What was on the Menu When Puppetician Ron DeSantis Had Dinner with His Billionaire IsrAlien Masters?

/

From [HERE] Florida Governor and presumptive presidential nominee Ron DeSantis was spotted dining in Jerusalem this week with Israeli-American billionaire Miriam Adelson.

She was among several major Republican donors at the dinner hosted Wednesday by Larry Mizel, an American businessman who helped found the Museum of Tolerance where the meal was being held. Mizel was the finance chairman for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign office in Colorado during the 2016 race.

DeSantis sat in between Mizel and Adelson, according to Axios, which broke the story.

Miriam and her late husband, casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, backed DeSantis during his successful 2018 gubernatorial run, donating $500,000 to the Friends of Ron DeSantis PAC.

DeSantis is likely seeking Adelson’s support once again, as he is expected to announce his candidacy for president in the coming weeks, though he faces an uphill battle. [MORE]

[Yurugu vs Yurugu '24, Who Will be Master?] "Just Brutal:" George Stephanopoulos, Dumbocrats Stunned by Corpse Biden’s Horrible Polling Against Trump in 2024 Matchup

/

From [HERE] A new poll from ABC showing Joe Biden’s approval numbers tanking across all metrics left “This Week” host George Stephanopoulos stunned.

“This is just brutal for President Biden,” Stephanopoulos admitted on Sunday in response to the poll.

ABC political director Rick Klein responded, “Absolutely George, and you talked earlier about that record low approval rating for President Biden, it’s actually six points down just since February.”

“And the skepticism over his leadership extends deep inside his own party only 36 percent of Democrats think that their party should nominate Joe Biden for a second term,” he continued. “58 percent say they would support someone else, prefer someone else. That’s despite the fact that the entire DNC, most of the Democratic establishment has rallied behind President Biden and you’re seeing real weaknesses in the coalition that powered Joe Biden to the presidency back in 2020.”

Treasury Secretary Yellen Sends Message of Western Imperialism to China (talking about ‘It can Develop, as long as it Accepts American Leadership’). But Does China Also Believe in White Supremacy?

/

From [HERE] Recently, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen made her first remarks on US economic engagement with China in nearly two years.

She rejected the idea that a war between the US and China is “increasingly inevitable,” that there is “no reason to fear healthy economic competition with any country,” and that “China’s economic growth need not be incompatible with US economic leadership.”

Yellen also said that the primary goal of the US is always to safeguard its “national security” and thus it’s not really out to hamper the rise of China or its economy. But actions speak louder than words, and her comments come on the back of the US attempting to cripple China’s entire semiconductor industry, forcing third-party countries to abide by those restrictions as well, adding numerous Chinese companies to its trade-restrictions entity list, using allegations of forced labour to opportunistically undermine certain Chinese industries and, of course, maintaining broad Trump-era tariffs on Chinese exports to the US.

It might be asked, what form of economic engagement is there to be had? Because the rhetoric, hyperbole and extremity from Washington could not be less conducive to an economic relationship with China, what with terms such as ‘decoupling’ being thrown around, and the existence of an entire US congressional committee purely to produce anti-China legislation. The Biden administration, for that matter, is so sensitive to appearing ‘weak’ on China, that it will capitulate to any popular trend that gains enough political clout, such as calls to ban the popular TikTok app.

The US is so wrapped up on its protectionist, America First doctrine that it cannot be seen to be making concessions. And, looking at Yellen’s choice of words, we see the “catch” – China is only permitted to grow on the condition that it accepts “US economic leadership” – in other terms, the US’ political, economic, and military dominance.

This isn’t about reaching a consensus or agreement between the two parties; it is about Washington unilaterally imposing its demands on Beijing and requiring that it step down from certain ambitions. This is classic Western imperialism when it comes to China. Economic engagement with China and its massive market is great, provided that it is the Americans who are setting the terms and reaping the profits. The idea of the Chinese asserting their own sovereign rights and interests is not an option. [MORE]

9 out of 10 Haitians seeking asylum in Mexico lack the resources to cover their basic necessities

/

More than nine in 10 Haitians seeking asylum in Mexico lack the resources to cover basic necessities such as food, shelter, and medical care, the International Rescue Committee (IRC) aid group said on Thursday, April 27th.

Tens of thousands of Haitians have been displaced in recent months as heavily armed gangs have expanded their control over the country, where there are frequent reports of kidnappings, sexual violence, and violent turf wars.

