Sheriff Quits Amid Backlash from the Police Murder of Sonya Massey [As Long as Cops Can Use Force Offensively, They Will Continue to Kill People]

From [HERE] Jack Campbell, the Illinois sheriff whose deputy was charged with murder after fatally shooting a Black woman in her home last month, said Friday that he would leave his position by the end of the month amid calls from the public and the governor that he do so.

The sheriff said in a statement obtained by WAND, a local television news station, that the “current political climate” made it impossible for him to continue in his role leading the Sangamon County Sheriff’s Office and that he would retire no later than Aug. 31.

Sheriff Campbell had previously said he would not resign as he faced criticism for having hired Sean Grayson, the white deputy who shot Sonya Massey, 36, despite knowing that Mr. Grayson, 30, had two convictions for driving under the influence on his record, including one that had led to Mr. Grayson’s premature discharge from the Army in February 2016.

Mr. Grayson fatally shot Ms. Massey at her home in Springfield, Ill., on July 6 after she had called the emergency services because she believed an intruder was in her home. [MORE]

Nothing can change with regard to police brutality so long as police have the power to use force offensively on “citizens.” In fact, despite the falling violent crime rates since 1993, police killings have increased. According to Mapping Police Violence, “Police killed more people in 2023 than any year in more than a decade. Police have continued to kill at a similar rate in 2024.“ Police killed at least 1,247 people in 2023. Black people were 27% of those killed by police in 2023 despite being only 13% of the population. Thus far, there have been only 9 days in 2024 where police did not kill someone. Black people are most likely to be killed by police and are three times more likely than whites to be killed by police. 33% of Black people killed by police were running away, driving away or otherwise trying to flee. Regardless of race, there is no accountability: 98.1% of killings by police from 2013-2023 did not result with officers even being charged with a crime. [MORE]

Petitioning puppeticians for reforms, or begging them to enforce the status quo by punishing police for conduct that is already illegal or begging them to defund or lower police department budgets can have no effect on the extraordinary police power to use force offensively on citizens. Said non-reformable and uncontrollable power to initiate the use of unprovoked violence on people is called “authority.” [MORE]

Baltimore Cops were Searching for a Robbery Suspect When They Attacked a Black Man who was Filming. Cops Slammed Him to the Concrete and Put a Gun to His Face, Though He Hadn't Committed a Crime

From [HERE] A Baltimore man is alleging excessive force against several Baltimore City police officers.

It comes after the court case against him was dismissed. The police department said its Public Integrity Bureau's Special Investigations Response Team began investigating immediately after the incident, and the internal investigation is ongoing.

The arrest happened in the 1900 block of East Oliver Street. Detectives said they were looking for an armed robbery suspect. Jaemaun Joyner said he was filming a video for a memorial of a friend.

A video obtained by 11 News shows police arriving to the scene in East Baltimore as one officer attempts to hold 24-year-old Joyner and place him in custody. Police body-worn cameras captured the May 23 incident, but the body-worn camera video does not show anything prior to Joyner's arrest.

"This is straight excessive force beyond any means necessary," said Jessica Rubin, a defense attorney.

Joyner's attorneys allege excessive force because of the takedown and the way officers pinned Joyner to the sidewalk.

"These officers went over the top. This was unnecessary, unprovoked and in the end, unacceptable," said Tony Garcia, a defense attorney.

In the video, the officers yelled at Joyner as they attempted to put him in handcuffs. Viewers can also hear him yell several times about an officer allegedly putting something in his pocket. The attorneys said they are alarmed to see what happened to their client, especially the alleged actions taken by Officer Conner Johnson.

"The statement of probable cause never mentions Detective Johnson or Officer Johnson pulls out that gun and presses his head and his temple and holds his head down with the service weapon while he has his other hand around his neck," said Hunter Pruette, a defense attorney.

According to a court charging document, "(Officers) were attempting to place Mr. Joyner in handcuffs. He was able to get away and attempted to flee on foot. This detective (PHIL POLANCO) was able to grab Mr. Joyner with both hands as he tried to run by me and conducted a forcible takedown."

"My son will not be a victim. If I can save any other parent from going through this, that's the goal," said Rhonda McCain, Joyner's mother.

The court record indicates officers recovered a handgun, eight live 22 caliber rounds, a magazine and a powder substance which they suspect is heroin.

"The Maryland State Police Gun Center advised that Mr. Joyner does not have any prohibiting factors which disqualify them from possessing a firearm... The investigation for the armed robbery is still ongoing," the charging document read

Prosecutors dismissed the case against Joyner on Monday. 11 News did check with the Baltimore City State's Attorney's Office, and was told that the case was dismissed for further investigation.

Judge Denies the Government’s Request to Dismiss a Disabled Black Teen’s Suit. Burlington Cops Put a Spit Bag Over His Face and Injected him with Ketamine though He Posed No Threat and Didn’t Flee

From [HERE] A Vermont judge has denied the city of Burlington’s request to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that police used excessive force and discriminated against a Black teenager whose mother had called law enforcement to teach him a lesson about stealing.

When the 14-year-old, who has behavioral and intellectual disabilities, failed to hand over the last of the stolen e-cigarettes on May 15, 2021, two officers physically forced him to do so, according to the lawsuit and police body camera video shared with The Associated Press by the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont. The teen was handcuffed and pinned to the ground in his house as he screamed and struggled, according to the lawsuit.

He was injected with the sedative ketamine and taken to a hospital, according to the lawsuit and video.

The lawsuit, filed by the teen's mother, accuses officers of treating him differently because they perceived him as aggressive due to his race. It also alleges that injecting him with ketamine was “race-based disparate treatment." Burlington officers had visited the home before and were aware of the teen’s disabilities, the lawsuit says.

“Too often, victims of police violence are denied their day in court because of an unjust legal doctrine called ‘qualified immunity,‘” Vermont ACLU attorney Harrison Stark wrote in a statement. “We are thrilled that ... the Court has agreed that this ‘get-out-of-court-free’ card is no excuse to close the courthouse doors."

The city did not immediately return an email seeking comment. A city spokesperson said in February that an investigation found that officers and fire department EMTs acted according to city and state regulations and policies.

The Associated Press generally doesn’t identify minors who are accused of crimes.

Body camera video shows two officers talking calmly to the teen, who is sitting on a bed. His mother tells him to cooperate; she goes through drawers and finds most of the remaining e-cigarettes and tries to get the last one from him.

Officers say if he turns the e-cigarettes over, they’ll leave and he won’t be charged. He doesn’t respond. After about 10 minutes, the officers forcibly remove the last of the e-cigarettes from his hand by pulling the 230-pound teen's arms behind his back and pinning him against the bed.

The city argued that officers conducted a reasonable search and seizure; that its police and fire departments are not subject to the Vermont Fair Housing and Public Accommodations Act and that they made reasonable efforts to account for the teen's disabilities; and that its police and fire departments are protected by qualified immunity, according to the judge.

