the court arose from a bed-and-breakfast named the Smuggler’s Inn in Blaine, Wash.. Part of the property abuts the U.S. border with Canada, and border patrol agents watched it constantly. They said they had seen people who walked across the border to the inn.

In 2014, inn owner Robert Boule clashed with border patrol agent Erik Egbert over a guest from Turkey who had raised suspicions. The inn owner said the agent pushed him and gathered papers involving the guest, and Boule later sued Egbert for violating the 4th Amendment.

The 9th Circuit Court allowed the suit to proceed, but the high court reversed that ruling in Egbert vs. Boule.

The three liberals — Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen G. Breyer and Elena Kagan — dissented.

The decision “contravenes precedent and will strip many more individuals who suffer injuries at the hands of other federal officers,” Sotomayor wrote.

Hidden Pfizer trial data shows that ALL “vaccinated” women in pregnancy lost their unborn babies

From (Natural News) A lawsuit filed by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency produced documents from Pfizer showing that its Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” caused all of the pregnant mothers on whom it was tested to miscarry.

Entitled, “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports,” a report from Pfizer describing events reported up to February 2021 – you can download that report – shows that not a single pregnant woman who took the Pfizer jabs delivered a live baby.

Table 6 of the report, titled “Missing Information,” reveals under the first topic of “Use in pregnancy and lactation” the following statement:

“Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).”

Taken at face value, this would suggest that of 270 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions, five “outcomes pending,” two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one normal outcome. However, there is also that tricky statement: “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”

“So really we have no idea what happened with 243 (5 + 238) of the pregnancies of these injected women; they have just not been included in the report,” reported Principia Scientific International.

“What we do know is that of 27 reported pregnancies (270 subtract 243), there are 28 dead babies! This appears to mean that someone was pregnant with twins and that 100 percent of the unborn babies died.”

Pfizer’s covid shots are ending human life

It is possible that the five “outcomes pending” may have resulted in a normal delivery. This means that, at best, only 87.5 percent of babies living inside “fully vaccinated” wombs died as opposed to 100 percent.

Either way, this is still a horrific outcome. No babies should be dying as a result of these injections if they are really “safe and effective” as claimed, and yet they appear to kill most or all unborn babies.

It turns out that Pfizer tried to cover this all up with an article called “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine,” which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on Dec. 31, 2020.

This paper tries to cover up the fact that in the first trimester of pregnancy, the Pfizer injection caused 82 percent of those who received it to miscarry. The Canadian Covid Care Alliance reported on this study the following month, exposing it as a total sham.

“The Pfizer-friendly study is a complete sham,” reported Principia Scientific International. “[I]t is replete with misrepresentation and deceptive methods.”

“These injections are criminal; period,” the group added, emphasizing the fact that nobodyshould be taking them.

The World Council for Health has put together a Cease and Desist Declaration that is being served to all governments, clinics, hospitals, medical regulatory bodies, doctors, nurses, politicians and “anyone participating in any way in the manufacture, shipping, distribution, promotion, or administration of these injections.”

“The message to anyone involved in these injection campaigns is ‘Stop now. This is a crime. You will be criminally and civilly responsible. The cat is out of the bag. Justice is coming,'” PSI explains about the initiative.

“Please keep photos and notes of to whom, when and where the declaration and notice is served. We are finalizing more resources on the World Council for Health web site to upload these photos and details.”

Lawmakers Call for Probe Into Deadly Federal Prison in Thomson, Ill. Authorities purposefully housed prisoners w/people they knew would be violent, subjected them to painful restraints for hours/days

From [HERE] On Thursday, three members of Congress called for an immediate federal investigation into violence and abuse at the U.S. penitentiary in Thomson, Ill., prompted by reporting by The Marshall Project and NPR. 

Sens. Dick Durbin and Tammy Duckworth and Rep. Cheri Bustos, all Democrats from Illinois, wrote in a letter to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz that it was "imperative" he look into allegations that staff purposefully housed prisoners with people they knew would be violent, and subjected them to painful restraints for hours or sometimes days. 

"If these reports prove accurate, they describe conduct that would almost certainly contravene numerous [Bureau of Prisons] policies, as well as infringing the civil rights of individuals in BOP custody and possibly violating federal criminal statutes," wrote the lawmakers, who called the report "disturbing." Lawmakers also asked Horowitz to look into the role staffing shortages have played in conditions at Thomson, which have been a serious problem since its opening.

Five men have been killed at Thomson since 2019, making the facility one of the deadliest federal prisons in the country. On top of the threat from other prisoners, dozens of incarcerated people at Thomson said they faced frequent abuse at the hands of guards. Many said in letters, lawsuits and interviews that they were shackled in cuffs so tight they left scars, and often went without food, water or a toilet. 

A spokesperson for the Bureau of Prisons said in an emailed statement that he could not comment on individual cases or pending lawsuits, but that allegations of misconduct were "taken seriously" and referred to the Inspector General for investigation.

Sen. Durbin will also soon lead a congressional hearing on "the continued overuse of solitary confinement and restricted housing in BOP, including at USP Thomson," according to an email from his spokesperson. Data provided by his office shows 7.8% of federal prisoners are currently in restricted housing. 

The Thomson facility was built by the Illinois state prison system but later bought by the Justice Department at the urging of Durbin, Duckworth, Bustos and other lawmakers. They said the new penitentiary would ease dangerous overcrowding in other federal prisons and be an economic boon for the region. Those members of Congress later raised concerns about persistent understaffing at the facility and pushed for retention bonuses for staff. 

Thomson is home to the Special Management Unit, a notorious prison program meant to house some of the system's most dangerous and volatile people — though many have ended up there who don't fit that description. The unit was previously housed at the penitentiary in Lewisburg, Pa. A 2016 investigation by The Marshall Project and NPR found the unit was plagued by frequent assaults, sparked by locking two people in a small cell for nearly 24 hours a day, a practice known as double-celled solitary confinement. When prisoners tried to reject a dangerous cellmate, many said they were locked in painful shackles until they relented.

In response to the 2016 stories, 37 civil rights groups called on the Justice Department to launch a federal investigation. Then in 2018, the Bureau of Prisons closed the unit at Lewisburg, and moved it to Thomson. Dozens of men incarcerated at Thomson report that the same problems and abuses followed to the new facility.

The Bureau of Prisons has been under heightened pressure and scrutiny after reports of sexual abuse, violence and other corruption. In January, agency director Michael Carvajal announced his resignation, after Sen. Durbin and others called for his firing. The Senate has also launched a new group focused on increasing oversight of federal prisons. 

The Justice Department Inspector General is an independent entity tasked with providing oversight of department programs, including federal prisons, and investigating allegations against department employees. 

In an email, a Justice Department spokesperson said the department was committed to investigating allegations of staff misconduct. "We will not hesitate to impose appropriate consequences for misconduct at all levels, including through criminal prosecution, as well through the Equal Employment Opportunity Office and the Office of the Inspector General," they wrote.

The Bureau of Prisons responded in an email that it "is fully cooperating on active investigations. As specific allegations of staff misconduct arise, they are referred for investigation."

Haiti’s Forced Payments to Enslavers Cost Economy $21 Billion, The New York Times Found

From [EJI] It was big news in the U.S. when enslaved people in Haiti rose up and wrested their freedom from France in 1791. Haiti was founded as an independent nation in 1804, striking such fear in the hearts of American enslavers that the U.S. did not officially recognize Haiti until 1862, after the start of the Civil War.

What happened next is less well known in the U.S. today. Two decades after declaring independence, the French forced formerly enslaved Haitians at gunpoint to pay reparations to the people who had enslaved them.

Reporters for The New York Times tracked each payment Haiti made over the course of the 64 years that followed and calculated that the nation paid about $560 million in today’s dollars to satisfy this ransom and the loans they were forced to take to pay it.

