Study in the Journal of Pediatrics Finds a High Percentage of Teens Develop Heart Damage Months after Getting 2nd Pfizer COVID Shot

From [HERE] New research published in the Journal of Pediatrics reveals that more than 66 percent of all adolescents who develop Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine”-related myopericarditis after the second jab still end up suffering from persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis.

This revelation suggests that, contrary to what the government claims, Fauci Flu shot adverse effects can be long term, even in children. And the saddest part is that children have a zero percent risk of dying from the disease in the first place, so what is the rationale behind them getting the shots?

Published on March 25, the study challenges the position held by multiple government agencies in the United States, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which claims that heart inflammation caused by Pfizer and Moderna mRNA (messenger RNA) injections is always “mild.”

Researchers at Seattle Children’s Hospital looked at cases of younger patients under age 18 who came to the hospital with chest pain and elevated serum troponin levels between April 1, 2021, and Jan. 7, 2022, which covers the height of the Operation Warp Speed mass injection campaign. All of them had received their second dose of Pfizer within the previous week.

Of the 35 patients who fit the criteria, 16 were determined to be suitable for evaluation purposes. All 16 underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tests three to eight months after their first examination.

Of these, 11 were found to have persistent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), though levels were lower than in previous months.

“The presence of LGE is an indicator of cardiac injury and fibrosis and has been strongly associated with worse prognosis in patients with classical acute myocarditis,” the study explains.

Fully vaccinated children have troponin levels more than 20 times higher than a heart attack patient

A meta-analysis of eight studies found that LGE is a predictor of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiac transplant, rehospitalizations, recurrent acute myocarditis, and is a requirement for mechanical circulatory support.

Another 11-study meta-analysis found the “presence and extent of LGE to be a significant predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes.”

While some of the child patients in the new study showed symptoms that “were transient and most patients appeared to respond to treatment,” there was still a “persistence of abnormal findings,” the team found.

All of this “rais[es] concerns for potential longer-term effects,” the researchers wrote, adding that they plan to take more MRIs at the one year mark to see whether any of the abnormalities have resolved.

“The paper provides more evidence that myocarditis in adolescents that result from COVID-19 vaccines is very serious,” says Dr. Madhava Setty, the senior science editor for The Defender, a project of Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

“All patients had significantly elevated serum troponin levels indicative of heart damage. And LGE, which is indicative of poor outcome, was present in more than two-thirds of the kids.”

“These young patients had a median troponin level of 9.15 – more than 20 times greater than the levels found in people suffering heart attacks.”

Commenting on the findings on Twitter, Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon and public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, wrote that the CDC has a “civic duty to rigorously study the long-term effects of vaccine-induced myocarditis.”

“New follow-up study 3-8 months after myocarditis shows the MRI heart abnormality of late gadolinium enhancement seen in 63% of children,” he added. “Merits further study.”

According to Dr. Anisha Koka, a cardiologist, the study also suggests that upwards of 70 percent of teenagers who develop myocarditis from covid injections will be left with a scar on their heart.

Suit Calls for Indonesia to Stop Mandates; Vax Doesn't Prevent COVID or its Transmission, So Experimental Shots are a Matter of Individual Choice, Not Public Health. Gov Destroyed Informed Consent

From [HERE] and [HERE] Lawsuit against Indonesian Minister of Health and President of Republic of Indonesia regarding Covid19 Vaccination

Jakarta, Tuesday, 15 March 2022. The Plaintiffs represented by the Legal Team from VST & Partners Law Office (https://vstlawfirm.com/) registered a Lawsuit for Unlawful Actions by the Minister of Health and the President of the Republic of Indonesia at the Jakarta Administrative Court about the Covid19 vaccine policies. Plaintiff I Ted Hilbert is a foreign national (Luxembourg) with permanent residency in Indonesia and Plaintiff II Fatoni Rahman is an Indonesian citizen.

As for the basis of the lawsuit, namely the actions taken by the government by mandating vaccination for all residents in the country by executive order, the policy is contrary to Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 292, Supplement to the Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2014 Number 292, Supplementary Gazette Republic of Indonesia Number 5601) (hereinafter referred to as Law 30/2014), Law Number 36 Year 2009 concerning Health (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2009 Number 144, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5063) (hereinafter referred to as Law 36/2009) , Law Number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2018 Number 128, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6236) (hereinafter referred to as Law 6/2018), Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights (Gazette State of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 165, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia N number 3886) (hereinafter referred to as Law 39/1999).

The reasons for the plaintiffs to file this lawsuit are as follows:

1. The Plaintiffs are Residents in Indonesia who are affected by the Government policy during the Covid19 Pandemic, especially related to the vaccine mandate as a requirement to get government administration services and enter public spaces or public transportation as well as facing fines for not being vaccinated.

2. The Plaintiffs are not refusing Covid19 vaccination without valid reasons or “anti-vaccine”. This case is about the right to obtain full, balanced and responsible information about health as guaranteed in Article 7 of Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health (Hereinafter referred to as Law 36/2009) and Informed Consent. In addition, the Plaintiffs are also entitled to obtain SAFE, QUALITY and affordable health services as guaranteed in Article 5 paragraph (2) of Law 36/2009 and lastly, the Plaintiffs have the right to INDEPENDENTLY and RESPONSIBLE DETERMINE THE HEALTH SERVICES NEEDED for themselves as per article 5 paragraph (3) of Law 36/2009. As per the law and the basic principle of Informed Consent in medicine, the Plaintiffs have the right to request and obtain clear and accountable information and data regarding the risks and benefits as well as the effectiveness of vaccines so that the Plaintiffs can independently and responsibly decide about Covid19 vaccination.

3. To determine the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, the Plaintiffs conducted independent research from many global government sources including the Indonesian government and peer reviewed studies from reputable international journals. The following are the results of the analysis which is part of the lawsuit materials:

Indonesian language: https://investigasi.org/analisis-lengkap-dan-ilmiah-penipuan-vaksin-covid19/

English Translation: https://investigasi-org.translate.goog/analisis-lengkap-dan-ilmiah-penipuan-vaksin-covid19/?_x_tr_sl=id&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

4. Based on the results of the research conducted, the Plaintiffs reached the conclusion that the risks of Covid19 vaccination outweigh the benefits for themselves and most other people, while acknowledging that there may be a benefit for specific groups of people. Most importantly, vaccination does not prevent transmission of Covid19, as admitted by the Ministry of Health, making vaccination clearly a matter of individual health decisions, not public health, and cannot be mandated through government policies. All global data and studies demonstrate that Covid19 vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission. By following the narrative and data from the Indonesian government that vaccines only prevent serious illness and death (which the Plaintiffs also object to based on data), not affecting any other person, refusing vaccination has to be considered in the same category as smoking, drinking alcohol or eating an unhealthy diet: a personal choice. There is no law or regulation prohibiting smoking, even though it is proven to be deadly, so why would there be any reason to mandate a highly questionable and experimental vaccine which only maybe provides some health benefit to some individuals while also having many risks and no proven long term safety?

As a consequence, the Plaintiffs filed an Administrative Objection to the Minister of Health as Defendant I demanding that all Covid19 vaccine mandates be stopped, which was received in full by the Ministry of Health on January 31, 2022 and rejected without plausible or legitimate grounds. After that, an Administrative Appeal was filed to the President as Defendant II which was received in full through the State Secretary on 22 February 2022 and also rejected without plausible or legitimate grounds.

