HHS Records Show Biden, Media, Corporations Colluded to Falsely Induce Consent to COVID Shots w/PropAgenda that Claimed Deadly Shots are Safe/Effective/Necessary. Blacks, Others Specifically Targeted

From [HERE] Judicial Watch announced this week that it received 249 pages of records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) detailing the extensive media plans for a propaganda campaign to push the COVID-19 vaccine.

Among other groups, Black people were specifically targeted with propaganda using “local Black doctors,” BET and showcase Blacks according to documents found in the FOIA response.

The records were received in response to an August 2021 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed after HHS failed to respond to an April 19, 2021 request for records related to the Biden HHS “COVID-19 Community Corps” program (Judicial Watch v. HHS No. 1:22-cv-02315).

Judicial Watch is asking for all records regarding the application process; all organizations asking to be chosen to participate; all grants and all communications of representatives of the HHS regarding the program.

The newly released records include a document titled “PEC [Public Education Campaign] Plan April 19 – May 31 [2021],” which includes (pages 30- 34) the following media plans and action items:

Major [public education] projects in April

• Vaccine engagement package to all entertainment talent and management agencies.

• Vaccine engagement package to all media companies and show producers.

• Outreach to major culture event producers.

• Outreach with WCDT [“We Can Do This”] brand and engagement ideas to major businesses and associations.

• Launch “Community Corps Business Chapter.”

• Start celebrity “Share the Mics.”

POTUS May 1-31

• Late night hosts vaccination video.

Additional ideas to be considered

Digital media

• Produce HHS question-and-answer videos featuring local Black doctors discussing the vaccines, how they work and why the public should get vaccinated.

• Request that Tom Brady create a video with his parents encouraging vaccination (his parents had COVID-19 last year and he has talked about their tough recovery).

• Create custom partnerships with the social media platforms with algorithms to hit the audience.

• Launch Hollywood comedy writers’ video content.

• Work with YouTube on an original special about vaccinations targeted to young people (similar to YouTube’s “Dear Call of 2020” special).

• Work with Instagram to produce a series about vaccines for @Instagram (the largest social media account in the world, with 387 million followers). Feature young creators doing in-depth pieces about young people’s questions. Request a stories highlight on vaccines on @Instagram to stay on the account through 2021.

• Request major TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram influences to create videos of themselves being vaccinated and start a special campaign of funny and/or musical videos about being vaccinated to encourage others to create content and post.

Earned media

• Request a vaccination special on Christian Broadcast Network featuring Evangelical leaders.

• Request that the major live TV entertainment shows feature hosts being vaccinated on air (ex: the hosts of “The Voice”).

• Request that the TV morning and daytime talk shows feature special vaccination reunion moments with everyday Americans talking about what this means to them (ex: hugging grandma for the first time).

• Convene an editorial meeting with the publishers of Catholic newspapers and newsletters across the country (ex: America Magazine, Florida Catholic, The Catholic Spirit, The Tablet).

• Dr. Biden interview with Chip and Joanna Gaines for Magnolia.

• Request vaccination specials with BET, The Undefeated, Desus & Mero, Sneaker Shopper, Hot Ones.

• Request a vaccination special With Christian Broadcasting Netflix and Evangelical leaders.

• Place a trusted messenger on the Joe Rogan Show and Barstool Sports to promote vaccination (work with outside experts to identify who will be most effective).

Partnerships

• Work with the NFL, NASCAR, MLB, CMA to request they create content with their talent and release through their broadcast and social channels. Also, create a “Share the Mic” program where the talent elevates public health voices.

• Work with all major sports leagues to send vaccination information to ticket holders

• Work with ESPN for hosts to provide vaccination information.

• Partner with Disneyland Parks for vaccination events when the amusement parks reopen.

• Work with the Hollywood guilds to work vaccination messaging into scripted and reality TV shows (ex: Writers Guild, Directors Guild.)

“These records show a disturbing and massive campaign by the Biden administration to propagandize and politicize the controversial COVID vaccine,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It seems as if the entire entertainment industry was an agent for the government!”

Through FOIA, Judicial Watch has uncovered a substantial amount of information about COVID-19 issues:

• Recently, National Institute of Health (NIH) records revealed an FBI “inquiry” into the NIH’s controversial bat coronavirus grant tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The records also show National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) officials were concerned about “gain-of-function” research in China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2016. The Fauci agency was also concerned about EcoHealth Alliance’s lack of compliance with reporting rules and use of gain-of-function research in the NIH-funded research involving bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China.

• HHS records revealed that from 2014 to 2019, $826,277 was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research by the NIAID.

• NIAID records showed that it gave nine China-related grants to EcoHealth Alliance to research coronavirus emergence in bats and was the NIH’s top issuer of grants to the Wuhan lab itself. The records also included an email from the vice director of the Wuhan Lab asking an NIH official for help finding disinfectants for the decontamination of airtight suits and indoor surfaces.

• HHS records included an “urgent for Dr. Fauci ” email chain, citing ties between the Wuhan lab and the taxpayer-funded EcoHealth Alliance. The government emails also reported that the foundation of U.S. billionaire Bill Gates worked closely with the Chinese government to pave the way for Chinese-produced medications to be sold outside China and help “raise China’s voice of governance by placing representatives from China on important international counsels as high level commitment from China.”

