German Data Confirms that COVID Deaths are Exaggerated in Most Countries and Much of the World is Unvaccinated [meaning not injected with poisons]

From [HERE] Mass formation collapse!

In a previous post, we referred to Worldometer to show not many died of Covid in most countries, even according to the official data.

Corona in Zahlen is a German site that also records Covid cases, and deaths, as well as official vaccination and Covid test numbers.

Corona in Zahlen is run by Dr. M. Siekmann and uses statistics from Johns Hopkins University to report corona infections in over 200 countries worldwide.

Worldwide corona statistics “are accessed via the freely accessible Our World in Data data set,” explains Corona in Zahlen.

Our World in Data is a non-profit organisation made up of researchers from the University of Oxford and the Global Change Data Lab.

Corona in Zahlen also uses data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for European countries and Robert Koch InstitutsR-Welt and DIVI for Germany.

Data Comparison

Of the 227 countries Worldometer have been tracking since the beginning of the pandemic, 9 have recorded zero deaths, 38 have recorded less than 100 deaths, 62 have recorded less than 200 deaths, 80 have recorded less than 500 deaths, and 100 have recorded less than 1000 deaths each.

In fact, 206 countries from the 227 reported less than 50,000 deaths.

Of the 222 countries Corona in Zahlen have been tracking, 8 have recorded zero deaths, 33 have recorded less than 100 deaths, 56 have recorded less than 200 deaths, 78 have recorded less than 500 deaths, and 93 less than 1000 deaths.

Covid in Zahlen reports less than 50,000 deaths for 200 of the 222 countries tracked.

Influenza Comparison

Now consider that during the 2018 flu season, the Office for National Statistics reported just over 50,000 deaths in England and Wales.

This was considered high, yet during the outbreak, Public Health England (PHE) declared that “while flu was rendering the largest number of people seriously unwell since the winter of 2010/11, it was still not an epidemic.”

Although we need to take the total size and population of each country into account, we can at least acknowledge that the population of England and Wales – even combined – is pretty small compared to most countries, say in Africa, for example.

Imagine how relieved and relaxed the global population would be feeling now, instead of stressed and fearful, if mainstream media had reported on the vast number of countries hardly hit with Covid-19 deaths over the last two years instead of reporting recorded Covid cases.

Also note that Covid only deaths are proving to be much smaller than official numbers as data in countries like Australia , New Zealand, the UK and USA now goes public, and the mainstream media like The New York Times, and Spectator are beginning to ask questions.

Vaccination Noncompliance

It is also reassuring to see Covid in Zahlen report official data showing less than 20% of the population went for the Covid vaccine in 30 countries, and less than 50% of the people had the vaccine in 78 countries. Less than 50% have fully vaccinated status in 96 countries (did not go back for more shots), and less than 25% have had a booster in 138 countries.

Big Pharma Accounts for 75% of the Total Ad Spend on TV. Which is Why The Dependent Media is Unwilling and Incapable of Reporting the Truth About Deadly COVID Injections

From [HERE] and [HERE] Pharmaceutical industry TV ad spend in the U.S 2016-2020. In 2020, the pharmaceutical industry spent 4.58 billion U.S. dollars on advertising on national TV in the United States, unsurprisingly representing a big shift in spending compared to the 2019 pre-covid market. In 2020 TV ad spending of the pharma industry accounted for 75 percent of the total ad spend.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Dependent Media – Establishment (dependent) media is both unwilling and incapable of reporting events truthfully, accurately, or without extreme bias. News coverage is just that—covering-up-(masking) and distorting the events and those wielding the power behind the events (those reported and deliberately unreported). News coverage has simply become “disinfotainment” with the sole purpose of perception and knowledge containment as well as reality concealment. You report in the interests of those who paying you to do so. (See: MEDIA, NBC & NEWS)

Today in History the Great Non-Violent Rebel, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was Assassinated. In 1967 He Explained, "The Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World Today [is] My Own Government"

From [EJI] On April 4, 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was shot and killed while standing on a hotel balcony in Memphis, Tennessee. Dr. King was in the city to speak on his growing Poor People's Campaign, and to support an economic protest by Black sanitation workers.

About two months earlier, 1,300 African American Memphis sanitation workers began a strike to protest low pay and poor treatment. When city leaders largely ignored the strike and refused to negotiate, the workers sought assistance from civil rights leaders, including Dr. King. He enthusiastically agreed to help and, on March 18, visited the city to speak to a crowd of more than 15,000 people.

Dr. King also planned a march of support. When the first attempt was violently suppressed by police, leaving one protestor dead, Dr. King resolved to stage another peaceful march on April 8. He returned to Memphis by plane on April 3, braving a bomb threat on his scheduled flight. Once in Memphis, he stayed at the Lorraine Motel and gave a short speech reflecting on his own mortality.

The next evening, April 4, Dr. King was shot as he stepped out onto the motel balcony. He was rushed to nearby St. Joseph's Hospital and pronounced dead at 7:05 pm, leaving a nation in shock and sparking mournful uprisings in more than 100 cities across the country. Just 39 years old, Dr. King left behind a wife, Coretta Scott King, and four young children. James Earl Ray, a white man, was later convicted of his assassination.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

rebel – one who lives authentically in the present, spontaneously responding to life according to the dictates of his/her inner voice and undivided intent and unrelenting will. Rebellion is unorganized, autonomous and individualistic. Wherever there is organized rebellion, it is no longer rebellion but rather revolution planned by revolutionaries—for in the very organization, the rebellion and the rebel both die. Revolution is a social phenomenon; rebellion is meditative. Lao Tzu was a rebel; Confucius and Karl Marx were not rebels. Martin Luther was purely a cunning politician fronting as a rebel, joining vested interests after creating a rift in Christianity. He was protesting the power of the Pope, not so that power should be distributed, but that he should be given the power. The Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., on the other hand, was a non-violent rebel. The philosophy of a rebel is always that of decentralization of power, and is the acid test of the true nature of a rebellion. A rebel is one who would rather live in hell along with those who are Alive authentically living their own reality than to be in heaven with those thinking they hold and know the truth—vicariously living. If your mama or daddy taught you well, you wouldn’t conform, assimilate, or shirk, you’d raise your frequency, change the channel and rebel. For a rebel, its space is always here, and its time is always now. To a rebel, the past is an unnecessary burden—one need not carry it. (See: Authenticity, Presence, Selt-Realization, Protestant, Pope, The Reformation, Revolution, Religion, Ideology, Ego, Mass, Class, Collective, Assimilation, Conformity & Rebellion)