For generations, Haiti’s revenues went to service its “double debt,” depriving its people of schools, hospitals, and basic infrastructure and pushing the country into a cycle of debt, poverty, and underdevelopment that persists today.

Had that money stayed in the Haitian economy over the last 200 years, The Times details in The Ransom and its accompanying bibliography, it would have added at least $21 billion over time.

And that’s the conservative estimate. Modeling based on the growth rate of Haiti’s Latin American neighbors suggests the payments diverted to France cost Haiti as much as $115 billion. If Haiti had not been forced to pay the people who had enslaved its citizens, The Times reported, its per capita income in 2018 could have been almost six times as large.

Building on more than a century of research by historians, economists, and others, The Times also made new connections about how the wealth stolen from Haiti was used to fuel the nascent French banking system—and to build the Eiffel Tower.

The bank that made the most money off the loan Haiti was forced to take in 1875 was Crédit Industriel et Commercial, which took millions of dollars in fees and interest from Haiti’s treasury at a time when it was helping finance Paris’s iconic monument to liberty. C.I.C.’s “executives and investors made so much money off Haiti that their profits sometimes exceeded Haiti’s entire public works budget,” The Times reported.

The head of Crédit Mutuel, a European financial conglomerate that bought C.I.C. in 1998, told The Times days after it published “The Ransom” that he will finance a team to investigate and expose the bank’s full history. “This is a very sad illustration of the meaning of colonization and financial colonization,” Nicolas Théry said.

The Times also reported that, although the payments were supposed to go to individual property owners and their descendants, the French government took $8.5 million in today’s currency from Haiti.

U.S. banks likewise extracted great wealth from Haiti. After National City Bank, Citigroup’s predecessor, and other Wall Street banks pushed hard for the U.S. to take over Haiti, the U.S. invaded in 1915, took over the national bank, and, as The Times wrote, “installed a puppet government, dissolved parliament at gunpoint, entrenched segregation, forced Haitians to build roads for no pay, killed protesters and rewrote the nation’s Constitution, enabling foreigners to own property for the first time since independence.”

The 19-year-long military occupation—one of the longest in U.S. history—was justified by Secretary of State Robert Lansing as a civilizing mission to end the “anarchy, savagery and oppression” in Haiti. The U.S. had to take over the impoverished nation because, as Mr. Lansing wrote, “the African race are devoid of any capacity for political organization.” [MORE]

Black Man on Tennessee Death-Row Appeals Ruling Denying Him Relief Despite Agreement by District Attorney that He is Intellectually Disabled

From [DPIC] A Tennessee death-row prisoner who county prosecutors agree is intellectually disabled is appealing a trial judge’s refusal to vacate his death sentence under a law designed to provide condemned prisoners a mechanism to enforce the constitutional prohibition against executing individuals with intellectual disability.

On June 1, 2022, lawyers for Byron Black filed an appeal with the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals challenging Senior Judge Walter Kurtz’s ruling that Black could not take advantage of an April 2021 state law that closed a procedural loophole that had prevented prisoners from presenting evidence that they are ineligible for the death penalty because of intellectually disability. 

In a statement issued in conjunction with the filing, Black’s lead counsel, assistant federal defender Kelley Henry, criticized the lower court’s ruling. “[T]he trial court’s refusal to let [Black] prove [his intellectual disability] under current law, if allowed to stand, would permit the State to knowingly and willfully violate the law by executing someone who is intellectually disabled,” she said.

Black’s lawyers and the Davidson County District Attorney’s Office agree that Black is intellectually disabled. However, when Black filed his unopposed petition to vacate his death sentence, Kurtz dismissed it on procedural grounds not raised by prosecutors, ruling that Black could not seek relief under the new law because his prior claim of intellectual disability had been denied in 2004. Black argued — and county prosecutors agreed — that this prior claim was not properly adjudicated because it was reviewed on an inadequate evidentiary record and decided under standards for determining intellectual disability that the U.S. Supreme Court later struck down as unconstitutionally restrictive.

Black’s brief argues that the Tennessee legislature never intended for courts to deny death-row prisoners constitutionally appropriate review of their intellectual disability claims on the grounds that they had previously been provided constitutionally inappropriate review. “[T]he legislature created the new cause of action to place all death row defendants on the same legal playing field as those defendants currently facing capital charges,” the brief says. “Everyone gets one fair bite at the apple – one that complies with constitutional mandates. It cannot be that the legislature intended to punish diligent death row defendants who were denied a constitutional adjudication of their claim because they acted too early. Such would be the very definition of arbitrary and capricious.”

Further, Black argues, county prosecutors have acknowledged that Black’s intellectual disability claim was litigated in 2004 on a materially deficient evidentiary record. Henry noted that prosecution expert witness, Dr. Susan Vaught, who previously testified that Black did not meet the criteria for intellectual disability, changed her opinion and now agreed that Black is intellectually disabled “based on new information in his record, the ability to review his performance at multiple points in time across multiple practitioners, changes in scientific knowledge and standards of practice, and changes in diagnostic criteria.”

Black notes that Davidson County prosecutors stipulated that he “would be found intellectually disabled were a hearing to be conducted” and conceded that his death sentence should be reformed to life imprisonment, even after the trial court raised the issue of whether the prior court ruling on intellectual disability barred Black from seeking relief under the new law. The prosecution “knowingly and intelligently waived” any procedural defenses, Black argues, and the trial court’s independent assertion of a defense that was explicitly waived violated due process.

Although Davidson County District Attorney Glenn Funk does not oppose Black’s intellectual disability claim, the state attorney general’s office and not local prosecutors will handle the appeal.Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery has repeatedly butted heads with Funk in the past, and Slatery called for legislation, since adopted, that would allow the attorney general to seek to replace a district attorney in a case if he believes that the locally elected district attorney is refusing to enforce the law.

On September 20, 2019, Slatery asked the Tennessee Supreme Court to set execution dates for an unprecedented nine death-row prisoners, including Black and three others from Davidson County. That same day, he filed a motion in the appeals court to invalidate a court-approved plea deal between Funk and former death-row prisoner Abu-Ali Abdur’Rahman and to reactivate a warrant for Abdur’Rahman’s execution. 

Black’s execution was scheduled for October 8, 2020, but was stayed by the Tennessee Supreme Courton June 12, 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic and rescheduled for April 8, 2021. On December 3, 2020, the court again stayed Black’s execution because of the pandemic. He was again scheduled to be executed on August 18, 2022 but Governor Bill Lee halted all executions in Tennesseein May 2022 after learning of irregularities in the state’s lethal injection procedures. 

It is not clear what position Slatery will take on Black’s appeal.

Supreme Ct Deny Death Penalty Review: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel During a Murder Trial Not a Good Enough Reason to Stop Texas Authoritarians from Murdering a Black Man

From [HERE] and [HERE] Terence Andrus’ childhood was horrific. From an early age, he faced heinous physical abuse and neglect at home; as a teenager, he was tormented by both peers and guards in juvenile detention. Andrus had a right to present this evidence to the jury at his capital trial, but his lawyer declined, ensuring that his client would be condemned to death. In 2020, the Supreme Court held that this failure, among others, violated the Sixth Amendment guarantee of effective counsel. Then, in an extraordinary act of defiance, five Republican judges on a lower court rejected SCOTUS’ finding, insisting that the higher court got it wrong. These judges all but dared the Supreme Court to bring them into line.

On Monday, the court refused. Instead, it rewarded this insubordination by allowing the lower court’s ruling to stand. This decision is devastating for Andrus, who will likely be put to death without vindicating the constitutional rights that were so egregiously violated at trial. It is also a disturbing signal to the lower courts that disobedience of binding precedent is permissible when it aligns with the majority’s hard-right ideology. There can be no “settled law” when SCOTUS lets rogue judges flout its own rulings and get away with it.

