Donovan Lewis' Family Files Suit Against Columbus After Police Murder. White Cop Opened Door and Immediately Shot Black Man as he Sat in Bed, Unarmed. White Liberal Prosecutor Stalls Filling Charges

From [HERE] Nearly six months after a Black man was fatally shot by a white officer while lying in bed, his family sued the officer and four others in the Columbus Police Department, calling his killing senseless and completely preventable.

The family of Donovan Lewis is seeking accountability, according to the complaint announced Thursday. Their lawyers said neither Columbus police nor Ohio’s capital city has acknowledged responsibility, and reforms are needed to prevent similar deaths.

The lawsuit also accuses longtime police officer Ricky Anderson of battery, breach of duty, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, failure to render aid and violating Lewis’ constitutional rights. Anderson and the other four officers are white.

Lewis, 20, died at a hospital following the shooting in the early morning hours of August 30, 2022. Police bodycam footage shows he was shot once in the abdomen, less than a second after an officer opened his bedroom door. Lewis appeared to be holding a vape pen, but no weapon.

Columbus police said officers had come to arrest Lewis on multiple warrants, including domestic violence, assault and felony improper handling of a firearm. No weapon was found in his home.

“This police officer fired his weapon less than a second after the door opened. That is about as reckless as a police officer can get,” Rex Elliott, the family’s attorney, said.

More than two months have passed since prosecutors were selected in December to review the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation’s independent investigation into Anderson’s shooting of Lewis and bring it before a grand jury. Lewis’ mother, Rebecca Duran, said she’s frustrated at how long that process is taking.

A separate lawsuit against the city of Columbus could be filed in the near future in federal court, according to Elliott.

“We now need the city to step up,” he said.

Messages left with the city and the police union seeking comment were not immediately returned.

The complaint also accuses all five officers of violating Andre’s Law, which was passed in 2021 by the Columbus City Council. It was named for Andre Hill, a Black man who was visiting a friend when he was fatally shot by an officer investigating a noise complaint in 2020. That officer, Adam Coy, pleaded not guilty to murder charges.

The law requires Columbus police officers to render immediate medical attention to an injured suspect. Officers failed to do that for Hill, and, according to the complaint, for Lewis as well.

After Lewis was killed last year, the city did stop serving overnight warrants for certain misdemeanor and non-violent felony suspects.

(White Liberal) Indianapolis Authorities Reach Settlement w/Dreasjon Reed's Family after Police Murdered Him. Liar Cops Claim He Shot @ Them But Enhanced Video Shows Him Holding 2 Phones and a T-Shirt

From [HERE] Indianapolis has agreed to pay $390,000 to settle a lawsuit by the mother of Dreasjon Reed almost three years after he was fatally shot by police following a vehicle pursuit.

Demetree Wynn sued the city on behalf of her son’s estate in June 2020, about a month after Reed's death. She brought multiple claims against the city and police, arguing that Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Officer De’Joure Mercer used excessive force when he shot Reed after a vehicle chase gave way to a foot pursuit.

Indianapolis police and the city deny any liability. The settlement does not stand as an admission of wrongdoing, the agreement states.

A 2020 grand jury investigation guided by white liberal prosecutors into Mercer found there wasn't enough probable cause to charge him with a crime. Following their decision, Indiana State Police presented ballistic and audio evidence to the public that they say shows Mercer and Reed exchanged gunfire right before Reed was killed.

In direct contrast surveillance video obtained by WRTV shows the moments leading up to the death of Dreasjon Reed. The video, which is about 24 seconds in length, shows Reed stopping his vehicle behind ACE Lock & Key near 62nd Street and Michigan Road after leading police on a long chase — which he was also streaming on Facebook Live.

Reed can be seen getting out of his vehicle and running with what appears to be a white t-shirt in his left hand and two cell phones in his right hand, while metro police officer Dejoure Mercer comes running after him.

WRTV stated “WRTV reviewed the surveillance video several times, using our technology to slow down, enhance, and view the footage frame-by-frame. We are reporting what we can see in Dreasjon Reed’s hands after we enhanced the video. We can see a t-shirt in his left hand, and two cell phones in his right hand. We know these are cell phones because when synced with his Facebook Live stream, you see the sky, the ground, and the individual as he runs from police.)”

“How in the world could you shoot if you had a t-shirt in one hand and a phone in the other? There is no way. You can’t … You can’t shoot someone,” Wynn said. [MORE]

Judge kept some details from the pending trial

The settlement comes less than a month before the lawsuit was set to go to trial. Days before a settlement notice was submitted to the court at the end of January, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana approved requests from both sides to shield certain pieces of evidence from landing before a jury.

The city won its request to keep any reference to the 2020 grand jury investigation into Mercer out of the trial. It also won its request to bar statements made by IMPD Officer Steven Scott, who was suspended from IMPD for several days after a recorded comment he made about Reed's body at the scene of the shooting: “I think it’s going to be closed casket, homie.”

In October 2020 the court threw out Wynn's emotional distress claim against Scott, leaving instead the claims against Mercer and the city.

Another piece of evidence that the jury would have never heard about: after the shooting IMPD Deputy Chief Kendale Adams – one of the officers who initiated the vehicle pursuit of Reed – said he delivered a $100 check to Reed’s mom to help cover her son’s burial expenses.

The check was delivered on behalf of the local non-profit 100 Black Men of Indianapolis, a youth development organization. But the city argued there’s no evidence the check was ever cashed.

