Fact Check: The Water Tanker in Downtown Jacksonville Isn't for the Puppetican Governor's Mansion; its for Trustmark Bank, gangbankers who 'pull the strings' and Own the Building Across the Street

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY

Gangbanker – a shrewd hoodlum who steals one’s past (collateral), present (awareness), and future (productive energy) through the deception of the sleight-of-mind trick called “money” in collusion (association) with other thieves with the legal sanction of the prime thief (Corporate State). 2) a financial proctologist. Gangbankers, through the veil of incorporation and legal license to plunder, hold whole communities for ransom. (See: “Money,” Gangbanking, Swindle, Fraud, LOP-Sided Banking, FRAUD, Thief, S&M Banking, Casino Economy, Predatory Economics, Usury, Interest, Principal & Reification)

Gangbanking – the legally sanctioned institution of covert slavery by the intergenerational dynastic banking families and their (pirate fraternity) member bank owners inflicted and imposed upon the subdued captured and domesticated population (dwellers upon the land) all over the world. 2) the centralization of symbolic imaginary debt in the hands of terrortorial gangsters backed by enforced by, and in collusion with an even more ruthless gang, i.e., the Corporate State. 3) the worldwide system of debt-based monetary “creation” in the form of digitized bank credit (ledger entries) stored “in” and transmitted from the memory banks of interconnected banking computer systems internetworked around the globe. Gangbanking is the system and mechanism for the international, intergenerational transmission and maintenance of global economic inequality and resource ownership and power differential. A further consequence of monopoly capitalism, state capitalism and virtual capitalism is that ownership of real assets and tangible wealth is increasingly transferred (appropriated) to banks as a whole, i.e., in the aggregate. Why should “banks” individually and collectively be allowed to collect principal and interest for merely publishing and administrating (via reciprocal clearing) our promises to “pay.” After all, the true creditor gave up property for irredeemable “notes” which are merely published by the "banking" system; and this arrangement certainly denies the true creditor interest, to take, for no more than the cost of tokenizing the debtor’s obligation, first principal equal to that of all wealth ever so financed, and secondly, to perpetually multiply that unjustified taking by interest. In re-borrowing interest, interest is converted to new principal (debt), which, because it exceeds the previous sum of debt, it is unquestionably how much debt increases. A circulation of political money subject to interest inherently and irreversibly multiplies debt in proportion to the circulation, even by inherently greater increments of periodic interest on ever greater sums of debt, until the system collapses under a sum of debt it can no longer service. Gangbanking is the plain and open fraud of officially sanctioned counterfeiting of “money” (i.e., substantive rights or actual claims on real wealth, goods, labor and services) and “lending” these imaginary intangible pretensions (as if they were discrete properties of some physical or scarce item, i.e., the misnomer of notional “real money” itself an oxymoron) at interest. [MORE]

From [HERE] A viral video showing a tanker truck parked across from the Mississippi Governor’s Mansion in Jackson has sparked speculation online that Gov. Tate Reeves’ home is enjoying special access to clean water while most residents of the capital city go without safe running water

But the speculation is wrong.

Two separate Trustmark employees told the Mississippi Free Press that the tanker parked across the street from the Governor’s Mansion is on standby to provide water to Trustmark Bank’s Jackson Downtown Branch, located in the building directly across from the residence.

“(It’s) just in case something happens with the water,” one of the employees said. “It’s not for them over there (at the Governor’s Mansion), it’s for us.” She added that the office has not had to use it.

After this story first published, Trustmark Director of Corporate Communications and Marketing Melanie Morgan responded to a request for comment Thursday afternoon and confirmed the employees’ story.

“It is absolutely solely for Trustmark,” she said, adding that they brought the tanker in to have on standby “out of an abundance of caution.” Morgan said the bank is asking many employees to work from home to save resources, but that the tanker is there in case it is needed to help keep key facilities operating, such as air-conditioning system for keeping computer servers stored in the building cool. [MORE]

What are the Limits of Handing Out Bottled Water to Solve a Water Crisis? Dems Afraid to Criticize Ineffective Jacksonville Mayor (or any other Black Politician) and Treat their Rolebot as a Rolemodel

LOSING IS WINNING ONLY FOR BLACKS IN THE SYSTEM OF RWS. Despite what racists tell you winning will never be losing. In all areas of PEOPLE ACTIVITY racists promote weiteko; an inversion of life - such as the promotion of losing as winning. SPECIFICALLY, THE DEPENDENT MEDIA consistently ignores or glosses over even THE most egregious FAILURES OR loser conduct BY ITS ACCEPTED OR APPROVED OF BLACK ROLEBOTS AND SHOWCASE BLACKS. It is part of ongoing psy-ops or false consciousness programming aimed at Black people to maintain cooperative master servant relationS between Blacks and whites. IT HELPS TO KEEP Black people in a "continuous state of checkmate” and a “losing streak that is centuries long.” [MORE] In sports we see it with the dependent media’s promotion of rolebot Lebron James as “a winner” despite the fact that he has lost six (6) championships (won 4) or WITH ELITE WHITE LIBERALS crowning Simone Biles “the GOAT” the day after her mental meltdown at the Olympics. In politics we see it with the appointment of obviously unqualified “opporTomists” like Judge Kentanji Brown (who had worked ONLY 6 MONTHS AS AN APPELLATE JUDGE WHEN BIDEN SELECTED HER) and WITH the uncritical examinations of Black politicians at all levels of government who are lionized despite failing to deliver anything of tangible, material benefit to their Black constituents. Dr. Martin Luther King WARNED, elite racists often support, appoint or promote unqualified negros into high positions so that important matters to Black life ARE handled frivolously. Here, we are NECESSARILY only talking about democrat politicians because, in general, the lone criticism offered ABOUT BLACK POLITICIANS by the dependent media is that they are ‘republican.’ THAT IS, TO ELITE WHITES, BLACK POLITICIANS ARE “BLACK” BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT REPUBLICAN - THERE APPEARS TO BE NO OTHER CRITERIA FOR “BLACKNESS.” Eric Adams, lori lightfoot, muriel bowser, Gregory Meeks, Kamala HARRIS, london breed AND MANY OTHER BOHICANS AND SAMBOS DON’T EMPOWER BLACK PEOPLE OR REPRESENT ANY BLACK POLITIC OR IDEOLOGY THAT AIMS AT DOING SO; SAID INDIVIDUALS SIMPLY POSSESS BLACK Chromosomes AND ARE OTHERWISE INTERCHANGEABLE WITH NEUROPEANS. DON’T MISTAKE THIS as an endorsement OF BLACK CONSERVATIVES. IT’S SIMPLY AN OBSERVATION THAT BLACK ELECTORAL POLITICS IS PRESENTLY DEVOID OF ACCOUNTABILITY, GOALS, SUBSTANCE AND INTERIORITY, HAVING NO IDEOLOGY BESIDES PARROTING WHATEVER IS ON THE WHITE LIBERALS’ AGENDA. LIKE FUNKTIONARY RHETORICALLY ASKS, “DOLLY WANT A CRACKER?”

With regard to BLACK PUNDITS IMPOSED ONTO BLACK PEOPLE BY ELITE WHITES AT CNN, MSNBC AND ELSEWHERE AND coin-operated Black media OUTLETS (who simply mimic MASSA’ media AND ONLY CRITIQUE WHAT MASSA’ MEDIA CRITIQUES OR WHATEVER IS SAFELY WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF SPEECH AND THOUGHT SET BY ELITE WHITES AND COMPATIBLE WITH RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY) the great rebel Dr. Amos Wilson explained,

‘the Black press and safe negro TV incumbents make little or no demands on Black politicians while it constantly parades them before the Black community as role models, regardless of their success or lack of it in advancing the interests of the community. The achieve­ments of Black politicians, no matter how dubious, are often pre­sented by the Black press as vicarious achievements of the Black community as a whole. Black incumbents are given ready access to Black media outlets to massage the Black community, to maintain their public persona, and to rationalize their very frequent failures to provide the Black community with responsive and effective political leadership. Thus, they keep their opposition out of the media limelight and the community is cajoled into re-electing a political establishment whose accomplishments are meager when not plainly regressive.’

From [HERE] and [HERE] State officials said they had no clear end date for the water crisis here, as residents on Thursday endured another day of unreliable water running through their pipes.

Many of the city’s roughly 150,000 residents have had little to no water pressure in their taps since Monday, when flooding overwhelmed the main water-treatment plant. Officials had been preparing for a crisis after the plant’s main pumps failed in July and the city went under a boil-water notice.

Nevertheless, Mayor Chokwe A. Lumumba assured residents at a press conference that the capital city had seen improvements in water pressure overnight, and the number of locations with water increased.

“We have seen steady improvements in the system,” he said. “There are individuals who did not have water pressure at all yesterday in which water pressure has returned, and the reports of the tanks is that there are steady gains being achieved each and every day.”

“In the middle of peak consumption, which is during the daytime hours, we’ve maintained steady (pressure),” he added. “At night is a moment that we look to have the greatest amount of recovery.”

Both the City of Jackson and the State of Mississippi declared states of emergency on Monday over problems at the O.B. Curtis Water Treatment Center worsened by Pearl River flooding this week. The treatment plant is designed to pump 50 million gallons a day for use in the capital city. Reporter Nick Judin reported earlier today that the Environmental Protection Agency had warned in a Mississippi Free Press interview several days ago that the facility’s systems were in danger of failing.

Gov. Tate Reeves said Monday that he is “sending a request for a federally declared disaster to support state and city emergencies.”

Mississippi’s 2nd Congressional District Rep. Bennie Thompson said he supports the move to ask for federal assistance. “I hope the Federal government will be able to provide resources adequate and comprehensive enough to address the health and safety crisis facing the City of Jackson and surrounding communities,” he said on social media. “This situation requires immediate attention and cooperation from Federal, state, and local governments.”

The 3rd Congressional District Rep. Michael Guest blamed “decades of failed leadership.” 

“The problems in Jackson were many years in the making, and it will take many more years to fix them,” he wrote Tuesday. “The solutions will only be found by elected officials working together to fix the underlying issues, not playing politics or just merely throwing money at the problems.”

The mayor today welcomed the cooperation of the State of Mississippi in resolving various historic problems in the water system, and denied Reeves’ warning at his press conference last night that the City is distributing untreated water.

Reeves’ exact words were: “Please stay safe. Do not drink the water. In too many cases, it is raw water from the reservoir being pushed through the pipes.”

Gov. Tate Reeves (pictured) said on Aug. 29, 2022, that Jackson is pumping raw water into its water system. Jackson Mayor Chokwe Lumumba denied that assertion on Aug. 30, 2022. Photo courtesy State of Mississippi

“I do want to clarify just a few inaccuracies that have gone forward; first and foremost, the City of Jackson has not distributed any untreated raw water,” Lumumba said today. “That is inaccurate, but we do encourage our residents to continue to abide by the boil-water notice that has been in effect.” 

The capital city has been under a boil-water notice for a month because of problems with water-treatment methods at the O.B. Curtis Water Treatment Center and related issues.

Lumumba said Monday that operators had stopped pushing the water into the system to ensure adequate treatment because of the Pearl River flood water coming into the system at the O.B. Curtis Water Treatment Plant. The City wanted to increase production at the J.H. Fewell Water Treatment Center, which generally supplies 20 million gallons daily into the system. However, a pump failed there, making it unable to do so.

However, Carol Kemker, the director of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division, told the Mississippi Free Press in an Aug. 26 interview that the facility’s system were likely to fail, in no small part due to the Lumumba administration dragging its feet on efforts to recruit qualified water operators.

“They could be reaching out to technical colleges, they could be holding recruitment events, they could be scheduling interviews, they could be putting in advertisements,” Kemker told Nick Judin. “(This is) what we do when we recruit. We’re not seeing those types of things.”