The story of Andrus’ case is tragic. His mother engaged in sex work and drug use when he was a child, selling and abusing drugs in front of her kids. She also beat her children with a board. At times, she disappeared for extended periods and left her kids without supervision or food. Her boyfriends were often violent, beating her and her children. In addition, one boyfriend raped Andrus’ younger half-sister. As a preteen, Andrus was diagnosed with affective psychosis. Sent into Texas’ notorious juvenile corrections system at age 16, Andrus was dosed with massive quantities of psychotropic drugs that were inappropriate for his condition and locked up in solitary confinement nearly 80 times. At the age of 20, during a carjacking he attempted while high on PCP, Andrus killed two people. Prosecutors charged him with capital murder.

In Texas, defendants can only be sentenced to death if the jury unanimously agrees that prosecutors have proved they pose a future danger to society. The state puts forth “aggravating evidence” showing why the defendant deserves to be killed; the defendants, in turn, have a constitutional right to present “mitigating evidence” showing why they deserve to live. Andrus’ attorney, James Crowley, had a duty to investigate and present mitigating evidence to the jury, and if he had looked, he would’ve found a mountain of it.

But he didn’t look. Rather, Crowley called Andrus’ mother to the stand, who lied about her son’s allegedly peaceful upbringing. Crowley then failed to rebut prosecutors’ aggravating evidence—even though they accused Andrus of committing a different violent crime of which he was probably innocent. Predictably, the jury interpreted this one-sided presentation as evidence that Andrus posed a threat of future violence and recommended the death penalty

Over the following years, Andrus obtained new lawyers who gathered ample mitigating evidence that never made it to the jury. They secured a hearing before a trial court, which ordered a new sentencing proceeding, finding that Crowley provided ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which is made up of elected Republicans, overruled the trial court, declaring that Crowley did not fall “below an objective standard of reasonableness.”

This decision was too much for the Supreme Court, which threw out the Texas court’s ruling in 2020 by a 6–3 vote. (The majority opinion was not signed; Justices Sam Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch dissented.) “There is no squaring that conduct, certainly when examined alongside counsel’s other shortfalls, with objectively reasonable judgment,” the majority concluded. The Sixth Amendment was violated here.

But that wasn’t the end of the case: To get relief for ineffective counsel, a defendant must show that their ineffective counsel “prejudiced” them—meaning there’s a “reasonable probability” that it affected the outcome. SCOTUS suggested that Andrus was “prejudiced,” since this mitigating evidence probably would have convinced at least one juror to spare his life. It then sent the case back down so the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals could apply its decision.

That’s not what the Texas court did. Instead, Judge Sharon Keller penned a belligerent 5–4 decision criticizing SCOTUS for questioning her own court’s work. Keller, who opposes freeing or compensating innocent people who are wrongly convicted, told the majority it was incorrect: The mitigating evidence that SCOTUS found “compelling,” she wrote, was actually “not particularly compelling.” Meanwhile, the aggravating evidence that SCOTUS found so weak and threadbare was, in her view, “strong” and “extensive.”

Keller would not even accept the justices’ bottom-line holding that, as a matter of law, Andrus received ineffective counsel: She pointedly referred to “alleged” failures of counsel that SCOTUS “believed” it had identified, then explained why she believed the higher court was mistaken. Based on this rejection of precedent, Keller found that Andrus faced no prejudice and upheld his capital sentence. Four judges dissented, writing that while they also thought SCOTUS got it wrong, they had no power to overrule it from below.

Mallory Nicholson’s Wrongful Conviction Vacated. Black Man Locked Up 21yrs after Getting the Niggarmarole; Misidentified by White Victims, White Prosecutors Withheld Evidence, White Jury Ignored Alibi

From [IP] District Court Judge Chika Anyiam granted the Dallas County district attorney’s motion to dismiss Mallory Nicholson’s 1982 burglary and sexual assault charges based on newly discovered evidence of his innocence that the State had withheld at his original trial. Today’s action by the court officially exonerates Mr. Nicholson of this crime after 40 years. 

Just over a year ago, Judge Anyiam recommended that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals grant Mr. Nicholson’s habeas corpus petition and vacate his conviction. Five months later, in November 2021, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted Mr. Nicholson’s petition based on newly discovered exculpatory evidence that had never been disclosed to Mr. Nicholson’s lawyers during his original trial.

Mr. Nicholson had spent 21 years in prison for crimes he did not commit and had been forced to register as a sex offender since 2003, when he was released on parole. In 2019, at the Innocence Project’s request, Cynthia Garza, chief of the Dallas County District Attorney’s Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU), and Holly Dozier agreed to review Mr. Nicholson’s case. During their reinvestigation, they discovered that the State had withheld key evidence at trial that pointed to an alternative suspect and demonstrated inconsistencies in the victims’ identifications of Mr. Nicholson. Under the United States Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, the State must disclose such favorable evidence to the defense and vacate convictions, like Mr. Nicholson’s, that involve Brady violations.

Mr. Nicholson was arrested for burglary and the sexual assault of two children in June 1982. No physical evidence connected him to the crime and he has steadfastly maintained his innocence for decades. At trial, he presented strong alibi evidence to support the fact that he had been with family at his wife’s funeral, which took place 45 minutes outside of Dallas at the time of the crimes.

Based on the discovery of the undisclosed exculpatory evidence, the CIU agreed that Mr. Nicholson was entitled to a new trial. In addition to the Brady violations, the case was also marred by eyewitness misidentification and racial bias. 

“Today, the criminal legal system acknowledges what Mr. Nicholson has known and maintained for the last 40 years — he had nothing to do with this crime. Mr. Nicholson has spent the last 40 years enduring the horror of a wrongful conviction. He spent 21 years locked in prison and for the last 20 years, has been forced to register as a sex offender, which led to him being ostracized by his community — all for a crime he did not commit,” said Innocence Project Attorney Adnan Sultan, who represents Mr. Nicholson. “Today, Mr. Nicholson has finally received justice thanks to the Dallas County district attorney, the CIU, and their work uncovering this Brady evidence and recognizing the misconduct of the trial prosecutors in this case.” 

Mr. Nicholson is also represented by Gary Udashen of Udashen Anton. “D.A. Creuzot’s actions in this case represent significant progress over the last 40 years in how prosecutions are handled in Dallas,”  said Mr. Udashen. “Today, we would hope that Mallory Nicholson would not be arrested, prosecuted, or convicted — and that any prosecutor handling this case would ensure that evidence showing someone other than Mr. Nicholson committed this offense would be fully disclosed to his attorneys.”

Mr. Nicholson is now officially eligible for compensation for the years he lost to his wrongful conviction.

The Background: Witness Misidentification 

On June 12, 1982, two boys, 7- and 9-year-old cousins, were approached by a young man who offered them $5 to help him enter an apartment through a window. Once inside, the man stole several items and sexually assaulted both children. The boys told their aunt, who called the police, and the cousins were taken to Parkland Hospital for sexual assault examinations.

Both boys initially told police and the examining doctor that they had been assaulted by a Black 14-year-old. They also provided the attacker’s nickname to police, who later learned that the attacker lived near the crime scene.  

Two days after the assault, police drove one of the victims to the crime scene. On the way, the boy saw 35-year-old Mallory Nicholson standing in front of an apartment building with friends and claimed he was the person who had committed the crime. 

The following day, police showed the other victim a photo lineup, which included Mr. Nicholson. While the victim did not identify Mr. Nicholson at the time, his mother later called detectives and claimed her son had recognized the person who had committed the crime but had been afraid to point him out. Police put Mr. Nicholson in a live lineup the next day, and both victims identified him. Even though Mr. Nicholson had been at his wife’s funeral on the day of the crime, police arrested him and charged him with burglary and sexual assault. Eyewitness misidentification, as in this case, has contributed to approximately 63% of the 232 wrongful convictions that the Innocence Project has helped overturn. 