"The crime was not serious, he did not pose an immediate threat, and he did not try to ‘evade arrest by flight,'” Vermont Superior Court Judge Helen Toor wrote in her ruling July 31. The officers also should have taken into account his reported mental health condition, she wrote. "That might have involved waiting more than 10 minutes before using any kind of physical force," she wrote.

Toor also wrote that “the allegations are more than sufficient to support a claim of racial discrimination." She also wrote the court “has no basis to dismiss any of the claims on qualified immunity grounds at this stage.” The city has three weeks from the judge's ruling to respond. A city spokesperson said by email on Tuesday that the city did not want to “comment on, or make predictions about, the likelihood of any particular outcome as this case moves forward through the court.”

The use of ketamine on suspects has recently come under scrutiny. At least 17 people died in Florida over a decade following encounters with police during which medical personnel injected them with sedatives, an investigation led by The Associated Press has found.

In Burlington, after the city investigated, the mayor at the time ordered the fire department to review the use of ketamine, and the state has updated protocols to require a doctor's permission, the city spokesperson said in February. Paramedics in the Burlington teen's case did get a doctor’s permission even though it wasn't required at the time, she said.

"Single Source Propaganda" in Effect as the Entire Massa’ Media Campaigns for SNiggering Borg Kamala, Promoting the Ongoing Grimace, Similar to Its PropAgenda for COVID Shots as "Safe and Effective"

WEIRD? IF YOU SEE A MF WITH A PERMANENT GRIN, WAVING AND POINTING AT YOU AND YOU'RE NOT AT A BURGER KING OR A CIRCUS, THEN GO THE OTHER DIRECTION.

From [HERE] The Democrats’ new presidential candidate, who’s never won a single primary vote, might have been crowned but hasn’t given a real interview or even an extemporaneous political statement since Democrat bigwigs pushed Biden aside. In a functioning liberal ‘democracy,’ this would be pretty big news.

The last time the vice president of the United States had a press conference was December 2023. The last time sat down with any media was June 24, when she was interviewed by the sycophants on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” Before that was the “Momala” Harris interview with Drew Barrymore, which might be the most cringe-worthy display of fawning in recorded history.

“What is the incentive for her [to take more questions]?” a person close to Harris’ campaign told Politico recently. “She’s getting out exactly the message she wants to get out.”

Indeed, it’s quite the paradox. The media continue to baby Kamala and get her message out to the public, so Kamala doesn’t feel the least bit of urgency in clarifying her record.

If they were so inclined, the naval-gazing media could probably get Kamala out of her shell by doing some honest, deep dives into her history and positions. If her lack of transparency were a daily top-of-the-fold story she would be compelled to speak.

Say what you will about Donald Trump, but he’s done scores of interviews and pressers over the past few months, many of them with antagonistic venues — including taking questions at the National Association of Black Journalists convention just weeks after surviving an assassination attempt.

Kamala hasn’t spoken to a hostile outlet in years. She won’t even take questions from her fans. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Propagenda – propaganda developed and directed to a particular audience as a means of predictive programming for accepting someone’s agenda as their very own. (See: $pinfidels, Predictive Programming & Coin-Operated)

$nigger – a sold-out snitching-smiling Sambo-Negro. 2) a South-Bender offender. $niggers smile for nothing except an empty mind while selling-out their own kind. They typically have an intellectual base yet are devoid of intelligence, thus promoting the on-going smiling face. They also often giggle and have a frivolous conception of society and scant knowledge of the vestiges of the trans-Atlantic slave trade that even brought their sorry-ass selves to shore. $niggers are traitors and pawns of the downpressors. Watch the company you keep! [MORE]

sniggering – the modus vivendi of opportunist (sell-out) compromises. 2) the actions of SNiggers. (See: Coin-Operated)

Neocrats – men and women who willingly sell body and spirit (soul—authentic self) for conveniences (amenities of privilege) offered by Hidalgo, the Gangbankers, stationary bandits and the New God “Corporate State.” (See: CON)

Elite White Liberals Remove and Replace Cori Bush with a New NGHR More Controllable and Pliable to Their Authority and Non-Black Agenda as SNAG Wesley Bell is S[e]lected to Missouri House Seat

From [HERE] Incumbent progressive Rep. Cori Bush lost the Democratic primary in Missouri against a well-funded challenger backed by pro-Israel group Aipac.

Bush’s loss to St. Louis County prosecuting attorney Wesley Bell, age 49, is a major electoral win for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which has targeted members of Congress who criticized Israel on the national stage. The congresswoman is the second member of the left-leaning House “Squad” to lose a Democratic primary this summer, after Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D., N.Y.) was defeated in June.

With 99% of the vote counted, Bell had 51.2% to Bush’s 45.6%, according to the Associated Press projection.

Bush, age 48, spent the summer on the campaign trail fundraising and fending off accusations that she had broken too often with her party. 

Voters in St. Louis faced a barrage of advertisements over the past few months in a $19 million primary that tested the power of Aipac and other pro-Israel groups to target Democrats who have criticized Israel over how it is conducting the war in Gaza. [MORE]

An army of thousands of black elected and [s]elected officials (borgs) at all levels of government are not a reflection of “black power.” Rather, they are representatives of a powerless people – powerless to prevent racists from practicing racism against them and powerless to solve their own problems. So-called “black” leaders, such as Eric Adams, Barak Obama, Kamala Harris or Lori Lightfoot, are not engaged in “black politics” nor do they espouse any “black” political philosophy, or do they have any articulable “Black agenda.” These highly controlled individuals function as straw bosses, black wards, rolebots and puppeticians who literally ‘perform leadership’ to Blacks on behalf of wealthy white interests and serve as their “human resources.” The individual political successes of black elected and [s]elected officials has not translated into power for the Black masses much in the same way that successful Black athletes and entertainers also do not tangibly empower Blacks- as they enrich the pockets of wealthy whites who own and control the sports and “enterstainment” industries. Showcase Blacks and puppeticians alike derive and maintain their success, relevance and prestige from their usefulness and allegiance to elite white liberals.

To Disarm Citizens, Elite Liberals Use Their US Senate Puppeticians to Intensify Attacks on Clarence Thomas - the Court’s Leading Proponent of the Right to Bear Arms in Public for Self-Defense

From [HERE] Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden has escalated his investigation into billionaire Harlan Crow’s tax treatment of luxury trips provided to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, according to a letter sent to Crow’s attorney on Monday.

In the letter, Wyden, a Democratic Senator from Oregon, expressed concern that Crow may have improperly benefitted from business-expense tax deductions for lavish gifts, including luxury travel:

I am deeply concerned that Mr. Crow may have been showering a public official with extravagant gifts, then writing off those gifts to lower his tax bill. This concern is only heightened by the Committee’s recent discovery of additional undisclosed international travel on Mr. Crow’s private jet by Justice Thomas. As I consider legislative solutions to curb potentially abusive deductions, I am offering you one final opportunity to address the tax treatment of yacht and jet trips involving Justice Thomas.

Last month, Wyden joined fellow Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse — Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Federal Courts — in asking US Attorney General Merrick Garland to appoint a special counsel to investigate possible ethics and tax violations connected with a spate of high-end gifts Thomas had previously failed to disclose. According to that letter, these gifts included multiple free trips on a private jet, yacht travel, lodging, tuition payments for a family member of Thomas, and real estate transactions.

