New German Autopsy Report Reveals People Who "Died Suddenly but who Weren’t Sick" were Likely Killed By COVID Injections

Dr. John Campbell describes a new report, published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, that details autopsies carried out at Heidelberg University Hospital in 2021.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5

New German Autopsy Report Reveals Those Who Died Suddenly Were Likely Killed By The Covid Vaccine
https://rumble.com/v1zuxar-new-german-autopsy-report-reveals-those-who-died-suddenly-were-likely-kille.html

New Autopsy Report Reveals Those Who Died Suddenly Were Likely Killed by the Covid Vaccine
https://brownstone.org/articles/new-autopsy-report-reveals-those-who-died-suddenly-were-likely-killed-by-the-covid-vaccine/

New German Autopsy Report Reveals Those Who Died Suddenly Were Likely Killed By The Covid Vaccine
https://brownstone.org/articles/new-autopsy-report-reveals-those-who-died-suddenly-were-likely-killed-by-the-covid-vaccine/

COVID-19 - Mystery Clots In Vaccinated Deceased People
https://sunfellow.com/covid19-blood-clots-in-vaccinated-dead-people/

Died Suddenly (Full Documentary, Not Suitable For Children)
https://rumble.com/v1wcesu-died-suddenly-full-documentary-not-suitable-for-children.html

10 Embalmers & Dr. Ryan Cole: How COVID Vaccine Mystery Clots Are Killing People All Over The World
https://rumble.com/v1wjhcq-9-embalmers-and-dr.-ryan-cole-how-covid-vaccine-mystery-clots-are-killing-p.html

Dr. Ryan Cole Responds To Dr. Eric Burnett's Blood Clot Conspiracy Comments
https://rumble.com/v1x0oi6-dr.-ryan-cole-responds-to-dr.-eric-burnetts-blood-clot-conspiracy-comments.html

Increasing Death Rates, Plummeting Birth Rates, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)
https://sunfellow.com/increasing-death-rates-plummeting-birth-rates-sudden-adult-death-syndrome-sads/

“Never Seen Blood Clots Like This.” Embalmers and Funeral Directors Reveal Massive Clots in the Corpses of Vaccinated People in Documentary “Died Suddenly” [but sheeple go on enjoying their illusions]

Robert Kennedy’s Organization Files Motion to Prevent California From Punishing Doctors for Providing Truthful Information to the Public About the Dangers of COVID Injections

From [HERE] Attorneys for Children’s Health Defense (CHD) on Tuesday filed a motion for preliminary injunction in an effort to prevent California from punishing doctors for COVID-19 “misinformation” while CHD’s lawsuit challenging the state’s new law makes its way through the courts.

California Assembly Bill 2098 (AB 2098), signed into law on Sept. 30, subjects the state’s doctors to discipline — including the suspension of their medical licenses — for sharing “misinformation” or “disinformation” about COVID-19 with their patients.

The law is set to take effect Jan. 1, 2023. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Jan. 17, 2023.

Attorneys Rick Jaffe, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD chairman and chief litigation counsel,  and Mary Holland, CHD president and general counsel, filed the motion in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California on behalf of plaintiffs LeTrinh Hoang, D.O., Physicians for Informed Consent and Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter.

According to the motion:

“AB 2098 prohibits physicians from conveying information and advice to their patients about COVID-19, which the State of California believes to be inconsistent with the prevailing opinions of the U.S. public health authorities and the majority of the medical community.

“However, if the pandemic has taught the world anything, it teaches that the views and edicts of the U.S. public health and medical authorities have changed, sometimes quickly, dramatically, and often inconsistently.”

The plaintiffs requested the Osteopathic Medical Board of California be prohibited from investigating or sanctioning any osteopathic physician under Section 2270 pending the final judgment in CHD’s lawsuit.

One of the six declarations attached to the motion is from Dr. Sanjay Verma, whose expert declaration presents numerous examples of public health authorities having to walk back their recommendations.

The declaration also details “points of vagueness and the general unsuitability of using “contemporary scientific consensus” as a disciplinary criterion.

Verma’s overview of the public health response to the pandemic is broken down into nine distinct categories and appendices:

• Evolving and contradictory mask consensus.

• Changing and contradictory statements about the ability of the vaccines to prevent infection.

• Vaccine safety.

• Vaccine efficacy.

• Disparaging or underestimating natural immunity.

• Unvaccinated dying at 11 times greater than fully vaccinated.

• Examples of changes to the scientific consensus.

• Countries with different vaccine recommendations.

• Over-estimation of COVID-19 deaths and hospitalizations.

“The Injunction motion is strengthened by Dr. Verma’s meticulously sourced chronology of the changing, contradictory edicts from U.S. public health authorities,” said Holland. “It is the highlight and, in my opinion, conclusively proves that the ‘contemporary scientific consensus’ is a moving target that is often later proved to be completely false.”

Holland added: “It is unconstitutional for the government to sanction physicians for running afoul of crazy quilt ‘science.’”

Other declarants provided personal stories detailing the harm they or their family members have suffered.

Shannen Pousada declared that for 29 years she worked as a nurse at Kaiser Permanente in Northern California. Last year, Kaiser required COVID-19 vaccination for employment.

Before her vaccination on Sept. 10, 2021, Pousada was in excellent health. Ten days after, she had a heart attack. Her Kaiser physicians repeatedly told her it was “misinformation” that the COVID-19 vaccine could cause heart attacks.

Kaiser doctors eventually admitted that the COVID-19 vaccination was the likely cause.

In her declaration, Pousada said:

“While there is a possibility my medical and legal situation can improve in 2023, if AB 2098 is deemed constitutional, that possibility is significantly diminished for me.

“And it would be even worse for people suffering COVID-19 vaccine injury in 2023 and beyond, because their physicians will not be willing to document their observation of so-called ‘misinformation’ necessary to resolution of legal claims.”

Plaintiff Hoang, a California-licensed osteopathic physician for more than 25 years, explained in her declaration some of the questions she is asked by patients and their families about issues related to COVID-19.

Sometimes her advice is supported by mainstream medical literature. However, she finds it difficult if not impossible to robotically parrot propaganda that does not reflect true evidence-based “scientific consensus.”

Often, Hoang said, her advice paints a more nuanced and personalized picture for her patients contemplating taking the vaccine or the boosters, but she is concerned that under the new law, she would put her license at risk.

Dr. Shira Miller, president of Physicians for Informed Consent, said in her declaration that physician speech is and will be chilled by AB 2098, in large part because of the vagueness and uncertainty in the law.

According to attorney Jaffe, “The science is evolving, and sometimes what the experts once held as gospel, turned out to be wrong. That is the fundamental truth of this case and that’s why I am confident the Court will stop the Osteopathic Medical Board of California from targeting doctor/patient speech.”