At trial, the boys claimed for the first time that the attacker had told them he had been in a hurry because he had had to attend his wife’s funeral. The State argued that this was a distinct fact, unique to Mr. Nicholson, which proved guilt.

Throughout the trial, the defense maintained that the boys had misidentified Mr. Nicholson as the person who committed the crime. It also presented numerous alibi witnesses who confirmed Mr. Nicholson had been at his wife’s funeral with friends and family in the hours after the crime occurred. Despite the strength of this evidence, Mr. Nicholson was convicted and sentenced to 55 years for the assaults and eight years for burglary.

Brady Evidence

In this case, the favorable evidence which the State failed to disclose to Mr. Nicholson’s defense counsel included:

• Five police reports documenting conversations the victims had had with police in which they identified their attacker by name as someone other than Mr. Nicholson. The reports were written by a police officer who was never called by the State as a witness despite his role in the investigation.

• The sexual assault report written by the doctor who examined the victims, which documented their descriptions of the attacker as a 14-year-old Black male.

• Handwritten interview notes from prosecuting attorneys listing physical characteristics of the attacker which were inconsistent with Mr. Nicholson’s appearance at the time of the crime in critical ways.

• Grand jury testimony from one of the victims in which he failed to say anything about the attacker being in a hurry because he had to attend his wife’s funeral. This was a critical omission, which defense attorneys could have used to discredit the victim at trial.

• Handwritten interview notes from the prosecuting attorneys that stated multiple times that the mother and grandmother of one of the victims knew Mr. Nicholson’s wife, and had been aware of her death and funeral date. Had the defense been privy to this information, they could have challenged the State’s argument that the victims’ statements about the attacker’s need to attend his wife’s funeral had been “the most telling factor” of Mr. Nicholson’s guilt.

Racial Bias 

Mr. Nicholson was tried before an all-white jury, who rejected his five alibi witnesses, all of whom were Black. All-white juries have historically convicted Black defendants at a higher rate than white defendants and have been shown to disregard the testimony of truthful Black defense witnesses in favor of weak circumstantial evidence.

Additionally, the prosecutor relied heavily on negative racial stereotypes at trial, focusing on Mr. Nicholson’s recent unemployment and implying that his alibi witnesses were not reliable because they “hung out” and drank every night. 

Officers were apparently satisfied by the simplest similarity between Mr. Nicholson and the original description of the attacker — the only commonality was that both were “Black males” — and therefore made no efforts to follow up on the alternative suspect. Such tunnel vision is a known function of implicit racial bias. The resulting wrongful conviction of Mr. Nicholson robbed him of nearly four decades of his life.

Federal Judge Upholds Oklahoma Lethal-Injection Protocol, Rejecting Evidence of Torturous Executions

From [DPIC] Judge Stephen Friot of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma has ruled that Oklahoma’s lethal-injection protocol is constitutional. After holding a week-long hearing on the state’s three-drug protocol in February and March 2022, Judge Friot credited the testimony of state experts over the prisoners’ expert testimony on the likelihood that the protocol would result in severe pain. While attorneys for the 28 prisoners who brought the suit can appeal the ruling, Oklahoma’s Attorney General plans to seek execution warrants immediately.

Judge Friot ruled on June 6, 2022 that Oklahoma’s protocol of midazolam (a sedative), vecuronium bromide (a paralytic), and potassium chloride (a drug that stops the heart) does not violate the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In particular, he addressed the argument that midazolam is not sufficient to render a prisoner insensate to pain, writing, “The evidence persuades the court, and not by a small margin, that even though midazolam is not the drug of choice for maintaining prolonged deep anesthesia, it can be relied upon, as used in the Oklahoma execution protocol, to render the inmate insensate to pain for the few minutes required to complete the execution.” By contrast, medical experts testifying in support of the prisoners described pulmonary edema found in autopsies of executed prisoners, and said it was a “virtual medical certainty” that the four prisoners executed in 2021 and 2022 under Oklahoma’s current protocol “experienced extreme pain and suffering.”

Jennifer Moreno, an attorney for the prisoners, said in a statement, “The district court’s decision ignores the overwhelming evidence presented at trial that Oklahoma’s execution protocol, both as written and as implemented, creates an unacceptable risk that prisoners will experience severe pain and suffering.” She said her team is “assessing our options for an appeal.”

Attorney General John O’Connor called the ruling “definitive” and said it brought the cases “one step closer to justice.” He indicated that his office will immediately request that the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals set execution dates for prisoners who have completed their appeals.

During the federal trial on the execution protocol, the prisoners presented graphic photographic evidence from the botched execution of John Grant, autopsy results showing that Grant and fellow death-row prisoner Bigler Stouffer suffered fluid build-ups in their lungs as they were put to death, and autopsy evidence that Grant aspirated vomit during his execution. They also presented documentary evidence that members of Oklahoma’s execution team filled out paperwork indicating the state had used an unauthorized chemical in place of the paralytic drug required in the state’s execution protocol.

Judge Friot acknowledged the contradictory facts presented by the state and the defense. He wrote, “Rarely, in any field of litigation, does a court see and hear well-qualified expert witnesses giving expert testimony as squarely—and emphatically— contradictory, on the issues at the heart of the matter, as this case.” Ultimately, he relied primarily on the testimony of Dr. Ervin Yen, an anesthesiologist, former Republican state senator, and independent candidate for Oklahoma governor, who Friot referred to as “a fresh face,” in contrast to other experts who had previously testified on midazolam in other states. In his testimony, Dr. Yen called the protocol “adequate to carry out an execution in as humane a way as possible.” 

In ruling against the prisoners, Judge Friot referenced U.S. Supreme Court rulings on lethal injection, explaining that, in order for an execution method to be found unconstitutional, the Court requires prisoners to prove that it “is sure or very likely to cause serious illness and needless suffering.” “The plaintiff inmates have fallen well short of clearing the bar set by the Supreme Court,” he wrote.

Oklahoma AG Requests 25 Execution Dates Despite Independent Investigation and Claims of Innocence, Serious Mental Illness, and Brain Damage

From [DPIC] Oklahoma state prosecutors are pushing to schedule 25 executions over approximately two years, after a federal judge denied death-row prisoners’ challenge to the state’s controversial lethal-injection protocol.

On June 10, 2022, Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor asked the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals to set execution dates for 25 of the 28 prisoners who were parties to the execution-protocol challenge. The request came just four days after Judge Stephen Friot’s ruling that the state’s three-drug procedure is constitutional. Attorneys for the prisoners have said they plan to appeal Friot’s decision.

If granted, the request would result in the largest mass scheduling of executions since Ohio set 27 execution dates in 2017. Only three of those executions were actually carried out before Ohio Governor Mike DeWine halted executions as a result of concerns about the same lethal injection protocol employed by Oklahoma. If Oklahoma proceeds with the 25 executions, it would conduct more executions over the next two years than have been carried out by all U.S. states combined since 2020.

Lawyers for the 25 prisoners expressed concern that the volume of executions will make it impossible for the prisoners to adequately present significant issues in their cases. At least eleven of the prisoners included in the state’s request for execution dates have claims of innocence, serious mental illness, and/or brain damage. 

Under O’Connor’s proposed execution order, Richard Glossip would be the second person scheduled to be put to death. Glossip has consistently maintained his innocence, and his innocence claims are currently the subject of an independent investigation commissioned by the Oklahoma legislature. Glossip’s attorney, Don Knight, said in a statement, “Oklahoma should not execute an innocent man considering 29 Republican legislators, including staunch conservatives who commissioned an independent investigation into Richard Glossip’s case, are still awaiting that report. Those findings could reveal exculpatory information previously unknown until this point. Until everyone has the opportunity to examine the final report, the Attorney General has a moral duty to delay the execution of Richard Glossip. No matter where people stand on the death penalty, no one should want to kill an innocent man. The stakes are too high to rush this process. A man's life is on the line.”