"Authority-" is not a force but a farce! "Every great advancement in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority." —Aldous Huxley. Government is the hefty price we pay for our lack of being further evolved as humans. "The disappearance of a sense of responsibility is the most far-reaching consequence of submission to authority." —Stanley Milgram Regarding obedience to authority and carrying out "orders" Milgram states, "Thus there is a fragmentation of the totai human act; no one man decides to carry out the evil act and is confronted with consequences. The person who assumes full responsibility for the act has evaporated. Perhaps this is the most common characteristic of socially organized evil in modern society." At its root, government is based on violence and coercion. Without violent authority, studies show that violent behavior will all but disappear in its wake. Authority breeds the violence that it combats and perpetuates. Violence perpetrated by individuals is learned through noxious social experiences typically suffered under some assumed "authority." "The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own government." —Dr. Martin L. King. Jr.. 1967. Read "Obedience to Authority" by Stanley Milgram, and "Constitution of No Authority" by Lysander Spooner. (See: Violence, Government. Yurugu, BOG. "The Law," Hierarchy. Obedience, Duty, Defiance, Disobedience, Compliance Priests, Preachers, Citizens, States, Involuntary Taxation, Tax Invasion, Behavior, Orders, Allegiance. Internal Revenue Service, Corporate State, Anarchy. Taxtortion, Power, Experts, Doggy & Neuropeans) [MORE]

Mega-Rich Got So Much Richer During Manufactured Pandemic the English Language Didn’t Have a Word to Describe it. FUNKTIONARY Calls it "Richcraft" Thru a "Plandemic" and "Socialist Distancing"

According to FUNKTIONARY

Richcraft – the sorcery of greed—the use of violence, laws, deception, theft, secret oaths, and oppression to snatch and hoard resources from and gain power over the vast majority of people’s lives through the widespread use of this vicious concoction of nefarious, lethal, legal, and demonstrably devious power. (See: COP, Gangbanking, Privilege, Aristocracy, Corporations, Usury, Power, Oppression, Violence, Greed, Deception, GIMME!, Political Money, Cultural Induction, GEO-Dollars, Control, The Pathocracy & Poor)

Socialist distancing – the ever-expanding and increasing disparity between the haves and the have-nots until the Socialist (i.e., monopoly capitalist) Welfare State becomes the Farewell State—farewell to your rights, your family, friends and even your life through Plandemics (Coronavirus), $camdemics (Corporate State turned Surveillance and Nanny State), 5G bio-weaponized eugenics, starvation, vaccinations, civil unrest, genocide and other nefarious LWO (Last World Order) activities that will greatly reduce the world’s population by 2030. Before Social Distancing, we were experiencing the effects of “Socialist Distancing”...the ever-widening separation between the “haves” (holders) and the “have-nots” (held-back) due to “monopoly capitalism” (centralization of credit in the hands of the State) which by wide academic recognition is the core attribute of communism / socialism, in fact, it is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto. The litmus test to any political system is what is used as “money” and who controls (monopolizes) its “issuance.” Labels just don’t cut it. Think deeper...learn to access the underlying reality behind the truth veneer you’ve been conditioned to hold or have been told. (See: Plandemic, $camdemics, Vaccines, Coronavirus, “Monopoly Capitalism,” Exchange, Economics, Matrix Capitalism, Political Money, GEO-Dollars, The Farewell State, Trapitalism, Cultural Induction & COVERT-19)

From [CHD] The word “billionaire” didn’t even exist until 1844. Fifty years later, we got “multibillionaire.” And for the next 127 years, that was enough.

But in 2020, while the working class faced near-record unemployment during the COVIDpandemic, the wealthiest Americans faced a different problem. Some of them had gotten so rich, there was no longer a word to describe just how rich they were.

That’s why I want to bring you one of the newest additions to the English language: “centibillionaires,” people with $100 billion or more.

What’s it like being one of history’s first centibillionaires? It’s hard to even imagine, but let’s try it by comparing them to the less fortunate. By which I mean just … regular … billionaires.

If you’re a regular billionaire, you can afford a private jet. If you’re a centibillionaire, you can afford a brand-new Gulfstream jet every single day for more than 10 years. (Not sure what you’d do with a new Gulfstream every day — maybe give one to each of your closest 4,000 friends?)

A regular billionaire would struggle to buy their own professional baseball team. Sad, I know. But a centibillionaire could easily buy every team in the entire major league.

If you’re a regular billionaire, you can donate to your alma mater and get your name on a building. If you’re a centibillionaire, you could single-handedly give every teacher in America an $8,000 raise for five straight years.

Of course, that’s not all you could do. $100 billion is enough to wipe out all the medical debt in the United States. Or provide permanent shelter for every homeless person in America. Or buy COVID vaccines for the entire world.

Basically what I’m saying is, $100 billion is a lot of money.

More than two and a half million times what the average American worker makes in a year.

1 Million Copies Sold — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ — The book that launched a movement. BUY TODAY!

So here’s the big question. Are these centibillionaires so rich because they work two and a half million times harder than the average American? Are they really 100 times smarter than the typical billionaire?

I don’t think so. The reason for the rise of centibillionaires is that for decades, wealth hasn’t trickled down, it’s gushed up, all the way to the very top.

That’s not an accident. As it turns out, the system that the super-rich themselves carefully crafted and lobbied for, benefits… the rich!

And while you may not own more private jets than your average centibillionaire, you probably do pay a higher tax rate.

And thanks to legal loopholes and the Trump tax cuts, when the wealthiest Americans die, they get to pass on most of their centibillions to their kids tax-free.

We’ve got two choices as a country. We can tax the richest Americans fairly, and invest that money in ways that benefit all of us.

Or we can keep doing what we’re doing, and watch as centibillionaires get even richer while the rest of us get left behind.

If you think wealth and power are too concentrated in the hands of a privileged few now, just imagine what a few more years of trickle-down nonsense will bring.

Of course, it won’t be all bad. At least “trillionaire” is easy to say.

Pfizer Seeks Approval to Inject Infants with its Deadly COVID Gene Therapy Shots

From [HERE] Because some human beings care about their children, VAERS was established in 1990 as an early-warning system to identify negative reactions and side effects of vaccination – which makes sense.

But there a major problems. It is managed by the FDA and the CDC, which explains why the VAERS database requires a class to learn how to find anything.

Taking the time to actually file a report is voluntary and out of fear of losing their jobs or being considered an “anti-vaxxer”, nobody wants to speak ill of the all-holy vaxxine, let alone make an official report.

It is estimated that only 1% of vaccine injuries ever get reported to VAERS. So that means when VAERS reports over 44,000 adverse reactions and 90 deaths, one can expect it to be as much as 4.4 million adverse reactions and 9,000 deaths. And these numbers are only from the age 5-17 group.

Conservative numbers put it at 10%, which is half a million children that have been wounded and killed from an unneeded, unwanted experimental gene therapy shot that we were lied to about, every step of the way.

Thanks to the OpenVAERS project, which is built upon the VAERS data, the public can easily search these reports and see for themselves: people are reporting adverse reactions such as chronic pain, loss of hearing and taste, talking gibberish and acting-out aggressively. And these are the mild cases.

There is a tsunami of major brain damage, major heart disease and fatalities. Edward Dowd has analyzed the data and has reported an 84% increase in deaths among ages 25-44, which is the same amount of lives lost to the Vietnam war.

Toby Rogers estimates that Big Pharma kills twice as many people that died in World War II – every single year.

The press ignores this because it’s not enough. They want your newborn babies, as well. Pfizer is pushing to get children as young as six months old given a shot that we know is potentially fatal, even though children were never at risk and are still not at risk.

The United States has been force-injecting infants and children with experimental vaccines for years and now, they want to this infamous clotshot.

Thanks to virtue-signalling mothers, some children have already been getting it in the womb, which is resulting in miscarriages, stillbirths and deaths from breastfeeding on toxic, genetically-modified mother’s milk.