In their declarations, Debbie Hobel and Jamie Coker-Robertson demonstrated that AB 2098 is already having a negative impact. If patients can’t differentiate between truthful advice and canned information their doctor provides, this will lead to irreparable damage to the physician/patient relationship.

Worldwide Deaths Prove Genocide: Excess Deaths in Australia 40% More than Normal, AI Eugenics, Hospital Murders

New Studies Suggest COVID Injected People are Infecting Unvaccinated People

From [HERE] Ever since the roll out of the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines” there has been abundant anecdotal evidence of “vaccine shedding,” where individuals who received one of the experimental mRNA injections were somehow also infecting those around them, even those who were unvaccinated.

Now there are some published studies that explain how the mechanism of this “shedding” might be happening, as well as evidence from Pfizer themselves according to their internal documents that they have been forced to release to the public.

One of those studies was published by Dr. Helene Banoun in the journal Infectious Disease Research.

Abstract

The massive COVID-19 vaccination campaign is the first time that mRNA vaccines havebeen used on a global scale. The mRNA vaccines correspond exactly to the definition of gene therapy of the American and European regulatory agencies. The  regulations require excretion studies of these drugs and their products (the translated proteins). These studies have not been  done for mRNA vaccines (nor for adenovirus vaccines). There are numerous reports of symptoms and pathologies identical to  the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines in unvaccinated persons in contact with freshly vaccinated persons. It is therefore  important to review the state of knowledge on the possible excretion of vaccine nano particles as well as mRNA and its product, the spike protein.

Vaccine mRNA-carrying lipid nano particles spread after injection throughout the  body according to available animal studies and vaccine mRNA (naked or in nano particles or innatural exosomes) is found in the bloodstream as well as vaccine spike in free form or encapsulated in exosomes (shown in human studies). Lipid nano particles (or their natural equivalent, exosomes or extracellular vesicles (EVs)) have been shown to be able to be excreted  through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier. These EVs are also able to penetrate by inhalation and through the skin (healthy or injured) as well as orally through breast milk (and why not during sexual intercourse through semen, as this has not been studied). It is urgent to enforce the legislation on gene therapy that applies to mRNA vaccines and to carry out studies on this subject while the generalization of mRNA vaccines is being considered.

Dr. Peter McCullough recently addressed this study.

From Dr. McCullough’s Substack Blog:

Health of Pure Bloods Threatened by Shedding of mRNA and Spike Protein

Why the Unvaccinated are Concerned about Close Contact with COVID-19 Vaccinated

One of the most common questions I am asked from the unvaccinated stems from concerns over “shedding.” Because the mRNA vaccines have been in development by the US Department of Defense DARPA since 2011, one would have expected that all of the necessary preclinical testing would have been completed before Operation Warp Speed was announced.

The 2015 FDA guidance on Gene Product Shedding Studies with gene therapies, which are defined as “all products that exert their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integration into the host genome and that are administered in the form of nucleic acids, viruses or genetically modified microorganisms”.

By this statement mRNA vaccines are indeed gene therapy products and should have been submitted to these excretion studies by DARPA funded researchers long ago.

Sadly, these careful development steps were skipped from the beginning in our military-style vaccine development program, and now the public is grappling with the issue of nucleic acid and Spike protein shedding as a potential concern among those who have worked so hard to remain healthy and free of COVID-19 vaccination.

In the most comprehensive paper on shedding thus far, former Inserm researcher Dr. Helene Banoun has published the basis for which there is great likelihood that mRNA either on lipid nanoparticles or within exosomes is circulatory in blood and is secreted in every body secretion that would naturally expect to contain particles of this size.

Fertig et al, have shown mRNA is circulatory in blood for at least two weeks with no reduction in concentration out to that time point. Likewise, Hanna et al, have found mRNA within breast milk.

Less data exist on Spike protein shedding but it is not a far stretch to understand this is well within the realm of reality. The pivotal questions are: 1) for how long is a recently vaccinated person at risk to shed on to others? 2) can shed mRNA be taken up by the recipient and begin to produce Spike protein just like vaccination? 3) can shed Spike protein cause disease as it does in the vaccinated (e.g. myocarditis, blood clots, etc.)?

It’s time for the lapses by DOD BARDA and NIH BARDA, to immediately be corrected by those agencies funding the necessary independent shedding studies to ensure the public safety of those who wisely deferred on COVID-19 vaccination.

This research should preferably be conducted while the current products are paused and taken off to market to protect others at risk. Until then, we simply cannot answer these questions for those who sacrificed so much to remain “pure-blood.” (Full article.)

Another study has been published on the Preprint Server Medrxiv.org titled: Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity. [MORE]

Hospital Trying to Kill You: 'You Don’t Put People who Are Conscious with an Open Airway on a Ventilator, you will Injure or Kill a Good Proportion of them within a Week' - Dr Yeadon, former Pfizer VP

NBA Sportscaster Suddenly Lost Consciousness and Convulsed live on-air While Talking to Dominique - probably Unrelated to Fake Ass Vax Murdering People Worldwide

Dr McCullough: "It Looks Like the mRNA Is Transferring from the Injected to the Unvaccinated" through Kissing, Sex, Touching, Breast Feeding etc. Also There's No Evidence the mRNA Ever Leaves the Body

Shedding Concerns: "It Looks Like the mRNA is Transferring from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated"

"Every shot is accumulating in the body with no ability for the body to get rid of it."

The Vigilant Fox
December 1, 2022

https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/shedding-concerns-it-looks-like-the

"What are the risks to the unvaccinated?” asked the founder of Action4Canada, Tanya Gaw, in an interview with Dr. Peter McCullough.

“There was a recent paper,” replied McCullough. “I just have it on my Substack if you want to review it -- you go to the Courageous Discourse substack. And the first author is Helene Banoun, a former Inserm scientist. Inserm is a leading research unit in France. And Banoun has summarized this. This is disturbing. It looks like the messenger RNA is transferring from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated now.”

“And, in a paper by Fertig and colleagues, the messenger RNA is found circulating in the blood for at least two weeks. And the curves were not going down. That’s as long as they looked.”

In another study, they found messenger RNA in the lymph nodes of the vaccinated for months. “It looks like the body’s not clearing it out,” stated McCullough.

"And then a recent paper that is 'most disturbing' from Hanna and colleagues -- JAMA. This paper showed that the messenger RNA is in the breast milk of women who took the vaccine during pregnancy or afterwards."

So the big question:

Could you actually take a vaccine inadvertently through close contact, kissing, sexual contact, or breastfeeding?

