Bignorant McNegro DA Upholds Murder of Black Shoplifter for Master: Posed No Threat Exiting Store, Shot to Death by Security Guard. Deadly Force Can't Be Used in Defense of Property or NonDeadly Force

CVS, Walgreens to Pay More Than $10 Billion to Settle Opioid Lawsuits. Drugstore chains agree to make payments to states, cities and tribes that sued over opioid abuse

The Black security guard who shot and killed a suspected Black shoplifter at a Walgreens in downtown San Francisco last month will not face criminal charges, the Black district attorney’s office announced Monday, saying the shooter acted in self-defense.

The district attorney’s office under Brooke Jenkins released surveillance video and a written report Monday regarding Michael Anthony’s fatal shooting of Banko Brown on April 27. [MORE]

AN OBVIOUS MURDER. The bignorant McNegro DA is woefully incompetent and/or a golden retriever desperate to please her white liberal masters. This along with other step-and-fetchit moves recently may help her obtain more trinkets and prestige from her masters along the coin-operated career path.

Here, the McNegro DA is not sustaining the death of the black shoplifter on behalf of the system of authority because the incident involved a security guard not a police officer. Unlike cops, the security guard has no special power to initiate unprovoked acts of violence and functions no differently than a regular citizen (absent a specific statute or deputization). Rather, said McNegro is upholding the right to murder Black people with impunity in support of the system of racism/white supremacy on behalf of her masters. [MORE]

While self-defense is a justification for use of deadly force, mere threat is not sufficient justification to use deadly force. It is axiomatic that deadly force is never permissible in defense against non-deadly force. Additonally, deadly force is not permitted to stop a fleeing suspect for a misdemeanor charge. It is also axiomatic that deadly force is never sanctioned for the defense of property because the value of property could never surmount that of life (insofar as white life is concerned).

Here, when the security guard pulled out his gun Banko stepped backwards before he was shot to death. Although the guard claimed he believed Banko had a knife, he never saw a knife and there actually was no knife. Banko was shot while holding a shopping bag. Thus, his belief was not reasonable under the circumstances. Although deadly force is permitted to repel an attack reasonably believed to include the risk of death or serious bodily harm, Banko, the smaller person, clearly does not pose a threat of serious bodily harm to the security guard at any time. Furthermore, after their “fight” Banko was attempting to flee and stepped outside the store to get away. Thus, the video appears to show an obvious factual basis for a murder charge and a clear question of fact for a jury to decide.

Like most BOHICANS, Jenkins has bent over backwards for her white masters. Electing or appointing Black rolebots like Jenkins is the opposite of Black power- here she has devalued Black life on behalf of elite white liberals who control and own all major resources of San Francisco. Dr. Martin Luther King explained that elite racists often support, appoint or promote unqualified negros into high positions so that important matters to Black life may be handled frivolously. Such a tactic in all areas of people activity is what Neely Fuller would call the refinement of racism white supremacy. In the context of criminal justice, MLK stated, “There is another injustice in the courts which is equally as bad. Cases in which only Negroes are involved are handled frivolously, without regard to justice or proper correction. We deplore this type of injustice as much as we do the injustice which the Negro confronts in his court relations with whites.” [MORE]

IRS Authorities Admit Black People Face More Audit Scrutiny. Powerless Black Taxpayers are 3 to 5 times more likely than Taxpayers who are not Black to be Audited

From [HERE] The Internal Revenue Service said on Monday that Black taxpayers have been far more likely to be audited than others and that it is considering changes to its case selection process to address discrimination in how the tax code is enforced.

The acknowledgment came after the publication of research this year showing that Black taxpayers were disproportionately audited, prompting calls from members of Congress for a review into the methodology and algorithms that help determine who is selected. The tax collection agency, which received an $80 billion infusion in funding last year as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, has said it would work to make the system more equitable.

“While there is a need for further research, our initial findings support the conclusion that Black taxpayers may be audited at higher rates than would be expected given their share of the population,” Daniel Werfel, the I.R.S. commissioner, wrote in a letter to Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

Mr. Werfel said the I.R.S. had dedicated “significant resources” to determine the reasons for the disparity and evaluating the data that is available to the agency when deciding who to audit and its automated processes. He suggested that the I.R.S. could consider basing audits on “broader tax issues” rather than focusing on people who might be improperly claiming earned-income tax credits.

The research found that Black taxpayers were three to five times more likely than taxpayers who are not Black to be audited. It noted that the I.R.S. disproportionately flagged tax returns with potential errors in the claiming of certain credits, like the earned-income tax credit, which supplements low-income workers’ incomes in an effort to alleviate poverty.

The I.R.S. does not collect information about race as part of the tax-filing process, and Mr. Werfel did not say whether he believed that should change.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, said last month that the I.R.S. should collect racial data in a way that allows the agency to guard against racial bias.

