Nurse Asks Puppeticians, "Why do the protected need protection from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn’t protect the protected in the 1st place?

From [HERE] A California nurse asked a board meeting why vaccines are necessary if they don’t work, in a video going viral on social media.

“Why do the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn’t protect the protected in the first place?” the nurse asks the San Diego County Board of Supervisors.

The Illogic for Mandates is Another Mind Virus: 'You have no right to infect me.' Yet Symptomless, Vaccinated and Otherwise Healthy Persons Can and Do Spread COVID and Vaccines Don't Prevent COVID

Dr. Ladapo is an associate professor at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine.

From the WSJ The Covid-19 pandemic has spurred a remarkable stream of scientific investigation, but that knowledge isn’t translating into better public policy. One example is a zealous pursuit of public mask wearing, a measure that has had, at best, a modest effect on viral transmission. Or take lockdowns, shown by research to increase deaths overall but nonetheless still considered an acceptable solution. This intellectual disconnect now extends to Covid-19 vaccine mandates. The policy is promoted as essential for stopping the spread of Covid-19, though the evidence suggests it won’t.

Mandates infringe on personal autonomy, which can lead to political strife and unintended consequences, but they have value in some situations. In general, however, wise policy making respects the intrinsic value of personal autonomy and seeks the least burdensome path to achieve social gains.

The common argument for vaccine mandates is: You have no right to infect me. But cases are partly driven by asymptomatic and presymptomatic spread—people who are unaware that they even are infected. It isn’t practical to punish adults who have no symptoms. This is why other diseases that can be spread by people without symptoms—such as influenza, genital herpes and hepatitis C—are met with policies like voluntary vaccination drives, screening protocols for sexually transmitted diseases, and clean needle exchange programs for intravenous drug users. Doctors and public health officials used to understand that stopping spread is usually not practical.

Here’s another problem: The vaccines reduce but don’t prevent transmission. Protection from infection appears to wane over time, more noticeably after three to four months, based on a large study of more than 300,000 people in the United Kingdom. As clinical studies from the U.S., Israel, and Qatar show—and many Americans can now personally attest—there is substantial evidence that people who are vaccinated can both contract and contribute to the spread of Covid-19.

This trend has been exacerbated by the Delta variant. The data show that vaccine effectiveness for infection protection fell from roughly 91% to 66% after emergence of the Delta variant, according to a recent CDC report. Data from Israel show rates of protection have declined to less than 40% for some patients. The data still show that people who are vaccinated against Covid-19 are less likely to become infected than people who aren’t vaccinated. People who have recovered from Covid-19 appear to have the most protection of all.

But these realities aren’t informing vaccine policy. When New York Gov. Kathy Hochul discussed expanding vaccine mandates to state-regulated facilities, she said: “We have to let people know when they walk into our facilities that the people that are taking care of them” are “safe themselves and will not spread this.” In fact, the data say they can and will spread it.

….Vaccine mandates can’t end the spread of the virus as effectiveness declines and new variants emerge. So how can they be a sensible policy? Is it sensible to consign tens of millions of people to an indeterminate number of boosters and the threat of job loss if it isn’t clear more doses will stop the spread, either?

The sensible approach, based on the available data, is to promote vaccines for the purpose of preventing serious illness. You don’t need a mandate for this—adults can make their own decisions. But mandates will prolong political conflicts over Covid-19, and they are an increasingly unsustainable strategy designed to achieve an unattainable goal.

Proxymoron Dr. Wen Remixes Failing COVID Logic and Promotes Ignorance/Confusion: 'The Unvaccinated Have No Constitutional Right to Travel and Vaccines are Not Intended to Prevent COVID or Its Spread'

According to FUNKTIONARY:   

a proxymoron is one moron who speaks on behalf of another pluperfect moron or a whole gang of morons. (See Politician, Congressman, Moron-Majority, Delegate, Prozac, Oxymoron & TV).

probot is a propagandizing programmed robot. (An official representative from an organization, agency or institution whose assignment is to make prepared statements and answer "cooked" (prepared) questions at news conferences, briefings and the like. A probot is a proxymoron who conveys programmed disinformation in computerized language and bureaucratese jargon. A probot is one who disseminates lies, distortions and convenient mass truths composed by a superior overruling elite. [MORE]

Is Dr. Wen a Coin-Operated Crisis Actress Hired on Demand by Uncle Brother? Video Surfaces of CNN Interview After the 2013 Boston Bombing. Coincidentally She Worked in the ER and Husband was @ Race

Contrary to Government Lies About ‘Super Safe Vaccines,’ Idaho Doctor Reports a ‘20 times increase’ of Cancer in Vaccinated Patients

From [HERE] A doctor has found an increase in cancers since the COVID-19 inoculation rollout. 

On March 18, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and owner and operator of a diagnostics lab, reported to the public in a video produced by Idaho state government’s  “Capitol Clarity” project,  that he is seeing a massive ‘uptick’ in various autoimmune diseases and cancers in patients who have been vaccinated.  

“Since January 1, in the laboratory, I’m seeing a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis,” reported Dr. Cole in the video clip shared on Twitter.  

“I’m not exaggerating at all because I look at my numbers year over year, I’m like ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before’,” he continued.  

Explaining his findings at the March 18 event, Cole told Idahoans that the vaccines seem to be causing serious autoimmune issues, in a way he described as a “reverse HIV” response. 

Cole explained that two types of cells are required for adequate immune system function: “Helper T-cells,” also called “CD4 cells,” and “killer T-cells,” often known as “CD8 cells.” 

According to Cole, in patients with HIV, there is a massive suppression of “helper T-cells” which cause immune system functions to plummet, and leave the patient susceptible to a variety of illnesses.  

