ALL You Need To Know about California’s New Immunization Registry: The Government is Trying to Kill You and/or Control You

From [HERE] WHAT IS CAIR2? 

California has had an immunization registry, operated by local health officers and the California Department of Public Health (“CDPH”), for 15 years. CDPH describes CAIR2 a “secure, confidential, statewide computerized immunization information system for California residents. The registry is accessed online to help providers and other authorized users track patient immunization records, reduce missed opportunities, and help fully immunize Californians of all ages.” [Emphasis added].

Prior to 2023, California law required any individuals administering vaccines enrolled with this registry to input immunizations directly into it; however, any administrators not enrolled in CAIR2 were not required to do so. They would simply administered the vaccine, recorded it in the patient file and on the “yellow card,” and that was the end of it. The law also authorized local health departments (“LHD”), CDPH, health care providers, and “other authorized users”, such as schools, childcare facilities, family childcare homes, and county human services agencies, to share specified immunization information for “to carry out their respective responsibilities,” such as for attendance, participation, receipt of benefits, etc.

As of today, however – thanks to Assemblywoman Akilah Weber’s Assembly Bill 1797, which was co-authored by – wait for it you will never believe it – former Senator Richard Pan, Senators Scott Weiner and Josh Newman, and Assemblymembers Buffy Wicks and Evan Low [click on link above which directs you to their contact information if you care to give them a shout] and became law on September 27, 2022 – every provider administering vaccines will be required to input the immunization into CAIR2, along with the recipient’s name, DOB, dates of immunization, type, adverse reactions, TB results, addresses phone number, gender, place of birth, race and ethnicity. Additionally, schools, childcare facilities, family childcare homes, WIC (Women, Infants & Children) service providers, foster care agencies, county human services agencies, and health care plans (“other authorized users”) can lawfully download and use your and your child’s immunization information to perform immunization status assessments of pupils, adults, and clients “to ensure health and safety.” [whatever any of that means].

Before we get to that, though, let’s refresh…. [MORE]

COVID Shots are Ineffective & Dangerous: Australian Gov Data Shows the Triple-Boosted are 35x more likely to be Hospitalized than People w/No Shot

From [HERE] As the Covid-19 vaccination rollout continues, more and more disturbing reports are coming to light about the dangerous and potentially deadly consequences of these vaccines. 

For instance, official Government data published in Australia reveals the triple-vaccinated population are 35x more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population. 

Despite reassurances from Governments and pharmaceutical companies, the shocking truth is that the very vaccines meant to protect us from Covid-19 are actually causing more harm than good. 

These vaccines have been linked to serious side effects on the cardiovascular, neurological, and reproductive systems. 

They are essentially mandatory progressive euthanasia, and it’s no wonder that even the UK’s National Health Service has been unable to handle the strain caused by these dangerous injections. 

The Government’s push for widespread vaccination is no longer about protecting public health, but rather using it as a tool for control and dependence.

The shocking reality is that the COVID vaccines are destroying our immune systems, as evident by the clear pattern of hospital admissions in Australia and infection rates in Cleveland.

The more shots we take, the weaker our immune systems become, and that’s just considering the intended effects of the therapy. These graphs don’t even take into account the devastating side effects that many people are experiencing.

It’s time to wake up and realize the dangerous consequences of these vaccines.

ALL CHARTS ARE HERE

Conclusion

As shocking new evidence emerges, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the Covid-19 vaccines are causing devastating effects on our immune systems and leading to mass hospitalizations.

According to official data from the Australian government, those who have received one or two doses of the vaccine are 20 times more likely to be hospitalized with Covid compared to those who are unvaccinated. And for those who have received three or more doses, the risk jumps to a staggering 35 times more likely.

The numbers are even more alarming when it comes to intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, with unvaccinated individuals enjoying 100% protection from needing ICU care, while those who are vaccinated face a 6 in 100,000 chance of being hospitalized in the ICU.

The Covid-19 “vaccines” are not only proving to be unsafe, but also highly ineffective. They are putting unsustainable pressure on hospitals and ICUs in Australia and around the world, and unless they are banned immediately, the NHS in the UK could be destroyed.

Not only do these vaccines fail to provide protection, but they also prevent the achievement of herd immunity.

With more than 50% of the population now vaccinated, it’s becoming clear that herd immunity will never be reached.

These are farcical, Monty Python-like numbers that point to an accelerating immunological catastrophe.

The data we have analyzed only looks at the disease the vaccines are supposed to protect against. It does not address the numerous cardiovascular, neurological, immunological, reproductive, and systemic side effects of the genetic vaccines that cause even more hospitalizations.

Big Pharma has taken control of our health services and destroyed them.

If it hasn’t already happened, it’s only a matter of time before 50% of hospital patients are suffering from vaccine-induced pathology. The credibility and viability of all healthcare worldwide depends on the immediate halt of genetic vaccination.

The Cleveland Clinic Conclusively Proves that (anti) Vaccines Progressively Destroy the Immune System in a Dose Dependent Manner

Here is the USnews.com 2022-2023 Best US Hospitals Honour Roll

1. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
2. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.
3. NYU Langone Hospitals, New York.
4. Cleveland Clinic.
5. (tie) Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore.
6. (tie) UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles.
7. New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia and Cornell, New York.
8. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
9. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago.
10. Stanford Health Care-Stanford Hospital, Stanford, California.

