In Case You Missed It, Photos of Racist Suspect Liberal Puppetician Justin Trudeau in BlackFace

Yet another image of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in blackface at the 2001 Arabian Nights party - this time in color - has emerged.

The photo, released in September by Canadian Proud, shows the liberal icon in a turban and robe, with his tongue sticking out. The world leader has also covered his face with dark makeup. The racist suspect apparently has a checkered history of blackface. [MORE]

Yes authority is a farce and we are being clowned by costumed and uncostumed orderlies.

Tyrants Own the Minds of Its Victims thru Their Assent to Certain Concepts [vaccine, COVID case, COVID death, variant, positive test] which Gives Rise to Coercive Control [The COVID Tyrant Paradigm]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

tyrant-paradigm - the assertion or assent to certain concepts, idea, memes, words, patterns of thinking, attitudes, beliefs, and convictions that give rise to coercive political systems. It includes the notion that the tyrants (territorial gangsters) are so omniscient and omnipotent that they can prevent natural persons from living free. The words that constitute the tyrant paradigm are enemy outposts in your mind. Tyrants "own" the minds of their oppressed victims to the extent that victims hold contents of the tyrant-paradigm in the minds. The tyrant-paradigm consists of the "construction of systematic thought" and "the systematic pattems of thought" that give rise to coercive political systems. (See: The OCTOCON, Territorial Gangsters & Reactions)

Tyrants - there are none; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind-control and word-conditioning control? "Find out the exact amount of injustice any people accept, and you will find out the exact amount of injustice they receive." -Freddy D. "The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it." -John Jay, Castilian Days II, 1872. (See: Tyranny, Terms, "The Law," Dictatorship, Corporate State & Fascism)

democracy - a commercial form of "government" (exploitation and theft via force, deception and involuntary participation) of the mob, by the mob, and/or the mob, i.e., Mob-Rule. 2) a guise rubber stamping of an alternative royalty into overruling power. 3) the worst possible form of government because the majority rules whether they be good, evil, or misled by a minority. 4) slavery of the people, by the people, for the people. 5) equality achieved through force. 6) a system where only the majority need to befooled. 7) advertised equality. 8) a parody of a free society that only ethical anarchism or voluntaryism can usher into existence.

"Democracy has always been seen (and is still seen today) as equality of rights (granted privileges), not conditions. To the hypothetical equality of rights there has always corresponded a substantial inequality of conditions. And instead of being related to the nature of their individuality, differences between people have always been those marked by the different basic conditions they live in as they struggle against the suffocating artificial divisions imposed on them by power." —Alfred M. Bonanno. Democracy is a euphonious term created mainly to serve as sheepskin for Leviathan, Doggy and the Crimethlnc. All-Stars. 9) Dictatorship camouflaged as freedom 10) a whitewashed plutocracy with a pastel eggshell finish. Democracy, next to "monetized debt," and direct taxation (on labor) is the biggest con-game perpetrated on a population. Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain and sustain power over people is to assure the people that they are ruling themselves. Once they believe that lie, they make wonderfully submissive and self-maintained slaves.

"There are those who maintain that at bottom what is called democracy, (whenever and wherever it is supposed to have existed), is merely the mask for the rule of capitalist and/or bureaucratic minorities over an ignorant and deceived majority whose franchise signifies only the right to choose or tc change its masters." -Max Nomad. As long as mob rule is allowed through secret ballots, operational and organizational transparency will evade us and vice (vested interests controlling economies) will continue to forsake us and break us. Democracy is a powerful synthetic ideology of recuperation. Democracy goes against the emancipation of desire. Democracy allows for A to band together with B (majority rule) to rip off C. Democracy and citizenship are the chains that filter your pursuit of happiness and the happiness in your pursuit. Democracy in America has been checked and balanced, or gone unchecked and unbalanced—depending on one's indoctrination—to the point (extent) of collapse. Only the improper is left to prop it up aright as if it were still standing on its own ideological efficacy and edifice. "Democracy (the political ideal) is just a dream, it has not happened anywhere, it cannot happen. And wherever it happens (in practice), it creates trouble, the medicine proves more dangerous than the disease itself." -OSHO. "If the people of a democracy are allowed to do so, they will vote away freedoms that are essential to that democracy." -Snell Putney. As H.L. Mencken so aptly observed, "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard." In a democracy, scum rises to the top; otherwise it starts there. Democracy is a specific instance of stationary rogue State power. Under the rubric of democracy, justice can be attained only by begging, buying, milking and taking. [MORE]

Public Input/Review Excluded as DoGooder Boston Mayor Used Uncontrollable Emergency Authority to Mandate Deadly COVID Injections, Destroying Rights to Bodily Autonomy. Citizens Blow Up Fake Town Hall

From [InfoWars} Boston Mayor Michelle Wu’s social media town hall got highjacked this week by fed-up city residents and labor unions fuming over the new mayor’s strident vaccine and mask mandates – even as other cities and states around the US are loosening pandemic restrictions.