• HHS records included a grant application for research involving the coronavirus that appears to describe “gain-of-function” research involving RNA extractions from bats, experiments on viruses, attempts to develop a chimeric virus and efforts to genetically manipulate the full-length bat SARSr-CoV WIV1 strain molecular clone.

• HHS records showed the State Department and NIAID knew immediately in January 2020 that China was withholding COVID-19 data, which was hindering risk assessment and response by public health officials.

• University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) records show the former director of the Galveston National Laboratory at the UTMB, Dr. James W. Le Duc, warned Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology of potential investigations into the COVID-19 issue by Congress.

• HHS records regarding biodistribution studies and related data for the COVID-19 vaccines show a key component of the vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, lipid nanoparticles, were found outside the injection site, mainly the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries of test animals, eight to 48 hours after injection.

• Records from the Federal Select Agent Program reveal safety lapses and violations at U.S. biosafety laboratories that conduct research on dangerous agents and toxins.

• HHS records include emails between NIH then-Director Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, the director of NIAID, about hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19.

• HHS records show that NIH officials tailored confidentiality forms to China’s terms and that the World Health Organization conducted an unreleased, “strictly confidential” COVID-19 epidemiological analysis in January 2020.

• Fauci emails include his approval of a press release supportive of China’s response to the 2019 novel coronavirus.

The 150 Bilderbergers [Profiteers for The Pathocracy] who Influenced and Controlled the COVID Plandemic and who are Responsible for Slow Motion Genocide

From [HERE] The Bilderberg Meetings are where global narratives are created in private and behind closed doors. This mammoth study of the aftermath of those meetings digs into the subsequent activities of members with respect to COVID-19. TN recommends downloading the associated PDF. ⁃ TN Editor

It is unknown whether a 2021 Bilderberg Meeting was held; the group’s website stated that it “had to be cancelled, due to travel and meeting restrictions.”[1] Of the 1861 living Bilderbergers, over 140, listed below, have played significant roles in managing the COVID-19 event: Many of those listed below are also on the list of COVID-19 WEF perpetrators.

Over 150 Bilderbergers (of the 1861 who are still alive) have played important parts in the COVID-19 event.

Many, perhaps most, of the below have been active in various roles; this page attempts to list them under the most important played. Steering committee members (both present and former) are underlined.

A lot of evidence suggests that SARS-CoV2 did not occur naturally, but was genetically manipulated from a naturally occurring bat coronavirus and possibly parts of additional viruses [2]. Bilderberg members have done important work in developing the CRISPR gene editing technique:

Bernard Cazeneuve – 2018 – In 2017 attended the founding ceremony of the BSL-4 lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, together with Yves Lévy, whose wife abruptly banned over-the-counter sales of hydroxychloroquine in France in January 2020,[3] declaring it “poisonous” without explanation.[4][5]

Emmanuelle Charpentier – 2016 – Pioneered CRISPR as a tool for genome editing (for which she was co-recipient of a Nobel prize in 2020)

Sean Parker – 2010 – Billionaire who was the first to gain NIH approval for a trial of CRISPR [6]

Pandemic Planning

Many Bilderbergers have worked repeatedly at Pandemic Planning; the group has been well represented at such exercises for at least 20 years.[7] Those with the most obvious ties:

• Gro Harlem Brundtland – 1982, 1983, introduced A Spreading Plague (2019 Pandemic planning exercise), and attended Atlantic Storm, and the February 2020 Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks exercise

• Avril Haines – 2017 – US Deep State actor who participated in Event 201 and the February 2020 Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks exercises. Deputy Director of the CIA 2013-15, Director of National Intelligence since 2021

• Sam Nunn – 1997, 1996 – Long experience in pandemic planning, Operation Dark Winter, A Spreading Plague, the February 2020 Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks exercise

• Judith Rodin – 2005 – As President of the Rockefeller Foundation took part in the Lock Step exercise which foresaw a pandemic as the means by which a techno totalitarian government might unfold.

Task Forces

• Vittorio Colao – 2018 – Leader of a special task force to handle “Phase 2” of the Italian Covid Task Force

• Christopher Liddell – 2017 – Member of Trump’s White House Coronavirus Task Force

• Matthew Pottinger – 2019 – Member of Trump’s White House Coronavirus Task Force. His wife Yen Pottinger was explaining the importance of social distancing in mid-March 2020[8]

• Kathleen Sebelius – 2008, 2007 – Member of Biden’s White House Coronavirus Task Force [9] and a board member of the Kaiser Family Foundation [10]

• Jeffrey Zients – 2017 – Became White House coronavirus coordinator in 2021,[11] announced in August that year that “it’s time to impose some requirements” where COVID jabs are concerned.[12]

Handlers

• Mark Carney – 2019, 2018, 2012, 2011 – “acting as an informal adviser to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on the federal government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.”[13]

• Andrew Liveris – 2012 – Ex Dow CEO and Member of the Board of Citigroup, “Special Adviser” to the Australia/National COVID-19 Coordination Commission [14]

Others

Other significant institutions have appointed Bilderbergers to their Covid or pandemic groups:

• Oliver Bäte – 2017 – Bavaria’s COVID-19 Economic Advisory Council member who made various alarmist statements about the virus, such as comparing it to a “worldwide meteor impact” or the explosion of a nuclear power station.[15]

• Laurence Boone – 2015 – A Commissioner of the Lancet Commission on COVID-19[16] – As the Global Economic Forum’s chief economist, advising about the economic response to COVID-19[17][18]

