‘Is Deez Nutz Up for Re-Erection?’ In New Ad Auto-Coon EnterStainers Encourage the Powerless Black ElectoRant to Remain Impotent and in a Childish Condition by Voting for the Master of their Choice

DR. AMOS WILSON STATES, ‘The Dependent Media is ever quick to remind the Black electorate of the historical struggles necessary to achieve their right to vote. It indicts the community for its electoral apathy and seeks to evoke guilt feelings in those who do not participate in the electoral process — making such ritualistic participation emblematic of democracy and first-class citizenship. This is of special interest when it is realized that very few, if any, of the major political, economic and social goals achieved by Black America, including the Voting Rights Act, were accomplished through Black voting prowess. The ballot box has been a relatively impotent weapon in the achievement of major victories by the Black community. Suddenly vigorous protest and direct-action legal suits and extralegal processes such as boycotts, sit-ins, and the like, which were used so effectively by the community to achieve its sociopolitical ends and to fight injustice and oppression, have fallen far behind the election of friendly white liberal puppeticians and Black rolebots to achieve the same ends.’ [MORE]

[MORE] VOTING SPONSORED BY YOUR MASTERS. (Voter ignorance and irrationality). Undeceiver Michael Huemer states, “One might assume that a democratic state will at least serve the interests of the majority of voters. Yet even this need not be true.

To see why, first consider the amount of practical power you wield by virtue of your ability to vote. For simplicity, assume that you are voting in an election with exactly two candidates. You as an individual are in a position to determine the outcome of the election if and only if the outcome turns on a single vote - that is, without your vote, the two candidates' vote totals would have differed by no more than one. If the totals would have been tied, then you can cast the tie-breaking vote; if one candidate would have won by a single vote, you can cause the election instead to be tied. In all other cases, your vote makes no difference to the outcome. If the candidates' vote totals differ by two or more, then the winning candidate would have won regardless of how you voted. But given the circumstances voters are actually in and can expect to be in for the foreseeable future, the probability of a national election turning on a single vote is negligible. So for all practical purposes, each voter knows in every election that his vote will make no difference whatsoever.

It is true that the voters as a whole have a great deal of power, in that they determine who holds the reins of government. But that is not our concern now. Our concern at the moment is how it is rational for you, as an individual, to behave. From the standpoint of rational choice, it is irrelevant what others can do; what is relevant is what you can do. You cannot make everyone else, or even a majority, vote in a particular way; you can control only your own vote. And this gives you approximately zero power over election outcomes. [MORE]

REALLY EASILY DOMINATED BY THEIR MASTERS: Neely Fuller explains “as long as any non-white person submits to, and/or cooperates with White Supremacy (racism), that non-white person is, for all functional purposes, a child.”

Neely Fuller explains that in a system of racism white supremacy ‘non-white people, regardless of age function as children. They are the servants to, the victims of, and the "children” under the power and direction of elite racists. Elite racists function as their parents, bosses, masters, and their major decision-makers.’ Elite racists hope and intend to keep all non-white people in a childish condition.’

According to FUNKTIONARY:

The Electorant – the willfully ignorant electorate—the suckers (voters and “taxpayers”) who delegate and abdicate their power to elected and appointed officials (employees) and the system through which voters’ will is subverted through statutes, laws and policies not approved or even known in the election process. The ‘electorant’ are always ranting and raving about their sordid and assorted conditions when they are responsible for them by being ignorant of the nature of delegated power and its effect, i.e., arbitrary power wielded with impunity and State-sanctioned immunity. The electorant have no recourse but to fuss and talk about change—utterly clueless. All power of the State resides in those who hold the purse strings. Control of the “money” is in the hands of those who further use it to corrupt others in order for one to retain power (dynastic banking cartel families) and the other to remain in power (politician). It is a symbiotic racket and one that continues unabated. (See: Voters, GEO-Dollars, “Monetized Debt,” Federal Reserve System, Willful Ignorance, Political Money, Gangbanking, Elections, MONEY, S&M Banking, Taxpayers, Second Tax, Dumbing-Down, Colonized Mind & Citizens of the United States)

enterstainment – dubious, dreadful, inappropriate or grossly offensive entertainment which leaves one feeling stained.

Would the US Government Ever Use Weather Modification Technology as a Weapon Against its Own Citizens, Creating Tropical Storms or Earthquakes for Political Reasons? Would They Patent the Technology?