The mayor said today that the O.B. Curtis Water facility is suffering from numerous equipment failures. “This is a set of accumulated problems based on deferred maintenance that has not taken place over decades,” he said at the press conference. [MORE]]

[There are No tyrants, only tyranny exists] Corpse Joe Mocks Blacks by Vowing to 'Fund Police.' He Dementia-Splains to Sheeple He Will Ban AR-15’s b/c There’s No Need for Tyranny Prevention these Days

According to FUNKTIONARY:

tyranny – the miscarriage of self-government. 2) the absence of ethical anarchy. In our system, tyranny must have an accomplice. The perpetrator by intent must be accommodated by the perpetrator by consent. The former initiates, the latter accommodates. Of all tyrannies, the greatest is the tyranny of the ego-mind. “If the government is allowed to place a tax on what is a natural right it can raise that tax to the point where that right has been effectively destroyed. That is tyranny.” Butcher’s Union Company v. Crescent City. “No man, no group, and no nation has the right to any man’s individual freedom. No matter how pure the motive, how great the emergency, how high the principle, such action is nothing but tyranny. It is never justified.” ~John W. Parsons. Tyranny Law #1 – Any power that can be abused will be abused. Tyranny Law #2 – Abuse always expands to fill the limits of resistance to it. Tyranny Law #3 – If people don’t resist the abuses of others, they will have no one to resist the abuses of themselves, and tyranny will prevail. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt. ~John Curran. Retaining and exercising the unalienable right to distribute one’s own property and wealth without restriction is the only guarantee of freedom from tyranny. (See: Authority, Labor, Natural Law, Self-Ownership, THC, Anarchy, Appropriation, Income Taxes, IRS, Bill of Rights, Property, Freedom, Self-Determination, GIMME!, Autotyranny, Free-Range Slavery, Matrix, Organizations, Private Services & Liberation)

From [HERE] President Joe Biden commenced the first of four trips to Pennsylvania in the next couple of days with a complete turnaround from his party's "defund the police" mantra to a "fund the police" one, along with a pledge to ban assault-style weapons in the country. He also doubled down on denigrating people who vote Trump as being far-right. 

Then he went really off script. 

"He used to go down in the East Side, what they call the bucket. Highest crime rate in the country. There's a place where I was the only white guy that worked as a lifeguard down in that area, on the East side. And, you know, you could always tell where the best basketball in the state is, where the best basketball in the city is. It's where everybody shows up,” said Biden to a somewhat uncomfortable but supportive crowd in Wilkes-Barre. 

Then he started talking about gun ownership, saying, “You know what the Mexicans, Mexico, which has real problems causing us real problems? You know what their biggest complaint is? Can't we stop the gun trafficking across the southern border, into Mexico?" 

Biden — who will go on to do three more appearances in Pennsylvania, concluding with the Labor Day parade in Pittsburgh on Monday — also offered his support for his party’s Senate candidate, John Fetterman. Fetterman, though, did not even attend the event, and Biden seemed confused about what offices he and gubernatorial nominee Josh Shapiro were running for. 

“Please, please elect [Shapiro, the sitting attorney general] to the Senate. Elect that big ol' boy [Fetterman, the sitting lieutenant governor] to be senator,” said Biden as he concluded his speech. 

Some Democrats in the state, who admit they would rather dance on hot coals than vote Republican, say Biden can get away with his verbal stumbles because he has been that way all of his career. Still, one can only imagine Fetterman wishes he’d just be anywhere but here. 

Currently, Fetterman leads Republican Dr. Mehmet Oz in the polls, with the RealClearPolitics average having the race at plus 7 for Fetterman and the latest poll by Emerson having Fetterman now down to plus 5 over the heart surgeon. The averaged RealClearPolitics polling began in June when Oz had just emerged from a bruising primary contest with businessman David McCormick that had deeply, negatively harmed his approval ratings. 

Fetterman suffered a stroke days before the May primary; since then, he has not resumed his duties in Harrisburg and took most of the summer off to recover from the effects of the stroke. 

Fetterman has not taken any questions from the press outside of a closed caption phone conversation with the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and a text exchange with me. He has given three speeches in the past two weeks: an 11-minute speech in Erie, a four-minute one in Pittsburgh, and a seven-minute speech in Venango County. 

Each appearance shows that the lieutenant governor's speech is halting and that he struggles with finding his words. Nonetheless, no update from his doctor has been given since June, when his cardiologist issued a statement that Fetterman’s health problems were a direct result of him not following his orders several years ago.

New NY Law Strips Imaginary Right to Wear, Bear or Carry Guns in Case of Public Confrontation. Freedumb Peddlers Violently Prevent Law Abiding Citizens from Defending Themselves in Most Public Places

ALL LAWS ARE VIOLENCE. THE REBEL LARKEN ROSE EXPLAINS, “In truth, every authoritarian “law” Is a command backed by the threat of retaliation against those who do not comply. Whether it is a “law” against committing murder or against building a deck without a building permit, it is neither a suggestion nor a request, but a command, backed by the threat of violence, whether in the form of forced confiscation of property (I.e., fines) or the kidnapping of a human being (i.e., imprisonment), What might be called “extortion” if done by the average citizen is called “taxation” when done by people who are imagined to have the right to rule.

From [HERE] New York defeated an attempt by gun-rights proponents to stop it from enforcing new restrictions on who and where people can carry concealed weapons.

US District Judge Glenn Suddaby in Syracuse rejected the request by Gun Owners of America Inc. and others for an order to halt the roll-out of the state’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act.

New York Attorney General Letitia James hailed the judge’s ruling. James is a black strawboss and tireless rolebot working hard for her white masters.

“Responsible gun control measures save lives and any attempts by the gun lobby to tear down New York’s sensible gun control laws will be met with fierce defense of the law,” she said in a prepared statement.

The case is Antonyuk v. Bruen, 22-cv-00734, U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York (Syracuse). 

Liberals overwhelmingly seem to prefer slavery or greater restrictions in the free range prison.

The Supreme Court made it clear that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense in public. The court clearly stated;

Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. As we explained in Heller, the “textual elements” of the Second Amendment’s operative clause— “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be in- fringed”—“guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. Heller further confirmed that the right to “bear arms” refers to the right to “wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.”

This definition of “bear” naturally encompasses public carry. Most gun owners do not wear a holstered pistol at their hip in their bedroom or while sitting at the dinner table. Although individuals often “keep” firearms in their home, at the ready for self-defense, most do not “bear” (i.e., carry) them in the home beyond moments of actual confrontation. To confine the right to “bear” arms to the home would nullify half of the Second Amendment’s operative protections.

Moreover, confining the right to “bear” arms to the home would make little sense given that self-defense is “the central component of the [Second Amendment] right itself.” Heller, 554 U. S., at 599; see also McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767. After all, the Second Amendment guarantees an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” Heller, 554 U. S., at 592, and confrontation can surely take place outside the home.

Although we remarked in Heller that the need for armed self-defense is perhaps “most acute” in the home, id., at 628, we did not suggest that the need was insignificant else- where. Many Americans hazard greater danger outside the home than in it. See Moore v. Madigan, 702 F. 3d 933, 937 (CA7 2012) (“[A] Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower”). The text of the Second Amendment reflects that reality.

The Second Amendment’s plain text thus presumptively guarantees petitioners Koch and Nash a right to “bear” arms in public for self-defense.

The new law bans handguns in places of a “sensitive nature,” which overbroadly includes all churches/places of worship, government buildings, all public parks, all kinds of schools, all public transit (apparently including all vehicles for hire (cabs/Uber/limo)), hospitals, shelters, residential group homes, nursing homes, and medical facilities, among others. It also prohibits law abiding citizens from carrying a handgun in Times Square.

The law defines all public transportation as a “sensitive place.” Among many other things, specifically it states,

A sensitive location shall mean:

any place, conveyance, or vehicle used for public transportation or public transit, subway cars, train cars, buses, ferries, railroad, omnibus, marine or aviation transportation; or any facility used for or in connection with service in the transportation of passengers, airports, train stations, subway and rail stations, and bus terminals;

any place owned or under the control of federal, state or local government, for the purpose of government administration, including courts;

any gathering of individuals to collectively express their constitutional rights to protest or assemble;

any place of worship or religious observation;

all libraries, public playgrounds, public parks, and zoos; NY’s new law violates the 2nd Amendment because there is no longstanding historical tradition of regulating peaceable public carry on public transportation, in churches, all government buildings and schools regardless of their nature as required by the new Supreme Court holding. Also, the ban on guns is unconstitutional because the Court explained that merely because a place is crowded does not make it a “sensitive place” worthy of stripping people the right to defend themselves with a handgun.

The Court explained, “When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. The government must then justify its regulation by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only then may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s “unqualified command.”

The sensitive places doctrine is an exception to the general right to the peaceable possession and carry of arms. The Court is guided by the history around the time of the creation of the 2nd Amendment to determine whether a gun is valid because the right to carry arms is considered to be a “pre-existing right.” Said history according to the Court and legal scholars is that carrying “common weapons” was an offense only when done in a manner “apt to terrify” people. [MORE] The Court ruled that there must be a “longstanding” history of “laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings.

Whether a place is a “sensitive place” is determined by historical record and/or particular place’s sensitive government interests or vulnerabilities. A longstanding history exists if there ‘are no disputes regarding the lawfulness of such prohibitions.” Constitutional law professor David Kopel explained that ‘factors which make places “sensitive” might be a place where most persons therein are minors (K-12 schools), places that concentrate adversarial conflict and can generate passionately angry emotions (courthouses, legislatures, polling places), or buildings containing people at acute personal risk of being targets of assassination (many government buildings). The answer cannot be that the places are crowded. Sometimes they are, but no more so than a busy downtown sidewalk, and sidewalks are not sensitive places.’

NY’s gun ban on public transportation and in churches is unconstitutional because there is apparently no longstanding historical record of prohibiting peaceable gun carry on public transportation or in church. To the contrary, the post-Independence historical record shows that peaceable carry when leaving the home was encouraged and often legally required by statute for safety. Kopel states,

“Post-independence, Americans were contemptuous of what they considered to be the constricted nature of the English right to arms. Madison said so in his speech introducing the Second Amendment in Congress. . . “Americans certainly did not think that bringing guns to town was a problem; to the contrary, laws typically required that arms be brought to churches or to all public meetings. Nor were there echoes of Henry VIII’s restrictions about loaded guns on the highways. Instead, statutes required arms carrying when traveling or away from home. Carrying firearms when going anywhere was normal in many parts of the United States.”

NY’s gun ban on public transportation also overburdens an individual right to carry - as anyone wishing to exercise his right could only do so while on foot or while driving/riding a bike to be wherever they want to be. An estimated 54% of households in New York City do not own a car, and rely on public transportation everyday. [MORE] All such persons, millions of people, would not be able to defend themselves with a gun in case of a confrontation, a core purpose of the 2nd Amendment. As such, said right is rendered 2nd class status under NY’s new law.