Wu, who took office just three months ago, upset many of her constituents with her vaccine passports and mandates for indoor dining, bars, businesses, schools, and city workers. 

She announced she does not plan to lift mask mandates for public schools at the end of February.

The mandate, which Wu announced in December and came into effect late last month, has been highly controversial sparking teachers union strikes, complaints from restaurants and local businesses, and unrest among Bostonians.  

Some of those angry Beantowners expressed their frustrations this week when Wu held an social media town hall on InstagramLive – and welcomed comments from her constituents, telling them ‘I will answer any questions that you have.’

‘Why do you hate kids? Teachers? Cops? Firemen?’ one commenter immediately demanded to know. 

‘Please stop the indoor vaccine requirement mandate,’ wrote another. ‘It does nothing but discriminate and rob people of freedom.’

Despite her promise to answer questions, negative queries were ignored. 

Wu instead cooed about a tiger emoji that someone posted in honor of the Chinese Lunar New Year.

[The Opposite of Black Power] To Make Master Happy RecogNegro NYC Mayor Wants to Detain Anyone Arrested Until Trial if They are Deemed "Dangerous" Using Criteria Designed to Lock Up More Blacks

From [HERE] When Mayor Eric Adams released a wide-ranging plan to tackle crime in New York City, one formidable obstacle became clear: He would need cooperation from all levels of government to attack the root causes of gun violence.

While the mayor oversees the Police Department and city agencies that will implement many of his proposals, some of the most significant portions of his plan hinge on his ability to win over forces outside his control — and signs of resistance are already emerging.

In Albany, Mr. Adams dived into one of the most searing debates in the State Capitol: He asked lawmakers to revise the state’s recently reformed bail law, which has divided Democrats and has been used by Republicans to stoke fears of rising crime.

The mayor called on judges to tackle a growing backlog of gun cases and urged Congress to implement universal background checks and ban assault weapons, legislation that remains in limbo because of Republican opposition.

He also asked district attorneys to prioritize gun-related cases — a vague directive that left some officials unsure if the mayor was aware of what their offices were already doing.

The response so far has been lukewarm, especially from Democratic legislative leaders in the Capitol. They passionately defended the 2019 legislation that seriously restricted the crimes for which judges could set bail. Though judges can still set bail for certain felonies, they are compelled to set it at the lowest level necessary to ensure defendants return to court.

But the Democratic leaders still appeared open to a dialogue.

“Can we stop blaming bail reform when the sun comes up?” Carl E. Heastie, the Assembly speaker, said last month. “Please stop just trying to make political fodder because we think it’ll make for good campaigns.” But he later allowed that “there’s a lot of discussions that have to happen.”

Andrea Stewart-Cousins, the majority leader in the State Senate, said on Tuesday that she was open to broad conversations about criminal justice. “We are concerned, as everyone is, about a spike in crime,” she said. “But there is no connection between our bail reform and the national spike in crime.”

The mayor quickly signaled he would be unafraid to use his bully pulpit to pressure lawmakers. Days after releasing his crime plan, he issued a forceful statement calling on lawmakers to give judges more discretion in sentencing after the release of a teenager whose bullet grazed a policeman’s leg in a scuffle. Although the teenager posted bail, Mr. Adams raised a different issue: whether judges should be free to deny bail to defendants they thought were dangerous and keep them in jail.

Mr. Adams’s stance has placed state Democratic leaders in a conundrum, especially in an election year.

On the one hand, the legislative leaders want to be courteous to the recently elected mayor, whose profile continues to rise. But they are also wary of lending credence to Republican attacks that the bail law Democrats passed is flawed or helped fuel crime, an assertion that is not supported by any reliable data

In late December, two years after the law took effect, the state began to publish data that documented the rates at which defendants were rearrested. In the year after reforms were fully implemented, the available data appears to show that roughly 20 percent of those released after being charged with crimes ineligible for bail were rearrested before trial. About 2 percent were rearrested for violent crimes.