The senators wrote at the time:

We do not make this request lightly. The evidence assembled thus far plainly suggests that Justice Thomas has committed numerous willful violations of federal ethics and false-statement laws and raises significant questions about whether he and his wealthy benefactors have complied with their federal tax obligations. Presented with opportunities to resolve questions about his conduct, Justice Thomas has maintained a suspicious silence.

Justice Thomas’ trips with Crow were first revealed in a ProPublica report that alleged Thomas had failed to disclose numerous gifts from Crow and others including vacations, flights on private jets, tuition payments for his great nephew’s education, and loan forgiveness. The report ignited a firestorm over judicial independence and the ties between wealthy elites and the nation’s highest court. [MORE]

UNCLE TOM MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT IF PROPAGANDI IS AFTER HIM. Justice Thomas destroyed the emotional clogic of freedumb/slavery advocates in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen. In the opinion he also dropped a few “revelation sandwich” reminders for serious, responsible Black individuals to consider in light of the facts that the quality of Black citizenship is so low that; no matter what the law says, Blacks are prohibited from possessing guns, Blacks are subject to omnipresent interference by cops with their freedom of movement and their right to be left the fuck alone, Black people are 3 times more likely than whites to be murdered by cops and the police have no legal duty to protect any particular citizen from harm unless they are in custody (“the public duty doctrine”). Said factors exist in a legal context in which law enforcement is uncontrollable by citizens, generally unaccountable to them, can’t be hired or fired by citizens and has irresponsible, limitless power over people to take life on the street as they see fit while providing a compulsory “service” that citizens have no “right” to decline. While discussing the existence of the right to carry weapons for self-defense against public confrontation during Reconstruction, Justice Thomas discussed the historical need for Blacks to vigorously defend themselves in a violent, racist society:

In the years before the 39th Congress proposed the Fourteenth Amendment, the Freedmen’s Bureau regularly kept it abreast of the dangers to blacks and Union men in the postbellum South. The reports described how blacks used publicly carried weapons to defend themselves and their communities. For example, the Bureau reported that a teacher from a Freedmen’s school in Maryland had written to say that, because of attacks on the school, “[b]oth the mayor and sheriff have warned the colored people to go armed to school, (which they do,)” and that the “[t]he super- intendent of schools came down and brought [the teacher] a revolver” for his protection. Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 658 (1866); see also H. R. Exec. Doc. No. 68, 39th Cong., 2d Sess., 91 (1867) (noting how, during the New Or- leans riots, blacks under attack “defended themselves . . . with such pistols as they had”).

Witnesses before the Joint Committee on Reconstruction also described the depredations visited on Southern blacks, and the efforts they made to defend themselves. One Virginia music professor related that when “[t]wo Union men were attacked . . . they drew their revolvers and held their assailants at bay.” H. R. Rep. No. 30, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., pt. 2, p. 110 (1866). An assistant commissioner to the Bureau from Alabama similarly reported that men were “rob- bing and disarming negroes upon the highway,” H. R. Exec. Doc. No. 70, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 297 (1866), indicating that blacks indeed carried arms publicly for their self- protection, even if not always with success. See also H. R. Exec. Doc. No. 329, 40th Cong., 2d Sess., 41 (1868) (describ- ing a Ku Klux Klan outfit that rode “through the country . . . robbing every one they come across of money, pistols, papers, &c.”); id., at 36 (noting how a black man in Tennes- see had been murdered on his way to get book subscriptions, with the murderer taking, among other things, the man’s pistol).

Blacks had “procured great numbers of old army muskets and revolvers, particularly in Texas,” and “employed them to protect themselves” with “vigor and audacity.” S. Exec. Doc. No. 43, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., at 8. Seeing that government was inadequately protecting them, “there [was] the strongest desire on the part of the freedmen to secure arms, revolvers particularly.” H. R. Rep. No. 30, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., pt. 3, at 102.

On July 6, 1868, Congress extended the 1866 Freedmen’s Bureau Act, see 15 Stat. 83, and reaffirmed that freedmen were entitled to the “full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings concerning personal liberty [and] personal security . . . including the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.” §14, 14 Stat. 176 (1866) (emphasis added). That same day, a Bureau official reported that freedmen in Kentucky and Tennessee were still constantly under threat: “No Union man or negro who attempts to take any active part in politics, or the improvement of his race, is safe a single day; and nearly all sleep upon their arms at night, and carry concealed weapons during the day.” H. R. Exec. Doc. No. 329, 40th Cong., 2d Sess., at 40. [MORE]

The Right to Bear Arms is an Imaginary Right: 4th Circuit Ct Upholds Maryland's AR-15 Ban. Ignorantly Claims it is a Military Weapon; Yet No Army in the World Uses a Rifle that is Only Semiautomatic

FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS there are NO TYRANTS; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind control and word-conditioning control? “Find out the exact amount of injustice any people accept, and you will find out the exact amount of injustice they receive..

From [HERE] The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has announced they will seek Supreme Court review in Bianchi v. Wilkinson, SAF’s challenge to Maryland’s assault weapons ban, after the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law.

“Today’s decision from the 4th Circuit is unsurprising given their prior decision in Kolbe,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “We believe, much like in Kolbe, the court’s analysis is flawed and that the challenged law is unconstitutional. We will be filing a petition for certiorari at the Supreme Court, as this case presents an excellent vehicle for the Court to settle this debate once and for all.”

In the 65-page opinion, judges for the majority wrote:

“The assault weapons [refering to the common AR15 rifle] at issue fall outside the ambit of protection offered by the Second Amendment because, in essence, they are military-style weapons designed for sustained combat operations that are ill-suited and disproportionate to the need for self-defense.” Chief Judge Diaz drafted a concurring opinion, with five other judges joining.

Judge Richardson drafted a dissenting opinion, with four other judges joining, stating:

“The Second Amendment is not a second-class right subject to the whimsical discretion of federal judges. Its mandate is absolute and, applied here, unequivocal…In holding otherwise, the majority grants states historically unprecedented leeway to trammel the constitutional liberties of their citizens.”

Joining SAF in the case are the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Field Traders, LLC., and three private citizens, David Snope, Micah Schaefer and Dominic Bianchi, for whom the case is named.

“The court relied heavily on the distinction between ‘military style’ arms and those appropriate for self-defense use,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “This distinction runs completely contrary to the mandates of Heller and Bruen, and now sets the stage for another petition for SCOTUS review of the case.”

