'Yes, Whatever You Say Master.' Obedience and Citizen Compliance with Trivial Demands: A Masktard Compilation Covering the Past 2 Years

According to FUNKTIONARY:

citizens – those who instinctively seek permission or ask themselves whether or not they are allowed to do anything before they act. Citizens (serfs, subjects or slaves), possess a “ruled” mind-virus mentality. 2) the hapless residents of the great democracy whose Constitution deliberately throttled democratic rule. (See: Citizenship, Plutocracy & Slavery)

obedience – a Self-Other irreversible relationship in which there is only communication (mind-to-mind), i.e. no contact, and an imbalance of power. 2) the highest form of the power-fear systemic. 3) slavery sold to both children and adults alike deceptively packaged in a respectfully sounding label. 4) reverse terrorism. You can compel obedience but you cannot compel responsibility or respect. Everyone should have a say in waking-up to (or waking up from) whatever they have been programmed to obey. It is difficult to reduce to obedience anyone who has no wish to command. If you can’t read very well and follow it up with the absence of critical thinking skills, then obey your masters and oppressors until you can—for your own survival. Life is more trouble-free when you obey. If you speak TV-English, by all means obey the beast, if you like freedom of movement with your slavery. TV’s ought to have warning labels: “Use of this device can be hazardous to your freedom.” How can you take a man seriously who watches T.V. obediently, drinks habitually and desires freedom too? The historian Howard Zinn is clear on the role obedience has played on our conditions throughout the centuries. “[Civil disobedienc] is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions of people have been killed because of this obedience. …Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is people are obedient while the jails are full with petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.” More atrocities are commited in the name of economics than in the name of hate, ideological or religious intolerance. (See: Authority, God, Atrocities, Conditioning, TV, War, The COMB, Control, Power, Violence, Religion, Should, Duty, Hatred, Other, Inhumanity, Communication, Programming, Indoctrination, Poverty, Gangbanking, Education, Unlearning, Force, Orderlies, Police, Force Continuum, Judicial Tyranny, Residency, Labor, Property, Servitude, Critical Thinking, Holodeck Court, Questioning, Pulpit, TUFF, Authenticity, Fear & Authoritarians)

disobedience – thinking for oneself—deciding for oneself what to do and not to do. 2) the refusal of services of those in power—to deny their alleged authority over you. The Beast allows you to be disobedient or ignorant but not both. Disobedience is the only crime—all others are offshoots. (See: Prometheus, Rights, Thinking, Thought & Rebel)

disobedient – master over one’s thoughts and acting on same relative to the dominating recidivism of authoritarian culture.

While Corpse Biden Fights for the Power to Reinstate His Moronic Mask Mandate Whenever He Wants, a Group of Physicians and Surgeons Argue Mask Mandates Violate Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Travel

From [HERE] The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed its amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit on Friday against the Biden Administration’s mask mandate on airplanes and other public transportation. The court is hearing Biden’s appeal from the April federal district court decision that invalidated his mask mandate.

“Mask mandates are tyrannical, and Congress never authorized the CDC to require travelers to wear masks,” stated Andrew Schlafly, General Counsel of AAPS. “Mask mandates infringe on two fundamental rights: freedom of speech and freedom of travel,” he argued in AAPS’s amicus brief.

The Biden Administration did not attempt to reinstate its mask mandate for travelers after it was blocked by a federal judge, amid widespread public opposition to the mandate. But Biden appealed to the 11th Circuit to seek authority to reinstate the mask mandate at any time, Mr. Schlafly explains.

Neither the government nor the parties filing briefs supporting it demonstrate effectiveness to Biden’s mask mandate, Mr. Schlafly argued in the brief. He cited multiple recent articles admitting to the ineffectiveness of mask mandates in different regions of our country.

According to their court brief;

Mask mandates infringe on two fundamental rights: freedom of speech and freedom of travel. The ability to see another’s demeanor while he is speaking is often as important as the content of what he says. Historically many American states and towns prohibited the wearing of masks, in order to avoid the harm they cause. See, e.g., N.Y. Penal Law § 240.35(4) (predecessor enacted in 1845, then reenacted in 1965, and then repealed amid Covid-19 in 2020). Determinations of credibility essential to courtroom trials are just as important in everyday life, as millions of decisions are made daily, based on not merely what one says, but on how he is perceived as saying it.

Whether and how government may impose a mask mandate on travelers is a substantial issue involving a major question, and the recent adoption by the Supreme Court of “major questions doctrine” requires affirming the decision below. On June 30, 2022, after Appellants filed their opening brief, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in the consolidated case of West Virginia v. EPA, 142 S. Ct. 2587 (2022), and expressly embraced major questions doctrine for the first time. It requires invalidating agency decision-making on major questions in the absence of express congressional authorization. Such is the case here.