Established in 1821, the Cleveland Clinic is an international healthcare system with over 200 hospitals and clinics. Its network of practices provides routine healthcare, emergency healthcare and specialist treatment. It consistently ranks as one of the top American and global healthcare providers, employing 65,000 healthcare professionals and treating nearly 6 million patients annually. 

They have very proactive Departments of Infectious Diseases, Infection Prevention, and Quantitative Health Sciences, that has consistently been the first to produce solid data about the effectiveness of Covid vaccines versus natural immunity using their own 65,000 staff as their clinical trial subjects!

They wisely did NOT insist that all their staff took the vaccine because they believe in bodily autonomy and are scientists who need a control group of unvaccinated people against which to measure the efficacy of the multi-jab vaccine intervention. 

Here are the Covid infection rates for the 1st 98 days from September 12 2022, when the bivalent Covid-19 vaccine was first offered to their employees. It was not mandated. It was offered.

Dr. John Campbell says 'The Alarming Increase in Non-Covid Related Excess Deaths is a Public Emergency Being Ignored by Government’ [genocide]

From [HERE] UK shows an alarming increase in non-Covid related excess deaths.

• This is consistent with data from November 2022.

• This merits an official government response.

• Data shows there are more infections but fewer cases are symptomatic, which is good news.

• Infections are high but hospitalisations are not high.

• Deaths due to Covid are not increasing. It’s the non-Covid deaths that are increasing.

• Previous infections reduce the likelihood of getting re-infected.

• Protection from the vaccine against re-infection only lasts 10-11 weeks, which is not very long.

• Most people admitted to hospital as incidental infections (not admitted for Covid).

• We’re not seeing many deaths in younger age groups.

• Other than age, obesity is the biggest risk factor of dying from Covid.

• It is strange that the government is not talking about these excess deaths which would constitute a public health emergency.

After He Collapsed Why Was Damar Hamlin Put In an Unmarked “Ambulance” with No Lettering or Insignia Identifying the Name or Number of the Provider and No Special Use Tags?

Rasmussen Poll Finds 50% of Americans Believe Side Effects from COVID Shots are Causing a Significant Number of Unexplained Deaths

From [HERE] Nearly half of Americans think COVID-19 vaccines may be to blame for many unexplained deaths, and more than a quarter say someone they know could be among the victims.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that (49%) of American Adults believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, including 28% who think it’s Very Likely. Thirty-seven percent (37%) don’t say a significant number of deaths have been caused by vaccine side effects, including 17% who believe it’s Not At All Likely. Another 14% are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Twenty-eight percent (28%) of adults say they personally know someone whose death they think may have been caused by side effects of COVID-19 vaccines, while 61% don’t and another 10% are not sure.

The documentary Died Suddenly has been criticized as promoting “debunked” anti-vaccine conspiracy theories but has been seen by some 15 million people.

Forty-eight percent (48%) of Americans believe there are legitimate reasons to be concerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, while 37% think people who worry about vaccine safety are spreading conspiracy theories. Another 15% are not sure.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it’s in the news, it’s in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 American Adults was conducted on December 28-30, 2022 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Seventy-one percent (71%) say they have received a COVID-19 vaccination, while 26% have not. Concerns about vaccine safety are much higher among the unvaccinated.

Seventy-seven percent (77%) of adults who have not gotten COVID-19 vaccinations believe it’s at least somewhat likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths. Among those who have gotten the vaccine, just 38% consider unexplained deaths from the vaccine at least somewhat likely.

Similarly, while 45% of those who have not been vaccinated against COVID-19 think someone they know personally might have died from vaccine side effects, only 22% of vaccinated adults think so.

Forty-six percent (46%) of adults who have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 believe people who worry about vaccine safety are spreading conspiracy theories, but just 15% of the unvaccinated share that belief. Sixty-nine percent (69%) of those who haven’t gotten the COVID-19 vaccine think there are legitimate reasons to be concerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, as do 40% of those who have gotten vaccinated against the virus. [MORE]

NYPD Post Gun Free Zone Signs Notifying Criminals that Law Abiding Citizens Will Be Unable to Defend Themselves in the Area, Marking the Top Places to Commit Crimes

NYPD SENDS MESSAGE TO NYC CRIMINALS: ALL THE LAW ABIDING PEOPLE YOU ROB OR ASSAULT IN TIMES SQUARE WILL BE UNARMED

The Supreme Court made it clear that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense in public. The public includes unsafe, crowded places like “Times Square.” The court clearly stated;

Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. As we explained in Heller, the “textual elements” of the Second Amendment’s operative clause— “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be in- fringed”—“guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. Heller further confirmed that the right to “bear arms” refers to the right to “wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.”

This definition of “bear” naturally encompasses public carry. Most gun owners do not wear a holstered pistol at their hip in their bedroom or while sitting at the dinner table. Although individuals often “keep” firearms in their home, at the ready for self-defense, most do not “bear” (i.e., carry) them in the home beyond moments of actual confrontation. To confine the right to “bear” arms to the home would nullify half of the Second Amendment’s operative protections.

Moreover, confining the right to “bear” arms to the home would make little sense given that self-defense is “the central component of the [Second Amendment] right itself.” Heller, 554 U. S., at 599; see also McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767. After all, the Second Amendment guarantees an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” Heller, 554 U. S., at 592, and confrontation can surely take place outside the home.

Although we remarked in Heller that the need for armed self-defense is perhaps “most acute” in the home, id., at 628, we did not suggest that the need was insignificant else- where. Many Americans hazard greater danger outside the home than in it. See Moore v. Madigan, 702 F. 3d 933, 937 (CA7 2012) (“[A] Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower”). The text of the Second Amendment reflects that reality.

