June 27, 2022

Servant Relations

June 27, 2022/ Tron Nick

**Black People Who Consciously or Unconsciously Believe in** **Racism/White Supremacy** **are** **Literally Crazy** **& Have a** **Double Consciousness. Their MIND IS ACTUALLY NOT THEIR OWN.**
**BLACK COPS ARE** **OBEDIENT** **BLACK** **ROLEBOTS** **AND HUMAN RESOURCES PLUGGED INTO** **DOGGY'S** **OPERATING SYSTEM. THEY** **WORSHIP** **RULES,** **GOVERNMENT** **AND LOGIC WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE** **LEX-ICON. MANY BLACK COPS PROBABLY POSSESS WHAT** **DR. BLYND** **CALLS “DOUBLE CONSCIOUSNESS”**
FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS:
DOUBLE CONSCIOUSNESS - THE SENSE OF LOOKING AT ONE'S SELF THROUGH THE EYE'S (AXIOLOGY) AND DISTORTED MIRRORS OF OTHERS. 2) THE PSYCHO-MISMANAGEMENT OF ONE'S NEUROSIS. 3) INTIMATELY INVOLVED WITH WHAT YOU HATE, AND TORN APART FROM WHO YOU (THINK YOU) ARE. YOU CANNOT LEARN TO USE THAT WHICH YOU REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE, I.E., ONE'S HERITAGE, ROOTS, OR ASILI. (SEE: MATAH, INAUTHENTIC, "WILLE-CHIP," POWER, ANXIETY, ANGUISH, LEARN & ASILI.)
incognegro – a Black individual so camouflaged in double-consciousness to the extent that he or she cannot be trusted by Blacks (who think) to think and act in the best interests of the greater collective of native Black Americans—especially those who hold elected or appointed positions of political power. (See: Negro, Coin-Operated, SNigger & Niggermarole)
Racism—a psycho-socio-economic reality based on a pseudo-scientific biological myth—is a power group dynamic, i.e., a defined group *cooperatively* via legacy institutions exerting structured and enforced institutionalized and systemic injustice, oppression and power over another group. Racism is not individualistic, but institutional, cultural, economic, political, linguistic, self-perpetuating and systematic. Racism is economic discrimination by one group over and against another for the purposes of subjugation and/or maintaining the imbalance of power through cooperative control, misinformation, indoctrination, genocide and oppression. [**MORE] and [MORE**]

MASTER CAN’T BE MASTER WITHOUT SERVANTS. From [HERE] NYPD Commissioner Keechant Sewell intervened to save the job of a decorated Latino officer who called a suspect the N-word during a 2018 arrest in the Bronx, according to a report from the Daily News.

Newly released NYPD documents stated that New York City Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell went against an administrative judge’s recommendation to fire Officer Benito Cruz after he yelled the slur as he held down the head of a 25-year-old suspect - a Black man - who had been tasered.

Sewell, who is the first Black woman to lead the NYPD announced her decision in an April memo, noting the officer’s "otherwise stellar history" as she imposed on an already-served 30-day suspension, docked him 45 vacation days and ordered him placed on a one-year “dismissal probation” where Cruz would be closely monitored for a year and could be fired without a hearing if he steps out of line.

According to the NYPD, Sewell said the Cruz, who was appointed as a police officer on July 9, 2014 had received an overall rating of "exceeds expectations" on his three most recent annual performance evaluations for 2018 and overall ratings of "exceptional for 2019 and 2020.

Cruz has also been awarded nine medals for excellent police duty and 16 medals for meritorious police duty and has no disciplinary record. He was placed on a level 1 discipline monitoring on March 3, 2020 which remains ongoing.

Cruz and two other officers faced disciplinary charges after the 2 a.m. arrest that happened outside of the Mitchel Houses on July 29, 2018, according to a report by Deputy Commissioner of Trials Josh Kleiman.

Cruz and Officer Mariano Bulfante responded to a report of a suspect with a gun while a third officer, John Manzo, arrived at a bodega on Willis Ave. to disperse a disorderly crowd.

Cruz and Bulfante joined Manzo when Jeremiah Bass refused to leave a Family Day celebration at the housing complex and began cursing and instructing the crowd to not listen to the NYPD officers.

Sgt. William Miller attempted to arrest Bass, he pulled away, smacked the sergeant’s hand, pushed off of him and ran, NYPD documents said.

The officers chased Bass as Bulfante twice yelled out, “You f***ing p***y!” according to Kleiman’s report.

Manzo then discharged his Taser and Bass fell to the ground when Cruz moved in, got on top of Bass and put his hand on his head in order to restrain him. Cruz then yelled, “Yeah, yeah, you talking s**t right now, you p***y a*s n****r?” Kleiman’s report added.

Kleiman ruled Cruz used excessive force after Bass, who was bleeding and unconscious and needed to be taken to a nearby hospital to have the Taser prongs removed from his body.

Bass later pleaded guilty to aggravated harassment.

Kleiman wanted Cruz fired and said that his words were “the most vile variety of discourteous and offensive language: hate speech.”

Sewell, however, disagreed with the proposed punishment. “Police Officer Cruz’s remark to the complainant in this matter was both vulgar and inappropriate. I make no attempt to defend his remark, but recognize that the statement was made during an otherwise chaotic encounter with a large group of individuals,” Sewell wrote.

“I find that Police Officer Cruz’s statement was made in a moment of time likely without forethought and that he allowed his judgment to fail him as there is no evidence of past racial or gender animus,” she added.

June 27, 2022

Video: Chicago Cop Chased and Shot a 13 yr Old Black Boy in the Back w/His Hands Up. Though Flight Alone Can't Establish Probable Cause 12 Cops Seized Him Probably Cause He’s Black. Now Unable to Walk

June 27, 2022/ Tron Nick

DON’T BLAME THE GUN. From [HERE] and [HERE] A new video of a 13-year-old Black teen who was gunned down by Chicago police last month shows he had his hands raised and appeared to be unarmed at the time.

The seventh-grader, identified only as AG, was shot by officers of the Chicago police department during a foot pursuit on 18 May.

Chicago police said the teen was fleeing from a stolen car when the incident occurred. A number of witness testimonies, however, had already stated that the teen had his hands raised and did not seem to be carrying any weapon.

The new surveillance video footage, accessed by the Daily Beast, now appears to confirm the testimonies. It showed the Black teen running off the pavement towards the light of a gas station parking lot with his hands visibly raised in the air and no weapon in sight.

