Federal Indictment Says a MD Cop Unlawfully Pulled Over and Falsely Arrested a Black Man. The Cop then Peppered sprayed him while he was handcuffed and waited several hours to transport him to jail

From [HERE] A federal grand jury indicted a former Maryland police officer on charges that he violated a man's civil rights during a 2019 traffic stop — and lied about it.

Officer Phillip Dupree, 38, is accused of deploying pepper spray, in an unreasonable use of force, on a man he pulled over in Washington, DC, outside his jurisdiction, on the early morning hours of August 4, 2019, the Justice Department wrote in a news release Wednesday.

The officer then wrote up a probable cause statement fabricating a justification for why he used force, according to the Justice Department. He was employed at the time by the Fairmount Heights Police Department in a small Maryland town with a population of less than 2,000.

Dupree was indicted on charges of kidnapping, perjury, and misconduct in office by a Maryland grand jury in November 2021 for the same case.

The state indictment alleged that Dupree arrested Torrence Sinclair, peppered sprayed him while he was handcuffed, and waited several hours to transport him from the police department to the county jail. This violates the department's general orders, which state "prisoners will be transported without unnecessary delay to the nearest processing facility," according to the indictment.

Sinclair also filed a civil suit in October 2020 against Dupree and the town of Fairmount Heights. The case is ongoing.

The suit alleged that Dupree submitted charges against Sinclair "based on a fabricated rendition of facts" with "one count of resisting arrest, two counts of disorderly conduct, one count of attempted assault second degree on a law enforcement officer, one count of malicious destruction of property and one count of attempted escape second degree."

The Prince George's County State Attorney's Office dropped all charges in November 2019.

Dupree is no longer with the department, Doris Sarumi, Fairmount Heights' town manager, told Insider. Sarumi could not comment on whether Dupree was fired and for what cause because it's a pending legal matter. 

An attorney for Dupree did not respond to a request for comment.

"This officer should have never been hired by the city of Fairmount Heights," Jonathan Y. Newton, Sinclair's attorney, told Insider. "He is the quintessential example of a bad cop, and everybody at that department and a lot of people in the area knew he was a bad cop. He gambled on the fact that nobody would challenge him on it."

Dupree also was fired by three other Maryland police departments, including for issues involving excessive force, before he was hired by Fairmount Heights in 2019, records showed.

He was first fired from the Capitol Heights Maryland Police Department in 2013, according to The Washington Post.

The officer was then hired by the District Heights Police Department on June 5, 2014. But in less than a year, Dupree racked up "more citizen complaints than that of any other officer" within the department and was fired in October 2015, according to a court opinion denying Dupree's appeal to consider his termination improper.

In 2018, he was fired from Prince George's Community College campus police force after eight months on the job, a spokesperson for the college wrote in an email to Insider. He was terminated for "performance" reasons.

While Dupree was with the Fairmount Heights Police Department, the officer was indicted on one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud by the US District Court.

He and two other police officers were accused of working together in 2019 to report false thefts of their own debit cards to law enforcement in order to claim insurance money and reimbursement from several banks.

A trial for the officers was tentatively set for January 23, 2023.

'Just b/c Your Hands are Up Doesn't Mean Cops Won't Shoot:' Suit says Newark Never Explained Why a Plainclothes Cop Jumped Out an Unmarked Van and Shot Carl Dorsey to Death or What crime he committed

From [HERE] The family of Carl Dorsey III, a South Orange resident who was fatally shot by a Newark Police Department detective, is still seeking answers from authorities around the shooting incident more than a year after his death.

Without even as much of an update from the Attorney General’s Office on an investigation into the incident to date, the grieving family has taken legal action, announcing Wednesday that they filed a civil lawsuit in State Superior Court against the Newark Police Department, the City of Newark, and the officers involved for the unwarranted and unlawful killing of Dorsey.

“We announced this today, not in a joyful mood but in a sorrowful, somber mood knowing that this is a journey that this family is going to have to move forward with,” said Robert Tarver Jr., an attorney representing Dorsey’s family in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit comes after Dorsey was killed in a police shooting that occurred on Jan. 1, 2021. At approximately 12:03 a.m. near Woodland Avenue and South 11th Street in Newark.

Officers, including Det. Rod Simpkins, had reportedly arrived on the scene after hearing gunshots fired in the area. 

Private security camera video confiscated by the police and later released by New Jersey's attorney general shows Dorsey running across the street as an unmarked van appears in the frame and comes to a screeching halt. A detective Simpkins quickly exits the sliding door of the van and then he appears to intentionally run into Dorsey in order to stop or slow him down.

After the detective collides with Dorsey he turns and shoots Dorsey dead. Dorsey falls to the ground, where he is no longer visible between the cars. It is not clear how many times Simpkins discharged his weapon or how many bullets struck Dorsey.   

The officer gets to his feet and walks toward Dorsey as two more officers emerge from the car.

Four more officers then run on screen from farther back up the street passing the area of the shooting and heading down the street. Simpkins is still standing over Dorsey on the ground.  He then walks away in the direction of the other officers. They all disappear off screen before someone walks back up the sidewalk and appears to bend down toward the victim. A group of officers also walk back and gather around where the man is lying on the ground. 

During the 1 minute 46 second footage, no one is seen administering medical assistance. 

The video is the only footage so far found of the incident. There is no dashcam or bodycam footage from the incident because the police claim no video exists and New Jersey state law does not require plainclothes officers to use them.

The state Attorney General's Office, which is investigating the fatal shooting, said no weapon was recovered from Dorsey or from the immediate area. 

Tarver said during a press conference held at the Gateway Center in Newark that the video of the shooting incident demonstrated that Dorsey posed no threat to police and that he was shot while moving away from officers.

“You can take a look at the video. The video is clear. The video is unambiguous,” Tarver asserted.

Weeks after the shooting, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka said that he found the information to be “tragic and disturbing" but incomplete.

“While the Attorney General’s Office is conducting an ongoing investigation, we are asking the public’s help to fill in some gaps,” Baraka said in a statement. "We will be asking the Attorney General’s Office to turn over information to our consent decree unit to review if the use of force or any other policy was violated.”

Charges in the lawsuit include the use of excessive, unlawful force and that the city failed to correct a pattern and practice of unlawful behavior that had not been corrected.

The lawsuit states that in 2009, Simpkins was a defendant in a lawsuit in which he was alleged to have pulled over, in plainclothes, a football coach and two teenagers. The lawsuit states that during the motor vehicle stop, Simpkins pointed his gun at the people in the vehicle and told them, “You have no f***ing rights.”

Madinah Person, Dorsey’s sister, said her family was “devastated by the whole experience.”

“I would just like to say to the officer that killed my brother and to the officers that watched him die on the concrete that I’m very disappointed in you as human beings,” said Person. “I’m very disappointed in you as cops and using your right to protect and serve. You did not protect and serve my brother. 

The lack of response from authorities has irked community leaders, too.

Larry Hamm, chair of local social justice advocacy group People’s Organization For Progress, has led multiple rallies and marches across Newark to raise awareness around what he believes was an unjust killing of Dorsey.

“Carl Dorsey should be alive today,” Hamm said. “But he was a victim - as far as we're concerned - of the use of excessive force. Over the past 18 months, we have organized protests to bring public attention to the death of Carl Dorsey because we have determined to not let this get swept under the rug.”

What’s even more frustrating for the family, Tarver said, is that it remains unclear if any corrective action was taken against Simpkins for the fatal shooting. Following the shooting, the detective was placed on administrative leave until an investigation is complete.

Video Shows White Cops in Liberal, Columbus Murder a Black Man; yet Cops, Media Pretend it Might Not Be Murder. Cop opened bedroom door, immediately fired @ Donovan Lewis as he sat up in bed, Unarmed

From [HERE] The killing of an unarmed Black man shot in bed by an Ohio police officer this week was “utterly senseless,” a lawyer for the man’s family said Thursday, calling for accountability and immediate reform amid a spate of police shootings in Columbus, the state capital.

In body-camera footage of Tuesday’s shooting released by authorities, a Columbus police officer pushes open a bedroom door and immediately fires at Donovan Lewis, 20, as he sits up in bed.

Officers had entered the apartment around 2:30 a.m. with a police dog to serve Lewis arrest warrants on charges of domestic violence, assault and improper handling of a firearm, Sgt. Joe Albert of Columbus police said.

In the footage, officers can be heard telling Lewis to crawl out of the room after he was shot. Lewis was handcuffed on the bed and died after being taken to a hospital. Rex Elliott, the lawyer representing Lewis’s family, told reporters Thursday that the young man was “treated like an animal.”

A probe is being conducted by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigations.

Andrew Ginther, the mayor of Columbus cautioned that a thorough accounting of what had occurred would take time.

The officer who shot Lewis was Ricky Anderson, a 30-year member of the force who is assigned to the canine unit. Anderson has been placed on paid administrative leave per department policy, Albert said.

Lewis’s killing was the third police shooting in the city in the past week, according to the Columbus Urban League, a nonprofit community organization that seeks to empower Black Americans.

Elliott, the attorney representing the Lewis family, described the officer’s actions as reckless and inexcusable during a news conference Thursday. He was accompanied by Lewis’s parents, siblings, grandmother and aunt. Relatives wept as Elliott replayed the footage of the shooting.

“While we support the investigation announced Tuesday by Police Chief Bryant, there’s also no question that the video tells us all, every single one of us, exactly what happened in the early morning hours of August 30,” Elliott said.

There was “no justification” for police “to shoot an unarmed man trying to get out of bed” as officers were instructing him to do, Elliott said.