The Second Amendment’s plain text thus presumptively guarantees petitioners Koch and Nash a right to “bear” arms in public for self-defense.

The sensitive places doctrine is an exception to the general right to the peaceable possession and carry of arms. The Court has explained that schools and government buildings are “sensitive places.” Whether a place is a “sensitive place” is determined by historical record and/or particular place’s sensitive government interests or vulnerabilities. A longstanding history exists if there ‘are no disputes regarding the lawfulness of such prohibitions.” Constitutional law professor David Kopel explained that ‘factors which make places “sensitive” might be a place where most persons therein are minors (K-12 schools), places that concentrate adversarial conflict and can generate passionately angry emotions (courthouses, legislatures, polling places), or buildings containing people at acute personal risk of being targets of assassination (many government buildings). However, the answer cannot be that the places are crowded. Sometimes they are, but no more so than a busy downtown sidewalk, and sidewalks are not sensitive places.’ As explained by the Court in a big city such as Chicago,

“[A] Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower”). The text of the Second Amendment reflects that reality.”

The Court also specifically stated that a place is not a sensitive place simply because it is crowded. Nevertheless, the new NY law bans handguns in places of a “sensitive nature,” which overbroadly includes all churches/places of worship, government buildings, all public parks, all kinds of schools, all public transit (apparently including all vehicles for hire (cabs/Uber/limo)), hospitals, shelters, residential group homes, nursing homes, and medical facilities, among others. It also prohibits law abiding citizens from carrying a handgun in Times Square.

Said prohibition is an obvious middle finger to the Court’s opinion and to anyone who desires true freedom and values unalienable rights, because the court already said so - a crowded place is not a sensitive place simply because it is crowded or busy. In fact, it is common sense among unwilling slaves that in a busy, crowded place a law abiding citizen is more likely to be confronted by criminals.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Freedomination – the liberty to choose the commitments, ideologies, covenants, contracts, judgments, and relationships that bind or restrain you within the Matrix. (See: The Matrix, Negative Hallucination, Phfreedom, Freedom & Liberty)

freedom peddlers – political agitators who fail to address the structured incapacity of most people for freedom and their inclination towards freedumb. Freedom peddlers talk about how free things are—but fail to mention the price of upkeep.

freedom seeker – those who realize they are not free, earnestly seeking those who really have control, or are their masters, but have not yet identified just who they are (much less, how they are being enslaved) in order to secure from them the freedom they so desire. The impulse to be free is not for the few. All are called, many hear, few respond. You are not a mistake or a problem to be solved. You are not the ego. You are the consciousness beyond the ego. Your search will remain in limbo or you will reach despair until you realize that you are always-already the singular sought-seeking pair. (See: Seeker, “I,” My, Ego, True Self, I-AM, False Self, Chapel Perilous, Bedside Baptist, Meditation & Seeking)

freedumb – the state of unrecognized psychological captivity (brain hemispheric hostage) that sheeple remain in because they don’t speak the language of reality nor constantly edit truth from perfecting heart to perfecting power—and when truth is spoken around them, refrain from being open, or impervious to it thus being forever chained to its distortions and limitations. 2) the mindset that proposes “since we are liberated, we are also free.” 3) the mindset that operates upon the notion that you can have individuality without accountability or responsibility. 4) the pretense that reality is truth and viceversa. People cherish unwarranted assumptions and relish their freedumb because they have been socialized into selfcensorship along with misidentification with the ego-mind—the absence of knowledge of Self. (See: Phfreedom, Truth, Unfreedom, Dumbelievers, Self, Belief Systems, Objective Truth, Individuality, Objective Reality, True Self & Reality)

Poll Shows Chicago Strawboss Mayor Lori Lightfoot Losing in Tough Re-Election Bid

From [HERE] Mayor Lori Lightfoot is facing stiff competition from a large field of candidates in her re-election bid as Chicago tackles crime and the lingering economic fallout of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Ms. Lightfoot, a 60-year-old former federal prosecutor, was the first Black woman and first gay person elected mayor of the nation’s third-largest city, winning every city ward in a 2019 runoff against Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle. Now, early polls show the mayor as an underdog in the Feb. 28 election, with the top two vote-getters expected to face off in an April runoff if no candidate wins a majority in the first round.

“I think there is a lot of disappointment in the communities that I represent, about having high hopes for her and being very disappointed in her performance,” said Alderman Tom Tunney, a pro-business restaurant owner in the city’s liberal Lakeview neighborhood, who is retiring from the council at the end of his term and had considered his own mayoral bid.

Ms. Lightfoot faces eight rivals, including six other Black candidates, which could dilute some of her support; U.S. Rep. Jesús “Chuy” Garcia (D., Ill.) who is Hispanic; and former schools chief Paul Vallas, who is white. [MORE]

Is Voting Enabling Black Power or Black Powerlessness? Less Than 1 Month After the 1st Black Woman is Sworn in as LA Mayor, LAPD Murder 2 Black Men and 1 Latino Man in City Dominated by White Liberals

ELECTING BLACK ROLEBOTS HAS NO EFFECT ON WHITE SUPREMACY. From [HERE] The Los Angeles Police Department on Wednesday said it has launched investigations into the deaths of three men after encounters with their officers. In two of the cases, the officers shot and killed the civilians.