The data is incomplete and limited, making it impossible to draw a complete picture, however, and some researchers say that it could be years before the full impact of the bail law can be properly assessed.

Even so, some Democrats say the preliminary results vindicate bail reform, pointing to the low rate of recidivism in violent crimes and citing the positive effects of allowing those facing trial to remain in their jobs and homes while they wait for their day in court.

Studies from other localities where similar reforms have been introduced have found that such laws do not “lead to a meaningful increase in crime,” according to an analysis released by the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Republicans, for their part, have largely argued that any preventable crime is a public policy failure. 

State Senator Zellnor Myrie, a left-leaning Democrat, said that it was “important that we acknowledge that whether or not the statistics bear it out, people feel afraid.” [MORE]

Newly Elected Black Reformer Manhattan DA Already 'Getting Reformed Into the System' as He's Forced to Walk Back Prosecution Policies Criticized as Too Lenient [on the Blacks and Latinos]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

reform - superficial change in form and formalities (fictitious change) which only further lubricates the status quo by renovating and painting old society in new colors. 2) appearance of change sans the change. Reform is always in the service of the status quo and the politician: it serves the privilege of the past not the promise of the future. [MORE]

From [HERE] Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in New York City on Friday reversed parts of a Jan. 3 memo that directed prosecutors to avoid seeking jail time for some robberies, assaults and gun crimes.

The initial memo, issued a few days after Bragg took office, had told prosecutors that they should seek jail time only for the most serious offenses, the New York Times reports. The document, which implemented his campaign promises, “prompted weeks of pushback from police officers, small business owners and public officials, making Mr. Bragg a political target,” the article reports.

Since then, Bragg has clarified and modified his new policy, completing “the pivot that he started to make shortly after the backlash began,” according to the New York Times.

ABC News, the New York Post and NBC New York also have coverage of the Feb. 4 memo, posted by the New York Post.

The articles outline these revisions:

• Bragg originally said robberies would be charged as felonies only if they created a genuine risk of physical harm. His new policy says commercial robberies involving the use of guns, realistic fake guns and other weapons carrying the risk of physical harm would be charged as felonies. “A commercial robbery with a gun will be charged as a felony, whether or not the gun is operable, loaded or a realistic imitation,” Bragg now says.

• The first memo did not say prosecutors should seek jail time for gun possession. Bragg’s new policy says “the default in gun cases is a felony prosecution.”

• Bragg originally said the crime of resisting arrest, standing alone, would not be prosecuted. His new policy says anyone who harms or tries to harm a police officer will be prosecuted. “Violence against police officers will not be tolerated,” Bragg now says.

Bragg also told prosecutors that they were hired for their experience and judgment, and it would be up to them to determine how to charge individual cases.

White Privileged Neuropeon Couple Allowed to Retain Their Law Licenses Despite Making Threats to Murder Black Protestors. White Prosecutors Gave Them Misdemeanor Treatment for Said Felony Conduct

From [HERE] White lawyers Mark and Patricia McCloskey have received a stayed suspension of their law licenses for brandishing guns as protesters marched through their neighborhood in June 2020.

The Missouri Supreme Court ordered the stayed suspensions (here and here) Tuesday, report the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Associated Press and St. Louis Public Radio.

Further discipline could be imposed on Mark or Patricia McCloskey if they fail to stay out of disciplinary trouble during a probationary period of one year, according to terms and conditions (here and here). They will each have to submit quarterly reports and provide 100 hours of pro bono service.

The McCloskeys pleaded guilty to misdemeanors in June 2021 for waving their guns during the racial justice protest in June 2020. Mark McCloskey pleaded guilty to fourth-degree assault, while Patricia McCloskey pleaded guilty to harassment. Missouri Gov. Mike Parson pardoned both lawyers in August 2021.

Missouri Chief Disciplinary Counsel Alan Pratzel had sought an indefinite suspension, with the ability to seek reinstatement after six months. Pratzel argued that the crimes showed indifference to public safety and involved moral turpitude.

Mark McCloskey told the Associated Press that he and his wife respect the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision, although they disagree.

“We will comply 100% with the orders,” he said.

But he plans to consult with his attorney about the possibility of asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.

Mark McCloskey is a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate. Last week, he testified in a support of a Missouri bill that would shift the burden of proof in self-defense cases, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch previously reported.

