Chicago Cops Accused of Wrongfully Raiding and Niggerizing Another Family: Cops Broke Down Door, Pointed Guns at Kids and Tried to Cover it up. City Fought Release of Bodycam [used mostly to convict]

ARE POLICE TARGETING ALL BLACKS OR PREVENTING CRIMES? From [HERE] A Black family is suing the Chicago police department for allegedly breaking down their door and pointing guns at two children before attempting to cover up that they had no evidence for the raid, The Associated Press reported Wednesday.

The Winters family filed the lawsuit Tuesday for police wrongfully raiding their home, which has reportedly become a frequent occurrence for people of color in the city.

On the night of Aug. 7, 2019, the children, two girls aged 4 and 9, were reportedly sitting on the bed when police charged in the room without warning or a warrant. Police pointed their guns at the sisters' father, Steven Winters, whose back was later knelt on by an officer with a gun to the back of his head. Another officer charged into the girls' room and pointed a flashlight and a gun at them, while a third officer pointed a gun at the children's sleeping grandfather.

The incident reportedly left the children with “lasting trauma ... in the form of nightmares, bed-wetting, trouble sleeping, decreased appetite, crying fits and fear and distrust of police,” according to the AP. 

The police department reportedly tried to cover up the incident by claiming they saw and heard a suspect run into the apartment, but these claims were proven false by the body camera footage that Al Hofeld Jr., the family's attorney, acquired through an open records request. The city has yet to release body cam footage of the incident.

“They do not show anyone entering or exiting plaintiffs’ building or plaintiffs’ apartment,” the lawsuit said according to the AP. “Officers did not find any sign that any suspect had entered. Officers did not arrest anyone. The terror and stress to this innocent family was all for naught. ”

However, this is not the first incident where police used excessive force during a botched raid. Chicago has reportedly been plagued with false raids against people of color.

In February 2019, a woman's home was wrongfully raided and she was handcuffed naked for 30 minutes. Police later discovered they had the wrong home and attempted to prevent the release of the body cam footage.

The city has reportedly spent hundreds of millions of dollars on police misconduct cases, AP noted. 

Police in Defense of Authority not Liberty: White Louisville Cop Pled Guilty to Striking a Kneeling Protestor in the Back of the Head w/a Riot Stick

From [HERE] Former Louisville Metro Police Officer Cory Evans pleaded guilty Wednesday to using excessive force when he hit a kneeling protester in the back of the head with a riot stick in May 2020.

Evans, who resigned in June, faces up to 48 months in prison and $1,962 in restitution if a federal judge accepts the plea agreement.

His sentencing is scheduled for Nov. 23 and he will remain free on bond.

The victim, identified as M.C. in court documents, did not attend the plea hearing. 

If U.S. District Court Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings decides not to accept the plea, Evans will be able to withdraw it. The maximum penalty for the felony charge, deprivation of rights under color of law, is 10 years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. 

If the case goes to trial, the U.S. Attorney's Office said the prosecution has testimony and video footage of Evans striking M.C. in the head with his riot stick on May 31, 2020, while the victim was kneeling on the ground and surrendering with his hands in the air.

Evans admitted striking M.C., who was taken to a hospital for minor injuries. 

Judge Jennings told Evans he must give up his firearms and actively seek employment while out on bond. 

Attorney Brian Butler, who represents Evans, said the former officer has obtained a job. 

Butler told reporters that Evans pleaded guilty because he wanted to take responsibility for his actions. 

In addition, Butler said Evans had a lengthy military career, where he served in combat zones, and the excessive force incident occurred during the beginning of the protests over the Breonna Taylor shooting. 

"It was an extremely tense situation," Butler said. 

Evans, who was charged on June 9, submitted his resignation to LMPD less than a week after the department released a statement saying the Chief's Office "immediately referred" the allegations against Evans to federal authorities "when they came to light."

Evans allegedly "willfully deprived arrestee M.C. of the right, secured and protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States, to be free of an unreasonable seizure, which includes the right to be free from the use of unreasonable force by a law enforcement officer," the complaint filed in federal court says.

Evans has been with LMPD since 2014.

In 2019, Evans was exonerated from allegations of police brutality after a Public Standards Unit investigation into a controversial traffic stop that occurred in December 2018 in front of the Kroger near the intersection of South 26th Street and West Broadway.

Cellphone video shows Evans punching Jarrus Ransom several times after police found pills in a Pepsi can while searching his car. Ransom was in a neck brace in his Metro Corrections mugshot, and his eye was swollen.

Body camera footage of the incident shows Ransom lunge into Evans and officers struggling to get him into handcuffs. The charges against Ransom stemming from the traffic stop were later dropped.

Ransom sued the city, Evans and fellow Officers Kyle Carroll and Sarah Nicolas, claiming they used excessive force during his arrest. The lawsuit was moved to federal court in the Western District of Kentucky, and the city has been dismissed from the case, according to court records.

In April, Evans sued local DUI attorney Larry Forman for defamation after a video was posted to YouTube alleging the officer planted evidence during the traffic stop.

Video Shows LAPD Treat Millionaire and NBA Player Jaxson Hayes Like a Nigger [a non-white Person who is Subject to White Supremacy] in a Free Range Prison [legal system based on physical coercion]

WHAT IS A NIGGER? From [HERE] New Orleans Pelicans big man Jaxson Hayes was arrested last week after an altercation with police and was later treated for injuries. Now, video has emerged of the incident and LAPD is investigating the use of excessive force, per TMZ.

This whole fiasco started when the LAPD received a domestic violence call from a woman and when they arrived, Jaxson Hayes was in the front yard. He was trying to go into the house.

WHAT IS AUTHORITY? “The lie of tyranny is that you will maintain the freedom of life by obeying authority. The choices it offers you are a lifetime of obedience or death.” Jeremy Locke.

Nina Turner Defeated in Primary After Powerful "IsrAlien" Lobby Spent $1.9 Million on a Coin-Operated, Black Role-Bot Aspiring to be a Puppetician for The Pathocracy

From [HERE] and [HERE] Progressive leader Nina Turner was defeated in the closely-watched Ohio primary for Congress tonight by establishment candidate Shontel Brown, according to reports in the media. The victory is a big win for the pro-Israel lobby inside the Democratic Party– and a blow to the insurgent left wing in the party. 

Turner conceded the race at about 10 p.m., saying, “On this night, we will not cross the river.” Brown was leading in the returns by about 5 percent. 

Turner blamed her defeat on outside financial contributions to her opponent. “I am going to work hard to ensure that something like this doesn’t happen to another progressive candidate again. We didn’t lose this race, evil money manipulated and maligned this election,” she reportedly said. 

Turner, 53, had been co-chair of Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign and is a leading advocate for poor and working class voters. She supported conditioning military aid to Israel, in stark contrast to Brown, 46, a Cuyahoga County councilperson, who embraced Israel in her campaign and was rewarded with substantial donations from pro-Israel groups. 

The Democratic Majority for Israel PAC spent a reported $1.9 million to back Brown. The Jewish Democratic Council of America said Jewish voters made the “critical difference” in the race, with Jews turning out at nearly double the rate of other voters in the district and voting largely for Brown on the basis of “Jewish values,” which include support for Israel. 

Brown started to catch up to Turner last month, after House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.) endorsed her, and after Democratic Majority for Israel’s PAC ran ads warning that Turner could undermine the Democratic agenda. Brown’s campaign emphasized that she had worked to elect Biden; the PAC’s ads reminded voters that Turner had cast a protest vote against the 2020 Democratic platform and had compared the choice between Trump and Biden to eating a full bowl or half bowl of human excrement.

In her victory speech last night Brown thanked her Jewish “brothers and sisters” for their support and linked it to her stance on Israel.

“When you stand on the land, when you see a person who has a firecracker that’s been dropped a drone in the Gaza strip, if you are within a few feet of a bomb shelter you can appreciate the vulnerability of a state,” she told to a crowd. “And that has [helped me understand] the importance of the U.S./Israel relationship.”

