Maryland’s March Towards Death Penalty Repeal

HumanRightsNow

On Valentine’s Day, in overflowing hearing rooms in both the House and Senate, Maryland legislators heard testimony from victim’s family members, former prison wardens, religious leaders, an innocent man who once faced execution in Maryland, the state’s Lieutenant Governor, and Governor Martin O’Malley. And what they heard, over and over, is that the death penalty must be abolished.

As in past years, those testifying in favor of repealing capital punishment far outnumbered those speaking for retaining it. That’s nothing new, but in other ways this year has been different. The crowds that gathered to witness the hearings were larger. The high-level political engagement has been stronger and more focused.  And the understanding that the votes exist to pass death penalty abolition into law is now fully entrenched in the Annapolis political landscape.

In the Washington Post, Senate President Mike Miller, himself a death penalty supporter, predicted that the repeal bill would pass his chamber “with a comfortable margin”.

Maryland would become the 18th state to abandon capital punishment (unless Montana beats them to it); and the 6th state in 6 years.

A combination of moral and practical arguments has worn down support for the death penalty in Maryland, and elevated calls for abolition. And a combination of advocacy with elected officials and strong grassroots organizing has now translated those calls into action.  Hopefully, by the end of Maryland’s legislative session in early April, that action will have translated into law – a law which banishes capital punishment to the history books.

Racist Suspect Limbaugh Ramps Up His Slavery-Based Attacks On Rep. Jackson Lee

MediaMatters

After mocking Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) by asking "who owned and who sold her" after she described herself as a "freed slave," Rush Limbaugh doubled down with a slew of even more vicious slavery-based attacks on Jackson Lee.

On his February 14 radio show, Limbaugh reacted to Jackson Lee's comments that she was a "freed slave" due to Civil War-era bipartisanship by asking "who owned and who sold her." The next day, after a listener said he'd called Jackson Lee's office and been hung up on, Limbaugh doubled down on his comments, speculating that her "owner" may have gotten a "good deal" because Jackson Lee "might have outlived her usefulness on the plantation" and her "child-rearing years are over":

Christopher Dorner, Counter-Racism Code

Victim of White Supremacy Blog

But beyond these concurrent events, nothing about this story supports Justice. Nothing about this incident helps to eliminate Racism. Nothing about what’s been reported will improve the lives of black people. To the contrary, this could possibly make things worse – already has for a few. I’ll outline a few key aspects of what has been reported thus far that violate major counter-racist objectives and bare the fingerprints and worldview of Racists/White people.

 

Whites derive an abundance of pleasure insulting black people. It boosts their morale to see us “chimpout,” become irrational, raging lunatics on their cue. Like Pavlov’s obedient pups, Whites provide us with auditory stimulus: NIGGER; we respond according to our training. Allen Iverson and countless others have had life changing altercations responding to the grade school insults of Racists. It never benefits black people to allow Whites to provoke us to substitute rage (even when justified) for reason. Mr. Dorner’s alleged manifesto describes him choking a White police officer for saying Nigger. Only Racists would appreciate this response. It eternally benefits Whites when we fail to remain codified, professional soldiers who understand and expect trifling, Racist behavior from any and all White people. Codified, professional warriors do not respond to name calling from their adversary. Successful combatants consistently respond to their enemies in the best manner possible. White people consciously and or subconsciously think of all black people as Niggers. Dr. Eddie Moore, Jr. – founder of the White Privilege Conference – has produced children with more then one White Woman, and even he publicly acknowledges this fact. Our enemies openly identifying themselves as such should never offend us.

 

Under the System of Racism (White Supremacy), all non-white people are being violently harmed. Any Victim of Racism can respond with counter-violence to White individuals they suspect of being Racist. But under no circumstances should ANY other non-white person be harmed during the use of counter-violence. Non-white people are terrorised; it makes no sense and is intolerable to add additional injury to an already battered people. The initial two victims Mr. Dorner is suspected of killing were non-white. The photographs of the slain engaged couple illustrate the extraordinary incorrectness of this act. It is total insanity for a non-white person to respond to Whites practicing Racism by murdering innocent non-white people. It’s as sensible as a slave of Thomas Jefferson attacking his Racist owner by decapitating Sally Hemings. Any act that is supposed to be against Racism cannot produce the same result as Racism. The essence of any counter-racist act should be affirming, saving and improving the lives of melanated people. Any act that violates this essential counter-racist code, should be forcefully rejected. [MORE]

Redskins general manager says team’s name will not change

TheGrio

At the groundbreaking for the Washington Redskins’ new training camp in Richmond, the controversy over the team’s name received more attention.