Mask On when Alone but Off in Public, Strings Loose on Puppetician Losing His Mind: Mentally Absent on Jimmy Kimmel, Corpse Joe's Robot-Valet Expressively Gestured/Babbled but Couldnt Finish a Thought

Biden Can’t Stop Tripping. In another instance of Biden’s ailing cognitive and physical decline, Corpse Brandon tripped up the stairs on his way to Air Force One on last Wednesday.

CAN A CORPSE [“a human been”] REPRESENT THE LIVING? The NYT states,, Midway through the 2022 primary season, many Democratic lawmakers and party officials are venting their frustrations with President Biden’s struggle to advance the bulk of his agenda, doubting his ability to rescue the party from a predicted midterm trouncing and increasingly viewing him as an anchor that should be cut loose in 2024.

As the challenges facing the nation mount and fatigued base voters show low enthusiasm, Democrats in union meetings, the back rooms of Capitol Hill and party gatherings from coast to coast are quietly worrying about Mr. Biden’s leadership, his age and his capability to take the fight to former President Donald J. Trump a second time.

Interviews with nearly 50 Democratic officials, from county leaders to members of Congress, as well as with disappointed voters who backed Mr. Biden in 2020, reveal a party alarmed about Republicans’ rising strength and extraordinarily pessimistic about an immediate path forward. [MORE]

TIME FOR A COMMERCIAL BREAK CORPSE. InfoWars stated Joe Biden’s appearance on ABC/Disney’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! Wednesday night went as bad as it could go, with his cognitive decline on full display.

Biden emerged from backstage wearing a mask and as usual was confused about where to go, then he inexplicably removed the mask when he stood mere inches from Kimmel’s face.

Towards the end of the interview, his first in nearly 120 days, Biden clearly lost steam when he began rambling about media reporters having “to get clicks on nightly news.”

The segment was such an obvious train wreck, Kimmel decided to throw to commercial as the senile commander-in-chief failed to string together a coherent sentence.

Corpse-Joe also rambled on about interracial TV commercials, which are a source of ? No idea what that mf was talking about - but like he said, “don’t give it up!”

According to FUNKTIONARY:

robot-valet – our subconscious auto-pilot inner-doer. We are slaves to our robot-valet who does things for us while we are not present in the moment. “Escape from our robothood happens when we learn to take control of our nervous system and to reprogram our individual realities.” ~Timothy Leary. (See: MIA, Self-Remembering, Self-Awakening, Rolebot, The Moment, Present, Asleep, Triune Slavery, Subconscious & Breaktrance)

Teen who was Shooting people with a water gun found beaten to death at the Otherwise Wonderful Lebron James School for Winners

From [HERE] A white teenager was discovered beaten to death after he supposedly drove around with friends shooting water guns at people. 

The body of Ethan Liming, 17, was found in the parking lot of the LeBron James-founded I Promise School in Akron, according to a report. 

The cause of death was blunt force trauma to the head, and Liming's family is begging for answers. 

"Ethan was everything: He was a good boy, he was a smart boy, he loved life, he loved living life. He wanted to be friends with everybody," Jennifer Liming, the teenager's mother, said. "Ethan didn't see color — he saw hearts. He was just such a good person."

"Please help us find these people," she said. "I just miss him so much. I wish he was here." 

An investigation into the events surrounding the teenager's death is ongoing, but his father, Bill Liming, a pastor, offered an account. 

His son and three friends drove to the school on the night of the incident, the father said, and ran into another group of three men and a young woman who attended the school. "Horseplay" escalated into a full-blown altercation, the teenager's father continued. 

"Teenagers were being teenagers," he said. "I don't want to say too much about the investigation, but apparently, some of his friends who were with him were fooling around in the parking lot, and some other people didn't like it." 

Ethan Liming left the car to address the situation, his father said. 

"When he got out of the car and told people to relax — 'it's a joke, it's a joke' — and the individuals didn't like that. One individual attacked him," he added. 

It was then when a second individual approached him from behind and struck him in the head, he said. 

"He was fighting back for his life," he continued. "A third individual came up behind him and overwhelmed him. And they knocked him out on the ground. His friends tried to help him." 

Ethan Liming's friends called 911, but they were unable to drive away from the other group, who came back "and finished my son off," Bill Liming said. 

"My son, Ethan Liming, was murdered by three African American males and a female who stood by and did nothing," he said. 

His son's friends "did everything they possibly could to help Ethan," he said. "They called 911 to get help. And when Ethan was knocked out and on the ground, his two African American friends tried to pick up his body and put him in the car to help save his life. He was still alive. He was still breathing." 

"The people who murdered him didn't like that and drove them away. They physically assaulted and beat the white child who was there with him. ... Help did not arrive in time. They did the best they could to help him when they were there. My heart's broken. We don't want any other children, or anybody else, to be hurt in that area. It's not safe. It's not secure." 

Akron Police Chief Stephen Mylett and Mayor Dan Horrigan addressed the incident at a press conference. 

"There were assumptions made that this was a race-related incident," Mylett said. "There is nothing that we have in our possession right now, any information at all, indicating race played a role in this homicide. Nothing." 

"I want to reassure the community that if we do receive information that race played a role in this, as in any homicide, we will consult with our prosecuting attorneys and add additional charges," the police chief added. 

Investigators believe Ethan Liming and his friend group used a SplatRBall Water Bead Blaster to shoot individuals prior to the incident. 

"It was a senseless act of violence in our city yet again," Mylett said. "We have a lot of work to do in this city — as the country does at large."

'If you got injected you didn't protect yourself or anyone else. You Face a life of potential adverse events and put your health in the hands of People Trying to Kill You.' Data Debunks COVID Lies

The Lie Premise

The official lie premise of COVID is that a deadly virus was going to indiscriminately kill and the only solution was to suppress it using novel (aka never been done before because in theory they wouldn’t work) interventions like social distancing, school and business closures, lockdowns and universal mask-wearing, until a novel (aka never been done before because it didn’t work) gene therapy became available to protect everyone (but only if everyone took it, not just the ones who were ever at risk of the virus, which actually was only those who were already sick with something else).

The virus was so novel and virulent that it respected none of the centuries of intelligence on other viruses, like natural herd immunity, seasonality, and inconsequential asymptomatic spread.

The Hypothesis

If the virus was as universally deadly as reported and the “cure” was as safe and effective™ as they made out then the death tally after introduction of the gene therapy should be significantly lower than before.Any talk of confounding should be dismissed. We are talking about the deadliest plague since the Spanish Flu and a treatment that is up to 100% effective in reducing death, in addition to reducing transmission and the only way to achieve herd immunity.No-one is safe until everyone is safe.

The Method

Examination of COVID deaths per 100k population before and after mass injection campaigns for 3,135 US counties, covering all states. The rate of COVID mortality is determined by the slope of the mortality curve so as to remove the impact of time that would contribute to the overall death tally.The “success” of the injection campaign is determined by the sum of all doses per 100 population.The distribution of the change in slope after mass injections should indicate the degree of how effective the injection is at reducing COVID mortality. We should expect the majority of counties to have shallower slopes, i.e. lower death rates. Thus, the majority of values should be negative.Comparison of the most “successful” counties in terms of injections and their resultant change in COVID death rate. We should expect a strong relationship between injection success and mortality rate reduction.

The Results

More than 80% of the counties had a higher rate of COVID deaths after mass injection campaigns. The average change was an increasein the rate of 0.2 deaths per 100k per day.