In a brief dissent last month related to an Illinois ban on the “assault weapon,” Justice Clarence Thomas said that the overwhelming popularity of the firearm (AR-15), coupled with its non-military operation, makes it a clear fit under the Second Amendment. [MORE] Thomas wrote:

The Seventh Circuit’s decision illustrates why this Court must provide more guidance on which weapons the Second Amendment covers. By contorting what little guidance our precedents provide, the Seventh Circuit concluded that the Second Amendment does not protect “militaristic” weapons. See 85 F. 4th, at 1199. It then tautologically defined “mili- taristic” weapons as those “that may be reserved for mili- tary use.” Id., at 1194. The Seventh Circuit’s contrived “non-militaristic” limitation on the Arms protected by the Second Amendment seems unmoored from both text and history. See Friedman v. Highland Park, 577 U. S. 1039, 1041 (2015) (THOMAS, J., dissenting from denial of certio- rari). And, even on its own terms, the Seventh Circuit’s ap- plication of its definition is nonsensical. See 85 F. 4th, at 1222 (Brennan, J., dissenting) (“The AR–15 is a civilian, not military, weapon. No army in the world uses a service rifle that is only semiautomatic”). In my view, Illinois’ ban is “highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semi-automatic firearms used for lawful purposes.” Friedman, 577 U. S., at 1042 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). It is difficult to see how the Seventh Circuit could have concluded that the most widely owned semiautomatic rifles are not “Arms” protected by the Second Amendment. [MORE]

Tim Walz On FreeDumb; MIN is 3rd in US at Locking Up Black People, Blacks are 5X More Likely to Be Killed by Cops in MIN. Also Mandated Deadly Shots and Locked People in Their Homes During COVID

FREEDUMB ADVOCATES TALK ABOUT FREEDOM BUT HATE FREEDOM. Elite white liberals hate; self-defense, free speech and are proponents of stopping, searching, interrogating and surveilling law abiding people, especially if they are Black or Latino. These racists are filling their reprehensible jails with Black people in places such as Minneapolis, D.C., NYC, LA, Chicago, St. Louis and everywhere they live with Black people. They worship blind obedience to authority and law over humanity. When they speak on “freedom” apparently they mean freedumb or privileges granted to them by a governmental master (not inherent freedom) such as “the right” to commit aborticide 24/7 at any time during a woman’s pregnancy? Authentic freedom has nothing to do with master’s favors in a free range prison.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

freedumb – the state of unrecognized psychological captivity (brain hemispheric hostage) that sheeple remain in because they don’t speak the language of reality nor constantly edit truth from perfecting heart to perfecting power—and when truth is spoken around them, refrain from being open, or impervious to it thus being forever chained to its distortions and limitations. 2) the mindset that proposes “since we are liberated, we are also free.” 3) the mindset that operates upon the notion that you can have individuality without accountability or responsibility. 4) the pretense that reality is truth and viceversa. People cherish unwarranted assumptions and relish their freedumb because they have been socialized into selfcensorship along with misidentification with the ego-mind—the absence of knowledge of Self. (See: Phfreedom, Truth, Unfreedom, Dumbelievers, Self, Belief Systems, Objective Truth, Individuality, Objective Reality, True Self & Reality)

academented – the brittle psychological condition resulting from years of indoctrination and predictive programming at an Academy or system of institutionalized compulsory “education.” 2) overdosing on our addiction to logical thinking and succumbing to its deleterious side effects of mental meltdown and spiritual sclerosis. 3) minds that have fossilized into fixed modes of dualistic thinking. 4) too busy thinking to realize the absence of seeing. 5) dumbing yourself down by degrees. [MORE]

Like elite white liberals and their media claim, puppetician Tim Walz is all about FreeDumb and he is:

• A recent report from the Sentencing Project finds that Black Americans are incarcerated in state prisons across the country at nearly five times the rate of whites, and Latinx people are 1.3 times as likely to be incarcerated than non-Latinx whites. Seven states maintain a Black/white disparity larger than 9 to 1: California, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Wisconsin. See above chart [MORE]

• Based on population, a Black person was 4.5x as likely and a Latinx person was 6.3x as likely to be killed by police as a White person in Minnesota from 2013-21. [MORE]

• Although Blacks make up only 6% of the MIN population they are 27% of all arrests. [MORE]

• Police in Minneapolis, a city controlled by elite white liberals, stopped Black people at 7.8 times the rate of white people, and Indigenous people at 10 times the rate from 2020 to 2022; the rate for searches was even worse. The DOJ found that MPD retaliated against protesters and journalists engaging in First Amendment-protected activities during the demonstrations [MORE]

• Puppetician Walz forced people to get injected with deadly, experimental COVID shots [MORE] He also helped to destroy informed consent by falsely claiming the injections were safe and incentivized teens by offering a a $100,000 scholarship to college if they got a COVID shot. [MORE] Walz issued an executive order that prohibited any resident of Minnesota from leaving his or her house, except as permitted by him. It was perhaps the most overtly fascist measure in America’s history.”

What have the Freedumb loving elite white liberals been up to in super-liberal Minnesota recently?

• Liberal Minneapolis to Pay more than $700k to Settle Claims that Cops Attacked Demonstrators who Protested the Police Murders of Black People

• Unwanted White Minnesota Cop Doesn't Serve Black People & Can't be Fired: Judge Re-Instates Public Ruler who Assaulted a Somali Teen & Told Him to Get Out the Park

• JUSTICE SYSTEM or SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY? White Cop Actress who Murdered Daunte Wright Sentenced to Only 2 Years. Judge Says Cop's Misuse of Her Absolute, Uncontrollable Authority was "A Mistake”

• FULL OF SHIT: White Liberal Prosecutor Drops Murder Charges against White MN Trooper who Shot Ricky Cobb. Takes the Word of the Cop Despite Video Showing Him Shoot Fleeing Black Man as He Drove Away

• White Minn Cop "Sorry" He Got Caught Brutally Attacking a Black Man who Posed No Threat, Breaking his Eye Socket. "Black" Rolebot DA Gives Him a No Jail Plea, Dismisses Felony for his Liberal Masters

• 2 Minneapolis Cops Fatally Shot a Black Man (Tekle Sundberg) from the Roof of an Apartment but Fail to Articulate what Prompted Them to Do So. Bodycam Not Released, Ben Crump Retained

• St Paul Approves $1.3M for Police Shooting of Marcus Golden. White Supremacy Mystery Remains Unsolved as Footprints and Tire Tracks in the Snow and Bullet Casings Show Cops Murdered Him as He Fled

• White MN Cops Looking for a Black Male in His 30’s Attacked a 67yr Old Black Man who Uses a Walker. After he Filed a Complaint Cops Charged Him for Obstruction, a Special Charge for NGHRS who Complain

• 4 Yrs Later, No Quick “Justice" for Jamar Clark Like the White Woman Got in Minneapolis [Police Chief Fired, Bodycams Mandatory, Black Cop Convicted & $20M Settlement in Less than 2 Yrs]

• [White Cops are Always Justified in Shooting Armed Non-White People] Prosecutor Fails to File Charges Against White St Paul Cops who Shot Native American 21 Times from 10 ft Away in His Home

• Based on an “Anonymous" Tip, White St Paul Cops were Looking for Any “Black Man w/Dreadlocks" when They Stopped & Assaulted Frank Baker & their Released K-9 Mauled His Leg- 1 Cop Arraigned

• On the Anniversary of George Floyd’s Murder by Police “Journalists” are Asking 'Has Anything Changed?' Of Course Not. Police Still Have the Uncontrollable Power to Use Force Offensively Against People

The Supreme Ct Barred Executing the Intellectually Disabled But Allows Exceptions: TX Authorities Murder 1) Black Man for Killing a 2) White Woman b/c 3) His Atty's Waited Too Long to Raise the Issue

From [HERE] A Black man who claimed an intellectual disability in a late attempt at a reprieve was executed Wednesday evening for the killing of a white woman who was jogging near her Houston home more than 27 years ago.

