‘COVID Shots are a Biological Weapons Project Run by the US Department of Defense,’ according to a fmr Big Pharma Executive

From [HERE] The U.S. government’s COVID-19 vaccination effort is a biological weapon project run by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), according to Alexandra Latypova, a former pharmaceutical research and development executive with 25 years of industry experience.

Latypova, who oversaw compliance for more than 60 clinical trials, knows the regulatory standards pharmaceutical companies historically were required to meet before bringing a product to market.

“People misunderstand that this is just another instance of Big Pharma corruption,” she told Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense, during an episode of “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast.” “It’s much, much bigger than that.”

Latypova said we have government reports describing the COVID-19 vaccines as a biological weapon. “I have a question to our government,” she said. “What is it that they’re exactly forcing on us?”

The DOD is “fully in charge” of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials and the vaccine’s manufacturing and distribution, and it owns the vaccine “until it is injected into a person,” she said.

By creating a “pseudo-legal structure” over time that included Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and other transaction authority agreements — called OTAs — the U.S. government allowed the military to take over the distribution of vaccines without adhering to historical safety testing guidelines or product recall procedures.

According to Latypova, the notion that the COVID-19 vaccines met regulatory standards for safety and effectiveness was the “biggest lie that was sold to the public.”

“I am describing a very illegal structure that’s made legal on paper,” she said. “It’s unlawful. They — the government — are driving this.”

Kennedy agreed with Latypova and pointed out that OTA was designed to allow the Pentagon to quickly buy weapons and weapons systems without paying attention to any existing regulatory authorities.

Kennedy said:

“What they’ve done is they’ve taken that authority and they’ve applied it to the vaccines so they’re purchasing the vaccines under OTA as a demonstration product.

“It’s all a huge military operation and the involvement of the drug companies is a kind of window dressing.”

The DOD paid the pharmaceutical companies for their brand names so people would think they were getting something from Pfizer or Moderna — but all of the distribution and manufacturing is done by the military, Kennedy said. The pharmaceutical companies were brought in to put their name on it and then to pretend to do clinical trials, he said.

Latypova and Kennedy discussed how the military accomplished this without most workers involved in the production and distribution of the vaccine catching on.

They also discussed how citizens and lawyers might effectively challenge the Pentagon’s COVID-19 vaccination project in the court system.

Class Action in South Africa says Pfizer’s COVID Injections are Harming and Killing People and Providing No Benefit. Supports Factual Clam that Pfizer Knew from the Beginning Vax was Deadly w/Data

From [HERE] The Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA) filed a show cause action on Monday with the High Court of South Africa. FASA is calling for an urgent judicial review of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine over concerns the product is harmful. 

The filing includes a real-world data analysis showing an association with increasing death from both COVID and non-COVID causes in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to review and rescind Pfizer’s emergency use authorization used to distribute the vaccine immediately. If the case proceeds, it would be the first time Pfizer has had to answer for its vaccine side effects. 

In an interview, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhorta said FASA, a grassroots movement made up of supporters, media, doctors, lawyers, and experts brought a case to the high court calling for a judicial review of Pfizer’s products stating the evidence suggests Pfizer’s COVID vaccine is not safe or effective. 

“What that means is that if it is successful, it will result in Pfizer’s product being removed from the market,” Malhotra said.

“What they’ve said is the medical regulator in South Africa did not do its duty — the suggestion is they approved this vaccine on the basis of irrationality, you know because the data that was used to make these decisions were based upon Pfizer’s own data which was commercially conflicted. “

Malhotra continued: 

“They designed the analysis — the suggestion is there was manipulation of the data from real-world evidence because they told us at the beginning it was 95% effective at preventing infection. That very quickly turned out not to be true. That really is what this case is about. “

“It’s also important to emphasize, that, of course, there’s been a real problem getting this discussion and both sides of the story into the mainstream media. That will not be an issue in a court of law. In a court of law, all sides will get an airing, and all sides will be heard,” he added. “When you look at the totality of the evidence its a very different picture from what we were told in the beginning that this was safe and effective. “

Malhotra has been calling for a complete suspension of COVID vaccines because the evidence suggests the harms are considerable and the benefits are negligible. Malholtra’s father died prematurely from an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine injury. 

This case will go forward in the upcoming months and proceedings will be open to the public.

Robert Kennedy’s Class Action Alleges Biden Admin and Feds Colluded with and Pressured Social Media Companies to Suppress Speech About the Dangers of Deadly, Experimental COVID Injections

From [HERE] On Friday, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) et al., filed a class action lawsuit against President Joe Biden and numerous other federal agents and agencies in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Monroe Division. The complaint alleges that the defendants have colluded with, encouraged and pressured social media companies to suppress speech that the government does not want the public to hear and to silence specific speakers who are critical of federal policy.

This class action, brought on behalf of all Americans who access the news from social media platforms, seeks nationwide injunctive relief on behalf of those Americans. Instead of seeking monetary damages, the claim asks the court to declare that the Defendants’ conduct violates the First Amendment and to prohibit them from engaging in any form of social media censorship in the future.

The complaint calls the government’s campaign to censor online speech one of “the gravest threats to free speech this country has ever faced.”

“Because of the historically unprecedented power wielded by a handful of behemoth social-media companies over the content of American public discourse, the federal government’s systematic campaign to induce these companies to censor speech is among the gravest threats to free speech this country has ever faced. …

Since 2020, an army of federal officers, at every level of the government—from the White House itself to the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security, the CDC, the Office of the Surgeon General, and numerous less-well-known federal entities—has been engaged in the effort to induce those companies to censor constitutionally protected speech.”

“U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said, ‘Censorship reflects a society’s lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.’ It also violates the constitution,” CHD Chairman and Chief Litigation Counsel Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said. “The collaboration between the White House and health and intelligence agency bureaucrats to silence criticism of presidential policies is an assault on the most fundamental foundation stone of American Democracy.”

“The most serious threat to free speech of our time—and probably one of the most serious in the nation’s history—is the federal government’s massive, concerted and extraordinarily successful effort to get social media companies to censor ideas and information the government doesn’t want people to see, say or hear,” said Jed Rubenfeld, co-counsel for Plaintiffs. “This lawsuit challenges that censorship campaign, and we hope to bring it to an end. The real victim is the public, which is why we’ve brought this suit as a class action on behalf of everyone who accesses news from social media.”

CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland said, “If Government can censor its critics, there is no atrocity it cannot commit. The public has been deprived of truthful, life-and-death information over the last three years; this lawsuit aims to have government censorship end, as it must, because it is unlawful under our constitution.”

Representing the Plaintiffs in addition to Mr. Rubenfeld is Louisiana Attorney G. Shelly Maturin, II.

Uncle Brother and Facebook Targeting the Uhuru Movement

From [HERE] In March 2023, Regions Bank notified the black nonprofit African People’s Education and Defense Fund (APEDF) that the bank was “exiting” their 20-year relationship, closing accounts, withdrawing lines of credit and canceling mortgage loans.

This assault on the ability of African people to build economic self-reliance was the latest in a series of actions revealing government and corporate cooperation targeting the black community programs of the Uhuru (Freedom) Movement including its popular Women’s Health Center, Black Power Vanguard Basketball Court, “One Africa! One Nation!” Marketplaces, Gary Brooks Community Garden, Uhuru Jiko Commercial Kitchens and Bakery Cafe, Akwaaba Hall events venues, Black Power 96 radio station, Uhuru Furniture & Collectibles stores, Uhuru Foods & Pies and Uhuru House black community centers.