He then turns around to his right and is suddenly shot by an officer, leading to him collapsing on the ground in front of the gas station, the video showed.

Officers can be seen surrounding AG and holding him by his legs, as his arm briefly drags on the pavement.

Under arrest for nothing. Cops had no probable cause or reasonable suspicion that AG had committed a crime or was engaged in a crime. With regard to white citizens in the Free Range, The Supreme Court and the high court in Illinois have ruled:

“it is well settled that flight alone is not sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, or is about to commit, a crime.” People v. Hyland , 981 N.E.2d 414; Illinois v Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124–25, (2000 ).

It is only when that flight is coupled with other factors that it may support reasonable suspicion justifying a Terry stop. People v. D.L. (In re D.L.), 2017 IL App (1st) 171764, 147 N.E.3d 114, 438 Ill.Dec. 845 (Ill. App. 2017)

Also, unless the officer has a reasonable articulable suspicion, he may not further detain a passenger. Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977).

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Probable cause – a code phrase for “probably ‘cause you’re Black.” Why did you get pulled over by the sneak-police (unmarked party-patrol car)? Probably ‘cause you’re Black or DWB. Why were you being held as a likely suspect? Probably ‘cause you’re Black. [MORE]

In the video CPD officers did not render immediate aide to AG, but instead callously dragged him across the pavement and then turned their attention to an uninjured officer who crashed into a sign at the gas station while arriving on scene.

The teen, who survived the incident, sustained a major spinal injury and is in danger of never walking again, according to the family. According to the lawsuit “he has been permanently and catastrophically injured” and “at this point doesn’t have movement of his legs”.

The teen, who was being chased by almost a dozen officers seen in the video, did not have any charges against him and no weapon was fired by him or found on him. The chase began after he was spotted in a car the police were trying to stop and he started running.

The agency said it had body cam footage from one of the officers at the scene but can not release it because the boy is a minor. Said explanation is contradicted by the fact that the family promptly filed a lawsuit on May 31, 2022 and purposefully put AG’s photo in the public document for the public to see. The incident occurred on May 18th. There should be 2 relevant body camera videos here because 2 white cops appear to be running closely together towards the boy. Additionally, the Chicago police have failed to disclose the identity of the cop who shot the boy - to protect the systems of racism white supremacy and governmental authority.

According to the complaint: the facts are as follows:

On the evening of May 18, 2022, A.G. was riding as a passenger in a Honda Accord. CPD was in pursuit of the car. As the car was driving west on Rice Street towards Cicero Avenue, A.G. got out of the car and ran. As A.G. was running south on Cicero Avenue through the lot of a Marathon gas station, there were several CPD officers on foot chasing him from behind. There were also several police vehicles nearby, in addition to a CPD helicopter overhead.

According to witness accounts, while A.G. was running he was told by one or more of the pursuing CPD officers to put his hands up. A.G. did as he was directed; he put his hands up with the intent of surrendering to the police.

At or about the same time, John Doe Officer, who was running behind A.G. with his gun unholstered, shot A.G. without cause or justification, causing A.G. to sustain catastrophic and permanent injuries.

A.G. immediately collapsed in the lot of the Marathon gas station. CPD officers did not render immediate aide to A.G., but instead callously dragged him across the pavement and then turned their attention to an uninjured officer who crashed into a sign at the gas station while arriving on scene.

A.G. did not have a weapon or do anything to make John Doe Officer believe that he was armed or dangerous. A.G. did not pose an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to John Doe Officer (who was running behind him) or to anyone.

As a result of the unjustified shooting by John Doe Officer, A.G. has (so far) been diagnosed with the following injuries:

gunshot wound;
complete lesion at T7-T10 level of thoracic spinal cord;
T10 spinal cord injury;
fracture of lamina of thoracic vertebrae;
fracture of transverse process of thoracic vertebrae;
fracture of spinous process of thoracic vertebrae;
retained magnetic metal foreign body;
multiplefractures of ribs;
hemothorax (collection of blood between the chest and lungs);
acute blood loss anemia;
bilateral pulmonary contusion;
esophageal injury; and
impaired mobility and ADLs. [MORE]

June 26, 2022

Cops Lobby for Unaccountability to Compliment their Uncontrollable Authority: Police Unions Spend Millions to Retain Sway over Big Cities and State Governments. The Top State Recipients are All Dems

June 26, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [HERE] Police unions and associations have spent over $48 million on state lobbying and contributed almost $71 million to state-level candidates and committees in the last decade alone, according to years of data tracked by OpenSecrets.

California politicians attracted more contributions from police unions and their affiliates than any other state since 2012 with $38.5 million. New York follows with $9.3 million over the same time period, while Texas was third at $3.1 million.

California, New York and Texas were also the top three states for police union lobbying spending in 2021, out of the 19 states with spending data tracked by OpenSecrets. These unions spent more than $2.4 million on state lobbying in California in 2021, over $1 million in New York and about $916,000 in Texas.

Police unions and associations have collectively contributed over $121 million to state political candidates since the 1990s as well, an OpenSecrets analysis found. Congressional campaigns have also received over $1.2 million dollars from more than 50 such unions and law enforcement PACs since the 1994 election cycle – benefiting more than 65% of current Congress members.

The most powerful and biggest spending police union in U.S. politics is the National Fraternal Order of Police, as OpenSecrets previously reported. As the nation’s largest and oldest police union, it represents over 364,000 members, and has spent over $2.3 million on federal lobbying in the last decade.

Lobbying on police accountability

Police unions are seen as one of the most significant and tenacious roadblocks to any substantial change in law enforcement policies and procedures at both the federal and state levels.

According to Campaign Zero – a national platform of data-driven policies addressing police violence – the millions spent by these unions every year go a long way in blocking efforts to hold police accountable, as well as manipulate the system in favor of police officers committing illegal activities.

While protests and demonstrations erupted following the death of Breonna Taylor during a botched no-knock raid by Louisville police officers in March 2020, the local branch of the Fraternal Order of Police participated in secret negotiations for their contract. They used the opportunity to advocate for more protection of special police officers and subsequently, for preventing changes in how the Louisville police tackled public safety.

Three months after Taylor’s death, Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer released a statement on social mediathat he did not have the power to legally fire police officers due to existing state law and collective bargaining agreements with police unions in place.

