According to Pew Research FBI Data Shows the Violent Crime Rate Fell 49% between 1993 and 2022 and the Property Crime Rate Declined 59% between 1993 and 2022

From [HERE] A growing share of Americans say reducing crime should be a top priority for the president and Congress to address this year. Around six-in-ten U.S. adults (58%) hold that view today, up from 47% at the beginning of Joe Biden’s presidency in 2021. [MORE]

How have crime rates in the U.S. changed over time?

Both the FBI and BJS data show dramatic declines in U.S. violent and property crime rates since the early 1990s, when crime spiked across much of the nation.

Using the FBI data, the violent crime rate fell 49% between 1993 and 2022, with large decreases in the rates of robbery (-74%), aggravated assault (-39%) and murder/nonnegligent manslaughter (-34%). It’s not possible to calculate the change in the rape rate during this period because the FBI revised its definition of the offense in 2013.

[MORE]

The FBI data also shows a 59% reduction in the U.S. property crime rate between 1993 and 2022, with big declines in the rates of burglary (-75%), larceny/theft (-54%) and motor vehicle theft (-53%).

Using the BJS statistics, the declines in the violent and property crime rates are even steeper than those captured in the FBI data. Per BJS, the U.S. violent and property crime rates each fell 71% between 1993 and 2022.

While crime rates have fallen sharply over the long term, the decline hasn’t always been steady. There have been notable increases in certain kinds of crime in some years, including recently.

In 2020, for example, the U.S. murder rate saw its largest single-year increase on record – and by 2022, it remained considerably higher than before the coronavirus pandemic. Preliminary data for 2023, however, suggests that the murder rate fell substantially last year.

How do Americans perceive crime in their country?

Americans tend to believe crime is up, even when official data shows it is down.

In 23 of 27 Gallup surveys conducted since 1993, at least 60% of U.S. adults have said there is more crime nationally than there was the year before, despite the downward trend in crime rates during most of that period. [MORE]

BLACK CRIMINALS FUNCTION AS A NEGATIVE REFERENCE GROUP VITAL TO MAINTAINING THE WHITE AMERICAN SELF-IMAGE. THE BLACK CRIMINAL IS USED TO SUPPORT THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY'S SELF-SERVING, SELF-JUSTIFYING JUDGMENTS OF ITSELF. WHITE AMERICA'S PREOCCUPATION WITH BLACK CRIMINALITY BETRAYS ITS OWN NEED FOR REASSURANCE; BETRAYS ITS OWN BASIC INSECURITY REGARDING ITS PROJECTED MORAL PURITY. CONSEQUENTLY, THE HIGHER THE INCIDENCE OF REPORTED BLACK CRIMINALITY, THE MORE EXCEPTIONALLY RIGHTEOUS WHITE AMERICA FEELS ITSELF TO BE. THE MORE RIGHTEOUS IT FEELS ITSELF TO BE THE MORE INTENSELY AND GUILTLESSLY IT PROMULGATES AND JUSTIFIES ITS DOMINATION AND EXPLOITATION OF AFRICAN PEOPLES AT HOME AND ABROAD.” THE ABOVE GOES FOR RACIST LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE MEDIA [MORE] THE ONLY PURPOSE OF RACE IS TO PRACTICE RACISM. [MORE]

Determined by Politicians Rather than Judges, Mandatory Minimums Perpetuate Mass Incarceration, according to New Study [gullible scholars Don't Realize Decarceration is Incompatible w/White Supremacy]

From [TheSentencingProject] Eliminating mandatory minimum sentencing laws is essential to creating a more just and equitable criminal justice system. Widespread evidence shows that mandatory minimum sentences produce substantial harm with no overall benefit to crime control.1 Determined by lawmakers rather than judges, these sentences represent a uniquely American approach to sentencing that has accelerated prison growth. They constrain judicial discretion, deepen racial disparities in the criminal legal system, and cause far-reaching harm to individuals, families, and communities.2

Despite building bipartisan agreement that such sentences are a policy failure, mandatory minimum sentences continue to be promoted as a tool to combat crime, even as the public signals waning support. This fact sheet identifies the main issues associated with mandatory minimum sentences. It documents the modest progress toward ending them, as well as efforts to reinstate them, and offers solutions to hasten change that will aid in ending mass incarceration.

Overview

Mandatory minimums are legal provisions in each state and the federal government that require a specific minimum prison term for certain crimes, regardless of individual circumstances.3 A range of criminal legal experts from ideologically diverse backgrounds4 maintain that mandatory minimums are an overly harsh, disproportionate punishment.5

As crime rose in the 1980s and early 1990s, federal and state lawmakers scrambled to calm public concern.6 With some support from academics, community leaders from areas with rising crime, corrections, law enforcement, and the legal community, politicians built on growing momentum to end indeterminate sentences, consisting of a range of years with no set minimum, and instead opted for longer, determinate sentences upon conviction with a long, minimum term. By 1995, all 50 states and the federal government constrained judges’ discretion in sentencing by mandating minimum imprisonment terms for a wide variety of offenses.7These policies encompassed:

• Mandatory prison sentences for many drug-related crimes and longer, mandatory minimum sentences for violent crimes and repeat (i.e., habitual) offenses;

• “Three strikes” laws that lengthened sentences, requiring minimum sentences of 25 years to life imprisonment for some, usually serious, offenses;8 and

• “Truth-in-sentencing” laws, which required people to serve most of their sentences, typically 85%, before eligibility for release.9

Problems with Mandatory Minimums

Prosecutors hold the power

A deterrence rationale underpinned mandatory minimum sentences: individuals were expected to refrain from committing new crimes if sentences were lengthened, and such sentences would also “send a message” to those considering criminal acts. The laws were professed to target violent crime, but their broad authority resulted in far more drug and other nonviolent convictions than violent convictions. The use of mandatory minimums effectively vests prosecutors with powerful sentencing discretion. The prosecutor controls the decision to charge a person with a mandatory-eligible crime and, in some states, the decision to apply the mandatory minimum to an eligible charge.10 Rather than eliminate discretion in sentencing, mandatory minimums therefore moved this power from judges to prosecutors. The threat of mandatory minimums also encourages defendants to plead to a different crime to avoid a stiff, mandatory sentence.