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Government – (as commonly misunderstood)—a communal exchange of autonomy for appearance of order (peace via coercion), expanded over time, with the option of exercising violence being reserved to those who define and provide an illusion of order through force and fear. 2) a coercive institution—dysfunctional force and veiled violence. 3) the compelled enforcement of involuntary society. The Corporate State)—a fictitious entity (mental aberration or abstraction) and thus a non-producer of wealth, but masquerading as the prime merchant. 4) human failure programs that stay (hold off) maximumissness and depend on the support (stealing then redistributing wealth) of its subject-victims. 5) ‘organized’ coerced support of selected monopolized services. 6) licensed, sanctioned and legalized criminal activity. 7) a sticky residue on your shoe. The whole idea of government is this: If enough people get together and act in concert, they can take some and not pay for it. Any government represents a crucial compromise with freedom and distortion of reality, and no reified abstraction (however crafted by crafty corporate cartoonists) can protect anyone from any and all danger. The feudal subject-King relationship is exactly the same as the federal citizen-Government relationship. “That government is best which governs not at all; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient. The objections that have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government. The standing army in the U.S. is only an arm of the standing government put into action only after the economic hit men and “jackals” (wet-ops) return home unsuccessful in their missions to earn their booty off dirty intrigue commissions. The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before people can act through it.” ~Henry David Thoreau (slightly adapted). Government was formed with one major and one minor purpose—the major purpose being to protect the wealth of the wealthy; and the minor purpose being to prevent the non-wealthy from becoming wealthy and subjecting them to the dictates of statutes (written laws—not common law). Government is itself an evil—an abstraction given artificial life for the ostensible purpose of preventing certain conditions from arising, these conditions being the product of injurious behavior (actual injury) on the part of other persons as well as autonomous freedom (ownership of one’s body, mind and labor) of those subjugated to force, exploitation, jurisdiction and control. Government is that group of people who hold the generally tolerated monopoly on acceptable violence. “It is a function of government to invent philosophies [and sophistries] to explain the demands of its own convenience.” ~Murray Kempson. Until people wake-the-spell up to a higher level of individual and collective consciousness, government so-called will remain an unnecessary, yet banefully suffered evil to battle the evil that itself breeds as a matter of course. The creation and imposition of government is the compelled pressure to conform to what is common, established, unoriginal, unacceptable, and ultimately inimical to all, whether reinforced by law, lethal force or acculturation. Throughout history many intelligent thinkers all around the world have tried to contemplate or design some way to have “government” and freedom too. Failing miserably and repeatedly to find one either in practice or in theory, it is time for intelligent human beings to give way to beings of higher consciousness using sagacity and sapience to finally realize that: 1) “government” itself is a deadly mental contrivance and immanent threat to their freedom; 2) there is no way to prevent “government” from constantly increasing its power and eroding freedom; 3) “government” itself being a reification (deadly cartoon) will vanish when the illusion on which it rests dissipates. This goes for all brands and flavors of “government” across the ideological spectrum. Violence (against statists) makes government appear legitimate. [MORE]

Owning the Weather by 2025: In 1996 a DOD Research Paper Predicted the US Military would be Able to Modify and Weaponize the Weather by Creating Tropical Storms, Precipitation, Changing Climate etc

From [HERE PDF] “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025”

Research Paper Presented To Air Force 2025 by Col Tamzy J. House Lt Col James B. Near, Jr. LTC William B. Shields (USA) Maj Ronald J. Celentano Maj David M. Husband Maj Ann E. Mercer Maj James E. Pugh

Abstract: 

In 2025, US aerospace forces can own the weather by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map. A high risk, high reward endeavor, weather modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather modification offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather modification system could provide to a war fighting commander in chief CINC are listed in table 1. Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather modification capability 1 advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, 2 computational capability, 3 information gathering and transmission, 4 a global sensor array, and 5 weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Executive Summary

In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather” by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.

Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Current technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.

In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness. “The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;” in 2025 we can “Own the Weather.” [MORE]

Peer-reviewed paper confirms COVID Shots kill brain and heart cells causing death

From [HERE] A new paper in the peer-reviewed medical literature just came out showing the COVID vaccines, and not COVID, is causing myocarditis and encephalitis leading to death.

The paper is entitled: A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19.

It was published yesterday, Oct 1, and now has already has over 100,000 views of the abstract and over 6,000 views of the full text.

Here’s the abstract:

The current report presents the case of a 76-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination. The patient was first vaccinated in May 2021 with the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vector vaccine, followed by two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in July and December 2021. The family of the deceased requested an autopsy due to ambiguous clinical signs before death. PD was confirmed by post-mortem examinations. Furthermore, signs of aspiration pneumonia and systemic arteriosclerosis were evident. However, histopathological analyses of the brain uncovered previously unsuspected findings, including acute vasculitis (predominantly lymphocytic) as well as multifocal necrotizing encephalitis of unknown etiology with pronounced inflammation including glial and lymphocytic reaction. In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.

For those not familiar with the medical lingo, necrotizing means tissue death and multifocal means “all over your brain.” 

And “corroborate previous reports” means this is happening over and over again. [MORE]

'Lets Not Put A Gloss On It. COVID Injections are Medical Murder' – Dr Mike Yeadon

A Plandemic of Misinformation by Elites and Their Authorities: Dr Malhotra Flip Flops. Now says All COVID Injections Must be Stopped

Puppetician Newsome Signs Law that Punishes Doctors who Inform People About the Dangers of COVID Shots if Info is "contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus" [fascism disguised as democracy]

From [HERE] California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a bill that subjects the state’s doctors to discipline, including the suspension of their medical licenses, for sharing “misinformation” or “disinformation” about COVID-19 with their patients.

