Track-a-Trick: In Tenn, 1 in 5 Blacks are Barred from Voting [Racists Make it Hard to Vote to Promote the Illusion that Voting is Power. Your Vote Only Matters If the Election is decided by 1 Vote]

According to FUNKTIONARY

Track-a-Trick – the political version of trick-or-treat where the big-pimping elected ghoul turns a trick on the voting fool—and covers its tracks by robbing directly from you whatever it lacks! Addicted to the political process you abuse—and every single time you vote, you still seem to lose. (See: VOTE, Elections, Pollworkers, Taxtortion & Politicians)

Two-party System – Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-dumb—working together systematically to keep you down, confused, and passively subservient to a system that is relegated to solving life’s problems and conflicts through the iron rule of political power. The real two-party system is the tail-gate and the after-party. Don’t vote—Act! Delete the Elite! Secret Ballots beget secret “government.” In order to bring in a new dawn of civilization, an advancing one, we must educate ourselves on the liberating power of symbioacracy and its four noble pillars: individuality, spirituality, noble law and knowledge—which restructure the dynamics of human relationships through the Golden Rule of serving others without being subservient to anyone while beneting all. We can invoke and activate (unleash) this dormant aspect of the Kingdom of heaven on Earth as soon as enough people have seen enough and realize that political power happens only through coercion and deception. Political structure and process has been a failing experiment for aeons. It’s not to late to join the afterparty of Reality and begin to see what the promises of infinity hold for everyone—including you and me. (See: Big Brother, Golden Rule, Contract, Kingdom of Heaven, Political Power, Authoritarianism, Iron Rule, The Representative System, Politics, VoteScam, Creativity, ChoicePoint, Republican, Tyrannolaw, Voting, Campaign Elections, VOTE, Electionomics, VOTERS, Freedom, Plutocracy & Electoral College)

From [HERE] One in five Black residents of Tennessee are prohibited by state law from voting. In combination with numerous other election barriers, advocates say, people of color have been broadly disenfranchised by white lawmakers maintaining their grip on power in the state. 

Tennessee has one of the most draconian laws in the country stripping voting rights from people convicted of felonies. More than 450,000 citizens in the state, disproportionately Black and Latino, are affected.

“We are not going to have a fully functional electorate unless more people have access to voting,” said Kathy Sinback, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee. “All of these policies have a disproportionate effect on our marginalized communities, our Black and brown communities. It truly is a remnant of what happened after the Civil War, when mass incarceration began and there was a concerted effort to disenfranchise, to police Black people to the point where they did not have full citizenship rights.”

Since the 2020 presidential election, access to voting and political representation has become even less equal.

In 2020, amid concerns about COVID-19 exposure, a court blocked the state’s requirement that first-time voters appear in person at a polling place. That ruling has since been overturned. 

Voters must qualify under a specific set of circumstances to cast absentee ballots in Tennessee. Fear of COVID-19 exposure or transmission is not one of them. When casting a ballot in person, Tennessee voters face one of the strictest voter ID laws in the country. They’re required to present a photo ID issued by the state or federal government, and student IDs, even from state colleges and universities, are specifically prohibited. [MORE]

6 in 10 Whites want Race out of College admissions [Most whites also believe in white supremacy] and Believe Black Kids are Excluded Due to their Inferiority Not the Racist Public Fool System

From [HERE] More than 6 in 10 Americans support a ban on the consideration of race in college admissions, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll, but an equally robust majority endorses programs to boost racial diversity on campuses.

The findings illuminate the turbulent crosscurrents of public opinion on affirmative action as the Supreme Court revisits the fraught subject barely six years after it upheld the limited use of race in admissions at the University of Texas. On Oct. 31, the justices will hear arguments in cases challenging race-conscious admissions at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

If the court’s conservative majority reverses decades of precedent and prohibits the consideration of race and ethnicity, the Post-Schar School poll conducted this month finds 63 percent of adults would support the change. At the same time, 64 percent say programs designed to increase racial diversity of students are a good thing. Support for boosting diversity is high across racial and ethnic groups, while Black Americans are less supportive of banning race as a factor in admissions than people of other backgrounds.

Americans appear torn over policies meant to remedy historic inequities in educational opportunity and uphold the principle that students learn a great deal through encounters with classmates who don’t look like them. [MORE]

Amos Wilson: Is Black America Dying of Natural Causes or Strangulation by White Supremacy/Racism?

The bane of the African community is the exploitative White American community which projects a so-called civilized, fraternal, egalitarian, liberal face while concurrently seeking to maintain White supremacy. This means that the White American community must maintain African subordination while not appearing to do so. It must cannibalistically sacrifice the vitality, autonomy, and if need be, the life of the African American community while posing as its benefactor and savior. It pleads innocence while washing its hands of the blood of African people. This duplicitous task can only be accomplished by making it appear that the African community is dying of natural causes, not of an ingenious attempt on the part of the White American community to strangle it to death. This means that African American hands must be used to plunge White American-manufactured daggers into the hearts of African American citizens. This is the assigned role of the Black-on-Black violent criminal. How this role is played out will be delineated in the chapters that follow.

To explain the problem of African subordination in terms of racism, racial hatred, and the like, is to misdirect and mislead the African community down the irrational and destructive path of seeking to overcome "racism" (as if "racism" could exist without some race of people being empowered to practice it) while leaving the power (and need) to practice this behavior in White hands. The African American and worldwide African communities have chased phantom explanations and solutions to their detriment. While the explanations and solutions expressed in this book may or may not be accepted by the reader, he or she must accept the fact that new explanations and solutions must be found and applied full speed ahead!. [MORE] and [MORE]

Brazilian Muslims demand Harvard return skull of slave who fought in uprising

From [HERE] The Islamic community of Salvador, in Brazil’s Bahia state, has pushed Harvard University to repatriate the skull of an enslaved man who allegedly took part in a famous uprising of African Muslims in the city in 1835.  

The skull is part of a Harvard collection of human remains of 19 people of African origin likely enslaved in the Americas.

The University’s Peabody and Warren museums also hold the remains of some 6,500 Native Americans, and have for decades faced pressure in the United States to return all of them to their communities or descendants.

Earlier this year, Harvard established a committee to investigate the institution’s collection of human remains and ways of returning them.

According to student newspaper The Harvard Crimson, the university agreed in September to repatriate the remains, though no further details on the process have been published.

Bahia's Muslim community, which began its campaign in September, now plans to make direct contact with Harvard through the Islamic Centre and House of Nigeria in Salvador. [MORE]

Gun Ownership Among Law Abiding Black People On the Rise, according to researchers [defying liberal clogic that possessing a gun somehow makes you less safe]

From [HERE] Gun ownership trends in Ohio and across the country are shifting, especially in the Black community and among women, authorities say.

