FDA says new vaccines no longer have to prevent infection or transmission in order to be approved

/

From [HERE] In order to qualify for approval as a “vaccine,” a pharmaceutical injection does not have to actually prevent infection with or transmission of any disease, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) publicly revealed this week.

Peter Marks, a top FDA official, issued a statement explaining that the “FDA’s authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration or the prevention of infection or transmission.”

In other words, a vaccine does not have to actually do anything to gain FDA approval. All that apparently has to happen is for a drug company with deep pockets to pay the agency enough money to buy that rubber stamp approval, unlocking an endless stream of profits.

(Related: Last spring, the FDA finally admitted that the covid “vaccines” it authorized and approved do, in fact, cause blood clots.)

CDC likewise redefined “vaccine” to include drug injections that do nothing

Traditionally speaking, an FDA-approved vaccine had to at least purport to prevent infection with or transmission of a disease. The whole point of a vaccine was to fight disease, we were long told.

Then came the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) and its associated “vaccines” and everything changed. Now, a vaccine can be just about anything, or nothing – it does not matter, just so long as the FDA and Big Pharma get paid for their efforts.

For years, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) claimed that a vaccine had to “produce immunity” in order to qualify as a vaccine. A vaccination, the agency said, involves the injection of an infectious organism “in order to prevent the disease.”

Just like the FDA, the CDC changed its definition of a vaccination post-covid to a drug injection that basically does nothing.

In recent months, the Coalition Advocating for Adequately Labeled Medicines (CAALM), comprised of a group of experts, has been calling on the FDA to clarify its definition of vaccines after the fiasco known as Operation Warp Speed ran its course.

“There is a widespread (but inaccurate) notion that efficacy against infection and transmission have been established by substantial evidence, and that these vaccines contribute to herd immunity,” CAALM said in a statement, pointing to false claims from fake president Joe Biden, Rochelle Walensky, head of the CDC, and Tony Fauci that covid injections prevent sickness and spread – which they do not, we now know.

Biden, for example, lied to America back in 2021 when he claimed that “you’re not going to get covid if you have these vaccinations.”

These and other statements by regime kingpins prompted CAALM to request from the FDA “language clarifying that phase III trials were not designed to determine and failed to provide substantial evidence of vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 transmission or death must be added to labels.”

The FDA ultimately denied CAALM’s request, claiming that its allegations against Biden, Walensky, and Fauci were just “selected statements by U.S government officials suggesting that vaccination against COVID-19 may prevent infection or transmission.”

“In responding to your Petition, we are not agreeing or disagreeing with any of the statements that are selected in the Petition,” Marks wrote in response to the request.

“Rather, we are observing that the statements referenced by the Petition do not demonstrate a commonly held belief that the clinical trials provided substantial evidence of efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We are not convinced that there is any widespread misconception about this.”

To this very day, Walensky is still going around claiming that, at one point, covid jabs somehow did prevent transmission and symptomatic illness, even though they clearly do absolutely nothing beneficial in those who take them.

500 People Join Landmark COVID Vaccine Injury Class Action Lawsuit Against Australian Authorities for Negligence in the Approval and Monitoring of Dangerous Injections

/

From [HERE] At least 500 Australians have already joined a “landmark” COVID-19 vaccine injury class action lawsuit filed this week against the Australian government and the medicines regulator seeks redress for those allegedly injured or left bereaved by the COVID-19 vaccines.

The suit accuses the Australian government, the country’s Therapeutic Goods Administration(TGA) and Department of Health and Aged Care, and a number of senior public servants of negligence related to the approval and monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines, breach of statutory duty and misfeasance in public office.

The action was filed in the Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales Registry.

According to the lawsuit, the respondents approved the vaccines “with no proper or reasonable evidentiary or logical basis to reasonably determine the Vaccines to be safe, effective and possessing a positive risk-benefit profile.”

Natalie Strijland, the litigator who filed the suit, said in a statement:

“The action will argue that the Therapeutic Goods Administration did not fulfil their duty to properly regulate the Covid-19 vaccines, resulting in considerable harm and damage to Australians.”

The suit alleges the government “acted negligently in approving the vaccines and also by failing to withdraw them” based upon the “known evidence” of risk.

“Australians who have experienced a serious adverse event following Covid-19 vaccination are invited to step forward and register for this class action,” Strijland said.

A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Aged Care said that the department “is aware” of the lawsuit and that “as the matter is before the court it is not appropriate to comment further.

Class actions provide “a path to justice” for people who may not have the resources to file a court claim on their own, said Alison Bevege, a journalist who has written for Reuters and Daily Mail, in an April 26 Substack post.

Those injured by COVID-19 vaccines have been “ignored, denied, belittled and marginalised,” Bevege added.

Australian doctor crowdsourced $110,000 to bring class action suit

Dr. Melissa McCann, a general practioner who also holds a Graduate Certificate of Allergic Diseases, raised more than $110,000 to crowdfund the case.

Commenting on the lawsuit, McCann tweeted:

According to McCann, the class action suit was necessary because Australia’s federal vaccine injury compensation program — the COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme — was “not fit for purpose” and had left many vaccine-injured Australians “abandoned with no support” after being promised “fair and accessible” compensation.

Services Australia as of April 12 had received 3,501 applications and paid 137 claims totaling more than $7.3 million, with 2,263 claims still in progress and 696 deemed not payable, news.com.au reported.

By comparison, the U.S. government, as of April 1, approved its first three payments to people injured by COVID-19 vaccines — amounting to a total of $4,634.89. Since the start of the pandemic, Americans claiming injuries related to COVID-19 vaccines and other countermeasures submitted 11,425 requests for compensation.

McCann earlier in February told “crowded halls filled with thousands of Australians” of how TGA and its leadership concealed fatal vaccine-induced myocarditis from the public, noted Peter McCullough, M.D., MPH, a board-certified cardiologist and internist.

“TGA had determined that several young previously healthy children died of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. Redacted letters from the TGA to McCann indicated these facts and an admission of willful concealment,” McCullough said.

‘I’d never known what a heart attack would feel like’

Among those represented in the lawsuit is Melbourne teacher Gareth O’Gradie, a previously healthy father of two who before he got his first Pfizer shot in July 2021, was into running, footy, cricket and tennis.

“Six days after [the vaccination] I had sudden-onset chest pain, shortness of breath, fever, chills, sweats,” he told World Freedom Alliance. “I’d never known what a heart attack would feel like, but that’s the type of thing I expected.”

O’Gradie, 41, was rushed to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with vaccine-induced pericarditis. He said:

“In the end I had open heart surgery to remove the pericardium, which had become inflamed and stuck to my heart. It’s extreme.

“All the heads of different departments, cardiology, rheumatology, cardiothoracic, all had conferences to say, ‘We’ve tried this, what is the next step for this recurrent pericarditis we can’t control the pain for?’ It wasn’t an easy decision.

“They said, ‘Nothing’s working — this is what we can offer.’”