“Under the current system, they would be reinstated within weeks, with back pay and potentially damages,” Fischer wrote.

While the city of Louisville paid Taylor’s family $12 million to settle the lawsuit, only one of the officers faced charges for her death. In March this year, that officer charged with wanton endangerment was acquitted.

According to Daniel DiSalvo, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and professor of political science at the City University of New York, George Floyd’s death also put police unions under a microscope.

“A consensus quickly emerged, asserting that unions protect officers who behave poorly and impede reform that would improve policing,” he wrote for National Affairs.

A series of police killings over the course of a few years also led the American Civil Liberties Union to launch a campaign in June 2021 aimed at exposing the lobbying power of police unions.

While Jim Pasco, National Fraternal Order of Police executive director, said lobbying spending by police unions has an influence on law enforcement and governance, he said he is hopeful that it is in a positive way.

“Our goal is to improve public safety for all citizens and for the police,” Pasco told OpenSecrets. “How can that be construed as negative?”

But he considered it “absurd” when asked about whether there should be any possible changes to lobbying in terms of reducing their sway over legislation.

“As an American, there is a First Amendment right to lobby your government, and those rights should not be taken away from police officers,” he said.

State officeholders accepting police union funds

Political candidates are known to actively seek endorsements from police unions during their careers. This includes former President Donald Trump and a number of current state governors – including governors of the three states with highest lobbyist spending by police unions such as California and New York’s Democratic Govs. Gavin Newsom and Kathy Hochul as well as Texas’ Republican Gov. Greg Abbott.

This arrangement is one of the major reasons union lobbying wields power over big U.S. cities and state legislation. Not only does it help lawmakers establish their strong stance on law enforcement agendas, but in turn, unions also benefit from using campaign contributions to make powerful political allies on city, state and federal levels.

Current state officeholders received $20.6 million in law enforcement contributions since 2012. Six such state officials have received more than $225,000, all Democrats from mostly California or New York.

State officeholders accepting police union funds

Political candidates are known to actively seek endorsements from police unions during their careers. This includes former President Donald Trump and a number of current state governors – including governors of the three states with highest lobbyist spending by police unions such as California and New York’s Democratic Govs. Gavin Newsom and Kathy Hochul as well as Texas’ Republican Gov. Greg Abbott.

This arrangement is one of the major reasons union lobbying wields power over big U.S. cities and state legislation. Not only does it help lawmakers establish their strong stance on law enforcement agendas, but in turn, unions also benefit from using campaign contributions to make powerful political allies on city, state and federal levels.

Current state officeholders received $20.6 million in law enforcement contributions since 2012. Six such state officials have received more than $225,000, all Democrats from mostly California or New York.

New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli (D-N.Y.), who received more than $611,000, tops the list as the political candidate receiving the highest amount from police unions in the last decade. For contributions in the 2022 cycle only, DiNapoli tops the list again with more than $200,000, followed by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) at $91,000 and Newsom of California at $73,000.

Texas has the second highest number of office holders, at 176, receiving contributions from police unions since 2012. This includes Abbott and members of both the state House and Senate. Pennsylvania is the only state that has more officeholders at 177, but received nearly $750,000 less than Texas in terms of total contributions.

While some states have more recipients than others, officeholders in 44 out of 50 states accepted funds from police unions in the last decade. However, no such contributions data was found for Connecticut, Maine, Vermont, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota or the District of Columbia.

California had 120 state officials who accepted contributions from police unions, while New York had 168 such state officeholders, OpenSecrets found.

Police unions in Texas collectively contributed $1 million to Republicans and more than $775,000 to Democrats at the state level. In California, Democrats received $6.2 million and Republicans over $1.4 million from police unions, while in New York, Democrats received over $2.3 million versus Republicans with a little over $700,000.

Such contributions mirror party control in the respective states, with police unions generally giving more to whichever party seems to have more power. Both New York and California are Democratic dominated state legislatures, while that of Texas is Republican.

Police protections in state laws

Although California is highly touted as one of the more progressive states in the nation, it was known to have some of the weakest police accountability laws in place until very recently.

California was one of 19 states granting special protections to officers being investigated for misconduct, and also among those states with specific laws to make police misconduct levels confidential.

Until the state legislature passed a bill in 2018, police personnel records in California remained confidential. Further expanding on that change, the legislature passed yet another law in 2021 that increased public access to additional records involving police use of excessive force and biased or racist behavior behind illegal searches.

But nearly half of all states still have laws that grant police officers special privileges and protections from being investigated for wrongdoing.

Of the 46 states that allow police unions to collectively bargain, 84% have contracts with measures in place that pose significant barriers to reducing their protective privileges. That includes Texas.

Texas state law restricts or delays interrogations of police officers and gives officers access to information, disqualifies complaints against them and limits oversight of police.

New York currently does not have a police bill of rights, but existing law authorizes any policeman to use force based on the officer’s belief that the individual committed a crime.

Reducing sway

California, New York and Texas also have higher rates of violent crime than some of the other states over a period of 10 years, according to data compiled by the FBI.

Texas had the highest violent crime rate of 446 per 100,000 people in 2020, which is the latest data available. California and New York had 442 and 363, respectively.

But unlike the other two states, New York saw a visible decrease in violent crime rate over the last decade. It went from a rate of 394 in 2010 to 406 in 2012, which was the highest, before it started reducing gradually.

Abdul Nasser Rad, managing editor of research and data with Campaign Zero, told OpenSecrets that he does not consider there to be any direct causal relationship between crime rates and lobbyist spending in those states.

“There might be some sort of possible correlation because of conservative states and lack of spending into community conditions and investments,” Rad said, “But there aren't any studies that look at that, per se.”

He added that the layers of American federalism are also designed in a way that a lot of police unions can garner their strength at the local level via public safety budgets. Therefore, according to Rad, one of the most immediate measures to reduce the sway police unions and associations currently hold is to shrink police budgets generally.

“Police union contracts take up most of the salary lines, which is the majority in most cases of police department budgets,” he said.

Rad also mentioned other possible measures to counter the power held by police unions, which include putting in place minority law enforcement unionism and other types of pluralistic representative unionism.