At any rate, ‘It is difficult to justify extending the “sensitive places” doctrine to places that are not schools or government buildings because there are few “longstanding” restrictions on other places.’ [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Freedomination – the liberty to choose the commitments, ideologies, covenants, contracts, judgments, and relationships that bind or restrain you within the Matrix. (See: The Matrix, Negative Hallucination, Phfreedom, Freedom & Liberty)

freedom peddlers – political agitators who fail to address the structured incapacity of most people for freedom and their inclination towards freedumb. Freedom peddlers talk about how free things are—but fail to mention the price of upkeep.

freedumb – the state of unrecognized psychological captivity (brain hemispheric hostage) that sheeple remain in because they don’t speak the language of reality nor constantly edit truth from perfecting heart to perfecting power—and when truth is spoken around them, refrain from being open, or impervious to it thus being forever chained to its distortions and limitations. 2) the mindset that proposes “since we are liberated, we are also free.” 3) the mindset that operates upon the notion that you can have individuality without accountability or responsibility. 4) the pretense that reality is truth and viceversa. People cherish unwarranted assumptions and relish their freedumb because they have been socialized into selfcensorship along with misidentification with the ego-mind—the absence of knowledge of Self. (See: Phfreedom, Truth, Unfreedom, Dumbelievers, Self, Belief Systems, Objective Truth, Individuality, Objective Reality, True Self & Reality)

Nevertheless, NY’s ban in all government buildings and schools is also unconstitutional. Although the Court has ruled that government schools and government buildings may be “sensitive places,” it never said all government buildings and all types of schools without regard to their nature and quality of business could meet such a designation. It’s obvious that all government buildings are not equal. Free standing public bathrooms, libraries, homeless shelters, DMV branch locations, sanitation dept etc for instance clearly rank low on the “sensitivity scale” compared to buildings like a courthouse or the Pentagon - - and far too low to strip an individual of his “guaranteed” right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals stated,

The White House lawn, although not a building, is just as sensitive as the White House itself. Consequently, the presumption of lawfulness for a regulation penalizing firearm possession there might approach the categorical. At the spectrum’s other end we might find a public park associated with no particular sensitive government interests—or a post office parking lot surrounding a run-of-the- mill post office. Perhaps such locations are “sensitive” in the sense that the government always has an interest in protecting its property or visitors. But without more concrete evidence of particular vulnerability, any presumption of lawfulness for a firearms regulation cannot control. Bonidy v. U.S. Postal Service, 790 F.3d 1121, 1138 (10th Cir. 2015).

Furthermore, Kopel explains that arms bans in all “schools” have very weak historical lineage.” As such NY’s blanket ban in all public and private schools and “their grounds” (which includes parking lots), including schools for professional adults, art students, private career schools, all colleges and universities is unconstitutional - as such places are not sensitive places.

Additionally, there is no legal or historical support for banning weapons in all public parks. [MORE] Federal and state courts have already struck similar prohibitions. The Supreme Court of Illinois held that a law prohibiting individuals from carrying or possessing arms within 1,000 feet of a public park violates the Second Amendment. The court disregarded the government’s argument that the public park was a sensitive place and it found that “the law severely burdened the core of the right to bear arms, because it prohibited the carriage of weapons for self-defense and it affected the entire law-abiding population of Illinois.” [MORE]. While it would appear that the federal government can regulate the possession of guns on “Its property” - but it cannot ban it.

Lastly, the NY prohibition of guns in Times Square appears to be a baseless unconstitutional contradiction to the Supreme Court ruling last month. Any busy downtown sidewalk may crowded — but sidewalks are not sensitive places. [MORE] The Court made it plain that merely because a place is crowded or busy does not magically transform it into a sensitive place. Explicitly rejecting such illogic, speaking for the Court Justice Thomas explained,

In their view, “sensitive places” where the government may lawfully disarm law-abiding citizens include all “places where people typically congregate and where law-enforcement and other public-safety professionals are presumptively available.” It is true that people sometimes congregate in “sensitive places,” and it is likewise true that law enforcement professionals are usually presumptively available in those locations. But expanding the category of “sensitive places” simply to all places of public congregation that are not isolated from law enforcement defines the category of “sensitive places” far too broadly. Respondents’ argument would in effect exempt cities from the Second Amendment and would eviscerate the general right to pub- licly carry arms for self-defense that we discuss in detail below. See Part III–B, infra. Put simply, there is no historical basis for New York to effectively declare the island of Manhattan a “sensitive place” simply because it is crowded and protected generally by the New York City Police Department. [MORE]

[Rotten to the Core] Freedom of Movement Restricted, 4th Amendment Rights Imaginary for Blacks in White, Liberal, Racist NYC: Data Shows NYPD are More Likely to Stop, Arrest, Search Black Motorists

From [HERE] Black drivers in New York City were more likely to have their vehicles searched or arrested than any other racial group in the first half of 2022, according to new city data shared with the Daily News.

When the race or ethnicity of drivers was known, about 4% of black drivers stopped were arrested, the data show. Approximately 3% of Latinos and 1% of Whites, Asians and Pacific Islanders who were stopped were eventually arrested.

Vehicle search percentages were the same — 4% of Black men stopped had their vehicles searched, compared to 3% of Latinos and 1% of Whites, as well as Asians and Pacific Islanders.

Around 8,154 arrests during motor vehicle stops led to arrests in the first half of 2022 – that is around 2% of the total of 358,895 stops.

More minority drivers are being pulled over by the NYPD, city data shared with the Daily News shows.

Police have stepped up traffic surveillance in the city since last winter, data shows.

The number of freeway stops increased by about 3% in the second three months of 2022, according to the data. From April through late June, NYPD officers made 182,142 traffic stops — 5,389 more than from January through March, when they made 176,753 traffic stops.

The growing number of vehicle stops affects the New York Civil Liberties Union, which says police need to be more vigilant to make fair decisions about who to stop.

“Given the long history of police bias over hitchhiking, it is alarming that the NYPD’s vehicle stop count is approaching 200,000 every three months,” said Christopher Dunn, NYCLU legal director. “This staggering number shows that there needs to be much more scrutiny into how drivers are treated by the NYPD.”

Black motorists accounted for 31% of cars stopped in the city in the first six months of 2022, when the driver race was known, the data shows. That’s out of all proportion to the city’s population, which is about 20% black, according to the Department of Urban Planning.

Latino motorists accounted for about 28% of cars stopped in the first half of 2022. That’s the city’s population, which is also about 28% Latino.

New data shows black drivers are more likely to be arrested than other groups in New York City. (Jeff Bachner/for New York Daily News)

White drivers accounted for 27% of traffic stops – slightly less than their 31% of the city’s population. Asian and Pacific islanders accounted for about 13% of traffic stops, while Asians make up about 16% of the urban population.

Although black drivers were more likely to be arrested, they were significantly less likely to receive subpoenas.

About 66% of black motorists stopped received a subpoena, NYPD data shows. About 72% of Whites, 77% of Asians and Pacific Islanders, and 84% of Latinos stopped received a subpoena.

The NYPD this year began releasing quarterly traffic stop data under a law passed by the City Council in 2021. When the data for the first quarter was released in May, the department said in a press release that motorists’ races over by police were “approximately proportional to the city’s overall racial demographics.”

COVID Injections are Killing Shocking Numbers of Doctors in Canada

From [HERE] Doctors all over Canada are dying due to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, with data suggesting that one doctor dies every other day due to the experimental jabs.

Entrepreneur and COVID-19 vaccine researcher Steve Kirsch noted that the data for the actual number of Canadian physicians being killed by the vaccines is difficult to find due to the refusal of Canadian mainstream media to cover the stories.

Fortunately, he and many other vaccine researchers have cobbled together enough information to paint a better picture of just how many doctors have died. (Related: 6 Fully jabbed doctors drop dead in Canada within days – experts baffled.)

One doctor interviewed by Kirsch noted that he had heard about at least 15 deaths of Canadian doctors over the last nine months. The doctor, who has been practicing for over 30 years, noted that he has never experienced any spike in unusual deaths of doctors before.

“Why is he now, all of a sudden, hearing of so many deaths, and why are these deaths all happening very soon after vaccination?” wrote Kirsch.

The researcher further noted that, from July 13 to July 28, seven doctors passed away, an average of one doctor every other day for two weeks.

Official causes of death were noted for being very unusual. Two of them died while swimming and another died in her sleep.

“The fact checkers assure us all that all of these doctors died for other reasons; the fact that they all died right after the vaccine was simply bad luck,” wrote Kirsch.

Hospitals and media all claim doctor deaths not related to vaccines

The deaths of the seven doctors made headline news because three of the seven doctors came from Mississauga Hospital in Ontario – a fact that nobody was able to deny.

The three doctors – Dr. Lorne Segall, Dr. Stephen McKenzie and Dr. Jakub Sawicki – all died within three days of each other, from July 17 to 21. Mainstream media outlets claimed that Segall and Sawicki had cancer – stage 4 lung and stage 4 gastric cancers, respectively – and McKenzie died of an “unspecified illness.”

On July 16, Dr. Paul Hannam, Chief of Emergency Medicine and Program Medical Director at North York General Hospital in Toronto, died. Hannam, 50, was an Olympic sailor and marathon runner in perfect health. His cause of death is still not being revealed, but both the hospital and corporate media have vehemently denied any links to the COVID-19 vaccines.

On July 23, Dr. Shahriar Jalali Mazlouman, 44, a family physician from the western province of Saskatchewan, was reported to have died in a swimming accident. Reports claim he was found dead at a local swimming pool, and his death is supposedly not related to the COVID-19 vaccines.

On July 26, Dr. Ryan Buyting, a neurosurgery resident working for the state-backed Alberta Health Services in Edmonton, passed away. He was only 26 years old and at his peak of health. He was described as having an exceptional work ethic. His death has not been officially attributed to a specific reason, making it very likely it was connected to the COVID-19 vaccine.

Finally, the seventh doctor to die within two weeks is Dr. Candace Nayman, 27, a pediatric resident at McMaster Children’s Hospital in Hamilton, Ontario. She is a triathlete and expert swimmer who collapsed while swimming.

Court Released FDA Data Reveals an 87% Miscarriage Rate During Pfizer's COVID Injection Trials. A CDC Study Shows the Miscarriage Rate is 82%. Israeli Study Shows Each COVID Shot Drops Sperm Count

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Since the rollout of the experimental COVID shots, U.S. health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women and their unborn babies

  • Meanwhile, now-released Pfizer court-ordered, released data — which the Food and Drug Administration wanted to hide for 75 years — reveal the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial

  • A CDC-sponsored study that was widely used to support the claim that the shot is safe during pregnancy misreported the data. The actual miscarriage rate in that paper was 82%

  • As of August 12, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID jab. For comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years is 2,239

  • Israeli research found the Pfizer COVID jab impairs male fertility for three months after each dose, dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared to baseline

From [MERCOLA PDF] Since the rollout of the experimental COVID shots, U.S. health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women, and have been urging all pregnant women to get the jab “to protect themselves and their babies.” To this day, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends the COVID shot for:1

“... people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future.”

The CDC further recommends:2

“People who are pregnant should stay up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines, including getting a COVID-19 booster when it’s time to get one.”

And claims:3

“Evidence continues to build showing that:

  • COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective.

  • There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in women or men.”

All the while, they’ve had Pfizer data showing the shots cause shocking rates of miscarriage which, adding insult to injury, have been blatantly miscategorized as a “recovered/resolved” adverse effect.4 Who in their right mind would consider DEATH a resolved side effect unless they had a depopulation agenda in mind all along?

I don’t see how this could be described as anything but a criminal cover-up. The only reason we know any of this is because U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to release Pfizer documents at a rate of 55,000 pages per month. The FDA and Pfizer had asked to release the documents at a pace of 500 pages per month, which meant it would take 75 years to disclose them all.5

Criminal Cover-Up 

Dr. Naomi Wolf recently reported that an analysis of Pfizer data revealed 44% of the women in the trial suffered miscarriages.6 That statistic turns out to have been the result of a miscalculation,7 as Pfizer listed the miscarriages in two separate columns, resulting in them being counted twice.

We’ve repeatedly found Pfizer’s data collection and reporting to be all over the place, and seemingly on purpose, to make hazards more difficult to ascertain. Wolf admitted the error and took down the original report. However, while fact checkers are gloating over the perceived victory, there’s plenty of other evidence in the Pfizer material to demonstrate these shots should be banned for all time.

In an August 20, 2022, Substack article, Dr. Pierre Kory addressed other, “absolutely horrifying,” findings on miscarriages found in the Pfizer data dumps:8

“... let’s do a dive on just one page of the many thousands. See below, Section 5.3.6, Page 12 of the document called ‘Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.’

Looking at the first bullet under the header: Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including:

In this paragraph, at first read, it is just a list of adverse events and numbers, detailed in a way that is confusing at best, and obfuscating at worst. I think it is the latter because, if you do some simple arithmetic trying to parse that paragraph, you end up with this:

270 pregnancies were reported in vaccinated women during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine campaign. In 238 of them, ‘no outcome was provided.’ So, they only knew the outcome of 32 pregnancies reported. What happened in those 32 pregnancies they followed up on?

