February 27, 2022

21 yr Old Med Student Severely Injured by COVID Shot. No One Can Be Held Liable. Gov Injury Program Doesn't Compensate for Injury or Future Harms but may Cover Out of Pocket Costs, Many Years from now

February 27, 2022/ Tron Nick

GOVT AND MEDIA LIE-ABILITY IS HIGH. IF INJURY IS SO “RARE”, THEN WHY NOT PAY FOR THE HARM CAUSED? From [CHD] A family whose 21-year-old son developed a life-threatening reaction to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has been waiting six months to learn if the U.S. government’s Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) will help cover their son’s medical bills, but nothing else.

The federal government has given complete immunity to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J for any injury caused by their Covid-19 vaccines. That’s right: you cannot sue them if you are injured by their Covid-19 vaccine. (See Note 1 to read the law yourself.) So, while their product may not give you immunity, Pfizer and Moderna are guaranteed immunity. Said immunity also shields doctors, hospitals and any other persons who administer or coerce people to take deadly COVID injections.

And it gets even worse. These companies are even immune for – hold your breath – willful misconduct. That may sound crazy, but it is shockingly true. You can only sue them for willful misconduct if the federal government first sues them for such conduct. (See Note 2 below to read the law yourself.) And what are the odds the federal government will do so after wildly promoting the vaccine? About as likely as the FDA ever admitting they promoted a vaccine that caused widespread harm. [MORE]

The CICP program, which operates under the federal Health Resources and Services Administration, provides payment for serious injuries or death caused by certain medications, medical devices and vaccines, including COVID vaccines.

The family of Kartik Bhakta in August 2021 submitted a claim on behalf of their son. So far, the claim has been ignored.

Bhakta, a second-year pre-med student described as a “genius” by his father, was severely injured after his first Pfizer shot. According to hospital records, Bhakta suffered from an extremely rare life-threatening adverse reaction to the vaccine.

Within two hours of his first dose, Bhakta experienced nausea and vomiting. He then developed back pain, a severe rash, tinnitus, eye problems, kidney failure, deafness and neuropathy. He spent three months in the hospital.

The day before getting vaccinated, Bhakta was healthy and had no medical conditions, his father said. The doctors said the neuropathy could be caused by steroids given to him for treatment, but they attribute the other conditions to the vaccine.

“We need some kind of help and direction from somewhere so that way he can get medical assistance or whatever he needs,” Bhakta’s father said.

In addition to a lengthy hospitalization, Bhakta underwent numerous surgeries, can’t walk without a walker and had to put his schooling on hold.

His family relocated to Texas in 2021 to be closer to the medical services their son needed, as the school’s insurance program stopped covering Bhakta’s medical bills in August.

His family does not have coverage for the additional eye surgeries their son needs and cannot work due to his medical appointments and need for care.

Instead, they’re relying on the government’s CICP to compensate him for his injuries.

The failures of the CICP to compensate the vaccine injured

The Bhakta family submitted a claim to the CICP in August and received an email that a staffer would follow up, but never received a response.

Over the next several months, family members contacted the CICP by phone and email multiple times. They unsuccessfully tried to obtain assistance from U.S. Rep. Filemon Vela’s (D-Texas) office.

Asked what the family would do if denied assistance, Bhakta’s father replied, “I don’t know. Then why is the government forcing us to take a vaccine if they’re not taking responsibility?”

Since the CICP launched in 2010, 7,033 claims have been filed, but only 29 claims have been compensated.

There are about 300 claims pending with the CICP for injuries or deaths due to COVID vaccines. As of Feb. 1, the CICP had approved only one claim, but that claim has not been paid out.

To be compensated by the CICP for a COVID vaccine injury, it must be established, based on “compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence,” that the injury or death was directly caused by the vaccine.

The CICP provides compensation only for out-of-pocket medical costs, lost wages or a death benefit. It does not provide any compensatory damages, which make an individual harmed “whole”; paying for all damages and necessary future harms and loss from the injury. The claim must be filed within one year of the injury.

According to Sean Greenwood, a vaccine injury attorney in Texas, even if the family does get an approved claim, they could wait “many many years” to receive compensation.

Once the government approves the vaccine for children under 5 years old and pregnant women, compensation requests will move over to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), Greenwood said. The NVICP allows up to $250,000 for pain and suffering.

The best option for people seeking recourse from COVID vaccine injuries is to file a CICP claim within one year of receiving the vaccine — and hope COVID vaccines will be added to the NVICP, Greenwood added.

“The best thing to do just to preserve your rights is to file in the CICP,” Greenwood said. “I just don’t have a lot of confidence that these people are going to get a good result.”

