‘The Entire Plandemic was/is Primarily Based on Useless PCR Testing b/c Inflated Case Counts and Deaths are the Number 1 Tool for Fear Mongering.’ Atty Reiner Fuellmich in Documentary, “The Big Reset”

Among others in the new documentary, The Big Reset, features Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, an experienced trial lawyer licensed in Germany and California who co-founded the Corona Committee.

With the COVID-19 crisis, policies have been implemented that would seem unthinkable under normal conditions. And all this has been achieved by means of an instrument as effective as it is old: fear.

There are two laboratories in this story: one, the one in Wuhan, the other the great sociological laboratory where the social engineering of the pandemic would have been designed and programmed.

This documentary includes the testimonies of geneticists, molecular biologists, epidemiologists, biochemists, lawyers, prestigious journalists and Nobel Laureates who are contributing very different versions of the pandemic to which the media have accustomed us. [MORE]

The COVID Injection Slow Motion Extermination: Massive Spike In US Cancer Deaths, Blood Disease, Renal Failure & More

17 Year Old Active Black Girl Dies Unexpectedly & Suddenly from an Unknown Illness. What Could It Be? The Dependent Media Won't Say b/c It's Complicit in COVID Vax Genocide

According to FUNKTIONARY:

coincidence theories – the naïve belief that problems (and solutions to them) happen spontaneously, that nothing is ever foreseen, plotted, planned or conspired through collusion by the wealthy and powerful. (See: Pathocracy, Fronts, Predictive Programming, Conspiracy Theories, Laws, Technetronic Age, WARS & Council on Foreign Relations)

The Media – the Spectacle-Cabal who love freedom of the press, but abhor freedom of speech. The Media is the Fourth Estate of Government (created, owned, administered and controlled by Pathocrats). It is one of the most essential arms of “government.” They couldn’t give you their Matrix Reality without it—likewise they couldn’t keep you imprisoned in it without it. The News Anchor holds down the Ship of State at the Port of Lies. How is it that shareholders of Media conglomerates also sit as anchors and bring you their master’s views as if it could ever be objective or news? “The media’s the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” ~ Malcolm X. (See: Television, Perception, MEDIA, Senses, CON, Normal, Pathocracy, NEWS, Corporate Media, Control, COG & Pixelated People)

Healthy Woman’s Brain Inflammation Caused by Moderna COVID Injection, Authors of Case Study Conclude

From [HERE] A healthy 35-year-old woman who experienced a seizure two days after her second dose of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine was diagnosed with limbic encephalitis, a rare form of brain inflammation.

The authors of a recent case study on the patient stated:

“We believe that this episode of limbic encephalitis, which occurred quickly after COVID-19 vaccination, is an uncommon side effect of the [Moderna] vaccine.”

Limbic encephalitis is an acute condition of noninfectious inflammation of the brain that affects the limbic system.

The limbic system is a group of structures involved in processing emotion and memory. It includes the hippocampus, medial temporal lobe, cingulate cortex and frontonasal cortex.

The symptoms of limbic encephalitis include amnesia (memory loss), behavioral changes, psychiatric symptoms, seizures and a disturbed level of consciousness.

The pathophysiology (functional changes that accompany a particular syndrome or disease) of limbic encephalitis is known to be mediated (indirectly caused) by an antigen that stimulates an antibody-mediated host immune response that inadvertently targets cells in the limbic area.

There are two causes of limbic encephalitis: paraneoplastic and autoimmune.

“Paraneoplastic” means “caused by or resulting from the presence of cancer in the body but not the physical presence of cancerous tissue in the part or organ affected.”

The patient was screened for tumors, and cancer was ruled out as the cause in this patient’s case. [MORE]

In the Context of the Plandemic is it Time to Assume that Health Research and Anything Else from the Medical Industrial Complex is fraudulent until proven otherwise? yup

From [HERE] Health research is based on trust. Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported. But about 20% of the time, said Ben Mol, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Monash Health, they would be wrong. As I’ve been concerned about research fraud for 40 years, I wasn’t that surprised as many would be by this figure, but it led me to think that the time may have come to stop assuming that research actually happened and is honestly reported, and assume that the research is fraudulent until there is some evidence to support it having happened and been honestly reported. The Cochrane Collaboration, which purveys “trusted information,” has now taken a step in that direction.

As he described in a webinar last week, Ian Roberts, professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, began to have doubts about the honest reporting of trials after a colleague asked if he knew that his systematic review showing the mannitol halved death from head injury was based on trials that had never happened. He didn’t, but he set about investigating the trials and confirmed that they hadn’t ever happened. They all had a lead author who purported to come from an institution that didn’t exist and who killed himself a few years later. The trials were all published in prestigious neurosurgery journals and had multiple co-authors. None of the co-authors had contributed patients to the trials, and some didn’t know that they were co-authors until after the trials were published. When Roberts contacted one of the journals the editor responded that “I wouldn’t trust the data.” Why, Roberts wondered, did he publish the trial? None of the trials have been retracted.

Later Roberts, who headed one of the Cochrane groups, did a systematic review of colloids versus crystalloids only to discover again that many of the trials that were included in the review could not be trusted. He is now sceptical about all systematic reviews, particularly those that are mostly reviews of multiple small trials. He compared the original idea of systematic reviews as searching for diamonds, knowledge that was available if brought together in systematic reviews; now he thinks of systematic reviewing as searching through rubbish. He proposed that small, single centre trials should be discarded, not combined in systematic reviews.

Mol, like Roberts, has conducted systematic reviews only to realise that most of the trials included either were zombie trials that were fatally flawed or were untrustworthy. What, he asked, is the scale of the problem? Although retractions are increasing, only about 0.04% of biomedical studies have been retracted, suggesting the problem is small. But the anaesthetist John Carlisle analysed 526 trials submitted to Anaesthesia and found that 73 (14%) had false data, and 43 (8%) he categorised as zombie. When he was able to examine individual patient data in 153 studies, 67 (44%) had untrustworthy data and 40 (26%) were zombie trials. Many of the trials came from the same countries (Egypt, China, India, Iran, Japan, South Korea, and Turkey), and when John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford University, examined individual patient data from trials submitted from those countries to Anaesthesia during a year he found that many were false: 100% (7/7) in Egypt; 75% (3/ 4) in Iran; 54% (7/13) in India; 46% (22/48) in China; 40% (2/5) in Turkey; 25% (5/20) in South Korea; and 18% (2/11) in Japan. Most of the trials were zombies. Ioannidis concluded that there are hundreds of thousands of zombie trials published from those countries alone.