My hands are literally trembling as I write this, but here goes. In these 32 pregnancies, there were:

• 23 spontaneous abortions

• 2 spontaneous abortions with intra-uterine death

So, 25 of the 32 pregnancies with known outcomes resulted in a miscarriage, a rate of 78%. Note that miscarriage normally occurs in only 12-15% of pregnancies

• 2 premature births with neonatal death

• 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death

• 1 normal outcome

Note that this only adds up to 29 known outcomes, but then they note that ‘two different outcomes were reported for each twin’ and then they talk about ‘fetus/baby cases as separate from mother cases.’ I have no idea how to interpret this explanation of outcomes, so it may have been one or two less (or more) deaths then.

So, of the 32 pregnancies they knew the outcome of, 87.5% resulted in the death of the fetus or neonate. Burying this data in the way and not alerting the world to what they found, is criminal activity ...”

To be perfectly clear, the failure to record and report the outcomes of 238 out of 274 pregnancies during a drug trial is simply unheard of. It’s shockingly unethical. And the fact that both the Food and Drug Administration and the CDC accepted this, and claim there’s “no evidence” of harm to pregnant women and their babies is proof positive of reprehensible maleficence.

There’s no fixing what’s gone wrong at the FDA and CDC. Their credibility with the public is ruined beyond any possible recovery. The CDC can review and reorganize itself all it wants, but it changes nothing. They are, to this day, urging pregnant women to take a shot that they KNOW will cause babies to die. Calling it a dystopia of epic proportions is a profoundly serious understatement.

CDC-Sponsored Study Also Tried to Hide Data

Need more evidence? How about the fact that the CDC-sponsored study9 published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in April 2021 — which was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected — also obfuscated data to hide a shockingly elevated miscarriage rate.

According to this paper, the miscarriage rate within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was 12.5%, which is only slightly above the normal average of 10%. (Looking at statistical data, the risk of miscarriage drops from an overall, average risk rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy as a whole, to just 5% between Weeks 6 and 7, all the way down to 1% between Weeks 14 and 20.10)

However, there’s a distinct problem with this calculation, as highlighted by Drs. Ira Bernstein, Sanja Jovanovic and Deann McLeod, HBSc, of Toronto. In a May 28, 2021, letter to the editor, they pointed out that:11

“In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their third-trimester (104/127 = 82%).”

In other words, when you exclude women who got the shot in their third trimester (since the third trimester is after week 20 and therefore should not be counted when determining miscarriage rate among those injected before week 20), the miscarriage rate is 82%. (The errors in that NEJM article were also reviewed in a Science, Public Health Policy and the Law paper12 published in November 2021.)

Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation, which strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during the first trimester is an absolute recipe for disaster. So, here was yet another attempt to hide the fact that more than 8 in 10 pregnancies may be terminated as a result of the jab.

As of August 12, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID jab.13 For comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years is 2,239.14

Birth Rates Are Suddenly Plummeting Worldwide

In addition to miscarriages, we’re also looking at abruptly plummeting birth rates, suggesting the COVID jabs are having an adverse impact on future fertility as well.

“They are large drops, and they are occurring, almost like clockwork, approximately 9 months after pregnant women around the world started to be vaccinated,” Kory notes.15

For example, Germany recently released data showing a 10% decline in birth rate during the first quarter of 2022.16

The live birth rate graph for Sweden looks much the same, with a 14% drop:17,18 According to Gunnar Anderson, a Swedish professor in demographics at Stockholm University, “We have never seen anything like this before, that the bottom just falls out in just one quarter.”19

Between January and April 2022, Switzerland’s birth rate was 15% lower than expected, the U.K.’s was down by 10% and Taiwan’s was down 23%.20,21,22 In Hungary, MP Dúró Dóra has expressed concern about a 20% drop in birth rate during January 2022, compared to January 2021.23

The U.S. is also showing signs of a drop in live births. Provisional data from North Dakota show a 10% decline in February 2022, 13% reduction in March and an 11% reduction in April, compared to the corresponding months in 2021.24

In the five countries with the highest COVID jab uptake, fertility has dropped by an average of 15.2%, whereas the five countries with the lowest COVID jab uptake have seen an average reduction of just 4.66%.

In a July 5, 2022, Counter Signal article, Mike Campbell reported that in the five countries with the highest COVID jab uptake, fertility has dropped by an average of 15.2%, whereas the five countries with the lowest COVID jab uptake have seen an average reduction of just 4.66%. Below is a chart from Birth Gauge25 on Twitter comparing live birth data for 2021 and 2022 in a large number of countries.

Many Women Report Menstrual Irregularities Post-Jab

High rates of menstrual irregularities post-jab are also a warning sign that reproductive capacity may be impacted. As of August 12, 2022, there were 31,443 VAERS reports of menstrual disorders.26

Changes include heavier and more painful periods27 and changes in menses length, as well as unexpected breakthrough bleeding or spotting among women on long-acting contraception or those who are postmenopausal and haven’t had a period in years or even decades.28

Health officials have tried to brush off the reports, but a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology — funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institutes of Health’s Office of Research on Women's Health — confirmed an association between menstrual cycle length and COVID-19 shots.29

According to the authors, it’s possible that the immune response created by the mRNA shots affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, which plays a well-known role in the timing of a woman’s cycle:30

“Our findings for individuals who received two doses in a single cycle supports this hypothesis. Given the dosing schedule of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (21 days for Pfizer and 28 days for Moderna), an individual receiving two doses in a single cycle would have received the first dose in the early follicular phase.

Cycle length variability results from events leading to the recruitment and maturation of the dominant follicle during the follicular phase ...”

Other Disturbing Evidence

A Japanese biodistribution study for Pfizer’s jab also showed the COVID spike protein from the shots accumulate in female ovaries and male testes,31,32 and there’s credible concern that the COVID jabs will cross-react with syncytin (a retroviral envelope protein) and reproductive genes in sperm, ova and placenta in ways that may impair fertility and reproductive outcomes.

A Pfizer-BioNTech rat study33 revealed the injection more than doubled the incidence of preimplantation loss (i.e., the risk of infertility), and led to mouth/jaw malformations, gastroschisis (a birth defect of the abdominal wall) and abnormalities in the right-sided aortic arch and cervical vertebrae.34,35 As noted by The Exposé:

“With this being the case, how on earth have medicine regulators around the world managed to state in their official guidance that ‘Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy’? And how have they managed to state ‘It is unknown whether the Pfizer vaccine has an impact on fertility’?

The truth of the matter is that they actively chose to cover it up. We know this thanks to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request36 made to the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).”

You can read more about that in The Exposé’s July 19, 2022, article, “FOIA Reveals Pfizer & Medicine Regulators Hid Dangers of COVID Vaccination During Pregnancy After Study Found It Increases Risk of Birth Defects & Infertility.”37

We’re also seeing a sudden uptick in infant mortality. The Exposé38 highlighted data from Scotland, showing neonatal deaths were 119% higher above the annual norm in March 2022.

COVID Jab Affects Male Fertility Too

Male fertility is also under attack by these bioweapons. Israeli research39,40 published in the journal Andrology found the Pfizer COVID jab temporarily but significantly impairs male fertility, dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared to baseline pre-jab.

Both eventually recovered, some three months after the last jab, but if you destroy a man’s sperm for three months every time he gets a COVID shot, you’re significantly reducing the probability of him fathering a child for a good part of any given year and the stats reviewed above support this.

Remember, the mRNA shots are recommended at three-month intervals for the original series, and boosters are now being recommended at varying intervals thereafter. In the video above, Amy Kelly, project director for the Daily Clout’s Pfizer document analysis team, reviews this study and other post-jab male fertility concerns.41

End the COVID Shots Now, Before It’s Too Late to Recover

In October 2021, when the FDA was voting on whether to authorize the COVID jab for children aged 5 through 11, Dr. Eric Rubin, an FDA advisory panel member, Harvard professor and editor-in-chief of the NEJM, stated:42

“We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes ... And I do think we should vote to approve it.”

So, in this and other instances, they’ve openly admitted that anyone who takes the jab is part of an experiment. Yet at the same time, the FDA and CDC have insisted that the jabs are perfectly safe — all while in possession of data showing they’re anything but! In conclusion, I agree with Kory, who writes:43

“... when a new medicine or device is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to be related to the intervention until proven otherwise. That is what I am doing here.

We must assume the vaccines are impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanations for a sudden drop in month to month birth rates. So stop the shots until you can prove they are not ...

Too many young people dying,44 too many becoming disabled, too many pregnancies resulting in fetal or neonatal death as above, and now we find out that if we continue with this vaccine obsession, they will not be replaced. This is a humanitarian catastrophe heaped atop the one caused by dangerous gain-of-function research. 

When will the world wake up to this rapidly unfolding horror? For those of us who know what is going on, it is hard not to feel helpless as we are forced to watch increasingly apparent and widespread needless death. But we will continue to try to get these truths out despite the massive censorship and propaganda overwhelming the globe. 

We have a moral and ethical obligation and take that responsibility seriously no matter what befalls us. Stop the vaccines, now. And if we can’t stop them, we must try to convince everyone we know to no longer agree to get vaccinated. Their lives and our future depend on it.”

- Sources and References

The Government is Trying to Kill Us: CDC Data Shows 45 Children Died After Getting a COVID Shot. 27 (60 %) were Healthy Before Injection. In the Past, any "Vaccine" Would Have Been Pulled by Now

From [JOELSMALLEY] and [HERE] In the US states alone, there have been 45 reports of children dying after receiving the COVID “vaccine” up to July 2022.

27 of these children (60%) were perfectly healthy beforehand.

It seems to me that three of the children who died took part in the clinical trials or a sponsored program by the manufacturer(s) where the expectation is that the report should go directly to them and for them to act appropriately on it.

In the past, any vaccine (proper ones) would have been pulled after 25 to 50 deaths of people of all ages, let alone children, let alone three during the clinical trials / sponsored programs.

The regulatory agencies and “vaccine” manufacturers have consistently denied causality.

Nevertheless, the temporal proximity of symptoms onset to “vaccination” date alone, for the majority of reports, indicates causality. 

It is also possible that many other deaths were not reported if they did not occur close to the “vaccination” date.

In addition, the majority of the causes of death are blood-clotting and cardiac-related.

Temporal proximity and consistency are two of the key Bradford Hill criteria1 to establish causality2.

So, what is the stopping condition for this, the most deadly therapeutic ever released on mankind?

Why are parents even letting their children have it given that the risk of death from COVID for a healthy child is near enough zero?

So, what is the stopping condition for this, the most deadly therapeutic ever released on mankind?

Why are parents even letting their children have it given that the risk of death from COVID for a healthy child is near enough zero?

In addition to the deaths, there were 1,892 other reports of serious adverse events:

  1. admission to Emergency Room

  2. hospitalisation

  3. permanent disability

  4. birth defects

  5. life-threatening events. [MORE]

Coercivist Liberals in DC Extend the Deadline for its Genocidal COVID Injection Mandate for Mostly Black School Kids after a Black Judge Overturns its Unconstitutional DC Government Worker Mandate

From [CHD] In a significant about-face, government officials in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 26 postponed a policy that would have required proof of vaccination for COVID-19 for all students age 12 and over for the new school year — just days after announcing the policy.

This announcement comes on the face of a related development, just one day prior, when D.C. Superior Court judge Maurice Ross struck down the district’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for government workers. The policy had been challenged by the D.C. Police Union earlier in the year.

DC school vaccine mandate postponed to January after concerns raised

In an Aug. 26 letter to school officials in the district, Deputy Mayor for Education Paul Kihn introduced a “staggered” approach for the implementation and enforcement of the district’s school vaccine mandate.

Under the new policy, students 12 and older now have a Jan. 3, 2023, deadline to receive the two-dose primary series of COVID-19 vaccines, after which they would face expulsion.