Dr. McCullough says, “it looks like the answer is YES.”

"Now the question on the table is: 'How long do you wait before contact?' No one knows! The vaccines, the messenger RNA vaccines, they’ve never been demonstrated to actually leave the body. They look like they’re permanent! As well as the spike protein that’s produced after them. This is very disturbing.

"So it’s hard to guide. I was saying, '[For] 30 days, refrain from kissing -- sexual contact with a vaccinated person.' But I’m now extending that to at least 90 days and, conservatively, maybe extend[ing] it from a point forward. I know there are married couples and all kinds of personal implications there. But no, this messenger RNA -- it looks like it’s for keeps. Every shot is accumulating in the body with no ability for the body to get rid of it.

"The vaccines, because they stay in the body so long, it looks like they permanently install into the human genome through reverse transcription. This is disturbing! Not only do the vaccines not get out of the body, but now they are changing the human genome . . . So it's conceivable that two vaccinated people could actually pass the code for Pfizer and Moderna into the baby! Permanently! The government, as they developed these vaccines, they rushed it through the final stages. There were no assurances that these were safe . . . In an autopsy study, the spike protein produced from the genetic material is found in the heart . . . It's found in the brain . . . I can tell you everyone who has taken the vaccine has this material in their brain, their heart, their adrenal glands, their reproductive organs, it's really a terrible thought. My heart goes out to people who have taken the vaccine."

Complete Interview:
https://rumble.com/v1ycdkm-tanya-gaw-interviews-dr.-peter-mccullough-the-courage-to-face-covid-19.html

Dr Masanori Fukushima: Vaccine Damage Is Now A Global Problem. Billions Of Lives Are At Risk

Since the Launch of Operation Warp Speed, at Least 1.1 Million Americans have “Died Suddenly”

From [HERE] The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has quietly confirmed that at least 1.1 million Americans have “died suddenly” ever since Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” were introduced under Operation Warp Speed.

Since the time when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for the jabs, more than six million Americans total have died. Of this, 1,106,079 deaths are considered to be “excess,” based on the five-year average from 2015 to 2019.

Other government data confirms that mortality rates per 100,000 people are highest among the “fully vaccinated” population, suggesting covid injections are the cause of all this excess mortality. (Related: The CDC has been removing covid jab injury and death reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS].)

We have the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEC) to thank for all this data, which is doing the work that the CDC and the FDA refuse to do by actually spelling it all out for the public to see.

An intergovernmental organization with 38 member countries, the OEC was founded in 1961 to “stimulate economic progress and world trade.” Part of what the group does is compile data and extrapolate it in an easy-to-digest format.

People really started dying AFTER the jabs were released, not before

Thus far, every single week in 2022 has seen a significant and noticeable number of excess deaths. At one point, upwards of 350,000 excess deaths were being reported per week, though the average has since decreased somewhat.

“This means 1,700 more Americans actually died by week 38 of 2022 than those who died by week 38 of 2020, despite the fact there was a huge wave of alleged Covid-19 deaths during this period,” reports The Exposé about what the data shows.

Put another way, there are more excess deaths occurring in the post-jab era than there were in the pre-jab era when the media and the government were scaring everyone about “covid.” It turns out the real threat is the jabs.

“But that’s not the worst of it,” The Exposé added. “Because the official CDC figures reveal that 2021 was a record-breaking year for deaths across the USA, with the country recording over 100,000 more deaths than it recorded in 2020, prior to the roll-out of the experimental Covid-19 injections.”

The official numbers from the CDC show that more than 101,000 additional people died in 2021 after Operation Warp Speed was in full swing compared to in 2020 when the jabs had not yet been unleashed.

“The first Covid-19 injection was administered in the USA on December 14th 2020, and according to the quietly published figures provided by the CDC, 6,090,716 Americans sadly lost their lives after this date up until week 38 of 2022,” The Exposé maintains.

If covid injections truly were unleashed for the purpose of “saving lives,” they sure did an awful job. More people died because of the injections, which had they never been released in the first place would have actually saved lives.

“I read recently that the global excess death number is over 75 million,” wrote a commenter. “Couple that with their loss of regeneration, as well as male and female infertility, and this is becoming a mass extinction event.”

Another responded that the actual figure, according to BizNews, is .75 million, or 750,000, excess deaths worldwide in 2022.

“Global excess mortality now is greater than it was during World War II,” wrote someone else, insinuating that covid jab deaths are part of an ongoing WWIII mass depopulation campaign.

Dr. Eli David on Twitter announced that in Israel, 2020 was supposedly a “once-in-a-century pandemic” with no vaccines available, but that total mortality was far higher in 2021 and 2022 after the jabs were unleashed.

Dr. Mark Trozzi says Children Are 100 Times More Likely To Die After COVID Injection [The Dependent Media Attacks Any Scientist, Doctor, Physician or Researcher who Proves COVID Shots are Dangerous]

The National Health Service in the UK Creates a £1.3 Billion Pot for COVID Injection Compensation Claims

From [HERE] The NHS has set aside £1.3 billion to cope with compensation claims arising from the pandemic this year with claims for treatment delays, cancellations and misdiagnosis expected.

An annual report from NHS Resolution, which deals with patient disputes, shows that the health service anticipates it will need to pay out more than a billion pounds this financial year to settle claims arising from poor service during Covid.

47 Members of Congress Urge Pentagon to Revoke Military’s COVID Irrational, Deadly Mandate

From [HERE] “The vaccine provides negligible benefit to the young, fit members of our Armed Forces, and the mandate’s imposition is clearly affecting the Department’s ability to sustain combat formations and recruit future talent,” the Congress members wrote in a Sept. 15 letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin.

Nearly 50 Republican lawmakers, led by Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.), have called on the U.S. Department of Defense to withdraw its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for military members, citing concerns over the mandate’s impact on the readiness of the U.S. armed forces.

In a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin dated Sept. 15, the lawmakers, including Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), expressed their “grave concerns” over the impact of the mandate, particularly with regard to the U.S. Army.

“As a result of your mandate, 8% of the Army’s approximately 1 million soldiers face expulsion, Army recruiters cannot meet their FY22 target and the Army has cut its projected FY23 end strength by 12,000 soldiers,” they wrote.

Referring to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, the lawmakers noted that the U.S. military currently faces “a self-imposed readiness crisis.”

Citing “sparse” data from the Department of the Army, they noted that “at least 40,000 National Guardsmen, 20,000 Army Reservists and at least 15,000 Active Army Soldiers” haven’t yet received a COVID-19 vaccine and subsequently face being discharged from service.

“The Department of Defense’s own COVID response page indicates that approximately 900,000 soldiers are fully vaccinated out of the 1 million soldiers in the Army, Army Reserve and Army National Guard,” the letter reads.