Facebook has blocked the ability for supporters to crowdfund for Uhuru programs through their personal pages. GoFundMe froze over $9,000 in donations for the Hands Off Uhuru! Legal Defense Fund for more than three months until the group’s lawyers took legal action to get the funds released. The Stripe payment processing company also blocked contributions to the group for a period of time.

On February 14, 2023 the Pinellas County Commission revoked $36,801 in funding that had been previously approved for WBPU 96.3 FM black community radio station in St. Petersburg, Florida after expressing political opposition to its association with the black power Uhuru Movement.

These economic sanctions have come on the heels of a series of violent government-initiated attacks on the Uhuru Movement that began in earnest with the July 29, 2022 militarized FBI raid on seven Uhuru properties and includes two acts of arson, one arrest and interrogation, censorship in the removal of a change.org petition and a U.S. state department announcement of a $10 million reward for information that could tie Uhuru leaders to Russian government interference in U.S. elections and public opinion influencing.

Ona Zené Yeshitela, Board President of APEDF, says “Our organization has built over 50 economic institutions, financed through our own fundraising work and the donations of thousands of people. These banks don’t want black people to be able to feed, clothe and house ourselves. They do not want money circulating in the black community.”

Omali Yeshitela is founder of the Uhuru Movement and Chairman of the African People’s Socialist Party. He is considered the primary target of the FBI raids and threatened indictments on charges of serving as a pawn of the Russian government. A 1960s field organizer registering voters with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, the 81-year-old Yeshitela has fought for Black Power for over 50 years. [MORE]

Grants Reveal Uncle Brother's Horrific Plans to Censor Americans’ Speech

From [HERE] The founding fathers should have included extra text in the First Amendment: “Congress shall not make any law, Executive shall not make any rule or order, Judiciary shall make no ruling” abridging freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to peaceable  assembly and right to protest the government for redress of our grievances.

There is indisputable evidence that our own government is the driving vehicle to completely obliterate free speech in America. The Congress can rein in the Administration but unfortunately, many in Congress are complicit and even encouraging Biden and staff to intensify the attack.

The current trajectory of this war on the First Amendment will result in criminalizing speech, imposing penalties like fines, court cases and imprisonment. ⁃ TN Editor

Our government is preparing to monitor every word Americans say on the internet—the speech of journalists, politicians, religious organizations, advocacy groups, and even private citizens. Should those conversations conflict with the government’s viewpoint about what is in the best interests of our country and her citizens, that speech will be silenced.

While the “Twitter Files” offer a glimpse into the government’s efforts to censor disfavored viewpoints, what we have seen is nothing compared to what is planned, as the details of hundreds of federal awards lay bare. Research by The Federalist reveals our tax dollars are funding the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine-learning (ML) technology that will allow the government to easily discover “problematic” speech and track Americans reading or partaking in such conversations.

Then, in partnership with Big Tech, Big Business, and media outlets, the government will ensure the speech is censored, under the guise of combatting “misinformation” and “disinformation.”

AI and ML Technology Will Monitor Everything We Say and Read

The federal government has awarded more than 500-plus contracts or grants related to “misinformation” or “disinformation” since 2020. One predominant area of research pushed by the Department of Defense involves the use of AI and ML technology to monitor or listen to internet “conversations.”

Originally used as a marketing tool for businesses to track discussions about their brands and products and to track competitors, the DOD and other federal agencies are now paying for-profit public relations and communications firms to convert their technology into tools for the government to monitor speech on the internet.

The areas of the internet the companies monitor differ somewhat, and each business offers its own unique AI and ML proprietary technology, but the underlying approach and goals remain identical: The technology under development will “mine” large portions of the internet and identify conversations deemed indicative of an emerging harmful narrative, to allow the government to track those “threats” and adopt countermeasures before the messages go viral.

With AI and ML identifying in real-time the origins of supposed influence operations and how the messages spread, the government will have the ability to preempt the amplification of the speech, squelching even true reporting before the general populace has an opportunity to learn the news. To appreciate fully the danger this poses to free speech requires Americans to consider the use of that technology with these seven additional details.

1. Everything Everywhere All At Once

First, the AI and ML technology under development will mine every conceivable mode of conversation for the government. Consider, for example, the databases monitored by just a few of the companies the government is paying to develop this AI and ML technology.

PeakMetrics, the recipient of a $1.5 million award, tracks millions of news sites, blogs, global social platforms, podcasts, TV and radio, and email newsletters.

Omelas Inc., which received more than $1 million in taxpayer money, culls data from “the most influential newspapers, TV channels, government offices, militant groups, and more across a dozen social networks and messaging apps, thousands of websites, and thousands of RSS feeds.”

Alethea Group, which received a Phase I award of nearly $50,000 to develop a “machine learning tool for proactive disinformation/misinformation detection, assessment, and mitigation,” boasts it covers data sources including mainstream and “fringe” social media platforms, peer-to-peer messaging platforms, blogs and forums, state-affiliated media sites, “gray” propaganda sites, and the dark web.

Newsguard, awarded $750,000 by the DOD, offers two databases, including its unreliable reliability ratings database of thousands of news and information websites and a second database of purported hoaxes.

Primer, which scored a $3 million award to develop its technology, offers a database that looks to news and media data sources, publicly captured images, the dark web, cyberattacks shared by the general public, and classified—presumably for government clients—and unclassified data sources. Primer also partners with Flashpoint, which adds “Telegram, Reddit, Discord, and “the deep and dark web” to the databases mined.

2. We’re Talking Americans, Not Just Russian Bots

It is also important to recognize that the AI and ML technology under development will not just mine foreign or state-connected actors, but will monitor everyone’s speech. Both the government grants and the web pages of the monitoring companies confirm this reality.

We also know from the “Twitter Files” that the government and its fellow residents in the Censorship-Industrial Complex view the speech of Americans as related to foreign influence operations merely because the viewpoint matches what they claim is an adversary’s perspective. And we know the government pushed for the censorship of ordinary Americans.

By its nature, AI and ML technology has unlimited potential to flag problematic speech on any imaginable subject. Here, the past is prologue: Speech need not involve terrorism, acts of war, or even our electoral process for our government to consider it within its purview to fact-check. (It also need not be false; see point 4).

The “Twitter Files” and recent events provide Americans a glimpse into the breadth of the topics the government may deem harmful narratives worthy of censor—from elections, to vaccines, to runs on grocery stores. Underlying the government’s obsession with silencing misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information is the “Great Power Competition” perspective of foreign relations, under which China and Russia represent a constant threat to America’s power, influences, and interests.

With the government viewing foreign relations through the Great Power Competition paradigm, speech on any topic, touching even tangentially on America’s “power, influences, and interests,” will be fair game for censorship efforts.

3. The Great Power Competition Renders Everything Fair Game for Censorship

While to convincingly prove this reality requires a deeper exposé—coming soon—on the Great Power Competition’s connection to the government’s focus on misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information, last week Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Arizona, showcased the current thinking inspiring our leaders. During a conference call with the Federal Deposit and Insurance Corporation about the Silicon Valley Bank bailout, Kelly asked whether there was “a way to censor information on social media to prevent a run on the banks.”

