Trial on Oklahoma’s Use of Lethal-Injections to Murder Prisoners Concludes. Evidence from Botched "Executions" Showed Inmates were Tortured while Dying, but Doctors for Barbaric Authorities Deny Pain

/

From [DPIC] A six-day federal trial on the constitutionality of Oklahoma’s lethal-injection protocol has concluded, with medical experts for the state’s death-row prisoners citing autopsy and eyewitness evidence to call the process “torturous” and doctors for the state denying that prisoners suffered as they were being put to death. 

The evidentiary portion of the trial began with medical testimony for the prisoners on February 28, 2022 and concluded with closing arguments from the two sides on March 7. The prisoners presented graphic photographic evidence from the botched execution of John Grant, autopsy results showing that Grant and fellow death-row prisoner Bigler Stouffer suffered fluid build-ups in their lungs as they were put to death, and autopsy evidence that Grant aspirated vomit during his execution. 

The trial also featured blockbuster documentary evidence that members of Oklahoma’s execution team filled out paperwork indicating the state had used an unauthorized chemical in place of the paralytic drug required in the state’s execution protocol. The state’s chief corrections official denied that there had been a drug mix-up, describing the appearance of the wrong chemical in state execution records as “a transcription error.” And the trial court permitted prosecutors to present anonymous testimony, submitted in writing, from a state doctor who was not subject to cross-examination by the prisoners’ lawyers. 

U.S. District Court Judge Stephen Friot (pictured) now must weigh the medical evidence and the conflicting testimony of experts presented by the state and the prisoners, and rule on whether the state’s three-drug execution protocol constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. His decision is expected to take several months.

The Prisoners’ Evidence at the Trial

The death-row prisoners’ case opened with testimony from Dr. Craig Stevens, a professor of pharmacology at Oklahoma State University. Dr. Stevens provided testimony that midazolam, the first drug in Oklahoma’s execution protocol, lacks the pharmacological properties necessary to adequately render prisoners unconscious and insensate before they are paralyzed by the second drug, vecuronium bromide, and subjected to what he called the “burning fire” sensation of the third drug, potassium chloride. 

Dr. Mark Edgar, a pathologist and autopsy director at the Mayo Clinic in Florida, who reviewed more than 30 autopsies of prisoners executed by death penalty protocols that employed midazolam, testified that 27 of those prisoners experienced “severe pulmonary edema,” or fluid filling the lungs. He described the sensations of pulmonary edema as “doom, panic, drowning, and asphyxiation.” Edgar attributed the edema to the use of midazolam. Reviewing the two available autopsy reports from the Oklahoma executions conducted while the trial was pending, Dr. Edgar testified that both Grant and Stouffer had experienced pulmonary edema. The average weight of an adult male’s lungs is 1,000 grams. Stouffer’s autopsy report noted that his lungs, heavy with fluid, weighed 1510 grams. Grant’s autopsy placed the weight of his lungs at 1390 grams.

Another phenomenon noted in the midazolam autopsies Dr. Edgar studied was froth in the executed prisoners’ lungs. Images of Grant’s lungs shown to the court contained what appeared as bubbles — evidence of frothing — which, Edgar testified, could only occur if “the prisoner is alive and breathing” when the edema occurred.

Black Woman’s Skull and Scalp Ripped Open by a Police Dog as White Brentwood Cops Use Their Uncontrollable Authority to Turn K-9 Loose During Hot Pursuit for Stolen Cosmetics. Attorney Released Video

/

Talkmika Bates’ scalp was reportedly torn off by a police dog after white Brentwood, California Police turned the animal loose on her during a “chase” after she was accused of shoplifting cosmetics in February 2020. Now, newly-released police body-camera footage is giving the public a view of the harrowing incident.

On February 22, 2022 her attorneys, Pointer and Belna filed a complaint seeking an unspecified amount of damages for Bates. The attorneys, not the cops, released the video last week. The elite white owned media has largely ignored the story and YouTube and other news media have blurred out portions of the video. The ostensible purpose for such editing is to protect viewers from graphic content - but the real purpose is censorship and protecting the systems of authority and racism white supremacy.

According to the complaint:

On February 10, 2020, at approximately 12:40 p.m., off-duty Brentwood Police Officer Ryan Rezentes and his Czech Republic trained German Sheppard “Marco” responded to a call for service to help locate three suspected shoplifters. Officer Rezentes deployed his police canine, “Marco,” and searched a field near Empire Way in Brentwood, CA.

Officer Rezentes’ was directed to take Marco and search a clump of bushes in the field. Without providing any warning or a reasonable opportunity to come out the bushes, Officer Rezentes commanded Marco to go into the bushes where the German Sheppard located Ms. Bates and immediately sunk its teeth into the unarmed woman’s head. Officer Rezentes ignored Ms. Bates’ chilling screams as he stood by and watched his canine viciously maul the young victim. Finally, the Officer began commanding the canine to “heel” in German. The dog ignored the commands while Ms. Bates continued to scream and beg for her life as the dog continued its attack. Nearly one minute later, Officer Rezentes once again command his dog to heel —yet again, the dog ignored his handler’s commands. Ms. Bates continued to cry out for her mother while pleading with the Officers to make the dog stop.

Officer Rezentes eventually came to the obvious conclusion that he had lost control of his attack animal and inexplicably yelled at Ms. Bates to “do something!” The Officer finally went into the bushes and physically removed the dog’s bite from Ms. Bates’ scalp. After over a minute of being attacked by the rogue animal, Ms. Bates was left laying on the ground mangled and paralyzed with fear.

Officers Rezentes and Lou yelled at Ms. Bates to stand up, an impossible task, as leaves and twigs scraped against her open head wounds. Eventually, Officer Lou helped Ms. Bates to her feet and placed her in handcuffs. The Officers berated Ms. Bates for running from police as if getting her head bit and mauled by a vicious canine was a lawful and appropriate punishment for her crimes.

