6 Companies Control 90% of What Americans Read, Watch and Hear (Talk and Think About). Many Black Sheeple Believe "The Dependent Media" is disinterested, unbiased and independent from Vested Interests

/

DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINED, “The most effective means of disseminating and reproducing ideas in society, and in the Afrikan American community in particular, is to have that community perceive their dissemination and reproduc­tion as the work of disinterested, unbiased, non-manipulative, liberal yet authoritative, White American individuals, groups, or institutions, or as flowing from sources independent of the marked influence of the powerful. Thus, White America strongly pushes and projects the powerful mythology of independent, liberal American media, universi­ties, and other information processing establishments. That is, America loudly congratulates itself for what it calls its "free press" and mass media which permit the free exchange of ideas. Most Black Americans utilize White media and these factors as their primary, if not sole, source of information. Most are not mindful of the fact that the American press and mass media are privately owned, profit-making, White elite-controlled corporations. The press is one among other institutions, "and one of the most important in maintaining the hegemony of the corporate class and the capitalist system itself," advances Parenti.

If the press cannot mold our every opinion, it can frame the perpetual reality around which our opinions take shape. Here may lie the most important effect of the news media: they set the issue agenda for the rest of us, choosing what to emphasize and what to ignore or suppress, in effect, organizing our political world for us. The media may not always be able to tell us what to think, but they are strikingly success­ful in telling us what to think about ...”.

From [CHD] Today, just six conglomerates — Comcast, Disney, AT&T, Sony, Fox and Paramount Global (formerly known as ViacomCBS) — control 90% of what you watch, read, or listen to. To put this into perspective: that means about 232 media executives have the power to decide what information 277 million Americans are able to access. In 2021, the “big six” banked a total of more than $478 billion in revenue. That’s more than both Finland’s and Ukraine’s GDP combined.

The issue extends to print media and radio giants, too: iHeartMedia owns 863 radio stationsnationwide, while Gannett owns more than 100 daily U.S. newspapers and nearly 1,000 weeklies.

As the pool controlling the media keeps shrinking, so does the breadth of the information reported. Hence why today’s thousands of news outlets often churn out embarrassingly duplicative content. [MORE]

J&J Pays $99M to Settle Suit for Causing West Virginia's Opioid Crisis. J&J Concealed, Mischaracterized and Failed to Disclose Risks of Addiction and Serious Health Risks, just Like COVID Vax

/

From [HERE] Johnson & Johnson will pay $99 million to settle a lawsuit in West Virginia that alleges the company helped fuel the state’s opioid crisis, removing the company from a trial that began this month.

West Virginia was one of several states that didn’t join a nationwide $5 billion opioid settlement that J&J  completed in February to resolve state and local government lawsuits against the company. 

J&J said Monday that its settlement with the West Virginia attorney general isn’t an admission of wrongdoing and that its marketing and promotion of prescription opioids were appropriate and responsible. The company no longer sells prescription opioids in the U.S.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said the settlement allowed the state to recover more than double the $48 million that the company had offered it in the national settlement.

“It was absolutely the correct decision to proceed to trial,” Mr. Morrisey said. “This settlement will provide significant help to those affected the most by the opioid crisis in West Virginia.”

The trial in Kanawha County is continuing against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and AbbVie Inc.’s Allergan and affiliated companies.

In that case, Mr. Morrisey alleges that the companies concealed, mischaracterized and failed to disclose the serious risk of addiction and promoted higher dosage amounts without disclosing inherently greater risks, among other things.

Teva declined to comment. Allergan didn’t respond to a request for comment. 

A separate bench trial was held last summer in federal court in Charleston, W.Va., in which Cabell County and the city of Huntington, W. Va., accused drug wholesalers McKessonCorp., AmerisourceBergen Corp. and Cardinal Health Inc. of creating a public nuisance when they shipped 81 million pills to the city and county between 2006 and 2014.

Defense attorneys argued that physicians prescribed opioids using their medical judgment and pharmacies dispensed medications to patients. They said they followed the law and had systems in place to identify suspicious orders.

The judge has yet to rule on that case.

UK Authorities Quietly Published Data Confirming the Fully Vaccinated Accounted for 92% of all COVID Deaths in March [read that again]

/

From [HERE] Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms the fully vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England throughout March,but what’s even more shocking is that 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaccinated population. 

But something even stranger than this is also occurring. Covid-19 is currently on the rise again across the UK, but the data confirms cases, hospitalisations and deaths are only rising among the triple vaccinated population, whereas they are declining significantly among the unvaccinated population.