The lawmakers pointed to testimony delivered in July by Vice Chief of Staff of the Army Gen. Joseph Martin before the House Armed Services Committee.

During that testimony, Martin said that “less than 20,000” people were facing discharge for refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine, much less than the initial figures that officials had provided.

‘Inquiries remain unanswered’

However, lawmakers in their letter to the U.S. Department of Defense noted that the Army hasn’t published official data pertaining to the number of unvaccinated service members in months.

“The opaqueness of the Department continues to frustrate Members of Congress attempting to perform oversight of the Executive Branch,” they wrote, noting that their “repeated inquiries remain unanswered.”

The Republicans also pointed to the “thousands of service members” that “have been left in limbo” while they await a formal judgment regarding their medical exemptions to the vaccine.

“Some have waited for nearly a year to learn if they will be forcibly discharged for their sincerely held religious beliefs or medical concerns,” the letter reads.

“Furthermore, according to current Army policy, even those few soldiers who receive permanent exemptions will be treated as second-class soldiers for the rest of their careers — each of them requires approval from the Undersecretary of the Army to travel, change assignments or even attend training courses away from their home station.”

According to U.S Army fragmentary orders published by Fox News, the Army has barred unvaccinated soldiers from official travel unless they receive the undersecretary’s approval.

“The Department has abused the trust and good faith of loyal service members by handling vaccine exemptions in a sluggish and disingenuous manner,” the letter reads.

They then questioned who would replace the roughly 75,000 soldiers if they were to be discharged from the Army.

Martin said in July that if a shortfall in Army troop size were to persist, it could have an impact on readiness.

Service member shortfall

Citing Army Secretary Christine Wormuth’s interview with NBC News earlier this year in which she noted that the Army has only met 52% of its recruiting goal for the FY22, the lawmakers asked, “How will it recruit another 75,000 troops beyond its annual target to account for vaccine-related discharges?”

In that same interview, Wormuth said she believes that the Army would end up roughly 12,000 to 15,000 recruits short this year.

“The data is now clear. The Department of Defense’s COVID vaccine mandate is deleterious to readiness and the military’s ability to fight and win wars,” the lawmakers wrote.

“The vaccine provides negligible benefit to the young, fit members of our Armed Forces, and the mandate’s imposition is clearly affecting the Department’s ability to sustain combat formations and recruit future talent.

“We urge you to immediately revoke your COVID-19 vaccine mandate for all service members, civilian personnel and contractors and re-instate those who have already been discharged.”

As of July 1, under the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate, members of the Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve who aren’t vaccinated and don’t have an approved exemption are unable to participate in federally funded drills and training and won’t receive pay or retirement credit.

Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate has been in place across the entire military since last year, and the White House has defended the move, stating that mass vaccination will help stem the spread of the virus.

U.S. Department of Defense officials didn’t respond to a request for comment by press time.

G20 Signs Declaration to Forcibly Impose an International Vaccine Passport on People, Controlling Freedom of Movement for Their Next Plandemic

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• The G20, a group of 19 nations — including the U.S. — plus the European Union, recently held their annual business meeting (B20) in Bali, Indonesia, where they declared that a digital vaccine passport, standardized by the World Health Organization, will be part of international pandemic prevention and response moving forward

• The rule for standardized international vaccine passports will be introduced as a revision to the international health regulations during the next World Health Assembly in Geneva

• The G20 recommendations also include the creation of guidelines for a globally coordinated response to crises, “enhanced by a technology-enabled ‘always-on’ global health infrastructure,” and a mutual recognition of COVID-19 vaccines made by G20 members

• President Biden signed the declaration despite the promises made by his White House COVID-19 Response Team leader, Jeff Zients, who in April 2021 stated, "Let me be clear that the government is not now, nor will we be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry a [vaccination] credential”

• The fact that the COVID shots do not prevent spread of infection has now been established many times over. This alone proves that vaccine passports are not for the purpose of containing epidemics. An international vaccine passport is the gateway to complete totalitarian control, because the entire control grid around a person gets tied together by it

From [HERE] As noted by former U.S. Rep. Dr. Ron Paul in the video above, World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab and other globalist leaders substitute truth with their own opinions. They decide what’s right and wrong; they decide what’s right for everyone. They dictate what’s "true" on any given day.

Anyone who disagrees with them is an "enemy of the state" — they being "the state" or, more accurately, the Deep State, the hidden power behind the apparent power of official government. Who are the members of this cabal? There’s no official membership list, but over time many of the individual players have become discernible.

The globalist cabal includes but is not limited to government heads, bankers and members of nongovernmental organizations (NGO’s) and liberal think tanks around the world.

One way in which the cabal hides its undemocratic influence is by having its members in dozens of different organizations. When several organizations agree on an issue, it makes it appear as though there’s a majority view, a consensus. But in reality, it’s the same small group of individuals asserting their agenda.

G20 Green-Light International Vaccine Passports

The G20, a group of 19 nations — including the U.S. — plus the European Union, recently held their annual business meeting (B20) in Bali, Indonesia, where they declared that digital vaccine passports, standardized by the World Health Organization, will be part of international pandemic prevention and response moving forward.1

Source: Council on Foreign Relations2

Part of the policy declaration3 reads:4

"We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates."

The rule for standardized international vaccine passports will reportedly be introduced as a revision to the international health regulations during the next World Health Assembly in Geneva.5

What this means is that when the next pandemic is declared, only those who have this digital health certificate will be allowed to move about freely and travel internationally. And, of course, only those who have been appropriately tested and/or vaccinated will have a valid passport.

In addition to adopting an international digital vaccine passport, the G20 recommendations also include the creation of guidelines for a globally coordinated response to crises, "enhanced by a technology-enabled ‘always-on’ global health infrastructure," and a mutual recognition of COVID-19 vaccines made by G20 members.

Schwab Tells Us What the G20 Are All About

Aside from key government leaders, high-profile globalists such as Schwab were also in attendance at the G20 meetings. In his B20 keynote address, Schwab highlighted the cabal’s agenda and goals:6

"What we have to confront is a deep, systemic and structural re-structuring of our world … [The] world will look differently after we have gone through this transition process."

Part of that worldwide restructuring of society that the WEF, the G20 and many other organizations are working in lockstep to achieve is the implementation of a global vaccine passport, which all of the G20 members have now agreed to. In the case of the U.S., President Biden signed the declaration despite the promises made by his White House COVID-19 Response Team leader, Jeff Zients, who in April 2021 stated:7

"Let me be clear that the government is not now, nor will we be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry a credential. There'll be no federal vaccination database, no federal mandate requiring everyone to obtain a single vaccination credential."