Kelly’s question was “couched” “in a concern that foreign actors would be doing this,” Rep. Thomas Massie told Public, but, according to Massie, Kelly “didn’t suggest the censorship should be limited to foreigners or to things that were untrue.”

The move from the censorship of terrorism to the silencing of supposed interference in elections to censoring posts about “bank runs” follows naturally from the shift in foreign relations paradigms from the War on Terror to the Great Powers Competition. The latter views anything affecting American power or influence as fair game. We also saw this shift with the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) proposal to consider “financial misinformation” within its purview.

The government’s censorship efforts won’t stop at supposed “financial misinformation,” however, because anything and everything journalists report and citizens discuss affects America’s “power, influence, and interest.” So, the government’s development of technology to monitor the entirety of the internet foretells a much more dangerous threat than apparent on the surface.

4. The Government Brands True Speech Misinformation

The threat to free speech stemming from the government’s monitoring of the internet is further increased by our overlords’ willingness to brand true speech “misinformation, disinformation, or mal-information” and then seek to censor it. The “Twitter Files” also exposed this reality, with our government and its lackeys seeking the censorship of true facts that might lead to “vaccine hesitancy” or reveal runs on grocery stores.

That our government would seek to silence true speech on such matters gives Americans reason to fear further censorship of true information.

5. Faulty Analysis and Biased Censors

The “Twitter Files” also revealed that censorship demands by the government, think tanks, and academic institutions relied on faulty misinformation analyses, including ones that identified innocent Americans as foreign actors. Also, many of those involved in the disinformation industry maintain left-leaning bias and a penchant for targeting conservatives.

In furthering its plans to monitor the internet for supposedly harmful narratives to silence, the government is continuing to work with biased groups, including ones that pushed faulty analyses, adding to the threat to free speech.

6. The Government’s Partners Are Poised to Censor

The government’s push to develop AI and ML technology to mine the internet is even more terrifying knowing that a Censorship Complex has already been built. The “Twitter Files” revealed the breadth and depth of the complex, with every alphabet-soup federal agency working with the social media giants and an array of think tanks and academic institutions, and with the legacy media providing an assist when censorship requests went ignored.

While Elon Musk may have exited Twitter from the group, the Censorship Complex still stands tall and ready to silence the speech of those who dare dissent. This public-private collaboration makes the government’s move to monitor the internet even more threatening to free speech. [MORE]

US Government Authorities Secretly Acquired Geolocation Tools that Can Covertly Track Cell Phones around the World without the Phone user’s Knowledge or Consent

From [HERE] Israel’s controversial cyber security firm NSO Group has made deals with the American government. According to a report in the New York Times, a deal was reached in November 2021 in which NSO Group provided the U.S. government access to a geolocation tool that can covertly track mobile phones around the world without the phone user’s knowledge or consent. The Times describes this as one of the company’s most powerful weapons.

This arrangement was reached just days after the administration of President Joe Biden publicly chastised NSO Group for its alleged activities in aiding dictatorships with the surveillance of political critics and journalists by hacking their mobile phones.

The Times reported that the deal was made with an American firm called “Cleopatra Holdings.” But a small New Jersey-based government contractor called Riva Networks was the intermediary used by the FBI when it acquired NSO Group’s controversial Pegasus spyware when Donald Trump was still in office.

The spyware was also used by none other than the ruler of Saudi Arabia, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MBS.

The New York Times said that the White House denied any knowledge of the matter when asked about it.

Israel Cybersecurity firm NSO Group develops ways to break through encryptions and security systems. Last July, it was revealed that NSO Group’s Pegasus Spyware software aids in the violation of people’s human rights around the world and that the company has known all about this. Specifically, they were charged with helping governments hack the telephones of journalists.

NSO Group was eventually blacklisted by the U.S. government in November 2021. And it was reported that NSO Group Pegasus spyware was used to track American embassy employees in East Africa. Specifically, 11 U.S. Embassy employees working in Uganda had their iPhones hacked by the program.

In 2022, the U.S. government scuttled plans by the American firm L3Harris to acquire NSO Group’s technology. [MORE]

Video: A White DC Park Cop Crept Into the Backseat of Parked Car and then Violently Woke Up Sleeping Black Teen. Cop Faced No Imminent Harm as Teen Drove Away but Still Shot Him to Death, Feds Review

From [HERE] The US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Thursday opened a civil investigation into the fatal shooting of 17-year-old Dalaneo Martin by a US Park Police officer on March 18 in Washington, DC. The announcement comes two days after the US Park Police released police bodycam footage of the shooting.

The investigation is set to probe into the shooting, which occurred when Washington Metropolitan Police and US Park Police were called to a neighborhood in northeast Washington, D.C. on the morning of March 18. Once there, officers found Martin in the driver’s seat of a suspected stolen car with the ignition on. The video shows the teen was asleep in the drivers seat of the car. The seat is reclined all the way down

“Here’s the plan,” one of the officers is heard saying in the video. “He’s knocked out. The back window is just plastic. I’m going to try to cut that out quietly. If he gets startled, doesn’t wake up, then we’re going to try to get in there, grab him before he puts that car in gear.” In response, another officer said, “If he takes off, he takes off. Just don’t get caught inside of that car.”

It’s not clear why the police didn’t simply just gently knock on the window to wake up the teen.

OFFICERS FACES ARE BLURRED OUT BY THE POLICE TO PROTECT THE SYSTEM OF AUTHORITY - A SYSTEM BASED ON FORCE AND INHERENTLY UNACCOUNTABLE TO THE PUBLIC IT RULES OVER.

Family demands name of US Park Police officer involved in shooting that killed teen. Government keeps cop’s identity secret.

An Officer is seen sneaking into the vehicle through the backseat doors of the car and the driver’s side door, startling Martin, who puts the car into gear and drives away with a US Park Police officer in the backseat. The officer in the video is heard yelling “Stop. Stop or I’ll shoot!” before firing his gun at Martin. The car then crashes into a house, and officers pull Martin out to attempt resuscitation.

In a statement, the DOJ US Attorney’s Office said, “The loss of a life is always tragic but is especially heartbreaking when it involves a child.” The investigation is an open matter, so no additional comment or release regarding it is currently provided.

US Invites Authoritarian Regimes to Conference Named a ‘Summit for Democracy’ [a ‘summit for free range prisons disguised as a democracy’]

From [HERE] The US government organized a conference of its allies which it misleadingly called a “Summit for Democracy”, but which actually featured numerous anti-democratic, far-right regimes.

The State Department invited 120 global leaders to participate in the summit on March 29 and 30. They did so virtually, via video calls.

Several of the heads of state who spoke represent governments that even Western officials, corporate media outlets, and mainstream human rights organizations have admitted are authoritarian, including Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, Andrzej Duda of Poland, and Narendra Modi of India.

The Joe Biden administration also invited Pakistan’s unelected coup regime, which came to power following a US-backed regime-change operation against democratically elected Prime Minister Imran Khan in April 2022. (Islamabad, however, decided not to attend, as it faces mass protests and instability at home.)

Italy’s far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni participated in the summit as well. Meloni is a defender of former fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. She started her political career as the leader of the youth wing of a fascist political party founded by war criminals from Mussolini’s regime.

Meloni’s far-right political party Fratelli d’Italia (Brothers of Italy) still uses the same symbols and colors of Mussolini’s fascist movement. An important leader of her party has a bust of the late dictator in his house, and was investigated for doing Nazi salutes.