Annette Sumlin is one of the faces of that trend.

“I know a lot of single African American women of all ages, and they’re scared to leave their homes at night, and sometimes in the day because they are afraid something may happen to them,” said Sumlin, 36, of Cleveland. “I also believe that my gun gives me my sense of security and it ensures that I can protect my home no matter what happens.”

The country began to see a spike in firearm purchases in 2019, when a little more than 13 million background checks were recorded. The numbers increased to 21 million in 2020 amid the pandemic, then decreased to 18.5 million in 2021, according to an analysis conducted by the National Sports Shooting Foundation. This year is set to fall in place as the third highest year for background checks.

In 2021, there were more than 5.4 million first-time gun buyers, a decrease from the 8.4 million in 2020. Half of guns the guns purchased were handguns.

Over 33% of gun buyers in 2021 were women. [MORE]

Black Strawboss Sheriff Tells Fed Jury that He Strapped Handcuffed Inmates to Restraint Chairs for Up to 6 Hours at a Time for their Own Benefit, Not Punishment in Atlanta Area Jail [run by liberals]

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

Straw-Boss – a Sambo who is appointed a certain oversight role for the white power structure Overseer. It is the job of the Straw- Boss to establish a formal organization to effectively and systematically carry out the wishes of the racist white supremacist power matrix while serving his own personal needs and ends through patronage power. 2) a ranking Snigger. 3) Toby. 4) “Safe-House Negro.” 5) responsible (to the white racist supremacist ideology) Negro. 6) the gatekeeper for Black professional positions gained through (acquiesced to) various sexual positions. 7) Pork Chop Boy. (See: McNegro)

Quisling – the name for a traitor, coined in April, 1940, meaning one who is content to accept the yoke of the conqueror for the sake of being given office and trinkets, even against the feeling and expression of the conquered people, and moreover, prepared to use the force continuum against his/her own people to impose the conquerors decrees. (See: SNAGs)

From [HERE] and [HERE] An Atlanta-area sheriff defended himself Thursday in federal court against charges that he violated the civil rights of multiple detainees by strapping them into restraint chairs for several hours as punishment.

Federal prosecutors indicted Victor Hill in April 2021, accusing the Clayton County Sheriff of using the restraint chairs for purposes other than for emergencies, such as when an inmate threatens to injure themselves, someone else, property or "has demonstrated violent or uncontrollable behavior."

The controversial yet popular sheriff, who has served in the elected position for ten years despite having already faced prosecution before, took the stand in the seventh day of trial. 

He told the court that he put detainees in restraint chairs because they showed "pre-attack indicators" and because of "the totality of the circumstances." He added that restraints can be used by law enforcement even during traffic stops to avoid potential attack or escape attempts. 

Hill and his defense counsel argued that the restraint chairs are used as a "preventative action as opposed to a reactive action," and that detainees can be placed in them based on their actions prior to their arrest.

But prosecutors argue that the seven alleged victims were already handcuffed and compliant with officers after their intake into the jail and exhibited no threatening signs to justify Hill strapping them into chairs for four or more hours.

One of the detainees was 17 years-old at the time and was brought into custody for vandalizing his home after having a dispute with his mother.

"Destructive behavior is a pre-indicator of violence," Hill said as his reason for placing Chryshon Hollins in a restraint chair.

When asked by prosecutors why he told Hollins and another detainee, "I'm going to sit your ass in the chair for 16 hours straight," Hill said they need a "strong male role to keep them in line" because many of the detainees were raised by a single mother and that females may not be able to get them under control as well. 

Hill also said that he was not aware that the teen had been put in the chair for an additional six hours after he had already been restrained for four, which is the maximum time for it to be used according to the official guidelines. 

Hollins said during his testimony on Monday that he cried throughout and that it "felt like torture." 

Despite Hill's statements that medical personnel check on inmates who are in restraint chairs every 15 minutes, two of the detainees said that they were not offered bathroom breaks and were forced to urinate on themselves. 

Walter Thomas, who was arrested for speeding with a suspended license and drug possession, told the court Tuesday that he urinated on himself "about three or four times."

While Hill testified that he ordered for the chair to be used on Thomas because he was not complying with an officer during intake, there is no video evidence, even though the sheriff said there is constant video surveillance inside the jail. 

When asked by U.S. Attorney Brent Gray if the two detainees who were taken out of their cells and then put in restraint chairs were being destructive, Hill said "No, not at the jail."

One of the detainees, Glenn Howell, was shown obeying an officer's instructions while being searched and calmly sitting in a chair handcuffed for several minutes unattended in a video presented to the jury earlier in the trial. 

A deputy complained to Hill that Howell had damaged his property after they had a payment dispute over landscaping work. Hill said he called Howell out of concern for the deputy's safety and as the conversation grew ugly, was told to "go fuck himself."

Hill said that because of this threat to law enforcement by Howell, he put him in the restraint chair after arresting him for "harassing communications."

"These type of people are a threat to jail security," Hill said, contradicting testimony provided Wednesday by two officers working in the jail during Howell's arrest who said he never threatened anyone or showed aggressive behavior. 

“It felt like a lifetime," Howell said about his five hours spent in a restraint chair. 

Howell testified that he began to experience claustrophobia while restrained in the chair and was denied medical attention when he expressed concern that he was having a heart attack.

Prosecutors presented the jury again with a video of Joseph Arnold, one of the detainees who is shown in handcuffs, complying with officers and asking if he was entitled to a "fair and speedy trial," to which Hill responded, "You're entitled to sit in this chair," before strapping him in.

Based on information he had received about Arnold's alleged crime of assaulting an elderly woman, Hill said he had made the decision to put him in the chair before he was even brought into the jail. 

Arnold said the restraints were “very painful and humiliating,” during his testimony.

However, Hill repeatedly testified Thursday that to his knowledge no inmates have been injured while being strapped in the chairs.

His statement contradicts photos and videos shown by prosecutors of red welts on the wrists of multiple detainees, and a grisly gash on both wrists of one of the men, Desmond Bailey. 

Hill's defense counsel also questioned Elizabeth Smith, a nurse from the jail and Clayton County Chief Deputy Roland Boehrer, who both said they had no knowledge of, or involvement with, any of the seven detainees. 