Basis for Vaccine Passports No Longer Exist

If you’re a rational person, you’re probably thinking, "But wait, the COVID jabs don’t prevent infection or spread, so there’s no basis for vaccine passports anymore." Indeed, this fact has now been established many times over. This alone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that COVID vaccine passports have nothing to do with public health or safety.

“An international vaccine passport is the gateway to complete totalitarian control, because the entire control grid around a person gets tied together by it.”

Their purpose is not to prevent or contain pandemics. They’re a control mechanism,8and a really important one. Vaccine passports are THE gateway to complete, totalitarian control of the populations of the world. The globalist cabal desperately needs everyone to have this passport, because the entire control grid around a person gets tied together by it. This is why fighting for informed consent is so crucial.

But how is the G20 getting around the obvious fact that the COVID passports are useless for their stated purpose? They ignore it, and instead stress that everyone also needs a digital identity, and this digital COVID certificate does both.

Outside their own circle, this rationale makes no sense whatsoever, but as noted by Dutch legal philosopher Eva Vlaardingerbroek, the fact that vaccine passports are sold based on a fraudulent premise is now "so obvious that they've thrown logic out the window."9

Their decisions make no sense, and they have no intention of making them sensible. They’re banking on being able to entrap us in their control system, at which point they’ll be able to tell you the moon is made of cheese and you’ll have no way of correcting them without losing everything.

Digital Identity Is Total Surveillance to Control You

As reported by Sociable:10

"In August, 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a 99-page guide book11 on the implementation of digital documentation of COVID-19 certificates, aka vaccine passports, stating that ‘a health pass based solely on individual vaccination status may increase the risk of disease spread.’

This is because the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ were never proven to prevent transmission nor infection, and it recently came to light in the European Parliament that Pfizer never even tested its product for stopping transmission. Despite this knowledge being publicly available, the B20 is still recommending proof of vaccination as a means to travel …

Vaccine passports, by their very nature, serve as a form of digital identity, according to the World Economic Forum (WEF). A digital identity encompasses everything that makes you unique in the digital realm, and it is a system that can consolidate all of your most personal intimate data, including which websites you visit, your online purchases, health records, financial accounts, and who you’re friends with on social media …

[D]igital identity schemes can give governments and corporations the power to incentivize, coerce, or otherwise manipulate human behavior under a system of social credit. Digital identities can be used to determine what products, services, and information are available to us, and they can certainly be used by public and private entities to deny us that access."

Source: World Economic Forum12

In March 2021, Naomi Wolf, author of "The End Of America," warned that accepting digital ID will be the end of all freedom:13 14

"I cannot say this forcefully enough: This is literally the end of human liberty in the West if this plan unfolds as planned … Vaccine passports sound like a fine thing if you don’t know what those platforms can do.

I’m CEO of a tech company, I understand what this platform does. It’s not about the vaccine, it’s not about the virus, it’s about data. And once this rolls out you don’t have a choice about being part of the system. What people have to understand is that any other functionality can be loaded onto that platform with no problem at all."

Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver has also issued a warning, saying:15

"Digital health or vaccine passports along with tracking and tracing apps present a serious threat to freedom. Vaccine passports and tracking apps are about collecting data and control. The vaccine passport is being promoted worldwide to limit a person’s ability to leave home, work, shop, dine, travel, attend a public event, or even worship.

COVID is being used to advance this dangerous threat to freedom. We must never accept vaccine passports or tracking apps as the new normal. The implications for freedom are significant."

Vaccine Passports Are Gateway for Complete Financial Control

When vaccine passports first became a topic of international discussions, many of us saw the writing on the wall and warned that such an implementation would become a tool for complete financial and physical control, and would automatically eliminate basic human rights and freedoms.

At the time, we were labeled crazy conspiracy theorists, but it didn’t take long before our worst fears were confirmed. Your vaccine passport will be your digital identity (as confirmed by the WEF), and to that digital identity they plan to add a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC) and a social credit score. These plans are not a conspiracy theory. They’re out in the open.

When you add all of those ingredients together — vaccine requirements for maintaining a valid passport, a digital identity, a social credit score and programmable CBDCs — you end up with a control grid that will eliminate your freedom to live life according to your own desires.

Even your diet can then be dictated by these megalomaniacs. They’re hell-bent on eliminating your ability to eat meat, for example. The whole world, especially the Western world, must transition to insect protein, they say. Meanwhile, you will not find meal worms and crickets on the menus at their globalist gatherings.16 No, insect protein is for the expendables.

COVID Is Used as a Path to Global Financial Surveillance

Once vaccine passports/digital identity and CBDCs are in place, the global cabal will be able to control your physical movements, behaviors and purchases based on how well you conform to their ideals, no matter how irrational, immoral, unethical, unfair or dangerous those may be. As reported by The Daily Sceptic:17

"It’s seemed evident for a while that the current fiat monetary system is, at best, unstable. At worst, it’s a Ponzi scheme whose time has expired. If that’s the case, I suspect the central bankers and 0.1% know this and might be prepared to usher in the new system before the old one collapses on itself — even as they loot it on the way down with the most significant wealth transfer in human history.

To anyone who pays attention to these trends, it seems evident that Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) will be that new system. Every indication is that CBDC’s arrival is imminent. [November 15, 2022], several global banks announced a partnership with the New York Federal Reserve to pilot digital dollars18 19 …

From my vantage point, it’s impossible to overstate the risk presented by CBDC. Whether it’s a utopian vision based on good intentions or a sinister plot to crush our sovereignty, the result may be the same: control. A Central Bank Digital Currency has all the downsides of fiat money, plus the added layers of surveillance and programmability overseen by the state.

So many people on Team Reality have likely felt like dissidents over the last few years simply for challenging anything beyond the herd mentality … Imagine a monetary system with features baked-in to socially engineer how we live. For example:

• Health: ‘You didn’t take your booster … you’re not allowed in public spaces.’

• Energy: ‘You used your energy allotment this month … your electric car won’t start.’

• Food: ‘You ate too much meat this week … your money is only good for plants (or bugs).’

• Savings: ‘If you don’t take your rations soon … your money will expire at the end of the month.’

• Free Speech: ‘You shared info that we disagree with … our algorithm is fining you.’ (PayPal has already started doing this) …

As we saw with the lockdowns, China is the model emulated in the west. Like the creep towards health-related authoritarian measures, unelected globalists with financial interests lurk in the background …

If you have yet to notice, a primary theme of the last three-plus years (at least) is ‘freedom vs. control’, so it’s not hyperbole to suggest that the future must be decentralized if we want to ensure our children grow up in a free world."

