CDC Forced to Admit It Doesn’t Collect Data on Natural Immunity to COVID

From [HERE] The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, said it has no record of an individual previously infected with COVID becoming reinfected and transmitting the virus to others.

The FOIA request, submitted Sept. 2 by attorney Aaron Siri of the Siri & Glimstad law firm on behalf of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), sought the following information:

“Documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.”

The CDC responded Nov. 5, stating:

“A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. The CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.”

According to Siri, the revelation that the CDC does not collect data on people who have acquired natural immunity to the virus raises questions about vaccine mandates, specifically how the the government, or employers can mandate vaccines for people who may not need them and who could be at a greater-than-average risk of experiencing an adverse reaction to the shots.

In a blog post, Siri wrote:

“… yet the CDC is actively crushing the rights of millions of naturally immune individuals in this country if they do not get the vaccine on the assumption they can transmit the virus. But despite clear proof the vaccinated spread the virus, the CDC lifts restrictions on the vaccinated?! That is dystopian.”

Siri added:

“Every single peer reviewed study has found that the naturally immune have far greater than 99% protection from having COVID, and this immunity does not wane. In contrast, the COVID vaccine provides, at best, 95% protection and this immunity wanes rapidly. I am no mathematician, but a constant 99% seems preferable to a 95% that quickly drops.”

The response from the CDC came as part of a broader exchange between the agency and Siri’s law firm, dating back to this past summer, in which ICAN and Siri’s law firm submitted a citizen’s petition to the CDC calling for restrictions on those individuals with natural immunity to be lifted.

Kyle Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty of All Charges in Killing of Two White Men, Injuring Another. White Jury Found that the Teen Defended Himself Against White-On-White-Crime

Kyle Rittenhouse was NOT CHARGED WITH KILLING OR ATTEMPTING TO HARM ANYONE BLACK OR RANDOMLY KILLING PEOPLE HE THOUGHT WERE BLACK. CONTRARY TO THE MEDIA’S implied NARRATIVE, THE GOVERNMENT DID NOT ALLEGE THAT RITTENHOUSE MURDERED OR ASSAULTED THE 3 WHITE VICTIMS BECAUSE THEY WERE PROTESTING ON BEHALF OF BLACK PEOPLE OR THAT HE DID SO TO DEFEND THE RIGHTS OF WHITE PROPERTY OWNERS. IN FACT, HE DID NOT RANDOMLY ATTACK ANYONE. FROM THE VIDEOS, EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY IT SEEMED THAT HE WAS UNDER ATTACK AND DEFENDED HIMSELF; The following facts were undisputed BY THE GOVERNMENT;

IN A MATTER OF SECONDS, RITTENHOUSE KILLED 1) A WHITE MAN AFTER HE WAS CHASED BY THE WHITE MAN, 2) then WHILE FLEEING THE SCENE WITH PERSONS CHASING HIM HE FELL DOWN in the street. While on the ground another white man hit him in the head with a skateboard. while still on the ground RITTENHOUSE FATALLY SHOT THE WHITE MAN (once) as SAID WHITE MAN ATTEMPTED TO ALSO KICK HIM IN THE FACE. SUBSEQUENTLY WHILE TRYING TO FLEE 3) a 3RD WHITE MAN ATTEMPTED TO GRAB RITTENHOUSE’S GUN, SO RITTENHOUSE SHOT HIM ONCE AND FLED.

From [HERE] and [HERE] The saga of Kyle Rittenhouse has shown the extent of America’s political polarization. But the not guilty verdict returned by 12 unanimous jurors in his Kenosha, Wis. murder trial Friday shows that when presented deliberately with evidence and forced to reason with one another, Americans can still agree on basic facts.

And the facts presented at trial made it very hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Rittenhouse did not act in self-defense when he shot three men, killing two, who attacked him amid an anarchic scene in downtown Kenosha last summer when he was 17.

The encounters were captured on video. Joseph Rosenbaum sprinted after Mr. Rittenhouse, who ran away across a parking lot. Rosenbaum lunged toward the rifle before Mr. Rittenhouse, who was trapped against parked cars, fired. According to Mr. Rittenhouse and another witness, Rosenbaum had threatened to kill the teenager earlier in the night.

As Mr. Rittenhouse tried to flee toward police lines, he was pursued by a mob. The teenager eventually fell down, and fired when one man tried to kick him in the face, another tried to hit him with a skateboard, and another approached him and raised a pistol.

The prosecution said Mr. Rittenhouse was a “chaos tourist” who provoked the violence. Yet the teenager worked as a lifeguard in Kenosha, where his father lived. However bad his judgment in showing up with a weapon he didn’t own at a riot, his intention was to stand guard in front of businesses and administer first aid.

As all this was laid out in open court, the prosecution’s case appeared to flounder. Pundits baying for a guilty verdict blamed the Kenosha County Judge, Bruce Schroeder, for favoring the defense. Judge Schroeder’s real offense was weighing motions carefully to allow a fair trial. His admonishment of the prosecution for questioning Mr. Rittenhouse about exercising his right to remain silent was entirely appropriate. Remember when the civil liberties of criminal defendants were a liberal cause? [MORE]

COVID = a Pandemic of Obedience [the highest form of the power-fear systemic]; 'We are now 20 months into “2 weeks to flatten the curve" and people are still hopelessly lost in the official narrative'

Is it Voodoo or a Lack of Dependent Media Propaganda that is Preventing COVID From Spreading in Haiti? Only 649 Total Deaths in a Country of 11 Million People Not Wearing Masks or social distancing or in a lock-down, Less than 1% Vaxed

From [FreedomArticles] Operation Coronavirus has shown how mass hypnosis can be inculcated into entire populations, around the world. We are now 20 months into “2 weeks to flatten the curve” and there are still many people hopelessly lost in the official narrative. The NWO (New World Order) controllers know that narrative is everything. To control the information and to control the way people interpret that information is the absolute power to control perception. Why do you think Bond villain and WEF head Klaus Schwab just held another WEF (World Economic Forum) event on introducing The Great Narrative? A really effective narrative has a hypnotizing effect. This article will take a deeper look at how the official COVID narrative has been able to induce people into a state of fear, disempowerment, compliance, obedience and mass hypnosis – and how it continues to do so – in a manner identical to the brainwashing propaganda of a cult.

Still Buying the Official Narrative …

Look around you. Do you see many people, including family, friends and colleagues, who are still buying into the official narrative – even at this stage in the game when there has been so much information to destroy it? Even when Big Pharma have admitted the vaccine was never designed to stop transmission? Even when recent statistics from VAERS (as of November 12th 2021) show 875,653 adverse events following COVID vaccines and 18,461 COVID vaccine deaths? We need to recall that the 2010 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care study concluded that under 1% of vaccine adverse events or side effects are ever reported; going by that, that would mean 87 million COVID vaccine injuries and 1.8 million COVID vaccine deaths in the USA – a nation of 330 million (over 1/4 of the country injured). Mass murder is certainly no exaggeration.

Clinical Psychology Professor Explains Mass Formation

In this interview on The Pandemic Podcast, Mattias Desmet, a professor of clinical psychology at the Belgian University of Ghent, explains the psychological reason why so many still buy into the narrative. He outlines 4 conditions that need to be present that allow people to fall for an absurd official narrative, become hypnotized and fall into what he calls mass formation. Mass formation (also known as mass psychology, mob psychology or crowd psychology) studies how human behavior is influenced by large groups of people. This brief description gives an overview of it. Gustave Le Bon, Sigmund Freud, Leon Festinger and Philip Zimbardo have all contributed to the understanding of this concept. Essentially, when people become part of a crowd, they deindividuate. There is a tendency for people to give away their personal identity, self-responsibility, self-awareness, guilt, empathy and other individual morality-related attitudes and behaviors. A mob mentality can take over.

Desmet cites the following 4 conditions as necessary precursors to mass hypnosis:

1. Lack of social bond/connectedness
2. Lack of meaning/sense making
3. Free-floating anxiety and psychological discontent
4. Free-floating frustration and aggression

When you have a society where there is already a lot of general anxiety, and where people are uprooted psychologically and spiritually because they are disconnected from their essence and their purpose (and from other humans too), they are ripe for exploitation. The NWO controllers melded together this free-floating anxiety with the fear of the virus (fear of disease/death). I encourage all readers to familiarize themselves with the NWO blueprint which was revealed in 1969 by Dr. Richard Day. It talks about how the world would be socially engineered so that everything would be chaotic and in a constant state of flux, and people would be encouraged to move away from their hometowns and families, so that people would be more disconnected from each other and feel less grounded.

Desmet describes how such people with these 4 conditions develop a very small field of attention, both mentally and emotionally, and seem unable to expand it even when faced with the facts. He gives examples from historical totalitarian regimes, saying that usually only around 30% of the population becomes hypnotized. Another 40% is not hypnotized but is cowardly, too afraid to speak up. This is why people must continue to speak out now during the COVID scamdemic. Historically, once the opposition is silenced or destroyed, the dictator becomes even more monstrous, metaphorically devouring his own children (killing his own people/supporters) as Hitler and Stalin both did.

Mass Hypnosis Leads to Mass Psychosis

Mass hypnosis isn’t even the final destination. It can go even further into mass psychosis, where an entire population becomes infected with madness and loses its ability to think clearly and rationally. Sound familiar? This After Skool/Academy of Ideas video does a great job of explaining mass psychosis – an epidemic of madness that occurs when a large portion of society loses touch with reality and descends into delusions. With anxiety already present in large amounts in the population, the foundations were already there to generate a pandemic of compliance – for that is what Operation Coronavirus really is, a pandemic of compliance. With decades or even centuries of relentless propaganda, the general population was a fertile ground for seeds of collectivism and authoritarianism to be sown and grown. [MORE]

K Rittenhouse’s white-on-white-crime/self-defense Trial is as White as Elizabeth Holmes' Trial but Due to Bignorance, People Believe Black Protesters were Murdered in Defense of White Peoples Property

WHITE COLLAR CRIME. On June 15, 2018, following an investigation by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California in San Francisco that lasted more than two years, a federal grand jury indicted ELIZABETH Holmes and former Theranos chief operating officer and president, Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani, on nine counts of wire fraud and two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Both pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors allege that Holmes and Balwani engaged in two criminal schemes, one to defraud investors, the other to defraud doctors and patients. After the indictment was issued, Holmes stepped down as CEO of Theranos but remained chair of the board. If convicted, Holmes faces a maximum sentence of twenty years in prison, and a fine of $250,000, plus restitution, for each count of wire fraud and for each conspiracy count [MORE] and [MORE]