Others have found similar results, and Mol’s best guess is that about 20% of trials are false. Very few of these papers are retracted.

We have long known that peer review is ineffective at detecting fraud, especially if the reviewers start, as most have until now, by assuming that the research is honestly reported. I remember being part of a panel in the 1990s investigating one of Britain’s most outrageous cases of fraud, when the statistical reviewer of the study told us that he had found multiple problems with the study and only hoped that it was better done than it was reported. We asked if had ever considered that the study might be fraudulent, and he told us that he hadn’t.

We have now reached a point where those doing systematic reviews must start by assuming that a study is fraudulent until they can have some evidence to the contrary. Some supporting evidence comes from the trial having been registered and having ethics committee approval. Andrew Grey, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Auckland, and others have developed a checklist with around 40 items that can be used as a screening tool for fraud (you can view the checklist here). The REAPPRAISED checklist (Research governance, Ethics, Authorship, Plagiarism, Research conduct, Analyses and methods, Image manipulation, Statistics, Errors, Data manipulation and reporting) covers issues like “ethical oversight and funding, research productivity and investigator workload, validity of randomisation, plausibility of results and duplicate data reporting.” The checklist has been used to detect studies that have subsequently been retracted but hasn’t been through the full evaluation that you would expect for a clinical screening tool. (But I must congratulate the authors on a clever acronym: some say that dreaming up the acronym for a study is the most difficult part of the whole process.)

Roberts and others wrote about the problem of the many untrustworthy and zombie trials in The BMJ six years ago with the provocative title: “The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change.” They wanted the Cochrane Collaboration and anybody conducting systematic reviews to take very seriously the problem of fraud. It was perhaps coincidence, but a few weeks before the webinar the Cochrane Collaboration produced guidelines on reviewing studies where there has been a retraction, an expression of concern, or the reviewers are worried about the trustworthiness of the data.

Retractions are the easiest to deal with, but they are, as Mol said, only a tiny fraction of untrustworthy or zombie studies. An editorial in the Cochrane Library accompanying the new guidelines recognises that there is no agreement on what constitutes an untrustworthy study, screening tools are not reliable, and “Misclassification could also lead to reputational damage to authors, legal consequences, and ethical issues associated with participants having taken part in research, only for it to be discounted.” The Collaboration is being cautious but does stand to lose credibility—and income—if the world ceases to trust Cochrane Reviews because they are thought to be based on untrustworthy trials. [MORE]

Whistleblower Receives $11 Million for Reporting Pharmaceutical Fraud

From [HERE] The United States Department of Justice settled a case against the pharmaceutical manufacturer Bayer Corporation.  Under the terms of the settlement, Bayer paid $40 million.  A former employee in the pharmaceutical company’s marketing department filed two qui tam lawsuits alleging violations of the False Claims Act.  For reporting fraud, the whistleblower received approximately $11 million, and they pursued both cases after the Department of Justice (DOJ) declined to intervene.

According to the allegations, the pharmaceutical company was paying kickbacks to healthcare providers to “induce them to utilize the drugs Trasylol and Avelox, and also marketed these drugs for off-label uses that were not reasonable and necessary.”  This lawsuit was filed in the District of New Jersey and alleged that the because of these kickbacks, the pharmaceutical company caused submission of false claims to Medicare and Medicaid.  The lawsuit that was transferred to the District of Minnesota entailed the pharmaceutical company knowingly misrepresenting the safety and efficacy of Baycol, a statin drug, and also renewing contracts with the Defense Logistics Agency based on these misrepresentations.  To settle these allegations, Bayer paid $38,860,555 to the United States and $1,139,445 to the Medicaid Participating States.  The Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General remarked about this settlement, “Today’s recovery highlights the critical role that whistleblowers play in the effective use of the False Claims Act to combat fraud in federal healthcare programs.”

The False Claims Act incentivizes private citizens to report fraud against the government and holds accountable companies that financially benefit from participation in government contracts and government-sponsored programs.  The Department of Justice needs whistleblowers to the be the antidote to pharmaceutical fraud. [MORE]

Judge dismisses AstraZeneca fraud case over Covid vaccine disclosures

From [HERE] A federal judge threw out securities fraud claims against AstraZeneca over statements it made during clinical trials of its Covid-19 vaccine, saying the plaintiffs failed to identify any false information or fraudulent intent to support their case.

“Read generously, the amended complaint does not state a claim because it does not identify any statement made misleading by any alleged omission,” concluded U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken in New York. 

The ruling was a loss for lawyers at Robbins Geller and Vanoverbeke Michaud, who hoped to assemble a class action with Monroe County, Mich., as lead plaintiff. 

During Operation Warp Speed, the federal government offered AstraZeneca as much as $1.2 billion for 300 million doses of its experimental vaccine, although the company said it would manufacture the drug at no profit during the epidemic and only hope to make money on the technology later. [MORE]

Petition for Grand Jury says 86% of COVID Deaths Weren’t Caused by COVID; Fed Authorities “Hyperinflated” Deaths/Cases/Hospitalizations by Changing Death Certificate Rules and Incentivizing Hospitals

PLANDEMIC. From [HERE] A petition for a grand jury filed in a federal court in Oregon by 2 Oregon state senators and a doctor claims federal authorities defrauded taxpayers over 3 trillion dollars and caused various harms by “hyperinflating” the number of COVID deaths, cases and hospitalizations. The suit seeks to empanel a citizens federal grand jury to indict federal authorities from the Trump and Biden administrations.

The petition was filed on March 7, 2022. The government filed a motion to dismiss on August 28, 2022 and petitioners filed their response on September 12, 2022.

The grand jury petition names the following defendants: Rochelle Walensky (CDC Director), Xavier Becerra (HHS Secretary), Brian Moyer (NVSS Director), Alex Azar (former HHS Secretary), and Robert Redfield (former CDC Director).

The petitioners are Dr. Henry Ealy, Senator Dennis Lithicum and Senator Kim Thatcher.

Court filings explain that “Respondents altered the instructions for the completion of death certificates without going through a lawful process with mandatory public comment and federal oversight. This change caused COVID-19 to be identified as the cause of death when the actual cause of death was from a pre-existing comorbidity. The result was that 88.6% to 94.0% of deaths reported as COVID-19 were not, in fact, caused solely by COVID-19.” Supporting documentation to the filing estimates that the actual death count from COVID-19 is 54,000 people not 890,000.

The petition also documents various ways the federal government manipulated case counts with useless PCR testing and manipulating guidelines. According to the petition, under manipulated guidelines “a single cough of undetermined origin [is] sufficient to diagnose a patient as COVID-19 positive. Even without confirmatory symptoms or lab testing, a patient with a single cough can be included in data collection such as for cases, hospitalizations, and even as a COVID death….”