Mask mandates are more politics than science, and politics is to be sorted out in the halls of Congress rather than at a politically unaccountable administrative agency. Congress uses a time-proven process that includes public hearings, feedback by constituents, vigorous public debate, and political accountability. All of these elements are essential before a burden as draconian as a traveler mask mandate is imposed, and yet none of this exists for agency decision-making by the CDC. The Constitution protects against government controlling what people say, and likewise protects against government controlling how people look when they say it. What is said with a slight smile can often mean something entirely different from what is said with clenched teeth. The CDC incorrectly insists that it should have immense unchecked power to decide what to allow on this, without any express congressional authorization.

As further explained by Justice Neil Gorsuch in his concurrence in West Virginia v. EPA, “major questions doctrine” is not new. Courts have rejected many prior agency attempts to grab breathtaking authority never authorized by Congress, as the CDC attempts here. Nothing in the relevant statute or its prior implementations remotely support the mandate that all travelers wear masks, let alone require ineffective mask-wearing. As a “major question” this is one for Congress to decide as part of the political process, not for agency employees to impose without hearings and meaningful public debate.

The amicus brief submitted by the AMA fails to cite or address a single legal authority. The amicus brief submitted by the Public Health amici cites only four legal precedents other than the decision below, one of which is a 1925 Georgia Supreme Court decision concerning the meaning of the word “sanitation”, along with numerous citations to various dictionaries. All the amici in support of the government fail to address major questions doctrine and the long line of Supreme Court precedents that led to its formal adoption in West Virginia v. EPA.

Just as glaring is the failure by the government’s amici to provide any justification for the travelers’ mask mandate. Mask mandates failed to work during the 1918 flu pandemic, and yet the briefs submitted by the government’s amici cite their unsuccessful use then as a reason to mandate them again. The medical briefs could have cast some scientific light on the matter at hand, but there is no science in support of requiring intermittent use of porous masks by travelers. In the briefing by the government amici, only one paragraph in each of their briefs even alludes to any general scientific support for a travelers’ mask mandate, and those allusions do not survive scrutiny.

Finally, with respect to the nationwide relief, it is necessary because travel is not an isolated activity. People travel with friends and family, and it would be senseless to hold that merely one within such a group is free of an unauthorized mandate, while the others within the group must still comply with what is unauthorized. The nationwide scope of the relief below was proper. [MORE]

"Masks Are a Super Freeway for the Virus to Come and Go." Engineer and Certified Industrial Hygienist Says Masks Don't Work on COVID and Are Harmful. [Everything you wanted to know about masks/COVID]

From [JOEL SMALLEY] Masks have not ever been and cannot be an effective control for airborne virus control. Engineering controls (air filtration/circulation and destruction) have been the solution for 80 years with good reason.

Stephen Petty:

1. Certified industrial hygienist;

2. Certified safety professional;

3. Professional engineer;

4. 45 years in the field of health and safety, trying to protect workers and the public from toxins;

5. Named/testified in over 400 legal cases related to exposure control and personal protective equipment (PPE);

talks us comprehensively through 50 years of evidence showing the ineffectiveness of masks in mitigating SARS-Cov-2, the COVID virus.

Naomi Wolf Says Emails Prove the CDC Consider People Criminals If They Raise Questions about the Safety of COVID Injections. Government Colluded w/Big Tech to Conceal Dangers of Deadly Shots

From [HERE] On May 10, 2021, Carol Crawford from the CDC press office sent an email stating the CDC’s intention to “establish COVID BOLO meetings on “misinformation’ and invite all Big Tech platforms to join the meetings.” Six days later, Ms. Crawford emailed Todd O’Boyle at Twitter asking him to participate in these “ BOLO Meetings” and gave him examples of tweets from misinformers from whom she was telling O’Boyle to censor on behalf of the CDC.

 Journalist and best-selling author Naomi Wolf was targeted as one of these so called  “misinformers a screen grab of a  tweet/thread of hers was used as an example in the BOLO Meetings emails that went out.

Dr. Naomi Wolf was permanently banned from Twitter days later.

 BOLO is a law enforcement term for “be on the lookout” for criminal suspects. Clear evidence that the CDC considers American journalists criminals if they raise questions about the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 injections.

Dr. Wolf stated:

“This morning I learned that our federal government violated the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by directing Big Tech to censor and deplatform me as a citizen and journalist in their desperate attempt to control the COVID vaccine narrative on behalf of their Big Pharma donors. So much for the big lie that “social media companies are private companies not bound by the First Amendment.”

The unavoidable truth is that social media companies are simply cut-outs for Washington D.C. big government bureaucrats, and I intend to pursue all legal remedies available to me to ensure this federal government abuse of American’s scared freedoms and Constitutional Rights is halted and all Government officials, involved are held to account, which may well include personal civil liability.” [MORE]

"Whenever Doctors Join Forces with Government and Deviate from their Commitment to "Do No Harm" Medicine Can Be Perverted from a Healing, Humanitarian Profession to a Murderous Operatus."- Vera Sharav

President of Costa Rica Drops COVID Injection Mandate and Mask Mandate

From [DAVIDICKE] On Wednesday, the new President of Costa Rica, Rodrigo Chaves, and the Minister of Health, Jocelyn Chacón, confirmed that the vaccine against covid-19 will not be mandatory in Costa Rica.