According to Kihn, the aim of this new approach is to provide school administrators “additional time to prepare and for students to get their COVID-19 vaccinations.”

Remarking on the postponement of the district’s policy, Mary Holland, president and general counsel of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), told The Defender:

“The district imposed a back-to-school COVID shot mandate that no other public school district in the country has imposed — and just walked it back to January 2023 from its proposed deadline in early September.

“The district has enacted dangerous policies that deny people the informed consent to which they are entitled by law. I am pleased that the courts have played a constructive role in checking some of the district’s worst abuses.”

District of Columbia Public Schools requires students who are of an age where a COVID-19 vaccine has received “full FDA approval” to receive the vaccine in order to be permitted to enroll.

Under the previous policy, reiterated by Mayor Muriel Bowser in early August and again on Aug. 25 at a press conference, students age 12 and over were mandated to provide proof of vaccination within the first 20 days of the new school year.

Responding to a question from the Daily Signal during the press conference, Bowser had strongly implied that students who did not furnish proof within the 20-day window would be expelled.

She said:

“[Students] can go to school on Monday, but they need to get their vaccinations … and their families will be alerted as to the dates.

“We’re not offering remote learning for children, and families will need to comply with what is necessary to come to school.”

The press conference was followed up with a press release issued the same day by District of Columbia Public Schools, in which the mayor said she was “excited to welcome our students, families, and staff back to school” — but left out those students who were unvaccinated.

Previously, in announcing the mandate for the upcoming school year, Dr. Thomas Farley, D.C. Health’s senior deputy director for community health administration, said that “schools haven’t been diligent in enforcing this [mandate] for a while, so parents may think they can be lax about it this year.”

“But this year we’re really very serious,” he continued. “Your child needs to be brought up to date in order to continue to attend school.”

In an interview prior to the postponement of the mandate, Kihn expressed concerns that an insufficient vaccination rate, combined with a lack of enforcement of the mandate, would lead to “outbreaks.”

He said:

“What we’re concerned about, and what D.C. Health is concerned about, is the challenge if we don’t do the enforcement.

“If we have a 70 or 75 percent immunization rate, that’s low enough for us to be concerned about outbreaks.”

Even with the recently announced postponement, the district’s vaccine mandate for school children remains in place. It is based on the Coronavirus Immunization of School Students and Early Childhood Workers Amendment Act of 2021, which obliges students age 12 and over to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

According to the Daily Signal, this makes the district an “outlier” in the U.S., “as many of the larger school districts recommend but do not require a COVID-19 vaccine in order to attend school in person.”

Indeed, Fox 5 Washington has characterized the mandate as the strictest in the country.

The impact of the mandate, if implemented with the start of the new school year, would have been significant. According to D.C. Health, approximately 22,000 students in the district’s public and charter schools are not “fully” vaccinated for COVID-19.

While district authorities claim that the postponement is to allow more time for school officials to process vaccination records, the mandate drew opposition from a variety of actors, ranging from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) to Republican lawmakers.

For instance, the district’s own data shows the lowest rates of COVID-19 vaccination are among Black students, approximately 40% of whom are unvaccinated or not “fully” vaccinated.

Put differently, this would have meant that up to 40% of Black students would have been at risk of expulsion for non-compliance with the mandate.

This prompted the NAACP D.C. branch to claim that the district’s vaccine mandate will unfairly impact minority students.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) referenced the lower rate of vaccination for African American students in a statement regarding a motion he filed that would have shielded the district’s students from the mandate. The motion was blocked by Senate Democrats.

“In D.C., the rate of vaccination for students 12 to 15 is 85 percent,” said Cruz in his statement. “For African American students, the rate drops to 60 percent.”

A separate letter sent by three Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives to Bowser on Aug. 18, called upon the mayor to “immediately stop the enforcement of the district’s unreasonable vaccine mandate for students ages 12 and older.”

The letter also characterized the district as “far outside the educational mainstream in mandating a vaccine on school-aged children.”

Oddly, Bowser, during the Aug. 25 press conference, suggested the number of unvaccinated students is lower than the district’s own data indicates.

She said:

“The actual percentages are likely higher because not all vaccines administered outside of the district are known to D.C. Health.

“The race-specific coverage number is particularly likely to be an underestimate because the COVID-19 vaccination records D.C. Health does receive from outside of the district often do not include both age and race.”

She did not provide an explanation as to why there would be such significant numbers of students, especially on a race-specific basis, who reside in the district and attend the district’s schools, but were vaccinated outside the district.

According to Bowser though, expelling students from school “doesn’t have to happen,” statingthat they can, for instance, visit “pop-ups” — referring to pop-up vaccination clinics that were in operation during the summer months and which will remain open in the coming weeks.

Kihn, in his statement, claimed that “we have heard from many of you about the challenges of tracking enforcement for COVID-19 vaccinations.”

Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist and epidemiologist who is a critic of COVID-19 mandates and restrictions, suggested in her blog that harsh headlines against the district’s mandate in the local media, Thursday’s court ruling striking down the mandate for D.C. government workers and the negative publicity that likely would result from the mass expulsion of students, particularly African-Americans, may have resulted in the about-face.

In the same blog post, Nass also noted that while the district’s schools require the COVID-19 vaccine for the age groups for which the vaccines are “fully licensed” by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in reality, “none of the ‘licensed’ vaccine [is] available,” and as a result, “it is not possible to procure the licensed product.”

Instead, says Nass, schoolchildren “are being injected with the EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] product, which is shielded from virtually all liability.”

Download for Free: Robert F. Kennedy's New Book — ‘A Letter to Liberals’

Nevertheless, major school districts walked back their mandates — except for the District of Columbia, according to Nass.

She wrote:

“Schools on the west coast that imposed these mandates either withdrew them in the face of legal challenge (LAUSD challenged by the Health Freedom Defense Fund) or announced a year’s postponement last spring.”

According to Holland, this may be, at least in part, due to the unique nature of the district’s local government.

She explained:

“The District of Columbia is unique in the country as it has only a city council to legislate. Most states have two legislative chambers, a Senate and an Assembly, creating a check on the policies of one chamber.

“The mayor and city council’s irrational and draconian COVID policies underscore the wisdom of checks and balances in government.”

Previously, Bowser had attempted to allow schoolchildren as young as 11 to be vaccinated without parental permission. CHD successfully sued to challenge this policy, which was struck down in March 2022.

Holland, in commenting on the district’s policies and CHD’s previous successful lawsuit against the district, told The Defender:

“The district has created more aggressive, harmful COVID measures than any other state. It attempted to allow 11-year-olds and older to receive COVID shots without parental knowledge or consent. CHD sued, and the federal court granted a preliminary injunction.

“The district mandated COVID shots for workers, and a court just ruled against it.”

CHD has threatened to sue the district in an attempt to strike down the vaccine mandate for students in D.C. schools.

The D.C. mayor’s office did not reply to a request from The Defender for comment by press time.

Government worker mandate struck down in court

Just one day prior to the postponement of the district’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for schoolchildren, a D.C. Superior Court judge ruled that the district’s vaccination mandate for government employees is unlawful, striking it down.

The ruling was issued by Judge Maurice A. Ross, following a lawsuit filed by the D.C. Police Union earlier in the year.

The district’s vaccine mandate for government employees was imposed in August 2021, requiring them to be “fully” vaccinated for COVID-19 by Feb. 15, 2022, or to apply for a medical or religious exemption by that date. Otherwise, they would face disciplinary actions, under a tiered system, up to and potentially including termination.

An option for government workers to opt-out of the mandate by furnishing weekly COVID-19 tests was removed by the district in November 2021.

However, according to Ross’ ruling, the D.C. mayor “lacks legal authority to impose a vaccine mandate,” which instead should have been passed into law by the D.C. council.

Specifically, Ross, in his decision, wrote that “the power to issue a vaccine mandate must come from a legislative body.”

He added that the District of Columbia Police Officers Standards and Training Board had the ability to set its own health standards.

The ruling requires the district to no longer enforce the mandate and also to withdraw any disciplinary proceedings it took against workers who had not complied.

In a statement, Bowser said:

“We are reviewing the court’s ruling, and believe that the judge misunderstood the strength and diversity of the authorities we relied upon in issuing the employee vaccination mandate.

“Over the past year and a half, we have seen that COVID-19 vaccines work — they keep people out of the hospital and save lives.

“Going forward, we will comply with the court’s orders as we continue encouraging our community to access life-saving vaccines.”

Gregg Pemberton, chairman of the D.C. Police Union, also issued a statement following the ruling.

He said:

“This is a significant victory for our union that protects the rights of our members and ensures that they will no longer be forced to receive the COVID-19 vaccine against their will and will no longer be subjected to discipline for deciding not to receive the vaccine.

“This has been a long and unnecessary fight. Had the mayor just engaged the union in good faith bargaining, we could have reached a reasonable compromise that protected everyone’s interests.

“Nonetheless, we are pleased that Judge Ross agreed with our arguments and issued this ruling. Now, all of our members can go back to doing the necessary work of trying to protect our communities from crime and violence without unlawful threats of discipline and termination.”

According to the Washington Post, 90% of government employees in the district were “fully” or partially vaccinated as of March 28. More recent data is not available.

Uninformed Consent: Mike Tyson Seen in a Wheelchair in Airport. Previously He Said He was Coerced into Getting COVID Injections to Make a Living, "Beaten Into Submission" to Take Experimental Shot

VIDEO ABOVE IS FROM 10/6/2021. VIDEO BELOW IS FROM THIS WeEK

UNINFORMED CONSENT. In video above Tyson said he was in a wheelchair because he has sciatica, which causes extreme nerve pain. It also appears to be one of the many, many undisclosed adverse effects from the genocidal COVID injections imposed onto the public.

Experimenting on people with “medical treatment” is barbaric. Voluntary consent requires a participant to be “fully informed” of all potential dangers, risks and benefits. If you believe in such things as “rights,” Ignored by simpleton, hypocritical and violent liberals is the right to refuse medical treatment and the right to refuse experimental medicines. Also, the first principle of the Nuremberg Code states:

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

Statist citizens go on defending their slavery as freedom and pretend that they are consenting to things that are voluntarily provided by the government. Folks are in a deep sleep, government services are compulsory; you can either obey or go to jail or die. There is nothing voluntary or mutual about it. The belief in authority is the most dangerous superstition ever known to man and is a curse upon mankind.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

vaccination – mandatory infection—typically administered by agents of Corporate State in their public schools of indoctrination camps. How can unvaccinated children endanger other children who are immunized?

biocide – the attempted annihilation of all life, which is the intent of Doggy and CrimethInc. (See: Doggy & CrimethInc.)

citizens – those who instinctively seek permission or ask themselves whether or not they are allowed to do anything before they act. Citizens (serfs, subjects or slaves), possess a “ruled” mind-virus mentality. 2) the hapless residents of the great democracy whose Constitution deliberately throttled democratic rule. (See: Citizenship, Plutocracy & Slavery) citizen’s arrest – assisted suicide. Citizen’s arrest is a joke and will get you injured or even killed which isn’t a

Doomsayers have Been Making Dead Wrong Predictions About Climate Disaster for Decades [environmentalism– a belief system of eugenics and population control offered to the masses by the Pathocracy]

Doomsayers have Been Making Dead Wrong Predictions About Climate Disaster for Decades [environmentalism– a belief system of eugenics and population control offered to the masses by the Pathocracy]

“ALREADY TOO LATE!” From [HERE] Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today.

None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.

What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science.

More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science.

While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited.

