Liberal Comedian Jimmy Dore Complains about His Lingering Vaccine Side Effects such as Brain Inflammation but Dependent Media Ignores Him b/c Criticism of "the Vaccine" is Prohibited by Uncle Brother

From [HERE] Comedian Jimmy Dore described side effects he’s experiencing more than four months after being injected with two doses of Moderna’s experimental Covid jab.

Speaking to Joe Rogan last week, Dore justified why he got the jab despite a general distrust of the establishment, explaining, “People are like, ‘Why [did you take it]? You trust the government?’ No I don’t trust the government. ‘You trust Big Pharma?’ No, I don’t trust Big Pharma, I trust my doctor.”

Dore described how he and others he knows who took the jab experienced similar symptoms post-vaccination; however, his symptoms have never fully gone away.

“So I had body aches, flu-like fever, joint aches, body pain. I had a stiff neck,” Dore said, adding he also experienced “waves of exhaustion.” 

The former Young Turks contributor also complained about the censorship faced by those who attempt to expose or speak about vaccine side effects.

“I tweeted just to let everybody know, ‘Hey, this is my reaction to the vaccine,’ and…people started to come [at] me and call me like, ‘Anti-vax.’ I’m like, ‘No, I got the vax, I got it.’ When people have a reaction to an experimental vaccine that is not FDA approved you’re supposed to not suppress the reaction, you’re supposed to ask people what the reactions are so we can make the vaccines better.”

Dore later said he takes medication to treat brain inflammation, which he says he now has as a result of the spike proteins contained in the vaccine.

Dore’s vaccine injury admissions on The Joe Rogan Show come after he documented the symptoms on his podcast in June, where he claimed a cardiologist told him of other patients experiencing similar vaccine-related side effects.

Renowned IP Underwriter and Analyst Provides Patent Documentation that COVID was Created by NIAID (US Gov) and that the "Vaccine" is an Injected Biological Weapon, Patented Prior to the 2020 Outbreak

• The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

Dr. David E. Martin is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM Inc., an international leader in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. M.CAM is a Virginia-based company that underwrites lending on intellectual property, earning a fee from the lender, usually a bank, and in most cases the right to sell on the IP if the company defaults. [MORE] Martin is the developer of the first innovation-based quantitative index of public equities and is the Managing Partner of the Purple Bridge Funds. He is the creator of the world’s first quantitative public equity index – the CNBC IQ100 powered by M·CAM. He is also a respected financial analyst. [MORE]

In the video above Attorney Reiner Fuellmich interviews Dr David Martin for the German Corona Investigative Committee. [MORE] He has provided citations for all the references he uses in the video which are also documented [HERE] and [HERE]. Other references, such patent information, are verifiable [HERE] and [HERE] and [HERE].

A full transcript of the interview is below:

Our firm has been the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries, so in the majority of the countries around the world. Our underwriting systems include the entire corpus of all patents, patent applications, federal grants procurement records, e-government records, etc. We have the ability to not only track what is happening and who is involved in what’s happening but we monitor a series of thematic interests for a variety of organizations and individuals as well as for our own commercial use, because as you probably know we maintain three Global Equity indices which are the the top performing large-cap and mid-cap equity indices worldwide. So our business is to monitor the innovation that’s happening around the world and specifically to monitor the economics of that innovation, the degree to which financial interests are being served, corporate interests are being dislocated etc. So our business is the business of innovation and its finance.

As you know we have reviewed the over 4,000 patents that have been issued around SARS Coronavirus and we have done a very comprehensive review of the financing of all of the manipulations of coronavirus which gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the beta coronavirus family. We took the reported gene sequence which was reportedly indicated as such by the ICTV (the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses) of the World Health Organization. We took the actual genetic sequences that were reportedly novel and reviewed those against the patent records that were available as of the spring of 2020. And what we found are over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy. There was no novel coronavirus. There are countless very subtle modifications of coronavirus sequences that have been uploaded but there was no single identified novel coronavirus at all. As a matter of fact, we found records in the patent records of sequences attributed to novelty going to patents that were sought as early as 1999. So not only was this not a novel anything, it’s actually not been novel for over two decades.

Up until 1999 the topic of coronavirus was uniquely applied to veterinary sciences. The first vaccine ever patented for coronavirus was actually sought by Pfizer. The application for the first vaccine for Coronavirus which was specifically a Spike protein — so the exact same thing that allegedly we have rushed into invention — the first application was filed January 28th 2000 — 21 years ago. So the idea that we mysteriously stumbled on the way to intervene on vaccines is not only ludicrous, it is incredulous because Timothy Miller, Sharon Klepfer, Albert Paul Reed, and Elaine Jones on January 28th 2000 filed what ultimately was issued as U.S. patent 637-2224, which was the spike protein virus vaccine for the canine coronavirus, which is actually one of the multiple forms of coronavirus. But as I said the early work up until 1999 was largely focused in the area of vaccines for animals. The two animals receiving the most attention were probably Ralph Baric’s work on rabbits, and the rabbit cardiomyopathy that was associated with significant problems among rabbit breeders; and then canine coronavirus in Pfizer’s work to identify how to develop a spike protein. [These] target candidates give rise to the obvious evidence that says that neither the coronavirus concept of vaccine nor the principle of the coronavirus itself as a pathogen of interest with respect to the spike protein’s behavior is anything novel at all. As matter fact it’s 22 years old on based on patent files.

What’s more problematic and what is actually the most egregious problem is that Anthony Fauci and NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines, and so this is actually not a natural progression of a zoonotic modification of coronavirus. As a matter of fact, very specifically in 1999 Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill specifically to create — this comes directly from a patent application filed on April 19th, 2002 — you heard the date correctly, 2002 — where NIAID built an infectious replication-defective coronavirus specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. In other words we [U.S. NIAID] made SARS and we patented it on April 19th, 2002 before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia. Which [outbreak] as you know followed that by several months, that patent issued as US patent 727-9327. That patent clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing the fact that we knew that the ACE-2 receptor, the ACE-2 binding domain for the s-1 spike protein and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen, was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen. And that technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could actually harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.

My organization was asked to monitor biological and chemical weapons treaty violations in the very early days of 2000. You’ll remember the anthrax events in September of 2001. And we were part of an investigation that gave rise to the Congressional inquiry into not only the anthrax origins but also into what was unusual behavior around Bayer’s ciprofloxacin drug, which was a drug used as a potential treatment for Anthrax poisoning. And throughout the fall of 2001 we began monitoring an enormous number of bacterial and viral pathogens that were being patented through NIH, NIAID, and the US Armed Services Infectious Disease Program, and a number of other agencies internationally that collaborated with them. And our concern was that coronavirus was being seen as not only a potential manipulable agent for potential uses as a vaccine vector, but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate. So our first public reporting on this took place, prior to the SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001. So you can imagine how disappointed I am to be sitting here twenty years later having 20 years earlier pointed out that there was a problem looming on the horizon with respect to coronavirus. But after the alleged outbreak — and I will always say alleged outbreak — because I think it’s important for us to understand that coronavirus as a circulating pathogen inside of the viral model that we have is actually not new to the human condition and is not new to the last two decades. It’s actually been part of the sequence of proteins that that circulates for quite a long time.

in PHOTO LEGEND HANK AARON WHO DIED 2 WEEKS AFTER GETTING INJECTED WITH A PLAY VACCINE. ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY: vaccinated - infected with poisons. (See: Antibiotics)

vaccination - mandatory infection--typically administered by agents of Corporate State in their public schools of indoctrination camps. How can unvaccinated children endanger other children who are immunized?

But the alleged outbreak [of SARS-1] that took place in China in 2002 going into 2003 gave rise to a very problematic April 2003 filing by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention. And this topic is of critical importance to get the nuance very precise, because in addition to filing the entire gene sequence on what became SARS coronavirus, which is actually a violation of 35 U.S. Code Section 101 — you cannot patent a naturally occurring substance. The 35 U.S. Code Section 101 violation, what is patent number 7220852, now that patent also had a series of derivative patents associated with it. These patent applications were broken apart because they were of multiple patentable subject matter. These include U.S. Patent 465-9270-3p which is actually a very interesting designation, U.S. Patent 7776521. These patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus but also covered the means of detecting it using RT-PCR. Now the reason why that’s a problem is, if you actually both own the patent on the gene itself and you own the patent on its detection, you have a cutting-edge advantage to being able to control 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself but also its detection — meaning you have entire scientific and message control. And this patent sought by the CDC was allegedly justified by their public relations team as being sought so that everyone would be free to be able to research coronavirus. The only problem with that statement is it’s a lie. And the reason why it’s a lie is because the Patent Office not once but twice rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable because the sequence was already in the public domain. In other words prior to CDC’s filing for a patent the Patent Office found 99.9% identity with the already existing coronavirus recorded in the public domain.

