FBI reports 3.4M warrantless US data searches in 2021

From [HERE] The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Annual Statistical Transparency Report released Friday reported the FBI, the domestic intelligence and security service of the US, made nearly 3.4 million warrantless US data searches in 2021.

This is the ninth FBI transparency report released pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) but “goes beyond” FISA requirements. It presents statistics on “how often the government uses certain national security authorities.”

As per the Report, over 200,000 non-US persons were targeted in FBI data searches under Section 702 in 2021. Section 702 authorizes the targeting of (i) non-US persons (ii) reasonably believed to be located outside the US (iii) to acquire foreign intelligence information. To ensure that all three requirements are appropriately met for each target, Section 702 requires targeting procedures to be applied to each individual targeting decision. Bulk collection of data is not permitted.

The data search capability of the FBI means that a single query “might include hundreds or thousands of query terms.” Another key statistic in the Report was that nearly 1.9 million query terms related to potential victims, including US persons. These accounted for the vast majority of the increase in US person queries conducted by the FBI over the prior year.

Sergeant Charged with Beating Three Men in Alabama Prison

From [EJI] The Justice Department announced on April 22 that a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging former Alabama Department of Corrections Sergeant Lorenzo Mills with assaulting three men incarcerated at Draper Correctional Facility near Elmore, Alabama. Mr. Mills was also charged with obstruction of justice for submitting a false statement about the incident.

On October 25, 2020, the indictment alleges that Correctional Officer Xavier Carroll brought three incarcerated men to an area outside the Draper shift office where Sgt. Mills violently assaulted the men by beating them with a baton. At least one of the victims suffered broken bones. Federal prosecutors say the men were not given medical attention until two days later because prison staff failed to report the assault when it happened.

The three victims had recently entered the Department of Corrections and were being held at Draper pursuant to a 14-day Covid-19 quarantine protocol. Two had less than one year to serve.

When the assault was finally reported on October 27, the indictment alleges, Sgt. Mills submitted a false written statement in which he wrote that he had not used any force against the three victims. 

The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Alabama in 2020 alleging that excessive force against incarcerated people by correctional officers, including beating with batons, is widespread in the Alabama prison system and often results in serious injuries and  deaths. Federal prosecutors alleged that prison staff frequently minimize or omit descriptions of injuries in incident reports, which contributes to incarcerated people’s unreasonable risk of serious harm.

Mr. Mills is one of 11 correctional officers, including a lieutenant and three sergeants, who have been criminally charged with abusing incarcerated people at the Elmore/Staton/Draper correctional complex since 2017, when officer Jeremy Singleton beat Billy Smith to death outside the shift office at Elmore Correctional Facility. He was later charged with manslaughter. 

The Greatest Wealth Transfer Program in the US for Whites [white supremacy is the ultimate affirmative action]

From [HERE] From 1862 to 1986, the United States government ran a homestead program that gave 2,992,058 white settlers and European immigrants (both documented and undocumented) a minimum of 160 acres of land from the Mississippi River to the West coast of America, including the Alaskan territory. Authorized by the Homestead Act of 1862, this land giveaway program ended for all participating states in 1976 and ended for land awards in Alaska in 1986.

White recipients in the land giveaway program were recruited through a widespread, government-sponsored advertising campaign in newspapers in America and Europe. The land was awarded to applicants who promised to live on it and develop the land for five years. Title to the property vested at the end of this five-year period.

Claimants paid total filing fees of $18 and $1.25 per acre after six-months of residency. These below-market land acquisition rates essentially made the land a free gift to the recipients.

Congress passed additional laws in 1873 that allowed the government to award larger tracts of land to these white settlers and immigrants.

A lot of the land grants included property that had timber rights, mineral rights, and oil and gas reserves, all of which the government eventually released to the land owners through various legislative enactments.

In all, more than 270 million acres of valuable land -- about ten percent of the land area of the United States -- was given to white settlers and immigrants.

The Homestead Act of 1862 was a 124-year-long, government-sponsored, wealth transfer program for a particular class of people -- white settlers and immigrants. It was the longest running, race-based, affirmative action program in United States history. Ironically, some of the descendants of the beneficiaries of this affirmative action program for whites were the first ones to claim their status as the "victims" of "reverse discrimination" in the 1970s and 80s.

An estimated $10 trillion dollars (when measured in today's present value) was transferred to white homesteaders, essentially for free. This land giveaway program made thousands of millionaires in the agriculture, timber, mining of natural resources, and oil and gas industries.

In addition to the gift of free public land to these white program recipients, the government-built land grant colleges to teach these settlers how to farm. It provided them with county agents to further their expertise in farming and the commercialization of natural resources running with the land. It also gave them low-interest loans so that they could mechanize their farms. Then, it provided them billions of dollars in federal subsidies not to farm certain crops.