Mr. Wyden said on Monday that it was “shameful” that racial bias in algorithms used by the I.R.S. had been guiding the audit selection process. He urged Mr. Werfel to correct that with the next filing system.

“You cannot have equality in society if algorithms and other automated systems that affect people’s lives treat them differently based on the color of their skin,” Mr. Wyden said. [MORE]

H&R Block and Turbotax Spending Millions Lobbying Puppeticians to Prevent Government from Starting a Free Tax Filing Service and to Maintain Complicated Filing Process

From [HERE] Commercial tax preparation companies like H&R Block and Intuit, the company that owns TurboTax, have poured tens of millions of dollars into lobbying as part of a multiyear push against a government-run filing service that would enable taxpayers to submit tax returns directly to the IRS at no cost. 

A free tax filing service could diminish the need for services provided by commercial tax prep companies, which profit from complicated tax filing processes that require many Americans to pay for help. 

TurboTax owner Intuit spent more on federal lobbying in the first three months of 2023 than any prior first quarter . The surge in spending comes on the heels of heated debate over whether the government should provide its own free tax filing service that was reignited by an $80 billion funding increase to overhaul the IRS as part of the Inflation Reduction Act passed in 2022.

The tax prep company — which also owns ​​QuickBooks, Mint, Credit Karma and Mailchimp — spent a record sum of $980,000 on lobbying during the first quarter of 2023, more than any prior first quarter. [MORE]

Milwaukee Judge Blocks New City Policy Requiring the Expedited Release of Body Camera Video after Police [acting on behalf of themselves] Invoked ‘Their Power’ to Conceal Video to Avoid Accountability

FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS THAT ‘Cops (patrolling predators) SHOULD wear body-cameras AND be under surveillance 24/7.  “If one million cobras were set loose on our city streets, wouldn’t you think it proper to know where each one was and what it was doing all the time?” ~Fred Woodworth.’

INSTEAD POLICE DEPARTMENTS USE BODYCAM AGAINST CITIZENS WHO IN REALITY FUNCTION AS THEIR SERVANTS AND ENEMIES. THAT IS, SOMEHOW POLICE DEPARTMENTS INDEPENDENTLY OWN ALL THE PUBLIC’S BODYCAM VIDEO -AS IF THEY ARE A SEPARATE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT ACTING ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES. ‘where fatal, encounters are recorded, time and again, police have resisted disclosing these videos, often in cases where doing so also helps them avoid accountability.

Also, The numbers reveal an uncomfortable truth: body camera videos are used far more often against ordinary citizens than the police. According to a recent survey of lead prosecutors, 92.6% report their office has used them against private citizens and only 8.3% against police officers.’ [MORE]

 THE GREAT POWER TO CONCEAL. From [HERE] A recently enacted city policy expediting the release of body camera footage from officer-involved critical incidents was temporarily put on hold by a Milwaukee judge on Friday.

On April 20, Milwaukee’s Fire and Police Commission – a civilian police oversight board whose members are appointed by the mayor and approved by the Milwaukee Common Council – enacted a new standard operating procedure holding that, among other things, body camera footage from officer-involved deaths or other critical incidents must be publicly released within 15 days of the incident, and victims' next of kin must be allowed to review the footage within 48 hours, with some exceptions.

The same day, the union representing around 1,400 sworn Milwaukee Police Department officers sued the city in Milwaukee County Circuit Court to enjoin the policy, arguing city officials failed to negotiate as required by the union’s collective bargaining agreement, instead blindsiding its members with a policy containing much tighter time constraints than a different version of the policy previously discussed.

The union wants a permanent injunction against the policy to preserve the status quo, honor union members’ due process rights and shield officers under formal investigation for critical incidents from having their reputations damaged in the court of public opinion before those investigations bring all the facts to light.

An injunction hearing was originally scheduled for June 28 before Judge Frederick Rosa (who is Black), but on May 8 the Milwaukee Police Association’s lawyer wrote a letter informing Rosa that pressing circumstances—specifically, two non-fatal critical incidents involving Milwaukee cops that took place days prior—necessitated a hearing for an emergency temporary restraining order.

In court on Friday, Brendan Matthews, the union's lawyer, reiterated that the rights of rank-and-file officers could be violated by the policy, including under the Wisconsin Constitution’s Marsy’s Law provision enhancing rights for victims of crimes, which he said can include police who have shot people.

Matthews cautioned that “video alone without explanation is dangerous,” as body camera footage removed from context doesn’t actually portray what an officer is seeing or perceiving. “Really bad things can happen” when false or incomplete narratives circulate before all the facts are known about a police shooting, he said.

Because the new policy affects conditions of employment for officers, whether the rule is coming from Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman or the FPC, the union needs to be given a full opportunity at the bargaining table regarding such a “monumental landscape change," Matthews said.