The Biden administration organized the first so-called “Summit for Democracy” in 2021, in attempt to unify US allies in a bloc to wage a new cold war on China and Russia, which were not invited to either summit.

These intentions were made obvious when the US pressured all invitees to sign a joint statement denouncing Russia over the proxy war in Ukraine. The left-wing governments in Brazil and Mexico refused to support Washington’s denunciation of Moscow.

For its part, China’s Foreign Ministry condemned the summit as an attempt to “draw lines between countries in the world according to US criteria and interfere in their affairs based on US interests”, in a way that “reflects how arrogant, intolerant, selfish and domineering the US has always been, and how it contravenes and tramples on democracy as part of the common values of humanity”.

The US government exposed its cynical political designs by inviting Ukraine and Taiwan to participate in the summit, despite the fact that Taiwan island is not a country, but rather a province of the People’s Republic of China.

When the US government normalized relations with China in 1972, it signed the first of three communiqués, in which it legally recognized that Taiwan is part of China.

Violating its formal diplomatic commitments, the Biden administration publicly illustrated Washington’s support for separatists in China’s Taiwan province by inviting them to both of the so-called “Summits for Democracy”.

Ukraine’s leader Volodymy Zelensky spoke at the conference as well, in spite of his brutal attack on democracy at home. Zelensky’s regime has banned all communist and socialist parties, while imposing some of the most aggressive anti-worker legislation in the world, suspending collective bargaining rights and essentially making it illegal to form a union.

Even the New York Times reluctantly acknowledged that Ukraine has imposed authoritarian control over the media. While Zelensky’s supporters maintain that this is necessary due to the ongoing war, his draconian crackdown began well before Russia invaded. In 2021, Zelensky’s regime banned critical media outletsdeemed to be “pro-Russian”, while arbitrarily persecuting and arresting opposition politicians.

Two NATO members were not invited to the so-called “Summit for Democracy”: Türkiye (formerly known as Turkey) and Hungary. This was clearly a politically motivated sign of disapproval by the Biden administration, because the two countries have tried to balance the West against Russia, maintaining good relations with both sides.

The democratically elected socialist governments in Venezuela and Nicaragua were not invited either. Instead, Washington invited right-wing US-sponsored opposition activists from both Latin American countries, including Lesther Alemán, who played a major role in a violent coup attempt in Nicaragua in 2018.

Also participating in the summit was the notorious CIA cutout the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which Washington has used to meddle in foreign countries all across the planet, organizing regime-change operations and funding “color revolutions”.

As a key foreign-policy strategy, the Biden administration has weaponized rhetoric about “democracy” to advance US geopolitical interests.

In his first State of the Union address in 2022, Biden claimed that Washington’s new cold war on China and Russia was a “battle between democracy and autocracies”.

But European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said otherwise in a speech in October, criticizing the deceptive “democracies vs. authoritarians” framing. [MORE]

The BLM Protester Murdered by TX Cop was White. Greg Abbot's Pardon Sends Message to Non-Racist White People [those who resist white supremacy], 'If You Try to Help Black People You Will Be Killed’

WHITE MAN TRYING TO HELP BLACK PEOPLE WAS LAWFULLY CARRYING A GUN WHEN MURDERED BY RACIST COP. From [HERE] Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced plans over the weekend to pardon Army sergeant Daniel Perry, the man convicted last week in the 2020 murder of a legally-armed 28-year-old at a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Austin.

On July 25, 2020, Garrett Foster, a 28-year-old white man, was murdered in Austin, Texas by 30-year old Daniel Perry, a white police officer. 

The move—which came just one day after Perry’s conviction—is unprecedented, and constitutes a stunning assault on the rule of law, legal experts said. “Profoundly wrong,” as former prosecutor Rick Cofer told the Austin American-Statesman. “Pure politics.”

Foster, who had been legally open carrying an AK-47, had walked up to Perry, who shot and killed him. Perry claimed that he had acted in self-defense, but in April 2023, a jury found Perry guilty of murder. He was acquitted of an aggravated assault charge. He is currently awaiting sentencing, and faces between 5 years to life in prison.

Perry had made numerous posts and direct messages on social media where he had expressed his desire to shoot protesters, which, along with contradictory statements to eyewitness accounts, brought into question his claim of self-defense.

Perry's trial for the murder of Foster took place at the end of March 2023 to the beginning of April 2023, nearly three years after the incident. The prosecution argued that since Foster had been exercising his right to open carry, there was no justification for Perry shooting him. The prosecution revealed that Perry had made multiple posts and direct messages on social media expressing his desire to shoot Black Lives Matter protesters, writing in messages, "I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex," and "I might go to Dallas to shoot looters." A friend of Perry's responded to him warning him of instigating protesters, stating, "We went through the same training ... Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot." Perry had expressed his support for violence against protesters on at least three social media posts, suggesting in one post to "shoot center of mass" because "it is a bigger target", and in another stated, "Send [protesters] to Texas we will show them why we say you don’t mess with Texas." [MORE]

WHAT IS RACISM/WHITE SUPREMACY? [A TEAM EFFORT]

Racism White Supremacy - psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." -Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, MD. [MORE]

Here, by attempting to pardon a white cop who murdered a white man who was participating and defending people protesting the police murders of Black of people, a racist suspect governor is sending a message to all persons, but particularly non-racist white people, that ‘if you try to help Black people you will be murdered.’ As explained, Garrett Foster, an armed white BLM protester, was murdered by Daniel Perry, a white police officer during a BLM protest.

All white people are not racist, but most are. All racists seek to have master-servant relations with non-white people. Here, we will presume that Garrett Foster was not racist and that officer Perry and Governor Abbot are racist. According to Neely Fuller, a racist is 'any person who "appears" to be "White," who is "classified" as "White," and/or who functions as an "acceptable member" of "The White Nation" (Race/Racist Nation), and who willfully and deliberately says or does anything that indicates a willingness to participate in any speech, action, or inaction that helps to establish, maintain, expand, and/or refine the practice of White Supremacy (Racism) in any one or more areas of activity. If a White person is able to be a Racist (White Supremacist), he or she may be one and should be suspect (Racist Suspect).

FUNKTIONARY explains that

racists - “upholders, supporters and perpetrators of the institution of the White Supremacy Dynamic. An often misunderstood term confusing bigotry (personal dislike of a clan of men and women) with that of a system of oppression (structured and perpetuated injustice—racism) by merchants, institutions, industrialists and slavers (Corporate State and their bastard, equally fictitious but deadly offspring, mega corporations). Caucasians can be racists, but racism is systematic (collective institutional) oppression. (See: Bigot, Racism White Supremacy, Corporate State, Corporations & Person)”

A racist suspect is any white person who is capable of practicing racism against non-whites. In general, if a White person is able to be a Racist (White Supremacist), he or she may be one and should be presumed to be Racist. According to Neely Fuller, as long as white supremacy exists, every person classified as "white" should be suspected of being Racist (White Supremacist). [MORE]  Since all whites are able to practice racism in a white supremacy system if they choose to do so, it is correct (and logical) to use the term “racist suspects” to identify whites who do not openly function as white supremacists (racists). [MORE]

Neely Fuller explains that white people who resist white supremacy are not racist/white supremacist - but this is only during the period when he or she is actually speaking and/or acting, effectively against white supremacy." No non-white person can be a white supremacist/racist. [MORE]

Dr. Welsing states, "people who classify themselves as White, who wish to be taken seriously, and who are righteous and responsible, will only talk about ending White Supremacy (Racism) and replacing it with Justice." [MORE] White people who claim to not be racist should be actively opposing and resisting white supremacy. Such people should be identifying racists because it is very difficult for non-white people to always determine who is racist and who is not. [MORE] White people who do nothing to oppose white supremacy are its silent partners benefiting from this worldwide social political economic arrangement of domination. Those who do nothing about it or cooperate with it are also racist/white supremacist. Neely Fuller explains, "any white person who is able to speak and/or act against white supremacy, even under threat of death, and who does not do so, is, during any period when he or she is not doing so, a white supremacist." [MORE]

California Police Union Director Charged with Importing and Distributing Fentanyl in the US

From [HERE] Joanne Marian Segovia, 64, the executive director of a police union in California, is facing federal charges after allegedly importing drugs from overseas and distributing them nationwide.