O’Gradie — who said he is “pro-science” and has never been “anti-vaccine” — believes the government provided “misinformation about the safety” of the vaccines.

“There was a lot of, you know, ‘We need to not scare the public as part of the vaccine rollout, so let’s not publicise these things,” he told news.com.au. “There was a large, intentional withholding of information — that doesn’t give people informed consent.”

Singapore Coroner says a COVID Booster Caused Healthy Woman's Death. She Developed Myocarditis and Died 4 Days after Experimental Injection

/

From [HERE] A 43-year-old woman who received a COVID-19 vaccine booster died about four days later, a coroner's court heard on Friday (Apr 14).

The cause of Madam Ontal Charlene Vargas' death was determined to be myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart.

State Coroner Adam Nakhoda said on Friday it was likely that the myocarditis was related to the COVID-19 booster vaccine that Mdm Ontal had received, and ruled that her death was a medical misadventure.

Mdm Ontal, a Filipina maid, received her Pfizer-BioNTech's Comirnaty booster shot on Dec 9, 2021. During the 42 minutes of observation at the clinic, she did not exhibit any adverse effects.

She went home and completed her domestic chores and did not complain of any issue to her employers, son or friends.

However, she grew unwell the next morning, feeling tired and breathless. She called her husband and told him she found it difficult to breathe.

She walked to a clinic for a check-up for mild chest discomfort, but was discharged from the clinic after she was assessed to be normal and she said she did not have any further discomfort.

Later that day, she felt unwell again and told her employer about it before taking a taxi to Singapore General Hospital.

According to the coroner's findings, Mdm Ontal stated at the hospital that she had no family history of heart disease or congenital heart problems.

She also said that she did not have any reaction to the first and second doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Her condition worsened on Dec 12, 2021 and she suddenly became unresponsive. Despite receiving appropriate medical care, her condition deteriorated rapidly and she died on Dec 13, 2021.

AUTOPSY

The forensic pathologist who conducted the autopsy found inflammation of Mdm Ontal's heart muscle, which was consistent with myocarditis.

Common causes for myocarditis include bacterial, viral or fungal infection, an autoimmune disease, consumption of drugs and as a result of a COVID-19 vaccine.

There was no evidence that Mdm Ontal had a bacterial, viral or fungal infection or autoimmune disease, or that she had taken drugs and medication that led to myocarditis.

She developed symptoms soon after receiving the vaccine, the court heard. It is reported in medical literature that myocarditis is a known adverse side effect of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, said the coroner.

After Mdm Ontal died, her family applied to the Ministry of Health (MOH) under the Vaccine Injury Financial Assistance Programme, which provides one-time financial assistance to those who experienced serious side effects that are assessed to be related to COVID-19 vaccines administered in Singapore.

The application was successful, although the coroner did not specify how much Mdm Ontal's family received. CNA has contacted MOH for more information.

The coroner said Mdm Ontal was a healthy woman with no chronic illnesses, and although a benign tumour was found at autopsy, it did not cause her death.

He said myocarditis is a known adverse effect following an mRNA vaccine. It is extremely rare but not unknown for a person who has received the vaccine to develop myocarditis, added the coroner.

Gov Paid Coin-Operated Hospitals Bonuses for Every COVID Patient Treated w/Emergency Authorized Meds (Remdesivir) and a 300% Upcharge for Patients put on ventilators, despite Knowing it Killed People

/

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • In late March 2020, the U.S. Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Within this $2 trillion stimulus package, $100 billion was earmarked for hospitals and local health centers that treated COVID patients

  • Hospitals were reimbursed an extra 20% for each Medicare patient hospitalized with COVID, and the only criteria to receive that bonus was a COVID-positive PCR test

  • The federal COVID-19 Treatments Add-On Payment program also paid hospitals bonuses for every COVID-19 patient treated with emergency-authorized COVID medications (Remdesivir, convalescent plasma, Baricitinib, Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir)

  • Hospitals also received a 300% upcharge for COVID patients placed on ventilators, even after it became apparent that this was a death sentence. Somewhere between 50% and 86% of all ventilated COVID patients died, yet government never dropped the incentive to use ventilators. Why?

  • Throughout 2020, evidence mounted showing the PCR test is incredibly unreliable above 35 cycles, and health agencies instructed labs to use 40 to 45 cycles. In essence, we had an epidemic of false positives, and financial incentives then drove hospitals to mistreat and kill countless patients, many of whom may not even have had COVID

From [HERE PDF] As detailed in “How COVID Patients Died for Profit,” hospitals were financially incentivized to diagnose patients with COVID and treat them with protocols known to be lethal, in part to “protect” the staff from infection.

As if that weren’t bad enough, primary care providers across the U.S. were also bribed to coerce patients into getting the toxic COVID shot. The following document was posted to Twitter in mid-April 2023 by Rep. Thomas Massie, an award-winning scientist and Republican Congressman for Kentucky.1

“Ethically, shouldn’t doctors disclose when they’re profiting by recommending a drug or treatment — especially a drug or treatment for which there is no medical malpractice liability?” Massie said.2 [MORE PDF]

'An Emergency w/Fake Numbers and Tests was the Master Art of the Plandemic:’ Data from a UK Hospital Shows 75% Of People Recorded as “COVID Deaths” During March to June 2020 Didn't Die From Covid

/

From [HERE] Data from a sizeable NHS Trust suggests that in the “first wave” of the covid pandemic, there were three asymptomatic “covid deaths” for every one symptomatic covid death.  The question is: how does someone die from a disease for which they have no symptoms?  It’s not a trick question and you don’t have to be a doctor to know the answer – they didn’t die from covid.

John Dee is a former head of clinical audit specialising in clinical outcomes at a busy NHS teaching hospital. Before this, he headed a statistical modelling section as a G7 UK government scientist, providing consultancy for both public and private sectors.

He has been publishing a series of articles titled ‘Catastrophic Health Collapse’ on his Substack. The series details his analysis of data on respiratory illness admissions for an Accident & Emergency Department of a sizeable NHS Trust.  The period of his analysis covers 2017 to 2021.

In Dee’s latest article, the seventh in the series, he compares in-hospital deaths of acute respiratory death and chronic respiratory death; and, in-hospital deaths of asymptomatic and symptomatic covid deaths.  By classifying deaths into these major categories and showing the data graphically, he highlights some obvious anomalies that, even to an untrained eye, raise some questions.

Dr Bhakdi: In Just 2 Yrs People Have Become Superstitious, No One Knows Anything, People Just Believe. Science is Over: Creating Emergencies w/Fake Numbers and Tests is the Master Art of the Plandemic

John Dee begins his analysis with a detailed explanation of what a “respiratory death” means in terms of ICD-10 codes. The International Classification of Diseases (“ICD”) codes are widely used by countries that are following the diktats of the World Health Organisation (“WHO”).  They are being used by 100 countries.  In England, OPCS-4 and ICD-10 are fully implemented and embedded in NHS standards and mandated for use by Health Care Providers.