Mississippi Courts are Helping Cops Keep Search Warrants Out Of the Public’s Hands

From [HERE] No-knock warrants remain under fire as they continue to needlessly increase the death toll of residents who often have no idea who’s violently entering their home and, therefore, respond in unpredictable ways. Supposedly obtained to increase officer safety, these warrants often seem like a handy way to put officers in “fear for your safety” mode, thus justifying the violence that follows.

But how often are they obtained? That’s tough to tell. Very few law enforcement agencies are willing to speak openly about their use/abuse of these warrants. Fortunately, public records and court proceedings will often provide the information cop shops and prosecutors won’t share freely.

Unfortunately, that’s not always the case. Warrants and affidavits are part of the court record in criminal proceedings. Warrants and their accompanying paperwork are often sealed by court orders, preventing the public from seeing them until the government (judge, law enforcement agency, etc.) feels comfortable sharing them.

In Mississippi, however, the status quo is even worse than the hit-and-miss warrant access available elsewhere in the country. This ProPublica report shines a light on the seemingly concerted effort to keep warrant documents out of the public’s hands across the state. (via FourthAmendment.com)

The opening details the struggles of public defender Merrill Nordstrom, who was simply trying to challenge the warrant (which happened to be no-knock) that had led to her client’s arrest. Police had violently entered her client’s home searching for drugs — an assault predicated by the alleged sale of less than a gram of marijuana to an informant. No drugs were found but cops came across a gun her client wasn’t allowed to own. 

Hoping to find warrants showing a pattern of violent no-knock raids predicated on alleged criminal acts that seemingly would not require this show of force, she went to the Greenville courthouse to read through other warrants. That’s when she discovered the court did not keep these records. Perversely, the local justice system was lending itself to injustice.

Though she had the search warrant for Bryant’s home, she couldn’t find records for most other raids in the city. The search warrants and supporting documents weren’t at the courthouse, even though the state Supreme Court’s rules require law enforcement to return warrants to the court.

Instead they were at the Greenville Police Department, hidden from view because law enforcement agencies, unlike the courts, can claim a broad public records exemption over records in their possession.

Wow. It’s as if no one in the Greenville courthouse is aware files can be copied, either physically or digitally. The police have no right to stash away the sole copies of search warrants in their own files, especially when it appears the sole purpose is to invert the presumption of openness that guides court proceedings.

It’s a statewide problem.

An investigation by the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal and ProPublica has found that almost two-thirds of Mississippi’s county-level justice courts prevent access to some or all search warrants and related documents. So do municipal courts in at least five of the state’s 10 largest cities, including Jackson, the capital.

The court-enabled opacity takes multiple forms. Some courts violate state law by not requiring law enforcement to turn in search warrants and other documents once the warrants have been served. In some cases, courts don’t even bother having cops do the dirty work. They simply refuse to give the public access to these documents.

It’s this opacity that encourages abuse of no-knock warrants. The public defender discussed above discovered a majority of warrants issued in Greenville were no-knock. And most were likely approved by Municipal Judge Michael Prewitt, the only circuit judge in the area for the last two decades. Judge Prewitt admitted as much when questioned by the defender, stating that he’d issue a no-knock warrant to “search for a sweater.” His excuse? There’s a lot of drug crime in Greenville.

This information came from the judge himself. The court claimed it had no records of any searches authorized by Judge Prewitt, despite his two decades of service. And it didn’t. The only person with access to the documents was the person who rubber-stamped them to send cops searching for sweaters.

Prewitt said in an email to the Daily Journal and ProPublica that he personally keeps copies of all search warrants that are returned to him.

The courts in Mississippi are serving law enforcement, rather than the public. Multiple court clerks were questioned by ProPublica. Far too many admitted they weren’t in the business of assuring public records were accessible by the public.

“We don’t keep those,” said Lamar County Justice Court Clerk Sandra Owen.

“Usually the return goes back to the sheriff’s offices,” said Jones County Justice Court Clerk Stacy Walls.

“I hardly ever see search warrants — before, during or after,” said Marion County Justice Court Clerk Wynette Parkman.

Once again, government employees are conveniently pretending it’s impossible to make a copy of a court document before giving it back to a law enforcement agency. In other cases, they’re simply pretending the rule ordering law enforcement to provide these documents to the court following a search doesn’t apply to them or the cops.

There is some justifiable ignorance tucked into all the law enforcement subservience. In many cases, clerks aren’t made aware that warrants have been signed by judges. As such, there’s no way they would know documents cops are mandated to return to the court have not been returned. 

But there’s also a lot of seemingly willful ignorance. Clerks seem to be aware of law enforcement’s obligations. However, they claim that, despite the clear wording, they’ve never been explicitly told these documents must remain in the hands of the court when (or, more likely, if) they’re returned by law enforcement officers. 

The entire report is an infuriating read. The general tone that comes across is that both involved government parties — law enforcement and courts — believe the general public has no right to access these documents, despite them clearly being part of the public record, in terms of court proceedings. [MORE]

Alabama Prisoners Continue to Strike Over ‘horrendous’ conditions. Inmates Refuse to Work for no pay in Prison jobs in food service, laundry and maintenance

From [HERE] An estimated 80% of prisoners from Alabama’s “major male facilities” went on strike on September 26th, in response to a wide range of conditions and grievances. Inside organizer Kinetik Swift Justice stated,

Basically, the message that we are sending is, the courts have shut down on us, the parole board has shut down on us. This society has long ago shut down on us. So basically, if that’s the case, and you’re not wanting us to return back to society, you can run these facilities yourselves.

The strike has now entered its third week, and at least five facilities, each with around 7,000 prisoners, continue to participate. Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) has punished prisoners by drastically reducing their meals, essentially attempting to starve them off the strike. “They have been killed, they have been abused, they are being tortured right now as we speak,” said Eric Buchanan, a formerly incarcerated person who spoke at a rally for the strike.

They are retaliating against our brothers right now by giving them very little food to eat.

ADOC has also used lower-custody prisoners to help break the strike, threatening to re-classify them back to a higher security facility if they refused to scab. Some of these minimum custody prisoners have still refused, however. One prisoner, who was thrown in solitary for refusing to help break the strike, stated,

They forced me to come over here from Decatur to put my life in jeopardy by working against the inmates, my own people, in this peaceful protest… I believe in what y’all doing. I’ve got a 21-year sentence. Y’all are helping me.

Statements From The Small Prison

From : All confined citizens in Alabama prisons.

Since the peaceful labor strike within the Alabama Department of Corrections began on September 26, those who are striking have faced relentless attempts to break our spirit by the correctional staff. We have been starved, placed into solitary confinement and suicide cells as retaliation, and forced into dangerous situations as ADOC tries to turn us against each other. In spite of this, international media and activists have turned their attention toward Alabama and its inhumane treatment of and policies around incarcerated individuals. The world is watching.