Chaves had promised that when his term began on 8 May he would end the mandatory Covid injection policy. In his first decree after taking office, Chaves dropped his country’s mask mandate and the requirement that public employees get vaccinated.

In November 2021, Costa Rica became the first country in the world to announce it would make Covid injections mandatory for children. Costa Rica has long mandated vaccines, and such requirements are supported by the country’s laws. However, three months after the announcement, Costa Ricans were still bitterly divided over mandatory Covid injections for children.

“Today [3 August] vaccines are no longer mandatory and any action against someone who does not want to be vaccinated is a violation of the law,” the president emphasised.

The announcement came after almost 93% of Costa Ricans had their first dose, 87% had a second, 51% a third and 10% a fourth dose, according to the Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social – the Costa Rican Social Security Fund which is in charge of most of the nation’s public health sector.

As well as the immediate end to compulsory vaccination Chaves said that there will be an investigation into the contracts signed by the previous government as he believes excessive amounts of doses were purchased.

Japanese Surgeon Calls for Suspension of COVID Boosters

From [JOEL SMALLEY] In a letter to the peer-reviewed journal Virology, a Japanese cardiovascular surgeon, Dr. Kenji Yamamoto, has called for the discontinuation of COVID-19 booster shots. “As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued,” Yamamoto wrote. Among his urgent concerns are the fact that the COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, which, in some cases, has been lethal to patients.

[…]

It is rare for a cardiac surgeon to get involved in government vaccination policy. It is even rarer for a practicing medical doctor to express an opinion like this that flies in the face of the medical status quo in a prestigious medical journal, and for the medical journal itself to publish the opinion.

Would the Government, The Dependent Media and Big Pharma Fully Inform You About the Dangers of COVID Shots If They Were Trying to Kill You? "Uniformed Consent" is a New Film About the COVID Genocide

In Nazi Germany, “the political decision to liquidate Jews and other “inferior races” made consent unthinkable.”

Despite the Fact that 70% of All Australians are "Fully Boosted,” Deaths from COVID Have Reached a Record High. Contrary to Media Lies the COVID Injected are Dying at an Ever-Increasing Rate

From [HERE] The latest figures are in, and things are not looking good for “fully vaccinated” Australia.

Even though more than 96 percent of the native population there took the first two mRNA (messenger RNA) jabs for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), and more than 70 percent are fully “boosted,” Chinese Virus deaths throughout the country have reached a record high.

The following data chart clearly shows that ever since the launch of Operation Warp Speed, injection-related deaths Down Under have been soaring. As of this writing, a peak has formed to suggest that with the passage of time, the fully injected are dropping dead at an ever-increasing rate.

Had Australia opted for ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) instead of Fauci Flu shots, the plandemic would have ended ages ago. Instead, Australia is now seeing mass death rather than a recovery. (Related: Australian officials want Aussies to get injected a bi-annual intervals for the rest of time.)

In fact, there were almost no covid-related deaths at all in Australia prior to the launch of the “vaccines.” There was a small peak in the fall of 2020 followed by a precipitous drop back to baselines levels, followed by a massive peak once people started getting injected.

Interestingly, the booster shot campaign was followed by another massive spike and peak, which will more than likely be followed by continued increases in the death count as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and other jab-induced health conditions take their toll.

“We were warned, but only intelligent people listened,” wrote a commenter in response to the news. “Antibody-dependent enhancement is happening, it is real, and it destroys the immune system.”

“No one mistreated their citizens more than Australia during the crisis,” added another. “The people that did that should be in jail.”

This is now a plandemic of the fully vaccinated

New South Wales (NSW) is reportedly seeing the most new “cases” of the Wuhan Flu, followed by Queensland and Victoria.

Each of these areas, as you may recall, imposed heavy restrictions throughout the plandemic – restrictions that area residents were told would put an end to the virus.

“Quarantine” concentration camps were set up; people were forced to mask everywhere they went; and public movement was restricted – but to no avail. The Chinese Virus is here to stay, thanks to the injections.

The media would have us all believe that people are “catching” and “re-catching” covid over and over again, but the reality is that what we are now seeing is a plandemic of the fully vaccinated whose immune systems are shot.

“They’re exhibiting symptoms of poisoning,” wrote another commenter about what the fully jabbed are experiencing, which is not “covid.” “Coughing and fever are mild symptoms. Neurological damage, spasms, and paralysis are serious symptoms, not unlike what happens to a cockroach that is sprayed with RAID.”

“Clots are a sign of internal bleeding. Severe clotting leads to amputation and heart attacks. The most severe symptom? Death.”

Another pointed out that nobody who is unvaccinated is experiencing any of this, which further proves that what sick people are suffering from is vaccine damage, not covid infection.

“Fake immunity designed to kill you never beats natural immunity,” wrote someone else about how the so-called vaccines do not in any way produce real or lasting immunity, but instead provoke vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDS).

“The unvaxxed are not getting sick not because they have natural immunity to a non-existent pathogen, but because they haven’t been poisoned,” added someone else. “The mRNA drug causes epithelial cells to manufacture the toxic spike protein 24/7, 365. There’s no off switch.”