“Columbus police. If you are inside, make yourself known,” one officer says. Off camera, a man can be heard saying, “They are sleeping.” The officer repeats: “Come on out. Come out now.”

A police dog enters the apartment and begins barking. Officers then follow the dog toward the room where Lewis was sleeping and open the door. A light illuminates Lewis starting to sit up in bed, and Anderson instantly fires. As Lewis writhes and moans, he is told to “crawl” out of the room and to stop resisting arrest. He is shown being handcuffed on the bed.

The police chief said that Lewis may have had a vape pen or electronic cigarette in his hand when he was shot, the Columbus Dispatch reported. Such an object is not visible in Lewis’s hand from the perspective of the body-cam footage, but it is later seen on the bed.

Akron police release video of officers shooting Black man dozens of times

“Police shot and killed Donovan Lewis while he was in one of the most vulnerable places a person can be — bed. As the investigation unfolds, some may point to the fact that the police were attempting to execute a warrant when they shot Mr. Lewis, as if to suggest that an alleged offense warrants immediate execution,” Kelly Sampson, director of racial justice at the anti-gun-violence organization Brady, said in a statement.

Elliott questioned why police chose to execute the warrant in the middle of the night.

“I think all of us in this room probably had parents tell us nothing good happens at 2 o’clock in the morning,” the lawyer said. “The explanation by Chief Bryant that, ‘Well, we do that because we have to be sure that they’re at home,’ is nonsense. The reality is that felony warrants are executed every day in daylight hours.”

The killing is the latest example of an unarmed Black American being shot by police. Black Americans are 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police than White Americans, according to a 2019 study by Northwestern University. Numbers are even starker in Ohio, where Black people are 4.5 times more likely to be killed by police than White people.

In December 2020, Andre Hill, a 47-year-old unarmed Black man, was shot four times by a Columbus officer while leaving a friend’s house. His family received a $10 million settlement from the city. Last year, an officer fatally shot Ma’Khia Bryant, a Black 16-year-0ld, outside her home. That officer was cleared of criminal wrongdoing after an investigation.

60 Days Ago White Cops were Recorded Shooting Jayland Walker 50X as He Fled. Although No Other Info is Needed to Establish Probable Cause for Murder, White AG Claims He Doesn't Have a Full Picture Yet

On June 27, 2022, at approximately 12:30 a.m., Akron, Ohio, police officers killed Jayland Walker, a 25-year-old Black man who was unarmed. 8 cops (all white) shot at him 90 times and struck him 46 times as he fled away from them.

On July 6th In a seven-minute message posted on his YouTube page Wednesday, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost addressed the state's investigation into the shooting death of Jayland Walker by the Akron Police Department in white, liberal Akron.

"The investigation will be objective, professional, and independent," Yost pledged. "There are many questions about what happened. Was the force necessary? What led police to shoot a young man so many times? What could have been done to prevent this in the first place?"

Yost stressed that the footage was just a portion of the overall investigation. Yost is a racist suspect and a republican.

"A few seconds of video does not provide us with the full picture, the full context of an incident that unfolded over many minutes, in many different locations. We have to let our investigators find the whole picture and seek out the truth, the whole truth, because that's what we all want is the truth," Yost stated. [MORE] yes, truth over reality.

ARTILLERY ABOVE IS FROM KEVIN RASHID JOHNSON [MORE]

When Mr. Yost refers to investigating and reviewing the evidence what exactly is he referring to? Jayland Walker was shot to death in one place. Sixty days have gone by. Does he mean interviewing the suspected killers and gathering their testimonial statements - that is, statements made by cops in anticipation of litigation and made after cops have lawyered up and reviewed video several times? Such evidence is subjective and self-serving and therefore should have little to no weight … who wants to be charged with murder?

The investigation appears to be pretense for painstakingly crafting some legal defense for cops as they comb through videos searching for some dark splotch visible only to mind blocked racist sheeple that might resemble a gun in Jayland’s hand (even though it was on the car seat and Jayland was outside the car, running for his life and away from 8 armed white folks) and for any possible exculpatory information no matter how immaterial to support the white cops’ right to remain violent and murder Jayland Walker and any other non-white person whenever they want to. Yost appears to be functioning like a criminal defense attorney, delaying, and zealously working to acquit white cops - not seeking accountability for authority.

Video recordings are unique by their nature. In general, a video recording is made through a fixed lens or “eyewitness” and the moving images presented can be played backwards, forwards, in slow motion, magnified and played over and over again. Such a perspective is one of a kind in criminal cases. In this matter, there is no evidence comparable to the video recording. As such, the lex-icon (“law as image - the appearance of justice (the form) over the substance of justice via truth and law over humanity.” ) is falling apart.

The videos captured the entire incident. Said 8 bodycamera videos are the only non-testimonial, objective, evidence in this matter. The videos contain information material to every element of murder, which is the intentional killing of human being by another without excuse, justification or mitigation. Probable cause is a low standard when it is applied to mere mortals (especially black citizens) on a daily basis in courtrooms by white prosecutors and judges. The government only has the burden to prove that more likely than not cops committed murder when they shot at a defenseless man over 90 times as he fled away from them posing no threat. That is not hard to do here if the cops are treated like human beings and not super-human representatives of authority exempt from morality.

As explained by an inmate in New Mexico the authorities are taking measures just to say they took measures. They’re not doing anything to help us & everyone knows that". In reality the legal system produces nothing else but the appearance of justice. FUNKTIONARY explains the lex-icon sustains your belief in the legitimacy of the legal system as a whole. Within the lex-icon elite whites go through great effort to produce a show of “fairness.” This production includes the court’s emphasis on “procedural due process,” “professionalism” and leaves out no detail as it includes plastic flags, oaths, black robes, elevated judge platform, formalities, high ceilings, latin phrases etc. Also, occasional dismissals and acquittals of Black defendants or convictions of white cops are a necessary part of the illusion.

FUNKTIONARY further explains:

lexiconned – mislead (conned) by (inside-the-circle) lexical definitions and their deft definers. 2) word-conditioning. (See: Belief, Oughtism, Symbolaeography, Group-Entity, White Lies, Truth-Based Reality, Language & Oughtomatism)

legal system – the underworld inverted and sanctioned for public consumption, control and compliance over the masses. The same system down through the ages runs the legal system on the outside world as a front for the people to believe in while running the underworld as well. (See: Law, Lawyer, Lawyers, Statutes, Proclamations, Tyranny & Nobility)

Report says White college graduates have over 7X the wealth of Black college graduates and the Black and white racial wealth gap is Expanding

MN lists 10 things Black America needs to know about college debt.

1. White college graduates have over seven times the wealth of Black college graduates.

According to Contexts, a sociology magazine that describes itself as making “cutting-edge social research accessible to general readers,” education is not always the great equalizer.

“The median white adult who attended college has 7.2 times more wealth than the median Black adult who attended college and 3.9 times more wealth than the median Latino adult who attended college,” contexts reported.

2. Students taking out loans to finance education has increased by 20 percent.

According to the Pew Research Center, students who took out student loans to fund their education rose from 49 percent in 1993 to 69 percent in 2012. This percentage represents approximately seven out of every 10 college students.

3. The Black and white racial wealth gap is getting worse.

While Black people are more educated than ever before, the racial wealth gap has worsened in the last 20 years.

According to the Economic Policy Institute’s State of America Wages report released in 2019, the racial wealth gap among Black and white college graduates increased from 17.2 percent in 2000 to 22.5 percent in 2019.

Among those with advanced degrees, the wealth gap increased from 12.5 percent to 17.6 percent.

4. Black college graduates have thousands more in college debt than white graduates.

According to the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans, “Black college graduates have nearly $25,000 more student loan debt: an average of $52,726 in student debt, compared to $28,006 for the typical White bachelor’s graduate.”

5. Black college graduates owe more in college debt, while white graduates owe less.

“On average, Black graduates owe 6 percent more than they have borrowed, while White graduates owe 10 percent less than they have borrowed,” the initiative says.

It also says, “Nearly half (48 percent) of all Black graduates owe more on their federal undergraduate loans four years after graduating with bachelor’s degrees, compared to just 17 percent of White graduates.”

6. More Black students receive Pell Grants than any other demographic.

Statistics show Black students received the most Pell grants of all demographics to help fund their education. The Education Data Initiative shows that 58 percent of Pell Grant recipients were Black in the 2015-2016 school year, which is the most recent data available by race and gender. [MORE]

IRS Revokes Tax-exempt Status of N.C. NAACP

From [HERE] North Carolina's influential state chapter of the NAACP has lost its federal tax-exempt status for failing to file tax returns for three years, according to the federal government.

The Internal Revenue Service stripped the civil rights organization's state chapter of its tax-exempt status May 15 under a process that automatically revokes the designation for nonprofits that fail to file federal tax returns for three consecutive years, according to a post on the IRS site. The status change was made public this month.

The state chapter has been a prominent voice in decrying the policies of the state's Republican-controlled legislature, including challenging voter access laws in recent years. Earlier this month, the civil rights group scored a victory when the state Supreme Court ruled a lower court must consider nullifying a voter ID mandate approved by citizens in 2018.

The loss of federal tax-exempt status was first reported by The News & Observer in Raleigh. The newspaper reports that experts on charitable giving say losing the status could hinder fundraising efforts and potentially drain the organization's resources through taxes on donations and fines.