As she emerged from the bushes, the assembled Officers could see large chunks of Ms. Bates’ scalp were ripped from her head, exposing bone and tissue. 15. In an apparent effort to cover-up this shocking display of police brutality, Officer Rezentes failed to include significant facts from his official police report detailing the encounter. In his report, Officer Rezentes claims that he did not have the benefit of a cover officer which prevented him from physically removing the dog from gnawing on Ms. Bates’ head. However, Brentwood Police Officer Lou’s body worn camera (BWC) proves this is patently false. In fact, the BWC clearly showed that he was standing next to Officer Rezentes with his gun drawn while reassuring Officer Rezentes, “Don't worry, I won’t shoot your dog.” Indeed, Officer Rezentes knowingly omitted the multiple failed attempts to get his canine to release its potentially deadly grip. Officer Rezentes failed to mention that Marco was out of control. 16. Following this tragic event, Ms. Bates was transported to John Muir Medical Center Walnut Creek for emergency medical care. Fortunately, surgeons were able to reattach her scalp however, Ms. Bates continues to suffer from headaches, memory loss and depression as a result of the horrific experience.

The complaint further states:

This violent, uncontrollable animal is still being deployed by the Brentwood Police Department. Indeed, the Police Department’s webpage encourages the community to say “hi” when they see Officer Rezentes and Marco out on patrol and highlights the fact Officer Rezentes lets Marco play with kids in the Brentwood Community!

Deadly Violence Continues in Alabama's Barbaric Prisons with Third Homicide at the Donaldson Correctional Facility in the Past 10 Days

/

From [EJI] Another man has been murdered at William E. Donaldson Correctional Facility near Birmingham, Alabama.

William Jennings, 49, was found unresponsive in his cell in a segregation housing unit on Tuesday with blunt force trauma injuries. He died in the prison infirmary a few hours later.

Mr. Jennings is the third person killed at Donaldson in the past 10 days.

Barry Gardner, 33, was stabbed to death in a dormitory at the prison on February 22.

Victor Russo, 60, died on February 25, two days after he was found unresponsive in a segregation cell. The Alabama Department of Corrections told reporters that Mr. Russo’s death “is not being investigated as a homicide at this time”—despite the coroner’s report that Mr. Russo was found in his cell with “apparent blunt force trauma” injuries. EJI received multiple reports that Mr. Russo had been struck repeatedly in the head by a senior correctional officer at the prison days before he collapsed.

William Jennings was killed in a “segregated” unit. According to ADOC regulations, segregation or restricted housing units are intended to be the most secure areas of a prison and should have the highest levels of supervision.

But multiple homicides have been documented in these units at Donaldson, including the death of David Franklin, 31, who died on February 9, 2021, after he was found unresponsive in a segregation cell at Donaldson. His death certificate stated that his cause of death was homicide by asphyxiation.

Dr. David Martin: mRNA vaccines are gene therapy designed to harm and enslave humanity

/

From [HERE] Well-known truth-teller Dr. David Martin told “Thrive Time Show” host Clay Clark that the mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines are gene therapy designed to harm people.

“We now have data that has been clearly published in the last several days showing that mRNA does get into the genome, does modify the genome and is not something that’s just this innocent little shot that creates a spike protein and you kind of get you fever and get you COVID symptoms and you get over them,” Martin said during the March 2 episode of the “Thrive Time Show” on Brighteon.TV.

“This is a genetic engineering and genetic modification, as stated by the companies. And it is, in fact, gene therapy, designed to harm humanity and perpetually make humanity a slave to the ongoing gene editing fantasies of psychopaths.” (Related: Bayer executive says covid mRNA shots are “gene therapy” falsely marketed as “vaccines.”)

Martin also gave an explanation about CRISPR after Clark brought up the technology that uses mRNA in gene editing.

CRISPR technology

“CRISPR has been around for almost a decade. It is a technology where we use nucleic acid engineering sequences to go in and essentially clip out what are called palindromic repeats,” Martin stated.

“Most people don’t understand that this whole thing, this whole mess that we’re in right now actually started in the 1950s, when we took what was chromosomes, which is the natural occurring form of nucleic acids in the human body, and pulled them apart and turn them into what we call DNA, that model does not exist. In reality, it doesn’t exist in any living system.

“What do exist are chromosomes, the entangled version of nucleic acids. But what we did was we took them apart, we took them into these long strings. And then what we found is that there are sequences inside of those we call genes. In those genes, what we found was sub-sequences which actually are the ability to insert or delete information into the genome.”

The speaker and author also compared CRISPR technology to patchwork quilts. He said that a patchwork quilt has a series of patterns and what CRISPR does is it takes one of the patches of the quilt out and replaces it with a different patch.

“But here’s the problem. Chromosomes actually have multi-dimensional information. When we decide to clip out a piece and clip in another piece. We’re not just changing the color of the quilt pattern. We’re changing the quilt. That’s a problem,” Martin said.

Prophets of AI

Clark showed a video clip of Dr. Yuval Noah Harari, who is a historian and bestselling author, speaking at the World Economic Forum. The host asked Martin about his opinion on the top adviser of WEF founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab.

Martin said Harari has a very warped view of human experience just like theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking and businessman-entrepreneur Elon Musk.

He elaborated: “His worldview is like the worldview of those who are the prophets of AI, the prophets of simulated reality. Those prophets all are calling for the erasure of diversity, so that we can actually have a command and control system that quite literally controls what would be called a human population through nothing more than simple upgrades, modifications, Trojan horses, viruses, literally and figurative.

“Their worldview is one that says that there will be an architect and the architect will come in and establish the code and the code will be what the expression of humanity is, in their likeness and image.

“The bottom line is to have a worldview that says, ‘We, those individuals who have creative thought, who have freedom of expression who have liberty, we are going to be exterminated, so that we become a slave race bent on the consumption and control of a few people who think they’re the programmers.’

“The fact of the matter is, Yuval Harari is wrong. Stephen Hawking was wrong. Elon Musk was wrong. AI is not to fear, because it, in fact, has no power over those individuals who have decided to preserve the integrity of their bodies, their minds and their spirits.”

COVID-19 Spike Protein Sequence ‘100% Match’ to Sequence Patented in 2016 by Moderna, Study Shows

/

Story at-a-glance:

  • A study published Feb. 21, 2022, in Frontiers in Virology claims to have discovered that a sequence of the virus’ spike protein is a 100% match to a modified messenger RNA (mmRNA) sequence patented by Moderna in 2016.

  • The genetic sequence patented by Moderna is part of a human DNA repair gene called MSH3. This patented sequence is found in SARS-CoV-2’s furin cleavage site in the spike protein — the part that gives the virus such easy access into human cells.

  • According to Moderna’s patent application, the gene sequence was modified “for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides,” ostensibly for use in cancer research.

  • According to the researchers, the chance that SARS-CoV-2 would have randomly acquired this furin cleavage site through natural evolution is 1 in 3 trillion.