We will not relent under these retaliatory tactics. Our brothers, particularly those with health conditions, addiction and mental health challenges, have faced challenges not only to their psychological well-being but also their very lives.

Especially alarming is ADOC’S intentional “bird feeding” food deprevention, which presents a severe health risk to those who suffer from diabetes and other illnesses that require a wellness diet.

Unlike the ADOC we value life.

By no means are we waiving a white flag of defeat. We are still demanding our concerns be heard before our Legislators and other elected officials. We also demand that our outside representatives be given a platform to be our voice and the public hear our arguments.

At this time, some have chosen to returned to work to ensure that ADOC does not continue to target the most vulnerable in our population. Others will continue to strike.

We will continue to escalate our strike, peacefully, until our voices are heard.

Alabama Confined Citizens

Individual Statement from Prisoner at Donaldson

My name is Gerald Griffin#247505. I’m serving a 22 year sentence under the Habitual Offender Act that’s is unconstitutional and that has the Alabama prisons over crowded in inhumane conditions prisoners here in Alabama connected their daily struggles for humanity and survival to the broader political context we entered collectively as one whole.

The prisoners in Alabama are tiered. Prisoners across the United States right now are actively engaging in some of the most passionate, consistent and effective rebellion in the country. The Alabama prisoners want better living conditions, workers pay incentives for programs they’ve completed, stop the abuse mentally and physically by ADOC officials, to put in action to oversee these unconstitutional sentences from the Hibitual offender act law, and for them to let go these elders that been in prison for excessive sentences at Donaldson Correctional Facility.

We are going to stay strong. Thank you for the ones that support us in this shutdown.

Break every chain to have a opportunity to hug my mother and sister again…

North Carolina’s Use of Death Qualification Disenfranchises Black People From Serving on Death Penalty Juries

From [HERE] The process of death qualification, which excludes people who oppose the death penalty from serving on capital juries, is racially discriminatory, civil rights advocate Reverend Dr. William J. Barber II wrote in an October 10, 2022 op-ed.

Rev. Barber and his co-authors, pastor Dumas Harshaw Jr. and preacher Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, introduce their article with a recognition of J.W. Hood, a Black man and AME Zion pastor, who fought to abolish slavery and co-authored North Carolina’s modern constitution. “Today, he’s exactly the kind of person who’s most likely to be denied the right to serve on a jury,” they write. “A century and a half after Hood spoke of the importance of jury service, a Wake County death penalty case is exposing the reality that Black people’s right to be represented in the jury box is still under threat in North Carolina.” 

They explain that “studies show that Black people are more likely to oppose the death penalty and question evidence presented by law enforcement,” and are therefore more likely to be excluded from capital juries during the death qualification process. This ignores the fact that the views of Black jurors are shaped by racial discrimination in the legal system. The authors write, “this perspective is the result of the African-American experience in the United States, which is shaped by the racist history of policing and the death penalty. Rules that do not recognize this fact make it impossible for us to work together toward a multiracial democracy.”

UN Experts: ‘Almost Impossible’ for Countries to Administer Death Penalty without Violating Defendants’ Human Rights

From [HERE] Two leading United Nations human rights experts have condemned capital punishment as incompatible with international legal requirements, saying the death penalty is “almost impossible” to administer while respecting the human rights of the accused.

In a joint statement issued from Geneva, Switzerland on Oct. 10, 2022 in connection with the observance of the 20th World Day Against the Death Penalty, Dr. Alice Jill Edwards, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and Morris Tidball-Binz, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions called death-penalty abolition “the only viable path.” “Although the death penalty is permitted in very limited circumstances under international law, the reality remains that in practice it is almost impossible for States to impose capital punishment while meeting their obligations to respect the human rights of those convicted,” they said.

The Special Rapporteurs criticized death-row conditions, torturous execution methods, and the use of capital punishment against vulnerable classes of defendants and as an instrument of political oppression. “A number of states continue to impose the death penalty for non-violent crimes such as blasphemy, adultery and drug-related offences, which fail the ‘most serious crime’ standard for the application of capital punishment under international law. A growing trend of imposing the death penalty on those exercising their right to peaceful political protest is deeply worrying,” they wrote.

EU Elite Josep Borrell Expresses the Delusion that Whites Must Dominate Non-Whites to Survive and Avoid Replacement: saying, ‘Most of the World is a Jungle that Could Invade Europe, which is a Garden’

NON-WHITE PEOPLE, PARTICULARLY BLACKS AND LATINOS MUST UNDERSTAND THAT SOME RACISTS PRACTICE RACISM TO SURVIVE. THEY BELIEVE THEY LITERALLY MUST DOMINATE AND CONTROL NON-WHITES IN ORDER TO SURVIVE AND NON-WHITES THREATEN THEIR ACTUAL SURVIVAL. RACISM IS A POWERFUL MOTIVATING FORCE. And persons who are classified as white are indeed replaceable. Most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

White plus Black equals Colored.

White plus Brown equals Colored.

White plus Yellow equals Colored.

It is scientific fact that white people are genetic recessive. In general, this means they cannot reproduce a white child when they have sexual relations with non-whites. In reality, 90% of the world's population of 7 billion people are non-white, PERSONS CLASSIFIED AS White make up less than 10% of the world's population AND ARE IN CONTINUAL DECLINE. NEVERTHELESS, EVERYWHERE NON-WHITES AND WHITES LIVE TOGETHER, THE WHITES ARE IN CONTROL OF NON-WHITES. THE ONLY PERSONS CONCERNED ABOUT THE DECLINING HUMAN TRAIT OF WHITE SKIN, A MEANINGLESS HUMAN CHARACTERISTIC, ARE RACISTS (DELUSIONAL persons WHO believE in the granfalloon of “RACE.”). [MORE] and [MORE]

DR. WELSING’S “Color-Confrontation theory” postulates that whites are vulnerable to their sense of numerical inadequacy. This inadequacy is apparent in their drive to divide the vast majority of non-whites into fractional, as well as frictional, minorities. RACISTS HAVE structured and manipulated their own thought processes and conceptual patterns, as well as those of the entire non-white world majority, so that the real numerical minority (whites) illusionally feels and represents itself as the world's majority, while the true numerical majority (non-whites) illusionally feels and views itself as the minority.’ [MORE]