The newspaper reported that the national NAACP intervened in 2019 to place the state chapter under a punitive administratorship, giving the national organization more input in how the state branch is staffed and operated. The state and national organizations are working to restore the branch's tax-exempt status. [MORE]

Alabama City Cuts Sales Tax on Groceries [“taxes – a euphemism for stealing—theft”]

From [EJI] Alabama is one of only three states in the U.S. that tax groceries at the full state sales tax rate without any credit or rebate.

The state takes in roughly $500 million each year in state grocery taxes, while data from the USDA shows that 17% of adults and 23% of children in Alabama struggle with food insecurity—the fifth highest rate of food insecurity in the country.

To help residents cope with the rising price of food, the City of Clay in Jefferson County, Alabama, voted last week to cut its share of Alabama’s sales tax on groceries from 4% to 2%.

“I think we’ll have more people shopping at the Pig and Publix because of this,” Mayor Charles Webster toldal.com. “People will come to our city to save a little money.”

Starting on November 1, shoppers at the Publix and Piggly Weekly in Clay will pay 8% instead of 10% in sales tax on fruits, vegetables, meat, bread, and other food items.

The tax reduction will expire on October 31, 2024.

Most states exempt groceries from their sales tax. Kansas and Virginia ended their state grocery taxes this year, leaving only 11 of the 45 states with a sales tax that still impose it on groceries.

Illinois also suspended its grocery tax for the fiscal year.

Except for Alabama, Mississippi, and South Dakota, the states that tax groceries offer a reduced rate for groceries or provide an offsetting grocery tax credit to help low-income families who spend a larger share of their income on food.

Families with annual incomes less than $20,800 pay almost eight times more as a share of their incomes in sales taxes than the top 1% of families, on average.

“Sales taxes on groceries have an especially harmful impact on income and racial inequities,” the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reported in 2020, because “low-income families tend to spend a larger share of their income on groceries.”

[SOUP – Society of Overworked Underpaid People] Strategic Starvation and The Benefits of World Hunger

According to FUNKTIONARY:

SOUP – Society of Overworked Underpaid People. 2) Society of Oppressed Underdeveloped People. 3) Society of Obsolete Underprivileged People. 4) Single Oppressive Unified Pattern. 5) Strapped Overruled Useless People. The Ruling Overclass along with Doggy, Hidalgo, the Beasthood, CrimethInc., et. al, have no more use for the majority of people on the planet, therefore prepare for further depopulation efforts to permeate the planet such as existing ones, e.g., AIDS, strategic starvation, biological warfare, genetic manipulation, Eugenocide and other nefarious stratagems and techniques.

starvation – under the vagaries of hunger. The problem of hunger and starvation across the planet is not the lack of food. It is the lack of love and the lack of compassion. Food deserts are made by neglect, by a lack of vision—not of provision. A consciousness that allows itself to believe in lack is part of the problem. When we think abundance while dethroning the abundantly greedy holding positions of power around the world, we will greatly reduce hunger and starvation globally. It all starts between our two ear lobes. The starvation of inspiration is the motivation. Think Abundantly, Act Accordingly!

From [HERE] We sometimes talk about hunger in the world as if it were a scourge that all of us want to see abolished, viewing it as comparable with the plague or aids. But that naïve view prevents us from coming to grips with what causes and sustains hunger. Hunger has great positive value to many people. Indeed, it is fundamental to the working of the world's economy. Hungry people are the most productive people, especially where there is a need for manual labour.

We in developed countries sometimes see poor people by the roadside holding up signs saying "Will Work for Food". Actually, most people work for food. It is mainly because people need food to survive that they work so hard either in producing food for themselves in subsistence-level production, or by selling their services to others in exchange for money. How many of us would sell our services if it were not for the threat of hunger?
More importantly, how many of us would sell our services so cheaply if it were not for the threat of hunger? When we sell our services cheaply, we enrich others, those who own the factories, the machines and the lands, and ultimately own the people who work for them. For those who depend on the availability of cheap labour, hunger is the foundation of their wealth.

The conventional thinking is that hunger is caused by low-paying jobs. For example, an article reports on "Brazil's ethanol slaves: 200,000 migrant sugar cutters who prop up renewable energy boom".1 While it is true that hunger is caused by low-paying jobs, we need to understand that hunger at the same time causes low-paying jobs to be created. Who would have established massive biofuel production operations in Brazil if they did not know there were thousands of hungry people desperate enough to take the awful jobs they would offer? Who would build any sort of factory if they did not know that many people would be available to take the jobs at low-pay rates?

Much of the hunger literature talks about how it is important to assure that people are well fed so that they can be more productive. That is nonsense. No one works harder than hungry people. Yes, people who are well nourished have greater capacity for productive physical activity, but well-nourished people are far less willing to do that work.

The non-governmental organization Free the Slaves defines slaves as people who are not allowed to walk away from their jobs. It estimates that there are about 27 million slaves in the world,2 including those who are literally locked into workrooms and held as bonded labourers in South Asia. However, they do not include people who might be described as slaves to hunger, that is, those who are free to walk away from their jobs but have nothing better to go to. Maybe most people who work are slaves to hunger?

For those of us at the high end of the social ladder, ending hunger globally would be a disaster. If there were no hunger in the world, who would plow the fields? Who would harvest our vegetables? Who would work in the rendering plants? Who would clean our toilets? We would have to produce our own food and clean our own toilets. No wonder people at the high end are not rushing to solve the hunger problem. For many of us, hunger is not a problem, but an asset.

Notes 1 Tom Phillipps, "Brazil's ethanol slaves: 200,000 migrant sugar cutters who prop up renewable energy boom". The Guardian. Online, 9 March 2007.
http://environment.guardian.co.uk/energy/story/0,,2030144,00.html
2 Free the Slaves. Online, 2007. http://www.freetheslaves.net/

In Apparent PR Stunt Racist Suspects at Bank of America Unveil ‘Zero Down Payment Mortgages' for Black/Latino Areas. Applicants Must Show Perfect Rent/Utility Bill Payments thru Govt COVID Lock Downs

From [HERE] Bank of America is offering mortgages for first-time homeowners that do not require down payments, minimum credit scores or closing costs in a program that aims to boost homeownership rates among first-time Black and Latino buyers.

Under the trial program, which was announced on Tuesday, Bank of America will offer loans to people in certain predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in Charlotte, N.C.; Dallas; Detroit; Los Angeles and Miami. Eligibility for the program, which is called the Community Affordable Loan Solution, is based on income and location, and requires no mortgage insurance.

From BoA, “Bank of America Introduces Community Affordable Loan Solution™ to Expand Homeownership Opportunities in Black/African American and Hispanic-Latino Communities”:

Bank of America today announced a new zero down payment, zero closing cost mortgage solution for first-time homebuyers, which will be available in designated markets, including certain Black/African American and/or Hispanic-Latino neighborhoods in Charlotte, Dallas, Detroit, Los Angeles and Miami. The Community Affordable Loan Solution™ aims to help eligible individuals and families obtain an affordable loan to purchase a home. 

The Community Affordable Loan Solution is a Special Purpose Credit Program which uses credit guidelines based on factors such as timely rent, utility bill, phone and auto insurance payments. It requires no mortgage insurance or minimum credit score. Individual eligibility is based on income and home location. Prospective buyers must complete a homebuyer certification course provided by select Bank of America and HUD-approved housing counseling partners prior to application.

This new program is in addition to and complements Bank of America’s existing $15 billion Community Homeownership Commitment™ to offer affordable mortgages, industry leading grants and educational opportunities to help 60,000 individuals and families purchase affordable homes by 2025. Through this commitment, Bank of America has already helped more than 36,000 people and families become homeowners, having provided more than $9.5 billion in low down payment loans and over $350 million in non-repayable down payment and/or closing cost grants. To date, two-thirds of the loans and grants made through the Community Homeownership Commitment has helped multicultural clients to achieve homeownership.

Bank of America also has a 26-year relationship with the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (NACA), through which the Bank has committed to providing an additional $15 billion in mortgages to low-to-moderate income homebuyers through May 2027.

According to the National Association of Realtors, today there is a nearly 30-percentage-point gap in homeownership between White and Black Americans; for Hispanic buyers, the gap is nearly 20 percent. And the competitive housing market has made it even more difficult for potential homebuyers, especially people of color, to buy homes.

“Homeownership strengthens our communities and can help individuals and families to build wealth over time,” said AJ Barkley, head of neighborhood and community lending for Bank of America. “Our Community Affordable Loan Solution will help make the dream of sustained homeownership attainable for more Black and Hispanic families, and it is part of our broader commitment to the communities that we serve.” [MORE]

Banks have contributed to racial gaps in homeownership rates by approving fewer loans with less favorable terms for Black applicants than for white borrowers with similar credit profiles, Dr. Ray said. It’s important, he added, that more financial institutions take steps like the one Bank of America has announced to correct the inequalities of the past and to be part of the solution.

@Armanwalker said Black home ownership rates remain at our near all-time lows and that the real-estate gap has been increasing. “These are not predatory loans,” @Armanwalker said. 

A Twitter user called @Benhem612 raised the question of whether the Bank of America program will be combined with protections to prevent homes from being sold for “pennies on the dollar.” 

Twitter user @CamTsn compared the program to Ninja loans, which are loans provided with little or no attempt to investigate the ability to repay. “What a great idea, offer Ninja loans 2.0 at the top of a housing bubble,” @CamTsn said. “I am absolutely sure this will not negatively impact minorities and their communities.” [MORE]

A Mistrial is Declared Over Engineers' Role in the Flint water crisis. Jury of Sheeple Unable to Decide if Firms should bear some responsibility for Contaminated Water

From [HERE] A judge declared a mistrial Thursday after jurors said they couldn't reach a verdict in a dispute over whether two engineering firms should bear some responsibility for Flint's lead-contaminated water.