Pfizer is planning on submitting another application for Emergency Use Authorization in early April. That’s about 18 million children under 5 who could be sacrificed to the altar of Big Pharma and political correctness.

If Pfizer can achieve permanent liability protection from the FDA, who they control, then they can add the mRNA gene therapy shot to the childhood vaccine schedule, where it will enjoy permanent liability protection, under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

These same crooks are putting a judge on the Supreme Court who openly defends leniency towards crimes that involve child rape.

They’re coming for your children and they will not stop.

If you still care about the human race and are looking for something you can do right now, you can go to TobyRogers.substack.com and read his “Urgent Call to Action” for more info.

Study in the Journal of Pediatrics Finds a High Percentage of Teens Develop Heart Damage Months after Getting 2nd Pfizer COVID Shot

From [HERE] New research published in the Journal of Pediatrics reveals that more than 66 percent of all adolescents who develop Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine”-related myopericarditis after the second jab still end up suffering from persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis.

This revelation suggests that, contrary to what the government claims, Fauci Flu shot adverse effects can be long term, even in children. And the saddest part is that children have a zero percent risk of dying from the disease in the first place, so what is the rationale behind them getting the shots?

Published on March 25, the study challenges the position held by multiple government agencies in the United States, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which claims that heart inflammation caused by Pfizer and Moderna mRNA (messenger RNA) injections is always “mild.”

Researchers at Seattle Children’s Hospital looked at cases of younger patients under age 18 who came to the hospital with chest pain and elevated serum troponin levels between April 1, 2021, and Jan. 7, 2022, which covers the height of the Operation Warp Speed mass injection campaign. All of them had received their second dose of Pfizer within the previous week.

Of the 35 patients who fit the criteria, 16 were determined to be suitable for evaluation purposes. All 16 underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tests three to eight months after their first examination.

Of these, 11 were found to have persistent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), though levels were lower than in previous months.

“The presence of LGE is an indicator of cardiac injury and fibrosis and has been strongly associated with worse prognosis in patients with classical acute myocarditis,” the study explains.

Fully vaccinated children have troponin levels more than 20 times higher than a heart attack patient

A meta-analysis of eight studies found that LGE is a predictor of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiac transplant, rehospitalizations, recurrent acute myocarditis, and is a requirement for mechanical circulatory support.

Another 11-study meta-analysis found the “presence and extent of LGE to be a significant predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes.”

While some of the child patients in the new study showed symptoms that “were transient and most patients appeared to respond to treatment,” there was still a “persistence of abnormal findings,” the team found.

All of this “rais[es] concerns for potential longer-term effects,” the researchers wrote, adding that they plan to take more MRIs at the one year mark to see whether any of the abnormalities have resolved.

“The paper provides more evidence that myocarditis in adolescents that result from COVID-19 vaccines is very serious,” says Dr. Madhava Setty, the senior science editor for The Defender, a project of Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

“All patients had significantly elevated serum troponin levels indicative of heart damage. And LGE, which is indicative of poor outcome, was present in more than two-thirds of the kids.”

“These young patients had a median troponin level of 9.15 – more than 20 times greater than the levels found in people suffering heart attacks.”

Commenting on the findings on Twitter, Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon and public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, wrote that the CDC has a “civic duty to rigorously study the long-term effects of vaccine-induced myocarditis.”

“New follow-up study 3-8 months after myocarditis shows the MRI heart abnormality of late gadolinium enhancement seen in 63% of children,” he added. “Merits further study.”

According to Dr. Anisha Koka, a cardiologist, the study also suggests that upwards of 70 percent of teenagers who develop myocarditis from covid injections will be left with a scar on their heart.

Suit Calls for Indonesia to Stop Mandates; Vax Doesn't Prevent COVID or its Transmission, So Experimental Shots are a Matter of Individual Choice, Not Public Health. Gov Destroyed Informed Consent

From [HERE] and [HERE] Lawsuit against Indonesian Minister of Health and President of Republic of Indonesia regarding Covid19 Vaccination

Jakarta, Tuesday, 15 March 2022. The Plaintiffs represented by the Legal Team from VST & Partners Law Office (https://vstlawfirm.com/) registered a Lawsuit for Unlawful Actions by the Minister of Health and the President of the Republic of Indonesia at the Jakarta Administrative Court about the Covid19 vaccine policies. Plaintiff I Ted Hilbert is a foreign national (Luxembourg) with permanent residency in Indonesia and Plaintiff II Fatoni Rahman is an Indonesian citizen.

As for the basis of the lawsuit, namely the actions taken by the government by mandating vaccination for all residents in the country by executive order, the policy is contrary to Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 292, Supplement to the Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2014 Number 292, Supplementary Gazette Republic of Indonesia Number 5601) (hereinafter referred to as Law 30/2014), Law Number 36 Year 2009 concerning Health (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2009 Number 144, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5063) (hereinafter referred to as Law 36/2009) , Law Number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2018 Number 128, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6236) (hereinafter referred to as Law 6/2018), Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights (Gazette State of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 165, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia N number 3886) (hereinafter referred to as Law 39/1999).

The reasons for the plaintiffs to file this lawsuit are as follows:

1. The Plaintiffs are Residents in Indonesia who are affected by the Government policy during the Covid19 Pandemic, especially related to the vaccine mandate as a requirement to get government administration services and enter public spaces or public transportation as well as facing fines for not being vaccinated.

2. The Plaintiffs are not refusing Covid19 vaccination without valid reasons or “anti-vaccine”. This case is about the right to obtain full, balanced and responsible information about health as guaranteed in Article 7 of Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health (Hereinafter referred to as Law 36/2009) and Informed Consent. In addition, the Plaintiffs are also entitled to obtain SAFE, QUALITY and affordable health services as guaranteed in Article 5 paragraph (2) of Law 36/2009 and lastly, the Plaintiffs have the right to INDEPENDENTLY and RESPONSIBLE DETERMINE THE HEALTH SERVICES NEEDED for themselves as per article 5 paragraph (3) of Law 36/2009. As per the law and the basic principle of Informed Consent in medicine, the Plaintiffs have the right to request and obtain clear and accountable information and data regarding the risks and benefits as well as the effectiveness of vaccines so that the Plaintiffs can independently and responsibly decide about Covid19 vaccination.

3. To determine the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, the Plaintiffs conducted independent research from many global government sources including the Indonesian government and peer reviewed studies from reputable international journals. The following are the results of the analysis which is part of the lawsuit materials:

Indonesian language: https://investigasi.org/analisis-lengkap-dan-ilmiah-penipuan-vaksin-covid19/

English Translation: https://investigasi-org.translate.goog/analisis-lengkap-dan-ilmiah-penipuan-vaksin-covid19/?_x_tr_sl=id&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

4. Based on the results of the research conducted, the Plaintiffs reached the conclusion that the risks of Covid19 vaccination outweigh the benefits for themselves and most other people, while acknowledging that there may be a benefit for specific groups of people. Most importantly, vaccination does not prevent transmission of Covid19, as admitted by the Ministry of Health, making vaccination clearly a matter of individual health decisions, not public health, and cannot be mandated through government policies. All global data and studies demonstrate that Covid19 vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission. By following the narrative and data from the Indonesian government that vaccines only prevent serious illness and death (which the Plaintiffs also object to based on data), not affecting any other person, refusing vaccination has to be considered in the same category as smoking, drinking alcohol or eating an unhealthy diet: a personal choice. There is no law or regulation prohibiting smoking, even though it is proven to be deadly, so why would there be any reason to mandate a highly questionable and experimental vaccine which only maybe provides some health benefit to some individuals while also having many risks and no proven long term safety?