Earthmoving equipment hummed outside as Redskins General Manager Bruce Allen and Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell spoke at the ceremonial groundbreaking for what will officially be called the Bon Secours Redskins Training Center, but questions afterward focused on the team name and whether, with Native Americans and other critics increasing the pressure, the Redskins would consider a name change. Allen’s one-word answer: No.

“It’s ludicrous to think in any way that we’re trying to upset anybody,” he said. “We’re proud of who we are and we’re proud of what we’re going to be and what we’re going to do here in the city of Richmond.”

NBC Washington: RGIII has ‘legitimate’ chance to star week 1

The team is building a new training facility in the heart of Richmond behind the Science Museum of Virginia that will feature two football fields with improved spectator areas.

The fan experience at the new training camp will be worth the drive, Allen said.

Click here to read the full story.

NYC Mayor to use executive power to eliminate jail custody for those arrested for low-level marijuana possession

ThinkProgress

Under Mayor Michael Bloomberg (I), arrests in New York City for marijuana have skyrocketed. And while Bloomberg made clear during a radio interview Friday that he does not support legalization of marijuana, he is ready to soften his stance. Bloomberg announced during his State of the City address Thursday that, in the absence of a state law decriminalizing public marijuana possession, he will use his executive power to eliminate jail custody for those arrested for low-level marijuana possession:

Commissioner Kelly and I support Governor Cuomo’s proposal to make possession of small amounts of marijuana a violation, rather than a misdemeanor and we’ll work to help him pass it this year. But we won’t wait for that to happen.

Right now, those arrested for possessing small amounts of marijuana are often held in custody overnight. We’re changing that. Effective next month, anyone presenting an ID and clearing a warrant check will be released directly from the precinct with a desk appearance ticket to return to court. It’s consistent with the law, it’s the right thing to do and it will allow us to target police resources where they’re needed most.

In his statement, Bloomberg also joins Cuomo in supporting a stronger state decriminalization measure. Technically, New York decriminalized marijuana possession in 1977 when it reduced the penalty for possession of 25 grams or less of marijuana to a civil fine. But the punishment does not protect public possession of marijuana, which, according to CNN, includes when an individual is asked to empty his or her pockets during one of the more than half a million stop-and-frisks conducted by the New York Police Department. Cuomo’s proposal would decriminalize possession of less than 15 grams of marijuana even in public view.

Bloomberg’s measure would mitigate the immediate harm to people arrested for marijuana – many of whom never face subsequent charges — but it would not change the fact that those found guilty of public marijuana possession will have a misdemeanor on their record, rather than paying a civil fine.

New York is one of 14 states that have some marijuana decriminalization measure on the books – in addition to the 18 states and the District of Columbia that have legalized medical marijuana, and the two states that have legalized recreational marijuana. Arrests for marijuana possession and other minor drug offenses nonetheless remain frequent and disproportionately impact African Americans.

U.S. Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske, known for opposing legalization of even medical marijuana, joined with NAACP President Ben Jealous in an op-ed published yesterday that declares: “It is clear that we cannot simply arrest our way out of the drug problem. Instead, we need smarter, results-based criminal justice policies to keep our communities safe, including treatment for people with substance use disorders and mental health issues.”

Why Undocumented Non-white Immigrants Are Terrified To Report Crimes, And How One City Is Fixing That

ThinkProgress

As leaders in some localities, like Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Arizona are trying to make undocumented immigrants’ lives as inhospitable and miserable as possible, the city of Dayton, Ohio is trying to aid those immigrants if they become victims of crime.