The petitioner’s response motion states;

“Respondents illegally created a system of diagnosis that inflated the number of COVID-19 cases that counted as unique “new” cases, multiple positive tests from same person. Respondents simultaneously proscribed the PCR test for diagnosis with fundamental defects that resulted in high rates of false positive results were additionally counted as unique “new” cases.

Further, Respondents created financial incentives for medical facilities inflate the number of COVID cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.

Federal data collection is subject to exacting controls for accurate data collection, analyses and publication. Respondents flouted these rules to create a system that inaccurately inflated COVID cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. These intentional acts of data fraud were used to panic the public into going along with unprecedented government seizure of power via emergency declarations based upon the fraudulently inflated data.”

Specifically, the petition explains the following;

Summary of Facts

The Petitioners allege that the Defendants violated federal law with respect to data integrity for COVID-19. The Petitioners allege that the Defendants failed to ensure, and/or willfully manipulated data being collected, analyzed, and published.

The Petitioners allege the Defendants’ violation of federal law led to a significant hyperinflation of COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and death counts, which was subsequently used to defraud the US Taxpayer out of at least $3.5 Trillion dollars in misappropriation of public funds between 2020 to 2022. For comparison, the US federal government typically allocates a maximum of $25.3 Billion annually in response to infectious disease with similar hospitalization and death rates. (Please refer to Exhibit M for detail and citations of COVID economic impact).

The Petitioners further allege that the Defendants:

• utilized the Medicare/Medicaid insurance reimbursement systems to

  financially incentivize compliance by hospital administrators, medical

  insurance billing specialists, and medical professionals

• that the publication of inaccurate data constitutes willful misconduct by public officials to intentionally defraud the American people and misappropriate US Taxpayer dollars, and

• that the actions of the Defendants constitute fraud, reckless and negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty and public trust.
  

Public officials have the implicit duty to tell the truth, and that duty is only more magnified during a time of crisis.

Violation of Federal Laws

The Defendants Redfield, Azar and subordinates, without notification to the Federal Register or initiating oversight and public comment, as required by the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”) and Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”), unilaterally changed how data was defined, collected, analyzed, and published exclusively for COVID. In doing so, the Defendants compromised the accuracy and integrity of all COVID data including cases, hospitalizations, and deaths leading to significant hyperinflation of all COVID data in clear violation of the Information Quality Act (“IQA”). (Please refer to Section 1 below for detail)

Acts of Criminal and Willful Misconduct

The Defendants Redfield, Azar, Moyer, and subordinates allegedly committed acts of willful misconduct by instructing medical professionals to emphasize COVID as the primary cause of death and simultaneously deemphasize comorbidities and other relevant causes of death data beginning on March 24, 2020, and again in April 2020. Further, the HHS financially incentivized hospitals to comply with the CDC’s and NVSS’s instruction by offering a greater financial reimbursement to hospitals for patients with Medicare/Medicaid health insurance coverage. According to the HHS, from April through July 2020, Medicare/Medicaid patients made up 274,000 of the 294,770 patients hospitalized due to COVID when compared against the CDC’s COVID-Net hospitalization database.14,15 With an estimated 92.9% of COVID hospitalizations in the age 50 and older demographic relying on Medicare/Medicaid for coverage, this makes accurate diagnosis essential for recovery and insurance reimbursement. Additionally, decisions to provide significant bonus compensation to hospitals appears to be an attempt to coerce hospitals into compliance and participation in the for-profit insurance fraud scheme authored by the HHS, CDC, and NVSS. (Please refer to Section 1 below for detail)

Communication of Fraudulent Data that Adversely Influenced and Continues to Influence Public Health Policy at National, State, & County Levels

The HHS, CDC and NVSS significantly hyperinflated COVID data which has had a demonstrably harmful impact upon citizens in each state. National, state, and county COVID public health policies have been based on published CDC COVID data and the complicity of state level public health directors, who by and large failed in their duty to ensure that requests made by the CDC and NVSS for COVID data collection would not lead to significantly inaccurate case, hospitalization, and death data. The root cause of the COVID plague that has gripped this country for more than two years can be best understood in how data has been illegally manipulated by the Defendants, now spanning two administrations. A lie told for years is no less a lie, even if that lie has been unfortunately accepted as truth. Defendants Walensky, Becerra, and Moyer have elected to continue to collect and publish fraudulent COVID data based upon the illegal practices of their predecessors Defendants Redfield and Azar. Additionally, Defendants Walensky and Becerra, in an effort to coverup the failures of the experimental COVID inoculations to prevent infection, intentionally terminated all publication of surveillance data for ‘vaccine breakthrough’ (aka ‘vaccine failure’) on October 30, 2021, one month prior to the beginning of exponential rises in ‘vaccine breakthrough’ cases, hospitalizations, and deaths nationwide. ‘Vaccine breakthrough’ occurs when a ‘fully vaccinated’ person contracts COVID despite being ‘fully vaccinated’. This is key data used to assess the efficacy of the experimental COVID inoculations. In the place of real numbers of confirmed ‘vaccine breakthrough’ cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, Defendants Walensky and Becerra have promoted a new fraudulent metric termed ‘vaccine efficacy’ that groups partially vaccinated individuals with unvaccinated individuals and refers to the group collectively and misleadingly as ‘unvaccinated’, which again constitutes data fraud. That the COVID data being published has been defined and collected in violation of federal law and that a new administration has continued to perpetuate these violations, we allege this constitutes acts of willful misconduct that has harmed millions of citizens across our great nation physically, emotionally, and economically.

The image above displays 5 columns of COVID data published through February 6, 2022.

Looking left to right, column one displays that COVID death count published by the CDC. This is the total number of deaths published using the March 24th, 2020 COVID Alert No. 2.

The 2nd column displays a projected value assuming that soft audits of all death certificates would be similar to what occurred in Santa Clara & Alameda Counties and produce a 25% reduction in death counts.

The middle column displays the projected maximum reduction in death counts if a full audit of all records was based upon the 2003 death certificate reporting handbooks published by the CDC and still in use for all causes of death except COVID. It is important to note that the CDC states as of February 6, 2022 that, “For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.” This statement has remained unchanged since at least July 2021.

The 4th column is the total number of deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) as of February 4, 2022.

The 5th column is the estimated number of actual deaths based upon the case filing filed by attorney Tom Renz in the US District Court of Alabama on July 19, 2021, which asserts under penalty of perjury that data being reported to VAERS is significantly under reported by a factor of 5 at the very minimum.