California Assembly Bill 2098 (AB 2098) defines “misinformation” as “false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care” and “disinformation” as “misinformation that the licensee deliberately disseminated with malicious intent or an intent to mislead.”

Newsom said the law applies only to physicians’ speech with patients during discussions directly related to COVID-19 treatment.

Language in the bill points out that the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) has warned that physicians who spread misinformation or disinformation “risk losing their medical license, and … have a duty to provide their patients with accurate, science-based information.”

The FSMB, as previously reported by The Defender, takes money from Big Pharma and has a history of challenging and attacking non-pharmaceutical medical approaches used by integrative doctors as falling outside the “standard of care” as they define it.

Commenting on Newsom’s decision to sign the controversial AB 2098, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) chairman and chief legal counsel, said the law “fundamentally changes the sacred relationship between physician and patient that has existed since Hippocrates.”

Kennedy added:

“Under the new rubric, the doctor no longer serves the best interest of the patient but acts as an agent of state policy.

“History is replete with nightmarish examples of what happens when doctors stop healing and act instead to advance ‘the greater good.’ Governments have variously cited that phrase to justify euthanasia of the elderly, mental defectives, homosexuals and other ‘useless eaters’ and to enforce ‘one-child’ policies.

“When governments start practicing medicine, the story never ends well.”

AB 2098 was introduced in mid-February by California Assemblymember Evan Low — one of seven Democratic lawmakers who in January formed the Vaccine Work Group to develop legislation promoting the use of COVID-19 vaccines while “battling misinformation.”

The bill passed the California Assembly in May, and the California Senate in late August.

The American Medical Association (AMA), which strongly supports the bill, hopes other states will follow suit in “ensuring that licensing boards have the authority to take disciplinary action against health professionals for spreading health-related disinformation,” according to a new policy adopted at its mid-June annual meeting aimed at addressing public health “disinformation.”

The AMA’s adopted policy expanded on prior efforts and called for the organization to work with “health professional societies and other relevant organizations to implement a comprehensive strategy to address health-related disinformation disseminated by health professionals.”

‘Tool for enforcing propaganda and censorship policies’ approved by state

The Defender reached out to numerous physicians who support informed consent and medical freedom.

Here’s what they told us.

Dr. Michelle Perro, California-based pediatrician, said:

“The Golden State has declared its intent with the passage and signing of AB 2098 to effectively muzzle physicians in regards to ‘COVID-speak.’

“Physicians were reticent prior to the passage of this draconian bill to speak on behalf of their patients. With looming threats of loss of livelihood, it is unlikely that any physician will speak out at this juncture. For those physicians still willing to throw down the gauntlet, a mass exodus from California will likely ensue …

“But the largest concern is regarding our children. Parents will not be able to depend on medical professionals and need to protect their own children against ill-advised experimental therapies. This bill will not only remove healthy discourse but will further divide our communities.”

Dr. Sanjay Verma, California-based cardiologist, said:

“Even in the best of times, ‘standard of care’ emerges after years of reproducible research. Even when multiple trials support the generation of new practice guidelines, often years pass before the new practice guidelines are adopted and implemented in community centers.

“In a rapidly evolving pandemic resulting from a new virus … there is all the more reason to insist on the passage of time before codifying prevailing norms into enforceable policies. …

“Throughout the pandemic, contrarian scientific voices have been subjected to censure and censorship. However, often these very perspectives were later proven to be irrefutably true ….

“Informed consent requires the discussion of risks, benefits and alternatives to any medical intervention. CA AB 2098 enables medical board disciplinary action for perspectives that challenges the accuracy and thoroughness of CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administraton] safety monitoring. That itself will cause patient harm.

“Science demands open and transparent debate. Throughout the history of modern medicine there are numerous examples in which the contrarian view led to advances in knowledge and in reassessing product post-market safety.

“CA AB 2098 is the wrong approach to improving trust in public health and maximizing adoption of rational, risk-stratified, evidence-based mitigation efforts during a pandemic that indubitably caused tremendous morbidity and mortality.”

Dr. Liz Mumper, Virginia-based pediatrician and medical advisor to CHD, said:

“I am despondent that AB 2098 is now law. ‘Misinformation’ is not defined. Scientific truth evolves over time — what is labeled as today’s misinformation may be tomorrow’s ingenious breakthrough.

“I worry that excellent physicians who discuss early treatments for COVID or weigh risks versus benefits of the jabs will flee the state.”

Dr. Robert Malone, Virginia-based physician, biochemist and infectious disease researcher, said:

“This bill will primarily act as a strong incentive for all independent-thinking physicians and other medical care providers to migrate their practices to other states.