This week, the Dayton City Commission approved $30,000 in funding to reach out to undocumented immigrants when they fall prey to crime. Because of their legal status, many migrants are understandably afraid to involve law enforcement if a crime is committed against them.

The Dayton Daily News has more:

“If individuals are undocumented, there is a significant deterrent for them potentially to report crime,” Dayton Police Chief Richard Biehl said. “As I’ve said many, many times, if you want crime to grow in a community, just have people too afraid to report it.”

Federal law provides “U-Visa” status for some undocumented immigrants who are victims of crime. If the victim helps law enforcement authorities investigate and prosecute the offender, they can apply for a U-Visa, which grants four years of lawful immigration status, plus the ability to apply for permanent residency. [...]

“We had an individual about a year or so ago brutally beaten and literally left for dead, who was undocumented,” Biehl said. “The reason this was reported is … the person literally had to crawl to the door of a house to call for help.”

U visas were created in the 2000 re-authorization of the Violence Against Women Act. However, not enough has been done to assuage immigrants’ fears and make them comfortable enough to report crimes. Between 2000 and early 2011, just 18,654 crime victims came forward and received U visas, a fraction of the crimes committed against the 14 million undocumented immigrants currently in the country. Federal law currently caps the number of U visas that can be issued annually at 10,000, but that limit has been debated in the current Violence Against Women Act re-authorization push. This week, the Senate voted to re-authorize the law, but it continues to face roadblocks in the Republican-led House.

The city of Dayton, led by Republican Mayor Gary Leitzell, has built a strong reputation in the past couple years as welcoming to immigrants, particularly those fleeing states with harsh new anti-immigrant laws. Immigrants, Leitzell said, bring “new ideas, new perspectives and new talent to our workforce. … To reverse the decades-long trend of economic decline in this city, we need to think globally.”

Federal judge grants class action status to challenge of NYPD 'stop-and-frisk' policy

Jurist

A judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of New York [official website] on Monday granted class action status [opinion, PDF] to a lawsuit brought to stop the New York Police Department (NYPD) [official website] from continuing its "stop-and-frisk" practice outside of apartment buildings in the Bronx. In the first part of her legal analysis, Judge Shira Scheindlin found that the plaintiffs, all of whom are African-American and Latino residents of New York City, possess proper standing for such injunctive relief under Article III of the US Constitution [texts] because the "frequency of alleged injuries inflicted by the practice...creates a likelihood of future injury sufficient to address standing concerns." She added that the risk of future injury to the plaintiffs from the stop-and-frisk program is "real and immediate." In her lengthier second legal analysis, Judge Scheindlin determined that the plaintiffs met all prerequisites of a class action lawsuit under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [text]. In particular, she concluded that the claims alleged were common and typical, numerous, adequate, and ascertainable. The lawsuit itself [complaint, PDF] challenges the constitutionality of "Operation Clean Halls," which is part of the NYPD's broader "stop-and-frisk" policy that allows police to patrol private apartments all over New York City.

Last month Scheindlin lifted an order [JURIST report] that previously required the NYPD to stop using its "stop-and-frisk" practice. There, the judge reasoned that complying with the former order would place an undue burden on the NYPD to train thousands of officers and their supervisors. Two weeks prior Scheindlin declared the "stop-and-frisk" policy unconstitutional [JURIST report] on grounds that it violates the protection against unreasonable search and seizures of the Fourth Amendment [text; Cornell LII backgrounder]. There, she reasoned that officers were not first meeting their requirement of developing a reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk supposed trespassers. Scheindlin's original decision was the first federal ruling to find that the "stop-and-frisk" practice is unconstitutional, though the NYPD has recently received a great deal of scrutiny for various allegations of misconduct. In July, a report issued by a coalition of legal rights organizations said that the NYPD used excessive force and violated the rights of protesters [JURIST report] who participated in the Occupy Wall Street movement in New York City. A month prior, a Muslim rights group filed a lawsuit [JURIST report] in New Jersey seeking to end the department's controversial surveillance program, which allegedly targets individuals based on religious affiliation. In May, following an investigation into the NYPD's surveillance program, New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey Chiesa concluded that it did not violate the Constitution. In March, NYPD commissioner Raymond Kelly fervently denied [speech; press release] that the surveillance programs were unconstitutional.