Racial and ethnic disparities flourish

Studies show that Black people receive mandatory minimum sentences more frequently than whites.11 A 2019 study found that people of color in New York made up 91% of arrests for crimes that carry mandatory minimums, whereas whites made up only 7%.12 At the federal level, a 2017 United States Sentencing Commission report on drug sentences revealed that Black people were the most likely to have been sentenced under a mandatory minimum than any other group, and that, despite equal rates of using drugs,13 Black and Hispanic individuals comprised the majority of persons convicted of drug-related offenses (which are the most common federal offenses subject to mandatory minimums).14

The racial disparity associated with the sentencing of crack and powder cocaine offenses in the federal system after Congress passed the draconian Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 is well known. The law created a quantity-based 100:1 disparity between federal crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses, imposing the same five and ten-year mandatory minimum penalties for selling five and 50 grams of crack cocaine as for 100 times the amount of powder cocaine. In 1986, before the law passed, the average federal drug sentence for African Americans was 11% higher than for whites but within four years, this average was 49% higher.15 A 2007 analysis by the United States Sentencing Commission showed that 82% of people convicted of crack-related offenses were Black, a stunning difference compared to whites (9%).16 This injustice was reduced, but not eliminated through the Fair Sentencing Act in 2010 which lowered the disparity to 18:1 from 100:1.

DECARCERATION IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH WHITE SUPREMACY’S GOAL OF PLACING LARGE NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE INTO GREATER CONFINEMENT.

RWS REQUIRES THE GREATER CONFINEMENT OF SUBSTANTIAL NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE. UNDECEIVER NEELY FULLER MAKES IT PLAIN THAT “THE WHITE SUPREMACISTS KNOW THAT A WORLD SYSTEM BASED ON RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY REQUIRES THAT SUBSTANTIAL NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE BE GREATLY RESTRICTED IN THEIR MOVEMENTS FROM PLACE TO PLACE. THE WHITE SUPREMACISTS RESTRICT THE MOVEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE SO AS TO KEEP THEM IDLE, AND/OR KEEP THEM FROM BECOMING CONSTRUCTIVELY SUFFICIENT.

THE RACISTS MAKE CERTAIN THAT LARGE NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE EXIST UNDER CONDITIONS THAT WILL MOST LIKELY CAUSE THEM TO DO THINGS THAT WILL GIVE RACISTS AN “EXCUSE” TO PUT THEM IN GREATER CONFINEMENT.” [MORE]

Prison conditions worsen

In addition to their profound racial differences, mandatory minimum sentences have contributed to prison overcrowding, which exacerbates extremely unsanitary and dangerous living conditions. Overcrowded prisons create resource deficits for rehabilitation, mental and behavioral health needs, and education needs. Eliminating mandatory minimums would allow the reallocation of resources that could instead go toward funding these services and programs, which have known community safety benefits.17

State and Federal Reforms Underway

After decades of lengthening prison terms to discourage engagement in crime, the failure of this approach is abundantly clear, and some jurisdictions are reversing course. A few notable reforms in recent years include:

• Almost half of all states, as well as the federal government, have reduced or eliminated some mandatory minimums related to drug offenses.18

• Colorado, Iowa, and Washington now forbid mandatory minimums for youth who are transferred to the adult system.19

• Mississippi scaled back its truth-in-sentencing law so that certain nonviolent offenses committed by someone without a criminal history could be reviewed after serving one fourth of their sentence instead of the previous mandate of needing to serve 85% of their sentence.20

While states have yet to address the overuse of mandatory minimum sentences for violent offenses, the limits put on harsh penalties for nonviolent and drug offenses is encouraging. But even here, reform of mandatory minimums has been too sporadic and insufficient to meaningfully pull the prison population back to its pre-mass incarceration levels. Reforms should be strengthened so they point the way toward a new paradigm of sentencing that allows individualized assessments, that includes regular review, and earned release as soon as possible.

Support for Misguided Policies Remains

We are now in the 50th year of the uniquely American reliance on mass incarceration.21 Experts agree that this has come about by politics, not crime, and many of the policies are related to mandatory minimum sentences.9 From perpetuating racial disparities, hindering rehabilitation, and straining resources, these policies have had significant negative consequences for individuals, families, and communities.

While inroads have been made to reverse or reform mandatory minimum laws in select states, we are nowhere near an end to the “get tough” politics that brought them about. Old rhetoric tends to resurface when crime worries rise. In 2022, the Tennessee legislature passed a new truth-in-sentencing law,23which requires individuals to serve 100% of their sentence upon conviction for eight separate felonies. The law is expected to increase the prison population considerably.24

A successful push in California for two new mandatory minimums followed another highly televised crime by Stanford University student Brock Turner in 2016.25 Because the sexual assault did not fall neatly in the state definition of rape, the two new laws expanded the definition of rape and prohibited the use of probation in a wider range of crimes of a sexual nature. The case exemplifies the understandable emotional public outcry for immediate action. It is important to remember, though, that the burden of such quickly developed laws is likely to fall disproportionately on non-white individuals, unlike this defendant, perpetuating the crisis of punitiveness toward Black and Brown communities.26 [MORE]

Are Alabama Prisons for Confinement or Gender Annihilation? Gov Has Spent $10M Defending Claims that Overcrowded Inmates are Routinely Raped, Sexually Abused and Subjected to Horrific Sexual Violence