Lawsuit Filed after a White Kenosha Cop Held his Knee on a 12-year-old Black Girl’s Neck for More than 20 Seconds at Public School. White DA Declined to File Charges in City Run by White Liberals

YEAH. GET OUT AND VOTE FOR THIS WHITE LIBERAL HYPOCRISY?

From [HERE] A white Wisconsin police officer, working as a school security guard while off duty, is facing a lawsuit from the family of a 12-year-old Black girl after he held his knee on her neck for more than 20 seconds while breaking up a fight at school.

The lawsuit accuses the officer, whose actions were caught on tape, of using an illegal chokehold.

Also named in the action against the security guard are the city of Kenosha and the Kenosha unified school district that the girl’s father, Jerrel Perez, hold responsible for the “unreasonable and excessive force” used against his daughter during the incident last year.

The officer, who was working off-duty security at the school, was named as Shawn Guetschow. He has since resigned from the school district, but remains a police officer. His lawyer, Sam Hall, will “vigorously defend” him and the district, according to a statement reported by the Washington Post.

The incident, involving the school students, which was captured on security camera video, took place in the cafeteria of Lincoln middle school on 4 March last year. Another girl is seen approaching Perez’s daughter, who pushes her off, and a fight ensues.

Guetschow is seen pulling the other girl away, scuffling with the daughter and falling to the ground with her, whereupon he appeared to kneel on her neck for about 20 seconds as he handcuffed her, before pulling her up and walking her out.

In the 14-page lawsuit seeking unspecified damages, which was filed on Monday, Perez alleges his daughter was unable to breathe during the incident, and suffered physical and mental trauma that required treatment for almost a year.

In a statement, Perez’s lawyer, Drew DeVinney, said: “Although she is not healed from her trauma, she is ready to stand up for herself.” He said the girl had relocated with her father to Illinois as a result of the incident.

The filing alleges Guetschow had a reputation for having a short temper during previous employment with another police department, and was improperly trained by Kenosha police and the school district.

His performance with the nearby Lake Geneva police department was graded “unacceptable”, the lawsuit claims, and he was assessed as “emotional, panicked or loses their temper”.

It further states Guetschow did not issue any commands to Perez’s daughter during the restraint, which caused a brain injury, cervical strain and recurrent headaches.

Guetschow, it claims, “acted with malice or in reckless disregard” of the girl’s rights.

The case has drawn parallels with the murder of George Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man who died after a white Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for nine minutes and 29 seconds in May 2020.

In a Facebook post following the middle school incident last year, Perez posted side-by-side images of the Minnesota officer Derek Chauvin, who was fired and later convicted of murder, kneeling on Floyd’s neck, and Guetschow doing the same to his daughter, and the caption: “What’s the difference?”

By law, police officers in Wisconsin are prohibited from using chokeholds, defined as “the intentional and prolonged application of force to the throat, windpipe, or carotid arteries that prevents or hinders breathing”, except in life-threatening situations or self-defense.

Hall, in a statement to the Associated Press, said state prosecutors decided not to bring charges against Guetschow, and the US attorney’s office in Milwaukee determined he didn’t commit any civil rights violations.

The Kenosha city attorney Matthew Knight [racist suspect in photo above] declined comment and said the city had not seen the lawsuit yet.

The Police Dog is a Weapon Used by Terrorcrats and Race Soldiers to Niggerize and Compel Obedience to Authority

From [HERE] Some of the most horrifically indelible images of the Civil Rights struggle show police dogs attacking young demonstrators in Birmingham, Alabama, in 1963. Birmingham became emblematic of animalistic police brutality against non-violent protestors—but it wasn’t unique at the time. And the racial weaponization of dogs isn’t just something of that time, as examples from Abu Ghriab (2004) to Ferguson (2014) show.

Scholar Tyler Wall doesn’t think it’s coincidental that K-9 units were introduced in police departments across the country during the Civil Rights era of the 1950s and 1960s, however. Quoting advocates of the day, Wall writes that dogs were deployed as tools to “civilize the savagery of urban (dis)order by pacifying urban space.” In practice, this meant dogs were deployed in the “criminalization of the so-called Negro problem,” to “police the material and symbolic boundaries of the color line,” and to enforce the dehumanization of people of color.

“The mystical power of the police dog […] was its apparent ability to recognize the boundaries dividing those bodies in need of protection—white propertied bodies—from those darker bodies prowling on the boundaries of white bourgeois order.” [MORE]

Black Woman is Suing Detroit Police After a Cop Shot Her Dog and Dumped It Into a Trash Can without Telling Her

From [HERE] and [HERE] A Detroit woman is suing the city’s police department after one of its officers shot her dog and dumped it into a trash can without telling her.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court on Feb. 8, alleges a Detroit cop violated the Fourth Amendment rights of Tiffany Lindsay in September 2021 when he jumped over her backyard fence without a warrant or probable cause in search of a carjacking suspect.

Lindsay’s dog, Jack, lunged at the officer, Steven Brandon, biting his forearm and tearing his pants, according to a police report. Brandon responded by striking the dog several times before drawing a gun and killing the animal.

“Brandon apparently attempted to hide the seizure of Jack from Plaintiff by stuffing Jack’s body into Plaintiff’s neighbor’s trash bin,” the lawsuit states.

If Brandon bothered to knock on Lindsay’s door and ask for permission to search her yard, the incident would never have happened, the lawsuit states.