5. Before the administrative objections to the government and subsequent lawsuit filing, the Plaintiffs have made various attempts to obtain information and data from the government since September 2021 without any result. Due to the failure of the Ministry of Health to comply with the Freedom of Information Law (UU KIP), a complaint was filed by the Plaintiffs to Ombudsman RI and even an official request from Ombudsman RI to the Ministry of Health to provide the information and data was formally refused. Another official request to BPOM (Indonesian FDA) for the risk-benefit analysis data of Covid19 vaccines was officially denied citing intellectual property rights of the vaccine manufacturer as well as the potential misuse of the information. In summary, every request for data about vaccine safety and effectiveness was either ignored or formally denied, in a blatant violation of freedom of information laws as well as informed consent principle and laws.

No government has the right to mandate the injection of experimental substances into the body of its people, this has already been confirmed by the US Supreme Court and several other high profile cases, for example the New Zeeland High Court has declared the mandatory vaccination for Police officers illegal. In addition to this, the Austrian government has declared their own vaccine mandate as a violation of basic rights which cannot be justified due to the relatively harmless nature of Covid19 and retracted its vaccine mandates.

Plaintiff’s Press Contact:

Ted Hilbert WhatsApp +6281294055112, tedhilbert@gmail.com

Contact VST Lawfirm WhatsApp +6281212117270

Website VST Lawfirm: https://vstlawfirm.com

There Never was a Pandemic, Only a Plandemic, a War Against Humanity. One of the Biggest Lies in World History

From [HERE] Introduction 

Destabilizing the social, political and economic structure of 190 sovereign countries cannot constitute  a “solution” to combating the virus. But that was the imposed “solution” which was implemented in several stages from the very outset of the corona crisis in January 2020.  It’s the destruction of people’s  lives. It is the destabilization of civil society. 

Fake science was supportive of this devastating agenda. The lies were sustained by a massive media disinformation campaign. 24/7, Incessant and Repetitive “Covid alerts” in the course of the last two years.

The  historic March 11, 2020 lockdown triggered economic and social chaos Worldwide. It was an act of “economic warfare”: a war against humanity. 

This diabolical agenda has undermined the sovereignty of nation states. 

It has contributed  to a wave of bankruptcies. It has impoverished people Worldwide.

It has led to a spiralling dollar denominated global debt. 

The powerful structures of global capitalism, Big Money coupled with its intelligence and military apparatus are the driving force. 

Using advanced digital and communications technologies, the lockdown and “closure” of the global economy is unprecedented in World history.

The Central Role of the Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (RT-PCR)

From the very outset, both the media and the governments have overlooked and ignored the flaws and falsehoods pertaining to the RT-PCR test as a means to detecting the spread of the virus and identifying SARS-CoV-2.

“The PCR is a Process. It does not tell you that you are sick”.

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.

This misuse of the RT-PCR technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, … under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients. .

Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.

The Entire Data Base of “Covid-19 Confirmed Cases” is Invalid.

Media disinformation has prevailed  for more than two years despite the fact that both the WHO and the CDC (with the usual innuendos) have confirmed what was known from the very outset in January 2020, namely that the RT-PCR test used to justify every single policy mandate including lockdowns, social distancing, the mask, confinement of the labor force, closure of economic activity, etc. was flawed and invalid. 

The WHO issued its Mea Culpa more than a year ago on January 20, 2021. A few months later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)  (July 21, 2021) called for the withdrawal of the PCR test as a valid method for detecting and identifying SARS-CoV-2.  Moreover, the WHO in January 2020, did not possess an isolate and purified sample of the novel 2019-nCov virus. The Berlin Virology team (headed by Drosten):

“recommended to the WHO, that in the absence of an isolate of the 2019-nCoV virus, a similar 2003-SARS-CoV should be used as a “proxy” (point of reference) of the novel virus” (See Michel Chossudovsky, E-Book, Chapter III)

As of December, 31 2021, the PCR test is no longer considered valid by the CDC in the U.S.  For more details see: CDC No Longer Recognizes the PCR Test As a Valid Method for Detecting “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”?

The CDC has now firmly acknowledged that the PCR test does not effectively differentiate between Covid-19 and Seasonal Influenza. A PCR positive does not imply a “Covid-19 Confirmed Case”. It could be influenza or a corona common cold. The CDC called for its withdrawal effective December 31, 2021.

Fake Data: 465 Million So-Called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”

If the PCR test is invalid (confirmed by numerous studies as well as WHO, CDC), the 465 Million so-called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” (see diagram below, MARCH 18, 2022) collected and tabulated Worldwide since the outset of the Covid-19 crisis are meaningless. Click here to get the latest figures.

The Pandemic Treaty and the QR Verification  Code 

In early March 2022 an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) was established with a mandate to  create “A Pandemic Treaty”, i.e. a global health governance entity under WHO auspices, which would override the authority of the WHO member states:

, “The INB held its first meeting to draft and negotiate an international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response under the authority of the WHO” (Mercola)

The Pandemic Treaty  is tied into the WHO’s QR Verification Code project, which is intent upon creating a global digital data bank of 7.9 billion people. Both initiatives are to be carried out concurrently by  the WHO in liaison with ID2020 and the Gavi Alliance, both of which are funded by the Gates Foundation.

Peter Koenig describes the QR Code as

“an all-electronic ID – linking everything to everything of each individual (records of health, banking, personal and private, etc.).”

According to David Scripac  “A worldwide digital ID system is in the making. [The aim] of the WEF—and of all the central banks [is] to implement a global system in which everyone’s personal data will be incorporated into the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) network.”

The QR Verification Code potentially sets the stage for the instatement of “a global police state” controlled by the financial establishment. It’s part of what the late David Rockefeller entitled “the march towards World Government”.

The  legitimacy of both the Pandemic Treaty and the QR Verification Code under WHO auspices rests on the presumption that the alleged “Covid-19 Pandemic is Real” and that the “mRNA vaccine constitutes a SOLUTION to the alleged Covid-19 pandemic.”

Both initiatives are based on outright fraud and corruption. What is the evidence:

1. The Number of  “Covid-19 Cumulative Confirmed Cases” resulting from the RT-PCR test did not  justify the WHO’s decision to officially launch a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The numbers were ridiculously low. There was no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was spreading nationally or internationally.

2. The Lockdown instructions transmitted in March 2020 to more than 190 member states of the UN are totally invalid.

3. The methodology using the PCR test to detect and identify the SARS-CoV2 and its alleged variants has been acknowledged by the WHO and the CDC as being totally dysfunctional as outlined above.

4. All the data pertaining to Covid-19 Cumulative Confirmed Cases compiled by national governments and tabulated by the WHO since January 2020 are invalid and meaningless.

5. The Covid-19 Vaccine launched in November 2020 has resulted in an upward Worldwide tide of mortality and morbidity

In this article I will distinguish between several phases in the evolution of this crisis.

Phase I: Ridiculously Low Numbers of  “Covid-19 Confirmed Cases” Used to Justify the Launching of the Covid-19 Pandemic

From the very outset, the estimates of “confirmed positive cases” have been part of a “Numbers Game”.

The first stage of this crisis was the launching of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the WHO on January 30th. While officially it was not designated as a “Pandemic”, it nonetheless contributed to spearheading the fear campaign. The number of “confirmed cases” based on faulty estimates (PCR) used to justify this far reaching decision was ridiculously low.

