The Richland County Sheriff Claims “Completely Transparency" but Refuses to Release More than a Few Seconds of the Public's Video of White Cops Fatal Shooting of a Black Man Holding a Piece of Wood

/

From [HERE] A sheriff's department in South Carolina released dashboard camera footage Tuesday of a deputy fatally shooting a Black man as he approached officers with a piece of wood. Police and the dependent media, which is run by elite whites, have described the object as a wooden stake. The Black man's family called the killing unjustified.

The 49-second clip from a longer video shows Irvin D. Moorer Charley being shot with a stun gun while slowly walking toward the officers as one deputy yells “Taser! Taser!" The stun gun has no apparent affect, and then Moorer Charley runs at the Richland County deputy as the officer fires seven times until the man collapses.

Moorer Charley’s family has seen the footage and a representative said it did not change their minds.

“It's a clear cover up for us. They shot a man who they knew was mentally ill," said Benita Robinson, a legal assistant for Johnny E. Watson, the attorney representing some family members.

The sheriff's department has only released small segments of the dashboard camera and deputy's body camera to the public with Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott recently saying all the footage was “just not something everyone needs to see."

“If you want to show something, show the whole thing," Robinson said.

The Richland County Sheriff’s Department also released a photo of the 16-inch (40-centimeter) long piece of wood in Moorer Charley’s hands as well as the 911 call. A statement said authorities wanted to be completely transparent and “provide clarity to misstatements that this was a mental health call for service.”

Moorer Charley's brother told the deputies his brother was mentally ill in parts of videos that weren't released and what deputies called a wooden stake was just a piece of wood, according to Robinson.

The officers are heard calling Moorer Charley “Irvin" on the dashboard video released Tuesday as deputies had been called to deal with the man's mental problems about two dozen times without violence, said Robinson. She added the family plans a statement and a possible news conference soon.

The 911 call came in just before Saturday's shooting. The sheriff's department said it was made by an unidentified woman who said she was Moorer Charley' sister. The woman said the man had pulled a knife on her brother, mother and stepfather and was punching them.

Moorer Charley's mother is also seen on the dashcam video by her son's side begging the deputies “don’t hit my son. Please don’t hit my son” before falling to the ground after a deputy orders her to move out of the way. She can be seen writhing on the ground after the shots are fired at her son.

Moorer Charley is heard twice on the dashcam footage telling the deputies “y'all can shoot me."

Lott defended deputies John Anderson and Zachary Hentz, saying they were protecting themselves from potentially deadly violence in a close encounter. Hentz arrived after Anderson and fired the Taser and the seven shots as he was backpedaling, according to the dashcam footage.

The Richland County Sheriff's Department investigates its own police shootings while nearly every other agency in the state relies on the State Law Enforcement Division as independent examiners.

Lott said his deputies have the expertise and temperament to fairly investigate their fellow officers. He also uses a citizen advisory board to review shootings and other major incidents and report back to him and asks the FBI to review any officer shootings.

The sheriff said he showed all the videos to that board as well as prosecutors, who are still reviewing the case to see if the shooting was justified.

Ivan Charley's said Monday his brother's life was complicated by mental illness that contributed to frequent fights he had with his family,

The police got called sometimes, but every other time they calmed Moorer Charley down with common sense instead of with guns drawn and even sometimes gave him rides so he could leave the area, his brother said.

Ivan Charley said his brother had calmed down before the deputies arrived and only picked up the piece of wood after he got upset at the officers — footage that has not been released to the public which has only seen after Moorer Charley walked out of the home with the wood in his hand.

“He was still alive, but y’all killed him because he had a stick in his hand,” Ivan Charley said. “It’s a stick. ... It’s still wood, and it’s not made of bullets.”

$4M settlement in Manuel Ellis Case. Wash Cops Held a Black Man Down in a Hobble Restraint and After he Told Them He Couldn't Breathe Cops Put a Spit Mask Over His Face, Murdering him. Charges Pending

/

From [HERE] The family of Manuel Ellis, a Black man killed by police in Washington State two years ago as he pleaded for breath, has now reached a $4 million proposed settlement with one of the two government agencies it named in a wrongful death lawsuit.

“We are happy to have reached this agreement with the County,” the family’s attorney, Matthew A. Ericksen Sr., said in an email. “By reaching this resolution Pierce County has established a foundation upon which the Ellis family and the community can begin the process of moving forward.”

Ellis’ sister, Monet Carter-Mixon, and mother, Marcia Carter, continue to pursue their federal civil rights and wrongful death lawsuit against the city of Tacoma and against several individual officers, some of whom have been charged criminally.

Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson charged Tacoma police officers Christopher Burbank and Matthew Collins, who are White, with second-degree murder after witnesses reported that they attacked Ellis without provocation.