WHITE ON WHITE CRIME. As with the rittenhouse case, the above facts at issue and charges in the trial are unrelated to racism WHITE SUPREMACY. RITTENHOUSE IS NOT CHARGED WITH KILLING OR ATTEMPTING TO HARM ANYONE BLACK OR RANDOMLY KILLING PEOPLE HE THOUGHT WERE BLACK. WHILE HE MAY HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR TROUBLE AND MOTIVATED TO GO TO KENOSHA FOR THE WRONG REASONS, CONTRARY TO THE MEDIA’S implied NARRATIVE, THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOT ALLEGED THAT RITTENHOUSE MURDERED OR ASSAULTED THE 3 WHITE VICTIMS BECAUSE THEY WERE PROTESTING ON BEHALF OF BLACK PEOPLE OR THAT HE DID SO TO DEFEND THE RIGHTS OF WHITE PROPERTY OWNERS. IN FACT, HE DID NOT RANDOMLY ATTACK ANYONE. FROM THE VIDEOS, EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY IT appears OBVIOUS THAT HE WAS UNDER ATTACK AND DEFENDED HIMSELF; A JURY WILL DECIDE WHETHER HE USED TOO MUCH FORCE WHEN HE DID SO. The following facts are undisputed BY THE GOVERNMENT;

IN A MATTER OF SECONDS, RITTENHOUSE KILLED 1) A WHITE MAN AFTER HE WAS CHASED BY THE WHITE MAN, 2) then WHILE FLEEING THE SCENE WITH PERSONS CHASING HIM HE FELL DOWN in the street. While on the ground another white man hit him in the head with a skateboard. while still on the ground RITTENHOUSE FATALLY SHOT THE WHITE MAN (once) as SAID WHITE MAN ATTEMPTED TO ALSO KICK HIM IN THE FACE. SUBSEQUENTLY WHILE TRYING TO FLEE 3) a 3RD WHITE MAN ATTEMPTED TO GRAB RITTENHOUSE’S GUN, SO RITTENHOUSE SHOT HIM ONCE AND FLED.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THOSE WHO ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF BLACK LIVES DON’T accidentally ADVOCATE FOR AN EQUALITY OF DEGRADATION OR LESS “RIGHTS” OR MORE SLAVERY FOR ALL. IT IS TRUE THAT IF RITTENHOUSE WAS BLACK HE WOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED on the spot AND THAT HE WAS ACTUALLY PRESUMED INNOCENT AND GIVEN THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT BY WHITE AUTHORITIES SOLELY BECAUSE HE IS WHITE. CLEARLY, BLACK PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME WAY BUT ARE NOT DUE TO THE SYSTEM OF RWS. BUT, To DEMAND THAT ALL PERSONS BE SIMILARLY SUBJECTED TO A SYSTEM OF INJUSTICE OR DEGRADED IN THE MANNER BLACK PEOPLE ARE IS PERVERSE OR REVERSE ADVOCACY FOR “FREEDUMB.”

FROM THE BEGINNING, IN THE SPECTACLE THE DEPENDENT MEDIA HAS PARROTED A RACIAL NARRATIVE IN THIS SELF-DEFENSE CASE and unfortunately BW WAS ALSO MEDIA HOAXED BY THEIR NONSENSE. what is DOGGY’S GOAL HERE? IS IT TO DO AWAY WITH SELF-DEFENSE, so people can no longer defend themselves? A DOO-GOODER actually IMPLIED that yesterday ON DEM NOW that ONLY COSTUMED AUTHORITIES SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE FORCE TO DEFEND YOU OR others [see Do-gooder in below video at 11:23]. THIS IS THE LOW CALORIE LOGIC of simpletons, SLAVE THINKING, DON'T BULLSHIT YOURSELF. WATCH THE VIDEOS AND THE TRIAL TESTIMONY YOURSELF AND DON’T ALLOW THE DEPENDENT MEDIA TO CONTROL YOUR THINKING or NEVER be a part of anyone’s deception.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

bignorance - big-time ignorance; ignorant of being ignorant, unaware of being unaware. There is ignorance and then there is ignorance of ignorance. The first is bliss, the second type is deadly. If you don't know that you are ignorant, you can never do anything about your ignorance. Most of us are ignorant of being ignorant. But once you become aware that you then you can start working on it by working on yourself through various self-knowledge and self-remembering modalities. The most fundamental of these modalities is what I refer to as "Unlearning" or being informed that you're not just uninformed but misinformed and the ways to overcome this condition and the underlying condition that lead (or gave rise) to it---thereby becoming a reality hidden from you yet readily recognizable by those who have awakened. (See: Unaware & Ignorance)

freedumb - the state of unrecognized psychological captivity that sheeple remain in because they don't speak the language of reality nor edit truth from perfecting heart to perfecting power--and when truth is spoken around them, refrain from being open, or impervious to it thus being forever chained to its distortions and limitations. 2) the mindset that proposes "since we are liberated, we are also free." 3) the mindset that operates upon the notion that you can have individuality without accountability or responsibility. 4) the pretense that reality is truth and vice-versa. People cherish unwarranted assumptions and relish their freedumb because they have been socialized into self-censorship along with misidentification with the ego-mind--the absence of knowledge of Self. (See: Phfreedom, Truth, Unfreedom, Dumbelievers, Self, Belief Systems, True Self & Reality)

WIS JI-Criminal 805 Privilege: Self-defense: Force Intended or Likely To Cause Death or Great Bodily Harm — 939.48 (Wisconsin Jury Instructions - Criminal (2020))

805 PRIVILEGE: SELF-DEFENSE: FORCE INTENDED OR LIKELY TO CAUSE DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM — §939.48

[INSERT THE FOLLOWING AFTER THE ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME ARE DEFINED BUT BEFORE THE CONCLUDING PARAGRAPHS.]

Self-Defense

Self-defense is an issue in this case. The law of self-defense allows the defendant to threaten or intentionally use force against another only if:

· the defendant believed that there was an actual or imminent unlawful interference[i] with the defendant's person; and

· the defendant believed that the amount of force the defendant used or threatened to use was necessary to prevent or terminate the interference; and

· the defendant's beliefs were reasonable.

The defendant may intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm only if the defendant reasonably believed that the force used was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to (himself) (herself).

Determining Whether Beliefs Were Reasonable

A belief may be reasonable even though mistaken.[ii] In determining whether the defendant's beliefs were reasonable, the standard is what a person of ordinary intelligence and prudence would have believed in the defendant's position under the circumstances that existed at the time of the alleged offense.[iii] The reasonableness of the defendant's beliefs must be determined from the standpoint of the defendant at the time of the defendant's acts and not from the viewpoint of the jury now.

[IF RETREAT IS AN ISSUE, ADD APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION HERE — SEE WIS JI-CRIMINAL 810.]

[IF THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT PROVOKED THE ATTACK, ADD APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION HERE — SEE WIS JI-CRIMINAL 815.]

State's Burden of Proof

The State must prove by evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act lawfully in self-defense.

Jury's Decision

If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all elements of [iv] have been proved and that the defendant did not act lawfully in self defense, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.

COMMENT

Wis JI-Criminal 805 was originally published in 1966 and revised in 1993. This revision was approved by the Committee in June 2000 and involved adoption of a new format, nonsubstantive changes to the text, and updating of the comment.

The 1994 revision of this instruction changed its format to allow integrating the description of self-defense with the instruction for the crime charged. See the Comment to Wis JI-Criminal 800. Instructions for homicide offenses include models for cases involving self-defense. See Wis JI-Criminal 1014, 1016, 1017, and 1022.

--------

Notes:

[i]. For purposes of self-defense, "unlawful" means "either tortious or expressly prohibited by criminal law or both." Section 939.48(6). Further instruction on what constitutes "unlawful interference" in the context of the facts of a particular case may be desirable.

The word "unlawful" also appears in sub. (2) of §939.48, which provides that a "person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others . . ." loses the right to claim the privilege of self-defense. [See Wis JI-Criminal 815.] In State v. Bougneit, 97 Wis.2d 687, 294 N.W.2d 675 (Ct. App. 1980), the court held that engaging in what would be considered disorderly conduct under §947.01 could constitute "unlawful conduct" for the purposes of §939.48(2).

The "unlawful" component of "unlawful interference" is just one part of the predicate for invoking the privilege of self-defense. As stated in the instruction, the defendant must have believed "that there was an actual or imminent unlawful interference with the defendant's person and [must have] believed the amount of force he used or threatened to use was necessary to prevent or terminate the interference."

[ii]. This treatment of "reasonably believes" is intended to be consistent with the definition provided in §939.22(32).

[iii]. The phrase "in the defendant's position under the circumstances that existed at the time of the alleged offense" is intended to allow consideration of a broad range of circumstances that relate to the defendant's situation. For example, with children (assuming they are old enough to be criminally charged), the standard relates to a reasonable person of like age, intelligence, and experience. Maichle v. Jonovic, 69 Wis.2d 622, 627-28, 230 N.W.2d 789 (1975).

Another situation where the personal circumstances become important in defining the self-defense standard is in a case involving a battered spouse. Wisconsin cases dealing with the subject have tended to use doctrines other than self-defense in these cases. In State v. Hoyt, 21 Wis.2d 284, 128 N.W.2d 645 (1964), for example, the theory of defense related to "heat of passion, caused by reasonable and adequate provocation" rather than self-defense. Likewise, in State v. Felton, 110 Wis.2d 485, 329 N.W.2d 161 (1983), provocation and not guilty by reason of mental disease were considered to be the relevant doctrines. However, some cases of this type may legitimately be considered under self-defense rules: the history of abuse between the spouses may be relevant to evaluating whether the defendant's belief in the need to use force was reasonable. See, for example, State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis.2d 302, 414 N.W.2d 626 (1987).

[iv]. In the two blanks provided, insert the number of elements that the crime has and the name of that crime, where the crime has a convenient short title. For example, for a case involving simple battery under §940.19(1), the sentence would read as follows: “. . . that all four elements of battery have been proved . . .” See Wis JI-Criminal 1220A. If the crime does not have a convenient short title, use “this offense” instead. For example, for a case involving substantial battery under §940.19(2), the sentence would read: “that both elements of this offense were proved, . . .” See Wis JI-Criminal 1222A.

WIS JI-Criminal 805 Privilege: Self-defense: Force Intended or Likely To Cause Death or Great Bodily Harm — 939.48 (Wisconsin Jury Instructions - Criminal (2020))

Governor Calls Off Murder, Grants Clemency to Julius Jones [Master Allows Innocent Black Servant to Live, Subjects Him to Life in Prison without Parole]

From [HERE] Hours before the State of Oklahoma was scheduled to execute Julius Jones today, Gov. Kevin Stitt granted clemency to Mr. Jones and commuted his death sentence to life in prison without parole.