Brandon’s acts “were intentional, grossly negligent and amounted to reckless or callous indifference to Plaintiff’s constitutional rights,” according to the lawsuit, filed by attorney Christopher S. Olson.

Olson further alleges that DPD kills more dogs than any police department in the country because it doesn’t take the shootings seriously.

When officers kill a dog, they’re only required to file a “Destruction of Animal” report that is signed by the police chief or his delegate.

“The Destruction of Animal report approval process is a sham rubber stamp,” Olson wrote in the lawsuit.

DPD “has a custom of tolerance or acquiescence in shooting dogs in violation of the Fourth Amendment,” the lawsuit alleges.

Lindsay is just the latest Detroit resident to file a lawsuit against the police department for killing a dog, according to a 2016 Reason investigation that found one officer had shot more than 80 dogs during his career.

Since 2016, the cash-strapped city doled out more than $460,000 to settle five dog-killing lawsuits. In one of the latest cases, the city agreed to pay $75,000 to settle a lawsuit in 2020 after body camera footage showed officers lied about the circumstances that led to an officer shooting two dogs during a drug raid.

DPD determined the shooting was unjustified.

Detroit police declined to comment on the latest case, citing pending litigation, but said the officers involved are under investigation.

Unlike False Flags, 3 Yrs Later and No Justice for Manuel Ellis' Murder. Video Shows Cops Repeatedly Punch, Choke, Taze and Kneel on Black Man. Hogtied Him w/Spit Hood for 6 Min. Trial Continued Again

From [HERE] Once again, the trial for the three Tacoma police officers charged in the killing of Manny Ellis has been delayed.

On March 3, 2020, lifelong Tacoma resident Manny Ellis died while being arrested by Christopher Burbank, Matthew Collins and Timothy Rankine, three on-duty Tacoma police officers.

Ellis was a 33-year-old African American man who died on March 3, 2020, during an arrest by police officers in Tacoma, Washington, a city run by white liberals.

The Pierce County Sheriff's Department initially claimed that Ellis had attacked a police car and then attacked officers, leading to the arrest. State prosecutors quoted civilian witnesses as saying that Ellis did not attack the police car or officers; they also said it was the officers who initiated the use of physical force on Ellis after a conversation.[4][5] 

Video of the incident showed officers repeatedly punching Ellis, choking him, using a Taser, and kneeling on him.[6][7] State prosecutors stated that "Ellis was not fighting back", citing witness statements and video evidence.[8] A police radio recording showed that Ellis said he "can’t breathe".[9] Ellis told officers "can't breathe, sir" multiple times, according to prosecutors.[10] Ellis was hogtied, face-down into the street asphalt, with an officer on him, for at least six minutes, and a spit hood was placed on his head in this position, stated prosecutors.[10] Ellis died at the scene while receiving medical aid from paramedics.[3]

Ellis’ final statements are a grim echo of George Floyd’s last words: a police radio recorded Ellis repeatedly pleading “can’t breathe, sir.”

Rankine is charged with first-degree manslaughter. Manslaughter typically indicates a reckless disregard for life but does not involve malice or an intent to kill. Collins and Burbank are charged with second-degree murder. 

The trial was originally scheduled for Jan. 30, 2023 but has now been delayed yet again until September 2023, pending the outcome of a Washington Supreme court case set to determine whether internal affairs statements from an officer who was not charged should be released to prosecutors.

There have been no functional repercussions for Burbank, Collins or Rankine. During the internal investigation, they were placed on administrative leave and continued to receive their salary from the city of Tacoma. Although they were detained in jail pending the trial, they were bailed out that very same day by a local Tacoma businessman. For three years, they have gone about their lives in our community awaiting trial. They have been able to go grocery shopping, relax at home with loved ones and celebrate the holidays. 

Meanwhile, Ellis’ family and friends are still living a nightmare. Three years later, Manny is still dead, legal fees are piling up and the court date is continually pushed back. For victims of police brutality and their families, justice is shallow, if it ever comes at all.

Unfortunately, this is not uncommon in the United States. Trials involving unjust killings and police misconduct against citizens can drag on for years. Those who are convicted of a crime are often handed sentences involving house arrest, probation, or a few paltry years in prison. 

In a finance-based legal system such as the one we have in America, you have to be able to pay to retain a lawyer to even file charges. If you are poor, you cannot afford justice. The US census reports that Black people experience poverty at a significantly higher rate than white people (21% versus 9%). In a country with heavily entrenched systemic racism, people of color are far more likely to experience police violence. Mapping Police Violence, a nonprofit that keeps track of police shootings, reports that although Black people are 13% of the US population, they make up a disproportionate 27% of those who are killed by police. Combining these two factors, people of color are far more likely to be killed by police as well as be unable to access legal justice. 

An on-duty police officer can be reasonably assured that they will not be found culpable for any acts of racial violence committed against the public. The police in the United States possess functional legal immunity, performing in the field as judge, jury, and executioner. Operating like any other gang in their territory, police possess a monopoly on the use of force, and any resistance against that force is a potential justification for your execution in the street. That should scare you. It scares me.

So-Called "Racist Buffalo Supermarket Shooter" Sentenced to Life After Taking Guilty Plea. Like Most Flags; All Emotion, Few Facts, Limited Video and No Actual Contested Trial on the Merits Occurred

Don’t human beings bleed when they get shot by a high powered rifle at close range? See video below. IT CONTAINS NO BLOOD, LOOKS FAKE AS FUCK.