The section of the ICD codes for ‘Diseases of the respiratory system’ has 452 codes and sub-codes – people could die with a common cold or they can die from acute respiratory failure, so we’re looking at respiratory death within a very broad spectrum of associated conditions rather than primary uni-causal death.

With the detail offered by ICD-10 coding, it is possible to separate acute/severe/life-threatening respiratory conditions from chronic/minor. The assumption Dee makes is that if somebody is going to die from covid then they’ll enter an acute respiratory phase at some point. If they don’t enter an acute phase, then their case should not be treated as a symptomatic covid death. Equally, if somebody suffered from bacterial pneumonia or other non-covid viral pneumonia then this case should not be treated as symptomatic covid death.

“In this way,” Dee explained, “we can separate out those cases deserving of the classification of symptomatic covid death; that is to say, these are deaths whereby SARS-COV-2 is the one and only pathogen causing an acute respiratory condition leading directly to their demise. All other cases yielding a positive test result are thus coded as asymptomatic covid.” [MORE]

The Harms from Wearing Masks Are Real: New Study found low levels of blood oxygen, and increased levels of carbon dioxide, heart rate, humidity and systolic blood pressure

/

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Researchers found a robust relationship between mask wearing, low levels of blood oxygen, and increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), heart rate, humidity and systolic blood pressure

  • Clinical symptoms included headache, fatigue, shortness of breath and dizziness. High levels of CO2 reduce blood pH and may be associated with protein misfolding and altered interactions with nucleic acids, which is hypothesized to lead to diabetes, osteoporosis, cancer and neurological disorders

  • In 2020, national experts on respiratory protection and infectious diseases said that while there was limited evidence of effectiveness, they still supported wearing masks in public. However, people should "not count on or expect" face coverings to protect them

  • There is a cost for ignorance, which may be paid for decades. Although population-wide mask mandates never made sense, the massive censorship and shutdown of healthy scientific debate was perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this masking debacle

From [HERE] Mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic were an exercise in scientific insanity and evidence is mounting that the long-term physical consequences may not be evident for some time.1 It started with recommendations to wear a mask in public and quickly deteriorated to questionable advice ranging from head scratching and mildly amusing to the outright laughable.

Spain's mandated use of face masks while swimming in the ocean,2 double masking,3 triple masking and masking while exercising4 all fall into one of those categories, depending on your perspective.

On the other side of the coin were business owners and individuals who recognized the madness of wearing masks to protect against a virus since for nearly 25 years researchers have questioned the effectiveness of surgical and cloth masks. An NBC report5 in February 2021 showed a grocery store in Naples, Florida, where hardly any of the customers wore masks.

The news reporter said the store owner “is known for his conservative and often controversial viewpoints.” The owner posted a sign that individuals who have a medical condition were exempt from the mask mandate order and since by HIPAA guidelines and the Fourth Amendment they could not legally ask about medical conditions, the store assumed if you did not wear a mask you had a medical condition.6

Mask mandates were put in place without ever properly evaluating efficacy, they divided communities and were used as a form of virtue signaling and a visible reminder of compliance with what became the “new normal.” Research7 has demonstrated that masks do not protect but, rather, increase the risk you may get sick.

The rationale behind a widespread mask mandate must be questioned, yet it doesn't appear that public health officials are paying attention to science. Is that really surprising?

Long-Term Consequences of Face Masks Are Unknown

A group of scientists from Germany, Poland, India and Austria8 sought to evaluate the effects of mask wearing on physiological, metabolic and clinical parameters. In a 2023 review of past use, the researchers noted that in most countries face masks had been restricted to health professionals for decades.

They wrote that even before 2020, effectiveness was debatable and it wasn't until 2020 that leaders and scientists began suggesting that masks might protect against viral transmission, even though the evidence was weak. Certain properties of surgical face masks were used to justify their use in hospital settings in the past, such as preventing bacteria from entering surgical wounds and during operations.

Yet, past research also found the evidence to support use during surgery was not unequivocal.9 The studies included in the featured 2023 systematic analysis evaluated the adverse effects masks may have. The median trial duration was only 18 minutes, yet the pooled results were significant.

In reviewing the literature, the researchers found both standard surgical masks and N95 masks had significant effects, but the N95 mask had a greater impact on clinical parameters. The researchers measured adverse effects in decreased oxygen saturation, minute ventilation and simultaneous increase in blood CO2, heart rate, humidity and systolic blood pressure.

During exertion, a robust relationship to mask wearing was noted in discomfort, shortness of breath, heat and humidity. When the symptoms of the participants were pooled, there was a significant prevalence of headache, acne, skin irritation, shortness of breath, voice disorders and dizziness.

The researchers found that the masks interfered with oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide (CO2) release, which compromised respiration. They concluded that the risks and benefits of face mask wearing must be assessed against side effects and the available evidence of their effectiveness against viral transmission: “In the absence of strong empirical evidence of effectiveness, mask wearing should not be mandated let alone enforced by law.”10

The result of this systematic review is similar to another published in 202111 that evaluated 44 mostly experimental, quantitative, studies and 65 substantive publications. They looked at psychological and physical deterioration and found there was a significant correlation between oxygen drop and fatigue.

Of participants wearing N95 masks, 82% showed a rise in CO2, 72% had a drop in oxygen and 60% reported headaches. The researchers concluded: “Extended mask wearing by the general population could lead to relevant effects and consequences in many medical fields.”12

Masks Raise CO2 Levels

Your body's homeostasis depends on balance. CO2 and oxygen must also be in balance. When CO2 levels are too high, it can be an indication of other underlying medical conditions, such as kidney failure, lung disease and Cushing syndrome.13

Too much CO2 can also trigger health conditions.14 Excess CO2 reduces blood pH, which may be associated with protein misfolding and altered interaction with nucleic acids, metals and drugs. Clinical presentation of the systemic effects is hypothesized to include diabetes, osteoporosis, cancer and neurological disorders.

In other words, too much CO2 in the blood may be responsible for long-term health conditions well beyond the short-term effects of headache, fatigue and dizziness. A 2021 paper15 described the effects of wearing a face mask on CO2 concentration.

The researchers found there was no difference in the three types of face masks tested, which included a surgical mask, N95 mask and cloth mask. They wrote that the concentrations of CO2 had no toxicological effects according to the literature, yet "concentrations in the detected range can cause undesirable symptoms, such as fatigue, headache and loss of concentration."16

These recorded side effects strongly suggest the brain was oxygen deprived. While the researchers noted the short-term exposure to high CO2 levels in the blood may not trigger “toxicological effects,” the long-term effects were not measured. Another study published in early 202117 also found that while face masks increased CO2 levels, they remained below the short-term National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) limit.

For those who only read the title of the paper, it appears as if wearing a face mask poses no significant health challenges. However, short-term use was defined as 15 minutes. For individuals who wore their face masks consistently throughout the day, as was required in states with a mask mandate, CO2 limits were exceeded.

These tests were performed on healthy adults. A study published in late 2022,18 evaluated CO2 levels in healthy children who wore face mask coverings. Since many countries made it compulsory for children to wear face masks in school, these scientists sought to determine the average CO2 levels in an experimental control study over 25 minutes.