It is unknown whether CICP claimants will also be able to file in the NVICP if the COVID vaccine is added to the program.

Countries like Japan and France have already added COVID vaccines to their equivalent courts, and those injured receive compensation “pretty quickly,” according to Greenwood.

Italy plans to set aside 150 million euros ($169.91 million) to compensate those injured by COVID vaccines, according to a draft decree shown to Reuters. About 50 million euros in 2022 and an additional 100 million in 2023 will be reserved for those permanently disabled by the COVID vaccines recommended by Italy’s health authority.

Note 1. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d the federal government “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19” provides that “manufacturers” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].”

Note 2. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(c)(5) “If an act or omission by a manufacturer or distributor with respect to a covered countermeasure, which act or omission is alleged under subsection (e)(3)(A) to constitute willful misconduct, … such act or omission shall not constitute ‘willful misconduct’ … if—(i)neither the Secretary nor the Attorney General has initiated an enforcement action with respect to such act or omission; or (ii)such an enforcement action has been initiated an

February 27, 2022

COVID Injections Have Caused Nearly 24,000 Deaths According to VAERS, the CDC's Underreported, Govt Manipulated Reporting System

February 27, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [CHD] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,119,063 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 11, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 23,990 reports of deaths — an increase of 375 over the previous week — and 192,517 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,382 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 760,102 adverse events, including 10,909 deaths and 79,111 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 11, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 10,909 U.S. deaths reported as of Feb. 11, 18% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 23% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 60% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 546 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Feb. 11, including 321 million doses of Pfizer, 206 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

8,173 adverse events, including 179 rated as serious and 3 reported deaths.

The most recent death involves a 7-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1975356) from Minnesota who died 11 days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine when she was found unresponsive by her mother. An autopsy is pending.

16 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).
29 reports of blood clotting disorders.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

29,154 adverse events, including 1,675 rated as serious and 38 reported deaths.

The most recent deaths involve a 13-year-old male (VAERS I.D. 2042005) from an unidentified state who died from a sudden heart attack seven months after receiving his second dose of Moderna, and a 17-year-old female from an unidentified state (VAERS I.D. 2039111) who died after receiving her first dose of Moderna. Medical information was limited and it is unknown if an autopsy was performed in either case.

68 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
639 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 627 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
158 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
54% of those who died were male, 41% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.
The average age of death was 72.7.
As of Feb. 11, 5,086 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1,635 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
Of the 3,557 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 40% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.
851 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with 40% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 30% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.
2,323 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.
1,592 reports of myocardial infarction.
13,102 reports of blood clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 5,846 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 4,670 reports to Moderna and 2,542 reports to J&J.
3,992 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,456 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,335 cases to Moderna and 170 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.

February 27, 2022

Insurance Company: Govts are Undercounting COVID Shot Injuries/Deaths. Estimates 3 Million Germans Got Medical Treatment for COVID Injuries. Claims Show 31,254 Vax Deaths but Govt Data Show only 2,255

February 27, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [CHD] and [MORE] A German health insurance company this week said an analysis of data collected from more than 10 million people suggests COVID vaccine side effects are “significantly” underreported.

The company, BKK ProVita (BKK), said its analysis revealed a “significant alarm signal” and that “a risk to human life cannot be ruled out.”

Based on the data collected, BKK said the number of vaccine side effects is many times higher than the number officially announced by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), Germany’s federal health agency that monitors the safety of vaccines and biomedicines.

The PEI announced in a press release there were 244,576 suspected cases of vaccine side effectsreported in 2021 following COVID vaccination, but BKK said its analysis revealed more than 400,000 cases.

BKK board member Andreas Schöfbeck told WELT, a German news publication, “The numbers determined are significant and urgently need to be checked for plausibility.”

In a letter, Schöfbeck said BKK analyzed doctors’ billing data from 10.9 million insured people and found 217,000 people received medical treatment due to vaccine side effects.

“In our opinion, there is a significant underreporting of the side effects of the vaccination,” said Schöfbeck. “According to our calculations, we consider 400,000 visits to the doctor by our insured persons due to vaccination complications to be realistic to date.”

Schöfbeck said if figures are extrapolated over a year for the entire German population of 83 million people, it is likely 2.5 – 3 million people in Germany received medical treatment for COVID vaccine adverse events.

“The data available to our company gives us reason to believe that there is a very considerable under-recording of suspected cases of vaccination side-effects after they received the [COVID-19] vaccine,” Schöfbeck wrote.

Schöfbeck sent the letter to PEI President Dr. Klaus Cichutek, the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds, the German Medical Association, National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, the Standing Vaccination Commission and BKK’s umbrella organization.