From the outset, blacks were not allowed to participate in the 1862 Homestead Act land giveaway program. The United States Supreme Court had already decided, on a 7-2 vote, in the 1857 Dred Scott case that blacks -- freed or slaves -- had no rights that white men were bound to respect. This holding included the right to own property.

The Unfulfilled Promise of 40 Acres for Freed Slaves

Union Army General William T. Sherman's Special Field Order No. 15, issued on January 16, 1865, set aside land for freed black slaves. With this Order, 400,000 acres of land described as "a strip of coastline stretching from Charleston, South Carolina, to the St. John's River in Florida, including Georgia's Sea Islands and the mainland thirty miles in from the coast" was to be reallocated to emancipated slaves in the South. Each slave family was entitled to 40 acres of land in this strip.

Abraham Lincoln's successor, President Andrew Johnson, a Southern and sympathizer with the Confederate states, vetoed Order No. 15 in the Fall of 1865. With his veto, the land was returned to the very planters who declared war on the United States of America.

As a result, black slaves were never awarded the public lands that were promised to them by the United States Government. Instead, former slaves, for the most part, became sharecroppers on the lands they used to work as slaves. [MORE]

‘Starbucks-Quick’ Justice for White Lives: A Philli Cop Murdered a White Child on March 1st, Video was Released March 6th, Cop was Identified and Fired on March 8th and Charged w/Murder Today

NO NEED FOR WHITES TO BEG, DANCE OR SING FOR JUSTICE IN A WHITE OVER BLACK SYSTEM b/c IT’S RARE THAT NON-WHITE COPS GET AWAY WITH MURDERING WHITE PEOPLE.

From [HERE] A Latino Philadelphia police officer who was fired after he fatally shot a 12-year-old boy in the back in March has been charged with murder in connection with the shooting, the authorities said Monday.

Larry Krasner, the Philadelphia district attorney, said at a news conference on Monday that the officer, Edsaul Mendoza, was arrested on Sunday and had been charged with first-degree murder, third-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter and possession of an instrument of crime. He was being held without bail, Mr. Krasner said.

The boy, Thomas Siderio, was fatally shot on March 1 in the city’s Girard Estates neighborhood, according to the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office.

At a news conference in March, Danielle Outlaw, the Philadelphia police commissioner, said that four plainclothes officers were completing an investigation in South Philadelphia on March 1 when they saw two youths.

On March 8th the Philadelphia inquirer identified the officer involved as Edsaul Mendoza (apparently journalists discovered his name after they actually did their own independent investigation into the incident. That is, they didn’t simply parrot and rely on police narratives - because a white child was involved. The police and the media have also had no problems or delay with posting the [former] officer’s photograph.)

One week after the incident the cop he was promptly fired apparently without a whole lot of fuss from the Philadelphia police Union, which is usually rigorous with its defense of cops, at least when they murder non-white people.

Mr. Krasner said on Monday that the four officers were surveilling the neighborhood from inside an unmarked police vehicle. They were not looking for Thomas when they saw him and a 17-year-old boy whom the authorities identified only as M.K.

The unmarked police vehicle slowed down and circled the block, Mr. Krasner said, and when it returned, Thomas fired a shot at the car just as its emergency lights turned on.

Brian Collins, an assistant district attorney, said at the news conference that there were “diverging accounts” among the four officers about why they had pulled up next to the boys. Two officers testified that they stopped them as part of a stolen firearm investigation. The other two said that, in addition to the investigation, they also made “a traffic violation stop” because the boys were riding bicycles the wrong way in the street, Mr. Collins said.

Mr. Collins said a grand jury noted a Philadelphia police directive that says plainclothes police officers are not supposed to make routine traffic stops.

After the shot was fired, three of the officers took cover, and Mr. Mendoza “began what can be fairly called a tactically unsound foot chase” of Thomas, Mr. Krasner said. As the chase began, another officer fired one shot “at no target in particular,” and Mr. Mendoza fired three shots at Thomas, Mr. Krasner said.

Thomas was unarmed when the last two shots were fired, having discarded the gun about 40 feet away, Mr. Krasner said. Immediately after he fired the final shot at Thomas, who by that time was on the ground, Mr. Mendoza told a fellow officer that the boy had tossed the gun and pointed to its location, Mr. Krasner said.

“When Officer Mendoza fired the third and fatal shot, he knew the 12-year-old, five-foot-tall, 111-pound Thomas Siderio no longer had a gun and no ability to harm him,” Mr. Krasner said. “But he fired a shot through his back nonetheless that killed him.”

Thomas was later pronounced dead at a hospital, the authorities said.

When Mr. Mendoza fired the third shot, Mr. Krasner said, he was about half a car length away from Thomas and “would have had the opportunity” to clearly see him.