Manuel Ellis was a 33-year-old black man who died on March 3, 2020, during an arrest by police officers. The Pierce County Sheriff’s Department initially claimed that Ellis had attacked a police car and then attacked officers, leading to the arrest. State prosecutors quoted civilian witnesses as saying that Ellis did not attack the police car or officers; they also said it was the officers who initiated the use of physical force on Ellis after a conversation. Video of the incident showed officers repeatedly punching Ellis, choking him, using a Taser, and kneeling on him. State prosecutors stated that "Ellis was not fighting back", citing witness statements and video evidence. A police radio recording showed that Ellis said he "can’t breathe". Ellis told officers "can't breathe, sir" multiple times, according to prosecutors.Ellis was hogtied, face-down, with an officer on him, for at least six minutes, and a spit hood was placed on his head in this position, stated prosecutors.[10] Ellis died at the scene while receiving medical aid from paramedics. [MORE]

In early June 2020, Ellis's death was ruled by county medical examiner Thomas Clark as a homicide due to "hypoxia due to physical restraint", and with "contributing conditions of methamphetamine intoxication and a dilated heart".[2][11] Prosecutors, in May 2021 documents, quoted Clark as saying that additional evidence that emerged after the autopsy concluded indicated that "Ellis's death was not likely caused by methamphetamine intoxication", and further indicated that restraint caused the death.

After Ellis's death, four Tacoma police officers were placed on paid administrative leave; they returned to work two weeks later, with the Tacoma police department stating "there were no known departmental violations". [MORE]

Officer Timothy Rankine, who is Asian, faces a charge of first-degree manslaughter. He is accused of kneeling on Ellis’ back and shoulder as Ellis repeatedly told them he couldn’t breathe, according to a probable cause statement filed in Pierce County Superior Court. The officers involved have pleaded not guilty.

Two Pierce County Sheriff deputies also responded to the scene, including Deputy Gary Sanders, who grabbed Manuel Ellis’ leg and assisted in restraining him while Tacoma police handcuffed and hogtied him. The family’s lawsuit faulted the deputies for not helping Ellis despite clearly being in distress.

His final words — “I can’t breathe, sir!” — were captured by a home security camera, followed by an officer’s reply: “Shut the (expletive) up, man.”

Suit says Without Warning Plainclothes Houston Cops in Unmarked Cars Shot Charion Lockett to Death as he Sat in a Car in His Driveway. Video Contradicts Cops' Claim that Black Man Shot At Them First

/

From [HERE] The mother of a 27-year-old Black man fatally shot by Houston cops accuses the officers of failing to identify themselves as police when approaching her son, who was sitting in his parked car.

According to the amended complaint,

Charion Lockett (hereinafter sometimes “Mr. Lockett) was 27 years old and had never been convicted, or even arrested, for any crime in his entire life. Charion Lockett held a Bachelor’s degree from Sam Houston State University, a Master’s Degree from Lamar University and was studying for the Law School Admissions Test.

The Houston Police Department began investigating an alleged attempted robbery which allegedly took place in or about November 2021. No one was injured in the alleged robbery and nothing was stolen.

The alleged victim, Torrey Brown, in the alleged attempted armed robbery was a known criminal with convictions for unlawful carrying a weapon and evading detention. Torrey Brown allegedly blamed Charion Lockett and some “unknown black male.”

Torrey Brown knew Charion Lockett from high school and had animosity towards him. The investigating officers’ first attempt to secure an arrest warrant for “aggravated robbery – deadly weapon” was rejected by a State District Court Judge. 

On the morning of February 7, 2022, an unidentified officer called Charion Lockett and his mother at or about 9:30 AM informing that Mr. Lockett had a warrant for his arrest in connection with the aforementioned armed robbery. The officer was informed that Charion intended to immediately retain an attorney and Mr. Lockett would turn himself later that day. The Houston Police Department had no information that Mr. Lockett was not going to turn himself in that day and Mr. Lockett made no attempt to flee Houston. The Houston Police Department officer did not say the police were coming to pick up Charion up.

At approximately 10:30 AM, Houston Police officers arrived at Mr. Lockett’s residence and began firing at him while he sat in his parked vehicle.

Body worn camera footage of the shooting shows Detective Inocencio riding in an unmarked red vehicle, pull up fast near Mr. Lockett, and open the door of his red unmarked car, dressed in civilian clothes, and point a Glock handgun directly at Mr. Lockett without ever identifying himself as a police officer, or saying anything. At all times Detective Inocencio was behind the car door and dash.

Officer Carroll, Officer Houlihan, and Officer Villareal also shot at Mr. Lockett without first identifying they were police, “hand ups”, “you’re under arrest”, or anything indicating they were police. It is unknown at this time which officers’ bullets wounded or killed Mr. Lockett.