The LAPD said its officers fatally shot 45-year-old Takar Smith on Jan. 2 and 35-year-old Oscar Sanchez on Jan. 3. Also on Jan. 3, 31-year-old Keenan Anderson died hours after a struggle with police officers in which he was shocked with a stun gun. The department released body-worn camera video of the three incidents Wednesday. The Smith and Anderson incidents look like murders by cops.

“Full investigations are underway, and I pledge that the City's investigations into these deaths will be transparent and will reflect the values of Los Angeles,” Mayor Karen Bass said in a press release. “I will ensure that the City’s investigations will drive only toward truth and accountability. Furthermore, the officers involved must be placed on immediate leave.”

Bass was sworn in on December 10, 2022. She is the first woman and the second Black person, after Tom Bradley, to serve as mayor of Los Angeles.

Bass extended her condolences to the families of Smith, Sanchez and Anderson. She added that she had “grave concerns about the deeply disturbing tapes” released Wednesday. [MORE]

Media and LAPD Pretend Knife Justifies Murder. Takar Smith was Holding a Childs Bike when Provocative Cops Repeatedly Tased Him, Then Shot Black Man to Death While He Was on His Knees, Posed No Threat

Cops Only Need “Possible Cause” to Use Force on Blacks in Racist System: LAPD Smother and Tase Black Teacher to Death as He Begged for Life. Stopped for “Possible DUI Driver” While Walking in Street

According to FUNKTIONARY:

voting – a pacification (sucker) process which allows the votary to make choices provided to her/him, not decisions. 2) a “privilege” of U.S. citizens to do it behind a curtain—as long as they do it alone. 3) political masturbation exercises for those who can’t cop real power. 4) a habitually accepted imposition that gives the votary-vassal-suckers an illusion of inclusion or participation. 5) an act of self-abuse. People mistake their voting for their voice—as the voice of the people is seldom, if ever, their own. While some died fighting for the privilege (not right) to vote or not to vote, they were restricted and therefore had no choice in the matter. If voting was a right, no one would ever have had to lose his or her life in a struggle to exercise that right. The Voting Rights Act of 1964 demonstrates that voting is a civic privilege (franchise) bestowed upon a people instead of the act of voting being an inherent right where exercise of the option to vote is one’s own decision without an attached obligation (compulsion) or expectation (compunction). We need to establish and assert our economic rights and declare our “endependence” by designing, collectively owning, controlling and administering our own systems of monetary and economic exchange (that funktion in the interests of its creators and participants) so as to take ownership of our bodies, labor, and fruits of our mental assets in the form of substantive rights receipts (circulating “money” in electronic form or circulating cash). Whoever creates the symbol that acts as a claim on your labor or wealth (in the absence of any other competing system of exchange) is the true owner of same—and you remain a slave to their system of unjust enrichment for exploitative gain. When we learn to vote with our own “money” and control the systems wherein economic power is wielded, political voting will be seen for the wholesale fraud and sham that it really is so that you may one day respect yourself the morning after voting. Voting in elections (especially at the national or federal level) is an expression and confession of our powerlessness over our daily affairs, options and interests. We must dispense with the ritual of voting as the archetypal expression of freedom, equality and participation. Voting without having economic rights and control of substantive rights is voting fraud—you get what you got laid for—a royal screwing (Phillips or Flathead) and it’s your own undoing. [MORE]

In Alabama on MLK Day Neuropeons and Their Authorities Celebrate Robert E. Lee's Birthday by Closing State Offices and Their Public Fool System

From [HERE] Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s birthday is on January 19, but it is celebrated by the State of Alabama today. Robert E. Lee Day has been an official state holiday in Alabama since sometime in the late 1800s. Lee was the most renowned general of the Confederacy in the Civil War.

Today is an official state holiday. State offices and most schools will be closed in observance of the holiday. Federal offices, post offices, and many businesses will also be closed, but that is because today is also Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Alabama and Mississippi merged its Lee celebration with MLK Day after President Ronald Reagan signed legislation, making it a national holiday. Some state legislators have advocated for dropping Robert E. Lee Day from the list of official holidays and making the holiday observance for Dr. King alone. That legislation has not advanced in past legislative sessions. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Neuropeons – neurotic, stupid and self-deluded poor white trash. 2) skin-heads. 3) Nazis, Neo-Nazis and Theo-Nazis. (See: KKK, WOTAN, Weiteko Disease, Fascism, Racism White Supremacy, Stupidity, Ku Klux Klan & Yurugu)

Neuropeans – (Neurotic Europeans)—neurotic, ignorant, narcissistic and self-deluded white supremacist Caucasians operating at the mythic and rational levels of consciousness only. 2) Fascists. (See: Weiteko Disease & White Supremacy)

confederacy – the objection to the abolition of racism, not the abolition of slavery (even their own). The Civil War was principally fought over the tariff and secondarily slavery (being only an objective of the war not its principle cause). The South could purchase their industrial goods far cheaper from England. The Northeast was an industrial economy badly needing the influx of southern capital. When the South seceded, the Eastern Establishment used the slavery issue as a trick to conscript poor white Yankees and shagged the South during the Civil War so that the end of the Civil War reduced all Southerners to the level of the kidnapped captive Africans in Amerikkka. The war over the existential, social, economic, mental and political position of formerly enslaved and kidnapped Africans and native Black Americans did not end with the Civil War (or the Emancipation Proclamation), it only was extensionalized and institutionalized in other forms, formats and formula that exist and persist to this very day. The South will rise again—this time it’s the down-in-the-mouth Dirty South. (See: Citizenship, FOAM, FRIGHT, Slavery, Gangbanking, Racism White Supremacy, Bigotry & KKK)