From [HERE] The man who killed 10 people in a racist massacre at a supermarket in Buffalo, N.Y., last year was sentenced to life in prison without parole Wednesday.

The 19-year-old white gunman, Payton Gendron, pleaded guilty to 15 counts brought by Buffalo prosecutors stemming from the May 14 attack at Tops Friendly Markets in a predominantly Black neighborhood. Gendron’s charges included first-degree murder and domestic terrorism, with the latter carrying a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole. 

Erie County Court Judge Susan Eagan sentenced him Wednesday to life in prison without parole for the domestic terrorism charge and for each of the 10 counts of first-degree murder, which will run concurrently. 

“There is no place for you or your ignorant, hateful and evil ideologies in a civilized society. There can be no mercy for you, no understanding, no second chances,” Judge Eagan said before the sentencing. “The damage you have caused is too great, and the people you have hurt are too valuable to this community. You will never see the light of day as a free man ever again.”

The sentencing came at the end of an emotional and tense hearing in which several people, including a survivor and relatives of those who died, gave emotional statements about the massacre’s impact. At one point, a person rushed toward the gunman. Gendron later apologized for his actions.

Gendron killed 10 people and wounded three others in the racist attack last year. All but two of the 13 victims were Black and included an 86-year-old grandmother, a retired Buffalo police lieutenant and a church deacon. The massacre was among the deadliest mass shootings in 2022 and rattled a community already facing decades of disinvestment. [MORE]

In Anticipation of Congressional Inquiry Fauci Now Admits COVID Shots are Ineffective and He Always Knew It. Unelected Liar Falsely Induced Public Consent to Take Dangerous Shots Now Causing Deaths

From [HERE] Dr. Anthony Fauci is now acknowledging COVID-19 vaccines, like influenza vaccines, hardly work and wouldn’t be approved based on the standards used for other vaccines. 

Fauci co-authored a paper published on Jan. 11 in Cell, claiming vaccines are ineffective at controlling respiratory RNA viruses like influenza, RSV and SARS-CoV-2—and experimental and licensed COVID-19 vaccines do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity.

“After more than 60 years of experience with influenza vaccines, very little improvement in vaccine prevention of infection has been noted,” the authors wrote. “As pointed out decades ago, and still true today, the rates of effectiveness of our best-approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases.”

The authors then compare ineffective influenza vaccines to COVID-19 vaccines, stating it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines:

“Even decades-long efforts to develop better, so-called ‘universal’ influenza vaccines—vaccines that would create more broadly protective immunity, preferably lasting over longer time periods have not yet resulted in next-generation, broadly protective vaccines, although a large number of experimental vaccines are in preclinical or early clinical development.” 

Dr. Fauci stepped down from his position as chief medical advisor to President Biden and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases days before the study was published. 

Throughout the pandemic, Fauci falsely claimed COVID-19 vaccines prevented transmission of the virus, that vaccinated people could feel safe they weren’t going to get infected, that vaccines provided long-lasting immunity, and said if a vaccinated person were to get sick, they would likely be asymptomatic. Fauci also covered up the high probability the SARS-COV-2 virus that caused COVID escaped from a lab in Wuhan that received U.S. funding. 

Now, after experimental COVID vaccines were forced on millions of Americans, were added to the pediatric immunization schedule, caused millions of reported adverse events, including deaths, and pharmaceutical companies made their billions, Fauci says vaccines are ineffective. 

In addition, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisors on Jan. 26 recommended all COVID vaccine doses be replaced with experimental bivalent booster shots to mimic the influenza vaccine schedule Fauci acknowledges in this paper does not work. 

“What this is is a justification for more funding for more development of new vaccine technology,” Dr. Robert Malone said in an interview on Steve Bannon’s War Room. The irony is what they’re pushing is mucosal vaccines […]. What they’re basically saying here is they’re pitching Congress and the world for another traunch of money to develop a next-generation technology for mucosal vaccinations[…].”

“Fauci is acknowledging the failures of the existing technologies and the intrinsic logic failures associated with that,” Malone added. 

Malone said this is “absolutely a defensive move,” referencing Fauci’s upcoming testimony he will have to provide to Congress. Never underestimate Tony Fauci, his political acumen and his ability to evade accountability, Malone said. “He is an extremely adroit politician bureaucrat, and he is absolutely aware. “

The paper’s final paragraph is shocking: 

“Past unsuccessful attempts to elicit solid protection against mucosal respiratory viruses and to control the deadly outbreaks and pandemics they cause have been a scientific and public health failure that must be urgently addressed. 

“We are excited and invigorated that many investigators and collaborative groups are rethinking, from the ground up, all of our past assumptions and approaches to preventing important respiratory viral diseases and working to find bold new paths forward.”

According to journalist Alex Berenson, Fauci is gearing up to push a new type of vaccine on the world after the U.S. and other countries injected their citizens with more than 3 billion doses of mRNA. 

“[…] With these words, Fauci is admitting that effort has failed completely,” Berenson said. “He’s not excluding the mRNAs from ‘past unsuccessful attempts’ that ‘have been a public health failure.’ He’s not saying they can form the basis for ‘bold new paths.’ He’s washing his hands of them—and whatever the long-term consequences of their failed effort to rewire the immune system may be.”

As Berenson points out, Fauci is 82 years-old. So, it will be “up to the rest of us to deal with what he’s done.”