Similarly, Cole describes, “post-vaccine, what we are seeing is a drop in your killer T-cells, in your CD8 cells,” 

“And what do CD8 cells do? They keep all other viruses in check,” he continued. 

Much like HIV causes immune system disruption by suppressing CD4 “helper” cells, the same thing happens when CD8 “killer” cells are suppressed. In Dr. Cole’s expert view, this is what seems to be the case with the COVID-19 jabs.  

Cole goes on to state that as a result of this vaccine-induced “killer T-cell” suppression, he is seeing an “uptick” of not only endometrial cancer, but also melanomas, as well as herpes, shingles, mono, and a “huge uptick” in HPV when “looking at the cervical biopsies of women.”  

This is not the first time the COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to serious issues regarding women’s health. 

According to a German research study, polyethylene glycol, an ingredient found in the Pfizer and Moderna jabs, has been found to pose a “potential toxicity risk” to women’s ovaries.  

Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president at Pfizer, has cited the German study as a possible explanation for the large number of menstrual irregularities and miscarriages being reported by vaccinated women.  

Yeadon warns young women to avoid the vaccine for, in his expert opinion as a toxicologist, the shots will likely impede a woman’s ability to get pregnant and carry a baby to term.  

Dr. Cole states in his video that, not only are melanomas showing up more frequently, like endometrial cancers, the melanomas are also developing more rapidly, and are more severe in younger people, than he has ever previously witnessed. 

“Most concerning of all, there is a pattern of these types of immune cells in the body keeping cancer in check,” stated the doctor. 

“I’m seeing invasive melanomas in younger patients; normally we catch those early, and they are thin melanomas, [but] I’m seeing thick melanomas skyrocketing in the last month or two,” he added. 

Cole came into prominence in January of 2021 when the Idaho government put in place an effort called “Capitol Clarity,” with the stated goal of keeping Idahoans informed about the facts surrounding COVID-19.  

Capitol Clarity has since hosted Dr. Ryan Cole multiple times to provide information to the public about vaccine safety and COVID-19 measures more broadly.  

The videos of Dr. Cole at these events, which were originally posted on YouTube, have since been deleted by the Google owned video platform in a continual effort of censorship by Big Tech. 

“You’re not being told the truth,” said Yeadon “Thinking about this, I try to imagine that I was speaking to my own young adult daughters, for whom I would be very concerned if they got these vaccines.” 

Latino Denver Cop Crippled after Being Forced to Take Pfizer Shot to Keep His Job. Prior to the Injection he was Healthy, Now He Can't Walk

In a very emotional interview, Denver police officer Jose Manriquez, appearing on Fox News along with his attorney, explains how he reluctantly took the Pfizer COVID-19 shot in order to keep his job, and now can no longer walk by himself. He is a 34-year-old father of four and military veteran who had recovered from COVID-19, and was allegedly in good health prior to receiving the Pfizer shot. [MORE]

Physician ‘Horribly Injured’ and “Incapacitated" after Pfizer Vaccine. She Plead w/US Public Health Officials for Help — Got Dissed

From [HERE] Danice Hertz, a 64-year-old physician who was “horribly ill” and “incapacitated” after getting Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, claims U.S. health agencies are ignoring thousands of adverse events.

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Hertz said if she could go back in time, she would not have gotten vaccinated.

Hertz said she has been in contact with numerous health agencies, physicians and researchers — including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Surgeon General and doctors at Harvard and Stanford universities and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles — in an effort to obtain help for the neurological injuries she suffered after getting the vaccine.

Hertz told The Defender there are thousands of people like her — who have been injured by COVID vaccines — who are suffering and need help, yet they’re ignored by mainstream media and U.S. health agencies. Meanwhile, COVID vaccine mandates are being rolled out for millions of Americans, with barely any discussion of the risks.

Hertz, a gastroenterologist who retired in October, got her first and only dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on Dec. 23, 2020. “There was an opportunity to get the vaccine because the hospital was giving it to every doctor,” Hertz said. “I didn’t know if I would need to go back into the workforce, so I ran to get it. Within 30 minutes, I started experiencing adverse effects.”

“I waited the 15 minutes you’re required to wait after you get it, and I went to the car and my face started burning,” Hertz said. “I drove home five minutes away, and by the time I walked through the door, I told my husband to call the paramedics.”

Hertz said within 24 hours she developed neurological symptoms, including severe paresthesiasin her face, tongue, scalp, chest wall and limbs, as well as tremors, twitching, weakness, headaches, tinnitus and imbalance.

“My blood pressure was 186 over 127, which I’ve come to find is characteristic of these reactions,” Hertz said.

Hertz called her doctor, and took Benadryl and steroids in case she was having an allergic reaction. The next day her face turned completely numb.

Hertz said:

“My entire face felt like it was burning — like acid had been poured on my face. I had sensations throughout my body like it was vibrating. I felt like I had a tight band around my chest, chest pain and shortness of breath, and I went to bed for seven days.”

Hertz followed up with an allergist who treated her with steroids in case she was experiencing an allergic reaction to the vaccine. After a few weeks of no improvement, Hertz met with the chief neurologist at Cedars-Sinai.

“I saw six neurologists, five allergists, three rheumatologists, and no one had a clue,” Hertz said. “They did blood work, skin biopsies, an MRI and more, and nothing really came up. Unfortunately, if a doctor doesn’t know what’s wrong with you they’re done with you, though that’s not how I practiced.”

“Early on, when Hertz was evaluated by the first neurologist, Hertz requested a “CISA consult” with the CDC.”

According to the CDC’s website, the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Project was established in 2001 to address the unmet vaccine safety clinical research needs of the U.S.