Arthur Lee Burton, 54, received a lethal injection at the state penitentiary in Huntsville and was pronounced dead at 6:47 p.m. local time. He was condemned for the July 1997 killing and attempted rape of Nancy Adleman, a 48-year-old mother of three. 

Burton appeared nervous as he lay strapped to the death chamber gurney and a spiritual adviser prayed briefly over him, the inmate’s right leg twitching under a white sheet that covered him from his chest to his feet.

“I want to say thank you to all the people who support me and pray for me,” Burton said when asked by the warden if he had a final statement, his voice repeatedly cracking with a sharp breath after saying several words.

“To all the people I have hurt and caused pain, I wish we didn’t have to be here at this moment, but I want you to know that I am sorry for putting y’all through this and my family. I’m not better than anyone. I hope that I find peace and y’all can too.”

He nodded to his brother, Michael, watching through a window nearby, took four gasps as the lethal dose of the sedative pentobarbital began taking effect, then appeared to yawn before all movement stopped. He was pronounced dead 24 minutes later.

Adleman had been brutally beaten and strangled with her own shoelace in a heavily wooded area off a jogging trail along a bayou, police said. According to authorities, Burton confessed to killing her, saying “she asked me why was I doing it and that I didn’t have to do it.” He recanted this confession at trial.

Hours before the scheduled execution time, the U.S. Supreme Court declined a defense request to intervene after lower courts had previously rejected Burton’s request for a stay.

Burton’s lawyers had argued that reports by two experts and the records showed Burton “exhibited low scores on tests of learning, reasoning, comprehending complex ideas, problem solving, and suggestibility, all of which are examples of significant limitations in intellectual functioning.” They had argued the evidence was a strong indication of an intellectual disability that made him “categorically exempt from the death penalty.”

Prosecutors, however, argued that Burton had not previously raised claims of an intellectual disability and that he had waited until eight days before his scheduled execution to do so.

An expert for the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, which prosecuted Burton, said in an Aug. 1 report that he had not seen any evidence Burton suffered from a significant deficit in intellectual or mental capabilities.

“I have not seen any mental health or other notations that Mr. Burton suffers from a significant deficit in intellectual or mental capabilities,” said the report by Thomas Guilmette, a psychology professor at Providence College in Rhode Island.

The Supreme Court in 2002 had barred the execution of intellectually disabled people. But it has given states some discretion to decide how to determine such disabilities. 

Burton was convicted in 1998 but his death sentence was overturned by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2000. He received another death sentence at a new punishment trial in 2002.

In their petition to the Supreme Court, Burton’s lawyers accused the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of rejecting their claims of intellectual disability because of “hostility” toward prior Supreme Court rulings that criticized the state’s rules on determining intellectual disability.

In its filing to the Supreme Court, the Texas Attorney General’s Office denied that the state appeals court was refusing to adhere to current criteria for determining intellectual disability.

Burton was the third inmate put to death this year in Texas, the nation’s busiest capital punishment state, and the 11th in the U.S.

On Thursday, Taberon Dave Honie is scheduled to be the first inmate executed in Utah since 2010. He was condemned for the 1998 killing of his girlfriend’s mother.

Dr Vernon Coleman: The PCR Test Can Kill You – and Could Be Used to Vaccinate You

From [HERE] Right from the start of 2020, my articles and videos about covid attracted an enormous amount of abuse. But the one article which seemed to attract most abuse was one in which I warned about the dangers of the PCR test. Journalists and broadcasters who wouldn’t know what to do with a scientific paper if they were given one, jumped up and down with great indignation. I was vilified for having said such a thing. But now that more and more doctors are belatedly beginning to wake up to the fact that there was no pandemic, that covid was just the annual flu and that the heavily promoted vaccine doesn’t work and is dangerous, it is time to take another look at the evidence about the PCR Test. (For the record I have a one inch thick stack of scientific papers proving that the PCR test is dangerous and can be lethal. Curiously, those scientific references appear to have disappeared from the internet – or are at least difficult to find.)

We all know now that PCR tests are useless for finding cases of covid-19 but very good at helping governments keep us in our own homes under house arrest. In some parts of the world, the PCR tests are banned as utterly useless. I explained precisely what’s wrong with these misused tests in an article on this website subtly called ‘The PCR Test Is Useless for Covid-19 (But Useful for Crooked Governments). 

The big problem, of course, is that the British Government, for example, deliberately ignores the WHO guidelines and does the test in a crooked way which would, in a just and sensible world, result in Johnson, Hancock and their advisors crowded into the dock. 

You’d get as good a result if you just divided people into two groups: those with a vowel in their surname and those without a vowel, and then announced that the ones with the vowel all had covid-19 and the rest all needed to change their names within seven days or pay a huge fine. 

So, everyone with functioning brain tissue knows that the PCR test is useless, except for political reasons, and that the whole testing programme is an outrageously expensive and disruptive shambles. Only government ministers, scientific advisors and pseudo-journalists at the wretched BBC think that PCR tests are valuable. Did you know, by the way, that the Government has allegedly hired 900 consultants to help with the test and trace scheme? The consultants are being paid £1,000 a day each though what they do for that I cannot imagine. That’s £900,000 a day. I suspect that 99.99% of the population would be happier if the £900,000 a day were spent on dentists. 

But that’s not the half of it. Most people seem to have accepted the need for regular PCR testing. Indeed, people in the UK queue up to have it done as often as possible – as though they get some sort of thrill out of having a complete stranger stuff something into a bodily orifice – pushing it in as far as it will go, twizzling it about a bit, and then pulling it out and buggering off without so much as ‘a thank you very much I’ll give you a ring tomorrow and we’ll have dinner and then do it again’. 

There is talk of children having daily tests though I haven’t been able to find any evidence that this would be a good idea for anyone other than the hugely profitable industry now involved in making and looking at the swabs. 

What no one ever mentions is that the PCR tests are dangerous and can, if done improperly, case excruciating pain. This is probably why some countries don’t like them. There is indeed a great deal of confusion about how far the swab should go. (Or should that be the Klaus Schwab) In Australia, the guidelines are that the swab should only go a few centimetres up the nostril but nasopharyngeal swabs can go much further. The United States Department of Health and Human services says that the swab should reach a depth equal to the distance from the nostrils to the outer opening of the ear. That’s a huge distance. In Ottawa, Canada, the recommendation is half that distance. 