Pennsylvania voter ID law suspended for primary election

Jurist

Lawyers for Pennsylvania and the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania (ACLU) [advocacy website] on Friday reached an accord allowing state residents to vote in upcoming primary and special elections without submitting identification. According to media sources, voters will be asked to present ID [Bloomberg report], but may decline to do so. The temporary agreement extends an October ruling [JURIST report] by a Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court [official website] judge enjoining enforcement of the state's voter ID law [HB 943 materials] for November's presidential election. Supporters of the proposed legislation say that it will combat voter fraud, but opponents fear that it will disenfranchise poor, elderly and minority voters who may find it difficult to obtain a photo ID. According to sources, the law has the potential to exclude nearly 800,000 eligible voters. The lawsuit is set to go to trial on July 15.

Voting rights [JURIST backgrounder] remain a contentious issue in the US. The ACLU challenged the law [petition for review, PDF; JURIST report] in May, asking a court to block enforcement of the law for the November elections. The group claimed that the law violates the Pennsylvania Constitution [text] and will prevent eligible voters from casting their votes. Pennsylvania Governor Corbett signed the bill into law [JURIST report] in March. It was passed earlier that week in the House of Representatives by a vote of 104-88. In November, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court vacated the decision [JURIST reports] of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court upholding the state's new voter identification law and remanded for further consideration. Unlike the current trend of voter ID laws, Pennsylvania's allows voters to vote without an ID as long as they verify their identity within six days of voting. Absentee ballots will also only require identification by Social Security number. There are now 32 US states [NCSL backgrounder] that require voters to present some form of ID at the polls, but the issue remains controversial.

Jesse Jackson Jr., wife agree to plead guilty

Yahoo

In a spectacular fall from political prominence, former U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. and his wife agreed Friday to plead guilty to federal charges growing out of what prosecutors said was a scheme to use $750,000 in campaign funds for lavish personal expenses, including a $43,000 gold watch and furs.

Federal prosecutors filed one charge of conspiracy against the former Chicago congressman and charged his ex-alderman wife, Sandra, with one count of filing false joint federal income tax returns for the years 2006 through 2011 that knowingly understated the income the couple received. Both agreed to plead guilty in deals with federal prosecutors.

Both face maximum penalties of several years in prison; he also faces hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and forfeitures. But the government did not immediately release the text of its plea agreements. Such agreements almost invariably call for prosecutors to recommend sentences below the maximum.

The son of a famed civil rights leader, Jackson, a Democrat, entered Congress in 1995 and resigned last November. Sandi, as she's known, was a Chicago alderman, but resigned last month amid the federal investigation.

Jackson used campaign money to buy such things as a $43,350 on a gold-plated, men's Rolex watch and $9,587.64 on children's furniture, according to court papers filed in the case. His wife spent $5,150 on fur capes and parkas, the document said.

"I offer no excuses for my conduct, and I fully accept my responsibility for the improper decisions and mistakes I have made," the ex-congressman said in a written statement released by his lawyers. "I want to offer my sincerest apologies ... for my errors in judgment and while my journey is not yet complete, it is my hope that I am remembered for things that I did right."

Several messages left with Jackson's father, the voluble civil rights leader Jesse Jackson, were not returned Friday. The elder Jackson has often declined to comment about his son's health and legal woes over the past several months.

The government said, "Defendant Jesse L. Jackson Jr., willingly and knowingly, used approximately $750,000 from the campaign's accounts for personal expenses" that benefited him and his co-conspirator, who was not named in the one-count criminal information filed in the case. The filing of a criminal information means a defendant has waived the right to have a grand jury consider the case; it is used by federal prosecutors when they have reached a deal for a guilty plea.

The prosecutors' court filing said that upon conviction, Jackson must forfeit $750,000, plus tens of thousands of dollars' worth of memorabilia items and furs. The memorabilia includes a football signed by U.S. presidents, a Michael Jackson and Eddie Van Halen guitar, a Michael Jackson fedora, Martin Luther King Jr. memorabilia, Malcolm X memorabilia, Jimi Hendrix memorabilia and Bruce Lee memorabilia — all from a company called Antiquities of Nevada.