And over the rejection of the Patent Examiner and after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007, the CDC over[came] the Patent Office’s rejection of their patent, and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS Coronavirus. So every public statement that CDC has made that said that this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own paid bribe to the Patent Office. And to make matters worse, they paid an additional fee to keep their application private. Last time I checked, if you’re trying to make information available for the public to research, you would not pay a fee to keep the information private. I wish I could have made up anything I just said, but all of that is available in the public patent archive record which any member of the public can review. The United States Patent Office has not only the evidence but the actual documents which I have in my possession now.

This is critically important because fact-checkers have repeatedly stated that the novel coronavirus designated as SARS-CoV-2 is in fact distinct from the CDC patent. And here is both the genetic and the patent problem. If you look at the gene sequence that is filed by CDC in 2003, again in 2005, and then again in 2006, what you find is identity in somewhere between 89 to 99% of the sequence overlaps that have been identified in what’s called the novel subclade of SARS-CoV-2. What we know is that the core designation of SARS coronavirus which is actually the clade of the beta coronavirus family, and the subclade that has been called SARS-CoV 2, have to overlap from a taxonomy point of view. You cannot have SARS designation on a thing without it first being SARS. So the disingenuous fact-checking that has been done, saying that somehow or another CDC has nothing to do with this particular patent or this particular pathogen, is beyond both the literal credibility of the published sequences, and it’s also beyond credulity when it comes to the ICTV taxonomy, because it very clearly states that this is in fact a subclade of the clade called SARS coronavirus.

Now what’s important is on the 28th of April — and listen to the date very carefully because this date is problematic — 3 days after CDC filed the patent on the SARS coronavirus in 2003, 3 days later Sequoia Pharmaceuticals — a company that was set up in Maryland — Sequoia Pharmaceuticals on the 28th of April 2003 filed a patent on antiviral agents of treatment and control of infections by coronavirus. CDC filed three days earlier and then the treatment was available 3 days later. Just hold that thought for a second. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals and ultimately [Ablig] Pharmaceuticals became rolled into the proprietary Holdings of Pfizer, [Crysel], and Johnson & Johnson, So ask yourself a simple question: How would one have a patent on a treatment for a thing that had been invented three days earlier? The patent in question, the April 28th 2003 patent 715-1163, issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals has another problem. The problem is it was issued and published before the CDC patent on coronavirus was actually allowed. So the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero. It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published. Because CDC had paid to keep it secret. This, my friends, is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering, and collusion. This is not a theory, this is evidence. You cannot have information in the future inform a treatment for a thing that did not exist. It is a RICO case and the RICO pattern which was established in April of 2003 for the first coronavirus was played out to exactly the same schedule when we see SARS-CoV show up, when we have Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID prior to the definition of the novel subclade. How do you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?

Before you actually have the thing on the 5th of June 2008 — which is an important date because it is actually around the time when DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Program in the United States, actively took an interest in coronavirus as a biological weapon — June 5th 2008 [Ablig], which as you know is now part of Sanofi, filed the series of patents that specifically targeted what we’ve been told is the novel feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and you heard what I just said, this is the 5th of June 2008 they found the specific sequence they targeted, what was called the poly-basic cleavage site for SARS-CoV the novel spike protein in the ACE-2 receptor binding domain which is allegedly novel, to SARS-CoV-2, and all of that was patented on the 5th of June 2008. And those patents in sequence were issued between November 24th of 2015 which was U.S. Patent 919-3780, so that one came out after the gain-of-function moratorium. That one came after the MERS outbreak in the Middle East but what you find is that then in 2016, 2017, 2019 a series of patents all covering not only the RNA strands but also the subcomponents of the gene strands were all issued to [Ablig] and Sanofi and then we have Rubius Therapeutics, we have Children’s Medical Corporation, we have countless others that include Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Protein Science Corporation, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong, Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai, all identifying in patent filings that ranged from 2008 until 2017 every attribute that was allegedly uniquely published by the single reference publication. The novel coronavirus reveals quote ‘natural insertions at the S1, S2 cleavage site of the spike protein and possible recombinant origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the paper that has routinely been used to identify the novel virus.

Unfortunately if you actually take what they report to be novel, you find 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly novel in SARS-CoV-2 specifically as it relates to the poly-basic cleavage site ACE-2 receptor binding domain, and the spike protein, so the clinically novel components of the clinically unique, clinically contagious virus [were already in those 73 patents]. There was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that, and by 2016 the paper that was funded during the gain-of-function moratorium that said that the SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence — written by none other than Ralph Baric — was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation. A statement made in 2015 by [Eco-Health Alliance Director] Peter Daszak reported in the National Academies of Science Press publication February 12th 2016, and I’m quoting ‘We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process‘ end quote. Let me repeat the quote: ‘We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process‘ end quote.

There wasn’t a lab leak. This was an intentional by weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people to get them addicted to a pan-coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released, and every study that has ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak is a red herring. And there’s really nothing that is new in this, zero. These patents on everything clinically novel, 73, [were] all issued before 2019. To prove that this was actually not a release of anything, because patent 727-9327, the patent on the recombinant nature of that lung targeting coronavirus, was transferred mysteriously from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institutes of Health in 2018. Now here’s the problem with that under the Bayh-Dole Act, the U.S. Government already has what’s called a march-in right provision. That means if the U.S. Government has paid for research they are entitled to benefit from that research at their demand or at their whim. So explain why in 2017 and 2018 suddenly the National Institutes of Health have to take ownership of the patent that they already had rights to, held by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. And how did they need to file a Certificate of Correction to make sure that it was legally enforceable because there was a typographical error in the grant reference in the first filing so they needed to make sure that not only did they get it right but they needed to make sure every typographical error contained in the patent was corrected on the single patent to develop the Vaccine Research Institute’s mandate which was shared between the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill in November of 2019 and Moderna in November of 2019, when UNC Chapel Hill and NIAID and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine a month before an outbreak ever happened, you have all the evidence.

The script for this was written first January 6th 2004, in Bioterrorism, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Therapeutics, and Immune Modulators. Moderna introduced the notion of what they called The New Normal which became the branded campaign that was adopted by the World Health Organization, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board which was the Board upon which the Chinese Director of Center for Disease Control, Elias of the Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci sat together on that Board of Directors. But the the first introduction of The New Normal Campaign, which was about getting people to accept a universal pan-influenza pan-coronavirus vaccine, was actually adopted January 6th 2004 so it’s it’s been around quite quite a long time.

Moderna knew that it was going to be placed in the front of the line with respect to the development of a vaccine in March of 2019, and this is a very important date because in March of 2019, for reasons that are not transparent, they suddenly amended a series of rejected patent filings, which is a very bizarre behavior, but they amended a number of patent filings specifically to make reference to a deliberate or accidental release of coronavirus. So in March 2019 [with] the amended failed patent applications, [they] begin the process of a coronavirus vaccine development. And they began dealing with a very significant problem that they had which was they relied on technology that they did not own. Two Canadian companies Arbutus Pharmaceuticals and Acuitas Pharmaceuticals actually own the patent on the lipid nanoparticle envelope that’s required to deliver the injection of the mRNA fragment. And those patents have been issued both in Canada and in the U.S. and then around the world. Moderna knew that they did not own the rights and began trying to negotiate with Arbutus and Acuitas to make the lipid nanoparticle patented technology available to be put into a vaccine. And we know, before that in November they entered into a research and cooperative research and development agreement with UNC Chapel Hill with respect to getting the spike protein to put inside of the lipid nanoparticle so that they actually had a candidate vaccine before we had a pathogen allegedly that was running around. What makes that story most problematic beyond the self-evident nature of it is that we know that from 2016 until 2019 at every one of the NIAID advisory Council Board meetings, Anthony Fauci lamented the fact that he could not find a way to get people to accept the universal influenza vaccine, which was his favorite target — he was trying to get the population to engage in this process.