The bill would create pretrial immunity hearings in which a defendant can make a self-defense claim. The state would have to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant isn’t immune from prosecution. Currently, the defendant has the burden of raising and proving self-defense during trial.

One opponent has called the bill the “Make Murder Legal Act.”

Racist Suspect Republican Judge Sentences BLM Activist to 6 Yrs in Jail for Voting when She was Ineligible to Vote, But Still On the Rolls [contrast w/3 yrs for White Cop who Murdered Laquan McDonald]

From [HERE] Critics are denouncing a six-years-and-a-day sentence for a Black Lives Matter activist who said she didn’t know that her voter registration was illegal because she received inadequate and faulty information from the state of Tennessee.

Judge W. Mark Ward of Shelby County, Tennessee, sentenced 44-year-old Pamela Moses on Jan. 31 for her illegal attempt to register to vote in 2019, report the Associated Press, the New York Times, the Guardian and the Washington Post. Ward added that he would consider probation for Moses, a Black woman, after nine months of incarceration.

“Voting rights activists say Ms. Moses’ lengthy sentence underscores racial disparities in the criminal justice system when it comes to voting fraud cases,” the New York Times reports, “especially since white men who have been charged in more straightforward instances of voting fraud have received probation or just days of imprisonment.”

The Associated Press said some legal experts view Moses’ sentence “as excessive and baffling.”

Moses was barred from voting because of her criminal record. She pleaded guilty in 2015 to tampering with evidence and forgery, both felonies, and to misdemeanor counts of perjury, stalking, theft under $500 and escape, according to a press release announcing the latest sentence.

Most of the 2015 charges stemmed from allegations that Moses impersonated an attorney in an attempt to file a judicial misconduct complaint against a judge, according to prior coverage by the Memphis Commercial Appeal. She was placed on probation for seven years as a result of the 2015 sentence. She was also told to comply with any treatment recommended by court-ordered mental health evaluations.

The evidence-tampering conviction meant that Moses was permanently ineligible to register and vote in Tennessee. But no one informed Moses, she told the Guardian. She should have been removed from the voting rolls at that time, but it didn’t happen. She voted in at least six elections between 2015 and 2018, according to a sentencing order cited by the New York Times.

Moses’ lawyer, Bede Anyanwu, told the New York Times that officials had told Moses only that she had to check her probation status to vote.

Moses learned of a possible problem when she decided to run for Memphis mayor in 2019, according to the Guardian. Election officials told Moses that she couldn’t be on the ballot because of her felony conviction. Moses was confused because she thought that her probation was over. She asked a judge for clarification, and the judge said Moses was still on probation.

Moses thought that the judge calculated her sentence incorrectly, so she asked the probation office for help. An officer signed a form that said Moses’ probation was over. Moses filed the form with election officials.

The probation officer made a mistake, however, and the Tennessee Department of Correction told election officials the next day that Moses could not vote. Moses said she wasn’t informed of the reversal, according to the Washington Post.

That resulted in charges, including the charge on which Moses was convicted: false entry on official election documents.

Prosecutors had argued at trial that Moses knew that she was ineligible to vote after the judge told her that she was ineligible. Ward apparently accepted that argument, saying she “tricked the probation department” into giving her a document saying she was off probation.

David Becker, a former attorney in the voting section of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, told the Associated Press that Tennessee “is an outlier” because of restrictive voting laws that are “so difficult to navigate that I don’t think voters understand them.”

Racist Indicted by Federal Grand Jury on Hate Crime Charges for Arson of Black Church (MLK Community Presbyterian Church)

From [HERE] A white man was indicted by a federal grand jury Thursday on hate crimes charges relating to the arson of a Black church in Massachusetts.

Dushko Vulchev was indicted on four counts of damage to religious property involving fire and one count of use of fire to commit a federal felony relating to a fire at the Martin Luther King Jr. Community Presbyterian Church in Springfield in the morning hours of December 28, 2020. There had been other fires and damage to church property in the days leading up to the fire. Review of video surveillance evidence identified Vulchev as the perpetrator.

A subsequent search uncovered electronic storage devices belonging to Vulchev which contained multiple images and messages of racial animus toward Black people, including a “White Lives Matter” mural and an image of Adolf Hitler. In interviews persons familiar with Vulchev told law enforcement officials that he frequently displayed hatred of non-white people and routinely referred to Black people with racial epithets.

The charge of damage to religious property carries a sentence of up to twenty years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of up to $250,000. Use of fire to commit a federal felony provides up to ten years in prison. Vulchev was previously charged by criminal complaint in April 2021.