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Israeliens - imposter (pale interloper alien) Hebrews—Eastern European stock Caucasians who adopted the philosophy, myths, fables, and traditions of the so-called "Jews" while living in Russia—masquerading as if they had any genetic or historical ancestry and cultural heritage to the Afrikan Hebrews, the Afrim people, who occupied Canaan (Palestine) from ancient times. 2) those who currently are occupying Palestine (the land of Canaan), colonizing and killing its rightful descendants, historic owners and dwellers), and are undeniably alien (foreign—not aboriginal) to that land. 3) imposter Hebrews originating from the Pale of Settlement in Kazzarian Russia currently an occupying force (militarily holed-up and propped-up by US financial support and British skullduggery) in occupied Palestine. 4) alien Jews—Pinchbeck Hebrews. Israeliens are East Europeans with no genetic or actual historic ties whatsoever to the land now called Palestine. Israeliens have brainwashed (and fooled themselves and many others into believing this historical lie and propaganda that they are the descendants of "Jews" (a misnomer for African Hebrews, itself a misnomer for the Afrim people). Anyone with a modicum of research skills, knowledge of basic geography, philology, and an unbiased-by-religious-myth mind can easily confirm or validate this fact for his or herself. Both so-called Sephardic and Askanazzim "Jews" are not historically tied to the Afrim. It's not that Caucasians who have adopted the "Jewish" religion shouldn't have a place to live—but how about suggesting relocating where they came from—the hills of Russia, and not on another peoples" land. You don't invade (break into) someone's house (property) and expect them to just go away and not fight to get it back (despite how much force, murdering, deception, and propaganda that is brought to bear to justify such wrongful invasion and genocide). Psychological repression is both invisible and reflexive. (See: Zionism, USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, Genocide, Immigrant Human, Evolution, Caucasian, Pilgarlick, El & Judaism)

Voter Suppression? Only 11% Turnout in Detroit After Elites Whites Waged an Expensive Campaign to Defeat Ballot Proposal for Govt Accountability, Affordable housing and a Moratorium on Water Shutoffs

From [HERE] and [HERE] Only about 11% of registered voters in Detroit turned out for the primary election on Tuesday, choosing candidates for mayor, city council, and clerk, and weighing in on a controversial initiative to revise the charter.

By a two-to-one margin, Detroiters rejected Proposal P, a charter amendment aimed at promoting equity and accountability, cracking down on police brutality, improving transportation and access to affordable housing, protecting property values, imposing a moratorium on water shutoffs, and developing a comprehensive environmental health policy.

Corporate donors and other opponents waged an expensive campaign to defeat the proposal.

Mayor Mike Duggan claimed the charter could bankrupt the city, saying it would cost as much as $2 billion over a four-year period. An independent analysis from Michigan State University estimated the charter would only cost an additional $7 million a year.

The charter was the subject of a court battle after opponents argued that charter revisions needed Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s approval to appear on the ballot. Ultimately, the Michigan Supreme Court sided with supporters of the proposal, saying it didn't need the governor's approval to appear on the ballot.

In the mayoral race, Duggan easily defeated his nine challengers with 72% of the vote. He will face Anthony Adams, ex-deputy mayor to former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, who placed second with nearly 10% of the vote.

Eight Detroit City Council district seats and two at-large council seats also were on the ballot.

For the at-large seats, the top vote-getters were incumbent Councilwoman Janee’ L. Ayers and Coleman A. Young, Jr., the son of former Coleman A. Young. Each of them received about 30% of the vote. At-large candidates Mary Waters and Nicole Small also advanced to the general election.

For the council district seats, the top two candidates will face off in the general election.

In District 1, incumbent Councilman James Tate, Jr. secured 70.1% of the vote, with Krystal Larsosa coming in second with 12.2% of the vote.

In District 4, Latisha Johnson garnered 31.8% of the vote, followed by M.L. Erick with 24.4%. The seat is currently held by Andre Spivey, who was recently indicted on bribery charges.

In District 7, Frederick Durhal received 29.9% of the vote, followed by Regina Ross with 24.2%. The seat was vacated earlier this year by Gabe Leland, who was sentenced to probation as part of a bribery scandal.

The other districts had only one or two candidates, so they automatically advanced to the general election.

In District 2, Councilman Roy McCalister, Jr. will face Angela Calloway. In District 6, Gabriela Santiago-Romero and Hector Santiago will face off.

District 3 Councilman Scott Benson and District 5 Council President Pro Tem Mary Sheffield advanced without a challenger.

City Clerk Janice Winfrey garnered 70.4% of the vote and will face Denzel McCampbell, a voting rights advocate and staffer for U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib.

In Macomb County, state Rep. Douglas Wozniak, R-Shelby Township won in a special election for a state Senate seat vacated by Pete Lucido, R-Shelby Township. He will face Democrat Martin Robert Genter in the general election in November.

'Black Lives Don't Matter to Racists:' Racist Suspect MO Governor Sends Message to Neuropeons by Pardoning the White Couple who Made Felony Threats to Kill Black Protesters by Pointing Guns at Them

 From [HERE] Racist suspect Missouri Gov. Mike Parson on Tuesday announced that he made good on his promise to pardon a couple who gained notoriety for pointing guns at social justice demonstrators as they marched past the couple's home in a luxury St. Louis enclave last year.

Parson, a Republican, on Friday pardoned Mark McCloskey, who pleaded guilty in June to misdemeanor fourth-degree assault and was fined $750, and Patricia McCloskey, who pleaded guilty to misdemeanor harassment and was fined $2,000.

The McCloskeys, both racist suspect lawyers in their 60s, said they felt threatened by the protesters, who were passing their home in June 2020 on their way to demonstrate in front of the mayor's house nearby in one of hundreds of similar demonstrations around the country after George Floyd's death. The couple also said the group was trespassing on a private street.

Mark McCloskey emerged from his home with an AR-15-style rifle, and Patricia McCloskey waved a semiautomatic pistol, according to the indictment. Photos and cellphone video captured the confrontation, which drew widespread attention and made the couple heroes to some and villains to others. No shots were fired and no one was hurt.

Special prosecutor Richard Callahan said his investigation determined that the protesters were peaceful.

"There was no evidence that any of them had a weapon and no one I interviewed realized they had ventured onto a private enclave,” Callahan said in a news release after the McCloskeys pleaded guilty.

Mark McCloskey, who announced in May that he was running for a U.S. Senate seat in Missouri, was unapologetic after the plea hearing.

“I’d do it again,” he said from the courthouse steps in downtown St. Louis. “Any time the mob approaches me, I’ll do what I can to put them in imminent threat of physical injury because that’s what kept them from destroying my house and my family.”

Because the charges were misdemeanors, the McCloskeys did not face the possibility of losing their law licenses or their rights to own firearms.

The McCloskeys were indicted by a grand jury in October on felony charges of the unlawful use of a weapon and evidence tampering. Callahan later amended the charges to give jurors the alternative of convictions of misdemeanor harassment instead of the weapons charge.

Parson’s legal team has been working through a backlog of clemency requests for months. He hasn't yet taken action on longtime inmate Kevin Strickland, who several prosecutors now say is innocent of a 1978 Kansas City triple homicide. Parson could pardon Strickland, but he has said he’s not convinced he is innocent.

Hundreds of Communities Declared Racism a Public Health Crisis. What Result? [many Blacks Continue to Live in a Dream World where Singing, Marching and Chanting Will Solve Problems or Change Racists]

‘THROW BACK’ BLACKS. Debate in a de-mockery cannot be stilled but it can be controlled and constrained within “proper” bounds. Doggy sets the table for us or “controls the spectrum of ideas” discussed by “citizens” - encouraging us to think within certain boundaries of “thinkable thought” while enforcing the belief that freedom reigns. Such debate or “resistance” is desirable for tyrants in a corporate police state because it keeps the peasants thinking they are participating, knowledgable or involved without providing them any real means to achieve freedom.” [MORE] Dr. Amos Wilson states, "the central aim of the ruling elite's ideology process is to define the "domain of discourse." That is, the corporate elite seeks to define the limits of "acceptable ideas" and to define what is worth talking about, worth learning, teaching, promoting, and writing about. Of course, the limits of the "acceptable," the "responsible," are set at those points which support and justify the interests of the elite itself." [MORE]

In reality, the alleged “resistance” is really very tame politics engaged in by obedient citizens also known as propagandhi. Elites have drawn the parameters of Black dissent by programming Blacks to believe that what is actually common sense and essentially conservative is somehow "radical" politics. Therefore, Blacks reject common sense in rejecting "the radical" or what is perceived as "radical." Consequently, law abiding or obedient Blacks will not pursue things that anyone else with common sense would pursue- because to do so would be revolutionary! The resisters are not resisting anything. They are expressing genuine, common sense outrage at an unaccountable system of white collective power: racist suspect jurors, judges, prosecutors, fellow cops, media and businesses that support, defend and finance a cop’s right to murder or harm Blacks. But what else?

From [HERE] Last year, dozens of communities rushed to declare racism a public health crisis amid the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide protests against police brutality, both of which disproportionately affect people of color.