  • In a Feb. 24, 2022, interview, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel proposed the COVID-19 pandemic may have been the result of a lab leak.

From [CHD] The facts surrounding SARS-CoV-2’s origin just keep getting stranger and more disturbing as time goes on.

From the start, most of the evidence seemed to point to the virus being a lab creation that somehow escaped the confines of the laboratory. We really don’t have much of anything to suggest otherwise.

Now, a study published Feb. 21 in Frontiers in Virology claims to have discovered that a sequence of the virus’ spike protein is a 100% match to a modified messenger RNA (mmRNA) sequence patented by Moderna — in 2016.

Some believe this is a smoking gun, proving gain of function research is at the heart of this mystery. Of course, more research is needed to verify the findings, but if proven correct, it could be rather incriminating.

What did Moderna patent?

The genetic sequence patented by Moderna — and now found to be part of the SARS-CoV-2’s furin cleavage site in the spike protein that gives the virus access into human cells — is a 19-nucleotide sequence of a human gene called MSH3, which is a DNA repair gene.

Nucleotides code for specific amino acids. The MSH3 gene works with the part of your immune system responsible for combating cancer by repairing damaged cells. This pathway has been identified as a potential target for new cancer treatments.

As noted in the patent application, the gene sequence has been modified “for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides,” ostensibly for use in cancer research. The first name listed on the patent is Stéphane Bancel, a Frenchman who has been Moderna’s chief executive officer since 2011.

What’s so curious here is that the scientists of the Frontiers in Virology paper searched all viral and bacterial databases looking for matches to the furin cleavage site patented by Moderna, and SARS-CoV-2 is the only pathogen that has this sequence. It’s an absolute match — 100% identical.

What are the chances of a naturally-occurring virus having a rarely encountered furin cleavage site that is genetically identical to an engineered and patented one? As noted by the authors:

“The absence of CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG from any eukaryotic or viral genome in the BLAST database makes recombination in an intermediate host an unlikely explanation for its presence in SARS-CoV-2.”

In other words, the sequence being a natural zoonosis is extremely unlikely. According to the researchers, the chance that SARS-CoV-2 would have randomly acquired this furin cleavage site through natural evolution is 1 in 3 trillion.

They also noted that “Recombination in an intermediate host is an unlikely explanation.” What’s more, it’s known that inserting a furin cleavage site on the spike protein of a virus will make it more infectious.

Moderna CEO suggests lab leak responsible for COVID-19

One hypothesis raised in the paper is that the matching code might have been introduced into the SARS-CoV-2 genome through infected human cells that express the MSH3 gene. The question, then, is how and when did that happen?

Interestingly, in a Feb. 24 interview, Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo questioned Bancel about the finding. He responded saying their scientists are looking into the claim, adding:

“That it came from a lab is possible. Humans make mistakes. It’s possible that the Wuhan lab in China was working on virus enhancement or gene modification and then there was an accident where somebody was infected in the lab, which affected family and friends. It is possible. On the claim you just mentioned, scientists will look to know if it’s real or not.”

Why This Code?

Now, if SARS-CoV-2 was man-made, why would they use this particular code? As noted in the Frontiers of Virology paper, the MSH3 sequence in question has been shown to cause mismatch repair in DNA, and faulty repair of genetic damage can lead to a number of diseases, including cancer. But overexpression of MSH3 also plays a role in virology:

“Overexpression of MSH3 is known to interfere with mismatch repair … which holds virologic importance. Induction of DNA mismatch repair deficiency results in permissiveness of influenza A virus (IAV) infection of human respiratory cells and increased pathogenicity. Mismatch repair deficiency may extend shedding of SARS-CoV-2 …

“A human-codon-optimized mRNA encoding a protein 100% homologous to human MSH3 could, during the course of viral research, inadvertently or intentionally induce mismatch repair deficiency in a human cell line, which would increase susceptibility to SARS-like viral infection.”

It’s interesting to note that Moderna did not have a single successful mRNA product brought to market before the COVID-19 pandemic allowed them to bypass normal regulatory requirements.

Now, all of a sudden, we’re to believe they managed to throw together a safe and effective mRNA injection against SARS-CoV-2, a virus that just so happens to contain one of its own patented components. What are the odds?

Did Dr. Anthony Fauci, a leading promoter of mRNA technology as a replacement for traditional vaccines, have anything to do with Moderna’s sudden “success”? It certainly looks that way.

After all, the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), an arm of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), both funded and co-developed Moderna’s COVID-19 jab.

As explained by the NIH, the injection “combines Moderna’s mRNA delivery platform with the stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike immunogen (S-2P) developed by NIAID scientists.”

In mid-November 2021, Moderna granted co-ownership of its COVID-19 mRNA “vaccine” patent to the NIH to resolve a dispute involving the naming of the inventors.

Can the COVID jab trigger cancer?

Incidentally, since the release of the mRNA COVID jab, some doctors have raised concerns about the possibility of the injections to trigger cancer, largely due to its detrimental impact on your immune function.

For clarity, this may have nothing to do with Moderna’s patented MSH3 sequence specifically, because the RNA code in the jab is not identical to the RNA code of the actual virus. The RNA in the jab has been genetically altered yet again to resist breakdown and ensure the creation of abundant copies of the spike protein.

So far, the link to cancer post-jab seems to be related to the downregulation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which is involved in both infections and cancer. In an October 2021 article, Dr. Nicole Delépine, a French pediatric oncologist, discussed reports of exploding cancer cases post-jab:

“Several months ago, we expressed at least “theoretical reservations” about vaccinating cancer patients or former patients who had been cured, because of the underlying mechanism of the gene injection on immunity.

“Several geneticists had also expressed their concerns about the possible interference between active or dormant cancer cells and the activity of gene therapy on lymphocytes in particular. Months have passed, and the vaccine madness has amplified …

“[C]learly there seems to be three situations:

  • The appearance of a cancer rapidly after the injection (two weeks to a few months) and very progressive, in a person who was previously free of known carcinological pathologies.

    1. The resumption of cancer in a patient who has been in complete remission for several months or years.

    2. The rapid, even explosive, evolution of a cancer that is not yet controlled.

“Beyond the testimonies that are pouring in from relatives and friends and on social networks, a Swiss newspaper has finally addressed the subject in a broader way. Here are some excerpts from their article and their references:

“‘Can COVID vaccines cause cancer? In some cases, the answer seems to be yes … [It] has been shown that in up to 50% of vaccinees, COVID vaccines can induce temporary immunosuppression or immune dysregulation (lymphocytopenia) that can last for about a week or possibly longer.