Findings issued by the United States Department of Justice documenting the extraordinary rise in violence and sexual assaults in Alabama's prisons over the last five years leave no doubt that there is a humanitarian crisis in our state's prisons. Photographs are now appearing in local and national media that provide a window into violence that state officials have long shielded from public view. [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY MAKES IT PLAIN:

prisons – U.S. Bureau of Gender Annihilation and Family Destruction. Prisons are indicative of society’s sickness, the political repression of the State and a corrupt—if not bankrupt—economic system of monopoly capitalism. There is a myth supported by Corporate media that prisons function to keep criminals away from society. This is patently false as most crimes are non-violent and actually go unreported. Most “criminals” operate and remain within agencies and boardrooms—though not in prison, making life for others a living hell. Prisons are but reflections of society’s infractions—refracted in the form of deformed grins and shadowed sins—missing the mark is the mark of the missing and exploited, the lost, oppressed, despised and compromised, left with only vices as their bootstrap devices in a misbegotten world gone astray. A place where the multitudes (have-nots) scrap amongst each other in order to taste the morsel of just another still-born day that brings the hope unborn aborted in the muffled moans of yesterday. The ghetto groans in the birth of a new dawn accompanied by the same old sirens serenading the pangs of hunger, souls murmur and pre-mumble the pre-amble to be free; free from the oppression of the OCTOCON and its emissaries. I’ve seen the whites of eyes, clear and teary—hold on my people, don’t get weary. We must all learn to discern and honor the sacredness of life—the life you deserve is the one you preserve, and the life you help save may help you save your own. (See: The OCTOCON, Penal Code, DL Brothers, Buck Rodgers Time, BOP, Capital Punishment, Monopoly Capitalism & Homo Tiempos) [MORE]

From [HERE] An incarcerated man sued Alabama, claiming state officials were deliberately indifferent to the risk of sexual violence in the state’s prisons. As the judge noted in 2023, Jacob Barefield’s complaint listed terrifying, credible examples. But something else caught the judge’s eye—the State’s response when asked why it spent over $10 million fighting such lawsuits.

We are “an easy target,” the State’s lawyers wrote in a court filing, and “baseless claims must still be defended.” Besides, the State said, Mr. Barefield’s complaint had not “plausibly” claimed a pattern of unchecked sexual violence.

U.S. District Court Judge W. Keith Watkins wrote:

Did they read the complaint? If they had then they would know that such a violent environment is exactly what [the plaintiff] alleges, and arguments to the contrary are disingenuous, if not bordering on outright dishonesty.

In Alabama, people incarcerated in overcrowded and understaffed prisons are routinely raped, sexually abused, and subjected to horrific sexual violence. Twenty years after Congress unanimously passed the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), sexual violence in Alabama’s prisons is at an all-time high. 

For years, officials have been notified about a pattern of sexual assaults, rapes, and brutal attacks. Last year, the Alabama Department of Corrections received almost daily reports of prison sexual assaults.

Mr. Barefield’s complaint, filed in federal court, details allegations of a harrowing episode at an Alabama prison. 

According to the complaint,  Mr. Barefield, 25, was standing in the canteen snack line at Ventress Correctional Facility, a sprawling medium security prison in southeastern Alabama, on Sunday morning, November 11, 2018, when an incarcerated man wearing a teal wristband approached him with a knife.

The wristband meant the man lived in F Dorm, the section of Ventress reserved for prisoners with recent serious infractions and needing the highest level of management. LL, the man flashing the knife at Mr. Barefield, had been transferred to Ventress from St. Clair, a maximum security prison where he had allegedly stabbed a man to death in a fight five years earlier.

LL’s wristband signaled that he had no business being in the canteen that morning with Mr. Barefield and the other men there. But no guard was there to stop him. LL encountered not a single guard as he walked Mr. Barefield out of the canteen at knifepoint, across the prison yard, past a number of buildings, and toward F Dorm.

The complaint alleges that Ventress officials knew Mr. Barefield might be a target. They had determined that he was especially vulnerable to sexual assault. He wore the yellow wristband of C Dorm, whose residents are not allowed in F Dorm. But the guard at the door to F Dorm did not check his wristband, and no correctional officer was on duty inside the dorm. 

The door should have been locked. It wasn’t. LL opened it and forced Mr. Barefield into the open-bay dorm, a big room that housed more than 100 men classified as high risk. 

Marching his captive past the rows of metal bunk beds, LL forced Mr. Barefield onto a lower bunk. A nearby television had its volume turned all the way up. Sheets and blankets hung from the upper bunk, creating a makeshift tent, or “hump” in Alabama prison slang, that concealed what went on inside.

LL told another prisoner he was going “to show him how to take control of another inmate.” Then he entered the tent.

What happened next, according to the complaint, is described by Judge Watkins in his August 22, 2023, memorandum opinion in Mr. Barefield’s lawsuit: 

There, in the middle of the morning, in a violent offender’s dorm that Barefield should never have been allowed to enter, in a crowded area that should have been supervised by a guard, in a makeshift tent that should have been immediately taken down, using a knife that should have been confiscated, [LL] raped Jacob Barefield…The T.V. drowned out any cries.

After the rape finally ended, LL and another incarcerated person held Mr. Barefield hostage inside the ”hump” for more than five hours. During that time, in violation of Ventress policy, no guards patrolled or even monitored surveillance cameras in that section of F Dorm.  

If Mr. Barefield told anyone what had happened, he’d be killed, LL warned. 

When a prison official arrived to do the daily count before dinner, LL released Mr. Barefield, who immediately sought aid. He told the shift commander in the yard he had been attacked and repeatedly asked for his help.

The commander did not take a statement or file a report, as required. He did not direct Mr. Barefield to the infirmary or ask who had raped him. He simply ordered him back to C Dorm. 

That night Mr. Barefield telephoned a friend and asked her to report the rape to the warden and other supervisors. She did, promptly. But Mr. Barefield’s suit said that for two days, in violation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act, those officials took no action.