“There isn’t, however, a one size fits all solution,” Rad said. “But it is most important to separate the ability of police unions over management and discipline generally. [MORE]

June 26, 2022

Little Boys Changing Gender, Wearing Sex Clothes/Dresses? Elites Showcase Celebrities Sons to Propagendize Weiteko (an Inversion of Life), the Destruction of Family, RWS and Government Authority

June 26, 2022/ Tron Nick

Vigilant Citizen asks Why are there so many little boys walking around in dresses in Hollywood? Why are these children so intensely promoted on social and mass media? And what the hell is going on with Liev Shreiber?

I do not particularly enjoy discussing the children of celebrities. These kids did not choose to live under the spotlight and they deserve to enjoy normal childhoods. However, some celebrity parents do everything in their power to thrust their children under that proverbial spotlight. They are paraded around at social events, publicized all over social media, and some are even used as props for PR stunts and general virtue signaling.

While that behavior is already exploitive in its own right, another level of strangeness has been emerging in Hollywood in the past years: Little boys walking around in dresses. And some are as young as TWO years old. And many of them wear outfits that are weirdly revealing and sexualized. It has become something of a “trend” among the Hollywood elite, a fashionable thing to do. Of course, mass media outlets inevitably shower these parents with praise because they allow their children to “express themselves”.

But what if it was the exact opposite? What if some of these boys were groomed and forced to dress and act as girls for some kind of insane reason? Wouldn’t that qualify as a particularly insidious form of child abuse? Here are some examples of this trend. [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY defines as follows:

Weiteko Disease – the Caucasian’s patapathetic and pathological fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man . 2) Death-force. (See: Caucasian, Western Civilization & Yurugu)

Propagenda – propaganda developed and directed to a particular audience as a means of predictive programming for accepting someone’s agenda as their very own. (See: $pinfidels, Predictive Programming & Coin-Operated)

June 26, 2022

Did Pfizer Perform Adequate Safety Testing for its Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine in Preclinical Studies? Evidence of Scientific and Regulatory Fraud

June 26, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [HERE]

by Sasha Latypova

Abstract

The rushed “warp speed” development and approval of completely novel Covid-19 mRNA and DNA vaccines pushed on the people of the world has resulted until today in millions of reported injuries and thousands of deaths according to public health databases such as VAERS (US), EudraVigilance (EU), Yellow Card (UK) and others. This article reviews some of the publicly available documents on Pfizer’s non-clinical development program and points out its deficiencies, omissions and gaps, which were very obvious, yet were never questioned by the regulators or other health authorities. The cursory nature of the entire preclinical program can be summed up as “we did not find any safety signals because we did not look for them.” The omission of safety studies which are considered standard or even mandatory, and the scientific dishonesty in those studies which were performed are so obvious and glaring that they cannot be attributed to the incompetence of the manufacturers and regulators. Rather, the question of wilful negligence must be raised.

The focus of my review is the scope and adequacy of the program of non-clinical assessment for a novel gene therapy vaccine, combined with a brief discussion of the relevant regulatory frameworks. I did not dive deeply into the review of the results of specific studies. My goal is to illustrate the complete breakdown of the regular process of drug development and approval, previously known to be rigorous and ethical, as well as the shocking negligence on the part of the regulatory agencies which are supposed to keep the pharmaceutical manufacturers honest. In carrying out this review, I have made the following findings:

Pfizer’s program did not include a comprehensive end-to-end test of all components of the final approved product (the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine). Instead, the studies included in the document package submitted to the FDA employed several variants and analogues of the product, whose comparability to the actual COVID-19 vaccine was not demonstrated or evaluated. Thus, no comprehensive assessment of product safety can be made on the basis of these studies.
A key determinant of a drug’s toxicity is its distribution within the body. However, with the mRNA active ingredient of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, this crucial aspect was never studied!
Pfizer claimed absence of potential for “vaccine-elicited disease enhancement” based on studies of an animal species that does not get sick from SARS-CoV-2.
The CDC, the FDA and Pfizer all lied about “vaccine staying at the injection site”; they knew all along that distribution of the vaccine throughout the body had to be expected.
Pfizer skipped major categories of safety testing altogether.
Pfizer used dishonest and self-serving interpretation of regulatory guidelines to justify the shortcuts it took in routine safety testing.
Both FDA and Pfizer knew about major toxicities associated with gene-therapy medicines in general, and they therefore cannot claim lack of anticipatory knowledge of these risks with the particular gene therapy medicine that is Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. This points to intentional fraud and collusion between Pfizer and the regulators, who conspired to push this untested dangerous product on the market.

Overall, therefore, both the manufacturer and the regulators behaved in a highly dishonest manner and conspired to push an entirely novel technology and product on millions of people without carrying out a single well designed safety assessment.

June 25, 2022

Offering More Proof that "Rights" Only Exist in Books and on TV the Supreme Ct Rules that Individuals Have No Right to Sue Police for a Violation Of Miranda Rules, Can't Be a Basis for a § 1983 Claim

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

**According to** **FUNKTIONARY**
The Spectacle - a constructed reality; the concrete inversion of life; via the autonomous movement of the apparently non-living. 2) the mirrorization of the noumenon into the phenomenal universe without understanding or overstanding it as such an objectivization in duality. The Spectacle is not a collection of images but a social relation among people mediated by images. The Spectacle is a theoretical construct—a tool for explaining many things about society; how people live vicariously through the dominant images of production, consumption and power relations. It is the thoughtfofms in which people create, contemplate and consume mediated by images of what-life-is, so that they will forget how to live radically for themselves. It is the totality of images and illusions that alienate people from living, its the primary production of modern societies. It is ideology materialized. It is the social relations that are mediated by the mass media; it is what makes people apathetic and reduces them to inactivity. [**MORE**]

From [HERE] There is a legal maxim that first year law students learn—for every right, there is a remedy; where there is no remedy, there is no right. William Blackstone said it this way: "It is a settled and invariable principle in the laws of England, that every right when with-held must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress."

Today, the Supreme Court limited federal legal remedies for violations of Miranda rights. In Vega v. Tekoh, No. 21-499 (June 23, 2022)(link is external), a 6-to-3 divided Supreme Court held a violation of the Miranda rules does not provide a basis for a § 1983 claim. Justice Alito delivered the opinion for the court, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Justice Kagan dissented, joined by Justices Breyer and Sotomayor.