There is no apparent relationship between the counties that injected the most and subsequent better outcomes in terms of lower COVID death rates.

The highest injected counties in California, Colorado, New Mexico, Maine, and Massachusetts do not have the greatest reductions in COVID death rates.

Even within states like Maine where the south coast is more heavily injected than the rest of the state, there is no difference in the change in COVID death rate across counties. The same is true of the west coast of California.

In fact, the counties with the best overall changes in COVID death rate were simply the ones that were hardest hit prior to mass injection campaigns, like Gove (Kansas), Jerauld, Buffalo, and Gregory (South Dakota), Dickey (North Dakota) and Hancock (Georgia).

You can easily see the high COVID deaths pre-vax, the dark red belt running north to south through the middle of the country, the southeast states, and parts of Arizona, mirrored in the light red and green areas in the deaths post-vax. [MORE]

A Growing Number of Young Healthy Adults are Mysteriously Dying: Dependent Media Attempts to Normalize "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome" Caused by COVID Injections [the leading Cause of Coincidences]

From [HERE] Under the Age of 40? Time to Get Your Heart Checked: The Normalization of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) Healthy young people are dying suddenly and unexpectedly from a mysterious syndrome – as doctors seek answers through a new national register.

Young woman who went to gym and walked 10,000 steps a day dies suddenly in sleep

College lacrosse player from Long Island dead at 19

New bride, 30, who was found dead in a tanning salon cubicle in Swansea after collapsing with a suspected heart problem

Pediatrician Dr Michelle Perro: “Clearly [COVID Injections] are dangerous for kids. There’s no doubt. The data is irrefutable, and yet we’ve proceeded. So, we’re dealing with other agendas here"

From [MERCOLA] The introduction of the experimental COVID jabs has opened the eyes of many to the fact that there are fundamental flaws with the vaccine program — not just with the mRNA shots, which have never existed before, but also with conventional vaccines.

• Toxins in food, water and air; vaccines, mRNA shots, electromagnetic field exposures and more, are making children sicker than any generation before them.

• When trying to prevent and/or treat a COVID jab injury, five toxic components need to be addressed: spike protein toxicity, PEG, inflammation from the nanolipid, graphene oxide and nanotoxicity.

• A key tool in Dr. Michelle Perro’s treatment arsenal is spike protein-binding therapies like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

• Other helpful remedies include fibrinolytic enzymes like lumbrokinase, NAC, pine needle tea, curcumin, zeolite and symptom-specific homeopathics.

For the last two years, Dr. Michelle Perro has been in the trenches treating COVID-19complications, not only from infection but also from the jab, which has been far more problematic and deadly.

Perro went to Yale as an undergrad, and then to Mount Sinai Medical School. She completed her postgraduate residency training in pediatrics at Bellevue Hospital in New York City.

She now sees patients with an integrative approach, educates regarding GMOs, pesticides and environmental health and is working on her second book in California, where the pediatric population is highly vaccinated.

Perro’s journey

During the first 40 years of her career as a pediatrician, she didn’t question the validity of vaccines. “Thinking that we would intentionally harm children is a very difficult reach,” she says. “It’s out of reach of many pediatricians.”

However, by the early 2000s, she began to see a significant uptick in autism, and that led her down the proverbial rabbit trail to vaccines.

According to Perro:

“[The rise in autism] correlated with my understanding of GMOs and pesticides. However, when you start looking at one toxicant, you look at other toxicants, and that’s where I got into the field of environmental toxicity, including our food, air, water, EMFs, you name it …

“Now I’m an advisor for NAEM [the National Academy of Medicine], and I’m working on a pediatric environmental health questionnaire. I wrote an Environmental Health Bill of Rights for children. So, I’m deep into this now — not just focusing on vaccines, but the global issue of protecting children from environmental toxicity …

“Over 25 years ago, I became a homeopath, and then an integrated physician. I don’t talk about being a homeopath because it’s not taken well by a lot of my peers, but most of my treatment successes have been from homeopathy.”

Old truths are being re-revealed

Interestingly, the introduction of the experimental COVID jabs has really opened the eyes of a large percentage of the population to the fact that there are fundamental flaws with the vaccine program as a whole — not just with the mRNA shots, which have never existed before, but also with conventional vaccines.

Dr. Maurice Hilleman, for example, a former head of Merck who developed polio vaccines, has admitted these vaccines were contaminated with dozens of viral pathogens, including simian virus 40, which can cause cancer.

Perro says:

“This idea of vaccination contamination was exposed again in 2017 when they found nano contamination with heavy metals in 43 out of 44 vaccines in a study out of Italy.

“And these nanoparticles, because of their size, are inflammatory. They cross the blood-brain barrier. And I am sure, without a doubt, that’s what’s linked to this neuroinflammatory process that we see with kids on the spectrum, the rise in ADHD and other neurosensory/neurocognitive issues.”

Glyphosate worsens aluminum toxicity

Perro also cites research showing glyphosate shuttles aluminum across the blood-brain barrier in six different ways. So, glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in the world, and aluminum are synergistic.

This, too, is likely part of the equation, because children are highly exposed to glyphosate through food, which then shuttles the aluminum from their childhood vaccines straight into their brains.

Aluminum is added to many vaccines as an adjuvant because it elicits a stronger immune response.

This, in turn, results in higher antibody titers, which is how they measure vaccine effectiveness. The problem is, by stimulating the humoral antibody system only, and not the cellular immune system, you create an imbalance that can eventually lead to immune dysregulation, with the worst outcome being cancer.

In short, vaccination is not nearly as effective as the multifaceted immune response you have when exposed to natural infection. This is even more true for young children.

As explained by Perro:

“It really speaks to why children are immunologically different than adults. Children are not mini-adults, because they have that other arm of the immune system, the innate immune system …

“Children have a very robust innate immune system, and they have a thymus, which involutes with time as adults — ours are long gone. Because of this innate immune system, and increased NK [natural killer] cells, they’re able to fight COVID.

“That’s why children do so well with this virus. [They have] robust innate immunity, which is totally bypassed when you give somebody a vaccination. Dr. [Anthony] Fauci himself said in 2004 that natural immunity is better than vaccine-induced immunity.”

Pediatric side effects from the COVID jab

Once the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the COVID jab for children, aged 12 to 17, it didn’t take long before Perro started seeing injuries in her practice.

Perro says:

“I was amazed at how many kids were injured … The types of reactions I started seeing were initially neurologic. Some of them, in the beginning, were simple but concerning, like tinnitus, which is ringing in the ear, and that could be horrific for a kid …

“I had a musician who goes to Julliard, and he had severe acute onset [of tinnitus] after the first the Pfizer [shot]. It got worse after the second. I have colleagues who saw Guillain-Barre ascending paralysis … I saw cardiac [problems], myocarditis for sure, and abnormal heart rate responses like tachycardia and increased heart rate …

“I saw POTS — postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome — something very common in Lyme disease that is very difficult to treat. Another weird thing I saw was this one child with rhabdomyolysis, where he had massive breakdown of his muscle tissue, which is a very rare event in childhood.

“Then, I started seeing people develop symptoms who were unvaccinated, including myself. I got ‘spiked.’ That’s what I call it, ‘getting spiked.’

“[I saw] teenage girls with heavy menstrual bleeding, prolonged bleeding, and other menstrual irregularities. There was a smattering of rashes, urticaria, hives — a bizarre host of rashes.

“So, this is the kind of stuff we started seeing, and this began happening last June [2021], after ACIP, the American Committee of Immunization Practice, said, ‘Yep, 12-year-olds can be vaccinated [against COVID]’

“Once again, we as clinicians … have to sort out how to fix it with tools not in the traditional toolbox. That’s what we’re faced with …

“There is a bigger agenda here, because clearly these vaccines are dangerous for kids. There’s no doubt. The data is irrefutable, and yet we’ve proceeded. So, we’re dealing with other agendas here … I think parents need to rise up and protect their children, because this is not going away. If anything, it’s ramping up.”