More than 200 cities, counties, local governments, public health and educational entities made such declarations since 2020, according to the American Public Health Association – up from just seven in 2019. (At least one city, Holyoke, Massachusetts, has rescinded its declaration.)

And the trend has continued as leaders in Chicago, Salt Lake City and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention made similar declarations.

Public health experts and local leaders heralded these declarations as important first steps in addressing the role racism plays in public health but warned that they required action. Although many of the declarations look similar, what steps communities took to address the systemic inequalities vary widely.

Can You Make a Mirror Out of a Brick? If you believe declaring racism a public health crisis will somehow neutralize racism white supremacy then you are a plaything in the hands of others. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explained in a system of white domination non-white people “are in a continuous state of checkmate” and Black people are currently in a “losing streak that is centuries long. [MORE] The operating system of White supremacy is thriving, refining and updating itself right now while Blacks remain in a reactionary state.

According to Dr. Amos Wilson, 'to live “reactionarily” means “always reacting to what other people are doing, always being overwhelmed by events, and overwhelmed by the future, instead of creating events, and creating the future, and making the future.' [MORE] Osho states 'to react means you are acting unconsciously. Somebody is manipulating you. Somebody says something, does something, and you react. The real master of the situation is somebody else. Somebody comes and insults you and you react, you become angry. Somebody comes and praises you and you smile and you become happy. Both are the same. You are a slave and the other knows how to push your buttons. You are behaving like a mechanism. You are an automaton, not a human yet.'

Chancellor Williams and Welsing have both explained that most Blacks 'continue to live in a dream world where they believe that singing, marching, dancing, chanting, praying, releasing balloons in the air and making declarations will solve their problems.' [MORE] Elite whites remain in control by keeping Black people in a state of mental maladaptiveness - maintaining this mental state is a political, social necessity, Black people must be literal kept out of their minds - and they are. [MORE]

Liberal Comedian Jimmy Dore Complains about His Lingering Vaccine Side Effects such as Brain Inflammation but Dependent Media Ignores Him b/c Criticism of "the Vaccine" is Prohibited by Uncle Brother

From [HERE] Comedian Jimmy Dore described side effects he’s experiencing more than four months after being injected with two doses of Moderna’s experimental Covid jab.

Speaking to Joe Rogan last week, Dore justified why he got the jab despite a general distrust of the establishment, explaining, “People are like, ‘Why [did you take it]? You trust the government?’ No I don’t trust the government. ‘You trust Big Pharma?’ No, I don’t trust Big Pharma, I trust my doctor.”

Dore described how he and others he knows who took the jab experienced similar symptoms post-vaccination; however, his symptoms have never fully gone away.

“So I had body aches, flu-like fever, joint aches, body pain. I had a stiff neck,” Dore said, adding he also experienced “waves of exhaustion.” 

The former Young Turks contributor also complained about the censorship faced by those who attempt to expose or speak about vaccine side effects.

“I tweeted just to let everybody know, ‘Hey, this is my reaction to the vaccine,’ and…people started to come [at] me and call me like, ‘Anti-vax.’ I’m like, ‘No, I got the vax, I got it.’ When people have a reaction to an experimental vaccine that is not FDA approved you’re supposed to not suppress the reaction, you’re supposed to ask people what the reactions are so we can make the vaccines better.”

Dore later said he takes medication to treat brain inflammation, which he says he now has as a result of the spike proteins contained in the vaccine.

Dore’s vaccine injury admissions on The Joe Rogan Show come after he documented the symptoms on his podcast in June, where he claimed a cardiologist told him of other patients experiencing similar vaccine-related side effects.

Renowned IP Underwriter and Analyst Provides Patent Documentation that COVID was Created by NIAID (US Gov) and that the "Vaccine" is an Injected Biological Weapon, Patented Prior to the 2020 Outbreak

• The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

Dr. David E. Martin is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM Inc., an international leader in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. M.CAM is a Virginia-based company that underwrites lending on intellectual property, earning a fee from the lender, usually a bank, and in most cases the right to sell on the IP if the company defaults. [MORE] Martin is the developer of the first innovation-based quantitative index of public equities and is the Managing Partner of the Purple Bridge Funds. He is the creator of the world’s first quantitative public equity index – the CNBC IQ100 powered by M·CAM. He is also a respected financial analyst. [MORE]

In the video above Attorney Reiner Fuellmich interviews Dr David Martin for the German Corona Investigative Committee. [MORE] He has provided citations for all the references he uses in the video which are also documented [HERE] and [HERE]. Other references, such patent information, are verifiable [HERE] and [HERE] and [HERE].

A full transcript of the interview is below:

Our firm has been the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries, so in the majority of the countries around the world. Our underwriting systems include the entire corpus of all patents, patent applications, federal grants procurement records, e-government records, etc. We have the ability to not only track what is happening and who is involved in what’s happening but we monitor a series of thematic interests for a variety of organizations and individuals as well as for our own commercial use, because as you probably know we maintain three Global Equity indices which are the the top performing large-cap and mid-cap equity indices worldwide. So our business is to monitor the innovation that’s happening around the world and specifically to monitor the economics of that innovation, the degree to which financial interests are being served, corporate interests are being dislocated etc. So our business is the business of innovation and its finance.

As you know we have reviewed the over 4,000 patents that have been issued around SARS Coronavirus and we have done a very comprehensive review of the financing of all of the manipulations of coronavirus which gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the beta coronavirus family. We took the reported gene sequence which was reportedly indicated as such by the ICTV (the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses) of the World Health Organization. We took the actual genetic sequences that were reportedly novel and reviewed those against the patent records that were available as of the spring of 2020. And what we found are over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy. There was no novel coronavirus. There are countless very subtle modifications of coronavirus sequences that have been uploaded but there was no single identified novel coronavirus at all. As a matter of fact, we found records in the patent records of sequences attributed to novelty going to patents that were sought as early as 1999. So not only was this not a novel anything, it’s actually not been novel for over two decades.

Up until 1999 the topic of coronavirus was uniquely applied to veterinary sciences. The first vaccine ever patented for coronavirus was actually sought by Pfizer. The application for the first vaccine for Coronavirus which was specifically a Spike protein — so the exact same thing that allegedly we have rushed into invention — the first application was filed January 28th 2000 — 21 years ago. So the idea that we mysteriously stumbled on the way to intervene on vaccines is not only ludicrous, it is incredulous because Timothy Miller, Sharon Klepfer, Albert Paul Reed, and Elaine Jones on January 28th 2000 filed what ultimately was issued as U.S. patent 637-2224, which was the spike protein virus vaccine for the canine coronavirus, which is actually one of the multiple forms of coronavirus. But as I said the early work up until 1999 was largely focused in the area of vaccines for animals. The two animals receiving the most attention were probably Ralph Baric’s work on rabbits, and the rabbit cardiomyopathy that was associated with significant problems among rabbit breeders; and then canine coronavirus in Pfizer’s work to identify how to develop a spike protein. [These] target candidates give rise to the obvious evidence that says that neither the coronavirus concept of vaccine nor the principle of the coronavirus itself as a pathogen of interest with respect to the spike protein’s behavior is anything novel at all. As matter fact it’s 22 years old on based on patent files.

What’s more problematic and what is actually the most egregious problem is that Anthony Fauci and NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines, and so this is actually not a natural progression of a zoonotic modification of coronavirus. As a matter of fact, very specifically in 1999 Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill specifically to create — this comes directly from a patent application filed on April 19th, 2002 — you heard the date correctly, 2002 — where NIAID built an infectious replication-defective coronavirus specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. In other words we [U.S. NIAID] made SARS and we patented it on April 19th, 2002 before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia. Which [outbreak] as you know followed that by several months, that patent issued as US patent 727-9327. That patent clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing the fact that we knew that the ACE-2 receptor, the ACE-2 binding domain for the s-1 spike protein and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen, was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen. And that technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could actually harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.