• Sylvia Burwell – 2018 – Co-chair of the Council on Foreign Relations’ “Independent Task Force on Improving Pandemic Preparedness

• Mitchell Daniels – 2012 – Member of the Council on Foreign Relations’ “Independent Task Force on Improving Pandemic Preparedness”

• Joe Kaeser – 2016,2015 – Appointed to Bavaria’s COVID-19 Economic Advisory Council (as Siemens CEO) by Markus Söder

• Paul Polman – 2012 – Member of The Lancet’s COVID-19 commission.[19]

• Olli Rehn – 2007 – As Governor of Bank of Finland, in 2021 became chair of FIFA’s COVID-19 Relief Plan steering committee.[20], published about “Monetary policy in the emerging post-pandemic context”[21]

• Jeffrey Sachs – 1990 – Chaired the Lancet‘s COVID-19 commission.[22][23]

• Tidjane Thiam – 2019, 2013 – One of the four African Union’s COVID-19 Special Envoys [24]

• Philip Zelikow – 2007, 2006 – Drafter of the 9/11 Commission Report,[25] appointed to lead the University of Virginia’s COVID Commission Planning Group [26]

Social change

The “response” to COVID-19 was a sweeping set of social changes enforced by fiat, having minimal scientific justification, if any. They directly contradicted best practices up to 2020.

• Stefan Löfven – 2013 – As Swedish PM, managed the Swedish Covid measures.[27]

• Mary Ann Sieghart – 2001 – Presented Fallout on BBC Radio 4, a series about the possible outcomes of the Coronavirus.[28][29]

Lockdowns

Most nation states decreed what was termed a “lockdown”, i.e., a drastic restriction of freedom of movement. This was in opposition to the 2019 WHO best practice guide for pandemics, which specifically advised against this practice. As of Summer 2021, there is little scientific evidence that these measures had any measurable impact on the spread of COVID-19, but this claim remains part of the COVID-19 official narrative.

• Alberto Alesina – 2018 – “Strongly agreed” in March 2020 with all 3 points of the Bilderberg consensus Lockdown policy, with a high degree of confidence.[30] Died in May 2020, aged 63.

• Cathy Berx – 2018 – Governor of Antwerp who oversaw the introduction of lockdown and curfew measures in Antwerp in July 2020.[31]

• Stefano Feltri – 2019 – Italian journalist who wrote supporting the official narrative, that lockdowns were “inevitable”[32]

• Demis Hassabis – 2018, 2016, 2015 – Dialed into a meeting of SAGE which promoted the UK COVID Lockdown.

• Sauli Niinistö – 1997 – As President of Finland uncritically wrote of “the need for strict, short-term restrictive measures…” and was similarly uncritical about the need for a fast rollout of “vaccines”[33]

• Bill Morneau – 2017, 2016 – as Canadian Finance Minister in 2020 “approved the spending of nearly $200 billion in federal aid in a deliberate effort to shut down huge portions of Canadian society”[34]

• Norbert Röttgen – 2014 – As chair of the CDU he was promoting the German Covid lockdowns [35]

• Erna Solberg – 2011 – Norwegian PM who led the national lockdowns. Directed billions of dollars to international vaccine programs (GAVI etc)

Furlough Schemes

• György Surányi – 1999, 1997, 1996 – Wrote a long essay in April 2020 suggesting the Hungarian government pay targeted subsidies to those who lose their jobs due to lockdowns.[36]

Digitalisation

• Carlo Ratti – 2014 – Architect who published about Reimagining the Office [37]

• Frans Timmermans – 2008 – Co-Executive Vice President of the European Commission for A Europe Fit for the Digital Age, Vice-President of the European Commission, took many opportunities to opine on “Which world do we want after COVID-19?”[38]

• Margrethe Vestager – 2014 – Co-Executive Vice President of the European Commission for A Europe Fit for the Digital Age\

[….]

Controlling the Narrative

• William Joseph Burns – 2016-2015 – Career diplomat CIA Director from March 2021, ensured that the U.S. intelligence community does not know the origins of COVID-19[47]

• Regina Dugan – 2015 – DARPA, Facebook, Google, “The global pandemic is our generation’s Sputnik”, CEO of Wellcome Trust

• Henry Kissinger – 2019-2010, 2008-1994, 1992-1980, 1978, 1977, 1971, 1964, 1957 October, 1957 February – Arch-Bilderberger deep politician, numerous influential public pronouncements on COVID-19

• Ivan Krastev – 2019 – Published various articles about COVID-19’s social impact from March 2020[48] onwards [49] and wrote Is It Tomorrow Yet? Paradoxes of the Pandemic

• Charles Michel – 2018, 2016, 2015 – As President of the European Council, in December 2020 he proposed an international treaty on pandemics.[50]

• George Soros – 2002, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1990 – The Good Club, the influence of BLM to control the narrative in 2020[51]

• Sidney Taurel – 2007 – Chair of Pearson which “implement[ed] new health and safety principles” and “launched an online community for our people to connect, share stories and support each other”,[52] chair emeritus of Eli Lilly which produced bamlanivimab.[53]

• Fareed Zakaria – 2005, 2003 – Journalist who wrote Ten Lessons for a Post-Pandemic World [54]

Academia

• Senem Aydın-Düzgit – 2016 – Professor of International Relations, published multiple papers on COVID and governance, some co-authored with Fuat Keyman