“It creates yet another social engineering policy that will be weaponized by any person with an axe to grind against any physician or medical provider in the state by filing accusations, which will then have to be investigated and litigated, functionally creating a medical Stasi.

“This is clearly a tool for enforcing propaganda and censorship policies approved by the state of California.”

Dr. Peter McCullough, Texas-based internist and cardiologist, said:

“As a medical expert treating patients with COVID-19 and vaccine injury syndromes, I anticipate AB 2098 will cause physicians to retract from treating such patients.

“AB 2098 makes it impossible for healthcare providers to have honest and fully informed conversations about the rapidly evolving pandemic and the health problems it has brought to Californians.

“This new law hurts the most vulnerable at a time when they need their physicians to be honest and forthright.

“California is on a slippery slope of medical totalitarianism.” [MORE]

No Right to Defend Yourself in Case of Assault, Robbery, Rape etc on DC’s Dangerous Subway. Blight House Urges Court to Keep Gun Ban for Law Abiding Citizens [so That Only Criminals Will have Guns]

From [HERE] The Biden administration is urging a federal judge to uphold Washington’s ban on individuals carrying firearms on the city’s crime-ridden local public transit system popularly known as the DC Metro.

The lawsuit is one of many filed nationwide challenging gun laws after the Supreme Court’s landmark 6–3 ruling on June 23 recognizing a constitutional right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. The opinion states that to ban concealed weapons in a specific place, “the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s tradition of firearm regulation.”

The plaintiffs—city residents Gregory T. Angelo, Tyler Yzaguirre, and Robert M. Miller, along with Fairfax, Virginia, resident Cameron M. Erickson—filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on June 30.

Judge Randolph D. Moss, an Obama appointee, is presiding over the case. The plaintiffs are suing the District of Columbia and Metropolitan Police Department Chief Robert J. Contee III. Yzaguirre is president of the nonprofit Second Amendment Institute.

The four men, all holders of concealed pistol carry licenses issued by Contee’s office, are regular riders of the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, which runs bus and subway lines in the greater Washington area, including in northern Virginia and Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in Maryland. [MORE]

Although, the Supreme Court made it clear that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense in public, liberal puppeticians and freedumb believers work tirelessly to make said inalienable right illusory. The court clearly stated;

Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. As we explained in Heller, the “textual elements” of the Second Amendment’s operative clause— “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be in- fringed”—“guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. Heller further confirmed that the right to “bear arms” refers to the right to “wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.”

This definition of “bear” naturally encompasses public carry. Most gun owners do not wear a holstered pistol at their hip in their bedroom or while sitting at the dinner table. Although individuals often “keep” firearms in their home, at the ready for self-defense, most do not “bear” (i.e., carry) them in the home beyond moments of actual confrontation. To confine the right to “bear” arms to the home would nullify half of the Second Amendment’s operative protections.

Moreover, confining the right to “bear” arms to the home would make little sense given that self-defense is “the central component of the [Second Amendment] right itself.” Heller, 554 U. S., at 599; see also McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767. After all, the Second Amendment guarantees an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” Heller, 554 U. S., at 592, and confrontation can surely take place outside the home.

Although we remarked in Heller that the need for armed self-defense is perhaps “most acute” in the home, id., at 628, we did not suggest that the need was insignificant else- where. Many Americans hazard greater danger outside the home than in it. See Moore v. Madigan, 702 F. 3d 933, 937 (CA7 2012) (“[A] Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower”). The text of the Second Amendment reflects that reality.

The Second Amendment’s plain text thus presumptively guarantees petitioners Koch and Nash a right to “bear” arms in public for self-defense.

Liberals Cram Blacks (91%) Into Inhumane DC Jail: Lack Drinking Water, Showers, First Aid, Broken Toilets, Food w/Worms, Trials Postponed Until '24. Jan 6th Defendants Bring Attention to Conditions

From [HERE] Thirty-four US political prisoners of the Biden regime penned a very sad letter this week requesting a transfer to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba facility where they would receive meals, sunlight, freedom of religion, exercise, entertainment, and be treated like human beings.

DC Jail is 91% Black. Although the percentage of the overall Black population in DC has decreased, the percentage of incarcerated Blacks, particularly Black men, has remained relatively high and stable since 1990. [MORE] The vast majority of inmates are held pre-trial. All trials have been subject to postponements because of COVID. Felony trials in some cases are being set in 2024 due to the busy calendars of prosecutors, courts and defense attorneys. [MORE] and [MORE] This means persons held pre-trial and presumed innocent must wait for trial in this reprehensible jail run by liberals. [who do you think has jammed the jail with Blacks? Do republican klansman-like judges and prosecutors run the courts or police force?? DC is 95% liberal and white liberal prosecutors/judges and their rolebotic servant Blacks are responsible, - just as they are in many places where Blacks try to live]

These thirty-four January 6 political prisoners have been held for over a year and a half without trial for misdemeanors and trumped-up felony charges.