Collectively, this graphic contends that a full audit of all COVID death certificates could reveal that more people have died in connection with the experimental COVID inoculations than due to complications from the SARS-CoV-2 infection had federal laws not been violated, hyper-inflating COVID data published by the CDC. [MORE]

Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases

From [HERE] The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.  

Dr. Charles Lieber, 60, Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was arrested this morning and charged by criminal complaint with one count of making a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement. 

Yanqing Ye, 29, a Chinese national, was charged in an indictment today with one count each of visa fraud, making false statements, acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy. Ye is currently in China. 

Zaosong Zheng, 30, a Chinese national, was arrested on Dec. 10, 2019, at Boston’s Logan International Airport and charged by criminal complaint with attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China.  On Jan. 21, 2020, Zheng was indicted on one count of smuggling goods from the United States and one count of making false, fictitious or fraudulent statements.  He has been detained since Dec. 30, 2019.

Dr. Charles Lieber

According to court documents, since 2008, Dr. Lieber who has served as the Principal Investigator of the Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialized in the area of nanoscience, has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defense (DOD).  These grants require the disclosure of significant foreign financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities. Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017.  China’s Thousand Talents Plan is one of the most prominent Chinese Talent recruit plans that are designed to attract, recruit, and cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security.  These talent programs seek to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and reward individuals for stealing proprietary information.  Under the terms of Lieber’s three-year Thousand Talents contract, WUT paid Lieber $50,000 USD per month, living expenses of up to 1,000,000 Chinese Yuan (approximately $158,000 USD at the time) and awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT.  In return, Lieber was obligated to work for WUT “not less than nine months a year” by “declaring international cooperation projects, cultivating young teachers and Ph.D. students, organizing international conference[s], applying for patents and publishing articles in the name of” WUT.

The complaint alleges that in 2018 and 2019, Lieber lied about his involvement in the Thousand Talents Plan and affiliation with WUT.  On or about, April 24, 2018, during an interview with investigators, Lieber stated that he was never asked to participate in the Thousand Talents Program, but he “wasn’t sure” how China categorized him.  In November 2018, NIH inquired of Harvard whether Lieber had failed to disclose his then-suspected relationship with WUT and China’s Thousand Talents Plan.  Lieber caused Harvard to falsely tell NIH that Lieber “had no formal association with WUT” after 2012, that “WUT continued to falsely exaggerate” his involvement with WUT in subsequent years, and that Lieber “is not and has never been a participant in” China’s Thousand Talents Plan. 

Yanqing Ye

According to the indictment, Ye is a Lieutenant of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the armed forces of the People’s Republic of China and member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).  On her J-1 visa application, Ye falsely identified herself as a “student” and lied about her ongoing military service at the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), a top military academy directed by the CCP.  It is further alleged that while studying at Boston University’s (BU) Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering from October 2017 to April 2019, Ye continued to work as a PLA Lieutenant completing numerous assignments from PLA officers such as conducting research, assessing U.S. military websites and sending U.S. documents and information to China.

According to court documents, on April 20, 2019, federal officers interviewed Ye at Boston’s Logan International Airport. During the interview, it is alleged that Ye falsely claimed that she had minimal contact with two NUDT professors who were high-ranking PLA officers.  However, a search of Ye’s electronic devices demonstrated that at the direction of one NUDT professor, who was a PLA Colonel, Ye had accessed U.S. military websites, researched U.S. military projects and compiled information for the PLA on two U.S. scientists with expertise in robotics and computer science.  Furthermore, a review of a WeChat conversation revealed that Ye and the other PLA official from NUDT were collaborating on a research paper about a risk assessment model designed to decipher data for military applications.  During the interview, Ye admitted that she held the rank of Lieutenant in the PLA and admitted she was a member of the CCP.

Zaosong Zheng

In August 2018, Zheng entered the United States on a J-1 visa and conducted cancer-cell research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston from Sept. 4, 2018, to Dec. 9, 2019. It is alleged that on Dec. 9, 2019, Zheng stole 21 vials of biological research and attempted to smuggle them out of the United States aboard a flight destined for China.  Federal officers at Logan Airport discovered the vials hidden in a sock inside one of Zheng’s bags, and not properly packaged.  It is alleged that initially, Zheng lied to officers about the contents of his luggage, but later admitted he had stolen the vials from a lab at Beth Israel.  Zheng stated that he intended to bring the vials to China to use them to conduct research in his own laboratory and publish the results under his own name.

The charge of making false, fictitious and fraudulent statements provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of visa fraud provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of acting as an agent of a foreign government provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of conspiracy provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of smuggling goods from the United States provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, United States Attorney Andrew E. Lelling; Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Boston Field Division Joseph R. Bonavolonta; Michael Denning, Director of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Boston Field Office; Leigh-Alistair Barzey, Special Agent in Charge of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Northeast Field Office; Philip Coyne, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; and William Higgins, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Export Enforcement, Boston Field Office made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorneys B. Stephanie Siegmann, Jason Casey and Benjamin Tolkoff of Lelling’s National Security Unit are prosecuting these cases with the assistance of trial attorneys William Mackie and David Aaron at the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section.

The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

These case are part of the Department of Justice’s China Initiative, which reflects the strategic priority of countering Chinese national security threats and reinforces the President’s overall national security strategy. In addition to identifying and prosecuting those engaged in trade secret theft, hacking and economic espionage, the initiative will increase efforts to protect our critical infrastructure against external threats including foreign direct investment, supply chain threats and the foreign agents seeking to influence the American public and policymakers without proper registration.

By 2050, one in every four people in the world will be African – offering up a massive consumer and business market

From [INDYBAY] The continent of Africa has staked its position as the cornerstone of the world’s future.

The continent is now positioned to be the most important driver of global business with a $2.5 trillion market opportunity. Every sector of the continent’s economy from manufacturing to agriculture to services to finance is on a growth trajectory.

By 2050, one in every four people in the world will be African – offering up a massive consumer and business market. The Africa Continental Free Trade Area Agreement will fuel trade and investment opportunities within the continent as well as the world.

This is no longer a question for debate, more so an acknowledgment that Africans are making things happen and changing economic realities.

We are seizing the moment. The environment is primed for ambitious plays, and an infusion of creative and decisive moves that will lead to economic growth and sustainable development.

New and dynamic financing models, bold partnerships, easier trade across borders, the full participation of women, a pursuit of climate justice, investment in renewable energy, the emergence of Africa’s creative and cultural industry, technology invention and adoption, and agricultural transformation are all areas the continent must continue to support and elevate.