Segovia has been charged with an attempt to unlawfully import valeryl fentanyl, a new synthetic opioid, and faces up to a maximum sentence of 20 years, according to the complaint.

Authorities say the union exec peddled thousands of synthetic opioids, including valeryl fentanyl, that were disguised as chocolates, wedding favors, and makeup. The criminal complaint against Segovia was filed March 27 by the Office of the United States Attorney.

Segovia is the executive director of the San Jose Police Officers’ Association (SJPOA) and authorities alleged she used her personal and office computers to order the opioids and made shipments using the union’s UPS account.

Segovia has been in her position for nearly 20 years, according to CNN affiliate KGO-TV. [MORE]

“The NYPD continues to make clear that they don’t care what the law says:” Report Says Uncontrollable Cops Ignored 93% of Surveillance Law Rules in the POST Act

From [HERE] Back in July 2020, then New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology (POST) Act into law, which required the New York Police Department to reveal how it uses surveillance technology and to formulate surveillance policies.

The NYPD, however, has rejected 93 percent of the advice from an independent oversight body, the Department of Investigations' (DOI) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for the force about how to comply with the law. According to OIG's Ninth Annual Report [PDF], the cop watchdog made 15 recommendations and the NYPD refused to implement 14 of them.

These include recommendations like identifying the organizations with which NYPD shares surveillance data: "NYPD should identify in each IUP [Impact and Use Policy] each external agency, by name, with which the Department can share surveillance data."

NYPD, according to the report, argues that it has complied with the POST Act, found in a previous OIG report [PDF] to fall short of community expectations because it "did not require the same level of transparency with respect to the use of surveillance technology as other jurisdictions require…"

The OIG agrees its recommendation is not an explicit requirement of the law, but says that following its recommendation will allow the watchdog to audit NYPD's POST Act compliance and that it is required by law to "study, audit and make recommendations relating to the operations, policies, programs and practices" of the city police.

The non-profit Surveillance Oversight Technology Project (STOP) in a statementrepeated its demand that the City Council pass broader surveillance legislation, including an amendment to the city's POST Act to ban controversial technologies like facial recognition.

“The NYPD continues to make clear that they don’t care what the law says,” said Surveillance Technology Oversight Project executive director Albert Fox Cahn. "This report helps support what advocates have said for years: that the NYPD is violating the POST Act."

• NYPD puts down $94k robot canine contract after outcry

• Braking news: Cops slammed for spamming Waze to slow drivers down

• Apple sued in nightmare case involving teen wrongly accused of shoplifting, driver's permit used by impostor, and unreliable facial-rec tech

• Motorbike ride-share app CEO taken to pieces in grisly New York dismemberment

NYPD's use of facial recognition technology has drawn fire from other organizations like Amnesty International. NYPD maintains facial recognition is a useful investigative tool and claims that federal government studies have shown it can be used in a way that avoids misidentification.

Not all of the federal government is so keen on facial recognition: The General Services Administration (GSA) somewhat scandalously declined to implement face scanning in its Login.gov service, citing uneven performance on different types of people despite authentication standards that endorse it.

‘Just trying to help’ by providing a compulsory service that citizens cannot decline in a system anchored in physical coercion [Obey or go to jail or die]

Asked to comment on the DOI OIG report, a spokesperson for the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Public Information (DCPI) told The Register, "The role of the city's Office of Inspector General is important in city government and the NYPD remains committed to working collaboratively with the office as we move forward in improving all of the department's programs, policies and operations and practices.

"The NYPD shares the goal with the office of ensuring public safety and will absorb this report as the department continues working to build stronger relationships with all of those we serve in New York City."

The DCPI spokesperson said that the NYPD has implemented or accepted nearly 75 percent of DOI's recommendations since 2015 and continued to work with DOI to improve police services.

Indeed, the report says the NYPD has rejected around 25 percent of DOI recommendations over the past eight years but it has only fully accepted 58.5 percent. The remainder consists of partially implemented (10.5 percent), accepted in principle (3.5 percent), and under consideration (2 percent).

That seemingly favorable percentage follows from considering all 18 of OIG-NYPD Recommendations To NYPD from 2015-2022. Considered individually, specific sets of recommendations like "An Assessment of NYPD’s Response to the POST ACT," saw a 93.3 percent rejection rate.

"The DOI released a report in 2022 which found that the NYPD is fully compliant with the POST Ac," the DCPI spokesperson said. "As such, the NYPD is one of the most transparent police agencies in the nation, providing detailed information on various surveillance technologies in use by the NYPD."

Cahn from STOP took issue with that statement. "The NYPD continues to systematically hide the billions it spends on unproven and biased surveillance technology," he said in an email to The Register. "It's bad when the Department wastes money that puts New Yorkers in harm's way and shreds the Constitution, but it’s even worse when they lie about it.

"The City Council was clear in what they expected from the NYPD, and the Department simply isn't following the law. Now they just are flat out lying when they say they fully comply with the POST Act. The POST Act is one of the weakest surveillance oversight laws in the country, but the NYPD still refuses to meet even these minimal transparency requirements." ®

Lawsuit Claims NYPD is Collecting Suspects’ DNA in a “Suspect Index” w/o their Consent or Court Approval and Keeping those Samples Even if the Person is Never Charged or Convicted of a Crime

From [HERE] A New York federal judge has ruled the New York Police Department (NYPD) must face a lawsuit claiming it violates the Fourth Amendment by maintaining a DNA database with no warrant.

In an order filed March 23,  U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald said she would not strike down the class action lawsuit leveled against the police force simply because it had deleted samples from the named plaintiffs. 

The NYPD is accused of collecting suspects’ DNA  in a “Suspect Index” without their consent or a court’s approval and keeping those samples even if the person is never charged with or convicted of a crime. Those records are compared with DNA from crime scenes for multiple years, the lawsuit states.

In their March 2022 lawsuit, plaintiffs Shakira Leslie and Shamill Burgos allege the department’s DNA retention practices violate both the Fourth Amendment and a state law establishing New York’s database of such records.

The NYPD filed for the case against it to be dismissed, arguing that the lawsuit was moot as it had already deleted the plaintiffs’ DNA from the database. However the judge did not agree.

“There is no indication that defendants plan to discontinue the Suspect Index, a complex system they have built and maintained for many years,” the judge wrote in her order. 

“The Court also agrees with plaintiffs that mooting this action would allow defendants to frustrate any attempted class litigation, as they have already attempted to do here.” 