This group of men have been isolated, beaten viciously, abused, threatened, tormented, and belittled by the guards based on their political and religious beliefs.

The men and women have been without medical assistance, medications, exercise, and most of these men have been held in isolation with little human contact for months at a time.

This is America’s future if the good people of the country do not stand up and demand an end to this injustice.

These men and women know that if they were to be moved to Gitmo they would not have flooded toilets, mold, flies, and frequent beatings.

Here is the transcript:

When one considers a society that distinguishes itself upon the standards of a “First World Country” allocation among the other numerous Nations around the globe, while informing its citizens that they belong to a country that ensures “Liberty and Justice for All”, it’s difficult to imagine then, that The United States of America, supposedly the wealthiest Nation on the planet, would subjugate its own citizens to that of incarceration and injustice instead, all while administering medieval standards of living to the agonizing occupants of its “Correctional Facilities”.

The destitute and desperate prisoners of 1901 D St. SE, Washington D.C. 20003 have and will continue to endure a combination of any and all of the following:

• Begging for Help / Water / Medical Aid / Mercy through a 4 inch by 10 inch window of cold metal doors

• No Visitations

• No Religious Services

• No Attorney Access

• Mail delayed 3-4 months prior to delivery

• Laundry returning with brown stains, pubic hair, and or reeking of ripe urine

• Worms found in salad of “Meals”

• Inadequate calorie count of “Meals”

• Complete lack of nourishment in “Meals”

• Loss of Head Hair due to malnourishment of “Meals”

• Loss of Eye Sight due to malnourishment of “Meals”

• Suffering from Scurvy due to malnourishment of “Meals”

• Blatant extortion via commissary in order to maintain health and or body weight

• Rust in the Water

• Rust in jagged metal desks in Cells

• Rust on metal cages near face on small windows of Cells

• Black Mold on walls of Cells

• Black Mold on floors of Cells

• Black Mold in vents of Cells

• Broken Sinks in Cells

• Broken toilets that either wont flush or repeatedly explode in Cells

• Cockroaches in Cell / Cell Block

• Mice in Cell / Cell Block

• Black Mold on floors and walls of showers in Cell Block

• Black Sewer Flies in the Shower

• Denial of basic cleaning equipment to sanitize Living Space

• Denial of personal grooming allowed, forced to use Nair on head and face that leaves chemical burns on skin

• Stuck in Cells for 9 days without shower

• Improper Medical Care

• Medical Care arriving months later, or none at all!

• Lead Paint inside Cell / Cell Block

• No Access to Discovery

• No Legal Support such as laptops, printers, copiers

• Denial of Legal Mentors

• Vaccine Requirements for Visitations

• Vaccine Requirements for Visitors

• Vaccine Requirements for Haircuts

• Vaccine Requirements for Religious Services

• Vaccine Requirements for speaking with Lawyers in person

• C.R.T. Propaganda on Tablets

• Re-Education Propaganda on Tablets

• Lack of Legal Documentation on Tablets

• Racially Biased information on Tablets

• Removal of Internet Access / Booster for Educational Tablets

• Solitary Confinement for 25 ½ hours or more at a time

• Outdoor Rec denied arbitrarily

• Entry to Congressmen & Women who came to check on us Denied

• Repeatedly Mocked and or Insulted for our skin color or “Religious” documentation

• Compared to “Beasts”, “Dogs” and “Hogs” by “The Final Call” Magazine

• Politically mocked by staff with Democrat, Black Lives Matter, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden related attire

• Sent to “The Hole” if we express any political views whatsoever

• Racially Profiled by Guards

• Sleeping on the job by Guards

• Denial of hot water by Guards

• Prevented from attending court dates by Guards

• Homosexual and or Verbal Assaults by Guards

• Maced by Guards

• Physically Harassed by Guards

• Assaulted by Guards

• Cell Invasions in the middle of the night by Guards

• Grievous Beatings by Guards

• Threatened with and or Nearly Stabbed with “12 Inch Knives”

• Trials Postponed for at least 6 Months or almost a Year

• Bond / Bail continually Denied

• Removal of Internet Access of Clear Tablets

• Removal of Access to Attorney

• Removal of Access to Law Library

• Removal of Access to Worship Services

• Removal of Access to Grievance Forms on Tablets

It is because of this extensive report of complaints and afflictions upon those held prisoners here in the District of Columbia Jail, that not only compel us to alert the world of the diabolical conditions this “correctional facility” continues to crush all of its detainees with, but also as political prisoners on American soil, who have been unjustly and unfairly incarcerated, relentlessly burdened by selective prosecution, slandered and vilified by mainstream and social media, deliberately accosted with death threats from within the jail and received threats upon our homes and families through the mail, ALL extending from a political nature or affiliation,  We hereby request to spend our precious and limited days, should the government continue to insist on holding us captive unconstitutionally as pre-trial detainees, to be transferred and reside at Guantanamo Bay,   a detention facility that actually provides nutritional meals, routine sunlight exposure, top notch medical care, is respectful of religious requirements, has centers for exercise/entertainment for its detainees despite the fact that those residents are malicious terrorists, real members of the Taliban, and few are United States Citizens, instead of remaining trapped within the wretched confines of cruel and unusual punishment of the DC Jail.