The Oklahoma Board of Pardon and Parole recommended that Mr. Jones’s death sentence be commuted to life in prison with parole on September 13, after board members expressed doubts about his guilt in a 1999 shooting.

The Oklahoma Board of Pardon and Parole recommended that Mr. Jones’s death sentence be commuted to life in prison with parole on September 13, after board members expressed doubts about his guilt in a 1999 shooting.

“I believe in death penalty cases there should be no doubt, and put simply, I have doubts in this case,” board Chairman Adam Luck said. “I cannot ignore those doubts, especially when the stakes are life and death.”

In its first-ever commutation hearing in a death penalty case, the board voted 3-1 in favor of the commutation recommendation after Scott Williams recused himself because of a professional relationship with Mr. Jones’s attorney. The three votes came from Mr. Luck, Kelly Doyle, and Larry Morris.

Ms. Doyle said she had doubts about the case against Mr. Jones and believed it was “not in the best interest of the state” to execute him, The Frontier reported. She also pointed to the “excessive nature” of the death penalty for someone who was a teenager at the time, given “what we know now about brain science and brain development.”

The decision came after a four-hour hearing that included testimony from the victim’s family, an Oklahoma County prosecutor, and advocates for Mr. Jones.

One week after the board issued its decision, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals set a November 18 execution date for Mr. Jones. Gov. Stitt did not act on the board’s recommendation, saying it should be addressed in a clemency hearing. 

The board held a three-hour-long clemency hearing on November 1 and voted again to recommend that the governor should grant clemency and commute Mr. Jones’s death sentence. 

Julius Jones, now 41, was just 19 when Paul Howell, a white insurance executive, was fatally shot in Edmond, Oklahoma, an affluent suburb north of Oklahoma City.

Mr. Jones, a Black man, has long maintained his innocence, alleging that he was framed by the actual killer, who testified that Mr. Jones was the shooter and, Mr. Jones said in his commutation application, planted incriminating evidence in his home.

The only eyewitness description of the shooter did not match Mr. Jones’s appearance at the time of the crime—it matched codefendant Chris Jordan, the State’s key witness against Mr. Jones. And in recent years, four people have come forward to support that Jordan framed Julius Jones and bragged that he made a deal with prosecutors to get out of prison after only 15 years, the Black Wall Street Times reports.

For every nine people who have been executed since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, one person has been identified as innocent.

Bryan Stevenson, Letter of support for Julius Jones

Racial discrimination affected Mr. Jones’s trial in troubling ways, EJI director Bryan Stevenson wrote in a letter of support to the board and the governor. In a case with a Black defendant and a white victim, the prosecutors struck all qualified African Americans from the jury pool, except for one. One seated juror who was tasked with deciding Mr. Jones’s culpability and fate told another seated juror, “They should just take the n—r out and shoot him behind the jail.”

These remarks are rooted in our nation’s history of racial terror lynchings. EJI has documented nearly 6,500 racial terror lynchings in America between 1865 and 1950, and it was not uncommon for Black people to be abducted from jail and shot “out back.”

In Okemah, Oklahoma, a Black woman named Laura Nelson and her teenaged son, L.D., were kidnapped from custody before they could stand trial on murder charges. Members of the mob forcibly removed them from the jail and hanged them from a bridge over the Canadian River. The mob presumed Ms. Nelson and her son were guilty and stripped them of due process, deciding that a trial was not worth anyone’s time.

The juror who used the n-word to refer to Mr. Jones and suggested that he should be lynched explicitly said that the trial was “a waste of time.” He voted to convict and execute Mr. Jones, but when the other juror told the judge about these comments, the judge tolerated the remarks and never disclosed them to Mr. Jones’s lawyers. They were concealed until 2017, and even though Mr. Jones’s appeals lawyers filed numerous pleadings, no court has reviewed the merits of this claim because of procedural bars.

After Mr. Jones’s case was featured in an ABC documentary in 2018, millions of people signed a petition in support of Mr. Jones and a number of high-profile supporters joined the effort to get his sentence commuted.

'I thought they were shooting an animal or something.' Mistrial in Henry Green Case: Witnesses Said 2 White OH Plainclothes Cops Jumped Out Unmarked Car w/o ID'ing Themselves and Executed Black Man

From [HERE] and [HERE] A mistrial has been declared in a federal civil rights lawsuit against two racist suspect Columbus police officers who shot and killed a 23-year-old Black man while the officers were in plainclothes in June 2016.

Henry Green V, 23, was shot and killed during a confrontation with Columbus Police Officers Zachary Rosen and Jason Bare, who were in plainclothes, in the South Linden neighborhood.

A docket entry noted “jurors cannot come to a unanimous decision. Mistrial declared.” Meredith Tucker, spokeswoman for Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein, confirmed the mistrial late Wednesday.

Sean L. Walton, representing the Green family, released the following statement on the court’s decision:

Despite today’s outcome, we know the public has now learned the truth about Henry Green V’s death at the hands of Columbus Police Officers Zachary Rosen and Jason Bare. Although we know it is difficult for some to believe police officers could act so heinously, our belief is that these officers will soon be held accountable for their actions. Henry’s family, led by his mother Adrienne Hood, has fought for accountability relentlessly since June 6, 2016. The inability of this jury to reach a decision does not change that mission. The city of Columbus has been put on notice, and we will continue to aggressively tell the truth that Zachary Rosen, Jason Bare, and the Columbus Division of Police choose not to. We look forward to our next day in court.

Green’s estate could pursue a new trial.

“We’ll move forward from there,” Hood said. “I have to stay in this for even longer. I’ll be in it, obviously, for the rest of my life. But it’s been an emotional week and a half. I definitely would have liked a for-sure win today, but I did not lose. There’s the ability to fight again.”

According to the complaint:

On June 6, 2016, around 6:00 pm, Henry Green was in in his Linden neighborhood, located in Columbus, Ohio. He was walking down the street with a friend, headed to dinner at his aunt’s house, located on Duxberry Ave.

As he and his friend walked down East 26th Ave and approached the intersection of Ontario St., they encountered a white SUV that swerved as if trying to hit them.

As they jumped back, they noticed two white males in the SUV, and they watched the SUV as it turned right on to Gerbert Rd., which was parallel to the street they had then began walking down, Ontario St.

On heightened alert and unaware of the intentions of the individuals in the white SUV, Henry and his friend watched the vehicle continue down Gerbert Rd., and as they approached the intersection of Ontario St. and Duxberry Ave., they saw the white SUV speeding down Duxberry Ave. towards them.

According to interviews conducted by the Critical Incident Response Team of the Columbus Division of Police on June 22, 2016, Officers Bare and Rosen were in the white SUV and in plainclothes, working the Community Safety Initiative.

Officer Bare stated that he was wearing camouflage shorts, a gray t-shirt, and a ball. Officer Bare stated his badge was displayed on his chest and hanging from a lanyard outside his shirt. Officer Rosen stated that he was wearing blue jeans, a blue t-shirt and his badge was “hanging from a metal (chain) lanyard.”

Officer Bare stated that upon driving through the intersection at 26th Ave. and Ontario St., Henry walked into the street towards them and lifted his shirt up at the waist to display a pistol in his front waistband.

Officer Bare stated that they aired Henry’s description over the radio, turned down Duxberry and drove toward Ontario St., where they again encountered Henry. Officer Bare stated that when they stopped in front of him, Henry lifted his shirt to grab the black pistol, pulled it from his waistband.

Officer Bare stated that both he and Officer Rosen yelled “Police,” “put your gun down”, or “words to that effect,” while he used his right hand to lift and flash his badge towards Henry.

Officer Bare stated that Henry refused to comply with their commands and instead raised his weapon and pointed it at Officer Rosen.

Officer Bare stated that Henry advanced toward Officer Rosen and he heard several gunshots, which he believed were from Henry.

Officer Bare stated that he fired a total of seven shots at Henry. Officer Rosen stated that as he and Officer Bare were driving they encountered Henry, who continued walking into the street as if he wanted to force them to stop or strike him.

Officer Rosen stated that Henry lifted his shirt and flashed his gun, as if he was trying to get him to slow down so that he could car jack him.

Officer Rosen stated that as they drove by, he saw Henry in his left side view mirror aiming the pistol at their vehicle.

Officer Rosen stated that as they approached Henry at the next intersection, Officer Rosen upholstered his pistol.

Officer Rosen stated at this point Henry reached into his waistband and pulled his pistol.

Officer Rosen stated that he raised and pointed his pistol at Henry through the front windshield and put the car in park.

Officer Rosen stated that he pointed his pistol between the gap between the “A” pillar on the driver’s side of the vehicle and the open driver’s side door and shouted “police” and “don’t move” or “words to that effect.”Officer Rosen stated that Henry did not comply and instead raised his weapon towards Officer Rosen. Officer Rosen stated that because he believed Henry was “firing or about to fire his weapon” he then made the decision to begin firing at Henry.

Officer Rosen stated that he fired his weapon a total of fifteen times. Officer Rosen stated that Henry did not comply with his commands and he “fired/returned fire” at him.

In his interview with the Columbus Division of Police, Officer Rosen stated people were coming off their porches yelling, “Why did you shoot him?”

Although Henry Green V is not alive to tell his account of the events of June 6, 2016, numerous witnesses have given their accounts of the day in question.

Witness #1 stated that Henry did not pull a weapon on the white SUV while on E. 26th Ave. He stated that there was no indication by Officers Bare or Rosen that they were police officers, neither officer identified themselves as police officers, neither officer had their badge visible, the officers reacted extremely quickly and aggressively, and the officers fired prior to Henry ever raising a weapon at the officers or firing at them. He stated that they continued to walk towards Henry and fire at him, even as he lay on the ground. He stated that he did not know they were officers until they placed Henry in handcuffs on the ground.

Witness #2 stated that Henry did not have a gun out when he encountered him that day. He stated that the white SUV sped down Duxberry Ave. before coming to an abrupt stop in front of Henry. He stated that he noticed the driver had a gun pointed at the window as he drove down the street. He stated that the officers fired so quickly that he believed the shots were fired almost as soon as they exited the vehicle. He stated that they did not identify themselves as officers and did not have any badge visible. He stated that Officers Bare and Rosen began firing at Henry first, and eventually Henry was able to pull and raise his gun to defend himself. He stated that the officers continued to fire on Henry, even as Henry lay on the ground. He did not know that they were officers until they handcuffed Henry on the ground. He also stated that his fiancée and young children were outside in the backdrop and he feared for their safety.