My organization was asked to monitor biological and chemical weapons treaty violations in the very early days of 2000. You’ll remember the anthrax events in September of 2001. And we were part of an investigation that gave rise to the Congressional inquiry into not only the anthrax origins but also into what was unusual behavior around Bayer’s ciprofloxacin drug, which was a drug used as a potential treatment for Anthrax poisoning. And throughout the fall of 2001 we began monitoring an enormous number of bacterial and viral pathogens that were being patented through NIH, NIAID, and the US Armed Services Infectious Disease Program, and a number of other agencies internationally that collaborated with them. And our concern was that coronavirus was being seen as not only a potential manipulable agent for potential uses as a vaccine vector, but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate. So our first public reporting on this took place, prior to the SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001. So you can imagine how disappointed I am to be sitting here twenty years later having 20 years earlier pointed out that there was a problem looming on the horizon with respect to coronavirus. But after the alleged outbreak — and I will always say alleged outbreak — because I think it’s important for us to understand that coronavirus as a circulating pathogen inside of the viral model that we have is actually not new to the human condition and is not new to the last two decades. It’s actually been part of the sequence of proteins that that circulates for quite a long time.

in PHOTO LEGEND HANK AARON WHO DIED 2 WEEKS AFTER GETTING INJECTED WITH A PLAY VACCINE. ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY: vaccinated - infected with poisons. (See: Antibiotics)

vaccination - mandatory infection--typically administered by agents of Corporate State in their public schools of indoctrination camps. How can unvaccinated children endanger other children who are immunized?

But the alleged outbreak [of SARS-1] that took place in China in 2002 going into 2003 gave rise to a very problematic April 2003 filing by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention. And this topic is of critical importance to get the nuance very precise, because in addition to filing the entire gene sequence on what became SARS coronavirus, which is actually a violation of 35 U.S. Code Section 101 — you cannot patent a naturally occurring substance. The 35 U.S. Code Section 101 violation, what is patent number 7220852, now that patent also had a series of derivative patents associated with it. These patent applications were broken apart because they were of multiple patentable subject matter. These include U.S. Patent 465-9270-3p which is actually a very interesting designation, U.S. Patent 7776521. These patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus but also covered the means of detecting it using RT-PCR. Now the reason why that’s a problem is, if you actually both own the patent on the gene itself and you own the patent on its detection, you have a cutting-edge advantage to being able to control 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself but also its detection — meaning you have entire scientific and message control. And this patent sought by the CDC was allegedly justified by their public relations team as being sought so that everyone would be free to be able to research coronavirus. The only problem with that statement is it’s a lie. And the reason why it’s a lie is because the Patent Office not once but twice rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable because the sequence was already in the public domain. In other words prior to CDC’s filing for a patent the Patent Office found 99.9% identity with the already existing coronavirus recorded in the public domain.

And over the rejection of the Patent Examiner and after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007, the CDC over[came] the Patent Office’s rejection of their patent, and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS Coronavirus. So every public statement that CDC has made that said that this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own paid bribe to the Patent Office. And to make matters worse, they paid an additional fee to keep their application private. Last time I checked, if you’re trying to make information available for the public to research, you would not pay a fee to keep the information private. I wish I could have made up anything I just said, but all of that is available in the public patent archive record which any member of the public can review. The United States Patent Office has not only the evidence but the actual documents which I have in my possession now.

This is critically important because fact-checkers have repeatedly stated that the novel coronavirus designated as SARS-CoV-2 is in fact distinct from the CDC patent. And here is both the genetic and the patent problem. If you look at the gene sequence that is filed by CDC in 2003, again in 2005, and then again in 2006, what you find is identity in somewhere between 89 to 99% of the sequence overlaps that have been identified in what’s called the novel subclade of SARS-CoV-2. What we know is that the core designation of SARS coronavirus which is actually the clade of the beta coronavirus family, and the subclade that has been called SARS-CoV 2, have to overlap from a taxonomy point of view. You cannot have SARS designation on a thing without it first being SARS. So the disingenuous fact-checking that has been done, saying that somehow or another CDC has nothing to do with this particular patent or this particular pathogen, is beyond both the literal credibility of the published sequences, and it’s also beyond credulity when it comes to the ICTV taxonomy, because it very clearly states that this is in fact a subclade of the clade called SARS coronavirus.

Now what’s important is on the 28th of April — and listen to the date very carefully because this date is problematic — 3 days after CDC filed the patent on the SARS coronavirus in 2003, 3 days later Sequoia Pharmaceuticals — a company that was set up in Maryland — Sequoia Pharmaceuticals on the 28th of April 2003 filed a patent on antiviral agents of treatment and control of infections by coronavirus. CDC filed three days earlier and then the treatment was available 3 days later. Just hold that thought for a second. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals and ultimately [Ablig] Pharmaceuticals became rolled into the proprietary Holdings of Pfizer, [Crysel], and Johnson & Johnson, So ask yourself a simple question: How would one have a patent on a treatment for a thing that had been invented three days earlier? The patent in question, the April 28th 2003 patent 715-1163, issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals has another problem. The problem is it was issued and published before the CDC patent on coronavirus was actually allowed. So the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero. It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published. Because CDC had paid to keep it secret. This, my friends, is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering, and collusion. This is not a theory, this is evidence. You cannot have information in the future inform a treatment for a thing that did not exist. It is a RICO case and the RICO pattern which was established in April of 2003 for the first coronavirus was played out to exactly the same schedule when we see SARS-CoV show up, when we have Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID prior to the definition of the novel subclade. How do you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?

Before you actually have the thing on the 5th of June 2008 — which is an important date because it is actually around the time when DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Program in the United States, actively took an interest in coronavirus as a biological weapon — June 5th 2008 [Ablig], which as you know is now part of Sanofi, filed the series of patents that specifically targeted what we’ve been told is the novel feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and you heard what I just said, this is the 5th of June 2008 they found the specific sequence they targeted, what was called the poly-basic cleavage site for SARS-CoV the novel spike protein in the ACE-2 receptor binding domain which is allegedly novel, to SARS-CoV-2, and all of that was patented on the 5th of June 2008. And those patents in sequence were issued between November 24th of 2015 which was U.S. Patent 919-3780, so that one came out after the gain-of-function moratorium. That one came after the MERS outbreak in the Middle East but what you find is that then in 2016, 2017, 2019 a series of patents all covering not only the RNA strands but also the subcomponents of the gene strands were all issued to [Ablig] and Sanofi and then we have Rubius Therapeutics, we have Children’s Medical Corporation, we have countless others that include Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Protein Science Corporation, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong, Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai, all identifying in patent filings that ranged from 2008 until 2017 every attribute that was allegedly uniquely published by the single reference publication. The novel coronavirus reveals quote ‘natural insertions at the S1, S2 cleavage site of the spike protein and possible recombinant origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the paper that has routinely been used to identify the novel virus.

Unfortunately if you actually take what they report to be novel, you find 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly novel in SARS-CoV-2 specifically as it relates to the poly-basic cleavage site ACE-2 receptor binding domain, and the spike protein, so the clinically novel components of the clinically unique, clinically contagious virus [were already in those 73 patents]. There was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that, and by 2016 the paper that was funded during the gain-of-function moratorium that said that the SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence — written by none other than Ralph Baric — was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation. A statement made in 2015 by [Eco-Health Alliance Director] Peter Daszak reported in the National Academies of Science Press publication February 12th 2016, and I’m quoting ‘We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process‘ end quote. Let me repeat the quote: ‘We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process‘ end quote.

There wasn’t a lab leak. This was an intentional by weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people to get them addicted to a pan-coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released, and every study that has ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak is a red herring. And there’s really nothing that is new in this, zero. These patents on everything clinically novel, 73, [were] all issued before 2019. To prove that this was actually not a release of anything, because patent 727-9327, the patent on the recombinant nature of that lung targeting coronavirus, was transferred mysteriously from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institutes of Health in 2018. Now here’s the problem with that under the Bayh-Dole Act, the U.S. Government already has what’s called a march-in right provision. That means if the U.S. Government has paid for research they are entitled to benefit from that research at their demand or at their whim. So explain why in 2017 and 2018 suddenly the National Institutes of Health have to take ownership of the patent that they already had rights to, held by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. And how did they need to file a Certificate of Correction to make sure that it was legally enforceable because there was a typographical error in the grant reference in the first filing so they needed to make sure that not only did they get it right but they needed to make sure every typographical error contained in the patent was corrected on the single patent to develop the Vaccine Research Institute’s mandate which was shared between the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill in November of 2019 and Moderna in November of 2019, when UNC Chapel Hill and NIAID and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine a month before an outbreak ever happened, you have all the evidence.

The script for this was written first January 6th 2004, in Bioterrorism, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Therapeutics, and Immune Modulators. Moderna introduced the notion of what they called The New Normal which became the branded campaign that was adopted by the World Health Organization, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board which was the Board upon which the Chinese Director of Center for Disease Control, Elias of the Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci sat together on that Board of Directors. But the the first introduction of The New Normal Campaign, which was about getting people to accept a universal pan-influenza pan-coronavirus vaccine, was actually adopted January 6th 2004 so it’s it’s been around quite quite a long time.