If there’s a silver lining in all of this, it’s that the globalist cabal — the "deep state" that pulls the strings of governments around the world, the hidden power that is making decisions that are devastating for the entire world — overplayed their hand during COVID, exposing their heinous ideologies and plans for all the world to see. As noted by Maajid Nawaz in an interview this past summer (video above):

"When dogma defines your behavior you’re no longer looking at reality … so you’re going to be less pragmatic … That leaves serious blind spots. You end up not seeing reality for what it is, and that is why they ended up overplaying their hand. They’re not looking to reality, they’re looking to their dream, their ideal, which is actually a nightmare.

One great thing that happened during COVID is they overplayed their hand. They exposed themselves … There’s now very little doubt, among those who have heard of the World Economic Forum, that it’s attempting to influence how we do government and politics …

Why do we have an unelected bureaucrat, and a foreign one at that, telling us how to live our lives …? It doesn’t make sense. But then we go further. Why do they all seem to be beholden to this unelected foreign bureaucrat? Why do they all appear to be doing this man’s bidding? … Why can’t they just say no?"

As noted by Nawaz, the government leaders who are not saying no to Schwab for some reason cannot say no, likely because they’ve been compromised. Compromising and blackmailing officials on behalf of the globalist cabal was Jeffrey Epstein’s specialty, and there’s no reason to assume their secrets died with him.

Those with cleaner records may have been threatened into compliance. I would add a third possibility, and that is that they’re in on it because they share the globalists ideals, which include not only top-down authoritarianism but also transhumanism and eugenics. A fourth possibility is self-preservation. They may simply want to secure their own position within the ruling echelon in the new world of "have it alls" and "have nothings."

We Now Know What They’re Capable Of

Whatever the incentive, the problem they now all face is the fact that they’ve prematurely exposed themselves and their plans. They’ve also exposed how far they’re willing to go. For example, we know they’re willing to seize your bank account and close down your ability to transact over something as minor as making a donation to a cause they don’t like or posting "wrong"-think on social media — and that’s without the benefit of CBDCs!

So, they’ve already shown us what they WILL do once CBDCs are in place. The only difference is that penalties can then be automated. Is this a world you want to live in? Is this what you want for your children and grandchildren? If not, it’s your duty to be the resistance.

Adults today are the last generation that will be able to prevent this global tyranny. If we do nothing, our children will be ensconced in a digital prison they won’t be able to break free from. So, we cannot leave it to them. It’s up to us. So, when CBDCs are rolled out, we must reject them, no matter how inconvenient that might be. When vaccine passports are rolled out, we must reject them, despite the limitations that might bring.

In 2021, countless people were coerced into taking the jabs because they wanted to travel, fearing travel bans for the unvaccinated would be permanent. Well, they weren’t, because enough people pushed back.

We may have to endure limitations if we refuse the coming international vaccine passport, but if enough people around the world refuse, the system won’t work, and those limitations will prove to be temporary. The only way any of the globalists plans can become permanent is if we do as we’re told and go along with them.

1

Sociable November 15, 2022

2

Sociable November 15, 2022

3

B20 Indonesia 2022 Policy Recommendations

4

Sociable November 17, 2022

5

Sociable November 15, 2022

6

KCP News November 22, 2022

7

KCP News November 22, 2022

8

Sociable November 2021

9

YouTube GB News November 17, 2022

10

Sociable November 15, 2022

11

WHO August 27, 2021

12

Sociable November 15, 2022

13

Real Clear Politics March 29, 2021

14

RW Malone November 22, 2022 Substack

15

IC.org November 17, 2022

16

Twitter Event Horizon November 17, 2022

17

Daily Sceptic November 18, 2022

18

Watcher.guru November 15, 2022

19

Coin Telegraph November 15, 2022

Liar Fauci Forgets: The white coat supremacist can’t seem to remember the destructive policies he imposed on the American people

From [HERE] “If there are oversight hearings, I absolutely will cooperate fully and testify before the Congress if asked. You may not know, but I’ve testified before the Congress a few hundred times over the last 40 years or so. So I have no trouble testifying. We can defend and explain and stand by everything that we’ve said. So I have nothing to hide.”

That was White House advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci last Tuesday, one day before he was to give a deposition in a case brought by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, charging that the federal government outsourced censorship to tech companies. As it emerged in his deposition the next day, Fauci had plenty to hide. 

“It was amazing, literally, that we spent seven hours with Dr. Fauci—this is a man who single-handedly wrecked the U.S. economy based upon ‘the science, follow the science,’” Landry told the Epoch Times. “we discovered that he can’t recall practically anything dealing with his Covid response . . . He just said, ‘I can’t recall, I haven’t seen that. And I think we need to put these documents into context.’”

One of the things Fauci failed to recall was his collaboration with National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins in “a quick and devastating published takedown” of the Great Barrington Declaration. Authors Dr. Martin Kulldorff (Harvard), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford), and Dr. Sunetra Gupta (Oxford), and many other medical scientists, called for an end to Fauci’s draconian lockdown policy. 

According to New Civil Liberties Alliance attorney Jenin Younes, representing plaintiffs Kulldorff and Bhattacharya, Fauci said, “I have a very busy day job running a six billion dollar institute. I don’t have time to worry about things like the Great Barrington Declaration.” But Fauci was indeed worried. In an email to Dr. Deborah Birx, Fauci wrote, “I have come out very strongly publicly against the Great Barrington Declaration.” 

The man who publicly proclaimed “I represent science,” now replicates the performance of FBI boss James Comey, who in 2018 testified “I can’t recall” in response to more than 200 questions about matters in which he was directly involved. While Fauci feigns memory lapse, Americans should not forget the sort of person they are dealing with.  

Anthony Fauci earned a medical degree in 1966 but if he ever practiced medicine it was only for a short time. In 1968, to avoid service in military hospitals, Fauci became a “yellow beret” with a cushy job at the National Institutes of Health. 

Fauci’s bio shows no advanced degrees in biochemistry or molecular biology but by 1984 he was heading the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID). Nobel laureate Kary Mullis, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), said Fauci “doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine. He should not be in a position like he’s in.” In other words, Fauci was unqualified, and that reality was soon to become evident. 

As Michael Fumento noted in The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, Fauci was hopelessly wrong in his prediction that AIDS would ravage the heterosexual population. As UC Berkeley molecular biologist Peter Duesberg showed in Inventing the AIDS Virus, Fauci was a pioneer of cancel culture, quashing media appearances by better-qualified persons of different views. Despite his costly blunders, Fauci remained in command of NIAID, with steadily increasing salary and power.