Weeks later, Warden Michael Strickland barged in on a meeting between Ventress’s PREA compliance officer and Mr. Barefield. As the ultimate authority at Ventress, the warden said to Mr. Barefield “something along the lines of ‘grow some hair on your chin,’” Judge Watkins wrote.  

“If true,” Judge Watkins wrote, “the allegations in this case tell a horrific story about excessively dangerous conditions in another Alabama state prison—and the failures of authorities to fix them.”

The judge added this footnote: 

This case does not come to the court in isolation. In the past year, several courts have found viable allegations of unconstitutionally violent conditions of confinement throughout the Alabama prison system. The common themes in these cases are easily detected: understaffing, overcrowding, proliferation of contraband weapons, and abject failures to monitor and supervise inmates—all of which have allegedly led to the highest rates of inmate-on-inmate violence in the country. And those failures, especially concerning egregious understaffing, are not new. Over five years ago, the Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) was ordered to staff Alabama prisons at a constitutionally adequate level. He has not yet done so.  

11th Circuit Affirms Sheriff Victor Hill’s Abuse Conviction: Black Strawboss Handcuffed Inmates to Restraint Chairs for Up to 6 Hours at a Time in Atlanta Area Jail

ALTHOUGH DO-GOODER REFORMERS OFTEN CLAIM DIVERSE POLICE FORCES ARE A CURE FOR POLICE BRUTALITY, BLACK COPS BRUTALIZE AND HARM BLACK PEOPLE AT A RATE NEARLY EQUAL TO WHITE COPS. SAID DO-GOODERS ARE DRUNK-OFF THEIR JESUSIZED BELIEF IN STATISM. SCHOLAR ALEX VITALE STATES, “REFORMERS OFTEN CALL FOR RECRUITING MORE OFFICERS OF COLOR IN THE HOPES THAT THEY WILL TREAT COMMUNITIES WITH GREATER DIGNITY, RESPECT, AND FAIRNESS. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS LITTLE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP THIS HOPE. EVEN THE MOST DIVERSE FORCES HAVE MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH RACIAL PROFILING AND BIAS, AND INDIVIDUAL BLACK AND LATINO OFFICERS APPEAR TO PERFORM VERY MUCH LIKE THEIR WHITE COUNTERPARTS.” HE STATES, “THERE IS NOW A LARGE BODY OF EVIDENCE MEASURING WHETHER THE RACE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OFFICERS AFFECTS THEIR USE OF FORCE. MOST STUDIES SHOW NO EFFECT. MORE DISTRESSINGLY, A FEW INDICATE THAT BLACK OFFICERS ARE MORE LIKELY TO USE FORCE OR MAKE ARRESTS, ESPECIALLY OF BLACK CIVILIANS.” [MORE] and [MORE]AND [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS

Quisling – the name for a traitor, coined in April, 1940, meaning one who is content to accept the yoke of the conqueror for the sake of being given office and trinkets, even against the feeling and expression of the conquered people, and moreover, prepared to use the force continuum against his/her own people to impose the conquerors decrees. (See: SNAGs)

"The notion that '[n]o man is above the law and no man is below it' is fundamental to our democratic republic's continuing viability." So says the Eleventh Circuit(link is external) as its opening statement in affirming the conviction of Victor Hill, a former Clayton County, Ga. sheriff for gratuitously putting detainees in a restraint chair for hours at a time, causing extreme pain and lasting injuries.

The case is United States v. Victor Hill, 23-10934 (11th Cir. 2024).

Former CDC Director Robert Redfield Admits that People Under Age 50 Had No Reason to Get COVID Injections. Also Admits Experimental Shots Caused Significant Injury. Claims He Warned Government

From [HERE] Former CDC Director Robert Redfield said Thursday that many officials who tried to warn the public about potential problems with COVID-19 vaccines were silenced and that it’s time to acknowledge the jab resulted in “significant” side effects.

“Those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines … we kind of got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines, because they were afraid that that would cause people not to want to get vaccinated,” Dr. Redfield told Chris Cuomo on NewsNation.

Dr. Redfield, who helmed the CDC during Operation Warp Speed, argued the COVID shots were “important” and saved “a lot of lives,” but also admitted that individuals under 50 years old had no reason to receive the experimental COVID injection and that the shots caused “significant side effects.”

“They’re important for the most vulnerable people, those over 60, 65 years of age. They really aren’t that critical for those that are under 50 or younger. But those vaccines saved a lot of lives, but they also—we have to be honest, some people got significant side effects from the vaccine,” he said.

“I have a number of people that are quite ill and they never had COVID, but they are ill from the vaccine,” he continued. “And we just have to acknowledge that.”

Redfield was one of the first major government health officials to claim that in his “professional opinion” the virus that caused COVID-19 originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Cuomo himself recently admitted he experienced health issues from the COVID jab.

A bombshell report published by the Correlation Research in the Public Interest in September found the COVID jabs were causally linked to a drastic increase in all-cause mortality in 17 countries, ultimately resulting in at least 17 million deaths.

And a recent large-scale study through the Global Covid Vaccine Safety (GCoVS) Project analyzed health data from 99 million patients encompassing eight countries and confirmed a causal link between the shots and myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and more.

Dr James Thorpe- The Purpose of COVID Injections is Depopulation; Killing, Injuring and Sterilizing People. Authorities Murdered or Intentionally Injured 585 Million People w/the Alleged "Vaccine"

Dr. Charles Hoffe: If an Unvaxxed Person Has Sex with Someone who Got COVID Injections the Unvaxxed Person Will be Exposed to Spike Protein which May Cause Illness, Inflammation

The Plandemic was Always about Genthanasia - Getting as Many Humans as Possible Injected with a Bioweapon to Kill Them in a Slow Motion Extermination

From [HERE] The pandemic end game was always about injecting the masses with the ultimate depopulation bioweapon of the globalists – mRNA "vaccines." Forget about the torture of lockdowns, the brain-suffocating masks, the society-crippling social distancing mandates, because it was, is and always will be about getting people injected with millions of forever-prions. Who's distracted? Who got so caught up in the frenzy, that they actually agreed to the most dangerous medical experiment in the history of Western Medicine?