After baseline measurements were taken, children wore either surgical masks or an FFP2 mask, similar to an N95 mask. Researchers measured breathing frequency and pulse in 45 children with a mean age of 10.7 years. They found that the difference between the two masks was small and not significant but that wearing any mask raised the CO2 content quickly to a “very high level” in healthy children in a seated resting position.19

Experts Supported Masks Despite Limited Data

It seems that public health experts were supporting the use of mask mandates despite weak evidence that they protected from viral transmission. In April 2020, national experts on respiratory protection and infectious diseases wrote a commentary titled “Masks-for-All for COVID-19 Not Based on Sound Data,” saying:20

“Despite the current limited scientific data detailing their effectiveness, we support the wearing of face coverings by the public when mandated and when in close contact with people whose infection status they don't know.

However, we also encourage everyone to continue to limit their time spent indoors near potentially infectious people and to not count on or expect a cloth mask or face covering to protect them or the people around them.”

Data began accumulating in 1975, and possibly earlier, that surgical face masks may not be effective. In 1975,21 researchers concluded that "surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination" and in 198922 researchers found that masks used during cardiac catheterization did not impact the infection rate.

A 1991 study23 was published in which a general surgical team wore no masks during half of their surgeries over a two-year period. There were 1,537 operations with face masks that resulted in 4.7% wound infections and 1,551 operations without face masks resulting in 3.5% wound infections. In other words, there were fewer infections when the surgical team did not wear a face mask.

A 2009 systematic review of the literature24 found no significant difference in post-operative wound infection and concluded that “from the limited randomized trials it is not clear whether wearing surgical face masks harms or benefits the patients undergoing elective surgery.”

In 2015, another literature review25 cautioned that there was an overall lack of substantial evidence to support the claims that face masks protect either patients or surgeons from infectious contamination. Also in 2015,26 researchers from the University of New South Wales demonstrated that cloth masks not only were not effective in stopping the transmission of respiratory illnesses and viral infections, but health care workers who wore them had a “much higher” infection rate.

In the face of experimental studies and systematic reviews of the literature demonstrating weak evidence that surgical masks were effective during surgery to reduce infection from bacteria, which are significantly larger than viruses, public health experts continued to insist that surgical masks and cloth masks can stop viral transmission. This insanity has likely had a significant effect on physical and mental health, which will be experienced for years to come.

Magical Thinking Has Harmed Children and Adults

Magical thinking — the belief that you can influence outcomes by doing something that has no causal connection to them — has persisted throughout the pandemic. Although the data show that masking cannot stop viral transmission, people feel safer when they wear them. It's the very definition of magical thinking.

In addition to the dangers of high CO2 levels and the physiological repercussions, face masks also pose other dangers. For example, a study27 of surgical and cotton face masks from 13 healthy volunteers demonstrated that 43% of the bacteria on the masks after four hours were antibiotic-resistant.

To best clean these masks, the study found they must be boiled at 100° C (212° F), washed at 60° C (140° F) with detergent or ironed with a steam iron. Yet a large-scale survey of almost 25,000 participants revealed that only 21% of the responders cleaned their cotton face masks daily.28

Studies29 have also isolated symptoms that collectively have been identified as mask-induced exhaustion syndrome (MIES). Researchers have warned that children, pregnant women and those who are sick or suffering from certain chronic conditions may be particularly at risk from extended masking.

The cluster of symptoms identified as MIES includes exhaustion, increased heart rate, decreased blood oxygen saturation with increased blood CO2, increased breathing resistance, headache, dizziness and a decrease in empathy perception. These researchers noted:30

“... the advocacy of an extended mask requirement remains predominantly theoretical … Moreover, recent studies on SARS-CoV-2 show both a significantly lower infectivity and a significantly lower case mortality than previously assumed, as it could be calculated that the median corrected infection fatality rate (IFR) was 0.10% in locations with a lower than average global COVID-19 population mortality rate. 

In early October 2020, the WHO also publicly announced that projections show COVID-19 to be fatal for approximately 0.14% of those who become ill — compared to 0.10% for endemic influenza — again a figure far lower than expected. On the other hand, the side effects of masks are clinically relevant.”

Another risk is associated with inhaling plastic particles and titanium dioxide nanoparticles. In a1998 lung cancer study31 researchers found microplastics in lung tissue including a plastics and fibers identified in 99 of the 114 lung samples examined. A team of scientists from Hull York Medical School32 examined human lung tissue in 13 patients who underwent lung surgery and found 39 pieces in 11 tissue samples.33

The most abundant types of microplastics were polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). This finding points to the ubiquitous use of surgical masks as PP is the most commonly used plastic component in them.34 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies titanium dioxide as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means it’s “possibly carcinogenic to humans” by inhalation.35

The state of California36 includes titanium dioxide in the form of airborne particles on the Proposition 65 list. Despite these facts, the compound is commonly used in face mask textiles. A Scientific Reports study stated, “Although titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a suspected human carcinogen when inhaled, fiber-grade TiO2 (nano)particles were demonstrated in synthetic textile fibers of face masks intended for the general public.”37

Given the data that face masks are not effective, may increase the risk of infection, did not impact infection trends for COVID38 and come with a long list of psychological and physical adverse effects, it begs the question if public health experts will create another environment where lack of compliance with unreasonable and ineffective interventions lead to societal shunning in the next plandemic?

Science Has Been Censored by Propagandists

There is a cost for ignorance, which society may be paying for decades to come. Although population-wide mask mandates never made sense, the massive censorship and shutdown of healthy scientific debate was perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this masking debacle. Only those who went along to get along were allowed to air their perfectly scripted views. Those who had concerns were silenced, shamed and maligned, regardless of their credentials.

A 2023 review39 by Cochrane Library added 11 new randomized control trials (RCT) and cluster RCTs to their previous 2020 analysis and concluded that, while there's "uncertainty about the effects of face masks" due to trial bias and low adherence by participants, the pooled results of randomized controlled trials "did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks."

In a February 6, 2023, Substack article, lead author of the Cochrane review, Tom Jefferson, described the propaganda effort to twist the findings and other physical interventions against COVID-19.40

“What disturbs me … is the idea of 'debunking' or 'normalization' of the information flow. We have done the tough work over two decades, reporting results separately from our interpretation, as in all Cochrane reviews. The studies' results are the results reported by the authors of the single studies included in the reviews.

Our interpretation is one you can — and should if you want — challenge. However, successfully challenging our interpretation requires hard work, elbow grease, graft, focus, and application. So picking up the phone and speaking to someone, then deciding how to 'debunk' or normalize the message, is so much easier.”

- Sources and References

California Prison Authorities Accused of Cooperating with ICE to Deport Non-White Immigrants

/

From [HERE] Criminal justice advocates and incarcerated people sued the California Department of Corrections on Thursday, claiming the agency discriminates against hundreds of people each year by assisting federal immigration agents. 