MLK was a Rebel Willing to Die for Justice but Racists Propagandize Him as a Dreamer and Train Sleeping Toms to Degrade His Image and Themselves b/c the Annihilation of Black Self-Respect is Priceless

A major part of white supremacy is the annihilation of Black self respect. Dr. Amos Wilson stated, "the most powerful obstacle against the liberation of Afrikan peoples from White domination and exploitation is not the ability of Whites to use superior military or police firepower or their threat to use it against Afrikan insurgency, but is their ability to engage in unrelenting psychopolitical violence against the collective Afrikan psyche." [MORE] 'Their devastatingly ingenious use of it against the minds of Afrikan peoples which represent the greatest threat to Afrikan survival.' [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY explains that social relations between Blacks and whites are mediated by false images and narratives within The Spectacle. In this constructed reality the totality of the messaging and images presented are the actual materialization of the ideology of racism white supremacy. Dr. Blynd states The Spectacle is “the mirrorization of the noumenon into the phenomenal universe without understanding or overstanding it as such an objectivization in duality.” Relentless propaganda maintains the cooperative master servant relationship between Blacks and whites and has kept Black people in a "continuous state of checkmate” and a “losing streak that is centuries long.” [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Sleeping Tom - a person of Afrikan descent who has not consciously awakened to fully embrace his or her own asili (cultural heritage and imperative). 2) a socially unconscious person of Afrikan descent who participates in secret balloting (voting). A sleepin' Tom lives and reacts out of another culture's asili or out of the mind of another; not their own. 3) a Negro who is unaware that he is all souled-out. 4) a Negro who isn't aware that he is in fact and in deed a certified Sambo. 5) a broken, token Negro; a coin-operative. (See: Straw Boss, Doublemindedness, Sambo, Uncle Tom-Tom, Coin-Operated & Secret Ballots) 

HISTORY - Human Interest Stories Telling Oppressor's Reality Yearly. (See: War, Violence, Yurugu & Hueman)

history - the record of previous futures. 2) the scribe with the biggest hustle or weapon or both. 3) the credible fiction that rulers/conquerors weave between apparently known "facts." 4) useful fiction. 5) pattern-making. 6) the nightmare from which we are all trying to awake. 7) one conspiracy after another in a continuum of lies, distortions and omissions. All history is a distorted record of the struggle of the oppressed against the oppressor---one of controlled order of the powerful versus economic justice sought by those suffering from and resisting the oppression. History is always an opinion (oral or written) about yesterday's power struggles. Our reflection in history makes us symbols of ourselves to ourselves becoming caricatures--an image of a picture within a picture behind the lie that fronts as the picture---framed but not ever brought into plain view. History is not merely a process of ascent, but one of descent simultaneously--and is not something so much so to be interpreted as it is to be controlled in order to address the issue of perennial peace and conscious unfoldment for humanity and the destiny and density of womb-mankind. On an esoteric (higher-dimensional) realm, all of history is an acid trip towards ascendance and transfiguration, or transubstantiation---recombinant genetics and polarity magick--towards conscious resurrection- immortality--memorialization via real-tirne hyperlinked, multi-referential, dynamic, heuristic electromagnetic digital communication and information neural sensing and biofeedback systems. By writing the wrongs of history in advance, Dr. Blynd portends, amends and inks-in what others merely think of askance as chance. Afrikan history was in its decline when the immigrant human appeared on the scene. History repeats itself because no one was listening to the Black man the first time. Remember, history is in you;  not you in it. You are your history--whether you recognize it or not. Don't just make history-- live it! When you become your history, choices made in the present leave no residue with which to cling to, i.e., there is no discount of the present and all actions or experiences are appreciated and released therefore life is lived spontaneously in the flow--the stream of joy, When you become your history, you die even unto your death and thus your dead self (in the form of accumulated consequences from choices made in the past no longer exerts its imprint in the present. In becoming your history, you open up to impacting the living past without having the past impact your present. By being your history, you will realize that things happen through  you and not to  you. You are no longer victimized by your past in the present. "A people without knowledge of their history is like a tree with no roots." -The Honorable Marcus Mosiah Garvey. when something has had too much of itself---its history; when something has had enough of itself, that's history! Without Self-knowledge and a firm grip on history, we break our ties to cultural continuity and relapse into a collective memory disposed witness to events seemingly disconnected, disjointed or disassociated with and dispossessed to our past. Don't let history remain a mystery to you, go beyond and behind the myth and the mythmakers scribing a fabrication weaving into an education that is pure prevarication - deliberate lies mixed with objective truth--to keep you placid, complacent and duped. (See: Violence, Cultural Continuity, Oppression, Memory, Liberation, Power, Freedom, Revolution, Government, Empire, Justice, Tyrannolaw, Neuralife, Living Past, The Past, The Past, Fear, Present Moment, Consciousness, Ourstory, Hystory, Lifebox, Culture, Taught, Pity, Noble Law, Authors, Coincidence Theories, Conspiracy Theories, Law, Education, Resistance, Afrikan Civilization. GAP & His-Story)

City National Bank Will Pay $31 Million After Discriminating Against Black And Latino Communities

From [HERE] The United States Department of Justice has reached a $31 million settlement with City National Bank in a historic housing discrimination case. City National, based in Los Angeles, is one of America’s 50 biggest banks. This settlement is the largest-ever in a redlining case investigated by the Justice Department.