“Furthermore, COVID mRNA vaccines have shown to ‘reprogram’… adaptive and innate immune responses and, in particular, to downregulate the so-called TLR4 pathway, which is known to play an important role in the immune response to infections and cancer cells.

“Thus, if there is already a tumor somewhere — known or unknown — or if there is a predisposition to a certain type of cancer, such a state of vaccine-induced immune suppression or immune dysregulation could potentially trigger sudden tumor growth and cancer within weeks of vaccination …’”

Dr. Ryan Cole, in August 2021, also reported seeing a significant increase in certain types of cancer, especially endometrial and uterine cancers, since the start of the mass injection campaign. Cole runs a large pathology laboratory in Idaho.

Other key components of SARS-CoV-2 have also been patented

Time will tell where this all leads, but clearly, SARS-CoV-2 does not appear to be the result of natural evolution. The evidence for it being man-made is simply overwhelming. So far, few in mainstream media have been willing to touch this story, for obvious reasons.

Finding a key gene sequence of the virus in a patent of one of the primary vaccine makers is inconvenient to say the least — and this is in addition to all the other patents relating to the virus.

As previously detailed by David Martin, Ph.D., SARS-CoV-2 appears to have been engineered in the 1990s, perfected in 1999 and patented in 2002. Evidence also shows that plans for mandatory vaccinations were hatched in 2015. That year, during an Academies of Science meeting, Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance stated:

“… until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCM’s [medical countermeasures] such as pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine.

“A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of [the] process.”

According to Martin, “That’s admission of a felony, and the felony is domestic terrorism.”

In a November 2021 Red Pill Expo speech, Martin reviewed the timeline of the COVID-19 jab, which began in 1990 with the first coronavirus vaccine patent for canines (dogs) filed by Pfizer.

That vaccine was an S-1 spike protein vaccine — just like the current Pfizer COVID shot, and according to Martin, that S-1 spike protein is a bioweapon, not a pathogen.

Nine years later, in 1999, Fauci, as director of the NIAID, tasked the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill with the creation of “an infectious replication-defective coronavirus” specifically targeted for human lung epithelium.

The patent for that replication-defective coronavirus that attacks human lung cells, filed April 19, 2002, (Patent No. 7279327), details the gene sequencing of the resulting virus, and how the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain and the S-1 spike protein were engineered and could be synthetically modified in the lab using readily available gene sequencing technologies.

Basically, computer code is turned into a manmade pathogen, or an intermediate pathogen. This technology was initially funded in order to harness the coronavirus as a vector for an HIV vaccine, but it clearly didn’t end there.

CDC holds patents on SARS coronavirus

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also holds key patents, including an illegally obtained patent for the entire gene sequence for the SARS coronavirus (Patent No. 7220852), which Martin says is 99% identical to the sequence now identified as SARS-CoV-2.

That CDC patent also had several derivative patents associated with it, including U.S. patent 46592703P and U.S. patent 7776521, which cover the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus and the means for detecting it using RT PCR testing.

With these two patents, the CDC has complete scientific control, as it owns the provenance of both the virus and its detection.

According to Martin, there’s also evidence of a criminal conspiracy involving the CDC and Sequoia Pharmaceuticals. April 28, 2003 — three days after the CDC filed its patent for the SARS coronavirus — Sequoia Pharmaceuticals filed a patent on an antiviral agent for the treatment and control of infectious coronavirus (Patent No. 7151163).

So, the CDC filed a patent on SARS coronavirus, and three days later there’s a treatment? This strongly suggests there was a working relationship behind the scenes. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, founded in 2002, develops antiviral therapeutics with a special focus on drug-resistant viruses. Its lead investors include the Wellcome Trust.

But there’s yet another problem with Sequoia’s 2003 filing for an antiviral agent. It was actually issued and published before the CDC patent on SARS coronavirus had been granted, which didn’t happen until 2007, and the CDC had paid to keep the application private.

So, there is zero possibility for anyone but an insider to have that information. This is clear evidence of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion, Martin notes. You cannot develop a treatment for something that you do not know exists.

Sanofi also owns a series of patents detailing what we’ve been told are novel features of SARS-CoV-2, namely the polybasic cleavage site, the spike protein and the ACE2 receptor binding domain. The first of those patents, U.S. Patent No. 9193780, was issued Nov. 24, 2015.

Between 2008 and 2017, a series of patents were also filed by a long list of players, including Crucell, Rubeus Therapeutics, Children’s Medical Corporation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in München, Protein Science Corporation, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong and the Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai.

According to Martin, there are 73 patents, issued between 2008 and 2019, that describe the very elements that are said to be unique to SARS-CoV-2. It’s unclear whether Moderna’s 2016 patent filing is part of that list.

Some of the world’s most dangerous bioweapons are made at a lab in Maryland

/

From [NaturalNews]The United States Army’s premier biolaboratory in Maryland has been exposed as an incubator for the development of deadly pathogens like weaponized coronaviruses, Ebola, Zika, anthrax and more.

USAMRIID was originally commissioned to respond to the Soviet Union’s biological weapons program (or so we were told). But now, it conducts research on some of the deadliest bioweapons known to mankind – and it routinely receives taxpayer funding from Congress to do this.

A state public records request by U.S. Right to Know further revealed that USAMRIID changed its mission statement in 2014 to eliminate references to the Cold War and the creation of medical products for military servicemen. Now, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, as it is called in long form, appears to function much like the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China.

While USAMRIID supposedly stopped developing bioweapons back in 1969, it now conducts research on alleged biological threats including Ebola, Zika, Anthrax and the plague. Its roughly 900 employees, which include military, civilian and contract researchers, also conduct research for universities and private companies.

“The global biological threat landscape has changed due to gain-of-function technology, the limited capacity of the intelligence community to identify biological threats and the proliferation of ‘dual-use’ research programs that generate pathogens that could be harmful in the wrong hands, the report states,” The Defender reported.

Why is the U.S. military wasting taxpayer dollars creating new vaccine and other pharmaceutical products for Big Pharma?

The revelation about USAMRIID comes alongside another revelation that similar U.S.-NATO biolabs litter Europe, North Africa and elsewhere, including in Ukraine.