IF BLACK AND LATINO INDIVIDUALS CAN UNDERSTAND RACISM AS A BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM OF WHITE SURVIVAL AND THEREFORE THAT RACISTS “are playing a White survival game [which] has to inferiorize the functioning of Black and other people of color,” THEN THEY CAN LOGICALLY SEE THAT NON-WHITES CAN NEVER BE INTEGRATED WITH RACISTS. TO SOME RACISTS, INTEGRATION IS WHITE SUICIDE OR GENOCIDE. WITH SUCH AN UNDERSTANDING NON-WHITES COULD ALSO ONCE AND FOR ALL DROP MORAL SUASION AS A STRATEGY TO SOMEHOW TRANSFORM RACISTS AND BECOME EQUAL PARTNERS WITH THEM. SUCH GUILLIBLE THINKING HAVE CAUSED BLACK PEOPLE’S CENTURIES LONG LOSING STREAK WITH RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY. NON-WHITES WHO UNDERSTAND THE COLOR CONFRONTATION THEORY KNOW THAT RACISTS ARE THE PERMANENT ENEMIES OF BLACK PEOPLE AND THERBY UNDERSTAND THAT YOU CAN NEVER BE ALLIES WITH PERSONS WHO SEEK TO BE YOUR MASTER.

From [HERE] The European Union’s top foreign-policy official showed how the colonialist mentality is still very much alive on the continent.

EU foreign-policy chief Josep Borrell said “Europe is a garden,” which is “beautiful” and superior to the vast majority of the countries on Earth. On the other hand, he claimed, “Most of the rest of the world is a jungle, and the jungle could invade the garden.”

Borrell argued that “the world needs Europe,” because it is a “beacon” that must civilize the rest of the world.

The enlightened Western “gardeners have to go to the jungle,” he insisted, because if the supposed barbarians are not tamed, “the rest of the world will invade us.”

Borrell delivered this overtly racist rant at the inauguration of the European Diplomatic Academy in Brussels on October 13.

According to the official transcript, published at the EU website, Borrell said the following:

Europe is a garden. We have built a garden. Everything works. It is the best combination of political freedom, economic prosperity and social cohesion that the humankind has been able to build – the three things together. And here, Bruges is maybe a good representation of beautiful things, intellectual life, wellbeing.

The rest of the world – and you know this very well, Federica – is not exactly a garden. Most of the rest of the world is a jungle, and the jungle could invade the garden. The gardeners should take care of it, but they will not protect the garden by building walls. A nice small garden surrounded by high walls in order to prevent the jungle from coming in is not going to be a solution. Because the jungle has a strong growth capacity, and the wall will never be high enough in order to protect the garden.

The gardeners have to go to the jungle. Europeans have to be much more engaged with the rest of the world. Otherwise, the rest of the world will invade us, by different ways and means.

Yes, this is my most important message: we have to be much more engaged with the rest of the world.

Dr. Amos Wilson states, "[Blacks] must question how is it that a minority people [whites], a very small percentage of mankind, a people who are essentially resourceless in terms of their natural resources, maintain the power they have. Why is it that the peoples whose lands contain the wealth of the earth are the poorest people? Why is it that Afrika with some twenty (20) or thirty (30) strategic metals that make the space age possible — why is it that the image of Afrika is projected at us time and time again as that of starving children, as societies in disorder, as societies on the verge of disaster? This implies that there must exist a political, social situation wherein the mental orientation of our people must be so structured that the power and the ability of the Europeans to rule this earth are continually maintained.' [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY STATES

Europe – northwest Asia—a geographic lie—continentally speaking, a continent is land surrounded by water. Europe is surrounded by land-grabbers. Europe—so little history and so much crime. Europe is a thawed-out ice-box. It is a section of contiguous land mass named after “Europa,” an African woman, the daughter of Belus, and the sister of Phineus, the Nubian. The oldest extant record of European history is titled “The Ethipians.” Contrary to popular belief, so-called Europe is not a continent—go look on any map. The inaccurate official version of the etymology for the name “Europe” comes from that of the Greek moon goddess Europa, which means white face or pale face. At first she rode her luna bull over the seas and through the world. Then with the Patriarchal revolt, he raped her and became instead her abductor. Europeans (the so-called white race) as a distinct ethnicity, have no factually certain or known historical origin so they adapted the Roman mythological story of Romulus and Remus as their biological ancestry. The more probable history is being the offspring of the Cave-Man and Homo-Sapien Sapiens. So few controlling the rest of the view—to the history, the mystery, and the vast ancient past. So, Afrikan folk, what is there left to do? History changes its view when you fight back. Don’t be frightened, the fight will be spiritual—not physical. Melanin strives in stress but shuts down with fear. (See: Caucasian, Melanin, Racism White Supremacy, His-Story, Self-Determination, Manifest Destiny, Empire, Imperialism, Fascism, Mutual Aid, Violence, Conflict, War & Yurugu)

The EU foreign-policy chief failed to mention that, for more than 500 years, European colonialist powers have run the most violent empires in human history, overseeing mass genocides, racialized chattel slavery, ethnic cleansing, and constant wars.

Instead, Borrell continued later in his remarks portraying Europe as a superior “beacon” of civilization:

Believe me, Europe is a good example for many things. The world needs Europe. My experience of travelling around the world is that people look at us as a beacon.

Why [do] so many people come to Europe? Are there flows of illegal or irregular migrants going to Russia? Not many. No, they are coming to Europe but for good reasons.

Keep the garden, be good gardeners. But your duty will not be to take care of the garden itself but [of] the jungle outside.

In the same speech, Borrell claimed Europe is superior because of its “institutions”:

There is a big difference between Europe and the rest of the world – well, the rest of the world, understand me what I mean, no? – is that we have strong institutions. … The big difference between developed and not developed is not the economy, it is institutions.

Here, we have a judiciary – a neutral, independent judiciary. Here, we have systems of distributing the revenue. Here, we have elections that provide a free for the citizens. Here, we have the red lights controlling the traffic, people taking the garbage.

…

The big difference between us and an important part of the rest of the world is that we have institutions.

Despite his implications, countries across the Global South do indeed have independent judiciaries, tax services, free elections, traffic lights, and garbage collectors. But the EU’s top foreign-policy official apparently believes that the majority of the world’s population consists of illiterate knuckle-dragging cavemen.

Borrell evidently could see that his comments were racist, so he cautiously added, “I cannot go to emerging countries and build institutions for them – they have to be built by them. Otherwise, it would be a kind of neo-colonialism.”

But while he superficially rejected neocolonialism, Borrell’s remarks reflected a blatant neocolonialist mentality.

And the EU foreign-policy chief’s use of the term “emerging countries” made it clear that his rant was aimed specifically at the formerly colonized nations in the Global South.