This month, the head of the Mexican refugee agency COMAR told Reuters that asylum claims by Haitians were on track to surpass the record 52,000 recorded in 2021.

However, the IRC found through interviews with household leaders representing about 450 people that more than 90% lacked a steady income to cover essential needs.

More than seven in 10 said they struggled to access reliable information in Haitian Creole, particularly about legal pathways to migration and their rights in Mexico.

Language barriers, discrimination, and lack of space made accessing shelters difficult, the IRC said, causing many migrants to live on the streets or in makeshift camps. Nearly half said they needed help to afford enough food. [MORE]

Inducing Public Consent: US and UK Government docs reveal confidentiality agreements were made to Hide Injurious Reactions to COVID Shots from the Public

/

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • U.S. and U.K. health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to COVID-19 shots and emphasized their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic

  • The news was revealed in 57 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) records via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit

  • A government email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering COVID-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy

  • Regulatory filings show Pfizer knew of its shots’ waning effectiveness in April 2021 but didn’t publicly acknowledge it until late July 2021

  • Preclinical studies for Pfizer’s COVID shots also warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles, but the trial reported it was “completed with no safety concerns”

From [HERE] In the days leading up to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 shot, an agreement was made to keep serious adverse reactions under wraps. U.S. and U.K. health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to COVID shots and emphasized their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic.1

The news was revealed by Judicial Watch, which obtained 57 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) records 2 via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. Initially, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request in August 2021 that specifically asked for: 3

“All emails sent to and from members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee regarding adverse events, deaths and/or injuries caused by investigatory vaccines for the prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19 currently produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and/or Johnson & Johnson.”

The request was ignored, prompting the lawsuit that ultimately revealed the confidentiality agreement between U.S. and U.K. regulators. "Why are we engaged in a secret deal to keep secret information about adverse events related to the vaccines?" Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton asked. "I just think it's troubling. The documents speak for themselves." 4

US and UK Officials Make Pact to Keep Safety Issues Quiet

The pact was revealed in a series of email exchanges from December 2020. Initiated by Jonathan Mogford, policy director of the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and sent to FDA commissioner Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Judicial Watch reported: 5

“As background, Mogford includes information on “two cases of anaphylactoid reactions in individuals with a strong past history of allergic reactions….” Marks replies to Mogford: “It would be very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional details [redacted] from MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency] under the terms of our mutual confidentiality agreement.”

Mogford later replies, “… attached are [redacted] hope that’s helpful in the meantime. If I can just remind — information shared under our confidentiality agreement.””

An email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering COVID-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy. According to Judicial Watch: 6

“The CDC’s Dr. Amanda Cohn emailed Office of Vaccines Research and Review Director Marion Gruber and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks with the subject line “Coadministration of COVID-19 Vaccines with Other Vaccines During Pregnancy.”

Gruber writes, “I am fine with this language.” Marks then responds to Cohn and her CDC colleague, Sarah Mbaeyi, “I can live with this too. Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know. Thanks.”

Cohn replies, “We have a meeting with Rochelle [presumably CDC Director Rochelle Walensky] at 3:30 about if we should say anything or wait until we have more definitive information. I will let you know where we land. I’m not sure there is a right answer.””

“It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over, albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the COVID vaccines that the public has every right to know,” Fitton said in a news release. “This disturbing batch of new documents have uncovered a secret confidentiality agreement tied to COVID vaccine safety issues and emails that raise new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.” 7

Pfizer Hid Data on Lack of Effectiveness

After initially claiming in late 2020 that its COVID-19 shots were 95% effective, Pfizer’s COVID shots turned out to have rapidly waning protection of just 39%. 8 That figure was reported in July 2021 by the Israeli Ministry of Health. 9 Pfizer echoed the “declining trend in vaccine efficacy” in late July 2021, 10 but regulatory filings from April 2021 show Pfizer knew of the shots’ failures months earlier.

“It’s clear from the documents that these analyses were almost 4 months old by the time they became public,” Peter Doshi, associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, told Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., a former medical scientist with the University of Adelaide and former reporter for ABC News in Australia. 11

“It’s disappointing that neither Pfizer, nor regulators, disclosed these data until it was too obvious to ignore new outbreaks in Israel and Massachusetts, which made it clear that vaccine performance was not holding up,” he said. 12

 Even Pfizer’s six-month phase III trial data, released April 1, 2021, stayed silent on the shots’ waning efficacy. 13 And, at that time, health officials were still claiming that the shot would stop COVID-19 transmission. In May 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci stated “when you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health ... you become a dead end to the virus.”