In October last year (2020) I reported on at least one case where a healthy individual had noticed cerebrospinal fluid pouring out of her nose after an invasive PCR test. That really isn’t something you want happening. The woman concerned, who was in her 40s, had a PCR nasal swab test and later went to see a doctor complaining of vomiting, a runny nose, a headache and a stiff neck. The pseudo-journalists at the BBC can, if they are interested in facts, find the details in the JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Surgeons found that the fluid running down her nose was cerebrospinal fluid – the fluid that protects the brain. [MORE]

Indigenous Activist Leonard Peltier Will Likely Die in Prison After Parole Denied. Framed for the Murder of 2 FBI Agents

From [HERE] On July 2, Leonard Peltier (Turtle Mountain Ojibwe), a leader of the American Indian Movement (AIM) in the 1970s, was denied parole by the U.S. Parole Commission, ensuring that he will most likely die in federal prison.

Suffering from serious health issues as he nears 80, Peltier is serving two consecutive life sentences for killing FBI agents, Jack R. Coler and Ronald A. Williams, on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota in June 1975.

Imprisoned for nearly 50 years, Peltier has maintained his innocence and there are grounds to believe him.[1]

The federal government, for example, withheld a ballistics report at Peltier’s trial indicating the fatal bullets did not come from his weapon, according to court documents Peltier filed on appeal.

One prosecution witness, Michael Anderson, testified during cross-examination that he was threatened by an FBI agent, and said that he agreed to testify in exchange for criminal charges against him in another case being dropped.

Another witness, Myrtle Poor Bear, said that she had been coerced into signing a false affidavit implicating Peltier and that her life had been threatened. “They had the law in their hands, and could do anything,” she said of the FBI. [MORE]

KCPD Refuse to Release "Their" Video of White Cop Shooting Amaree’ya Henderson in the Face After a Suspect Traffic Stop. A Lawsuit is the Only “Justice” Available as White Prosecutors Fail to Charge

From [HERE] The mother of a Black man killed in a Kansas City, Kansas, traffic stop last year has filed a lawsuit against the local government, claiming her son was unarmed and posed no threat to police when an officer shot him to death in his car.

Amaree’ya Henderson of Kansas City was killed in April 2023 after an officer jumped on the door frame of his vehicle to prevent Henderson from leaving a traffic stop, according to the lawsuit filed Friday in the U.S. District of Kansas Office in Kansas City, Kansas.

Attorneys for Pauletta Johnson, his mother, argue that the officer fired “blindly” into the vehicle — while Henderson’s girlfriend was in the passenger seat — and put himself in danger. He killed the 25-year-old when other, safer courses of action were available, the lawsuit says.

“A vehicle pulling away from a traffic stop does not give a police officer continued permission to kill a non-threatening citizen,” attorneys wrote in the lawsuit, adding that there was never an allegation that Henderson was “armed with any type of weapon” and that he was not wanted for a crime.

The lawsuit names the Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas, the police department and Officer Austin Schuler as defendants.

“Both the Wyandotte County District Attorney’s Office and the Department of Justice investigated the facts of the case and determined that criminal charges against Officer Schuler were not warranted,” they said in a statement.

On April 26, 2023, Henderson and his girlfriend Shakira Hill had just finished a DoorDash delivery in the Shawnee Heights neighborhood when Schuler pulled them over on Metropolitan Avenue, near the 12th Street Bridge, the lawsuit says.

Apparently the traffic stop was unlawful - as police have not explained any lawful reason for the stop. Hill said Henderson was not violating any traffic laws.

Hill said the officer approached the driver’s side window, but it was broken. She said they rolled down the back window. Hill said that she and Henderson asked the officer multiple times why they had been pulled over, but that the officer did not provide them with a reason.

Henderson gave the officer his license and registration, according to the lawsuit. The couple believed the officer was writing them a ticket for expired plates, according to the lawsuit, and Henderson contacted his mother via FaceTime.

According to the complaint, more uniformed officers arrived on the scene and Schuler again approached the vehicle with his flashlight. Attorneys allege that during the confrontation, the officer unnecessarily escalated the situation by pulling open the door of Henderson’s vehicle.

The attorneys say Henderson, fearing for his life, began to drive away as Schuler planted himself on the doorjamb, pulled out his gun and shot the 25-year-old in the arm and face. The vehicle collided with a parked car. According to Attorney Nuru Witherspoon

‘Officer was not threatened, and was not in the path of the vehicle’. ‘In fact, he put himself in harm’s way by hopping onto the frame of the vehicle.’

Amaree’ya Henderson’s car travels for 220 to 250 feet before it strikes a parked vehicle after he is shot in the face and torso at close range.

According to police, the officer was treated in hospital for minor injuries after the shooting.

In addition to wrongfully killing Henderson, the indictment also accuses the officer of violating police policy and training.

None of the officers used de-escalation techniques during the traffic stop, the lawyers allege. And shooting a motorist behind the wheel of a moving car — a practice generally discouraged by policing experts — is limited by KCK police policy to situations in which an officer or another person is in danger.

In March 2023, a month after the shooting, U.S. District Attorney Mark Dupree’s office said no criminal charges would be filed against the officer. Prosecutors reviewed the evidence and concluded the officer reasonably feared for his life when the vehicle sped away at a “high rate of speed” and Henderson “ignored commands” to stop.

Requirements for bodycam images

The Henderson shooting sparked community protests in 2023, along with broader calls for transparency from area activists. Leaders of the police reform group Justice for Wyandotte last year called on law enforcement to release footage of the shooting, a step it has taken in some cases to prosecute Black people, including the killing of a former police detective who disarmed an officer in 2022.

Bodycam footage of the Henderson shooting has never been made public. In Kansas, family members and their attorneys can view such footage privately, but state law limits the situations in which videos can be shared widely.

Body camera footage is considered criminal investigation data and is released to the public at the discretion of the police or other officials, such as the prosecutor.

The Kansas Star’s request for a copy of the video was denied by the United States Government in December.

A recent Star investigation into body camera disclosures in the state found that law enforcement released only one video of eight fatal police shootings over a five-year period.

In April, the brother of a man killed in February 2023 filed a lawsuit over footage of that police shooting. The case is still pending in Wyandotte County Superior Court.

The lawsuit filed Friday by Henderson’s mother alleges constitutional rights violations and wrongful death. It seeks a jury trial in federal court.

FBI Confirms that Bullets Were Fired at Trump and a Bullet Hit Trump

From [HERE] Former President Donald Trump was struck with a bullet during an assassination attempt at a western Pennsylvania campaign rally, the FBI said Friday.

“What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle,” the bureau said in a statement seeking to dispel conflicting accounts of the July 13 shooting. FBI Director Christopher Wray told lawmakers earlier this week that officials were still analyzing evidence to determine what hit Trump: a bullet, shrapnel, glass or something else.

At an event Friday night, Trump said he had just taken off the ear bandage.

Several investigations are under way into how the 20-year-old was able to climb onto a rooftop with a clear line of sight to Trump and open fire with an AR-15 rifle. A spectator, Corey Comperatore, was killed and two other people were critically injured. A Secret Service sniper team shot back, killing Crooks.

Trump said Friday that he planned to return to the farm show grounds in Butler, Pa., the site of the assassination attempt, for a rally that would honor Comperatore and those who were hurt. 