Signed by:

1. Brian Mann (Pro se) #378522

2. Pete Schwartz #377185

3. Brandon Fellows #377943

4. Jeffrey McKellop #376887

5. Andrew Taake #378837

6. Scott Fairlamb #376877

7. Daniel Caldwell #376977

8. Ryan Nichols, Sr. #376795

9. Joseph Padilla #376981

10. Guy Reffitt #376682

11. Troy Smocks #376973

12. Chris Quaglin #378835

13. Sean McHugh #378159

14. Shane J. Jenkins #377186

15. Dominic Pezzola #376366

16. Edward Lang #376444

17. Peter F. Stager #376784

18. James McGrew #377892

19. William Chrestman #376795

20. Ronnie Sandlin #377783

21. Nathaniel Degrave #376789

22. Jorden Mink #377184

23. Cleveland Grover Meredith, Jr. #376201

24. Alan Byerly #378160

25. Thomas Ballard #378839

26. Julian Elie Khater #377187

27. Marshall Neefe 378836

28. Jonathan Mellis #376907

29. Robert Gieswein #376980

30. Kelly Meggs #376780

31. Jessica Watkins #376520

32. Kenneth Harrelson #377692

33. Garrett Miller #377321

34. David Dempsey #378838

At Trial for Excessive Force Portland Cops say Their Right to Attack People 'Authorizes Force Against Protestors who are Passively Resisting and People in a Crowd who may have Committed Crimes before'

From [HERE] The first civil lawsuit against Portland for police behavior during 2020 protests to reach a jury is being heard this week. Testimony from officers who suggests the bureau is still at odds with the federal government about when the use of force is allowed

Portland police officer testimony in a civil trial last week suggests police in the city have an understanding of civil rights and use-of-force laws that stands in sharp contrast to that of the federal courts and of lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice. In one instance, an officer appeared to not fully understand the bureau’s use-of-force directives.

Officers Brent Taylor and Craig Lehman and Det. Erik Kammerer, all members of the now disbanded Rapid Response Team, which was the primary unit policing the 2020 protests, testified last week in a lawsuit brought by Erin Wenzel. The officers who allegedly assaulted Wenzel have not been identified, but Lehman, Taylor and Kammerer were all present the night she was injured. Wenzel alleges officers shoved her to the ground from behind multiple times on Aug. 14, 2020, while she was following their orders to disperse.

Lehman, who briefly took the stand on Wednesday, appeared stumped when asked to explain the bureau’s use of force directives. Wenzel’s attorney John Burgess asked Lehman if he would have been permitted to shove a person to the ground from behind if that person were following officer instructions. Lehman, quoting directly from bureau policies, said it would depend on the totality of the circumstances and the reasonableness of the force.

“What does that mean?” Burgess asked.

“I don’t know how to elaborate more than that,” Lehman responded after a six-second pause, before repeating the directive’s language. “Just the totality of the circumstances, what’s going on and if it was reasonable to do so.”

The police officers who have testified and the attorneys for the city have so far suggested they are free to use force they deem necessary against protesters who are passively resisting and against people in a crowd who they believe may have committed crimes in the past or may commit crimes later in the protest.

Taylor said his experience in past protests and whether or not he knew that someone was a known agitator or that they had been complicit in shield holding or “defending the crowd” all factored into his decision to use force.

“They feel totally justified using force against people who they deem to be troublemakers based on their physical appearance or past actions,” said Portland attorney Whitney Stark, whose firm represents clients suing the city over alleged violations during 2020 protests. “That’s so wrong. Your job is to protect and serve everybody, including protesters who are protesting you, and you are not doing that.”

Stark said it appeared as though the police had targeted Wenzel and other protesters simply because they were wearing black. [MORE]

Liberal Authorities in Topeka say Bodycam Video is Owned by Cops as a "Personnel Record" [used Only to convict Blacks, Not Cops]. Refuse to Release Video of Cops Fatal Shooting of Christopher Kelley

From [HERE] Topeka police last week denied a request by The Capital-Journal seeking body camera video of the fatal shooting by three Topeka police officers June 24 of Christopher Kelley, 38, whom officers said charged at them with a knife.

Topeka, Kansas is a liberal, white city.

Police legal adviser David Huckabee said the Kansas Open Records Act shields the videos involved from public release because they are personnel records and investigative records, and because their release would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

Those arguments lack merit, replied Max Kautsch, a Lawrence attorney and president of the Kansas Coalition for Open Government.

Topeka police have an obligation to make the video public to answer questions surrounding Kelly's death, Kautsch said.

"The credibility of the entire local law enforcement apparatus is at stake until it releases the video," he said.