The conspiracy charge carries a maximum statutory penalty of up to five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and other penalties. U.S. District Judge Robert L. Wilkins is assigned to the case.

Tom Kirsch, an attorney for Jackson's wife said she has signed a plea agreement with federal prosecutors and would plead guilty to one tax count.

Kirsch said his client and her husband have supported each other. He said the episode has been stressful for Sandi Jackson, but she "expected to be held responsible ... and wants to put (it) behind her and her family."

The charge against Sandi Jackson carries a maximum of three-year prison sentence. But Kirsch says the agreement "does not contemplate a sentence of that length."

The court papers said that Jackson filed false financial reports with the U.S. House of Representatives in an attempt to conceal his and his wife's conversion of campaign funds for their personal benefit.

A black and red cashmere cape cost $1,500, a mink reversible parka cost $1,200 and a black fox reversible cost $1,500, prosecutors wrote.

According the government's court papers:

—Jackson and his wife carried out the scheme by using credit cards issued to Jackson's re-election campaigns to pay personal credit card bills for $582,772.58 in purchases by Jackson. Jackson provided his wife and a long-time campaign treasurer $112,150.39, solely for having the two carry out transactions that personally benefited Jackson.

—In a false filing with the House, the owner of an unidentified Alabama-based company issued a $25,000 check to pay down a balance on one of Jackson's personal credit cards. Jackson's financial disclosure statement with the House omitted the payment made on Jackson's behalf.

—In a false campaign filing with the Federal Election Commission, an unidentified treasurer for Jackson's campaigns reported that the campaign spent $1,553.09 at a Chicago Museum for "room rental-fundraiser." In fact, said the court papers, Jackson spent those funds to buy porcelain collector's items.

Jackson's resignation ended a once-promising political career tarnished by unproven allegations that he was involved in discussions to raise campaign funds for imprisoned former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich in exchange for appointment — which never came — to President Barack Obama's vacated U.S. Senate seat. The House Ethics Committee, which no longer has any power over Jackson, may choose to issue a report on the matter.

Jackson denied any wrongdoing in the Blagojevich matter. But the suspicions, along with revelations that he had had an extramarital affair, derailed any aspirations for higher political office. It wasn't clear from the court papers whether the woman with whom he had the affair was among the half dozen people identified the documents by letters of the alphabet rather than by their names.

Since last June, Jackson has been hospitalized twice at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., for treatment of bipolar disorder and other issues, and he stayed out of the public eye for months, even during the November elections.

Hearings on Barriers to Social Re-Entry for Individuals with Convictions and Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction

NACDL

With more than 65 million Americans possessing a criminal record, the consequences of conviction – specific legal barriers, generalized discrimination, and social stigma – have become more numerous and severe, more public, and more permanent. These restrictions affect jobs and licenses, housing, public benefits, judicial rights, parental rights, interstate travel, and even volunteer opportunities. Moreover, the legal mechanisms relied on in the past to restore rights and status for formerly convicted individuals have atrophied or become ineffective, with the result that a significant percentage of the American public is permanently consigned to second class citizenship.

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ (NACDL) Task Force on Restoration of Rights and Status After Conviction will hold its fifth set of hearings to undertake an inquiry into how legal mechanisms for relief from the collateral consequences of conviction are essentially working, in both state and federal systems, on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday, February 20-22, 2013, in Washington, D.C.

The Washington, D.C. panelists include (a link to the complete agenda and witness list is below): Ben Jealous, President, NAACP; Dr. Gabriela Lemus, Senior Advisor to Secretary Director of Public Engagement, Department of Labor; Honorable Robert Ehrlich, former Maryland Governor; Bobby Vassar, Chief of Staff, Office of Congressman Bobby Scott (D-VA); Sam Morison, former Staff Attorney with the United States Pardons Office; Todd Cox, Director of the Office of Community and Legislative Affairs, EEOC;  Katherine Culliton-González, Senior Attorney and Director of Voter Protection for Advancement Project; Kristopher Baumann, Chairman, Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee; Nancy Ware, Director, Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency; and individuals from the affected community including, Kemba Smith, President of Kemba Smith Foundation, Author of Poster Child, and granted clemency by President Clinton; Lawrence Garrison, real estate agent; and Lamont Carey, President/CEO, LaCarey Entertainment.