And what becomes very evident with Peter Daszak (Eco-Health Alliance), UNC Chapel Hill and others and then most specifically by March of 2019 in the amended patent filings by Moderna, we see that there is an epiphany that says what if there was an accidental or an intentional release of respiratory pathogen. And what makes that particular phrase problematic is it is exactly recited in the book A World At Risk which is the scenario that was put together by the World Health Organization in September of 2019. So months before there’s an alleged pathogen, [this book from WHO] says that we need to have a coordinated global experience of a respiratory pathogen release which by September 2020 must put in place a universal capacity for public relations management, crowd control, and the acceptance of a universal vaccine mandate. That was September of 2019 and the language of an intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was written into the scenario that quote ‘must be completed by September 2020‘.

The ACE-2 receptor was already described in the patents before 2019. Specifically the ACE-2 receptor targeting mechanism for SARS coronavirus is in publications going back to 2008, in the weaponization conferences that took place in Slovenia in Europe, all across Europe, and all across the DARPA infrastructure. We’ve known about that since 2013 and its isolation and amplification, add to this 70 amendments that merge the two. The failed [Moderna] patent applications were essentially revitalized in March of 2019, to include the ‘deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen‘ language. Their [patenting] process is similar to other pharmaceutical companies where they ever-green applications and continually modify applications to enjoy the earliest priority dates available. But that’s why you have to go back and look at the amendment of the application records to find out when the actual amendment language is put in place. Any assertion that this pathogen is somehow unique or novel falls apart on the actual gene sequences which are published in the patent record and then more egregiously falls apart in the fact that we have Peter Daszak himself stating that we have to create public hype to get the public to accept the medical countermeasure of a pan-coronavirus vaccine. And what makes that most ludicrous is the fact that as we know World Health Organization had declared coronavirus kind of a dead letter — they said that that we had eradicated coronavirus as a concern. So why having eradicated it in 2007 and 2008, why did we start spending billions of dollars globally on a vaccine for a thing that had been eradicated by declaration in 2008? That falls into the zone of incredulity, to say the least.

The entirety of the evidence then is that this is a tool — the coronavirus and the vaccines, this is a tool and the interest of DARPA in creating a biological weapon out of this. This is a tool for everything else that latches onto this, including population control. This was seen as a highly malleable bio-weapon. There is no question that by 2005 it was unquestionably a weapon of choice. Unfortunately very well-meaning people get trapped into conversations about whether we’re having a vaccine for a virus. The fact of the matter is we’re not. We are injecting a spike protein mRNA secret mRNA sequence which is a computer simulation; it’s not derived from nature, it’s a computer simulation of a sequence which has been known and patented for years. And what we know is that that sequence is reported across phone conversations that took place between Moderna and the [NIH] Vaccine Research Center. The story that this is somehow prophylactic or preventative flies in the face of 100% of the evidence because the evidence makes it abundantly clear that there has been no effort by any pharmaceutical company to combat the virus. This is about getting people injected with the known-to-be-harmful spike protein. So the cover story is that if you get an expression of a spike protein you’re going to have some sort of general symptomatic relief but the fact of the matter is there has never been an intent to vaccinate a population as defined by the vaccination universe [namely, to prevent infection].

When Anthony Fauci tried desperately to get some of his quote ‘synthetic RNA vaccines’ [for HIV] published he had his own patents rejected by the Patent Office, and I want to read what the patent office told him when NIAID’s own Anthony Fauci thought that he could get an mRNA-like vaccine patented as a vaccine. And here’s the quote: ‘These arguments are persuasive to the extent that an antigenic peptide stimulates an immune response that may produce antibodies that bind to a specific peptide or protein, but it is not persuasive in regards to a vaccine.‘ This is the Patent Office. The immune response produced by a vaccine must be more than merely some immune response, it must also be protective as noted in the Patent Office action. ‘The art recognizes the term vaccine to be a compound which prevents infection. Applicant has not demonstrated that the instantly claimed vaccine meets even the lower standards set forth in the specification let alone the standard definition for being operative. In regards therefore claims five, seven, and nine are not operative.‘ As the anti-HIV vaccine which is what he was working on is not patentable utility. So Anthony Fauci himself was told by the Patent Office themselves that what he was proposing as a vaccine does not meet the patentable standard, the legal standard, or the clinical standard.

This is the problem going back to the very beginning of what’s alleged to be a pandemic. We do not have any evidence that the gene sequence alteration had any clinical significance whatsoever, There has not been a single paper published by anyone that is actually established that anything novel since November of 2019 has clinical distinction from anything that predates November of 2019. The problem with the 73 patents that I described is that those 73 patents all contain what was reported to be novel in December and January of 2019 and 2020 respectively, so the problem is that even if we were to accept that there are idiopathic pneumonias, even if we were to accept that there are some sets of pathogen induced symptoms, we do not have a single piece of published evidence that tells us that anything about the subclade SARS-CoV-2 has clinical distinction from anything that was known and published prior to November 2019 in 73 patents dating to 2008.

Influenza did not leave the human population. Influenza was a failed decade-long pan-influenza vaccine mandate that was desperately desperately desperately promoted by governments around the world. They failed and they decided if influenza doesn’t deliver on the public promise of getting everybody to get an injection, let’s change the pathogen.

US Judge Postpones (Again) Suit Over COVID Conditions at Dallas Jail. Inhumane Authorities Failed to Provide Soap, Cleaning supplies, Food, blankets and had Shortages of Basics like Toilet Paper

From [HERE] In late April 2020, shortly after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Texas and its partners filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Dallas County Sheriff Marian Brown in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

The lawsuit was continued again in July.

Representing nine plaintiffs, the filing comes in light of more than 30 individuals in the jail testing positive for COVID-19 back then. The lawsuit accuses Sheriff Brown and her department of failing to take proper action in order to protect incarcerated people from the novel virus.

Ideare Bailey, one of the nine plaintiffs, testified that when he was arrested for property theft and landed in the Dallas County Jail on April 6, he was not provided with a mask despite being forced to live in close proximity in a dormitory with 60 other people. He also had no feasible way to stay apart from the men coughing in the dorm.

When Bailey inevitably got sick, the medical staff not only refused to take his temperature until three whole days later but also were negligent of his aftercare after his positive COVID-19 diagnosis.

Allegedly, they only gave Bailey a mask soon after he tested positive and just gave him Tylenol to cope with the side effects. They did not administer insulin for his diabetes nor check his oxygen levels.

Other plaintiffs have also spoken out on how during the pandemic the jail did not provide access to soap and cleaning supplies, had a constant shortage of food and blankets, and were inconsistent in giving out basic supplies like toilet paper.

The lawsuit is asking the District Court to immediately remove medically at-risk people from jail and ensure that the jail establishes proper health protocol to combat the virus spread, such as providing sufficient cleaning supplies, testing regularly, and enforcing physical distancing.

At the filing of the lawsuit, Alison Grinter of the NGAN Legal Advocacy Fund stated that the COVID-19 pandemic “will spread faster and hit harder in our jails and [the court] must take action now to prevent needless deaths.”

Terri Burke – former executive director of ACLU of Texas – also commented, “People’s lives are at stake … and [we are] asking the court to take immediate action. We [must make] sure that our vulnerable loved ones in jail don’t get left behind and have a way out.”

However, reality often does not meet expectations.

The case has been pending for more than a year now and a trial was initially scheduled to take place on July 27. But, citing the need for the court to shuffle through an increasing backlog of motions, U.S. District Judge Ada Brown ordered the postponement of the upcoming trial and has yet to set a new date.

In light of this delay, objections have obviously erupted from ACLU of Texas and advocates of their lawsuit.

ACLU of Texas staff attorney Brian Klosterboer stated that “this is a lawsuit that could be resolved if the county takes some small steps to keep people safe in jail” and the million dollars spent fighting the lawsuit could have gone into actually solving the growing health crisis in the jail.

Jails and prisons are generally accepted as one of the most dangerous places amidst the pandemic as the outbreak of the virus is much stronger in their facilities. Dallas County Jail is no exception because during November last year, it was already one of the worst hotspots for the disease in the country.

A study by the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas found that incarcerated people in Texas jails and prisons tested positive at a rate of 490 percent higher than the state’s general population.

Evidently, according to an ACLU of Texas statement earlier this month, the situation in the Dallas County Jail has not improved much since the filing of the lawsuit in that it “still does not provide comprehensive testing for COVID-19 … [and even] failed its annual inspection for the first time in years … due in part to a failure to provide soap and hygiene products [to detainees].”

As of May 2021, it has also purportedly administered vaccines to, at most, just 25 percent of the jail’s population.