• Fuat Keyman – 2012 – Professor of International Relations and Vice President at Sabancı University, published multiple papers on COVID and governance, some co-authored with Senem Aydın-Düzgit

• James Orbinksi – 2011 – Developed the COVID-19 Global Health Portal. [55] Also published various research about COVID-19 [56][57]

• Ole Petter Ottersen – 2011 – Presented at the July 2020 International Symposium on Novel Ideas in Science and Ethics of Vaccines Against Covid-19 Pandemic,[58] published research on Addressing production gaps for vaccines in African countries

• Arild Underdal – 2004 – Editing academic research about COVID-19[59][60][61]

• James Vaupel – 2011 – Edited and co-authored academic research about COVID-19,[62] on topics such as the death toll in Sweden after their refusal to instigate widespread lockdowns.[63][64][65]

Big media

The non-reporting of Bilderberg by TV or newspapers reveals that the group has considerable control of big media, which was mobilised to support the official narrative.

• Juan Luis Cebrián – 2018-2001, 1993, 1990-1987, 1985, 1983- Billionaire, media mogul, one of the ten most influential Spaniards in Spain and Latin America for 44 years (from 1976 to 2019).

• Andrew Coyne – 2015 – Canadian columnist and aggressive pusher of the COVID official narrative. e.g., He dismissed the Great Reset as a “conspiracy theory”, and in December 2021 headlined an article Is the case for vaccine mandates like the case for seatbelt laws? No, it’s much, much stronger [66]

• Mathias Döpfner – 2019-2014, 2007-2005 – Billionaire, Axel Springer Publishing House/CEO

• Felix Gutzwiller – 2013 – On Swiss TV in March 2020 answering public questions about COVID-19 [67]

• François Lenglet – 2017 – French editor who in March 2021 termed vaccine passports “the best recovery instrument available” [68]

Elites Whites in WEF, The Dependent Media and Social Media Claim to “Own Science,” Own the Narrative and Control What Sheople Think and Say About Deadly COVID Shots and Environmentalism

From [HERE] The World Economic Forum (WEF) held the Sustainable Development Impact Meetings, where unelected groups held a “Tackling Disinformation” panel, with participants including the UN, Brown University, and even CNN.

The panel discussed how best to control narratives on issues like climate change and COVID-19.

The UN’s Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications, Melissa Fleming, noted that the UN had partnered with Big Tech companies, including Google and TikTok, to control narratives surrounding COVID and climate change.

“We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do,” she said.

The UN said it partnered with Google to influence search results on climate change so that narratives from “authoritative” sources would appear at the top of search results.

“We partnered with Google,” said Fleming. “For example, if you Google ‘climate change,’ you will, at the top of your search, you will get all kinds of UN resources.

“We started this partnership when we were shocked to see that when we Googled ‘climate change,’ we were getting incredibly distorted information right at the top.”

The UN also says it partnered with TikTok on a project dubbed “Team Halo,” to control the narratives surrounding COVID-19.

“We had another trusted messenger project, which was called ‘Team Halo’ where we trained scientists around the world and some doctors on TikTok, and we had TikTok working with us,” Fleming said.

“Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers,” she said, adding, “influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, but really keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, and they were much more trusted than the United Nationstelling them something from New York City headquarters.”

The “Tackling Disinformation” panel was moderated by Adrian Monck, the WEF’s managing director.

Monck said that the CNN was part of the strategy to “own the narrative.”

“CNN is both an organization that’s trying to make sense of the world and trying to establish the facts; it’s also part of a political war on who owns the narrative,” he said.

UK Health Security Agency Data Shows "Vaccinated" Individuals Account for 90% of COVID Deaths. Government also Concealing the Number of People Unvaccinated: True Number is 19 Million Not 3-5 Million

 From [HERE] Britons declining the lethal Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine are truly blessed as they are farther from the grave than those who chose to get injected.

Figures from the U.K. Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that one in every 110 vaccinated Britons had died by Jan. 31, 2022. Meanwhile, only one in every 187 unvaccinated Britons had died as of the same period. Unfortunately, this discrepancy is just increasing every passing day.

More up-to-date figures from the ONS showed that one in every 73 vaccinated Britons had died as of May 31, 2022. This spike in deaths among vaccinated Britons was definitely a cause for alarm as 43 million people in the U.K. had been injected with at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose.

According to the country’s National Immunization Management system, this means that 19.6 million remain unvaccinated in England. This directly contradicted claims by the British government and the mainstream media that only between three million and five million Britons are yet to be injected.

“These figures prove we definitely have a serious problem,” the Daily Expose pointed out. “There is no other conclusion that can be found for the fact mortality rates per 100,000 are the lowest among the unvaccinated other than that the COVID-19 injections are killing people.”

“Government and mainstream media would never tell you this. The extraordinary amount of your hard-earned money spent on these experimental, harmful injections, and the amount of propaganda they’ve used to coerce the public into taking them is disgraceful and amounts to a crime against humanity. This is why they will never admit the damage they have done.” (Related: UK covering up THOUSANDS of COVID-19 vaccine deaths.)

UKHSA: Vaccinated individuals account for 90 percent of COVID-19 deaths

Downing Street has been adamant in pushing boosters, but new research has shown that the boosters are only “boosting” vaccine deaths. Moreover, the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) itself bared that vaccinated individuals accounted for 90 percent of all COVID-19 deaths in England. It also revealed that four of five deaths in the U.K. are among those injected with COVID-19 booster doses.