Assistant City Attorney James Lewis argued that, for one thing, the union needs to file a grievance over the policy with the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission before filing a lawsuit. In any case, there are protections in the policy directly dealing with the union’s concerns about officer safety and privacy, such as giving the police chief the option to withhold release of video or redact video presenting a particularized threat to individuals involved, officers included.

Lewis argued in the city’s briefs and before Rosa that the union members' beef is really that they disagree with the policy, so they’re couching that dissatisfaction in a lawsuit about bargaining procedures.

The city’s attorney refuted the union’s claims that the FPC pulled a fast one by changing an earlier version of the policy – one which, for example, gave the MPD more than 15 days to release body camera footage of police shootings – by noting that there were nine public hearings on the matter. Lewis also disputed that the policy affects officers’ conditions of employment and said the city as a municipality, therefore, does not have to bargain over the policy on the union’s terms.

Rosa acknowledged that the policy is of great public concern and noted that “it’s not my job to rewrite [it],” his only charge being to determine if enactment of the policy violated the union’s collective bargaining rights.

The judge paid lip service to the FPC’s delegation of authority to enact these kinds of rules, but he said it was also clear that union members’ collective bargaining agreement may be impacted by the policy and that there are concerns about whether proper procedures were followed.

In the end, Rosa granted the union its injunction, which blocks enforcement of the policy at least until the case’s next hearing in late June, when the issues at play will be more fully fleshed out.

You Don't Live in a Police State? An FBI Contractor Previously Hired to Infiltrate Islamic Terror Groups is Now Paid by Uncle Brother to Focus on/Surveil Groups Organized Against Deadly COVID Mandates

From [HERE] An FBI surveillance contractor infiltrated the chatrooms of two airline industry groups opposed to vaccine mandates to collect intelligence on the groups’ organizing activities, investigative journalist Lee Fang reported.

The contractor, Flashpoint, which in the past infiltrated Islamic terror groups, now focuses on “anti-vaccine” groups and other domestic political organizations, according to Fang.

In a webinar presentation for clients last year, which Fang analyzed on his Substack, Flashpoint analyst Vlad Cuiujuclu demonstrated his company’s methods for identifying and entering encrypted Telegram chat groups.

He explained how the company attempted to join chatrooms of transportation workers resisting the COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

Fang described the presentation:

“‘In this case, we’re searching for a closed channel of U.S. Freedom Flyers,’ said Cuiujuclu. ‘It’s basically a group that opposed vaccination and masks.’

“As he clicked through a database, Cuiujuclu showed a chat group on Telegram sponsored by Airline Professionals For Justice, another group formed by airline industry workers opposed to the mandate. The forum, he added, provided useful insights, including Zoom links for meetings of the grassroots organization.

“‘Private chats,’ said Cuiujuclu, ‘require for you to have an invite link,’ which he noted can often either be found by scrolling through public forums or by ‘engag[ing] the admin of that channel.’”

Flashpoint also offers clients artificial intelligence and internet scraping tools.

According to Fang, the firm is a leader in the “threat intelligence industry,” a growing number of security and surveillance firms that create fake online identities to infiltrate Discord chats, WhatsApp groups, Reddit forums and dark web message boards to gather information for clients, including corporations and the FBI, to monitor potential threats.

Joshua Yoder, president of US Freedom Flyers, said he is aware that Flashpoint infiltrated private chat groups associated with his organization.

Yoder told The Defender:

“Tradecraft and other strategies are often used to gain inside knowledge of conservative organizations with the intent to disrupt, mislead and otherwise thwart effective campaigns.

“Infiltration is a tactic used by the deep state to prevent the truth from being told by attempting to destroy the advancement of the message. The team at US Freedom Flyers has been successful in recognizing these attacks and we have taken decisive actions to protect the organization and our members.”

Aviation industry workers were some of the most vocal and organized against COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

They wrote an open letter to the aviation industry signed by thousands of organizations, physicians and pilots. They also organized research on the risks of vaccines for pilots, spoke publicly about the “culture of fear and intimidation” around the mandates in the industry, and filed multiple lawsuits in Canada, the Netherlands, and the U.S.

US Freedom Flyers brought a lawsuit against Atlas Air, one of the largest air cargo carriers in the aviation industry, in May 2022.

Fang told The Defender the targeting of American citizens resisting the vaccine mandates fits into a long history of surveillance being used to subvert democracy. He said:

“There is a long sordid history of informants and surveillance contractors working to undermine democratic engagement in this country.

“The push against regular citizens opposed to COVID-19 vaccine mandates has come in many forms: censorship, demonization and in this case, surveillance.”

The growing market for spying on domestic dissent

Flashpoint advertises its surveillance success on its website, providing examples of its work undermining environmental activism, G20 protests and protests against the aviation industry.

The webpages describing these activities were taken down after Fang published his investigation, but they can be found on the Wayback Machine internet archive.