Read More

A State of ‘Maze-Ment:’ 'Today Corpse Biden Opened a Pack of Paper and Drank from a Cup All by Himself... so the Victories are Piling Up!' Dem's State Media Pretend 10k is Big Money for Student Loans

THE INTERCEPT’S NEW DOCUMENTARY, “Freedom Dreams: Black Women and the Student Debt Crisis,” profiles Black women educators and activists struggling under the weight of tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, in student loan debt. The title is inspired by scholar and activist Robin D. G. Kelley’s eponymous book, and the film is narrated by former Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner, a longtime ally of the growing debt abolition movement. [MORE] and [MORE] and [MORE] and [MORE]

As defined in FUNKTIONARY:

maze – a fortified network of oversimplified logics and programmed attachments with strong emotional charges (connected to the attachments) severely hampering one in achieving lasting satisfaction from Life and clarification in Life. In a state of a ‘mazement’ learning is suspended and experiences which need to be assimilated are repressed. The cheddar-chasers say: “Don’t bother me, I know what I have to do to get what I want.” You would be amazed to learn how simple (not easy) it is to escape the smoke alarm reaction filled haze of the mighty maze. 2) a system of interconnecting multicursal pathways replete with blind alleys, twists and turns, false choices and unknown exit points often designed to confuse or confound the traveler. Mazes can be used to spiral through the rungs of our evolution in consciousness both infinitely extendable and expandable. (See: Cementality, Meditativeness, BLYND, Generalizations, Absolute Truth, Psylence, Critical Thought, Me-Bot, Understanding, Logic, Identifications, Mindful Witnessing, Souljourn, Consciousness, Clarity & Neuralasticity)

debtor – one who works directly and indirectly for the bank. (See: Usury, “Monetized Debt” & Bankster)

debt – (Latin) debeo, meaning “I owe;” obligation to pay; the undelivered (not received) portion of an exchange. Debt is an ingenious substitute for the chain and whip of the fascist slave-driver. Debt used as “money” does more than stimulate and shackle those who labor in an economy—it also compels them to conform and make them behave. People construct their own financial cages with bars of debt, usury as a lock, interest being the key, and the warden a loan ranger “bankster,” and there is no parole for those on debt-rolls of debt-row. We really don’t fully comprehend debt nor its implications as a conduit for exchanges. The power differential of debt and compound interest is mind-numbing. Our global economic system is based entirely on bank created imaginary debt-proliferation—exacerbating the complexity, velocity and magnitude of socioeconomic, environmental and psychological problems the world over while devaluing the notion of any holistic or meaningful life. Debt-based so-called “monetary systems” are a parasite and plague to natural economies and voluntary exchange. Debt extends and pretends forever (the imaginary exponential debt expansion system). Debt is a word which almost no writers and mendicant-minded pundits on monetary theory and practice seem too definite. Running into debt (secret slavery) is not so bad, it’s just that running into your alleged creditors can be embarrassing—despite credit being no thing. Debt-as-money (imaginary demand) is in reality nothing more than the illusion of wealth. When what we use as (if it were) “money” is imaginary debt, there can be no freedom. (See: Debth, “Credit,” “Monetized Debt,” UCC, Co-Surety, FRACTURE, Thing, Political Money, IRS, Flag Money, Cultural Induction, Gangbanking & Debtonation)

The Rewards/Punishments of White Supremacy: Authorities Send Derek Chauvin to a Safer, Whiter Prison in Arizona while Kevin Rashad Johnson (Black Panther) is Being Denied Cancer Treatment in VA Prison

From [HERE] The white Minneapolis police officer convicted of killing George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, was transferred to a federal prison in Tucson Wednesday, Aug. 24.

According to a CBS report, Derek Chauvin was transferred from the Minnesota Correctional Facility in Oak Park Heights to the Federal Correctional Institution - Tucson.

FCI Tucson, 8901 S. Wilmot Road, is a medium-security U.S. penitentiary that houses 266 inmates. Said prison is a safer prison as it had the fewest number of “prohibited acts” among all federal prisons according to the Department of Justice. Also it has a reputation for having better communication, visitation, education, and programming than other federal facilities.

It also appears to be an overwhelmingly white prison. A Black inmate from DC commented recently that USP Tucson is “one of the most racist institutions [he has] ever been in.” [MORE]

U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson suggested when sentencing Chauvin that he be placed near family who live between Iowa and Minnesota. But federal officials are not bound by judicial requests.

Chauvin is serving more than 20 years for the murder and for violating Floyd’s civil rights.

Floyd’s killing sparked protests worldwide over police brutality and racism.

Chauvin, who is white, sat on Floyd’s neck on the the pavement for more than nine minutes as the Black man pleaded over and over , “I can’t breathe,” and murdered him.

Earlier in July, former officer Thomas Lane was sentenced to 2 ½ years. He's been ordered to report to a low-security federal prison camp in Colorado later this month. [MORE]

Meanwhile black inmates are routinely denied medical treatment in foul state and federal prisons. Kevin Rashad Johnson, a Black Panther, is being denied cancer treatment at the Nottaway Correctional Centre, a state prison in Burke Virginia. Johnson is a realitarian known for his heavy Artillery. Tests he took last October and November indicated that he had prostrate cancer but no biopsy was performed until April and the results reported to him on July 1. Eleven of 13 biopsies are positive for prostate cancer. Although he needs treatment to begin immediately prison authorities have nevertheless refused to provide care. [MORE] Johnson has asked anyone concerned to send a letter or email to the prison orderlies listed below. He has proposed the following letter but feel free to change it as you like:

“My name is _______________________. My friend Kevin Johnson,#1007485, housed at Nottoway, just learned from the prison doctor that he has prostate cancer. Tests he took last October and November indicated that diagnosis almost certainly, but no biopsy was performed until April and the results reported to him on July 1. Eleven of 13 biopsies are positive for prostate cancer.

“Cancer kills, and it can kill fast. A friend with prostate cancer says his treatment started immediately upon diagnosis in an effort to stop the cancer from spreading to his lymph nodes and on to his bones, where it would be fatal. The Virginia Department of Corrections has already failed in its responsibility to provide even minimal care. Mr. Johnson’s thousands of supporters are shocked to hear of these inexcusably long delays in diagnosis. The best possible treatment must begin now. No obstacle must be allowed to cause further delay.”


Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Harold W. Clarke
VADOC
P.O. Box 26963
Richmond, VA 23261
(804) 674-3000
docmail@vadoc.virginia.gov

Director of Health Services, VADOC
Steve Herrick
healthservicesinquiries@vadoc.virginia.gov
(804) 887-8118

Warden Clint Davis
Nottoway Correctional Center
2892 Schutt Rd.
Burkeville, VA 23922
(434) 767-5543

The Affirmative Action of White Supremacy: Louisville Jewish Community Hires a White Cop Involved in the Murders of Breonna Taylor and David McAtee, a Restaurant Owner Shot to Death During a Protest

From [HERE] The largest Jewish community organization in Louisville, Kentucky is facing criticism for hiring a police officer who was at the scene during the police killings of Breonna Taylor and David McAtee, both in 2020.

Josh Judah, a retired white lieutenant colonel with the Louisville Metro Police Department (in photo), was hired to serve as a security advisor for The Jewish Community of Louisville, an umbrella group that includes Louisville’s Jewish Community Center and Jewish Federation.

Judah was at the scene of the raid at Breonna Taylor’s apartment in March of 2020, when police carried out a no-knock search warrant and shot the young Black woman six times. He reportedly confirmed another officer’s untrue claims that Taylor was on the floor and armed with a rifle. Four current and former Louisville police, not including Judah, face federal civil rights and unlawful conspiracy charges in her death.

Judah’s new role includes overseeing the JCL’s SAFE Louisville initiative, which includes running security operations of Jewish institutions and organizations across Kentucky, responding to antisemitic threats and incidents and supervising community safety trainings. In the role, Judah is the full-time representative in Louisville of the Secure Community Network, a national Jewish security service founded by the Jewish Federations of North America and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.

Judah was also involved in the events surrounding the death of David McAtee, a Black restaurant owner shot by police and the National Guard during the nationwide protests against police brutality in 2020. Judah had dispatched police to disperse a crowd gathering outside McAtee’s restaurant, where there was a party in violation of the city’s 9:00 p.m. curfew. Police fired pepper balls into the crowd, McAtee responded by firing two shots, and the Louisville police and National Guard fired back. A bullet struck McAtee in the chest and killed him.

McAtee’s family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the National Guard members and police officers involved, including Judah. The civil case will go to trial in April 2023.

According to NPR affiliate station WFPL, a few members of the Louisville Jewish community had circulated a petition to JCL leaders criticizing the hire, saying it could “threaten the safety and comfort” of Jews of color and create a rift between the Black and Jewish communities.

“While many members of Jewish communities have grown accustomed to having a police presence in our spaces, and feel more secure due to this presence, this positive association is not universal,” the petition says. “Inviting law enforcement into a space does not guarantee all those in that space will be, or feel, protected equally.” [MORE]

THE WORLD IS 90% NON-WHITE BUT EVERYWHERE WHITES AND BLACKS LIVE TOGETHER THE WHITES ARE IN CONTROL. THERE IS NO SYSTEM OF BLACK SUPREMACY ANYWHERE IN EXISTENCE.

World of 7 Billion People

According to FUNKTIONARY

Racism White Supremacy - psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." -Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, MD. Hate and oppression can never reign. Only love is supreme.

People who classify themselves as White, who wish to be taken seriously, and who are righteous and responsible, will only talk about ending White Supremacy (Racism) and replacing it with Justice. [MORE]

New racist texts reveal Torrance cops talked about hurting and killing Black suspects

From [HERE] The day after Torrance police shot Christopher DeAndre Mitchell in 2018, his mother and a dozen of his loved ones staged a protest outside the department’s headquarters.

At the same time, a group of officers — including the two who had killed Mitchell — were discussing the situation via text message.

“Was going to tell you all those [N-word] family members are all pissed off in front of the station,” one wrote, according to court documents recently reviewed by The Times. 

Court records show the officers later mused about what might happen once the identities of those who shot the 23-year-old became public. 

“Gun cleaning Party at my house when they release my name??” one asked.

And earlier this year, another trove of offensive texts came to light. 

In response to a court filing from officers implicated in the scandal, the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office submitted an exhibit containing all 390 “anti-Semitic, racist, homophobic or transphobic remarks” allegedly made by the officers between 2018 and 2020. The documents, which were heavily redacted, included the comments about Mitchell’s loved ones and contained racist cartoons of Black and Latino residents as well as remarks about lynching suspects and killing Black children. 

Officers have long been trying to suppress evidence of the texts, which were found last year shortly before prosecutors charged former Torrance police officers Christopher Tomsic and Cody Weldin with spray-painting a swastika inside a car.

A search warrant executed as part of that case found Tomsic, Weldin and at least 15 other officers had been exchanging racist, violent and homophobic messages for years, court records show. The officers’ attorneys argued the search went way beyond the scope of the criminal investigation, so most of the texts should be barred from use in prosecutions or internal disciplinary hearings.

Ironically, it was that move to suppress the texts that made them available, after the district attorney’s office filed its report on the messages in court.

Tomsic and Weldin left the police department in 2020 after the swastika incident. A spokesman wouldn’t say if they were fired or resigned.

If the city doesn’t act soon, other officers implicated in the texting scandal could avoid discipline. Under state law, officers generally must face discipline within one year of their agency learning about alleged misconduct. Records show the district attorney’s office recovered all of the racist messages last August, though it’s unclear when Torrance officials reviewed them.

Police Chief Jeremiah Hart declined to comment. Sgt. Mark Ponegalek, a Torrance police spokesman, declined to answer questions from The Times, citing ongoing investigations. But he insisted the agency is working toward reform and noted Torrance police have held meetings with state investigators and provided them with roughly 100,000 pages of documents.

Those affected by the officers under investigation said the seeming lack of action in Torrance is terrifying, but not surprising. 

Sheila Bates, a Black Lives Matter organizer who has accused some of the officers of assault, said the department “cannot hold these officers accountable …They cannot keep the public safe.”

“They cannot keep their Black residents safe,” she continued.

Dirul Robinson’s case is one of dozens affected by the texting scandal. 

The 47-year-old was driving away from a gathering for a deceased friend in 2018 when he was stopped by police for playing loud music and failing to signal before making a lane change, according to court records and his attorney, Ty Anis. 