Japanese Company, Shionogi, has Started Human Trials of the First Once-a-day Pill for COVID. Pill Aims to Neutralize the Virus 5 days after a Patient takes it w/o Vaccine

From [HERE] A Japanese company has started human trials of the first once-a-day pill for Covid-19 patients, joining Pfizer Inc. PFE 0.51% and Merck MRK 1.32% & Co. in the race to find treatments for the disease.

Osaka-based Shionogi 4507 3.20% & Co., which helped develop the blockbuster cholesterol drug Crestor, said it designed its pill to attack the Covid-19 virus. It said the once-a-day dosing would be more convenient. The company said it is testing the drug and any side effects in trials that began this month and are likely to continue until next year.

Shionogi is months behind Pfizer and Merck, which have started later-stage tests of pills to treat Covid-19. Pfizer has said its twice-daily pill could be ready to hit the market as soon as this year. It is preparing to enroll more than 2,000 patients in a test of the antiviral pillcombined with a booster antiviral drug against a placebo.

All three companies aim to fill one of the biggest gaps in fighting the pandemic. Vaccines remain effective at preventing serious illness from known strains of the Covid-19 virus including the contagious Delta strain, studies have shown. But some people don’t want to get vaccinated, and cases can occur for those who do get their shots. 

Existing treatments, including Gilead Sciences Inc.’s infused antiviral drug remdesivir, generally have to be administered in hospitals and work only some of the time. Other drugs that can be given in hospitals include monoclonal antibody drugs such as one made byRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and the steroid dexamethasone.

Drugmakers are looking for a pill that those who get a positive Covid-19 test could take at home while their symptoms are mild. Such medicines already exist for influenza, includingRoche Holding AG’s Tamiflu and Shionogi’s Xofluza, although they don’t work for all patients and might be prescribed too late to do much good. Xofluza is marketed in the U.S. by Roche.

“Our target is a very safe oral compound, like Tamiflu, like Xofluza,” said Isao Teshirogi, Shionogi’s chief executive officer. He said Shionogi’s Covid-19 pill aims to neutralize the virus five days after a patient takes it.

Dr. Teshirogi said Shionogi expects to enroll 50 to 100 healthy subjects in its trial in Japan. A larger trial comparing the drug with a placebo in Covid-19 patients could begin in Japan later this year, he said.

The failure rate for drug trials is generally high. Any side effect, even a relatively mild one such as nausea, could make a Covid-19 pill impractical for home use. It isn’t yet known whether getting rid of the virus in patients would translate into reducing serious complications such as low oxygen that land people in the hospital, researchers working on Covid-19 treatments said. [MORE]

Pfizer and BioNTech Raise Price on COVID Vaccines Sold to US Government from $19 to $24 a Shot on Latest Purchase of 200 Million Vaccines. So Far US has Bought 1 Billion Doses

From [HERE] The U.S. has purchased 200 million additional Covid-19 vaccine doses from Pfizer Inc.PFE 0.51% and partner BioNTech SE, BNTX 0.35% at a higher price than previous deals.

The U.S. is paying about $24 a dose, according to Pfizer, up from the $19.50 that the government paid in its earlier deals to supply the country. The deal brings the total purchased from the U.S. to 1 billion doses.

The companies said they expect to deliver 110 million of the additional doses by the end of the year, with the rest by the end of next April. Pfizer said the U.S. has the option to acquire an updated version of the vaccine targeting variants, should they be available and authorized by regulators. Pfizer is testing one targeting the Beta variant, which was first identified in South Africa. 

“The price for this order accounts for the additional investment necessary to produce, package and deliver new formulations of the vaccine, as well as the increased cost associated with delivering the vaccine in smaller pack sizes to facilitate delivery at individual provider offices, including pediatricians,” a Pfizer spokesman said in a statement.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki confirmed that the Biden administration’s purchase could be used to inoculate children or serve as booster shots should health regulators deem them necessary.

“We’ve always prepared for every scenario,” Ms. Psaki said, noting that the additional shots will be delivered between the upcoming fall and the spring of 2022.

Officials from the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have yet to say that booster shots are necessary. Pfizer said earlier this month it would seek clearance from U.S. regulators to distribute a booster shot of its Covid-19 vaccine. 

More than 86 million people in the U.S. ages 12 and up have received the two-dose shot, the most among the three shots cleared by regulators for use, according to federal figures.

Johnson and Johnson Hits the Jackpot w/COVID: Vaccine Should Notch $2.5 Billion in Revenue for the Year, according to Chief Financial Officer

From [HERE] Greater demand for medical devices, drugs and consumer-health products helped boost sales and profit for Johnson & Johnson JNJ 1.06% in the latest quarter, a sign people are returning for healthcare services they deferred earlier in the pandemic.

Sales of J&J’s medical devices climbed 63% year over year, the company said Wednesday. Higher sales of the company’s skin-care and beauty products helped lift J&J’s consumer-health revenue by 13% compared with a year earlier.

The New Brunswick, N.J.-based company, a bellwether for the healthcare industry because its products span several categories, logged sales of $23.31 billion—a 27% increase year over year—and adjusted earnings of $2.48 a share.

Wall Street analysts had forecast adjusted earnings of $2.29 a share and revenue of $22.49 billion, according to FactSet.

Shares of Johnson & Johnson were largely flat Wednesday.

J&J executives expressed confidence the return to healthcare use would continue, saying they didn’t expect the spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus would have an impact.

“Our outlook for the rest of the year really remains strong for our sector regardless of what happens with emerging variants and any continued blips as it relates to Covid,” said Jennifer Taubert, who runs J&J’s pharmaceuticals business.

Ashley McEvoy, J&J’s medical devices chief, said hospitals appear better than earlier in the pandemic at handling any surges in Covid-19 cases while keeping elective surgeries going. Yet she said some hospitals in the U.S. are beginning to delay elective procedures as Covid-19 cases mount.

The company raised its guidance for full-year performance. J&J forecast sales of $93.8 billion to $94.6 billion and adjusted earnings of $9.60 to $9.70 a share, up from the maximums from its previous forecast of $91.6 billion and $9.57 a share.

J&J said sales of its Covid-19 vaccine, which generated $164 million in revenue in the second quarter, would pick up during the latter parts of the year. The shot should notch $2.5 billion in revenue for the year, most of it in the fourth quarter, Chief Financial Officer Joseph Wolk said.

CBPP Study Says COVID has Exacerbated “Socialist Distancing" btw Whites and Non-Whites as Black/Latino Households Still Disproportionately Lack Sufficient Food and are Unable to Pay Rent/Daily Needs

From [HERE] While employment is rising and strains on household budgets have eased in recent months, the employment rate remains low and millions still report that their households did not get enough to eat or are not caught up on rent payments. We are able to track the extent of the nation’s progress against hardship thanks to nearly real-time data from several sources on the ongoing economic crisis.

Key hardship indicators show strong improvement since December, Census Bureau data show, aided by job growth and government benefits. Hardship rates fell especially fast after the enactment of the American Rescue Plan on March 11, which included $1,400 payments for most Americans as well as other assistance to struggling households. (See Figure 1.) Nonetheless, 20 million adults live in households that did not get enough to eat, 11.5 million adult renters are behind on rent, and some of the progress from late March appears to be waning.

The impacts of the pandemic and the economic fallout have been widespread, but remain particularly prevalent among Black adults, Latino adults,[1] and other people of color. These disproportionate impacts reflect harsh, long-standing inequities — often stemming from structural racism — in education, employment, housing, and health care that the current crisis has exacerbated. Households with children also continue to face especially high hardship rates. Considerable evidence suggests that reducing childhood hardship and poverty would yield improvements in education and health, higher productivity and earnings, less incarceration, and other lasting benefits to children and society.[2]

Report is [HERE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Socialist distancing – the ever-expanding and increasing disparity between the haves and the have-nots until the Socialist (i.e., monopoly capitalist) Welfare State becomes the Farewell State—farewell to your rights, your family, friends and even your life through Plandemics (Coronavirus), $camdemics (Corporate State turned Surveillance and Nanny State), 5G bio-weaponized eugenics, starvation, vaccinations, civil unrest, genocide and other nefarious LWO (Last World Order) activities that will greatly reduce the world’s population by 2030. Before Social Distancing, we were experiencing the effects of “Socialist Distancing”...the ever-widening separation between the “haves” (holders) and the “have-nots” (held-back) due to “monopoly capitalism” (centralization of credit in the hands of the State) which by wide academic recognition is the core attribute of communism / socialism, in fact, it is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto. The litmus test to any political system is what is used as “money” and who controls (monopolizes) its “issuance.” Labels just don’t cut it. Think deeper...learn to access the underlying reality behind the truth veneer you’ve been conditioned to hold or have been told. (See: Plandemic, $camdemics, Vaccines, Coronavirus, “Monopoly Capitalism,” Exchange, Economics, Matrix Capitalism, Political Money, GEO-Dollars, The Farewell State, Trapitalism, Cultural Induction & COVERT-19)

'Because We Said So' Not Good Enough for Everybody: Surgeon General Mad About Covid Misinformation but Fails to Dispel Claim that Vaccines Carry Substantially Serious Side Effects and May Cause Death

From [HERE] Joe Biden’s administration renewed its assault on social media companies allegedly spreading Covid-19 misinformation on Sunday, as new infections continued to surge across the entire US.