Novel Lawsuit Claims COVID 'Shelter in Place' or Shut Down Orders Interfered with the Inalienable Right to Earn a Living and Arbitrarily Denied Fruits of Labor Under NC Law

Shelter in place orders were unnecessary Government seizures of people’s livelihoods and businesses that forced indefinite closures and widespread layoffs. Said conduct was not narrowly tailored because other ‘precautionary measures to manage contact tracing of [customers]; install plexiglass, touchless thermometers, six-feet distance markers, and screening booths; and to initiate vigilant cleaning procedures—all in consult with local health officials—would have been sufficient to combat the ALLEGED spread of COVID-19.’ (At any rate, asymptomatic transmission of COVID is epidemiologically irrelevant and shelter in place orders had no detectable impact on epidemic spreading, cases, hospitalisations, or deaths. Said governmental conduct was “among the most repressive acts ever imposed on citizens in a democracy.”) [MORE] The government’s actions may be described as “uncompensated takings” that violate the Takings Clause of the 5th Amendment. That is, the government is legally obligated to properly compensate citizens for their tangible losses. [MORE] If you believe such things as “rights” exist in the first place. The interesting lawsuit below is not a takings clause suit but invokes the NC Constitution.

From [HERE] Owners of an Alamance County speedway can move forward with a lawsuit against the state's top health official. The suit stems from a COVID-19 shutdown order.

• Ace Speedway owners argue the shutdown deprived them of the right "to the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor." They also contend the shutdown amounted to selective enforcement of a COVID-19 emergency order.

• A unanimous decision from the N.C. Court of Appeals means the state Supreme Court faces no obligation to take the case.

A unanimous N.C. Court of Appeals panel has ruled that owners of an Alamance County racetrack shut down during the COVID-19 pandemic can move forward with a lawsuit against the state’s top health official.

Ace Speedway’s lawsuit argues that a shutdown order from Dr. Mandy Cohen, then serving as secretary of the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, violated the speedway owners’ rights. The suit contends the shutdown infringed on speedway owners’ right to earn a living. The shutdown also represented selective enforcement of Gov. Roy Cooper’s COVID executive orders, according to the suit.

The suit is now known as Kinsley v. Ace Speedway Racing Ltd., with current DHHS Secretary Kody Kinsley replacing Cohen as the target of the speedway’s legal action.

“This case makes us consider the use of overwhelming power by the State against the individual liberties of its citizens and how that use of power may be challenged,” wrote Judge Jefferson Griffin.

“Ace’s counterclaims propose that the Governor’s orders were enforced upon them without justification and without equal protection of law,” Griffin added. “Ace’s counterclaims are constitutional claims alleging (1) executive orders issued by the Governor in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were an unlawful infringement on Ace’s right to earn a living as guaranteed by our Constitution’s fruits of labor clause, and (2) the Secretary’s enforcement actions against Ace under the executive order constituted unlawful selective enforcement.”

“We hold that Ace pled each of its constitutional claims sufficiently to survive the Secretary’s motion to dismiss.”

Ace held a series of auto races in May and June 2020, even after Cooper personally asked the Alamance County sheriff to urge the speedway to shut down. Cooper had issued a COVID-19 executive order blocking “mass gatherings” of more than 25 people. 

Ace’s races drew at least 1,000 spectators and as many as 2,550 people. The speedway operated with COVID abatement measures adopted in consultation with local health officials.

Jason Turner, an Ace Speedway owner, also attracted media attention for his outspoken comments against the governor’s shutdown efforts.

Cohen issued an abatement order on June 8, 2020, and secured a court order forcing Ace to shut down its operations.

The speedway filed suit and continued its legal action, even after Cohen dropped her abatement efforts in September 2020, when Cooper had loosened some mass gathering restrictions. A trial judge ruled in January 2021 against the health secretary’s motion to dismiss Ace’s constitutional claims.

Griffin’s opinion focused attention on Ace’s argument that Cohen violated Article I, Section 1 of the N.C. Constitution. That section says North Carolinians’ “inalienable rights” include “the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor.”

“[T]he addition of a right to the fruits of one’s labor to the North Carolina Constitution sought to increase the floor of protections granted by similar provisions in the United States federal constitution,” Griffin wrote. “Since then, our courts have construed North Carolina citizens’ right to the ‘fruits of their labor’ to be synonymous with their ‘right to earn a living’ in whatever occupation they desired.”

“The core principle behind the fruits of their labor clause is that government ‘“may not, under the guise of protecting the public interests, arbitrarily interfere with private business, or impose unusual and unnecessary restrictions upon lawful occupations,”’” Griffin wrote.

“The intended purpose of the Governor’s order was not to regulate a particular occupation or business enterprise, but the direct and intended purpose of the Abatement Order was to cease the operation of a business,” the judge added. “It cannot be denied that the scope and breadth of the Abatement Order restricted or otherwise interfered with the lawful operation of a business serving the public.”