Mr. Lockett likely saw the red vehicle pull up suddenly with Detective Inocencio pointing the Glock directly at him-exactly as the video shows-and immediately became in fear of his life as would anyone. Mr. Lockett had never seen Officer Inocencio, or the other officers that were there, prior to seeing the red car suddenly gun pointed at him and likely did not know Officer Inocencio, or others, were police officers.

Prior to the shooting of Mr. Lockett no officer stated they were the police, “hands up”, “you’re under arrest”, or any other words indicating it was an arrest.

After the shots were fired by Officer Inocencio, the other officers opened fire striking Mr. Lockett in the back as he attempted to run for his life. Mr. Lockett died of the gunfire at the scene.

Mr. Lockett has a concealed carry license. 

Mr. Lockett suffered great pain, anguish and was killed as a result of Defendants’ actions. Mr. Lockett’s mother Plaintiff has also suffered immense grief, anxiety, and depression. [MORE]

Instead of Complying w/a White Cop's Orders to Get Out a Car, a Black Man Had the Audacity to Ask for a Supervisor. Thereafter the Cop Assaulted Him, b/c Public Masters Don't Serve Citizen-Subjects

/

hmmm, DOES THE MASTER NEED CONSENT FROM THE SLAVE? From [HERE] Delane Gordon, a Black DoorDash driver, was a few hundred yards from his delivery destination when a white police officer passed him, hooked a U-turn and pulled him over for speeding.

On the side of the road in Collegedale, Tenn., Gordon “politely and repeatedly” asked to speak to the police officer’s supervisor, Gordon’s attorney says. But the situation escalated as the police officer demanded that Gordon get out of the car while Gordon refused, video of the March 10 incident shows.

“Get out!” the police officer ordered, pointing a Taser at Gordon, according to the video. The officer, whom the Collegedale Police Department has not identified, accused Gordon of not providing his identification, the video shows.

“Sir, I feel uncomfortable,” Gordon said. “Please get your supervisor.”

The officer then tried to pull Gordon out of the car. When Gordon did not comply, the officer pulled out his Taser again.

The footage, captured by Gordon, shows only 49 seconds of the incident.

Undeceiver Larken Rose explains

The Myth of Consent

In the modem world, slavery is almost universally condemned. But the relationship of a perceived “authority” to his subject is very much the relationship of a slave master (owner) to a slave (property). Not wanting to admit that, and not wanting to condone what amounts to slavery, those who believe in “authority” are trained to memorize and repeat blatantly inaccurate rhetoric designed to hide the true nature of the situation. One example of this is the phrase “consent of the governed.”

There are two basic ways in which people can interact: by mutual agreement, or by one person using threats or violence to force his will upon another. The first can be labeled “consent”– both sides willingly and voluntarily agreeing to what is to be done. The second can be labeled “governing” – one person controlling another. Since these two – consent and governing – are opposites, the concept of “consent of the governed” is a contradiction. If there is mutual consent, it is not “government”; if there is governing, there is no consent. Some will claim that a majority; or the people as a whole, have given their consent to be ruled, even if many individuals have not. But such an argument turns

the concept of consent on its head. No one, individually or as a group, can give consent for something to be done to someone else. That is simply not what “consent” means. It defies logic to say, “I give my consent for you to be robbed.” Yet that is the basis of the cult of “democracy”: the notion that a majority can give consent on behalf of a minority, That is not “consent of the governed”; it is forcible control of the governed, with the “consent” of a third party.

Even if someone were silly enough to actually tell someone else, “I agree to let you forcibly control me,” the moment the controller must force the “controllee” to do something, there is obviously no longer “consent.” Prior to that moment, there is no “governing” – only voluntary cooperation. Expressing the concept more precisely exposes its inherent schizophrenia: “I agree to let you force things upon me, whether I agree to them or not.”

But in reality, no one ever agrees to let those in “government” do whatever they want. So, in order to fabricate “consent” where there is none, believers in “authority” add another, even more bizarre, step to the mythology: the notion of “implied consent.” The claim is that, by merely living in a town, or a state, or a country, one is “agreeing” to abide by whatever rules happen to be issued by the people who claim to have the right to rule that town, state, or country. The idea is that if someone does not like the rules, he is free to leave the town, state, or country altogether, and if he chooses not to leave, that constitutes giving his consent to be controlled by the rulers of that jurisdiction.

Though it is constantly parroted as gospel, the idea defies common sense. It makes no more sense than a carjacker stopping a driver on a Sunday and telling him, “By driving a car in this neighborhood on Sunday, you are agreeing to give me your car.” One person obviously cannot decide what counts as someone else “agreeing” to something. An agreement is when two or more people communicate a mutual willingness to enter into some arrangement. Simply being born somewhere is not agreeing to anything, nor is living in one’s own house when some king or politician has declared it to be within the realm he rules. It is one thing for someone to say, “If you want to ride in my car, you may not smoke,” or “You can come into my house only if you take your shoes off.” It is quite another to try to tell other people what they can do on their own property. Whoever has the right to make the rules for a particular place is, by definition, the owner of that place. That is the basis of the idea of private property: that there can be an “owner” who has the exclusive right to decide what is done with and on that property. The owner of a house

has the right to keep others out of it and, by extension, the right to tell visitors what they can and cannot do as long as they are in the house.