The Biden Administration launched the Combating Redlining Initiative in October 2021. The Justice Department has since secured more than $75 million on behalf of communities that discriminatory housing practices have harmed, including a $24 million settlement with Trident Mortgage, a Philadelphia-based Berkshire Hathaway company.

Redlining is a longstanding set of policies and practices that have prohibited banks from approving mortgages for people seeking to purchase homes in neighborhoods that are largely comprised of Black and Latino residents. It originated in the 1930s and continued on for decades. Neighborhoods were rated on an ‘A’ to ‘D’ risk scale. Lenders then drew red lines around so-called “risky” neighborhoods on city maps; most banks refused to finance mortgages in those areas.

Legislation like the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 were intended to outlaw redlining. By then, hard-to-reverse damage had been done. White families had accumulated generational wealth via home ownership, while predominantly Black communities were left with lower property values, chronically underfunded schools, fewer profitable businesses, crime, and poverty. Redlining may have ended in policy five decades ago, but not fully in practice, as the recent lawsuit against City National Bank demonstrates.

Between 2017 and 2022, City National discriminated against Black and Latino residents by underwriting fewer mortgages and marketing less frequently in their communities, the DOJ found. Also, over two decades, the bank opened just one new branch in a predominantly Black or Latino neighborhood. As a result, other financial institutions received six times more mortgage applicants than did City National during this same timeframe. [MORE]

According to Pew Research the IRS Now Audits the Poorest Americans at About the Same Rate as the Top 1%. Black Counties Have the Highest Audit Rates in the US

From [HERE] As we reported last year, Americans who receive the earned income tax credit, one of the country’s largest anti-poverty programs, are audited at a higher rate than all but the richest taxpayers. The new data shows that the trend has only grown stronger.

Audits of the rich continue to plunge while those of the poor hold steady, and the two audit rates are converging. Last year, the top 1% of taxpayers by income were audited at a rate of 1.56%. EITC recipients, who typically have annual income under $20,000, were audited at 1.41%.

Part of the reason is ease. Audits of EITC recipients are largely automated and far less complicated.

“While the wealthy now have an open invitation to cheat, low-income taxpayers are receiving heightened scrutiny because they can be audited far more easily. All it takes is a letter instead of a team of investigators and lawyers,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee.

“We have two tax systems in this country,” he said, “and nothing illustrates that better than the IRS ignoring wealthy tax cheats while penalizing low-income workers over small mistakes.”

The agency audited 382,000 recipients of the EITC in 2018, accounting for 43% of all audits of individuals last year. When we mapped the estimated audit rates for every county in America, the counties with the highest audit rates were poor, rural, mostly African American and in the South, a reflection of the high number of EITC claims there.

Natassia Smick and her husband were among those unlucky 382,000 households. We wrote about them last year. They live outside Los Angeles and saw their entire refund frozen in February 2018. For a couple who earned about $33,000 in 2017, that $7,300 refund was big money ($2,000 of it stemmed from the EITC). When it didn’t come, Smick said she had to abandon plans for catching up with her credit card debt.

After Smick sent in all her supporting documents, it took until this May to get a final answer from the IRS. Fourteen months after it all started, the IRS said it agreed Smick and her husband were due about $7,000, she said. But the agency disagreed on the remaining $350, because it couldn’t verify her husband’s employment for part of the year. Smick said the IRS was wrong to hold back the $350, but she couldn’t afford to contest it and further delay the $7,000.

“I’m not going to fight anymore,” she said. “We have already waited too long, and we are not in a financial position to wait another three months to appeal.”

A new study by academic and government researchers shows that there has been a big cost to these audits: They’ve discouraged hundreds of thousands of families who might qualify for the credit from claiming it in future years.

For poor taxpayers, the worst part of the EITC audits is usually the beginning. That’s because they almost always begin with the shock of the refund being held.

But the audits also hardly ever end well. According to data in the new study, most end without the taxpayer responding at all, and the poorer the audit target, the more likely that is to happen. Those with wage income under $10,000 per year, for instance, didn’t respond at all in 64% of the EITC audits. For those with income over $40,000 per year, that rate dipped to 35%.

The diminished response rate of the poorest taxpayers in part reflects that they are harder to reach: In 15% of those audits, the mail couldn’t be delivered. But earlier studies have also shown that many poor taxpayers don’t understand they are being audited or have trouble deciphering what the IRS is asking in its letters.

The EITC is aimed mainly at low-income workers with children. Last year, 26 million households received an average credit of about $2,500. Most EITC audits require taxpayers to dig up documents to show that a child meets the legal threshold of a “qualifying child,” a status that’s distinct from a dependent. The IRS has long blamed the law’s complexity as the main reason taxpayers may incorrectly claim the credit.

Smick was among the rare audit veterans who prevailed. Taxpayers rarely win against the IRS regardless of how likely they are to qualify for the credit, according to the new study, which was done by Day Manoli, an assistant professor of economics at the University of Texas at Austin, and researchers with the IRS and Treasury Department. [MORE]

Last Year the Federal Government Took Over $4.6 Billion in Business Taxes from Gun Makers

From [HERE] America's gun industry is booming. Over 11.3 million firearms were manufactured in the United States in 2020, more than double the 5.6 million produced in 2010, and nearly triple the 3.9 million guns manufactured in 2000, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Surging demand for firearms has been a boon not only for the balance sheets of American gun makers, but also government coffers.

Between sporting arms and ammunition companies and supporting sectors, the American firearm industry generated $70.5 billion in economic output in 2021, according to the advocacy group The Firearm Industry Trade Association. The federal government also levied $4.6 billion in business taxes from the gun industry in 2021, up 84% from a decade earlier. The firearm industry in some states accounts for a far larger share of government firearm tax revenue than others.