The figures published July 6 by the ONS covered the period between Jan. 1, 2021 and May 31, 2022. Calculations done by the Expose found that between Jan. 1, 2021 and Jan. 31, 2022, a total of 394,178 vaccinated individuals died. In contrast, only 104,659 unvaccinated individuals died. Given these computations, it won’t be long before hundreds of thousands of Britons will soon be buried.

Aside from this, the ONS data further revealed that mortality rates per 100,000 are lowest among the unvaccinated in every age group. This leads to the conclusion that the COVID injections are, in fact, killing people.

Given these alarming numbers, British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra called for the immediate suspension of the COVID-19 vaccine. He joined many Britons weary of the narrative that vaccines are necessary for normal life to resume.

“There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current COVID vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny,” he wrote. “Until all the raw data on the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been independently analyzed, any claims purporting that they confer a net benefit to humankind cannot be considered to be evidence based.”

From experience, Britons have come to realize that the vaccines are no wonder cure for COVID-19 as the vaccinated are not only dying – they are being killed. The experimental vaccines have failed to produce the desired results and people have the right to do whatever they want with their bodies.

Watch this video about Britons shutting down a COVID-19 vaccine center in Bristol.

Thousands of Sudden, Unexpected Deaths Flood the HHS Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Coincidence Theorists Believe its Unrelated to COVID Shots Because Media and Government Told Them So

[fascism disguised as democracy] California Liberals are Not About Liberation: New law Punishes Doctors who Disagree with Corporate Science Free “Medicine”

From [HERE] California Gov. Gavin Newsom made a splash this summer by running ads in Florida that claimed “freedom is under attack in your state.” The ads should have aired in his own state, which is the land of lockdowns and mask mandates. And under a new state law, doctors may even be punished for disputing the government’s public-health orthodoxy. 

These experts are often wrong and loath to admit it, as we learned with pandemic government lockdowns. Yet California Democrats last month enacted legislation that empowers the state medical board to discipline doctors licensed in the state who “disseminate misinformation or disinformation” that contradicts the “contemporary scientific consensus.”

The law grants the board broad discretion to define the scientific consensus and misinformation. Yet seven of the board’s 15 members, who are appointed by the Governor and state lawmakers, aren’t even physicians. The president is an environmental attorney. Another runs a life coaching company. 

As an example of misinformation, a legislative analysis offers the hypothetical of a doctor advising patients to inject themselves with bleach to treat Covid. A doctor who did this could be sanctioned for “gross negligence” and sued for malpractice. But such egregious examples are rare and don’t need a new law to discipline.

The law’s real purpose is to silence doctors who disagree with the public-health establishment on controversial subjects on which there is substantial disagreement. One example is Covid vaccines for children, which most public-health officials recommend but the science is far from certain.

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo on Friday advised that young men not get mRNA vaccines after a state analysis found they experienced an 84% increase in cardiac-related deaths within 28 days of vaccination. He has also recommended against vaccinating healthy children because they are at low risk for severe illness, and the benefits don’t clearly exceed the uncertain risks. 

Under California’s new law, a pediatrician who advises children against vaccination could have his license yanked. Ditto a gynecologist who tells a new mother that trace amounts of the mRNA vaccine have been found in breast milk. The latter is true, but the board might determine that it contradicts the consensus that vaccines are safe.

“Independent Panel” will Review Justin Trudeau’s Use of Emergency Law to Silence Trucker Protests Over COVID Mandates Imposed During Manufactured COVID Emergency in Dictatorship Disguised as Democracy

In Case You Missed It, Photos of Racist Suspect Liberal Puppetician Justin Trudeau in BlackFace

From [HERE] An independent panel will begin hearings this week into Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s use of an emergency measure to disperse anti-vaccine protesters who had blocked Canada-US border crossings and occupied downtown Ottawa earlier this year.

The Public Order Emergency Commission, headed by former Ontario Court of Appeal Justice Paul Rouleau, will hold its first public hearing on Thursday in the capital.

The commission will look into the circumstances that led Trudeau to invoke the Emergencies Act in February in response to the “Freedom Convoy” demonstrations, organised by activists concerned about irrational, deadly COVID mandates.

“This critical phase will shed light on the events that led to the declaration of the public order emergency and fully explore the reasons advanced for the declaration,” Rouleau said in a statement on Tuesday.

The panel said it will hear testimony from 65 witnesses, including convoy participants, Ottawa residents, law enforcement officers, municipal and provincial officials, and federal government ministers. Trudeau is also expected to answer questions during the six weeks of public hearings.

The decision to invoke the Emergencies Act for the first time since it came into force in 1988 drew concern from civil rights groups and other observers who questioned whether Canada had met the strict legal threshold needed to invoke the measure.

Others have asked whether it was necessary to use the act at all or if authorities lacked the will to use the tools already at their disposal to end the protests.

The move gave the government sweeping powers, including the ability to bar any public assembly “that may reasonably be expected to lead to a breach of the peace” and restrict access to specific areas.

MIT Researcher Finds that COVID Injections May Induce Brain Diseases

From [HERE] A researcher from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has warned that the SARS-CoV-2 spoke protein used in the mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines could induce brain diseases.