Veolia North America and Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, known as LAN, were accused of not doing enough to get Flint to treat the highly corrosive water or to urge a return to a regional water supplier.

A mistrial was declared in federal court in Ann Arbor, Michigan, court spokesman David Ashenfelter said.

After hearing months of evidence, the jury began full deliberations on July 25 but also took a planned 11-day break before returning Tuesday.

The trial centered on the engineering firms and the effects of lead on four children, not all Flint residents. But the result was being closely watched because it would likely influence possible settlements or trials in other cases.

Veolia and LAN were not part of a landmark $626 million deal involving thousands of residents of the majority-Black city, the state of Michigan and other parties. [MORE]

Fact Check: The Water Tanker in Downtown Jacksonville Isn't for the Puppetican Governor's Mansion; its for Trustmark Bank, gangbankers who 'pull the strings' and Own the Building Across the Street

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY

Gangbanker – a shrewd hoodlum who steals one’s past (collateral), present (awareness), and future (productive energy) through the deception of the sleight-of-mind trick called “money” in collusion (association) with other thieves with the legal sanction of the prime thief (Corporate State). 2) a financial proctologist. Gangbankers, through the veil of incorporation and legal license to plunder, hold whole communities for ransom. (See: “Money,” Gangbanking, Swindle, Fraud, LOP-Sided Banking, FRAUD, Thief, S&M Banking, Casino Economy, Predatory Economics, Usury, Interest, Principal & Reification)

Gangbanking – the legally sanctioned institution of covert slavery by the intergenerational dynastic banking families and their (pirate fraternity) member bank owners inflicted and imposed upon the subdued captured and domesticated population (dwellers upon the land) all over the world. 2) the centralization of symbolic imaginary debt in the hands of terrortorial gangsters backed by enforced by, and in collusion with an even more ruthless gang, i.e., the Corporate State. 3) the worldwide system of debt-based monetary “creation” in the form of digitized bank credit (ledger entries) stored “in” and transmitted from the memory banks of interconnected banking computer systems internetworked around the globe. Gangbanking is the system and mechanism for the international, intergenerational transmission and maintenance of global economic inequality and resource ownership and power differential. A further consequence of monopoly capitalism, state capitalism and virtual capitalism is that ownership of real assets and tangible wealth is increasingly transferred (appropriated) to banks as a whole, i.e., in the aggregate. Why should “banks” individually and collectively be allowed to collect principal and interest for merely publishing and administrating (via reciprocal clearing) our promises to “pay.” After all, the true creditor gave up property for irredeemable “notes” which are merely published by the "banking" system; and this arrangement certainly denies the true creditor interest, to take, for no more than the cost of tokenizing the debtor’s obligation, first principal equal to that of all wealth ever so financed, and secondly, to perpetually multiply that unjustified taking by interest. In re-borrowing interest, interest is converted to new principal (debt), which, because it exceeds the previous sum of debt, it is unquestionably how much debt increases. A circulation of political money subject to interest inherently and irreversibly multiplies debt in proportion to the circulation, even by inherently greater increments of periodic interest on ever greater sums of debt, until the system collapses under a sum of debt it can no longer service. Gangbanking is the plain and open fraud of officially sanctioned counterfeiting of “money” (i.e., substantive rights or actual claims on real wealth, goods, labor and services) and “lending” these imaginary intangible pretensions (as if they were discrete properties of some physical or scarce item, i.e., the misnomer of notional “real money” itself an oxymoron) at interest. [MORE]

From [HERE] A viral video showing a tanker truck parked across from the Mississippi Governor’s Mansion in Jackson has sparked speculation online that Gov. Tate Reeves’ home is enjoying special access to clean water while most residents of the capital city go without safe running water. 

But the speculation is wrong.

Two separate Trustmark employees told the Mississippi Free Press that the tanker parked across the street from the Governor’s Mansion is on standby to provide water to Trustmark Bank’s Jackson Downtown Branch, located in the building directly across from the residence.

“(It’s) just in case something happens with the water,” one of the employees said. “It’s not for them over there (at the Governor’s Mansion), it’s for us.” She added that the office has not had to use it.

After this story first published, Trustmark Director of Corporate Communications and Marketing Melanie Morgan responded to a request for comment Thursday afternoon and confirmed the employees’ story.

“It is absolutely solely for Trustmark,” she said, adding that they brought the tanker in to have on standby “out of an abundance of caution.” Morgan said the bank is asking many employees to work from home to save resources, but that the tanker is there in case it is needed to help keep key facilities operating, such as air-conditioning system for keeping computer servers stored in the building cool. [MORE]

What are the Limits of Handing Out Bottled Water to Solve a Water Crisis? Dems Afraid to Criticize Ineffective Jacksonville Mayor (or any other Black Politician) and Treat their Rolebot as a Rolemodel

LOSING IS WINNING ONLY FOR BLACKS IN THE SYSTEM OF RWS. Despite what racists tell you winning will never be losing. In all areas of PEOPLE ACTIVITY racists promote weiteko; an inversion of life - such as the promotion of losing as winning. SPECIFICALLY, THE DEPENDENT MEDIA consistently ignores or glosses over even THE most egregious FAILURES OR loser conduct BY ITS ACCEPTED OR APPROVED OF BLACK ROLEBOTS AND SHOWCASE BLACKS. It is part of ongoing psy-ops or false consciousness programming aimed at Black people to maintain cooperative master servant relationS between Blacks and whites. IT HELPS TO KEEP Black people in a "continuous state of checkmate” and a “losing streak that is centuries long.” [MORE] In sports we see it with the dependent media’s promotion of rolebot Lebron James as “a winner” despite the fact that he has lost six (6) championships (won 4) or WITH ELITE WHITE LIBERALS crowning Simone Biles “the GOAT” the day after her mental meltdown at the Olympics. In politics we see it with the appointment of obviously unqualified “opporTomists” like Judge Kentanji Brown (who had worked ONLY 6 MONTHS AS AN APPELLATE JUDGE WHEN BIDEN SELECTED HER) and WITH the uncritical examinations of Black politicians at all levels of government who are lionized despite failing to deliver anything of tangible, material benefit to their Black constituents. Dr. Martin Luther King WARNED, elite racists often support, appoint or promote unqualified negros into high positions so that important matters to Black life ARE handled frivolously. Here, we are NECESSARILY only talking about democrat politicians because, in general, the lone criticism offered ABOUT BLACK POLITICIANS by the dependent media is that they are ‘republican.’ THAT IS, TO ELITE WHITES, BLACK POLITICIANS ARE “BLACK” BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT REPUBLICAN - THERE APPEARS TO BE NO OTHER CRITERIA FOR “BLACKNESS.” Eric Adams, lori lightfoot, muriel bowser, Gregory Meeks, Kamala HARRIS, london breed AND MANY OTHER BOHICANS AND SAMBOS DON’T EMPOWER BLACK PEOPLE OR REPRESENT ANY BLACK POLITIC OR IDEOLOGY THAT AIMS AT DOING SO; SAID INDIVIDUALS SIMPLY POSSESS BLACK Chromosomes AND ARE OTHERWISE INTERCHANGEABLE WITH NEUROPEANS. DON’T MISTAKE THIS as an endorsement OF BLACK CONSERVATIVES. IT’S SIMPLY AN OBSERVATION THAT BLACK ELECTORAL POLITICS IS PRESENTLY DEVOID OF ACCOUNTABILITY, GOALS, SUBSTANCE AND INTERIORITY, HAVING NO IDEOLOGY BESIDES PARROTING WHATEVER IS ON THE WHITE LIBERALS’ AGENDA. LIKE FUNKTIONARY RHETORICALLY ASKS, “DOLLY WANT A CRACKER?”

With regard to BLACK PUNDITS IMPOSED ONTO BLACK PEOPLE BY ELITE WHITES AT CNN, MSNBC AND ELSEWHERE AND coin-operated Black media OUTLETS (who simply mimic MASSA’ media AND ONLY CRITIQUE WHAT MASSA’ MEDIA CRITIQUES OR WHATEVER IS SAFELY WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF SPEECH AND THOUGHT SET BY ELITE WHITES AND COMPATIBLE WITH RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY) the great rebel Dr. Amos Wilson explained,

‘the Black press and safe negro TV incumbents make little or no demands on Black politicians while it constantly parades them before the Black community as role models, regardless of their success or lack of it in advancing the interests of the community. The achieve­ments of Black politicians, no matter how dubious, are often pre­sented by the Black press as vicarious achievements of the Black community as a whole. Black incumbents are given ready access to Black media outlets to massage the Black community, to maintain their public persona, and to rationalize their very frequent failures to provide the Black community with responsive and effective political leadership. Thus, they keep their opposition out of the media limelight and the community is cajoled into re-electing a political establishment whose accomplishments are meager when not plainly regressive.’

From [HERE] and [HERE] State officials said they had no clear end date for the water crisis here, as residents on Thursday endured another day of unreliable water running through their pipes.

Many of the city’s roughly 150,000 residents have had little to no water pressure in their taps since Monday, when flooding overwhelmed the main water-treatment plant. Officials had been preparing for a crisis after the plant’s main pumps failed in July and the city went under a boil-water notice.

Nevertheless, Mayor Chokwe A. Lumumba assured residents at a press conference that the capital city had seen improvements in water pressure overnight, and the number of locations with water increased.

“We have seen steady improvements in the system,” he said. “There are individuals who did not have water pressure at all yesterday in which water pressure has returned, and the reports of the tanks is that there are steady gains being achieved each and every day.”