Moderna knew that it was going to be placed in the front of the line with respect to the development of a vaccine in March of 2019, and this is a very important date because in March of 2019, for reasons that are not transparent, they suddenly amended a series of rejected patent filings, which is a very bizarre behavior, but they amended a number of patent filings specifically to make reference to a deliberate or accidental release of coronavirus. So in March 2019 [with] the amended failed patent applications, [they] begin the process of a coronavirus vaccine development. And they began dealing with a very significant problem that they had which was they relied on technology that they did not own. Two Canadian companies Arbutus Pharmaceuticals and Acuitas Pharmaceuticals actually own the patent on the lipid nanoparticle envelope that’s required to deliver the injection of the mRNA fragment. And those patents have been issued both in Canada and in the U.S. and then around the world. Moderna knew that they did not own the rights and began trying to negotiate with Arbutus and Acuitas to make the lipid nanoparticle patented technology available to be put into a vaccine. And we know, before that in November they entered into a research and cooperative research and development agreement with UNC Chapel Hill with respect to getting the spike protein to put inside of the lipid nanoparticle so that they actually had a candidate vaccine before we had a pathogen allegedly that was running around. What makes that story most problematic beyond the self-evident nature of it is that we know that from 2016 until 2019 at every one of the NIAID advisory Council Board meetings, Anthony Fauci lamented the fact that he could not find a way to get people to accept the universal influenza vaccine, which was his favorite target — he was trying to get the population to engage in this process.

And what becomes very evident with Peter Daszak (Eco-Health Alliance), UNC Chapel Hill and others and then most specifically by March of 2019 in the amended patent filings by Moderna, we see that there is an epiphany that says what if there was an accidental or an intentional release of respiratory pathogen. And what makes that particular phrase problematic is it is exactly recited in the book A World At Risk which is the scenario that was put together by the World Health Organization in September of 2019. So months before there’s an alleged pathogen, [this book from WHO] says that we need to have a coordinated global experience of a respiratory pathogen release which by September 2020 must put in place a universal capacity for public relations management, crowd control, and the acceptance of a universal vaccine mandate. That was September of 2019 and the language of an intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was written into the scenario that quote ‘must be completed by September 2020‘.

The ACE-2 receptor was already described in the patents before 2019. Specifically the ACE-2 receptor targeting mechanism for SARS coronavirus is in publications going back to 2008, in the weaponization conferences that took place in Slovenia in Europe, all across Europe, and all across the DARPA infrastructure. We’ve known about that since 2013 and its isolation and amplification, add to this 70 amendments that merge the two. The failed [Moderna] patent applications were essentially revitalized in March of 2019, to include the ‘deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen‘ language. Their [patenting] process is similar to other pharmaceutical companies where they ever-green applications and continually modify applications to enjoy the earliest priority dates available. But that’s why you have to go back and look at the amendment of the application records to find out when the actual amendment language is put in place. Any assertion that this pathogen is somehow unique or novel falls apart on the actual gene sequences which are published in the patent record and then more egregiously falls apart in the fact that we have Peter Daszak himself stating that we have to create public hype to get the public to accept the medical countermeasure of a pan-coronavirus vaccine. And what makes that most ludicrous is the fact that as we know World Health Organization had declared coronavirus kind of a dead letter — they said that that we had eradicated coronavirus as a concern. So why having eradicated it in 2007 and 2008, why did we start spending billions of dollars globally on a vaccine for a thing that had been eradicated by declaration in 2008? That falls into the zone of incredulity, to say the least.

The entirety of the evidence then is that this is a tool — the coronavirus and the vaccines, this is a tool and the interest of DARPA in creating a biological weapon out of this. This is a tool for everything else that latches onto this, including population control. This was seen as a highly malleable bio-weapon. There is no question that by 2005 it was unquestionably a weapon of choice. Unfortunately very well-meaning people get trapped into conversations about whether we’re having a vaccine for a virus. The fact of the matter is we’re not. We are injecting a spike protein mRNA secret mRNA sequence which is a computer simulation; it’s not derived from nature, it’s a computer simulation of a sequence which has been known and patented for years. And what we know is that that sequence is reported across phone conversations that took place between Moderna and the [NIH] Vaccine Research Center. The story that this is somehow prophylactic or preventative flies in the face of 100% of the evidence because the evidence makes it abundantly clear that there has been no effort by any pharmaceutical company to combat the virus. This is about getting people injected with the known-to-be-harmful spike protein. So the cover story is that if you get an expression of a spike protein you’re going to have some sort of general symptomatic relief but the fact of the matter is there has never been an intent to vaccinate a population as defined by the vaccination universe [namely, to prevent infection].

When Anthony Fauci tried desperately to get some of his quote ‘synthetic RNA vaccines’ [for HIV] published he had his own patents rejected by the Patent Office, and I want to read what the patent office told him when NIAID’s own Anthony Fauci thought that he could get an mRNA-like vaccine patented as a vaccine. And here’s the quote: ‘These arguments are persuasive to the extent that an antigenic peptide stimulates an immune response that may produce antibodies that bind to a specific peptide or protein, but it is not persuasive in regards to a vaccine.‘ This is the Patent Office. The immune response produced by a vaccine must be more than merely some immune response, it must also be protective as noted in the Patent Office action. ‘The art recognizes the term vaccine to be a compound which prevents infection. Applicant has not demonstrated that the instantly claimed vaccine meets even the lower standards set forth in the specification let alone the standard definition for being operative. In regards therefore claims five, seven, and nine are not operative.‘ As the anti-HIV vaccine which is what he was working on is not patentable utility. So Anthony Fauci himself was told by the Patent Office themselves that what he was proposing as a vaccine does not meet the patentable standard, the legal standard, or the clinical standard.

This is the problem going back to the very beginning of what’s alleged to be a pandemic. We do not have any evidence that the gene sequence alteration had any clinical significance whatsoever, There has not been a single paper published by anyone that is actually established that anything novel since November of 2019 has clinical distinction from anything that predates November of 2019. The problem with the 73 patents that I described is that those 73 patents all contain what was reported to be novel in December and January of 2019 and 2020 respectively, so the problem is that even if we were to accept that there are idiopathic pneumonias, even if we were to accept that there are some sets of pathogen induced symptoms, we do not have a single piece of published evidence that tells us that anything about the subclade SARS-CoV-2 has clinical distinction from anything that was known and published prior to November 2019 in 73 patents dating to 2008.

Influenza did not leave the human population. Influenza was a failed decade-long pan-influenza vaccine mandate that was desperately desperately desperately promoted by governments around the world. They failed and they decided if influenza doesn’t deliver on the public promise of getting everybody to get an injection, let’s change the pathogen.

CDC announces limited, targeted eviction moratorium until early October

From [HERE] The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Tuesday issued a fresh stop on certain evictions Tuesday, saying that evicting people could be detrimental to public health and would interfere with efforts to slow the pandemic.

The new moratorium comes after President Joe Biden and his administration allowed a previous freeze to expire, setting off fury among members of his own party.

The new ban applies to areas of the country with high or substantial transmission of Covid-19 and will last until October 3, according to the announcement.

"In the context of a pandemic, eviction moratoria -- like quarantine, isolation, and social distancing -- can be an effective public health measure utilized to prevent the spread of communicable disease. Eviction moratoria facilitate self-isolation and self-quarantine by people who become ill or who are at risk of transmitting COVID-19 by keeping people out of congregate settings and in their own homes," the statement read.

The eviction issue had escalated into a contentious dispute between the White House and progressive Democrats, who accused the President of saddling them with passing an extension at the eleventh hour. Biden's aides said everyone should have known the moratorium was expiring and that congressional action was needed.

Left in the lurch were millions of Americans behind on their rent because of the pandemic still gripping parts of the country.

The resolution will stop short of another nationwide eviction freeze, but instead will be more limited in scope, targeted to places with high Covid spread.

A source familiar with the effort said the announcement would cover 80% of US counties and 90% of the US population.

Biden's aides had repeatedly insisted he lacked legal authority to renew the existing moratorium, citing a Supreme Court opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh from late June that said another extension would require congressional approval.

The President said earlier Tuesday the new eviction ban would be different from the previous one. But he openly acknowledged it would likely face legal scrutiny, and said the time it takes for the court process to unfold will allow for emergency rental assistance to reach troubled tenants.

Biden said he'd sought out constitutional scholars to advise him on a path forward after the Supreme Court's ruling, and said the "bulk" of them warned an eviction moratorium was "not likely to pass constitutional muster."