Meet the mRNA-bioweapon disguised as a vaccine

Talk about camouflage. The mRNA so-called "vaccine" (which does NOT qualify as one) was planned to infect the entire human body with toxic spike prions that bind together using nanotechnology, clog the vascular system, pollute the cleansing organs, strain the heart, freak out the immune system, disrupt the central nervous system, and destroy any fetus. It gets worse.

What if you had "free medical coverage" to help you pay for the treatments you will need after being injected with the "technological" formula that tricks your cells into producing millions of toxic, virus-mimicking prions? Does that sound like a good deal? It's like telling people to shoot themselves in the foot with a shotgun, and then any medical work they need to help recover from the injury is covered. Sounds great, right? Where is the end of the line for that?

Today's war gas chambers are bioweapons disguised as vaccines. Today's nuclear war isn't nuclear at all, but it's likely to give you cancer, and a heart attack too, by using spike proteins to trick your body into malfunctioning, forever. How many years does each Covid jab remove from human existence? Is it decades? Did you know that since the Wuhan jab rollout, cancer rates are skyrocketing? What "standard of care" helps fight cancer that's invading every part of your body via every blood vessel?

End game was, is and always will be about "vaccinating" as many sheeple as possible

What more insidious way could there ever be to absolutely wipe out the majority of earth's population than with a "medicine" that 70 percent of the populace believes is one hundred percent "safe and effective"? At least 7 of every 10 humans that walk the earth right now think that vaccines are the best way to stay alive, prevent viral infections and keep pandemics from spreading. Nearly every one of these same people believe in climate change also, because… "science."

Although there is ZERO science proving mRNA vaccines prevent or lessen the impact of Covid-19, these sheeple have been brainwashed by falsified, globalist-funded 'research' and the fake news media complex. The same goes for "global warming," which had to be changed to "climate change" when all the NASA-faked statistics got revealed for what they really are.  The temperature graph got cherry-picked for the past 100 years, but none of the sheeple had a look at the 1,000-year graph, or the 10,000 year graph, that shows earth is actually in a slow cooling phase. Oops.

The globalist end game is to bankrupt America's middle class, infect them all with millions of deadly prions yearly, and replace them all with illegal immigrants from around the world. Get ready for the United Banana Republic of America, because that's where this is all directly headed. Have you been sucked in by the Covid jab cult or the climate change cult? Don't drink the Koolaid.

300 Pages of Emails Leave No Doubt: Fauci, NIH Knew Early on of Injuries, Deaths Caused by Experimental COVID Injections

According to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense, reports of injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines — including a child injured by the Pfizer vaccine during a clinical trial and a fatal vaccine-induced case of myocarditis — reached NIH researchers, Dr. Anthony Fauci and others in 2021 and 2022.

From [HERE] Several adverse event reports from people injured by the COVID-19 vaccines reached National Institutes of Health (NIH) researchers in 2021 and 2022 — including a report of a child injured by the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine during a clinical trial, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

The documents also include reports of vaccine-injured people who were suicidal and emails sent to government officials — including Dr. Anthony Fauci — by a COVID-19 vaccine injury victim frustrated with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Board’s (CICP) slow pace of responding to their vaccine injury claims.

As reports of vaccine injuries came in, the agency advised one injured person that it was “not prudent” to get a second dose.

Some researchers cited a lack of knowledge about vaccine injuries due to the rapid speed at which they were developed.

The 300-page batch of documents released to CHD on April 21 contains emails between the NIH and people reporting COVID-19 vaccine injuries. CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in November 2022.

On April 12, 2023, CHD sued the NIH to obtain the records after the NIH did not respond to the request.

In an October 2023 settlement, the NIH agreed to produce up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 pages per month. This month’s batch also revealed that Fauci and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials knew of serious COVID-19 vaccine adverse events as early as December 2020.

‘No doubt in my mind that the vaccine caused’ girl’s injuries

In emails sent to NIH researchers Farinaz Safavi, M.D., Ph.D., Dr. Avindra Nath and Amanda Wiebold starting May 24, 2021 (pages 237-243), the parents of a girl injured during the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine trial detailed their daughter’s condition.

For 2nd Straight Year Homelessness Increases in DC, a City Controlled by Elite White Liberals; Black Families Hit Hardest as Black People Make Up 86% of DC Homeless but are Only 46% of the Population

Photo courtesy of Vincent Brown, the undeceiver.

IN WASHINGTON, DC, AFRICAN AMERICANS MAKE UP 86.4 PERCENT OF THE HOMELESS POPULATION, WHILE REPRESENTING ONLY 46.6 PERCENT OF THE CITY’S POPULATION. ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS, THIS IMBALANCE IS NOT IMPROVING OVER TIME. IT CAN BE DEDUCED THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE LANDLORDS ARE WHITE LIBERALS, AS DC IS ONLY 5% REPUBLICAN. [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS

homeless – the informationally disenfranchised and in many cases also the psychologically disengaged. The streets may belong to the people, but they make less than ideal places to live. In the cold, the homeless look for the “grate” outdoors.

From [HERE] New data published Monday showed the number of homeless people living on D.C. streets increased for the second consecutive year — and many of those seeking shelter are families.

The D.C. mayor’s office said the city recorded a 14% increase in homelessness this year, according to the District’s annual Point-in-Time Count taken in January.

Raw numbers haven’t been released yet, but a 14% increase over the 4,922 people counted as homeless last year in the District would put this year’s number around 5,600 people. In 2022, the District recorded 4,410 people living on city streets.