“In the middle of peak consumption, which is during the daytime hours, we’ve maintained steady (pressure),” he added. “At night is a moment that we look to have the greatest amount of recovery.”

Both the City of Jackson and the State of Mississippi declared states of emergency on Monday over problems at the O.B. Curtis Water Treatment Center worsened by Pearl River flooding this week. The treatment plant is designed to pump 50 million gallons a day for use in the capital city. Reporter Nick Judin reported earlier today that the Environmental Protection Agency had warned in a Mississippi Free Press interview several days ago that the facility’s systems were in danger of failing.

Gov. Tate Reeves said Monday that he is “sending a request for a federally declared disaster to support state and city emergencies.”

Mississippi’s 2nd Congressional District Rep. Bennie Thompson said he supports the move to ask for federal assistance. “I hope the Federal government will be able to provide resources adequate and comprehensive enough to address the health and safety crisis facing the City of Jackson and surrounding communities,” he said on social media. “This situation requires immediate attention and cooperation from Federal, state, and local governments.”

The 3rd Congressional District Rep. Michael Guest blamed “decades of failed leadership.” 

“The problems in Jackson were many years in the making, and it will take many more years to fix them,” he wrote Tuesday. “The solutions will only be found by elected officials working together to fix the underlying issues, not playing politics or just merely throwing money at the problems.”

The mayor today welcomed the cooperation of the State of Mississippi in resolving various historic problems in the water system, and denied Reeves’ warning at his press conference last night that the City is distributing untreated water.

Reeves’ exact words were: “Please stay safe. Do not drink the water. In too many cases, it is raw water from the reservoir being pushed through the pipes.”

Gov. Tate Reeves (pictured) said on Aug. 29, 2022, that Jackson is pumping raw water into its water system. Jackson Mayor Chokwe Lumumba denied that assertion on Aug. 30, 2022. Photo courtesy State of Mississippi

“I do want to clarify just a few inaccuracies that have gone forward; first and foremost, the City of Jackson has not distributed any untreated raw water,” Lumumba said today. “That is inaccurate, but we do encourage our residents to continue to abide by the boil-water notice that has been in effect.” 

The capital city has been under a boil-water notice for a month because of problems with water-treatment methods at the O.B. Curtis Water Treatment Center and related issues.

Lumumba said Monday that operators had stopped pushing the water into the system to ensure adequate treatment because of the Pearl River flood water coming into the system at the O.B. Curtis Water Treatment Plant. The City wanted to increase production at the J.H. Fewell Water Treatment Center, which generally supplies 20 million gallons daily into the system. However, a pump failed there, making it unable to do so.

However, Carol Kemker, the director of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division, told the Mississippi Free Press in an Aug. 26 interview that the facility’s system were likely to fail, in no small part due to the Lumumba administration dragging its feet on efforts to recruit qualified water operators.

“They could be reaching out to technical colleges, they could be holding recruitment events, they could be scheduling interviews, they could be putting in advertisements,” Kemker told Nick Judin. “(This is) what we do when we recruit. We’re not seeing those types of things.”

The mayor said today that the O.B. Curtis Water facility is suffering from numerous equipment failures. “This is a set of accumulated problems based on deferred maintenance that has not taken place over decades,” he said at the press conference. [MORE]]

[There are No tyrants, only tyranny exists] Corpse Joe Mocks Blacks by Vowing to 'Fund Police.' He Dementia-Splains to Sheeple He Will Ban AR-15’s b/c There’s No Need for Tyranny Prevention these Days

According to FUNKTIONARY:

tyranny – the miscarriage of self-government. 2) the absence of ethical anarchy. In our system, tyranny must have an accomplice. The perpetrator by intent must be accommodated by the perpetrator by consent. The former initiates, the latter accommodates. Of all tyrannies, the greatest is the tyranny of the ego-mind. “If the government is allowed to place a tax on what is a natural right it can raise that tax to the point where that right has been effectively destroyed. That is tyranny.” Butcher’s Union Company v. Crescent City. “No man, no group, and no nation has the right to any man’s individual freedom. No matter how pure the motive, how great the emergency, how high the principle, such action is nothing but tyranny. It is never justified.” ~John W. Parsons. Tyranny Law #1 – Any power that can be abused will be abused. Tyranny Law #2 – Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it. Tyranny Law #3 – If people don’t resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt. ~John Curran. Retaining and exercising the unalienable right to distribute one’s own property and wealth without restriction is the only guarantee of freedom from tyranny. (See: Authority, Labor, Natural Law, Self-Ownership, THC, Anarchy, Appropriation, Income Taxes, IRS, Bill of Rights, Property, Freedom, Self-Determination, GIMME!, Autotyranny, Free-Range Slavery, Matrix, Organizations, Private Services & Liberation)

From [HERE] President Joe Biden commenced the first of four trips to Pennsylvania in the next couple of days with a complete turnaround from his party's "defund the police" mantra to a "fund the police" one, along with a pledge to ban assault-style weapons in the country. He also doubled down on denigrating people who vote Trump as being far-right. 

Then he went really off script. 

"He used to go down in the East Side, what they call the bucket. Highest crime rate in the country. There's a place where I was the only white guy that worked as a lifeguard down in that area, on the East side. And, you know, you could always tell where the best basketball in the state is, where the best basketball in the city is. It's where everybody shows up,” said Biden to a somewhat uncomfortable but supportive crowd in Wilkes-Barre. 

Then he started talking about gun ownership, saying, “You know what the Mexicans, Mexico, which has real problems causing us real problems? You know what their biggest complaint is? Can't we stop the gun trafficking across the southern border, into Mexico?" 

Biden — who will go on to do three more appearances in Pennsylvania, concluding with the Labor Day parade in Pittsburgh on Monday — also offered his support for his party’s Senate candidate, John Fetterman. Fetterman, though, did not even attend the event, and Biden seemed confused about what offices he and gubernatorial nominee Josh Shapiro were running for. 

“Please, please elect [Shapiro, the sitting attorney general] to the Senate. Elect that big ol' boy [Fetterman, the sitting lieutenant governor] to be senator,” said Biden as he concluded his speech. 

Some Democrats in the state, who admit they would rather dance on hot coals than vote Republican, say Biden can get away with his verbal stumbles because he has been that way all of his career. Still, one can only imagine Fetterman wishes he’d just be anywhere but here. 

Currently, Fetterman leads Republican Dr. Mehmet Oz in the polls, with the RealClearPolitics average having the race at plus 7 for Fetterman and the latest poll by Emerson having Fetterman now down to plus 5 over the heart surgeon. The averaged RealClearPolitics polling began in June when Oz had just emerged from a bruising primary contest with businessman David McCormick that had deeply, negatively harmed his approval ratings. 

Fetterman suffered a stroke days before the May primary; since then, he has not resumed his duties in Harrisburg and took most of the summer off to recover from the effects of the stroke. 

Fetterman has not taken any questions from the press outside of a closed caption phone conversation with the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and a text exchange with me. He has given three speeches in the past two weeks: an 11-minute speech in Erie, a four-minute one in Pittsburgh, and a seven-minute speech in Venango County. 

Each appearance shows that the lieutenant governor's speech is halting and that he struggles with finding his words. Nonetheless, no update from his doctor has been given since June, when his cardiologist issued a statement that Fetterman’s health problems were a direct result of him not following his orders several years ago.

New NY Law Strips Imaginary Right to Wear, Bear or Carry Guns in Case of Public Confrontation. Freedumb Peddlers Violently Prevent Law Abiding Citizens from Defending Themselves in Most Public Places

ALL LAWS ARE VIOLENCE. THE REBEL LARKEN ROSE EXPLAINS, “In truth, every authoritarian “law” Is a command backed by the threat of retaliation against those who do not comply. Whether it is a “law” against committing murder or against building a deck without a building permit, it is neither a suggestion nor a request, but a command, backed by the threat of violence, whether in the form of forced confiscation of property (I.e., fines) or the kidnapping of a human being (i.e., imprisonment), What might be called “extortion” if done by the average citizen is called “taxation” when done by people who are imagined to have the right to rule.

From [HERE] New York defeated an attempt by gun-rights proponents to stop it from enforcing new restrictions on who and where people can carry concealed weapons.

US District Judge Glenn Suddaby in Syracuse rejected the request by Gun Owners of America Inc. and others for an order to halt the roll-out of the state’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act.

New York Attorney General Letitia James hailed the judge’s ruling. James is a black strawboss and tireless rolebot working hard for her white masters.

“Responsible gun control measures save lives and any attempts by the gun lobby to tear down New York’s sensible gun control laws will be met with fierce defense of the law,” she said in a prepared statement.

The case is Antonyuk v. Bruen, 22-cv-00734, U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York (Syracuse). 

Liberals overwhelmingly seem to prefer slavery or greater restrictions in the free range prison.

The Supreme Court made it clear that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense in public. The court clearly stated;

Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. As we explained in Heller, the “textual elements” of the Second Amendment’s operative clause— “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be in- fringed”—“guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. Heller further confirmed that the right to “bear arms” refers to the right to “wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.”

This definition of “bear” naturally encompasses public carry. Most gun owners do not wear a holstered pistol at their hip in their bedroom or while sitting at the dinner table. Although individuals often “keep” firearms in their home, at the ready for self-defense, most do not “bear” (i.e., carry) them in the home beyond moments of actual confrontation. To confine the right to “bear” arms to the home would nullify half of the Second Amendment’s operative protections.