Reversing the Ninth Circuit, Justice Alito’s majority opinion starts and ends this way:

This case presents the question whether a plaintiff may sue a police officer under Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U.S.C. §1983, based on the allegedly improper admission of an “unMirandized”1 statement in a criminal prosecution. The case arose out of the interrogation of respondent, Terence Tekoh, by petitioner, Los Angeles County Sheriff ’s Deputy Carlos Vega. Deputy Vega questioned Tekoh at his place of employment and did not give him a Miranda warning. Tekoh was prosecuted, and his confession was admitted into evidence, but the jury returned a verdict of not guilty. Tekoh then sued Vega under §1983, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the use of Tekoh’s un-Mirandized statement provided a valid basis for a §1983 claim against Vega. We now reject this extension of our Miranda case law.

****

Because a violation of Miranda is not itself a violation of the Fifth Amendment, and because we see no justification for expanding Miranda to confer a right to sue under §1983, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Justice Kagain's dissent, joined by Justices Breyer and Sotomayor, begins like this:

The Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), affords well-known protections to suspects who are interrogated by police while in custody. Those protections derive from the Constitution: Dickerson v. United States tells us in no uncertain terms that Miranda is a “constitutional rule.” 530 U. S. 428, 444 (2000). And that rule grants a corresponding right: If police fail to provide the Miranda warnings to a suspect before interrogating him, then he is generally entitled to have any resulting confession excluded from his trial. See 384 U. S., at 478–479. From those facts, only one conclusion can follow—that Miranda’s protections are a “right[]” “secured by the Constitution” under the federal civil rights statute. Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U. S. C. §1983. Yet the Court today says otherwise. It holds that Miranda is not a constitutional right enforceable through a §1983 suit. And so it prevents individuals from obtaining any redress when police violate their rights under Miranda. I respectfully dissent.

The opinion in Tekoh is here(link is external); oral argument here(link is external); and mertis briefing here(link is external).

June 25, 2022

As China reports Only 5,226 COVID Deaths During the Plandemic, Naomi Wolf Reports that Phizer is Actually a German/Chinese Company and the Chinese Own the Vax Technology, “Designed to Kill the West”

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

Reuters reports, Mainland China reported 143 new coronavirus cases for June 23, of which 37 were symptomatic and 106 were asymptomatic, the National Health Commission said on Friday.

That compared with 135 new cases a day earlier - 48 symptomatic and 87 asymptomatic infections, which China counts separately.

There were zero new deaths, leaving the nation's death count at 5,226.

As of Thursday, mainland China had confirmed 225,434 cases with symptoms.

June 25, 2022

Peer Reviewed Study: COVID “vaccines” are devastating men’s sperm counts

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

A new peer-reviewed studypublished in the journal Andrology shows that men who get “vaccinated” with Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) injections experience massive decreases in sperm counts.

Sperm samples collected from three fertility clinics in Israel show that Fauci Flu shots fight against men’s reproductive capacity, rendering them impotent and in some cases sexless.

Call it hidden fertility risks, if you will, but the findings contradict claims by the government and Big Pharma that COVID shots are “safe and effective.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

Early on following the launch of Operation Warp Speed, animal studies pointed to an increased risk of miscarriage because of the jabs. There was also evidence to suggest that the contents of the shots reached both the ovaries in female rats and testes in male rats.

So-called “health authorities,” however, denied all of this and continued pushing the shots on humans. And now serious problems are arising to suggest that “fully vaccinated” men may no longer be able to reproduce. (Related: COVID “vaccines” are also linked to causing AIDS.)

“Now – after a half-billion men have received mRNA shots – the skeptics appear to be right. Again,” wrote Alex Berenson on his Substack.

“The Israeli paper offers hard evidence that the vaccines may present a systemic risk to men’s sperm counts. What was a conspiracy theory is now just a theory. AGAIN.” [MORE]

June 25, 2022

Covid Pandemic Truths: Vaccinated People Are the Spreaders of New Variants

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [EXPOSE] The majority of the testing for Covid infection has been performed using what is called a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in which a person’s nose or sometimes throat is swabbed for evidence of viral genetic material. The inventor of this test stated that no clinical infection can be diagnosed using the PCR test alone. Yet the CDC used this test to imply that tens of millions of Americans were infected with Covid-19.

Are The New Waves of Infection Real? Is Testing for Covid-19 Accurate?

We have now learned that the test does not identify the whole virus, just a segment. In addition, many other viruses, bacteria, and even some things that are not microorganisms at all can yield a positive test. For instance, the president of Tanzania secretly had a sheep, a goat, and pawpaw (a type of fruit) tested using PCR by his health department. The goat and the pawpaw both tested positive.

Recently, the CDC announced that the PCR test would no longer be used because they discovered that it cross-reacts with the influenza virus, meaning virtually all influenza infections in the last flu season could have been diagnosed as Covid-19. This explains why there were only a few hundred flu cases reported in the entire U.S. this past season — a number unprecedented in modern times. (The CDC claims that each year there are about 30,000 deaths from the flu and over 300,000 hospital admissions).

Cycles of the PCR test are run to amplify its sensitivity, and it is known that doing more than 30 cycles increases the likelihood of the test being falsely positive. Yet the CDC recommended that all labs perform 40 or more cycles, which would have meant that around 97% of positive tests were, in fact, negative. That is, the person tested most likely did not have a Covid infection.

Combined with the lack of specificity of the PCR test, fear-mongering by the media and the CDC greatly exaggerated the impact of the first wave of the Covid outbreak. The same is almost certainly true with the new Delta variant. Virologists emphasise that the more people who are vaccinated, the more variants will appear. However, while the variants are more contagious, they are less harmful. This is the nature of virus mutations.

Who Are the Superspreaders of The Virus?

In fact, based on the observation that the vaccinated have very high titers of virus in their nasopharynx, according to mRNA technology developer Dr. Robert Malone, it is the vaccinated who are more likely to spread the new variant, as they remain asymptomatic longer than an unvaccinated person. Viral titers (concentrations) were found to be very high in the noses of vaccinated as well as infected unvaccinated people. If the “vaccine” worked, they should have found none or extremely small amounts of the virus.

The average age of death from Covid-19 is around 75 years (95% occurred over age 65 years). Moreover, the highest death rate among vaccinated people is in the same age group — the very ones the vaccines are supposed to protect.

The most egregious form of this fear-mongering is to imply that the Delta variant infections are all in the unvaccinated. This is not true. A study in Scotland, for example, found that 87% of Delta variant cases occurred in the fully vaccinated. Similar findings were reported in the United Kingdom and Israel. Moreover, a recent report released by the CDC found that 74% of the cases in a Cape Cod, Massachusetts cluster were among vaccinated individuals. Most of these people were reported to have the Delta variant.