According to the Office of Science Policy of the National Institutes of Health, gain of function research can “enhance the pathogenicity or transmissibility of potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs)” and that can raise “biosafety and biosecurity concerns.” In 2012, Fauci cited the risks of such research, wondering, “what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” 

The NIH banned gain of function research in 2014 but revived it in 2017 with no objection from Fauci. In January of 2017, Fauci proclaimed “we will definitely get surprised in the next few years” by an infectious disease outbreak. 

Fauci’s NIAID funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Communist China, where gain of function research could be conducted in secret, with no accountability. The WIV, a partner with China’s military, also received shipments of deadly pathogens from a Chinese agent at Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg. 

In early 2020, Fauci opposed President Trump’s ban on flights from China and praised China’s response to the pandemic. Fauci recommended the lockdowns that wrecked the economy, trampled constitutional rights, shut children out of school, and caused untold suffering across the nation. 

In early 2021, a report by New York Attorney General Letitia James revealed thousands more nursing home residents may have died from COVID-19 than New York Governor Andrew Cuomo had publicly acknowledged. Jim Sciutto of CNN asked Fauci to comment on Cuomo’s claim that he was only following federal guidelines.

“You know, Jim, I can’t,” Fauci responded. “I mean, excuse me. I really am—I’m honestly not trying to erase your question, but I’m not really sure of all the details of that, and I think if I, if you make a statement, it might be wrong or taken out of context. So, I prefer not to comment on that,” and so on. In reality, Fauci had already clarified the details. 

As Fox News recalled, Fauci told PBS that, unlike other parts of the country, New York responded “properly” and “correctly” to the pandemic. That is part of what Fauci now claims not to remember. 

Anthony Fauci is a physician who first does harm and has no use for informed consent. Dr. Fauci wields executive-level power—Joe Biden even jokes that Fauci is the real president—but never has to face the voters. The late Angelo Codevilla called out Fauci as a “deep state fraud,” which might be too kind.

As the nation’s chief “pusher man,” a front man for Big Pharma, Fauci understands the green side of white coat supremacy. Remember, the NIAID and his government colleagues profit from the potions they recommend. In June, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) asked Fauci if anybody on the vaccine committee “ever received money from the people who make vaccines?” Fauci failed to answer and claimed that his own royalties averaged less than $200 per year. 

As Americans might recall, the jury is still out on the long-term effects of the vaccines Fauci wants administered to everyone, including children. The people who make vaccines have been heavily advertising new boosters for sub-variants of the Omicron variant. 

Vitamins C and D Finally Adopted as Coronavirus Treatment

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Vitamins C and D were adopted in the conventional treatment of novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. This fortunate turn of events is likely to save thousands of lives, while keeping health care costs down

• During the pandemic, seriously ill coronavirus patients in New York state’s largest hospital system received 1,500 milligrams of intravenous vitamin C three to four times a day, in conjunction with other conventional treatments

• Vitamin C at extremely high doses acts as an antiviral drug, actually killing viruses

• In recent articles, former CDC chief Dr. Tom Frieden and Dr. John C. Umhau, a public health specialist at NIH, highlight the usefulness of sun exposure and/or vitamin D supplementation to reduce your risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection

• Although vitamin D does not appear to have a direct effect on viruses, it does strengthen immune function, thus allowing the host body to combat the virus more effectively. It also suppresses inflammatory processes

From [HERE] Remember when Washington Post reporters were boldly declaring that vitamins C and D could not (and should not) be used against respiratory infections? The information I was sharing about their use was deemed so dangerous to public health that I was branded as a "fake news" site by self-appointed, pharma-owned arbiters of truth like NewsGuard.

How times have changed. After having defamatory lies published about me, vitamins C and D are now (finally) being adopted in the conventional treatment of novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2.

That just goes to show that when push comes to shove, the truth eventually prevails. When the medicine cabinet is empty, and doctors have limited options, suddenly the basics become viable again, and that is good news indeed, as it's likely to save thousands of lives, while keeping health care costs down.

Vitamin C Treatment Implemented for Coronavirus Infection

As reported by the New York Post, March 24, 2020:1

"Seriously sick coronavirus patients in New York state's largest hospital system are being given massive doses of vitamin C ... Dr. Andrew G. Weber, a pulmonologist and critical-care specialist affiliated with two Northwell Health facilities on Long Island, said his intensive-care patients with the coronavirus immediately receive 1,500 milligrams of intravenous vitamin C.

Identical amounts of the powerful antioxidant are then re-administered three or four times a day, he said ... The regimen is based on experimental treatments administered to people with the coronavirus in Shanghai, China ...

'The patients who received vitamin C did significantly better than those who did not get vitamin C,' he said. 'It helps a tremendous amount, but it is not highlighted because it's not a sexy drug' ...

Weber ... said vitamin C levels in coronavirus patients drop dramatically when they suffer sepsis, an inflammatory response that occurs when their bodies overreact to the infection. 'It makes all the sense in the world to try and maintain this level of vitamin C,' he said."

A Northwell Health spokesperson reportedly confirmed that vitamin C treatment was being "widely used" against coronavirus within the 23-hospital system. According to Weber, vitamin C was used in conjunction with the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin, which have also shown promise in coronavirus treatment.2

Vitamin C Is a Vastly Underutilized Antiviral 'Drug'

According to Dr. Ronald Hunninghake, an internationally recognized expert on vitamin C who has personally supervised tens of thousands of intravenous (IV) vitamin C administrations, vitamin C is "definitely a very underutilized modality in infectious disease," considering "it's really a premiere treatment" for infections.

In my interview with him, Hunninghake suggested one of the reasons why conventional medicine has been so slow to recognize the importance of vitamin C has to do with the fact that they've been looking at it as a mere vitamin, when in fact it's a potent oxidizing agent that can help eliminate pathogens when given in high doses.

There are also financial factors. In short, it's too inexpensive. Conventional medicine, as a general rule, is notoriously uninterested in solutions that cannot produce significant profits. One of the primary reasons we started seeing its use against COVID-19 is undoubtedly because at the time we had no expensive drugs in the medical arsenal that could be turned to.

In my March 17, 2020, interview with Dr. Andrew Saul, editor-in-chief of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, he mentions being in contact with a South Korean medical doctor who was giving patients and medical staff an injection of 100,000 IUs of vitamin D along with as much as 24,000 mg (24 grams) of IV vitamin C. "He's reporting that these people are getting well in a matter of days," Saul says.

As explained by Saul, vitamin C at extremely high doses acts as an antiviral drug, actually killing viruses. While it does have anti-inflammatory activity, which helps prevent the massive cytokine cascade associated with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, it's antiviral capacity likely has more to do with it being a non-rate-limited free radical scavenger. As explained by Saul in our interview:

"Cathcart's view is that you simply push in vitamin C to provide the electrons to reduce the free radicals. This is the way Cathcart and Levy look at vitamin C's function (at very high doses) as an antiviral.