The shooting marked the Secret Service’s most stunning failure since President Ronald Reagan was shot in 1981, leading Director Kimberly Cheatle to resign on Tuesday. Wray testified the following day before the House Judiciary Committee, giving circumspect responses to questions about Trump’s injury that drew criticism from some Republicans.

Friday’s FBI statement was the first law-enforcement account of Trump’s injuries. Authorities had earlier refused to provide details on what struck him, and Trump hasn’t released his medical records. Trump and his former White House physician, Ronnie Jackson, have repeatedly asserted that Trump was struck by a bullet. Last week, Jackson released a detailed account of how a bullet struck and wounded the former president.

White Liberal California Governor Issues Order to Clear Homeless Encampments. 73% of CA Homeless are Non-White. Although Black People are only 5% of the State Population, 26% of Homeless are Black

PHOTO IS THE PROPERTY OF VINCENT BROWN

From [HERE] California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order Thursday setting guidelines for the removal of homeless encampments by state agencies and departments while requesting that local governments adopt the policies as well.

The order will require state agencies under Newsom’s authority to address homeless encampments on state property and set five explicit policies to follow for removal. The policies include (1) site assessments determining whether a camp is a danger to public health and warrants immediate removal; (2) reasonable advance notice to vacate where exigent circumstances warranting removal exist; (3) standard 48-hour notice to vacate before removals; (4) communication with service providers for outreach to individuals experiencing homelessness; (5) 60-day storage of personal property for homeless individuals at the removal site.

The order also encouraged local governments to use “all available resources and infrastructure, including resources provided by the State’s historic investments in housing and intervention programs” to address the crisis and “humanely remove encampments from public spaces.” The California Interagency Council on Homelessness was tasked with developing guidance and technical assistance for local governments adopting the order’s policies.

The order extends only to state agencies and departments under the executive branch. It is not binding on cities and local governments but would include lands under the control of the Department of Transportation, Parks and Recreation, and Fish and Wildlife.

The ACLU condemned the order, accusing the governor of displaying a “disregard for human dignity” and calling the order a superficial fix on a systemic problem driven by underlying issues including “skyrocketing housing costs.”

It is estimated that over 180,000 people experience homelessness in California as of 2023. According to a University of California study, California’s homeless make up nearly a third of the homeless in the entire US in a state that contains 12 percent of the nation’s population. Said study explains that non-whites make up 73% of the homeless population. They are also overrepresented. Although Black people make up 5% of the entire CA population they are 26% of all homeless. Native American or Indigenous identity (12%) were also overrepresented compared to the overall California population. Thirty-five percent of participants identified as Latino/x.

‘Idea that COVID Shots Saved Lives is Ridiculous:’ Largest Study of Its Kind Finds Excess Deaths During Pandemic were Caused by Public Health Response, Not "the Virus"

From [HERE] A study released today of excess mortality in 125 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic found the major causes of death globally stemmed from public health establishment’s response, including mandates and lockdowns that caused severe stress, harmful medical interventions and the COVID-19 vaccines.

A study released today of excess mortality in 125 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic found the major causes of death globally stemmed from public health establishment’s response, including mandates and lockdowns that caused severe stress, harmful medical interventions and the COVID-19 vaccines.

“We conclude that nothing special would have occurred in terms of mortality had a pandemic not been declared and had the declaration not been acted upon,” the authors of the study wrote.

Researchers from the Canadian nonprofit Correlation Research in the Public Interest and the University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières analyzed excess all-cause mortality data prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning with the March 11, 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic declaration and ending on May 5, 2023, when the WHO declared the pandemic over.

The results, presented in a detailed 521-page analysis, establish baseline all-cause mortality rates across 125 countries and use those to determine the variations in excess deaths during the pandemic.

The researchers also used the baseline rates to investigate how the individual country variations in excess death rates correlated to different pandemic-related interventions, including vaccination and booster campaigns.

Not all of the results on a country-by-country basis were the same. For example, in some countries, mortality spikes occurred before the vaccines were rolled out, while in other places, the mortality spikes tracked closely with vaccine or booster campaigns.

In some places, excess mortality rates returned to baseline or close to baseline in 2022, while in others, the rates persisted well into 2023. Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., lead author of the study, told The Defenderthe disparities result from the complex nature of pandemic measures — and the data — in different areas.

Once Rancourt’s team was able to establish the baseline and excess mortality data for each place, they clustered and examined the data through different filters to interpret it, and drew several conclusions.

The researchers established that there was significant excess mortality worldwide between March 11, 2020, and May 5, 2023.

Overall excess mortality during the three years in the 93 countries with sufficient data to make an estimate is approximately 0.392% of the 2021 population — or approximately 30.9 million excess deaths from all causes.

The conventional explanation for the excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, Rancourt said, is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus caused virtually all deaths — and there would have been even more deaths if there hadn’t been a vaccine.

The variations in excess all-cause mortality rates across space and time, the authors wrote, “allow us to conclude that the Covid-period (2020-2023) excess all-cause mortality in the world is incompatible with a pandemic viral respiratory disease as a primary cause of death.”

They said the theory that the virus caused the deaths is propped up by mass virus-testing campaigns that should be abandoned.

‘Idea that vaccines saved lives is ridiculous’

Rancourt and his team cited several factors they believe disprove the theory that the virus caused a spike in all-cause mortality.

For example, they wrote that excess mortality surged almost simultaneously across several continents when a pandemic was declared, while there were no comparable surges in areas that had not yet declared a pandemic.

This suggests that pandemic interventions like lockdowns, which were implemented synchronously across many countries, likely caused the surges.

The researchers also pointed out the significant variation in mortality rates during the pandemic in all time periods, even across different political jurisdictions directly adjacent to each other. If the virus caused the deaths, it would follow that the infection fatality rate would be the same, or at least similar across political boundaries.

The researchers also found a lot of variability in death rates within countries over time, which also would not be an expected outcome if those deaths were caused by a pathogen.

Rancourt said they found “the idea that the vaccine saved lives is ridiculous,” and based on flawed modeling as he and colleagues also showed in a previous paper.

Here again, they found no systematic or statistically significant trends showing that vaccination campaigns in 2020 and 2021 reduced all-cause mortality.

Instead, they found that in many places, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, and most countries showed temporal associations between vaccine rollouts and increases in all-cause mortality.

Medical interventions — including denial of treatment — caused premature deaths

Rancourt said the excess deaths his team identified are strongly associated with the combination of two major factors — the proportion of elderly in a country’s population and the number of people living in poverty. Both factors increased peoples’ vulnerability to “sudden and profound structural societal changes” and “medical assaults.”

While the proximal cause of death may be classified on death certificates as a respiratory condition or infection, the researchers noted, they argue the true primary causes of death are actually biological stress, non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions and the COVID-19 vaccination rollouts.

The study provides an overview of plausible mechanisms for this hypothesis, including research showing that some people experienced severe biological stress from measures like mandates and lockdowns.