The Worldwide population outside China is of the order of 6.4 billion. On January 30, 2020 outside China there were:

83 cases in 18 countries, and only 7 of them had no history of travel in China. (see WHO, January 30, 2020).

83 Cases outside China: There was no “scientific basis” to justify the launching of a Worldwide Public Health Emergency of International Concern.

Republican-dominated Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Prohibiting the Death Penalty for People with Serious Mental Illness - only the 2nd State to Do So

From [HERE] The Kentucky State Senate has given final legislative approval to a bill that would make the Commonwealth the second U.S. state to bar the execution of people with serious mental illness. 

On March 25, 2022, the Republican-dominated body voted 25-9 to pass HB 269, a bill that prohibits the death penalty for defendants diagnosed with any of four specified mental health disorders. The measure overwhelmingly passed the House on February 9 by a vote of 76-19. If signed by Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, Kentucky would join Ohio in exempting severely mentally ill defendants from capital punishment.

Under the bill’s provisions, defendants who had active symptoms and a documented diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and/or delusional disorder at the time of the offense would no longer be subject to the death penalty. Defendants seeking to bar capital prosecution under the bill are required to file a motion in the trial court at least 120 days before their scheduled trial date. If the court determines that the defendant meets the statute’s requirements, the case will proceed to a non-capital trial. Unlike a similar measure passed in Ohio in 2021, Kentucky’s law would not apply to those already sentenced to death in the state.

Gangs [within a gang] in the LA Sheriff's Department to be Investigated by Oversight Panel. Cop Gangs are Tied to the Deaths of at Least 19 People, all of whom were Black or Latino Males

From [HERE] Last year, journalist Cerise Castle authored an investigation into gangs within the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. She detailed the long history of these gangs and how prevalent they still are in Los Angeles, in an investigative series published by Knock LA.

"There are at least 18 gangs within the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department," according to the investigation, and they are allegedly tied to the deaths of at least 19 people, all of whom were men of color. Castle's reporting includes a database of names of deputies reportedly involved in these gangs. The department did not speak to the journalism outlet for the series.

This week, the civilian oversight board charged with keeping tabs on the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) announced it's launching an investigation into the prevalence of deputy gangs within the department.

The announcement of the committee's investigation comes roughly a year after Knock LA published Castle's investigation.

"It was quite a full-circle moment for me to see that an independent investigation into these deputy gangs is being pursued," Castle told NPR of the news.

Since her project was released, Castle said, she has seen multiple occasions where LASD deputies, along with the gangs they are a part of, "take egregious actions" against civilians in LA.

"Many stories do not make it into the news," she said.

Her investigations into LASD deputy gangs continue.

These kinds of gangs have created decades of problems within the department and with how it deals with the citizens of Los Angeles, according to the civilian oversight board. Those problems include claims of discrimination, excessive force and even murder.

"Deputy gangs have fostered and promoted excessive force against citizens, discriminated against other deputies based on race and gender, and undermined the chain of command and discipline," said Sean Kennedy, the commission's chair, in a statement. "Despite years of documented history of this issue, the Department has failed to eliminate the gangs."

Sheriff Alex Villanueva wrote on Facebook that inquiries into his department over alleged gangs are just a "fishing expedition" and "political theater."

He wrote, "Not one elected official, or their political appointees, have provided me even one name" of a deputy involved in gangs.

The investigation is set to take five to six months to complete. The commission aims to determine which stations these gangs operate out of, as well as the scope and impact these groups have had on the communities that deputies are meant to protect.

The county's inspector general also launched an investigation into the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department this year.

In a letter sent to Villanueva, LA County Inspector General Max Huntsman demanded documents from the department that are still owed to investigators.

In this letter, Huntsman said at least 41 Los Angeles County deputies have been identified as being tattooed members of the Banditos or Executioners gangs.

California law requires that law enforcement agencies maintain a policy prohibiting such "law enforcement gangs." Yet numerous reports have shown the existence of these deputy gangs within the county's sheriff's department.

California's legislature has defined law enforcement gangs as "peace officers within a law enforcement agency who may identify themselves by a name and may be associated with an identifying symbol, including, but not limited to, matching tattoos." Lawmakers have said the problem appears to be most prolific in the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.

Suit Filed for James Williams, Murdered by a White Canton Cop, Shot Dead w/o Warning. Black Man Posed No Threat as He Fired His Gun Into the Air to Celebrate New Year's Eve, Same Way WFs Were Doing

From [HERE] The family of James Williams, a Black man who was fatally shot without warning by a white Ohio police officer minutes into the New Year, has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the officer and the city of Canton in federal court.

Williams, 46, had been firing celebratory gunfire skyward from behind a 6-foot-tall privacy at his home when officer Robert Huber fired multiple rounds through the fence as smoke rose into the air. Footage from Huber’s body camera showed him shouting “Get down!” after he had shot Williams, who died at a hospital.

Canton Police Chief Jack Angelo on the day of the shooting said the officer was outside his vehicle and confronted someone who began shooting a firearm. Angelo said the officer feared for his safety and fired his duty weapon at the person, striking him.

Canton Mayor Thomas Bernabei released a statement to The Canton Repository, which first reported on the lawsuit Wednesday, that the city had no comment. The statement noted that the shooting is being investigated by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and that its findings would be presented to a Stark County grand jury to determine whether criminal charges would be filed.

Messages were left with Huber’s attorney on Thursday.

At a news conference on Wednesday, Williams’ widow, Marquetta, said, “I will fight today, tomorrow and every day until I have no breath left because it’s my family today but may be yours tomorrow.”

The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory and special damages for claims that include excessive force, wrongful death, deliberate indifference to medical needs, assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Williams was the father of four daughters and stepfather to two more. His three minor children with Marquetta Williams are named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Klansas City to Pay $325k: White Cops Ignored Black Teen's So-Called "4th Amendment Rights" by Ordering Him Out of a Car for No Reason, Throwing Him to the Ground and Striking Him more than 10 Times

From [HERE] A Black Kansas City teenager will receive a $325,000 settlement after three white police officers hit him more than 10 times and used a stun gun on him, according to an excessive force lawsuit.

It is the third settlement this year against Kansas City police in cases involving Black teenagers, with a total payout of $1.3 million, The Kansas City Star reported.

The lawsuit alleged the 17-year-old was sitting in his car in a parking lot waiting for friends after homecoming at Hogan Preparatory Academy on Oct. 12, 2019.

Two officers approached the car and ordered him to get out. When the teen got out of the car, he was thrown to the ground, punched, knelt on by two officers and hit with a stun gun by a third, according to the lawsuit.

Video filed with the lawsuit includes the teenager calling for help and saying he was not resisting, The Star reported.

The teenager had not committed any traffic violations. He was arrested but never charged with a crime.

The Kansas City Police Department declined to comment on the settlement.

The police department has paid more than $10.8 million in excessive force and wrongful arrest claims since 2014.

GA to Pay $4.8M for White Cop's Murder of Julian Lewis. Shot Black Man in the Head After Forcing Him Off Road to Enforce Broken Tail Light Law. Killer Cop Remains Free, White DA Still Holds Bodycam

 From [HERE] The state of Georgia has agreed to pay a $4.8 million legal settlement to the family of a Black man who was fatally shot by a white state trooper trying to pull him over for a broken tail light (pulled him over because he’s black).

The office of Georgia’s attorney general confirmed the hefty settlement amount Friday.