You have been lied to on a monumental scale over the past two years by your Government, its Scientific Advisers, and the mainstream media. But the biggest lie of all is perhaps that the Covid-19 injections are both safe and effective. Neither of these statements are true. If you want recent evidence of them not being safe then look no further than the recent announcement from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). 

On the 6th April 2022, the UKHSA released a statement confirming they were launching an urgent investigation due to the detection of higher than usual rate of liver inflammation (hepatitis) among children, and that similar cases were also being assessed in Scotland. 

They have already ruled out the common viruses that cause hepatitis, so now they need look no further than the Covid-19 injection that has been unnecessarily offered to children, because Pfizer’s own study confirms the Covid-19 mRNA jab accumulates in the liver following vaccination and causes hepatitis. [MORE]

New Study: One-Fifth of Fully Vaxxed (3X) Swedes became Infected with Omicron Within 2 Months

/

From [HERE] As concluded by researchers at Danderyd Hospital in Sweden, the Omicron strain effectively gets past antibodies. While most of the patients surveyed only had mild symptoms, they remained infectious for up to nine days.

More than one in five people tested positive for the Omicron strain of the COVID-19 virus within two months of receiving their third dose or booster shot, a fresh Swedish study shows.

The study is part of the large COMMUNITY project at Danderyd Hospital aimed at examining and comparing immunity after COVID-19 infection and after vaccination. During this stage of the study, 375 hospital staff were PCR-tested regularly, regardless of symptoms.

“Omicron gets past the antibodies. We see that those who become infected had as high levels of antibodies as those who didn’t become infected”, Charlotte Thålin, assistant chief physician and the study’s research leader, told national broadcaster SVT.Many of those who ultimately tested positive had symptoms ranging from mild to none whatsoever, yet still had high virus levels. Over half of the participants tested positive for 11 days and remained infectious for up to nine days.

“This is the first time that it has been possible to follow the virus levels in the airways during an ongoing Omicron infection, and it was surprising that so many remained positive for so long and had such high virus levels even though they had just received their third dose”, Charlotte Thålin mused.

When asked whether it is still worth vaccinating when the protection levels promised by vaccine producers initially are obviously failing, Thålin remained adamant that the jab still protects against serious illness, whereas Omicron can be dangerous for the unvaccinated as well as for the elderly and risk groups.

“And in the grand scheme of things, we want to reduce the spread of infection because the higher the spread of infection in a well-vaccinated population, the greater the risk that we get new mutations and new virus strains”, Thålin concluded.

Sweden has an overall vaccination rate of over 73 percent, far above the worldwide rate of under 59 percent. 

Fed Apls Court Holds that Government Lock Down Orders During COVID are a Valid Contractual Defense. Business Defendant Excused from Performance Under a Contract (If There is a Force Majeure Clause)

/

From [HERE] Over the past two years, there has been a fair amount of litigation surrounding the enforceability of force majeure provisions in response to the pandemic. A force majeure clause is a contractual provision that excuses one or both parties’ performance obligations when circumstances beyond the parties’ control arise and make performance impracticable or impossible. Such provisions ordinarily cover natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods. Other circumstances that may trigger force majeure provisions and relieve parties of liability include war, acts of terrorism, labor strikes and epidemics. With respect to COVID-19, courts around the country have generally construed force majeure provisions narrowly to find that, absent specific pandemic-related language, the pandemic does not trigger force majeure provisions. Other courts have decided that the COVID-19 pandemic falls within the more general definitions of “natural disaster.” Last week, a Federal Court of Appeals weighed in for the first time on the issue.

In June 2020, JN Contemporary Art LLC (JN) sued Phillips Auctioneers LLC (Phillips) in the Southern District of New York for breach of a contract which obligated Phillips to sell a painting on behalf of JN at a live auction. Phillips moved to dismiss the complaint, invoking the force majeure clause to terminate its agreement to sell the painting on behalf of JN, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and state government orders requiring nonessential businesses to cease in-person operations. The terms of the force majeure clause contained in the agreement provided: “In the event that the auction is postponed for circumstances beyond our or your reasonable control, including, without limitation, as a result of natural disaster, fire, flood, general strike, war, armed conflict, terrorist attack or nuclear or chemical contamination, we may terminate this Agreement with immediate effect. In such event, our obligation to make payment of the Guaranteed Minimum shall be null and void and we shall have no other liability to you.” Judge Denise Cote of Southern District of New York granted the motion to dismiss filed by Phillips, finding that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “natural disaster” and that the pandemic constituted “a circumstance beyond the parties’ reasonable control” as contemplated by their agreement. JN appealed and just last week the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal. See JN Contemporary Art LLC sued Phillips Auctioneers LLC, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 7652, 2022 WL 852293 (2d Cir. March 23, 2022).