Whho Are the Superspreaders of The Virus?

In fact, based on the observation that the vaccinated have very high titers of virus in their nasopharynx, according to mRNA technology developer Dr. Robert Malone, it is the vaccinated who are more likely to spread the new variant, as they remain asymptomatic longer than an unvaccinated person. Viral titers (concentrations) were found to be very high in the noses of vaccinated as well as infected unvaccinated people. If the “vaccine” worked, they should have found none or extremely small amounts of the virus.

The average age of death from Covid-19 is around 75 years (95% occurred over age 65 years). Moreover, the highest death rate among vaccinated people is in the same age group — the very ones the vaccines are supposed to protect.

The most egregious form of this fear-mongering is to imply that the Delta variant infections are all in the unvaccinated. This is not true. A study in Scotland, for example, found that 87% of Delta variant cases occurred in the fully vaccinated. Similar findings were reported in the United Kingdom and Israel. Moreover, a recent report released by the CDC found that 74% of the cases in a Cape Cod, Massachusetts cluster were among vaccinated individuals. Most of these people were reported to have the Delta variant.

What Are the True Numbers?

The vaccines for Covid-19 stand to make more money for their developers than any other vaccines at any time in history. Those same companies also wield enormous financial power and influence in the media, medical journals, medical societies (such as the American Medical Association), hospitals, research institutions, and government bureaucracies (such as the National Institutes of Health [NIH]). Moreover, of course, they donate vast sums to elected officials.

We are witnessing an unprecedented attack on free speech directed at anyone who challenges pro-vaccine propaganda, including virologists, infectious disease specialists, epidemiologists, and pulmonologists. Dr. Michael Yeadon, ex-chief science officer for Pfizer; a whistle-blower from Moderna; Dr. Robert Malone, the developer of the mRNA vaccine technique; and other highly qualified scientists have been banned from social media and the mainstream news outlets for speaking out. Why? Because they might convince people that these vaccines are dangerous and that they should be halted immediately.

There is growing evidence that government agencies are hiding the true number seriously injured and killed by these vaccines. A lawsuit has been filed in Alabama federal court by attorney Thomas Renz based on the sworn testimony of a government whistle-blower. This person testified under oath that, according to actual government records from the Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 45,000 people have died after getting the vaccine.

This refers to data from just one government system reporting to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The real number of dead could be much higher.

Recall that at the height of the “pandemic,” about 50% of all deaths occurred in nursing homes and that government officials in several states had deliberately placed infected patients in these high-risk facilities.

Where are the highest rates of vaccine-related deaths now occurring? Nursing homes and among the elderly — the very ones we are supposed to be protecting. In some places, nursing home death rates secondary to the vaccines (most of which occur within 2 days of being vaccinated) equal or exceed the rate of deaths caused by the virus itself. Some nursing homes have reported vaccine-related death rates of 30% or higher. The vaccines were meant to protect the most vulnerable, but now those individuals are the ones dying and being injured by the vaccine itself.

Source

Russell Blaylock, a retired American neurosurgeon, wrote the above in an extensive paper, ‘Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?’, published on 8 December 2021 in the Surgical Neurological Internationaljournal. We are republishing sections, more easily digestible portions, of his article as a series of articles titled ‘Covid Pandemic Truths’.

This article is the fifth in our series and covers the sections in Blaylocks’s paper as subtitled above. You can find the first article in this series HERE.

Although we have not included them, Blaylock’s article is well referenced.

Read Blaylock’s full article – Russell L. Blaylock. Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?. 08-Dec-2021;12:59. – by following this LINK.

June 25, 2022

If COVID Shots are Safe Why did the President of PharmaMar Pay to Falsify His Vaccination Status and Get Injected with Saline? Spanish Govt Investigating Network of Elites with Fake Certificates

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [HERE] and [HERE] Spanish police have dismantled a criminal network that sold fake COVID-19 vaccination certificates, El Periodico reports.

Under the umbrella of ‘Operation Jenner,’ named after the English developer of the first smallpox vaccine, Edward Jenner, authorities have been tracking down those thought to be in possession of false COVID-19 certificates. The certificates were recorded in the official registry by a Spanish nurse and a nursing assistant working at the La Paz University Hospital. [MORE]

The European investigation, revealed a large bunch of world-class individuals committing fraud. They spent an infinite amount of money to have their names added to the National Immunization Register. Jose Maria Fernandez Sousa-Faro, the 76-year-old president of PharmaMar was included in the scandal of fake vaccination for reflecting that he had received the third dose of the vaccination.

He was arrested on suspicion of falsifying his Covid-19 vaccination status. It was discovered that he had injected saline rather than the vaccine using bribes to change the records. The investigation revealed that he had spent a tremendous price to get his name included in the database of immunized people. According to sources connected to the case, Sousa-Faro will soon be summoned to present himself in court.

PharmaMar is an IBEX 35 company and one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in Spain. The company is dedicated to researching drugs including cancer, Alzheimer’s and yes, COVID-19.

Dr. Sousa-Faro has more than ninety scientific publications and patents in the fields of biochemistry, antibiotics, and molecular biology to his name. Since 1985, Fernández Sousa has headed the Board of Directors of the Zeltia Group, a world leader in the research and development of medicines of marine origin.

The “Operation Jenner” investigation revealed a vast network of “elite” names who paid a large sum of money to have their names registered at the National Immunisation Register.

The investigation has revealed that a nursing assistant working at the La Paz University charged more than 200,000 euros for illegally registering the names of people on the National Immunisation Register. He has been arrested and is currently in custody. [MORE]

The police have disclosed that the nurse charged the people according to their social standings The more popular they were, the higher the price. [MORE]

Amongst those that have been investigated are leading singers, musicians, football stars, business people, politicians and top medical personnel, such as Trinitario Casanova, one of the richest men in Spain, Kidd Keo, trap singer in English and Spanish, Anier, rap singer, Jarfaiter, rap singer, Veronica Echegui, actress, Bruno Gonzalez Cabrera, soccer player, Fabio Díez Steinaker, former beach volleyball Olympian, José Luis Zapater, alias Titín, former boxer, Camilo Esquivel, recognized and prestigious doctor. [MORE]

June 25, 2022

A Peer-Reviewed Study in the New England Journal of Medicine Shows Pfizer, Moderna COVID Shots May Increase Risk of Infection. Previous NEJM Study Showed Natural Immunity is Superior to Pfizer Shot

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [CHD] A new peer-reviewed study shows two doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine yield negative protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, while previous infection without vaccination offers about 50% immunity.