But he said "several key scholars" told him it might, and he decided it would be worth the risk if it allowed extra time for already-allocated emergency rental funds to reach Americans who need them. [MORE]

After Begging Blacks and Latinos to Vote, Biden and Democratic Leadership Allow Eviction Moratorium to Expire, Enabling Mostly White Landlords to Evict Mostly Black and Latino Tenants

NOT A PROBLEM FOR WHITE RENTERS [WHAT IS SOCIALIST DISTANCING?] ACCORDING TO THE CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORITIES AN ESTIMATED 10.5 MILLION ADULTS LIVING IN RENTAL HOUSING — 14 PERCENT OF ADULT RENTERS — WERE NOT CAUGHT UP ON RENT, ACCORDING TO DATA COLLECTED MAY 26–JUNE 7.[6] HERE, TOO, RENTERS OF COLOR WERE MORE LIKELY TO REPORT THAT THEIR HOUSEHOLD WAS NOT CAUGHT UP ON RENT: 24 PERCENT OF BLACK RENTERS, 16 PERCENT OF LATINO RENTERS, AND 15 PERCENT OF ASIAN RENTERS SAID THEY WERE NOT CAUGHT UP ON RENT, COMPARED TO 10 PERCENT OF WHITE RENTERS. THE RATE WAS 19 PERCENT FOR AMERICAN INDIAN, ALASKA NATIVE, NATIVE HAWAIIAN, PACIFIC ISLANDER, AND MULTIRACIAL ADULTS TAKEN TOGETHER.

From [HERE] A nationwide moratorium on residential evictions expired on Saturday after a last-minute effort by the Biden administration to win an extension failed, putting hundreds of thousands of tenants at risk of losing shelter, while tens of billions in federal funding intended to pay their back rent sit untapped.

Data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities show that an estimated 14% of adult renters, or 10.5 million adults, are not caught up. 

People of color who rent their homes are disproportionately affected by the inability to keep up with payments: 24% of Black renters, 16% of Latino renters and 15% of Asian renters said they were not caught up on rent, compared with 10% of white renters, according to the data. 

The expiration was a humbling setback for President Biden, whose team has allegedly tried for months to fix a dysfunctional emergency rent relief program to help struggling renters and landlords. Running out of time and desperate to head off a possible wave of evictions, the White House abruptly shifted course on Thursday, throwing responsibility to Congress and prompting a frenzied — and ultimately unsuccessful — rescue operation by Democrats in the House on Friday.

The collapse of those efforts reflected the culmination of months of frustration, as the White House pushed hard on states to speed housing assistance to tenants — with mixed results — before the moratorium expired. Hampered by a lack of action by the Trump administration, which left no real plan to carry out the program, Mr. Biden’s team has struggled to build a viable federal-local funding pipeline, hindered by state governments that view the initiative as a burden and the ambivalence of many landlords.

As a result, the $47 billion Emergency Rental Assistance program, to date, disbursed only $3 billion — about 7 percent of what was supposed to be a crisis-averting infusion of cash. [MORE]

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday said Democrats cannot blame Republicans for the expiration of the eviction moratorium.

"The House and House leadership had the opportunity to vote to extend the moratorium. ... We cannot in good faith blame the Republican Party when House Democrats have the majority," the progressive New York Democrat said on CNN’s “State of the Union." “This Court order came down on the White House a month ago, and the White House waited until the day before the House adjourned to release a statement asking Congress to extend the moratorium.”

Members of the Biden administration on Sunday pushed back strongly on that characterization with millions of renters who are behind in their payments at risk of homelessness after efforts to extend the moratorium fizzled ahead of a midnight deadline. Congress has sent out tens of billions of dollars to states and municipalities, meaning governors are largely responsible for establishing rental help programs. 

“Those state governments need to get it together, but we cannot kick people out of their homes when our end of the bargain has not been fulfilled. Out of the $46 billion that has been allocated, only $3 billion has gone out to help renters and small mom and pop landlords,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

Ocasio-Cortez organized a sit-in Saturday at midnight in Washington, D.C., tweeting “We’re out here to extend the moratorium, so where’s Congress? It’s time we come back and #ExtendTheMoratorium.” 

The rally came after eight House lawmakers, including Ocasio-Cortez, urged President Joe Biden in a letter to extend the moratorium. There are fewer than a dozen state eviction bans in place, POLITICO reported on Friday. 

In a statement released Friday, President Joe Biden called on state and local governments "to take all possible steps to immediately disburse these funds."

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who deferred on commenting directly on a video showing Ocasio-Cortez slamming Democratic inaction on the evictions ban, said on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday morning: “Let’s be clear, the administration has been acting throughout, and the president views this as a moral issue and not just a political one.”

He further cited the emergency rental assistance to state, “though it’s not necessarily getting to everyone.”

Brian Deese, director of the National Economic Council, said on Fox News on Sunday that it’s now up to the states to disperse the billions of dollars to landlords and renters: “That money is there. The states have the tools, the localities have the tools, and there’s no excuse. They need to move that money to those renters and those landlords immediately.”

Deese said the White House can extend the eviction moratorium for properties that are backed by government guarantees, like HUD, USDA and the VA. “But the key message here is that no landlord should evict without seeking that rental assistance,” Deese said.

Socialist Distancing: During Pandemic, Blacks faced more financial emergencies w/fewer economic resources, resulting in a widening gap in economic opportunity btw Black and white households

Huge wealth disparities between Black and white households in America existed long before the COVID-19 pandemic and have continued during the crisis. Data show that during the pandemic, Black households faced more financial emergencies with fewer economic resources, resulting in a widening gap in economic opportunity between Black and white households.

A new report from The Center for American Progress stated, “The pandemic occurred against the backdrop of a massive Black-white wealth gap. Because households quickly needed to rely on their wealth when the pandemic hit in early 2020, the crisis also illustrated the importance of wealth for families’ financial security. Black households suffered more in the pandemic in large part because they needed more but had much less wealth than white households. Wealth, both as an emergency buffer and as a means to invest in people’s futures, became critically important.

Millions of households, especially African American and Latino households, faced unemployment and multiple health emergencies more or less from one day to the next. Yet many of these same households had few or no emergency savings to fall back on during this time. When people lost their jobs, many needed to rely on emergency savings, leaving them with less financial security as the pandemic unfolded. For example, in 2020, 46.7 percent of unemployed white households could not come up with $400 in an emergency, while 65.2 percent of unemployed Black households lacked access to $400 in such situations.5

Many more white than Black households could use their savings during the pandemic to fill any financial gaps left by job losses and/or higher health care costs. This disparate reliance on savings to pay for current expenses reflects the highly unequal distribution of emergency savings by race.6 After all, households that had no or few emergency savings could not use them to help pay their bills after a job loss. While 45.9 percent of white households that saw a drop in job-related income used their savings to pay for current expenses, only 30.6 percent of Black households did so. (see Figure 1) Similarly, more white households than Black households—28.5 percent versus 18.8 percent—used their savings when they were out of work due to health reasons. When households actually needed to rely on their savings, fewer Black households than white households had the opportunity to do so, even though many more Black households experienced layoffs and health emergencies during this time.

Even if they could not fall back on savings, Black households still needed to fill the gap in their finances left by job losses and higher health care costs. They often did so by borrowing more money.7 For example, 44.5 percent of white households that used savings to pay for expenses also borrowed on credit cards, and 16.1 percent borrowed from family and friends; this suggests that they did not have enough emergency savings. In comparison, many more Black households in this situation borrowed money, with 45.8 percent taking out loans and 28.5 percent borrowing from family and friends. Essentially, Black households substituted more debt for limited emergency savings, widening the wealth gap between typical Black and white families.

Even when Black households used their savings to pay for expenses, they were more likely to experience financial hardships amid the pandemic. This suggests that Black families’ savings were often not enough to allow them to handle the many job, child care, and health care challenges that arose during the pandemic. African Americans that used their savings to pay for current expenses were more likely than white households to sometimes or often not have enough food, to not be current on their rent or mortgage, and to have difficulties paying all of their bills. (see Figure 2) For instance, 64.1 percent of African Americans who used their savings to pay for expenses had trouble paying all of their bills, and the same was true for only 49.2 percent of white households. (see Figure 2) Having savings to pay for expenses during emergencies was clearly not enough to avoid economic hardships for all households, but the chance of still experiencing such hardships was much higher for Black households than for white ones.

Put differently, Americans generally have too few emergency savings, but this shortfall during the pandemic was much worse for Black households.

The bottom line is accessing savings to fill the gap left by too little income among widespread economic emergencies is not enough to avoid economic hardship and future hardship as debt grows, especially among Black households.