For example, Flashpoint described its capacity to monitor activists organizing against pollution and the aviation industry. The website said:

“By monitoring the situation and assessing tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP’s), Flashpoint was able to assess the impact of upcoming protests, and determine that these groups would likely continue to protest and attempt to impede airport construction and expansion projects through direct action. …

“Based on this information, Flashpoint customers were able to take actions to help control the impact to business operations, and to ensure the safety of their employees and facilities as well as the safety of those protesting.”

Flashpoint was founded by Evan Kohlmann, former NBC News contributor who investigated Islamic terror groups and whom The Intercept described as “the U.S. government’s go-to expert witness in terrorism prosecutions.”

Jack Poulson of Tech Inquiry, a group that researches the surveillance industry, told Fang that “Flashpoint has been selling its chatroom infiltration services to companies and governments for years.”

But, he said, it has shifted its focus from “surveilling Muslims after September 11” and “followed the money into both the Pentagon’s information warfare programs and the business of monitoring domestic protest groups.”

Last year, Flashpoint acquired Echosec Systems, another intelligence contractor, and last month it formalized a partnership with Google Cloud.

These acquisitions come in addition to “a steady stream of contracts to Flashpoint in recent years from the FBI, the Department of Defense, Treasury Department, and Department of Homeland Security, among other agencies,” Fang wrote.

Fang also spoke to Jay Bhattacharya, M.D., Ph.D., professor of medicine at Stanford University, research associate at the National Bureau of Economics Research and one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration.

Bhattacharya said:

“This kind of domestic spying violates the implicit protection Americans have in these kinds of settings.

“This isn’t terrorism, this doesn’t have anything to do with national security.

“This is a private set of employees, workers who are trying to maintain their jobs in the face of unscientific demands for COVID vaccinations.”

'There’s no such thing as an "mRNA Vaccine." Stop calling it that. It is a gene-editing technology used to invent new species, create autoimmune diseases, cause cancers and to develop bioweapons'

By Calling mRNA Injections 'COVID-19 Vaccines' Instead of Bioweapons We're Protecting Criminals From [HERE] Millions of innocent adults and children were subject to perverse and cruel experiments and murdered during the WWII Holocaust because local government officials and public servants throughout European communities were willing to assist in the killing of their fellow citizens, while simultaneously defending their heinous actions and the tyrants they obeyed. The other community members who believed that they were safe from the tyrants’ cruelty were too afraid or apathetic to speak out against their government and community leaders. Sound familiar?

The most evil crime in our nation’s history is being committed right now, on our watch. American adults and innocent children are being injured, disabled and killed by being psychologically manipulated and coerced into participating in a heinous global experiment of being injected with mRNA technology bioweapons under the guise of COVID-19 vaccines.

There’s no such thing as an mRNA vaccine. Stop calling it that. mRNA is and always has been part of the category of gene-editing technologies. Gene-editing technologies are used to invent new species (from viruses, to plants, to hybrid parasites and animals), create autoimmune diseases, cause cancers, and to develop military-grade bioweapons.

mRNA gene-editing technologies have been researched and developed for over 40 years, drove companies into bankruptcy many times, and have never been FDA-approved for anything before COVID-19 because they have no useful benefits to human health, and can only cause harm, injury and death. 

Per 18 USC 175, mRNA technologies are the literal, verbatim definition of a biological weapon. 

A biological weapon is any biological agent (mRNA), toxin (WIV spike S-2P), or delivery system (device/LNP/vaccine) that is not reasonably justified by a prophylactic or protective purpose; bona fide research, or other peaceful purposes.

mRNA technology is gene-editing technology. It can be used for purposes of inducing genetic mutations. According to the NIH, the cause of Sudden Unexplained Death in Children can be explained by genetic mutations. Specifically, “The researchers focused on 137 genes associated with heart or seizure disorders, both of which can trigger sudden death.”

Our government healthcare officials and industry leaders in mRNA technology are not surprised that children and young adults are suffering from massive heart inflammation, seizures, and sudden death. These are profoundly horrifying, but well-known effects of mRNA technology. This is why mRNA technology has never been FDA-approved for human use in its over 40 years of history. 

Call the mRNA injections bioweapons or weapons of mass destructions (WMDs), but stop calling them vaccines. The mRNA injections don’t prevent disease and they never did. The COVID-19 vaccines were designed to cause disease, disabilities and death; and Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, HHS, the FDA, CDC, the NIH and all of our government officials and government healthcare experts know it.

Innocent children are dying, pregnant women are having their babies murdered in their wombs, professional athletes are suffering heart attacks on the field, commercial airline pilots are becoming incapacitated during flight and then dying, young adults are becoming disabled or dying suddenly all across America. The injuries, diseases, and deaths caused by the mRNA injections are not side effects. They are intended consequences of an advanced technology bioweapon. 

In order to hold criminals to account, it’s critical that we and our trusted experts are able to clearly articulate and document how the COVID-19 mRNA injections do not meet the definition of a vaccine and that they are weapons of biowarfare.

Intended Consequences is a great place to begin.