According to a lawsuit filed in Alameda County Superior Court, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation refers people in custody to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for detention and deportation after they have served their time. They say this practice contributes to a dual system of justice that targets immigrants, refugees and anyone whom officers assume was born outside the U.S.

The plaintiffs say the corrections department makes referral decisions using nothing more than their perception of an incarcerated person’s place of birth, race, ethnicity or ability to speak English. They claim the policy has led to many residents and citizens being put into the deportation pipeline based on false, racialized assumptions of their immigration status and resulted in people being blocked from rehabilitative programs that could reduce their time in custody.

Ny Nourn, co-director of plaintiff Asian Prisoner Support Committee, said she had fear and anxiety for years knowing she was under an ICE hold while incarcerated. 

“Shortly after a visit from an ICE agent, in May of 2017, on what was supposed to be my first day of freedom after being granted parole, CDCR automatically transferred me to ICE detention, where I would spend the next six months fighting deportation,” Nourn said. “CDCR continues to work with ICE to discriminate against foreign-born people like me instead of helping keep our communities safe and families together.” 

Plaintiff Roth Chan is a U.S. citizen whose family immigrated from Cambodia. When she entered custody, officials perceived her to be foreign-born and classified her as “Mexican” on prison paperwork — triggering the policy known as a “potential hold,” which state officials use to send information about people to ICE and deny them placement in prison programs. 

She claims she repeatedly notified CDCR of her U.S. citizenship but was ignored. The potential hold blocked her access to alternative-to-custody programs, rehabilitation programs and early release.

“It put me in a deep depression,” Chan said. “I would attend programs all day in prison, and by the end of the day I would cry knowing that I wasn’t earning credits for an earlier release just based on my appearance. I still have a hard time sleeping. I wonder what will happen if ICE picks me up or transfers me to an immigration detention facility.” [MORE]

Non-White Immigrants Waiting 10 Years in US just to get a Court Date in Conveyer Belt Like Court

/

U.S. immigration offices have become so overwhelmed with processing migrants for court that some asylum-seekers who crossed the border in Mexico may be waiting a decade before they even get a date to see a judge.

The backlog stems from a change made two months after President Joe Biden took office, when Border Patrol agents began the now-defunct practice of quickly releasing immigrants on parole. They were given instructions to report to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office at their final destination to be processed for court — work previously done by the Border Patrol.

The change prevented the kind of massive overcrowding of holding cells in 2019, when some migrants stood on toilets for room to breathe. But the cost became evident as ICE officers tasked with issuing court papers couldn't keep pace. [MORE]

US to Issue More than A Million Visas” to Indians In 2023: Top Authority

/

US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Donald Lu also told Press Trust of India in an interview this week that they are also prioritising work visas: H-1B’s and L visas, the most sought-after by IT professionals from India.

Washington: The US is on track to issue more than a million visas to Indians this year, a top official has said, assuring that the Biden administration is committed this summer to make sure it processes all of the student visas for Indians whose school starts this fall.

US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Donald Lu also told Press Trust of India in an interview this week that they are also prioritising work visas: H-1B’s and L visas, the most sought-after by IT professionals from India.

The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows US companies to employ foreign workers in speciality occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise.

Technology companies depend on it to hire tens of thousands of employees each year from countries like India and China. [MORE]

Uncle Brother Watch: Senate Puppeticians Introduce S.884 to Create Digital Identity for All Americans

/

From [HERE] U.S. Senators Kyrsten Sinema, an independent of Arizona, and Cynthia Lummis, Republican of Wyoming, have introduced Senate Bill 884, also known as “the Improving Digital Identity Act of 2023.”

The bill was introduced March 21 and ordered to proceed out of committee on March 29 without amendments and with a favorable recommendation.

The bill’s text states:

“The lack of an easy, affordable, reliable, and secure way for organizations, businesses, and government agencies to identify whether an individual is who they claim to be online creates an attack vector that is widely exploited by adversaries in cyberspace and precludes many high-value transactions from being available online. Incidents of identity theft and identity fraud continue to rise in the United States, where more than 293,000,000 people were impacted by data breaches in 2021.”

The bill calls for the formation of a public-private partnership to bring this digital ID system into being.

“The public and private sectors should collaborate to deliver solutions that promote confidence, privacy, choice, equity, accessibility, and innovation. The private sector drives much of the innovation around digital identity in the United States and has an important role to play in delivering digital identity solutions.”

The bill references the bipartisan Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity, which has called for the federal government to “create an interagency task force directed to find secure, user-friendly, privacy-centric ways in which agencies can serve as 1 authoritative source to validate identity attributes in the broader identity market. This action would enable Government agencies and the private sector to drive significant risk out of new account openings and other high-risk, high-value online services, and it would help all citizens more easily and securely engage in transactions online.” [MORE]

Lost Trust w/Racist Gov: Black Councilwoman asks Racist Suspect Feds to Investigate Ralph Yarl Shooting: White Cops Failed to Arrest, White DA Delayed Charging White Man who Tried to Murder Black Teen

/

From [HERE] In a letter last week, Black Kansas City councilwoman Melissa Robinson explained to federal prosecutors why she and other Black leaders do not trust Kansas City police and are asking for an outside investigation of the shooting Ralph Yarl.

As Robinson described in the April 17 letter to U.S. Attorney Teresa A. Moore, Yarl, a Black teen, was shot and seriously injured by a white man when he went to the wrong house to pick up his siblings in a Northland neighborhood four days earlier.

The shooting angered many in Kansas City and across the country, with many feeling race played a role in the slowness of local law enforcement to arrest and charge a white man for shooting a Black teenager.

The accused shooter, 84-year-old Andrew D. Lester of Kansas City, North, was released by police within two hours of being taken into custody after the shooting. Four days passed before Clay County prosecutors charged him with first-degree assault and armed criminal action and he surrendered himself at the county jail.

In her letter, Robinson, who represents the Third District which includes neighborhoods on the city’s East Side, explained that many Black residents had already lost trust in Kansas City police. She asked the federal prosecutor in Kansas City to pursue a hate crime investigation.

“This situation scares me, quite frankly,” Robinson wrote. “The uprising I could feel during the period when the suspect had yet to be charged was frightening. Kansas City needs this investigation to be thorough and done right . . . we need assurances of such. Specifically, Black citizens need to feel confident that we cannot be ‘hunted’ in this City.” “It would greatly help the confidence of Kansas City, specifically the many residents that have learned a distrust for KCPD, if your office was willing to step in and conduct a hate crime investigation,” Robinson wrote. “I personally would be very grateful as I have two young black boys myself. I believe the community needs federal help and support at such a critical moment.” [MORE]

Over thirty years ago Dr. Frances Cress Welsing warned Black sheople:

“…Black people everywhere must begin to understand why the Black collective, and Black males in particular, have been under intensive attack for the past 2,000 years. Indeed, Jesus was a Black male who was lynched by uniformed white male Roman soldiers 2,000 years ago, as a result of the same war that has continued into the present day extension of the same Roman (white) empire.