CISA is a national network of vaccine safety experts from the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office and seven medical research centers, plus other partners who address vaccine safety issues, conduct high-quality clinical research and assess complex clinical adverse events following vaccination.

The CISA Project also provides consultation to U.S. clinicians who have vaccine safety questions about a specific patient residing in the U.S. It also provides consultation to U.S. healthcare providers and public health partners on vaccine safety issues, and reviews clinical adverse events following immunization involving U.S.-licensed vaccines.

Hertz’s case was accepted into the CISA Project and was presented at the CDC’s grand rounds on March 24. Five weeks later, a physician forwarded a letter to Hertz suggesting she had “mast cell disorder.”

The CISA Project never followed up with her. [MORE]

The Vested Interests Manipulate COVID Deaths by Pretending that Dying w/COVID is the Same as Dying from COVID. Deaths from heart attack, car accident, etc Counted IF they test positive pre/postmortem

The CDC and mainstream news have manipulated numbers and minds since Covid hit the U.S. They refer to the CDC as the “experts” but the only thing they are experts at is manipulating numbers.

The CDC task force and health department officials have all stated they are including anyone who dies from a heart attack, stroke, car accident, gunshot wound, kidney failure, or any other cause of death, as a “Covid death” IF they test positive with Covid pre or postmortem. Unfortunately, all most people here is that over half a million Americans have died FROM this virus. Imagine how the above percentages would drastically change, if the real numbers were published.

The HardTruth states, If it really was a pandemic the governments would not have to lie or inflate the death figures to make the people believe that more people are dying of covid than they really were.  You wouldn’t have to say for instance that someone who has been battling cancer for 6 years and then died didn’t die of cancer but died of Covid because they tested positive (PCR Test does not test for Covid) for Covid within 28 days.  Does that mean if you tested positive for covid and then 25 days later you fall down the stairs and die you would go into the covid death statistics?

Clearly they are inflating the covid deaths to create fear amongst the public, so that they will accept the draconian lockdowns and restrictions which is all aimed at the endgame of you taking the covid vaccine so that they can bring in covid vaccine passports for any human activity.

Dr. Vernon Coleman - “Some pathologists have decreed that dead patients who have the coronavirus must now be cremated without examination. I’ve seen a briefing which states: `If a death is believed to be due to confirmed COVID-19 infection there is unlikely to be any need for a post-mortem examination to be conducted and the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death should be issued’. The key word here is surely `believed’.  Knowing that nowhere near enough people are dying of the coronavirus to justify the oppressive new measures they’ve introduced, the authorities are quietly making sure that most of the people who die are classified as coronavirus deaths. Indeed, there is some evidence that people are being classified as coronavirus victims without ever having been tested. It seems that Britain is doing what the Italians did – if a patient has the virus and they die then they died of the virus. But I suspect we’re going one step further. If someone who dies is thought to have had the virus, or might have had the virus, then they are coronavirus victims and their death is added to the total. The lack of testing makes this easy.  Today, it is clear that the cure, not the problem, is causing the crisis.  Right at the beginning of the coronavirus affair I pointed out that according to the World Health Organization, the ordinary flu kills between 250,000 and 600,000 people a year – most of them in the winter months. I said that if the coronavirus hadn’t killed between 100,000 and 150,000 people around the world by the middle of April then it would be clear that it was not as dangerous as we had been told and, indeed, not as dangerous as the flu.  Well, the authorities are claiming that the death rate from the corona has now reached 100,000.  So is the coronavirus as deadly as the mathematicians and the politicians said it was?  No – because they have fiddled the figures.  Today, anyone who has the coronavirus, or is thought to have it even though they have not been tested, will be put down as having died of the coronavirus. Time and time again, the authorities report that someone died `with’ the disease. Not `of’ the disease. And yet those patients are put down as having died as a result of the coronavirus.  So, if you fall downstairs and break your neck, but you had a cough before you died, then you will be classified as a coronavirus death. If you had a heart attack but were thought to have the coronavirus then you officially died of the coronavirus rather than the heart attack. A lack of widespread testing makes this possible. And post mortems have been abandoned for many patients.  In my second video I explained why the Italian figures for coronavirus deaths cannot be trusted – indeed, 88% of those who officially died of the coronavirus almost certainly died of something else. The evidence for that is on my website. And in the UK, Imperial College (which originally forecast the coronavirus would kill 500,000 people in the UK) has apparently admitted that two thirds of the people who have been listed as having died of the coronavirus would have died anyway – of something else.  I have no doubt that the figures have been distorted in the same way in other countries.  So, using figures from UK and Italy, the total worldwide number of deaths from the coronavirus is, at most, probably between a quarter and a third of the alleged current total – that is it may be between 25,000 and 33,000 but is probably considerably lower.  And that makes the coronavirus far less deadly than a mild strain of the flu. It is certainly absurd to compare it to the plague as has frequently been done by hysterical commentators. The plague killed 40% of the population when it swept through Europe. And to compare the coronavirus to the Second World War is an insult to those soldiers and civilians who lived through those terrible years” –Dr. Vernon Coleman – Author of over 100 books which have, together, sold over two million copies in the UK alone. He has contributed articles and stories to hundreds of other publications including The Sunday Times, Observer, Guardian, Daily Telegraph, Sunday Telegraph, Daily Express, Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday. http://www.vernoncoleman.com/main.htm

​Here in the video below it is admitted that if you attend hospital with a broken leg and you get a positive test for Covid while in hospital you go down as an official covid case, even though you have no symptoms of Covid. If rushed to hospital with heart attack and then come up positive test with covid while in hospital and then you die in hospital you go down in the stats as a covid death, even though you have no symptoms of covid.  That is called fraud and deception and that is how they get the covid deaths and cases high and then they lock the country down on these statistics. 100,000+ U.K covid deaths? I don't think so. [MORE]

Study Finds that Governments are Undercounting Police Killings. Btw 1980 and 2018 Cops Killed 30,800 People; 55% misclassified or unreported. The highest under-reporting was for Blacks

From [HERE] A peer-reviewed study published last week in The Lancet found that 30,800 people died from police violence in the U.S. between 1980 and 2018—and 17,100 of them (more than 55%) were misclassified or unreported in official vital statistics reports.