EU is waging a new cold war to integrate ‘post-Putin Russia’ into West-led hegemonic system

In the same October 13 speech, Josep Borrell obliquely acknowledged that the West is fighting a new cold war against Russia and China.

“Now, we are definitely out of the Cold War and the post-Cold War. The post-Cold War has ended with the Ukrainian war,” he said. [MORE]

To Mandroids [academented conformists, managers] Anything Contrary to the Vested Interests is Disinformation [‘those who are clever at deceiving others become equally adroit at deceiving themselves’]

From [HERE] Summary: The strategic warning report is intended to provide relevant and necessary intelligence to the senior policy-maker for the United States (U.S.) intelligence community (IC). The strategic warning report aims to identify the necessary posture and response to address the matter referenced in the strategic warning. The strategic warning report will convey to the policy-maker the urgency to respond and the potential consequences concerning national security (Gentry and Gordon 2019). Therefore, the intelligence professional must be clear, concise, and deliberate in presenting the strategic warning to a policymaker.

The national security matter addressed in this strategic warning report concerns the potential degradation and limitations of U.S. intelligence collection and analysis platforms due to the deliberate disinformation campaign directed by the foreign adversary (Frank, Dambre, and Clark, 2022). Contained in this strategic warning report are significant factors affecting the policies regarding national security. The pertinent factors include Assumptions, Analysis, Threats, Indicators, Opportunities, and the Strategic Intelligence Posture (SIP). The foreign adversary’s disinformation campaign may take many forms but is most often seen across virtual social media platforms. Social media platforms are a lightly controlled breeding ground for disinformation strategies. The intelligence professional’s strategic warning is thus that disinformation operations targeting U.S. intelligence collection and national interests represent a critical threat to the intelligence community infrastructure and its ability to provide valued strategic intelligence to senior policy-makers in the intelligence community.

Assumptions

There have been several flawed attempts to inhibit the spread of disinformation. The focus has always been on social media platforms. The role of actors other than social platforms is often ignored, particularly the historical part of mass media in spreading state propaganda or suppressing political expression (CITAP, 2022). Most recently, President Biden established the Disinformation Governance Board to study best practices in combating the harmful effects of disinformation. The board was later dissolved in May 2022. Following the false premise that “broken” social media is responsible for the ills it reveals, regulation will suppress speech (Cato, 2022). Social media restrictions will be viewed as an infringement on First Amendment Rights. Social media restriction is not an infringement when the rights being practiced impede national security. Focusing on the perpetrators and penalizing violators will minimize the spread of disinformation to manageable levels (DHS, 2022).

Analysis

Disinformation has a long history of plaguing Americans. According to Marwick and Kuo (2021), it became apparent in the 2016 U.S. General elections that the spread of disinformation is driven by fundamental human tendencies to share shocking information and to prefer information that conforms with their existing beliefs (Haigh, Haigh, and Matychak, 2019). Disinformation happens in moments of crisis when people search for information to help them understand what is happening or how to stay safe (ShareVerified, 2022). There is evidence that certain groups purposely target U.S. intelligence agencies to discredit their reports. They have been named the ‘deep state’ on many platforms. The narrative is constantly repeated. As a result of this disinformation campaign against the U.S. intelligence agencies, the reports are questioned and often not believed.

Disinformation is crippling the credibility of the United States intelligence agencies. The political, economic, and cultural impacts limit the United States’ ability to govern effectively. In the wake of the crisis in Ukraine that erupted in 2013–2014, the Kremlin has been accused of orchestrating disinformation campaigns against the Ukrainian government and western countries by using online trolls, a person or group that intentionally incites discord in online conversations, and state-controlled online outlets such as RT (formerly known as Russia Today), Sputnik and Life News (Bjola and Pammet, 2016). Foreign news has led to a wave of counter-disinformation measures in the West to combat what is seen as a threat to democracy, international security, and stability (Golovchenko, Hartmann, and Adler-Nissen, 2018). Action must be taken immediately to quell the spread of disinformation to ensure the United States can continue supporting Ukraine effectively as Russia reconstitutes and continues its advancements in Eastern Ukraine. More people are beginning to support the narrative that Ukraine is corrupt and perhaps Russia is justified in launching an attack. Failure to counter anti-Ukraine messaging can have an irreversible impact on Western democracy when factual evidentiary data from the intelligence community is rendered propaganda from the ‘deep state.’ More than $40 billion in additional aid to Ukraine was approved by the U.S. Congress on May 19, 2022, bringing the total U.S. commitment during the Russian invasion to roughly $54 billion combined with the aid package passed in March (Pallaro and Parlapiano, 2022). The U.S. cannot sustain this level of support to Ukraine without U.S. support, and the disinformation campaign may prolong the war and the level of aid needed by the Ukrainian government. [MORE]

UN Investigative body calls Israel presence in Palestine ‘unlawful under international law,’ Fascist US Authorities Criticize Inquiry

From [HERE] The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, Thursday released its second report, stating there are “reasonable grounds to conclude that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory is now unlawful under international law due to its permanence and the Israeli Government’s de-facto annexation policies.”

The commission called for the UN Security Council to bring to an end the “illegal situation resulting from the permanent occupation imposed by Israel” and require Israel to bring “its permanent occupation to an end immediately.” According to the commission, Israel has “created and is maintaining a complex environment of coercion,” including the demolition of homes and the destruction of property, excessive use of force by security forces, mass incarceration, settler violence, restricted movement through checkpoints and roads and limitations on access to livelihoods, basic necessities, services and humanitarian assistance. Such occupation policies violate the right of Palestinians to an adequate standard of living under Article 11 of the ICESCR, Article 46 of The Hague Regulations and Article 53 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

The commission reported 398 settler attacks in the West Bank, with 84 attacks resulting in casualties from January to July 2022.  In comparison, there were 496 attacks during 2021 and 358 attacks in 2020. The commission called special attention to gender-based violations and stated that the policies implemented by Israel in Palestine have a pervasive discriminatory effect on Palestinian women and violate the protections of CEDAW.

Commission member Chris Sidoti said:

The actions of Israeli Governments reviewed in our report constitute an illegal occupation and annexation regime that must be addressed. The international system and individual States must act and uphold their obligations under international law. That must begin at this session of the General Assembly with a referral to the International Court of Justice.

The commission recommended three actions: (1) the Israeli government should comply completely with international law and end without any delay its 55 years of occupation of the Palestinian and Syrian territories; (2) the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court should prioritize its investigation into the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; and (3) the UN General Assembly should urgently request an advisory opinion from the ICJ on the legal consequences of Israel’s continued refusal to end its occupation of the Palestine and East Jerusalem.