“We hold that Ace adequately pled that the Secretary, through [the] Abatement Order, deprived Ace of its constitutional right to the fruits of one’s own labor and, therefore, sovereign immunity cannot bar Ace’s claim,” Griffin wrote.

Ace also “sufficiently pleads a constitutional challenge” that Cohen violated speedway owners’ rights under Article I, Section 19 of the N.C. Constitution. It reads that “no person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws.”

“Ace effectively pled that it was among a class of ‘many speedways’ that similarly conducted races with fans in attendance during the period where such actions were banned,” Griffin explained. “Ace further pled that Governor Cooper and the Secretary ‘singled out’ Ace for enforcement by directing the Sheriff to take action against Ace and, when that failed, by issuing the Abatement Order against Ace alone.”

“Finally, Ace’s complaint pled its belief that it was singled out for enforcement in response to Defendant Turner’s statements to the press ‘and not because a true Imminent Hazard exist[ed,]’ as the Secretary asserted in the Abatement Order,” Griffin added. “These pleadings, taken as true, sufficiently allege bad faith enforcement of [Cooper’s executive order] against Ace alone.”

Kinsley could appeal to the N.C. Supreme Court. Because Judges Jeff Carpenter and Fred Gore agreed with Griffin and ruled unanimously, the state’s highest court faces no obligation to take the case.

Without an appeal, the case would head back to Superior Court for a trial on the merits of Ace Speedway’s claims.

CHD Survey Finds that After Getting a COVID Shot 15% of US Adults Have Been Diagnosed with a New Health Condition - 21% of Blacks and 32% of Latinos

From [CHD] More than two years after Operation Warp Speed began, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) commissioned John Zogby Strategies to conduct two surveys (see here and here) about attitudes and the overall health of American adults.

Key highlights from the survey of 1,038 adults

The survey found that 67% of respondents received one or more COVID-19 vaccines, while 33% are unvaccinated. Furthermore, among those vaccinated, 6% received one dose, 28% received two doses, 21% received three doses, and 12% took four or more.

Of those receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, 15% say they’ve been diagnosed by a medical practitioner with a new condition within a matter of weeks to several months after taking the vaccine.

“The fact that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports more than 232 million Americans ages 18-65 have taken at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, and 15% of those surveyed report a newly diagnosed condition is concerning and needs further study,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) executive director Laura Bono. “The mRNA vaccine technology is new and clinical trials naturally have no long-term data. CHD believes this survey points to the need for further study.”

Other key demographics of newly diagnosed medical conditions after COVID-19 vaccines show:

• 17% of those receiving two doses

• 13% of respondents had three shots

• 30% of those ages 18-29

• 23% of those ages 30-49

• 6% of those ages 50-64

• 4% of those older than 65

• 7% of whites

• 21% of African-Americans

• 32% of Hispanics

• 15% of liberals

• 14% of moderates

• 8% of conservatives

A follow-up question provided a list of medical conditions and asked diagnosed respondents to “select all that apply.” Among those who were medically diagnosed with a new condition within a matter of weeks to several months, the top five cited conditions were:

• 21% blood clots

• 19% heart attack

• 18% liver damage

• 17% leg clots/lung clots

• 15% stroke

Overall, 67% reported that getting the vaccine was a good decision, 24% were neutral and 10% regret it.

Survey participants were then asked if someone they personally know had been medically diagnosed with a new medical condition within the same time frame. Overall, 26% reported yes, while 63% reported no.

Looking at age cohorts:

• 34% of those ages 18-29 say they know someone who was diagnosed, as did

• 30% of those ages 30-49,

• 21% of those ages 50-64,

• and 18% of those older than 65

Again, respondents were offered the same list of conditions and asked to “select all that apply.” The top five cited conditions were:****

• 28 % blood clots

• 20% stroke

• 19% autoimmune

• 16% lung clots

• 15% heart attack

Key highlights from the survey of 829 adults ages 18-49

Among those under age 50 – 62% report receiving a COVID-19 vaccine vs. 38% who have had none.

Among those receiving any COVID-19 vaccine, almost one quarter — 22% — report being medically diagnosed within a matter of weeks to several months after taking a shot.

The top five cited new conditions include:

• 21% autoimmune

• 20% blood clots

• 19% stroke/lung clots

• 17% liver damage/leg clots/heart attack

• 15% disrupted menstrual cycle/Guillain-Barré/Bell’s palsy

Regarding describing the conditions, 47% report mild, 43% report serious and 10% report severe/still recovering.

Describing their experience with taking one or more COVID-19 vaccines, 58% report it was a good decision, 28% are neutral and 14% regret it.

Finally, 30% of those ages 18-49 report knowing someone else who has been medically diagnosed within a matter of weeks to several months after taking a COVID-19 vaccine.

The top five cited medically diagnosed conditions of the person known by those under age 50 are:

• 30% blood clots

• 23% stroke

• 20% autoimmune

• 18% leg clots/lung clots

• 17% heart attack

In other findings:

Regarding trust in the government to handle future pandemics among the all-adults survey — 23% say it has increased, 34% say it has decreased, 32% say it has remained the same, the rest were unsure.