Witness #3 stated that she was standing outside when she saw the encounter unfold. She had seen Henry walking that day “minding his own business,” although she did not know him personally. She stated that the SUV was driving down the street and Henry hopped out of the way of the vehicle, and Officers Bare and Rosen jumped out of the SUV. She stated that she thought a street fight was about to unfold because she did not know they were officers and did not see any badges. She did not hear them identify themselves in any way. She stated that she did not know if Henry may have flashed a gun, but he did not pull one out before the officers began firing on Henry. She stated Henry made it to the sidewalk, and she believes he may have been trying to make it home, but he fell and his body went stiff. She stated they “let off a whole bunch of rounds.” She stated that when they began cuffing him, she yelled “why are y’all putting a dead man in cuffs?” She expressed to her best friend that she had just “watched an innocent man die,” and that she had watched him walking up and down the street all day and he did not do anything wrong in the encounter.

Witness #4 stated that Henry walked past him on Duxberry moments prior to the encounter in question. He stated that he saw the entire incident unfold, turning around as he heard the individuals in the white SUV jump out with their guns drawn. He never heard them identify themselves as officers, did not see any badges visible, and did not know they were officers until they began to handcuff Henry and a uniformed officer shows up seconds afterward to perform CPR. He stated that Mr. Green was clearly dead at this point, and that the actions of the officers were reckless, because there were surrounding houses and children present.

Witness #5 stated that she was in her house feeding her children when she heard shots and went to the window. She saw the officers exchanging fire with Henry. She stated one officer was using the car as a shield. She stated that once Henry fell to the ground and his gun had fallen on the ground, they continued shooting him as they walked up on him. She noted the officers’ badges were not displayed until after the shooting, when people began yelling at them and they pulled their badges from under their shirts to identify themselves.

Witness #6 stated that he heard gunshots, and once the gunshots stopped he ran outside to make sure his godchildren were ok. He stated that within a minute police cruisers were pulling up. He noted that he witnessed the officers pull their badges from under their shirts after the shooting.

Witness #7 stated that she did not see the incident from the beginning, but she heard gunshots while she was in her car and turned to look. She stated that she saw two white males shooting at the ground. She stated that she initially thought they may have been “shooting an animal or something.” She later discovered they were officers, but she stated that she saw no indication that they were other than the way they were holding their guns.

Witness #8 stated that she did not see the incident from the beginning, but when she heard gunshots she looked out of her window and saw the officers shooting Henry on the ground. She stated she did not hear any announcements of “police” prior to the gunshots. She stated, “if you ask me it was overkill.” She stated that she believes she heard cop guns shooting first. She believes that Henry fired back at the officers. She stated the ones that shot him didn’t attempt to give him CPR, they just tried to roll him over and cuff him.

Witness #9 stated that she was outside her car getting ready to get in when the she witnessed the encounter. She stated that she saw the white SUV pull up in front of Henry and the two individuals get out and just start shooting. She did not see Henry with a gun. She stated that she never heard anyone yell “freeze” or anything like that, and she wasn’t that far away from the shooting.

Witness #10 stated that he normally would not talk to police, but if he was murdered he would want someone to talk on his behalf. He gave that reasoning for why he gave a statement regarding what he witnessed. He stated that while he was sitting in his vehicle he heard gunshots and glass breaking. He stated that he then made sure his family was safe, and witnessed the shooting unfold. He stated that he saw Officers Bare and Rosen shooting Henry two to four times while he was standing up, and continue to shoot him once he fell to the ground. He believed they shot twenty to twenty-five times total during the incident. He stated that he never heard the “two white males” say anything, never saw any police badges and did not know it was the police until the shooting stopped and one of the males pulled out a police radio.

Witness #11 stated that from what she witnessed, Officers Bare and Rosen just started shooting and did not say anything to Henry. She stated that the officers kept shooting once Henry was on the ground, describing their actions as “overkill”.

On June 6, 2016, the Columbus Division of Police issued a news release stating in part, “On June 6, 2016 at approximately 6:10pm, officers were working plain-clothes directed patrol in the area of Ontario Street and Duxberry Avenue and observed two men standing on the street corner. One man was holding a gun. According to a witness, officers exited their vehicle, with their badges displayed, and ordered the man to drop the gun. The man ignored the commands and opened fire on the officers. The officers returned fire and struck the suspect multiple times.” The release stated that the incident will be investigated by the Critical Incident Response Team.

Along with the aforementioned news release, Columbus Division of Police Spokesman Rich Weiner informed the media that police had “spoken to an independent witness who corroborated the general scenario outlined by police.”3

It is now known that the release of this information runs counter to what is clear from the results of the Columbus Division of Police’s own CIRT investigation.

Not only was there no witness who corroborated the officers’ version of events, there were numerous witnesses who directly countered the officers’ version of events, many of which were interviewed immediately following the shooting.

There is no evidence of any witness who corroborated the officers’ version of events. No witness gave any statement that they heard the officers identify themselves. No witness gave any statement that they witnessed Henry pull a weapon on the officers.

No witness gave any statement that they witnessed Henry fire at the officers first.

White prosecutors declined to bring charges after their grand jury determined in 2017 that there was no wrongdoing by the officers and did not indict them in the shooting.

Hood, as administrator of her son’s estate, sued in federal court, alleging wrongful death and the use of unreasonable force against her son.

The district court initially ruled in favor of the officers and others named in the suit, writing that the officers’ use of deadly force was reasonable and did not amount to excessive force.

A three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, however, remanded the case for further deliberations, noting in a majority decision: “The experts from both parties indicated that some of Green's gunshot wounds were sustained while he was in a 'lowered' position, likely when he was down on the ground or in the process of going down … a jury could reasonably conclude that the officers' use of force in this context was unreasonable."

The trial in the case began before Judge Sargus on Nov. 8, with closing arguments presented on Monday, according to court documents. Jury deliberations began late Monday, with the hung jury declared Wednesday afternoon.

Although Evidence Points to Julius Jones' Innocence OK Authorities Still Plan to Murder Him tmw. Cops Erect Barricades Around Gov's Mansion as He Considers His Uncontrollable Power to Take/Grant Life

From [HERE] and [HERE] Oklahoma City police officers have begun erecting barricades around the governor’s mansion, the Black Times reported, as governor Kevin Stitt considers stopping the impending execution of controversial Oklahoma death row inmate Julius Jones.

The state parole board has twice recommended that Jones, sentenced to execution for the 1999 murder of Paul Howell, be removed from death row, citing doubts about his true guilt. The decision, however, ultimately rests with Governor Stitt, and the execution will take place on 18 November unless he elects to grant Jones clemency. 

The OKCPD said on Tuesday on social media it put up the barriers to create a “safe place” for peaceful protest, at the request of the Oklahoma Highway Patrol.

Julius Jones has been on death row in Oklahoma for 19 years for a 1999 murder he’s always said he had no part in. Mr. Jones, who is represented by federal attorneys Dale Baich and Amanda Bass, was convicted and sentenced to death at the age of 19 and has now spent half his life in prison, waiting to be executed for a crime that new and compelling evidence suggests he didn’t commit.

More than 6.3 million people, and counting, have signed a petition supporting Mr. Jones in his fight to prove his innocence in the killing of Paul Howell, a businessperson, in Edmond, Okla.,

Despite this, Mr. Jones’ execution has been scheduled for Nov. 18. His is one of seven people facing execution in Oklahoma in the next six months. If carried out, they will be the first executions to take place in Oklahoma since 2015, after a series of botched executions resulted in a statewide moratorium.

1. Julius Jones was at home having dinner with his parents and sister at the time of the murder; however, his legal team failed to present his alibi at his original trial. His trial attorneys did not call Mr. Jones or his family members to the stand.

2. Mr. Jones did not match the description of the person who committed the crime, which was provided by a sole eyewitness. The person who killed Mr. Howell was described as having 1-2 inches of hair, but Mr. Jones had a shaved head.

3. A man named Christopher Jordan matched the eyewitness’ hair description, but claimed only to have been the “getaway driver” and not the shooter at trial. He was the State’s star witness against Mr. Jones.

In exchange for testifying that Mr. Jones was the shooter, Mr. Jordan was given a plea deal for his alleged role as the “getaway driver.” He served 15 years in prison and, today, he is free.

4. Three people incarcerated with Mr. Jordan at different times have said in sworn affidavits that Mr. Jordan told each of them that he committed the murder and framed Mr. Jones. None of these three men have met Mr. Jones and they do not know one another. And none of them have been offered a shorter sentence or incentive in exchange for disclosing Mr. Jordan’s confessions.

The impact of racial bias in Julius’ Jones’ case:

1. Mr. Howell, a white man, was killed in a predominantly white neighborhood. Immediately, then District Attorney Bob Macy characterized the crime as an act of violence committed by Black men, fueled by drugs. This narrative was perpetuated by media coverage.

2. The officer who arrested Mr. Jones called him the n-word and dared him to run, then implied he would shoot him if he did.

3. Eleven out of the 12 jurors at Mr. Jones’ trial were white, and one juror referred to Mr. Jones by the n-word, and suggested that he be taken out behind the courthouse and shot.

4. One-third of District Attorney Macy’s death penalty convictions have been overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct. Many of those whose convictions were vacated are Black people. To date, 10 people sentenced to death in murder cases in Oklahoma have been exonerated.

Polish Doctor Finds Another Strange Life Form in the Pfizer Vax, made of aluminum and carbon

From [HERE] Another strange COVID vaccine life form has been discovered under the microscope, this time made of aluminum and carbon. The discovery was made by a Polish doctor by the name of Dr. Franc Zalewski. Throughout his video presentation, he calls it “the thing.” He found it in the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine shot, in 1 of 3 vials he studied. Dr. Zalewski’s discovery comes on top of the research of many other independent doctors, scientists and researchers (Dr. Robert Young, Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Zandre Botha and Dr. John B.) who also found that the COVID vaccine contains all sorts of questionable and outright horrific contents – graphene, nanometals, PEG, parasites, self-propelling creatures with tentacles, synthetic fibers and synthetic self-assembling circular structures.

COVID Vaccine Life Form: “The Thing” of Aluminum, Bromine and Carbon

So what is this thing? Similar to what Madej found under the microscope, it’s some kind of synthetic creature with tentacles. Zalewski compares it to something from a science fiction movie, including The Matrix, which contained an entity which “flies, had tentacles, and attaches itself to other things.” In this case, Zalewski carefully measured “the thing” and discovered the ratio of its head to its legs (a head of 20 microns/micrometers to legs of 2.5 millimeters, which equals a ratio of 1:125). He believes that “the thing” will grow and develop inside people’s bodies, commenting:

“It seems to have a head and 3 legs … It hasn’t been created to just sit there and do nothing … This is a life form … It grew/developed in 4 days … Is this a plant? Dust? ‘A being’ given to people in eggs in a fertile/suitable environment. Somewhere closeby there might be some sort of signal which caused that being to start living. Just as pinecone seeds won’t grow unless they will be in a suitable environment on fertile ground, the same “that thing” seems not to be moving. It may be dormant/sleeping … I hope it won’t be activated.”