The proposed class action is still relevant to many people whose DNA the department keeps and compares to crime scene forensic evidence, she added. 

DNA was taken without notice or permission, lawsuit alleges

Leslie and Burgos were arrested by New York City police in separate incidents in 2019, they allege. Both were brought to an NYPD precinct for questioning after officers discovered a firearm in cars in which they were passengers, they say.

Despite never pressing charges, the NYPD took their DNA secretly, the lawsuit alleges. Leslie’s was allegedly taken from a cup of water and Burgos’ from a cigarette and water.

Meanwhile, the NYPD is facing another class action lawsuit alleging it illegally made the sealed arrest records of 10 New York residents public in a report that was sent to media outlets.

The plaintiffs are represented by Philip Desgranges, J. David Pollock, Paula Garcia-Salazar, Anna Blondell, Allison Durkin, Peter Laumann, Lisa Freeman and Corey Stoughton of the Legal Aid Society.

The NYPD DNA class action lawsuit is Leslie, et al. v. City of New York, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-02305, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. 

‘You Will Not Replace Us:’ White Louisiana Cop Attacked a Black Man after Unlawful Stop by Slamming His Head Into Sidewalk. ACLU Says Cop was Angry b/c Black Man had a White Wife, Settlement Reached

FUNKTIONARY explains that a "Caucasian" - is "One whose worst and most basic fear still remains genetic annihilation in the form of the fear of the impending "Black Planet." Whither goest thou white man? (See: Weiteko Disease, Yurungu, Western Civilization, Recessive Genes, Colored People, Melanin & Mutant). 

As explained by Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, “color always annihilates non-color.” Rarely discussed, it is scientific fact that white people are genetic recessive and are unable to produce color or melanin. Social integration or intermixing sexual relations with non-whites is considered white genocide to racists. Most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

White plus Black equals Colored.

White plus Brown equals Colored.

White plus Yellow equals Colored. [MORE] AND [MORE] and [MORE]

Some racists believe they must harm or murder blacks to survive

From [HERE] A Black man who says  police officers  slammed him to the ground, knocked him unconscious and falsely arrested him after a racially motivated traffic stop has reached a legal settlement with the Marshal’s Office in Jackson, Louisiana, a town of about 4,000 people just north of Baton Rouge.

The alleged attack happened during an August 2020 traffic stop in which Officer Travis Clay Depew was accused of beating Craig White because he objected to White’s relationship with a white woman, according to the lawsuit.

‘What is your old lady up to these days?’

It was about 8 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2020, when White, driving his Honda Accord on Charter Street in Jackson, noticed blue flashing lights in his rearview mirror. He pulled over to the side of the road and watched as an officer got out of his patrol car and approached. It was Depew.

The officer took White’s license and registration, then asked a question which White believes was the reason he was pulled over.

“What is your old lady up to these days?” Depew asked, according to the suit.

“I don’t know,” White said. “She’s at home, I guess.”

White is Black. His wife is white. Depew had a problem with that, White’s lawyers alleged.

Depew ordered White to step out of his vehicle, then tried to search White without cause or reasonable suspicion that he had committed a crime, according to the suit. When he lunged at White and started to “aggressively touch” him, White slapped his hand away.

“Without warning and in the blink of an eye,” Depew tackled White to the ground, slamming his head and shoulder into the pavement, according to the suit. White lost consciousness and woke up in the back of an ambulance, handcuffed and with a bandage on his head.

The injuries White suffered were so severe they prevented him from working as a car mechanic for about six months, according to the suit. He continues to struggle with recurring headaches, problems with his vision, a reduced range of motion in his right arm, as well as anxiety, depression and a loss of sleep.

In his report, Depew said he pulled White over because he saw him texting while driving. He then suspected White had drugs in his pocket and when he tried to search him, White put his hand on his neck and shoved him. Fearing he would be pushed into oncoming traffic, Depew said, he tackled White to the ground and handcuffed him.

“It was at that point I noticed Craig appeared to be unconscious. I then observed some blood coming from Craig’s head and I heard what sounded like snoring,” Depew wrote in his report. “It was also found that during Craig’s resistance my Jackson issued body worn camera was damaged.”

But the ACLU disputes Depew’s claims.

“White made no actions that could reasonably be construed as an act of aggression” toward Depew or another officer who was at the scene, attorneys wrote in White’s lawsuit. But without any warning, Depew tackled him to the ground.

“In doing so, he slammed Plaintiff White’s head and shoulder into the asphalt and caused Plaintiff White’s head to bleed,” White’s attorneys wrote.

Depew arrested White on a host of charges including resisting and battery of an officer.  White accused Depew of manufacturing the charges and failing to turn on his body camera in an attempt to cover up his misconduct, a pattern of behavior that played out in the coming months, according to the suit.

White’s settlement is the sixth with a law enforcement agency announced or finalized this year by the ACLU of Louisiana.  Each involved allegations of excessive force and racial profiling, among other constitutional violations. Together they expose a failure of leadership to purge problem officers from their ranks, something that plagues police departments across the country, said Nora Ahmed, legal director of the ACLU of Louisiana.

“Those officers that end up committing killings are the very officers that are unlawfully stopping people, the very officers that are unlawfully searching people, the very officers that are engaged in unlawful arrest and the very officers that are engaged in excessive force,” Ahmed said. “And yet these officers continue to stay employed.”

The Jackson Marshal’s Office is a perfect example, according to the ACLU lawsuit filed in August 2021 on behalf of White.

The accused officer, Depew, has a troubled history marked by accusations of violence and racism, raising questions as to why the Jackson department hired him in the first place, then continued to employ him after even more allegations poured in.

Depew was previously fired in 2017 by the Pointe Coupee Police Department after accusations of stalking and malfeasance in office, according to the lawsuit and news reports. Details of the arrest are unknown as Depew’s court records were expunged in February 2021, according to the suit and reports.

The Jackson Marshal’s Office, however, had access to the files at the time they hired Depew, and, therefore, are directly responsible for what happened to White, the lawsuit alleged.

While employed by the Jackson Marshal’s Office, in addition to attacking White, Depew was accused of beating another Black man in the face with a flashlight, sexually assaulting a woman during a traffic stop, and strangling a 16-year-old boy while repeatedly calling him the N-word.

Depew was convicted of simple battery in January for the incident involving the teenager and has since left the department. The Jackson Marshal’s Office did not respond to requests for comment. Attorneys for the Marshal’s Office also did not respond to requests for comment.

The ACLU has not disclosed the terms of White’s settlement, which was reached in August 2022 but not finalized until recently. The Marshal’s Office hasn’t responded to a public records request seeking that information.

The lawsuit against the Jackson Marshal’s Office was filed as part of the ACLU of Louisiana’s Justice Lab. The initiative, launched in 2020,  enlists law firms and legal clinics to file litigation against law enforcement agencies throughout the state. Justice Lab partners have filed 50 cases throughout Louisiana focusing on excessive force, racial profiling, unreasonable searches, stops and seizures, and false arrests.

In March, the civil rights group announced a settlement with the Hammond Police Department on behalf of Timothy Watkins, a Black man who was injured during a shoplifting arrest. Watkins called 911 in April 2020 after someone threw a chunk of ceramic building material through his car windshield. Instead of investigating his complaint, the arriving officers, who were all white, arrested Watkins for allegedly stealing two bottles of tequila worth less than $80. That charge was later dropped, according to the lawsuit.