The surveys included 1,038 American adults of all ages (MOE +/- 3.1) and 829 18-49-year-olds (MOE +/- 3.5) Both polls were fielded July 22-24, and data sets were pre-stratified and weighted to be representative of their respective populations. Error margins are higher for subgroups.

For questions, wording and full results, see ALL ADULTS and 18-49.

Fed Ct Says Walgreens is Immune from Liability Under the Prep Act: Woman Fell in the Parking Lot after Getting COVID Shot. All who Administer Shots are Immune Unless there was Willful Misconduct

From [HERE] Walgreen Co. is immune from a customer’s suit seeking damages for injuries she suffered in a fall after receiving her Covid-19 vaccine, a federal court in New Mexico said.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act provides an exclusive, administrative remedy for “any claim for loss that has a causal relationship with the administration to or use by an individual of a covered countermeasure” such as a vaccine, the US District Court for the District of New Mexico said.

Suzanne Storment’s injuries directly related to Walgreens’ administration of the vaccine, and therefore weren’t actionable, the court said.

Storment received her first Covid-19 vaccination at a Walgreens store in Albuquerque in February 2021. There were no chairs to sit on while waiting to see if there were any untoward effects, so Storment went out to the parking lot to sit in her car.

Once in the parking lot, Storment felt dizzy and fell to the pavement, fracturing her elbow in multiple places. She sued Walgreens for damages.

Congress, in the PREP Act, “plainly provided immunity under both federal and state law with respect to all claims for loss” arising from the administration of the vaccine, the court said.

The PREP Act's cause of action permits suits only for “willful misconduct.” 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(d)(1). The Act defines “willful misconduct” as “an act or omission that is taken-(i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose; (ii) knowingly without legal or factual justification; and (iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit.” Id. § 247d-6d(c)(1)(A). The Act further specifies that willful misconduct “shall be construed as establishing a standard for liability that is more stringent than a standard of negligence in any form or recklessness.” Id. § 247d-6d(c)(1)(B).

Storment’s injury “is unfortunate and certainly deserving of a remedy,” the court said. But it can’t be divorced from the administration of the vaccine. The PREP Act therefore applies and provides Walgreens with immunity, Judge Margaret I. Strickland said in Wednesday’s opinion.

Branch Law Firm represents Storment. Modrall Sperling represents Walgreens.

The case is Storment v. Walgreen Co., 2022 BL 261083, D.N.M., No. 1:21-cv-898, 7/27/22.

Destroying People: Movie “mRNA ‘Vaccine’ Genocide” Interviews Victims of COVID Injections. Media Keeps Concealing Reality that COVID Shots are The Most Dangerous Drug in History of Modern Medicine

The Following List of Vaccine Makers, Providers and Hospitals Stand-behind Their COVID Shots and Have Waived Government Granted Immunity from Liability for Injuries or Death Caused: NONE

Dr Fleming says 'There is No Benefit to COVID Shots. Vax is a Bioweapon Making the Vaccinated Susceptible to Disease and Death. Companies Must Be Held Accountable, Gain of Function Research Stopped'

From [HERE] Dr Richard Fleming is an American Medical Doctor, specialising in cardiology and has a law degree. He is a Fellow of the American College of Physicians and a Fellow of the American Society of Internal Medicine, he is a medical patent expert, has authored between 400 and 500 medical papers, and has sat on review boards of medical journals.

In March this year, he testified that:

1. SARS-CoV-2 is a lab-engineered bio-weapon, funded by the US government, the result of gain-of-function research on the spike protein, making it more infectious.

2. Safe and Effective treatments for the virus were suppressed by the US health regulatory agencies.

3. Quarantining of healthy people is completely ineffective.

4. The mRNA/RNA “vaccines” produced by Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen are bio-weapons delivering the same toxic spike protein as the virus but in loads up to 5 million times higher.

5. The vaccinated are responsible for pressure-selecting variants (alpha, delta, omicron, etc.), prolonging the epidemic.

6. The “vaccine” disrupts the natural immune system, making the vaccinated more susceptible to infection and disease.

7. The “vaccine” damages red-blood cells and causes hyper-inflammatory and clotting that cause disease and death in its own right.

CDC Official Used Purposefully Flawed Data to Justify COVID Shots for Infants and Children Analysis Shows

From [CHD] An official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) used data from a flawed preprint study that exaggerated the risk of death for children from COVID-19 in her presentations to CDC and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisors who were responsible for recommending Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines for infants and young children.

The study, first published May 25 on the medRxiv preprint server, was authored by a group of U.K. researchers. On June 28, the authors published a revised version of the study, after critics questioned some of their original findings.

“It’s really disturbing that data this poor made its way into the meetings to discuss childhood COVID and that it took me less than a few minutes to find a major flaw (and then I found many more as I looked deeper),” said Kelley K, who was the first to point out some of the study’s flaws on her website COVID-Georgia.com.

After learning of Kelley’s analysis, The Defender reviewed the original preprint, confirmed Kelley’s findings and uncovered additional flaws in the original preprint and also in the June 28 revised version.

