Fake Ass Vax is Not Killing People? PayPal also Complicit in Genocide by Helping to Destroy Informed Consent: Terminates Accounts of Non-Profit Organizations Fighting Deadly COVID Injection Mandates

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

From [MERCOLA PDF] December 21, 2021, after business hours, PayPal notied the National Vaccine Information Center that it would no longer process donations from their supporters — effective immediately -

• Other organizations also dropped by PayPal include the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and Organic Consumer’s Association (OCA)

• In October 2021, self-proclaimed “media watchdog” group Media Matters accused PayPal and GoFundMe of “hosting crowdfunding campaigns for organizations that spread harmful COVID-19 misinformation”

• PayPal is actively researching transactions that fund hate groups, antigovernment organizations and extremists; it’s unclear, however, how they dene these terms or the groups that fall under them

• Instead of ignoring, fearing or abandoning information that is being targeted with censorship, use censorship as a cue or guide that you should delve more deeply into the topic at hand to reveal the underlying truth

• PayPal is the latest tech giant to join the censorship game, shutting down its services for a variety of nonprot organizations that are working to stop injection mandates.

  This increasingly orchestrated attack has targeted the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), Organic

Consumer’s Association (OCA) and many others — and should send a chill down the spine of anyone who values the freedom upon which the U.S. was founded.

Powerful forces are at play, and Big Tech is among them, working to suppress, discredit and silence certain science, speech and viewpoints. “No longer is there any doubt,” investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson reported, “that vaccine industry interests and other corporate and political interests are pulling the strings so that Big Tech moves to squash scientic views, studies, scientists, and opinions that are contrary to the narrative.”1

NVIC Triumphs Despite PayPal’s Attack

December 21, 2021, after business hours, PayPal notied NVIC that it would no longer process donations from their supporters — effective immediately. “In essence,” NVIC wrote in a news release, “PayPal wants to control your choices and tell you which nonprot charities you may and may not support. Pay Pal’s sudden and unexplained action against our donors comes in the middle of our annual end-of-year fundraising campaign.”2

PayPal’s attack against them is the culmination of Big Tech’s attempts to silence the nonprot. After NVIC held its Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination — Protecting Health & Autonomy in the 21st Century — in October 2020, they were increasingly targeted by mainstream media and a “political operative in the U.K.” During 2021, they were eliminated from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube — yet their resolve to share the truth hasn’t wavered.

The same is true following PayPal’s announcement that they had cancelled NVIC’s account. It didn’t stop NVIC — the nonprot simply secured a new secure platform for donations. They announced December 24, 2021:3

“Just as we pivoted in early 2021 to establish our presence on new social media platforms, NVIC has quickly established a secure alternative to PayPal for processing your credit card donations ... NVIC is being heavily censored

because we have spoken the truth about vaccination, health and autonomy for 40 years.

While big tech and the forced vaccination lobby put out a steady supply of authoritarian propaganda promoting fear and hatred of those who engage in rational thinking, NVIC will continue to defend the legal right to make voluntary choices about vaccination without being punished for the choice made as we move forward with our mission to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education and defend the informed consent ethic.”

The press following PayPal’s cancellation worked against the tech giant, as it prompted NVIC supporters to help in response. As Attkisson explained:4

“The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is one of the many fact-based advocacy groups that has suffered under the heavy hand of censorship from Big Tech acting on behalf of pharmaceutical/government/corporate interests. But victory can be found in a strategy that turns the censorship on its head.

If Americans can use censorship as a cue or guide to seek more information about that topic, person, or study, they defeat the intent of the censors.

After NVIC was dumped from PayPal so that donations from supporters could not be processed during a crucial fundraising campaign, the nonprot announced it had established a presence on an alternative fundraising platform. And the American people responded. NVIC has announced receiving substantial donations and support on the new platform, in part due to the attention the PayPal censorship gave to the issue.”

PayPal Claims Violations of ‘Acceptable Use’ Policies

In October 2021, self-proclaimed “media watchdog” group Media Matters accused PayPal and GoFundMe of “hosting crowdfunding campaigns for organizations that spread harmful COVID-19 misinformation.”5

Some of the organizations mentioned in the article include the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), America’s Frontline Doctors and Children’s Health Defense, which have been speaking out about early COVID-19 treatments and red ags about censorship since the beginning of the pandemic.

Dening them as “groups known for spreading medical misinformation,” the article, which itself is spreading misinformation, then calls out PayPal’s policies that do not allow users to “provide false, inaccurate or misleading information,” among others.6

In short, people and organizations are being censored, deplatformed and banned from social media and payment processing platforms for the crime of spreading “misinformation,” the meaning of which can change from day to day and from platform to platform.

In July 2021, Reuters also reported that PayPal planned to research transactions that fund hate groups, anti-government organizations and extremists. It’s unclear, however, how they dene these terms or the groups that fall under them.7

It’s a modern-day witch hunt, whereby the U.S. Department of Homeland Security even lists promulgating “false narratives” around COVID-19 as a top national security threat, which basically puts a “domestic terrorist” target on the backs of those of us who have been identied as the most prolic “superspreaders” of COVID-19 misinformation, whatever that “misinformation” happens to be.

In the case of OCA, which was also suddenly dropped by PayPal, it was said that they violated the company’s “acceptable use” policies. In a message to their subscribers and donors, OCA put it bluntly: “We are under attack.” They continued:8

“Last week PayPal, our credit card processor for hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations, (and recurring donations) cut off all of our accounts (OCA, Regeneration International, and Citizens Regeneration Lobby) with no notice, claiming that we were violators of PayPal’s “acceptable use” policies.

This outrageous attack on OCA’s fundraising is similar to the intimidation and censorship carried out by other Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook, who have threatened to cut off OCA and Millions Against Monsanto from our two million social media followers, unless we stop talking about the origins, nature, virulence, prevention, and treatment of COVID-19.

Subsequently we have been forced to put out two different versions of our weekly newsletter, Organic Bytes, one uncensored for our subscribers, one censored for distribution on social media. Needless to say OCA will not back down from our investigative reporting, our denunciations of corporate and government corruption and crime, and our truth-telling regarding genetic engineering and COVID-19.

We are exploring litigation against PayPal with lawyers and allied organizations who support free speech and truth-telling.”

Like NVIC, OCA wasn’t deterred by PayPal’s act of censorship; they simply switched to another credit card processor to continue on with their mission, despite the ongoing attempts at government intimidation and Big Tech censorship.

The PayPal Mafia

Many may not be aware of the close ties between PayPal’s early employees, who came to be known as the “PayPal Maa,” and big names in the tech industry today. As reported by Insider, “The payments company — launched as Connity in 1998 by Peter Thiel, Max Levchin, and Luke Nosek — grew to become a Silicon Valley giant.

It was acquired by eBay in 2002 for $1.5 billion in a deal that altered Silicon Valley history and helped spawn the careers of some of tech's most famous names.”9 This includes:10

• Palantir — This data analytics software company was founded by Thiel in 2003; the idea came from his experiences with credit card fraud at PayPal. 9 10

• Affirm — This company allows people shopping online to pay for products over time using an instant line of credit. It was founded in 2013 by Max Levchin, one of PayPal’s cofounders.

• YouTube — YouTube founders Steve Chen and Chad Hurley worked at PayPal during its early days.

• SpaceX — Elon Musk’s banking company X.com merged with Thiel’s company Confinity to become PayPal in 2001. Not only is Musk a former PayPal CEO, but he made $165 million when PayPal sold, which was used to start SpaceX.

• LinkedIn — LinkedIn’s founder, Reid Hoffman, was a former executive vice president at PayPal.

Big Tech Censorship Is Rampant

PayPal terminating nonprofits is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Big Tech and its censorship of the information you see daily on the internet. Efforts to shut down public discussions and information are in full force, while Big Tech is also actively manipulating what you can and can’t see online, to the extent that they can alter perceptions of reality.

Zachary Vorhies, a former senior software engineer at Google and Google’s YouTube, uncovered more than 950 pages of confidential Google documents showing a plan to re- rank the entire internet based on Google’s corporate values, using machine learning to intervene for “fairness.”

He resigned in June 2019 and turned over the documents to the Department of Justice, then released them to the public via Project Veritas to expose Google’s censorship activities.11 Susan Wojcicki, the CEO of YouTube, made pushing down “fake news” and increasing “authoritative news” sound like a good thing, Attkisson reported,12 but when Vorhies looked at Google’s design documents, the fake news they were censoring wasn’t really fake.

“I was apolitical,” he said, “but I started to think, is this really fake news? Why are they denying it as fake news in order to justify censorship?” Part of this involved Google’s efforts at social reconstruction to correct “algorithmic unfairness,” which could be any algorithm that reinforces existing stereotypes.

Could objective reality be algorithmically unfair? Google says yes. Vorhies used the example of doing a Google search for CEOs, and the images returned included mostly men. Although it’s reality, this could be considered algorithmically unfair and, according to Google, justifies intervention in order to x it. He also uses the example of the Autofill search recommendations that pop up if you do a Google search.

Autofill is what happens when you start typing a search query into a search engine and algorithms kick in to offer suggestions to complete your search. If you type “men can,” you may get Autofill recommendations such as “men can lactate” and “men can get pregnant,” or “women can produce sperm” — things that represent an inversion of stereotypes and a reversal of gender roles.

We've been led to believe that whatever the Autofill recommendations are is what most people are searching for — Google has stated that the suggestions given are generated by a collection of user data — but that's not true, at least not anymore.

FLCCC Was Also Canceled by PayPal

In another example of Big Tech and PayPal’s overreach, they also shut down FLCCC’s donation platform October 15, 2021, “in violation of PayPal’s Acceptable Use Policy.”13 “Big tech must think we’re having a big impact,” FLCCC tweeted. “We are.”14 But again, it’s not only PayPal — this is an orchestrated effort by Big Tech, in concert with government, media, intelligence agencies and other forces. As FLCCC reported:15

“These attacks join LinkedIn and Vimeo, which removed our accounts, and YouTube, which began taking down our testimonial videos months ago. The powerful forces of Big Tech, Big Pharma, government, health authorities, and mainstream media continue to suppress us. There is nothing false in anything that we post.

This is an attack on our ability to fundraise, our free speech, and our efforts to share effective, safe COVID-19 prevention and treatment protocols to help people around the world stay out of the hospital — and to save precious lives impacted by this dangerous virus.”

What can you do? Fight back against the heavy hand of censorship by beating them at their own game. Instead of ignoring, fearing or abandoning the information that is being targeted with censorship, do as Attkisson suggested — use censorship as a cue or guide that you should delve more deeply into the topic at hand to reveal the underlying truth.

Sources and References

1 Sharyl Attkisson January 3, 2022

2, 3 NVIC December 24, 2021

4 Sharyl Attkisson January 3, 2022

5, 6 Media Matters October 7, 2021

7 Reuters July 26, 2021

8 Organic Consumers Association, We Are Under Attack

9, 10 Insider December 24, 2020

11 Project Veritas April 6, 2020

12 Full Measure January 10, 2021

13, 14 Twitter, FLCCC October 15, 2021

15 FLCCC Alliance, Mailchimp email

The Black Magic of Philanthropy ft. Bill Gates, Clintons, Abramovic, Gaga, W.H.O., Do-Gooders Destroying Humanity Under the Pretense of Saving It

Dr. Peter McCullough: COVID Shots Inject Genetic Material into your Body that Program your Cells to Start Producing the Spike Protein which Can Do Near-Incomprehensible, Lethal Damage to your Health

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• The COVID shots are based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which is the most pathogenic part of the virus, responsible for the worst symptoms of COVID-19, such as the abnormal blood clotting seen in severely ill patients

• Pzer’s and Moderna’s mRNA shots, and Janssen’s vector DNA shot, all inject genetic material into your body that program your cells to start producing this spike protein. They’re gene transfer technologies that instruct your body to produce a dangerous protein inside its own tissues

• A Pzer biodistribution study showed both the mRNA and spike protein is widely distributed in the body. In particular, it accumulates in the ovaries. Despite that, reproductive toxicology studies were eliminated in the interest of speed

• The average number of adverse event reports following vaccination for the past 10 years has been about 39,000 annually for all vaccines combined, with an average of 155 deaths. The COVID jabs alone now account for 701,126 adverse events in U.S. territories as of December 17, 2021, including 9,476 deaths

• Cases of myocarditis explode after the second shot, and disproportionally affect boys; 90% of post-jab myocarditis reports are males, and 85% of reports occurred after the second dose. Cases are also inversely correlated to age, with younger boys being at greater risk. The estimated incidence for post-jab cardiac adverse events is 162 per million for boys aged 12 through 15, and 94 per million for boys aged 16 to 17

From [MERCOLA PDF] In the video presentation above, Dr. Peter McCullough, a highly credentialed and published cardiologist, internist and epidemiologist, and one of the primary physicians leading the charge to provide commonsense clinical wisdom into COVID treatments, explains what the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is and how it harms human biology — whether it comes from a natural SARS-CoV-2 infection or a COVID jab.