At modest doses, normal supplemental doses ... vitamin C strengthens the immune system because the white blood cells need it to work. White blood cells carry around in them a lot of vitamin C ... So, vitamin C is very well-known to directly beef up the immune system through the white blood cells." [MORE]

Complaint Filed Against Pfizer’s CEO for making ‘Disgracefully Misleading Statements’ that; 'COVID is Thriving Among Kids.’ In Reality, There’s No Evidence Healthy Kids Have Any Significant Risk

From [HERE] and [HERE] Dr Albert Bourla used an interview with the BBC last December to claim that “there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely, are in favour of” vaccinating youngsters aged five to 11 against Covid-19. 

He argued that “Covid in schools is thriving” adding: “This is disturbing, significantly, the educational system, and there are kids that will have severe symptoms.”

The interview was published on Dec 2 - before the vaccine had been approved by Britain’s medical regulator for this age group. 

Shortly after the article’s publication, a complaint was submitted to the pharmaceutical watchdog - the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) - by UsForThem, a parent campaign group which was set up to promote the plight of children during the pandemic. 

‘Extremely promotional in nature’

The complaint alleged that Dr Bourla’s remarks about the children’s vaccine were “disgracefully misleading” and “extremely promotional in nature”, arguing that it breached several clauses of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry’s (ABPI) code of practice. 

“There is simply no evidence that healthy schoolchildren in the UK are at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they are is disgracefully misleading,” they said. [MORE]

FDA is Coin-Operated: Although the FDA doesn't accept corporate money, it gets money funneled via a nonprofit foundation, which receives money from other nonprofits funded by private interests

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration itself does not accept corporate money, it does receive money funneled via a nonprofit foundation, which receives money from other nonprofits funded by private interests

• The Reagan-Udall Foundation is a nonprofit foundation created by Congress in 2007 to support scientific research that is of interest to the FDA. It accepts grants from government, individual donors and other nonprofits — even when those nonprofits are created and funded by industry

• The Reagan-Udall Foundation has received large donations from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

• Ellen Sigal, who currently chairs the Reagan-Udall Foundation’s board of directors, is also vice president of the Cancer Moonshot program, funded by the Gates Foundation, and she’s on the board of the Parker Institute, which is partnered with Inovio, a Gates-funded company that is currently working on a COVID-19 vaccine

• According to the rules, no more than four of the 14-member board of the Reagan-Udall Foundation are supposed to be representatives of FDA-regulated industries, yet in 2017, nine of the then 13-member board had financial ties to industry at the time of their appointment

From [HERE] If you’re like most people, you probably assume that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is funded by the U.S. government and therefore isn’t catering to private industries.

The agency itself certainly tries to present itself as independent from the industries it regulates but, in reality, legal loopholes have led to the FDA receiving money from, and being captured and corrupted by, private interests.

While the FDA itself does not accept corporate money, it does receive money funneled via a nonprofit foundation, which in turn receives money from other nonprofits funded by private interests. It’s really all a façade because the end result is the same. Those donating the money ultimately end up with the ability to pull strings, when needed.

The Reagan-Udall Foundation

As explained by NPR1 back in 2012, the Reagan-Udall Foundation is a nonprofit foundation created by Congress in 2007 to support scientific research that is of interest to the FDA. According to NPR:2

“The idea was that this foundation could do things the FDA can't. It would raise money from private sources, fund research in areas where the FDA lacks expertise, and organize collaborations involving industry, patient groups and academia.”

As explained in a 2008 article3 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, the creation of the Reagan-Udall Foundation was part of a larger plan to establish a private-public partnership to facilitate the Critical Path Initiative.

The Critical Path Initiative was part of the FDA’s attempts to streamline and modernize the drug approval process by having companies pay user fees. Part of the Reagan-Udall Foundation’s responsibilities was to set goals and priorities for the Critical Path Initiative, and then award grants to meet those goals.

Massive Loophole: Nonprofits Funded by Industry

However, critics voiced concern, saying the Reagan-Udall Foundation might allow the food and medical industries “to sway FDA decisions,” since it could raise money from private, including industry, sources. To quell some of these fears, the Reagan-Udall Foundation said it would only accept grants from government, individual donors and other nonprofits, not industry.

After a few years of scraping by on small, private donations, the foundation received a $150,000 grant from the PhRMA Foundation, another nonprofit foundation funded by drug companies. Being a nonprofit, the PhRMA Foundation fit the description of an acceptable funding source, but just how independent can it actually be when it’s founded and funded by drug companies?

As noted by consumer advocate Sidney Wolfe with Public Citizen, while the PhRMA Foundation is technically a nonprofit, “one can hardly expect that they're going to do things that are not in the interests of their funders."4

Indeed, and this influence is in addition to the influence food, drug and medical device companies already have, by way of user fees. Again, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act established an accelerated application process for new drugs. The sped-up process is funded through industry-paid fees.

This fee, however, works more like a payoff or soft bribe. When a company pays the FDA for an accelerated review, the agency no longer has an incentive to find fault with the product or demand more extensive testing.

FDA Foundation Funded by the Gates Foundation

Not surprisingly, the Reagan-Udall Foundation has received large donations from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which we now know rarely does anything that doesn’t benefit Gates’ personal bottom line and overall agenda.

As detailed in “Bill Gates — Most Dangerous Philanthropist in Modern History?” Gates has used his philanthropy to shape public policy in ways that benefit his own agenda.

A March 17, 2020, article5 in The Nation titled, “Bill Gates’ Charity Paradox,” even points out that the Gates Foundation has given $2 billion in tax-deductible charitable donations to private companies, including GlaxoSmithKline, Unilever, IBM, Vodafone, the Mastercard affiliate MasterCard Labs for Financial Inclusion,6 7 Scholastic Inc. and NBC Universal Media.8 9

Many of these so-called donations end up benefiting the Gates Foundation, as it also invests in the very same companies and industries that it donates money to. This circular economy is why Gates just keeps getting richer, the more money he gives away.

Part of this wealth growth also appears to be due to the tax breaks given for charitable donations. In short, it’s a perfect money-shuffling scheme that limits taxes while maximizing income generation.

If donating to for-profit companies sounds oddly illegal to you, you’d be right. Gates is a tax evader for doing so — he’s simply getting away with it. The nonprofit foundation is a disguise to avoid taxes while funding the research arms of for-profit organizations that his foundation is invested in, which is illegal.

The image below shows donations received by the Reagan-Udall Foundation in 2013. Topping the list is the Gates Foundation, whose contributions for the year amounted to $977,165, followed by a string of drug companies. [MORE]