Do You Live Near a Cell Tower? Small Town Threatens Verizon to Cease-and-Desist. Residents ill After 5G Activation. Radiation Causes Brain Problems, DNA Damage, Cancer, Alzheimers, infertility,

From [CHD] In what may be the first such move by a city health department, members of the Pittsfield, Massachusetts Board of Health on Feb. 2 voted unanimously to issue a cease-and-desist order to Verizon if the company refuses to discuss removing or relocating a cell tower residents said is the source of multiple illnesses.

The order would require Verizon to turn off the tower unless it commits to resolving issues raised by residents of the Berkshire Mountains community.

Following the vote, Verizon told WAMC Northeast Public Radio:

“Verizon telecommunications equipment and networks comply with all health and safety standards established by the FCC [Federal Communications Commission]. We have met on multiple occasions with the Pittsfield Health Department and members of the community to address their concerns with this site. All of Verizon’s equipment at the Pittsfield tower operates well under the FCC’s conservative limits, as confirmed by the city’s own RF study from last summer.”

Susan Foster, a medical writer who organized a SPECT brain scan pilot study of California firefighters in 2004, said Verizon and other telecom giants, championed by the FCC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, hide behind the illusion that their cell towers produce only a small fraction of what the FCC allows.

“The truth is the FCC set those limits extraordinarily high for several purposes, and one is to offer the illusion of safety,” Foster said.

She added:

“Every time one of the carriers wants to come in and place a cell tower near your child’s school or in the midst of a residential neighborhood, telecom representatives come before a local planning board and present carefully orchestrated routines in which they say, ‘The cell tower we are proposing for this site measures at 1/1000 of what the FCC allows.’

“Of course, that sounds reassuring. What they don’t tell you is that thousands of studies by some of the world’s leading physicians and scientists have found radio-frequency radiation is linked to acoustic neuromas and glioblastomas, oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, male infertility and electrosensitivity (EHS) at a small fraction of what the FCC allows.”

In fact, in December 2019, Verizon warned investors, in documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, that it could be the target of litigation that could require the company to pay significant damages or settlements:

“[O]ur wireless business also faces personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits relating to alleged health effects of wireless phones or radio-frequency transmitters. We may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay significant awards or settlements.”

Foster has studied the health impact of wireless technology for nearly two decades. She organized a firefighters pilot study at a small station in central California where she chronicled previously healthy firefighters suffering cognitive impairment to the point they got lost responding to 911 calls in the same town they grew up in.

The study, published in 2004, was conducted by Gunnar Heuser, M.D., Ph.D., then of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. It found brain abnormalities inconsistent with the profile of previously strong, healthy men in the prime of life.

The study served as the basis for state and national lobbying on the part of the firefighters which resulted most recently in an exemption to 5G towers on fire stations throughout the state of California — the first such exemption in the world.

“If the firefighters, the strongest of the strong among us, sustained brain damage at 1/1000 of what the FCC allows, and this was 2G when we did the study in 2004, what are we doing to pregnant women, developing children, the immunocompromised, the elderly and to society as a whole?” Foster asked.

Foster said the symptoms she found in firefighters correlate with the symptoms reported by Pittsfield residents.

Pittsfield residents have been reporting symptoms to city leaders and the Board of Health for at least 18 months.

For some, the symptoms appeared immediately after the August 2020 activation of the cell tower.

For others, the headaches, nausea, vomiting, rashes, vertigo and foggy thinking — and in some cases, more severe medical conditions — came on in the days, weeks and months later.

Residents invited medical and scientific experts to speak to city officials. Some residents sold their homes and left Pittsfield because they were no longer able to live with the radiation raining down on them. Others lived in their cars or moved in with relatives.

Courtney Gilardi, whose family moved to a small cottage several miles away, has been active in the fight against the 115-ft Verizon tower ever since it was lowered into a clearing of trees in the midst of her neighborhood.

Gilardi and her 13-year-old daughter spoke at the recent Pittsfield Board of Health meeting, along with eight of their neighbors.

The two also testified before a subcommittee of the Massachusetts legislature as lawmakers were considering establishing a 5G commission patterned after that of neighboring New Hampshire.

Foster called Pittsfield a microcosm of the country.

“We are literally trapped in a web of laws and FCC directives that take away our rights when it comes to fighting these towers,” Foster said.

One year after Verizon activated the tower in Pittsfield, a victory in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals found the FCC’s regulatory limits were “arbitrary and capricious.”