After the shooting, Mr. Krasner said, Mr. Mendoza gave an “untruthful statement” about his position when he fired the final two shots.

“When people make untruthful statements about what happened that are crucial to understanding the death of another person, in the law, that can be interpreted to indicate guilty knowledge, a sense that you need to cover something up because you know that what you did is illegal,” Mr. Krasner said.

Conor Corcoran, a lawyer representing Thomas’s father, whose name is also Thomas Siderio, said that he believed there was not “conclusive evidence” that the boy had fired a gun.

“Until all that information comes to light, I still think it’s very premature and reckless to speculate that my boy even fired a gun to begin with, but we’ll see,” Mr. Corcoran said, referring to Thomas.

In a statement on Monday, John McNesby, president of Lodge No. 5 of the Fraternal Order of Police, said that Mr. Mendoza, “like every other citizen, is entitled to due process, and we are confident that our judicial system will protect this officer’s constitutional right to a fair trial.”

Because the shooting was still being investigated, Mr. Corcoran said it was too soon to speculate on what damages the family would seek. But he said that “for sure, the Philadelphia Police Department is unfortunately going to have to pay for the death of this child.”

There is footage of the shooting that has not been publicly released that Mr. Krasner described as “very, very disturbing and very difficult to watch.”

Mr. Krasner said investigators were looking into other possible factors that had yet to be confirmed, including “indications” that Mr. Mendoza had told Thomas to drop the gun before the boy did so and to “get down” after he dropped the weapon.

The investigation is unfolding at a time when police departments across the country have come under increased scrutiny over accusations of misconduct. In Philadelphia, protesters took to the streets in October 2020 after two police officers fatally shot Walter Wallace Jr., a 27-year-old Black man who was armed with a knife. The city later agreed to pay $2.5 million to settle a wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Mr. Wallace’s family, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

CDC finds majority of Americans have natural immunity against COVID

From [HERE] A new CDC study shows that the record number of infections during the Omicron wave gave many Americans infection-induced immunity. Between December 2021 and February 2022, the estimated percentage of the U.S. population with infection-induced antibodies increased from 34% to 58% across all age groups. The largest increases were in children and adolescents (see figure below).

Here are the details from the CDC report:

During December 2021–February 2022, overall U.S. seroprevalence increased from 33.5% (95% CI = 33.1–34.0) to 57.7% (95% CI = 57.1–58.3). 

Over the same period, seroprevalence increased from 44.2% (95% CI = 42.8–45.8) to 75.2% (95% CI = 73.6–76.8) among children aged 0–11 years and from 45.6% (95% CI = 44.4–46.9) to 74.2% (95% CI = 72.8–75.5) among persons aged 12–17 years. [Note the very high levels reached for children.]

Seroprevalence increased from 36.5% (95% CI = 35.7–37.4) to 63.7% (95% CI = 62.5–64.8) among adults aged 18–49 years, 28.8% (95% CI = 27.9–29.8) to 49.8% (95% CI = 48.5–51.3) among those aged 50–64 years, and from 19.1% (95% CI = 18.4–19.8) to 33.2% (95% CI = 32.2–34.3) among those aged ≥65 years.

Look at the figure below to more clearly see how the natural immunity increased for different age groups. [MORE]

James Clyburn and Maxine Waters are Among the Congressional Puppeticians Pressuring the FDA to Inject Infants and Children with Experimental, Deadly COVID Treatments

From [HERE] There is probably no other single issue in American politics today that unites both Democrats and Republicans more than the topic of vaccines, and especially the topic of COVID-19 experimental “vaccines” and issuing as many emergency use authorizations (EUAs) as possible to inject as many people as possible with these deadly shots.

You cannot hold a political office at the federal level today if you are anti-vaccine. Being pro-vaccine and supporting Big Pharma is a requirement for both Democrats and Republicans who want to be elected, and it is the one issue that both previous U.S. President Donald Trump and current U.S. President Joe Biden agree on today.

A group of pro-child abuse and pro-attempted murder of babies and young children members of Congress are now pressuring the FDA to approve COVID-19 vaccines for babies and young children under the age of 5.

They are the members of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, originally setup in April of 2020 under then President Donald Trump, and they are upset that the FDA has not issued an EUA for babies and children under the age of 5 so that parents can attempt to murder and abuse their children with one of these deadly shots.

Fierce Pharma reports:

Even though most people in the U.S. have been eligible for COVID-19 vaccines and boosters for quite some time, children under 5 still don’t have vaccine options. Now, lawmakers are asking the FDA to lay out its plans in this age group⁠—and address a perceived delay for Moderna’s product.

Yesterday, Congress’s Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis sent a letter (PDF) to FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, M.D., requesting a briefing on the status of COVID-19 vaccines for the under 5 age group.