Study falsely claimed COVID was leading cause of death in U.S. children

During a June 17 meeting of its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to discuss pediatric COVID-19 vaccines in children under 5, Dr. Katherine Fleming-Dutra, a pediatrician and pediatric emergency medicine physician with the CDC, presented a table that falsely claimed COVID-19 was a leading cause of death in U.S. children.

Fleming-Dutra earlier that week presented the same table during the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee meeting, along with other slides from the original U.K. study that also falsely claimedCOVID-19 as a “top 5 cause of death” in children.

The table, which was sourced from the U.K. study, was disseminated widely by physicians on Twitter who claimed the data “made the case” for vaccinating children under 5.

Emails Reveal Biden, Pharma Pressured Top FDA Officials to Approve Booster Timeline

From [CHD] Judicial Watch today announced it received 112 pages from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that show top officials being pressured by “companies and for that matter the administration, who try to impose timeless [sic] that make no sense.”

The records were produced to Judicial Watch in response to a February Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) that was filed after HHS failed to respond to a Sept. 3, 2021, FOIA request for records of communication from the former director and deputy director of the FDA’s Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Dr. Marion Gruber and Dr. Philip Krause, respectively (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:22-cv-00292)).

Drs. Gruber and Krause reportedly resigned during the White House’s push to approve the COVID-19 vaccine “booster shots.”

On Sept. 13, 2021, Gruber and Krause were among a group of resigning doctors who agreed that, “available evidence doesn’t yet indicate a need for COVID-19 vaccine booster shots among the general population …”

The records include an Aug. 25, 2021, email by Marion Gruber to her boss, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Director Peter Marks:

“Over the last couple of days, Janssen has bombarded us with emails regarding their booster dose studies.

“I am also very concerned that companies (such as Pfizer and Janssen) are trying to put pressure on OVRR [Office of Vaccines Research and Review] by way of PR [public relations]. We need to be given time to consider their data and cannot be pushed by these companies and for that matter the Administration, who try to impose timeless [sic] that make no sense (e.g., Sep 20)…. It appears that at least Pfizer’s data will not be aligned with this approach and the ‘n’ [test numbers] they have is grossly insufficient. Obviously, we have to review the data but we have taken a peek and have serious concerns.

“Lastly, and this is my personal opinion, data we have seen so far from various companies (Pfizer, Janssen, Moderna) appear to suggest that boosters are not needed.”

In an email exchange on Aug. 27, 2021, Gruber replies to an email from Maureen Hess, a communications specialist at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research:

“Well, the message appears to be ‘total buy-in in the need for boosters,’ this is not how I am writing the BD [likely board decision], I am trying to take a more neutral approach. This piece sounds as if we already decided to approve this supplement.”

Hess responds, “Okay, I’ll make some additional edits (but JW [likely Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock] was included on this statement so our edits may be rejected above us.”

After sending more emails about edits Hess made, Gruber replies, “From my perspective, this is as good as it can get. Obviously, this statements [sic] puts us into a real bind but the damage is already done.”

In an Aug. 20, 2021, email exchange Dr. Doran Fink, the Deputy Director of the FDA’s Division of Vaccines and Related Products Applications raises questions regarding new data, that Moderna was submitting to FDA about its COVID vaccine. Fink told Drs. Gruber, Krause and other colleagues:

“I had to bite my tongue when Peter [likely Dr. Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research] mentioned this morning we wouldn’t be doing rushed reviews anymore so as not to ask about the booster doses that the administration promised to everyone by Sept 20!

“And then there is the question of the data that will support these booster doses — maybe I’m wrong, but my understanding is that Pfizer is proposing that their sBLA include the Phase 1 booster data from a grand total of 23 subjects. I’m not sure what Moderna will have, but the data Fauci presented in the press conference from NIAID studies, which was ~25 subjects per treatment arm.”

Gruber states in an Aug. 17, 2021, email “They [Dr. Doran’s team] fully understand that the Acting Commissioner would like to approve this product [Pfizer COVID booster vaccine] very soon and are trying their best to complete their review and assessment, while at the same time, maintaining our high standards and scientific and clinical integrity.”

Philip Krause, in an Aug. 10, 2021 email, complains: “It sounds like Peter [likely Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks] thinks he has taken over all vaccine operations, not just the Pfizer BLA [Biologics License Application] …”

On Aug. 23, 2021, Dr. Arnold Monto, professor in the Department of Epidemiology of the University of Michigan School of Public Health, emails Drs. Gruber and Krause using the subject “VRBPAC and boosters.”

The email said:

“The Surgeon General last night made a statement that the FDA and CDC advisory committees would be reviewing Hope that he misspoke about the VRBPAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) Doesn’t seem to be enough time to get it organized Just got asked about flu vaccination and COVID boosters being given at the same time. Gave my personal information, don’t”

Gruber then replies to Monto: “We will be discussing the ‘booster question’ and related submissions including whether VRBPAC should be held. We do not know yet and you are right that timing will be an issue once again.”

On Sept. 22, 2021, the FDA approved the use of a booster dose of the Pfizer drug.