The Task Force’s inaugural hearing was held in Chicago, Illinois, October 2011, followed by hearings in Miami in February, Cleveland in April and San Francisco in July. The final hearing will be held in New York City in May. Witnesses have shared a range of personal and professional experiences, perspectives and expertise on the important practical issues surrounding barriers to re-entry and the collateral consequences of a criminal record. Over two dozen witnesses in Washington, D.C. will include representatives from federal agencies, community based organizations, attorneys, law enforcement, researchers, civil rights advocates, as well as, individuals with convictions who themselves confronted barriers to re-entry.

The results of these regional hearings will be compiled into a report that will identify the best practices that help facilitate the full restoration of rights and status of an individual post a conviction. In addition, the report will provide policy recommendations that jurisdictions on the state and federal level can implement to help ensure that those with convictions can be put on a path to secure the full restoration of their rights and status. 

If you are interested in attending part or all of these hearings, please register at http://restorationdc.eventbrite.com/ or contact NACDL’s State Legislative Affairs Director Angelyn C. Frazer at afrazer@nacdl.org or at (202) 465-7642 by the close of business on Tuesday February 19, 2013.

A complete schedule and witness list is linked here. 

For more information about the Task Force, please visit the website at www.nacdl.org/criminaldefense/restoration/ 

CA. Anonymous to Hold Protests Against the LAPD

Facebook

Chris Dorner was murdered by the San Bernardino police. They think they are judge, jury, and executioner. Go show you don't approve of police brutality and corruption peacefully to the nearest LAPD HQ.

 

If you do not live in the LA area, send the page We Stand With Chris Dorner for information on your local police if you'd like to also protest brutality.

 

Protests will begin on Friday at 10:00am PST. Other organizations such as Anonymous OpFkLAPD will be holding a simultaneous protest on Saturday. They will meet up with us, we're all in this together.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BT31Uw9RBUY

This will continue indefinitely.

Kerry: Sequestration Might Force Cuts in Multi-Billion Dollar Aid to Israel Aid

Photo is of John Kerry from Jan. 8, 2005, the day after the election challenge failed. A small group of House Democrats challenged voting irregularities in Ohio - even though they needed at least one senator to join them in order to temporarily stop the process and force the House and Senate to formally debate their complaint - Kerry fled to the ancient Omayyad Mosque in old Damascus in the Middle East. He was seen sipping Arabic coffee. 

Antiwar

Secretary of State John Kerry has joined the chorus of officials claiming that the minor cuts resulting from sequestration would be a huge threat to “national security,” and was quick to play the Israel card in defending his own department’s budget. 

According to Kerry, the $2.6 billion cut in the budgets of the US State Department and USAID would mean a few hundred million dollars in cuts to American grants to foreign militaries, the largest of which is the multi-billion dollar yearly “aid” to Israel.

Kerry’s comments are part of an administration campaign to insist that the cuts are unacceptable, as Senate Democrats push a plan for major tax increases as an alternative to allowing the cuts.

And while the average American might not be sold on the idea that a slight reduction in annual gifts to the Israeli military is such a dire thing, Congressional sentiment is likely to be starkly different, as many see anything even hinting of falling short of slavish dedication to Israel as an unthinkable lapse. Devastating tax increases might not be popular among Congressmen, but if they can be spun as a pro-Israel move, their support is likely assured.

Police Claim Rambro died from 'gunshot to head' (white supremacy)

Aljazeera

US police officials say an autopsy report has revealed that Christopher Dorner, a fugitive former officer whose charred remains were found in a burned-out California mountain cabin following clashes with police, had died from a single gunshot wound to the head.

San Bernardino County Sheriffs' Captain Kevin Lacy told a news conference on Friday that Dorner's fatal wound appeared to be self-inflicted.