Kelley was a husband, father, cook and friend, and had been a lance corporal in the Marine Corps, said Danielle Twemlow, who helped organize a gathering held July 14 to memorialize him on the south steps of the Kansas Statehouse.

According to the government, police were called about 9 a.m. June 24 to the area of S.E. 4th and Holliday, where Kelley — a Black man had reportedly trespassed on BNSF Railroad property, threatened a BNSF employee with a knife, then began cutting himself with the knife before police arrived, said Shawnee County District Attorney Mike Kagay.

He said officers set up a perimeter and tried to negotiate for roughly an hour, shooting Kelley with "bean bag" rounds and foam/rubber projectiles, though he disobeyed their commands and continued to occasionally cut himself with the knife.

About 10 a.m., Kelley screamed and charged with the knife extended over his head at the officers, who fatally shot him, Kagay said.

An autopsy showed Kelley had methamphetamine and marijuana in his system, he said.

The Kansas Bureau of Investigation investigated circumstances of Kelley's death, then forwarded a report to Kagay's office.

Kagay announced Sept. 23 that he had concluded that the officers acted justifiably and would not be subject to criminal prosecution. Their names have not been made public.

Police say video constitutes personnel records

The Capital-Journal on Sept. 23 submitted a request to Topeka's city government seeking police body camera video of the incident in which Kelley died.

In his response Wednesday to The Capital-Journal's request, Huckabee said it was being refused under a section of the Kansas Open Records Act that enables agencies to "deny the release of any materials considered as personnel records, performance ratings or individually identifiable records pertaining to employees or applicants for employment."

Kautsch said the police department would have a hard time proving the video of Kelley's shooting is a personnel record. 

He said the Kansas Atttorney General's Office in 1999 ruled "the personnel exception is designed to protect information that is normally kept in personnel records files, such as documentation of discipline, references and resumes, ADA and FMLA issues, as well as specific personal information such as home address and social security number."

In Liberal San Francisco Puppeticians Authorize Police to Obtain Warrantless Access to Private Security Cameras in Real Time, including Amazon’s Ring and Google’s Nest ‘Security’ Systems

From [HERE] In a 7-4 vote on Tuesday, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors agreed to test Mayor London Breed’s controversial plan to overhaul the city’s surveillance practices, which will allow police to access private security cameras in real time.

Supervisors Catherine Stefani, Aaron Peskin, Gordon Mar, Matt Dorsey, Myrna Melgar, Rafael Mandelman and Ahsha Safaí voted to approve the trial run, while Connie Chan, Dean Preston, Hillary Ronen and Shamann Walton voted in dissent.

“I know the thought process is, ‘Just trust us, just trust the police department.’ But the reality is people have been violating civil liberties since my ancestors were brought here from an entirely, completely different continent,” Walton — the board president and District 10 representative — said.

Under the new policy, police can access up to 24 hours of live video of outdoor footage from private surveillance cameras owned by individuals or businesses without a warrant as long as the camera’s owner allows it. Police must meet one of three outlined criteria to use their newfound power: they must be responding to a life-threatening emergency, deciding how to deploy officers in response to a large public event or conducting a criminal investigation that was approved in writing by a captain or higher-ranking police official.

The trial will last 15 months. If supervisors wish to extend or revise the policy, they must take a second vote.

Breed first proposed an overhaul of the city’s surveillance practices late last year as a way to crack down on retail theft, rioting, looting and drug-dealing. The plan initially received blowback from Peskin and others, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Bar Association of San Francisco, who feared the policy would be abused by police. Peskin, along with other members of the Board of Supervisors, introduced a competing proposal that, along with Breed’s, would have appeared on the June 7 primary ballot.

11 School Teachers Dead Since May in Jamaica. Coincidence Theorists says It Probably Has Nothing to Do with COVID Injections as Rolebotic Puppeticians Continue Encouraging Genocidal Shots

From [HERE] According to COVID Blog Jamaican educators are actually dying at a similar rate to Canadian doctors. At least eight Jamaican teachers and principals died in an eight-day stretch back in May.

• Gregory Williams: Portmore Community College in St Catherine (May 11)

• Ann Marie Johnson Lindo: Duncans All-Age School in Trelawny (May 12)

• Antoinette Banton-Ellis: Vere Technical High School in Clarendon (May 12)

• Carlos Gordon: One Way Prep School in Kingston (May 14)

• Donnalee Wright: Tarrant High School in St Andrew (May 16)

• Amory Tomlinson: St Elizabeth – Black River (May 18)

• Jennifer Gidden: Charlemont High School (May 18)

The report, again courtesy of the only publication in Jamaica paying attention, The Observer, said there was one more unnamed teacher who died. Thus, at least 11 total educators have died in the country since May.

Jamaica Prime Minister Andrew Holness is, without question, the most loyal, die-hard vaxx zealot of all Caribbean premiers. He posted the proverbial “I got my vaccine” photos for all three of his alleged AstraZeneca viral vector DNA injections (despite some Jamaicans suggesting all of said photo-ops were staged).