In a pre-print study published Aug. 16 in the journal Diseases, Dr. Stephanie Seneff and her colleagues wrote that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein acts like a prion. This protein can transmit its misfolded shape onto normal prions, causing neurodegenerative diseases that wreak havoc in the human brain.

She cited “compelling evidence” showing that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains amino acid sequences previously established as prion-like proteins. These proteins responsible for neurodegenerative issues are then produced by the body in the same manner as the proteins responsible for COVID-19.

Seneff and her co-authors added that while tracing the various pathways through which the proteins were expected to travel and distribute throughout the body, they found some highly concerning biological consequences that would be expected to occur with increased frequency as a consequence. Specifically, the contribution of spike proteins to neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases as well as clotting disorders and suppressed prion protein regulation in the context of insulin resistance and health complications that it could induce.

The study authors briefly touched on the hypothesis of the late Nobel Prize laureate Dr. Luc Montagnier on the inserts of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, arguing that the virus was most likely engineered as bioweapons. (Related: Vaccinated people found to be 600% more likely to die from covid “variants” than unvaccinated people.)

While the spike proteins from the natural COVID infection do pose risks, those risks are nowhere near the damage that can be potentially inflicted on a person’s body by the spike proteins from mRNA vaccines.

In a separate study, the researchers also found that there are incidents of thromboembolic events and hemorrhagic stroke cases that could occur within 28 days after getting the BNT162b2 or CoronaVac jabs.

Because of this, Seneff urged parents not to vaccinate their children with mRNA shots due to the wide spectrum of harm that they can inflict on the body.

Seneff previously warned of COVID-19 vaccine dangers

This is not the first time Seneff has tried to warn people about the dangerous effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. In 2021, she wrote a paper discussing the safety concerns surrounding the vaccines, especially considering the rapid speed at which they came from controlled trials to mass deployment.

She reviewed the components and the intended biological response to the vaccines, including the production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of acute and long-term induced pathologies that include blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases.

Some of the potential induced pathologies she listed back then discussed the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences with the spike protein, urging health authorities to clarify the long-term effects of the vaccines to better assess their risks and benefits, especially as they are using novel technologies.

Seneff also called the government’s rushed actions to vaccinate people “perverse” for “getting Pharma to produce expensive drugs, untested, and then throwing them out to the public with the false promise that they’re safe, when they’re not.”

She insisted even then that it was wrong of public health officials to impede on the ability of doctors to use safe and established natural methods by repurposing drugs to treat COVID and alleviate symptoms early on.

“It is morally reprehensible what the government is doing. They should have been promoting safe methods as they discovered them and instead, they just blocked everything,” she said.

Representative says Pfizer Didn't Test Whether COVID Shots Stop Transmission. Undermines Any Rational Basis for Mandates and Invalidates any Individual's Consent Induced by Govt/Media Lies (Battery)

From [HERE] and [HERE] Governments all over the Western world spent billions on propaganda campaigns claiming that getting vaccinated against COVID-19 would keep others safe and prevent them from contracting the virus. 

Many countries as well as local, regional and municipal jurisdictions implemented draconian “vaccine passport” rules that separated and excluded unvaccinated citizens from restaurants, public spaces, transportation and countless other services based on the argument that the unvaccinated would spread the disease. 

“Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market – no, ha. These, er… we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.”

NEVER TESTED ON PREVENTING TRANSMISSION

But in stunning new developments on Monday, a Pfizer executive admitted in a European Parliament hearing that the company’s COVID-19 vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission. 

When asked by Dutch MEP Rob Roos if the vaccine was tested on whether it would prevent transmission of the virus before it was taken to market, Pfizer executive Janine Small, whose job title is Regional President for International Developed Markets, answered:

“Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market – no, ha. These, er… we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.”

Skin-Tone Conflict Ends w/Latino Puppetician Resigning Over Colorist Remarks and Complicity w/White Supremacy. [the only difference btw racism and colorism is that non-whites discriminate w/o power’]

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

Colorism – the prejudices that Afrikans hold about each other and seemingly use against or to the advantage of themselves and others of relatively similar complexion. 2) skin-tone stratification among melanated people used as a divisive strategy and tactic. Colorism in the cultural context of group power, is an attitude. Colorism is reflected in intra-group interaction— it occurs within a group. In the Euro-cultural context, influence without the perception of a sufficient power base behind it is ignored at best—and invisible at worst—but having the same net effect just the same. The only appreciable difference between racism and colorism is that we discriminate without power. We are guilty of complicity in the deadly power game of world-wide White Racism Supremacy. (See: Racism, RACIST, Power, Political Silence, Sambo, Snigger & ARC)

From [HERE] The controversy engulfing the Los Angeles City Council has opened up long-simmering racial tensions in the city. After days of mounting pressure, the former leader of the Los Angeles City Council resigned her seat yesterday. Nury Martinez was one of the most powerful politicians in the city until she was caught on a secret recording making racist remarks during a conversation with two of her council colleagues. The scandal is upending politics in LA as demands for more resignations continue. We're joined now by NPR's Adrian Florido, who is in Los Angeles and has been covering this story.

Adrian, Nury Martinez has been facing calls to resign from the city council for days now. But until yesterday, she had resisted. What finally did it?