Researchers also found that Black Americans were 3.5 times more likely to be killed by police than white Americans. Nearly 60% of these deaths were not attributed to police violence in government data. That’s the highest level of underreporting for any group.

Hispanic people of any race and non-Hispanic Indigenous people were about 1.8 times more likely to die from police violence than white people, the researchers found.

Inaccurate data minimizes the problem of police violence, Fablina Sharara, one of the lead authors, told USA TODAY.

“Recent high-profile police killings of Black people have drawn worldwide attention to this urgent public health crisis, but the magnitude of this problem can’t be fully understood without reliable data,” she said in a press release. “Inaccurately reporting or misclassifying these deaths further obscures the larger issue of systemic racism that is embedded in many U.S. institutions, including law enforcement.”

Researchers at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington compared data from the U.S. National Vital Statistics System to three non-governmental, open-source databases on police violence: Fatal Encounters, Mapping Police Violence, and The Counted. The federal government has used NVSS to track deaths from law enforcement since 1949.

“These figures show a system of violent and fatal policing in the USA that is unfairly and unevenly applied across race and ethnicity,” The Lancet’s editorial board wrote. The medical journal identified the study as the most accurate and comprehensive assessment of police killings in America to date.

Previous research has found similar rates of underreporting and racial disparities, but this study stands out for the lengthy time period it examined—nearly four decades.

Over that period, researchers found the overall mortality rate due to police violence increased by more than 38%, even though crime has declined since the early 1990s. In 2019, more men died in the U.S. from police violence than from Hodgkin lymphoma or testicular cancer.

One of the starkest findings was that racial disparities in police shootings have actually widened since 2000, IHME director Dr. Christopher Murray told The New York Times.

Under-reporting varied widely across states, the researchers found. From 1980 to 2018, the top five states with the highest under-reporting rates were Oklahoma, with an estimated 83.7% of deaths misclassified; Wyoming, with 79.1%; Alabama, with 76.9%; Louisiana, with 75.7%; and Nebraska, with 72.9%.

The states with the highest mortality rate from police violence were Oklahoma, Washington, D.C., Arizona, Alaska, Nevada, and Wyoming.

“I think the big takeaway is that most people in public health tend to take vital statistics for the U.S. and other countries as the absolute truth, and it turns out, as we show, the vital statistics are missing more than half of the police violence deaths,” Dr. Murray told the Times.

“You have to look for why those deaths that are being picked up by the open-source investigations, looking in the media and elsewhere, aren’t showing up in the official statistics. That does point to the system of medical examiners and the incentives that may exist for them to want to not classify a death as related to police violence.”

The researchers found that some deaths were misclassified because coroners and medical examiners failed to indicate police involvement on the death certificate or assigned the wrong codes in the national database.

But the study also pointed to “substantial conflicts of interest” that could discourage medical examiners and coroners from indicating police involvement, including the fact that many of them work for or are embedded within police departments.

In a 2011 survey of National Association of Medical Examiners members cited in the study, 22% of respondents reported that they had been pressured by an elected official or appointee to change the cause or manner of death on a death certificate. [MORE]

Body Cavity Search Case Allowed to Proceed: Suit Claims Boston Cops and Hospital Doctor Forcibly Subjected a Suspected Drug Dealer to 2 Anal Cavity Searches w/o a warrant, While Handcuffed and Sedated

From [HERE] A federal judge refused to dismiss emotional distress claims against a hospital accused of subjecting a suspected drug dealer to two anal cavity searches without a warrant. The suspect testified that he now suffers from loss of sleep, difficulty eating, and suicidal thoughts due to the experience, and it remains disputed whether the attending physician who performed the searches was employed by the hospital, Steward Medical Group, Inc. (SMG).

According the court, the complaint stated,

On May 13, 2015, Dyer was arrested for drug possession. After a “physical altercation,” Dyer “began having chest pains.” Emergency medical technicians instructed police officers Crossen and Lai to escort Dyer to Carney Hospital. In the ambulance, Crossen told Dyer that he believed Dyer had drugs hidden in his rectum, and “that ‘he’ was going to give [Dyer] a rectal exam.”

When they arrived at Carney Hospital, Crossen told Dyer he would order a doctor to conduct an anal cavity search. Crossen instructed hospital staff to place Dyer on a gurney face-down, and Crossen and Lai handcuffed Riley to the bottom of the gurney. Crossen and Lai then removed Riley’s clothes. Crossen then allegedly “slapped” Riley’s bare buttocks and made offensive remarks referring to Dyer as his “bitch,” at which point Riley screamed for help. Crossen then digitally penetrated Dyer’s rectum. Dyer continued screaming for help.