Vivek Murthy, the US surgeon general who has accused companies including Facebook of “poisoning information” about coronavirus vaccines, said they were not doing enough to check the online proliferation of false claims.

“The reality is that misinformation is still spreading like wildfire in our country aided and abetted by technology platforms,” he said on Fox News Sunday.

“I’m worried about what is to come because we are seeing increasing cases among the unvaccinated in particular. It’s so important people have the information they need about the vaccine … it is our fastest, most effective way out of this pandemic.” [MORE]

Last month a medical study that appeared on the National Library of Medicine website called "The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations — We Should Rethink the Policy" explained that the COVID vaccines are effective but carry significant risk of death and serious side effects. The doctors who authored the study, Harald Walach Rainer (Poznan University of the Medical Sciences, Pediatric Hospital in Poland ) J. Klement (Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, Germany) and Wouter Aukem (Independent Data and Pattern Scientist, Brinkenbergweg, The Netherlands), explain that ‘governments should rethink their vaccination policies in light of the deadly risks involved.’

The study was removed from the internet last week and replaced with a version that has “retracted” stamped across it. The original is posted here. The abstract states:

COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits. Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects. Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.

Covid Deaths in Africa Jumped 40% Last Week

From [HERE] Africa is now in the deadliest stage of its pandemic, and there is little prospect of relief in sight.

The Delta variant is sweeping across the continent. Namibia and Tunisia are reporting more deaths per capita than any other country. Hospitals across the continent are filling up, oxygen supplies and medical workers are stretched thin and recorded deaths jumped 40 percent last week alone.

But only about 1 percent of Africans have been fully vaccinated. And even the African Union’s modest goal of getting 20 percent of the population vaccinated by the end of 2021 seems out of reach.

Rich nations have bought up most doses long into the future, often far more than they could conceivably need. Hundreds of millions of shots from a global vaccine-sharing effort have failed to materialize.

Supplies to African countries are unlikely to increase much in the next few months, rendering the most effective tool against Covid, vaccines, of little use in the current wave. Instead, many countries are resorting to lockdowns and curfews.

Even a year from now, supplies may not be enough to meet demand from Africa’s 1.3 billion people unless richer countries share their stockpiles and rethink how the distribution system should work.

“The blame squarely lies with the rich countries,” said Dr. Githinji Gitahi, a commissioner with Africa Covid-19 Response, a continental task force. “A vaccine delayed is a vaccine denied.”

Unable to strike early deals for vaccines, African nations relied on Covax, a global partnership, to deliver free doses to countries that needed them.

But Covax deliveries ground to a halt after India imposed export restrictions on the AstraZeneca vaccine as it dealt with its own resurgence this year.

U.S. Sending Senior FBI, DHS Officers “to Assist" Haiti in Aftermath of Moïse Assassination

From [HERE] Senior officials with the FBI and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will go to the nation as soon as possible after receiving a request from Haitian authorities for security and investigative assistance.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the objective of the delegation is to support law enforcement efforts on the ground and provide resources in terms of womanpower and manpower, in addition to financial assistance.

Moïse was shot dead in his private residence in the hills above Port-au-Prince around 1 a.m. Wednesday. The attack also wounded his wife, Martine Moïse, who was transported to a hospital in Florida for treatment.

Four people suspected of being involved in Moïse's assassination were killed by police in a shootout. Haitian authorities have arrested 17 suspects and are searching for eight more believed to be involved in the slaying.

"We are going to bring them to justice," National Police Chief Léon Charles said at a news conference Thursday. During the briefing, the 17 suspects sat handcuffed on the floor.

Two U.S. citizens of Haitian descent were among those arrested, investigative Judge Clément Noël told French newspaper Le Nouvelliste. Noël said the two Haitian Americans were acting as translators for a group of attackers that originally planned to arrest, not kill, Moïse.

The American suspects have been identified as James Solages, 35, and Joseph Vincent, 55.

Psaki said Friday that the ongoing investigation into the assassination, including the arrest of two U.S. citizens, is "not going to impact the assistance we are providing to the people of Haiti."

"Our assistance is to help the people of Haiti and to help them get through what is a very challenging time and has long been, even before the assassination of the president," Psaki told reporters.

Newsweek reached out to the FBI and DHS for comment on the law enforcement delegation but didn't receive a response before publication.

The White House also announced Friday that Haiti is one of the countries that will receive COVID-19 vaccines from the United States. Psaki didn't provide the number of vaccines that will be shipped but said the administration is preparing to deliver them as early as next week. [MORE]

[if the vaccines were unsafe would the privately owned, profit-making, White elite-controlled Dependent Media let us know?] FDA Gives Warning of Rare Nerve Syndrome to J&J Vaccine

From [HERE] The Food and Drug Administration warned Monday that Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine can lead to an increased risk of a rare neurological condition known as Guillain–Barré syndrome, another setback for a vaccine that has largely been sidelined in the United States.

Although regulators have found that the chances of developing the condition are low, they appear to be three to five times higher among recipients of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine than among the general population in the United States, according to people familiar with the decision. The warning was attached to fact sheetsabout the vaccine for providers and patients.

Federal officials have identified 100 suspected cases of Guillain-Barré disease among recipients of the one-dose shot through a federal monitoring system that relies on patients and health care providers to report adverse effects of vaccines. Ninety five percent of those cases were considered serious and required hospitalization, the F.D.A. said. The reports are preliminary.

In a statement, the agency said that while “the available evidence suggests an association” between the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and increased risk of Guillain–Barré syndrome, “it is insufficient to establish a causal relationship.” [MORE]

Peer Reviewed Study in Medical Journal Removed from the Internet says COVID Vaccines are More Risky than Advertised and Should Be Used Sparingly b/c They Cause Death and Serious Side Effects

From [HERE] A medical study that appeared on the National Library of Medicine website called "The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations — We Should Rethink the Policy" explained that the COVID vaccines are effective but carry significant risk of death and serious side effects. The doctors who authored the study, Harald Walach Rainer (Poznan University of the Medical Sciences, Pediatric Hospital in Poland ) J. Klement (Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, Germany) and Wouter Aukem (Independent Data and Pattern Scientist, Brinkenbergweg, The Netherlands), explain that ‘governments should rethink their vaccination policies in light of the deadly risks involved.’

The study was removed from the internet last week and replaced with a version that has “retracted” stamped across it. The original is posted here. The abstract states:

COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits. Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects. Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.

The conclusion states:

Conclusions.

The present assessment raises the question whether it would be necessary to rethink policies and use COVID-19 vaccines more sparingly and with some discretion only in those that are willing to accept the risk because they feel more at risk from the true infection than the mock infection. Perhaps it might be necessary to dampen the enthusiasm by sober facts? In our view, the EMA and national authorities should instigate a safety review into the safety database of COVID-19 vaccines and governments should carefully consider their policies in light of these data. Ideally, independent scientists should carry out thorough case reviews of the very severe cases, so that there can be evidence-based recommendations on who is likely to benefit from a SARS-CoV2 vaccination and who is in danger of suffering from side effects. Currently, our estimates show that we have to accept four fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2–11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations, placing risks and benefits on the same order of magnitude.

COVID "Socialist Distancing" Has Lowered the Life Expectancy of Black People to 71.5 Yrs, Increasing the Gap w/Whites [77.6 yrs]. Still, the "White Race," Unable to Produce Color, Continues to Decline

As stated by Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, white people are vulnerable to their sense of numerical inadequacy. Most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

White plus Black equals Colored.

White plus Brown equals Colored.

White plus Yellow equals Colored.