As a consequence, the Plaintiffs filed an Administrative Objection to the Minister of Health as Defendant I demanding that all Covid19 vaccine mandates be stopped, which was received in full by the Ministry of Health on January 31, 2022 and rejected without plausible or legitimate groundsAfter that, an Administrative Appeal was filed to the President as Defendant II which was received in full through the State Secretary on 22 February 2022 and also rejected without plausible or legitimate grounds.

5. Before the administrative objections to the government and subsequent lawsuit filing, the Plaintiffs have made various attempts to obtain information and data from the government since September 2021 without any result. Due to the failure of the Ministry of Health to comply with the Freedom of Information Law (UU KIP), a complaint was filed by the Plaintiffs to Ombudsman RI and even an official request from Ombudsman RI to the Ministry of Health to provide the information and data was formally refused. Another official request to BPOM (Indonesian FDA) for the risk-benefit analysis data of Covid19 vaccines was officially denied citing intellectual property rights of the vaccine manufacturer as well as the potential misuse of the information. In summary, every request for data about vaccine safety and effectiveness was either ignored or formally denied, in a blatant violation of freedom of information laws as well as informed consent principle and laws.

No government has the right to mandate the injection of experimental substances into the body of its people, this has already been confirmed by the US Supreme Court and several other high profile cases, for example the New Zeeland High Court has declared the mandatory vaccination for Police officers illegal. In addition to this, the Austrian government has declared their own vaccine mandate as a violation of basic rights which cannot be justified due to the relatively harmless nature of Covid19 and retracted its vaccine mandates.

Plaintiff’s Press Contact:

Ted Hilbert WhatsApp +6281294055112, tedhilbert@gmail.com

Contact VST Lawfirm WhatsApp +6281212117270

Website VST Lawfirm: https://vstlawfirm.com

There Never was a Pandemic, Only a Plandemic, a War Against Humanity. One of the Biggest Lies in World History

From [HERE] Introduction 

Destabilizing the social, political and economic structure of 190 sovereign countries cannot constitute  a “solution” to combating the virus. But that was the imposed “solution” which was implemented in several stages from the very outset of the corona crisis in January 2020.  It’s the destruction of people’s  lives. It is the destabilization of civil society. 

Fake science was supportive of this devastating agenda. The lies were sustained by a massive media disinformation campaign. 24/7, Incessant and Repetitive “Covid alerts” in the course of the last two years.

The  historic March 11, 2020 lockdown triggered economic and social chaos Worldwide. It was an act of “economic warfare”: a war against humanity. 

This diabolical agenda has undermined the sovereignty of nation states. 

It has contributed  to a wave of bankruptcies. It has impoverished people Worldwide.

It has led to a spiralling dollar denominated global debt. 

The powerful structures of global capitalism, Big Money coupled with its intelligence and military apparatus are the driving force. 

Using advanced digital and communications technologies, the lockdown and “closure” of the global economy is unprecedented in World history.

The Central Role of the Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (RT-PCR)

From the very outset, both the media and the governments have overlooked and ignored the flaws and falsehoods pertaining to the RT-PCR test as a means to detecting the spread of the virus and identifying SARS-CoV-2.

The PCR is a Process. It does not tell you that you are sick”.

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.

This misuse of the RT-PCR technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, … under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients. .

Dr. Pascal SacréBelgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.

The Entire Data Base of “Covid-19 Confirmed Cases” is Invalid.

Media disinformation has prevailed  for more than two years despite the fact that both the WHO and the CDC (with the usual innuendos) have confirmed what was known from the very outset in January 2020, namely that the RT-PCR test used to justify every single policy mandate including lockdowns, social distancing, the mask, confinement of the labor force, closure of economic activity, etc. was flawed and invalid. 

The WHO issued its Mea Culpa more than a year ago on January 20, 2021. A few months later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)  (July 21, 2021) called for the withdrawal of the PCR test as a valid method for detecting and identifying SARS-CoV-2.  Moreover, the WHO in January 2020, did not possess an isolate and purified sample of the novel 2019-nCov virus. The Berlin Virology team (headed by Drosten):

“recommended to the WHO, that in the absence of an isolate of the 2019-nCoV virus, a similar 2003-SARS-CoV should be used as a “proxy” (point of reference) of the novel virus” (See Michel Chossudovsky, E-Book, Chapter III)

As of December, 31 2021, the PCR test is no longer considered valid by the CDC in the U.S.  For more details see: CDC No Longer Recognizes the PCR Test As a Valid Method for Detecting “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”?

The CDC has now firmly acknowledged that the PCR test does not effectively differentiate between Covid-19 and Seasonal Influenza. A PCR positive does not imply a “Covid-19 Confirmed Case”. It could be influenza or a corona common cold. The CDC called for its withdrawal effective December 31, 2021.

Fake Data: 465 Million So-Called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”

If the PCR test is invalid (confirmed by numerous studies as well as WHO, CDC), the 465 Million so-called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” (see diagram below, MARCH 18, 2022) collected and tabulated Worldwide since the outset of the Covid-19 crisis are meaningless. Click here to get the latest figures.

The Pandemic Treaty and the QR Verification  Code 

In early March 2022 an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) was established with a mandate to  create “A Pandemic Treaty”, i.e. a global health governance entity under WHO auspices, which would override the authority of the WHO member states:

, “The INB held its first meeting to draft and negotiate an international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response under the authority of the WHO” (Mercola)

The Pandemic Treaty  is tied into the WHO’s QR Verification Code project, which is intent upon creating a global digital data bank of 7.9 billion people. Both initiatives are to be carried out concurrently by  the WHO in liaison with ID2020 and the Gavi Alliance, both of which are funded by the Gates Foundation.

Peter Koenig describes the QR Code as

“an all-electronic ID – linking everything to everything of each individual (records of health, banking, personal and private, etc.).”

According to David Scripac  “A worldwide digital ID system is in the making. [The aim] of the WEF—and of all the central banks [is] to implement a global system in which everyone’s personal data will be incorporated into the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) network.”

The QR Verification Code potentially sets the stage for the instatement of “a global police state” controlled by the financial establishment. It’s part of what the late David Rockefeller entitled “the march towards World Government”.

The  legitimacy of both the Pandemic Treaty and the QR Verification Code under WHO auspices rests on the presumption that the alleged “Covid-19 Pandemic is Real” and that the “mRNA vaccine constitutes a SOLUTION to the alleged Covid-19 pandemic.”

Both initiatives are based on outright fraud and corruption. What is the evidence:

1. The Number of  “Covid-19 Cumulative Confirmed Cases” resulting from the RT-PCR test did not  justify the WHO’s decision to officially launch a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The numbers were ridiculously low. There was no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was spreading nationally or internationally.