Africa is in its rightful place on the global stage, building new opportunities for itself and for the world.

We are telling our own stories, recognizing and addressing our mistakes, building powerful and viable economic engines, and no longer asking for permission for a spot on the global stage.

Under the leadership of the Deputy Secretary General of the United Nations, Amina J. Mohammed, the inaugural Global Africa Business Initiative is designed to place Africa in its proper spot on the world stage, bringing to focus a roadmap for Africa that is sustainable, inclusive, just, and managed by Africans for Africans.

The conference will take place during the United Nations General Assembly week from 18-19 September 2022.

There will be robust dives on how Africa offers a powerful business ecosystem when activated brings prosperity to all Africans and citizens of the world.

When Africa wins, the world wins.

Dem Puppeticians Go Out of Their Way to Dissociate Themselves from Being Perceived as Advocates for Black Lives as House Approves Bill to Boost Police Funding that's Not Even Expected to become Law

From [HERE] House Democrats passed bills that would give millions of dollars in grants to police agencies, even as resistance from some progressives showed how difficult the issue has become for the party.

The votes on Thursday were designed to help vulnerable Democrats, some of whom are being accused of being antipolice in midterm campaign ads, to convey to voters that they want to combat rising crime rates and support law enforcement. The bills aren’t expected to move forward in the Senate or become law, and Republicans suggested the votes were a campaign-season stunt. A recent NBC News poll found that Republicans had a 23-point edge over Democrats on the question of which party was better at addressing crime as an issue.

“We must fund, not defund, law enforcement,” said Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D., N.J.), whose bill would authorize $60 million a year for five years for local police departments with fewer than 125 officers, for hiring and training, including for de-escalation of conflict. Some progressives pushed for more accountability measures for police officers in the legislation.

Mr. Gottheimer’s bill passed on a 360-64 vote, with nine Democrats and 55 Republicans voting against it.

As Directed by Her White Liberal Masters Rolebot Letitia James Found her defendant [Trump] first and then Looked for Evidence to Charge Him with Something. But What Does She Do For Black Folks?

From [HERE] Common wisdom says that on a good day state attorneys general do 70% politics and 30% law. That’s on a good day. On Wednesday New York Attorney General Letitia James lived up to that reputation by filing a civil lawsuit against Donald Trump. The suit alleges that the former President and three of his children inflated the asset values and net worth of their properties to get better terms from banks on loans and better deals from insurers.

Ms. James ran for office promising to indict Mr. Trump, which is the opposite of the way justice should be done. You’re supposed to find a crime and then identify the perpetrator. Ms. James declared Mr. Trump could “be indicted for criminal offenses” and has hunted ever since for a crime to charge him with. 

Her civil lawsuit requires a mere preponderance of evidence standard to prove guilt, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. She has referred the case to the Internal Revenue Service and federal prosecutors in Manhattan, though the Manhattan district attorney didn’t file charges after examining the same issues.

This isn’t to dismiss the financial fraud charges. The lawsuit says Mr. Trump used “objectively false numbers to calculate property values,” including counting his Trump Tower apartment at 30,000 sq. ft. when it was 10,996 sq. ft. so that it could be improperly valued at $327 million. His golf course in Scotland was valued at $327 million on the calculation that 2,500 homes could be developed (worth $267 million) when he had zoning approval for only 1,500 homes and apartments. 

“All told, Mr. Trump, the Trump Organization, and the other Defendants, as part of a repeated pattern and common scheme, derived more than 200 false and misleading valuations of assets,” the lawsuit says. 

No one who has ever listened to Mr. Trump will be surprised if he hyped the value of his holdings in dealing with bankers. But then no one in New York finance would ever trust only what Mr. Trump claims before signing a document or lending him money.

As far as we’ve seen, the lenders don’t seem to consider themselves victims. They made money on the loans, which didn’t default. The transactions were presumably scoured by auditors and bank due-diligence officers. There is enormous variability in real-estate valuations. The question Ms. James will have to prove is whether Mr. Trump’s claims amounted to intentional fraud. 

The scent of politics can be detected in the sanctions Ms. James is seeking. She wrapped the three adult Trump children into the suit and is seeking to bar them for life from being officers of any business in New York. Mr. Trump would be barred from entering into any commercial real-estate acquisitions in New York state for five years and also barred from applying for loans from “any financial institution chartered by or registered with the New York Department of Financial Services” for five years.

She is also seeking $250 million in restitution, which probably exceeds the interest earned on the difference in interest rates that banks might have charged Mr. Trump if his assets were worth less than advertised. 

Ms. James’s decision to drop this lawsuit only a few weeks before the midterm election also smacks of political motivation. Mr. Trump isn’t on any ballot. But she knows Mr. Trump drives Democrats to vote, and keeping him at the center of the news is a Democratic priority. [MORE]

SNiggering Traitor Eric Adams Bends Over Backwards to Ease Perceptions of Orthodox Jews; Promises to Strengthen Cash Bail, Which Disproportionately Detains Blacks and Affects Ability to Retain an Atty

From [HERE] New York City Mayor Eric Adams held two separate, closed-door meetings with members of the Orthodox Jewish community at City Hall this week. 

Planned ahead of the Jewish New Year — which begins on the evening of Sunday, Sept. 25 — the meetings seemed designed to showcase the mayor’s support for Orthodox Jewish New Yorkers at a time in which many in the community are concerned about crime, in general, and antisemitic attacks, in particular. 

At the same time, the mayor called upon the Orthodox community for their continued support, particularly on the issue of bail reform, which he claims has returned dangerous criminals to the streets.

On Monday, Adams held an invitation only meeting with members of the haredi Orthodox press, including representatives from Hamodia, Der Yid and Yeshiva World News. On Tuesday, he had a sit-down with “our Jewish community leaders,” as he called them on Twitter — a mostly male and Orthodox group of leaders that included Rabbi David Niederman, executive director of United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgand North Brooklyn; David Greenfield, CEO of Met Council, the anti-poverty group, and Satmar activist Rabbi Moishe Indig. 

At Monday’s media meeting, Hamodia reported that Adams doubled down on his support for Gov. Kathy Hochul when asked about whether or not Orthodox voters should cast their vote for her opponent, the Jewish Republican Rep. Lee Zeldin.

Zeldin is a staunch Conservative who is supported by former President Donald Trump, which lends him appeal to an Orthodox voting bloc that has voted Republican in recent years, at least in presidential elections.

“I am a Gov. Hochul person,” Adams said. “That’s where my vote is going. I encourage others to vote Gov. Hochul.”