The trooper who killed Julian Lewis was swiftly fired by the Georgia State Patrol and charged with murder following the 2020 killing. But the prosecution of the former trooper, Jacob Thompson, stalled last summer when either an incompetent or liar white DA District Attorney Daphne J. Totten (racist suspect in photo) failed to get her grand jury in rural Screven County to indict him. [MORE]

Atlanta attorney Andrew Lampros said state officials agreed to mediate a settlement to avoid a civil lawsuit over 60-year-old Lewis’ death. He said the slain man’s wife, Betty Lewis, remains “hopeful but frustrated” that Thompson will eventually stand trial, either in state or federal court.

“This is a classic case of driving while Black,” Lampros said. “That is all that Mr. Lewis, I believe, was guilty of.”

Thompson, who is white, tried to pull Lewis over for a broken tail light near the Georgia-South Carolina state line on Aug. 7, 2020. When Lewis didn’t immediately stop, the trooper pursued him and forced his car into a ditch, then shot Lewis in the head.

Mr. Thompson drew his gun as he got out of his vehicle, he told investigators, and said he saw Mr. Lewis trying to maneuver his vehicle toward him, prompting him to fire his weapon. Mr. Lewis was struck once and pronounced dead at the scene, the report said.

Specifically, Thompson wrote in his incident report that he opened fire as Lewis was revving his engine and turning his steering wheel, as if he was trying to ram the trooper.

But Dustin Peak, a Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent, testified in September that this would have been impossible, because Mr. Lewis’s vehicle was inoperable after it hit the ditch and the car battery disconnected, The Associated Press reported.

Peak testified that dash camera video showed one second elapsed between the time the trooper got out of his patrol vehicle and when he fired the shot that killed Lewis.

White cop Thompson was arrested on charges of felony murder and aggravated assault a week after the shooting.

In a statement on Thursday, Hall & Lampros, the law firm representing Mr. Lewis’s family, said that “it is believed” that Mr. Lewis had continued driving because he wanted to go to an area “where he knew other people would be present.”

Francys Johnson, a lawyer for Mr. Lewis’s family, said that the settlement, which was reached last month before a lawsuit was filed, was only one step in the family’s effort to hold Mr. Thompson accountable.

Lewis’ family has called on District Attorney Daphne Totten to empanel another grand jury and try again to get an indictment.

Francys Johnson, a lawyer for Mr. Lewis’s family, said Georgia law allowed district attorneys to impanel new grand juries if a prior one declined to pursue charges. “We believe that this was a very strong case,” Mr. Johnson said. “The evidence was there and still is.” [MORE] Mr. Johnson said that Mr. Lewis’s family was still waiting for the district attorney, Daphne J. Totten, to release a police video of the shooting. Then, referring to the grand jury members, he said, “And it’s been shown now to 22 citizens in Screven County, but it has not been shown to Julian’s mother or his wife or his attorney.” [MORE]

The slain man’s family has also urged federal authorities to bring charges. The office of acting U.S. Attorney David Estes issued a statement last fall that federal prosecutors were “examining” the circumstances of Lewis’ death “in consultation with the FBI.” No further details were given.

A New York Times investigation last year found that, in a five-year period, police officers in the United States killed at least 400 drivers during traffic stops for minor offenses, including broken taillights.

Only five officers were convicted in those killings, and local governments paid at least $125 million in 40 settlements.

While the state admitted no wrongdoing in settling civil claims over Lewis’ death, Lampros said it still brings some consolation to his family.

Although Trenton Cops Had No Basis to Believe a Black Man Sitting in Car Had Committed a Crime They Seized Him Anyway, Violating His "Rights." Cops Then Shot Him as He Tried to Flee, Causing Paralysis

From [HERE] Police body camera video has been released from an officer-involved shooting of an unarmed Black man in Trenton last month.

Authorities say four Trenton police officers approached a vehicle occupied by Jajuan Henderson, 29, of Burlington City, New Jersey, in the early morning hours of February 12 on Center Street.

In the videos, officers refer to the encounter as a "traffic stop," but it's not clear from the video why the stop was initiated.

"Open the door. You gotta step out of the car," an officer can be heard saying when Henderson won't roll down his window and appears to be unable to produce his license, registration and insurance.

When Henderson does not get out of the car, the officer threatens to break the window. "I'm calling the cops," Henderson is heard responding in the video.

"We are the cops!" an officer replies.

"I know, but y'all can't do this," Henderson says.

At least one time the officers told him to stop reaching around the vehicle, using expletives.

Henderson tells them he's looking for his phone, to call his lawyer.

About five minutes after the video starts, an officer shatters the driver's side window.

Henderson screams and then starts the ignition. He accelerates forward and backward, crashing into vehicles.

"Holy!" one of the officers shouts, just before four shots are fired, striking Henderson.

The officer who broke the window and fired the shots has been identified as Michael Gettler by the Union County Prosecutors office, which is handling the investigation to avoid a conflict of interest.

The officers radio for help and remove Henderson from the car, starting CPR.

"Stay with us, stay with us," an officer can be heard saying as another performed chest compressions. [cop actors performing for the body camera]

Henderson survived, but attorneys say he is paralyzed from the chest down.

He and his family are now suing the city of Trenton, the police department and the officers, who have been placed on administrative leave while the incident is investigated.

"He asked to call the police on the police. Because he knew that what they were doing was wrong before they shot him," said attorney Gregg Zeff.

He says through all this, his client was unarmed, and still doesn't know why police responded to begin with.

"We know he was in a parked car. We don't know why the police rolled up on him," said Zeff.

Zeff says Henderson now faces criminal charges because of this incident, including resisting arrest and obstruction of justice.

He says Henderson was originally charged with aggravated assault, but those charges were dropped.

In the lawsuit, Zeff says Henderson was targeted because of his race.

"Race is an overwhelming factor any time an African American man has an encounter with a police officer, period," said Zeff. "Assuming this was a traffic stop I think if Jajuan was a white man they would have put a ticket on the windshield and walked away."

"I will remove your f--king soul from your f–-king body." Reporter Obtains Audio of White Sunrise Cop Threatening a Black Man During Arrest Incident Where Cop Choked Another Cop who Intervened

From [HERE] and [HERE] Earlier this year, a Florida police department released silent body camera footage showing a white male officer threatening a Black man who was being arrested. The footage also captured the moment the officer turned and choked a female junior colleague who'd tried to pull him off the man. Now, newly-released audio is adding even more context to the shocking incident. 

Officers with the Sunrise Police Department responded to a call in November 2021 that a man was attacking people outside of a convenience store. The officers were attempting to get the man in the vehicle when Sgt. Christopher Pullease arrived at the scene, aggressively taking over the arrest. 

"Hey, hey, look at me," Pullease said while holding a Mac canister in the man's face, according to audio obtained by Miami TV station WSVN. "Look at me! You wanna f––king play f––king games? You're playing with the wrong motherf––ker." 

"Do what you gotta do, man," the handcuffed man responds. "You gonna Mace me? Mace me." 

Pullease then leans closer to the man, before threatening him. "Look at me, motherf––ker. You wanna play f––king games? You wanna be disrespectful with me f––king officers? I will remove your f––king soul from your f––king body." 

That's when a 28-year-old female officer steps in, pulling at Pullease's belt in attempt to intervene and deescalate the situation. Pullease turns around, grabs her by the throat and pins her against a patrol car.

"What the f––k? Don't ever f––king touch me again," the sergeant said. "Get the f––k off of me," he added before telling her he'll "f––king see you in about five minutes." Pullease goes to his police car before coming back and demanding all the officers at the scene to turn their body cameras off.