The presentation was given at the Burleson, Texas, COVID Symposium: A Legal Perspective, which streamed live December 3, 2021. He begins by addressing the necessity for safety whenever a new biologic product is launched. Safety is not something we can simply ignore, no matter what else is at stake. We must demand that whatever we’re given actually meets some kind of safety standard.

Warning bells started ringing in McCullough’s ears in the summer of 2020, long before the COVID shots were rolled out. “I was telling lawmakers that we’ve got a problem,” McCullough says, because corners were being cut that might result in a dangerous product. Safety studies, for example, were truncated down to a mere two months, which doesn’t allow for adequate evaluation.

Why Did They Use Spike Protein?

He also had several other concerns about the development program. Notably, the shots were based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which by then we already realized is the most pathogenic part of the virus, responsible for the worst symptoms of COVID-19, such as the abnormal blood clotting seen in severely ill patients.

As explained by McCullough, the virus can be illustrated as a ball with spike-like protrusions on its surface. Those spikes are what’s causing the problems.

“They had been genetically altered and engineered in a lab in Wuhan, China” McCullough says, “to be particularly infectious, and to be particularly dangerous when they get into the human body.

The last thing you want in your body is one of those [spike proteins], let alone billions of them because [they] damage the brain, they damage the heart, they

damage bone marrow, they can tear up platelets and red blood cells. Very importantly, they damage blood vessels and cause blood clotting.”

Pzer’s and Moderna’s mRNA shots, and Janssen’s vector DNA shot, all inject genetic material into your body that programs your cells to start producing the spike protein. They’re gene transfer technologies.

In short, the shots instruct your body to produce a dangerous protein inside its own tissues. “We’ve never done that before in the history of medicine,” McCullough says, and for good reason: It’s a bad idea. “It’s almost like a science ction story going bad,” he says.

The idea is that by making your body produce this damaging spike protein, your body will react and ght it off, thereby creating immunity. However, in the process, the spike protein can do near-incomprehensible damage. In some people, the spike protein is lethal.

Uncontrolled Spike Protein Production

What’s more, we have uncontrolled production of spike protein, both in terms of quantity and time. The May 2021 paper,1 “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients,” proved the spike protein circulated in the blood stream for an average of 15 days’ post-injection. The longest was 29 days.

This refuted the claim that the mRNA simply stayed in the arm and didn’t circulate out of the injection site. Logically, that claim doesn’t make much sense, and the Japanese government, early on, demanded Pzer do a study to show them where the injected mRNA actually goes.

Pzer did that biodistribution study,2 which showed both the mRNA and spike protein were widely distributed in animals’ bodies. In particular, it was found to accumulate in the ovaries. Despite that, the Pzer biodistribution data package reveals reproductive toxicology studies were eliminated in the interest of speed.

June 25, 2021, a paper was posted on the preprint server BioRxiv, showing the S1 portion of the spike protein remains detectable for up to 15 months after you recover from COVID-19.

“No wonder people have long-COVID syndrome,” McCullough says. “The body is trying to clean out this spike protein that’s not supposed to be there, 15 months after you’ve had the infection.”

McCullough points out that Bruce Patterson, the Stanford scientist who led that study, also continues to nd the whole spike protein — both the S1 and S2 segments — in patients who got the COVID jab, months post-injection.

So, as of right now, we don’t know when the spike protein production ceases. What we do know, with great certainty, is that the spike protein damages the human body and contributes to both acute and chronic health conditions and diseases.

Australia has already purchased 14 doses of the COVID jabs for every person. This is meant to cover them for seven years, at one dose every six months. As noted by McCullough, some people simply aren’t going to survive that kind of continuous and ever-increasing onslaught of spike protein.

Urgent Questions on Vaccine Safety

Clear danger signals were apparent in April 2021, and May 24, 2021, McCullough published a paper along with 56 other international scientists in the journal Authorea.3

The paper, “SARS-CoV-2 Mass Vaccination: Urgent Questions on Vaccine Safety that Demand Answers from International Health Agencies, Regulatory Authorities, Governments and Vaccine Developers,” demanded the injections be pulled from the market unless or until safety concerns are addressed. Key clinical concerns raised include:

The potentially hazardous mechanisms of action of the shots resulting in cell, tissue

The paper was sent to every health and regulatory agency in the world. Here we are in early 2022 and, well, you can see what the response was. It’s been nonexistent.

A Critical Appraisal of VAERS

In October 2021, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., with the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge in Israel, published a report in the Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law journal.4 The report, “Critical Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the US Vaccine Adverse

and organ damage

The presence of harmful spike protein in donated blood

Lack of genotoxicity, teratogenicity and oncogenicity studies

The effects of bioaccumulation in women’s ovaries

The potential for reduced fertility

The lack of a data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) to oversee clinical trials and post-market surveillance

The lack of human ethics committee to oversee clinical trials

The lack of restrictions on exempted groups from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) such as pregnant women, women of childbearing potential, COVID survivors (previously immune)

The lack of risk stratication for hospitalization and death in the clinical trials

The lack of data transparency

The lack of public risk mitigation (early and at-home treatment options)

Event Reporting System (VAERS) a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System?” details three primary problems found:

1. Deleted adverse event reports involving COVID jab injuries

2. Delayed entry of reports

3. Recoding of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MeDRA) terms from severe to mild

It also includes bar plots showing the extreme difference between the COVID shots compared to all other vaccines on the market. If the shots were safe, the number of VAERS reports would remain relatively steady, not varying much from previous years, but what we see is a staggering spike in vaccine injuries reported in 2021.

The average number of adverse event reports following vaccination for the past 10 years has been about 39,000 annually, with an average of 155 deaths. That’s for all available vaccines combined.

The COVID jabs alone now account for 701,126 adverse events in U.S. territories as of December 17, 2021, including 9,476 deaths. If you include international reports that make their way into the VAERS system, we’re looking at 983,756 adverse event reports and 20,622 deaths.5

As staggering as these numbers are, they are just the tip of the iceberg. When you add in the underreporting factor, which is believed to be anywhere from ve to 40, the numbers are simply astronomical.

VAERS is an early warning system and is supposed to alert our government to potentially hazardous vaccines once they’ve been rolled out. The signal from VAERS is so clear there’s simply no doubt we have a safety problem on our hands.

Can COVID Shots Cause Death?

As noted by McCullough, there’s a very tight temporality to the shots in most deaths. Half have occurred within 48 hours of injection, and 80% have died within one week of their jab (be it the rst, second or third dose).6

Temporality is one of the 10 Bradford Hill criteria used to establish causal relationship. In order to be causative, one event must occur before another, and the shorter the duration between the two events, the higher the likelihood of a causative effect.

In June 2021, Scott McLachlan, Ph.D., at the University of London published an analysis7 of VAERS death reports concluding that 86% of post-jab deaths could be attributed to the shots. There was no other explanation for the deaths. McLachlan also looked at who’s getting killed by the shots and, sadly, it’s the same people the shots are intended to protect — our seniors.

In September 2021, Ronald Kostoff, Ph.D., published a report8 that also showed seniors were dying from the jab at far higher rates than other age groups. As noted by McCullough, this makes perfect sense because people die from COVID-19 due to the impact of the spike protein. Why would anyone assume they will survive having it produced in their own bodies?

Using the best-case scenario cost-benet analysis, Kostoff estimates that people aged 65 and older are ve times more likely to die of the COVID shot than from COVID-19 itself.

The reason for this is because if you take the shot, you’re guaranteed to be exposed to its risks, but you’re not guaranteed to get COVID-19 if you don’t take the shot. You may be exposed, or you may not. And not everyone develops a severe infection even when directly exposed.

COVID Jab-Associated Myocarditis in Children

In early September 2021, Tracy Beth Hoeg and colleagues posted an analysis9 of VAERS data on the preprint server medRxiv, showing that more than 86% of the children aged

12 to 17 who reported symptoms of myocarditis were severe enough to require hospitalization.

They also concluded that healthy boys have a “considerably higher” chance of being hospitalized with myocarditis post-jab than they are of requiring hospitalization for COVID-19.

According to McCullough, the FDA has heard these data twice in 2021 and never disputed them. Yet they’ve proceeded with recommendations to give the COVID jab to anyone with a pulse over the age of 5. It’s just shocking. Historically, as a rule, we’ve never given drugs to people when they’re more likely to harm than provide a benet.

What Hoeg et. al.10 showed is that cases of myocarditis explode after the second shot, and disproportionally affect boys. A full 90% of post-jab myocarditis reports are males, and 85% of reports occurred after the second dose. According to Hoeg et. al.:11

“The estimated incidence of CAEs [cardiac adverse events] among boys aged 12-15 years following the second dose was 162 per million; the incidence among boys aged 16-17 years was 94 per million. The estimated incidence of CAEs among girls was 13 per million in both age groups.

The incidence of CAEs was considerably lower after the rst dose across all age and sex groups. Median peak troponin was 5.2 ng/mL among boys aged 12-15 years, 11.6 ng/mL among boys aged 16-17 years, 0.8 ng/mL among girls aged 12-15 years, and 7.3 ng/mL among girls aged 16-17 years.”

Troponin Levels Reveal Massive Heart Damage

Troponin is a protein that helps regulate contractions of your heart and skeletal muscles. It’s a biomarker for heart damage, as your heart releases troponin in response to an injury. Elevated troponin is used to assess whether you’ve had a heart attack, for example.

Normal troponin levels are nearly undetectable, so even small increases can indicate heart damage. A level above 0.4 ng/mL is typically indicative of a heart attack and anything between 0.04 ng/mL and 0.4 ng/mL indicates there’s some kind of problem with the heart.12

So, the sky high post-jab troponin levels in these adolescent boys is anything but inconsequential. It can absolutely be life-threatening. Myocarditis can result in sudden death, as illustrated in an October 2021 case report13 from Korea, where the death of a 22-year-old man from acute myocarditis was causally linked to the Pzer shot.

“Without a doubt, it will kill kids,” McCullough says. Even if not acutely lethal, myocarditis can signicantly lower your life expectancy. Historically, the three- to ve- year survival rate for myocarditis has ranged from 56% to 83%.14 That means a certain percentage don’t make it past ve years because their heart is too damaged.

McCullough and Rose have also tried to publish an analysis on this topic. They submitted a paper15 on myocarditis cases in VAERS following the COVID jabs to the journal Current Problems in Cardiology. But after initially accepting the paper, the journal suddenly changed its mind.

You can still nd the pre-proof on Rose’s website though. What they show is that post- jab myocarditis is inversely correlated to age, so the risk gets higher the younger you are. They too found there’s a dose-dependent risk, with boys having a six-fold greater risk of myocarditis following the second dose.

Mortality in Adolescents Is Skyrocketing

McCullough’s assertion that the shot will kill some children is also starting to show in statistics. British data, for example, shows deaths among teenagers have spiked since that age group became eligible for the COVID shots.16

Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, 148 deaths were reported among 15- to 19-year-olds. During that same time period in 2021,

217 deaths occurred in that age group. That’s an increase of 47%, which has yet to be explained.

Deaths from COVID-19 also went up among 15- to 19-year-olds after the shots were rolled out. Signicant concerns have been raised about the possibility that COVID jabs might worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).17 Is that what’s going on here? As reported by The Exposé, which conducted the investigation:18

“Correlation does not equal causation, but it is extremely concerning to see that deaths have increased by 47% among teens over the age of 15, and COVID-19 deaths have also increased among this age group since they started receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and it is perhaps one coincidence too far.”

COVID Jabs Double Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Aside from troponin levels, researchers have also found Pzer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 shots dramatically increase other biomarkers associated with thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following injection.19

People who had received two doses of the mRNA jab more than doubled their ve-year risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the researchers found, driving it from an average of 11% to 25%. ACS is an umbrella term that includes not only heart attacks, but also a range of other conditions involving abruptly reduced blood ow to your heart.