“If you structurally change the society by preventing people from moving, breathing, working, having their lives, having to stay at home, lock them in. If you do all these incredibly huge changes, structural changes in society, that is going to induce biological stress,” Rancourt told The Defender.

“There’s very compelling scientific evidence that biological stress is a massive killer,” he added.

Rancourt also pointed out that the stress of lockdowns affected poor people quite differently than it did people who could easily work from home, have food delivered and live relatively comfortably.

The authors also pointed to extensive evidence showing that medical interventions — including denial of treatment — caused premature deaths.

Such interventions included but were not limited to the denial of antibiotics and ivermectin against bacterial pneumonia, the systematic use of mechanical ventilators, experimental treatment protocols, new palliative medications and overdoses, isolation of vulnerable people and encouraged voluntary or involuntary suicide.

The March-April 2020 COVID-19 peak they identified in several countries is difficult to explain without such medical interventions, they wrote.

17 million excess deaths tied to COVID vaccines

Finally, the researchers projected that 17 million of the excess deaths they identified were associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, confirming the findings of their previous research on a smaller sample of countries.

Those vaccine-related estimations were based on analyses of places that had large spikes immediately following vaccination or booster campaigns and also by examining the numbers of vaccine doses and their relation to deaths over time.

Thirty percent of the countries they analyzed had no excess deaths until either the vaccine rollouts or the booster campaigns. And there were significant correlations between COVID-19 vaccine rollouts and peaks or increases in excess all-cause mortality. Ninety-seven percent of countries showed a late-2021 or early-2022 peak in excess all-cause mortality temporally associated with booster rollouts.

It is highly unlikely, the researchers wrote, that the vaccine-mortality associations are coincidental.

Rancourt noticed that people critical of this idea point to the fact that in some places, there are sometimes campaigns or booster campaigns that aren’t associated with spikes in excess mortality.

However, he said vaccination campaigns don’t always lead to such spikes because vaccination was not related to death in the same way in every situation. Vulnerability factors like the age of those vaccinated, the health of the population and other sociological factors related to stressors on the immune system change how they are affected by vaccine toxicity or the vaccines’ effects on the immune system.

Based on their analysis and interpretations, they concluded, “We are compelled to state that the public health establishment and its agents fundamentally caused all the excess mortality in the Covid period.”

Individuals Have a ‘Stunning’ 620% Higher Risk of Myocarditis After Getting mRNA COVID Injection

From [HERE] A peer-reviewed study of 9.2 million South Koreans published in Nature Communications uncovered a 620% increased risk of myocarditis and 175% higher risk of pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Researchers also noted increased risks of several autoimmune conditions, especially after booster doses.

A large-scale peer-reviewed South Korean study has found significantly increased risks of serious cardiac and neurological conditions following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, and lesser risks of several autoimmune diseases.

The nationwide population-based cohort study, published Tuesday in Nature Communications, followed nearly 4.5 million people for an average of 15 months after vaccination.

Researchers found a striking 620% increased risk of myocarditis and 175% increased risk ofpericarditis in people who received the vaccine compared to historical controls.

The study also revealed a 62% increased risk for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a rare neurological disorder.

The researchers did not highlight the the cardiac and GBS risks, but only used the data to confirm the validity of their study design, which focused on determining the risks of autoimmune diseasesassociated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

The researchers found a 16% increased chance of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE — the most common lupus type) and a 58% higher risk of bullous pemphigoid (BP — large, fluid-filled blisters).

The study also revealed that booster shots were associated with slightly increased risks of severalautoimmune connective tissue diseases (AI-CTDs), including alopecia areata (patchy hair loss),psoriasis (scaly, inflamed skin) and rheumatoid arthritis.

“Given that the risk of SLE and BP was increased in certain demographic conditions such as age and sex, long-term monitoring is necessary after mRNA vaccination for the development of AI-CTDs,” the study authors noted.

Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense (CHD), noted how the authors minimized the most alarming data but told The Defender the study was otherwise “very robust.”

Hooker said several other studies also show relationships between autoimmune disorders — including systemic lupus — and mRNA vaccination.

The Nature Communications article follows another South Korean study published in May that found significant increases in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. [MORE]

South Korean Study Finds COVID Shots Linked to Increased Risk of Alzheimer’s and Mild Cognitive Impairment

From [HERE] A South Korean peer-reviewed study found statistically significant increases in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment in people who received a COVID-19 vaccine — particularly mRNA vaccines — within three months of post-vaccination.

The South Korean researchers — who on May 28 published their findings in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine — said they undertook the study due to concerns of COVID-19 vaccine side effects, “particularly potential links to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease.”

Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., who analyzed the study on a July 22 episode of his YouTube show, asked why Western countries such as the U.S. or U.K. aren’t investigating such potential links. “Why is it often the Asian countries that seem to be leading the way in openness on this?”

According to Campbell, part of what’s preventing Western countries is that governments and pharmaceutical companies have refused to release low-level participant data. “Could it be that researchers in the West are working under limitations?”

In the South Korean study, researchers analyzed data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service from more than half a million residents of Seoul, South Korea, age 65 and older.

The study participants were randomly selected, Campbell said. “That’s important. The sample was random so it shouldn’t have any systematic biases.”

After dividing the individuals into vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, the researchers compared the incidence of both mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease between the groups.

Mild cognitive impairment is sometimes a stage in the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, according to the Mayo Clinic. However, some people with mild cognitive impairment get better over time.

Those in the vaccinated group received either an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and/or a cDNA vaccine. However, the researchers later looked at just those who had received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and found there to be an especially high incidence of cognitive decline when compared to the unvaccinated.

mRNA shots linked to a more than double rate of mild cognitive impairment

The authors of the South Korean study reported that after three months of receiving the vaccine, the mRNA vaccine group showed a roughly 22% increase in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (odds ratio: 1.225, p-value = 0.026) compared with the unvaccinated.

“This is significant because developing Alzheimer’s disease over three months is a very rapid development of Alzheimer’s disease,” Campbell said.

Similarly, the mRNA vaccine group after three months post-vaccination showed nearly 2.4 times the rate of mild cognitive impairment compared with the unvaccinated (odds ratio: 2.377, p-value < 0.001).

The researchers found no significant link between COVID-19 vaccination and vascular dementia or Parkinson’s disease, “which is encouraging,” Campbell said.

The researchers concluded that their study “suggests a potential link between COVID-19 vaccination, particularly mRNA vaccines, and increased incidences” of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. [more]

Elites are Trying to Kill Us: 20 Universities Still Forcing Students to Get Dangerous COVID Injections

From [HERE] Twenty United States colleges continue to require their students to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, according to the watchdog organization No College Mandates.

These mandates face increasingly heavy criticism from medical doctors and scholars who point to concerns regarding the vaccine’s safety, efficacy, and necessity.

Lucia Sinatra, co-founder of No College Mandates, an organization that tracks and advocates for the abolition of vaccine mandates, told The College Fix that such policies are “unreasonable and discriminatory.”

Many schools have been quietly retiring their vaccine mandates over the past year. The most recent of these include Wayne State University, which announced this month that it “strongly” recommends but no longer requires the vaccine.