In a press briefing, US Department of State Spokesperson Ned Price said Israel is “consistently unfairly targeted” by the UN. According to Price, “[n]o country, the record of no country, should be immune from scrutiny, but no country should also be targeted unfairly. And that’s the principle that we seek to uphold.”

In 2021, the UN Human Rights Council held a special session on the “grave human rights situation” in Palestine and East Jerusalem and adopted a resolution to establish the a special commission of inquiry. The commission released its first report in May.

In the 1960s when the Flu Vax was found to be ineffective Whistleblowers were Censored, Fired or Filtered Out by the Vested Interests

“The Only Reason I Voted No was that Hell No Wasn’t a Choice.' Top Pediatrician on FDA’s Vaccine Committee Rejects COVID Boosters Approved for 5-Year-Olds

From [HERE] On Wednesday, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the new COVID-19 boosters for children as young as 5 years old. The decision was followed by a recommendation from CDC Director Rochelle Walensky.

“Updated COVID-19 vaccines add Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 spike protein components to the current vaccine composition, helping to restore protection that has waned since previous vaccination and targeting recent Omicron variants that are more transmissible and immune-evading,” the CDC wrote in a statement.  

The agency added: “FDA’s authorization of updated (bivalent) COVID-19 vaccines for this younger age group, and CDC’s recommendation for use, are critical next steps forward in our country’s vaccination program—a program that has helped provide increased protection against severe COVID-19 disease and death.”

PROMINENT PEDIATRICIAN DISAGREES 

But a member of the FDA’s Vaccine Advisory Committee did not agree with the decision to approve the bivalent boosters.

Dr. Paul Offit is one of the country’s most prominent pediatricians. He serves as director of the Vaccine Education Center and professor of pediatrics in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. In addition, he is the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

“We really need much better data, I think, before we move forward on this, and I can only hope that it’s coming,” Dr. Offit said in a video that has gone viral on Twitter. “I feel very strongly about my ‘no’ vote there, in fact, the only reason I voted ‘no’ was that ‘hell no’ wasn’t a choice […] The fix was in here a little bit, maybe that’s not the right phrase, but it was something that they wanted…” he added.

“I DIDN’T SEE THE BENEFITS”

As previously reported by The Florida Standard, the bivalent boosters only rely on data from testing on eight mice. 

“I don’t think you should ever ask tens of millions of people to get a vaccine based on mouse data,” Dr. Offit stated in an interview with NBC 10 Philadelphia on August 22.

“Do the benefits of this vaccine outweigh the risks? I didn’t see the benefits,” Dr. Offit said.

The World’s 2nd-Largest PR Firms Representing Pfizer and Moderna Have Staff Embedded in the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Division

From [HERE] The world’s second-largest global relations firms representing Pfizer and Moderna has staff embedded in the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine division. 

During the 2020 pandemic, the CDC, with U.S. tax dollars, paid Weber Shandwick to “boost its health communication” during the pandemic, which involved campaigns that encouraged Americans to get vaccinated. 

The New York-based firm has been responsible for elevating Pfizer’s profile since 2003 and partnered with Moderna in June 2022 to market its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine despite being a rival to Pfizer’s. 

Weber Shandwick’s conflict of interest was brought to light in a LinkedIn post by an employee of the PR firm last year who said they were excited about starting a job at the PR firm and working with the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD). 

The NCIRD implements vaccine programs and heads the agency’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), according to an exposé newsletter by investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker.

Weber Shandwick in 2020 secured a $ 50 million contract from the U.S. Government to promote flu vaccines to the public. Responsibilities included circulating social media posts and articles promoting vaccines and sending press releases to the media. It was also involved in paid media advertising. 

A “$50 million contract allows PR firm to be ‘embedded at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta as part of the Division of Viral Diseases team,’” said Thacker in a tweet Tuesday.

According to Daily Mail, a spokesperson for Weber Shandwick told the media outlet the firm had a “thorough vetting and mitigation process to avoid conflicts.”

Craig Holman, a lobbyist on Capitol Hill for Public Citizen, criticized the CDC for its obvious conflict of interest.

“This is irresponsible of CDC to issue a PR contract to Weber Shandwick,” he told the DisInformation Chronicle on Substack. “Knowing that the firm also works for Moderna and Pfizer.”

Pfizer currently controls about 70% of the U.S, and European markets and brought in roughly $81 billion in 2021 — mostly from its COVID-19 vaccine. This year the pharmaceutical giant expects to bring in $50 billion from just its vaccine and antiviral medication Paxlovid — infamous for causing “rebound COVID.”

According to The Epoch Times, Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna last year brought in a combined estimated pre-tax profit of $1,000 a second, $65,000 a minute or $93.5 million a day. 

The companies plan to continue to rake in the profits with their endless experimental booster shots, currently recommended for everyone 12 and over. 

Plandemic: Irrational US lockdowns and Fear Driven Panic Miraculously Healed the US/China Trade Rift that had been Developing for the 2 Years Prior

From [HERE] The story of the shocking lockdowns, in the US and around the world, of Spring of 2020 is impossible to tell without the central role of China, where lockdowns began and where the virus is believed to have originated. The World Health Organization, with the UK and the US as signatories, proclaimed that China managed the virus properly in an influential reportdated February 26, 2020. 

This series of events did not occur in a vacuum. The US and China were in the thick of a fiery trade war, with nearly two years of rounds of claims and counterclaims, fines and retaliations, as well as on and off rounds of negotiations that proved fruitless. There was plenty of carnage on both sides along the way. 

Is there a way in which the two fields of battle – the trade row and the virus response – are somehow linked? Was the selling of lockdowns as a virus response its own form of trade retaliation? Many have speculated along those lines. 

And there’s another intriguing prospect raised by this stark reality: even while the US was in the thick of a cruel lockdown that crushed small business and so much of American civic life, trade with China actually began to recover, due mostly to the persuasive gifts of Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. Perhaps this was not an accident.

Let’s review the series of events.

Starting in 2018, President Trump imposed tariffs on trade with China. It was an unusual approach by any postwar standard. Normally presidents past would impose tariffs on goods from any country in the name of protecting domestic industry, or perhaps target a single country on grounds of national security. 

This was different – targeting a single country on economic grounds – and it happened because Trump had a list of countries with whom the US ran a trade deficit, which he saw as proof of how “they” owed “us” money. 

So he started at the top of the list (China) and went down (Mexico, Germany, and even Canada). There is no evidence that he fully understood either what it means to have a “trade deficit” or that these policies could not force any other country to pay anything; American consumers and businesses pay the tariffs as another form of taxation to the US government. 