Zalewski also points out that he saw more than of these creatures, putting to rest any claims this was just a coincidence. Indeed, with all the discoveries that have been made now, replete with microscopic imagery, could anyone who has looked squarely at the evidence still believe this is some giant coincidence rather than the coldly calculated transhumanistic agenda? Zalewski suggests that graphene in the vaccine acts as a kind of food or catalyst for “the thing” because the vaccine contains the eggs of “the thing” which appear to hatch in the presence of graphene.

Another Video Claims to Show Real-Time Self-Assembling Graphene in Pfizer Vaccine

Independent analysis of the COVID vax continues worldwide. Speaking of Pfizer and graphene, there is another video circulating (with German subtitles) that claims to show the contents of the Pfizer vax under a microscope. The video starts of with lots of tiny white dots or points, and some black ones too. As it progresses, you can see the points slowly connect to make lines, which reinforces a key theme of the synthetic life forms contained within the COVID non-vaccines: self-assembly.

The COVID Vax is a Tool of Bioterrorism and Transhumanism

NWO (New World Order) propaganda promotes the idea that you need to be scared of new threat of bioterrorism and that government will save and protect you. You do need to watch out for bioterrorism but government will be the one perpetrating it, not preventing it. The real bioterrorism is not from some make-believe virus but rather contaminated fake-vaccines with horrific synthetic parasites which, the evidence would suggest, can self-assemble, self-replicate and proliferate inside the human body.

Zalewski comments several times that people have taken the COVID vax voluntarily. Voluntarily. And now many of them will probably harbor aluminum-based life forms inside their bodies. There is so much information now rapidly coming out exposing the COVID vax contents. Hopefully, this information will be shared around the world and will help, by its horrific nature, to put an end to the COVID scamdemic more quickly than it would otherwise have ended. Hopefully, a realization will dawn on those who have been programmed by the mainstream narrative, or who are still on the fence, so they awaken from their slumber and understand what is truly happening here.

Contrary to Conservative and Liberal Media's Race Narratives, in Kyle Rittenhouse’s White-on-White Crime and Self-Defense Trial there were No Black Victims or Aggrieved White Property Owners Involved

The COVID Tyranny Requires Accomplices [It is Blind Obedience to Corporate Elites, Their Authorities, Media and Doctors] Only Widespread Disobedience Can Stop the Slow Motion Extermination of People

According to FUNKTIONARY:

tyranny - the miscarriage of self-government. 2) the absence of ethical anarchy. In our system, tyranny must have an accomplice. The perpetrator by intent must be accommodated by the perpetrator by consent. The former initiates, the latter accommodates. Of all tyrannies, the greatest is the tyranny of the ego-mind. "If the government is allowed to place a tax on what is a natural right it can raise that tax to the point where that right has been effectively destroyed. That is tyranny."" Butcher's Union Company v. Crescent City. "No man, no group, and no nation has the right to any man's individual freedom. No matter how pure the motive, how great the emergency, how high the principle, such action is nothing but tyranny. It is never justified." -John W. Parsons. [MORE]

disobedience - thinking for oneself - deciding for oneself what to do and what not to do. 2) the refusal of services of those in power- to deny their alleged authority over you. The Beast allows you to be disobedient or ignorant but not both. Disobedience is the only crime - all others are offshoots. (See: Prometheus, Rights, Thinking, Though & Rebel).

By Peter Koenig. From [Global Research] There is so much scientific communication published on the non-mainstream media, pointing repeatedly and again and again to the absolute lack of justification for vaccinating children, for vaccinating adults, there is simply no justification for vaccination. Period. And this especially not with an experimental mRNA-genome altering injection – there is no justification for the entire criminal Covid hoax, period.

Covid’s mortality rate is about 0.07%, or less. Anything else is a lie.

The very Dr. Anthony Fauci said so in a peer-reviewed paper, New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), “Navigating the Uncharted”, March 2020.

Yet the steamroller bulldozes on, rolling over all the scientific evidence, and since the steamroller pays and corrupts the media, the media keep lying and corrupting people, and the governments keep corrupting, threatening, blackmailing, coercing certain vulnerable scientists into continuing with the lie despite their better knowledge.

Deceit-propaganda has no end with a narrative that is a total lie. The steamroller consists of the governments and their corrupted media, the entire UN system, in particular WHO and this powerful elitist cult, whose members are not be named, but are generally known.

This is all fact.

Repeating the “non-justification” over and over again — that it is unconstitutional, that it is illegal, that it is criminal, that it is against human rights, that it is not justified by any science that holds its ground – is useless. As only the converted will listen. While the steamroller doesn’t listen, rolls on, rolls over everything, over any opposing opinion, doesn’t even seek dialogue. The steamroller is right – by sheer crushing any opposition, and forcing them into tyranny.

Some may spread the truth. But we see what damage has already been done in the course of less than 2 years — millions, perhaps tens of millions have died — not from Covid, but from the poison that is called Covid vaccine. Yet, the steamroller ignores all that… never mentions this fact, just forces more and more people into getting the poison jab. And it rolls on over all the evidence, lying to you, to us, that’s what the very governments, elected and paid for by us, the people, are doing – all of them, all 193 UN member countries.

The few honest and transparent ones (most of them in Africa, one in Haiti), they were punished by death, through poison, by strangulation, by guns — they are to be deterrents for others, who may possibly want to follow in their footsteps and defy the Big Crime UN Agenda 2030.

This has to be said.

This has to be known by the people.

It’s not just a question of vaccination or not vaccination.

YOU must understand what is behind the false vaccination, to understand that it is much more than believing the governments nice-talk of protecting your health – all these governments have sold themselves to the devil, to hell, to say it bluntly, because they all know the true agenda behind this UN Agenda 2030, that started with the midnight gong of entering 1 January 2020 – not by accident. The vaxx agenda is a question of life and death.

No pandemic starts at once worldwide…. except when it had been prepared by a long hand before, through several publicly known events, but not disseminated by the bought mainstream media, such as the 2010 Rockefeller Report, Event 201 of 18 October, 2019 in NYC sponsored by the Gates Foundation, by Rockefeller funded Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and by – who else – the all-commanding NGO – the World Economic Forum, the WEF.

Believe it or not, the WEF is an NGO of the elite, of the richest of the rich, of the Wall Street heads, Corporate Heads, Hollywood Heads – and some other heads. Yes, the WEF is an NGO that orders the UN to behave and to tell lies they (the WEF) want them (Guterres and his UN clan) to tell the world, and to repeat the lies over and over again.

And the real agenda is:

1) Massive population reduction – as part of the Gates, Rockefeller, Kissinger, et al eugenist agenda. That’s their number one goal. That’s why you are not getting a true vaccine, but a killer vaccine, it undermines your immune system, it results in mortality and morbidity. Deaths and injuries may occur within 2 to 3 years, so that strong believers in the vaccine, and deniers of the truth, will never accuse the vaccine, or the vaccine manufacturers, or WHO, of your or your relative’s death – that’s part of the plan, because the consequences of the “vaxx” are multiple but some of their main characteristics are:

i) the substances in the injection attack the human reproductive systems, male and female, often by cancer, miscarriages and more;

ii) they cause blood clots – that lodge mainly in the lungs, impairing your breathing capacity, but they can and often do migrate to the heart, causing heart strokes, or heart embolies, or heart attacks, or they move to the brain, where they may cause a brain stroke, or death;

iii) they may attack — and often do — your immune system through the overproduction of Spike proteins created by the “vaccine”, so you may fall for any infectious disease, that otherwise you would have resisted by your natural immune system.

2) They convert your body through the graphene oxide in the injection into a magnetic field that will respond to 5G and soon 6G ultra-microwaves’ commands, converting your brain into a computer and converting you, Humans, into robots or Transhumans, that can be surveyed and controlled by every step “it” takes – no longer you but the transhuman. If not behaving according to orders, it, the transhuman, may also be extinguished, by remote-control.

Sounds too fantastic to be true? Read Klaus Schwab’s book, “Covid-19: The Great Reset“, and watch his 2016 interview (less than 2 min) with the Swiss French TV (see also first segment in video below), where he intimates and predicts that by about 2025 humans will be chipped, so they can receive commands from 5G / 6G waves, and, he literally adds, will become Transhumans.

3) The fabricated Covid crisis is bankrupting as many small and medium and even large enterprises as possible around the globe, creating untold unemployment and misery and leaving a stock of bankrupted assets to be transferred for a penny on the dollar – or less – to the top elite, to those who are engineering the biblical crime we are experiencing since almost two years.

This is not conspiracy, these are facts, facts which we, the People, still may stop if we wake up NOW and act in solidarity.

Getting back to the beginning, where the point is made, that it is no good to keep endlessly repeating the illegality of the “Covid measures”, the unconstitutionality of the Covid passes, or the Green Passes, or the vaxx-passes, or all that is stored in the infamous QR-code, for now on your cell phone, soon to be implanted under your skin, already predicted in 2016, by Klaus Schwab.

Repeating what those of us, who do not follow the mainstream have captured long ago, is no good, unless you also explain the whole story, namely that Covid and the vaxx hoax around it, is but an instrument for a much larger agenda, of which the number one goal is massive population reduction, and you may be part of it. Knowing what the eugenists real goal is, you might faint. Let it suffice to say that their objective is reducing the world population by considerably more than half. And that beginning by the rich western world, where most unrenewable resources are used, where most capital can be stolen and transferred to the top elitist cult-clan, so that you, surviving citizen, may be happy with a basic income, that allows you to survive.

Or, as Klaus Schwab says: “You will own nothing and be Happy.”

Unless you are aware of this entire background, not only of the unconstitutionality of the fake and deadly “vaccine”, you will just roll over in your comfort zone, letting it happen, being tyrannized, without noticing – and at the end, when it is too late, you will wake up and say “nobody told me” — exactly. Doesn’t that sound familiar?  As familiar as to almost believe that Hitler’s Nazi Germany and the ensuing WWII was just a trial run for what is unfolding in front of our eyes – as UN Agenda 2030.

Be aware. We can stop it. If we want to. We are many. They are few.

We still have 9 years to go. But once you have been jabbed – you have lost a fair amount of your capacity to resist, of your autonomy, as you may die, or become incapacitated. So, don’t get vaxxed, don’t accept tyranny, don’t accept a discriminating vaxx- certificate. Say NO – to the covid crime being committed by “our” authorities upon us, the People.

And talk to the police, the military. They should also know. Because in the end, they are sitting in the same boat as we, the People, especially since their constitutional role is defending the people, not the tyrants at the head of governments. Talk to them. Peacefully – with reason. As they are also being lied to.