In Months, the Jabs’ Effectiveness Wanes to Zero

As should be evident by now, there are signicant risks to these COVID shots. But what about the benet side of the equation? As noted by McCullough, while the shots reduce the risk of death from COVID-19, the benet is vanishingly small.

A number of papers have been published calculating the absolute risk reduction of the shots, showing the four available COVID jabs in the U.S. provide an absolute risk reduction between just 0.7% and 1.3%.20,21

McCullough goes on to cite a December 1, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine study22 that compared the effectiveness of Pzer’s and Moderna’s injections among hospitalized veterans. Here too, they found that the shots had an effectiveness of less than 1% against all COVID-19 events, over the course of six months.

As of the end of October 2021, we had 22 studies showing the shots’ ecacy against all variants rapidly wane over the course of three to six months, eventually hitting zero.

For example, a Swedish study23 published October 25, 2021, looked at data from 842,974 pairs, where each person who had received two COVID jabs was paired and compared against an unvaccinated individual, to see if the vaccinated had fewer symptomatic cases and hospitalizations.

Early on, the double-jabbed appeared to have decent protection, but that quickly changed. The Pzer jab went from 92% effectiveness at Day 15 through 30, to 47% at Day 121 through 180, and zero from Day 201 onward. The Moderna shot had a similar trajectory, being estimated at 59% from Day 181 onward.

“ Vaccines aren’t viable if they can’t last a year! The minimum criteria to accept a vaccine ... is 50% coverage and it must last one year. These [COVI”D shots] aren’t cutting it. ~ Dr. Peter McCullough

The AstraZeneca injection had a lower effectiveness out of the gate, waned faster than the mRNA shots, and had no detectable effectiveness as of Day 121. All the while, millions of Americans have already had COVID24 and have natural immunity that doesn’t wane in this manner.

“Vaccines aren’t viable if they can’t last a year!” McCullough exclaims. “The minimum criteria to accept a vaccine ... is 50% coverage and it must last one year. These [COVID shots] aren’t cutting it. None of them are viable to be commercial products.”

The COVID-Jabbed Are Just as Infectious as the Unvaccinated

COVID jab mandates are even more irrational when you take into account the fact that they don’t prevent you from being infected, and studies have repeatedly shown that when you are infected, you have the same or higher viral load as unvaccinated individuals. What that means is you’re just as infectious as an unvaccinated person.

What’s more, as noted in a letter25 to the editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, the shots also have only minor inuence on viral clearance. If you get the COVID shot and come down with COVID, you might be sick for a day or so less than someone who is unvaccinated.

We Must Treat COVID Patients Early

McCullough closes out his presentation going over the all-important issue of early treatment. You need to treat COVID early and aggressively. You also need to hit it from multiple sides. No single drug can effectively treat all aspects of this infection (although the Omicron variant does not appear to have any of the blood clotting and low oxygen issues associated with the earliest strains).

Very few people need die from COVID as long as they get appropriate treatment early enough. The fact that our health authorities are to this day refusing to acknowledge successful treatment protocols is nothing short of a crime.

If you want to live, and if you want your family and friends to live, you’d be wise to ignore the CDC’s and FDA’s recommendation to wait until you can’t breathe and then go to the hospital, where they’ll give you toxic remdesivir and lethal ventilation. Instead, arm yourself with one or more early treatment protocols and make sure you have the basics in your medicine cabinet. Protocols you can use include:

The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance's (FLCCC's) prevention and early at- home treatment protocol. They also have an in-hospital protocol and long-term management guidance for long-haul COVID-19 syndrome. You can nd a listing of

doctors who can prescribe ivermectin and other necessary medicines on the FLCCC website

The AAPS protocol
Tess Laurie's World Council for Health protocol America's Frontline Doctors

I reviewed all of these protocols and believe the FLCCC’s is the easiest and most effective. I’ve posted a summary of it below. However, I’ve altered some of the recommendations. Specically, I recommend:

Decreasing zinc dose from 100 mg to 50 mg elemental zinc, but only for three days, then decrease to 15 mg elemental zinc.

Increasing quercetin from 250 mg to 500 mg.

Add NAC to 500 mg per day.

When using vitamin C, I recommend liposomal vitamin C, 1,000 to 2,000 mg, four to six times per day.

When using honey, make sure it’s raw, not normal honey from the grocery store. Raw honey can be obtained online or at a health food store.

Add brinolytic enzymes like lumbrokinase, serrapeptidase or nattokinase, two to four tablets, two to three times a day, on an empty stomach (one hour before or two hours after a meal). This will help break down any microclots and can be used in lieu of aspirin.

I’ve also added a couple of therapies that they have yet to include:

Nebulized hydrogen peroxide — Nebulize 5 ml of 0.1% peroxide dissolved in 0.9% normal saline every hour or two. It’s best to use a nebulizer that plugs into the wall,

as these are more effective than battery operated ones. Intravenous ozone administered by a trained ozone physician.

Sources and References

1 Clinical Infectious Diseases May 20, 2021; ciab465
2 Trial Site News June 6, 2021
3 Authorea May 24, 2021
4 Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law October 2021; 3: 100-129 5 OpenVAERS Data as of December 17, 2021

6 Dare to Seek the Truth Dr. Peter McCullough
7 ResearchGate June 2021 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26987.226402
8 Toxicology Reports September 2021; 8: 1665-1684
9, 10, 11 medRxiv September 8, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866
12 Medical News Today June 7, 2019
13 Journal of Korean Medical Science October 18, 2021; 36(40): e286
14 European Heart Journal September 2008; 29(17): 2073–2082
15 Journal Pre-proof, A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID [...]
16, 18 The Exposé September 30, 2021
17 Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Oct 28 : e13795
19 Circulation November 16, 2021; 144(Suppl_1)
20 Medicina 2021; 57: 199
21 The Lancet Microbe July 1, 2021; 2(7): E279-E280
22 NEJM December 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2115463
23 Lancet Preprints October 25, 2021
24 Our World in Data December 15, 2021
25 NEJM December 23, 2021; 385: 26 (PDF)

Rebreathing CO2 increases blood pressure and leads to rapid heart rate, chest pain, confusion, twitches, headaches, fatigue, panic attacks and mass formation psychosis ("Mask Asphyxiation Disease")

From [HERE] Hypercapnia occurs when CO2 levels become elevated in the body. This happens when we rebreathe the gaseous waste air coming out of our mouths and noses, imposing harmful and dangerous effects on the mind and body. Rebreathing CO2 increases your blood pressure and leads to rapid heart rate, chest pain, confusion, twitches, headaches, fatigue, panic attacks and mass formation psychosis. Once this becomes perpetual, organ damage and asphyxiation probability increases. About two hundred million Americans are suffering from this relatively new syndrome resulting from being deprived of proper amounts of oxygen. It’s slow suffocation, and the Covid masks are to blame for all of it, whether homemade or N95.

Asphyxiation occurs when carbon dioxide interferes with the oxygenation of tissue. The long-term end result is death. Perpetual mask-wearing zombies are limiting the oxygen that enters the lungs, thus reducing oxygen in their blood, and therefore diminishing the oxygen and nutrients that are carried to body tissues, including the brain. Research reveals that prolonged use of Covid masks, homemade or N95, can cause anywhere from five percent on up to 20 percent loss of oxygen. [MORE]

Virginia’s New Governor Rescinds Unhealthy Mask and Deadly Vax Mandates for Schools, State Employees on First Day

From [HERE] Glenn Youngkin, Virigina’s first Republican governor to win statewide office since 2009, signed 11 executive orders on his first day that include rescinding vaccine mandates for state employees.

In his inauguration speech Saturday, Youngkin mentioned education as his policy priority. He promised to raise standards of education and teacher pay, and stated that he would “remove politics from the classroom.” His executive order that bans the teaching of critical race theory calls the framework “divisive,” prompting criticism from the Virginia Legislative Black Caucus.

Youngkin lamented the school shutdowns and the economic difficulties that have followed the pandemic. While doing so, he has also signed an executive order to “empower” Virginia parents in their children’s education and upbringing by allowing parents to make decisions on whether their child wears a mask in school. Additionally, he issued an executive directive to “restore individual freedoms and personal privacy by rescinding the vaccine mandate for all state employees.”

Other executive orders that the governor signed included establishing a commission to combat antisemitism, withdrawing from a regional greenhouse gas reduction initiative and declaring Virginia “open for business.” He also signed several directives including one that will cut “job killing regulations” by 25%.

As a first-time elected official, Youngkin takes office in the midst of two emergencies- a 30-day limited state of emergency aimed at the state’s hospitals that are struggling under the hike of coronavirus cases, and another ahead of a snowstorm predicted to hit Virginia on Sunday.

MIT Scientist Says It is 'Outrageous to Be Giving Fake Vax to Kids b/c There is Very Low Risk of Dying from COVID" and Warns Injections Likely to Cause ‘Crippling’ Brain Disease in Children

From [CHD] Giving young people COVID vaccines will likely cause an “alarming increase in several major neurodegenerative diseases,” Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D. told Fox News today.

It’s “outrageous” to vaccinate young people for COVID because they have a “very low risk” of dying from the virus, said Seneff, senior research scientist at MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

“When you look at the potential harm from these vaccines, it just doesn’t make any sense,” Seneff said. “And repeated boosters are going to be very devastating in the long term.”

Seneff told Fox News’ Laura Ingraham she’s done “a lot of research” to help her understand how COVID vaccines can lead to neurodegenerative diseases later on in life.

“It’s very disturbing,” she said.

Her research paper is [HERE] PDF. According to Seneff’s research:

“[B]oth the mRNA vaccines and the DNA vector vaccines may be a pathway to crippling disease sometime in the future. Through the prion-like action of the spike protein, we will likely see an alarming increase in several major neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, CKD, ALS and Alzheimer’s, and these diseases will show up with increasing prevalence among younger and younger populations, in years to come.

“Unfortunately, we won’t know whether the vaccines caused this increase because there will usually be a long time separation between the vaccination event and the disease diagnosis.”

That latter point, Seneff said, is “very convenient for the vaccine manufacturers, who stand to make huge profits off of our misfortunes — both from the sale of the vaccines themselves and from the large medical cost of treating all these debilitating diseases.”

Researcher ​Dr. Tess Lawrie: Safe, Effective and Cheap Treatments for Treating and Prevent COVID, such as Ivermectin, are Suppressed So Authorities Can Push Deadly COVID Injections

Dr. Tess Lawrie is a world-class researcher and consultant to the World Health Organisation. In the video below she has decided to speak out in protest against the current medical establishment at considerable personal risk.  She co-founded the BiRD Group; an international consortium of experts dedicated to the transparent and accurate scientific research of Ivermectin, with particular emphasis on the treatment and prevention of Covid-19.  She discusses how there is no evidence of anyone suffering adverse reactions when using Ivermectin but there is considerable evidence of people suffering serious adverse reactions from the covid vaccines.

New CDC Data Shows One Million and Thirty Four Thousand (1,033,994) Reports of Adverse Events following COVID Injections. Data Includes Record of a 7 yr Old Dead 11 Days After Injection

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,033,994 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Jan. 1, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 21,745 reports of deaths — an increase of 363 over the previous week — and 170,446 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 3,840 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 723,042 adverse events, including 9,936 deaths and 64,406 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Jan. 7, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 9,936 U.S. deaths reported as of Jan. 7, 19% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 24% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 516 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Jan. 7, including 303 million doses of Pfizer, 197 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Jan. 7, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

• 6,399 adverse events, including 142 rated as serious and 3 reported deaths.

The most recent death involves a 7-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1975356) from Minnesota who died 11 days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine when she was found unresponsive by her mother. An autopsy is pending.

• 14 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).

• 22 reports of blood clotting disorders.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Jan. 7, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:  

• 26,631 adverse events, including 1,530 rated as serious and 35 reported deaths.

The most recent death involves a 15-year-old girl from Minnesota (VAERS I.D. 1974744), who died 177 days after receiving her second dose of Pfizer from a pulmonary embolus. An autopsy is pending.

• 62 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases
  attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

• 589 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 578 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

• 149 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Jan. 7, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

• 19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.

• 55% of those who died were male, 42% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.

• The average age of death was 72.6.

• As of Jan. 7, 4,806 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1,533 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.

• Of the 3,419 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 41% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.

• 836 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with 41% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 30% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.

• 2,256 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.

• 12,331 reports of blood clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 5,457 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 4,398 reports to Moderna and 2,428 reports to J&J.

• 3,688 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,269 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,249 cases to Moderna and 158 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.