Adams added that Hochul was a “partner” who was “extremely helpful in the area of crime,” he said. 

However, while Adams and Hochul are allies, there has been tension between the two on the subject of bail reform. Progressives say the cash bail system unfairly burdens the poor and leaves people more desperate and unstable. Racist and ignorant critics of bail reform, meanwhile, make fact free claims that the system keeps violent suspects off the streets.

In April, Hochul tightened New York’s bail laws, making more crimes bail-eligible and gave judges more discretion in determining the severity of cases. Adams, who ran his campaign as a tough-on-crime mayor, hoped she would go further and said in August that “an insane, broken system” was allowing repeat offenders to be released onto the streets. [MORE]

If a Cop Lies 1 Time Can You Believe Anything Else He Says? Nearly 1 Thousand Cases Dismissed or Convictions Vacated at the Request of NYC Prosecutors Due to Unreliable Testimony by Corrupt, Liar Cops

NYC’S FINEST: No Criminal Charges Filed by DA after a Disciplinary Hearing Judge Found 2 Cops Guilty of Raping a 15 Yr Old Girl Multiple Times. Record of Hearing Decision Previously Kept Secret by NYPD

From [HERE] No matter how expensive law enforcement is, it can always get more expensive. Most agencies demand outsized portions of local budgets. That’s just the ground floor.

Cops want more money and less accountability. Perpetually. The cost of keeping bad cops on the payroll is far, far more than their paychecks. Bad cops generate lawsuits, which generate legal fees and settlements, all paid for by the people already paying their salaries.

That’s what the NYPD does. In addition to its ~$10 billion (with a “B”) annual budget, the city (via the billfolds of residents) hands out more than $250 million a year in lawsuit settlements. 

Then there’s the double-charging NYC residents have seen over the past couple of years. They pay cops to make busts, only to have those cops repay their trust with corruption and severe misconduct. Now, prosecutions that residents have paid for are being tossed, thanks to their link to disgraced or convicted NYPD officers. 

The additional bleeding started early last year, when a single corrupt NYPD narcotics detective (Joseph Franco, a 20-year-officer hit with 26 criminal charges in 2019) resulted in the dismissal of 90 cases. One officer, nearly 100 cases. The flow of blood continued throughout 2021, leading to another 60 dismissals in November, these related three officers facing criminal charges. One of those officers had been with the NYPD for thirteen years before finally being fired.

The bleeding has only accelerated since then. In August of this year, another 133 convictions linked to former detective Joseph Franco were dismissed by the Bronx district attorney, bringing this one officer’s total to more than 500 tossed cases. 

This is the latest news on the corrupt cop/case dismissal front for the NYPD. It very likely won’t be the last. 

District Attorney Eric Gonzalez presented 378 cases to a Brooklyn Supreme Court judge asking for their dismissal based on new evidence that the police officers who testified were not reliable witnesses.

“These former police officers were found to have committed serious misconduct that directly relates to their official job duties, calling into question the integrity of every arrest they have made,” Gonzalez said. “A thorough review by my Conviction Review Unit identified those cases in which their testimony was essential to proving guilt, and I will now move to dismiss those convictions as I no longer have confidence in the integrity of the evidence that underpinned them.”

These cases are linked to 13 officers, some who have been found guilty of criminal acts including planting drugs, taking bribes, perjury, and… um… murder[!!!]. 131 of the cases are linked to a corrupt Brooklyn narcotics unit. The other 78 cases are linked to two drug officers who admitted to accepting sexual favors as bribes. [MORE]

Coroner for Authoritarians Changes Autopsy for Authoritarians: Claims Elijah McClain Died from Ketamine and Not From 3 White Cops Beating, Choking and Piling on 140lbs Black Man as he Begged for Life

From [HERE] The Adams County coroner has changed the cause of death of 23-year-old Elijah McClain to ketamine administration following forcible restraint but maintains that the manner of death is “undetermined” — contradicting the state’s case against the police officers and paramedics who are charged in connection to his death.

It’s unclear exactly why the elected Adams County Coroner Monica Broncucia-Jordan and her contracted forensic pathologist changed their minds last year amid a statewide grand jury investigation. 

In the amended autopsy report made public on Friday, Dr. Stephen Cina, who performs autopsies for Adams County, wrote that he received new information in the grand jury probe, including extensive body camera footage, witness statements and additional records. He said he requested those back when he performed the original autopsy in 2019, but didn’t get everything. 

Cina noted that the large dose of ketamine McClain received by paramedics was the biggest culprit in his death. 

“Simply put, this dosage of ketamine was too much for this individual and it resulted in an overdose … I believe that Mr. McClain would most likely be alive but for the administration of ketamine.”

Cina also goes on to mostly take the blame off of law enforcement officers for McClain’s death and noted that the carotid control chokehold McClain received by police likely would not have left any lasting damage to McClain’s health.

“This type of hold is often used in the martial arts with no lasting adverse consequences,” he wrote. “There were no findings in the neck indicative of traumatic asphyxiation … I have seen no evidence that injuries inflicted by the police contributed to death.”

Cina noted that his opinion is that McClain “likely would have recovered if he did not receive this injection.”

The initial autopsy, released a few months after McClain’s 2019 deadly encounter with police, had an “undetermined” cause and manner of death and was signed by Broncucia-Jordan, with Cina performing the autopsy. 

But during the 2021 closed-door investigation by the statewide grand jury, new evidence was presented and the change was made official on July 1, 2021. It was released to the public on Friday. [MORE]

McClain died at a hospital after a violent arrest on the evening of August 24, 2019. McClain was walking home after he had gone to a corner store to purchase a soda or ice-tea.

McClain, who routinely wore masks when outside because he had anemia and became cold easily, according to family, refused to stop for officers when they first contacted him. However, the police apparently had no legal justification to stop him in the first place. “I have a right to go where I am going,” he said. The white Aurora officers involved were Randy Roedema, Jason Rosenblatt and Nathan Woodyard.

According to the federal indictment:

WOODYARD arrived first and ordered Mr. McClain to stop. WOODYARD did not see Mr. McClain with any weapons, but he noted a grocery bag and that, in his opinion, Mr. McClain was “suspicious.” Immediately after WOODYARD contacted Mr. McClain, ROSENBLATT joined WOODYARD, and the stop quickly turned physical. The officers grabbed Mr. McClain's arms then forcibly moved Mr. McClain over to a grassy area near where the officers first contacted Mr. McClain and pushed him up against the exterior wall of a nearby apartment building. ROEDEMA grabbed the grocery bag out of Mr. McClain’s hands and threw it to the ground. He did not examine the bag’s contents. The bag contained cans of iced tea. Mr. McClain was struggling as the officers attempted to restrain him. While Mr. McClain was pushed up against the wall and struggling, ROEDEMA told the other officers that Mr. McClain had reached for ‘your gun” Neither ROSENBLATT nor WOODYARD knew whether “your gun” meant ROSENBLATTs or WOODYARD's gun. ROEDEMA later said that Mr. McClain reached for ROSENBLATT's gun. ROSENBLATT stated that he did not feel any contact with his service weapon.