"I Can't Breathe [b/c you Shot me]:" Donnell Rochester Posed No Threat When Baltimore Race Soldiers Shot Him. Cops Handcuffed Him as He Died in the Street, Pretended like He was Ok, Freddie Gray Style

'I Think You Tried to Touch Me So Now I Can Kill You:' From [HERE] Video of the police killing of 18-year-old Donnell Rochester is harrowing. 

Baltimore Police officers chase Rochester, who runs and then retreats back to his car, a white Honda Accord, and drives off.

“Get out the car, get out the car now,” cops yell at Rochester, who drives forward. Officer Connor Murray shoots at Rochester, whose car bumps Murray. Soon after, Officer Robert Mauri shoots at Rochester through the windshield and the Honda Accord stops, the car door opens, and Rochester, with his hands up, says, “I can’t breathe.” 

He collapses into the street and repeats, “I can’t breathe.” Cops pull Rochester to the ground and try to handcuff him.

“Put your fucking hand behind your back,” Mauri, who shot Rochester moments before, yells.

“Start a medic,” Murray, who also shot Rochester, says over the radio. “Suspect in custody.”

Rochester, handcuffed, gasping for air, blood leaking out of him and onto the pavement of Chilton Street in Northeast Baltimore around 3PM on Feb. 19, is now surrounded by cops.

“What’s your name?” a cop asks.

Rochester can’t get it out: “My name is…” 

“Where you hit at?” one cop asks Rochester. “Huh?”

Rochester struggles to answer. He has been shot in the chest.

“Where you hit at?” the cop asks again, impatient.

“He’s hit up top,” Murray says. “Upper chest.”

10 seconds later, another cop walks up to Rochester.

“Are you ok?” that cop asks Rochester.

“No,” Rochester responds. 

Officers kneel over Rochester, trying to tend to the gunshot wound—or a “GSW,” as Mauri calls it over the radio at one point.

“Bro, where you shot at?” a cop asks.

Rochester struggles to answer.

“Where you shot at, bro?” the cop asks again.

“My stomach,” Rochester says, hard to hear.

“Turn him over, turn him over,” another cop advises.

The cops turn Rochester’s body around, still looking for the wound or wounds.

“I can’t breathe,” Rochester tells the cops. 

Approximately 15 minutes after he was shot, Rochester was dead.

4th Amendment Rights Nonexistent in Free Range Prison: White Des Moines Cop Brutally Assaults Homeless Black Man Walking Down the Street Who Had Not Committed a Crime. Cop Lied to Justify the Stop

From [HERE] An activist group is again accusing the Des Moines Police Department of abuse and discrimination with their release of video of the arrest of a Black man last fall. 

The videos in question show the arrest of Lentern Woods on September 23rd, 2021. In the videos, officer Joshua Buttons approached Woods – who Button knew had a history of mental illness – on a Des Moines street. As Buttons tries to talk to Woods, Woods ignores the officer and walks away. Button is seen following Woods to the end of the block, then tackling him to the ground before he crosses the street. Woods then hits Button and the officer responds with punches, knees and a taser. Woods is eventually taken into custody and charged with assault on Button.

In a discussion with a supervisor after the arrest that was recorded on a body camera, Button says he was trying to keep Woods out of traffic and says he used his taser because Woods was grabbing at his belt on which his gun was harnessed.

The group calls the incident another example of a police department that is operating without proper oversight from Des Moines’ elected leaders. “We have a city of leaders that refuse to do anything,” said Sharon Zanders-Ackiss with Iowa CCI, “We keep giving you evidence that it’s happening over and over and over. Yet you try to minimize the risk of our reality. This is what our community is dealing with. And until we get some leadership in there that can clean house and do the job they need to do. This will continue because right now there’s no accountability and you can’t keep squashing it and thinking it’s gonna go away because we’re not going away.”

The group is once again calling for Chief Dana Wingert to be fired from the Des Moines Police Department. They are also asking for the creation of a community review board to oversee the police department.

The Des Moines Police Department responded to the accusations with forceful denials on Thursday. According to the department, Woods was seen violently swinging his fists as passersby and walking into traffic before Button approached him. They claim stills from Button’s body camera video clearly show that Woods has his hands on the officer’s taser (which would be a no no in the Free Range because citizens have no right to defend themselves from unlawful assaults from cops, even where they have a reasonable belief that cops are trying to kill them, discussed below).

However, the bodycam video does not show that Woods had been doing anything other than walking down the street. In fact, there are no other pedestrians present in the body cam video- thus Woods could not have committed the crime of threats to do bodily harm, which is a misdemeanor or felony depending on the words uttered to someone; watch the video for yourself. As such, the white cop lied about what occurred and violated Woods’ so-called 4th Amendment rights to be free from unlawful seizures. That is, at the time of the stop Woods had not committed any crime and there was no legal basis for the stop. Or so goes the legal truth of the 4th Amendment. The Supreme Court has explained that in order for the police to stop you the police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and that you are involved in the activity. Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate or unclear and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion.

But legal truths in books and courtrooms must give way to reality on the street. Race Soldiers so frequently abuse their power that no one can make a compelling argument that constitutional rights afford Black people any protection from cops on the street. Black & Latino men face an omnipresent threat of being stopped, seized and searched by cops without legal cause anytime, anyplace. The only thing upholding the 4th Amendment is your belief in it. It is an illusion, a strategy and nothing more. In reality, Constitutional rights are myths, non-existent in a system of free range slavery. Observe also that the cops claim that after the cop tackled Woods to the ground that Woods threw a punch at him. In other words, the Black man attempted to defend himself from an unlawful arrest. Such action has been made unlawful in most states. Citizen-subjects must always obey authority; obey authority or be placed in greater confinement. In a system of physical coercion (law over humanity) only another, higher authority, such as a judge, can declare an arrest lawful. Similarly, you only have rights if an authority agrees that you do; you may believe you have rights but only authorities decide whether you do or don’t. Pursuant to Iowa Code 804.12:

A person is not authorized to use force to resist an arrest, either of the person’s self, or another which the person knows is being made either by a peace officer or by a private person summoned and directed by a peace officer to make the arrest, even if the person believes that the arrest is unlawful or the arrest is in fact unlawful.

Pursuant to FUNKTIONARY:

disobedience – thinking for oneself—deciding for oneself what to do and not to do. 2) the refusal of services of those in power—to deny their alleged authority over you. The Beast allows you to be disobedient or ignorant but not both. Disobedience is the only crime—all others are offshoots. (See: Prometheus, Rights, Thinking, Thought & Rebel)

disobedient – master over one’s thoughts and acting on same relative to the dominating recidivism of authoritarian culture