The findings, published June 15 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) analyzed information from more than 100,000 Omicron-infected and non-infected residents in Qatar from Dec. 23, 2021, through Feb. 21, 2022.

The authors compared the effectiveness of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, natural immunity from previous infection with other variants and hybrid immunity (a combination of infection and vaccination) against symptomatic Omicron infection and severe, critical and fatal disease.

Researchers found those who had a prior infection but had not been vaccinated had 46.1% and 50% immunity against the BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron subvariants more than 300 days after the previous infection.

However, individuals who received two doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, but had not been previously infected, had negative immunity against the BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron subvariants — indicating an increased risk of infection compared to someone without prior infection and vaccination.

Six months after the second dose of Pfizer, immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -3.4% below an average person without infection and vaccination, which as a control, was set at 0.

For two doses of Moderna, immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -10.3% about six months after the last dose.

The authors said three doses of the Pfizer shot increased immunity to over 50%, but immunity was measured only at a median of 42 days after the third dose, showing a rapid immune declinein a very short period of time.

In comparison, those who had previously been infected had 50% immunity even at 300 days after infection.

After six months, the study showed vaccine efficacy fell to negative figures 270 days after the second dose, predicting more rapidly waning immunity for vaccines compared to natural immunity.

The researchers concluded:

“No discernable differences in protection against symptomatic BA.1 and BA.2 infection were seen with previous infection, vaccination and hybrid immunity. Vaccination enhanced protection among persons who had had a previous infection. Hybrid immunity resulting from previous infection and recent booster vaccination conferred the strongest protection.”

But that statement is ambiguous, said Dr. Madhava Setty, a board-certified anesthesiologist and senior science editor for The Defender, because it could lead readers to wrongly conclude the researchers found that previous infection, vaccination or some combination of vaccination and infection provided equal protection against the BA.1 or BA.2 Omicron variants.

Setty also pointed out the lack of statistical significance in the data surrounding severe, critical or fatal infections:

“Table S5 compares natural immunity to the Moderna formulation. With the BA.1 variant, only natural immunity has positive effectiveness that is statistically significant. You can see that for all the other combinations of vaccine doses, the window of statistical significance extends into the negative range.

“For example, in the “Three Doses with no prior infection” row the effectiveness where we can be 95% certain ranges from -435% to 100%. This is meaningless. They cannot claim that three doses is predictive of benefit. In fact, it could very well be deleterious. We just don’t know because so few people had severe illness in that cohort.

“The equivalent table is not given for Pfizer, however Figure 2 in the main text shows there is a statistically significant benefit against severe illness.”

With regard to the BA.2 variant, natural immunity may also fall in the negative range (-6.8 to 92.4), as does three doses with no prior infection (-3800 to 100), Setty said. “Only when they group the two variants together can they calculate effectiveness that is statistically significant.”

Setty said researchers also excluded a large number of cases from their calculation and failed to disclose how many people got severe, critical or fatal COVID-19.

Setty told The Defender:

“As is always the case right now, they only count cases from the time of maximum vaccine effect (>14 days after the second jab or >7 days after the booster). Figure S3 shows that 116 vaccinated people got COVID-19 between the first and second dose, while three people got COVID-19 within 14 days of the second dose and 156 got COVID-19 within a week of the third dose.

“All of these cases were excluded from their calculation. Nowhere do they tell us how many of those got severe, critical or fatal COVID-19.”

Setty also noted researchers glossed over the time frames where they compare effectiveness. He said:

“In Figure 3, researchers only calculated effectiveness of natural immunity by adding up cases after four months. This is probably because researchers define previous infection occurring greater than 90 days earlier.

“However, even 120 days out, a previous infection still offers greater protection than two or three doses at their maximum window of protection. Even a year out, natural immunity is still on par with a recently boosted individual.”

Previous NEJM study showed natural immunity superior to two doses of Pfizer shot

The June 15 NEJM study followed another NEJM study, published June 9, that found natural immunity “protection was higher than that conferred after the same time had elapsed since receipt of a second dose of vaccine among previously uninfected persons.”

Using the Israeli Ministry of Health database, researchers extracted data for August and September 2021, when the Delta variant was predominant, on all persons who had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 or who had received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

The study found both natural and artificial immunity waned over time, but individuals who were previously infected but were not vaccinated had half the risks of reinfection compared to those who received two doses of Pfizer and who had never been infected.

“Among persons who had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, protection against reinfection decreased as the time increased,” researchers said, “however, this protection was higher” than protection conferred during the same time interval through two vaccine doses.

“Natural immunity wins again,” tweeted Dr. Martin Makary, a public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, referring to the study.

Researchers acknowledged natural infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 “provides natural immunity against reinfection,” adding that recent studies have shown “waning of the immunity provided by” Pfizer’s vaccine.

June 25, 2022

According to Government Data in the VAERS System, COVID Injections Have Caused 29,031 Deaths, and 240,022 Serious Injuries (VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events)

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [CHD] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,307,928 reports of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and June 17, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). That’s an increase of 6,572 adverse events over the previous week.

VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 29,031 reports of deaths — an increase of 172 over the previous week — and 240,022 serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 1,610 compared with the previous week.

Of the 29,031 reported deaths, 18,814 cases are attributed to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, 7,627 cases to Moderna and 2,525 cases to Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 835,063 adverse events, including 13,388 deaths and 84,542 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and June 17, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 13,388 U.S. deaths reported as of June 17, 16% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 20% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 59% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 592 million COVID-19 vaccine doses had been administered as of June 16, including349 million doses of Pfizer, 223 million doses of Moderna and 19 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 17, 2022, for 6-month-olds to 5-year-olds show:

1,757 adverse events, including 64 cases rated as serious and 3 reported deaths.
4 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).
The CDC uses a narrowed case definition of “myocarditis,” which excludes cases of cardiac arrest, ischemic strokes and deaths due to heart problems that occur before one has the chance to go to the emergency department.
13 reports of blood clotting disorders.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 17, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

11,534 adverse events, including 298 rated as serious and 6 reported deaths.