“Across the last two years, we counted a higher percentage of people experiencing homelessness for the first time, which both points to the need for earlier interventions as well as our success at supporting those who have experienced long-term homelessness to regain housing,” Laura Zeilinger, director of the D.C. Department of Human Services, said in a news release. “We are committed to continue to build on and invest in proven solutions, and innovative approaches to enhance our system for District residents facing homelessness.”

Families accounted for 39% of the increase in homelessness, while single individuals represented 6% of the increase, according to the mayor’s office.

That’s a change from the PIT count last year, when both groups were relatively equal contributors to 2023’s uptick in homelessness. Families made up 12% of last year’s increase, and single individuals accounted for 10%.

City officials noted there are fewer transients in the city now than in 2020, when data was collected roughly two months before the COVID-19 pandemic took hold.

The mayor’s office said the 30% reduction in homelessness over the past four years stemmed from pandemic-era policies such as the eviction moratorium and an infusion of federal cash into cities and states.

The District’s homeless population dropped 31% between 2020-22 — which led the nation, according to the mayor’s office — until the trend began to reverse after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the eviction moratorium in 2021 and federal money slowly dried up.

But homeless advocates who work in the city believe the District’s numbers are finally correcting after being undercounted during the heart of the pandemic. 

“The District reported a significant decrease in homelessness overall during COVID, and we saw nothing to support that dramatic decrease that they were reporting,” Joe Mettimano, the executive director for Central Union Mission, told The Washington Times.

Mr. Mettimano said he saw the same number coming to Central Union’s men’s only shelter during COVID as he does now. 

And he mentioned that the organization’s food pantry, which is open to anyone, saw a 50-75% surge in visits from women and families during the pandemic that has yet to recede. [MORE]

Feds Keep the Poverty Line Artificially Low ($15,060 for 1 adult in 2024) to Conceal at Least 36 Million Households who Earn Too Much to Qualify for Welfare and Not Enough to Afford the Basics

From [HERE] Some of the country’s savviest economic trend predictors spend all day answering call-center phones. 

Operators at 211 emergency helplines raised alarm bells about a baby formula shortage ahead of the headlines about empty shelves. And they knew that families were defaulting on their mortgages before the subprime collapse in 2008.    

Now, even as the economy looks healthy by many measures, 211 workers say they are hearing something concerning: more people living very close to poverty than the federal poverty line might suggest. The disparity aligns with polls showing high levels of consumer malaise despite recent good news like cooling inflation, low unemployment and strong hiring in March.

United Way, the nonprofit that operates about half of the country’s 200-plus 211 centers, and other poverty researchers blame that disconnect partly on the federal poverty line, which they say hasn’t kept up with the real cost of living. 

The share of households below the census-designated federal poverty line has barely budged since 2010. Meanwhile, poverty researchers say a large and fast-growing group of people are earning too much to qualify for social services and not enough to afford the basics where they live.

“We wonder why there’s so much anger in public discourse today, and it’s in part because of the stress people feel to just keep themselves and their families afloat,” says Lisa Tepper Bates, president of United Way of Connecticut. “People feel like the system is not serving them.” 

United Way calls this population ALICE, or Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. The organization says about 36 million American households, or 29%, met the criteria in 2021, the most recent year for which data is available. That is up 18% from 2010. Preliminary data show the same trend continuing through 2022.

In nearby Hartford, where the cost of living outpaces the national average, 38% of households fit that description. Call centers operate locally, and Connecticut’s center hears from residents all over the state. 

Not many answers

During years of underemployment as a single parent, Theo Bonet got help from services—and later applied to work as a United Way contact specialist to help families who also needed assistance. The 42-year-old didn’t expect to tell so many callers that they earn too much for assistance. 

“It’s heart-wrenching to have to say to someone who’s struggling, ‘I’m sorry, you’re not eligible,’ ” says Bonet, adding that the frequency of these calls has risen sharply. 

Callers tell Bonet that they are embarrassed to ask for help and that they are often doing so for the first time after working throughout adulthood. “I always remind them it takes strength to make a call,” Bonet says. 

Trained to route callers to thousands of outside resources and service providers, United Way operators say those available to ALICE families struggling to pay their bills are often limited to food pantries and a smattering of religious and government programs without income restrictions. 

The federal poverty level for a family of four stands at $31,200. United Way of Connecticut estimates the bare-minimum survival budget for a family of four with two young children in the state to be as high as $126,000. United Way uses the local cost of housing, groceries, child care, healthcare, transportation, technology and taxes to come up with ALICE survival budgets for every U.S. county. 

Bonet recently spoke with a man who said he earned $10,000 a month and was looking for low-cost medical facilities because he couldn’t afford health insurance. 

“I just was kind of in disbelief to hear someone who makes that much struggling,” Bonet says. 

Defining poverty

United Way of Connecticut President Tepper Bates doesn’t mince words: “The federal poverty line is garbage.”

Although the Census Bureau raises the poverty line each year in step with the Labor Department’s consumer-price index, some poverty experts say the underlying math doesn’t reflect many financial realities. The core assumption that families spend a third of their total income on food, they say, is inconsistent with the fact that on average, housing consumes the largest share of household budgets. And the metric doesn’t adjust for differences in the cost of living across the U.S., which hurts residents of high-cost states such as Connecticut.  

The Census Bureau released its own supplemental poverty measure in 2011 that provides a more nuanced calculation. The official poverty line of $15,060 for one adult in 2024, however, remains the baseline for determining most public assistance. Among the benefits: Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the National School Lunch Program. 

A group of Democratic congressmen introduced a bill in December that would change the poverty line calculation more drastically than the supplemental measure and likely qualify more families for benefits. It hasn’t received a vote.   