Dr. Riley entered the room and saw Crossen removing his fingers from Dyer. Dr. Riley then left the room with Crossen and Lai. Outside, Crossen and Lai informed Dr. Riley that Dyer had “a history of packing drugs, hypodermic needles and other weapons in his rectum.” When they returned, Dr. Riley explained that Crossen and Lai told him that Dyer “got caught with drugs in [his] buttocks today” and that the officers had asked Dr. Riley to perform a rectal exam on Dyer. Dr. Riley asked Dyer if he had drugs in his rectum, and Dyer denied having any drugs. Dr. Riley asked Dyer to consent to an anal cavity search, but Dyer refused. D. 1-1 ¶ 24. Dr. Riley then “drugged or sedated” Dyer, told Lai and Crossen to hold Dyer down as Dyer continued to protest, and inserted two fingers into Dyer’s rectum. Nurses, hearing Dyer, occasionally “yell[ed] and open[ed] the curtain” to keep Dyer quiet. Dr. Riley then took an x-ray of Dyer’s pelvis.

The court’s order denying the request to dismiss stated:

The following facts are undisputed. Dyer was arrested on May 13, 2015 for suspected involvement in a drug transaction. During the arrest, Dyer stated he was experiencing chest pains. Subsequently, Dyer was transported to Carney Hospital for treatment, id., where he was treated by Dr. Reily, Dr. Reily is an employee of SMG. Dyer contends that there are additional facts that support his opposition to the summary judgment motion. Namely, Dyer alleges that he was forcibly subjected to two anal cavity searches without a warrant, first by Crossen and then by Dr. Reily. D. 103 ¶¶ 25, 31, 33, 39. Dyer claims that Carney Hospital staff heard as he screamed for help during the searches. Id.

Dyer also argues that he did not consent to receiving medication or x-ray imaging of his abdomen and pelvis ordered by Dr. Reily. Id. ¶¶ 35, 40. Without Dyer’s consent, id. ¶ 40, Dr. Reily communicated to Crossen and Lai that the x-rays showed that Dyer “had not secreted any drugs or contraband in his body,”

Archaeologists Find a Rare 2,700-yr-old Toilet in Israel and IsrAliens Pretend It's Part of Their Past, Continuing the Masquerade that Europeans Somehow Have Genetic, Historic Ties to Afrikan Hebrews

From [HERE] Overlooking a sea of Jerusalem stone buildings and King Solomon’s First Temple, a wealthy man from the 7th century B.C. built himself a palace where he could appreciate what is still recognized as one of the best views of the ancient city. Perhaps a man of royal blood or political power, he probably broadcast his affluence by hosting dignitaries and displaying intricate pottery and stone architecture, experts said.

He also appreciated a rare luxury — a toilet.

The rectangular-shaped limestone commode is about 2,700 years old, the Israel Antiquities Authority announced Tuesday. Archaeologists discovered it as part of an excavation of the palace at Armon Hanatziv in southern Jerusalem.

“It’s very rare,” Yaakov Billig, the archaeologist from the Israel Antiquities Authority who oversaw the excavation, said in an interview with The Washington Post. “So this guy was well off.”

Archaeologists are frequently excavating areas of Israel, and particularly in Jerusalem. The findings are a tourist draw, and many of the antiques are sent to museums or studied by experts.

Eli Eskosido, director of the Israel Antiquities Authority, said the discoveries, particularly the toilet, are “fascinating.”

“Jerusalem never ceases to amaze,” Eskosido said in a statement to The Post. “I am convinced that the glorious past of the city will continue to be revealed to us in the future and will allow us to experience and learn about our past.” [MORE] OUR PAST? Is he deluded from false consciousness programming, racist projection or PCP?

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Israeliens - imposter (pale interloper alien) Hebrews—Eastern European stock Caucasians who adopted the philosophy, myths, fables, and traditions of the so-called "Jews" while living in Russia—masquerading as if they had any genetic or historical ancestry and cultural heritage to the Afrikan Hebrews, the Afrim people, who occupied Canaan (Palestine) from ancient times. 2) those who currently are occupying Palestine (the land of Canaan), colonizing and killing its rightful descendants, historic owners and dwellers), and are undeniably alien (foreign—not aboriginal) to that land. 3) imposter Hebrews originating from the Pale of Settlement in Kazzarian Russia currently an occupying force (militarily holed-up and propped-up by US financial support and British skullduggery) in occupied Palestine. 4) alien Jews—Pinchbeck Hebrews. Israeliens are East Europeans with no genetic or actual historic ties whatsoever to the land now called Palestine. Israeliens have brainwashed (and fooled themselves and many others into believing this historical lie and propaganda that they are the descendants of "Jews" (a misnomer for African Hebrews, itself a misnomer for the Afrim people). Anyone with a modicum of research skills, knowledge of basic geography, philology, and an unbiased-by-religious-myth mind can easily confirm or validate this fact for his or herself. Both so-called Sephardic and Askanazzim "Jews" are not historically tied to the Afrim. It's not that Caucasians who have adopted the "Jewish" religion shouldn't have a place to live—but how about suggesting relocating where they came from—the hills of Russia, and not on another peoples" land. You don't invade (break into) someone's house (property) and expect them to just go away and not fight to get it back (despite how much force, murdering, deception, and propaganda that is brought to bear to justify such wrongful invasion and genocide). Psychological repression is both invisible and reflexive. (See: Zionism, USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, Genocide, Immigrant Human, Evolution, Caucasian, Pilgarlick, El & Judaism)

Yurugu Always Stealing from Blacks: Judge Rules Robinhood's Unauthorized Use of Ice Cube’s Image and Phrase 'Check yo self before you wreck yo self' in an Advertisement Didn't Imply His Endorsement

From [HERE] A federal Magistrate Judge in California dismissed a trademark suit against Robinhood brought by rapper and actor O’Shea Jackson, also known as Ice Cube, who claimed the financial trading app’s use of his image and paraphrasing of his catchphrase “Check yo self before you wreck yo self” deceptively created the impression that he endorses the company’s services. According to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler’s (a white Obama appointee) ruling:

The graphic and caption illustrate Robinhood’s online article describing a market correction for tech stocks. The original line from Ice Cube’s song is “” which Robinhood paraphrased as “Correct yourself before you wreck yourself.” “Check yo self” is also Ice Cube’s catchphrase. He claims that by using his image and catchphrase, Robinhood created the false and deceptive commercial impression that Ice Cube endorses Robinhood’s services and violated the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A).1 The court previously dismissed the case for lack of standing because the plaintiff did not plausibly plead that Robinhood’s use of Ice Cube’s identity suggested his endorsement of Robinhood’s products. The amended complaint does not cure the previous complaint’s deficiencies. The court thus grants Robinhood’s motion to dismiss.