Stop it NOW.

Died From or Died With COVID? Should Govts be Counting Murder, Suicide and Fatal Accidents as COVID Deaths? Investigation Reveals Purposeful Miscounts to Support a Posture Already Taken [Depopulation]

From [HERE] In this short news report from Full Measure, Sharyl Attkisson interviews the coroner from Grand County, Colorado, where a murder-suicide during Thanksgiving 2020 were recorded as two COVID-19 deaths. While outlandish, it has appeared from other reports around the country1 and statements from the Colorado governor, this practice is not uncommon.2

In the early months of 2020, many in the mainstream news media laughingly called concerns that there were more deaths reported from COVID-19 than could be attributed

to the disease a “death toll conspiracy.”3 Rolling Stone reported this was led by conservative Republicans and “anti-vaxxers” who believe the numbers were inflated.4

Yet, it was only several short months later that data confirmed what many already knew: The number of people who died “from” COVID-19 we're not the same as those who died “with” COVID-19. The differentiation is not subtle. In the rst case, individuals died from the disease.

However, in the second case, an individual may have tested positive for COVID-19 within the last 28 days but died from other health conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes or end stage cancer.

Inaccurate and high false positive rates from PCR tests likely contributed to the number of individuals who died “with” COVID-19. PCR tests use something called “cycle thresholds” to look for positive cases. The higher the threshold, the greater the risk a healthy person is labeled as a COVID-19 “case.”5 In reality, PCR testing is not a proper diagnostic tool.6 Yet, it has supported the promoted narrative that the U.S. is suffering from a rising number of deaths.

Inflated COVID Death Numbers Recorded in Multiple Counties

In July 2021, Santa Clara and Alameda counties in California did an analysis of the number of people who died from COVID-19. Santa Clara found a significant discrepancy.7 The data did not change. The number of actual deaths did not change. But the authorities found 22% of the deaths recorded from COVID-19 could not be attributed to the virus.

The new numbers were generated by counting only those people whose cause of death was ‘from’ the virus. They left off the people who had tested positive at the time of death, but whose cause of death was not the result of an infection from SARS-CoV-2. In the month before, Alameda County recounted their deaths and registered a drop of roughly 25%.8

Dr. Monica Gandy is an infectious disease expert at the University of California San Francisco. She believes that it's important to have an accurate accounting of the cause of death. She spoke with a reporter from CBS KPIX San Francisco and rather optimistically believed the CDC “may soon ask all counties to do the same as Alameda and Santa Clara Counties and that the nation could also see a drop in its COVID-19 death toll.”9

In the Full Measure video above, Attkisson recounts the story from 2020 of the two deaths from gunshot wounds in Grand County, Colorado, that were recorded as COVID- 19 deaths.

The video also reveals that what was happening in Grand County was happening across the state. Dr. James Caruso, chief medical examiner and coroner for Denver, recounted hearing similar stories from coroners in rural counties where it was easier to quickly assess whether a death was from COVID. He told Attkisson:10

“I was told by some of my fellow coroners in the more rural counties in Colorado that it was happening to them, that they knew of issues where they had signed out a death certificate with perhaps trauma involved. And they were being advised that it was being counted as a COVID-related death.”

Caruso believes that early in the process at the local level, death certificates are probably completed accurately. But then, potentially at the state or federal level, there is a possibility that agencies are cross-referencing COVID tests against death certificates. Anyone who had tested positive is listed as a COVID-related death, regardless of how they died.

When Attkisson checked the tally of deaths in Grand County in July 2021, she found The New York Times had over reported the deaths, including the two gunshot wounds, one who had died outside of the county and two people who were recorded as dead but were alive.11

Merrit Linke is the chair of the Grand County Board of Commissioners. He and the other commissioners drafted and signed a letter that was sent to the governor of Colorado.

Essentially, the letter said, “Hey, these numbers are not correct. It's not right. We should report these correctly, and please x this."12

The response was appalling. Brenda Bock is the corner for Grand County, and she also signed the letter with the commissioners. She recounted her conversation with the governor of Colorado to Attkisson, saying, “He told me he didn't believe it was right, but he wasn't going to have them remove it from the count because all the other states were doing it that way so we were going to also.”13

Financial Incentives Likely Contributed to inflated Numbers

The reason other states were over reporting COVID deaths, and maybe the reason the governor of Colorado wanted to continue, were the financial incentives offered to hospitals. As early as April 2020, some health authorities were suspicious that the COVID-19 death counts were padded.

However, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the chief medical adviser to the president, brushed off those questions, even after the CDC numbers were called into question later in the year.14 A host of mainstream media also reported these suspicions were a conspiracy theory.15,16

Yet, in June 2020, nurse Erin Olszewski gave rst-hand testimony, sharing how nancial incentives were at the heart of diagnosis and mistreatment at a public hospital in Queens, New York.17 Olszewski was interviewed by The Press and the Public Project as part of the series “Perspectives on the Pandemic.” Olszewski has a long history of honorable service in the army.

She was deployed during Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003. “Part of her duties involved overseeing aid disbursement and improvements to hospital facilities. While in the country she received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service and was wounded in combat.”18 She retired in 2012 to work as a civilian nurse and continued work as a medical freedom and informed consent advocate.

According to Olszewski, patients who tested negative were routinely listed as positive and quickly placed on ventilators, a largely inappropriate treatment that ended up killing nearly all of them. By August 2020,19 then-CDC director Dr. Robert Redeld admitted financial policies may have artificially inflated hospitalization rates and death toll statistics.

In response to a question before a House panel committee asked by Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer, R-Mo., about potential “perverse incentives” that hospitals might have to alter death certificates, Redeld said:20

“I think you’re correct in that we’ve seen this in other disease processes, too. Really, in the HIV epidemic, somebody may have a heart attack but also have HIV — the hospital would prefer the [classifcation] for HIV because there’s greater reimbursement.”

The Washington Examiner21 also reported that in August 2020 more than 3,000 people were removed from the death count in Texas after it was revealed they did not test positive but were only considered a probable case.

CDC Now Counting Vaccination Deaths as Unvaccinated Illness

The issue of inaccurately counting COVID-related deaths is continuing. Based on statements made by Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it appears the CDC is manipulating statistics to create a false and inaccurate impression.

In a July 16, 2021, White House Press briefing, she claimed “over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are unvaccinated.”22 Just a few weeks later, she inadvertently revealed how the CDC came by that statistic.23

The CDC took hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021 to come to this conclusion. However, during this time frame, most of the people in the U.S. were not vaccinated,24 so the majority of people in the hospital or who had died would not have received the vaccine.

The newest way that the CDC is playing with statistics is to count anyone who has died within the rst 14 days post-injection as unvaccinated.25 This not only articially inates the unvaccinated death toll, but also articially deates the number of people who die as a result of the genetic therapy shot.

The vast majority of deaths from the COVID jabs are happening within the rst 2 weeks.26 These deaths are now being recorded as an unvaccinated death from COVID, rather than being counted as a death related to a breakthrough infection or vaccine injury.

This may be related to the fact that public health agencies were fully aware of the expected side effects from the shot and that they may have determined these were acceptable losses. According to Slide 16 in an October 22, 2020, presentation to the FDA by the director of Biostatistics and Epidemiology on some of the expected effects included:27

As you’ll note, many of these effects from the shot are reported in growing numbers to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).28 Additionally, the FDA added a warning to the Pzer and Moderna shots about the risk of heart inammation and myocarditis.29

Just days before, the CDC announced the benets of the shot outweigh the risk of a “likely association” between the shots and myocarditis in otherwise healthy young people.30 In June 2021, CNN31 reported the CDC had received 1,226 preliminary reports of children with myocarditis or pericarditis through VAERS.

Interestingly, the CDC found these numbers enough to issue a warning but have completely ignored the number who have died from the shots. By October 22, 2021, VAERS had recorded 10,956 cases of “rare”32 myocarditis and 17,619 deaths from the shot.33

AMA Teaches Doctors the Power of Misinformation

Before turning to your health care professional for accurate information, it's important to note that the American Medical Association is strongly advising doctors to follow the company line. And the company line is full of “language swaps,” samples of acceptable social media posts and information on how to deect or redirect questions to push AMA acceptable content.34

Deception has been the name of the game since long before the vaccine was released. As the push toward the “Great Reset” continues on multiple fronts, it is imperative that the medical establishment remain on board with the same rhetoric and unsubstantiated messages to drive fear and impair American’s critical decision making.

The language swaps and sample social media posts take advantage of a powerful tool – words. Language is a powerful way to shape reality,35,36,37 because it shapes how we think about what we’re experiencing. As noted by storyteller and lmmaker Jason Silva:38

“The use of language, the words you use to describe reality, can in fact engender reality, can disclose reality. Words are generative... We create and perceive our reality through language. We think reality into existence through linguistic construction in real-time.”

For example, “lockdown” sounds like involuntary imprisonment imposed by a totalitarian regime, which is what it is, whereas “stay-at-home order” sounds far less draconian. After all, “home” is typically associated with comfort and safety. The AMA goes on to provide instructions on how to block, deect and stall in the face of tough questions where an honest answer might break the ocial narrative.

I encourage you to read through Page 8 of the guide and pay attention to how these psychological tricks are used when listening to interviews or reading the news.

The AMA’s guidance isn’t all bad. Some of its advice makes perfect sense. But the inclusion of language swaps that result in false statements being made, and tools for steering, blocking, deecting, redirecting and stalling to avoid direct answers do nothing but erode credibility and thus trust in the medical community.

After having gathered data during the pandemic for roughly 19 months (March 2020 to October 2021) it is imperative that the American people begin to question the number of reported “cases” and deaths in a country where medical care is reportedly better and more advanced than many other countries.

In other words, why does the U.S. lead the world in number of deaths from an infection? 39 Might it be for the same reason that Australia is in a tyrannical lockdown when their infection rate is .6% and just 1% of those infected have died? Could there be a different agenda than what you’ve been led to believe?