To Conceal Reality the Media Told So Many Lies About COVID and Genocidal COVID Shots. The False Narratives are Enemy Outposts in the Believer's Mind, Giving Rise to More Coercive Political Systems

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Lockdowns, social distancing, school and business closures, universal mask wearing, use of face shields and plastic barriers, travel restrictions, the use of PCR tests to diagnose infection, the choice of treatments and the safety and effectiveness of the COVID jabs — all of these countermeasures were based on a combination of lies, fraud and/or willful ignorance

  • Universal lockdowns have never before been used as a pandemic prevention measure, and for good reason. It doesn’t work. To prevent spread of infection, you isolate those who are actually sick. Healthy people cannot spread infection, so there’s no reason to isolate them

  • An August 2020 analysis of COVID-19 surveillance data from the top 50 countries in terms of reported cases also concluded that border closures, lockdowns and wide-spread testing had no impact on COVID-19 mortality per million people. Another paper published in 2021 found lockdowns were actually associated with increases in excess mortality

  • The absence of evidence to support mask wearing for infection control was confirmed from the very beginning by the same agencies and organizations that ended up recommending and/or mandating universal mask wearing

  • To avoid making the same mistakes in future pandemics, medical crises must not be managed by means of emergency powers. Emergency powers should be used only in case of war

From [MERCOLA] At this point, the lies we've been told about COVID countermeasures are so numerous, it would be easier to point to what was right and correct than list what was wrong, because the "correct" list would basically be blank.

Lockdowns, social distancing, school and business closures, universal mask wearing, use of face shields and plastic barriers, travel restrictions, the use of PCR tests to diagnose infection, the choice of treatments and the safety and effectiveness of the COVID jabs — all of these countermeasures were based on a combination of lies, fraud and/or willful ignorance. As tweeted by journalist Abir Ballan, co-founder of the Think Twice campaign.

[Abir Ballan] explains the Government and The Dependent Media have told so many lies about COVID and COVID Injections. She wrote '“Turning a blind eye to the lies, won't make them go away. They happened. You need to find the courage to face them.”

FUNKTIONARY explains authorities own the minds of those who believe in granfalloons such as “The COVID Lies." These false narratives are enemy outposts in the believer's mind that give rise to more coercive political systems. [MORE]

They lied about the lockdowns. They don't stop the virus. They destroy society.

  • They lied about masks. They are not effective. They are useless. An instrument of fear. An instrument of divide and conquer. An instrument to break communication.

  • They lied about social distancing. The virus spreads through aerosols in the air. It doesn't matter where you stand. Stickers on the floor don't protect you. They just break social cohesion.

  • They lied about PCR tests. They can't diagnose infectiousness. They give false positive results at high cycle thresholds. They were used to make your life difficult so you can beg for mercy and accept any way out.

  • They lied about treatments. They suppressed available treatments and didn't provide evidence-based care.

  • They lied about vaccines. COVID mRNA treatments are not vaccines. Prior to the rollout of said treatments the CDC eliminated the word “immunity” from its definitions of “Vaccine” and “Vaccination.” The CDC probably did so because it recognizes that the Injections do not produce immunity to the disease known as COVID-19. This is a critical factual and legal distinction. The Supreme Court has long held that the right to refuse medical treatment is a fundamental human right. Since the Injections do not stop the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as a matter of fact, they are not “vaccines” as a matter of law. Instead, they are a therapeutic or medical treatment which all people have the fundamental human right to refuse. [MORE]

  • They lied about the vaccines. They don't protect granny, if you take them.

    They increase your chance of getting infected. Is this what they called effective

  • They are not safe. They didn't conduct proper pharmacovigilance studies. They have no long-term safety data and the existing safety data is looking pretty concerning.

  • They have lied and more people have died. More people are dying now above the average expected deaths in many countries. These deaths won't go away even if you dig your head in the sand. Don't you want to know WHY?

Fingerprints of NYC Teachers Who Refused to Get COVID Injections Sent to FBI, Affidavit Says

From [HERE] Unvaccinated New York City teachers were reportedly “flagged” and their fingerprints sent to the FBI, according to an affidavit filed in federal court last week.

In the New Yorkers for Religious Liberty Inc. v. The City of New York appeals hearing, challenging the now-rescinded vaccine mandate for city employees, plaintiff’s attorney John Burch said that “flagged” teachers were labeled with “problem codes” that impact their ability to get another job.

The allegations were based on a June 2022 affidavit written by Betsy Combier, president of the due process advocacy group Advocatz, detailing how the New York City Department of Education (DOE) flagged unvaccinated teachers without evidence of misconduct and sent their information, including fingerprints “to the national databases at both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and [New York’s] State Division of Criminal Justice Services.”

Sujata Gibson, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, commented on these revelations to The Defender:

“These are hardworking teachers and educators with excellent employment records who dedicated their lives to teaching in the New York City public schools. It is unacceptable that the DOE would place problem codes on their employment files and flag their fingerprints with the FBI simply because they were not able or willing to get vaccinated.

“This was never about public health. This was about punishing those whose religious and other beliefs don’t line up with corporate interests in an effort to make it impossible to dissent.”

Michael Kane, national grassroots organizer for Children’s Health Defense and founder of Teachers For Choice, reported the “problem codes” on Feb. 9, one day after the hearing in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

He explained the relevance of this information for the case to The Defender:

“The point our attorneys were making is that not only were our constitutional rights violated when the mandates first occurred, but that these violations continue to occur, because this problem code is put on for us practicing our sincerely held religious beliefs. And when we go to apply for jobs, it’s still blocking us.