The declining white population is not a new or reversible trend - the decline has only quickened. Although rarely discussed, white people are genetic recessive. It is scientific fact that Black is a genetically dominant trait. Whenever Black mixes with White, which is a recessive genetic trait, Black will dominate. In general, this means "whites" cannot reproduce a white child when they have sexual relations with non-whites. The so-called white "race" can and eventually will be replaced or "genetically annihilated" through such assimilation or social intermixing with non-whites. As white populations have been consistently declining, Black and Brown populations are surging. And this scares some racists to death, CAUSING THEM TO ACT OUT GENOCIDALLY AND genthanasiastically [MORE]

The LA Times states Americans were in trouble, with an average life expectancy that had sunk below that of any other affluent country.

Now, new research finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has delivered another crushing blow to longevity in the United States. In just two years, the pandemic that has killed more than 600,000 Americans has slashed close to two years off the average life expectancy.

An American born in 2018 could expect to live 78.7 years, on average. At the end of 2020, that number had fallen to 76.9 years, according to research published this week in the medical journal BMJ.

That precipitous drop — more than eight times steeper than in any other country in the U.S.’ economic league — now puts American life spans on par with those seen in Peru, Colombia, Chile and Thailand. Not since World War II have Americans experienced such a steep dive in longevity.

But those averages hide an even more shocking reality in communities of color. The pandemic’s power to shorten the lives of Black and brown people in the U.S. has been even more striking.

In fact, in just one year, the pandemic has wiped out two decades of progress made by Black Americans in narrowing a longevity gap with white Americans. 

In 2018, a Black American had an average life span of 74.7 years. But by the end of 2020, the life expectancy of a Black American had dropped by more than three years, to 71.5 years. Meanwhile, the average life span for white Americans dropped from 78.6 years to 77.3 years.

In other words, the gap between Black and white Americans grew from 3.9 years to 5.8 years.

For Latino Americans, the pandemic’s damage has cut even more deeply. Despite their higher rates of poverty and hardship, U.S. residents who identify as Latino have historically lived close to three years longer, on average, than non-Hispanic whites.

But the pandemic’s outsized toll in Latino communities, especially among working-age adults, has all but wiped out that advantage.

In 2018, a Latino resident of the United States could expect to live 81.8 years. By 2020, that had sunk to 78 years.

“Look at the massive disproportionality and the profundity of the insult shown here,” said Dr. Clyde Yancy, a Northwestern University cardiologist who has called on colleagues to address racial and ethnic inequities in medicine. “We have to reengineer our societies and healthcare for better opportunity, and for greater health equity. If we had to roll up our sleeves before, now we have to fundamentally start over.”

In an editorial published alongside the new research, UC Berkeley demographer Magali Barbieri wrote that the pandemic has “operated as a magnifier of already existing vulnerabilities within the U.S. population.”

The United States spends by far the most on healthcare of any high-income country — a whopping 17% of its gross domestic product, Barbieri wrote. But even that won’t fix the inequities made plain by the new life expectancy numbers if leaders fail to acknowledge and address the needs of vulnerable Americans, she wrote.

Computing figures for average life expectancy at birth may seem like a sterile statistical exercise. But they are an important measure of a nation’s health. In addition to revealing health inequities within a given country, they offer a standard yardstick by which to compare the health of people in different countries.

Childhood vaccination, better pregnancy care and wider use of disease-preventing treatments will nudge a country’s life expectancies upward. War, famine, disease and inefficient use of medical resources will drive them downward. Life span inequities within a country will drag down a country’s average and expose systemic discrimination and societal fissures.

The paper’s senior author, Dr. Steven Woolf, said he is often challenged to understand why the world’s wealthiest country — a country that quickly produced a trio of COVID-19 vaccines that are among the world’s most powerful — has fared so poorly in limiting the pandemic’s toll.

“It’s a vivid paradox,” Woolf said. “We really do a fantastic job in developing cutting-edge medications and technologies in healthcare, but a pretty lousy job of distributing them fairly. The same thing happens with diabetes, hypertension, and even maternal and child health. ... We have a fundamental problem with providing healthcare and getting it out to the people who need it most.”

UNDECEIVER DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINED, “THE BANE OF THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY IS THE EXPLOITATIVE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY WHICH PROJECTS A SO-CALLED CIVILIZED, FRATERNAL, EGALITARIAN, LIBERAL FACE WHILE CONCURRENTLY SEEKING TO MAINTAIN WHITE SUPREMACY. THIS MEANS THAT THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY MUST MAINTAIN AFRICAN SUBORDINATION WHILE NOT APPEARING TO DO SO. IT MUST CANNIBALISTICALLY SACRIFICE THE VITALITY, AUTONOMY, AND IF NEED BE, THE LIFE OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY WHILE POSING AS ITS BENEFACTOR AND SAVIOR. IT PLEADS INNOCENCE WHILE WASHING ITS HANDS OF THE BLOOD OF AFRICAN PEOPLE. THIS DUPLICITOUS TASK CAN ONLY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING IT APPEAR THAT THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY IS DYING OF NATURAL CAUSES, NOT OF AN INGENIOUS ATTEMPT ON THE PART OF THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY TO STRANGLE IT TO DEATH.” [MORE]

PHFREEDOM FIGHTER DR. BLYND DEFINES: SOCIALIST DISTANCING – THE EVER-EXPANDING AND INCREASING DISPARITY BETWEEN THE HAVES AND THE HAVE-NOTS UNTIL THE SOCIALIST (I.E., MONOPOLY CAPITALIST) WELFARE STATE BECOMES THE FAREWELL STATE—FAREWELL TO YOUR RIGHTS, YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS AND EVEN YOUR LIFE THROUGH PLANDEMICS (CORONAVIRUS), $CAMDEMICS (CORPORATE STATE TURNED SURVEILLANCE AND NANNY STATE), 5G BIO-WEAPONIZED EUGENICS, STARVATION, VACCINATIONS, CIVIL UNREST, GENOCIDE AND OTHER NEFARIOUS LWO (LAST WORLD ORDER) ACTIVITIES THAT WILL GREATLY REDUCE THE WORLD’S POPULATION BY 2030. (SEE: PLANDEMIC, $CAMDEMIC, VACCINES, CORONAVIRUS, THE FAREWELL STATE & COVERT-19) [MORE]

ACCORDING TO UNDECEIVER ISHMAEL REED: GENTHANASIA - THE NON-VIOLENT WEEDING OUT OF UNDESIRABLES OR THE SLOW MOTION EXTERMINATION OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE.[MORE]

COVID "Socialist Distancing" Has Lowered the Life Expectancy of Black People to 71.5 Yrs, Increasing the Gap w/Whites [77.6 yrs]. Still, the "White Race," Unable to Produce Color, Continues to Decline

As stated by Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, white people are vulnerable to their sense of numerical inadequacy. Most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

White plus Black equals Colored.

White plus Brown equals Colored.

White plus Yellow equals Colored.

The declining white population is not a new or reversible trend - the decline has only quickened. Although rarely discussed, white people are genetic recessive. It is scientific fact that Black is a genetically dominant trait. Whenever Black mixes with White, which is a recessive genetic trait, Black will dominate. In general, this means "whites" cannot reproduce a white child when they have sexual relations with non-whites. The so-called white "race" can and eventually will be replaced or "genetically annihilated" through such assimilation or social intermixing with non-whites. As white populations have been consistently declining, Black and Brown populations are surging. And this scares some racists to death, CAUSING THEM TO ACT OUT GENOCIDALLY AND genthanasiastically [MORE]

The LA Times states Americans were in trouble, with an average life expectancy that had sunk below that of any other affluent country.

Now, new research finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has delivered another crushing blow to longevity in the United States. In just two years, the pandemic that has killed more than 600,000 Americans has slashed close to two years off the average life expectancy.

An American born in 2018 could expect to live 78.7 years, on average. At the end of 2020, that number had fallen to 76.9 years, according to research published this week in the medical journal BMJ.

That precipitous drop — more than eight times steeper than in any other country in the U.S.’ economic league — now puts American life spans on par with those seen in Peru, Colombia, Chile and Thailand. Not since World War II have Americans experienced such a steep dive in longevity.

But those averages hide an even more shocking reality in communities of color. The pandemic’s power to shorten the lives of Black and brown people in the U.S. has been even more striking.

In fact, in just one year, the pandemic has wiped out two decades of progress made by Black Americans in narrowing a longevity gap with white Americans. 