2. The Lockdown instructions transmitted in March 2020 to more than 190 member states of the UN are totally invalid.

3. The methodology using the PCR test to detect and identify the SARS-CoV2 and its alleged variants has been acknowledged by the WHO and the CDC as being totally dysfunctional as outlined above.

4. All the data pertaining to Covid-19 Cumulative Confirmed Cases compiled by national governments and tabulated by the WHO since January 2020 are invalid and meaningless.

5. The Covid-19 Vaccine launched in November 2020 has resulted in an upward Worldwide tide of mortality and morbidity

In this article I will distinguish between several phases in the evolution of this crisis.

Phase I: Ridiculously Low Numbers of  “Covid-19 Confirmed Cases” Used to Justify the Launching of the Covid-19 Pandemic

From the very outset, the estimates of “confirmed positive cases” have been part of a “Numbers Game”.

The first stage of this crisis was the launching of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the WHO on January 30th. While officially it was not designated as a “Pandemic”, it nonetheless contributed to spearheading the fear campaign. The number of “confirmed cases” based on faulty estimates (PCR) used to justify this far reaching decision was ridiculously low.

The Worldwide population outside China is of the order of 6.4 billion. On January 30, 2020 outside China there were:

83 cases in 18 countries, and only 7 of them had no history of travel in China. (see WHO, January 30, 2020).

83 Cases outside China: There was no “scientific basis” to justify the launching of a Worldwide Public Health Emergency of International Concern.

Republican-dominated Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Prohibiting the Death Penalty for People with Serious Mental Illness - only the 2nd State to Do So

From [HERE] The Kentucky State Senate has given final legislative approval to a bill that would make the Commonwealth the second U.S. state to bar the execution of people with serious mental illness. 

On March 25, 2022, the Republican-dominated body voted 25-9 to pass HB 269, a bill that prohibits the death penalty for defendants diagnosed with any of four specified mental health disorders. The measure overwhelmingly passed the House on February 9 by a vote of 76-19. If signed by Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, Kentucky would join Ohio in exempting severely mentally ill defendants from capital punishment.

Under the bill’s provisions, defendants who had active symptoms and a documented diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and/or delusional disorder at the time of the offense would no longer be subject to the death penalty. Defendants seeking to bar capital prosecution under the bill are required to file a motion in the trial court at least 120 days before their scheduled trial date. If the court determines that the defendant meets the statute’s requirements, the case will proceed to a non-capital trial. Unlike a similar measure passed in Ohio in 2021, Kentucky’s law would not apply to those already sentenced to death in the state.

Gangs [within a gang] in the LA Sheriff's Department to be Investigated by Oversight Panel. Cop Gangs are Tied to the Deaths of at Least 19 People, all of whom were Black or Latino Males

From [HERE] Last year, journalist Cerise Castle authored an investigation into gangs within the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. She detailed the long history of these gangs and how prevalent they still are in Los Angeles, in an investigative series published by Knock LA.

"There are at least 18 gangs within the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department," according to the investigation, and they are allegedly tied to the deaths of at least 19 people, all of whom were men of color. Castle's reporting includes a database of names of deputies reportedly involved in these gangs. The department did not speak to the journalism outlet for the series.

This week, the civilian oversight board charged with keeping tabs on the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) announced it's launching an investigation into the prevalence of deputy gangs within the department.

The announcement of the committee's investigation comes roughly a year after Knock LA published Castle's investigation.

"It was quite a full-circle moment for me to see that an independent investigation into these deputy gangs is being pursued," Castle told NPR of the news.

Since her project was released, Castle said, she has seen multiple occasions where LASD deputies, along with the gangs they are a part of, "take egregious actions" against civilians in LA.

"Many stories do not make it into the news," she said.

Her investigations into LASD deputy gangs continue.

These kinds of gangs have created decades of problems within the department and with how it deals with the citizens of Los Angeles, according to the civilian oversight board. Those problems include claims of discrimination, excessive force and even murder.

"Deputy gangs have fostered and promoted excessive force against citizens, discriminated against other deputies based on race and gender, and undermined the chain of command and discipline," said Sean Kennedy, the commission's chair, in a statement. "Despite years of documented history of this issue, the Department has failed to eliminate the gangs."

Sheriff Alex Villanueva wrote on Facebook that inquiries into his department over alleged gangs are just a "fishing expedition" and "political theater."

He wrote, "Not one elected official, or their political appointees, have provided me even one name" of a deputy involved in gangs.

The investigation is set to take five to six months to complete. The commission aims to determine which stations these gangs operate out of, as well as the scope and impact these groups have had on the communities that deputies are meant to protect.

The county's inspector general also launched an investigation into the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department this year.

In a letter sent to Villanueva, LA County Inspector General Max Huntsman demanded documents from the department that are still owed to investigators.

In this letter, Huntsman said at least 41 Los Angeles County deputies have been identified as being tattooed members of the Banditos or Executioners gangs.

California law requires that law enforcement agencies maintain a policy prohibiting such "law enforcement gangs." Yet numerous reports have shown the existence of these deputy gangs within the county's sheriff's department.

California's legislature has defined law enforcement gangs as "peace officers within a law enforcement agency who may identify themselves by a name and may be associated with an identifying symbol, including, but not limited to, matching tattoos." Lawmakers have said the problem appears to be most prolific in the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.

Suit Filed for James Williams, Murdered by a White Canton Cop, Shot Dead w/o Warning. Black Man Posed No Threat as He Fired His Gun Into the Air to Celebrate New Year's Eve, Same Way WFs Were Doing

From [HERE] The family of James Williams, a Black man who was fatally shot without warning by a white Ohio police officer minutes into the New Year, has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the officer and the city of Canton in federal court.

Williams, 46, had been firing celebratory gunfire skyward from behind a 6-foot-tall privacy at his home when officer Robert Huber fired multiple rounds through the fence as smoke rose into the air. Footage from Huber’s body camera showed him shouting “Get down!” after he had shot Williams, who died at a hospital.

Canton Police Chief Jack Angelo on the day of the shooting said the officer was outside his vehicle and confronted someone who began shooting a firearm. Angelo said the officer feared for his safety and fired his duty weapon at the person, striking him.

Canton Mayor Thomas Bernabei released a statement to The Canton Repository, which first reported on the lawsuit Wednesday, that the city had no comment. The statement noted that the shooting is being investigated by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and that its findings would be presented to a Stark County grand jury to determine whether criminal charges would be filed.

Messages were left with Huber’s attorney on Thursday.

At a news conference on Wednesday, Williams’ widow, Marquetta, said, “I will fight today, tomorrow and every day until I have no breath left because it’s my family today but may be yours tomorrow.”

The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory and special damages for claims that include excessive force, wrongful death, deliberate indifference to medical needs, assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Williams was the father of four daughters and stepfather to two more. His three minor children with Marquetta Williams are named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Klansas City to Pay $325k: White Cops Ignored Black Teen's So-Called "4th Amendment Rights" by Ordering Him Out of a Car for No Reason, Throwing Him to the Ground and Striking Him more than 10 Times

From [HERE] A Black Kansas City teenager will receive a $325,000 settlement after three white police officers hit him more than 10 times and used a stun gun on him, according to an excessive force lawsuit.