"During the autopsy yesterday, the doctor who conducted the process concluded that the cause of death was a single
gunshot wound to the head. We are not, at this point, ready to speak about the manner of death and tell you whether or
not it was as a result of a self-inflicted wound or another round," he said.

"We will tell you that, while we are still compiling information and putting our reports together, the information we have right now seems to indicate that the wound that took Christopher Dorner's life was self-inflicted."

1,000 officers

Dorner, who also served as an officer in the US Navy reserves, was accused of killing four people since February 3, including a sheriff's deputy shot during the gun battle on Tuesday in the San Bernardino Mountains.

An angry manifesto found posted last week on a Facebook page that apparently belonged to Dorner claimed he had been
wrongly terminated from the Los Angeles Police Department and vowed to seek revenge by unleashing "unconventional and asymmetrical warfare" on police officers and their families.

Police said he had been on the run since last Wednesday, when he was named as the prime suspect in the killings of a
couple, including the daughter of a retired Los Angeles police captain, in Irvine, south of Los Angeles.

The ensuing manhunt involved more than 1,000 officers from over a dozen local, state and federal law enforcement
agencies and stretched from the Mexican border to the California desert north of the San Bernardino.

Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck called it the largest manhunt in the region's history.

Obama takes major step in expanding drone use in America

Rt.com

US President Barack Obama has approved legislation that is expected to immediately accelerate the use of domestic surveillance drones within the United States.

On Thursday, Pres. Obama signed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, a bill that the Federal Aviation Administration’s AnneMarie Ternay describes as containing requirements for integrating unmanned aircraft systems and vehicles such as drones into the national airspace starting immediately.

With the president’s approval this week, the FAA has already begun soliciting proposals from cities across the country that are interested in becoming one of six soon-to-be established test sites where drones and UAVs will be sent into the sky as America takes the next step towards accepting the latest generation of aircraft.

The FAA says that locations in over 30 states have already showed interest in the program. Soon the agency will be tasked with picking a mere half-dozen locations so that drones can formally be introduced into official US airspace and not just strips of sky above designated areas.

Should the FAA stay on schedule, drones are likely to start flying regularly in the US by late 2015, and as many as 30,000 non-military UAVs are expected to be in the sky by the end of the decade. First, however, the FAA, drone builders and pilots will have to pick test sites to work out the kinks of a controversial aircraft.

“We expect to learn how unmanned aircraft systems operate in different environments and how they will impact air traffic operations,” FAA Chief Michael Huerta says in a statement obtained by the Associated Press. “The test sites will inform the agency as we develop standards for certifying unmanned aircraft and determine necessary air traffic requirements.”

"This research will give us valuable information about how best to ensure the safe introduction of this advanced technology into our nation's skies," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood added to the AP.

Earlier in the week, the head of the FAA’s new drone department spoke at a convention outside of Washington, DC to discuss some concerns Americans have voiced en masse lately about bringing drones to inside of America’s borders. The US Department of Homeland Security already has an arsenal of the aircraft at its disposal for use in border-patrol missions, but small-time law enforcement agencies and other federal, state and educational institutions hope to have drones of their in the near future. So far, the FAA has received at least 81 applications from entities wishing to obtain drone licenses, including police departments and universities. What exactly law enforcement could do with a drone has some Americans concerns, though, an issue that was addressed at this week’s conference.

“We currently have rules in the books that deal with releasing anything from an aircraft, period. Those rules are in place and that would prohibit weapons from being installed on a civil aircraft,” Jim Williams of the FAA’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration Office said this week.

On the same day that President Obama signed off on the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, around 150 people from Oakland, California attended an Alameda County meeting to weigh in on demands from figures there to put drones in the sky.

“We oppose the use of public resources to buy machines to surveil its citizens,” said Michael Seigel, a member of Alameda County Against Drones, according to Wired’s Danger Room.

Earlier in the week, the FAA’s Mr. Williams dismissed those concerns, saying, “The FAA has no authority to make rules or enforce any rules relative to privacy.”

“We can ask [the industry] to take into consideration the privacy issue. … There aren’t any rules to date on that.”