Sources and References

1, 7, 8, 9 KPIX, July 2, 2021
2 Bitchute, September 23, 2021, Minute 3:40 & 6:00
3 Forbes, July 21, 2020
4 Rolling Stone, April 16, 2020 headline
5 Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2021;25(3)
6 Bulgarian Pathology Association, July 1, 2020
10 Bitchute, September 23, 2021, Minute 3:40
11 Bitchute, September 23, 2021, Min 9:20
12 Bitchute, September 23, 2021, Min 3:20
13 Bitchute, September 23, 2021, Min 6:00
14 CNBC, September 1, 2020
15 KHN, November 2, 2020
16 NBC, September 29, 2020
17, 18 YouTube, June 9, 2020
19, 20 Washington Examiner, August 1, 2020
21 Washington Examiner, July 16, 2020, para 1, 2
22 WH.gov Press Brieng July 16, 2021 75% down the page 23 Fox News, Min 00:38

24 USA Facts, U.S. Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker
25 CDC, October 15, 2021, top bullets
26 Twitter, Diagnosis Foundation
27 Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, Slide 16 28, 33 OpenVAERS

29 CNN, June 26, 2021
30, 32 CNN, June 23, 2021
31 CNN, June 23, 2021, para 2
34 AMA COVID-19 Guide
35 Critical Theory, August 14, 2013
36 Fast Company, June 28, 2018
37 Argos Multilingual, How Language Shapes our Perception of Reality 38 Thymindoman.com Does Language Construct Reality? para 1
39 Wordometer, Coronavirus, Table 1

Correction: A Media Hoaxed Public Believes Kyle Rittenhouse Killed Blacks in Defense of Property. Wrong: He Shot 3 White Men in Self-Defense. Case Concerns the Promotion of Polarization, Not Racism

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Dependent Media - Establishment (dependent) media is both unwilling and incapable of reporting events truthfully, accurately or without extreme bias. News coverage is just that - covering up (masking) and distorting the events and those wielding power behind the events (those reported and deliberately unreported). News coverage has simply become “disinfotaiment” with the sole purpose of perception and knowledge containment as well as reality concealment. You report in the interests of those who are paying you to do so. (see MEDIA, NBC & NEWS).

mass media - "Massa' Media. Massa's media plus + Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses. 2) The "Mess" Media. 3) wholesale re-tale--retelling the whole tale (propaganda) exactly as you're told, consistently and relentlessly. How can you possibly relate when you are framed by the very debate wherein you are an unwilling spectator? Let's be perfectly cleat on this. There's no counter-option or outlet to vent when you're under the controlled thoughtform of mass-think manufactured consent. "Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one." -A.J. Liebling. (See: Media, T.V., Mass, Alienation, Spectacle Society, NEWS, ABCTV, Propaganda, Legislation & The New God Economy)

While National Guard Troops Brace for Violence, Rittenhouse Judge Rules Teenagers (under 18/white) May Possess and Open Carry an AR-15, Dismissing his Gun Charge Before Closing Argument

From [HERE] The white judge presiding over the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse on Monday dismissed the gun charge the teen faced for being underage while publicly carrying the semiautomatic rifle he used to kill two and injure a third at a Kenosha, Wisconsin, protest last year, leaving five felonies for the jury to deliberate over after closing arguments.

Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder – who has drawn scrutiny and criticism for some of his actions during the high-profile trial – began jury instructions Monday morning by telling the jurors not to consider the misdemeanor gun charge Rittenhouse faced for being under 18 when possessing the AR-15 he wielded on Aug. 25, 2020, the night of the shootings.

Schroeder ruled Wisconsin’s open carry law is so confusingly written it can be interpreted to mean 17-year-olds can openly carry firearms as long as they’re not short-barrel rifles. He believed the jury could only convict if prosecutors proved the barrel of Rittenhouse’s rifle was less than 16 inches and has an overall length shorter than 26 inches.

The AR-15-style rifle Rittenhouse used to fatally shoot two men and injure a third is 35 inches long with a barrel length of 16 inches. Under defense questioning, a Kenosha police detective said he believed the Smith & Wesson M & P 15 was standard size.

In other words, as far as the judge is concerned teens (but not adults) may openly possess an AR-15 in public as the white teen did in this case because no law in Wisconsin prohibits it (he probably also only had in mind white teenagers because he is white).

The judge’s decision stunned prosecutors, who argued his interpretation of the law does not make sense. Under the judge’s interpretation, it would be illegal for a 17-year-old to carry brass knuckles in Wisconsin but permissible to carry a semi-automatic rifle.

“There’s no ambiguity,” assistant district attorney James Kraus told the judge Friday. “It is very clear that (17-year olds) are not to possess dangerous weapons.”

The state law says “any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.” It defines a dangerous weapon as any “firearm, loaded or unloaded,” as well as metallic knucks, nunchaku, pointed stars and other items.

Rittenhouse’s defense team, however, successfully argued that there was a loophole in the law that says the misdemeanor only applies to 17-year-olds carrying short-barrel rifles. Carrying a short-barrel rifle at any age in Wisconsin is a felony, with exceptions for active military and police officers. [MORE]

Rittenhouse’s defense attorneys, Corey Chirafisi of Madison and Mark Richards of Racine, have long argued a loophole in the confusingly worded Wisconsin gun law relevant to the case allowed then-17-year-old Rittenhouse to possess the AR-15 in public because it is not a short-barreled rifle or shotgun.

The state, led by Assistant Kenosha County District Attorneys Thomas Binger and James Kraus, unsuccessfully countered that such an exception only applies to minor teens who are hunting and have proper hunting certification. Kraus reiterated Monday ahead of jury instructions that the defense’s interpretation “essentially swallows the whole statute.”

Schroeder sided with the defense, reestablishing for the record that he has problems with the statute’s wording. The judge offered to let the jury measure the AR-15 to determine if its length complied with the law, but the state’s attorneys conceded it does not technically qualify as a short-barreled rifle under the statute and the count was dismissed. The move comes after Schroeder last week dismissed a charge for violating an emergency curfew in place the night of the shootings. 

Prosecutors have charged Rittenhouse with first-degree reckless homicide for killing Joseph Rosenbaum, 36; first-degree intentional homicide for killing Anthony Huber, 26; and first-degree attempted intentional homicide for injuring Gaige Grosskreutz, 28. He is also charged with two counts of recklessly endangering safety with a dangerous weapon for firing two shots at an unknown man who kicked him while he was on the ground and for pointing his gun in the direction of Richie McGinniss, a videographer for the Daily Caller in the line of fire when Rosenbaum was shot.

Lesser included offenses like second-degree homicide were included in the jury instructions at the request of prosecutors. Rittenhouse's attorneys have argued self-defense on all the charges, saying their client shot while being chased and attacked by a crowd of protesters after fatally shooting Rosenbaum, who they say chased and threatened to kill the defendant.

New Zealand Scientists Question COVID's Existence. 'We Have Taken for Granted that a Virus Actually exists. SARS-CoV-2 has Never Been Physically Isolated" or "Shown to be the Cause of any Disease"

From [HERE] Scientists from New Zealand have published a groundbreaking new report examining all aspects of the ongoing COVID-19 hoax which has expanded into a terrifying war on humanity wearing the deceptive face of “Public Health,” and have concluded that COVID-19 is a mammoth fraud and profound war on humanity based on a virological fraud–no virus has been isolated or proved to cause “COVID-19, the disease and pandemic invented by the World Health Organization,” while governments “have used this imaginary disease to terrorize and imprison their citizens” and vaccines instructing the human body to poison itself–also loaded with toxins–have injured millions and are killing many thousands around the world.

The Abstract states as follows:

COVID-19 is a fraud because its alleged causal agent, a purported novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, has not been proven to exist in nature and therefore has not been established as the cause of COVID-19, the disease and pandemic invented by the World Health Organisation (WHO). For the selfsame reason there are no variants of the “virus”, which likewise exist only hypothetically in computers, cloud-based gene banks and in the minds of innocent people who have been comprehensively gulled by their governments.

The COVID-19 fraud, with its numerous preposterous claims, constitutes nothing less than a war on humanity by organisations such as Anser, Fors Marsh, and Palantir that conduct the scam through Big Pharma, with its backers and enablers, including the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WHO, technology conglomerates, the mainstream media, complicit governments, and COVID “pirates” such as UNC Chapel Hill and Imperial College London, to a one beneficiaries of the fraud.

COVID-19 is a war on humanity because politicians and their governments continue to use this imaginary disease to terrorise and imprison their citizens, denying them guaranteed human rights and freedoms, and violating their once inviolable bodies with highly experimental and hazardous injections that contain a computer-generated spike protein mRNA sequence that instructs the body to poison itself. These nefarious injections, which also contain undeclared non-biological objects for undeclared purposes, are injuring millions and killing many thousands of people around the world, including up to 218 New Zealanders as at 2 October 2021.1

A virological fraud lies at the heart of these crimes against humanity – that SARS-CoV-2 has never been physically isolated or shown to be the aetiological (causal) agent of COVID- 19. In this article, the authors examine the illusory world of virology to explain how a virus that no one has seen or knows where it has come from, that no one knows what it does or where it is going, is, according to the fraudsters, stealing across borders and boundaries and coming to get you no matter where you are. How can it be, the authors ask, that this phantasmagorical madness has morphed into a world redolent with fear in which democratic governments have abandoned democratic principles to engage in the control and “deletion of human beings” that may be just a “variant” away from turning into World War III?”

Another section states the following: (footnotes omitted)

THE TROJAN HORSE

Everything turns on these two concepts: absence and presence. Of what is SARS-CoV-2 predicated: absence or presence? That is the question we must must decide. For without the instantiated presence of SARS-CoV-2 there are no COVID-19 cases to count, and therefore no ground or justification for any government s response to a phantom pandemic.

This assault on humanity relies on a trojan horse to deliver the fraud into our minds and bodies, making possible the fulfilment of the globalist agenda of a population control grid with the apparent ultimate aim of controlling populations in every way possible.18

While debates go on around the world regarding the origins of COVID-19, the latest case numbers, its lethality, and the effectiveness of the so-called vaccines, the participants in these debates seem to take something for granted: that a virus actually exists. The vast majority of the public and the medical profession are unaware that the trojan horse is modern virology and its anti-scientific methods that assert the existence of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. Most would be surprised to learn that the “virus” has never been found inside a single human or shown to be the cause of any disease.

VIROLOGY’S DOUBLE DECEPTION

The COVID-19 crime against humanity requires the absence of this virus so there is no material reference against which the make-believe genome can be cross-checked, to establish, for instance, whether or not the purported SARS-CoV-2 proteins specifically stem from the alleged virus.

This illusory trick relies on virology’s double deception: (a) the substitution of the dictionary and scientifically postulated meaning of the noun isolation for its opposite; and (b) the substitution of the fake proxy of inducing cytopathic effects (CPEs) by inoculating typically abnormal cell lines in vitro for the postulated proxy of infecting a healthy or non-diseased host in vivo to establish causality between the purported pathogen and the disease. However, even using “normal” cell lines would not establish causality by Koch’s postulates or any other scientific postulates, as they are simply test tube observations involving alleged viruses.