It is the third settlement this year against Kansas City police in cases involving Black teenagers, with a total payout of $1.3 million, The Kansas City Star reported.

The lawsuit alleged the 17-year-old was sitting in his car in a parking lot waiting for friends after homecoming at Hogan Preparatory Academy on Oct. 12, 2019.

Two officers approached the car and ordered him to get out. When the teen got out of the car, he was thrown to the ground, punched, knelt on by two officers and hit with a stun gun by a third, according to the lawsuit.

Video filed with the lawsuit includes the teenager calling for help and saying he was not resisting, The Star reported.

The teenager had not committed any traffic violations. He was arrested but never charged with a crime.

The Kansas City Police Department declined to comment on the settlement.

The police department has paid more than $10.8 million in excessive force and wrongful arrest claims since 2014.

GA to Pay $4.8M for White Cop's Murder of Julian Lewis. Shot Black Man in the Head After Forcing Him Off Road to Enforce Broken Tail Light Law. Killer Cop Remains Free, White DA Still Holds Bodycam

 From [HERE] The state of Georgia has agreed to pay a $4.8 million legal settlement to the family of a Black man who was fatally shot by a white state trooper trying to pull him over for a broken tail light (pulled him over because he’s black).

The office of Georgia’s attorney general confirmed the hefty settlement amount Friday.

The trooper who killed Julian Lewis was swiftly fired by the Georgia State Patrol and charged with murder following the 2020 killing. But the prosecution of the former trooper, Jacob Thompson, stalled last summer when either an incompetent or liar white DA District Attorney Daphne J. Totten (racist suspect in photo) failed to get her grand jury in rural Screven County to indict him. [MORE]

Atlanta attorney Andrew Lampros said state officials agreed to mediate a settlement to avoid a civil lawsuit over 60-year-old Lewis’ death. He said the slain man’s wife, Betty Lewis, remains “hopeful but frustrated” that Thompson will eventually stand trial, either in state or federal court.

“This is a classic case of driving while Black,” Lampros said. “That is all that Mr. Lewis, I believe, was guilty of.”

Thompson, who is white, tried to pull Lewis over for a broken tail light near the Georgia-South Carolina state line on Aug. 7, 2020. When Lewis didn’t immediately stop, the trooper pursued him and forced his car into a ditch, then shot Lewis in the head.

Mr. Thompson drew his gun as he got out of his vehicle, he told investigators, and said he saw Mr. Lewis trying to maneuver his vehicle toward him, prompting him to fire his weapon. Mr. Lewis was struck once and pronounced dead at the scene, the report said.

Specifically, Thompson wrote in his incident report that he opened fire as Lewis was revving his engine and turning his steering wheel, as if he was trying to ram the trooper.

But Dustin Peak, a Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent, testified in September that this would have been impossible, because Mr. Lewis’s vehicle was inoperable after it hit the ditch and the car battery disconnected, The Associated Press reported.

Peak testified that dash camera video showed one second elapsed between the time the trooper got out of his patrol vehicle and when he fired the shot that killed Lewis.

White cop Thompson was arrested on charges of felony murder and aggravated assault a week after the shooting.

In a statement on Thursday, Hall & Lampros, the law firm representing Mr. Lewis’s family, said that “it is believed” that Mr. Lewis had continued driving because he wanted to go to an area “where he knew other people would be present.”

Francys Johnson, a lawyer for Mr. Lewis’s family, said that the settlement, which was reached last month before a lawsuit was filed, was only one step in the family’s effort to hold Mr. Thompson accountable.

Lewis’ family has called on District Attorney Daphne Totten to empanel another grand jury and try again to get an indictment.

Francys Johnson, a lawyer for Mr. Lewis’s family, said Georgia law allowed district attorneys to impanel new grand juries if a prior one declined to pursue charges. “We believe that this was a very strong case,” Mr. Johnson said. “The evidence was there and still is.” [MORE] Mr. Johnson said that Mr. Lewis’s family was still waiting for the district attorney, Daphne J. Totten, to release a police video of the shooting. Then, referring to the grand jury members, he said, “And it’s been shown now to 22 citizens in Screven County, but it has not been shown to Julian’s mother or his wife or his attorney.” [MORE]

The slain man’s family has also urged federal authorities to bring charges. The office of acting U.S. Attorney David Estes issued a statement last fall that federal prosecutors were “examining” the circumstances of Lewis’ death “in consultation with the FBI.” No further details were given.

New York Times investigation last year found that, in a five-year period, police officers in the United States killed at least 400 drivers during traffic stops for minor offenses, including broken taillights.

Only five officers were convicted in those killings, and local governments paid at least $125 million in 40 settlements.

While the state admitted no wrongdoing in settling civil claims over Lewis’ death, Lampros said it still brings some consolation to his family.

Although Trenton Cops Had No Basis to Believe a Black Man Sitting in Car Had Committed a Crime They Seized Him Anyway, Violating His "Rights." Cops Then Shot Him as He Tried to Flee, Causing Paralysis

From [HERE] Police body camera video has been released from an officer-involved shooting of an unarmed Black man in Trenton last month.

Authorities say four Trenton police officers approached a vehicle occupied by Jajuan Henderson, 29, of Burlington City, New Jersey, in the early morning hours of February 12 on Center Street.

In the videos, officers refer to the encounter as a "traffic stop," but it's not clear from the video why the stop was initiated.

"Open the door. You gotta step out of the car," an officer can be heard saying when Henderson won't roll down his window and appears to be unable to produce his license, registration and insurance.

When Henderson does not get out of the car, the officer threatens to break the window. "I'm calling the cops," Henderson is heard responding in the video.

"We are the cops!" an officer replies.

"I know, but y'all can't do this," Henderson says.

At least one time the officers told him to stop reaching around the vehicle, using expletives.

Henderson tells them he's looking for his phone, to call his lawyer.

About five minutes after the video starts, an officer shatters the driver's side window.

Henderson screams and then starts the ignition. He accelerates forward and backward, crashing into vehicles.

"Holy!" one of the officers shouts, just before four shots are fired, striking Henderson.

The officer who broke the window and fired the shots has been identified as Michael Gettler by the Union County Prosecutors office, which is handling the investigation to avoid a conflict of interest.

The officers radio for help and remove Henderson from the car, starting CPR.

"Stay with us, stay with us," an officer can be heard saying as another performed chest compressions. [cop actors performing for the body camera]

Henderson survived, but attorneys say he is paralyzed from the chest down.

He and his family are now suing the city of Trenton, the police department and the officers, who have been placed on administrative leave while the incident is investigated.

"He asked to call the police on the police. Because he knew that what they were doing was wrong before they shot him," said attorney Gregg Zeff.

He says through all this, his client was unarmed, and still doesn't know why police responded to begin with.

"We know he was in a parked car. We don't know why the police rolled up on him," said Zeff.

Zeff says Henderson now faces criminal charges because of this incident, including resisting arrest and obstruction of justice.

He says Henderson was originally charged with aggravated assault, but those charges were dropped.

In the lawsuit, Zeff says Henderson was targeted because of his race.