Whenever there is a sense of increased vulnerability within the local and/or global white collective - as, for example, caused by inflation (currency devaluation), unemployment, loss of a war or counter-struggle by non-white peoples (e.g., Arabs controlling and limiting oil supplies, Iranians taking white hostages, Black guerillas struggling in southern Africa and the loss of the Vietnam War) - there will be an increase of the ever-present "normal" daily slaughter and murder of Black and other non-white males by those both legally and illegally authorized to do so. This murder and slaughter will be logically viewed as justified within the specific logic framework of the fear of white genetic annihilation.

Within the historic framework of Western civilization and culture (the civilization and culture organized to prevent white genetic annihilation), all white peoples have the spoken or unspoken mandate to participate actively in their collective struggle for global white genetic survival. This specifically means, of necessity, the murder and slaughter of Black and other non-white males whenever it is felt within the white collective to be necessary and, therefore, justified.” [MORE]

RecogNegro Susan Rice Leaving the Blight House. Corpse Biden’s Domestic Policy Adviser is “Black” but Had No Black Agenda and Delivered Nothing of Tangible Value to Black Communities

/

PLEASE DON’T GO BOHICAN RICE. ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

BOHICAN – Bend Over Here It Comes Again Negro. $Sniggers are the last of the buck-dancing Bohicans. “I am the last of the Bohicans,” he said, “…and I will never be broken. I am the last and worst of my breed—and the final token.” (See: Snigger, Coin-Operated, Samboism, Uncle Tom, Possumist, Turdistan, Piece-Activist, Niggeroe & GOP)

RecogNegro – spotting a sell-out who has either crossed over or passed over into a reality that continuously crosses his or her kind out or passes them over to the “authorities” (racist economic and criminal injustice system). Everybody your color ain’t your kind or deeper still—all your skinfolks ain’t your kinfolks. (See: Afro-Sin-Trick, Sambo & Criss-Crossover)

The Moteasuh Tribe – the miseducated coin-operated buck-dancing, sole-shuffling, politically dis-appointed kneegrows who pander to Massah’s agenda—Mo’ Tea Sir? This tribe of sorry-ass kneegrows follow the dictates and even orchestrates the marching bandits of racism white supremacy as spewed forth from the mouthpieces of political power within the borders of the Witches Castle. It’s the Condi-Clarence-Powell complex—that is, those who do Massah’s bidding as if you weren’t kidding yourself that you were doing otherwise. Keep your eyes on the lies, the liars, and the disguise.

From [HERE] Susan Rice, President Biden’s top domestic policy adviser, is departing the administration, the White House said Monday.

Ms. Rice, a longtime foreign-policy expert, has led the White House Domestic Policy Council since the start of the administration, helping coordinate with federal agencies on a broad variety of issues, including economic mobility, healthcare, gun control and immigration. Her last day will be May 26, an administration official said.

In a statement, President Biden thanked Ms. Rice for her service, saying, “​​there is no one more capable, and more determined to get important things done for the American people than Susan Rice.”  

He praised Ms. Rice for her work on health policy, including on lowering prescription drug prices for seniors.

In a tweet, Ms. Rice said she was “so proud of all we have been able to accomplish together for the American people.” [MORE]

UNFORTUNATELY, ITS STILL UNCERTAIN WHETHER DEEZ NUTZ AND ONYA CHIN WILL BE RUNNING FOR MASTER OF THE FREE RANGE PRISON.

Electoral politics – a polylogue of agreed-upon illusions and false (deflectionary) issues. (See: Politicking & Pathocracy)

electorate – the democratically hoodwinked. 2) the every four year scam-a-thon. (See: Voting, Elections & VoteScam)

The Electorant – the willfully ignorant electorate—the suckers (voters and “taxpayers”) who delegate and abdicate their power to elected and appointed officials (employees) and the system through which voters’ will is subverted through statutes, laws and policies not approved or even known in the election process. The ‘electorant’ are always ranting and raving about their sordid and assorted conditions when they are responsible for them by being ignorant of the nature of delegated power and its effect, i.e., arbitrary power wielded with impunity and State-sanctioned immunity. The electorant have no recourse but to fuss and talk about change—utterly clueless. All power of the State resides in those who hold the purse strings. Control of the “money” is in the hands of those who further use it to corrupt others in order for one to retain power (dynastic banking cartel families) and the other to remain in power (politician). It is a symbiotic racket and one that continues unabated. (See: Voters, GEO-Dollars, “Monetized Debt,” Federal Reserve System, Willful Ignorance, Political Money, Gangbanking, Elections, MONEY, S&M Banking, Taxpayers, Second Tax, Dumbing-Down, Colonized Mind & Citizens of the United States)

Yup. Exactly. “Black” rolebots and borgs working on behalf of white liberals deliver nothing of material value to Black communities - they work on behalf of “the American people.” Here, that means solving white liberals’ problems.

About twenty years ago Norman Kelley observed that black people had become political weaklings, “complicit in their own political emasculation.” At one time Black Americans forcefully argued for their own seat at the table but now in their relations with Democrats they function like trained seals or dogs that “bark and clap” at election time and shut-up afterwards. Black people, once envied and imitated by people seeking freedom throughout the world are now demobilized and have no effective political organizations, no real leaders and “black politics” is literally void of any actual substance.

An army of thousands of black elected and selected rolebots like Rice at all levels of government are not engaged in any “black politics” and have no “black political philosophy,” no “Black agenda” or black messaging or organizing and no explanation to account for the system of racism white supremacy affecting black people’s lives or any response to the war being waged on law abiding Black people by police. Said black puppeticians have non-white skin and black chromosomes but for all non-cosmetic purposes they are interchangeable with their white liberal counterparts. “Blackness” and “black politics” has come to mean ‘not Republican’ and not much else. Black politics has gone from being aggressively results oriented and highly organized to being tame, reactionary activity channelled into voting for the Democratic Party and its grimacing white liberal and black borg candidates.

As explained by Kelley ‘Democrats offer only boilerplate liberalism and no legislative initiative, no substantial policy initiatives that benefit African-Americans.“ No real agenda drives politics beyond having the Democratic candidate show up.” ‘Democrats don’t stand for anything in regard to Blacks; black people are voting against republicans but not for Democrats. Similarly, Robert Smith observed what is striking about any so-called ‘black agenda’ is that it is not really black. That is, relatively few items are race specific.’