The most recent reported death (VAERS I.D. 2315376) occurred in a 9-year-old female from Florida who died 172 days after receiving Pfizer’s vaccine. She was diagnosed with COVID-19 on May 28, 2022, and treated with various drugs, including Remdesivir. She was found unresponsive at home on June 3, and was declared brain dead.

22 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis.

The Defender has noticed over previous weeks that reports of myocarditis and pericarditis have been removed by the CDC from the VAERS system in this age group. No explanation was provided.

44 reports of blood clotting disorders.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 17, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

32,386 adverse events, including 1,834 rated as serious and 44 reported deaths.
62 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 97% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
655 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 643 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
166 reports of blood clotting disorders with all cases attributed to Pfizer. VAERS reported 167 cases of blood clotting disorders in the 12- to 17-year-old age group last week.
20 cases of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) with all cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 17, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
53% of those who died were male, 42% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.
The average age of death was 73.
As of June 17, 5,592 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines, including 1,748 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
Of the 3,614 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 40% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.
892 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, with 42% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 30% to Moderna and 27% to J&J.
2,290 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.
1,726 reports of myocardial infarction.
14,118 reports of blood-clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 6,313 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 5,065 reports to Moderna and 2,703 reports to J&J.
4,060 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,596 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,441 cases to Moderna and 172 cases to J&J.
11 cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with 5 cases attributed Pfizer, 5 cases to Moderna and 1 case to J&J.
267 cases of POTS with 165 cases attributed to Pfizer, 84 cases to Moderna and 17 cases to J&J.

CDC advisors recommend Moderna shot for children ages 6 through 17

The CDC’s vaccine advisory panel unanimously voted 15 to 0 to recommend two doses of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 6 through 17 years old.

Members of the panel acknowledged there is a risk of heart inflammation associated with both mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, but they said a follow-up survey suggests most fully recover.

Not everyone agrees, including University of British Columbia professor Dr. Steven Pelech, who last year criticized health agencies’ relaxed attitude about myocarditis as misleading.

“Contrary to what a number of people have said, there is no such thing as ‘mild myocarditis,’” Pelech said.

Pelech explained that once the heart muscle cells are killed, “they can never be replaced by new muscle cells, but only by scar tissue.” This can lead to “a greater chance of heart attack and other problems later in life.”

The FDA last week authorized Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use in the child and adolescent age group.

Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, deputy director of the H1N1 Vaccine Task Force at the CDC, said the risk of myocarditis “may be higher” with the Moderna vaccine compared to Pfizer, but there are limitations to what scientists know about the condition in this age group.

Shimabukuro said most adverse events reported following vaccination are “mild and transient events like injection site or systemic reactions,” and the CDC would continue to monitor the safety of COVID-9 vaccines.

CDC admits it never monitored VAERS for COVID vaccine safety signals

In response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), the CDC last week admitted it never analyzed VAERS for safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines.

The CDC is supposed to mine VAERS data for safety signals by calculating what are known as proportional reporting ratios (PRRs).

This is a method of comparing the proportion of different types of adverse events reported for a new vaccine to the proportion of those events reported for an older, established vaccine.

If the new vaccine shows a significantly higher reporting rate of a particular adverse event relative to the old one, it counts as a safety signal that should then trigger a more thorough investigation.

According to a briefing document, the CDC “will perform PRR data mining on a weekly basis or as needed.”

Yet in its response to CHD’s FOIA request, the agency wrote, “no PRRs were conducted by CDC” and data mining is “outside of the agency’s purview.” The agency suggested contacting the FDA, which was supposed to perform a different type of data mining, according to the briefing document.

Reports of chickenpox, shingles following COVID-19 vaccines on the rise

Doctors and scientists are seeing an increase in the reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus, which causes chickenpox, following COVID-19 vaccines, The Epoch Times reported.

After a person gets chickenpox, the virus lies dormant in the nervous system for life and can be reactivated, showing up as shingles, or herpes zoster, later in life.

Federal health officials said there’s no correlation between COVID-19 vaccines and shingles, but numerous studies show a higher incidence of shingles in people who received the vaccine.

The FDA claims it has not detected any safety signals regarding shingles following approved or authorized COVID-19 vaccines. The CDC alleges “there is no current connection” between COVID-19 vaccines and the reactivation of the chickenpox virus.

Scott Pauley, CDC spokesperson, said any adverse reactions experienced after receiving the shot are “temporary and a positive sign that the vaccine is working.”

Pfizer, Moderna COVID vaccines may increase risk of infection

A new peer-reviewed study shows two doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine yield negative protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, while previous infection without vaccination offers about 50% immunity.

The findings, published June 15 in the New England Journal of Medicine, analyzed information from more than 100,000 Omicron-infected and non-infected residents in Qatar from Dec. 23, 2021, through Feb. 21, 2022.

Researchers found those who had a prior infection but had not been vaccinated had 46.1% and 50% immunity against the BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron subvariants more than 300 days after the previous infection.

However, individuals who received two doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, but were not previously infected, had negative immunity against the subvariants — indicating an increased risk of infection compared to someone without prior infection and vaccination.

Six months after the second dose of Pfizer, immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -3.4% below an average person without infection and vaccination, which as a control, was set at 0.

For two doses of Moderna, immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -10.3% about six months after the last dose. [MORE]

June 25, 2022

Naomi Wolf: Phizer Knew COVID Vax Caused Miscarriages. During Trials Most of the Records (234) of Pregnant Woman Were "Lost." Of the Remaining 36 Women, 28 Lost Babies. 3100 Babies Dead So Far

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

Pfizer is Not German, it is a German Chinese Company. China Owns the Tech Behind Vax Designed to Kill the West

From [HERE] and [HERE] Naomi Wolf graduated from Yale in 1984 and was a Rhodes scholar at New College, Oxford University. She is the author of the new book The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19 and The War Against the Human and bestseller feminist books, “The Beauty Myth”, “Fire with Fire”, “Promiscuities” and “Misconceptions”. The New York Times called “The Beauty Myth” one of the 70 most significant books of the century. More recently, Naomi has written books critiquing the establishment’s advances in censorship, Covid-19 vaccinations and many more issues which she addresses with James.

June 25, 2022

If COVID Shots are Safe Why did the President of PharmaMar Pay to Falsify His Vaccination Status and Get Injected with Saline? Spanish Gov Investigating Network of Elites with Fake Certificates

June 25, 2022/ Tron Nick