All over the world, the U.S. military-industrial complex has been building bioweapons laboratories where all sorts of deadly pathogens are being tampered with and released. Whether these releases are accidental or intentional is still up for debate.

USAMRIID has suffered many such problems in recent years, including biosafety “breaches” that have shut down high-security work. Many allege that the Department of Defense (DoD) is wasting gobs of taxpayer dollars in the process.

USAMRIID Commander David Franz says that the Maryland lab has failed to deliver on its mission statement. He also says that the lab’s work does not necessarily involve any type of medical advances, despite claims that this is what goes on there.

“The emphasis on products to the warfighter has become less relevant,” reads a report he helped compile.

“Because prophylaxis for ‘biological agents’ (traditional vaccines) requires great specificity and a period of at least weeks before protection is achieved, the era of vaccines for the force, one of USARMIID’s greatest historic strengths, is essentially over.”

Franz and the others who put together the report recommended that the mission of USARMIID change to focus on the creation of vaccines and drugs. The lab apparently listened and now develops new pharmakeia products for Big Pharma.

“To be the leader in the advancement of medical biological defense with world-renowned experts dedicated to protecting our military forces and the nation,” USAMRIID’s vision statement now reads.

Since 2014 when the vision statement was changed, USAMRIID has faced numerous allegations of “financial mismanagement.” It is also one of two facilities at Fort Detrick with so-called BSL-4 labs, which handle the most dangerous pathogens in the world.

Caree Vander Linden, a public affairs officer at USAMRIID, says that the lab has not developed a Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” candidate. However, the facility did test the jabs in their pre-clinical trial stage.

USAMRIID also played a part in developing and unleashing the deadly covid drug remdesivir, which is a major cash cow for Tony Fauci and friends.

Ontario Judge Refuses to Accept as Fact that Injecting Children against COVID is what’s best for them simply because it’s encouraged by the government

/

From [HERE] In a very rare case, an Ontario Judge has actually ruled against a forced COVID vaccination for two children, ages 10 and 12, where a father was requesting that they be forced to receive the shots against their wish, and against the wish of their mother.

While this judge actually just simply did his job, which was to listen to the evidence that both sides presented before ruling, it made waves in the Canadian corporate media, because similar previous cases did not do that, but simply took the Government’s position regardless of what the facts were.

Global News reports:

An Ontario judge says he is not prepared to accept as fact that vaccinating children against COVID-19 is what’s best for them simply because it’s encouraged by the government, noting a number of factors – including the children’s own preferences – must be taken into account.

In a decision issued last week, Superior Court Justice Alex Pazaratz rejected a father’s motion to have his two younger children – ages 12 and 10 – vaccinated despite their mother’s and their own objections, and cautioned against dismissing certain viewpoints without evidence.

The ruling represents a departure from earlier Canadian cases involving disputes over COVID-19 vaccinations, where courts have taken what’s called “judicial notice” – essentially accepting statements as fact – that immunization is beneficial for children, said Alyssa Bach, an associate lawyer at Shulman & Partners LLP.

“We now have cases where judges have taken that judicial notice that the vaccine is in the best interest, and now one where it was decided that that wasn’t the case. And so it’s a reminder that each family’s circumstances, and the circumstances of the children, are going to be taken into consideration on a case-by-case basis,” she said Tuesday.

“It’s notable that Justice Pazaratz, in his decision, did go through the other cases where this judicial notice had been taken and distinguished it and how this case was different than the other cases.”

In most of the previous cases, the children were younger, so their views on COVID-19 shots were “either unascertainable or less relevant because of the child’s lack of maturity,” the judge wrote in his ruling.

And in the cases where the children’s preferences were overridden, the court found the parent seeking vaccination had presented more reasonable information to the children and made more compelling arguments in court, Pazaratz said.

As well, the court in many of those cases found the materials presented by the parent opposed to vaccination were “grossly deficient, unreliable and – at times – dubious. This lack of an equally credible counterpoint to government recommendations may well have been determinative in those earlier cases,” he said.

Not so in the case at hand, the judge noted.

Here, the parents, both in their mid-30s, separated more than seven years ago. The oldest, a 14-year-old boy, lives primarily with his father and chose to vaccinated against COVID-19 last fall – a decision both parents supported, the ruling says.

The two younger children, a 12-year-old girl and a 10-year-old boy, live primarily with their mother. Both were interviewed twice by a social worker and explained why they didn’t want to be vaccinated, with the youngest also expressing fears that his father would force him to get the shots, the document says.

The mother stressed she is not against vaccines overall, adding all three have received their regular immunizations, the ruling says. She also stated she would be open to having the younger two – who have already had the virus and recovered – get COVID-19 shots at a later date “if safety concerns can be better addressed,” it says.

Among the materials she submitted were a fact sheet issued by Pfizer, the drugmaker behind one of the main COVID-19 vaccines, and scientific papers, Pazaratz said.

The father, meanwhile, submitted fact sheets issued by the government and the Canadian Paediatric Society, as well as “numerous downloads” from the mother’s social media accounts on allegations she was promoting conspiracy theories, the ruling says.

“The mother’s evidence focused entirely on the medical and scientific issues. In contrast, the father focused extensively on labelling and discrediting the mother as a person, in a dismissive attempt to argue that her views aren’t worthy of consideration,” the judge said.

What’s more, he said, there is no evidence the mother has sought to impose her views on the children.

Pazaratz warned against allowing personal attacks, rather than debate based on evidence, into the judicial system.

He also cautioned against applying judicial notice in cases “where expert opinion is unclear or in dispute,” noting the government has historically been wrong on many issues, including the residential school system.

The judge further noted that health directives have “constantly changed” during the pandemic as new information emerged.

“This is not the kind of case where the court can say that either side is necessarily correct. Nor that the same determinations should apply for every child, no matter the circumstances,” he wrote.

“Anyone reading even some of the articles presented by the mother would likely conclude that these are complicated and evolving issues, and there can be no simplistic presumption that one side is right and that the other side is comprised of a bunch of crackpots. That’s why the court should require evidence rather than conclusory statements.”

The father, meanwhile, provided no evidence that the mother’s views had been debunked, the judge wrote. (Full article.)

COVID Vaccines Killed More People In 2021 Than All Other Vaccines Killed in 32 Years

/

From [HERE] Year 2021 will go down in history as the year of unprecedented lives destroyed by experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

What I am going to report here at the end of 2021 is that using the U.S. Government’s own data, available to the public (at least at the time of publication), proves conclusively that more people died and were injured by the experimental COVID-19 shots than all other vaccines combined for the past 32 years.