Preventing and treating COVID jab injuries

When trying to prevent and/or treat a COVID jab injury, there are five toxic components that need to be addressed:

• Spike protein toxicity

• PEG

• Inflammation from the nanolipid

• Graphene oxide

• Nanotoxicity

Each of these can be modulated in a variety of ways. “That’s why we have to use an entire menu of things when treating a reaction from the COVID vaccine,” she says. A key tool in Perro’s treatment arsenal is spike protein-binding therapies like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

She explains:

“If you’re making spike [protein], even though kids don’t have a lot of ACE2 receptors, those spikes are everywhere. In mice, it is shown that they cross the blood-brain barrier. They’re disseminated, and then they tend to focus on your area of weakness.

“They go into fat-loving tissues, they go into the ovaries, they seem to go everywhere. So, binding the spike protein, that’s one aspect, and there are different things you can do, both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical.

“My favorite is ivermectin for the spike. I was giving kids 12 milligrams, initially, once a day. I went up to 12 mg twice a day for Omicron, but it depends on the size of the kid. For bigger kids, it’s 18 mg twice a day.

“I didn’t see any toxicity with ivermectin. I’ve used ivermectin before, mostly for parasitic infections, and I never had any problem with ivermectin. I have not used hydroxychloroquine before, but now, for Omicron, I would use hydroxychloroquine, 200 mg twice a day.

“I use a lot of quercetin and zinc together … To decrease inflammation, especially IL6, you also want to use a lot of immunomodulators, and a lot of supplements can do that.”

What’s in Perro’s toolbox?

In addition to ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to bind the toxic spike protein, and quercetin and zinc to boost immune function, Perro also uses the following remedies for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19, and the prevention and treatment of COVID jab injuries:

• Fibrinolytic enzymes like lumbrokinase to prevent blood clots and digest existing clots, especially if your D-dimer level is elevated, as this is a biomarker for clotting. For this to work, however, you must take it on an empty stomach. When taken with food, it acts as a digestive aid, but when taken an hour before food, or two hours after, you get the systemic benefits.

• N-acetylcysteine, or NAC, which inhibits expression of proinflammatory cytokines, improves T cell response, benefits a variety of lung problems, and inhibits the hypercoagulation that can result in stroke and/or blood clots.

• Pine needle tea, which has antioxidant, antimutagenic and antitumor benefits

• Curcumin, to quell inflammation.

• Zeolite.

• Whole foods such as garlic and ginger.

• Symptom-specific homeopathic remedies.

• Nebulized hydrogen peroxide and oral/nasal rinses with peroxide and iodine.

I would also recommend getting plenty of sunshine, as infrared rays, especially the near-infrared spectrum, triggers melatonin production in your mitochondria.

Melatonin is a potent antioxidant, and it increases glutathione, which is crucial for efficient detox. Melatonin also increases mitochondrial efficiency and energy production in the form of ATP.

Of course, eating organic is key since GMOs also have been demonstrated to decrease glutathione — the master antioxidant — and increase oxidative stress, which is the basis for all chronic disease.

If you’re prone to sunburn, it could be a sign that you’re eating too many seed oils high in linoleic acid, so to reduce your tendency to get burned, cut out all seed oils from your diet.

That includes restaurant foods, processed foods and condiments in particular, but also conventionally raised chicken and pork. A very low, virtually zero seed oil diet is probably one of the best ways to prevent sunburn and chronic degenerative diseases including heart disease and cancer.

Adding in more whole food vitamin C can also help prevent sunburn. Acerola cherry (Barbados cherry) contains some of the highest amounts of vitamin C.

More information

As noted by Perro, recognizing there’s a problem is always the first step. So, first, we have to recognize that our children are under toxic assault, and in many instances, the harming of children’s health appears to be intentional.

Step 2, then, is for parents to take back control and remove the systems that have taken over and are harming their children. While that may sound like an insurmountable task, it doesn’t have to be.

It begins with cleaning up your family’s diet, using food as medicine, growing some of your own food and getting back to basic principles of health and healthcare.

Perro says:

“We have to get them out of this infantilized system where people feel they have to run to the physician for every bruise, cut and boo-boo, ‘Quick, call the pediatrician!’

“Not so. Parents have lost that ability and we have to regain it. Think about when we were kids. How often did you go to the doctor? I think I went once as a child. Our parents had some knowledge, so we need to regain that.”

Perro also believes we must begin to create parallel systems and structures, as suggested by Mattias Desmet, Ph.D. The power of this strategy was demonstrated by Vaclav Havel, a political dissident who eventually became the president of Czechoslovakia.

A parallel structure is any kind of business, organization, technology, movement or creative pursuit that fits within a totalitarian society while being morally outside of it.

Once enough parallel structures are created, a parallel culture is born that functions as a sanctuary of sanity within a totalitarian world.

To learn more, see GMO Science, which is the nonprofit Dr. Michelle Perro cofounded in 2014. Also keep your eyes peeled for her next book, “Making Our Children Well,” which is scheduled to be published sometime in 2023.

UK Government Data Shows “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” (SADS) is Caused by COVID Injections

From [EXPOSE] and [MORE] Doctors are allegedly baffled at what is causing a sudden uptick in what they have dubbed ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ among adults under the age of 40 over the past year, and are now urging all under 40’s to go and get their heart checked.

But these doctors need not remain “baffled” any longer because we have rock-solid evidence that the Covid-19 vaccine is to blame. 

• Official UK Office for National Statistics data shows vaccinated adults aged 18 to 39 have a 92% higher mortality rate (per 100,000) than unvaccinated adults.

• Official Public Health Scotland data reveals there has been a 67% increase compared to the historical average in the number of 15 to 44-year-olds suffering heart attacks, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases since this age group was first offered the Covid-19 injection.

• And figures published by NHS England in response to a freedom of information request show that ambulance call-outs for heart illness have doubled among all age groups including the under 30’s since the beginning of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign.

Healthy young people are dying suddenly and unexpectedly from what doctors are dubbing “a mysterious syndrome” and these same doctors are now seeking answers through a new national register. 

People aged under 40 are now being urged to have their hearts checked because doctors claim they may potentially be at risk of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.

Doctors say the syndrome, known as SADS, has been fatal for all kinds of people regardless of whether they maintain a fit and healthy lifestyle.

“SADS is an umbrella term to describe unexpected deaths in young people”, said The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

But it turns out the term is actually used when a post-mortem cannot find an obvious cause of death, and the reason doctors are struggling to find an obvious cause of death is that we’re now seeing thousands of deaths due to something that was impossible to occur prior to 2021. Covid-19 vaccination.

This becomes obvious once you know where to look. But the problem is doctors are actively discouraged from looking and it is not publicised in the mainstream media. However, all the answers doctors are looking for to explain what they are dubbing Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, are contained in official Government data. 

Vaccinated Young Adults have a 92% higher mortality rate (per 100,000) than Unvaccinated Young Adults

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics and the recognised national statistical institute of the UK. It is responsible for collecting and publishing statistics related to the economy, population and society at national, regional and local levels.

An ONS dataset on deaths in England by vaccination status can be found here. It contains a large amount of data on age-standardised mortality rates for deaths by vaccination status between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022.

Table 2 of the dataset contains data on the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status by age group for all deaths in England. The following table shows an example of how the numbers are presented in the dataset –

What immediately catches the eye when looking at this data is the mortality rate per 100,00 person-years among 18-39-year-olds in the month of January 2021. The figures show the death rate among the unvaccinated in this month was 67.7 deaths per 100,000 person-years. Whilst the death rate among the partly vaccinated (at least 21 days ago) was 119.9 deaths per 100,000 years.