JN first argued on appeal that the district court erred in finding as a matter of law, without the benefit of any discovery, that the COVID-19 pandemic is a natural disaster, as it is debatable whether COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus or one created by man. JN next argued that Phillips did not have to sell the painting at a live auction, but could have sold it online or delayed a live auction sale to some point in the future. The Second Circuit disagreed. The Second Circuit stated that it did not need to rule on the finding by the district court that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “natural disaster” as it could decide the case on other grounds. The Second Circuit stated that the primary purpose of a force majeure clause is to “relieve a party from its contractual duties when its performance has been prevented by a force beyond its control or when the purpose of the contract has been frustrated.” The Second Circuit held that the COVID-19 pandemic and the orders issued by the government restricting nonessential businesses constituted circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the parties. In addition, the Second Circuit held that the agreement only required sale at a live auction and that when a defendant is excused from performance by force majeure, a defendant is not required to provide substitute performance.

Much has been written over the last year or two about courts interpreting force majeure clauses narrowly and strictly and not excusing performance due to COVID-19, and many parties are now excluding COVID-19 from their force majeure clauses altogether. The decision last week by Second Circuit in JN Contemporary Art LLC vs. Phillips Auctioneers LLC stands in contrast to many prior court decisions for two reasons. First, the Second Circuit interpreted the force majeure clause at issue more broadly and excused performance due to COVID-19. Second, it appears to be the first decision by a Federal Court of Appeals on this issue.

The Italian National Institute of Health Reveals the Fully "Vaccinated" now account for 7 in every 10 COVID Deaths

/

From [HERE] Covid-19 Deaths are beginning to rise again across Italy despite millions now being triple vaccinated, and the latest official Italian Government data shows that the vaccinated population account for 7 in every 10 of those deaths, as well as 8 in every 10 cases and hospitalisations, and 7 in every 10 ICU admissions. 

Italy’s National Institute of Health publishes a periodic Covid-19 Surveillance report, the latest of which can be accessed here, or the full list of which can be accessed here. 

In the latest report, data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths can be found in tables 4a, 4b and 4c on pages 26, 27 and 28. 

The following table has been collated from the data found in Table 4A in the ‘Diagnosi tra 25/02/2022 – 27/03/2022’ section and shows the total number of cases across Italy by vaccination status –

In all, between 25th Feb and 27th March 22, Italy recorded 1,594,849 Covid-19 infections, and an astounding 1,284,615 of these were among the vaccinated population, meaning the vaccinated accounted for 81% of all Covid-19 cases within one month. 

The unvaccinated accounted for just 310,234 cases, the one-dose vaccinated accounted for 36,199 cases, the two dose vaccinated accounted for 329,016 cases, and the triple vaccinated accounted for a shocking 919,400 cases. This means the triple vaccinated alone accounted for 58% of all Covid-19 cases across Italy between 25th Feb and 27th March 22. [MORE]

A Great Hoax: Multiple Studies Show COVID Injections Don't Stop Infections, Transmissions, Hospitalizations or Deaths. More than 3 Dozen Studies Contradict the Effectiveness of Forced Injections

/

From [HERE] Studies on the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines found that they do not effectively stop the transmission of the disease, bringing into question the necessity of mandating them.

Epidemiologist Paul Alexander recently published a round-up of some of the newest evidence that calls into question the safety and efficacy of COVID shots.

Among the studies that he summarized was one from Israel that showed vaccinated individuals who have never been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 had a 13-fold increased risk of getting infected with the delta variant compared to those who have been unvaccinated but have been previously infected, showing that natural immunity is more effective.

Another study from the European Journal of Epidemiology found that there is no significant relationship between COVID-19 cases and the number of people getting vaccinated on a countrywide level. In other words, getting more people injected does not necessarily lower the spread of the virus.

Official data from the United Kingdom also showed that fully vaccinated adults now have a higher risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death compared to the unvaccinated.

Based on the studies, Alexander concluded that COVID vaccines are not to be expected to contribute to eliminating the communal spread of the virus or reaching herd immunity. He also said the studies “unravel the rationale for vaccine mandates and passports.” (Related: Over 400 studies show COVID-19 measures are failures… lockdowns don’t work, masks don’t work and school closures help no one.)