I am going to refer to these COVID-19 experimental injections as “vaccines” since that is how the industry and the U.S. Government refers to them, even though this new class of drugs injected into people does not meet the classic definition of a “vaccine” prior to this year.

I am going to keep this report very simple, and focus on only two data points of the experimental vaccines: reported cases and deaths.

There are other data points that were headline news in 2021, such as the unprecedented amount of fetal deathsfollowing these experimental vaccines, as well as the record number of people suffering and dying from heart diseasefollowing the injections, but we are just going to look at cases and deaths in this report, and I am going to expose some government data that I have not previously reported that will leave no doubt that 2021 was America’s holocaust.

The Globalists and their puppet politicians are guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity, and if the people do not rise up and take these criminals down, things are only going to get worse in 2022.

FOIA Response Reveals that Biden's HHS Paid $1B to Mass Media Outlets to Propagandize the False Safety of COVID Shots in a Uniform Media Campaign that Destroyed Informed Consent and Concealed Reality

/

What is The Dependent Media?

From [HERE] A Freedom of Information Act request filed by Del Bigtree and Robert F Kennedy Jr at Children’s Health Defense has revealed that Biden’s Health and Human Services Department paid $1 billion of your tax dollars to bribe all the major news outlets to tell you to get vaccinated.

“HHS revealed that it purchased advertising from major news networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as cable TV news stations Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, legacy media publications including the New York Post, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post, digital media companies like BuzzFeed News and Newsmax, and hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations. These outlets were collectively responsible for publishing countless articles and video segments regarding the vaccine that were nearly uniformly positive about the vaccine in terms of both its efficacy and safety.

“Hundreds of news organizations were paid by the federal government to advertise for the vaccines as part of a ‘comprehensive media campaign,’ according to documents TheBlaze obtained from the Department of Health and Human Services. The Biden administration purchased ads on TV, radio, in print, and on social media to build vaccine confidence, timing this effort with the increasing availability of the vaccines. The government also relied on earned media featuring ‘influencers’ from ‘communities hit hard by COVID-19’ and ‘experts’ like White House chief medical adviser Dr Anthony Fauci and other academics to be interviewed and promote vaccination in the news.”

We weren’t supposed to see this information for 75 years. It was the fight of people like Dr Robert Malone and Dr Naomi Wolfe and others that got this disclosed and the two joined Steve Bannon for this episode of the War Room.

Dr Malone tells Steve, “The courts have forced Pfizer and the FDA to comply with the law, which is that after licensure is granted, these documents must be made available. Previously, they’re considered confidential – and remember that, as Naomi’s about to discuss and what the truckers are so upset about: we have been forced to take these vaxxines, and we have been told that they’re totally safe and effective.

“What this documents is the government has been well aware that they are not fully safe and has hidden this information from us. How that really matters for Pfizer is that the indemnification clauses require that Pfizer disclose known adverse events and this documentation demonstrates they didn’t do so. So, a lot of the lawyers are licking their chops over this, because it seems to indicate a break in the veil, that may allow legal action, basically due to fraud and concealment of these risks from the general public.

“This is why you have not been able to have full informed consent, is they’ve hidden all this information from you and they’ve used all the propaganda and censorship tools – which you’re about to cover – and paid media to keep all this information from you and spin it, so that you think the left is right and the down is the up and the Moon is made of green cheese.”

Bannon refers to so some “Pretty big events that are happening early in the week,” the details of which he’s not at liberty to reveal but in which Dr Malone will be involved and which he will be back on the show to discuss.

Internal Memo Shows Biden, CDC Making Plandemic Decisions by Following Poll Numbers, Not Science

/

Everything Biden said about COVID vaccines was nonsense.

These are the points he made “First, stay protected with vaccines and treatments.  We know how incredibly effective vaccines are.  If you’re vaccinated and boosted you have the highest degree of protection.  …We will never give up on vaccinating more Americans. Now, I know parents with kids under 5 are eager to see a vaccine authorized for their children.  … If necessary, we’ll be able to deploy new vaccines within 100 days instead of many more months or years.  … And with 75% of adult Americans fully vaccinated and hospitalizations down by 77%, most Americans can remove their masks, return to work, stay in the classroom, and move forward safely.”

Actual data contradicts what Biden said.  If COVID vaccines were really effective, then how can the nearly one million COVID deaths be explained with 75% percent of adults vaccinated?  The US COVID death rate is incredibly high compared to other nations.  Biden failed to acknowledge the many hundreds of thousands of Americans who have died or suffered serious illness from the COVID vaccines, not the infection.  No one who follows actual medical science and looks at benefits and risks of vaccination would seriously question whether they or their children should get the shot. [MORE]

From [CHD] An internal memo from a firm that conducted polling for President Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign advises the Democratic Party on how it can present itself as having “defeated” COVID-19. 

The content of the Feb. 24 memo, “Taking the Win over COVID-19,” closely matches statements Biden made Tuesday during Tuesday’s State of the Union address.

The two-page memo was distributed to “interested parties” by Impact Research, a public opinion research firm that provides “strategic thoughts for Democrats positioning themselves on COVID-19 after nearly two years of the pandemic.” 

The “strategic thoughts” proffered by Impact Research include:

  • Declare the crisis phase of COVID over and push for feeling and acting more normal.

  • Recognize that people are “worn out” and feeling real harm from the years-long restrictions and take their side.

  • Acknowledge COVID still exists and likely will for a long time.

  • Don’t set “COVID zero” as the victory condition.

  • Stop talking about restrictions and the unknown future ahead.

The authors of the memo, Molly Murphy and Bryan Stryker, provided an explanation of the thought process underlying these strategic thoughts while describing efforts against COVID as a “war” – one that is now moving into a new phase:

“After two years that necessitated lockdowns, travel bans, school closures, mask mandates, and nearly a million deaths, nearly every American finally has the tools to protect themselves from this virus. It’s time for Democrats to take credit for ending the COVID crisis phase of the COVID war, point to important victories like vaccine distribution and providing economic stability to Americans, and fully enter the rebuilding phase that comes after any war.”

Acknowledging that shifting public opinion has a tangible political and policy impact, the memo also references the increasing fatigue with and unpopularity of COVID-related mandates among the general public:

“Twice as many voters are now more concerned about COVID’s effect on the economy (49%) than about someone in their family or someone they know becoming infected with the coronavirus (24%).