The amended complaint cites congressional testimony and SEC filings to illustrate that Robinhood Snacks is a commercial product that entices new users to sign up for the app and offers digestible educational content that also satisfies certain financial regulatory requirements.3 It adds allegations about its demographics and the appeal of celebrities like Ice Cube (and its celebrity endorsers Jay-Z, Nas, and Snoop Dog) to support the point that using Ice Cube’s picture and phrase created consumer confusion and suggested Ice Cube’s endorsement of its products.

The amended complaint falls for the same defect found in the original: it does not sufficiently plead an injury in fact because Robinhood’s use of Ice Cube’s image and phrase does not suggest Ice Cube’s endorsement of Robinhood’s product.

Ice Cube is a celebrity. If the unauthorized use of his image suggested his endorsement of Robinhood, then he would suffer injury in fact. But the image and phrase are not an endorsement: they illustrate a point in the newsletter about a market correction in tech stocks

Haitians are Not His Kind of Blacks: Black Lives Matter to Biden So Long as They Can Vote and Refugees are Prohibited from Voting. Blight House Softens Guidelines but Resumes Non-White Deportations

From [HERE] and [HERE] The Biden administration’s struggles with immigration continued this week as its efforts to continue expelling asylum-seeking families overshadowed its announcement that most undocumented people in the U.S. will not be targeted for deportation.

President Joe Biden took office promising to build a “fair and humane” immigration system and restore America’s reputation as a welcoming place for refugees and asylum applicants, which he said had been tarnished by the hardline tactics of his predecessor Donald Trump.

Republicans claim Biden has caused a crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border by rolling out a welcome mat for all immigrants, but many are being removed as quickly as they arrive.

The administration is still enforcing a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention pandemic-related order known as Title 42, implemented last year by Trump, under which most immigrants are removed from U.S. soil without a chance to apply for asylum.

The government has used Title 42 as grounds to boot more than 937,000 people since October 2020, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

That number has grown significantly in the past two weeks as the Biden administration sent more than 50 planeloads of Haitians — about 5,000 in all — back to their home country, said Nina Raoul, co-founder of the New York-based aid group Haitian Women for Haitian Refugees, on a press call Friday.

A federal judge recently ordered Homeland Security to stop Title 42 expulsions of immigrant families. Before that injunction took effect, DHS obtained a stay order Thursday from the D.C. Circuit of Appeals.

The move was widely condemned by immigrant advocates.

“The administration chose to further promulgate the Trump administration’s racist and xenophobic policies by appealing the case and then proceeding to expel thousands of Haitians from Del Rio, Texas,” said Tami Goodlette, director of litigation for the Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services.

“The Biden administration has lost its way and needs to remember its promises from the election,” she continued.

E.L. is one of thousands of Haitians who crossed the Rio Grande into Del Rio last month and gathered under a bridge connecting the U.S. and Mexico in hopes of applying for asylum.

Speaking through an interpreter on the press call Friday, E.L., identified only by her initials, said she arrived there with her children. They endured frigid nights with no blankets to cover them as they slept in the open atop a sheet.

DHS officials said they provided food, water and medical aid to the group. But E.L. noted she saw men who crossed back into Mexico to buy food for their wives and children were blocked from returning by lariat-wielding Border Patrol agents on horses.

DHS opened an investigation after photos and videos of the agents went viral and is expected to release its findings next week.

Biden's Homeland Security Strawboss Magically Grants ICE Cops More "Authority" to Arrest, Deport and Initiate Other Unprovoked Acts of Violence Against "Non-Whites" who Cross an Imaginary "Border"

From [HERE] Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas is revising guidelines governing which immigrants in the country illegally should be targets for arrest or deportation, to give U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers more discretion following complaints from ICE officers and some Republicans that the Biden administration’s initial approach was too restrictive.

Under the new set of guidelines, which will become effective in 60 days, ICE officers would have the latitude to decide which immigrants pose a public-safety threat, rather than follow strict categories the administration put in place earlier this year making only immigrants who have committed aggravated felonies—a term used in immigration law that captures some of the most severe crimes, including murder, rape and human trafficking—eligible for arrest or deportation.

The updated guidelines respond to complaints from ICE officers that they weren’t being allowed to pursue dangerous felons who had committed other offenses—ICE briefly put off an operation to pursue sex offenders under the Biden administration’s initial set of guidelines—as well as lawsuits from Texas and other conservative states claiming they were too restrictive.

Under the new guidelines, officers are given a set of factors to consider when deciding whether an immigrant poses a current public-safety threat, Mr. Mayorkas said on a call with reporters on Thursday.

“To treat people and questions of public-safety threats categorically like that actually is not effective and could lead to ineffective and unjust results,” Mr. Mayorkas said. “And so therefore we are requiring and, frankly, empowering our workforce to exercise their judgment.”

The new factors to consider include the harm suffered by the victim of the crime in question, the length of the immigrant’s prison sentence, the sophistication of the crime and whether or not the immigrant used a gun.