German Authorities Charge Dr. Bhakdi with Crimes for Revealing Truths About Experimental COVID Shots that Kill/Injure People. Trial Set for May 23 in Free Range Prison Disguised as a Democracy

From [HERE] Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz. He has been telling the truth about COVID-19 and the mRNA vaccines since the very beginning of the so-called “COVID-19 Pandemic.” As a result, in order to silence him, he has been vindictively accused of two unfounded charges in connection with two public statements he made in April and September of 2021. He is now facing a hearing at the lower court in Plön, Germany.

Read the timeline of Dr. Bhakdi’s legal case.

https://doctors4covidethics.org/timeline-of-the-events/.

Dr. Bhakdi urgently needs your support.

Dr. Bhakdi has played a leading role in shaping and communicating the Doctors for COVID Ethics message. Doctors for COVID ethics have informed and will continue to inform the general public about COVID-19 and vaccination based on conscientious science. We support the right of Dr. Bhakdi’s freedom of speech, share his concerns, and stand with him.

Information on Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD

https://doctors4covidethics.org/about-sucharit-bhakdi-md/.

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi: COVID is a Plandemic. A Carefully Planned Conspiracy Designed to Kill Us and Our Children; Create Panic Over COVID in Order to Coerce and Induce People to Take Deadly Injections

Black Surgeon General in FLA says Feds Ignored the Risks from mRNA COVID Shots and Manipulated the Public into Believing They were Harmless, Wants Answers. CDC/FDA Liberals Respond w/Personal Insults

From [HERE] Claiming that a “lack of transparency only harms Americans’ faith in science,” Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, M.D., Ph.D., this week called on the nation’s top public health officials to “publicly” explain 12 key issues related to the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

In a letter sent Wednesday to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Robert Califf and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky, Ladapo said:

“Your ongoing decision to ignore many of the risks associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines alongside your efforts to manipulate the public into thinking they are harmless, have resulted in a deep distrust in the American health care system.

“Beginning with Operation Warp Speed, and possibly to be continued with an additional $5 billion investment in Project NextGen, the federal government has relentlessly forced a premature vaccine into the arms of the American people with little to no concern for the serious adverse ramifications.”

Ladapo said the “data are unequivocal: After the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) reporting increased by 1,700%, including a 4,400% increase in life-threatening conditions.”

Ladapo listed 12 points of data and demanded the health officials “publicly” explain their decision-making process around those data.

Commenting on the letter, blogger Igor Chudov said the surgeon general asks “all the right questions” about COVID-19 vaccines — and exposes the FDA and the CDC as “charlatans” engaging in “medical quackery.”

Chudov summarized Ladapo’s questions:

• Why were randomized clinical trials not conducted for “Covid boosters” (such trials were necessary to establish that they are safe and effective)

• Why did the FDA ignore many subclinical myocarditis reports and allow Pfizer to postpone its report on subclinical myocarditis?

• Why were vaccine side effects intentionally ignored in V-Safe?

• Why did the FDA allow Pfizer to hide the results of its clinical trial of Covid vaccines in pregnant women, that ended in 2022?

• Why are the FDA and the CDC hiding negative effectiveness of Covid vaccines?

Wednesday’s letter is the latest in an ongoing exchange between Florida’s surgeon general and the agencies’ top officials that began when Ladapo, in a Feb. 15 letter, expressed concern about the adverse effects of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and asked FDA and CDC officials for greater transparency in publicly acknowledging these effects.

The letter corresponded with a health alert Ladapo issued that same day to the Florida healthcare sector and the public warning that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines caused a “substantial increase” in reports of adverse events in Florida.

The letter and health alert summarized the substantial increase in VAERS reports in Florida after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, including for life-threatening conditions. [MORE]

A Review of the Manufacturing Contracts between US DOD and Moderna Provide More Proof COVID mRNA Shots were a Military-Backed Countermeasure

From [HERE] Here is a high-level review of the manufacturing contracts between US DOD and Moderna. 

Moderna’s injection, mRNA-1273 is co-owned with the US Government, as the company has been funded by the defense research grants for years and also received intellectual property transfers from the US Government, in addition to preclinical and clinical research work conducted for Moderna by the NIH Vaccine Research Center. The NIH and Moderna each have a separate Investigational New Drug number for this product.

Moderna entered 2 types of contracts with the US Government for Spikevax injection:

• “Vaccine” contract and amendments that specifies R&D projects that the US Government ordered and paid for. Note that in Pfizer’s case no R&D activities were ordered or paid for by the US Government, as these were excluded from the scope of the contract.

• “Manufacturing” contract(s) that ordered a large-scale manufacturing. This is different from Pfizer manufacturing contracts as the words “demonstration” and “prototype” are not used. I believe this is because OTA contracts must be for prototypes but FAR contracting doesn’t have to be.