During his arrest, Watkins told officers he suffered from severe sciatica – nerve pain in his lower back, hips and legs – and asked that they handcuff him from the front.

“The officer callously and unjustifiably ignored Mr. Watkins’ pleas, and he was left handcuffed in a twisted, bent-over position for over 30 minutes while he was driven to the police station,” according to the ACLU of Louisiana. “As he had feared, this acutely aggravated his medical condition, causing debilitating long-term pain that has left him unable to perform even basic household chores.”

An additional three settlements were announced in February, the most recent of which was with the Thibodaux Police Department on behalf of Yohann Jackson, a Black man with cerebral palsy. Jackson claimed officers intentionally injured his disabled right arm while they performed an illegal search of his home after they claimed to smell marijuana. The city of Thibodaux did not respond to a public records request for terms of the settlement.

Those officers that end up committing killings are the very officers that are unlawfully stopping people, the very officers that are unlawfully searching people, the very officers that are engaged in unlawful arrest and the very officers that are engaged in excessive force. 

– Nora Ahmed, ACLU of Louisiana

Earlier that month, the New Orleans Police Department finalized a $10,000 settlement with Michael Celestine, a Black man who claimed he was stopped by police without cause, threatened with a gun, shocked with a stun gun, then falsely arrested, all while officers ignored his medical needs.

That came on the heels of a $20,000 settlement with the Shreveport Police Department on behalf ofBrandon Kennedy who said an officer assaulted him after he expressed support for the Black Lives Matter movement.

Each of the involved police departments denied any wrongdoing, according to court documents. Other than Depew, the officers in each case are still employed, according to the departments and the Innocence Project New Orleans’ Louisiana Law Enforcement Accountability Database.

Are We Being Lexi-Conned or just Niggarmaroled? After 9 Months White AG Still Unsure Whether White Cops Murdered Jayland Walker by Shooting the Black Man 60X in the Back as He Fled. Grand Jury Begins

Massacre of Jayland Walker Sounded Like Fireworks. On Video an Army of Lathered-Up, White Akron Cops Shot Unarmed Black Man 60 Times as He Fled on Foot. Cops Claim He Didn't Stop for an Unknown Traffic Violation. Above is one bodycam video.

GUN CONTROL OF THE BLACKS. From [HERE] A grand jury in Ohio will hear evidence this week to decide whether police officers should face criminal charges in the shooting of Jayland Walker, a 25-year-old Black man whose death sparked protests in Akron last summer. He was a Doordash driver.

Eight officers fired dozens of rounds at Walker following a car and foot chase. Autopsy records show that eight officers fired more than 90 rounds at Walker, with more than 60 striking his body. Seven of the cops were white. Police said it began when they tried to pull him over for minor equipment violations and he failed to stop, cops then claim he fired a shot from his car 40 seconds into the pursuit.

Police body camera video showed Walker eventually bailed from his slowly moving car while wearing a ski mask and ran into a parking lot, where pursuing officers opened fire. A county medical examiner said Walker was shot at least 40 times. A handgun, loaded magazine and wedding ring were found on the driver’s seat of the car.

Attorney Bobby DiCello said there is no evidence showing that the firearm was discharged at an officer.

Whether a gun was fired is simply police misdirection and distraction from the only material issue which is whether the black man posed a threat as he fled on foot from police. He had no object in his hand and the cops never saw a gun, because it was on the car seat.

Walker's family called it a brutal and senseless shooting of a man who was unarmed at the time and whose fiancee recently died. Police union officials said the officers thought there was an immediate threat of serious harm and that their actions were in line with their training and protocols.

Authorities claim Walker made a threatening gesture before he was shot, but the body camera footage from June 27 speaks for itself. Police chased Walker for about 10 seconds before officers fired from multiple directions in a burst of shots that lasted 6 or 7 seconds.

After Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost took over the investigation last summer at the request of Akron police, prosecutors in his office will present the case to the grand jury this week. Yost is a republican and a racist suspect. However, Yost recently charged a Columbus cop for the murder of Andre Hill.

City leaders have been meeting with community leaders, church groups, activists and business owners ahead of the grand jury meeting while also preparing for potential protests.

The city is considering setting up a designated protest zone downtown outside the city hall building, where workers already have put plywood over the first-floor windows. There's also temporary fencing around the county courthouse.

“We're not anticipating violence, but we’re preparing for anything,” said Stephanie Marsh, a city spokesperson.

Only Barbarians Would Handcuff a Corpse. Akron Cops Handcuffed Jayland Walker After Shooting Him 60 Times. According to the Autopsy report, His Body Arrived Cuffed at Coroner's Office

FUNKTIONARY explains the lex-icon sustains your belief in the legitimacy of the legal system as a whole. Within the lex-icon elite whites go through great effort to produce a show of “fairness.” This production includes the court’s emphasis on “procedural due process,” “professionalism” and leaves out no detail as it includes plastic flags, oaths, black robes, elevated judge platform, formalities, high ceilings, latin phrases etc. Also, occasional dismissals and acquittals of Black defendants or convictions of white cops are a necessary part of the illusion. FUNKTIONARY further explains:

lexiconned – mislead (conned) by (inside-the-circle) lexical definitions and their deft definers. 2) word-conditioning. (See: Belief, Oughtism, Symbolaeography, Group-Entity, White Lies, Truth-Based Reality, Language & Oughtomatism)

legal system – the underworld inverted and sanctioned for public consumption, control and compliance over the masses. The same system down through the ages runs the legal system on the outside world as a front for the people to believe in while running the underworld as well. (See: Law, Lawyer, Lawyers, Statutes, Proclamations, Tyranny & Nobility)

The Niggarmarole – bullshit laced with hype sprinkled with jive-ass incompetence resulting in a tragicomedy of errors—selfrepeating and never receding—played out and played over and over until you’ve realized that it’s over—but something you’ll never truly get over. The Niggamarole is an experience that you allow others to put you through when you think you’ve been left with nothing else to do. The only performance happening in a niggamarole is purely theatrical—all for show—none for closing deals and making dough. (See: Bullshit, Piece-Activist, Reaves Technique & Soonshine)

Only Cops Should Have Guns? White Mississippi Deputies Shoved Their Guns Into the Mouths of 2 Handcuffed Black Men and Tortured Them During Unlawful Search. One Shot in the Face. Feds Investigate

GUN CONTROL OVER THE BLACKS From [HERE] Several deputies from a Mississippi sheriff’s department being investigated by the Justice Department for possible civil rights violations have been involved in at least four violent encounters with Black men since 2019 that left two dead and another with lasting injuries, an Associated Press investigation found.

Two of the men allege that Rankin County sheriff's deputies shoved guns into their mouths during separate encounters. In one case, the deputy pulled the trigger, leaving the man with wounds that required parts of his tongue to be sewn back together. In one of the two fatal confrontations, the man's mother said a deputy kneeled on her son's neck while he told them he couldn't breathe.

Police and court records obtained by the AP show that several deputies who were accepted to the sheriff's office's Special Response Team — a tactical unit whose members receive advanced training — were involved in each of the four encounters. In three of them, the heavily redacted documents don't indicate if they were serving in their normal capacity as deputies or as members of the unit.