The guidance also encourages officers to weigh potential mitigating factors, such as how long ago the crime occurred, whether the immigrant is too young or old, and what sort of effect deporting the immigrant would have on his or her family members.

Mr. Mayorkas’s guidelines also allow immigration officers to go after anyone they deem poses a national-security or border-security threat—defined as anyone who crossed the border illegally after Nov. 1, 2020. The Department of Homeland Security and the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute both estimate there are about 11 million immigrants in the country without a permanent legal status, and under the Biden administration’s priorities most of them wouldn’t be targets for deportation.

“In exercising our discretion,” the updated guidelines state, “we are guided by the fact that the majority of undocumented noncitizens who could be subject to removal have been contributing members of our communities for years.”

The memo directs ICE officers not to deport someone if they have a pending visa or another form of humanitarian relief available. It also states immigrants shouldn’t become targets for deportation if they speak out about workplace or landlord mistreatment, or become witnesses to investigations about unscrupulous employers or landlords.

Video Shows a White Gwinnett Cop Pull a Black Man Over, Order Him Out w/Hands up and then Punch Him in the face. As He Lay Facedown Another White Cop Ran up and Stomped on His Head, Suit filed

From [HERE] Demetrius Hollins says he wants his lawsuit to send a message to police.

On Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Atlanta, the Gwinnett County man sued the county, the former police chief, and the two cops who assaulted him in 2017.

Sgt. Michael Bongiovanni had pulled Hollins over for a license plate issue, and shortly after Hollins exited the car with his hands up, the sergeant punched him in the face, bystander video showed. As Hollins lay facedown, apparently not resisting, officer Robert McDonald ran up and stomped Hollins’ head.

“I don’t want anyone else to experience the pain and horror I did,” Hollins said. “My hope is that this lawsuit serves as a reminder that members of law enforcement need to treat people with respect. I shouldn’t be receiving justice simply because of a video.”

The video tore across the internet with people throughout the U.S. holding it up as an example of brutality against Blacks by white police.

The lawsuit accuses Gwinnett police leaders of ignoring a pattern of excessive force and falsified reports that should have raised alarm about both officers, particularly when they worked together.

“(Then-Police Chief Butch Ayers) and the county had knowledge that Bongiovanni and McDonald had a history of using excessive force when responding to calls together,” the lawsuit says, “but nevertheless took no action to provide additional training, counseling, or discipline to either officer, and further took no action to restrict either of them from responding to calls together.”

The Police Department didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Former police chief Ayers, now executive director of the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police, sent this statement: “Although I disagree with many of the allegations made in the complaint, the matter is under litigation and as such, I am not able to provide any further comment at this time.”

In Bongiovanni’s 18 years at the agency, the suit alleges, his use-of-force reports often portrayed him deploying his Taser or punching people in the face to “gain compliance” — even when it wasn’t clear why the person was considered a physical threat. Still, he was never disciplined.

For him, McDonald and others, Gwinnett police leadership “rubber-stamped” questionable use-of-force instances for years, according to the lawsuit, filed on Hollins’ behalf by civil rights attorney L. Chris Stewart.

In another case, according to the lawsuit, McDonald, at a supervisor’s suggestion, claimed in a report that a man had been injured when police found him. But officers had, in fact, beaten him severely, the lawsuit says.

Bongiovanni and McDonald were fired after the video of Hollins’ assault went viral. The chief called it disturbing.

A grand jury subsequently indicted both officers.

Bongiovanni pleaded no contest in 2019 to aggravated assault and was sentenced to six months in a jail work-release program, followed by five months of house arrest. McDonald was convicted by a jury and sentenced to 10 years’ probation with the first 11 months on house arrest.

Philly to Pay $2M After an Army of Lathered Up Cops Swarmed to a Black Woman's Car, Broke the Windows, Pulled Her Out and Beat Her in the Street; Niggerizing her and her Child who was in Backseat

From [HERE] The city of Philadelphia will pay $2 million to a 29-year-old mother who was pulled from her SUV during civil unrest last October and beaten by police then separated from her toddler — a scene captured on video and shared widely on social media.

The city said Monday that it had reached the agreement after negotiations with lawyers for Rickia Young, a North Philadelphia home health-care aide who the video showed tried to drive through mayhem and then was swarmed by officers who bashed in her windows. She did not file a lawsuit.

A police officer and a sergeant were fired in May as a result of their conduct during the incident, and an additional 15 officers are awaiting disciplinary proceedings, department officials said Monday.

Police Commissioner Danielle Outlaw said in a statement that “instead of fighting crime and the fear of crime, some of the officers on the scene created an environment that terrorized Rickia Young, her family, and other members of the public.”

Young’s attorneys called on District Attorney Larry Krasner to file criminal charges against the officers involved. Krasner said Monday he couldn’t confirm a criminal investigation. He said that, in general, investigating police behavior during chaotic incidents “presents a challenge in terms of locating body-worn cameras for the individuals involved.”

“When you have a situation that is somewhat fluid on the street,” he said, “it is more difficult to reconstruct exactly what officer was where, when.”

A Police Department spokesperson said Sgt. David Chisholm, a 13-year veteran who worked in the 26th Police District, was fired for violating departmental policies, including inappropriate communications or conduct while on duty, use of force, and lying or attempting to deceive during a departmental investigation.

Police Officer Darren Kardos, a seven-year veteran who worked in the 19th Police District, was fired for excessive use of force and physical abuse with a baton.

A spokesperson for the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 5, the union that represents Philadelphia police officers, did not respond to a request for comment.