Note on redactions. In both Moderna and Pfizer’s contracts many areas are redacted indicating a reason for redaction – the “redaction codes.” Redacted content has been given codes b (4) and b (6), standing for:

(b) (4) Disclosure of information that would affect the application of advanced technology in a U.S. weapons system,

and

(b) (6) Disclosure of information, including information of foreign governments, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States.

There are several versions of the contract available, plus amendments. The first version was signed on August 9, 2020 and the last available version is June 15, 2021. In one of them the name of the signatory on the Moderna side was redacted with (b)(6). In another version it’s unredacted – it was Hamilton Bennett, a senior director of vaccine access and partnerships. [MORE]

DC Doctor Facing Suit for Allegedly Forcing 2 Black Children to Get Vaxxed by Preventing Them from Exiting a Mobile Clinic is from Same Medical Practice that Injected Kids w/o Ever Informing Parents

COVID Fraud and Battery: Suit Says a Racist Suspect Georgetown Doctor Forced 2 Black Kids to Get Vaxxed w/o Mom's Consent, Prevented Kids from Leaving Clinic and Consulting w/Mom who Was Outside Door

From [ATTY AARON SIRI] A recently filed lawsuit alleges that a pediatrician who works at MedStar in Washington, D.C., forcibly vaccinated two minors without parental consent. According to the lawsuit:

two minor children were held in a room by Defendant until she overcame their will and forcibly vaccinated them while physically preventing them from consulting with their mother, who was right outside the room.

As if that weren’t bad enough, the lawsuit further alleges: 

Minor children W.M. and K.M. were additionally provided with false and fraudulent information in order to obtain purported consent to a procedure in the absence of actual or freely given consent. Specifically, Dr. Rethy told the children that they were required to be vaccinated against COVID-19 to attend school and that they had no lawful option to decline such vaccination.

What makes this story even more incredible is that this is the same pediatric practice that sought to vaccinate a minor child in the lawsuit we brought to strike down the“Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020” passed by Washington D.C. in 2020. We succeeded in winning an injunction which resulted in the repeal of that law.

Before being repealed, the law permitted doctors in D.C. to vaccinate a child, 11 years of age or older, without their parent’s consent or knowledge, and created an elaborate and deceitful scheme in which the healthcare provider, insurance company, school, and health department all participated to hide from those parents the fact that their child had been vaccinated. According to the law, a child did not even need to be a resident of the District of Columbia in order to be vaccinated without parental consent!

In this previous case, the minor was subject to intense pressure and coercion to get vaccinated by a doctor and her staff at MedStar in D.C. When she eventually refused the vaccines, the doctor and staff took physical positions in the room that made her feel trapped! Thankfully, she was eventually able to escape without getting vaccinated.

These lawsuits expose a deeply concerning trend that must be stopped dead in its tracks. And these lawsuits should hopefully have that exact effect. 

To any doctor out there who injects a minor without parental consent, you should know this: if that child’s parent contacts our firm, expect to receive an unwanted injection of justice in return. 

For now, I am pleased to celebrate the repeal of the D.C. law that permitted vaccination of minors without parental consent and thank ICAN for making that lawsuit possible! 

Doctors Bhakdi, Nass and Palmer Warn: The Integration of Foreign Genes into your Chromosomes from COVID mRNA Injections can Cause Cancer or Inflammation that is Transferable to Offspring

A Short Compilation of Pro-Experimental Vaxxers (Freedumb Peddlers) who "Died Suddenly" After Mocking Others

Another Olympic Athlete Drops Dead. Sprinter Tori Bowie RIP [Coincidence Theorists Believe There is Nothing Unusual About the Substantial Number of People Dying Since the mRNA Vax Rollout]

Tori Bowie, a sprinter who won three medals at the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro and the next year won the world championship in the 100-meter dash with a stunning comeback, has died. She was 32.

Her death was confirmed in a statement on Wednesday by U.S.A. Track and Field, which provided no other details.

The Orange County, Fla., sheriff’s office said in a statement that its personnel went to a house in Winter Garden, Fla., on Tuesday to check on a woman in her 30s who had not been seen or heard from in several days. They entered the home and found the body of a woman, whom they tentatively identified as Frentorish “Tori” Bowie. The statement said “there were no signs of foul play.”

At the 2016 Olympics, Bowie won a gold medal in the 4x100 relay, anchoring a team with Tianna Bartoletta, Allyson Felix and English Gardner that finished the race with a time of 41.01. She won the silver medal in the 100-meter dash and bronze in the 200-meter. [MORE]

[sudden death syndrome] Pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt: Autopsies Show the mRNA Vaccine SHREDS People From Within

Biotech Analyst: mRNA Technology in COVID Shots and the Food Supply is a Bioweapon Designed to Cause Disease, Disability and Death. It Contains Electromagnetic Particles which Change the Human Species

DeSantis Signs Bills Permanently Banning Deadly mRNA COVID "Vaccine" and Mask Mandates in Florida

From [HERE] Governor Ron DeSantis was in Destin Thursday morning signing his "Prescribe Freedom" legislation.