"Race is an overwhelming factor any time an African American man has an encounter with a police officer, period," said Zeff. "Assuming this was a traffic stop I think if Jajuan was a white man they would have put a ticket on the windshield and walked away."

"I will remove your f--king soul from your f–-king body." Reporter Obtains Audio of White Sunrise Cop Threatening a Black Man During Arrest Incident Where Cop Choked Another Cop who Intervened

From [HERE] and [HERE] Earlier this year, a Florida police department released silent body camera footage showing a white male officer threatening a Black man who was being arrested. The footage also captured the moment the officer turned and choked a female junior colleague who'd tried to pull him off the man. Now, newly-released audio is adding even more context to the shocking incident. 

Officers with the Sunrise Police Department responded to a call in November 2021 that a man was attacking people outside of a convenience store. The officers were attempting to get the man in the vehicle when Sgt. Christopher Pullease arrived at the scene, aggressively taking over the arrest. 

"Hey, hey, look at me," Pullease said while holding a Mac canister in the man's face, according to audio obtained by Miami TV station WSVN. "Look at me! You wanna f––king play f––king games? You're playing with the wrong motherf––ker." 

"Do what you gotta do, man," the handcuffed man responds. "You gonna Mace me? Mace me." 

Pullease then leans closer to the man, before threatening him. "Look at me, motherf––ker. You wanna play f––king games? You wanna be disrespectful with me f––king officers? I will remove your f––king soul from your f––king body." 

That's when a 28-year-old female officer steps in, pulling at Pullease's belt in attempt to intervene and deescalate the situation. Pullease turns around, grabs her by the throat and pins her against a patrol car.

"What the f––k? Don't ever f––king touch me again," the sergeant said. "Get the f––k off of me," he added before telling her he'll "f––king see you in about five minutes." Pullease goes to his police car before coming back and demanding all the officers at the scene to turn their body cameras off.

"I Can't Breathe [b/c you Shot me]:" Donnell Rochester Posed No Threat When Baltimore Race Soldiers Shot Him. Cops Handcuffed Him as He Died in the Street, Pretended like He was Ok, Freddie Gray Style

'I Think You Tried to Touch Me So Now I Can Kill You:' From [HERE] Video of the police killing of 18-year-old Donnell Rochester is harrowing

Baltimore Police officers chase Rochester, who runs and then retreats back to his car, a white Honda Accord, and drives off.

“Get out the car, get out the car now,” cops yell at Rochester, who drives forward. Officer Connor Murray shoots at Rochester, whose car bumps Murray. Soon after, Officer Robert Mauri shoots at Rochester through the windshield and the Honda Accord stops, the car door opens, and Rochester, with his hands up, says, “I can’t breathe.” 

He collapses into the street and repeats, “I can’t breathe.” Cops pull Rochester to the ground and try to handcuff him.

“Put your fucking hand behind your back,” Mauri, who shot Rochester moments before, yells.

“Start a medic,” Murray, who also shot Rochester, says over the radio. “Suspect in custody.”

Rochester, handcuffed, gasping for air, blood leaking out of him and onto the pavement of Chilton Street in Northeast Baltimore around 3PM on Feb. 19, is now surrounded by cops.

“What’s your name?” a cop asks.

Rochester can’t get it out: “My name is…” 

“Where you hit at?” one cop asks Rochester. “Huh?”

Rochester struggles to answer. He has been shot in the chest.

“Where you hit at?” the cop asks again, impatient.

“He’s hit up top,” Murray says. “Upper chest.”

10 seconds later, another cop walks up to Rochester.

“Are you ok?” that cop asks Rochester.

“No,” Rochester responds. 

Officers kneel over Rochester, trying to tend to the gunshot wound—or a “GSW,” as Mauri calls it over the radio at one point.

“Bro, where you shot at?” a cop asks.

Rochester struggles to answer.

“Where you shot at, bro?” the cop asks again.

“My stomach,” Rochester says, hard to hear.

“Turn him over, turn him over,” another cop advises.

The cops turn Rochester’s body around, still looking for the wound or wounds.

“I can’t breathe,” Rochester tells the cops. 

Approximately 15 minutes after he was shot, Rochester was dead.

4th Amendment Rights Nonexistent in Free Range Prison: White Des Moines Cop Brutally Assaults Homeless Black Man Walking Down the Street Who Had Not Committed a Crime. Cop Lied to Justify the Stop

From [HERE] An activist group is again accusing the Des Moines Police Department of abuse and discrimination with their release of video of the arrest of a Black man last fall. 

The videos in question show the arrest of Lentern Woods on September 23rd, 2021. In the videos, officer Joshua Buttons approached Woods – who Button knew had a history of mental illness – on a Des Moines street. As Buttons tries to talk to Woods, Woods ignores the officer and walks away. Button is seen following Woods to the end of the block, then tackling him to the ground before he crosses the street. Woods then hits Button and the officer responds with punches, knees and a taser. Woods is eventually taken into custody and charged with assault on Button.

In a discussion with a supervisor after the arrest that was recorded on a body camera, Button says he was trying to keep Woods out of traffic and says he used his taser because Woods was grabbing at his belt on which his gun was harnessed.

The group calls the incident another example of a police department that is operating without proper oversight from Des Moines’ elected leaders. “We have a city of leaders that refuse to do anything,” said Sharon Zanders-Ackiss with Iowa CCI, “We keep giving you evidence that it’s happening over and over and over. Yet you try to minimize the risk of our reality. This is what our community is dealing with. And until we get some leadership in there that can clean house and do the job they need to do. This will continue because right now there’s no accountability and you can’t keep squashing it and thinking it’s gonna go away because we’re not going away.”

The group is once again calling for Chief Dana Wingert to be fired from the Des Moines Police Department. They are also asking for the creation of a community review board to oversee the police department.

The Des Moines Police Department responded to the accusations with forceful denials on Thursday. According to the department, Woods was seen violently swinging his fists as passersby and walking into traffic before Button approached him. They claim stills from Button’s body camera video clearly show that Woods has his hands on the officer’s taser (which would be a no no in the Free Range because citizens have no right to defend themselves from unlawful assaults from cops, even where they have a reasonable belief that cops are trying to kill them, discussed below).

However, the bodycam video does not show that Woods had been doing anything other than walking down the street. In fact, there are no other pedestrians present in the body cam video- thus Woods could not have committed the crime of threats to do bodily harm, which is a misdemeanor or felony depending on the words uttered to someone; watch the video for yourself. As such, the white cop lied about what occurred and violated Woods’ so-called 4th Amendment rights to be free from unlawful seizures. That is, at the time of the stop Woods had not committed any crime and there was no legal basis for the stop. Or so goes the legal truth of the 4th Amendment. The Supreme Court has explained that in order for the police to stop you the police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and that you are involved in the activity. Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate or unclear and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion.