rights – fantasmatic or fictitious objects having no reality in actuality by those imagining as an identity being in possession of them. Rights are cultural gratuities perceived through various fantasy frames, recognized, and sometimes even created, by man’s system of law to provide a modicum or pretense of civility under a system whereby their very undermining and violation is vouchsafed. Rights are merely rites unless you know how to assert and defend them in order to enjoy them. 2) things people are free to do whether they are able to or not. 3) conditions of existence required by hue-man’s nature for their potential survival (primarily against the cartoon that kills, i.e., the wholly unconscionable entity called the “State”). It is a mistaken notion that rights are enjoyed by one at the expense of the many—that is the realm of privilege. Enjoyment of rights in a neo-imperialistic world controlled by Yurugu through the Greater System (Symbolic Order), paradoxically, entails not only a recognition of their inevitability but, equally, their impossibility. How can we be endowed with rights, or even know what rights are when they are based on binary considerations? Rights, as ontological ephemera, cannot be universally observed, recognized, realized or enforced—and paradoxically, act also as its own eternal source for its assertion and vessel for its fulfillment in our imaginary enjoyment of them. While the law reads rights referentially, what is universally needed in the praxis of rights discourse today is a particular re-inscription, demystification or reontologising of rights (revivified and convivial) by the pan-gendered subject-citizendecoder— taken symptomatically rather than seriously. Most people rarely experience the cognizance of being property of corporate fictions because as long as you don’t violate the rules of society your real status as feudal-property-slave is not involved or revealed. If there is no ‘I,’ to what and to whom do rights as objects accrue? Those who are confused by suffering (and the subject of same) require a re-onotoligisation of rights through the trajectory of meaning independent of their existence. Rights and even ‘lefts’ (i.e., what remains after all of our imaginary rights are traced to their inception as figment) for that matter, like good and evil, are human inventions which humans treat as non-human realities. While fantasy frames invent rights, romanticism reinvents them. Enjoy your symptoms and play with your syndrome—the symptom is the solution. Read carefully the holding in the supreme Court case of U.S. v. Babcock. Rights are myths—obedience to servitude or jail is the reality. Always remember: “The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.” ~William Safire. (See: Abilities, Bill of Rights, Monoright, Servitude, Fantasy, Jurisdiction, Human Resources, Citizenship, Frankenstein, Autonomy, Rule of Law, Surrogate Power, Indigenous Power, Yurugu, Jouissance, Privilege, Disobedience, Duty & Willpower)

Community Unable to Fire or Decline Unwanted "Service" from a White Cop who Trolled and then Beat a Small Black Child as He Sat On Top of Him. Rancho Cordova Authorities Reinstate Officer [Overseer]

From [HERE] and [HERE] The white Rancho Cordova police officer who was fired in 2020 for a use-of-force incident that went viral online has been reinstated, the officer’s attorney said. Deputy Brian Fowell was terminated by the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office — which has a contract to provide law enforcement for the city of Rancho Cordova — when a professional standards unit investigation concluded Fowell used excessive force against a 14-year-old boy. The incident was captured in a cellphone video less than a minute long, posted in April 2020, and spread across social media, garnering millions of views, and was even retweeted by then-Sen. and vice-presidential nominee Kamala Harris, who called it “a horrific abuse of power.”

Fowell appealed his termination in October 2020. And in a decision released Monday, he won his job back. An arbitrator, an independent judge for internal police matters, ruled in Fowell’s favor.

William Creger, Fowell’s attorney, said the arbitrator said in his ruling that while the Sheriff’s Office was entitled to discipline Fowell, termination in this case wasn’t warranted. “The sheriff’s office was entitled to take Deputy Fowell out of the public spotlight for awhile,” Creger said. “The arbitrator said (Fowell) didn’t do everything perfectly, he could’ve handled it in a different way ... but it didn’t need to rise to the level of termination.” Creger said Fowell’s exemplary record as an officer also factored into the arbitrator’s decision. In 2019, Fowell was awarded employee of the quarter in 2019. That same year, he also earned a life-saving medal when he performed CPR on a young girl who was dying in front her family. Because peace officer personnel records are still broadly protected by California law, Creger said he was unable to provide more detail. A Sacramento Bee request for the Sheriff’s Office investigation into the incident was denied, saying the case did not fall within existing public records law. [only positive or “good” public records about cops are readily available to the public]

The incident involving Fowell dominated local and national headlines in the weeks before protests swept across the U.S. in the wake of the May 2020 death of George Floyd. The video clip was shared millions of times on social media. In the video, Fowell can be seen pushing Tufono’s head into the ground as he tries to turn the teen onto his stomach. In the widely circulated video the white cop is seen punching the 14-year-old boy while pinning him to the ground on Monday as he tried to detain him.

The cop, who is large, appears to be perhaps 3 times the size of the small Black boy.

Fowell strikes Tufono in the abdomen twice. He then grabs Tufono’s right wrist and jerks his face down on the ground, pinning his arm behind his back.

The officer tried to detain the youth, whom he suspected of “criminal activity.” From a distance, the white cop claimed that somehow he witnessed a hand-to-hand sale of tobacco.

How the cop could see tobacco or money in a small child’s hands from a distance is another white supremacy mystery. One that the mostly white media rarely attempt to solve in the countless interactions between Black people and the police reported on and recorded. The Supreme Court has explained that in order for the police to stop you police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and that you are involved in the activity. Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate or unclear and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. The systems of authority and white supremacy/racism are predicated upon black people's belief in many, many lies. The 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures and searches and right “to be secure" or to move freely without apprehension of oppression as you come and go is one of those lies. An illusion, but we still believe.

According to the police when Fowell approached Tufono, the teen refused to identify himself, the Sheriff’s Office said at the time. “Having reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was occurring, the deputy attempted to detain the juvenile so he could conduct further investigation,” the Sheriff’s Office said at the time. “The juvenile became physically resistive at that time, causing the deputy to lose control of his handcuffs, which landed several feet away.” Reasonable

Nothing Has Changed Since George Floyd Died, US Cops Still Kill Someone Every 8 Hours [if you Delegate your "Public Servant" the Power to Forcibly Control You, is He Still Your Servant?]

YOU ARE DREAMING. If a “public servant," such as a police officer, is uncontrollable, unaccountable, can’t be hired or fired by you, has irresponsible power over you and provides a compulsory “service” then he is actually your Master. AUTHORITY is the governmental right to forcibly control people and people’s legal and moral obligation to obey. Citizen-subjects cannot and do not control authority. Only authorities possess the superhuman [above humans] or magical power of authority.

In reality authority is an illusion, having no actual rational basis in reality. “People cannot delegate rights they do not have, which makes it impossible for anyone to acquire the right to rule. People cannot alter morality, which makes the “laws” of “government” devoid of any inherent “authority.” Ergo, “authority”-the right to rule-cannot logically exist. An agent or representative can only be authorized to carry out the power of the principal. It is not possible for an agent to have more power than the principal (could a mere cashier at a fast food restaurant have more power to bind the business than the owner?) If citizens don’t have the right to initiate unprovoked acts of violence against other people, then how can they delegate anyone else acting on their behalf to do so? Allegedly governmental power comes from the people. That is, we delegate our individual power to the government for it to act on our behalf. However, it goes without saying that people cannot delegate powers that they do not themselves possess.

The belief in “Authority” is not relevant to funding or governmental budgets. It cannot be reformed, it is a false coin that can only be dropped as an irrational belief in non-reality. Larken Rose explains, “the belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality, and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed. Rather than being a force for order and justice, the belief in “authority” is the arch-enemy of humanity.”