The bills permanently ban vaccine and mask mandates in Florida.

That includes government offices, schools and workplaces.

They also protect physicians who offer treatments other than those recommended by federal agencies.

"These restrictions and these mandates, the purpose of them was not to safeguard your health. The purpose was to control your behavior," DeSantis said.

The legislation also bans vaccine passports, gain of function research, and formally rejects world health organization recommendations in Florida.

Whites Murdering Blacks: 1st Hearing Held by Ohio Lawmakers to Abolish the Death Penalty [OH Death Row is 55% Black, yet Black people are only 14% of the state's population]

PERSONS SCHEDULED TO BE MURDERED BY OHIO AUTHORITIES ("Death Row")

Death row data above is from the DPIC.

From [HERE] On May 9, 2023, the Ohio Senate Judiciary Committee held its first hearing on Senate Bill 101 that would abolish the state’s death penalty. The co-sponsors of the bill, Senate Democratic Leader Nickie Antonio (D-Lakewood) and Senator Stephen Huffman (R-Tipp City), argued in favor of the bill’s passage and noted that more than one-third of Ohio’s senators have signed on as sponsors.

Antonio said that the bill has received “the most bipartisan support yet” and described the death penalty as “expensive, impractical, unjust, inhumane and erroneous.” In 2022, Antonio and Huffman met with human rights representatives from other countries who said some companies are interested in pursuing business in states that have abolished the death penalty. Huffman said, “We are the only Western nation and member of NATO that still uses the death penalty.”

Huffman said his opposition to the death penalty has been influenced by his religious beliefs: “I believe life at all stages is sacred and truly a person’s greatest gift from God. As both medical director and a man of unwavering faith, I believe this gift of life should be preserved and defended at all costs.”

If passed, Ohio would become the 24th state to abolish the death penalty. There are at least 120 people on death row and the last execution was carried out in July 2018.

Question: 'After string of dismissals, how will SF's McNegro Rolebot DA Handle Her Remaining Police Brutality Case?' Answer: How Ever Her White Liberal Masters Want Her to Handle It

From [HERE] When San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins took the city’s top law enforcement seat last year, she inherited three historic prosecutions of police officers for on-duty assaults or killings.

Now, San Francisco is down to one, and some are already predicting its collapse. 

“I’m not optimistic,” said Oakland civil rights attorney John Burris, who represented family members of Sean Moore in their excessive force lawsuit against San Francisco. Given Jenkins’ pattern to date, Burris said he would not be surprised if the criminal case is dismissed.

Moore was shot and wounded by Officer Kenneth Cha in 2017. The victim died three years later while serving a sentence for an unrelated crime in San Quentin prison, apparently from health complications from his gunshot wound. 

Jenkins was not immediately available for comment on Friday. San Francisco officials settled with Moore’s family for $3.25 million. He was unarmed when he was shot.  

Should the case against Cha sputter, it would mark a significant shift from the core policies of former District Attorney Chesa Boudin, who promised to take a hard line on police misconduct and was the first San Francisco district attorney to charge an officer with homicide. [MORE]

White Minn Cop "Sorry" He Got Caught Brutally Attacking a Black Man who Posed No Threat, Breaking his Eye Socket. "Black" Rolebot DA Gives Him a No Jail Plea, Dismisses Felony for his Liberal Masters

From [HERE] A white Minneapolis police officer will be spared jail time after pleading guilty to assault and misconduct charges for brutally beating a defenseless Black man.

Justin Stetson entered guilty pleas to felony third-degree assault and gross misdemeanor misconduct of a public employee or officer for the 2020 beating of Jaleel Stallings. Stetson was originally charged with assault more than two years after the attack, but recently the Minnesota Attorney General's Office added the lesser charge, signaling a potential plea.

District Judge Shereen Askalani accepted Stetson's guilty pleas Wednesday. The agreement means Stetson will avoid jail time and the felony charge will be removed from his record if he successfully completes a two-year probation.

Terms of the deal require that Stetson enroll in an anger management class and write a letter apologizing to Stallings, who suffered a broken eye socket, spent days in jail and went on trial for attempted murder in the aftermath of the encounter with police on May 30, 2020. He was acquitted by a jury and won a $1.5 million settlement from the city. In Stallings' unsuccessful objection to the plea deal, he noted that he spent more time in jail than Stetson.

If Stetson remains offense-free and abides by all conditions of the plea, such as completing 30 to 90 days of community service, never seeking employment as an officer or possessing firearms, the felony charge will be dropped from his criminal record and the court will enter a conviction only for the misdemeanor.

Askalani will formally sentence Stetson on Aug. 9. Stallings, who now lives in Texas, plans to attend.

The Attorney General's Office said it could not disclose details of the plea until the hearing Wednesday morning. Attorney General Keith Ellison appeared for the hearing, but declined to take questions on why he found the plea acceptable.