As Doshi explained, “Publicly disclosing that efficacy waned so soon after authorization might have undermined the credibility of authorities, who’d been projecting great confidence about the vaccines’ ability to end the pandemic.”14

 But instead of transparency and supporting informed consent so Americans could make their own choice about the shots with all the data, Demasi reported: 15

“Within weeks of Pfizer publishing its data on waning efficacy, President Biden ordered all federal workers (and employees of contractors) to get vaccinated within 75 days, otherwise they’d face punishment or have their employment terminated.”

Shots’ Effects on Brain Known Since 2020

mRNA COVID-19 shots teach your cells to produce a protein, or piece of protein, that triggers an immune response, including the production of antibodies. 16 However, because natural mRNA is easily broken down, this means the experimental gene therapy needs a special delivery system to make it to the body’s cells.

The shots use lipid nanoparticles that contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) 17 for this purpose. The mRNA is wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that carry it to your cells, and the LNPs are “PEGylated” — that is, chemically attached to PEG molecules to increase stability. 18

Usually, if you were to inject RNA into your body, enzymes would immediately break it apart, but the COVID-19 shots are specifically designed so that doesn’t happen. While it was originally advertised that COVID-19 shots “stay in the arm,” Pfizer knew since at least November 2020 that the shots may influence the brain.

Pfizer contracted Acuitas Therapeutics to conduct animal studies, which found LNPs from COVID-19 shots rapidly traveled to other areas, including the brain, eyes, heart, ovaries and other organs.19 20

 Naturopath Colleen Huber explained: 21

“Now that we have LNPs with their mRNA payload delivered past the BBB and into the brain, what do they do once they arrive to the fluid surrounding neurons? The rest is an easy journey for LNPs. Neurons take up LNPs — and they do so very efficiently, at 100 percent uptake, by means of apolipoprotein E, and usually without immune reaction at that point.

Apolipoprotein E is abundant in the brain — it is produced by astrocytes. The mechanism of uptake is endocytosis, in which the membrane of the neuron engulfs or swallows the approaching LNP. That has been observed since at least 2013. In this way, the Trojan Horse content of the LNP is delivered, because it was contained in a benign-seeming — to the neuronal membrane — package.”

A number of neurological injuries have been reported following COVID-19 shots, including ischemic stroke, Bell’s palsy, tinnitus and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. As for one mechanism of brain injury, Stephanie Seneff, a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), believes genetic modifications introduced by COVID-19 shots may induce immune cells to release large quantities of exosomes into circulation.

Exosomes are extracellular vesicles that contain protein, DNA, RNA and other constituents, and may contain mRNA along with spike protein. According to Seneff and colleagues: 22

“[W]e present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.

We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.

We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage.”

COVID Shots Melting Muscles

Preclinical studies for Pfizer’s COVID shots also warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles. Writing in DailyClout, Dr. Robert Chandler reported:23

“The Pfizer documents 24

 contain results from a 17-day study of repeat dose injections of BNT162b2 [Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot] in Wistar Han rats. Myonecrosis and inflammation were identified histopathologically. The appearance was described as “Jellied” (Table 3), which is what rhabdomyolysis might look like after 17 days.”

Despite this and other concerning findings, including fibrosis, inflammation and myofiber degeneration present at the injection site, Chandler explains, “How was this data presented at the December 10, 2020, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting regarding the Emergency Use Authorization for BNT162b2? … Completed with no safety concerns.” 25

A review of data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) also revealed a dramatic increase in reports of rhabdomyolysis following the rollout of COVID-19 shots. In fact, Chandler reveals: 26

“79% of all reported rhabdomyolysis cases occurred in the two complete years (2021 and 2022) after the EUA was approved in December of 2020 … A dramatic, 37-fold increase in the annual rate of cases of rhabdomyolysis occurred after mass inoculation with Spike Producing Genetic Therapy Products began in December 2020. COVID-19 (2020) did not cause an increase in rhabdomyolysis reporting in VAERS compared with years 2001-2020.”