And that sheds some light on the underlying assumption behind the idea of implied consent. To tell someone that his only valid choices are either to leave the “country” or to abide by whatever commands the politicians issue logically implies that everything in the “country” is the property of the politicians. If a person can spend year after year paying for his home, or even building it himself, and his choices are still to either obey the politicians or get out, that means that his house and the time and effort he invested in the house are the property of the politicians. And for one person’s time and effort to rightfully belong to another is the definition of slavery. That is exactly what the “implied consent” theory means: that every “country” is a huge slave plantation, and that everything and everyone there is the property of the politicians. And, of course, the master does not need the consent of his slave.

The believers in “government” never explain how it is that a few politicians could have acquired the right to unilaterally claim exclusive ownership of thousands of square miles of land, where other people were already living, as their territory, to rule and exploit as they see fit. It would be no different from a lunatic saying, “I hereby declare North America to be my rightful domain, so anyone living here has to do whatever I say, If you don’t like it, you can leave.”

There is also a practical problem with the “obey or get out” attitude, which is that getting out would only relocate the individual to some other giant slave plantation, a different “country.” The end result is that everyone on earth is a slave, with the only choice being which master to live under. This completely rules out actual freedom. More to the point, that is not what “consent” means.

In the Free Range Prison You're Free to Do Whatever You Want Except Disobey Authority: White KS Cops Attempt to Kill a Black Man who Allegedly Jaywalked on an Empty Street and Disobeyed Orders to Stop

/

From [HERE] and [HERE] Four white Independence police officers, the former police chief and the city are being sued for battery, racial discrimination and excessive force. The Dependent Media, controlled by elite whites, has removed the lawsuit from various web sites to protect the system of racism white supremacy and the system of authority.

It stems from an incident on Feb. 14, 2020. Justin Layton was walking along 39th Street in Independence.

Layton says the officers “senselessly tased, tackled, choke and beat” him before his head was rammed into a police vehicle. Layton also says he was called “nigger” repeatedly by the officers.

The lawsuit names as defendants four police officers — Taylor Cox, Logan Dale, Lacy Gipson and Tanner Philip — and former Police Chief Brad Halsey.The video shows officers restraining Layton. Of the officers named in the suit, only Gipson and Philip remain with the department.

In the end, Layton was arrested for jaywalking and possession of a controlled substance. Layton’s attorney said that the “controlled substance” is medication for epilepsy.

The lawsuit claims the dashcam video shows the officer using a neck restraint, and it says the chief and the city are responsible for the policies that led to Layton being detained in the first place.

It claims Independence police use a “hot map” program, which in effect profiles minorities in certain neighborhoods.

“It’s just accountability — that’s what I want,” said Layton. “That’s what I’m aiming for and I’m not going to stop until I get it.” [MORE] “He was like, ‘jaywalking.’ I was like, ‘jaywalking?’ I was walking on the sidewalk,” Layton said.

"He almost killed me," Layton said of the officer who stopped him. "He literally almost killed me."

Michael Wilbon, a McNegro Mandroid (a programmed, academented, miseducated, trained, stupefied and stymied conformist infected w/Yurugu Virus) Defends COVID Mandates Which are Killing/Harming People

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

McNegro – over one million sold-out. How can any neo-Negro sell out of anything that he does not own—other than merchandise? You have to own something to sell-out. (See: Negropolitan, BOHICAN, Eyeservant, $nigger & Sambo)

proxymoron – one moron who speaks or acts on behalf of another pluperfect moron or a whole gang of morons. (See: Politician, Bureaucracium, Congressman, Moron-Majority, Delegate, Prozac, Oxymoron & TV)

clogic - clogged logic--closed-circuit logic--clueless logic--locked in an endless loop of flawed axioms and paradoxical premises that prevent describing or relating to reality in alignment with its attributes. Using "clogic" is like being trapped in a hall of mirrors in which the two (self and world) endlessly reflect and determine one another in a dualistic duel that shape and dominate each other and with erring inaccuracy keeping us overruled and fooled (through dim and gross reflections that distort the world and ourselves) that is, until Shatterday arrives. (See: Shatterday, Psycholesterol, Wholesight, BLYND, Axioms, Logic, Truth, Proof, Experience, Objectivism, Third Sight & Suffering)