ADRIAN FLORIDO, BYLINE: Well, the pressure, A, had just become overwhelming. And the calls for her resignation came from as high up as the White House. What Nury Martinez was heard saying on this leaked tape were just about the worst things you could say as a politician in a city like Los Angeles, where cross-racial coalitions are so important in politics. She used racist language to talk about Black people, Indigenous Mexican immigrants and others. And this all happened during a conversation with two council colleagues, all of them Latinos, about how to increase their political power through the city's redistricting process while diluting the power of Black voters. So people were really outraged.

MARTINEZ: And that outrage was very loud in Los Angeles. Now that she has resigned, though, how are people responding?

FLORIDO: Well, they're happy, of course, but they're saying that it's not enough. Last night, I was in South Los Angeles at a meeting that community organizers called to bring Black and Latino residents together to diffuse tension, given that this racism came out of the mouths of Latino politicians. People at this meeting were celebrating Martinez's resignation and the resignation of a union leader who was also part of that conversation. But they said that they were going to keep demanding that the other two council members on that tape, Kevin de Leon and Gil Cedillo, also resign. [MORE]

‘Is Deez Nutz Up for Re-Erection?’ In New Ad Auto-Coon EnterStainers Encourage the Powerless Black ElectoRant to Remain Impotent and in a Childish Condition by Voting for the Master of their Choice

DR. AMOS WILSON STATES, ‘The Dependent Media is ever quick to remind the Black electorate of the historical struggles necessary to achieve their right to vote. It indicts the community for its electoral apathy and seeks to evoke guilt feelings in those who do not participate in the electoral process — making such ritualistic participation emblematic of democracy and first-class citizenship. This is of special interest when it is realized that very few, if any, of the major political, economic and social goals achieved by Black America, including the Voting Rights Act, were accomplished through Black voting prowess. The ballot box has been a relatively impotent weapon in the achievement of major victories by the Black community. Suddenly vigorous protest and direct-action legal suits and extralegal processes such as boycotts, sit-ins, and the like, which were used so effectively by the community to achieve its sociopolitical ends and to fight injustice and oppression, have fallen far behind the election of friendly white liberal puppeticians and Black rolebots to achieve the same ends.’ [MORE]

[MORE] VOTING SPONSORED BY YOUR MASTERS. (Voter ignorance and irrationality). Undeceiver Michael Huemer states, “One might assume that a democratic state will at least serve the interests of the majority of voters. Yet even this need not be true.

To see why, first consider the amount of practical power you wield by virtue of your ability to vote. For simplicity, assume that you are voting in an election with exactly two candidates. You as an individual are in a position to determine the outcome of the election if and only if the outcome turns on a single vote - that is, without your vote, the two candidates' vote totals would have differed by no more than one. If the totals would have been tied, then you can cast the tie-breaking vote; if one candidate would have won by a single vote, you can cause the election instead to be tied. In all other cases, your vote makes no difference to the outcome. If the candidates' vote totals differ by two or more, then the winning candidate would have won regardless of how you voted. But given the circumstances voters are actually in and can expect to be in for the foreseeable future, the probability of a national election turning on a single vote is negligible. So for all practical purposes, each voter knows in every election that his vote will make no difference whatsoever.

It is true that the voters as a whole have a great deal of power, in that they determine who holds the reins of government. But that is not our concern now. Our concern at the moment is how it is rational for you, as an individual, to behave. From the standpoint of rational choice, it is irrelevant what others can do; what is relevant is what you can do. You cannot make everyone else, or even a majority, vote in a particular way; you can control only your own vote. And this gives you approximately zero power over election outcomes. [MORE]

REALLY EASILY DOMINATED BY THEIR MASTERS: Neely Fuller explains “as long as any non-white person submits to, and/or cooperates with White Supremacy (racism), that non-white person is, for all functional purposes, a child.”

Neely Fuller explains that in a system of racism white supremacy ‘non-white people, regardless of age function as children. They are the servants to, the victims of, and the "children” under the power and direction of elite racists. Elite racists function as their parents, bosses, masters, and their major decision-makers.’ Elite racists hope and intend to keep all non-white people in a childish condition.’

According to FUNKTIONARY:

The Electorant – the willfully ignorant electorate—the suckers (voters and “taxpayers”) who delegate and abdicate their power to elected and appointed officials (employees) and the system through which voters’ will is subverted through statutes, laws and policies not approved or even known in the election process. The ‘electorant’ are always ranting and raving about their sordid and assorted conditions when they are responsible for them by being ignorant of the nature of delegated power and its effect, i.e., arbitrary power wielded with impunity and State-sanctioned immunity. The electorant have no recourse but to fuss and talk about change—utterly clueless. All power of the State resides in those who hold the purse strings. Control of the “money” is in the hands of those who further use it to corrupt others in order for one to retain power (dynastic banking cartel families) and the other to remain in power (politician). It is a symbiotic racket and one that continues unabated. (See: Voters, GEO-Dollars, “Monetized Debt,” Federal Reserve System, Willful Ignorance, Political Money, Gangbanking, Elections, MONEY, S&M Banking, Taxpayers, Second Tax, Dumbing-Down, Colonized Mind & Citizens of the United States)

enterstainment – dubious, dreadful, inappropriate or grossly offensive entertainment which leaves one feeling stained.

Would the US Government Ever Use Weather Modification Technology as a Weapon Against its Own Citizens, Creating Tropical Storms or Earthquakes for Political Reasons? Would They Patent the Technology?