Freedom and authority cannot possibly co-exist because authority is slavery. FUNKTIONARY explains, ‘Obedience to authority is “the highest form of the power-fear systemic. . .slavery sold to both children and adults alike deceptively packaged in a respectfully sounding label.” Jeremy Locke explained, “Slavery is not a concept of totality. Slavery exists wherever the freedom of man is destroyed. Theft and bullying are slavery. In history, African natives, Jews and many others have experienced lifelong slavery. The ultimate slavery is murder. Slavery stops people from being able to make choices for their own lives. Everything that restricts your mind, your movements and your speech is evil. Slavery is found in both the partial and complete destruction of freedom.” He further states, “The lie of tyranny is that you will maintain the freedom of life by obeying authority. The choices it offers you are a lifetime of obedience or death“

The belief in Authority is an evil curse upon humanity and it is the basis of your government. [MORE]

From [FTP] It has been nearly two years since Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd. At the time, Floyd’s death would set off massive protests across the country as politicians and political pundits played lip service to Black Lives Matter and others, as they offered up their hollow support. Illustrating the extremely hollow nature of their “support” is the fact that despite all the appeals to emotion, the toothless “reform” bills, and incessant gaslighting — absolutely nothing has changed.

As the fourth month of 2022 begins, American cops are keeping to their deadly numbers like clockwork. One quarter of the year is over and cops have killed more than 250 people — right on track with previous years. This number is set to increase by one, on average, every 8 hours, every single day, of every single week, of every single month, of every single year.

The Biden administration promised change but since he’s been in office, it’s been more of the same, and, in fact, has gotten worse. Last year’s budget (FY 2021) for the hiring program, approved under Trump, was set at $156.5 million. Biden more than doubled the funding for it in FY 2022.

The “defund the police” movement has since morphed into a “fund the police” more movement, spearheaded by the very people who promised to do the opposite. Biden just released a “fund the police” budget proposal in March for $30bn more in law enforcement and crime prevention efforts, including funding to put “more police officers on the beat.”

America spends more on policing than every other country in the world spends on their entire militaries, except for China. But if we remove China from the picture, US law enforcement would be the largest military in the world — and it’s deployed right here in the land of the free.

Despite all this spending, crime in many areas is on the rise, corruption in police is rampant, and police in America are still killing unarmed and even innocent people. And what do the politicians do to fix it? Increase spending.

Since 2018, cops in America have killed 4,761 citizens. And politicians want to give them more money, as if that is the solution.

“To invest more into a system that we all know is broken is really a slap in the face to everyone who marched in summer 2020,” said Chris Harris, director of policy at the Austin Justice Coalition in Texas. “It reflects just a real lack of solutions to the problems that we face. It’s just more of the same – even if it’s exactly the thing that we know continues to hurt and kill people.”

These shocking numbers highlight a major problem when it comes to how police are policing. For starters, police have proven their incompetence in dealing with mental health issues. Since 2015 alone, police in America have over a thousand people during a mental health crisis. Many of these folks were never accused of a crime prior to police arriving on the scene.

This inability to resolve mental health issues without using deadly force is the impetus behind programs like the Support Team Assistance Response (STAR) program in Denver. You know, actual solutions that don’t require billions more in tax money.

As TFTP has pointed out, even cops who voluntarily attend Crisis Intervention Training (CIT), have shown that they are quick to the trigger when dealing with the mentally ill.

The list of unarmed and often completely innocent mentally ill people killed by police is immense. TFTP archives are full of tragic stories in which police were called to help someone in a crisis and end up murdering them. People are killed even when they aren’t in a crisis and simply act differently like Elijah McClain, who was on his way home from buying groceries and was murdered by police because he was an introvert and wore a ski mask. [MORE]

After Angry White Shareholders Threatened Legal Action Coca-Cola Scraps Diversity Requirement Plan to Hire Black Lawyers from External Law Firms [only 5% of All Lawyers are Black according to the ABA]

CONSPIRACY OR COINCIDENCE? ACCORDING TO THE A RECENT STUDY AND THE ABA ONLY 5% OF ALL ATTORNEYS ARE BLACK. SAID NUMBER HAS REMAINED STEADY FROM 2009 - 2019. THE LEGAL PROFESSION IS NEARLY ALL WHITE: SPECIFICALLY, IT IS 85% WHITE, 5% BLACK, 5% LATINO, 2% ASIAN AMERICAN AND 1% NATIVE AMERICAN. [MORE] AND [MORE]

MOREOVER, THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS FOUND THAT THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IS 80% WHITE. AMONG THE HIGHEST STATE COURTS THE JUDICIARY IS 83% WHITE. IN FACT THERE ARE NO BLACK JUSTICES IN 28 STATES, THERE ARE NO LATINO JUSTICES IN 40 STATES, THERE ARE NO ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICES IN 44 STATES AND THERE ARE NO NATIVE AMERICAN JUSTICES IN 47 STATES. [MORE] ANOTHER STUDY FOUND THAT THE STATE JUDICIARY AT ALL OTHER LOWER LEVELS IS ALSO 80% WHITE. [MORE]

From [HERE] Coca-Cola Monday announced they will not implement the controversial diversity requirements for external law firms working for the company following a backlash from their investors.

The policy introduced in January 2021, set out that outside counsels would have to have 30% of their employees from diverse backgrounds, and half the billable time going to black lawyers specifically. The requirements were announced by formal general counsel Bradley Gaton. Before stepping down from his position as legal chief, Gayton justified the drastic measures to attempt to address the legal sectors disparities facing black lawyers and other lawyers from diverse backgrounds.

However, the policy was met with backlash from shareholders who threatened legal action, with the American Civil Rights Project (ACRP) labeling the requirements as “woke” and breaching section 42 of the USC 1981, prohibiting illegal race discrimination.  Group executive, Daniel Morenoff called the decision “amazing” that no consideration had been given to the infringement on American Civil Rights law.

It has since been understood by Monica Howard Douglas, an in-house lawyer for Coco-Cola and now general counsel that the guidelines were never implemented in response to threats of lawsuits from shareholders. The company website that has since removed the controversial guidelines will continue its 2030 equality plan and rethink promoting diversity internally and externally, with a focus on a workforce that mirrors the market they serve.

AIDS, Cancer from COVID Injections. Wuhan Paper Says People have Shot their Immune Systems to Death with Vaccines

From [HERE] A paper written by scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology claimed that many patients who experienced severe SARS-CoV-2 symptoms also had “lymphopenia,” which is the depletion of all the important immune T lymphocyte cells. This depletion was caused by apoptosis, or the cellular suicide, of T cells after infection.

The attraction to T cells and the ability to infect them were unrelated to the usual way that the COVID virus infects other cells, such as lung cells, because T cells do not have the needed receptors.

However, SARS-CoV-2 destroys the immune T cells similar to the way the human immunodeficiency virus does.

]T lymphocytes are the cells responsible for killing infected or cancerous cells. They are a type of white blood cells that protect the body against cancerous cells and those that have become infected by pathogens, such as bacteria and viruses.

These T cell lymphocytes develop from the stem cells in the bone marrow, and they migrate to the thymus via blood. The thymus is part of the lymphatic system that functions mainly to promote the development of mature T cells, which are necessary for cell-mediated immunity. This is a type of response that involves the activation of the immune cells to fight infection. T cells function to actively destroy infected cells and signal others to participate in the immune response.

Research shows dramatic declines in T cells

The paper further showed that there are dramatic declines in T cells as well as CD4 and CD8 cells.

In explaining how they performed genetic tests to make sure that the T cells actually get infected, the researcher said they analyzed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens in PBCs using flow cytometry. The results suggested that T lymphocytes were infected, and in a certain patient, T cells also showed high infection rates. The team also confirmed the presence of viral antigen in T lymphocytes from patient blood.

In preparing postmortem lung sections from patients with fatal injections, they were able to analyze T lymphocytes infiltration and virus infection and found that T lymphocytes infiltration in the lung section was also positive for SARS-CoV-2 NP staining, indicating that the virus has infected the lung.