The letter comes after U.S. chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci, M.D., indicated on CNN that the FDA is considering holding off on reviewing Moderna’s vaccine candidate in order to authorize it at the same time as Pfizer’s to “not confuse people” with a staggered rollout, the lawmakers wrote. That could lead to a potential delay of several weeks for Moderna’s shot, they said.

Moderna reportedly plans to submit its vaccine for the under-5 age group by the end of April. Pfizer, for its part, is prepping a filing for June, the lawmakers wrote.

Congress is hopeful that the FDA briefing requested would provide scientific rationale for the potential Moderna delay. (Full article.)

These members of Congress are complicit with the criminal act of attempted murder against the nation’s babies and children, and I encourage everyone who reads this to contact them and let them know that they will be held accountable for their actions, if not in this life, then when they die and meet their Creator.

SD Authorities Seek to Wipe Out an $85 Million Jury Award. Say Government Not Responsible After 11 Cops Murdered a Filipino Man They Hogtied, Shocked and Slowly Suffocated to Death

From [HERE] and [HERE] San Diego County lawyers are seeking to wipe out an $85 million jury award to the family of man who died after being restrained by sheriff’s deputies in 2015, or get a new trial in the lawsuit that generated the case.

County lawyers contend the verdict stemming from the negligence and wrongful death lawsuit was “incurably infected with error” and that the trial was riddled with rulings that hurt the county’s case.

The request is detailed in motions filed in U.S. District Court in San Diego earlier this month by county lawyers. They are the first moves in what will likely be a protracted fight to reduce or completely overturn the verdict returned March 15 in favor of the family of Lucky Phounsy.

One motion asks U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn Huff to set aside the verdict, contending the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported. A second seeks a new trial, or a reduction in the award, arguing there were a series of trial errors and that the amount awarded was excessive.

Phounsy, 32, died on April 13, 2015.

It took nearly seven full years from the confrontation inside Phounsy’s home — which involved a dozen deputies at one point — to the jury verdict. Lawyers for the family plowed through reams of documents and conducted more than 70 depositions.

The case twice went to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, as county lawyers fought for qualified immunity — legal protection from lawsuits that government officials can claim — for the deputies and officials involved in the death.

Both attempts failed, but they added years, and perhaps hundreds of thousands in costs, to the case. In September, the case finally went to trial — but ended up with a hung jury. A second trial began in February and this time ended with the $85 million verdict.

Phounsy died after a struggle during which deputies put him in maximum restraints — a way of immobilizing someone by binding their ankles with a strap and tethering it to a second strap around the waist.

The way Phounsy was restrained, and that deputies did not properly monitor his condition for nearly 30 minutes and that his head was forcibly pressed down while he was in an ambulance to the hospital by another deputy, caused him to slowly suffocate, lawyers for the family said.

Paramedics put a sock over his face on the way to hospital, according to the lawsuit. Phounsy’s heart stopped on the way to the hospital. He was resuscitated, but died several days later.

The county medical examiner concluded his death was accidental and the result of the long struggle with deputies, combined with the effects of the drug ecstasy he had taken several days before.

But lawyers for the family disputed that conclusion and argued that the conduct of the deputies caused him to suffocate to death.

They pointed to deputies binding Phounsy’s hands and ankles in restraints, failing to monitor his vital signs and continuing to restrain him when one deputy forcibly held his head down while he was in an ambulance.

Fatal encounter

The 32-year-old Phounsy had gone to a music festival four days before the April 13, 2015, confrontation, where he ingested the drug Ecstasy, court records say. He returned home but, perhaps because of the effects of the drug, he was unable to sleep for three days.

On the day of his son’s birthday he became more erratic and paranoid, Fleming said. His wife Loan and other family members said he should go to the hospital. But as they readied for the trip, Phounsy called 911 himself and told the dispatcher that his family was in danger, and someone was trying to harm them.

His wife then got on the phone and told the dispatcher Phounsy was unarmed. Two deputies arrived, went inside and began to speak with him. When one tried to handcuff him, getting one cuff on his wrist, Phounsy became alarmed. A deputy fired a Taser, and Phounsy began to fight back.

Soon 10 more deputies had arrived. They tackled him and Tasered him twice more, and struck him several times with batons. Phounsy was put in the restraints, taken outside the home and eventually to the hospital.

In the ambulance, former Deputy Richard Fischer held Phounsy’s head down toward his chest for nearly the entire ride, the restraints still in place. Fisher later said he did so because Phounsy was continuing to struggle.

When Phounsy arrived at the hospital his heart had stopped. A week later he was removed from life support and died.

Years after the incident, in 2019, Fischer pleaded guilty to battery charges in an unrelated case following accusations brought by 16 women who said he had fondled, hugged or tried to kiss them. He was fired from the department, which has since paid out nearly $5 million in settlements from those cases. [MORE]

Lawyers for the family must still file their arguments opposing the county motions. In a statement, attorneys Mark Fleming and Timothy Scott said the county is still evading responsibility for Phounsy’s death.