In 2018, a Black American had an average life span of 74.7 years. But by the end of 2020, the life expectancy of a Black American had dropped by more than three years, to 71.5 years. Meanwhile, the average life span for white Americans dropped from 78.6 years to 77.3 years.

In other words, the gap between Black and white Americans grew from 3.9 years to 5.8 years.

For Latino Americans, the pandemic’s damage has cut even more deeply. Despite their higher rates of poverty and hardship, U.S. residents who identify as Latino have historically lived close to three years longer, on average, than non-Hispanic whites.

But the pandemic’s outsized toll in Latino communities, especially among working-age adults, has all but wiped out that advantage.

In 2018, a Latino resident of the United States could expect to live 81.8 years. By 2020, that had sunk to 78 years.

“Look at the massive disproportionality and the profundity of the insult shown here,” said Dr. Clyde Yancy, a Northwestern University cardiologist who has called on colleagues to address racial and ethnic inequities in medicine. “We have to reengineer our societies and healthcare for better opportunity, and for greater health equity. If we had to roll up our sleeves before, now we have to fundamentally start over.”

In an editorial published alongside the new research, UC Berkeley demographer Magali Barbieri wrote that the pandemic has “operated as a magnifier of already existing vulnerabilities within the U.S. population.”

The United States spends by far the most on healthcare of any high-income country — a whopping 17% of its gross domestic product, Barbieri wrote. But even that won’t fix the inequities made plain by the new life expectancy numbers if leaders fail to acknowledge and address the needs of vulnerable Americans, she wrote.

Computing figures for average life expectancy at birth may seem like a sterile statistical exercise. But they are an important measure of a nation’s health. In addition to revealing health inequities within a given country, they offer a standard yardstick by which to compare the health of people in different countries.

Childhood vaccination, better pregnancy care and wider use of disease-preventing treatments will nudge a country’s life expectancies upward. War, famine, disease and inefficient use of medical resources will drive them downward. Life span inequities within a country will drag down a country’s average and expose systemic discrimination and societal fissures.

The paper’s senior author, Dr. Steven Woolf, said he is often challenged to understand why the world’s wealthiest country — a country that quickly produced a trio of COVID-19 vaccines that are among the world’s most powerful — has fared so poorly in limiting the pandemic’s toll.

“It’s a vivid paradox,” Woolf said. “We really do a fantastic job in developing cutting-edge medications and technologies in healthcare, but a pretty lousy job of distributing them fairly. The same thing happens with diabetes, hypertension, and even maternal and child health. ... We have a fundamental problem with providing healthcare and getting it out to the people who need it most.”

UNDECEIVER DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINED, “THE BANE OF THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY IS THE EXPLOITATIVE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY WHICH PROJECTS A SO-CALLED CIVILIZED, FRATERNAL, EGALITARIAN, LIBERAL FACE WHILE CONCURRENTLY SEEKING TO MAINTAIN WHITE SUPREMACY. THIS MEANS THAT THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY MUST MAINTAIN AFRICAN SUBORDINATION WHILE NOT APPEARING TO DO SO. IT MUST CANNIBALISTICALLY SACRIFICE THE VITALITY, AUTONOMY, AND IF NEED BE, THE LIFE OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY WHILE POSING AS ITS BENEFACTOR AND SAVIOR. IT PLEADS INNOCENCE WHILE WASHING ITS HANDS OF THE BLOOD OF AFRICAN PEOPLE. THIS DUPLICITOUS TASK CAN ONLY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING IT APPEAR THAT THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY IS DYING OF NATURAL CAUSES, NOT OF AN INGENIOUS ATTEMPT ON THE PART OF THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY TO STRANGLE IT TO DEATH.” [MORE]

PHFREEDOM FIGHTER DR. BLYND DEFINES: SOCIALIST DISTANCING – THE EVER-EXPANDING AND INCREASING DISPARITY BETWEEN THE HAVES AND THE HAVE-NOTS UNTIL THE SOCIALIST (I.E., MONOPOLY CAPITALIST) WELFARE STATE BECOMES THE FAREWELL STATE—FAREWELL TO YOUR RIGHTS, YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS AND EVEN YOUR LIFE THROUGH PLANDEMICS (CORONAVIRUS), $CAMDEMICS (CORPORATE STATE TURNED SURVEILLANCE AND NANNY STATE), 5G BIO-WEAPONIZED EUGENICS, STARVATION, VACCINATIONS, CIVIL UNREST, GENOCIDE AND OTHER NEFARIOUS LWO (LAST WORLD ORDER) ACTIVITIES THAT WILL GREATLY REDUCE THE WORLD’S POPULATION BY 2030. (SEE: PLANDEMIC, $CAMDEMIC, VACCINES, CORONAVIRUS, THE FAREWELL STATE & COVERT-19) [MORE]

ACCORDING TO UNDECEIVER ISHMAEL REED: GENTHANASIA - THE NON-VIOLENT WEEDING OUT OF UNDESIRABLES OR THE SLOW MOTION EXTERMINATION OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE.[MORE]

So Called "Delta Variant" of Covid-19 Surges Across Africa

From [HERE] The more-transmissible Delta variant of the coronavirus is surging across Africa, the continent with the least vaccines and weakest healthcare systems, feeding fears among epidemiologists and political leaders of a public-health disaster that could echo the tragedy that unfolded in India in the spring.

The speed of the takeover of the variant, which was first identified in India and is forcing governments around the globe to tighten restrictions on social and economic activities, has shocked health experts in Africa, a continent that—in part thanks to its younger population—has recorded fewer Covid-19 deaths than other regions. Some are warning that previous infection from another strain of the virus may not protect against Delta, leaving swaths of the population that were believed to be immune once again vulnerable.

In South Africa, families have been driving ailing relatives across state lines to try to secure one of the country’s few remaining intensive-care beds. On a recent June night, every one of the 30 Covid-19 patients in the intensive-care unit of Uganda’s largest hospital died as the oxygen supplies ran out. In Zambia’s capital, Lusaka, doctors say the mortuaries have run out of space.

“We are in the grip of a devastating wave that by all indications seems like it will be worse than those that preceded it,” South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said Sunday in a televised address in which he imposed new lockdown measures. “The rapid spread is extremely serious,” he said.

Africa’s third wave of infection comes at a perilous moment for the continent: Just 1.1% of its 1.3 billion people are fully vaccinated, medical supplies have been depleted, doctors are physically and mentally exhausted and, in some cases, unpaid and hospitals are turning patients away for lack of beds and oxygen.

Governments, struggling to rebound from the region’s worst recession on record, had been reluctant to impose new lockdowns until they saw the speed of the Delta’s expansion.

The reason—and the cause of rising panic—is the spread of the Delta variant that ripped through India in April and May, killing nearly 400,000 people according to the government and more than 1 million according to some epidemiologists. The Delta strain, also known as B.1.617.2, will probably make up 50% of Covid-19 infections in the U.S. by early to mid-July, according to researchers. It has been cited by Anthony Fauci, President Biden’s chief medical adviser, as the greatest threat to U.S. efforts to defeat the virus.

Across Africa, at least 20 countries are experiencing sharp increases in infections that have already surpassed or are projected to top earlier peaks, according to the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Over the past week, Covid-19 infections on the continent jumped by 31%, while the number of deaths rose by 19%, the agency said.

The NOI says COVID-19 Vaccines are the Drug Pushers’ Dream of Profit and Depopulation

From [HERE] Why are Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates pushing vaccines so hard and completely dismissing known therapies or treatments for COVID-19? Minister Farrakhan directly addressed them both in “The Criterion”:

“They’re making money now plotting to give seven billion five hundred million people a vaccination. Dr. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and Melinda, you want to depopulate the earth? What the hell gives you that right? Who are you to sit down with your billions and talk about who can live and who should die?”

Let’s go back a bit to understand the background leading up to the “Warp Speed” production of “vaccines”, when there are dietary regimens, therapies and treatments to prevent and/or dramatically reduce the impact of COVID-19 and viruses like it.

In December of 2017 America dropped the ban on genetic modifications of viruses, which allowed non-military labs to genetically modify viruses, like in China’s Wuhan province laboratory.

• On January 11, 2017, at a Georgetown University forum on pandemic preparedness, Dr. Anthony Fauci predicted the Trump Administration would face a surprise disease outbreak, noting that “risks have never been higher.”

• Also, in January 2017 the Pentagon (US Dept. of Defense) predicted a coronavirus epidemic while America would be unprepared.