Pandemic-era benefits cushioned families during the early period of rapid inflation, says Marianne Page, director of the Center for Poverty and Inequality Research and an economics professor at the University of California, Davis. Without those programs, more families are struggling, she says. 

“People are worse off now,” Page says. “There are a lot of other measures by which we might think the economy is doing OK. But at the end of the day, things like inflation and benefits being clawed back have an impact on a family’s ability to purchase the goods and services that it needs.” 

The Department of Health and Human Services and Commerce Department, which both play roles in federal poverty calculations and benefit allocation, directed the Journal to each other or to publicly available information. [MORE]

An Inside Job: 'The Oct 7th Attacks on Israel Were Organized and Enabled by Israel. The $2 Billion Fence at Gaza is Impenetrable to “Hamas” and is the Most Surveilled Border in the World’

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Israel – the name of the most successful and vicious terrorist groups that ultimately became a nation (Corporate State) on the heels of the British government controlled United Nations mandate. 2) Occupied Palestine—preoccupied by Palestinians prior to the time in history when there weren’t any Hebrews living on the dusty tiny strip of land on the western edge of the Asian continent erroneously referred to as the Middle East. 3) the name created by combining two Khemetic gods Isis, Ra with a Semitic one El. Israel or Is it Real? (See: Zionism, Twelve Tribes of Israel, Jews, Terrorism, Racism White Supremacy, Caucasian, Israeliens & Thugs)

Israeliens – impostor (pale interloper alien) Hebrews—Eastern European stock Caucasians who adopted the philosophy, myths, fables, and traditions of the so-called “Jews” while living in Russia—masquerading as if they had any genetic or historical ancestry and cultural heritage to the Afrikan Hebrews, the Afrim people, who occupied Canaan (Palestine) from ancient times. 2) those who currently are occupying Palestine (the land of Canaan), colonizing and killing its rightful descendants, historic owners and dwellers), and are undeniably alien (foreign—not aboriginal) to that land. 3) impostor Hebrews originating from the Pale of Settlement in Kazzarian Russia currently an occupying force (militarily holed-up and propped-up by US financial support and British skullduggery) in occupied Palestine. 4) alien Jews—Pinchbeck Hebrews. Israeliens are East Europeans with no genetic or actual historic ties whatsoever to the land now called Palestine. Israeliens have brainwashed (and fooled) themselves and many others into believing this historical lie and propaganda that they are the descendents of “Jews” (a misnomer for African Hebrews, itself a misnomer for the Afrim people). Anyone with a modicum of research skills, knowledge of basic geography, philology, and an unbiased-by-religious-myth mind can easily confirm or validate this fact for his or herself. Both so-called Sephardim and Ashkenazim “Jews” are not historically tied to the Afrim. It’s not that Caucasians who have adopted the “Jewish” religion shouldn’t have a place to live—but how about suggesting relocating where they came from—the hills of Russia, and not on another peoples’ land. You don’t invade (break into) someone’s house (property) and expect them to just go away and not fight to get it back (despite how much force, murdering, deception, and propaganda that is brought to bear to justify such wrongful invasion and genocide). Psychological repression is both invisible and reflexive. (See: Zionism, USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, Genocide, Immigrant Human, Jew, Twelve Tribes of Israel, Evolution, Caucasian, Pilgarlick, El & Judaism)

The Dependent Media Pretends "Democratic" Israel was Forced Into "War" w/Another Nation in Order to Conceal its Ongoing Holocaust Against its Own Citizens who Have No Army, Navy or Air Force

BASIC REALITY CONCEALED BY AUTHORITY AND THEIR MEDIA From [HERE] ‣Israel and Gaza are not separate countries. Gaza is a small territory mostly surrounded by Israel and whose borders Israel controls (directly or in the case of one crossing, indirectly).

• ‣Gaza is often called an “open-air prison” -- for good reason.

• ‣Muslim, Christian, and Jewish Palestinian Arabs peacefully shared the land before Israel was created in 1948.

• ‣Israel was founded in 1948 by forcing non-Jewish Palestinians off the land.

• ‣Israel has been taking over more Palestinian land ever since...

• ‣The two “sides” are not evenly matched.

• ‣Palestinians are killed at massively higher rates than Israelis, and this has always been true.

• ‣Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank have often tried nonviolent resistance.

• ‣Numerous respected organizations have documented Israel’s systemic human rights abuses and violations of international law.

• ‣Israel relies on funding and diplomatic cover from the U.S. Its actions often harm the United States

• ‣On Oct. 7, hundreds broke out of Gaza, attacked Israeli soldiers & civilians, and some took hostages. Israel disseminated atrocity claims about the attack, many of them found to be without evidence and untrue.

• ‣Israel immediately began indiscriminately shelling Gaza, killing and maiming men, women, and children of all ages.

"Gaza isn't starving. Gaza is being starved by Israel." Videos Show Genocidal, Crazy IsrAlien "Settlers" Attack and Destroy Food on Aid Trucks Headed for Gaza

From [HERE] and [MORE]. US GOVERNMENT IS LYING TO YOU - IT KNOWS BARBARIC ISRALIENS ARE STOPPING AID. From targeting humanitarian vehicles to standing by as mobs attack trucks, Israel is blocking aid from reaching Gaza.

ON MONDAY, A mob of Israeli settlers attacked aid trucks carrying food supplies to Gaza. The extremists pillaged the cargo, destroying and smashing supplies desperately needed more than half a year into Israel’s assault on the besieged enclave. Israel’s police and military traded blame, each saying the other should have prevented it, but a senior security official told Haaretz that the rioters received “inside information about the trucks’ movement” from officers.