cementality – the non-intuitive and unwise state of mind and approach to Life wherein one attempts to set one’s position unshakably firm (cemented) as soon as possible into a conviction, and then defends any given position(s) against any reality (changes) to these positions with fanatical vim and fervent vigor. People who live in truth (and not reality) function with a cementality. But, since we live in reality (dynamically in real life) and not in truth (static, predictable, certain, artificial life) we must take and make provisional action decisions for this time, now; keeping an open mind by suspending belief and disbelief. Living in reality allows one’s position(s) to gradually evolve (morph) based on learning (and unlearning) from day-to-day testing, i.e., personal experience, per se—evolving from absolute truth to objective truth to subjective truth to reality-based truth. (See: Absolute Truth, Objective Truth, Subjective Truth, Reality Boxes, Truth-Based Truth, Believing, Academented, Ideology, Spontaneity, I-Concept, Split-Mind, Whole-Mind, Attachment, Consciousness, Neuralasticity, Indoctrination, Cultural Conditioning & Reality-Based Truth)

Sleeping Tom – a person of Afrikan descent who has not consciously awakened to fully embrace his or her own asili (connective cultural tissue, heritage, imprimatur, and imperative). 2) a socially unconscious person of Afrikan descent who participates in secret balloting (voting). A sleepin’ Tom lives and reacts out of another culture’s asili or out of the mind of another; not their own. 3) a Negro who is unaware that he is all souled-out. 4) a Negro who isn’t aware that he is in fact and in deed a certified Sambo. 5) a broken, token Negro; a coin-operative. (See: Straw Boss, Asili, Doublemindedness, Sambo, Uncle Tom-Tom, Coin-Operated, Black Flask Brigade & Secret Ballots)

Weiteko Disease – the Caucasian’s patapathetic and pathological fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man . 2) Death-force. (See: Caucasian, Western Civilization & Yurugu)

Liberal US Cities Change Course, Now Clearing Homeless Camps, that are Filled with Mostly Unhoused Black People

/

From [HERE] Makeshift shelters abut busy roadways, tent cities line sidewalks, tarps cover broken-down cars, and sleeping bags are tucked in storefront doorways. The reality of the homelessness crisis in Oregon's largest city can’t be denied.

“I would be an idiot to sit here and tell you that things are better today than they were five years ago with regard to homelessness,” Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler said recently. “People in this city aren’t stupid. They can open their eyes.”

As COVID-19 took root in the U.S., people on the street were largely left on their own — with many cities halting sweeps of homeless camps following guidance from federal health officials. The lack of remediation led to a situation that has spiraled out of control in many places, with frustrated residents calling for action as extreme forms of poverty play out on city streets.

Wheeler has now used emergency powers to ban camping along certain roadways and says homelessness is the “most important issue facing our community, bar none.”

Increasingly in liberal cities across the country — where people living in tents in public spaces have long been tolerated — leaders are removing encampments and pushing other strict measures to address homelessness that would have been unheard of a few years ago.

In Seattle, new Mayor Bruce Harrell ran on a platform that called for action on encampments, focusing on highly visible tent cities in his first few months in office. Across from City Hall, two blocks worth of tents and belongings were removed Wednesday. The clearing marked the end of a two and a half week standoff between the mayor and activists who occupied the camp, working in shifts to keep homeless people from being moved.

In Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser launched a pilot program over the summer to permanently clear several homeless camps. In December, the initiative faced a critical test as lawmakers voted on a bill that would ban clearings until April. It failed 5-7.

In California, home to more than 160,000 homeless people, cities are reshaping how they address the crisis. The Los Angeles City Council used new laws to ban camping in 54 locations. LA Mayoral candidate Joe Buscaino has introduced plans for a ballot measure that would prohibit people from sleeping outdoors in public spaces if they have turned down offers of shelter.

San Francisco Mayor London Breed declared a state of emergency in December in the crime-heavy Tenderloin neighborhood, which has been ground zero for drug dealing, overdose deaths and homelessness. She said it’s time to get aggressive and “less tolerant of all the bull—- that has destroyed our city.”

In Sacramento voters may decide on multiple proposed homeless-related ballot measures in November — including prohibiting people from storing “hazardous waste,” such as needles and feces, on public and private property, and requiring the city to create thousands of shelter beds. City officials in the area are feeling increasing pressure to break liberal conventions, including from an conservation group that is demanding that 750 people camping along a 23-mile (37-kilometer) natural corridor of the American River Parkway be removed from the area.

Advocates for the homeless have denounced aggressive measures, saying the problem is being treated as a blight or a chance for cheap political gains, instead of a humanitarian crisis.

Donald H. Whitehead Jr., executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, said at least 65 U.S. cities are criminalizing or sweeping encampments. “Everywhere that there is a high population of homeless people, we started to see this as their response.”

Portland’s homeless crisis has grown increasingly visible in recent years. During the area's 2019 point-in-time count — a yearly census of sorts — an estimated 4,015 people were experiencing homelessness, with half of them “unsheltered” or sleeping outside. Advocates say the numbers have likely significantly increased.