The federal government collected $155.8 million in business tax revenue from the firearm industry in New York in 2021. Adjusting for population, this comes out to about $8 per state resident, the 11th lowest among the 50 states.

Overall, New York's firearm and ammunition industry, including supporting sectors, employed 10,150 people in 2021. The industry generated $2.5 billion in total economic output, or $128 per capita, the eighth lowest per capita figure among states.

All data in this report is from the 2022 Firearm and Ammunition Industry Economic Impact Report from The Firearm Industry Trade Association.

$900k Settlement after Houston Cops Shot Unarmed, Naked Black Man in Hospital Room. Suit Claimed Hospital Authorities and Police Conspired in Cover up and Filed False Charges to Justify their Actions

From [HERE] When Alan Pean drove himself to Houston’s St. Joseph Medical Center in August 2015, he got into a minor car accident. He wasn’t thinking straight—he was trying to check himself in for mental health treatment. He had a history of bipolar disorder and, according to court documents, was seeking help for acute emotional distress—he’d hallucinated that men were trying to invade his apartment. But in the hospital, things would only get worse. The day after he was admitted, Pean was shot in the chest in his room. 

Pean was unarmed and naked at the time of the shooting. He survived after emergency surgery, only to be hit with criminal charges for alleged assault of the armed guards who charged into his hospital room. His lawyers later described that ultimately unsuccessful prosecution effort as a calculated conspiracy to absolve the man who had shot and nearly killed Pean: an off-duty Houston Police officer. In October, the City of Houston agreed to pay out $902,500—one of the highest settlement amounts in the city’s recent history—to Pean, whose father and two brothers are working as or training to be physicians, and who identifies as Black.  

Pean and his lawyers filed suit in 2016 naming the City of Houston, the officers involved in the shooting who worked extra jobs as hospital security guards, two others involved in the investigation, the hospital and its parent company, and the security company. The civil case against the hospital is ongoing.

Houston Police Department records show there have been 371 officer-involved shootings in Houston since 2010. In 120 of those, the suspect was killed. None resulted in an indictment, according to city staff.  

But Houston PD’s system policy of investigating officer-involved shootings was previously found lacking after a civil rights suit against the department was filed by Audry Releford, a Black Houstonian whose unarmed son was killed by a police officer in front of his house in 2012.

The case drew national headlines in 2015 after Houston authorities criminally charged Pean and attempted to justify the off-duty officers’ decision to shoot an unarmed man in his hospital room.

After Pean checked into the hospital that night, he continued behaving erratically. Video available in the Paen case shows that he had been dancing naked in the doorway of his hospital around the time a nurse called security for assistance.

“THEY HAD SIGNIFICANT LIABILITY BEYOND JUST THE OFFICERS’ LIABILITY … BECAUSE THEIR DE FACTO POLICY IS ESSENTIALLY A LICENSE FOR HOUSTON POLICE OFFICERS TO KILL.”

Off-duty Houston Police Department Officers Roggie Law and Oscar Ortega responded. They were working as paid security for the hospital at the time. The officers entered Pean’s hospital room and closed the door. There were no hospital staff members or cameras in the room with them.

According to the lawsuit, the officers then “initiated a physical confrontation with Alan,” who was naked and unarmed and in the midst of a mental health crisis. The officers, unable to subdue Pean, escalated the situation. First, Officer Law used his Taser on Pean. When that failed to defuse the confrontation, Ortega shot Pean in the chest with his service pistol. As Pean lay on the floor bleeding, the officers handcuffed him, the lawsuit says. When they radioed others about the incident, they allegedly failed to mention Pean had been shot. A hospital employee examined Pean and rushed him to the intensive care unit. As he recovered, he remained handcuffed in his hospital room. 

During this time, the lawsuit alleges the hospital and police concocted a plan to “cover up and falsely justify their actions” by slapping Pean with charges of aggravated assault against a public servant and reckless driving. “HPD’s notorious blue wall of silence also operates as a blue wall of sound to protect HPD officers against outside scrutiny,” the lawsuit alleges. 

None of these charges would stick—a Harris County grand jury dismissed the assault charges, and the Harris County Criminal Court nixed the reckless driving charge. But Pean was still forced to post bond. He later had to travel from New York back to Texas to surrender himself when he found out about the reckless driving charge.

THE HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT’S INTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION CLEARED THE OFFICERS WITHOUT INTERVIEWING THE VICTIM OR CONSULTING MEDICAL RECORDS.

An investigation by the Houston Chronicle after the fact showed the Houston Police Department’s internal affairs division reviewed the officers and quietly cleared them—without interviewing the victim or consulting medical records. 

Houston Police Department’s current use of force policy requires officers to take someone’s “mental capacity” into account before using force. Officers are also required to request emergency medical services when they come across someone who is injured (whether or not they’re the cause of the injury). The policy also requires officers to “provide first aid to their level of training without any unreasonable delay” while they await medical personnel. 

Pean’s legal saga is far from over, as he, his family, and his attorneys continue to seek damages from the medical facility for its handling of his crisis. His father and brother, as physicians, have spoken out to medical groups too.

Jury Deliberating in Case of VA Cops who Niggerized Gullible Black US Army Lieutenant by Threatening His Life at Gas Station in Viral Video of Traffic Stop

From [HERE] and [HERE] Friday marked day five in the controversial lawsuit involving a U.S. Army lieutenant and two Windsor police officers, with the jury deliberations now on hold for the long weekend.