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Government – (as commonly misunderstood)—a communal exchange of autonomy for appearance of order (peace via coercion), expanded over time, with the option of exercising violence being reserved to those who define and provide an illusion of order through force and fear. 2) a coercive institution—dysfunctional force and veiled violence. 3) the compelled enforcement of involuntary society. The Corporate State)—a fictitious entity (mental aberration or abstraction) and thus a non-producer of wealth, but masquerading as the prime merchant. 4) human failure programs that stay (hold off) maximumissness and depend on the support (stealing then redistributing wealth) of its subject-victims. 5) ‘organized’ coerced support of selected monopolized services. 6) licensed, sanctioned and legalized criminal activity. 7) a sticky residue on your shoe. The whole idea of government is this: If enough people get together and act in concert, they can take some and not pay for it. Any government represents a crucial compromise with freedom and distortion of reality, and no reified abstraction (however crafted by crafty corporate cartoonists) can protect anyone from any and all danger. The feudal subject-King relationship is exactly the same as the federal citizen-Government relationship. “That government is best which governs not at all; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient. The objections that have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government. The standing army in the U.S. is only an arm of the standing government put into action only after the economic hit men and “jackals” (wet-ops) return home unsuccessful in their missions to earn their booty off dirty intrigue commissions. The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before people can act through it.” ~Henry David Thoreau (slightly adapted). Government was formed with one major and one minor purpose—the major purpose being to protect the wealth of the wealthy; and the minor purpose being to prevent the non-wealthy from becoming wealthy and subjecting them to the dictates of statutes (written laws—not common law). Government is itself an evil—an abstraction given artificial life for the ostensible purpose of preventing certain conditions from arising, these conditions being the product of injurious behavior (actual injury) on the part of other persons as well as autonomous freedom (ownership of one’s body, mind and labor) of those subjugated to force, exploitation, jurisdiction and control. Government is that group of people who hold the generally tolerated monopoly on acceptable violence. “It is a function of government to invent philosophies [and sophistries] to explain the demands of its own convenience.” ~Murray Kempson. Until people wake-the-spell up to a higher level of individual and collective consciousness, government so-called will remain an unnecessary, yet banefully suffered evil to battle the evil that itself breeds as a matter of course. The creation and imposition of government is the compelled pressure to conform to what is common, established, unoriginal, unacceptable, and ultimately inimical to all, whether reinforced by law, lethal force or acculturation. Throughout history many intelligent thinkers all around the world have tried to contemplate or design some way to have “government” and freedom too. Failing miserably and repeatedly to find one either in practice or in theory, it is time for intelligent human beings to give way to beings of higher consciousness using sagacity and sapience to finally realize that: 1) “government” itself is a deadly mental contrivance and immanent threat to their freedom; 2) there is no way to prevent “government” from constantly increasing its power and eroding freedom; 3) “government” itself being a reification (deadly cartoon) will vanish when the illusion on which it rests dissipates. This goes for all brands and flavors of “government” across the ideological spectrum. Violence (against statists) makes government appear legitimate. [MORE]

Owning the Weather by 2025: In 1996 a DOD Research Paper Predicted the US Military would be Able to Modify and Weaponize the Weather by Creating Tropical Storms, Precipitation, Changing Climate etc

From [HERE PDF] “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025”

Research Paper Presented To Air Force 2025 by Col Tamzy J. House Lt Col James B. Near, Jr. LTC William B. Shields (USA) Maj Ronald J. Celentano Maj David M. Husband Maj Ann E. Mercer Maj James E. Pugh

Abstract: 

In 2025, US aerospace forces can own the weather by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map. A high risk, high reward endeavor, weather modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather modification offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather modification system could provide to a war fighting commander in chief CINC are listed in table 1. Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather modification capability 1 advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, 2 computational capability, 3 information gathering and transmission, 4 a global sensor array, and 5 weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Executive Summary

In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather” by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.

Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Current technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.

In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness. “The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;” in 2025 we can “Own the Weather.” [MORE]

Peer-reviewed paper confirms COVID Shots kill brain and heart cells causing death

From [HERE] A new paper in the peer-reviewed medical literature just came out showing the COVID vaccines, and not COVID, is causing myocarditis and encephalitis leading to death.

The paper is entitled: A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19.

It was published yesterday, Oct 1, and now has already has over 100,000 views of the abstract and over 6,000 views of the full text.

Here’s the abstract:

The current report presents the case of a 76-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination. The patient was first vaccinated in May 2021 with the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vector vaccine, followed by two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in July and December 2021. The family of the deceased requested an autopsy due to ambiguous clinical signs before death. PD was confirmed by post-mortem examinations. Furthermore, signs of aspiration pneumonia and systemic arteriosclerosis were evident. However, histopathological analyses of the brain uncovered previously unsuspected findings, including acute vasculitis (predominantly lymphocytic) as well as multifocal necrotizing encephalitis of unknown etiology with pronounced inflammation including glial and lymphocytic reaction. In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.

For those not familiar with the medical lingo, necrotizing means tissue death and multifocal means “all over your brain.” 

And “corroborate previous reports” means this is happening over and over again. [MORE]

'Lets Not Put A Gloss On It. COVID Injections are Medical Murder' – Dr Mike Yeadon

A Plandemic of Misinformation by Elites and Their Authorities: Dr Malhotra Flip Flops. Now says All COVID Injections Must be Stopped