Elite whites and their Black probots are quick to remind anyone that “Black voters are not a monolith, and their attitudes differ based on upbringing, geography and other factors.” Such an overstatement purposefully misses the point. No group of people is a monolith; obviously individuals are not the group. But black people are not white people – and white people are not subjected to the system of racism white supremacy. Nor are police waging any war against white liberals. Have you checked out the Urban League’s 2022 State of Black America? Blacks are three-fifths along the way to experiencing equal status with White Americans. The Black-White disparity persists across virtually every line or indicator of life and quality of life in the US. Black people occupy the bottom of nearly every statistical category of life. [MORE] White liberals’ ad-hoc menu of political concerns have little to do with the realities of daily life Black people face. Democrats have no messaging or even an explanation for racism white supremacy, no theory to account for ongoing police abuse. Fantastically, racist suspect liberals have deceived Black people into believing the system of racism white supremacy is a system of bigotry, unchecked mean words, name calling and disrespect. The apparent goal here must be to force racists, deluded psychopathic people who are the permanent enemies of Black people and who believe in an imaginary human hierarchy, to be quiet until they clean up their language and ‘to stop hate’ by individually transforming them through moral suasion. Such ‘turn the other cheek politics’ belong in another context, have nothing to do with reality [racism white supremacy] and should be buried along with John Lewis’ corpse. Said vested interests cleverly push the belief that racism is words not organized-team conduct by white people and that racial disparity occurs automatically as simply the by product of an invisible system with anonymous, unconsciously acting actors. Like the jails just stay overcrowded with Blacks by default and not through the intentional conduct of white liberal judges, police, prosecutors, jurors and probation officers.

Racist, white liberals have no intention of ever helping Blacks neutralize white supremacy – it would undo their own hustle; maintaining master-servant relations while convincing gullible blacks that racism white supremacy is bigotry. Naturally, boilerplate liberalism fails to address racism white supremacy and all its symptomatic problems such as poverty, economic discrimination, lack of economic development, Mcjob employment, underemployment, drug addiction, infant mortality, AIDS, chronic welfare dependency, lack of affordable housing, homelessness, servant education, the unequal administration of justice, police brutality, incarceration and more.

Black sheeple filled with anxiety are running around worrying about voting “rights” - yet voting for white liberals and their black rolebots has done nothing to neutralize the system of racism white supremacy.

To white liberals, Black people and their welfare are not the end of the electoral process but merely the means for winning. Recognegros like Susan Rice help create optics that look good to the gullible Black electorant who make no demands on their masters. Whether Susan Harris or other black rolebots ever deliver or even attempt to deliver any tangible, material benefits or economical empowerment or provide substantive justice to the Black community is beside the point. The Black electorant expects nothing in return for its vote. As explained by Kelley ‘Democrats know they will suffer no sanctions from disgruntled, obedient blacks,’ who are content to “bark and clap” during election and shut-up afterwards.

Quietly Published CDC Report Confirms Over 1.1 Million Americans have ‘Died Suddenly’ Since the COVID Vaccine Roll-Out

/

From [HERE] The Covid-19 injections were meant to reduce the sudden surge of deaths the USA recorded in 2020 due to the alleged Covid-19 pandemic. But unfortunately, the official figures prove that the opposite has happened.

Official reports quietly published by the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) confirm that over 6 million Americans have died ever since the U.S. Food & Drug Administration granted emergency use authorisation to a Covid-19 vaccine in December 2020; with 2021 being a record-breaking year for deaths.

This sadly means that at least 1.1 million Americans may have ‘died suddenly’ during this time frame because according to the CDC reports there have been 1,106,079 excess deaths compared to the 2015-2019 five-year average.

And with further official Government figures [from the UK] confirming that mortality rates per 100,000 are highest among the vaccinated population in every single age group, it would appear Covid-19 vaccination is almost entirely to blame. [MORE]

How are COVID Shots Affecting Mothers-To-Be? Data reveals a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and a more than twofold increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes across 6 different categories

/

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots are associated with a significant increase in adverse events among women of reproductive age

  • Data revealed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and a more than twofold increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes across six different categories following COVID-19 shots

  • COVID-19 shot contents are biodistributed into the bloodstream within hours and cross “all physiologic barriers including the maternal-placental-fetal barrier and the blood brain barriers in both the mother and the fetus”

  • Birth rates in multiple European countries fell significantly in the end of 2021, months after COVID-19 shots became widely utilized

  • Researchers have called for the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for all persons of childbearing and reproductive age

From [HERE] and [PDF] While a typical vaccine must undergo 10 to 12 years of trials before it's released, during the pandemic, COVID-19 shots were made available to the public just 10 months after development, courtesy of an Emergency Use Authorization.1 Even pregnant women were subjected to the shots, and in many cases were mandated to receive them.

"The pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, maybe humanity," Dr. James Thorp, a maternal fetal medicine expert, told Tucker Carlson.2 Thorp and colleagues published a preprint study that found striking risks to pregnant women who received the shots, along with their unborn babies.3

The outcomes were so dire that the researchers concluded pregnant women should not receive COVID-19 shots until further research is completed. "A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy is advised until randomized prospective trials document safety in pregnancy and long-term follow-up in offspring," they explained.4

COVID Shots Linked to 27-Fold Higher Risk of Miscarriage

Thorp and colleagues used data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) to assess adverse events experienced by women of reproductive age following receipt of a COVID-19 shot, compared to receipt of a flu shot. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots were associated with a significant increase in adverse events (AE), including:5

"When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or persons-received, all COVID-19 vaccine AE far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds … Pregnancy and menstrual abnormalities are significantly more frequent following COVID-19 vaccinations than that of Influenza vaccinations," the researchers noted.6

Specifically, the data revealed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and a more than twofold increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes across six different categories, according to board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.7

Were Nurses Issued Gag Order Against Speaking Out?

Problems began to appear shortly after COVID-19 shots were rolled out, such that a leaked email from a large California hospital was sent out in warning to 200 nurses. The email, from September 2022, contained the subject line, "Demise Handling," referring to an increase in stillbirths and fetal deaths. A TCW report by journalist Sally Beck shared the email's content, which read:8

"It seems as though the increase of demise patients [babies] that we are seeing is going to continue. There were 22 demises [stillbirths and fetal deaths] in August [2022], which ties [equals] the record number of demises in July 2021, and so far in September [2022] there have been 7 and it's only the 8th day of the month."

Beck reports that one nurse, Michelle Gershman, who works in the neonatal ward had her bonus withheld because she spoke out about the rise in fetal deaths. "We used to have one fetal demise per month. That rose to one or two per week," Gershman said. Beck reported:

"Her experience, and the experience of doctors working with pregnant women, is contrary to official 'safe and effective' observation and advice, but no one was free to speak out because of a gagging order imposed in September 20219 by the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG).

… At the beginning of the rollout, in December 2020, pregnant women who were healthcare workers or deemed to be at risk from Covid began receiving the shots. By May 2021, the vaccine was being recommended to all pregnant American women.

This is despite the fact that none of the vaccine manufacturers had completed reproductive toxicology reports in animals, and none had started clinical trials in pregnant women. Two months later, hospitals noticed a huge increase in miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm births, pregnancy complications and menstrual abnormalities."

COVID-19 Shots Should Be Category X

The mRNA from COVID-19 shots circulates in the body for 28 days or more, and the spike protein may trigger clotting, bleeding and tissue damage, according to McCullough.