A number of case reports have since been published of “COVID-19 mRNA vaccination-induced rhabdomyolysis,” including in a 16-year-old male two days after his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot 27 and a 21-year-old male one day after his first COVID-19 shot. 28

The findings that Pfizer and government officials were aware of serious adverse events and waning effectiveness of COVID-19 shots but neglected to share this with the public will only further undermine trust in public health authorities.

As Martin Kulldorff — co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which scientifically critiqued the effects of prolonged lockdowns in response to COVID-19 — told Demasi, “In public health, it is important to be honest with the public. Pfizer should have reported the declining vaccine efficacy in its April 1, 2021, press release, which they clearly knew about at the time.” 29

Likewise with the numerous reports of adverse events linked to the shots, which have now been linked to an explosion of excess deaths.

Steve Kirsch: The FDA knew on September 17, 2021 that people who got COVID Injections were 2X more likely to be infected

/

From [HERE] Executive summary. The Cleveland Clinic study, which I fully explain in this article, shows that the more vaccines you get, the more likely you are to be infected with COVID. 

This was not a fluke. As I pointed out in my article, the results were consistent with three other large studies, two of which (the Qatar and Pfizer studies) were general population and not just healthcare workers.

One of the two large confirming studies was the Pfizer Phase 3 trial participants themselves. 

Did you know that Pfizer told the FDA in a document dated September 17, 2021 that people who were on the vaccine for a longer period were more likely to be infected with COVD than those who spent only about half the time in the vaccinated state. The difference between the infection rates of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed was more than 2X. See this section of my article for details on data in the FDA document and the simple calculation to determine the relative infection rates.

The bottom line is that the FDA knew on Sept 17, 2021 that you were more likely to be infected with COVID if you were vaccinated. That’s the opposite of what they told us.

What do we do now?

We need to acknowledge our mistakes and take corrective action.

Every business who has a vaccine mandate should immediately issue a reverse mandate.

For example,

  1. Hospitals should immediately fire anyone who is vaccinated with the COVID vaccine. Proof of being unvaccinated should be required to keep your job. Religious and medical exemptions should be honored so if anyone’s religious beliefs require them to be vaccinated, those people should be accommodated. Similarly, if anyone has a medical condition requiring them to be vaccinated, they should be given an exemption.

  2. College campuses should not allow students who are vaccinated to enroll. In addition, all visitors to campus will need to show proof of unvaccination. In short, if you are vaccinated, you should no longer be allowed on campus.

  3. Proof of unvaccination should be required to enter restaurants and attend public gatherings.

  4. If you are not an American citizen, you should not be able to enter the US without proof of unvaccination.

  5. Unvaccination should be required to hold elective office.

  6. All emergency personnel (police, fire, paramedics) must be unvaccinated or face losing their job.

  7. All doctors who advised their patients to get vaccinated should have their license to practice medicine revoked by the medical boards. Their board certifications and hospital privileges should be removed as well. After all, these physicians are a danger to society because they lack the ability to think for themselves and do what is best for their patients.

  8. Doctors who write vaccine prescriptions for the COVID vaccine shall be investigated and may have their license to practice medicine revoked. After all, the COVID vaccine isn’t justifiable for any patient so you must be a very bad doctor who doesn’t believe in evidence-based medicine.

  9. Other than as noted above, there should be no tolerance for the vaccinated. These people should have known better. They are a risk to society and prevent us from getting to herd immunity. They should be ostracized and excluded from all family events moving forward. [MORE]

Michael Palmer, MD: Alternate mechanisms of mRNA vaccine toxicity: which one is the main culprit?

/

This paper summarizes the mode of action of mRNA vaccines, as well as three potential pathogenetic mechanisms that may account for the toxicity observed with the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, namely: chemical toxicity of lipid nanoparticles, direct toxicity of the spike protein, whose expression is induced by the vaccines, and the destructive effects of the immune response to the spike protein. The case is made that of these mechanism the third is likely the most important one. If this conclusion is correct, then essentially the same level of toxicity must be expected with future mRNA vaccines against any other pathogenic microbes. [MORE]

Economist Toby Rogers Calls the Substantial Rising Autism Rates Among Black Children "Evidence of a Genocide." Data Shows Black and Hispanic Kids "are being poisoned at an astronomical rate"

/

From [TOBY ROGERS] and [HERE] I. Introduction

The new autism numbers came out last Thursday. We all knew that they would be bad because nearly every prevalence report for the last 20 years has shown increasing rates. We also knew that once again the CDC and mainstream media would try to spin increasing prevalence as “good news” in the Orwellian way that they do. 