Lt. Caron Nazario is suing officer Daniel Crocker and now-former officer Joe Gutierrez for claims of assault and battery, false imprisonment and illegal search during a traffic stop in 2020.

Closing arguments began around 1 p.m. Friday and continued until 5:30pm.

The plaintiffs called their last witness Friday morning, Nazario’s battalion commander Lt. Charles Reinhold.

The U.S. Army lieutenant who was pepper sprayed, struck and handcuffed by police in rural Virginia, but never arrested, will argue to a jury that police assaulted and falsely imprisoned and that his vehicle was illegally searched.

Video of the 2020 traffic stop got millions of views the next year after Caron Nazario filed the federal lawsuit that is now being heard, highlighting fears of mistreatment among Black drivers and intensifying the scrutiny of the boundaries of reasonable, and legal, police conduct.

The episode also served as a grim signal to many Black Americans that military uniforms don’t necessarily protect against abuse of authority by law enforcement. [MORE]

Black Reporter from the Wall Street Journal was Just a “Suspicious” NGHR to a White Phoenix Cop who Detained Him for Interviewing Customers in Front of Chase Bank

From [HERE] The Phoenix Police Department has opened an internal investigation into the detainment of a Wall Street Journal reporter who was conducting interviews outside a Chase Bank in November.

The reporter, Dion Rabouin, who is Black, was reporting outside the bank when he was handcuffed and placed in a police vehicle, The Wall Street Journal said in a statement.

Mr. Rabouin’s detainment occurred on Nov. 23 but gained widespread attention after the television station ABC15 reported on the episode on Wednesday.

Footage taken by a bystander shows Mr. Rabouin being handcuffed and sitting inside a police vehicle. An officer can be heard telling him, “I’m not giving you any more chances.” Mr. Rabouin is heard responding, “You’re not giving me any chances for what? I haven’t done anything wrong.”

In a statement, the Police Department said that it had opened an “administrative investigation” after receiving a letter from the editor in chief of The Journal, which, the police said, expressed concerns about the “interaction” between Mr. Rabouin and one of their officers.

“Bank personnel contacted police after they received customer complaints that a man was approaching people as they entered the bank asking them personal questions,” the department said. It added that the interaction between Mr. Rabouin and the police officer took place on private property.

Once the investigation is complete, it will be made public, the department said. Mr. Rabouin was not charged.

According to a police report posted by ABC15, a Chase Bank employee notified the authorities of a “suspicious person outside the bank” who had identified himself as a reporter and was refusing to leave.

The officer, Caleb Zimmerman, said in the report that he had spoken with bank staff members, who said that they had informed Mr. Rabouin that he was making customers uncomfortable. Officer Zimmerman said that he had concluded that Mr. Rabouin was trespassing.

“He stated he had his I.D. on him, but refused to produce it,” according to the report. “At that time, I told Dion to turn around and put his hands behind his back, which he did not do.”

The incident comes amid a sweeping federal investigation into the conduct of the Phoenix Police Department and whether it engaged in discriminatory and abusive practices and used excessive force.

The Journal said it was “deeply concerned” at the treatment of Mr. Rabouin, who is based in New York and covers finance.

“We have asked the Phoenix Police Department to pursue a thorough investigation into the incident and explain why their officers needlessly escalated the situation and took these aggressive steps,” The Journal said in a statement. “No journalist should ever be detained simply for exercising their First Amendment rights.”

Mr. Rabouin did not immediately respond to requests for an interview on Sunday but has acknowledged the incident on Twitter.

“Things really escalated quickly,” Mr. Rabouin said in an interview with ABC15.

He said that he had been in Phoenix spending time with family when he went to the bank to interview people and that he intentionally did not “dress up” — he wore shorts and a T-shirt — because he did not want bank customers to believe he was trying to sell them something.

He told the television station that he was working on a story and that he was looking for real people, not experts and economists. He did not identify the nature of the story.

He said that he had been standing on the sidewalk next to the building when bank employees came outside to ask what he was doing. Mr. Rabouin told ABC15 that he had identified himself as a journalist and that no one had asked him to leave.

Shortly after, Mr. Rabouin said, a police officer showed up. He said that he had offered to leave but that the officer grabbed him and told him, “This can get bad for you if you don’t comply.”

Maura Cordova, a spokeswoman for Chase Bank, would not comment further on the details surrounding Mr. Rabouin’s detainment.

“We apologize to Mr. Rabouin,” she said on Sunday. “I have nothing else to add.”

According to the letter sent by The Journal’s editor in chief, Matt Murray, Mr. Rabouin had been interviewing passers-by on a public sidewalk outside the bank when he was approached by an officer, who told Mr. Rabouin that he was trespassing.

“At no point until then had Mr. Rabouin been asked to leave the sidewalk outside the bank by Chase personnel or anyone else,” Mr. Murray said, adding that Mr. Rabouin had a “clear right” to be present on the sidewalk while reporting.

He said that Mr. Rabouin offered to leave but was then handcuffed and placed in a police vehicle. Footage showed that Mr. Rabouin kept “a calm and professional demeanor throughout the episode,” Mr. Murray said.

“I am relieved that Mr. Rabouin’s interaction with Phoenix police officers ended peacefully,” Mr. Murray added. “But I am appalled and concerned that officers at your department would attempt to interfere with Mr. Rabouin’s constitutional right to engage in journalism and purport to limit anyone’s presence in a public location. Such conduct is offensive to civil liberties.” [MORE]