“So that is the main thrust of the argument. That’s one of the pieces of evidence that there is ongoing harm happening to us [because] they never stopped. To this day we are experiencing harm because of what New York City did to us. That was the real rationale that our attorneys were trying to get across.”

Unvaccinated teachers denied jobs due to the ‘problem code’

According to Combier’s affidavit, the DOE assigns “problem codes” to the personnel files of employees that “should not be hired due to unexplained misconduct of some kind.”

The affidavit stated:

“When the DOE puts a problem code in the employee’s personnel file, it also places a flag on the employee’s fingerprints, which is then sent to the national databases at both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the State Division of Criminal Justice Services.

“I have represented more than 15 DOE employees before the DOE’s Office of Personnel Investigation in proceedings in which they requested the removal of their problem codes. The flag has several names such as ‘problem code,’ ‘pr’ code, ‘pc’ code, ‘ineligible,’ and ‘no hire/inquiry’ code; however, all refer to a salary block, whatever title it is given.”

Combier stated she had seen such “problem codes” in the personnel files of former DOE employees who did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

“The DOE places a problem code on the employee’s personnel file immediately upon getting information that the employee did not submit proof of vaccination.

“As soon as the employee gets the vaccination and submits proof, the code is removed from his or her file.”

Combier also provided an email from a DOE official confirming that a “problem code” was added to the personnel files of “DOE employees who were placed on leave without pay for failing to be vaccinated in violation of the DOE’s mandate.”

The “flag” then adversely impacted the employment prospects of teachers when they sought jobs outside of New York City. Combier wrote:

“I am aware that non-DOE schools located in counties outside New York City receive funds from the NYC DOE for certain teaching positions. These may include, for example, special education or STEM [science, technology, mathematics] teachers.

“The DOE pays the salaries for these positions using the same system it uses to pay traditional DOE employees, which is called Galaxy. Galaxy indicates whether the employee has a problem code in his or her file and blocks payment to the employee with this flag/code if viewed in the personnel file.”

As a result:

“At least 15 of my clients with problem codes were not hired by prospective schools outside the DOE because such schools saw the problem codes in Galaxy, even though those schools were located outside New York City.

“Such schools were able to see the codes because the position applied for was financed by the DOE and so the school used the Galaxy system and could check the prospective employee’s file.”

Attorneys for the city did not deny the veracity of this information in court.

Kane wrote, “Attorney Susan Paulson who was defending NYC stated that educators fired for declining COVID vaccination were not removed for misconduct, but rather for not meeting a requirement for employment.”

“If there was no misconduct, why are unvaccinated educators’ fingerprints sent to the FBI?” asked Kane.

Kane: Refusing vaccination isn’t ‘extremist’

Kane told The Defender that Teachers For Choice will attempt to work with city officials to discover the facts surrounding the assignment of the codes and the sharing of this information with the FBI, including determining who authorized these actions.

He told The Defender:

“The first thing we’re doing is we’re working with the Common-Sense Caucus in City Hall to get them to investigate. We need an investigation. I have my speculation of what’s going on, but the truth is we don’t know what’s going on. Who gave the order for these problem codes to be given simply for the fact that we’re declining COVID vaccination? Why did they do that? And have our civil rights been hurt because of it? I think they have.

“So right now, I think we need an investigation, because there’s lots of speculation happening and we need to get to the bottom of what really happened.”

The Common-Sense Caucus is an officially recognized caucus within the New York City Council.

Kane said it is composed primarily of Republicans and has “been the only voice against mandates in New York City governance.”

“We’ve been working closely with them, and they’ve been really pushing Mayor Eric Adams to be reasonable and to hear our concerns,” Kane said.

He said legal action is a strong possibility, but they will give Adams and the city an opportunity to respond first. He said:

“Right now we need to see if there will be any investigation into this, and we need to give New York City and Mayor Adams a chance to reply correctly. There’s a chance he didn’t do this. There’s a chance this happened from the previous administration, from Mayor Bill de Blasio.

“Letters need to be written, requests need to be made, and that may or may not lead to litigation. We have to see, because if the city complies and, and tries to work to fix this problem, I think that would be great. But we don’t know yet. It’s too early in the process.”

Kane also wrote that by sending biometric data about unvaccinated teachers to the FBI, “NYC educators were being set up to be viewed as ‘right-wing extremists’ or even ‘terrorists.’”

“Educators who declined COVID vaccination — including myself — had every right to do so,” Kane wrote. “No one is a ‘terrorist’ or ‘extremist’ for holding the line on what does and does not go inside of their bodies — especially injected directly into their muscle tissue,” he added.

Teachers fired by the DOE because they declined the COVID-19 vaccine may face a difficult time being rehired by the city, despite the city’s claims that such workers can reapply for employment now that the vaccine mandate for city employees has been rescinded.

Kane said “reapplication definitely could be problematic” for these individuals. But he also noted, “The city is bleeding for employees. They’re desperately dying for people to take jobs. So yes, I think it will hurt many, but I think the city is hurting way more right now.”

As previously reported by The Defender, the U.S. House of Representatives has convened a Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, investigating claims that agencies such as the FBI collected information on and in some cases harassed ordinary Americans for their beliefs on topics such as COVID-19.