Alexander also noted that taking the vaccine escalates the person’s risk of getting infected. This is called negative efficacy, which is jargon for disease-promoting effects in drugs. In the case of a vaccine, this means that the vaccinated person is more likely to get infected compared to the unvaccinated.

This is bad, in particular, because evidence shows that the vaccines are non-sterilizing and that they do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization or death. They never worked.

For Alexander, what is happening with the COVID vaccines is reminiscent of the negative vaccine efficacy of the dengue vaccines that killed children in the Philippines in 2017, where the shots should not have been used.

Today, the repercussions of COVID vaccines show a massive increase in all-cause mortality numbers reported by insurance companies. Excess deaths are also showing up in almost all age cohorts and cannot be explained away by other causes, and the COVID-19 vaccine is now being referred to as the “greatest fraud” in modern history.

While business continues for Big Pharma companies like Pfizer and Moderna, as word gets out past censors and silencers, it is only a matter of time until the truth about the ineffective vaccines becomes evident to everyone.

Government, Big Pharma gaslighting people

There has also been an interesting change in narrative from medical influencers, public health officials and other mainstream advocates regarding the COVID vaccines. Now, people are supposed to believe that the vaccines were never meant to stop transmission, nor are they supposed to prevent others from getting infected with the disease. (Related: Even the NYT admits covid infections in children are merely like a “mild flu” – so why the vaccines, then?)

Today, vaccines are said to only prevent severe illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky brazenly admitting the injections can no longer prevent transmission.

This move by the government, Big Pharma and other medical “professionals” is called manipulative gaslighting. People were told from the beginning that the rapidly developed vaccines will “end the pandemic” and those who are fully vaccinated are the only ones allowed to have access to their jobs and going to public spaces.

People are also expected to accept the unethical decisions from policymakers regarding their decisions to lift vaccine mandates for professional athletes and performers, but not for police officers or healthcare workers, many of whom already lost their careers because of the mandates that local governments have previously implemented on the guise of public safety.

There’s no other way to describe it: COVID-19 vaccine is the greatest fraud in modern history.

Doctor’s Analysis of Data Obtained on 78 Million People in the US and England Demonstrate that COVID Injections Don't Prevent COVID or its Transmission and Don't Prevent Severe Illness or Death

/

From [CHD] “Our vaccines are working exceptionally well,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death — they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”

Thus spoke Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Walensky, in an Aug. 5, 2021 interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

Walensky may have believed the vaccines prevented severe illness and death then — but she cannot possibly believe that now.

That was eight months ago. The vaccines had barely been rolled out eight months earlier.

Now we have nearly 16 months of observation and what have we found? What has Walensky’s CDC revealed that contradicts her glib patter?

While there are thousands of articles discussing COVID-19 vaccines, I have come to agree with professor Tom Jefferson that in order to arrive at the truth, all we need to look at are epidemiological data of very high quality.

In other words:

  • We want raw, official data, before it has been subjected to adjustments or algorithms that “smooth” the data.

  • We want large populations.

  • We want the most solid endpoints, such as hospitalizations or deaths.

Over the past few days I have identified and analyzed such studies on my blog (here and here) and on Substack. The data are from official sources, published by the U.S. CDC and the UK’s Office of National Statistics.

Information on 30 million adults in California and New York, three-fourths of whom were vaccinated, were used to compare COVID hospitalization and case rates in those who were vaccinated and had no prior COVID illness, with adults who were never vaccinated but had recovered from COVID, and presumably had natural immunity.

The data were collected from June to November 2021, before the Omicron wave appeared.

The Defender reported on this data two months ago:

  • Vaccinated Californians and New Yorkers were three times more likely to develop COVID than those who had prior immunity and were unvaccinated.

  • Vaccinated Californians had a higher rate of hospitalizations (severe illness) than those who were unvaccinated but had prior immunity. (New York did not provide hospitalization data.)

  • The vaccine failures in this huge study cannot be blamed on Omicron, because the data were collected during Delta.

The UK data from its Office of National Statistics, published March 16, extend from Jan. 1, 2021, through Jan. 31, and include both the Delta and Omicron waves.

The data have been age-standardized. The database includes 86% of all deaths in England (which has a population of 56 million) during the 13 months described.

The graphs reveal that being doubly vaccinated protected the English against death for most of 2021.