Taken together, it showed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral antigen in T lymphocytes either in the blood or in the lungs section of COVID-19 patients.

According to the researchers, HIV also uses the same receptor as SARS-CoV-2 to enter lymphocytes and the same gp120 protein to facilitate its entry into the cells, making their effect on lymphocytes similar in many ways.

AIDS, cancer from vaccines

There had also been reports of the COVID vaccines causing cancer and vaccine-induced AIDS at an alarming rate. Three whistleblowers managed to acquire data from the Department of Justice about the COVID-19 vaccines and their adverse effects.

One of these whistleblowers is physician Ryan Cole, who also spoke at Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson’s COVID panel earlier this year. Cole said he noticed certain viruses increasing, while only a limited number of T cells keep cancers in check. In the 40,000 biopsies that he did in the past year, Cole said he’s seen many types of cancers in vaccinated individuals.

Dr. Zev Zelenko, who speaks of the negative effects of the COVID vaccines, said that a jab could damage the tumor suppressor genes, and people are essentially killing their immune systems.

“And so that’s why there’s a huge spike in cancers. A huge spike in autoimmune diseases, opportunistic infections. Not to mention blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, myocarditis, miscarriages, ovarian testicular dysfunction, most likely infertility and antibody-dependent enhancement,” he said.

Controlling Speech to Control Thought: Police Detain Attorney Working on the Grand Jury Investigating the COVID Eugenocide Conspiracy to Commit Crimes Against Humanity under the Guise of a Plandemic

 From [HERE] Virginie de Araujo-Rechhia, a French lawyer on Reiner Fuellmich’s Grand Jury team, has reportedly been arrested at her home and taken into custody.

On Mar. 22, 2022, de Araujo-Rechhia was picked up by police amid her work with three different citizens’ associations in France that are trying to bring criminal charges against politicians who voted for an Aug. 5, 2021, law that brought in a wave of repressive Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) restrictions.

The full circumstances surrounding de Araujo-Rechhia’s arrest remain unknown. Most of the news outlets reporting on it say that her current whereabouts are unknown.

“We don’t fully know the circumstances under which such a measure was decided and what she is being charged with,” one reported explained. “We have been trying since this morning to determine where she has been taken.”

“All our efforts in this regard have so far been in vain. Thanks for circulating this message, without changing a single word. We’ll keep you informed as soon as possible.”

Governments conspire with the media to spread “panic propaganda 24/7,” Fuellmich says

In case you missed it, Fuellmich assembled a coalition of lawyers and judges to prosecute the crimes against humanity that were committed in the name of “public health.”

Dubbed the Peoples’ Court of Public Opinion, this coalition recently gathered in Germany, where Fuellmich is from, to compile all of the details about what corrupt leaders have done under the directive of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

“This case, involving the most heinous crimes against humanity committed under the guise of a corona pandemic, looks complicated only at first glance,” Fuellmich said in his opening statement.

“One, there is no corona pandemic, but only a PCR test ‘plandemic’ fueled by an elaborate psychological operation designed to create a constant state of panic among the world’s population. This agenda has been long planned.”

One of the people who joined Fuellmich was de Araujo-Rechhia, who is now apparently being targeted by the state, potentially in retaliation for her work on the project.

In France, conditions degraded quickly under the authoritarian leadership of Emmanuel Macron, who imposed harsh restrictions on the French people, including Fauci Flu “vaccine passports.”

There were massive protests against Macron’s fascism, but ultimately France was still plunged into a tyrannical nightmare under his directives.

A similar situation occurred in Germany, Fuellmich’s homeland, where leaders similarly imposed harsh measures aimed at stopping society from living any kind of normal life.

“[Covid’s] ultimately unsuccessful precursor was the swine flu some 12 years ago, and it was cooked up by a group of super rich psychopathic and sociopathic people who hate and fear people at the same time, have no empathy, and are driven by the desire to gain full control over all of us, the people of the world,” Fuellmich says about how this was all tried before.

According to Fuellmich, governments work together with the corporate-controlled media to spread “panic propaganda 24/7.” This is what he, de Araujo-Rechhia and others involved with the fight are trying to stop.

As we learn more about the situation with de Araujo-Rechhia, we will keep you informed about it in follow-up articles.

“Does this jury have real power to enforce their decisions? Only if the military and police forces of many countries listened to them,” commented someone at Natural News about Fuellmich’s Peoples’ Court of Public Opinion.

“In the modern world neither national nor international law is functioning any more. For modern rulers an agenda is more important than any law or established convention.”

Twitter declares telling the truth about COVID deaths to be “unsafe”

From [HERE] To keep people from reading an article about false death count reporting throughout the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) plandemic, social media giant Twitter reportedly plastered a warning across all links to the website hosting it, in this case the DailyMail Online, dubbing it “unsafe.”

Twitter users who attempted to click the article to read more about how untold thousands of deaths were falsely labeled as “COVID” deaths were met with a message explaining that the link could be “malicious” or “spammy.”

“The link you are trying to access has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially spammy or unsafe, in accordance with Twitter’s URL policy,” the prompt read.

The rest of the prompt read: “This link could fall into any of the below categories: malicious links that could steal personal information or harm electronic devices; spammy links that mislead people or disrupt their experience; violent or misleading content that could lead to real-world harm; and certain categories of content that, if posted directly on Twitter, are a violation of the Twitter Rules.

Twitter users were then given the option, in a large blue box, to go “Back to previous page.” Those who chose to read the article anyway were offered a smaller link at the bottom along with the text, “Ignore this warning and continue.”

If Twitter is censoring it, it’s probably true

As of this writing, Twitter stopped blocking links to the DailyMail Online article in question, which was written by the news outlet’s deputy health editor Eve Simmons.

The article itself revealed that the COVID death toll in Great Britain (and likely everywhere else) was vastly overestimated by government officials. Simmons called the way mortalities were recorded throughout the plandemic “chaotic,” noting that thousands of deaths in the U.K. were “wrongly” blamed on the virus.”

“The health chiefs admitted, embarrassingly, that the numbers they’d been feeding the Government were only an approximation – provoking fury from Ministers,” Simmons further wrote.

“More recently it was revealed that a quarter of Omicron deaths included in the daily figures did not, in fact, list COVID as a primary cause … More than two years since Covid-19 emerged, many feel they want a simple answer: how many were killed by this virus?”

For daring to publish this, Simmons met the ire of Jack Dorsey’s censorship army, which apparently became extremely triggered by the revelation. This is par for the course on Twitter, of course, which routinely censors the truth, especially when it harms the pharmaceutical industry.

In this case, revealing too much about how government officials lied about the COVID death count threatens to expose other key players, which we can only assume are among the Twitter “partners” that requested the DailyMail Online article be slapped with a warning label.

As someone in the comment section at Reclaim the Net, which reposted part of the DailyMail Online article, pointed out, the Fauci Flu is not a “virus,” but rather a bioweapon.

“This bio-weapon still only amounts to a cold and flu-like symptoms if one is really unhealthy,” this person added. “The real deadly bioweapons are the experimental mRNA bioweapon injections that have the added bonus of changing one’s genetic makeup, rendering the individual non-human.”

Over at Natural News, a reader suggested that Dorsey belongs in prison for his complicity in censoring important truths that could save lives. Perhaps justice will one day come to him and everyone else involved in committing crimes against humanity under the cover of “public health.”