Robinson — who had multiple prior arrests and served time in state prison for assault — asked the officers to issue him a citation and let him leave, Anis said. The officers ordered him out of the car instead. 

Robinson, who is Black, suspected he was being racially profiled and refused. He alleged that officers drew their guns without provocation, leading him to panic and flee the scene, according to court records.

He was arrested on suspicion of evading police, resisting arrest and causing a hit-and-run crash. After a preliminary hearing in February 2020, Robinson accepted a plea deal that would send him to prison for 32 months. 

But something about the case gnawed at Anis.

Dashboard camera footage from the scene had cut out between the initial stop and Robinson’s flight — the time frame when Robinson said the officers had pointed guns at him, according to court filings. One of the arresting officers, Joshua Satterfield, was unavailable to testify at Robinson’s preliminary hearing and officials never said why, according to Anis. 

More than a year later, Anis received a letter from the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office. Satterfield was involved in the texting scandal, at one point referring to a Black child as a “nigglet,” according to court records. Two other officers involved in the stop and chase, Tomsic and Christopher Allen-Young, had also been implicated in the scandal, records show.

Anis filed a motion to withdraw Robinson’s plea, claiming prosecutors had failed to turn over evidence impeaching the officers who arrested his client. 

The case was thrown out earlier this year, after prosecutors joined a motion to toss all charges against Robinson except for the hit-and-run allegation.

Anis said he would not have let his client plead guilty if he had known about the officers’ text messages. Robinson’s son was born shortly before he was sent to prison, and he missed the baby’s earliest days as a result of the plea deal.

Greg Risling, a spokesman for the district attorney’s office, said there is not currently a criminal investigation into allegations that the officers needlessly pointed guns at Robinson or deleted camera footage.

Tom Yu, an attorney representing Satterfield, dismissed Robinson’s allegations and questioned whether Robinson’s attorney was “smoking crack.”

“I think Josh is a hell of a street cop,” Yu said. “He arrests white people, Black people, Hispanic people.”

At least 113 cases in which officers linked to the scandal were involved in arrests or would have been material witnesses have been dismissed by city and county prosecutors, according to documents provided in response to public records requests. 

“In hindsight, do I wish I’d stalled on the case and kept it going longer? Yes. But at that point in time, I had nothing else,” said Anis, a former L.A. County prosecutor. “It was basically Dirul’s word against these two Torrance cops.”

The hateful text messages exchanged by Torrance police officers have largely been kept out of view. Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. George Gascón acknowledged their existence during an August 2021 news conference, but any disclosures made to defense attorneys about them were filed under seal. 

Although The Times identified most of the officers in the scandal last December, the newspaper was able to review only snippets of conversations. A week later, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge severely limited what prosecutors could share about the scandal.

But the legal fight stemming from the criminal case against Tomsic and Weldin led prosecutors to enter a heavily redacted report on the text messages into a public court file earlier this year. Among previously unreported texts were gruesome promises of indiscriminate violence against Black people.

One officer shared pictures of tiny coffins intended to house the bodies of Black children they would “put down.” Another described how he would brutally execute suspects. 

Sherlyn Haynes, center, mother of Christopher DeAndre Mitchell, is escorted out of a 2019 Torrance City Council meeting for yelling and swearing at the mayor.

(Myung J. Chun/Los Angeles Times)

“Lucky I wasn’t out and about,” one officer wrote in response to a text about Black men robbing someone in Torrance, according to the records. “D.A. shoot team asking me why they are all hung by a noose and shot in the back of the head 8 times each.”

An attorney for the union representing rank-and-file Torrance police officers did not respond to requests for comment.

The officers’ racist exchanges ranged from vague offensive memes and cartoons about Black and Latino men to comments about specific people they had interacted with. Black suspects were repeatedly referred to with racial slurs. On more than one occasion, officers referenced specific acts of violence against Mitchell’s family and their supporters. 

Two of the officers The Times has previously linked to the scandal — Matthew Concannon and Anthony Chavez — fatally shot Mitchell when he was in the driver’s seat of a stolen car. Authorities said Mitchell had an air rifle in his lap, ignored orders to exit the vehicle and moved his hands toward the weapon before officers opened fire.

The district attorney’s office, then led by Jackie Lacey, declined to charge the officers, but Gascón reopened the case and last year hired a special prosecutor to review the shooting. Attempts to contact Concannon and Chavez have been unsuccessful. Risling declined to offer an update on the review of Mitchell’s death.

After a protest over Mitchell’s killing took place during a 2019 City Council meeting, one of the officers sent a text describing the demonstrators as “savages,” according to court records. Other messages referenced striking Mitchell’s mother, Sherlyn Haynes, with a baton and bragged about injuring another protester with a “takedown.”

Sherlyn Haynes, center, speaks at Torrance City Hall in 2019.

(Courtesy of Peter Carr)

Bates, the Black Lives Matter-Los Angeles organizer, said she confronted the officer who she said hit Mitchell’s mother the night of the protest. In response, Bates said, several officers threw her into a row of chairs and dogpiled on top of her. Bates was arrested on suspicion of disrupting a public meeting, though charges were never filed. 

In a lawsuit against the department, she identified one of the officers who attacked her as Brian Kawamoto. Last year, records reviewed by The Times showed Kawamoto sent the message referring to protesters as “savages.” In other texts, he said he “wanted to make Torrance great again” in response to another officer’s comment about beating a suspect, according to records reviewed by The Times. 

Three other officers implicated in the racist text scandal — Allen-Young, Andrew Kissinger and Omar Alonso — have also been accused of using excessive force at that protest, according to other lawsuits filed by people hurt that night.

“It really added insult to injury ... to know, that they not only came after me because of me speaking up, but also because of who I am, being a Black woman,” Bates said. “It’s racism that is intrinsic to who they are, but it’s also racism that has deadly consequences.”

The city agreed to pay $500,000 to settle Bates’ lawsuit earlier this year after receiving a motion to turn over the text messages as discovery in her case, according to her attorney, Erin Darling. 

Bates’ suit is one of several in which attorneys say fear of disclosing the texts cost the city heavily.

The family of Deautry Ross, a Black man who died in a 2018 struggle with several officers, including Tomsic, settled its wrongful death case against the city for $3 million last year after requesting the text messages, according to civil rights attorney DeWitt Lacy. 

Mitchell’s family was awarded $7.8 million in a settlement this year after a judge granted their discovery request for records tied to the “text message scandal” dating back to 2016, according to court records and the family’s attorney, Peter Carr. 

More legal bills are likely coming. Both Robinson and Kiley Swaine, the man whose car officers allegedly spray-painted a swastika inside of, have sued the department.

Despite the mounting legal bills and pile of cases dismissed due to the alleged misconduct, almost all of the officers linked to the texting scandal remain employed by the Torrance Police Department. And there’s a chance it could stay that way.

Yu, who represents Weldin, Chavez, Satterfield and officer David Chandler in separate civil and criminal matters, filed a motion earlier this year arguing the warrant that netted the texts was overly broad and evidence collected from it should not be used against the officers in disciplinary proceedings.

The warrant, other attorneys have argued, should have only given investigators access to messages sent or received by Weldin and Tomsic related to the alleged vandalism incident.

“The bottom line is, if I sent a message to my co-worker about how I feel about certain people, why did the police have the constitutional right to seize that and use that against me?” Yu asked. “If I’m making an enforcement act as a police officer, and I’m not making the enforcement decision based on how I feel, then who cares about how I feel?”

A ruling on the motion to suppress evidence in the case is expected by the end of September. 

Under state law, police officers normally cannot be disciplined for misconduct “if the investigation of the allegation is not completed within one year” of its discovery. Records show the district attorney’s office extracted the texts from Tomsic and Weldin’s phones last August. But internal affairs interviews with some of the officers implicated in the scandal only began in April, records show. 

It remains unclear when exactly Torrance police obtained that extraction report. Chandler is also facing a criminal prosecution for shooting a man in the back, which could extend the timeline in his case. 

CALIFORNIA

Torrance police officer linked to racist text message scandal is charged in 2018 shooting

Aug. 27, 2021

Anis says the officers would serve no public safety benefit if they were allowed to keep their jobs.

“I don’t believe that they could ever testify in a criminal case,” he said.

Through a review of public court files, internal documents and interviews with people with direct knowledge of the investigation, The Times previously identified the officers who sent racist messages as Tomsic, Weldin, Chandler, Kawamoto, Satterfield, Allen-Young, Blake Williams, Omar Alonso and former Long Beach Police Officer Maxwell Schroeder. 

Concannon, Chavez, Kissinger and Torrance police officer Enrique Villegas are also under investigation as part of the scandal, The Times has found. 

In total, Torrance police have confirmed 15 officers were placed on administrative leave as a result of the scandal. The department has refused to identify them. 

The only police officer to lose his job in connection with the scandal is Schroeder, who never worked in Torrance. 

LA County Ordered to Pay $31 Million to Vanessa Bryant. Reprehensible Cops Shared Gruesome Photos of Kobe and his Daughter's Severed Bodies, Remains for Amusement. Jury Didn't Believe Cops' Testimony

From [HERE] A jury Wednesday ordered Los Angeles County to pay Vanessa Bryant, widow of Lakers star Kobe Bryant, and another man $31 million in damages for the graphic photos sheriff’s deputies and firefighters took of the 2020 helicopter crash scene that killed Bryant, his daughter, and seven others.

In reaching the verdict after only a few hours of deliberations, jurors made it clear they had been persuaded by attorneys for Bryant and Chris Chester, who argued that illicit photos of the crash victims’ bodies had violated their clients’ right to privacy and inflicted emotional distress. Chester lost his wife, Sarah, and daughter, Payton, in the crash.

“We’re not here because of an accident,” Bryant’s attorney Craig Lavoie told jurors during his closing arguments Tuesday, on what would have been Kobe Bryant’s 44th birthday. “We’re here because of intentional conduct. Intentional conduct by those who were charged with protecting the dignity of Sarah and Payton, and Kobe and Gianna.” 

Throughout the 11-day trial in federal court in Los Angeles, lawyers for Bryant and Chester documented how the photos spread: They were flashed from a sheriff’s deputy’s phone screen to a bartender in Norwalk. They were shown to firefighters and their spouses during an awards gala at a hotel in Universal City in what amounted, one witness said, to a “party trick.” They were passed from one deputy to another as the pair played video games.

County lawyers countered that there were legitimate reasons for first responders to take and receive the photos, including to help determine the size of the crash site and decide what resources were needed. The images, they say, were never published online or in the media — nor were they seen by the victims’ families because of swift work by sheriff’s and fire leaders in tamping down their spread.

The jurors who acted very quickly in this case obviously rejected the county lawyers arguments and evidently did not find any of the police officer testimony credible.

“This is the pictures case, and there are no pictures,” Mira Hashmall, an attorney representing the county, repeated several times in her closing argument. 

But attorneys for Bryant and Chester argued that it is unknown how far the imagesspread because the county did not thoroughly investigate. It wasn’t until most of the involved deputies had received new phones that officials hired a firm to conduct a forensic examination of employee devices. 

“The truth is, the county has no idea, no idea who had the photos and who they sent them to,” Lavoie said. 

The laptop of one fire captain who took photos, Lavoie said, was missing its hard drive when it was examined. The captain, Brian Jordan, who has since retired, claimed under oath that he did not remember being at the crash site at all.

The phone of Joey Cruz, a deputy who showed graphic photos to a bartender in Norwalk, had been reset before it was turned over to the firm, Lavoie said. When it was turned on, it was as if it was new, with no photos saved. County attorneys argued that Cruz had transferred his data to his new phone, which also had no crash photos saved on it.

And the identity of at least one firefighter who received the photos remains unknown. 

In their closing statements, Bryant and Chester’s attorneys called into question the credibility of some deputies and firefighters who testified about what they did and why. Several gave testimony that was inconsistent with their earlier statements or was at odds with the testimony of other witnesses.