Officers are instructed that to perform a carotid control hold an officer uses his or her bicep and forearm to apply pressure to the carotid arteries on the sides of a 1 subject's neck, thereby cutting off blood flow to the subject's brain and causing temporary unconsciousness for the purpose gaining compliance or control ROSENBLATT stated that he applied an unsuccessful carotid control hold to Mr. McClain, and WOODYARD then applied a carotid control hold that resulted in Mr. McClain going unconscious and snoring. Mr. McClain suffered bodily injury. He was was rendered unconscious, suffered hypoxia, and his physical and mental condition were impaired. The risk of hypoxia and cerebral hypoxia was exacerbated by applying two carotid control holds. ROEDEMA also placed Mr. McClain in a bar hammer lock. Abar hammer lock is a physical defensive tactic whereby a subject's arm is held back behind their back to gain controlof the subject. ROEDEMA stated that he “cranked pretty hard” on Mr. McClain's shoulder and heard it pop three times. ROEDEMA, WOODYARD, and ROSENBLATT had all been trained that the carotid hold posed dangers and should never be administered more than once.

l hold, and ROSENBLATT radioed for Aurora Fire Rescue to respond to the scene. At the same time, Mr. McClain regained consciousness, the struggle resumed, and WOODYARD reported that Mr. McClain started to twist and pull away while on the ground. ROEDEMA, ROSENBLATT, and WOODYARD wrestled Mr. McClain to the ground. ROEDEMA tried to maintain control of Mr. McClain by putting his entire body on top of Mr. McClain in an attempt to sprawl him out.

The officers reported that Mr. McClain exhibited extraordinary strength. (a frail, 140-pound man, the three officers assumed that he was on drugs or a stimulant, performing for the camera, a white cop stated “Whatever he is on, he has crazy strength,” )The autopsy found only ketamine and marijuana in his system. )The officers placed Mr. McClain in handcuffs, and the officers continued to restrain Mr. McClain. ROEDEMA, ROSENBLATT, and WOODYARD remained on top of him and continued to hold him on the ground despite pleas that he could not breathe. 'WOODYARD rolled Mr. McClain onto his side into the “recovery position.” Officers were trained that if they administered a carotid control hold they had to place the individual in the “recovery position,” meaning placement on one’s side rather than in the prone position. Mr. McClain vomited multiple times while being restrained. Mr. McClain vomited into his mask during the struggle, and it ultimately came off after the handcuffs were secured. There was evidenceof vomit found inside the mask. Mr. McClain's handcuffs behind his back restricted his movement and prevented him from removing the mask.

Around this time, additional officers arrived on scene. ROEDEMA and ROSENBLATT continued to hold Mr. McClain on the ground, while WOODYARD walked away and was replaced by another officer. None of the officers checked Mr. MeClain’s pulse or monitored his airway, breathing, or circulation. ROSENBLATT straddled Mr. MeClain's legs, while ROEDEMA was positioned at McClain's back; Mr. McClain's hands were handcuffed behind his back. During this time, Mr. MeClain said his name, stated that he could not breathe and that what the officers were doing “really hurt,” Mr. McClain reported that he did not have a gun, did not do that sort of thing, he asked for help, and asked to find his phone. ROEDEMA applied, and directed other officers who responded to apply, pain compliance techniques to the handcuffed Mr. McClain. While restraining Mr. McClain, ROEDEMA increased pressure causing Mr. McClain tocry out, “Ah, ow, okay, okay.” KOEDEMA responded, “Well, chill out! You've already been told several times to stop.” Mr. McClain spoke again and ROEDEMA picked up Mr. McClain's torso and forcibly pushed it to the ground, causing Mr. McClain to cry out, “Ow!”

ROEDEMA was the senior patrol officer on scene and directed other officers. Mr. McClain repeatedly stated that he could not breathe. ROEDEMA ignored Mr. McClain's repeated statements that he could not breathe. Initially during the restraint, ROEDEMA, ROSENBLATT, and WOODYARD were all on top of Mr. McClain, and they were lying on his back. Throughout the restraint, two or three officers were physically restraining Mr. McClain, with ROEDEMA on his back and controlling him there, and with ROSENBLATT on Mr. McClain's legs. Other officers on the scene told ROEDEMA to make sure Mr. McClain could breathe, and ROEDEMA dismissed those reminders, asserting that Mr. McClain could breathe.

Additionally, prior to the restraint period, Mr. McClain vomited into his mask, which he was unable to remove during the struggle and once restrained. In addition to the vomit inside Mr. McClain'’s mask, Mr. McClain vomited repeatedly while being restrained on his side. Gurgling sounds by Mr. McClain were audible in body-worn camera video footage. Medical evidence indicated that this was evidence of potential aspiration while he was restrained. Mr. McClain's breathing further indicated he had hypoxia? following the police restraint and use of the carotid control hold. Medical evidence also conveyed that Mr. McClain was in a hypoxemic state with decreased cerebral oxygenation. Finally, Mr. McClain suffered from metabolic acidosis from the physical struggle with police. Hypoxia, hypoxemia? and metabolic acidosis, all constitute serious bodily injury. Individually and collectively, they pose a substantial risk of death or a substantial risk of protracted loss or impairment of the function of any part or organ of the body. [MORE]

Liar Acquitted: White Cop Said He Was "Terrified" when Jonathan Price Politely Greeted Him w/an Outstretched Hand, so He Shot the Black Man to Death. Cop Lied b/c He Knew White Jurors Would Believe It

From [HERE] A white police officer who fatally shot a Black man after the victim initially offered a handshake was acquitted of murder on Thursday.

Shaun Lucas, 24, shot Jonathan Price four times on Oct. 3, 2020, outside a convenience store in Wolfe City.

But Lucas apparently thought Price was drunk and moved to detain him. Police claimed that Price resisted and was unaffected when Lucas tried to shock him with a Taser. Cops further claimed that Price then reached for the Taser. Lucas said he feared for his life and responded by shooting and killing Price.