Brandon Says He'll Use Our Money to Buy Us Unwanted Masks [to remind us of "the emergency"] and Tests [that don't measure infectiousness] [Corpse Joe is Unlikely to be Alive for His Nuremberg Trial]

THE BLIGHT HOUSE ISSUED A “FACT SHEET” ABOUT TESTING AND MASKING THAT IS SCIENCE-FREE WITH ZERO CITATIONS. The Biden Administration to Begin Distributing At-Home, Rapid COVID-⁠19 Tests to Americans for Free.

According to FUNKTIONARY

BLIGHT SUPREMACY - genocide. , Genocide is the primary means of maintaining Blight Supremacy. (See Genocide and Racism.)

eugenics - the science of African extermination and of the gene that produces a people (ethnicity) with the object being African and melanated peoples of the world. 2) the science of Racism White Supremacy. Eugenics is a bogus pseudo-science founded by English psychoologist Francis Galton, used for purposes of white supremacy tactics made popular by Hitler in Nazi Germany but practiced earlier in the U.S.S.A. 3) the maniacal (Yuruguistic) philosophy of using genetic manipulation to create a better organism, better race or even a so-called master race by a lone totalitarian Dictator or a group of evil men under the veil of a Corporate State, i.e., Social Eugenics. 4) the racist belief held by many Caucasians that Africans and descendants of Africans are biologically moribund—and consequently were deficient in native or inborn intelligence and that the lack of intelligence would likely lead to a decline in the nation's collective intelligence. 5) the antidote of the Caucasian's unconscious fear of a Black Planet. 6) the artifice of attempting to make people appear to be other than they are. 7) the propaganda that African people should be done away with—exterminated. The name 'eugenics" was coined by the white psychologist Francis Galton. The triune objectives of Eugenics is selective ethnic genetic annihilation, population control (or depopulation), and selective breeding by a pathological strain of DNA. Eugenics essentially means, good white genetic stock; the selective breeding of white people and the mass extermination of African people. Mass incarceration, the homosexuality agenda (depopulation) grew out of the Eugenics movment. Read "War of the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race" by Edwin Black. (See: Genocide, Yurugu, Recombinant DNA, U.S. Sterilization Laws, Freemasony, Theosophy, Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments, Planned Parenthood, Neuropean, Weiteko Disease, Racism White Supremacy, Similac, PLC, Caucasian & Inferiority Complex)

Eugenicide - Neuropean-style genetic ethnic cleansing. (See: Yurugu, Fascism, United Nations & Weiteko Disease)

Biocide: the attempted annihilation of all life, which is the intent of Doggy and CrimethInc. (See: Doggy & CrimethInc.)

genocide - the intentional decreasing of the people of a given population or asili, particularly in the interests of another population or value system that wishes to control the resources of the victims. 2) the cide-show of the World Health Organization (WHO). (See: Population Control)

According to undeceiver Ishmael Reed:

genthanasia - the non-violent weeding out of undesirables or the slow motion extermination of non-white people. 2) Having failed to achieve victory through violent means the white supremacists have resorted to subtler means, referred to non-violent ethnic cleansing. “Genthanasia takes the form of placing an embargo on supplies that were promised to Puerto Rico, leading to 4,000 deaths. Poisoning of water in Flint, like creating smallpox epidemics among Indian tribes. Predictably, the bureaucratic rogues who were responsible for lead poisoning have had their convictions overturned by a friendly Colonial court. Genthanasia includes slavery with a different name, like private prisons where inmates are forced to work or starve. Where the deaths of prisoners are withheld from the public. The withholding of adequate housing, leading to disease-ridden street living noted in the headlines of USNews (23 April 2019), The Homeless Are Dying in Record Numbers on the Streets of Los Angeles. The assigning of Black and Latinx children to the service industries and placing a freeze upon their opportunity to advance by criminalizing pre-school and grade school students and applying suspensions to black and brown students in a disproportionate manner. One could add the administration’s denial of global warming, which is leading to thousands of deaths in the global south, nations that did not cause the problem. The U.S. is the Biggest Carbon Polluter in History.2 The Department of Health and Human Services reports that blacks, browns and reds bear the brunt of health hazards from living in toxic neighborhoods. Under the heading, More likely to live near polluting industries and breathe polluted air, African-Americans are three times as likely to die from asthma-related causes than white Americans. What else is this but another example of slow-motion extermination? Such actions against blacks, browns and reds indicate that the thinkers, hidden from the public and who finance pundits and publications, will go to any lengths to fulfill the desire of the founders and the Pilgrims, to create a white land ordained by God.”

Scientific Evidence Proves Masks Don't Work [there are no randomized studies for cloth, surgical, or N95 masks showing they stop COVID] and in 2020 Govt Health Authorities Around the World Agreed

From [HERE] and [KIRSCH] The Scientific evidence suggests face masks as worn by the general public do not work.

Government health ministers around the world said in 2020 face masks as worn by the general public do not work.  They are telling you to wear them because it creates fear and it keeps the threat of a virus in everyone's mind. 

Healthy people with no symptoms should not be wearing masks because asymptomatic people cannot spread a virus they do not have.  https://www.thehardtruth.co.uk/asymptomatic-transmission

 Dr. Paul E. Alexander, a Canadian epidemiologist, wrote: “Surgical and cloth masks, used as they currently are, have absolutely no impact on controlling the transmission of Covid-19 virus, and current evidence implies that face masks can be actually harmful.” (American Institute for Economic Research, Feb. 11, 2021.)

 ‘Masks and respirators do not work. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.  Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (<2.5μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective-dose is smaller than one aerosol particle.  The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.’ — DR. D. G. Rancourt, Ontario Civil Liberties Association, former tenured and Full Professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada (11 April, 2020)

​“I cannot recall any time in human history when nearly universal use of masks throughout society has successfully controlled the spread of disease,” Dr. Mikovits said. “The data support the opposite. That is, masks suppress the immune system, render the mist vulnerable to infection, and amplify more viruses in the compromised who become victims and further spread the disease among family and close contacts” - Dr. Judy Mikovits

 Literally there are dozens of articles, videos and studies by doctors, OSHA inspectors, professors and health professionals which show that masks worn by the general public do not stop the spread of a virus in fact they contribute to the virus spreading and to lowering your immune system.  Cases and deaths rose in every country after mask mandates where brought in, shouldn’t it have been the opposite.  Masks should have been brought in at the height of the covid cases and deaths in March\April not when there was no cases and deaths in July 2020.  They were brought in at this time to keep the fear in the minds of the public that the virus is still among us when it actually was not.  The wearing of masks keeps people fearful and that is why governments will not tell you to remove them for a long time, perhaps years.  Make people fearful and you can make them do anything.

​A 2020 study conducted by a team of Danish researchers has found that face masks have no effect in controlling the spread of COVID-19. 

A study conducted by a team of Danish researchers has found that face masks have no effect in controlling the spread of COVID-19. The new finding comes at a time when WHO is strictly advocating people to wear masks to contain the pandemic effectively.

​The study which is known as the Danmask-19 trial was conducted in the Spring 2020 with more than 3,000 participants. During the time of this trial, the general public was not asked to wear masks as a precautionary measure to control coronavirus.

​Out of the 3,000 participants, 1,500 people were given surgical masks. Researchers also made sure that these participants are changing these masks every eight hours. After one month, PCR tests were conducted on these 1,500 participants, and the results were compared with non-mask users.

​The results were pretty surprising, as there was no significant difference between mask users and non-maskers when it comes to getting contracted with coronavirus. According to the study report, 1.8 percent of mask users were infected with coronavirus when compared to 2.3 percent of non-maskers.

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817

A September 2020 report by the CDC found that more than 70 percent of COVID-positive patients contracted the virus in spite of faithful mask wearing while in public. Moreover, 14 percent of the patients who said they “often” wore masks were also infected. Meanwhile, just four percent of the COVID-positive patients said they “never” wore masks in the 14 days before the onset of their illness. 

The authoritative New England Medical Journal investigated the circumstances necessary for contamination. The conclusion of five scientists is that face masks are of no use at all. Infection only occurs after someone has been standing very close to an infected person with symptoms for several minutes.

​‘We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection’ — New England Journal of Medicine (21 May, 2020)

​Public health authorities define a significant exposure to covid-19 as face-to-face contact within one and a half meters with a patient who has covid-19 symptoms. That contact must be maintained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes).

​A large scale study was conducted to determine once and for all, whether face masks are useful for dentists. The result of this historic study was surprising:

​'These and other studies show that viruses or other submicron particles are not filtered by face masks.' - Dr John Hardie, BDS, MSc, PhD, FRCDC

 It should be concluded from these and similar studies that the filter material of face masks does not retain or filter out viruses.  Viruses are very, very, very small. Microns across. You can only see them with an electron microscope. As such the weave of a cloth mask provides almost no resistance to their passage.

The advice above from the WHO was in March 2020 but they changed their minds later on or where pressured to.

​A very extensive study carried out by nine scientists shows that the prolonged use of face masks in fact increases the risk of infection!

​'This study is the first RCT of mouth masks, and the results warn against the use of face masks. Moisture retention, re-use of face masks and poor filtration can lead to an increased risk of infection.' - BMJ Medical Report

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

​There’s also the issue of other possible complications, such as hypercapnia, an excess of carbon dioxide in the blood caused by re-breathing your own expelled air.  It’s also been shown that mask use can exacerbate chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) and perhaps other respiratory issues as shown in the study below.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31992666/

Face mask manufacturers warn: no protection against a virus.

Some honest manufacturers of face masks correctly inform their users that their products offer no protection against covid-19 and other viruses. If these medical ear loop masks - that have multiple layers (!) - don't help, then the self fabricated masks offer no protection either.

On the contrary: they block oxygen flow, which weakens the body and therefor weakens the immune system, which results in higher risk of infection.

47 studies confirm ineffectiveness of masks for COVID and 32 more confirm their negative health effects

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/47-studies-confirm-inefectiveness-of-masks-for-covid-and-32-more-confirm-their-negative-health-effects/

 Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence.

https://swprs.org/face-masks-and-covid-the-evidence/

 Peer-reviewed research concludes face masks are harmful to health and ineffective

https://wickedtruths.org/en/peer-reviewed-research-concludes-face-masks-are-useless-and-dangerous

 There is this study from the U.S National Library of medicine

The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/

 The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses

https://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses

​Masks Are neither Effective nor Safe: A Summary of the Science

https://www.technocracy.news/masks-are-neither-effective-nor-safe-a-summary-of-the-science/

 Watch the video titled ‘Why Masks Do More Harm than Good’ – by Dr. Michael Gaeta -https://vimeo.com/424254660

 Ben Swann: The Truth about Face Masks

https://vimeo.com/439643593

 Masks are neither effective nor safe: A summary of the science

https://www.primarydoctor.org/masks-not-effect

 Masks don’t work – a review of science relevant to Covid-19 social policy by Dr. Denis Rancourt PhD

https://thewallwillfall.org/2020/06/23/masks-dont-work-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covid-19-social-policy/

 Twenty Reasons Mandatory Face Masks are Unsafe, Ineffective and Immoral

https://www.globalresearch.ca/twenty-reasons-mandatory-face-masks-are-unsafe-ineffective-and-immoral/5735171

 The Study below with over 8000 subjects found masks “did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection.”

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240287

 A recent study in the journal Cancer Discovery found that inhalation of harmful microbes can contribute to advanced stage lung cancer in adults. Long-term use of face masks may help breed these dangerous pathogens.

https://www.wakingtimes.com/long-term-mask-use-may-contribute-to-advanced-stage-lung-cancer-study-finds/

 Wearing the Face Mask: Who is putting our Children at Risk, SARS-CoV-2 or the Actions of our Governments?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/wearing-the-face-mask-who-is-putting-our-children-at-risk-sars-cov-2-or-the-actions-of-our-governments/5723961

 COVID-19: Continuous Wearing of Mask Aggravates Risk of Infection. “Psychological Terrorism”? By Dr. Pascal Sacre

https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-continuous-wearing-of-mask-aggravates-the-risk-of-infection-psychological-terrorism/5719704

 Masks: The Science & Myths by Dr. Lee Merrick MD

https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/custom_videos/mask-myths/

 A very extensive study carried out by nine scientist’s shows that the prolonged use of face masks in fact increases the risk of infection!