Let’s walk through the two reports and then have a brief conversation about what we do about this. 

II. The new numbers

There are several systems for tracking autism prevalence in the U.S. including the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM), National Survey for Children’s Health (NSCH), and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). There are also federal programs including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that have their own counts. 

The two reports that came out on Thursday were from ADDM which tends to estimate lower autism prevalence (owing to slightly different research methods) than some of the other surveys. 

There are 11 ADDM sites across the country (Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin). Every two years they conduct a study of autism rates in a defined geographic region within the state (in as few as one county in Arizona, to as many as 21 counties in Arkansas). ADDM sites generally measure autism rates in 8-year-olds (almost all children with autism will be diagnosed by that age and such “constant age tracking” allows for more accurate comparisons between different birth cohorts). They are very thorough — reviewing diagnostic evaluations and school records for every child in that defined region. It takes them three years to write up the report (which is extremely unfortunate given the stakes). The main study that was just released looked at children born in 2012 who were studied in 2020. 

The headline was 1 in 36 children in the U.S. have autism which is an increase of 18% from the ADDM report (1 in 44) released just two years ago. 

I was quoted in an article by Brenda Baletti at Children’s Health Defense about the new numbers, “1 in 36 Kids Have Autism, CDC Says — Critics Slam Agency’s Failure to Investigate Causes.”

Cynthia Nevison wrote a brilliant analysis of the latest reports that was published by Children’s Health Defense on Friday titled, “In New Autism Report, CDC Again Fails to Address Root Causes.”

Dr. Nevison also discussed the reports on the Friday Roundtable of CHD.tv. 

III. Boys are 3.8 times more likely to have autism than girls 

1 in 36 = 2.78% of all kids in the U.S. have autism, according to the main study. There is variability across the ADDM sites from a low of 2.31% in Maryland to a high of 4.49% in California. But remember, autism is 3.8 times higher among boys than girls. So the autism rate among boys in California in 2020 was 6.94%. 

Every f*cking Democrat in California swore that vaccines were not linked to autism, they mandated one of the most extreme childhood vaccine schedules in the world in order for kids to go to school, and voilà 6.94% of boys in the state now have autism. 

This is genocide, democide, and androcide. Yes, I am aware of the fact that these children are “just” poisoned and injured for life, not murdered outright (although the SIDS numbers are also appalling). But this is a systematic destruction of a people nonetheless. 

IV. The way that the CDC has weaponized equity to promote genocide is sinister

In 2019, Cynthia Nevison was one of the first scholars to spot the fact that Black and Hispanic autism rates had surpassed autism rates in the White community (apologies for the capitalizations of the various races, not my preference, I get that race is a social construct, that’s just how they do it in these reports). During the battle against SB276 in 2019 (that removed all MEDICAL exemptions to vaccinations) we shared this information with elected officials including Lorena Gonzalez (who was chair of the California Latino Legislative Caucus at the time), but they voted to continue genociding their own base anyway.

Black and Hispanic autism rates exceed the rate in the White population in the most recent ADDM studies as well. 

Hispanic autism rates are 30% higher in 8-year-olds (born in 2012) and 80% higher in 4-year-olds (born in 2016) as compared with White children of the same age. 

Black autism rates are 20% higher for 8-year-olds (born in 2012) and 60% higher for 4-year-olds (born in 2016) as compared with White children of the same age. 

SB277 (that removed the personal belief exemption to vaccine mandates) passed in 2015. So the 2016 birth cohort is the first post-SB277 generation. The autism numbers are every bit as horrifying as we predicted they would be and contradict Democratic claims about vaccine safety. 

As Black and Hispanic rates were rising the CDC spun it as good news because they claimed it meant more Black and Hispanic kids had access to diagnostic testing. Now that Black and Hispanic autism rates exceed White rates that narrative does not make sense. Dr. Nevison explains:

The apparent underlying assumption was that there is a natural genetic level of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the population, which is reflected in White prevalence, and that all races and ethnicities will eventually stabilize at that level thanks to improved outreach and screening.

The new ADDM report recognizes that, “For the first time… the prevalence of ASD was lower among White children than among other racial and ethnic groups, reversing the direction of racial and ethnic differences in ASD prevalence observed in the past.” However, the authors neglect to acknowledge that this reversal undermines the hopeful interpretation of previous ADDM data and effectively turns the equity argument on its head.