The incident happened just before 2 a.m. on Oct. 27, hours after two police officers fatally shot Walter Wallace Jr., a 27-year-old Black man who relatives said was experiencing a mental health crisis that afternoon and lunged toward police while wielding a knife.

Protests erupted within hours, and some in West Philadelphia began burglarizing stores and vandalizing police vehicles. Dozens of officers were hurt, including one who was hospitalized after someone struck her with a pickup truck.

Young said she went to West Philadelphia to pick up her friend’s teenage son, whom she refers to as her nephew. She said she was driving down Chestnut Street toward 52nd Street when she encountered agitators who were throwing debris at police. She tried to make a U-turn, she said, when about two dozen police officers, some with shields, encircled her vehicle and demanded she get out.

Some officers can be seen on a bystander’s cellphone video smashing the windows, then pulling Young and the teenager out of the vehicle and beating them while they were on the ground.

Neither was charged with a crime.

As officers handcuffed Young and put her in a police wagon, others could be seen on the video pulling the toddler out of the backseat of the vehicle. Young’s mother said she found the child with officers in a cruiser in Center City miles away.

Last week, Young filed a lawsuit against the National Fraternal Order of Police, which two days after the incident posted a photo of a Philadelphia police officer holding Young’s then-2-year-old son. Philadelphia Police said investigators could not determine who took the photo.

Stockton Cops Indicted for Felony Assault after Beating Black Teen in Fetal Position on the Ground

From [HERE] Two former Stockton, California officers were indicted by a grand jury in connection with their alleged beating of a Black teenager at the end of a car chase in 2020.

The Sept. 1 grand jury indictment against Michael Stiles and Omar Villapudua alleges felony assault by a public officer, assault with force likely to cause great bodily injury, and great bodily injury enhancements for both. It was unsealed Friday.

"This indictment reminds all of us that when police use unlawful force they undermine community trust," San Joaquin County District Attorney Tori Verber Salazar said at a news conference.

She said two other officers investigated by her office for their role in the encounter faced no allegations, but she couldn't say why because the grand jury's transcripts were still sealed. Stiles and Villapudua were fired by the city in spring for acting outside the department's policy and training, Stockton Police Chief Eric Jones said at the time.

Carter's family is in the midst of a federal lawsuit against the city and the officers who detained the boy following the Dec. 30 chase. Their attorney, John Burris, released photos of Carter's face bruised and swollen and compared the violence against him to that used by Los Angeles Police Department officers against Rodney King in 1991.

Body camera video and audio released by the lawyer has the teenager saying, "I'm not resisting" and "OK, OK, OK. I'm down" as he suffers blows in what Carter described as the fetal position.

"Devin was afraid that the officers were going to beat him to death," Burris said in a statement in April.

The boy's father, George Carter, said at a news conference Friday that he believes he will suffer "lifelong trauma."

Prosecutors, he said, have "taken a step towards making things right."

The teen was wanted for alleged reckless driving and led officers on a chase for a few minutes until his vehicle was spun out in what law enforcement describes as the pursuit intervention technique, or PIT maneuver, according to police and court documents.

The police union alleged Carter caused a crash between a law enforcement vehicle and a civilian's car during the pursuit.

Carter was temporarily booked into juvenile detention facility on charges of evading and resisting arrest.

The next court hearing in the indictment was scheduled for Nov. 11. It's not entirely clear what sentence the district attorney would request for Stiles and Villapudua if they're successfully convicted.

"We're not even close to having that conversation," Salazar said.

white supremacy trivia: In the History of Law Enforcement How Many Black Cops Have Killed a White Person? Less than 5? Court Reverses Murder Conviction of Black Minn Cop Who Fatally Shot a White Woman

“In Death of a Dark Nation” Anon explains, “It is rare for a white police officer to be punished for using excessive force against a black man, woman, or child. It is just as rare for a black police officer to use excessive force against a white person.

In fact, the authors were unable to find a single instance of a black police officer shooting or killing an unarmed white person in the history of modern law enforcement. This is not surprising but it is absolute proof that the black individual operating within a system of white supremacy cannot mistreat whites even if he or she is wearing a uniform, a badge, and carrying a gun." 

Note than Anon is also necessarily saying that it is even more rare for a Black cop to get away shooting or killing an unarmed white person. BW can only find 2 perhaps 3 episodes [Dillion Taylor in Utah and allegedly Ofc Christopher Dorner in LA] involving a Black cop shooting an unarmed white person in the history of modern law enforcement. The cop who shot Taylor was not charged. If you know of any others let us know. [MORE]

---

From [HERE] The Minnesota Supreme Court on Wednesday reversed the third-degree murder conviction of a former Minneapolis police officer who fatally shot an Australian woman in 2017, saying the charge doesn't fit the circumstances in this case. Mohamed Noor was convicted of third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in the death of Justine Ruszczyk Damond, a dual U.S.-Australian citizen who called 911 to report a possible sexual assault behind her home.

Noor was sentenced to 12 1/2 years on the murder count but was not sentenced for manslaughter. 

The ruling means his murder conviction is overturned and the case will now go back to the district court, where he will be sentenced on the manslaughter count. He has already served more than 28 months of his murder sentence. If sentenced to the presumptive four years for manslaughter, he could be eligible for supervised release around the end of this year.

In the ruling, the Supreme Court said that for a third-degree murder charge, also known as "depraved-mind murder," the person's mental state must show a "generalized indifference to human life, which cannot exist when the defendant's conduct is directed with particularity at the person who is killed."

The justices said that the only reasonable inference that can be drawn in Noor's case is that his conduct was directed with particularity at Damond, "and the evidence is therefore insufficient to sustain his conviction ... for depraved-mind murder." [MORE]