'This study is the first RCT of mouth masks, and the results warn against the use of face masks. Moisture retention, re-use of face masks and poor filtration can lead to an increased risk of infection.' - BMJ Medical Report

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

 A July 2020 review by the University of Oxford, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine found that there is no evidence that cloth masks are at all effective against virus infection or transmission.
• Jefferson, Tom & Heneghan, Carl, Masking lack of evidence with
politics, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, July 23, 2020. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidencewith-politics/

A July 2020 study by Japanese researchers found that cloth masks “offer zero
protection against coronavirus.”
• Naoya Kon, Cloth face masks offer zero shield against virus, a study shows, The Asahi Shimbun, study by Kazunari Onishi. http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/13523664

“This experiment reconfirmed that wearing cloth and gauze masks can’t prevent virus infection.”

In an August 2020 article, Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, a Researcher, Ontario
Civil Liberties Association, debunks supposed “studies” purporting to support
compelled face mask use for the general population.
• See Rancourt, Face masks, lies, damn lies, and public health officials: “A growing body of evidence” August 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343399832_Face_masks_lies_damn_lies_and_public_hea [MORE]

The Law Applies to Us and The Law of the Jungle Applies to Authorities: White Cop Convicted of Murdering Laquan McDonald to be Released After Only 3 Yrs in Prison [Faced max sentence of over 400 Yrs]

WHAT IS WHITE COLLECTIVE POWER? WHITE COP’s murder charge carried a possible sentence of 20 Yrs and Each of the 16 counts of aggravated battery he was found guilty of carried a sentence of six to 30 years. However, Cook County Judge Vincent Gaughan said he would only consider the second-degree murder conviction while making his sentencing decision.

DR. BLYND STATES, We are bound by the written law but those who wrote the law are bound by the law of the jungle. Makes you feel like a fool, doesn't it? Minority rule majority fooled? Surely, on earth as it is in heaven. Why would we ever allow "government" to assert the position that it is not bound by the same law that binds us? The answer is that we are fools sweet-talked by judges into believing that the "natural state of affairs" is to bind the people by law, and the "'government" by fiat. "Government" has replaced religion as the opiate of the masses using the Media as its subduing gasses (fumes of subterfuge).

From [HERE] White Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke will be released from prison on Feb. 3 after serving a little less than three years and four months behind bars.

Van Dyke has been in custody since his conviction in October 2018 on aggravated battery and second degree murder charges for the shooting death of Laquan McDonald. A Cook County jury in October found Van Dyke guilty of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery in the Oct. 20, 2014, slaying. McDonald, 17, was shot 16 times.

In 2014, Van Dyke shot the Black teen 16 times. Video of the shooting from a police dashboard camera was released more than two years after courts and reporters forced the city of Chicago to release video of the killing it had sought to keep secret. It was a key piece of evidence in the trial and inflamed public reaction across the country. Van Dyke was found guilty of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery. The video showed that McDonald had not lunged at Van Dyke, as officers and city officials claimed for years to explain why he had not faced discipline or criminal charge.

The murder charge carried a possible sentence of four to 20 years in prison; probation without prison time was also an option. Each count of aggravated battery carried a sentence of six to 30 years.

However, Cook County Judge Vincent Gaughan said he would only consider the second-degree murder conviction while making his decision. He sentenced him to six years and nine months in prison for the 2014 murder of Laquan McDonald. His sentence was based on his second-degree murder conviction, which only required 50 percent of a sentence to be served.  He received credit for time served awaiting sentencing. [MORE]

Grace Memorial Baptist Church Pastor Rev. Marvin Hunter, McDonald's uncle, said he was notified Friday of Van Dyke's pending release.

"It's a shame that Jason Van Dyke has a date that he can be paroled and free from his past to a certain degree and Laquan McDonald can never have another birthday," Hunter said. "My prayer is that Mr. Van Dyke comes out a different man than when he went in."

William Calloway, the activist who was instrumental in getting the dash cam video of the shooting released reacted to news of Van Dyke's pending release.

"The federal government has the legal authority, U.S. Attorney John Lausch has the legal authority, and he has the moral obligation to file federal civil rights charges on Jason Van Dyke," Calloway said.

Van Dyke has spent the last three-plus years in multiple out-of-state prisons and at one point was assaulted while in the general population of a facility in Connecticut. His attorney, Jennifer Blagg, who worked on his appeal said she doesn't know exactly where he'll be released from next month. He is currently in an out-of-state facility in protective custody.

He will spend at least two years on parole and will have to check in with a parole officer on a regular basis while remaining in the Chicago area.

Ronald Greene's Mom: 'We're Waiting for State Police to Prove that It's More than a Gang of Thugs. Colonel Davis, We're Waiting on You to Prove that You're More than a Besuited Blackface Puppet'

Ronald Greene was a Black man who was tortured and murdered by white troopers in LA. On May 10, 2019, Greene, who was unarmed, died after being arrested by Louisiana State Police following a high-speed chase outside Monroe, Louisiana. During the arrest, he was stunned, punched, and placed in a chokehold. He was also dragged face down while handcuffed and shackled, and he was left face down for at least nine minutes. At least six white troopers were involved in the arrest.

When Greene's corpse was brought to the hospital, police told doctors that his car had run into a tree, a story a doctor said "does not add up", given the nature of Greene's injuries and the fact that there were two stun-gun probes lodged in his body; police later acknowledged that Greene had died during a struggle, though without mentioning any use of force by officers. Although authorities refused to release body camera footage for two years, the Associated Press obtained and published a portion of it in May 2021. [MORE]

IN PHOTO LAMAR DAVIS, A BLACK STRAW BOSS WHO CARRIES OUT VARIOUS FUNCTIONS FOR HIS WHITE AUTHORITARIAN MASTERS SUCH AS FIRING BLACKS (LIKE CARL CAVALIER) WHO SPEAK OUT OF TURN. ANOTHER FUNCTION IS ASSIST IN THE COVER-UP POLICE MURDERS OF BLACK PEOPLE (LIKE RONALD GREENE), WHO CAN BE MURDERED ANYTIME, ANY PLACE IN THE SYSTEM OF RWS IF AN AUTHORITARIAN SAYS SO. [MORE]

DON’T WAIT ANY LONGER. From [HERE] Ronald Greene's mother and Louisiana's Black lawmakers are accusing the State Police's top leaders of participating in a coverup of the circumstances of Greene's violent in-custody killing in 2019.

Greene's mother Mona Hardin likened the State Police to "organized crime" in an open letter to Superintendent Lamar Davis, while the Legislative Black Caucus issued a press release questioning whether second in command Lt. Col. Doug Cain had a role in the coverup. 

Greene died in 2019 following a brutal beating by State Police during an arrest in Union Parish near Monroe.

His cause of death was first covered up by State Police troopers on the scene who said Greene died from injuries suffered in a car accident during their pursuit of him before the severity of his beating and investigators' records became public.

A federal investigation is ongoing in the Greene killing.

The latest criticism of the State Police is connected to excerpts of various written reports from lead investigator Sgt. Albert Paxton in which Paxton wrote he was blocked from charging an officer who beat Greene, including former Superintendent Kevin Reeves and Cain.

Reeves retired in 2020 amid the escalating controversy. Gov. John Bel Edwards replaced Reeves with Davis, who is Black.

Paxton wrote in a later report that during a meeting with 3rd District Attorney John Belton Cain "seems angry the DA is even considering charging" one of the officers.

Earlier this month Paxton filed for early retirement. During a legislative hearing last month, Paxton said he told his supervisor: "I won’t participate in a coverup, I won’t hide evidence and I won’t lie."

In her letter, Hardin wrote: "The manner in which your agency protects its own considering the wrongdoing is likened to the action of a gang or other entity of organized crime. Colonel Davis, my family and I are waiting for you to do the right thing.

"We are waiting for you to prove that your agency is more than a gang of thugs willing to die upon a hill of lies. Colonel Davis, we are waiting on you to prove that you are more than an overpaid, besuited Blackface puppet, positioned to continue the coverup."

Legislative Black Caucus Chairman Ted James, D-Baton Rouge, said Paxton's written reports "for me really confirm what I've known all along, that this goes all the way to the top."

"These low-level troopers would not have been able to concoct these coverups without help from the higher-ups," James said.

James is leaving the Legislature effective Jan. 31 to take over as President Biden's regional administrator of the Small Business Administration.

Sen. Katrina Jackson, D-Monroe, who is Black, is a member of the Senate Select Committee on State Police Oversight that held a hearing in the Louisiana Capitol last month.

"I already know there are people who participated in the coverup who haven't been held accountable; I just don't believe we've been able to definitively identify them yet," Jackson said. "It's frustrating, but I don't care how long it takes, we have to get to the truth."

Davis said during last month's Senate Select Committee hearing that he has installed "fundamental changes" to prevent future violent excessive force arrests.

In a statement provided to USA Today Network Friday, Davis said his agency "will continue to provide assistance into the ongoing review of the (Ronald Greene) incident and we will continue to offer our full cooperation to all investigating authorities.”

“This matter is still under investigation by federal and state authorities and no investigative findings have been released at this time," Davis said in the statement. "I have the utmost confidence in my leadership team and our handling of this investigation during my administration.

"Our command staff and supervisors routinely engage in discussions with investigators and prosecuting authorities on the circumstances surrounding incidents and investigations."

Henry Cty (GA) to Pay Record Settlement to Desmond Marrow: White Cops Slammed his Head into a Truck, Choked Him and Pressed his Head Against Pavement. 1 Cop Charged w/Misdemeanor for Felony Assault

From [HERE] Former NFL player, Desmond Marrow, who was choked by a Henry County police officer during a 2017 arrest has reached a record settlement with the county.

Marrow, who was briefly with the Houston Texans, but never played in a game, was choked by a Henry County officer while in handcuffs during a road rage incident in 2018. The officer, David Rose, was initially cleared within days, but when cellphone footage was made available, the department reversed course and fired Rose.

Marrow filed his civil suit days after Rose was fired and Rose pleaded guilty to simple battery in September 2020. As a result, he will no longer be able to work as a police officer.

Video of Marrow's Dec. 2 arrest showed a gang of white officers slamming his head into the back of a truck in a McDonough, Ga., parking lot. The video, which was recorded by an anonymous bystander, showed Officer David Rose choking Marrow, 29, and pressing his head against the ground, seemingly causing him to lose consciousness.

"I can't breathe!" the former Houston Texans player can be heard screaming in the recording.

Henry County Police Chief Mark Amerman said he fired Rose because, in addition to using "unnecessary force," he was caught on his own dashcam saying he would leave certain details out of his police report.

"Rose was recorded stating that he choked Mr. Marrow," Amerman said in a statement. "He was also recorded stating that he was not going to write that information in his report." [MORE]

The settlement amount remains undisclosed, however Marrow’s attorneys said in a statement the settlement “marks a record amount for a non-death, officer-involved use of force case in Henry County.”

“We are pleased that Henry County has decided to resolve the case brought by Desmond Marrow and for a record amount for a non-death case. Most significantly, the officer who choked Mr. Marrow pleaded guilty to battery, surrendered his law enforcement certification and will never work in law enforcement again — two rare conclusions in use-of-force cases,” attorneys Chris Stewart, Dianna Lee and Andrea Boyd said according to the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

According to Marrow’s lawyers, the incident began when the former Texan followed two men that called him racial slurs and threw hot coffee into his vehicle at a Target parking lot. A witness called police and reported Marrow was carrying a weapon. Once the cops were on the scene, Marrow cooperated with the officer’s demands.

In a scene eerily similar to the death of George Floyd, video shows Henry County police slamming Marrow to the ground while he was cuffed. Additionally, one of the cops grabbed Marrow by the throat choking him as he said he couldn’t breathe. The former Texan was charged with making terroristic threats, reckless and aggressive driving, but those charges have since been dropp

Since CDC Has Admitted PCR Tests Can't Identify Active COVID Infection, What Does It Mean For Those Who Died w/a Positive Test? Did they have an active infection? If not, What is the Real Death Count?

Dr. Joseph Mercola states: What’s the Real Death Count?

The CDC’s belated admission that the PCR test can’t identify active infection raises another question: What does this mean for those who died with a positive test? Did they actually have an active infection? If not, should they have been designated as COVID deaths?

The obvious answer to the last two questions is, of course, no. The vast majority were likely false positives, and the real death toll from COVID-19 considerably lower than we’re led to believe. The CDC undoubtedly knew this all along, seeing how they’ve been relentlessly criticized for their recommendation to run the PCR at a CT of 40. They’re trying to pretend that they just realized this, but that’s simply not believable. [MORE]

Previously Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. Karina Reiss wrote the following

How dangerous is the new “killer” virus?