For example, Doug Johnson, the deputy who took photos that included close-ups of human remains, testified that he took 25 photos. But two other officials testified that Johnson told them he took at least 100. 

Under cross-examination Friday, Villanueva said the fact that no photos have surfaced online proved that internal investigators assigned to the case had done a thorough job stopping their spread. But his certainty wavered somewhat after appearing to learn on the stand about the discrepancies in Johnson’s photo count and the fire official who was never identified. 

“I believe they were all deleted,” he said, adding, “I’m pretty sure that’s accurate.”

When pressed further, he said: “God knows — that’s about it.”

Lavoie told the nine jurors that if he asked them to come up with a percentage that would represent the chances that these photos would surface, he’d probably hear nine different answers. 

“Whatever each of us thinks that number is, it’s definitely not zero,” Lavoie said. 

And that means that for the rest of Bryant and Chester’s lives, one of two things will happen: The photos will surface, or they will live in fear about when that day might come, Lavoie said. 

Chester’s attorney Jerry Jackson asked the jury to award Bryant and Chester up to $75 million in combined damages for their emotional distress. Bryant’s attorneys did not specify a figure. 

“You can’t award too much money for what they went through,” Jackson said. “What they went through is inhuman and inhumane,” he said, gesturing toward the county, “and they did it.”

'We Got 1 Not Listening:’ A Pastor said He Was Watering His Neighbors Plants. But to White Alabama Cops He was Just Another NGHR in the Free Range Prison to Arrest and Put into Greater Confinement

THE QUALITY OF BLACK CITIZENSHIP IS AT NEW LOWER LEVELS AS POWERLESS BLACKS GO ON PARROTING THEIR WHITE MASTERS, DELUDING THEMSELVES ABOUT “VOTING POWER,” RATIONALIZING THEIR SLAVERY AS “RIGHTS” AND INDULGING THEMSELVES WITH SNIGGERING ENTERSTAINMENT, AS IF SOMEONE ELSE IS COMING TO FREE THEM.

If you are talking about whether there was “probable cause” to arrest then you have missed the point.

According to FUNKTIONARY

Statism – the belief “citizens” and “states” exist and the memetic thought patterns supporting such beliefs. 2) the religion of oppression and domination coupled with the science of exploitation and sociopathic control. 3) the opiate of the so-called Elites. 4) a philosophy that idealizes majority rule gang force (authority) over individual authenticity (autonomy). 5) servitude over liberty and statutes over humanity. So long as “states” are viewed and accepted as natural, normal, reality-based and inevitable, they will continue to violently abstract humans into extinction. Statism is mind control; people both unwillingly and willingly surrender their property (labor being one’s most inviolable property) to men and women pretending to be “governors,” “commissioners,” and “presidents” etc. because they believe they are “citizens” of a so-called “state” and must pay their proverbial “fair share” to support such abstractions or fictions of law. Just using statism against itself proves bureaucrats never have a case regardless of what they “charge” someone with. “Statism and it’s supporting political theology do not exist in people’s minds to promote freedom or protect ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness;’ it’s pure mind control to divert our attention away from the actions of antisocial individuals (sociopaths) who are so desperate to “protect” us they are willing to kill us and steal our property.” ~Marc Stevens. (See: DOME, Beliefs, Landmine Legislation, $crapitalism, Standing, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Judicial Victimization, States, Holodeck Court, Allegiance, Anarchy, Society, Individuality, Civilization, Citizens, Monopoly Capitalism, The Golem, Government Paradox, Granfalloons, Corporate State, Government, Servitude, Stalinize, Property, Standing & Monopoly)

Citizenship – non-consensual jurisdiction. 2) the voluntary or involuntary unilateral conversion a natal filiation into a political subservience and affiliation. Citizenship demonstrates that one is a political gang-member owing allegiance and fealty to a Corporate State and the dictates of its laws, dictators, rulers (elected or unelected) and the collective (combined) power of its organizers, adminstraitors, smoke-screeners, invisible financier-owners, court systems and enforcers. 2) modern self-flagellation. Citizens are stockholders of commercial establishments (corporate fictions) called States. Government has no duty to protect anyone (Bowers v. Devito, 686 F.2d 616). Therefore, because there’s no duty to protect, there is no duty of allegiance. Without these “duties,” there are no “citizens.” Because there are no “citizens,” there is no “nation” and of course, no “illegal aliens.” Have you consented and volunteered (unknowingly or knowingly) to be a slave or is this “government” forcing you into slavery? Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master, and for the remainder, just any master will do. With citizenship comes the great responsibility of proving oneself unguilty. (See: Gangs, Date of Birth, Person, Individual, Allegiance, Duty, “Government,” Taxation, Chemical Warfare, Stationary Bandits, Human Resources, Society, Ruling, Involuntary Servitude, Citizens, Corporate State & Adherent Rights)

In the free range prison, all pretenses of civilization aside, the legal system is based entirely on physical coercion: comply with authority or go to jail or die. Government is force and nothing else. There is no free government. Government does not rest on voluntary support, it is anchored in violence. Michael Huemer explains,

“The need for an account of political legitimacy arises from the moral significance of coercion and from the coercive nature of government. It is important to bring these principles clearly into focus, to have a clear view of what needs explaining before we try to explain it.

     First, what is coercion? Hereinafter, I use the term ‘coercion’ to denote a person’s use of or threat to use physical force against another person. When I speak of coercing a person to do something, I shall mean using physical force or the threat of physical force to induce that person to perform the desired action. I use ‘physical force’ and ‘violence’ interchangeably. I shall not define ‘physical force’ here; our intuitive understanding of the notion will suffice for the subsequent arguments, and I shall not rely on any controversial judgments about what qualifies as physical force.

     My definition of ‘coercion’ is not intended as an analysis of the term’s standard use in English. It is a stipulative definition, intended to avoid repetition of the phrase ‘use of or threat to use physical force’. My use of the term differs from the ordinary usage in at least two ways: first, in the ordinarysense of the term, when A ‘coerces’ B, A induces B to behave in some way desired by A; but in my sense, A might coerce B by physically injuring B, whether or not A influences B’s behavior. Second, the ordinary sense counts a broader range of threats as coercive: in the ordinary sense, A might ‘coerce’ B using a threat to spread malicious rumors about B. This would not qualify as coercion in my sense, because the threat is not one of violence. The ordinary concept of coercion is useful in many contexts; nevertheless, I have introduced a stipulative definition because doing so enables us to consider some important and interesting arguments regarding political authority, while avoiding unnecessary semantic debates. 

     Government is a coercive institution. Generally speaking, when the state makes a law, the law carries with it a punishment to be imposed upon violators. It is possible to have a law with no specified punishment for violation, but all actual governments attach punishments to nearly all laws.  Not everyone who breaks the law will in fact be punished, but the state will generally make a reasonable effort at punishing violators and will generally punish a fair number of them, typically with fines or imprisonment. These punishments are intended to harm lawbreakers, and they generally succeed in doing so.

     Direct physical violence is rarely used as a punishment. Nevertheless, violence plays a crucial role in the system, because without the threat of violence, lawbreakers could simply choose not to suffer punishment. For example, the government commands that drivers stop before all red lights. If you violate this rule, you might be punished with a $200 fine. But this is simply another command. If you didn’t obey the command to stop before all red lights, why would you obey the command to pay $200 to the government? Perhaps the second command will be enforced by a third command: the government may threaten to revoke your driver’s license if you do not pay the fine. In other words, they may command you to stop driving. But if you violated the first two commands, why would you follow the third? Well, the command to stop driving may be enforced by a threat of imprisonment if you continue to drive without a license. As these examples illustrate, commands are often enforced with threats to issue further commands, yet that cannot be all there is to it. At the end of the chain must come a threat that the violator literally cannot defy. The system as a whole must be anchored by a non-voluntary intervention, a harm that the state can impose regardless of the individual’s choices.

     That anchor is provided by physical force. Even the threat of imprisonment requires enforcement: how can the state ensure that the criminal goes to the prison? The answer lies in coercion, involving actual or threatened bodily injury, or at a minimum, physical pushing or pulling of the individual’s body to the location of imprisonment. This is the final intervention that the individual cannot choose to defy. One can choose not to pay a fine, one can choose to drive without a license, and one can even choose not to walk to a police car to be taken away. But one cannot choose not to be subjected to physical force if the agents of the state decide to impose it.

     Thus, the legal system is founded on intentional, harmful coercion. To justify a law, one must justify imposition of that law on the population through a threat of harm, including the coercive imposition of actual harm on those who are caught violating the law. In common sense morality, the threat or actual coercive imposition of harm is normally wrong. This is not to say that it cannot be justified; it is only to say that coercion requires a justification. This may be because of the way in which coercion disrespects persons, seeking to bypass their reason and manipulate them through fear, or the way in which it seems to deny the autonomy and equality of other persons.

     I shall not attempt any comprehensive account of when coercion is justified. I rely on the intuitive judgment that harmful coercion requires a justification, as well as some intuitions about particular conditions that do or do not constitute satisfactory justifications. For instance, one legitimate justification is self-defense or defense of innocent third parties: one may harmfully coerce another person, if doing so is necessary to prevent that person from wrongfully harming someone else. Another justification for harmful coercion is consent. Thus, if you are in a boxing match, to which both participants have agreed, then you may punch your opponent in the face.

     On the other hand, many possible reasons for coercion are clearly inadequate. If you have a friend who eats too many potato chips, you may try to convince him to give them up. But if he won’t listen, you may not force him to stop. If you admire your neighbor’s car, you may offer to buy it from him. But if he won’t sell, you may not threaten him with violence. If you disagree with your coworker’s religious beliefs, you may try to convert him. But if he won’t listen, you may not punch him in the nose. And so on. In common sense ethics, the overwhelming majority of reasons for coercion fail as justifications.

     Modern states stand in need of an account of political legitimacy because modern states commonly coerce and harm individuals for reasons that would be viewed as inadequate for any non-governmental agent. This can be illustrated by some embellishments on the story of section 1.1.

     Suppose you announce that you believe a neighboring town is building some very destructive weapons, which they might one day use to terrorize other villages. To prevent this from happening, you round up a few like-minded villagers and travel to the neighboring town, where you violently depose the mayor, blowing up some buildings and predictably killing several innocent people in the process.

     If you behaved in this way, you would be labeled a terrorist and murderer, and calls for your execution or life imprisonment would likely abound. But when the government behaves in this way, its behavior is labeled ‘war’, and many support it. To be sure, there are many who reject the idea of pre-emptive war. But only political extremists describe soldiers or the government leaders who send them into battle as terrorists and murderers. Even among opponents of the 2003 Iraq war, for example, few went so far as to call George W. Bush a mass murderer or call for his execution or imprisonment. The notion of political authority is at work here: the feeling is that, whether its choice is good or bad, the government is the agent with the authority to decide whether to go to war. No other agent has the right to commit large-scale violence to achieve its ends, in anything like these circumstances.

     Suppose now that, amidst all your other unusual activities, you decide to start supporting charity. You find a charity that helps the poor. Unfortunately, you believe your village has not contributed enough to this charity voluntarily, so you take to forcibly extracting money from your neighbors and handing it over to the charity.

     If you behaved in this way, you would be labeled a thief and extortionist, and calls to imprison you and compel you to personally repay those whose wealth you expropriated would be commonplace. But when the government behaves in this way, its behavior is known as conducting social welfare programs, and most people support it. To be sure, there are some who oppose social welfare programs, but even opponents rarely view the government agents administering the programs, or the legislators who vote for the programs, as thieves and extortionists. Very few would call for their imprisonment or their being forced to personally repay taxpayers. Again, the notion of authority is at work: we think that the government has the authority to redistribute wealth; non-governmental organizations do not.

     This should give some indication of the range of governmental activities whose justification relies on the notion of political authority. We will discuss further in chapter 7 how far this range extends. But even from this brief discussion, it should be clear that, without a belief in authority, we would have to condemn a great deal of what we now accept as legitimate." [MORE]