Last month Wheeler used his emergency powers to ban camping on the sides of "high-crash" roadways — which encompass about 8% of the total area of the city. The decision followed a report showing 19 of 27 pedestrians killed by cars in Portland last year were homeless. People in at least 10 encampments were given 72 hours to leave.

“It’s been made very clear people are dying,” Wheeler said. “So I approach this from a sense of urgency."

Wheeler’s top adviser — Sam Adams, a former Portland mayor — has also outlined a controversial planthat would force up to 3,000 homeless people into massive temporary shelters staffed by Oregon National Guard members. Advocates say the move, which marks a major shift in tone and policy, would ultimately criminalize homelessness.

“I understand my suggestions are big ideas,” Adams wrote. “Our work so far, mine included, has … failed to produce the sought-after results.”

Oregon’s Democratic governor rejected the idea. But Adams says if liberal cities don’t take drastic action, ballot measures that crack down on homelessness may emerge instead.

That’s what happened in left-leaning Austin, Texas. Last year voters there reinstated a ban that penalizes those who camp downtown and near the University of Texas, in addition to making it a crime to ask for money in certain areas and times.

People who work with the homeless urge mayors to find long-term solutions — such as permanent housing and addressing root causes like addiction and affordability — instead of temporary ones they say will further traumatize and villainize a vulnerable population.

The pandemic has added complications, with homeless-related complaints skyrocketing in places like Portland, where the number of campsites removed each week plummeted from 50 to five after COVID-19 hit.

The situation has affected businesses and events, with employers routinely asking officials to do more. Some are looking to move, while others already have — notably Oregon’s largest annual golf tournament, the LPGA Tour’s Portland Classic, relocated from Portland last year due to safety concerns related to a nearby homeless encampment.

James Darwin “Dar” Crammond, director at the Oregon Water Science Center building downtown, told the City Council about his experience working in an area populated with encampments.

Crammond said four years ago the biggest security concerns were vandalism and occasional car break-ins. Now employees often are confronted by “unhinged” people and forced to sidestep discarded needles, he said.

Despite spending $300,000 on security and implementing a buddy system for workers to safely be outdoors, the division of the U.S. Geological Survey is looking to move.

“I don’t blame the campers. There are a few other options for housing. There’s a plague of meth and opiates and a world that offers them no hope and little assistance,” Crammond said. “In my view, where the blame squarely lies is with the City of Portland.”

In New York City, where a homeless man is accused of pushing a woman to her death in front of a subway in January, Mayor Eric Adams announced a plan to start barring people from sleeping on trains or riding the same lines all night.

Adams has likened homelessness to a “cancerous sore,” lending to what advocates describe as a negative and inaccurate narrative that villainizes the population.

“Talk to someone on the street and literally just hear a little bit about their stories — I mean, honestly, homelessness can happen to any one of us,” said Laura Recko, associate director of external communications for Central City Concern in Portland.

And some question whether the tougher approach is legal — citing the 2018 federal court decision known as Martin v. City of Boise, Idaho, that said cities cannot make it illegal for people to sleep or rest outside without providing sufficient indoor alternatives.

Whitehead, of the National Coalition for the Homeless, thought the landmark ruling would force elected officials to start developing long-term fixes and creating enough shelter beds for emergency needs. Instead, some areas are ignoring the decision or finding ways around it, he said.

“If cities become as creative about solutions as they are about criminalization, then we could end homelessness tomorrow,” he said.

The Disappearance of the Annual Flu Which was Replaced with COVID Shows Corruption at its Highest Level at the CDC

/

From [HIN] The flu bug is dead! It had a long run of success at the CDC, being used to rake in $BILLIONS in sales over the years with the yearly influenza vaccine, but alas its run is over now, as it has been supplanted by the new deadlier “virus,” COVID-19.

Oh make no mistake about it, the CDC tried to keep both viruses alive to have double the fear factor, and double the sales in vaccines, but in the end there just weren’t enough sick people to go around and support both with actual death statistics.

So the flu died. COVID-19 is way more scary than the annual flu, so one of them had to go, and people were just too used to the annual flu and were not fearing it as much anymore.

And if you think I am using sarcasm here to make a point, then go listen to Anthony Fauci say the exact same thingback in 2019 when he stated people did not fear the flu enough anymore, and that something new was needed, and hear it directly from his own mouth:

But everything is OK if you are invested in pharmaceutical stocks, because with the Federal Reserve banks creating money out of thin air and then having their puppet politicians give $TRILLIONS to the pharmaceutical industry, there was plenty of money to go around for other vaccines besides COVID, and annual sales of the flu vaccine skyrocketed to its highest total ever in the 2020-21 flu season, at 193.8 MILLION doses, the same year the COVID-19 vaccines were introduced.