“Two-thirds of parents and 80% of teachers say the pandemic caused learning loss, and voters are overwhelmingly more worried about learning loss than kids getting COVID. Six in ten Americans describe themselves as “worn out” by the pandemic. 

“The more we talk about the threat of COVID and onerously restrict people’s lives because of it, the more we turn them against us and show them we’re out of touch with their daily realities.”

Translated, this could be interpreted to mean that harsh COVID mandates — described in the memo as “onerous” — are costing votes for the politicians enforcing them.

As reported Feb. 25 by the political blog Punchbowl News, the memo “has been making the rounds among House and Senate Democratic campaigns and consultants.”

According to Punchbowl News, the pollsters at Impact Research, “certainly have tapped into the mood of Democratic campaign pros, who see disaster in November unless the party figures out a better message on Covid,” adding that “Biden administration sources have told us they plan to talk about turning a corner on Covid during the State of the Union [address], so clearly they share some of these thoughts.”

Biden follows the script

Indeed, Biden’s message Tuesday night closely paralleled the talking points of the Impact Research memo:

“For more than two years, COVID-19 has impacted every decision in our lives and the life of the nation. 

“And I know you’re tired, frustrated, and exhausted. 

“But I also know this. 

“Because of the progress we’ve made, because of your resilience and the tools we have, tonight I can say we are moving forward safely, back to more normal routines.  

“We’ve reached a new moment in the fight against COVID-19, with severe cases down to a level not seen since last July.  

“Just a few days ago, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the CDC — issued new mask guidelines. 

“Under these new guidelines, most Americans in most of the country can now be mask-free.   

“And based on the projections, more of the country will reach that point across the next couple of weeks. 

“Thanks to the progress we have made this past year, COVID-19 need no longer control our lives.  

“I know some are talking about “living with COVID-19.” Tonight – I say that we will never just accept living with COVID-19.

“We will continue to combat the virus as we do other diseases. And because this is a virus that mutates and spreads, we will stay on guard.”

When compared with the “strategic thoughts” put forth by Impact Research, it is clear Biden declared the crisis phase of COVID over, recognized people are “worn out,” acknowledged and “COVID still exists and likely will for a long time.” 

Biden — whose approval rate has dropped to as low as 38% according to recent polls — also did not, as the memo advised, set “COVID zero” as “the victory condition.”

The Impact Research memo was circulated one day before the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Feb. 25 eased their mask guidance, and a series of Democratic governors and mayors announced the end of mask and vaccine mandates.

The U.S. Capitol lifted its own mask mandate just two days prior to the State of the Union address.

Mass media outlets, which for the most part until now vehemently supported such countermeasures, also visibly shifted their position in recent days. 

For instance, a CNN medical analyst who had previously compared unvaccinated people to drunk drivers and who strongly favored strict COVID mandates, recently said “the science has changed” and that it is now appropriate to end mask mandates.

Moreover, on the same week, the Impact Research memo circulated, Saturday Night Live, which for the past two years also toed the pro-mandate orthodoxy, openly mocked vaccine and mask mandates and questioned whether they were ever necessary, with such lines as “Do I have to dump my oldest friend just cause he didn’t get … a booster?” [MORE]

Congressional Puppeticians Overseeing the Preyday Lending Industry, which Preys on Black People with High Interest Predatory Loans, Have Received Over $3.4 Million from the industry

/

From [HERE] Members of Congress currently on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and theHouse Committee on Financial Services collectively received over $3.4 million from the payday lending industry during their time in Congress, according to OpenSecrets data. Of the 78 senators and representatives on the committees, just 11 received no contributions from payday lending members or affiliates.

Both committees are tasked with regulating the payday lending industry, and are considering legislation to do just that. The Veterans and Consumers Fair Credit Act, which would cap the interest rate on extensions of consumer credit at 36%, was introduced in the Senate Banking Committee bySen. Jack Reed (D-RI) in July 2021, and reintroduced in the House Committee on Financial Services in November 2021 by Reps. Jesus Garcia (D-IL) and Glenn Grothman (R-WI). 

As of Feb. 2021, 19 states and the District of Columbia have legislation capping interest rates at 36%. Watchdog organization Accountable.US said the legislation would help fight predatory lenders that “target communities of color” and benefit Black Americans, citing “nearly 190 consumer, civil rights, and other public interest groups.” Several members of the committee who have taken large amounts of money from the industry have opposed an interest rate cap, according to Accountable.US. 

Several members of Congress have received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the payday lending industry including Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Al), Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) and Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MI). Luetkeymeyer has, so far, received $39,000 from PACs and individuals affiliated with the payday lending industry during the 2022 election cycle — more than any other sitting member of Congress. While many of the top recipients of contributions from the payday lending industry have each held office for over a decade, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), who served in the House from 2013 until she was elected to the Senate in 2019 through a special election, has received approximately $150,000 from the payday lending industry since she took office. 

In addition to pouring money into political contributions, the payday lending industry spent $4.2 million on lobbying in 2021, the highest it’s spent since 2017. In 2021, at least five companies and trade groups in the payday lending industry hired lobbyists for services that included lobbying on S.J. Resolution 15 — a bill to overturn a Trump-era rule that made it easier for non-bank lenders to issue loans through partnerships with national banks, according to Lobbying Disclosure Act filings.

In October 2020, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a “true lender” rule, which let non-bank lenders avoid state interest rate caps through partnerships with lenders. The Congressional Review Act was passed by the Senate in May 2021, and the House in June 2021, overturning the true lender rule.  

Ketanji Brown Has Worked as an Appellate Judge For 9 Months. Is She Really the Most Qualified Person to be a Supreme Court Justice? In Clown World Math is Different and Token Gestures Have Great Value

/

From [HERE] President Biden has made his pick for the U.S. Supreme Court: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. She has a thin appellate record. At least on regulation and business questions, she’s probably to the left of retiring Justice Stephen Breyer. We’ll see what Senate vetting brings, but the GOP shouldn’t indulge in the left’s scorched-earth tactics.