Compared to conventional coronaviruses. Gauging the true threat that the virus posed was initially impossible. Right from the beginning, the media and politicians spread a distorted and misleading picture based on fundamental flaws in data acquisition and especially on medically incorrect definitions laid down by the World Health Organization (WHO). Each positive laboratory test for the virus was to be reported as a COVID-19 case, irrespective of clinical presentation(15). This definition represented an unforgiveable breach of a first rule in infectiology: the necessity to differentiate between “infection” (invasion and multiplication of an agent in the host) and “infectious disease” (infection with ensuing illness). COVID-19 is the designation for severe illness that occurs only in about 10% of infected individuals(16), but because of incorrect designation, the number of “cases” surged and the virus vaulted to the top of the list of existential threats to the world.

Another serious mistake was that every deceased person who had tested positive for the virus entered the official records as a coronavirus victim. This method of reporting violated all international medical guidelines(17). The absurdity of giving COVID-19 as the cause of death in a patient who dies of cancer needs no comment. Correlation does not imply causation. This was causal fallacy that was destined to drive the world into a catastrophe. Truth surrounding the virus remained enshrouded in a tangle of rumours, myths and beliefs.

A French study, published on March 19, brought first light into the darkness(6). Two cohorts of approximately 8,000 patients with respiratory disease were grouped according to whether they were carrying everyday coronaviruses or SARS-CoV-2. Deaths in each group were registered over two months. However, the number of fatalities did not significantly differ in the two groups and the conclusion followed that the danger of “COVID-19” was probably overestimated. In a subsequent study, the same team compared the mortality associated with diagnosis of respiratory viruses during the colder months of 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 (week 47-week 14) in southeastern France. Overall, the proportion of respiratory virus-associated deaths among hospitalised patients was not significantly higher in 2019–2020 than the year before(18). Thus, addition of SARS-CoV-2 to the spectrum of viral pathogens did not affect overall mortality in patients with respiratory disease.

Regarding the number of deaths

How can the aforementioned be reconciled with the official reports of the
horrifying number of COVID-19 deaths? Two numbers must be known if the
danger of a virus is to be assessed: the number of infections and the number of deaths.

How many were infected by the new virus?

Attempts to answer this question were beset by three problems:

1. How reliable was the test for virus detection?

The virus is present in the nasopharynx for approximately two weeks, during
which time it can be detected. How is this done? Viral RNA is transcribed into DNA and quantified by the so-called polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The first assay for the new coronavirus was developed under guidance of Professor Christian Drosten, Head of the Institute for Virology at the Charité Berlin. This test was used worldwide in the initial months of the outbreak(19). Tests from other laboratories followed(20).

Diagnostic PCR tests must normally undergo stringent quality assessment and be approved by regulatory agencies before use. This is important because no laboratory test can ever give 100% correct results. The quality control requirements were essentially shelved in the case of SARS-CoV-2 because of
declared international urgency. Consequently, nothing was really known regarding test reliability, specificity and sensitivity. In essence, these parameters give an indication of how many false-positive or false-negative results should be expected. The test protocol from the Drosten laboratory were used worldwide, and test results played a key role in political decision-making. Yet, data interpretation was often largely a matter of belief. What did Drosten himself say on Twitter(21)?

Sure: Towards the end of the illness the PCR is sometimes positive and sometimes negative. Here, chance plays a role. When you test a patient twice as negative and discharge him as cured, it is indeed possible that you can have positive test results again at home. But this is still far from being a re-infection.

Several physician colleagues have informed us of similar haphazard results with patients who had been tested repeatedly during their hospitalisation. Is it particularly surprising that goats and papayas tested positive for the virus in
Tanzania? The criticism by the President of Tanzania regarding the unreliability of the test kits was of course immediately dismissed by the WHO(22).

But today it is perfectly clear that the test result is error-prone, as is every
PCR(23,24). How much so, and whether there are significant differences among the presently available tests, cannot be determined because of lack of data.

So let us assume that the PCR test is incredibly good and produces 99.5%
correct results. That sounds, and would indeed be, exceptional – it means that
one can expect only 0.5% false-positives. Now take the cruise ship “Mein Schiff 3”. After a crew member had tested positive for the virus, almost 2,900 people from 73 countries were forced into “ship quarantine”. Many had been on board for nine months. Complaints reached the outside world about the “prison-like” conditions, psychological problems abounded and nerves were frayed(25).

Nine positive cases were reported after testing was completed. One person
who tested positive had a cough, the other eight were without symptoms. Might they have belonged to the 0.5% false-positive cases, as perhaps the very first case had been? Where were the true-positives that must theoretically have been there? Were they possibly tested as false-negatives or were all positive tests false?

In the context of false results, we should consider the following: when the
epidemic subsided (in Germany, in mid-April,) PCR testing became a dangerous source of misinformation because numbers of new cases were derived from the “background noise” of false-positive results. When all 7,500 employees of the Charité Berlin (one of Europe’s largest university hospitals) were tested from April 7 to April 21, 0.33% were positive(26). True or false?

When positive test rates drop below a certain limit, it is senseless to continue
mass screening for the virus in non-symptomatic individuals. And use of
numbers acquired under these circumstances as a reason for implementing any measures should not be tolerated.

1. Selective or representative? Who was tested?

There is only one way to approximate how many people are infected during an epidemic with an agent that causes high numbers of unnoticed infections: at sites of an outbreak, the population must be tested as extensively as possible. But scientists who called for this during the coronavirus epidemic(27,28) were ignored.

Instead, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German federal government
agency and research institute for disease control, stipulated at the beginning that only selective testing should be carried out – exactly the opposite of what should have happened. And as the epidemic ran its course, the RKI stepwise altered the testing strategy – always in the diametrically wrong direction(29).

At first, only people who had been in a high-risk area and/or had been in
contact with an infected person and also presented with flu-like symptoms were to be tested. At the end of March, the RKI then changed the recommended test criteria to: flu-like symptoms and, at the same time, contact with an infected person. At the beginning of May, the President of the RKI, Professor Lothar Wieler, announced people with even “the slightest symptoms” should be tested(29).

The responsibility for translating these dubious decisions into action lay
entirely within the hands of the local health authorities. A co-worker at our lab was a typical example: the coach of her handball team was coronavirus positive. The players – all from different administrative districts – were sent home on 14-day quarantine. One player developed symptoms with coughing and hoarseness and wanted to get tested but was refused on the grounds that she had no fever. A player from a neighbouring district had no symptoms but the local health authority ordered a test despite this fact.

This resulted in chaos, caused by the appalling ineptitude of the authorities
from top to bottom. What would have been urgently needed instead were
scientifically sound studies to clarify basic issues of virus dissemination. As
many as possible should have been tested in outbreak areas. Antibody responses in those that had tested positively could have subsequently been assessed.

Only a single such study addressing these questions was undertaken in
Germany: the Heinsberg investigation conducted by Professor Hendrik Streeck, Director of the Institute for Virology at the University of Bonn. Aware of the importance of the preliminary data, these were presented at a press conference – where Streeck was torn apart by the disbelieving media(30,31). The fatality rate was ridiculed as being impossible because it was ten times lower than what acknowledged experts and the WHO had been spreading as established facts. After completion of the study, final results essentially confirming the preliminary report were again presented, and again deemed by the media to be flawed and inconclusive. But the results of the study spoke for themselves(32) – and they contradicted the panic propaganda of the media.

3. The number of conducted tests directly influences infection statistics

A third factor added to the statistical mess. Imagine that you wanted to count the number of a migratory bird species in a large lake district. There are hundreds of thousands but your counting device can only count 5,000 per day. Next day, you ask a colleague to help, and together you arrive at 10,000 counts. The day after that, two more colleagues join in and 20,000 birds are counted. In short, the higher the testing capacity/number of tests, the higher the numbers – as long as innumerable unidentified cases abound, as with SARS-CoV-2(16,32–36). The more tests are performed, the more COVID-19 cases are found during the epidemic. This is the essence of a “laboratory-created pandemic”.

Now recall that the test has neither 100% specificity nor 100% sensitivity –
meaning that occasionally you would mistake a log for a bird. Therefore, even
after all our birds have long since moved on, you would still “find” many by just
performing a sufficient number of tests.

In conclusion, no reliable data existed regarding the true numbers of infection at any stage of the epidemic in this country. At the peak of the epidemic, the official numbers must have been gross underestimates – in the order of 10 or even more. At its wane at the end of April in Germany, the numbers must also have been gross overestimates.

Basing any political decisions on official numbers at any stage was fallacy.

How many deaths did SARS-CoV-2 infections claim?

Here, again, we have the dilemma of definition: what is a “coronavirus death”?

If I drive to the hospital to be tested and later have a fatal car accident – just as my positive test results are returned – I become a coronavirus death. If I am diagnosed positive for coronavirus and jump off the balcony in shock, I also become a coronavirus death. The same is true for a sudden stroke, etc. As openly declared by RKI president Wieler, every individual with a positive test result at the time of death is entered into the statistics. The first “coronavirus death” in the northernmost state of Germany, Schleswig-Holstein, occurred in a palliative ward, where a patient with terminal oesophageal cancer was seeking peace before embarking on his last journey. A swab was taken just before his demise that was returned positive – after his death(37). He might equally well have been positive for other viruses such as rhino-, adeno- or influenza virus – if they had been tested for.

This particular case did not need more testing or a post-mortem to determine
the actual cause of death.

However, with the emergence of a new and possibly dangerous infectious disease, autopsies should be undertaken in cases of doubt to clarify the actual cause of death. Only one pathologist ventured to fulfil this task in Germany. Against the specific advice of the RKI, Professor Klaus Püschel, Director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine, Hamburg University, performed autopsies on all “coronavirus victims” and found that not one had been healthy(38). Most had suffered from several pre-existing conditions. One in two suffered from coronary heart disease. Other frequent ailments were hypertension, atherosclerosis, obesity, diabetes, cancer, lung and kidney disease and liver cirrhosis(39).

The same occurred elsewhere. Swiss pathologist Professor Alexander Tzankov reported that many victims had suffered from hypertension, most were overweight, two thirds had heart problems and one third had diabetes(40). The Italian Ministry of Health reported that 96% of COVID-19 hospital deaths had been patients with at least one severe underlying illness. Almost 50% had three or more pre-existing conditions(41).

Interestingly, Püschel found lung embolisms in every third patient(39). Pulmonary embolisms usually arise through detachment of blood clots in deep veins of the leg that are swept into the lungs. Clots typically form when blood flow sags in the legs, as when the elderly spend the day seated and inactive. A high frequency of lung embolisms was already described in deceased influenza patients 50 years ago(42). Thus, we are not on the verge of discovering a unique property of SARS-Cov-2 that would heighten its threat, but we do bear witness to the absurd situation where the elderly seek to protect themselves by obeying the chant that sounds around the world: “Stay at home”. Physical inactivity is pre-programmed, thromboses included? Swedish epidemiologist Professor Johann Giesecke recommended exactly the opposite: As much fresh air and activity as possible. The man knows his job!

The number of genuine COVID-19 fatalities remained unknown outside Hamburg. The situation was no better in other countries. Professor Walter Riccardi, adviser to the Italian Ministry of Health, stated in a March interview with “The Telegraph” that 88% of the Italian “coronavirus deaths” had not been due to the virus(43).

The problem with coronavirus death counts is such that the numbers can be viewed as nothing other than gross overestimates(44). In Belgium, not only fatalities with a positive COVID-19 test entered the ranks but also those where COVID-19 was simply suspected(45).

Scientific competence did not seem to rule the agenda of Germany’s RKI. Fortunately, there are scientists who stand out in contrast. Stanford Professor John Ioannidis is one of the eminent epidemiologists of our times. When it became clear that the epidemic in Europe was nearing its end, he showed how the officially reported numbers of “coronavirus deaths” could be used to calculate the absolute risk of dying from COVID-19(46).

The risk for a person under 65 years in Germany was about as high as a daily drive of 24 kilometres. The risk was low even for the elderly ≥ 80 with 10 “coronavirus deaths” per 10,000 ≥ 80-year olds in Germany (column at the far right).

Calculation of this number is simple. About 8.5 million citizens are ≥ 80 years in Germany. About 8,500 “coronavirus deaths” were recorded in this age group. This leads to an absolute risk of coronavirus death of 10 per 10,000 ≥ 80 year-olds. Now realise that every year about 1,200 of 10,000 ≥ 80-year olds die in Germany (black column, data from the Federal Office of Statistics). Nearly half of them due to cardiovascular diseases (CVD), almost a third from cancer and around 10% (over 100) owing to respiratory infections. The latter have always been caused by a multitude of pathogens including the coronavirus family. It is obvious that a new member has now joined the club, and that SARSCoV-2 cannot be assigned any special role as a “killer virus”.