“The rehashed arguments raised by the County have already been rejected" by courts several times,” said Scott. Fleming said that the bid to cut the money award disrespects “both the value of Lucky’s life and the enormity of his loss to his family, as well as the hard work and careful consideration of the jury.”

Chicago Straw Boss is Alarmed @ the Success of Private Security Cops, who are Hirable/Fireable and Controllable by Citizens, Have a Legal Duty to Protect, Not Immune and Only Act in Defense of Others

An essential difference between private security workers and police officers is that security workers possess no government authority or right to initiate unprovoked acts of violence on other people. Unprovoked violence against others or the use of “force” is the basis of all social evils and can only be used in the sense of attack not defense. As explained in FUNKTIONARY, “Unfortunately, governments only function by force. Once established, they put laws into effect by threatening persecution, imprisonment, fine, or death against all who don't comply with those laws--including the use of the force continuum.”[MORE]

From [HERE] Alarmed by growing numbers of carjackings and other street crimes, several neighborhoods on Chicago’s affluent North Side have signed up for patrols by armed off-duty police officers to create what some security companies are calling virtual gated communities.

At least five neighborhoods in or adjacent to Chicago’s North Side have added patrols for the first time in the past six months or are planning to sign up for patrols with P4 Security Solutions LLC, said Paul Ohm, executive vice president and principal.

The officers, who ride in marked security cars equipped with overhead lights, cameras and high-tech communications tools, aren’t tasked with making arrests, even though they are allowed to carry guns because they are sworn police officers. They contact 911 in an emergency and act as a deterrent, Mr. Ohm said.

The willingness of neighborhood associations to pay for security in neighborhoods such as Lincoln Park, Bucktown and Lakeview comes amid a surge of crime in Chicago and other cities, where interest in private security is also on the rise.

Sean Meehan, director of sales and marketing at United Security Inc. in Red Bank, N.J., said that he has received numerous calls for the first time in the past year from people in the Northeast looking to add security patrols in their neighborhoods, even though his company mostly guards malls, offices and other businesses.

“It’s crime,” he said. “Straight up crime—and the people in those areas not feeling safe.”

In San Francisco, Alan Byard, a licensed police officer who works for private clients under a program dating to the Gold Rush, said he has seen a big increase in interest in his services. Before the pandemic, he said he had 75 clients in the Marina area. Today, he has 175.

“As the pandemic was getting into the first six months, the clients started calling me up and saying, ‘Crime is out of control, what can you do?’” he said.

Private security patrols on public streets aren’t new, but they have more typically been found in gated communities and downtown business districts.

“It’s a force multiplier,” said Alderman Brian Hopkins, whose Chicago district includes Bucktown, one of the neighborhoods that has recently begun the patrols. “You actually do have police officers on the street. They just happen to be in security vehicles as opposed to police cars, but their experience comes with them.”

Data compiled by P4 from the Chicago Police Department show that reported crimes in the area it patrols in Bucktown were up 30% for the first quarter of this year compared with the same period in 2021, but reported crimes were up by 47% and 86% in two similar nearby neighborhoods.

Private patrols can reduce crime in areas they serve, said Jens Ludwig, head of the University of Chicago’s Crime Lab. But they tend to exacerbate racial and economic divisions that are already wide in the city, he added, and could potentially reduce political pressure to attack the problem at a citywide level. “That would be the open question and potential big concern,” he said. [that makes no sense, he is playing with his slavery. there would be political pressure to have the same results citywide]

The contracts with services like P4 typically require the formation of a new neighborhood association, which raises funds to pay for the service. Sometimes, only one or two neighbors will foot the bill, P4 officials said. In one section of Lincoln Park, neighbors were seeking contributions of $100 a month from anyone interested in pitching in, with a goal of raising $175,000 a year, according to a letter distributed to homeowners.

Josh Lane, a 34-year-old Bucktown resident, said he was knocked to the ground and robbed last summer by two young men with a fake gun when he was out walking his dog, Dante, one of several incidents that spurred the community to action.

His injuries weren’t serious and the robbers only made off with $12, his bank card and an old cellphone, Mr. Lane said. Shortly after that, the neighborhood began holding meetings and set up a new neighborhood association that is paying for the patrols.

Mr. Lane says he still feels generally safe in the neighborhood and has mixed feelings about the patrols.

“It’s a little like a dystopian sci-fi movie when you see the flashing green lights go by,” said Mr. Lane, who works in the medical-publishing business. He said he is also uneasy about the patrols being armed, fearing that they will eventually harm someone.