This double deception constitutes a violation of postulates on which the scientific community has long depended. This physical absence makes of SARS-CoV-2 a fail-safe fraud, one that industry-funded virologists applaud and one that the medico- pharmaceutical complex both exploits and rewards. So obscure is this black art and so arcane its language that few among the general public would stop to question it. Even Stephen Bustin, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) expert and creator of the MIQE protocols designed to tame the RT-PCR “Wild West”, falls for this virological fraud, as he revealed in his interview with Eric Coppolino:

Eric Coppolino (EFC): But there’s two different definitions of isolation going around though. One is that you separate it from all else, and the other is that you put it into a broth and you find it.
Stephen Bustin (SB): Yeah. Well, that’s not really my area of expertise. As far as I’m concerned, I’ve read the papers and if that’s the standard way of isolating a pathogen, so I have no problems with that.

EFC: Well, it’s the current way that’s used, I would say, that the idea of true purification you separate it into centrifuge, and you know you’ve got a sample of only that. And then that is the thing that is sequenced and then used to prime the PCR. It does not appear that that’s what’s happening ...

SB: Well, the way the sequence was established by taking the samples from the original patient growing up something and then sequencing it and then disassembling the sequence and what came out of that was the SARS virus.19 Which then very closely resembled a bat SARS virus. And was obviously a different one. So, that ... Well, you know, this is a standard way of doing this so I really can’t comment any further on that, except that to me that’s perfectly acceptable and that’s the way to do it.

FOUR PILLARS OF THE COVID-19 FRAUD

“If p, then q; now q is true; therefore p is true. ’E.g. ‘If pigs have wings, then some winged animals are good to eat; now some winged animals are good to eat; therefore pigs have wings. This form of inference is called scientific method .”21 Bertrand Russell, 1946

There are four pillars to the worldwide COVID-19 fraud, all of which are interlocking.

THE FIRST PILLAR: ISOLATION

The theory of disease-causing viruses dates back to the 1800s and virologists spent the first half of the 20th century trying to extract these suspected viruses directly from living hosts. The repeated failures led them to change course in the 1950s in order to retain any credibility. The virologists had to provide something to show their potential funders, including the growing pharmaceutical industry chomping at the bit to develop vaccines and anti-microbial drugs.

In 1954, scientists reported that they had evidence of the measles virus based on the observation that a sample from a measles patient had killed some cells in a test tube. These appearances are known as “cytopathic effects”.22 The authors admitted that “while there is no ground for concluding that the factors in vivo [in a human] are the same as those which underlie the formation of giant cells and the nuclear disturbances in vitro [in the test tube], the appearance of these phenomena ... might be associated with the virus of measles.”23

The appearance of CPEs is foundational to modern virology’s fraudulent claims of isolation and pathogenicity: a sample (e.g., a nose swab) is taken from a patient and mixed with some cells in a test tube, the cells die, and it is declared that a virus has been “isolated”. What virologists don’t want you to know is that the same appearances can be generated without adding purported virus samples to the test tube – in other words, it is the process itself, starvation of the cell and the addition of various toxic substances such as antibiotics and antifungals, that cause the already abnormal cell lines to react and die, no virus required. (Sometimes photographs of “mock” infections are provided, however the details of these experiments are conspicuous by their absence.) [MORE]

(After a Brief Respite from COVID Propaganda in the Spectacle) the Media is Promoting a "Winter Surge" in COVID cases while Ignoring the Actual Surge of Serious Injuries and Deaths from Vax Injections

From [CHD] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released new data today showing a total of 875,653 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 5, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 18,461 reports of deaths — an increase of 383 over the previous week, and 135,400 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 7,943 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 643,957 adverse events, including 8,456 deaths and 53,780 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 5, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 8,456 U.S. deaths reported as of Nov. 5, 10% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 15% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 26% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 427.6 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Nov. 5. This includes: 250 million doses of Pfizer, 162 million doses of Moderna and 16 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publicizes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

Numbers this week do not yet include reports from the authorization of Pfizer’s pediatric COVID vaccine for the 5 to 11 age group. Reports currently in VAERS for children under 12 are due to ”product administered to patient of inappropriate age.”

During a meeting on Oct. 26, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine panel, Dr. Jessica Rose, a viral immunologist and biologist, said tens of thousands of reports have been submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for children ages 0 to 18, and that 60 children have died — 23 of them were under  2 years old.

“It is disturbing to note that “product administered to patients of inappropriate age was filed 5,510 times in this age group,” Rose said. Two children were inappropriately injected, presumably by a trained medical professional, and subsequently died. This is malfeasance.”

This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show: [MORE]

What the Dependent Media Isn’t Reporting: A Pandemic of the Vaccinated

Dr. Pierre Kory: Contrary to Media Fear Mongering, 'COVID-19 Is Highly Treatable'

10 Current Trends of Operation Coronavirus

By Makia Freeman. Here are the latest COVID trends, following on from 10 COVID trends in August 2021 and 10 COVID trends September 2021. The situation is escalating as the NWO (New World Order) agenda plays itself out in a predictable fashion, step by step. Governments around the world, especially those of the English-speaking nations of the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, are suspiciously desperate to get every single citizen vaxxed – including the vulnerable such as children – no matter what it takes and no matter how much they have to bribe, blackmail, cajole and coerce the public. It is a time where the surreal has become real, where long-established legal and cultural traditions are being trampled underfoot. It is a time of out-of-control governments and disempowered people. It is a time where every single person must decide whether he or she prefers conformity, social approval and (in some cases) a paycheck, or whether he or she prefers freedom regardless of the price. Here are the latest scamdemic patterns and COVID trends.

COVID Trend #1: Implementation of Control Infrastructure Continues

To those with open eyes, it has long been patently obvious that the COVID scamdemic was an elaborate and clever ruse to usher in a control infrastructure that is intended to be permanent. Why would ruling bodies, from Canada to Israel to France, from California to New York, invest so much in vaccine certificates or passports with digital QR codes, if this were temporary? Why would Australia invest so much in building COVID quarantine camps for “ongoing operations” if this were temporary? Why would Canada invest so much in COVID isolating centers if this were temporary? Why would Victorian premier ‘Dictator Dan’ Andrews let slip he’s very happy for the Mickleham quarantine center for the “next pandemic”?

This is designed to permanent!

The structure of a future Orwellian surveillance state is being assembled. It is incredible that some people are still so asleep that they literally cannot see the architecture of control that is being rapidly constructed right here, right now, under their noses.

COVID Trend #2: Unvaccinated People Banned from Supermarkets and Grocery Shopping

Arch NWO insider and war criminal Henry Kissinger once said, “who controls the food supply controls the people.” The agenda of control is advancing methodically. First the carrot, then the stick, then the whip. The NWO controllers know that the idea is to eventually target people’s ability to obtain and/or grow their own food. They know that people may ignore their unlawful edicts and mandates, but only if they can remain independent. If they make people dependent on them for money and food, then compliance becomes far more widespread. A key goal in the ultimate agenda is to make it impossible for the unvaccinated to live a normal life, including getting food, so that then they cave in and get the shot. It was only a matter of time before they introduced this, however as with many things, they are trying it out in a few places first to test the public reaction. Earlier this year a mayor in the Philippines tried to stop the unvaccinated from getting food (and recently their tyrannical leader Duterte threatened to arrest those refusing the vax, as well as suggested vaxxing people in their sleep).

However, this is the first time to my knowledge that a rich Western nation has tried this. There is now a law in Hesse (a state in Germany) that allows all businesses, even supermarkets, to ban unvaxxed customers, even for groceries and other essentials.

COVID Trend #3: Numerous Independent Doctors Find Nanotech & Synthetic Lifeforms in COVID Fake-Vaccines

The horrific contents of the COVID fake-vaccine, whether Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson, is starting to be exposed by doctors and scientists around the world via microscopy analysis. The photographic evidence is stunning. Whether it’s graphene, PEG, nanometals and parasites, or luminescent nano superconductors, or self-assembling nanobots, or tentacled creatures, anyone can now see what is in these witches’ brews. The transhumanistic world of nanotech and synthetic lifeforms is here.

COVID Trend #4: Millions of People Quit or Get Fired, Leading to Systemic Staff and Supply Shortages

This one is a natural corollary of a COVID trend I pointed out earlier – the firing of many workers to create intentional understaffing. Some such as James Corbett have referred to it with language such as the “controlled demolition of the economy” which brings to mind the 9/11 false flag op, but this time played out in the worldwide economic arena. There are literally millions of people, in the US and Australia, quitting their jobs or allowing themselves to be sacked – everyone from 9/11 responders to heath workers to firemen to policemen.

When the NWO controllers orchestrate a scenario to terminate people en masse, not only does it put stress on those that have lost their jobs, and not only does it put stress on those businesses and organizations to run properly and meet customer demand, but also destroys the smooth functioning of the worldwide supply chain and economy, leading to generalized chaos around the world.

Staff shortages, stock shortages, supply shortages – all by design. The scheme is to create such disruption, stress, suffering and panic that people more willingly accept The Great Reset in all its forms, whether that be mask mandates, vaccine mandates, vaccine certificates/passports, biometric IDs, carbon allowances, climate lockdowns, internet lockdowns (cyber pandemic) and more.

The carrot/stick approach of blaming the unvaccinated is again being used as US Treasury Deputy Secretary Wally Adeyemo said that shortages will continue until everyone is vaxxed.

COVID Trend #5: Vaccine Mandates Expand (Including Eliminating Tests)

Another obvious trend is the expansion of vaccine mandates. Canada decided to lead the way in tyranny by forcing a vax mandate on all federal workers, plus all travelers over the age of 12 on plane, train or ship. California put a vax mandate on all its state workers and all its prison workers (although that was temporarily put on hold by a judge).

Part of this COVID trend is the elimination of the testing option – which was always planned. They roll out a new system, wait for the pushback, tell people “it’s not so bad, because if you don’t want to get vaxxed, you can always get tested” then quietly get rid of the that option. It’s the same pattern of control where government programs are first voluntary then mandatory – the frog-in-the-boiling-pot tactic or as David Icke calls it the Totalitarian Tiptoe.

COVID Trend #6: Tyranny Against the Unvaccinated Escalates

The NWO manipulators are attempting to make the unvaccinated the new untouchable caste. Recently, a Canadian town banned unvaccinated couples from getting married while Colorado State University threatened to arrest unvaccinated enrolled students if they set foot on campus.

Australia takes the cake again though. In the Northern Territory, a large state-like region in the north of Australia that contains the city Darwin, workers face $5,000 fines if they refuse the jab.

COVID Trend #7: Are Planes Making Emergency Landings or Crashing, Due to Out-of-Control Vaxxed Pilots?

This COVID trend is more in the speculative realm and requires more investigation, but nonetheless we must ask the question: are vaxxed pilots developing impaired judgement from the COVID vax which is causing them to mishandle the plane midflight? Stew Peters reported that a vaxxed Delta pilot died in flight, and that an emergency landing was required. [MORE]