But legal truths in books and courtrooms must give way to reality on the street. Race Soldiers so frequently abuse their power that no one can make a compelling argument that constitutional rights afford Black people any protection from cops on the street. Black & Latino men face an omnipresent threat of being stopped, seized and searched by cops without legal cause anytime, anyplace. The only thing upholding the 4th Amendment is your belief in it. It is an illusion, a strategy and nothing more. In reality, Constitutional rights are myths, non-existent in a system of free range slavery. Observe also that the cops claim that after the cop tackled Woods to the ground that Woods threw a punch at him. In other words, the Black man attempted to defend himself from an unlawful arrest. Such action has been made unlawful in most states. Citizen-subjects must always obey authority; obey authority or be placed in greater confinement. In a system of physical coercion (law over humanity) only another, higher authority, such as a judge, can declare an arrest lawful. Similarly, you only have rights if an authority agrees that you do; you may believe you have rights but only authorities decide whether you do or don’t. Pursuant to Iowa Code 804.12:

A person is not authorized to use force to resist an arrest, either of the person’s self, or another which the person knows is being made either by a peace officer or by a private person summoned and directed by a peace officer to make the arrest, even if the person believes that the arrest is unlawful or the arrest is in fact unlawful.

Pursuant to FUNKTIONARY:

disobedience – thinking for oneself—deciding for oneself what to do and not to do. 2) the refusal of services of those in power—to deny their alleged authority over you. The Beast allows you to be disobedient or ignorant but not both. Disobedience is the only crime—all others are offshoots. (See: Prometheus, Rights, Thinking, Thought & Rebel)

disobedient – master over one’s thoughts and acting on same relative to the dominating recidivism of authoritarian culture

rights – fantasmatic or fictitious objects having no reality in actuality by those imagining as an identity being in possession of them. Rights are cultural gratuities perceived through various fantasy frames, recognized, and sometimes even created, by man’s system of law to provide a modicum or pretense of civility under a system whereby their very undermining and violation is vouchsafed. Rights are merely rites unless you know how to assert and defend them in order to enjoy them. 2) things people are free to do whether they are able to or not. 3) conditions of existence required by hue-man’s nature for their potential survival (primarily against the cartoon that kills, i.e., the wholly unconscionable entity called the “State”). It is a mistaken notion that rights are enjoyed by one at the expense of the many—that is the realm of privilege. Enjoyment of rights in a neo-imperialistic world controlled by Yurugu through the Greater System (Symbolic Order), paradoxically, entails not only a recognition of their inevitability but, equally, their impossibility. How can we be endowed with rights, or even know what rights are when they are based on binary considerations? Rights, as ontological ephemera, cannot be universally observed, recognized, realized or enforced—and paradoxically, act also as its own eternal source for its assertion and vessel for its fulfillment in our imaginary enjoyment of them. While the law reads rights referentially, what is universally needed in the praxis of rights discourse today is a particular re-inscription, demystification or reontologising of rights (revivified and convivial) by the pan-gendered subject-citizendecoder— taken symptomatically rather than seriously. Most people rarely experience the cognizance of being property of corporate fictions because as long as you don’t violate the rules of society your real status as feudal-property-slave is not involved or revealed. If there is no ‘I,’ to what and to whom do rights as objects accrue? Those who are confused by suffering (and the subject of same) require a re-onotoligisation of rights through the trajectory of meaning independent of their existence. Rights and even ‘lefts’ (i.e., what remains after all of our imaginary rights are traced to their inception as figment) for that matter, like good and evil, are human inventions which humans treat as non-human realities. While fantasy frames invent rights, romanticism reinvents them. Enjoy your symptoms and play with your syndrome—the symptom is the solution. Read carefully the holding in the supreme Court case of U.S. v. Babcock. Rights are myths—obedience to servitude or jail is the reality. Always remember: “The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.” ~William Safire. (See: Abilities, Bill of Rights, Monoright, Servitude, Fantasy, Jurisdiction, Human Resources, Citizenship, Frankenstein, Autonomy, Rule of Law, Surrogate Power, Indigenous Power, Yurugu, Jouissance, Privilege, Disobedience, Duty & Willpower)

Community Unable to Fire or Decline Unwanted "Service" from a White Cop who Trolled and then Beat a Small Black Child as He Sat On Top of Him. Rancho Cordova Authorities Reinstate Officer [Overseer]

From [HERE] and [HERE] The white Rancho Cordova police officer who was fired in 2020 for a use-of-force incident that went viral online has been reinstated, the officer’s attorney said. Deputy Brian Fowell was terminated by the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office — which has a contract to provide law enforcement for the city of Rancho Cordova — when a professional standards unit investigation concluded Fowell used excessive force against a 14-year-old boy. The incident was captured in a cellphone video less than a minute long, posted in April 2020, and spread across social media, garnering millions of views, and was even retweeted by then-Sen. and vice-presidential nominee Kamala Harris, who called it “a horrific abuse of power.”

Fowell appealed his termination in October 2020. And in a decision released Monday, he won his job back. An arbitrator, an independent judge for internal police matters, ruled in Fowell’s favor.

William Creger, Fowell’s attorney, said the arbitrator said in his ruling that while the Sheriff’s Office was entitled to discipline Fowell, termination in this case wasn’t warranted. “The sheriff’s office was entitled to take Deputy Fowell out of the public spotlight for awhile,” Creger said. “The arbitrator said (Fowell) didn’t do everything perfectly, he could’ve handled it in a different way ... but it didn’t need to rise to the level of termination.” Creger said Fowell’s exemplary record as an officer also factored into the arbitrator’s decision. In 2019, Fowell was awarded employee of the quarter in 2019. That same year, he also earned a life-saving medal when he performed CPR on a young girl who was dying in front her family. Because peace officer personnel records are still broadly protected by California law, Creger said he was unable to provide more detail. A Sacramento Bee request for the Sheriff’s Office investigation into the incident was denied, saying the case did not fall within existing public records law. [only positive or “good” public records about cops are readily available to the public]

The incident involving Fowell dominated local and national headlines in the weeks before protests swept across the U.S. in the wake of the May 2020 death of George Floyd. The video clip was shared millions of times on social media. In the video, Fowell can be seen pushing Tufono’s head into the ground as he tries to turn the teen onto his stomach. In the widely circulated video the white cop is seen punching the 14-year-old boy while pinning him to the ground on Monday as he tried to detain him.

The cop, who is large, appears to be perhaps 3 times the size of the small Black boy.

Fowell strikes Tufono in the abdomen twice. He then grabs Tufono’s right wrist and jerks his face down on the ground, pinning his arm behind his back.

The officer tried to detain the youth, whom he suspected of “criminal activity.” From a distance, the white cop claimed that somehow he witnessed a hand-to-hand sale of tobacco.

How the cop could see tobacco or money in a small child’s hands from a distance is another white supremacy mystery. One that the mostly white media rarely attempt to solve in the countless interactions between Black people and the police reported on and recorded. The Supreme Court has explained that in order for the police to stop you police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and that you are involved in the activity. Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate or unclear and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. The systems of authority and white supremacy/racism are predicated upon black people's belief in many, many lies. The 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures and searches and right “to be secure" or to move freely without apprehension of oppression as you come and go is one of those lies. An illusion, but we still believe.

According to the police when Fowell approached Tufono, the teen refused to identify himself, the Sheriff’s Office said at the time. “Having reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was occurring, the deputy attempted to detain the juvenile so he could conduct further investigation,” the Sheriff’s Office said at the time. “The juvenile became physically resistive at that time, causing the deputy to lose control of his handcuffs, which landed several feet away.” Reasonable