Rankin County, which has about 120 sheriff's deputies serving its roughly 160,000 people, is predominantly white and just east of the state capital, Jackson, home to one of the highest percentages of Black residents of any major U.S. city. In the county seat of Brandon, a towering granite-and-marble monument topped by a statue of a Confederate soldier stands across the street from the sheriff's office.

In a notice of an upcoming lawsuit, attorneys for Jenkins and his friend Eddie Terrell Parker said on the night of Jan. 24 the deputies suddenly came into the home and proceeded to handcuff and beat them. They said the deputies stunned them with Tasers repeatedly over roughly 90 minutes and, at one point, forced them to lie on their backs as the deputies poured milk over their faces. The men restated the allegations in separate interviews with the AP.

When a Taser is used, it’s automatically logged into the device’s memory. The AP obtained the automated Taser records from the evening of Jan. 24. They show that deputies first fired one of the stun guns at 10:04 p.m. and fired one at least three more times over the next 65 minutes. However, those unredacted records might not paint a complete picture, as redacted records show that Tasers were turned on, turned off or used dozens more times during that period.

The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation was brought in to investigate the encounter. Its summary says a deputy shot Jenkins at approximately 11:45 p.m., or about 90 minutes after a Taser was first used, which matches the timeframe given by Parker and Jenkins. The deputy’s name was not disclosed by the bureau.

Police say the raid was prompted by a report of drug activity at the home. Jenkins was charged with possessing between 2 and 10 grams of methamphetamine and aggravated assault on a police officer. Parker was charged with two misdemeanors — possession of paraphernalia and disorderly conduct. Jenkins and Parker say the raid came to a head when the deputy shot Jenkins through the mouth. He still has difficulty speaking and eating.

Another Black man, Carvis Johnson, alleged in a federal lawsuit filed in 2020 that a Rankin County deputy placed a gun into his mouth during a 2019 drug bust. Johnson was not shot.

The sheriff's department refused repeated interview requests and denied access to any of the deputies who were involved in the violent confrontations. The department has not said whether deputies presented a search warrant, and it's unclear if any have been disciplined or are still members of the special unit.

The news outlet Insider has been investigating the sheriff’s department and persuaded a county judge to order the sheriff to turn over documents related to the deaths of four men in 2021. Chancery Judge Troy Farrell Odom expressed bewilderment that the department had refused to make the documents public.

“(The) day that our law enforcement officers start shielding this information from the public, all the while repeating, ‘Trust us. We’re from the government,’ is the day that should startle all Americans,” Odom wrote.

The AP requested body camera or dashcam footage from the night of the Jenkins raid. Jason Dare, an attorney for the sheriff’s department, said there was no record of either.

Mississippi doesn’t require police officers to wear body cameras. Incident reports and court records tie deputies from the raid to three other violent encounters with Black men.

Dedmon was also among deputies involved in a 2019 arrest of Johnson, according to the lawsuit Johnson filed alleging that one of the deputies put a gun in his mouth as they searched him for drugs. Johnson is currently imprisoned for selling methamphetamine.

Other documents obtained by the AP detail another violent confrontation between Elward and Damien Cameron, a 29-year-old man with a history of mental illness. He died in July 2021 after being arrested by Elward and Deputy Luke Stickman, who also opened fire on Woods during the 2019 standoff. A grand jury declined to bring charges in the case last October.

In an incident report, Elward wrote that while responding to a vandalism call, he repeatedly shocked Cameron with a Taser, punched and grappled with Cameron at the home of his mother, Monica Lee. He said after getting Cameron to his squad car, he again stunned him to get him to pull his legs into the vehicle.

After going back inside to retrieve his Taser, deputies returned to find Cameron unresponsive. Elward wrote that he pulled Cameron from the car and performed CPR, but Cameron was later declared dead at a hospital.

Lee, who witnessed the confrontation, told the AP that after subduing her son, Elward kneeled on his back for several minutes. She said when Stickman arrived, he kneeled on her son’s neck while handcuffing him, and that her son complained he couldn't breathe.

Lee said she later went outside, hoping to talk to her son before the deputies drove him away.

NY Red Flag Gun Law Ruled Unconstitutional

From [HERE] Judge Rules on Constitutionality of New York's Red Flag Law—

It seems since the 2022 United States Supreme Court ruing against New York in NYSR&PA v. Bruen, the courts continue beating down New York's unconstitutional gun laws.

Yesterday New York Supreme Court Judge Craig Stephen Brown ruled that the state's Red Flag violates the individual's civil rights and is therefore unconstitutional. In his statement, Judge Brown writes:

“Without the requirement of any input from a medical or mental health expert, the Court is required to make a determination of whether “the respondent is likely to engage in behavior that would result in serious harm to himself, herself, or others in…section 9.39 of the mental hygiene law.” Under Mental Hygiene Law, a person’s liberty rights cannot be curtailed unless a physician opines that a person is suffering from a condition “likely to result in serious harm.” Further, in order to extend any such curtailment of liberty beyond 48 hours, a second doctor’s opinion must be obtained and such opinion must be consistent with the first doctor’s opinion.”

“Absent from New York’s Red Flag Law is any provision whatsoever requiring even a single medical or mental health expert opinion providing a basis for the order to be issued. New York’s Red Flag Law, as currently written, lacks sufficient statutory guardrails to protect a citizen’s Second Amendment Constitutional right to bear arms.”

You can read the entire ruling here. In New York, the State Appellate Court is higher than the State Supreme Court, so you can bet the anti-gunners are working on an appeal of this ruling.

Old Enough to Die for the Military but Not to Defend Yourself or Family from Criminals? Colorado's FreeDumb Fighting Puppeticians Raise Minimum age to Purchase a Gun and Expand Red Flag Laws

From [HERE] Back in 1999, Connecticut passed the first “red flag” law in the country. A quarter of a century later, red flag laws are on the books in 20 states and the District of Columbia. Advocates of the law say it's a valuable tool law enforcement can use to take guns away from people before they harm themselves or someone else. Critics say the laws violate the civil rights of Americans by depriving them of due process and their right to self-defense protected by the Second Amendment.

This week, the red flag laws of two states made the news in different ways.

Changes to Colorado Red Flag Law—

Colorado made the news again for passing several of the gun control bills proposed by its progressive Democratic legislature. Among the bills that made the cut was SB23-170, which amended elements of the state's existing Red Flag law, what Colorado calls an “Extreme Risk Protection Order Petition”.

Under the current law,

“a family or household member and a law enforcement officer or agency can petition for an extreme risk protection order. The bill expands the list of who can petition for an extreme risk protection order to include licensed medical care providers, licensed mental health-care providers, licensed educators, and district attorneys.“

What may be even worse is that SB23-170,

“requires the office of gun violence prevention to expend funds annually on a public education campaign regarding the availability of, and the process for requesting, an extreme risk protection order.”

If you're a gun owner in Colorado, the government is going to spend your money to convince fellow Coloradans that violating American's civil rights is totally cool.

Colorado also passed SB23-169 and SB23-168. The first bill raised the minimum age to purchase any firearm from 18 to 21 years old. Colorado thinks you're old enough to die for your country, but not old enough to defend your family against the violent criminals its activist DAs have refused to hold accountable for their crimes. The second bill violates the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), and allows victims to sue gun manufacturers. This is just a scheme of leftists to destroy firearm manufacturers, and try to hold them accountable for criminals who use their product illegally in a crime.

Gun owners continue to lose ground and it looks like that will not change anytime soon.