Kane wrote that such practices in New York City are not new. DNA specimens of city employees collected from COVID-19 tests were cataloged in proprietary libraries owned by Fulgent Genetics, the company contracted by de Blasio to administer the tests. [MORE]

According to Dr Robert Malone the US Government is Tracking People Who Refused to Get COVID Shots or People Who Are Partially Jabbed through CDC Surveillance Program

Story at a glance:

  • The U.S. government has secretly been tracking those who didn’t get the COVID jab, or are only partially jabbed, through a previously unknown surveillance program designed by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics, a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • The program was implemented on April 1, 2022, and adopted by most medical clinics and hospitals across the U.S. until January 2023.

  • Under this program, doctors at clinics and hospitals have been instructed to ask patients about their vaccination status, which is then added to their electronic medical records as a diagnostic code, known as the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code, so that they can be tracked inside and outside of the medical system.

  • These new ICD-10 codes are part of the government’s plan to implement medical tyranny using vaccine passports and digital IDs.

  • They’re also tracking noncompliance with all other recommended vaccines using new ICD-10 codes, and have implemented codes to describe WHY you didn’t get a recommended vaccine. They’ve also added a billable ICD code for “vaccine safety counseling.”

From [HERE] As recently discovered and reported by Dr. Robert Malone, the U.S. government has secretly been tracking those who didn’t get the COVID jab, or are only partially jabbed, through a previously unknown surveillance program designed by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The program was implemented on April 1, 2022, but didn’t become universally adopted by most medical clinics and hospitals across the U.S. until January 2023.

Under this program, doctors at clinics and hospitals have been instructed to ask patients about their vaccination status, which is then added to their electronic medical records as a diagnostic code, known as the ICD-10 code, without their knowledge or consent so that they can be tracked — not just within the health care system but outside of it as well.

Secret tracking program revealed

The new ICD codes were introduced during the Sept. 14-15, 2021, ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting. The ICD committee includes representatives from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the NCHS.

Below is a screenshot of page 194 of the agenda distributed during that meeting.

According to the NCHS, “there is interest in being able to track people who are not immunized or only partially immunized,” and they figured out a way to do just that, by adding new ICD-10 codes.

As you can see below, ICD-10 code Z28.310 identifies those who have not received a COVID jab and Z28.311 identifies those who are not up-to-date on their shots.

Tracking unjabbed is part of the biosecurity agenda

Why do they want to track the unvaccinated? For what purpose? The short answer: to facilitate the implementation of vaccine passports.

As noted by Malone:

“Code Number Z28.310 listed above is not a code for an illness or diagnosis, but rather for non-compliance of a medical procedure … Once a person’s vaccination status is coded and uploaded into large data base, it can be accessed by government and private health insurers alike.

“The administrative state officers at the CDC have not made immunization status a reportable disease (yet) but immunization status is listed as one of the reasons for mandatory reporting. They are just one step away from being able to collect this information without your permission. Ergo: vaccine passports made easy. In this country, not having your vaccine records ‘up-to-date’ might mean:

  • The government will not restrict your travel, airlines will.

    1. The government will not restrict your travel, other nations will.

    2. The government will not restrict your travel, auto rental companies will.

    3. The government will not restrict your travel, public transport will.

    4. The government will not restrict your travel, private companies will.”

World Health Organization signed off on tracking codes

The ICD codes were created by the World Health Organization (WHO) and doctors — with the exception of those in private practice who don’t accept insurance — are required to use these codes to describe a patient’s condition and the care they received during their visit. [MORE]

A Top Chinese Authority Calls the US Balloon Response ‘Hysterical’ and an Effort “to Divert Attention From Its Domestic Problems”

From [HERE] China’s top foreign policy official on Saturday mocked America’s response to a recent Chinese spy balloon overflight, calling the U.S. actions “absurd and hysterical” and an effort “to divert attention from its domestic problems.”

The official, Wang Yi, the Chinese Communist Party’s senior member for foreign affairs, repeated his government’s claim that the balloon, which flew over several U.S. states this month before President Biden ordered it shot down, was a “civilian” craft blown off course by high winds.

He made the remarks in a speech to the Munich Security Conference, which has been largely focused on Ukraine, as suspense mounted over whether he might meet on the sidelines with Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken. It would be the first high-level diplomatic exchange between Washington and Beijing since Mr. Blinken canceled a planned trip to China over the balloon episode.

The balloon episode has heightened U.S.-China tensions at a time when the relationship was already at one of its lowest points in decades. American officials say the balloon carried visible equipment that “was clearly for intelligence surveillance,” part of a global surveillance fleet directed by China’s military. [MORE]

Banks Borrow Unsecured Cash at Record Clip While Deposits Flee Deposits at US lenders fell in 2 consecutive quarters last year for the 1st Time in Over a Decade

From [HERE] Banks were chasing away deposits during the depths of the pandemic. Now, some are paying higher rates to shore up cash.

Borrowing in the federal-funds market hit $120 billion on Jan. 27, the highest one-day total in Federal Reserve data going back to 2016. Activity in fed funds—used by banks and government-backed lenders to exchange cash reserves parked at the Fed—surged throughout the past year when the central bank raised interest rates at the fastest pace in decades.

Some banks are scrambling to borrow, looking to improve their liquidity and satisfy regulatory requirements while customers pull cash from savings accounts in search of higher-yielding products.

The typical fed-funds trade involves a Federal Home Loan Bank, or FHLB, lending cash overnight to a commercial bank. The government-sponsored entities, designed to support mortgage lending during the Great Depression, can’t earn interest by leaving funds at the Fed as banks can, so they lend their excess cash to banks without requiring securities to back the loan.