In a case brought by Children’s Health Defense and Environmental Health Trust, the court ruled on Aug. 13, 2021, that the FCC failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its current guidelines adequately protect against the harmful effects of exposure to radio frequency radiation.

Foster said there’s growing outrage at the encroachment of cell towers into every corner of people’s lives including outside their children’s bedroom windows.

With 5G beaming from hundreds of thousands of satellites orbiting Earth, and global petitions by scientists and physicians calling for a halt to the 5G rollout until it can be studied for health effects, the world might be rooting for Pittsfield to win its battle against Verizon, she said.

After Using Government Authority to Help Destroy the Taxicab Industry, Lyft Emerges as Fundraising Heavyweight in Massachusetts ahead of Vote on Gig Work Ballot Initiative to Rip-Off its Workers

From [HERE] Gig work-based companies such as food delivery apps and rideshare services are pouring millions into supporting a Massachusetts ballot initiative that would solidify their workers’ status as independent contractors instead of employees.

Rideshare company Lyft has already given a hefty $14 million in support of the Massachusetts measure, in hopes of being able to classify their drivers as independent contractors, which would allow Lyft to not provide drivers certain employee benefits such as health insurance and paid vacation.

The Massachusetts ballot initiative, which would classify app-based drivers as independent contractors and enact labor policies, could appear on the ballot during the state’s Nov. 8 election pending either legislature approval or further signature collection.

The issue of gig work classification was first raised statewide last year in California. 

A ballot measure that would allow gig workers to be classified as independent contractors in most cases — Prop. 22 — passed in 2020, handing a big win to gig work-based companies that put more than $200 million behind the measure, according to OpenSecrets data. Although the measure passed, a judge later ruled it unconstitutional and an appeal is pending.

Now, as Massachusetts considers a proposition similar to Prop. 22, companies are replicating their strategy from 2020 by throwing millions of dollars into the effort.

In addition to Lyft’s $14 million, UberDoorDash and Instacart have each injected more than $1 million into funding the Massachusetts measure.

According to the Boston Globe, Lyft’s donation is the largest political contribution the state has ever recorded — easily surpassing the previous record of General Motors’ $5.1 million contribution to fight a successful 2020 ballot measure that would allow auto shops to access more information about the cars they repair.

The majority of Lyft’s $14 million came in the form of a $13 million donation given on Dec. 30. Prior to the end-of-year contribution, Instacart had given the largest single sum of about $978,000.

The Massachusetts measure would classify gig workers as independent contractors instead of employees while providing some benefits, including establishing a pre-tips earning floor equivalent to 120% of the state’s minimum wage and health care stipends for those who work more than 15 hours per week. [MORE]

RichCraft: AstraZeneca Sees $4B in COVID Sales [Sheeple Continue to Believe Shots are "Free" and Offered by Do-Gooders as a Public Service. Death $hots are Only Free of All Liability for Harm Caused]

From [HERE] AstraZeneca recorded a big jump in revenue on Thursday as it begins to take a profit from its coronavirus vaccine for the first time.

The company recorded full-year revenues of $37.4 billion, an increase of 38% from the year before at constant exchange rates. Part of the boost came from $4 billion in sales of its COVID-19 vaccine, developed with the University of Oxford.

Despite rising revenue, AstraZeneca reported a pre-tax loss of $265 million due to costs from its purchase of U.S. drug company Alexion Pharmaceuticals and new drug research.

The Anglo-Swedish drugmaker said in November it would begin to take a “modest” profit from the COVID-19 shot, which it had been providing “at cost” — around $2 to $3 —following an agreement with Oxford. Other COVID-19 vaccine producers, such as Pfizer and Moderna, have been booking hefty profits on their shots all along.

In the three months to September, the company said revenue jumped by about 50%, to a record $9.9 billion. The increase was due to sales of more than $1 billion in COVID-19 vaccines and the inclusion for the first time of some $1.3 billion worth of revenue from its rare disease business unit following the recent acquisition of Alexion. [MORE]

Unelected Rulers at FDA Postpone 2/15 Meeting to Decide Whether to Give Genocidal COVID Injections to Infants and Toddlers After Pfizer Says Not Enough Data

From [CHD] Pfizer today said it will delay applying for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of its COVID vaccine for infants and children 6 months to 4 years old stating there’s not enough data on the efficiency of a third dose.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in response postponed a meeting that had been scheduled for Feb. 15 to review Pfizer’s application for the pediatric vaccine.