The pandemic laid the foundation for greater wealth inequality in the future

The racial wealth gap also manifests in disparities in long-term investments, and not just in differences in emergency savings and immediate financial insecurity; during the pandemic, Black households had less wealth and thus fewer opportunities to invest in education, homeownership, and business stability or to choose to retire amid a worsening labor market. Yet the pandemic was a time when families often needed to spend more money on education—for example, to support their children’s remote schooling or to pursue postsecondary education to boost their own earning potential in the face of a highly uncertain future in the labor market.

During this time, many households also sought housing stability and explored new housing options to protect their health and that of their families. Moreover, many household members who owned their own business needed to access savings to keep their business running as they either were forced to shut down or saw demand for their goods and services drop amid customers’ health concerns. Inevitably, the labor market quickly worsened, often pushing older Black workers in particular out onto the unemployment line.

While Black families often had greater needs to invest in education, housing, and businesses or to move into retirement, they had fewer resources to do so at the start of the pandemic. The result has been widening gaps in key long-term investments—such as education, housing, business ownership, and retirement—between Black and white households. [MORE]

To Justify Murdering Black Man, LA County Cop Claimed a COVID Mask Looked Like a Gun from 6 Ft Away. Shot Dana Mitchell Young in the back of the head, lower abdomen, buttock, and penis. Suit filed

From [HERE] and [HERE] The family of Dana Mitchell Young Jr., a 47-year-old Black man shot by deputies in South Los Angeles last year, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

On October 15, 2020, around 3:30 am, Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Walker shot and killed Dana Mitchell Young Jr. (AKA Malik) at the rear fence of Woodcrest Elementary School. Deputy Kevin Walker, who was within six feet of Malik at the time he discharged his weapon, claims to have mistaken a COVID-19 style mask in Malik’s hand for a gun. As Malik attempted to flee, Deputy Kevin Walker shot him four times — once in the back of the head, lower abdomen, buttock, and, disturbingly, in the penis. After taking Malik’s precious life, the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department left his body on the ground, behind an elementary school, for more than 14 hours.

Since the killing of their loved one, Malik’s family, with the support of Essie Justice Group,has tirelessly advocated for answers from the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department (LASD). At every turn, LASD has obfuscated the facts, dodged accountability, disregarded state law, and has refused the family even basic human dignity. In addition to ignoring a Public Records Act request filed in November 2020, Los Angeles Sheriff’s has only provided scant explanation about the shooting. Family members and Essie advocates had to fight in order to get Malik’s body released for burial only to discover unexplained trauma, abrasions, and bullet holes, including to the back of his head and penis. 

Kevin Walker is allegedly one of the eight cops involved in the barbaric beating of Christopher Bailey, an unarmed Black man who sustained 64 to 86 total body and face hits from cops. None of them have been charged by the “progressive” prosecutor George Gascon.

Dana Mitchell Young Jr. (AKA Malik) was a loved and loving father of five children and the grandfather of three grandchildren. Malik’s friends and family describe him as having been mellow, warm-hearted, loyal, helpful, and the type of person that would give the shirt off his back to help someone. 

In LA County alone, 929 people have been killed by LA police since 2000. Malik’s family is one of a few families who know the name of the officer who killed their loved one. Deputy Kevin Walker’s name was released on May 24, 2021, several months after the killing and only after sustained advocacy by the family, Essie Justice Group and Check the Sheriff coalition.

At the time of the shooting, Young was suspected of kidnapping a woman and attempting to sexually assault her.

NYC to Pay $567k Settlement. NYPD Cop Grabbed a Black Man from Behind and Put Him in a Chokehold to Force Him to Comply w/ a Noise Ordinance [all Laws are Backed by Violence but the Cop Used too Much]

From [HERE] Tomás Medina won’t get those minutes of his life back, but he’s getting something back from the city.

On behalf of Medina, The Legal Aid Society and Covington & Burling LLP announced a $567,500 settlement with the city in a case brought on behalf of plaintiff Tomás Medina challenging the New York City Police Department and its practice of using banned chokeholds and abusers the use if tasers.

This comes after the city attempted to get the case dismissed. 

Last year, Judge Alison Nathan ruled that the city and top NYPD officials could be held liable for Nunez’s misconduct. “Medina has raised a plausible inference that the NYPD has maintained a custom of tacitly endorsing or tolerating the improper or unconstitutional use of chokeholds and Tasers,” he said.

In 2018, Medina was placed in an illegal chokehold and tased 13 times by NYPD Detective Fabio Nunez during a response to a noise violation. After the incident was caught on video, Nunez remained on the force despite having multiple reports of misconduct. n the had been allowed to continue policing despite a long record of similar misconduct, Nunez was forced to retire after pleading guilty to an NYPD disciplinary charge of using a banned chokehold. 
This comes after the two-year anniversary of the Civilian Complaint Review Board substantiating complaints against Nunez.

“Being attacked by the NYPD was one of the scariest things to ever happen to me,” said Medina. “I could have died. What they did to me, and what they do to so many other people is not okay, but I take some comfort in knowing that Detective Nunez is no longer a police officer and that both he and the city have to pay for what they did to me.”

According to a criminal complaint, 33-year-old Tomas Medina was outside a car dealership at 438 West 206th Street around midnight on July 14th when Detective Fabio Nunez and Officer Shanee Pierce responded to a complaint of loud music. “They told me the neighbors complained about the music,” Medina told the Daily News, which first reported the story. “I told him I was already picking everything up to go.” At around the 11:39 mark in the video below, which was provided by Medina's attorneys at the Legal Aid Society, Detective Nunez approaches Medina from behind, grabs him by the neck, and pushes him into the side of a car. [MORE]

Incompetent in the Presence of Black Skin: VA Police Assumed Black Man was Trespassing and Stealing His Own Truck Although He Possessed the Key on an Unlocked Lot. Cops on Video w/Knee On His Neck

From [HERE] An arrest on Liberty University's campus has launched an internal investigation into campus police use of force.

Early Monday morning, three white campus police officers arrested Charles Miller, who is Black, in the parking lot at Candler's Station.

Miller's son captured a four-minute cellphone video from the driver's side that shows part of the interaction that ended with his father in handcuffs, facing the ground. Footage of the incident first surfaced on Facebook. ABC13 was given permission to show it.

Miller was ultimately arrested and charged with trespassing, failure to show ID, and fleeing.

LUPD Col. Richard Hinkley confirmed with ABC13 that his officers approached a truck parked by an empty car in the Candler's Station parking lot overnight.

“Early that morning Candler's Station was closed,” Col. Hinkley said. “It's property we patrol because we've had some incidents there with thefts and property damage around the stores.” 

The cellphone footage begins with officers requesting to see Miller's I.D. He refuses, saying "there is no crime." 

This exchange continues as officers are heard knocking on the truck's window.

The initial part of the video does not show the officer's faces, as the camera is pointed at the dashboard and center console, which places the time at 11:51 p.m.

"I told you what I’m doing, so that ends the investigation," Miller insists. "Picking up my vehicle. There you go."

One officer is heard asking for Miller's I.D., stating he was under arrest for trespassing. Another voice then states "you guys are being detained."

When Miller refuses to show his I.D., he's told again that he is under arrest.

A voice in the background asks, "you got your baton?" and "I really don’t want to break this window, but I will."

Miller's son asks officers if they were responding to a call, explaining why the pair was in the parking lot after hours.

"Alright, so, we came to grab our car. Hold on, nobody called it in. So, when you rolled up and we said we were grabbing our car – we’re not being detained so why do I need to show you my identification when I’m just grabbing my car?"

An officer responds, "Because again, as the sign is posted right here, you’re here after hours. It doesn’t matter if you were here before or not. You’re here after hours."

The cellphone video then pans up to the driver's side door after Miller exits the car. He is then approached by three officers as one states, "sir, you're being detained."

An officer grabs Miller's arm as two others approach from either side.

As his son gets out of the truck, the phone pans down toward the seat.

By the time he walks around to the back of the vehicle, Miller captures footage of his father headed toward the ground.

During the struggle, Miller exclaims, "you know it's not right!"

One of the officers sets his knee near Miller's head, then moves it to the base of his neck.

Miller's son asks, "Hey can you get your knee off his neck before he’s the next George Floyd please?"
The offer responds, "sir, my knee is not on his neck."

His attorney Tom Roberts Esq., said the stop was unlawful.

"There are two ordinary citizens who don't have criminal records, who are sitting in a parking lot having enjoyed the day and given businesses to the businesses in that strip mall coming back to pick up a car," Roberts explains.

"There is no basis for the charge of trespass. Without a charge of trespass an officer has no right to put his hands on Mr. Miller," Roberts said.