However, over last December and January (corresponding to the Omicron wave), COVID death rates in the doubly vaccinated but unboosted were higher than in those who had never been vaccinated. This was true for the population as a whole.

If you break down the deaths by age group, the vast majority of COVID deaths occurred in the over-70 population.

While deaths from COVID in younger people were trending up as the time since vaccination increased, by Jan. 31, 2022, they had not exceeded COVID deaths in the unvaccinated.

Boosters did appear to “top up” COVID immunity for a time in all age groups, reducing death rates. But one wonders how long it will take before this effect wears off?

What is the bottom line?

High-quality, official data obtained on more than 30 million American adults and 48 million residents of England incontrovertibly reveal that:

  • Natural immunity was three times better at preventing cases than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

  • Natural immunity was somewhat better at preventing serious illness, measured as hospitalizations, than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

  • Boosters (a third shot) reduced the death rate in England of those vaccinated against Omicron, but the benefit was starting to drop off by January 2022.

  • Overall, England’s unvaccinated population had a lower COVID death rate during the Omicron wave than the COVID death rate in its doubly vaccinated population.

  • Walensky and the other so-called experts are wrong. Natural immunity provided three times more protection against infection (and therefore against transmission) than did double vaccination, even before Omicron. After Omicron, vaccine efficacy was even worse.

  • While vaccination provided some protection against severe illness (measured as hospitalizations) during the Delta wave, it provided less protection than natural immunity.

  • The vast majority of COVID deaths occur in those over 70. In this age group, the doubly vaccinated died from COVID at higher rates during Omicron than the unvaccinated.

UnMasked Mayor Promotes an Ongoing Grimace and More Science-Free COVID Rules: The Proxymoronic StrawBoss says NYC Won’t Rehire Unvaxxed Workers. Video Shows Him Grin and Wave as a Crowd Shouts Insults

/

From [HERE] New York City Mayor Eric Adams said Thursday that his administration would not rehire unvaccinated city workers.

Around 1,400 city employees were fired earlier this year for failing to comply with the city’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Adams said, during a news conference at Citi Field, he did not plan to rehire them.  “Not at this time,” he said, according to The Wall Street Journal, “We are not reviewing if we are going to bring [them] back.”

He also thanked the more than 340,000 city employees who have been vaccinated, recognizing them for “[standing] up and [doing] the right thing.” [MORE VIDEO]

Adams is a Proxymoron (one moron who speaks or acts on behalf of another pluperfect moron or a whole gang of morons) and a democrat BOHICAN (Bend Over Here It Comes Again Negro). He is also the physical representation of the opposite of Black power in a city with the largest number of Black people in the country.

Official data obtained on more than 30 million American adults and 48 million residents of England incontrovertibly reveals that COVID-19 vaccines aren’t preventing COVID or its transmission, and they aren’t preventing severe illness or death. Also,

  • Natural immunity was three times better at preventing cases than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

  • Natural immunity was somewhat better at preventing serious illness, measured as hospitalizations, than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

  • Boosters (a third shot) reduced the death rate in England of those vaccinated against Omicron, but the benefit was starting to drop off by January 2022.

  • Overall, England’s unvaccinated population had a lower COVID death rate during the Omicron wave than the COVID death rate in its doubly vaccinated population.

  • Walensky and the other so-called experts are wrong. Natural immunity provided three times more protection against infection (and therefore against transmission) than did double vaccination, even before Omicron. After Omicron, vaccine efficacy was even worse.

  • While vaccination provided some protection against severe illness (measured as hospitalizations) during the Delta wave, it provided less protection than natural immunity.

  • The vast majority of COVID deaths occur in those over 70. In this age group, the doubly vaccinated died from COVID at higher rates during Omicron than the unvaccinated.

German Data Confirms that COVID Deaths are Exaggerated in Most Countries and Much of the World is Unvaccinated [meaning not injected with poisons]

/

From [HERE] Mass formation collapse!

In a previous post, we referred to Worldometer to show not many died of Covid in most countries, even according to the official data.

Corona in Zahlen is a German site that also records Covid cases, and deaths, as well as official vaccination and Covid test numbers.

Corona in Zahlen is run by Dr. M. Siekmann and uses statistics from Johns Hopkins University to report corona infections in over 200 countries worldwide.

Worldwide corona statistics “are accessed via the freely accessible Our World in Data data set,” explains Corona in Zahlen.

Our World in Data is a non-profit organisation made up of researchers from the University of Oxford and the Global Change Data Lab.