Because of this and other concerns, he states that, conservatively, COVID-19 shots should be given the Category X designation during pregnancy,10 which means, "The risk of use of the drug in pregnant women clearly outweighs any possible benefit. The drug is contraindicated in women who are or may become pregnant."11

Unfortunately, health officials in the U.S. continue to affirm its safety, even for vulnerable populations such as this, as they have from the very beginning. "Shockingly, in the very first week of mass vaccination in December of 2020," McCullough wrote, "news reels depicted well-intentioned pregnant mothers getting injected with synthetic lipid nanoparticles laced with long-lasting mRNA coding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology Spike protein."12

Thorp's study also reported that Pfizer's data showed COVID-19 shot contents are biodistributed into the bloodstream within hours and cross "all physiologic barriers including the maternal-placental-fetal barrier and the blood brain barriers in both the mother and the fetus."13

A separate study is, in fact, looking at using ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LPNs) like those used as mRNA delivery platforms in COVID-19 shots, as tools to deliver drugs to the placenta, because they're so effective at reaching it.

"LNPs enhance mRNA stability, circulation time, cellular uptake and preferential delivery to specific tissues compared to mRNA with no carrier platform," the researchers wrote.14 But the study contains some concerning data, which was shared on Twitter:15,16 [MORE] and [PDF]

Could a Man Holding a Baby Pose a Threat to Police? When a White Seattle Cop Shot Shaun Fuhr in the Head It was Obvious He Didn't Have a Gun b/c he was Cradling His Infant Child in His Arms-Suit Filed

/

From [HERE] The father of a 24-year-old Black man who was fatally shot by a white Seattle police officer while holding his infant daughter has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit, alleging excessive force and racial discrimination.

The lawsuit, filed by Jason Fuhr, alleges Shaun Fuhr was obeying officers’ commands to stop running from police when Officer Noah Zech shot him in the head April 29, 2020, at a construction site near Rainier Playfield in Columbia City. Shaun Fuhr was holding his infant daughter at the time and the gun shot caused him to drop the child, according to police.

The infant wasn’t hurt, police said. Fuhr later died at Harborview Medical Center.

Zech, a member of the Seattle Police Department’s SWAT team and a 15-year department veteran, was among a large number of officers who had responded to a frantic 911 call from a woman who said she had been beaten by her boyfriend, who fired a shot at her and had taken their 1-year-old daughter, according to police. The woman reported her boyfriend, Fuhr, had assaulted her throughout the day, and police said she had significant injuries.

None of the officers witnessed Fuhr commit a crime.

Seattle is city run by white liberals.

According to the complaint,

FACTS: THE UNJUSTIFIED KILLING OF SHAUN FUHR

Shaun Fuhr was an African American father of an infant child when he was shot and killed by a Seattle Police Officer

10. There is a video of Shaun Fuhr being shot in the head by Defendant Seattle Police Officer, Noah Zech.

11. On April 29, 2020, Defendant Noah Zech was working as a Seattle Police Officer.

12. On April 29, 2020, Defendant Noah Zech and other police officers responded to an alleged domestic incident involving Shaun Fuhr and the mother of his child.

13. Shaun Fuhr was on foot behind a section of townhouses while cradling his infant child in both arms.

14. The officers came running through an alley way and around the corner of a townhouse building to find Shaun Fuhr standing there, holding his infant daughter with both hands.

15. The officers commanded Shaun Fuhr to stop.

16. Shaun Fuhr complied with Seattle Police Officer’s command to stop. 

17. Immediately after complying with Seattle Officer’s command to stop, Shaun Fuhr was shot in the head by Noah Zech while holding his baby daughter in his arms.

18. Seattle Police Officer’s continued to yell commands to Shaun Fuhr to stop after he was shot in the head.

19. Immediately after being shot in the head, Shaun Fuhr’s baby daughter fell out of her father’s arms to the ground and started crying as she rolled down the slight hill Shaun was then standing on.

20. Noah Zech shot and killed Shaun Fuhr even though he was complying with the police commands.

21. At the time Shaun Fuhr was shot in the head, Shaun Fuhr was not running away and was standing with his baby girl in his arms..

22. At the time Shaun Fuhr was shot in the head, Shaun Fuhr was not charging at police.

23. At the time Shaun Fuhr was shot in the head by the defendant Seattle Police Officer, it was visibly clear that Mr. Fuhr did not have a gun in his hands.

24. At the time Shaun Fuhr was shot in the head by the defendant Seattle Police Officer, it was clear that Shaun Fuhr did not have any weapons in his hands.

25. At the time Shaun Fuhr was shot in the head by Defendant Noah Zech, Shaun Fuhr was not threatening, hitting, or assaulting anyone.

26. At the time Shaun Fuhr was shot in the head by Defendant Noah Zech, Shaun Fuhr was not threatening or hurting his child.

27. After complying with the Seattle Police Officers to stop, Shaun Fuhr stopped, and was then shot in the head.

28. Even after being shot, Seattle police officers were still giving commands to Shaun Fuhr to stop.

Zech was cleared of any wrongdoing following a review by the department’s Force Investigation Team, as well as an investigation by the Office of Police Accountability after the family and community groups complained.

“Shaun Fuhr was a young man who was dedicated to his family and had high expectations for his future,” the lawsuit says. “Shaun should be alive today.”

Police released a portion of the woman’s 911 call and officers’ body-worn camera video, which drew sharp criticism from members of the Black community and civil-liberties advocates, who questioned the need for deadly force while Fuhr was holding an infant and posed no threat to the approaching officers. Police don’t listen to or answer 911 calls so such information is not relevant to what the police knew at the time of the shooting. The video is blurred to protect the system of racism white supremacy, a white over Black system that most white people participate in.

Police on their public blotter displayed a semi-automatic handgun they said belonged to Fuhr and was found “nearby.” However, none of the cops saw Fuhr with a gun at the time of the shooting because he was holding his child with both hands - thus posing no threat.

Carolyn Riley-Payne, president of NAACP Seattle King County, issued a statement at the time decrying the fatal shooting as unnecessary.

“The officer who killed Mr. Fuhr shot at him while he was holding his little girl, and while he was running,” the statement said. “It is absolutely unacceptable that the officer demonstrated such utter disregard for the life and safety of the child.”

The lawsuit claims excessive force, negligence, outrage and wrongful death. It alleges Zech shot Fuhr “without investigation or de-escalation, by consciously disregarding the fact that Fuhr was clearly, visibly unarmed because he was holding his infant daughter, and Zech made these conscious choices because Shaun Fuhr is African American.”

The lawsuit notes that the SPD has been under a federal settlement agreement for more than a decade after the Department of Justice concluded in 2012 that officers routinely use excessive force and showed disturbing evidence of biased policing.

Department of Justice and Seattle officials last month asked a federal judge to find the SPD has complied with “core requirements” of the settlement agreement, calling on the judge to end most federal oversight of the agency.

“The city of Seattle implicitly, overtly condones and defends Seattle officers that shoot and kill unarmed people,” the lawsuit said, further claiming the city “has consistently failed to adequately train, supervise and discipline its officers who commit acts of excessive force.”