The incident is emblematic of a pattern that has played out repeatedly for months. Israelis, either vigilante extremists or state officials, block or outright attack humanitarian aid; the United States offers a milquetoast response or extends further favor to Israel; the violence continues and even ramps up. There is ample evidence of the Israeli government looking the other way as these attacks and obstructions on aid delivery play out. None of it is secret — much of it has been documented on camera and spread through social media. [MORE]

[MORE]

Happening Now in the "Grazed New World:" Video Shows IsrAliens Holocausting Humans in the North of Gaza as Sheeple in the US Believe Whatever The Dependent Media Tells Them to Believe

From [HERE] and [HERE] 10 women, 10 children and 8 men slaughtеred after Israel bоmbеd a family home in north Gaza

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Hagana, the – “Eastern ‘European’ Caucasians “Jewish,” i.e. (Kazzarian), guerrillas who in cahoots with the Rothschild parasitic hoodlum dynasty and the Royal Throne & Flush British Crown, established the so-called State of Israel, currently occupying (holed up) on the land of Palestine. (See: War, Zionism, Ideology, Religion & Racism White Supremacy)

HOIST:  House Of Israelien State Terrorism. The imperial United States and Britain propped up (hoisted and foisted) the illegal terrorist group-cum war nation State and continues to keep it propped up with a kickstand of annual multi-billion “dollar” gifts in the form of “credit,” media support, weapons, arms, logistics, intelligence and technology. [MORE]

improperty – claims or rights to ownership of land, resources or wealth that was achieved through deception, fraud, force, manipulation, coercion, threat, duress or unethical means. For example, the USA is the Improperty of the Native Americans; the State of Israel is the Improperty of the people of Palestine—as the 12 Tribes of Israel mentioned in the Bible is an allegory and not historical whatsoever. Misunderstood mythology is responsible for so much of the violence and bloodshed carried out in the name of both truth and religion—especially religious truth. (See: Tradition, The Bible, Twelve Tribes, Violence, Religious Truth, Religious Virus, Chosen People, Israel, Greed & Racism White Supremacy)

Study by a Coalition of Academic Institutions says Israel is Committing Genocide in Gaza

From [HERE] A ground-breaking study by a coalition of prestigious academic institutions has concluded that Israel’s actions in Gaza since 7 October, 2023, constitute genocide against the Palestinian people. The study, conducted by the University Network for Human Rights, the International Human Rights Clinic at Boston University School of Law, the International Human Rights Clinic at Cornell Law School, the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria, and the Lowenstein Human Rights Project at Yale Law School, presents a thorough legal analysis of Israel’s conduct in the context of the Genocide Convention of 1948.

The study found that Israel has committed genocidal acts of killing, causing serious harm to, and inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza, a protected group that forms a substantial part of the Palestinian people. Between 7 October last year and 1 May, 2024, Israel has killed at least 34,568 Palestinians and wounded 77,765 others in Gaza, comprising more than five per cent of Gaza’s population. Shockingly, over two per cent of Gaza’s children have been killed or injured, with approximately 14,500 Palestinian children killed in total.

The coalition’s report of the study also highlights the destruction of civilian infrastructure, including homes, hospitals, schools, UN facilities and cultural and religious heritage sites. As a result of Israel’s military offensive, 1.7 million civilians — over 75 per cent of Gaza’s population — have been forcibly displaced, and civilians face catastrophic levels of hunger and deprivation due to Israel’s restriction on access to basic essentials.

The report concludes that Israel’s genocidal acts in Gaza have been motivated by the requisite genocidal intent, as evidenced by statements from Israeli leaders expressing dehumanisation and cruelty towards Palestinians, as well as intentions to destroy and exterminate them. The patterns of conduct by Israeli military forces in Gaza further reinforce the finding of Israel’s genocidal intent, the report said.

The academic institutions call for an immediate cessation of Israel’s violations of the international legal prohibition of genocide and emphasise the obligations of all other states to refrain from recognising Israel’s breaches as legal, avoid complicity, and take positive steps to suppress, prevent, and punish further genocidal acts against the Palestinian people in Gaza.

[racism is not bigotry or mere words or name calling] US Agency Sues Exxon for Discrimination after Racists Hung Nooses at Plant in an Apparent Threat to Murder Black Workers

From [HERE] Exxon Mobil Corp was sued for racial discrimination by a U.S. federal agency on Thursday, with charges alleging that the oil major failed to protect workers from harassment after nooses were found at one of its facilities in 2020.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) said in a statement that a Black employee at Exxon's chemical plant in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, found a hangman's noose at his work site in January 2020.

The EEOC said that at the time of this report, Exxon was already aware of three other such instances of nooses being displayed at the complex and a nearby refinery, and that a fifth noose was reported later in 2020.

According to the EEOC, Exxon investigated some of these incidents, but not all, and "failed to take measures reasonably calculated to end the harassment."

The federal agency alleged that Exxon's actions and omissions regarding the noose incidents "created a racially hostile work environment."

In Latest GOP Outreach Effort to the NGHR Voters [sleeping toms] Texas Governor Greg Abbott Pardons Racist Suspect Convicted in the 2020 Fatal Shooting of a Black Lives Matter Protester

From [HERE] Daniel Perry was convicted of murdering protester Garrett Foster in 2020, and has already been released from prison in Texas

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has officially pardoned U.S. Army Sgt. Daniel Perry, who was convicted of murdering Black Lives Matter protester Garrett Foster in 2020.

According to reports from the Austin American-Statesman, Perry — who was sentenced to 25 years in prison for Foster's murder in April 2023 — was released from prison in Rosharon, Texas, less than one hour after Abbott signed a pardon proclamation.

On Thursday, May 16, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles wrote in a statement that it recommended Perry to be pardoned on the murder conviction.

"The members of the Board of Pardons and Paroles delved into the intricacies of Perry’s case. The investigative efforts encompassed a meticulous review of permanent documents, from police reports to court records, witness statements, and interviews with individuals linked to the case," the statement reads in part.

"After a thorough examination of the amassed information, the parole board reached a decision on May 16, 2024. The Board voted unanimously to recommend a full pardon and restoration of firearm rights."