“The guys who attacked me were stupid kids, but they don’t deserve to get shot,” he said.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot has expressed skepticism about the program. “People are concerned about their security, I’m concerned about their security,” she said in a December media briefing in which she called private security patrolling public streets a slippery slope. “Responsibility under state law and local law to patrol our streets lies exclusively with the Chicago Police Department.” [observe that there is no citation to any law here - because there is no legal support for her stupid opinion. People certainly can patrol their own neighborhoods.]

She declined to comment further through a spokesman. [Interesting because as a strawboss she is a spokesman for her white elite masters, parroting their statements and fulfilling their desires]

The Chicago Police Department said it encourages everyone to help police by reporting crimes and urges people not to take matters into their own hands. It declined to comment further. [yes people indeed have natural rights to defend themselves, their property and the right come to the defense of others]

On a recent afternoon in Bucktown, Colton Jeralds, a police officer on weekends in Pecatonica, Ill., radioed P4’s operations center to begin his shift on the neighborhood security detail. He drove a late-model Hyundai SUV and wore a black short-sleeve shirt with a bulletproof vest. He had a Glock 43 9mm handgun strapped to his left hip.

He slowly circled the perimeter of the 24-block area, which includes a bookstore, a perfume shop and cafes, then weaved through tree-lined neighborhood streets and alleys with a mix of newer mansions and traditional two- and three-story brick homes and apartments. He covers the entire area for the start of his shift, then splits it with another officer for the rest.

He said he enjoys talking to residents, helping dig them out of the snow, securing packages and alerting them to things like an open garage door. Many shifts are uneventful. A recent highlight was meeting with a man who had contacted him through a private social-media channel open to residents to discuss several packages that had been stolen from the man’s porch.

“I do think people notice us and they know that we are here patrolling the streets. I think that it has helped,” he said.

Jim Higgins, owner of Club Lucky, an Italian restaurant in the middle of the patrolled area, said last summer had been a particularly tough time but the patrols are starting to make people feel safer.

“I think people’s comfort has been raised. It’s a pretty small area that they patrol, so you’ll be walking your dog or your baby or going to the store and within a half-hour you’ll see them at least once—maybe every 20 minutes,” he said.

Racists See Things in Accord w/Their Beliefs: LAPD Believed a Latino Man's Phone was a Gun So They Shot Him w/o Warning. Cops Release Video/Audio They Never Saw or Heard Before Shooting to Justify It

From [HERE] Video posted online this week by the Los Angeles Police Department shows two officers approach a man they believed was armed with a gun in South L.A. in March and immediately shoot him.

Jose Barrera, 45, did not have a gun or any other weapon, but was holding a black cellphone and waving it around. He survived.

The shooting is the latest in which LAPD officers opened fire after misjudging the threat posed by an individual, in part based on inaccurate claims from others — including 911 callers — that the people were brandishing firearms.

The video is a remixed and edited version of reality in that it is a compilation of video and audio taken from different sources and audio. Only the uncut body cam video would show exactly what the officers saw and when they saw it - said info is the only information relevant as to whether their shooting was justified.

In the video from Barrera’s shooting that the department posted to YouTube on Thursday, a 911 caller tells a dispatcher in Spanish that a man with a gun is pointing it at people along Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. The dispatcher asks the man if it is a small gun, and he then says he doesn’t know exactly what the man is holding.

However, police don’t answer or hear 911 calls; the dispatch does. The dispatch then communicate directly to police in what is generally called a “radio run.” The cops in this incident didn’t talk to whomever called. Obviously, cops are trained to respond to what they perceive with their own senses in the present moment as it happens.

The call went out over the police radio as a man pointing an “unknown type handgun at passersby.”

Later, as responding officers Tatiana Bohorquez and Manuel Rios are driving toward the scene, a voice can be heard on the radio stating, “He does have a handgun, and he’s firing at a house right now.” Silent gun shots ….. heard by the dispatch or police? how fantastic.

“Oh, s—,” Bohorquez, who is driving, can be heard saying.

Next in the remixed video, Rios, in the passenger seat, then opens the passenger side door of the patrol vehicle as it is still moving and holds his handgun at the ready in his right hand.

“You might have to shoot. You might have to shoot,” Bohorquez says as they pull up near Barrera.

Rios then immediately opens fire, seeming to fire four rounds down the street at Barrera.

No “passerby[s]” were present or being threatened.

Cops never warned the Latino Man, gave him any orders or announced even their presence.

Timestamps on the body-worn video the department posted showed that the officers then waited about 10 minutes to begin approaching Barrera with a group of other officers. Barrera was handcuffed and taken to a local hospital for treatment.

England’s National Health Service Data Shows that Only 5,115 People Died Solely Due to COVID. The Remaining 109k Deaths Occurred to Persons who Had Fatal Pre-existing Conditions such as Heart Disease

From [HERE] The UK Government claims over 160,000 people have died of Covid-19 in England since March 2020, and they have used these claimed deaths to frighten people into compliance with ridiculous rules for the past two years. 