Corona in Zahlen also uses data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for European countries and Robert Koch Instituts, R-Welt and DIVI for Germany.

Data Comparison

Of the 227 countries Worldometer have been tracking since the beginning of the pandemic, 9 have recorded zero deaths, 38 have recorded less than 100 deaths, 62 have recorded less than 200 deaths, 80 have recorded less than 500 deaths, and 100 have recorded less than 1000 deaths each.

In fact, 206 countries from the 227 reported less than 50,000 deaths.

Of the 222 countries Corona in Zahlen have been tracking, 8 have recorded zero deaths, 33 have recorded less than 100 deaths, 56 have recorded less than 200 deaths, 78 have recorded less than 500 deaths, and 93 less than 1000 deaths.

Covid in Zahlen reports less than 50,000 deaths for 200 of the 222 countries tracked.

Influenza Comparison

Now consider that during the 2018 flu season, the Office for National Statistics reported just over 50,000 deaths in England and Wales.

This was considered high, yet during the outbreak, Public Health England (PHE) declared that “while flu was rendering the largest number of people seriously unwell since the winter of 2010/11, it was still not an epidemic.”

Although we need to take the total size and population of each country into account, we can at least acknowledge that the population of England and Wales – even combined – is pretty small compared to most countries, say in Africa, for example.

Imagine how relieved and relaxed the global population would be feeling now, instead of stressed and fearful, if mainstream media had reported on the vast number of countries hardly hit with Covid-19 deaths over the last two years instead of reporting recorded Covid cases.

Also note that Covid only deaths are proving to be much smaller than official numbers as data in countries like Australia , New Zealand, the UK and USA now goes public, and the mainstream media like The New York Times, and Spectator are beginning to ask questions.

Vaccination Noncompliance

It is also reassuring to see Covid in Zahlen report official data showing less than 20% of the population went for the Covid vaccine in 30 countries, and less than 50% of the people had the vaccine in 78 countries. Less than 50% have fully vaccinated status in 96 countries (did not go back for more shots), and less than 25% have had a booster in 138 countries.

Big Pharma Accounts for 75% of the Total Ad Spend on TV. Which is Why The Dependent Media is Unwilling and Incapable of Reporting the Truth About Deadly COVID Injections

/

From [HERE] and [HERE] Pharmaceutical industry TV ad spend in the U.S 2016-2020. In 2020, the pharmaceutical industry spent 4.58 billion U.S. dollars on advertising on national TV in the United States, unsurprisingly representing a big shift in spending compared to the 2019 pre-covid market. In 2020 TV ad spending of the pharma industry accounted for 75 percent of the total ad spend.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Dependent Media – Establishment (dependent) media is both unwilling and incapable of reporting events truthfully, accurately, or without extreme bias. News coverage is just that—covering-up-(masking) and distorting the events and those wielding the power behind the events (those reported and deliberately unreported). News coverage has simply become “disinfotainment” with the sole purpose of perception and knowledge containment as well as reality concealment. You report in the interests of those who paying you to do so. (See: MEDIA, NBC & NEWS)

Mega-Rich Got So Much Richer During Manufactured Pandemic the English Language Didn’t Have a Word to Describe it. FUNKTIONARY Calls it "Richcraft" Thru a "Plandemic" and "Socialist Distancing"

/

According to FUNKTIONARY

Richcraft – the sorcery of greed—the use of violence, laws, deception, theft, secret oaths, and oppression to snatch and hoard resources from and gain power over the vast majority of people’s lives through the widespread use of this vicious concoction of nefarious, lethal, legal, and demonstrably devious power. (See: COP, Gangbanking, Privilege, Aristocracy, Corporations, Usury, Power, Oppression, Violence, Greed, Deception, GIMME!, Political Money, Cultural Induction, GEO-Dollars, Control, The Pathocracy & Poor)