Body-camera footage of the incident was played at trial but never released to the public (because its secret).

Sabrina Price wept after the verdict was announced, per NBC Dallas-Fort Worth. She said, “There was not one person that looked like me,” said Sabrina Price, who is Black, of the Hunt County jury who made the decision.

Price, who was 31, extended his arm for a handshake and offered an apology for broken glass when Lucas arrived on the scene, according to both police statements and eye witnesses in the 1,100-person town about 60 miles northeast of Dallas.

Price, 31, reportedly approached Lucas politely and asked him how he was before offering to shake his hand. Lucas allegedly refused and tried to detain Price for suspected intoxication. Lucas then shot his Taser at the man before firing his gun at Price.

Police were initially called to the convenience store over reports of a fight. Witness testimony left it unclear how or why the fight started, but it was over by the time Lucas arrived on the scene.

“Shaun Lucas was acquitted in rural Hunt County, Texas, by an all white jury,” Price family attorney Lee Merritt said. “At the time of [Price’s] murder he was unarmed and did not pose a threat to anyone. Every law enforcement professional that reviewed the facts concluded Lucas’ use of force was unjustified.”

Lucas’ defense lawyers argued he acted in self-defense and was scared Price would grab his Taser.

“That’s the only reason he fired his gun,” attorney Robert Rogers said.[MORE]

'There's no justice to be had in our justice system. I will No Longer Participate in a system that's a Total Farce.' Super Attorney Drops Her Role of 'Helping to Make It Look Fair' in the Lex-icon

From [HERE] Attorney Leslie McAdoo Gordon Saturday announced in a 14-part Twitter thread she will no longer litigate cases in court due to the corrupt criminal and federal justice systems. 

McAdoo Gordon, principal at McAdoo Gordon & Associates, specializes in defending individuals and contractors against the federal government. Specialty areas include criminal defense, security clearances, federal employee discipline and removal, debarment of contractors, criminal, OIG and Congressional investigations, expungements, and attorney discipline. 

But after 26 years of litigating these cases in court, McAdoo Gordon says she is “retiring from the active practice of law in the courts.  I will no longer be representing clients in litigation (criminal, civil, appeal, administrative) matters or defending investigations. I am done being a working litigator.” 

McAdoo Gordon, formerly a special agent for the Department of Defense, Defense Investigative Service (now the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency), was frank about why she will no longer fight in court. 

“I'll have more to say later, but the bottom line is, after 26 years, & especially the last few, I have come to an inescapable conclusion: there is no justice to be had in our ‘justice’ system. I am no longer willing to participate in a system that I consider to be a total farce,” she said. 

“The state of our institutions - particularly the criminal ‘justice’ ones, but also the federal civil courts - is dire, & is unacceptable for a functioning republic. They must be radically overhauled & reformed, & a renewed emphasis on first principles restored,” she added. 

The attorney said that far from giving up the fight, she is shedding the shackles that have been holding her back. 

“My status as a practicing litigator has constrained me from speaking truth to and about the system.  With that constraint removed, I will not be silent any longer." 

“Some of us will need to be outside the system to do what is necessary & what can only be done by speaking freely,” she continued. “That can't be done by me personally unless I no longer have clients whose interests I am honor-bound to place above those of the system and the nation.  So, I am changing that to chart a new course.” 

McAdoo Gordon's plan remains a mystery, though she did confirm to America's Frontline News that she is “absolutely not running for public office.”

“The decision to do so was made only recently, although after a long period of contemplation.  But recent events - national, personal, & with regard to my caseload - have made it clear to me that the time is now right to begin this new chapter.” 

She confirmed she may continue to consult and provide expert testimony. 

“But, in the main, & for the foreseeable future, I am going to be focusing on our most urgent needs as a nation. We must rededicate ourselves to the rule of law, to federalism, to free speech, to true tolerance, to the Bill of Rights, to liberty values.  

“We have lost our connection to these things. We must find it again.  We will lose the Republic if we don't.” 

“We need now to screw up our courage and do what needs doing to preserve the Republic,” McAdoo Gordon concluded. “No one else is going to do it for us. It will not be easy. Nothing worth doing is. The Republic is absolutely worth it. And we will do it.” 

Nearly 8 in 10 Americans believe the United States has a two-tiered justice system, with politicians and members of the D.C. elite treated differently than ordinary Americans, reported America’s Frontline News.  

The Nationwide Issues Survey by The Trafalgar Group conducted last month asked 1,080 likely general election voters, “What is your opinion of the current state of the American justice system?”  

The poll found that 79.3% of Americans agreed that “There are two tiers of justice: One set of laws for politicians and Washington, D.C. insiders vs one set of laws for everyday Americans" while 11.6% said “There is one system of justice with laws applied to all Americans equally,” and 9.1% were not sure.  

When broken out by party, 87.8% of Republicans agreed that there are two tiers of justice, 6.9% believe it is a just system, and 5.3% are not sure.  

Surprisingly, most Democrats appeared to agree with the majority of Republicans, with 66.7% saying they believe there is a two-tiered justice system, 17.5% saying the justice system is equal for all, and 15.8% remaining unsure.

Black People’s 4th Amendment Rights Turned On/Off Like a Light Switch: Report says Police Stop-and-Frisk Blacks 18X More than Whites in Liberal Milwaukee [free range slavery disguised as democracy]

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

ADHERENT RIGHTS – PRIVILEGES DISGUISED AS SO-CALLED “RIGHTS” CREATED BY MEN VIA DECEPTIVE WORD-MANIPULATION IN WRITTEN FORM CALLED “SYMBOLAEOGRAPHY,” AND LEGAL DOCUMENTS. 2) PRIVILEGES GRANTED BY AN APPARENT OR PUTATIVE AUTHORITY AT THE EXPENSE OF ONE'S INHERENT OR UNALIENABLE ‘RIGHTS.’ (SEE: INHERENT RIGHTS & RIGHTS)

From [HERE] Milwaukee police continue to stop-and-frisk a disproportionate number of people who are Black.

That's according to the latest report from the non-partisan Crime and Justice Institute.

Researchers examined data from 2021 and found MPD has not made significant improvements since first agreeing to document traffic and pedestrian stops.

That agreement was part of a 2018 $3.4 million settlement. A federal lawsuit accused police of unconstitutionally stopping minorities in high numbers. 

MPD is responding to the latest report. It shows the traffic stop rate for Black residents is 4.8 times higher than for white drivers. 

The frisk rate is 17.96 times higher. 

Milwaukee police, Mayor Cavalier Johnson and the Fire and Police Commission are recognizing the importance of achieving full compliance.