But the CDC is sticking with the equity script regardless of the data. The last sentence of the main report states, 

These data indicate that ASD is common across all groups of children and underscore the considerable need for equitable and accessible screening, services, and supports for all children.

That’s not actually what these data indicate. These data indicate that American children are being poisoned at an astronomical rate and Black and Hispanic children are being poisoned even more than White children at this point. 

V. Higher socioeconomic status is now associated with lower autism rates — once again contradicting the official narrative

In 9 of the 11 ADDM sites, those in the highest third of income had the lowest autism rates (although only 3 of those results were statistically significant). Presumably, those with the most income have the greatest access to testing and diagnostic services — and yet their autism rates are the lowest. Ask yourself: what is different about White and wealthy populations as compared with the rest of the population? 

VI. The data on 4-year-olds is even worse

And then there was the second report released on Thursday — early identification of autism among 4-year-olds in 2020. The study found an astonishing 4.64% of four-year-olds in San Diego have autism. But remember autism is more prevalent in boys than girls so this works out to a 7.2% autism rate for boys in San Diego. For Black and Hispanic boys the results are even worse. Dr. Nevison explains:

The race-specific prevalence of the boys was not explicitly stated, but one can back-calculate that it was about 8% for both Blacks and Hispanics.

As the 2016 birth cohort ages and is fully diagnosed, a substantially higher prevalence can be expected, likely exceeding 10% for Black and Hispanic boys in California.

Again, this is the first post-SB277 generation. The law was phased in over time so the 2018 birth cohort will likely have even higher autism prevalence. Then SB276 passed in 2019, removing all medical exemptions to vaccination, so autism prevalence in the 2020 birth cohort and beyond will likely be even worse (perhaps offset somewhat by lower vaccination rates during the pandemic). 

San Diego is Lorena Gonzalez’s former Assembly District. Asm. Gonzalez spent the better part of her career in the Assembly ridiculing the parents of vaccine-injured children. And now the autism rates in her former assembly district are among the highest in the country — particularly for Hispanic and Black children. 

VII. Not all of the data are released to the public

As bad as the public facing numbers are, there are additional “cross-tabs” — granular data by county or even subsets within a particular county — that are even worse. These cross-tabs are not released to the public. They will show that in many large cities, the autism rate among low income boys of color is 10% or higher. This is a genocide that is being conducted by mostly Democratic political leaders who claim that they care about equity. 

Every politician in this country who cares about kids should demand the immediate release of ALL of the ADDM data. 

VIII. What are the costs to society from this mass poisoning of children? 

Nearly all of the major newspapers in the country wrote a story about the new autism prevalence numbers. None of those stories mentioned anything about the cost of autism. That’s odd, don’t you think? 

There are 9 very good studies on the cost of autism:

• Jarbrink et al. 2003, 2007

• Ganz et al. 2007;

• Knapp et al. 2009;

• Lavelle et al. 2014;

• Buescher et al. 2014;

• Leigh & Du 2015;

• Cakir et al. 2020; and

• Blaxill, Rogers, and Nevison 2021 (author copy below).

Leigh & Du show autism costs of one trillion dollars a year in the U.S. by 2025. 

Cakir et al. show autism costs of over seven trillion dollars over the period 2020 to 2029. 

The study I worked on together with Mark Blaxill and Cynthia Nevison shows autism costs hitting one trillion dollars a year in the mid 2030s. 

To put this in perspective, U.S. Defense Department spending is about $800 billion. So by all estimates autism costs in the U.S. will soon exceed U.S. Defense Department costs. 

Autism is now an INDUSTRY that has become too big to question. Pharma makes $50 billion annually from the childhood vaccine schedule, then another $10 billion from psychopharmaceuticals to “treat” autism, but there are also billions of dollars of revenue generated from genetics research, psychological testing, support services, and applied behavioral analysis therapy amongst others. And this industry works behind the scenes to censor any discussion about root causes and costs.

The only narrative that is allowed in the public square is that:

  • Autism is a blessing™️; 

  • Rising autism rates are Good News™️; 

  • Rising Black and Hispanic autism rates are a Victory for Equity™️; and 

  • The only problem here is those damn dirty anti-vaxxers, but otherwise we live in the Best of all Possible Worlds™️. 

The reality of course is quite different:

  • Over 90% of autism cases are likely the result of toxic injury;

  • We know how to prevent autism — keep toxic chemicals out of kids’ bodies;

  • Rising autism rates are evidence of a crime against humanity; and

  • The costs are catastrophic and will cause economic and political collapse in the U.S. in our lifetime.