The identities of the banks involved aren’t public. Traditionally, most borrowers have been foreign banks looking to make a few extra bucks by borrowing cheaply in fed funds, then leaving that cash at the Fed to earn more interest. Now, more U.S. banks are dipping in, according to Bank of America, likely because such borrowing is looked upon favorably by regulators. 

Aggressive bidding by a subset of commercial banks has jacked up the cost of the priciest fed-funds transactions, New York Fed data show. The highest borrowing rates are 0.15 percentage point above the Fed’s target range—now between 4.5% and 4.75%—and more than 0.3 point from the median, or the effective fed-funds rate. Essentially all trades were priced below the target range until October, before which no measurable portion had breached it since March 2020. [MORE]

Seymour Hersh on the Nord Stream Pipeline Attack

From [HERE] The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now

The U.S. Navy’s Diving and Salvage Center can be found in a location as obscure as its name—down what was once a country lane in rural Panama City, a now-booming resort city in the southwestern panhandle of Florida, 70 miles south of the Alabama border. The center’s complex is as nondescript as its location—a drab concrete post-World War II structure that has the look of a vocational high school on the west side of Chicago. A coin-operated laundromat and a dance school are across what is now a four-lane road.

The center has been training highly skilled deep-water divers for decades who, once assigned to American military units worldwide, are capable of technical diving to do the good—using C4 explosives to clear harbors and beaches of debris and unexploded ordnance—as well as the bad, like blowing up foreign oil rigs, fouling intake valves for undersea power plants, destroying locks on crucial shipping canals. The Panama City center, which boasts the second largest indoor pool in America, was the perfect place to recruit the best, and most taciturn, graduates of the diving school who successfully did last summer what they had been authorized to do 260 feet under the surface of the Baltic Sea.

Last June, the Navy divers, operating under the cover of a widely publicized mid-summer NATO exercise known as BALTOPS 22, planted the remotely triggered explosives that, three months later, destroyed three of the four Nord Stream pipelines, according to a source with direct knowledge of the operational planning.

Two of the pipelines, which were known collectively as Nord Stream 1, had been providing Germany and much of Western Europe with cheap Russian natural gas for more than a decade. A second pair of pipelines, called Nord Stream 2, had been built but were not yet operational. Now, with Russian troops massing on the Ukrainian border and the bloodiest war in Europe since 1945 looming, President Joseph Biden saw the pipelines as a vehicle for Vladimir Putin to weaponize natural gas for his political and territorial ambitions.

Asked for comment, Adrienne Watson, a White House spokesperson, said in an email, “This is false and complete fiction.” Tammy Thorp, a spokesperson for the Central Intelligence Agency, similarly wrote: “This claim is completely and utterly false.”

Biden’s decision to sabotage the pipelines came after more than nine months of highly secret back and forth debate inside Washington’s national security community about how to best achieve that goal. For much of that time, the issue was not whether to do the mission, but how to get it done with no overt clue as to who was responsible.

There was a vital bureaucratic reason for relying on the graduates of the center’s hardcore diving school in Panama City. The divers were Navy only, and not members of America’s Special Operations Command, whose covert operations must be reported to Congress and briefed in advance to the Senate and House leadership—the so-called Gang of Eight. The Biden Administration was doing everything possible to avoid leaks as the planning took place late in 2021 and into the first months of 2022.

President Biden and his foreign policy team—National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Tony Blinken, and Victoria Nuland, the Undersecretary of State for Policy—had been vocal and consistent in their hostility to the two pipelines, which ran side by side for 750 miles under the Baltic Sea from two different ports in northeastern Russia near the Estonian border, passing close to the Danish island of Bornholm before ending in northern Germany.

The direct route, which bypassed any need to transit Ukraine, had been a boon for the German economy, which enjoyed an abundance of cheap Russian natural gas—enough to run its factories and heat its homes while enabling German distributors to sell excess gas, at a profit, throughout Western Europe. Action that could be traced to the administration would violate US promises to minimize direct conflict with Russia. Secrecy was essential.

From its earliest days, Nord Stream 1 was seen by Washington and its anti-Russian NATO partners as a threat to western dominance. The holding company behind it, Nord Stream AG, was incorporated in Switzerland in 2005 in partnership with Gazprom, a publicly traded Russian company producing enormous profits for shareholders which is dominated by oligarchs known to be in the thrall of Putin. Gazprom controlled 51 percent of the company, with four European energy firms—one in France, one in the Netherlands and two in Germany—sharing the remaining 49 percent of stock, and having the right to control downstream sales of the inexpensive natural gas to local distributors in Germany and Western Europe. Gazprom’s profits were shared with the Russian government, and state gas and oil revenues were estimated in some years to amount to as much as 45 percent of Russia’s annual budget.

America’s political fears were real: Putin would now have an additional and much-needed major source of income, and Germany and the rest of Western Europe would become addicted to low-cost natural gas supplied by Russia—while diminishing European reliance on America. In fact, that’s exactly what happened. Many Germans saw Nord Stream 1 as part of the deliverance of former Chancellor Willy Brandt’s famed Ostpolitik theory, which would enable postwar Germany to rehabilitate itself and other European nations destroyed in World War II by, among other initiatives, utilizing cheap Russian gas to fuel a prosperous Western European market and trading economy. [MORE]