Moreover, confining the right to “bear” arms to the home would make little sense given that self-defense is “the central component of the [Second Amendment] right itself.” Heller, 554 U. S., at 599; see also McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767. After all, the Second Amendment guarantees an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” Heller, 554 U. S., at 592, and confrontation can surely take place outside the home.

Although we remarked in Heller that the need for armed self-defense is perhaps “most acute” in the home, id., at 628, we did not suggest that the need was insignificant else- where. Many Americans hazard greater danger outside the home than in it. See Moore v. Madigan, 702 F. 3d 933, 937 (CA7 2012) (“[A] Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower”). The text of the Second Amendment reflects that reality.

The Second Amendment’s plain text thus presumptively guarantees petitioners Koch and Nash a right to “bear” arms in public for self-defense.

The new law bans handguns in places of a “sensitive nature,” which overbroadly includes all churches/places of worship, government buildings, all public parks, all kinds of schools, all public transit (apparently including all vehicles for hire (cabs/Uber/limo)), hospitals, shelters, residential group homes, nursing homes, and medical facilities, among others. It also prohibits law abiding citizens from carrying a handgun in Times Square.

The law defines all public transportation as a “sensitive place.” Among many other things, specifically it states,

A sensitive location shall mean:

any place, conveyance, or vehicle used for public transportation or public transit, subway cars, train cars, buses, ferries, railroad, omnibus, marine or aviation transportation; or any facility used for or in connection with service in the transportation of passengers, airports, train stations, subway and rail stations, and bus terminals;

any place owned or under the control of federal, state or local government, for the purpose of government administration, including courts;

any gathering of individuals to collectively express their constitutional rights to protest or assemble;

any place of worship or religious observation;

all libraries, public playgrounds, public parks, and zoos; NY’s new law violates the 2nd Amendment because there is no longstanding historical tradition of regulating peaceable public carry on public transportation, in churches, all government buildings and schools regardless of their nature as required by the new Supreme Court holding. Also, the ban on guns is unconstitutional because the Court explained that merely because a place is crowded does not make it a “sensitive place” worthy of stripping people the right to defend themselves with a handgun.

The Court explained, “When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. The government must then justify its regulation by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only then may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s “unqualified command.”

The sensitive places doctrine is an exception to the general right to the peaceable possession and carry of arms. The Court is guided by the history around the time of the creation of the 2nd Amendment to determine whether a gun is valid because the right to carry arms is considered to be a “pre-existing right.” Said history according to the Court and legal scholars is that carrying “common weapons” was an offense only when done in a manner “apt to terrify” people. [MORE] The Court ruled that there must be a “longstanding” history of “laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings.”

Whether a place is a “sensitive place” is determined by historical record and/or particular place’s sensitive government interests or vulnerabilities. A longstanding history exists if there ‘are no disputes regarding the lawfulness of such prohibitions.” Constitutional law professor David Kopel explained that ‘factors which make places “sensitive” might be a place where most persons therein are minors (K-12 schools), places that concentrate adversarial conflict and can generate passionately angry emotions (courthouses, legislatures, polling places), or buildings containing people at acute personal risk of being targets of assassination (many government buildings). The answer cannot be that the places are crowded. Sometimes they are, but no more so than a busy downtown sidewalk, and sidewalks are not sensitive places.’

NY’s gun ban on public transportation and in churches is unconstitutional because there is apparently no longstanding historical record of prohibiting peaceable gun carry on public transportation or in church. To the contrary, the post-Independence historical record shows that peaceable carry when leaving the home was encouraged and often legally required by statute for safety. Kopel states,

“Post-independence, Americans were contemptuous of what they considered to be the constricted nature of the English right to arms. Madison said so in his speech introducing the Second Amendment in Congress. . . “Americans certainly did not think that bringing guns to town was a problem; to the contrary, laws typically required that arms be brought to churches or to all public meetings. Nor were there echoes of Henry VIII’s restrictions about loaded guns on the highways. Instead, statutes required arms carrying when traveling or away from home. Carrying firearms when going anywhere was normal in many parts of the United States.”

NY’s gun ban on public transportation also overburdens an individual right to carry - as anyone wishing to exercise his right could only do so while on foot or while driving/riding a bike to be wherever they want to be. An estimated 54% of households in New York City do not own a car, and rely on public transportation everyday. [MORE] All such persons, millions of people, would not be able to defend themselves with a gun in case of a confrontation, a core purpose of the 2nd Amendment. As such, said right is rendered 2nd class status under NY’s new law.

At any rate, ‘It is difficult to justify extending the “sensitive places” doctrine to places that are not schools or government buildings because there are few “longstanding” restrictions on other places.’ [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Freedomination – the liberty to choose the commitments, ideologies, covenants, contracts, judgments, and relationships that bind or restrain you within the Matrix. (See: The Matrix, Negative Hallucination, Phfreedom, Freedom & Liberty)

freedom peddlers – political agitators who fail to address the structured incapacity of most people for freedom and their inclination towards freedumb. Freedom peddlers talk about how free things are—but fail to mention the price of upkeep.

freedumb – the state of unrecognized psychological captivity (brain hemispheric hostage) that sheeple remain in because they don’t speak the language of reality nor constantly edit truth from perfecting heart to perfecting power—and when truth is spoken around them, refrain from being open, or impervious to it thus being forever chained to its distortions and limitations. 2) the mindset that proposes “since we are liberated, we are also free.” 3) the mindset that operates upon the notion that you can have individuality without accountability or responsibility. 4) the pretense that reality is truth and viceversa. People cherish unwarranted assumptions and relish their freedumb because they have been socialized into selfcensorship along with misidentification with the ego-mind—the absence of knowledge of Self. (See: Phfreedom, Truth, Unfreedom, Dumbelievers, Self, Belief Systems, Objective Truth, Individuality, Objective Reality, True Self & Reality)

Nevertheless, NY’s ban in all government buildings and schools is also unconstitutional. Although the Court has ruled that government schools and government buildings may be “sensitive places,” it never said all government buildings and all types of schools without regard to their nature and quality of business could meet such a designation. It’s obvious that all government buildings are not equal. Free standing public bathrooms, libraries, homeless shelters, DMV branch locations, sanitation dept etc for instance clearly rank low on the “sensitivity scale” compared to buildings like a courthouse or the Pentagon - - and far too low to strip an individual of his “guaranteed” right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals stated,

The White House lawn, although not a building, is just as sensitive as the White House itself. Consequently, the presumption of lawfulness for a regulation penalizing firearm possession there might approach the categorical. At the spectrum’s other end we might find a public park associated with no particular sensitive government interests—or a post office parking lot surrounding a run-of-the- mill post office. Perhaps such locations are “sensitive” in the sense that the government always has an interest in protecting its property or visitors. But without more concrete evidence of particular vulnerability, any presumption of lawfulness for a firearms regulation cannot control. Bonidy v. U.S. Postal Service, 790 F.3d 1121, 1138 (10th Cir. 2015).

Furthermore, Kopel explains that arms bans in all “schools” have very weak historical lineage.” As such NY’s blanket ban in all public and private schools and “their grounds” (which includes parking lots), including schools for professional adults, art students, private career schools, all colleges and universities is unconstitutional - as such places are not sensitive places.

Additionally, there is no legal or historical support for banning weapons in all public parks. [MORE] Federal and state courts have already struck similar prohibitions. The Supreme Court of Illinois held that a law prohibiting individuals from carrying or possessing arms within 1,000 feet of a public park violates the Second Amendment. The court disregarded the government’s argument that the public park was a sensitive place and it found that “the law severely burdened the core of the right to bear arms, because it prohibited the carriage of weapons for self-defense and it affected the entire law-abiding population of Illinois.” [MORE]. While it would appear that the federal government can regulate the possession of guns on “Its property” - but it cannot ban it.

Lastly, the NY prohibition of guns in Times Square appears to be a baseless unconstitutional contradiction to the Supreme Court ruling last month. Any busy downtown sidewalk may crowded — but sidewalks are not sensitive places. [MORE] The Court made it plain that merely because a place is crowded or busy does not magically transform it into a sensitive place. Explicitly rejecting such illogic, speaking for the Court Justice Thomas explained,

In their view, “sensitive places” where the government may lawfully disarm law-abiding citizens include all “places where people typically congregate and where law-enforcement and other public-safety professionals are presumptively available.” It is true that people sometimes congregate in “sensitive places,” and it is likewise true that law enforcement professionals are usually presumptively available in those locations. But expanding the category of “sensitive places” simply to all places of public congregation that are not isolated from law enforcement defines the category of “sensitive places” far too broadly. Respondents’ argument would in effect exempt cities from the Second Amendment and would eviscerate the general right to pub- licly carry arms for self-defense that we discuss in detail below. See Part III–B, infra. Put simply, there is no historical basis for New York to effectively declare the island of Manhattan a “sensitive place” simply because it is crowded and protected generally by the New York City Police Department. [MORE]

[Rotten to the Core] Freedom of Movement Restricted, 4th Amendment Rights Imaginary for Blacks in White, Liberal, Racist NYC: Data Shows NYPD are More Likely to Stop, Arrest, Search Black Motorists

From [HERE] Black drivers in New York City were more likely to have their vehicles searched or arrested than any other racial group in the first half of 2022, according to new city data shared with the Daily News.

When the race or ethnicity of drivers was known, about 4% of black drivers stopped were arrested, the data show. Approximately 3% of Latinos and 1% of Whites, Asians and Pacific Islanders who were stopped were eventually arrested.

Vehicle search percentages were the same — 4% of Black men stopped had their vehicles searched, compared to 3% of Latinos and 1% of Whites, as well as Asians and Pacific Islanders.