Talk about a windfall for Big Pharma, wow!

While they were raking in record profits from the COVID-19 shots, they also profited from the most doses of the flu vaccine ever sold, for a “disease” that basically doesn’t even exist anymore, according to the CDC’s own statistics.

Welcome to the Pharmaceutical Drug Cartel, and their criminal front group, the CDC.

Here is what the CDC’s official statistics are reporting for annual flu deaths since 2020, as of today, March 9, 2022:

As you can clearly see, the CDC’s own data is showing that the flu is all but disappearing as a cause of death, and is down to only 676 alleged deaths in 2022. I doubt that the flu even makes the top 100 list of diseases causing death now.

How many people allegedly died from the flu in the years prior to 2020 when COVID was unleashed?

According to the CDC:

  • 34,000 deaths in the 2018-2019 flu season

  • 61,000 deaths in the 2017-2018 flu season

  • 38,000 deaths in the 2016-2017 flu season

  • 23,000 deaths in the 2015-2016 flu season

  • 51,000 deaths in the 2014-2015 flu season

  • etc. (Source.)

According to the CDC’s own currently published data, therefore, deaths caused by the flu plummeted to the lowest numbers on record starting in 2020.

But doses of the flu vaccine INCREASED to all-time highs during that same period. [MORE]

Doctors Inform Tenn Legislators: Persons with Natural COVID Immunity are Likely to Die or Have a Serious Adverse Reaction If They get Vaccinated. This is the Most Dangerous Vaccine Rollout in History

/

*HB1871 by Hulsey. (SB1982 by Hensley.)Public Health - Amends TCA Title 4; Title 7; Title 8; Title 14; Title 50; Title 63 and Title 68. As introduced, prohibits governmental entities, local education agencies, schools, and private businesses from adopting or enforcing laws, rules, or practices that fail to recognize natural immunity as providing a level of immune protection that is at least as protective as a COVID-19 vaccine or treat individuals with natural immunity differently than individuals who have received the COVID-19 vaccine.The Abstract summarizes HB1871 as introduced.

On March 1, 2022 Doctor Urso and Doctor Ryan Cole testified at the Tennessee General Assembly House of Representatives Health Subcommittee concerning *HB1871

Among other things the Doctors explained with the COVID pandemic for the first time in the history of science we are ignoring natural immunity. It has been recognized for centuries as being far superior to vaccines. According to their testimony, persons with natural immunity are 30X less likely to get COVID than people who are the triple vaccinated. Natural COVD immunity is likely to be lifelong immunity. Dr. Cole stated that there is no evidence that anyone who is COVID recovered has transmitted COVID to anyone else.

Dr. Urso stated that persons with natural immunity who take the COVID shot are at risk for Hyper Immune Response – which means they’re likely to die or have a serious adverse reaction from the shot. He stated, for that reason, among others, vaccine mandates kill and harm adults and children. They reiterated the seriousness and dangerousness associated with taking a COVID vax if a person is COVID recovered. Dr. Urso explained for that very reason vaccine manufacturers purposefully did not include any persons with natural immunity from their studies.

Both doctors emphasized that has been the most dangerous vaccine rollout in our history. They implied that the vax is the reason for the excess, never before seen high morality rates and increase in various kinds of disease, illness or cancers such as neurological conditions, autoimmune diseases etc.

The doctors explained mandates kill and harm people and that there is no COVID medical emergency. They also stated that the triple vaxxed are more likely to die from COVID than unvaccinated persons.

Dr. Cole said that based on the number of deaths that occurred within the first month of the vaccine rollout FDA approval must’ve been obtained by fraud.

Doctors also reminded the lawmakers that all the COVID vaccines are completely experimental. Specifically, they stated that approved vaccines have not been made available in America.

Dr. Bhakdi: There's No Doubt the Vaccine is Poison Injected Into the Body. Spike Protein is Poison, It Has No Benefit. It's Killing People in Many Ways. How Can Anyone Stand to See this Happen?

/

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: ‘Now we know, We’re looking at an agent that has no benefit whatsoever but it has capacity to kill you in may ways. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi's Testimony at the COVID Eugenocide Model Grand Jury, day 4

Psychopathic Pfizer CEO Pushes for 4th COVID Injection, Says 3 Doses ‘Not That Good’ Against Infections

/

From [CHD] Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla on Sunday told CBS “Face the Nation” a fourth dose of its COVID-19vaccine will be necessary to maintain manageable levels of hospitalizations and mild infections.

The company plans to submit data on a fourth dose to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is working on a vaccine that protects against all COVID variants for at least a year.

In an interview on “Squawk Box,” Bourla said:

“I think we’re going to submit to FDA a significant package of data about the need for a fourth dose, and they need to make their own conclusions, of course, and then CDC also. […] to see that clearly  there is a need in an environment of Omicron to boost the immune response.”