Socialist distancing – the ever-expanding and increasing disparity between the haves and the have-nots until the Socialist (i.e., monopoly capitalist) Welfare State becomes the Farewell State—farewell to your rights, your family, friends and even your life through Plandemics (Coronavirus), $camdemics (Corporate State turned Surveillance and Nanny State), 5G bio-weaponized eugenics, starvation, vaccinations, civil unrest, genocide and other nefarious LWO (Last World Order) activities that will greatly reduce the world’s population by 2030. Before Social Distancing, we were experiencing the effects of “Socialist Distancing”...the ever-widening separation between the “haves” (holders) and the “have-nots” (held-back) due to “monopoly capitalism” (centralization of credit in the hands of the State) which by wide academic recognition is the core attribute of communism / socialism, in fact, it is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto. The litmus test to any political system is what is used as “money” and who controls (monopolizes) its “issuance.” Labels just don’t cut it. Think deeper...learn to access the underlying reality behind the truth veneer you’ve been conditioned to hold or have been told. (See: Plandemic, $camdemics, Vaccines, Coronavirus, “Monopoly Capitalism,” Exchange, Economics, Matrix Capitalism, Political Money, GEO-Dollars, The Farewell State, Trapitalism, Cultural Induction & COVERT-19)

From [CHD] The word “billionaire” didn’t even exist until 1844. Fifty years later, we got “multibillionaire.” And for the next 127 years, that was enough.

But in 2020, while the working class faced near-record unemployment during the COVIDpandemic, the wealthiest Americans faced a different problem. Some of them had gotten so rich, there was no longer a word to describe just how rich they were.

That’s why I want to bring you one of the newest additions to the English language: “centibillionaires,” people with $100 billion or more.

What’s it like being one of history’s first centibillionaires? It’s hard to even imagine, but let’s try it by comparing them to the less fortunate. By which I mean just … regular … billionaires.

If you’re a regular billionaire, you can afford a private jet. If you’re a centibillionaire, you can afford a brand-new Gulfstream jet every single day for more than 10 years. (Not sure what you’d do with a new Gulfstream every day — maybe give one to each of your closest 4,000 friends?)

A regular billionaire would struggle to buy their own professional baseball team. Sad, I know. But a centibillionaire could easily buy every team in the entire major league.

If you’re a regular billionaire, you can donate to your alma mater and get your name on a building. If you’re a centibillionaire, you could single-handedly give every teacher in America an $8,000 raise for five straight years.

Of course, that’s not all you could do. $100 billion is enough to wipe out all the medical debt in the United States. Or provide permanent shelter for every homeless person in America. Or buy COVID vaccines for the entire world.

Basically what I’m saying is, $100 billion is a lot of money.

More than two and a half million times what the average American worker makes in a year.

1 Million Copies Sold — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ — The book that launched a movement. BUY TODAY!

So here’s the big question. Are these centibillionaires so rich because they work two and a half million times harder than the average American? Are they really 100 times smarter than the typical billionaire?

I don’t think so. The reason for the rise of centibillionaires is that for decades, wealth hasn’t trickled down, it’s gushed up, all the way to the very top.

That’s not an accident. As it turns out, the system that the super-rich themselves carefully crafted and lobbied for, benefits… the rich!

And while you may not own more private jets than your average centibillionaire, you probably do pay a higher tax rate.

And thanks to legal loopholes and the Trump tax cuts, when the wealthiest Americans die, they get to pass on most of their centibillions to their kids tax-free.

We’ve got two choices as a country. We can tax the richest Americans fairly, and invest that money in ways that benefit all of us.

Or we can keep doing what we’re doing, and watch as centibillionaires get even richer while the rest of us get left behind.

If you think wealth and power are too concentrated in the hands of a privileged few now, just imagine what a few more years of trickle-down nonsense will bring.

Of course, it won’t be all bad. At least “trillionaire” is easy to say.

Pfizer Seeks Approval to Inject Infants with its Deadly COVID Gene Therapy Shots

/

From [HERE] Because some human beings care about their children, VAERS was established in 1990 as an early-warning system to identify negative reactions and side effects of vaccination – which makes sense.

But there a major problems. It is managed by the FDA and the CDC, which explains why the VAERS database requires a class to learn how to find anything.

Taking the time to actually file a report is voluntary and out of fear of losing their jobs or being considered an “anti-vaxxer”, nobody wants to speak ill of the all-holy vaxxine, let alone make an official report.

It is estimated that only 1% of vaccine injuries ever get reported to VAERS. So that means when VAERS reports over 44,000 adverse reactions and 90 deaths, one can expect it to be as much as 4.4 million adverse reactions and 9,000 deaths. And these numbers are only from the age 5-17 group.

Conservative numbers put it at 10%, which is half a million children that have been wounded and killed from an unneeded, unwanted experimental gene therapy shot that we were lied to about, every step of the way.

Thanks to the OpenVAERS project, which is built upon the VAERS data, the public can easily search these reports and see for themselves: people are reporting adverse reactions such as chronic pain, loss of hearing and taste, talking gibberish and acting-out aggressively. And these are the mild cases.