This is underlined by another observation. Severe respiratory infections are registered by the RKI in the context of influenza surveillance. The vertical line marks the time when documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infections was started. Was there ever any indication for an increase in the number of respiratory infections(47)? No, the 2019/20 winter peak is followed by typical seasonal decline. And note that the lockdown (red arrow) was implemented when the curve had almost reached base level.

CITATIONS

(15) “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report—61,” World Health Organization, March 20, 2020, https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200321-sitrep-61-covid-19.pdf.

(16) Michael Day, “COVID-19: Four Fifths of Cases Are Asymptomatic, China Figures Indicate,” BMJ 369, (April 2020): m1375, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1375.

(17) “Regeln zur Durchführung der ärztlichen Leichenschau,” AWMF Online (Germany), revised January to October 2017, https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/054-002l_S1_Regeln-zur-
Durchfuehrung-der-aerztlichen-Leichenschau_2018-02_01.pdf.

(18) Audrey Giraud-Gatineau et al., “Comparison of Mortality Associated with Respiratory Viral Infections between December 2019 and March 2020 with That of the Previous Year in Southeastern France,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases 96 (July 2020): 154–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.001.

(19) Victor M. Corman et al., “Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by Real-Time RTPCR,” Eurosurveillance 25, no. 3 (January 2020): 2000045, https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.

(20) Sonja Gurris, “Corona-Tests werden Geheimwaffe,” n-tv (Cologne), March 30, 2020, https://www.ntv.de/panorama/Corona-Tests-werden-Geheimwaffe-article21678629.html.

(21) Christian Drosten, Twitter post, April 13, 2020, 4:42 p.m., https://twitter.com/c_drosten/status/1249800091164192771.

(22) Australian Associated Press, “WHO Rejects Tanzania Claim Tests Faulty,” Examiner (Launceston), May 8, 2020, https://www.examiner.com.au/story/6749732/who-rejects-tanzania-claim-tests-faulty.

(23) Yafang Li et al., “Stability Issues of RT-PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 for Hospitalized Patients Clinically Diagnosed with COVID-19,” Journal of Medical Virology 92, no. 7 (July 2020): 903–8, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25786.

(24) Gurris, “Corona-Tests werden Geheimwaffe.”

(25) Ines Nastali, “Police Intervenes on Quarantined Mein Schiff 3,” Safety at Sea, May 6, 2020, https://safetyatsea.net/news/2020/police-intervenes-on-quarantined-mein-schiff-3-2.

(26) “Wenig Infektionen beim Charité-Personal,” Deutsches Ärzteblatt (Berlin), May 13, 2020, https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/112809/Wenig-Infektionen-beim-Charite-Personal.

(27) John P. A. Ioannidis, “Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Harms of Exaggerated Information and Non-Evidence-Based Measures,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 50, no. 4 (April 2020):e13222, https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13222.

(28) Sucharit Bhakdi, open letter to Angela Merkel, March 26, 2020, PDF available to download until March 31, 2021, https://c.gmx.net/@824224682608695698/cI1TagSeQmi0WlXK-m8vWA.

(29) Patrick Gensing and Markus Grill, “40 Prozent mehr Tests in Deutschland,” Tagesschau (Hamburg), May 6, 2020, https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/corona-tests-rki-101.html.

(30) Julia Bernewasser, “Das sind die ersten Lehren der Heinsberg-Studie,” Der Tagesspeigel (Berlin), April 9, 2020, https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/zwischenergebnis-zurcoronavirus-uebertragungdas-sind-die-ersten-lehrenderheinsberg-studie/25730138.html.

(31) Paula Schneider, “‘Unwissenschaftlich’: Statistikerin zerlegt Heinsberg-Studie, auf die sich Laschet stützt,” Focus (Munich), April 15, 2020, https://www.focus.de/gesundheit/news/hoffe-dass-wirdarausnur-wenig-ueber-corona-lernen-statistikerin-zerlegtheinsbergstudie-keine-transparenz-keinwissenschaftlicher-standard_id_11881853.html.

(32) Hendrik Streeck et al., “Infection Fatality Rate of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a German Community with a Super-Spreading Event,” preprint, medRxiv, June 2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.04.20090076.

(33) “Field Briefing: Diamond Princess COVID-19 Cases,” National Institute of Infectious Diseases (Japan), February 19, 2020, https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/en/2019-ncov-e/9407-covid-dpfe-01.html.

(34) Kenji Mizumoto et al., “Estimating the Asymptomatic Proportion of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Cases on Board the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020,” Eurosurveillance 25, no. 10 (March 2020): 20000180, https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180.

(35) Tara John, “Iceland Lab’s Testing Suggests 50% of Coronavirus Cases Have No Symptoms,” CNN, April 3, 2020, https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/01/europe/iceland-testing-coronavirus-intl/index.html.

(36) Rongrong Yang, Xien Gui, and Yong Xiong, “Comparison of Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Asymptomatic vs Symptomatic Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China,” JAMA Network Open 3, no. 5 (May 2020): e2010182, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10182.

(37) “Erster Todesfall in Schleswig-Holstein,” Der Spiegel, March 17, 2020, https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/coronavirus-erster-todesfall-in-schleswig-holstein-a-6db5f0b0-b662-45b0-bdb4-603684d4dc92.

(38) Bettina Mittelacher, “Mediziner: Alle Corona-Toten in Hamburg waren vorerkrankt,” Berliner Morgenpost, April 27, 2020, https://www.morgenpost.de/vermischtes/article228994571/Rechtsmediziner-Alle-Corona-Toten-hattenVorerkrankungen.html.

(39) Dominic Wichmann et al., “Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study,” Annals of Internal Medicine 173, no. 4 (August 2020):268–77, https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2003.

(40) Nikita Jolkver, “Coronavirus: Was die Toten über COVID-19 verraten,” DW Akademie (Bonn), April 30, 2020, https://p.dw.com/p/3baZF.

(41) SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Group, Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Patients Dying in Italy, report based on available data on July 9, 2020, https://www.epicentro.iss.it/en/coronavirus/bollettino/Report-COVID-2019_9_july_2020.pdf.

(42) O. Haferkamp and H. Matthys, “Grippe und Lungenembolien,” Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 95, no. 51 (1970): 2560–63, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1108874.

(43) Sarah Newey, “Why Have So Many Coronavirus Patients Died in Italy?,” Telegraph, March 23, 2020, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/have-many-coronaviruspatients-died-italy.

(44) Gregory Beals, “Official Coronavirus Death Tolls Are Only an Estimate, and That Is a Problem,” NBC News, April 15, 2020, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/official-coronavirus-death-tollsare-
only-estimate-problem-n1183756.

(45) Karolina Meta Beisel, “Warum Belgien die höchste Todesrate weltweit hat,” Tages-Anzeiger (Zurich), April 22, 2020, https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/warum-belgien-die-hoechstetodesrateweltweit-hat-825753123788.

(46) John P. A. Ioannidis, Cathrine Axfors, and Despina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, “Population-Level COVID-19 Mortality Risk for Non-Elderly Individuals Overall and for Non-Elderly Individuals without Underlying Diseases in Pandemic Epicenters,” Environmental Research 188 (September 2020): 109890, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109890.

(47) “GrippeWeb,” Robert Koch-Instituts, https://grippeweb.rki.de.

Video of Karry Mullis, Inventor of the PCR Test/Nobel Prize Winner, Saying ‘the PCR Test Can't Be Used to Determine COVID’ and ‘There's No Scientific Evidence that HIV is the Probable Cause of AIDS’

[MORE]

Panic Hype-Man Fauci Acknowledges the PCR Test Cannot Reliably Detect Infection or Measure Contagiousness [fake test = fake false positive numbers = plandemic]

MERCOLA STATES: SO What’s the Real Death Count? The CDC’s belated admission that the PCR test can’t identify active infection raises another question: What does this mean for those who died with a positive test? Did they actually have an active infection? If not, should they have been designated as COVID deaths?

The obvious answer to the last two questions is, of course, no. The vast majority were likely false positives, and the real death toll from COVID-19 considerably lower than we’re led to believe. The CDC undoubtedly knew this all along, seeing how they’ve been relentlessly criticized for their recommendation to run the PCR at a CT of 40. They’re trying to pretend that they just realized this, but that’s simply not believable.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE 

• Since the beginning of the pandemic, experts have warned that the PCR test is not as a valid diagnostic and produces far too many false positives, as it can pick up on “dead,” nonreplicating viral debris

• The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now admits the PCR test can remain positive for up to 12 weeks after infection. For this reason, they say most people don’t need to retest negative before ending their quarantine

• The CDC also admits the PCR cannot identify active infection or measure contagiousness

• People who are double-jabbed or unvaccinated and test positive for SARS-CoV-2, or have known exposure, but remain asymptomatic, now only need to isolate for five days rather than 10, but should wear a mask for another five days when at work or in public. People who are triple-jabbed do not need to isolate after exposure, but should wear a mask for 10 days

• Health care workers who test positive for COVID but remain asymptomatic can return to work after seven days with a negative test, but isolation time can be cut to five days if there are staffing shortages

From [HERE] and [MERCOLA PDF] Since the beginning of the pandemic, experts have warned that the PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and produces far too many false positives, as it can pick up on “dead,” nonreplicating viral debris.  The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) now admits the PCR test cannot identify active infection or measure contagiousness.

A PCR test cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive, non-infectious, viral particles. This is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness in order to create the appearance of a pandemic.

Furthermore, a PCR test cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for his work, explained this as shown in the video below.

Almost universally, health authorities have instructed labs to use excessively high cycle thresholds (“Ct”) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — thereby ensuring a maximum of false positives.

From the start, experts noted that a Ct over 35 is scientifically unjustifiable, yet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the CDC recommended running PCR tests at a Ct of 40,5; the University of Queensland in Australia said that laboratory technicians were running PCR tests at 40 to 50 Ct; and the World Health Organization recommended a Ct of 45.

The pandemic of false positives was then used by world governments to implement pandemic countermeasures that have destroyed the global economy, ruined countless lives, decimated the education of an entire generation and stripped us of basic human rights and freedoms.

In a 30 December 2021 appearance on MSNBC, Dr. Anthony Fauci responded to questions about the updated CDC guidance. CDC director Rochelle Walensky also tried to make sense of the new guidance in a 29 December 2021 ABC News interview.

Fauci was asked about how one can measure contagiousness. If the PCR can register positive for 12 weeks after an infection, it can’t be a reliable indicator of infectiousness. This was precisely the point that Mullis attempted to make in the video above with respect to PCR and HIV.

So, how can we tell if we’re infectious or not? Fauci confirmed that the PCR can only tell you there’s a presence or absence of viral fragments, not whether it’s an active infection, or whether you’re actually infectious. He did not, however, provide an answer to the question as to how one can measure contagiousness.

How is it that the CDC, and health officials in all countries for that matter, didn’t realise that the PCR test was picking up dead viral debris for three months, or longer, after infection? The facts that the test, a) was far too sensitive, and b) couldn’t identify active infection, were criticisms from the start. What the CDC’s belated admission means is that, for the past two years, people have unnecessarily wasted time in self-isolation — perhaps weeks — waiting for a negative test.

Sources and resources:

• Bombshell Admission — The COVID Tests Don’t Work, Dr. Joseph Mercola, 14 January 2022

• Dr. Lee Merritt: SARS-CoV2 and the Rise of Medical Technocracy, Doctors for Disaster Preparedness (DDP) 38th Annual Meeting, held on August 16, 2020, in Las Vegas

• Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? By Celia Farber, 7 April 2020

• Kary Mullis: Nobel Prize Winning Scientist on The PCR Test

• PCR Test Inventor Kary Mullis Tells the Truth About the Flawed COVID-19 Test

• Inventor of PCR Test – “PCR is not a reliable test for viruses”

Dying w/COVID is Not the Same as Dying from COVID: 'CDC Continues to Inflate the Number of COVID Deaths.' It Counts COVID as Causing Death Even If its Not Listed as the Underlying Cause of Death'

• An excerpt from Chapter 4 of “The Truth About COVID-19” by Dr. Joseph Mercola. [citations omitted}

You know the official story: COVID-19 is a highly contagious and deadly infection that can be stopped only by social distancing, frequent hand-washing, lockdowns, masks, mass testing, contact tracing, and ultimately vaccines. But in reality, COVID-19 appears to be a highly contagious, dangerous, lab-manufactured ~trigger" for the preexisting conditions of an aging and increasingly chronically ill population. The virus itself isn't the primary cause of most COVID-19 hospitalizations and fatalities. Rather, the virus exploits other serious diseases with high mortality that are widespread in the population and dangerous in and of themselves. It's these comorbidities, along with rampant medical malpractice (and other factors we've already touched on and will cover further in this book), that are the main drivers of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths. To put it simply: People are dying ~oith COVID-19 as opposed to dying from it.