Around 8,154 arrests during motor vehicle stops led to arrests in the first half of 2022 – that is around 2% of the total of 358,895 stops.

More minority drivers are being pulled over by the NYPD, city data shared with the Daily News shows.

Police have stepped up traffic surveillance in the city since last winter, data shows.

The number of freeway stops increased by about 3% in the second three months of 2022, according to the data. From April through late June, NYPD officers made 182,142 traffic stops — 5,389 more than from January through March, when they made 176,753 traffic stops.

The growing number of vehicle stops affects the New York Civil Liberties Union, which says police need to be more vigilant to make fair decisions about who to stop.

“Given the long history of police bias over hitchhiking, it is alarming that the NYPD’s vehicle stop count is approaching 200,000 every three months,” said Christopher Dunn, NYCLU legal director. “This staggering number shows that there needs to be much more scrutiny into how drivers are treated by the NYPD.”

Black motorists accounted for 31% of cars stopped in the city in the first six months of 2022, when the driver race was known, the data shows. That’s out of all proportion to the city’s population, which is about 20% black, according to the Department of Urban Planning.

Latino motorists accounted for about 28% of cars stopped in the first half of 2022. That’s the city’s population, which is also about 28% Latino.

New data shows black drivers are more likely to be arrested than other groups in New York City. (Jeff Bachner/for New York Daily News)

White drivers accounted for 27% of traffic stops – slightly less than their 31% of the city’s population. Asian and Pacific islanders accounted for about 13% of traffic stops, while Asians make up about 16% of the urban population.

Although black drivers were more likely to be arrested, they were significantly less likely to receive subpoenas.

About 66% of black motorists stopped received a subpoena, NYPD data shows. About 72% of Whites, 77% of Asians and Pacific Islanders, and 84% of Latinos stopped received a subpoena.

The NYPD this year began releasing quarterly traffic stop data under a law passed by the City Council in 2021. When the data for the first quarter was released in May, the department said in a press release that motorists’ races over by police were “approximately proportional to the city’s overall racial demographics.”

"Sudden Adult Death Syndrome" is Another Name for COVID Injection Genocide [Blight Supremacy] or Genthanasia [a slow motion extermination]

COVID Injections are Killing Shocking Numbers of Doctors in Canada

From [HERE] Doctors all over Canada are dying due to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, with data suggesting that one doctor dies every other day due to the experimental jabs.

Entrepreneur and COVID-19 vaccine researcher Steve Kirsch noted that the data for the actual number of Canadian physicians being killed by the vaccines is difficult to find due to the refusal of Canadian mainstream media to cover the stories.

Fortunately, he and many other vaccine researchers have cobbled together enough information to paint a better picture of just how many doctors have died. (Related: 6 Fully jabbed doctors drop dead in Canada within days – experts baffled.)

One doctor interviewed by Kirsch noted that he had heard about at least 15 deaths of Canadian doctors over the last nine months. The doctor, who has been practicing for over 30 years, noted that he has never experienced any spike in unusual deaths of doctors before.

“Why is he now, all of a sudden, hearing of so many deaths, and why are these deaths all happening very soon after vaccination?” wrote Kirsch.

The researcher further noted that, from July 13 to July 28, seven doctors passed away, an average of one doctor every other day for two weeks.

Official causes of death were noted for being very unusual. Two of them died while swimming and another died in her sleep.

“The fact checkers assure us all that all of these doctors died for other reasons; the fact that they all died right after the vaccine was simply bad luck,” wrote Kirsch.

Hospitals and media all claim doctor deaths not related to vaccines

The deaths of the seven doctors made headline news because three of the seven doctors came from Mississauga Hospital in Ontario – a fact that nobody was able to deny.

The three doctors – Dr. Lorne Segall, Dr. Stephen McKenzie and Dr. Jakub Sawicki – all died within three days of each other, from July 17 to 21. Mainstream media outlets claimed that Segall and Sawicki had cancer – stage 4 lung and stage 4 gastric cancers, respectively – and McKenzie died of an “unspecified illness.”

On July 16, Dr. Paul Hannam, Chief of Emergency Medicine and Program Medical Director at North York General Hospital in Toronto, died. Hannam, 50, was an Olympic sailor and marathon runner in perfect health. His cause of death is still not being revealed, but both the hospital and corporate media have vehemently denied any links to the COVID-19 vaccines.

On July 23, Dr. Shahriar Jalali Mazlouman, 44, a family physician from the western province of Saskatchewan, was reported to have died in a swimming accident. Reports claim he was found dead at a local swimming pool, and his death is supposedly not related to the COVID-19 vaccines.

On July 26, Dr. Ryan Buyting, a neurosurgery resident working for the state-backed Alberta Health Services in Edmonton, passed away. He was only 26 years old and at his peak of health. He was described as having an exceptional work ethic. His death has not been officially attributed to a specific reason, making it very likely it was connected to the COVID-19 vaccine.

Finally, the seventh doctor to die within two weeks is Dr. Candace Nayman, 27, a pediatric resident at McMaster Children’s Hospital in Hamilton, Ontario. She is a triathlete and expert swimmer who collapsed while swimming.

Court Released FDA Data Reveals an 87% Miscarriage Rate During Pfizer's COVID Injection Trials. A CDC Study Shows the Miscarriage Rate is 82%. Israeli Study Shows Each COVID Shot Drops Sperm Count

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Since the rollout of the experimental COVID shots, U.S. health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women and their unborn babies

• Meanwhile, now-released Pfizer court-ordered, released data — which the Food and Drug Administration wanted to hide for 75 years — reveal the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial

• A CDC-sponsored study that was widely used to support the claim that the shot is safe during pregnancy misreported the data. The actual miscarriage rate in that paper was 82%

• As of August 12, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID jab. For comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years is 2,239

• Israeli research found the Pfizer COVID jab impairs male fertility for three months after each dose, dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared to baseline

From [MERCOLA PDF] Since the rollout of the experimental COVID shots, U.S. health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women, and have been urging all pregnant women to get the jab “to protect themselves and their babies.” To this day, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends the COVID shot for:1

“... people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future.”

The CDC further recommends:2

“People who are pregnant should stay up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines, including getting a COVID-19 booster when it’s time to get one.”

And claims:3

“Evidence continues to build showing that:

• COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective.

• There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in women or men.”

All the while, they’ve had Pfizer data showing the shots cause shocking rates of miscarriage which, adding insult to injury, have been blatantly miscategorized as a “recovered/resolved” adverse effect.4 Who in their right mind would consider DEATH a resolved side effect unless they had a depopulation agenda in mind all along?

I don’t see how this could be described as anything but a criminal cover-up. The only reason we know any of this is because U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to release Pfizer documents at a rate of 55,000 pages per month. The FDA and Pfizer had asked to release the documents at a pace of 500 pages per month, which meant it would take 75 years to disclose them all.5

Criminal Cover-Up 

Dr. Naomi Wolf recently reported that an analysis of Pfizer data revealed 44% of the women in the trial suffered miscarriages.6 That statistic turns out to have been the result of a miscalculation,7 as Pfizer listed the miscarriages in two separate columns, resulting in them being counted twice.

We’ve repeatedly found Pfizer’s data collection and reporting to be all over the place, and seemingly on purpose, to make hazards more difficult to ascertain. Wolf admitted the error and took down the original report. However, while fact checkers are gloating over the perceived victory, there’s plenty of other evidence in the Pfizer material to demonstrate these shots should be banned for all time.

In an August 20, 2022, Substack article, Dr. Pierre Kory addressed other, “absolutely horrifying,” findings on miscarriages found in the Pfizer data dumps:8

“... let’s do a dive on just one page of the many thousands. See below, Section 5.3.6, Page 12 of the document called ‘Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.’

Looking at the first bullet under the header: Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including:

In this paragraph, at first read, it is just a list of adverse events and numbers, detailed in a way that is confusing at best, and obfuscating at worst. I think it is the latter because, if you do some simple arithmetic trying to parse that paragraph, you end up with this:

270 pregnancies were reported in vaccinated women during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine campaign. In 238 of them, ‘no outcome was provided.’ So, they only knew the outcome of 32 pregnancies reported. What happened in those 32 pregnancies they followed up on?

My hands are literally trembling as I write this, but here goes. In these 32 pregnancies, there were:

• 23 spontaneous abortions

• 2 spontaneous abortions with intra-uterine death

◦So, 25 of the 32 pregnancies with known outcomes resulted in a miscarriage, a rate of 78%. Note that miscarriage normally occurs in only 12-15% of pregnancies

• 2 premature births with neonatal death

• 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death

• 1 normal outcome

Note that this only adds up to 29 known outcomes, but then they note that ‘two different outcomes were reported for each twin’ and then they talk about ‘fetus/baby cases as separate from mother cases.’ I have no idea how to interpret this explanation of outcomes, so it may have been one or two less (or more) deaths then.

So, of the 32 pregnancies they knew the outcome of, 87.5% resulted in the death of the fetus or neonate. Burying this data in the way and not alerting the world to what they found, is criminal activity ...”

To be perfectly clear, the failure to record and report the outcomes of 238 out of 274 pregnancies during a drug trial is simply unheard of. It’s shockingly unethical. And the fact that both the Food and Drug Administration and the CDC accepted this, and claim there’s “no evidence” of harm to pregnant women and their babies is proof positive of reprehensible maleficence.

There’s no fixing what’s gone wrong at the FDA and CDC. Their credibility with the public is ruined beyond any possible recovery. The CDC can review and reorganize itself all it wants, but it changes nothing. They are, to this day, urging pregnant women to take a shot that they KNOW will cause babies to die. Calling it a dystopia of epic proportions is a profoundly serious understatement.