But reports published by England’s National Health Service (NHS) reveal that as of 20th April 2022, just 5,115 people have died of Covid-19 in England since the alleged pandemic began. 

And the same reports also reveal that Covid-19 deaths have increased by 176% compared to the number of alleged deaths that occurred prior to the first Covid-19 injection being administered in England. Is this what we would expect to see if the jabs are 95% effective at preventing death? 

The NHS has been publishing a weekly report on the number of Covid-19 deaths to have occurred in England’s hospitals since the beginning of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic. 

Heres the table taken from the ‘COVID-19 total deaths – weekly summaries’ report published 21st April 2022 – 

Source

The report shows us that the NHS claim 114,721 people have died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 since March 2020. But what’s suprising here is the extremely low number of people who had no pre-existing conditions and have died of Covid-19 alone. 

Of the 114,721 deaths just 5,115 have been solely attributed to Covid-19, and 109,606 deaths have occurred among people suffering with pre-existing conditions such as chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and heart disease among several others. 

This equates to just 4.45% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since March 2020 being solely due to Covid-19. Yet the UK Government claims over 150,000 people have died of Covid-19 in England within 28 days of a positive test since March 2020. 

However, there is something else that is unusual about these figures that can only be realised once we look at the numbers in a historical report.

The first Covid-19 injection was administered in England on the 9th December 2020, and as we will all know through endless propaganda, it was claimed to be 95% effective at preventing infection, hospitalisation and death. 

The claim that it was 95% effective at preventing infection is both deeply troubling and hilarious when you look at the Covid-19 case rates in England at the moment. Official data from the UK Health Security Agency shows the Covid-19 case-rates per 100,000 are highest among the triple vaccinated in all age groups. 

The data actually shows Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against infection has fallen to minus-391% among triple jabbed 60-69-year-olds, and between minus-298% and minus-324% among those aged 30 to 59.

All other age groups have also suffered a significant drop in vaccine effectiveness with figures showingall triple vaccinated adults now between 3 and 5 times more likely to be infected with Covid-19 than unvaccinated adults. [MORE]

Economics Professor at Michigan State University Estimates that COVID Injections Have Killed at Least 300,000 Americans

How Many People Died from the Covid-19 Inoculation? An Estimate Based on a Survey of the United States Population (Working Paper)

By Mark Skidmore

Mark Skidmore is Professor of Economics at Michigan State University where he holds the Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy. His research focuses on topics in public finance, regional economics, and the economics of natural disasters. Mark created the Lighthouse Economics website and blog to share economic research and information relevant for navigating tumultuous times.

Executive Summary

From [HERE] This paper examines potential fatalities and injuries from the Covid-19 inoculation using an online “Covid-19 Health Experiences Survey” administered to a representative sample of the US population. The sample is composed of 3,000 respondents balanced on age, gender, and income to the extent possible. The survey was administered in December 2021, collecting information regarding respondents’ experiences with the Covid-19 illness and the Covid-19 inoculations as well as Covid-19 health experiences within respondents’ social circles. The survey also collected respondent economic and demographic information. Using these data, I find the following:

Covid-19 inoculation-related fatalities:

  • Assuming that all the respondents who know somebody who they believe died from the inoculation actually died from the inoculation, estimated fatalities are about 308,000.

  • Subtracting out those who may have died regardless of inoculation yields an estimated 294,000 inoculation-induced fatalities. This is an initial first pass estimate—more evaluation is needed.

Factors associated with being inoculated:                        

  • The likelihood of being inoculated is significantly less for those who identify themselves as African American, Hispanic, and Asian, and Republican or Independent. Democrats, Caucasians, and more the highly educated are more likely to be inoculated.

  • Those who indicated that they obtain information about Covid-19 from alternative news sources were less likely to be inoculated. Those who obtain information from mainstream news and official government source are more likely to be inoculated.

  • Knowing someone who experienced a significant health problem from the Covid-19 illness increased the likelihood of being inoculated.

  • Knowing someone who had been injured by the Covid-19 inoculation substantially reduced the likelihood of being inoculated.

The official position of the US government is that the Covid-19 inoculations have resulted in nine fatalities (CDC, 2022).  The experiences shared by hundreds of respondents in this survey suggests that many people died or were injured following inoculation.  Which data are more believable—nine fatalities or as many as 300,000 fatalities?  Surveys have limitations in assessing the impacts of health interventions.  However, this type of evaluation offers an important point of triangulation. The experiences of people captured in surveys generally should be consistent with official government data.  In the case of Covid-19 inoculations, there is a tremendous divergence which should be cause for further inquiry.  My hope is that this research will motivate a full and transparent examination by independent health and medical scholars to ascertain the degree of harm being caused by the Covid-19 inoculations.