The reason Democrats kick vaccine-injured kids and their siblings out of school and then drive their families out of the state with these vaccine mandate bills is to reduce costs. (Is it conscious? Probably not, they are not that self-aware. But 95% of decisions are subconscious so whether they are conscious of what they are doing is really beside the point.) I imagine that as prevalence and costs increase they will resort to even more extreme measures to vilify, harass, and censor those who point out what is actually going on. 

Of course the better alternative is to prevent autism altogether by banning toxic chemicals that cause developmental disabilities. But we cannot have that conversation in this country because Pharma is implicated and they control the entire system. [MORE]

Liberal Authorities Seek to Hire 87,000 Armed IRS Agents. Will this Army be Used Against Wealthy White Folks who Have Lawyers to Defend Them or Used Against Poor and Working People?

/

From [HERE] After Democrats rammed through the latest massive spending package earlier this year containing tens of billions of dollars for 87,000 more IRS agents, the agency is not wasting any time going on a hiring binge.

And it’s not one that will make Americans feel warm and fuzzy inside.

The Criminal Investigation (CI) division of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has posted job openings for special agents who can carry guns and make arrests in all 50 states. The CI division is responsible for investigating financial crimes, money laundering, tax-related identity theft, and terrorist financing, FOX Business reported this week.

Special agents within the division are authorized by law to carry and use firearms, making them the only IRS employees with this authority. The available positions are located throughout the U.S.

Under the job postings’ “major duties” section, the agency says that special agents “[c]arry a firearm; must be prepared to protect him/herself or others from physical attacks at any time and without warning and use firearms in life-threatening situations; must be willing to use force up to and including the use of deadly force.”

In addition, IRS-CI special agents must be “willing and able to participate in arrests, execution of search warrants, and other dangerous assignments.” The posting goes on to note that special agents are required to maintain “a level of fitness necessary to effectively respond to life-threatening situations on the job.”

Applicants must fulfill several additional eligibility criteria, such as holding U.S. citizenship, being aged between 21 when completing the training academy and 37 at the time of appointment. Moreover, prospective special agents in the IRS’ Criminal Investigation division are required to clear pre-employment medical and tax exams, as well as drug tests, and must be legally authorized to possess firearms, the financial news outlet reported further.

The IRS began accepting applications for the special agent role in mid-February and the job posting will remain open through the end of the year. The posting lists 360 vacancies in 249 locations across the country, with at least one position available in each state. The salary range for the role is between $52,921 and $94,228 annually, the report continued.

“The IRS faced criticism last year when a similar posting went live amid debate in Congress over Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, which included $80 billion in increased funding for the IRS over a decade — much of which was intended to help the agency crack down on tax evasion,” FOX Business added.

According to the group Americans For Tax Reform, which generally opposes all tax increases:

Armed agents are sought at:

20 sites in Texas
18 sites in California
13 sites in each of Florida and New York
9 sites in each of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Illinois
8 sites in Ohio
7 sites in each of Tennessee, Michigan, New Jersey, Maryland
6 sites in each of Massachusetts, Missouri, Indiana, Virginia
5 sites in each of Arizona, Kentucky, Oregon, West Virginia
4 sites in each of North Carolina, South Carolina, Iowa, Wisconsin, Connecticut, Louisiana, Washington state and Alabama
3 sites in each of Minnesota, Oklahoma, Colorado, Mississippi, Arkansas, Utah, New Mexico
2 sites in each of Kansas, South Dakota, Nevada, New Hampshire
1 site in each of North Dakota, Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wyoming.

“In order to carry or use an IRS-owned weapon, agents must: engage in handgun firing training at least once each quarter, shoot at least the minimum of 75 percentage points on the firearms qualifying test using the issued handgun during two nonconsecutive quarters, participate in biannual firearms building entry exercises, participate in an annual briefing on firearms safety and security policies and IRS-CI’s directives and procedures regarding the safe handling and storage of firearms, and participate in a briefing each quarter regarding the policy of discharging a firearm at a moving vehicle,” the group’s site noted further, referencing the agency’s firearms training standards.

It seems clear the IRS is building an army to go after ordinary earners, not wealthy Americans who are far fewer in number.