• On August 12, 2019, the world was warned to be ready for ethnic specific bioweapons.

• In October of 2019, China surpassed America and became the greatest economy in the world.

• On October 18, 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum (an international think tank of bankers) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201 which “modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic…”

They said that this strangely prophetic event was “not a prediction,” but a lot of people dropped their stock portfolios, including the head of the Senate intelligence committee, Richard Burr. The “scenario” predicted that the pandemic would produce a worldwide recession. And though it was claimed to be a fantasy, CEOs of major corporations started quitting their jobs like never before; they appeared to be anticipating the stock market crash in February of 2020.

Among the seven major recommendations coming out of Event 201 was that governments would take control of social media to “combat mis- and disinformation,” and to “flood media with fast, accurate, and consistent information.” And that is exactly what happened. There has been a TOTAL CENSORING from broadcast, print and social media of anyone speaking or writing against the reckless and unlawful imposition of the experimental vaccines. 

The people are constantly bombarded about the “severity” of the “pandemic”, new variants of the virus and “the need” to take the so-called vaccines. They advised health authorities to employ “trusted community leaders such as faith leaders” to herd the masses to the vaccines.

As far back as 2015 Bill Gates suggested that in an epidemic governments should indemnify drug companies against lawsuits, if officials expect them to test new treatments very quickly.

(https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/The-Next-Epidemic-Berlin-and-DC-Trip)

He got his wish in February of 2020. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked a 2005 law that empowers him to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines. That protection lasts until 2024. For the next four years, these vaccine manufacturers have no liability for injuries stemming from their product.

In January 2016, Moderna “…entered a global health project framework agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to advance mRNA-based development projects for various infectious diseases. 

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has committed up to $20.0 million in grant funding to support our initial project related to the evaluation of antibody combinations in a preclinical setting as well as the conduct of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial of a potential mRNA medicine to help prevent … HIV infections. 

Follow-on projects which could bring total potential funding under the framework agreement up to $100 million (including the HIV antibody project) to support the development of additional mRNA-based projects for various infectious diseases.”

(https://www.modernatx.com/ecosystem/strategic-collaborators/foundations-advancing-mrna-science-and-research)

Moderna’s company shares began trading on Nasdaq in December of 2018, though it never produced an HIV vaccine or any other product that had been approved by the FDA or offered on the open market. 

The value of Moderna’s stock was stagnant throughout 2019. After the government provided protection against lawsuits, their stock value skyrocketed by 400% by the end of 2020.

• Moderna Historical Annual Stock Price Data

• Year Year Close Annual % Change

• 2020 104.47 434.10%

• 2019 19.56 28.09%

• 2018 15.27 0.00%

Another company that produced an early “vaccine”, Pfizer, also took advantage of indemnity. They needed it because they had been sued a number of times for faulty drugs. Pfizer, the largest pharmaceutical company in the world, recently reported revenue of $52 billion. operates in over 180 countries with over one-hundred thousand employees. [MORE]

153 Houston Hospital Workers Fired or Quit over COVID Vaccine Requirement

From [HERE] More than 150 workers at a Houston hospital quit or were fired on Tuesday after being suspended for refusing to get vaccinated against the coronavirus.

The Houston Methodist Hospital system suspended 178 unvaccinated employees without pay two weeks ago for missing a June 7 deadline to get jabbed.

Whoever didn’t comply or resign during the suspension period was let go on Tuesday, system spokeswoman Gale Smith told The Post.

“The employees who became compliant during the suspension period returned to work the day after they became compliant,” Smith said.

A group of 117 staff members had sued the hospital in May, claiming the COVID-19 vaccines were “experimental” and required inoculations made workers “guinea pigs.” The lawsuit compared the vaccine requirement to medical experiments inside Nazi Germany concentration camps.

But US District Judge Lynn Hughes tossed out the suit on June 12, condemning the Nazi comparison and saying it was false to label the vaccines as experimental.

The judge made a distinction in her ruling between an employment requirement and a forced inoculation.

“If a worker refuses an assignment, changed office, earlier start time, or other directive, he may be properly fired,” the judge wrote in her ruling.

“Every employment includes limits on the worker’s behavior in exchange for remuneration. That is all part of the bargain.”

The case has been appealed.

The NOI says the US Govt is Suppressing Safe COVID Treatments to Push Deadly "Vaccine." Claims Americans are 22x more likely to die than Cubans and Chinese people are 517x better off than Americans

From [HERE] The U.S. government and mass media are keeping the public blind to possible inexpensive treatments for COVID-19, while pushing vaccines like a drug-pusher promotes cocaine. The vaccine producers are distributing their so-called vaccines under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), based upon their being no other treatments or therapies that can fight COVID-19. 

To keep their authorization and monopoly, the drug companies have gotten the government and mass media to hide known and proven therapies for COVID-19. We will first introduce you to proven treatments, then later go into the hidden agenda behind these so-called vaccines.

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan in his monumental July 4, 2020 presentation called “The Criterion” warned the people not to take these experimental vaccines for COVID-19, especially while there are potential therapies available. He said:

“I asked God to bring down the virus heavily on Florida because 90 miles from Florida our Cuban family, when the plague broke out in Wuhan, they went to Hubei province in Wuhan and with the Chinese they corrected it and drove it out of Wuhan. Don’t we need something that Cuba has? But you have an embargo on Cuba. …”

In a May 13, 2020 Reuters articled entitled “With Castro-era biotech, Cuba seeks to compete in coronavirus treatment race,” it was reported that:

“None of the nearly 3,000 healthcare workers who used interferon nose drops became infected with the novel coronavirus. …. They included more than 500 with high exposure to infected patients, the Chinese researchers said. … The island nation says it has been successful in treating the novel coronavirus at home and in China, and that 80 countries have already expressed an interest in buying its interferon alpha 2b.”

“None of the nearly 3,000 healthcare workers who used interferon nose drops became infected with the novel coronavirus. …. They included more than 500 with high exposure to infected patients, the Chinese researchers said. … The island nation says it has been successful in treating the novel coronavirus at home and in China, and that 80 countries have already expressed an interest in buying its interferon alpha 2b.”

In the meantime, America continues to blockade Cuba, thereby depriving American citizens of proven therapies for COVID-19. So how has America, Cuba, China and other countries fared over the last year fighting this coronavirus, even before there were any so-called vaccines?

Below we have compared the deaths per 100,000 population between the U.S. and eight other so-call Third World countries. When you crunch the numbers, you find that the United States has registered 181 deaths per 100,000. And yet Cuba deaths per 100,000 are only eight. So, people in the U.S. are 22 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than are the Cubans. By this same measurement Chinese people are 517 times better off than Americans. 

This should be eye opening! How is it that COVID-19 broke out in China first, and way before there were any so-called vaccines China had broken the grip of this virus by asking Cuba for help with her interferon alpha 2b. Today China only has 4,636 COVID deaths for its entire population of 1.4 billion, and the U.S. now counts 601,000 deaths for its much smaller population of 330 million. Not only does America have the most racist historical medical malpractice, but it has—by far–THE WORST RECORD OF COVID DEATHS ON PLANET EARTH.

Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad asked readers:

What happened in the six African countries? Johns Hopkins University keeps a running count of mortality rates for 180 countries since the beginning of the COVID-19 “outbreak.” The data below was taken from their May 27, 2021 update.

And here is something else that Dr. Fauci and mainstream media do not want their terrified public to know. There is another cheap, widely used drug that has now been shown to be most effective against COVID-19—Ivermectin. On December 8, 2020 Dr. Pierre Kory testified to the Senate Homeland Security committee on “Focus on Early Treatment of COVID-19” that “Ivermectin is highly safe, widely available, and low cost. Its discovery was awarded the Nobel Prize in medicine, and is already included on the WHO’s ‘World’s List of Essential Medicines.’”

“Nearly all studies are demonstrating the therapeutic potency and safety of ivermectin in preventing transmission and progression of illness in nearly all who take the drug. We now have data from over 20 well-designed clinical studies, ten of them randomized, controlled trials, with every study consistently reporting large magnitude and statistically significant benefits in decreasing transmission rates, shortening recovery times, decreasing hospitalizations, or large reductions in deaths.”

He went on to describe the benefits that were achieved in Peru and Mexico after deploying mass ivermectin treatments between August and October of 2020. These benefits were so compelling that recently Mexico City implemented a similar program, that resulted in an incredible 52–76 percent reduction in hospitalizations.