Data Show COVID-19 Isn't a Significant Threat

To understand the truth versus the official story, we have to separate the real statistics from the “official" statistics on cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. A relatively high “case" load does not mean people are actually getting sick and dying. The media has been conflating a positive test result with the actual disease, COVID-19, thereby deliberately misleading the public into believing the infection is far more serious and widespread than it actually is.

COVID-19 is not confirmed by a positive test; it is a clinical diagnosis of someone infected with SARS-COV-2 who is exhibiting severe respiratory illness characterized by fever, coughing, and shortness of breath. By using a test that falsely labels healthy individuals as sick and infectious, mass testing drives the narrative that we're in a lethal pandemic. Indeed, the use of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests is at the very heart of this entire scam. If it wasn't for this flawed test, there would be no pandemic to speak of I will review this in greater detail in chapter 5.

Mislabeled Causes of Death

According to groundbreaking data released by the CDC on August 26, 2020, only 6 percent of the total COVID-19-related deaths in the US had COVID- 19 listed as the sole cause of death off the death certificate.1 To help that sink in: 6 percent of 496,112 (the total death toU reported by the CDC as of February, 21, 2021) is 29,766. In other words, SARS-CoV-2 infection was directly responsible for 29,766 deaths of otherwise healthy individuals--a far different story from the 200,000-plus (and rising) number reported in the media. The remaining 94 percent of patients had an average of 2.6 health conditions that contributed to their deaths.

These data paint a picture that's in stark contrast with Johns Hopkins University, which in August 2020 reported that about 170,000 of the 5.4 million Americans who had tested positive for COVID-19 had died, prompting Dr. Thomas Frieden, former director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to say that COVID-19 is now the third leading cause of death in the US, killing more Americans than "accidents, injuries, lung disease, diabetes, Alzheimer's, and many, many other causes." 2. Frieden is simply stoking the flames of fear with this claim.

Johns Hopkins has been having a hard time keeping its story straight. In November 2020 the institution published an article alleging accounting errors on a national level regarding COVID-19 deaths in the elderly.

"Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19," the author of the article said. "Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact) the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same." But after a link to the Johns Hopkins article was posted on Twitter, the article quickly disappeared.3 Fortunately, an archive of it is still available.4

The American Institute for Economic Research reported on the mysterious disappearance of the article and went a few steps further by posting its own graph taken from CDC data in April 2020. "This suggests that it could be possible that a huge number of deaths could have been mainly due to more serious ailments such as heart disease but categorized as a COVID-19 death, a far less lethal disease," the institute reported.5. Incidentally, this is precisely what CDC guidance has instructed medical practitioners to do.

The CDC's Plan to Intentionally Inflate Numbers of Deaths Due to COVID-19

The CDC has done its part to ensure that as many deaths as possible are attributed to COVID-19---even when it was not the actual cause of death. In personal correspondence, Meryl Nass, MD, reported that in March 2020: "The CDC issued new guidance that required doctors who complete death certificates to list COVID-19 on the certificate if it contributed to or caused the death. This was no different than what we did before. We are supposed to list all contributory causes.

The official communication at that time read:

It is important to emphasize that Coronavirus Disease 2019 COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death...

For example, in cases when COVID-19 causes pneumonia and fatal respiratory distress, both/ pneumonia and respiratory distress should be included along with COVID-19 in Part I... If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.6

In April 2020 the CDC issued new guidance documents on how to complete death certificates for COVID-19 and even hosted a webinar on the process, but according to Nass, the guidelines remained substantively the same. Then, later in the fall of 2020, the CDC changed course dramatically, this time without bringing any attention to the new guidelines. According to Nass: "Without fanfare, the CDC acknowledged on another webpage that even if COVID was not listed by the doctor as the underlying cause of death, or the proximate cause of death, as long as it was listed as one cause or contributor, it would be coded as the cause of death."

Indeed, the CDC website at the time of this writing reads (emphasis ours): "When COVID-19 is reported as a cause of death on the death certificate, it is coded and counted as a death due to COVID-19.” 8.

All of this caused Nass to conclude that the fanfare that occurred in April was "deliberate misdirection." You may not appreciate how absurd this is, so let me give you an example. If a young healthy person died in a motorcycle accident and had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, according to these CDC guidelines, their death would be listed as a COVID-19 death.

All these machinations with the death certificates hide the fact that the death rate from COVID-19 for everyone except for those over 60 is significancy lower than the death rate for influenza. [MORE]

Would Perpetrators of Genocide Lie Under Oath? Fauci Tells Puppetician, 'COVID Injections Aren't Deadly, VAERS Records are Unreliable.' Like the Record of the 13 Yr Old who Died 3 Days After the Vax?

From [HERE] CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Anthony Fauci appeared before a Senate Committee Hearing this week regarding the “Omicron Response,” and both of them lied under oath.

They both claimed that they “didn’t know” how many deaths were recorded in VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines, and Walensky stated the COVID-19 vaccines are “incredibly safe” and “protect us against Omicron, they protect us against Delta, they protect us against COVID.”

She also stated that all reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths have been “adjudicated,” when in fact not a single COVID-19 vaccine injury, let alone a death, has been tried in the Government CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program, the only place where a vaccine death or injury following a COVID-19 shot can be “adjudicated.”

Senator Tommy Tuberville, a really really stoopid puppetician from Alabama, either displayed his complete ignorance regarding VAERS, or colluded with Walensky and Fauci to ask them a meaningless question which then gave them the opportunity to control the narrative. [MORE]

the puppetician asked:

Dr. Walensky, it has been reported by some virologists and scientists that this year around 170 people have died from taking the regular flu vaccine.

The Vaccine Adverse Reporting System reported that the number of people dying after or following the COVID vaccine is actually in the thousands.

Now this is what I am hearing. I’ll give you a chance to refute that or confirm it here. Is this true?

Are we having that many people die after taking one of these vaccines?

This is a meaningless question because the answer is already public knowledge!

The VAERS database is open to the public, and anybody can search it. You don’t need a “virologist” or “scientist” to tell you how many deaths there are following COVID-19 shots. Anyone can make that search, and it takes less than 60 seconds to find the answer.

As of this recorded Senate Hearing, the total deaths following COVID-19 shots in VAERS was 21,382. (Source.)

So what he should have asked was:

Dr. Walensky, VAERS is reporting 21,382 deaths following the emergency use authorized COVID-19 vaccines for the first year, which is more deaths than following all FDA-approved vaccines for the past 31 years combined, since VAERS started recording deaths following vaccines in 1990.

Why are we still injecting these experimental products into Americans?

But instead, he questioned whether or not VAERS was actually reporting this, which led to a canned response by both Walensky and Fauci that VAERS is not reliable, because someone can get the vaccine and then walk outside and get hit by a car, and that is recorded as a vaccine death.

FAUCI, AN UNELECTED MEMBER OF THE PERMANENT GOVERNMENT IS A PROXYMORON OR DUMMY WHO SPEAKS ON BEHALF OF BIG PHARMA AND AUTHORITY. a proxymoron is one moron who speaks on behalf of another pluperfect moron or a whole gang of morons. (See Politician, Congressman, Moron-Majority, Delegate, Prozac, Oxymoron & TV). [MORE]

Here, in reality COVID Shots Are the Deadliest ‘Vaccines’ in Medical History. According to Dr. Joseph Mercola, VAERS reporting is likely underreported by a factor of 41. Since there are over 8,000 domestic deaths reported to VAERS, and 98% of those deaths are “excess deaths,” this suggests that as many as 300,000 Americans may have died from the COVID shots thus far

• Calculations based on government data from 35% of the world’s population suggest we’re killing approximately 411 people per million doses on average. Moderna and Pfizer are both two-dose regimens, which pushes this to 822 deaths per million fully vaccinated. And that’s just the short-term mortality. We still have no concept of how these shots might impact mortality and morbidity in the longer term

• An Italian investigation found that if the COVID mortality definition were changed to only include those cases where there were no preexisting comorbidities, the mortality from COVID comes out to just 2.9% of the overall reported number. This suggests that if a COVID death was redefined to being a death actually “from” COVID rather than “with” COVID, the death count could be substantially smaller than 760,000 deaths and may be smaller than the number killed by the vaccines

• The deadliest vaccine ever made is the smallpox vaccine, which killed 1 in 1 million vaccinated people. The COVID shots kills 822 per million fully vaccinated, making it more than 800 times deadlier than the deadliest vaccine in human history

it is undisputed that scientific research has demonstrated that the VAERS database vastly under reports COVID injection injuries and deaths. Recently an engineering study estimated that COVID Injections have killed 150,00 people in the US. alone, while a Columbia University study, “COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk” by Spiro P. Pantazatos and Hervé Seligmann, explained that injection deaths are underreported by at least a factor of 20 in VAERS. Said study estimated that at least 200,000 people have been killed by COVID injections. At this point the dangerousness of the fake vaccines is well established for those who eyes to see; in fact Over One Thousand Scientific Studies Prove That the COVID-19 Vaccines Are Dangerous.

Last month 2 prominent doctor researchers, Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt published conclusive evidence that the fake vaccine are killing people. Fifteen dead bodies were examined (all died from 7 days to 6 months after vaccination; ages 28 to 95). The coroner didn’t associate the vaccine as the cause of death in any of the cases. However, further examination revealed that the vaccine was implicated in the deaths of 14 of the 15 cases. The most attacked organ was the heart (in all of the people who died), but other organs were attacked as well. The implications are potentially enormous resulting in millions of deaths.

VAERS data released Friday b1/7/22 y the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,017,001 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 21,382 deaths and 166,606 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 31, 2021.

 VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 21,382 reports of deaths — an increase of 380 over the previous week — and 166,606 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,100 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 715,857 adverse events, including 9,778 deaths and 63,089 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 31, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 9,778 U.S. deaths reported as of Dec. 31, 20% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 24% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 507.1 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Dec. 30, This includes296 million doses of Pfizer, 194 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Dec. 31, 2021, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

• 6,005 adverse events, including 126 rated as serious and 3 reported deaths.

The most recent death involves a 7-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1975356) from Minnesota who died 11 days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine when she was found unresponsive by her mother. An autopsy is pending.

• 13 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).

• 15 reports of blood clotting disorders.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Dec. 31, 2021, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

• 26,169 adverse events, including 1,516 rated as serious and 35 reported deaths.

The most recent death involves a 15-year-old girl from Minnesota (VAERS I.D. 1974744), who died 177 days after receiving her second dose of Pfizer from a pulmonary embolus. An autopsy is pending.

• 62 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases
  attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

• 579 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 573 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

• 146 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Dec. 31, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:

• 19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.

• 54% of those who died were male, 41% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.

• The average age of death was 72.7.

• As of Dec. 31, 4,730 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1,499 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.

• Of the 3,386 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 41% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.

• 825 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with 41% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 29% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.

• 2,252 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.

• 12,200 reports of blood clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 5,398 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 4,345 reports to Moderna and 2,275 reports to J&J.

• 3,405 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,409 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,220 cases to Moderna and 155 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.

CDC not investigating 13-year-old’s death following COVID vaccine

The CDC is not investigating the death of a 13-year-old Michigan boy who died June 16, 2021, of myocarditis three days after his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Judicial Watch on Wednesday obtained 314 pages of records from the CDC, including communications from Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky showing a request for information about the death of Jacob Clynick.

In the communications, CDC officials said the agency was not actively involved in the investigation of Clynick’s death, although it did make contact with the state health department and the pathologist who confirmed preliminary results showed “bilateral ventricular enlargement and histology consistent with myocarditis.”

The official said the agency was in touch to “maintain situational awareness” but said it was up to the states to conduct investigations into deaths reported following COVID vaccines.

The teen’s death was not acknowledged by CDC officials in presentations on myocarditis or vaccine safety during meetings held by the agency’s vaccine safety advisory panel, which makes clinical recommendations for use of COVID vaccines in children.