CDC-Sponsored Study Also Tried to Hide Data

Need more evidence? How about the fact that the CDC-sponsored study9 published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in April 2021 — which was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected — also obfuscated data to hide a shockingly elevated miscarriage rate.

According to this paper, the miscarriage rate within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was 12.5%, which is only slightly above the normal average of 10%. (Looking at statistical data, the risk of miscarriage drops from an overall, average risk rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy as a whole, to just 5% between Weeks 6 and 7, all the way down to 1% between Weeks 14 and 20.10)

However, there’s a distinct problem with this calculation, as highlighted by Drs. Ira Bernstein, Sanja Jovanovic and Deann McLeod, HBSc, of Toronto. In a May 28, 2021, letter to the editor, they pointed out that:11

“In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their third-trimester (104/127 = 82%).”

In other words, when you exclude women who got the shot in their third trimester (since the third trimester is after week 20 and therefore should not be counted when determining miscarriage rate among those injected before week 20), the miscarriage rate is 82%. (The errors in that NEJM article were also reviewed in a Science, Public Health Policy and the Law paper12 published in November 2021.)

Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation, which strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during the first trimester is an absolute recipe for disaster. So, here was yet another attempt to hide the fact that more than 8 in 10 pregnancies may be terminated as a result of the jab.

As of August 12, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID jab.13 For comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years is 2,239.14

Birth Rates Are Suddenly Plummeting Worldwide

In addition to miscarriages, we’re also looking at abruptly plummeting birth rates, suggesting the COVID jabs are having an adverse impact on future fertility as well.

“They are large drops, and they are occurring, almost like clockwork, approximately 9 months after pregnant women around the world started to be vaccinated,” Kory notes.15

For example, Germany recently released data showing a 10% decline in birth rate during the first quarter of 2022.16

The live birth rate graph for Sweden looks much the same, with a 14% drop:17,18 According to Gunnar Anderson, a Swedish professor in demographics at Stockholm University, “We have never seen anything like this before, that the bottom just falls out in just one quarter.”19

Between January and April 2022, Switzerland’s birth rate was 15% lower than expected, the U.K.’s was down by 10% and Taiwan’s was down 23%.20,21,22 In Hungary, MP Dúró Dóra has expressed concern about a 20% drop in birth rate during January 2022, compared to January 2021.23

The U.S. is also showing signs of a drop in live births. Provisional data from North Dakota show a 10% decline in February 2022, 13% reduction in March and an 11% reduction in April, compared to the corresponding months in 2021.24

In the five countries with the highest COVID jab uptake, fertility has dropped by an average of 15.2%, whereas the five countries with the lowest COVID jab uptake have seen an average reduction of just 4.66%.

In a July 5, 2022, Counter Signal article, Mike Campbell reported that in the five countries with the highest COVID jab uptake, fertility has dropped by an average of 15.2%, whereas the five countries with the lowest COVID jab uptake have seen an average reduction of just 4.66%. Below is a chart from Birth Gauge25 on Twitter comparing live birth data for 2021 and 2022 in a large number of countries.

Many Women Report Menstrual Irregularities Post-Jab

High rates of menstrual irregularities post-jab are also a warning sign that reproductive capacity may be impacted. As of August 12, 2022, there were 31,443 VAERS reports of menstrual disorders.26

Changes include heavier and more painful periods27 and changes in menses length, as well as unexpected breakthrough bleeding or spotting among women on long-acting contraception or those who are postmenopausal and haven’t had a period in years or even decades.28

Health officials have tried to brush off the reports, but a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology — funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institutes of Health’s Office of Research on Women's Health — confirmed an association between menstrual cycle length and COVID-19 shots.29

According to the authors, it’s possible that the immune response created by the mRNA shots affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, which plays a well-known role in the timing of a woman’s cycle:30

“Our findings for individuals who received two doses in a single cycle supports this hypothesis. Given the dosing schedule of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (21 days for Pfizer and 28 days for Moderna), an individual receiving two doses in a single cycle would have received the first dose in the early follicular phase.

Cycle length variability results from events leading to the recruitment and maturation of the dominant follicle during the follicular phase ...”

Other Disturbing Evidence

A Japanese biodistribution study for Pfizer’s jab also showed the COVID spike protein from the shots accumulate in female ovaries and male testes,31,32 and there’s credible concern that the COVID jabs will cross-react with syncytin (a retroviral envelope protein) and reproductive genes in sperm, ova and placenta in ways that may impair fertility and reproductive outcomes.

A Pfizer-BioNTech rat study33 revealed the injection more than doubled the incidence of preimplantation loss (i.e., the risk of infertility), and led to mouth/jaw malformations, gastroschisis (a birth defect of the abdominal wall) and abnormalities in the right-sided aortic arch and cervical vertebrae.34,35 As noted by The Exposé:

“With this being the case, how on earth have medicine regulators around the world managed to state in their official guidance that ‘Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy’? And how have they managed to state ‘It is unknown whether the Pfizer vaccine has an impact on fertility’?

The truth of the matter is that they actively chose to cover it up. We know this thanks to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request36 made to the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).”

You can read more about that in The Exposé’s July 19, 2022, article, “FOIA Reveals Pfizer & Medicine Regulators Hid Dangers of COVID Vaccination During Pregnancy After Study Found It Increases Risk of Birth Defects & Infertility.”37

We’re also seeing a sudden uptick in infant mortality. The Exposé38 highlighted data from Scotland, showing neonatal deaths were 119% higher above the annual norm in March 2022.

COVID Jab Affects Male Fertility Too

Male fertility is also under attack by these bioweapons. Israeli research39,40 published in the journal Andrology found the Pfizer COVID jab temporarily but significantly impairs male fertility, dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared to baseline pre-jab.

Both eventually recovered, some three months after the last jab, but if you destroy a man’s sperm for three months every time he gets a COVID shot, you’re significantly reducing the probability of him fathering a child for a good part of any given year and the stats reviewed above support this.

Remember, the mRNA shots are recommended at three-month intervals for the original series, and boosters are now being recommended at varying intervals thereafter. In the video above, Amy Kelly, project director for the Daily Clout’s Pfizer document analysis team, reviews this study and other post-jab male fertility concerns.41

End the COVID Shots Now, Before It’s Too Late to Recover

In October 2021, when the FDA was voting on whether to authorize the COVID jab for children aged 5 through 11, Dr. Eric Rubin, an FDA advisory panel member, Harvard professor and editor-in-chief of the NEJM, stated:42

“We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes ... And I do think we should vote to approve it.”

So, in this and other instances, they’ve openly admitted that anyone who takes the jab is part of an experiment. Yet at the same time, the FDA and CDC have insisted that the jabs are perfectly safe — all while in possession of data showing they’re anything but! In conclusion, I agree with Kory, who writes:43

“... when a new medicine or device is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to be related to the intervention until proven otherwise. That is what I am doing here.

We must assume the vaccines are impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanations for a sudden drop in month to month birth rates. So stop the shots until you can prove they are not ...

Too many young people dying,44 too many becoming disabled, too many pregnancies resulting in fetal or neonatal death as above, and now we find out that if we continue with this vaccine obsession, they will not be replaced. This is a humanitarian catastrophe heaped atop the one caused by dangerous gain-of-function research. 

When will the world wake up to this rapidly unfolding horror? For those of us who know what is going on, it is hard not to feel helpless as we are forced to watch increasingly apparent and widespread needless death. But we will continue to try to get these truths out despite the massive censorship and propaganda overwhelming the globe. 

We have a moral and ethical obligation and take that responsibility seriously no matter what befalls us. Stop the vaccines, now. And if we can’t stop them, we must try to convince everyone we know to no longer agree to get vaccinated. Their lives and our future depend on it.”

- Sources and References

• 1, 2, 3 CDC.gov Updated July 14, 2022

• 4, 6 Clark County Today August 18, 2022

• 5 Bloomberg Law January 18, 2022

• 7 Twitter Phil Kerpen August 17, 2022

• 8, 15, 19, 43 Pierre Kory Substack August 20, 2022

• 9 N Engl J Med 2021; 384:2273-2282

• 10 Medical News Today January 12, 2020

• 11 Wayback NEJM Letter to the Editor June 27, 2021

• 12 Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law November 2021; 4: 130-143

• 13, 26 OpenVAERS Reproductive Health Reports as of August 12, 2022

• 14, 35, 38, 44 The Expose August 7, 2022

• 16 Expose News July 18, 2022

• 17, 20, 23 The Counter Signal July 5, 2022

• 18 Twitter Havard Skjaervik June 27, 2022

• 21, 24 Igor Chudov Substack June 25, 2022

• 22 SWPRS June 2022

• 25 Twitter Birth Gauge June 3, 2022

• 27 Boston University September 9, 2021

• 28 NPR August 9, 2021

• 29 Obstetrics & Gynecology: January 5, 2022 - Volume - Issue - 10.1097

• 30 Obstetrics & Gynecology: January 5, 2022 - Volume - Issue - 10.1097, Discussion

• 31 Children’s Health Defense June 3, 2021

• 32 Rights and Freedoms, Confidential Pfizer Research Document

• 33 Reproductive Toxicology August 2021; 103: 28-35

• 34 Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law November 2021; 4:130-143, page 135

• 36, 37 The Expose July 19, 2022

• 39 Andrology June 17, 2022 DOI: 10.111/andr.13209

• 40 Expose June 26, 2022

• 41 Daily Clout August 16, 2022

• 42 Townhall October 26, 2021