The full paper can be accessed at: How Many People Died from the Covid-19 Inoculations? An Estimate Based on a Survey of the United States Population

American Airlines Pilot who Went Into Cardiac Arrest Minutes after Landing Plane says COVID Injection Caused His Heart to Stop

From [HERE] An American Airlines pilot suffered cardiac arrest minutes after landing his plane. Thankfully he survived, and he fully believes the Covid-19 injection he was forced to get by his employers is to blame. 

Steve Kirsch sat down for an interview with Josh Yoder of US Freedom Flyers about American Airlines Captain Bob Snow. Snow had a cardiac arrest minutes after landing the plane. He nearly died.

According to Snow, it’s pretty clear that his cardiac arrest was due to the experimental COVID vaccine that American Airlines forced him to take to keep his job.

Key points in the video interview below include:

  1. How Snow knows it was the vaccine and not just “bad luck”

  2. American Airlines never called Snow in the hospital even though it was their fault he took the vaccine and almost died. You’d think he’d get a call from the CEO. Instead, the only thing they did was fly his family to the hospital to meet with him.

  3. We need to be testing every vaccinated pilot with EKG, D-dimer, troponin, and cardiac MRIs to assess their health. This is for their health and for the safety of the flying public. The airlines and/or FAA should be requiring this. Myocarditis can be subclinical so pilots may not know they are injured.

  4. The airlines are NOT doing the screenings required to assess pilot health and passenger safety. Presumably, this is because doing those screenings would: 1) reveal to the public how unsafe the vaccines are and increase vaccine hesitancy, and 2) disqualify too many pilots. Yoder estimates that 30% of the pilots may need to be disqualified due to heart conditions caused by the vaccine. Therefore, the most likely outcome is that the airlines will pretend this incident never happened and the CDC will claim without evidence that there is no link to the vaccine like they usually do. The press will give them a pass on this and not ask any hard questions.

  5. When a plane goes down and people are killed, it’s OK for the airlines because the insurance companies will pay and everyone will pretend it was just a freak accident that couldn’t have been avoided.

Wisconsin Family Launches Billboard Campaign that Claims Hospital COVID Treatment Protocols Killed Their Daughter Grace

From [HERE] On October 13, 2021, Grace Schara passed away at Ascension’s St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Wisconsin.  Her parents say the doctors and hospital killed Grace by their insistence to follow ineffective COVID treatment protocols.

On Oct. 13, 2021, at 7:27 pm, beautiful Grace Schara—an inquisitive young woman with Down-Syndrome—died a tragic and preventable death at a Wisconsin hospital. Rather than using treatments proven to combat COVID-19, Ascension’s St. Elizabeth’s Hospital followed the U.S. government’s ineffective COVID-19 treatment protocols, for which they reap significant financial rewards. On the final day of Grace’s life, as her doctor assured her parents she was doing well, Dr. Gavin Shokar also “unilaterally labeled Grace a DNR and ordered a lethal combination of IV sedatives and narcotics”—a fatal combination of the drugs Precedex, Lorazepam, and Morphine—which were administered over an incredibly short period of time. Notably, all three drugs are manufactured by mRNA “vaccine” maker and pharmaceutical giant Pfizer.

The Schara family is still speaking out about their daughter’s tragic death. The family of Grace Shara is now running over a dozen billboards in the FOX Valley area.

From the press release:

Grace was admitted to St. Elizabeth’s for Covid-19 respiratory issues, but was recovering before a doctor began giving sedatives to her.

Dr. Gavin Shokar, MD, apparently found it so likely she would die from his administration of Precedex – a powerful sedative used in surgery – that he wrote his own do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order on her a mere eight minutes after giving her the maximum dose. When Grace was still alive Shokar then combined Precedex with Lorazepam (another powerful sedative) and a Morphine push within minutes of one another on Grace’s last day to finish her off. A 14-year ICU nurse, Hollee McInnis, delivered the lethal dosage.

“Each of these medicines, on their own, have an increased risk of serious or life-threatening breathing problems and cardiac arrest,” said a doctor familiar with Grace’s case. “There’s an additive effect when used in combination. To use them like they did in a person with a diagnosis of acute respiratory distress is beyond believable as to intention,” she said.

A DNR order is legally required to be discussed with family and consented to in writing, neither of which occurred in Grace’s case. Grace was not given a DNR bracelet, which is required by law. In fact, family members were never told Grace had a DNR designation until her last breaths, when doctors and nurses did nothing to help her, despite the family telling them Grace didn’t have a DNR. Apathetic medical staff allowed Grace to die as her sister at her bedside helplessly begged them to revive her, while her parents – who were not allowed in her room – watched her die via FaceTime.