There is a tsunami of major brain damage, major heart disease and fatalities. Edward Dowd has analyzed the data and has reported an 84% increase in deaths among ages 25-44, which is the same amount of lives lost to the Vietnam war.

Toby Rogers estimates that Big Pharma kills twice as many people that died in World War II – every single year.

The press ignores this because it’s not enough. They want your newborn babies, as well. Pfizer is pushing to get children as young as six months old given a shot that we know is potentially fatal, even though children were never at risk and are still not at risk.

The United States has been force-injecting infants and children with experimental vaccines for years and now, they want to this infamous clotshot.

Thanks to virtue-signalling mothers, some children have already been getting it in the womb, which is resulting in miscarriages, stillbirths and deaths from breastfeeding on toxic, genetically-modified mother’s milk.

Pfizer is planning on submitting another application for Emergency Use Authorization in early April. That’s about 18 million children under 5 who could be sacrificed to the altar of Big Pharma and political correctness.

If Pfizer can achieve permanent liability protection from the FDA, who they control, then they can add the mRNA gene therapy shot to the childhood vaccine schedule, where it will enjoy permanent liability protection, under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

These same crooks are putting a judge on the Supreme Court who openly defends leniency towards crimes that involve child rape.

They’re coming for your children and they will not stop.

If you still care about the human race and are looking for something you can do right now, you can go to TobyRogers.substack.com and read his “Urgent Call to Action” for more info.

Study in the Journal of Pediatrics Finds a High Percentage of Teens Develop Heart Damage Months after Getting 2nd Pfizer COVID Shot

/

From [HERE] New research published in the Journal of Pediatrics reveals that more than 66 percent of all adolescents who develop Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine”-related myopericarditis after the second jab still end up suffering from persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis.

This revelation suggests that, contrary to what the government claims, Fauci Flu shot adverse effects can be long term, even in children. And the saddest part is that children have a zero percent risk of dying from the disease in the first place, so what is the rationale behind them getting the shots?

Published on March 25, the study challenges the position held by multiple government agencies in the United States, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which claims that heart inflammation caused by Pfizer and Moderna mRNA (messenger RNA) injections is always “mild.”

Researchers at Seattle Children’s Hospital looked at cases of younger patients under age 18 who came to the hospital with chest pain and elevated serum troponin levels between April 1, 2021, and Jan. 7, 2022, which covers the height of the Operation Warp Speed mass injection campaign. All of them had received their second dose of Pfizer within the previous week.

Of the 35 patients who fit the criteria, 16 were determined to be suitable for evaluation purposes. All 16 underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tests three to eight months after their first examination.

Of these, 11 were found to have persistent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), though levels were lower than in previous months.

“The presence of LGE is an indicator of cardiac injury and fibrosis and has been strongly associated with worse prognosis in patients with classical acute myocarditis,” the study explains.

Fully vaccinated children have troponin levels more than 20 times higher than a heart attack patient

A meta-analysis of eight studies found that LGE is a predictor of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiac transplant, rehospitalizations, recurrent acute myocarditis, and is a requirement for mechanical circulatory support.

Another 11-study meta-analysis found the “presence and extent of LGE to be a significant predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes.”

While some of the child patients in the new study showed symptoms that “were transient and most patients appeared to respond to treatment,” there was still a “persistence of abnormal findings,” the team found.

All of this “rais[es] concerns for potential longer-term effects,” the researchers wrote, adding that they plan to take more MRIs at the one year mark to see whether any of the abnormalities have resolved.

“The paper provides more evidence that myocarditis in adolescents that result from COVID-19 vaccines is very serious,” says Dr. Madhava Setty, the senior science editor for The Defender, a project of Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

“All patients had significantly elevated serum troponin levels indicative of heart damage. And LGE, which is indicative of poor outcome, was present in more than two-thirds of the kids.”

“These young patients had a median troponin level of 9.15 – more than 20 times greater than the levels found in people suffering heart attacks.”

Commenting on the findings on Twitter, Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon and public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, wrote that the CDC has a “civic duty to rigorously study the long-term effects of vaccine-induced myocarditis.”

“New follow-up study 3-8 months after myocarditis shows the MRI heart abnormality of late gadolinium enhancement seen in 63% of children,” he added. “Merits further study.”

According to Dr. Anisha Koka, a cardiologist, the study also suggests that upwards of 70 percent of teenagers who develop myocarditis from covid injections will be left with a scar on their heart.