This shows that vaccinated 18-39-year-olds were more likely to die in January 2021, suggesting the Covid-19 injections increased the risk of death or played a part in causing death. So we dug further and extracted all the figures on 18-39-year-olds for each month between January 2021 and January 2022, and this is what we found –

The above chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years among adults aged 18 to 39 in England. The green line is the mortality rate among the unvaccinated, which while fluctuating has remained pretty stable throughout.

The other lines however represent different vaccination statuses, and they are extremely concerning. The orange, yellow, and pink lines represent mortality rates within 21 days of receiving a first, second or third dose. And they reveal that the risk of death increases significantly immediately after vaccination.

But the most concerning figures are the mortality rates among those vaccinated at least 21 days ago, which you can see more clearly in the following chart –

What’s most concerning here is that the second injection seems to make things much worse in terms of the risk of death.

The highest mortality rate among the double vaccinated (at least 21 days ago) occurred in September 2021, with 125.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years. In the same month, the mortality rate among the unvaccinated equated to 46.8. Meaning the double vaccinated mortality rate was 169% higher than the unvaccinated mortality rate.

But the largest statistical difference occurred in November 2021. The mortality rate among the unvaccinated equated to 33.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years, whereas the mortality rate among the double vaccinated equated to 107. A difference of 220.4%.

The following chart shows the average-age standardised mortality rate to have occurred between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22 by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years among adults aged 18 to 39 in England –

On average the one-dose vaccinated were 51% more likely to die than the unvaccinated between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22. Whilst the double vaccinated were 91.4% more likely to die than the unvaccinated between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22. And based on the small amount of data available so far, on average the triple vaccinated are on average 25.3% more likely to die than the unvaccinated.

What these official figures from the UK’s Office for National Statistics strongly suggest is that Covid-19 vaccination kills and increases a person’s risk of death due to any cause. And this increased risk of death isn’t because so many people have been vaccinated, these are figures per 100,000. 

Any doctor worth their salt would not instantly use the above to claim that Covid-19 vaccination is the cause of a sudden uptick in Sudden Adult Death Syndrome. They would instead decide that the above warrants further research. So we’ve done that research for them. [MORE]

Doctors Claim to be ‘Baffled’ by the Increase in "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome" (SADS). Dr Ryan Cole Says it's Caused by the Vax. 'People are getting a toxin in their body that’s Inflames their heart'

From [HERE] and [FULL VIDEO] Dr. Ryan Cole: "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome is because people are getting a toxin in their body that's inflaming their heart."

"If you look around the world, a couple of athletes per month used to die on the football field or on the soccer pitch. Now we're getting hundreds each month dying. Why? Is there something new in humanity? You bet there is [something]: a toxic lipid nanoparticle and a toxic modified RNA that doesn't shut off."

"Dr. Bruce Patterson, pathologist, colleague, showed that the spike was persisting in our circulating CD 16+ monocytes for up to 15 months! So, it's insanity to keep pushing the most deadly, dangerous medical product ever allowed to persist in humanity."

As w/the Arrest of "White Supremacists" in Idaho, Media Continually Depicts "Racists" w/Affiliation w/Clown Groups [like kkk]. A Racist is Anyone Engaged in Master-Servant Relations w/Non-White People

The New York Times reported: Dozens of members of a white supremacist group were arrested on Saturday in Idaho before they could act on plans to riot at a local Pride event, the police said.

After receiving a tip from a concerned citizen, the police detained and charged 31 people who belonged to a far-right group known as Patriot Front, said Lee White, the chief of the Coeur d’Alene Police Department, at a news conference.

They are being charged with conspiracy to riot, a misdemeanor, he said.

Bob Norris, the sheriff of Kootenai County, said that a person reported seeing a group of people jump into a U-Haul van near the intersection of Northwest Boulevard and Interstate 90 in Coeur d’Alene. And they were all dressed like a small army,” Sheriff Norris said. “We had units in their area, and we were able to intercept them pretty quickly.”

A few miles away, the North Idaho Pride Alliance was holding “Pride in the Park,” an annual event, at Coeur d’Alene City Park.

The Anti-Defamation League, which tracks extremist organizations and hate crimes, describes Patriot Front as a Texas-based white supremacist group that formed when members of another white supremacist group, Vanguard America, broke off after the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017. [MORE]

Notice that liberal and conservative whites rarely attempt to define the highly observable phenomenon of racism. Nevertheless, said racist suspects constantly chatter about racism in terms of mean words and conduct and affiliation with clown groups, such as KKK, nazis, proud boys, etc. Racism is not primarily about bigotry - minor inconveniences such as trouble catching a cab, standing in a long line to vote, or name calling, disrespect, stereotypes or other mean conduct & words by white people. Also, being a white supremacist has nothing to do with membership in some clownish organization and there are differing ways to practice white supremacy. Rather, racism/white supremacy is about the superior, dominate position of whites and vast unequal power and opportunities and maintaining the imbalance of power through Black people’s cooperative control. A white supremacist can be a soccer mom, a businessman, or a US Senator if they are practicing racism against non-whites. [MORE] Racism concerns a power relationship between whites and Blacks. Belief that racism is only bigotry is a vital part of false programming sold by elite whites - white publishers, professionals, professors and government representatives and also promoted by their showcase Blacks who parrot such programming in various styles. [MORE]

Amos Wilson explained that defining racism in terms of attitude or bigotry will absolutely lead to solving the wrong problems. FUNKTIONARY defines:

Racism White Supremacy - psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." -Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, MD.

Diane Sare on the Alleged Nazi Killings in Buffalo and the US Support for Nazis in Ukraine

From [HERE] The following statement was released on video today by Diane Sare in response to the senseless slaughter of ten people in Buffalo Saturday by a crazed teenager, wearing one of the symbols made popular by the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion in Ukraine, now sponsored, armed and trained by the U.S. and U.K. governments:

Good morning! It’s Diane Sare, LaRouche independent candidate for U.S. Senate against Chuck Schumer. You can see I’m here in Buffalo. I was in Holland, New York yesterday at the Tulip Festival when I got word of the horrific mass shooting at a Tops in Buffalo. The shooter, who has been identified as Payton Gendron, was wearing the “black sun” insignia, which is shared by the Nazi Azov Battalion in Ukraine. I think this is extremely significant.

First of all, let me express my deepest condolences and sympathy to the families and loved ones of the ten people who were killed in yesterday’s rampage, which never should have occurred. But I have to issue strong words about the situation. When you have a government which refuses to condemn Nazi atrocities committed by the Azov Battalion in Ukraine, but not only refuses to condemn them, but funnels them $40 billion worth of aid and weapons; when you have leaders of our elected government—that is, members of the House and Senate like Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell, going over to meet with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and supporting the narrative which is full of lies; when it is the Nazis committing the war crimes and the atrocities, not the Russians—we are provoking a nuclear war with Russia. When you have Colonel Vindman saying that we should send Ukraine—Nazi elements in Ukraine—advanced weapons which can shoot missile strikes deep into Russia’s territory, then you have a government which has gone mad. And when the government has gone mad, it should not be a surprise when American citizens go mad.

I’m running for U.S. Senate against Chuck Schumer to put an end to this murderous madness. The only way this crisis can be solved is through negotiation. The relationships among nations must be governed by the commonality of the universal interests of mankind as a whole. Only then can we resolve these crises; only then will we see an end to the kind of horrific violence which was perpetrated in this city yesterday. So please, contact your Congressman; tell them to stop logistical and military support of a Nazi, racist agenda that will lead to World War III. No more weapons to Ukraine; no more support of the Nazi Azov Battalion; no more support of ISIS terrorists. The American people want the truth. We want to live in peace and dignity as part of a concert among civilized nations on this planet.