Holness posted photos of his two young sons receiving Pfizer mRNA injections in August 2021; and encouraged all Jamaican kids ages 12 and up to receive the lethal injections.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation gave the Jamaica Library Board $2 million in 2013. The purpose of the grant was to “enrich lives and ultimately contribute to the achievement of the country’s Vision 2030.” Holness, who was the country’s opposition leader and education spokesman at the time, praised Bill Gates for the money. It’s safe to assume a large chunk of said funds went straight to Holness, who became Prime Minister three years later. And that’s not all.

The 77th U.N. General Assembly in New York conclude on Monday. Kamina Johnson Smith is the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade in the Holness cabinet. She used her time at the U.N. for kissing up to World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus…

Louisiana Agency Repeals Order Forcing Children to Get Injected w/Deadly COVID Shots to Attend Public School

From [HERE] On Tuesday, the Louisiana Department of Health (LDH) officially repealed the state’s requirement that children receive the COVID vaccine in order to attend school. Governor John Bel Edwards spent nearly six months overriding the legislature’s passage of HCR3 in May which called for an end to the mandate, vetoing the bill and continuing the mandate through LDH.

The repeal comes after Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Children’s Health Defense (CHD) joined Dr. Robert Malone, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and thousands of parents earlier this year to oppose the mandate.

After this week’s repeal, Landry filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit he brought against the governor (Crews v. Edwards) which sought to have the vaccine mandate enjoined. Landry issued a statement Wednesday which reads in part:

“Today is the culmination of hard work by so many concerned parents throughout Louisiana. This is the direct result of moms, dads, grandparents, and guardians fighting for what is right. I thank Representative Raymond Crews, Health Freedom Louisiana, the Bayou Mama Bears, Town Hall Baton Rouge, Children’s Health Defense and all those from across Louisiana that stood with us for parental choice.

“Child medical decisions should be made by their guardians, not the government. I hope this health freedom victory reminds everyone what can happen when we all work together. When citizens are engaged and get involved, their government will listen.”

Landry is currently involved in another case along with the state of Missouri against President Biden and other high-ranking officials for allegedly colluding with social media giants to censor and suppress free speech related to COVID-19 and other important topics.

“What happened this week in Louisiana should inspire people across the country to take a stand against arbitrary and sometimes dangerous government mandates,” said CHD president and general counsel Mary Holland. “We all have a responsibility to call out government officials when they overstep their boundaries if we’re to maintain the freedom the founders of our country fought so hard to establish.”

Judge Rules Against NYC’s Irrational COVID Injection Mandate, Orders City to Reinstate Terminated Cops

From [HERE] A Manhattan judge ruled against the city’s coronavirus (COVID-19) mandate as it applies to members of the city’s large police union, and ordered members of that union who were terminated or put on leave to be reinstated.

State Supreme Court Judge Lyle Frank said the mandate is invalid as a condition of employment for members of the Police Benevolent Association (PBA), which brought the suit against the city.

Union President Pat Lynch has been a vocal critic against the mandate, and is party to the lawsuit brought in February.

“This decision confirms what we have said from the start: the vaccine mandate was an improper infringement on our members’ right to make personal medical decisions in consultation with their own health care professionals,” Lynch said. “We will continue to fight to protect those rights.”

In addition to Frank’s ruling against the mandate, he ordered the city to reinstate any PBA members who had been fired or put on leave after not complying with the rule.

Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella commended the PBA for initiating the effort.

“Our hope is that the city does not appeal this decision, and allows the police officers who were terminated to get reinstated as soon as possible, as well as all the other city employees who were wrongfully terminated,” said Fossella.

A spokesman for the Law Department said that the city filed a notice of appeal freezing the judge’s decision and pointed to previous similar cases that the city has won, including a Tuesday win in a suit brought by the Uniformed Firefighters Association.

“We are immediately appealing this ruling. It is at odds with every other court decision upholding the mandate as a condition of employment,” the spokesman said.

The city’s case qualifies the vaccine mandate as a condition of employment similar to the city employee residency requirement, but the judge ruled that the rule lacked statutory authority. [MORE]

FDA to Vax Injured: We Got Nothin’

From [HERE] Twenty people who were harmed by Covid-19 vaccines came to Washington D.C. this week—sick, bereaved, from a dozen states—seeking help from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.  

This is what they got: One hour with the top vaccine official in the United States—in a Zoom call to their hotel conference room. 

Two had lost sons, 16 and 34 years old, soon after their shots. Three were in wheelchairs, including a girl, 14. A surgeon, nurse practitioner, teacher, and most others can no longer work. Once healthy and fit, many had been eager to be vaccinated.

“They were hiding behind a monitor,” said Brianne Dressen, 41, a Utah mother of two who was incapacitated in a vaccine trial for which she enthusiastically volunteered in November 2020. “All of us, we came out here, and Peter Marks could not get out of his house and meet with us.” [MORE]