Two separate clinical trials of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine for the younger age group are in progress: one involving children between the ages of 6 months to 2 years old, the other involving children between ages 2 and 4.

CNBC last month reported two shots did not induce an adequate immune response in children 2 to 4 years old in Pfizer’s clinical trials, leading Dr. Anthony Fauci to predict children in that age group would need a three-dose regimen of the vaccine.

In what the New York Times described as a “highly unusual move,” the FDA urged Pfizer to apply for EUA of the vaccine, even though two doses failed to produce the hoped-for immune responseamong children 2 to 4 years old and the vaccine maker did not yet have data on the efficacy of a third shot.

Pfizer had planned to submit its application to the FDA next week, then provide additional data in the coming weeks on a third dose, NBC reported.

The FDA did not say when the Feb. 15 meeting would be rescheduled, and Pfizer did not indicate when it would submit the application. [MORE]

US Government data reveals the COVID fake Vaccines are over 49 times deadlier than the Flu Vaccines per No. of doses administered

From [HERE] The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) hosted by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) contains historical data on adverse reactions reported against every vaccine that has been administered in the United States of America. 

A quick search of the CDC VAERS database on the number of adverse events reported against the Covid-19 injections since they were first rolled out in the USA, reveals that between December 2020 and 28th Jan 2022, a total of 743,179 adverse event reports were made in just 1 year and 2 months. 

Performing a similar search of the VAERS database on the number of adverse events reported against the Flu vaccines, reveals that between 2008 and 2020 there were a total of just 137,533 adverse events reports were made in a period of 13 years. 

Taking these numbers at face value you could assume that the Covid-19 injection have proven to be at least 5.4 times more harmful than the Flu vaccines. But if you were to then make this claim you would most likely be shot down with cries of “yes but hundreds of millions of people have been given the Covid-19 vaccine at once so this is normal and just a tiny percentage”. 

So we decided to dig into the number of Flu vaccines administered in the USA between 2008 and 2020, and the number of Covid-19 vaccines administered in the USA between Dec 2020 and 28th Jan 2022, and work out how harmful each vaccine has really proven to be, to see if the horrendous number of adverse reactions reported to the Covid-19 vaccines are in line with the expected norm for other vaccines. 

We should however mention that the following numbers we are about to present to you for the Flu vaccines are actually overly generous and paint the flu vaccine in a slightly more harmful light than what it has actually proven to be. 

This is because we have extracted the number of adverse reactions reported against the flu vaccines from the very beginning of 2008 to the very end of 2020, but the number of doses of Flu vaccine administered only includes part of 2008 and part of 2020 due to the CDC data only telling us the number of doses administered in a Flu season rather than a full year. 

The other factor that paints the flu vaccines in a slightly more harmful light is that they are generally only administered to young children, the elderly, pregnant women, and the vulnerable, and this demographic contains a high proportion of people who are likely to suffer ailments or die in general. Whereas the Covid-19 injections have been offered to every single person over the age of 5 in America. 

The following chart shows the total number of flu vaccine doses administered in 13 full flu seasons all the way from the 2008/2009 flu season to the 2019-2020 flu season. The data has been extracted from the CDC info found here.

COVID fake “vaccines" are causing micro blood clots in millions… and there’s no medical solution

From [HERE] The millions of health impacts being reported in conjunction with Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” have one common link: microscopic blood clots triggered by spike proteins.

It is now known that the jabs damage blood vessels throughout the body. They are far worse, in fact, than covid itself.

While the full extent of what these spike proteins and micro blood clots do is not yet fully known, it is clear that they cause nothing but harm.

“Blood clots that occur in the tiniest blood vessels are referred to as microvascular thromboses and reduce blood flow,” reported LifeSiteNews. “The clinical symptoms depend on the organs that are most strongly affected.”

The problem with micro blood clotting is that it is not visible to the naked eye or even to normal scans. And yet the damage it causes is prolific.

When pumped into the lungs, for instance, spike protein-induced micro blood clotting can lead to pulmonary embolisms. If they reach the brain, confusion or stroke can ensue.

“If they lodge in the heart, they can cause a heart attack or promote inflammation,” LifeSiteNews added. (Related: One possible solution for spike protein damage is broccoli sprouts.)

“If they lodge in the smaller blood vessels that provide oxygen to the hands or feet, they can cause those limbs to go numb and possibly require amputation. Clots in other organs, such as the liver or the kidneys, could cause those organs to fail.”