Bourla said a fourth dose is “necessary for right now” because protection after three doses of Pfizer’s vaccine is “not that good against infections” and “doesn’t last very long” when faced with a variant like Omicron.

Bourla said Pfizer is making a vaccine that covers Omicron and all other variants and is optimistic about the preliminary data he’s seen so far.

“There are so much trials that are going right now, and a lot of them we’ll start reading by the end of the month,” he added.

Bourla told CBS he foresees Americans needing to prepare themselves every fall for a COVID booster just like they do with the flu vaccine. [MORE]

Massa’s Media Angry Kevin Durant Would Dare to Question Their Master’s Genocidal COVID Injections and NYC's Science-Free COVID Mandate, Overseen by the NYC Mayor, Their Black StrawBoss, Safe Negro

/

According to FUNKTIONARY

mass media – “Massa’ Media. Massa’s media plus (+) Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses. 2) The “Mess” Media. 3) wholesale retale— retelling the whole tale (propaganda) exactly as you’re told, consistently and relentlessly. How can you possibly relate when you are framed by the very debate wherein you are an unwilling spectator? Let’s be perfectly clear on this. There’s no counteroption or outlet to vent when you’re under the controlled thoughtform of mass-think manufactured consent. “Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.” ~A.J. Liebling. (See: Media, T.V., Mass, Alienation, Spectacle Society, NEWS, ABCTV, Propaganda, Legislation & The New God Economy)

[MORE]

On Saturday, Barbaric Authorities in Saudi Arabia Murdered 81 People in the Largest Mass Execution in Modern History. The Dependent Media and US Puppeticians Silently Support Repressive Dictatorship

/

From [EJI] Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Interior announced that 81 individuals were executed on Saturday in the country’s largest mass execution in decades.

Human rights groups have widely condemned the executions, which follow Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s promises to reform the country’s criminal legal system and limit its use of capital punishment. Earlier this month, the crown prince reportedly told The Atlantic that a “high percentage” of executions had been avoided through settlements with victims’ families.

“Just last week the Crown Prince told journalists he plans to modernise Saudi Arabia’s criminal justice system,” London-based advocacy group Reprieve tweeted on Saturday, “only to order the largest mass execution in the country’s history.”

In a statement published by the state-run Saudi Press Agency, the government did not identify the 81 individuals executed and did not say where or how they were put to death. CBS News reports that people sentenced to death are typically beheaded in Saudi Arabia.

The number of people executed on Saturday exceeds the country’s two most recent mass executions—47 people were executed in 2016 and 37 mostly minority Shiites were beheaded in 2019—and surpasses even the 1980 mass execution of 63 people convicted of seizing the Grand Mosque in Mecca.

The government said the executed individuals were convicted of crimes ranging from killings to belonging to militant groups. It did not specify the charges in each case but acknowledged that they included nonhomicide offenses like “pledging allegiance” to foreign terrorist organizations and traveling to conflict zones.

Reprieve said that several of the executed men were convicted of nonviolent offences related to attending protests.

“There are prisoners of conscience on Saudi death row,” the group said in a statement, “and others arrested as children or charged with non-violent crimes. We fear for every one of them following this brutal display of impunity.”

Ali Adubusi, the director of the European Saudi Organisation for Human Rights told CBS that some of those executed had been tortured and faced trials “carried out in secret.”

The watchdog group said it had been unable to identify or track most of the cases “due to the lack of transparency in dealing with execution cases, threats, and intimidation of families and civil society,” but in the few cases it could document, “the charges did not include any serious charges.”

“These executions are the opposite of justice,” Mr. Adubusi said.

Saudi Arabia has faced international criticism of its use of the death penalty, including for children.

Despite the kingdom’s pledge to end capital punishment for childhood crimes, Reprieve reports that Mustafa al-Darwish was executed last year for attending protests when he was 17 years old, and Abdullah al-Howaiti, who was just 14 when he was arrested and tortured into signing a false ‘confession’, was resentenced to beheading last month.

Saudi Arabia is among the small group of outlier countries that continue to execute people in contravention of the global trend against capital punishment. Worldwide, 144 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice, in contrast with 55 retentionist countries.

Excluding China, just four countries—Iran (at least 246), Egypt (at least 107), Iraq (at least 45), and Saudi Arabia (27)—accounted for 88% of all known executions in 2020, according to Amnesty International. The U.S. followed Saudi Arabia with 17 executions in 2020.

The number of executions in Saudi Arabia declined sharply in 2020 (from 184 recorded in 2019), likely due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the kingdom’s decision not to carry out executions while hosting the G-20 summit.

Amnesty International reported that Saudi Arabia continued to impose death sentences despite failing to meet international fair trial standards in 2020, and that the kingdom was one of four countries known to have used “confessions” that may have been extracted through torture or other ill treatment to convict and sentence people to death.