Roberts continued, "The officers cannot find cover under Terry v Ohio under the facts of this case, even with their claim that there had been a rash of thefts of catalytic converters."

"First, there was nothing suspicious about 2 African Americans sitting in a truck in a heavily trafficked parking lot without more. Second, when they informed the officers they were there to pick up Mr. Miller's car that was more than sufficient to dispel any claim of suspicion--Either Charles Miller would have the keys or he would not!"

Black, Democrats at All Levels of Govt in Atlanta Yet Blacks are Still Subjected to Police Violence and Routine Interference w/Their Freedom of Movement: Video Shows a Cop Kick Black Woman in the Face

From [HERE] Another police brutality incident put Atlanta back in the law enforcement spotlight, with some questioning the city’s status as a hub for Black people. Atlanta-based attorney Tiffany Williams Roberts tore into the city’s image as a place for Black people to thrive, suggesting it is a tale of two cities: The best of times and the worst of times.

“Atlanta is not a Mecca when it comes to the impact of the violent police state,” tweeted Roberts. “We are part of the problem. Period.”  
Even as all eyes were watching the streets in the wake of 2020 racial justice protests, Atlanta police officers killed Rayshard Brooks and brutalized two HBCU students on live television. Countless others were detained or arrested during protests, with questions raised about the use of force in the department’s response last summer.

Some of the previously fired officers were subsequently reinstated due to an independent board finding procedural issues in their dismissal. And even as cities like Atlanta grapple with a reported rise in crime, elected officials cannot turn a blind eye to the other issues affecting residents.  

Atlanta is governed by a Black mayor and mostly Black 15-member Atlanta City Council. Every mayor elected since 1973 has been black. Many of the department heads are Black including the acting police chief. Atlanta is split between three congressional districts, 2 of its reps are Black. All of the above are democrat.

White NJ Cops Assaulted a Handcuffed Black Man having an Epilpetic Seizure. Cops Pressed Him Face Down in the Street w/Full Body weight until he stopped breathing. Govt Request to Dismiss Case Denied

From [HERE] A federal judge has denied the government’s request to dismiss a Black man’s lawsuit alleging excessive force by police officers who put their body weight on him while he was lying face-down in handcuffs, 

In the lawsuit, Taharqa Dean says he was arrested after Deptford police officers mistakenly believed he was breaking into a car outside a deli in December 2011.

Taharqa Dean appeared to stop breathing during the September 2015 incident and was hospitalized with injuries for more than a week, according to a decision by U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman.

The judge said police body-cam video of the encounter was inconclusive on key points, requiring a jury to resolve disputed facts of a chaotic encounter.

Dean's attorney, Stanley King of Woodbury, believes the video supports the lawsuit's claims. According to the complaint;

On or around September 23, 2015 at approximately 9:00 a.m., Plaintiff suffered a seizure while walking on Reading Street near his home. He fell to the ground, where he laid unconscious until someone discovered him and called 911.

Glassboro Police Officers Michael Fanfarillo and Kyle Snyder responded to the 911 call regarding a man lying on the ground having a seizure.

Fanfarillo stated that upon his arrival, he observed Dean lying on the ground having a seizure. He stated that Dean was sweating profusely, semi-conscious, breathing heavily, and severely disoriented

Fanfarillo knew Dean and knew that Dean suffered from seizures. The paramedics arrived shortly after Fanfarillo and Snyder. They evaluated Dean and determined that he needed to be transported to Kennedy Hospital for treatment.

The paramedics placed Dean on a stretcher, secured him with safety straps, placed the stretcher in the ambulance and headed for Kennedy Hospital.

While the ambulance was en route to the hospital, Dean began to unloosen the straps and attempted to get off of the stretcher. He was still in the midst of his seizure.

The paramedics called the police for assistance in getting Dean safely back onto the stretcher. Fanfarillo and Snyder again responded to the call.

When they arrived, the officers opened the rear doors of the ambulance and saw Dean standing with the safety straps tangled around his legs. Dean’s pants were down below his knees. Fanfarillo attempted to speak to Dean, but Dean did not respond. Fanfarillo stated that he “could see that [Dean] still appeared to be disoriented.”

Dean then adjusted his clothes and attempted to exit the ambulance by stepping out of the rear doors.

Snyder grabbed and tackled Dean, causing Dean to fall out of ambulance and onto the street. Fanfarillo and Snyder immediately began a merciless assault on Dean, all the while telling him to “stop resisting.”

Dean did not have the presence of mind to resist. He repeatedly asked, “Why” and pleaded for his father, “John,” as the officers continued their assault.

After Dean was secured in handcuffs and bleeding from cuts and abrasions on his head and face, Snyder sprayed Dean with OC spray. Officers Visceglia, Moore and Gray responded to the scene within a few moments and immediately began to join the assault on Dean.

None of the officers on the scene attempted to stop the other officers from their unlawful use of force on Dean. The officers were wearing body cameras that depicted the entire event.

Although the video recordings clearly depict Dean’s conduct and innocence, Defendants charged Dean with Aggravated Assault on Police Officer in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(5)(A), Disorderly Conduct in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-2A(1), and Disarming a Law Enforcement Officer in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C-12-11A.

To support the charge of Disarming a Law Enforcement Officer, Michael Fanarillo stated in his police report that he observed Dean reaching for Snyder’s gun. Snyder also falsely stated in his police report and in sworn testimony given to the grand jury that Dean grabbed his gun and attempted to remove it from its holster.

These statements and testimony were false and not supported by the video recording.

All of the criminal charges against Dean were ultimately dismissed. The conduct of Defendants Michael Fanfarillo, Snyder, Moore, Visceglia and Gray as alleged above was conscious shocking, intentional, willful, malicious, and demonstrates Defendants’ deliberate indifference to the constitutionally protected rights of Plaintiff.

As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid acts of Defendants, the plaintiff suffered, emotional pain and suffering, and grievous bodily harm—including rotator cuff injuries requiring surgery, nerve damage in his wrists, bulging disks in his neck and back and head trauma.

According to the ruling, the police turned Dean face-down on the street and officers knelt and placed their body weight on his legs and backside during an attempt to secure his ankles.

Officers kept their weight on Dean's body after a tranquilizing drug had been administered into his torso, the decision adds.

It says Dean "continued to scream and attempted to move his hands." Officers commanded him to calm down, saying "they would get off of him when he did so."

“It’s obvious he doesn’t even realize people are talking to him,” King said of his client's behavior on the video. "If he's out of it, why do you treat him as someone who's disobeying you?"

When Dean appeared to calm down, the EMTs and officers realized he'd apparently stopped breathing, the ruling continued. Dean was given oxygen to revive him, then was removed in an ambulance.

"In sum, from the time (Dean) was handcuffed, laid face down, and had his ankles secured, approximately six minutes passed with officers collectively pressing their body weight into the plaintiff’s body until he stopped breathing on his own," the ruling said.

King said Dean was accused of aggravated assault and trying to take an officer's weapon, but the charges were dismissed.

"They charged him in an attempt to justify their use of force," the lawyer asserted. "If you see where he’s capable of trying to disarm an officer, please let me know.’

In his July 22 ruling, Hillman dismissed some claims in the lawsuit, saying police were shown to have acted properly until Dean was handcuffed.

"It would not have been proper for the (police) to essentially allow (Dean) to leave and walk away while in the middle of what any reasonable person would view as a medical emergency," the ruling said. Right, judge so they attempted to kill him in order to help him.

But the judge said Dean could argue police used excessive force after he was handcuffed. The suit seeks unspecified damages from Glassboro's municipal government.

Once the facts were determined, Hillman said, he would rule on whether the officers could claim qualified immunity against the lawsuit.

[Never call 911 for mental health help] Gullible Black Woman is Shocked that White GA Cops and K-9 Arrived to Force Their Undeclinable Service Onto Her Husband, Assaulting/Biting Him after Calling 911

From [HERE] Alpharetta police have launched an internal investigation after a handcuffed man experiencing a “mental health crisis” was bitten by a police dog last weekend in the front yard of his home.

Travis Moya, 36, is recovering from a concussion and multiple bite wounds after his attorneys said officers used excessive force while arresting him Sunday evening in front of his family.

Police responded to Moya’s home about 6:15 p.m. after his wife called 911. The man’s attorneys described it as a non-violent mental health call, saying Moya was never physically combative or violent, and hadn’t committed a crime.

“Mr. Moya was having a mental health crisis,” his attorney, Chris Stewart, told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “This was non-violent, nothing crazy, but his wife felt that an ambulance needed to check him out. They called for help, and instead, a K-9 unit shows up.”