Covid “vaccine” spike proteins were designed to destroy the human body

Since spike proteins can lodge almost anywhere in the body, the resulting damage can take many forms. This explains why the “fully vaccinated” are developing all sorts of health problems, some of them seemingly unrelated.

As of this writing, more than one million reports of covid jab-caused adverse events have been reported to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). Hundreds of thousands of deaths have also been reported.

Medical expert Dr. Peter McCullough has repeatedly warned about micro clots, only to be ignored by the establishment. He stated early on in the plandemic that the spike protein itself is causing coagulation and blood clotting, though few listened.

Spike protein-induced coagulation is unique in that it causes red blood cells to stick together, as well as platelets. This is a very different type of blood clotting that one would expect to see with major blood clots in the arteries and veins.

Canadian doctor Charles Hoffe went public last summer with evidence showing that 62 percent of his hundreds of vaccinated patients showed high numbers on the d-dimer test, suggesting the presence of micro blood clots.

“A d-dimer test measures the amount of degraded fibrin in the blood,” LifeSiteNewsexplains.

On top of releasing this finding, Hoffe warned that mRNA (messenger RNA) injections, which program the body to produce its own spike proteins, would “kill most people through heart failure,” either immediately or later on down the road.

In the next few years, Hoffe says, nearly everyone who got stabbed with an mRNA needle will die from heart failure. Time will tell if his assessment comes to fruition.

Anyone who took the mRNA shot from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna will eventually, if they have not already, see their capillaries get plugged up. At some point, this will result in a major cardiovascular event possibly leading to death.

“In plain language, he said that the mRNA shots are programmed to turn a person’s body into a spike protein ‘factory,’ and that over time these mass-produced spike proteins cause progressive blood clotting.”

Heart Problems After COVID Are Much Worse for the Vaccinated, Nature Study Shows – But It’s Hidden in the Appendix

From [HERE] Nature published a comprehensive study this week on cardiovascular risk including a total of over 11 million patients that has made a few headlines. The aim was to identify the cause of increased cardiac pathology. It should have been a very simple study comparing four groups:

  1. Not infected and never vaccinated

  2. Not infected and vaccinated

  3. Infected but not vaccinated

  4. Infected and vaccinated

It is hard to believe the authors did not look at these groups, but whatever was found when comparing them remains a mystery.

Instead, the following groups were compared:

  1. Not infected and never vaccinated data from 2017

  2. Not infected, including vaccinated and not vaccinated

  3. Infected but not vaccinated

  4. Infected with vaccinated people included but using modelled adjustments

When studies with huge datasets use modelling and fail to share data prior to their adjustments alarm bells should start ringing. Therefore, I took a deeper dive to see what else was questionable.

There were serious biases in the paper which need addressing but first let’s look at the critical question of myocarditis (heart inflammation).

Because of the known risk of myocarditis from vaccination it is worth looking particularly closely at the data presented on this. Oddly, for the issue of the day, the data on myocarditis was all hidden in the supplementary appendix to the paper.

The risk of myocarditis appears to be an autoimmune (the immune system attacking the heart after interaction with the spike protein) rather than direct damage by the virus/vaccine spike protein. Therefore, myocarditis could result from the virus or the vaccine. The key question that needs answering is whether vaccination protects or enhances the risk from the virus.

The authors report 370 per million risk of myocarditis after Covid infection in the unvaccinated. The contemporary control rate was 70 per million and the historic one was 40 per million. What was wrong with the contemporary controls?

They made it clear they removed those who had been vaccinated from the calculation in the Covid arm but they did not state they did this for the control arm. Did vaccination lead to a 30 per million increase in myocarditis in the control arm? Given the cohort appears to be old and we know myocarditis incidence is worse in the young a one in 30,000 incidence is significant.

What about those who were vaccinated and had Covid? Once vaccination (and modelling) were included, the rate rose to 500 per million. It is not entirely clear whether supplementary Table 22 excludes those who were not vaccinated, but given that it does not state the unvaccinated were excluded from this data it is fair to assume the 500 per million relates to the whole population.

Given the higher risk of myocarditis after vaccination one might wonder whether this study showed protection from infection due to vaccination, as this would lower risk from the virus. Hidden in the legends of the supplementary tables the authors reveal that 62% of the Covid patients had been vaccinated compared to 56% of the non-infected controls (not a great advert for vaccine effectiveness against infection). [MORE]