According to the organization’s news release, the FDA, “amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to allow for use of a single booster dose, to be administered at least six months after completion of the primary series” for people at “high risk” of “severe COVID-19.”

“These FDA documents confirm a politicized approval process for the controversial COVID-19 vaccine booster shots,” says Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is a scandal that it took months and a federal lawsuit to these troubling facts about this unprecedented and seemingly never-ending vaccine operation.”

Through FOIA requests and lawsuits, Judicial Watch has uncovered a substantial amount of information about COVID-19 issues:

• Recently, National Institutes of Health (NIH) records revealed an FBI “inquiry” into the NIH’s controversial bat coronavirus grant tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The records also show National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) officials were concerned about “gain-of-function” research in China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2016. The Fauci agency was also concerned about EcoHealth Alliance’s lack of compliance with reporting rules and use of gain-of-function research in the NIH-funded research involving bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China.

• HHS records revealed that from 2014 to 2019, $826,277 was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research by the NIAID.

• NIAID records showed that it gave nine China-related grants to EcoHealth Alliance to research coronavirus emergence in bats and was the NIH’s top issuer of grants to the Wuhan lab itself. The records also included an email from the vice director of the Wuhan Lab asking an NIH official for help finding disinfectants for decontamination of airtight suits and indoor surfaces.

• HHS records included an “urgent for Dr. Fauci” email chain, citing ties between the Wuhan lab and the taxpayer-funded EcoHealth Alliance. The government emails also reported that the foundation of U.S. billionaire Bill Gates worked closely with the Chinese government to pave the way for Chinese-produced medications to be sold outside China and help “raise China’s voice of governance by placing representatives from China on important international counsels as high-level commitment from China.”

• HHS records included a grant application for research involving the coronavirus that appears to describe “gain-of-function” research involving RNA extractions from bats, experiments on viruses, attempts to develop a chimeric virus and efforts to genetically manipulate the full-length bat SARSr-CoV WIV1 strain molecular clone.

• HHS records showed the State Department and NIAID knew immediately in January 2020 that China was withholding COVID data, which was hindering risk assessment and response by public health officials.

• University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) records show the former director of the Galveston National Laboratory at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Dr. James W. Le Duc warned Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology of potential investigations into the COVID issue by Congress.

• HHS records regarding biodistribution studies and related data for the COVID-19 vaccines show a key component of the vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), were found outside the injection site, mainly the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries of test animals, eight to 48 hours after injection.

• Records from the Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP) reveal safety lapses and violations at U.S. biosafety laboratories that conduct research on dangerous agents and toxins.

• HHS records include emails between NIH then-Director Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, the director of the NIAID, about hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19.

• HHS records show that NIH officials tailored confidentiality forms to China’s terms and that the World Health Organization (WHO) conducted an unreleased, “strictly confidential” COVID-19 epidemiological analysis in January 2020.

• Fauci’s emails include his approval of a press release supportive of China’s response to the 2019 novel coronavirus.

Response to FOIA Request Reveals the US Government Colluded with Twitter, Google and Fakebook to Suppress Information Posted About the Dangers of COVID Shots and Intentionally Destroy Informed Consent

INFORMED AND VOLUNTARY CONSENT IS UNTHINKABLE TO PERPETRATORS OF GENOCIDE AND GENTHANASIA

From [HERE] A number of documents described as “the tip of the iceberg” have been made public, revealing communications between private tech giants and the US administration bodies, aimed at closely coordinating censorship of Covid topics on social media.

This was announced on Wednesday by America First Legal (AFL)nonprofit, which obtained the documents thanks to a lawsuit filed against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The legal action came after a failed attempt to, through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, learn about the level of the involvement of the White House in this type of censorship.

The communications are interpreted as providing yet another piece of evidence of coordination, or even collusion, between US authorities and Google, Twitter, and Facebook.

AFL was spurred to action after Jen Psaki, at the time White House press secretary, last July declared that the administration was “regularly making sure” to inform social networks about what it identifies as narrative dangerous to public health. “And we work to engage with them to better understand the enforcement of social media platform policies,” Psaki said.

The emails that have now finally been released show that CDC maintained regular communication with the three biggest social platforms starting in December 2020 and for at least another six months. These exchanges reveal what “working” with Google and others looked like: it went as far as flagging posts by social sites’ users as “examples” of what needs to be censored.

Ad money was also a building block in this unusual and secretive form of close cooperation that could eventually bring into question the status of Big Tech corporations as private entities not bound by the First Amendment. In April of last year, Facebook gave CDC $15 million-worth of ad credits as a “gift” to be used to spread the agency’s messages on vaccines, social distancing, travel and other Covid restrictions.

In other emails, Twitter employees are arranging regular chats with CDC, while the agency at one point in the spring of last year warned Facebook that its algorithms are not doing a good job – because along with vaccine “misinformation” they also were also getting rid of some posts by public health institutions.

An interesting detail concerns a high-ranking CDC official appearing at Google’s Trusted Media Summit in 2020, but not allowing organizers to post their address on YouTube – because they were not authorized to speak publicly. [MORE]