Clearview AI scraped 30 Billion Images from Facebook to build its facial recognition database and then Gave the Photos to Cops. Police have used the database a million times

/

US police have used the database nearly a million times, the company’s CEO told the BBC.

One digital rights advocate told Insider the company is “a total affront to peoples’ rights, full stop.”

From [HERE] A controversial facial recognition database, used by police departments across the nation, was built in part with 30 billion photos the company scraped from Facebook and other social media users without their permission, the company’s CEO recently admitted, creating what critics called a “perpetual police line-up,” even for people who haven’t done anything wrong. The company, Clearview AI, boasts of its potential for identifying rioters at the January 6 attack on the Capitol, saving children being abused or exploited, and helping exonerate people wrongfully accused of crimes. But critics point to wrongful arrests fueled by faulty identifications made by facial recognition, including cases in Detroit and New Orleans. Clearview took photos without users’ knowledge, its CEO Hoan Ton-That acknowledged in an interview last month with the BBC. Doing so allowed for the rapid expansion of the company’s massive database, which is marketed on its website to law enforcement as a tool “to bring justice to victims.” Ton-That told the BBC that Clearview AI’s facial recognition database has been accessed by US police nearly a million times since the company’s founding in 2017, though the relationships between law enforcement and Clearview AI remain murky and that number could not be confirmed by Insider.

An Uncontrollable Group of Baltimore Cops Don’t Answer Calls or Investigate Crimes. Instead They Roam Black Neighborhoods Surveilling People They Deem Suspicious and Unlawfully Stop and Search Them

/

From [HERE] When Tyrie Washington saw Baltimore City Police roll past him a little after noon on a Thursday in July of 2020, he ran. He darted through an alley in West Baltimore—he knew the neighborhood well because he’d lived there for years—and then hopped a fence and hid.  

From the passenger seat of an unmarked police car, Detective Alex Rodriguez spotted the 21-year-old Washington, crouched by a bush in the yard of a residence. 

Moments earlier, Detective Drake Winkey of the Baltimore Police Department’s Northwest District Action Team (DAT) announced over the radio that someone was “running through the alley.” 

Rodriguez got out of the car shouting, “Stop.” Washington jumped a fence, but fell to the ground. Rodriguez grabbed him. 

“Stop bro, stop,” Rodriguez said. “Why you running?” 

Out of breath, Washington articulated what he believed were his rights. “All right, I got my ID,” he told Rodriguez. “You’re not gonna search me.” 

Washington was referring to his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. He believed that would prevent any search of his person and that all Rodriguez could lawfully do was ask for his ID. 

Then Detective Israel Lopez—who pulled up with Det. Winkey moments earlier—announced “gun,” reached into Washington’s pants and removed a handgun.   

“Y’all bitches don’t got nothing else to do?” Washington asked the three cops surrounding him. “[Than] lockin’ up people with guns on the streets?”

DAT Detective Darwin Noesi said. “Yeah.” 

“Exactly,” Rodriguez chimed in. “People like you.” 

The officers who arrested Washington were part of a District Action Team, a group of specialized units within the Baltimore Police Department, currently with 75 members in total. DAT officers do not answer calls or investigate homicides, but instead engage in proactive policing in neighborhoods they deem “high crime” areas. They look for people they perceive as suspicious and keep an eye out for crimes happening—or about to happen.  

Each of the department’s nine districts has at least one DAT unit. The officers operate in marked and unmarked police vehicles; their uniform is tactical vests and other “plainclothes” gear. While DAT officers engage in tasks like foot patrols, traffic stops, and executing warrants, their primary focus is violence reduction through gun and drug enforcement.  

District Action Team enforcement often looks like Washington’s arrest in 2020. Defense attorneys argue, however, that DAT officers circumvent Fourth Amendment protections and manufacture probable cause through a vast set of vague descriptors: “bulges” in clothing or backpacks, “furtive gestures,” nervousness including a  “visible carotid artery,” clothing out of season, and running from police. 

DAT was established in the summer of 2017, just months after the police disbanded the federally indicted gun- and drug-seizing unit Gun Trace Task Force (GTTF), whose members stole cash and drugs, dealt drugs, and planted evidence. Then-Police Commissioner Kevin Davis announced the new DAT squads would be a different kind of proactive policing than the plainclothes cops jumping out of unmarked cars to harass and arrest: “The ‘jump-out boys’ culture was just counterproductive to everything we have to do in the crime fight,” Davis said then.  [MORE]