In any case, contrary to what Trump promised and expected, Xi Jinping retaliated and made it ever more difficult for the US to export to or import from China. Consumers and producers on both sides suffered. For a while, the consequences for China were devastating. By October 2018, imports from China to the US fell off a cliff. 

Matters became far worse with pandemic lockdowns in the US, a period during which China had opened up completely. Trump shut down travel to China on January 31, 2020, thinking that this would keep the virus out that had been in the US already six months, and continually referred to the “China virus.” A pathogen from China was something that Trump believed he needed to stop. The result was another blow to US-China trade. 

Anthony Fauci’s deputy assistant H. Clifford Lane went to China in mid-February 2020 to observe how China had supposed crushed the virus through brutal lockdowns, and, through a WHO report, urged the US to follow the same course. Trump went along at the urging of Fauci, Deborah Birx, and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, as well as vice president Mike Pence. [MORE]

Corpse Biden Extends the Manufactured COVID “Emergency,” thereby Extending the Govt's Grant of Immunity for Any Injury Caused by COVID Shots to Any “Vaccine” Maker” or Person who Administer Shots

The U.S. has extended the COVID public health emergency through Jan. 11, despite corpse Joe Biden’s recent claim that the pandemic is over. Yep “over” because it never existed in the first place.

The public health emergency, first declared in January 2020 by the Trump administration, has been renewed every 90 days since the plandemic began. [MORE]

The extension of the manufactured COVID emergency (plandemic) means that emergency use authorization immunity for fake COVID vaccines also continues.

From [HERE] The Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Alex M. Azar III, has granted the companies selling and those involved in virtually any other activity related to any COVID-19 vaccine immunity from liability for any injuries caused by these products. Prior to his current position, Secretary Azar was a senior executive for a major pharmaceutical company, Eli Lilly and Company, from 2007 to 2017.

Secretary Azar has issued a “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19.” (85 FR 15198.) It provides that those that “prescribe, administer, deliver, distribute or dispense” and the “manufacturers [and] distributors” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].” (Id.; 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d.)

The above stated regulations are the implementing regs for the actual statutory immunity provide for COVID injections. As explained by attorney Aaron Siri,

The federal government has given complete immunity to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J for any injury caused by their Covid-19 vaccines.  That’s right: you cannot sue them if you are injured by their Covid-19 vaccine.  (See Note 1 to read the law yourself.)  So, while their product may not give you immunity, Pfizer and Moderna are guaranteed immunity.  Said immunity also shields doctors, hospitals and any other persons who administer or coerce people to take deadly COVID injections.

And it gets even worse.  These companies are even immune for – hold your breath – willful misconduct.  That may sound crazy, but it is shockingly true.  You can only sue them for willful misconduct if the federal government first sues them for such conduct.  (See Note 2 below to read the law yourself.)  And what are the odds the federal government will do so after wildly promoting the vaccine?  About as likely as the FDA ever admitting they promoted a vaccine that caused widespread harm. [MORE]

Note 1. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d the federal government “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19” provides that “manufacturers” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].”

Note 2. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(c)(5) “If an act or omission by a manufacturer or distributor with respect to a covered countermeasure, which act or omission is alleged under subsection (e)(3)(A) to constitute willful misconduct, … such act or omission shall not constitute ‘willful misconduct’ … if—(i)neither the Secretary nor the Attorney General has initiated an enforcement action with respect to such act or omission; or (ii)such an enforcement action has been initiated and the action has been terminated or finally resolved without a covered remedy.”

Authorities in US and China Continue to Ignore Natural Immunity to COVID to Promote Depopulation, Genocide

From [HERE] Global giants U.S. and China still require proof of vaccination and ignore natural immunity to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) despite multiple studies proving it is better in all respects than vaccine immunity.

In China, travelers need to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and have obtained proof of vaccination to apply for visas. The communist nation even provides easier visa application procedures with looser requirements for people who were vaccinated using Chinese-made COVID-19 vaccines.

In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) requires non-citizens and non-immigrant passengers alike arriving from a foreign country by air to present proof of vaccination. Worse yet, the CDC’s guidelines for incoming air travelers does not recognize those with natural immunity. (Related: After destroying American society, the CDC admits natural immunity works better than COVID jabs.)

“At this time all non-citizen, non-immigrant air passengers traveling to the United States, regardless of antibody status, are required to provide proof of COVID-19 vaccination,” reads the CDC’s page on COVID-19 vaccination requirements for air travelers entering the country.

Natural immunity is far superior than so-called vaccine immunity – and many countries are responding accordingly

Multiple studies since nearly the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts in late 2020 have proven that natural immunity to COVID-19, acquired through previous infection, is far superior to any so-called immunity provided by the experimental and ineffective COVID-19 vaccines.

One such study was released in late September by the peer-reviewed medical journal The Lancet, one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world.

The study, conducted by researchers from Quebec and British Columbia in Canada, found: “Previous omicron BA.1 primary infection alone was the single most protective factor against BA.2 reinfection (risk reduction of 72 percent), and was associated with higher protection than pre-omicron primary infection alone (38 percent), or even than three doses of mRNA vaccine in people with no previous infection (46 percent).”

“Receiving natural immunity is better than three mRNA doses – that’s two primary doses and a booster,” commented investigative journalist Jefferey Jaxen on “The Highwire with Del Bigtree.”

In response to this study, the government of Canada has lifted COVID-19 mask, testing and ArriveCan – a digital vaccine passport – requirements for people entering the country. Air Canada, the country’s flag carrier and largest airline, welcomed the decision, saying the reduction in travel requirements is desperately needed for the benefit of travelers and the economy.

Canada is not the only country with data supporting both the strength of natural immunity and the weakness of so-called vaccine immunity.

In the United Kingdom, one study also published by The Lancet found that people with higher body mass indexes who got vaccinated with one or two doses of the COVID-19 vaccines had “a higher risk of test positivity after vaccination,” proving that the vaccines actually lowered their immunity.

In Sweden, a preprint study published in SSRN found that its results were similar to the previously mentioned U.K. study, “albeit with even more rapidly waning effectiveness.” The study found that “vaccinated individuals experienced a higher risk of infection [to the omicron variant] than those unvaccinated.”

Both Sweden and the United Kingdom have relaxed many of their requirements for travelers entering their respective countries.

“We have talked about this so much. The vaccine is helping you get infected,” commented Bigtree. “What negative efficacy means, you’re doing worse than had you not had anything at all. Which means somehow it’s better for your immune system to be more vulnerable, the exact opposite of what a product like this is supposed to be doing to you.”