In a written statement, Ellison called the outcome a historic accountability measure that bars Stetson from ever serving as a law enforcement officer in Minnesota again.

"Rarely if ever do police officers plead guilty to using excessive force in the line of duty — and today, Stetson has admitted he did so under color of his official authority, in violation of the law," Ellison wrote, while acknowledging the harm Stallings suffered.

"We cannot undo the unjust trial he endured, and we cannot undo the unjust days he spent in jail. Nevertheless, I hope Stetson's admission of the facts related to the assault, his apology and acknowledgment he was part of a harmful culture of policing in the Minneapolis Police Department, and his inability ever to wear a badge again serves as some measure of accountability to Mr. Stallings and to the community."

Stallings, 30, and his attorney, Eric Rice, characterized the plea deal as a "betrayal" of justice.

"The lenient resolution simply reassures other malicious officers that they are welcome to use violence and lies against their own citizens without fear of punishment," Stallings wrote in a 15-page letter to the court.

Immediately following the hearing, Rice denounced a court process that appeared to ignore the victim's concerns. He believes the outcome will fail to curtail police misconduct in Minneapolis.

"With nothing changed, these things will continue to happen again. Rogue officers will continue to abuse their position and inflict improper violence," Rice told the Star Tribune. "They will lie to conceal their actions, and they will have a system that even with substantial efforts doesn't hold them to account."

Stallings was charged with attempted murder after firing at Minneapolis police officers in the chaotic protests that followed George Floyd’s death but was acquitted of all charges against him.

Jaleel Stallings argued self-defense during his trial, testifying that he fired at the unmarked white van after he was struck in the chest with what turned out to be a nonlethal rubber bullet fired by police.

Stallings, 29, testified that he thought he was being attacked by civilians, had been struck by a bullet and was potentially bleeding out, his attorney. Court documents show that after Stallings was hit, he fired three shots toward the van as a warning, then took cover. He surrendered when he realized he had fired at police. No officers were hit.

when Stallings realized he had fired at police officers, he immediately put his gun on the ground and lay face-down, with his hands on the ground. A pretrial order from Judge William Koch said Stallings was motionless for 20 seconds and posed no obvious threat before Officer Justin Stetson and Sgt. Andrew Bittell approached him. The order says Stetson began kicking and punching Stallings in the head and neck, and Bittell began kneeing and punching him in the stomach, chest and back. [MORE]

Stetson repeatedly struck him and didn't stop until a sergeant intervened.

The judge found that Stetson and Bittell violated Stallings’ Fourth Amendment rights during the arrest and that their actions were objectively unreasonable.

The Attorney General's Office took over the case after the Hennepin County Attorney's Office initially charged Stallings with eight felonies, including attempted murder. Stallings was legally in possession of a firearm the night Stetson and a swarm of officers attacked him.

Five days after Floyd's murder, officers were roving in south Minneapolis in an unmarked van and shooting nonlethal projectiles at people who were violating curfew orders. Stallings, a veteran with a license to carry, armed himself for protection during the unrest. When the officers shot a projectile at Stallings, he fired back, unaware they were police officers. When they stopped the van and ran toward him, Stallings dropped his gun and surrendered.

In court Wednesday, Stetson agreed that his force was excessive and unlawful. He admitted to picking up Stallings' head from the ground as he lay in a prone position, unarmed and compliant, then slamming his face into the concrete.

"When you were kicking him and punching him, at some point do you believe you crossed the line?" Bruno asked him in establishing facts of the case.

"Yes," Stetson said.

"You went too far?"

"Yes."

"You let your emotions get too much of you that night?"

"Yes."

Assistant Attorneys General Zuri Balmakund and Erin Eldridge questioned him in greater detail about the attack, forcing him to acknowledge slamming Stallings' head into the pavement, delivering knee strikes to the head and face, and not discontinuing the assault until he was told to stop. Stetson agreed to all facts. And he affirmed that the force was unauthorized under the law and outside his scope as an officer.

As the hearing was coming to a close, Bruno asked Stetson if he was sorry for his actions.

Yes, I am sorry," Stetson said.

Balmakund made clear to the judge that Stallings did not agree to the plea because he considered it "too lenient."

"The state is of the position that based on discussion with defense counsel and the prosecution team," she said, "this resolution is appropriate."

In a one-page letter addressed to Stallings and his loved ones, Stetson apologized for exhibiting a "lack of control and poor judgment" that night.

"The humiliation that you must have felt during that time must have been unbearable. Not only did I cause you physical injury but I know that the emotional scars of the brutality are equally as painful and can last forever," Stetson wrote.

"I acknowledge and apologize for the actions of the past and the role that MPD has played in society's historical mistreatment of the disadvantaged communities and against those engaged in peaceful civil protests."

The gesture fell flat for Stallings' attorney.

"At this point," Rice said, "it is essentially worthless."