Judge Jackson’s elevation wouldn’t change the Supreme Court’s direction in the near term, since she’d replace a fellow liberal. But at age 51 she could serve for three decades. Although Judge Jackson clerked for Justice Breyer, she might lack his pragmatic and independent streak. He is less hostile to business and religious liberty than Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

What about Judge Jackson? It’s hard to know for sure. She was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit last June, but her first opinion didn’t arrive until this month. It was a victory for public-employee unions on a matter of administrative law. It was also unanimous, as was her second opinion. As a district judge since 2013, Judge Jackson made hundreds of rulings. That is a different kind of work, involving judicial fact finding and so forth, and we’ll soon discover how much can be gleaned from it.

Mr. Biden’s other criteria that must be mentioned, unfortunately, are race and sex. He promised in 2020 to put a black woman on the High Court, and Judge Jackson is a black woman. But the Senate should focus on her record. “I’ve experienced life in perhaps a different way than some of my colleagues because of who I am,” she said last year. But she added that “race would be the kind of thing that would be inappropriate to inject into my evaluation of a case.”

It’s notable, though, that Mr. Biden seems to have made the choice that most progressives wanted. Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn, whose endorsement in the 2020 South Carolina primary helped Mr. Biden win the White House, pushed for district Judge J. Michelle Childs. She attended state schools, which is another form of diversity the Supreme Court lacks, and she was the first black woman to be partner at a major South Carolina law firm.

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham all but said he’d vote for Judge Childs. Yet progressives smeared her as corporate stooge, and President Biden is nothing if not a man who follows his party. Reacting to the nomination of Judge Jackson, an Ivy Leaguer, Mr. Graham was wary. “The radical Left has won President Biden over yet again,” he tweeted Friday. “I expect a respectful but interesting hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Harvard-Yale train to the Supreme Court continues to run unabated.”

As Mr. Graham says, the public is owed hearings that are respectful, thorough and, yes, even interesting. Judge Jackson is on Harvard’s board of overseers, while the Supreme Court is poised to consider the school’s racial preferences in admissions. Some of her prominent rulings as a district judge were reversed. Another has a footnote on the first page to explain that it “uses the term ‘noncitizen’ in lieu of the term ‘alien.’”

All fair game. But Republicans should refuse to engage in the politics of personal destruction that Democrats routinely wage. Many Republicans may be frustrated that they don’t have more leverage, but elections have consequences. Mr. Biden won in 2020, and then President Trump’s claims of a stolen election in Georgia cost the GOP control of the Senate. Conservatives are paying the price again.

The Dependent Media, who are Complicit in the COVID Genocide, are Now Creating "Myth-Information," Blaming Anything but COVID Injections on Increases in Heart Attacks & Strokes

/

From [DAILYEXPOSE] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly admitted back in October 2021 that the Covid-19 vaccines cause heart inflammation, heart attack and stroke.

Specifically, the CDC admitted that the vaccines cause myocarditis and myopericarditis. The former occurs when the heart muscle – also known as the myocardium – becomes inflamed. The latter occurs when both the heart muscle and the sac that surrounds the heart – known as the pericardium – become inflamed.

Myocarditis can weaken the heart’s ability to pump blood and cause arrhythmias. Severe cases of myocarditis could weaken the heart so much that it becomes unable to pump enough blood to the entire body. This can also lead to clots forming in the heart, which can cause either strokes or heart attacks.

“Evidence from multiple safety monitoring systems in multiple countries supports the finding of an increased risk of myocarditis and myopericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination,” read a CDC report titled “COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Updates,” written by a member of the CDC’s COVID-19 Vaccine Task Force.

The report pointed out that the risk of myocarditis and myopericarditis is highest in adolescents and young adults. Males are also more likely to experience either condition than females.

The conditions are more likely to occur following the second dose than following the first, and the onset of symptoms occurs within a few days of vaccination, up to a week.

Mainstream media outlets are diverting people’s attention away from the COVID-19 vaccines by trying to blame the heart conditions and their symptoms on other factors. Shane St. Pierre, the host of the “Anti-Disinformation” show, pointed this out on the show’s March 3rd episode.

St. Pierre first noted that most of the Western world’s largest and most influential mainstream media outlets have deep ties to – if they aren’t outright controlled by – Big Pharma companies.

Mainstream media outlets are tied to Big Pharma through two of the world’s largest investment management corporations – BlackRock and The Vanguard Group. Together, their portfolio holdings are worth over $17 trillion.

“More importantly, they are the owners and controllers of the Big Pharma industry. And even more importantly than that, BlackRock and Vanguard own the world’s mainstream media,” said St. Pierre. “In other words, Big Pharma owns the mainstream media.”

This gives mainstream media outlets a strong incentive to publish a deluge of articles claiming that certain factors in life and not the experimental and deadly COVID-19 vaccines were raising people’s risks of developing different health conditions. He then pointed out that all of these articles only started coming out when the COVID-19 vaccines started becoming more widespread.

One article published by the Daily Express on Dec. 12, 2021 claimed that skipping breakfast may increase the risk of heart attacks “despite intermittent fasting being the biggest proven health benefit of all time,” said St. Pierre. “Now, suddenly, skipping breakfast causes heart attacks.”

“But if you don’t skip breakfast, suddenly the world’s most popular breakfast food – eggs – enhances your risk of blood clots,” he added. St. Pierre is referring to another Daily Express article, published on Jan. 22 that claimed a substance in eggs is actually why people have an increased risk of blood clots, heart attacks and strokes.

Non-Stop Ukraine War Coverage by The Jim Crow Media because Unlike Most Wars, the Victims are White [in Addition to Distracting Sheeple from the Ongoing COVID Genocide]

/

From [FTP] We are living in dangerous times. All around the world, intense military actions are taking place. Last week alone, Russia launched a huge military invasion of Ukraine; Saudi Arabia carried out dozens of strikes on Yemen; Israel launched a wave of deadly missile attacks against Syria; and the United States restarted its bombing campaign in Somalia.

These four deadly incidents happened concurrently. Yet judging by media coverage, it is highly unlikely that many will even be aware of the final three. A MintPress News study of five leading Western media outlets found that overwhelming attention was paid to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, while the others were barely mentioned, if at all.

In total, in the week between Monday, February 21 and Sunday, February 27, Fox News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC ran almost 1,300 separate stories on the Ukraine invasion, two stories on the Syria attack, one on Somalia, and none at all on the Saudi-led war on Yemen.

The data for the study was collected using the Factiva news database, which was then cross referenced with searches on the websites of the respective news outlets’ websites, and also checked against precise Google searches to generate a final total. A chart visualizing the disparity in coverage over those seven days can be seen below. [MORE]