In another letter, the company suggested vaccine side effects across Germany are at least 10 times more common than what was reported by the PEI, the German newspaper Nordkurier reported Wednesday.

The letters did not disclose symptoms, the severity of adverse events or which vaccines caused the side effects.

Germany’s drug regulator approved COVID vaccines from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax and Moderna.

Federal health officials in the U.S. and Germany have emphasized the benefits of COVID vaccines outweigh the potential risks, and side effects are rare.

In the U.S. last month, an executive at an Indiana life insurance company reported a “stunning” 40% increase in the death rate among 18- to 64-year-old adults compared to pre-pandemic levels, The Defender reported.

During the same call, OneAmerica’s CEO J. Scott Davison also described a major uptick in both short- and long-term disability claims.

The insurance executive rated the extraordinarily high death rate as “the highest … we have seen in the history of this business,” adding the trend is “consistent across every player in that business.”

To further underscore the import of his statements, Davison said, “Just to give you an idea of how bad [40%] is, a … one-in-200 catastrophe would be a 10% increase over pre-pandemic. So 40% is just unheard of.”

Contrary to what the public might assume — given the media’s unremitting coverage of COVID-19— Davison reported most of the death claims listed causes of death other than COVID.

Commenting on the news, Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, wrote, “It would take something REALLY BIG to have an effect this big.”

Moreover, Kirsch said, the culprit would have to be something first introduced in 2021 — “something new … that a huge number of people would be exposed to” — such as COVID shots.

Vaccine scientist Dr. Robert Malone and statistician Jessica Rose, Ph.D., agreed that experimentalCOVID injections should be considered prime suspects.

February 27, 2022

Govt Manipulating Data: Hospitals are Instructed to Count All Persons as Unvaxed if there is No Immediate Confirmation of Vax Status, thereby Inflating the No of Unvaxed Hospitalizations and Deaths

February 27, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [HIRSHORN] There has been recent attention to CDC hiding considerable data on COVID health impacts. What has not been focused on, however, is an even greater fraud. In its goal of coercing the whole population to get COVID shots, CDC has manipulated data to make it look like it is the unvaccinated who have suffered the worst impacts, like hospitalization and death. They wanted the public to believe there has been a pandemic of the unvaccinated.

For months there have been frightening statements along the lines that unvaccinated Americans are XXX times more likely to be hospitalized or die. All such statements, including one made by President Biden, are lies, intentionally created by over-counting the number of unvaccinated people.

On February 5 President Biden said: “Here’s the deal: Unvaccinated individuals are 97 times more likely to die compared to those who are boosted. Protect yourself and those around you by getting vaccinated and boosted today.”

This is what the data fraud is all about.

How has CDC and the public health system created this fiction?

Simply put, it comes down to hospitals categorizing many people as unvaccinated when, in fact, they likely had received the jab.

The fraud by hospitals and CDC is really so simple. When a COVID patient enters the hospital system there is an immediate check within that system to see if the person had gotten the jab. Just one very big problem.

A large number of people who enter any hospital very likely got the jab at any one of countless places giving free vaccinations. That group includes chain pharmacies and ones in supermarkets, community places run by various public health agencies, and physician offices.

What happens when a COVID patient enters a hospital and there is no immediate confirmation that the person got the jab? That person is classified as UNVACCINATED.

This procedure guarantees an inflated number of unvaccinated COVID hospitalizations and deaths!

The goal is to instill fear among the population that COVID shots are critically needed for public health and safety.

So, data are created for the nation by CDC that there is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. In truth, the continuing explosion of COVID infections, hospitalizations and deaths in recent months has been a pandemic of the vaccinated. So many people who have been fully vaccinated, including many who got booster jabs, got infected, got hospitalized, and all too often died.

Another aspect of this fraud is that many vaccine related adverse events are not getting into the CDC VAERS data system because people who are not officially recognized as vaccinated but are suffering a multitude of health problems or death are not counted by CDC. They are being counted as unvaccinated and, therefore, their conditions do not always fit into the CDC data system counting impacts of vaccines.

Another aspect of this fraud is the use of incorrect population data.

CDC easily uses outdated population numbers that leads to artificially inflated estimates of COVID-19 case, hospitalization and death rates among the ever-shrinking unvaccinated population. They use population numbers that are lower than the most recent numbers from census studies. Simply put, they use a denominator that is too low to make their calculation of pandemic impacts seem higher than they really are.

All of this fraud not only casts blame on the unvaccinated, it also is designed to make use of COVID vaccines more effective than they really are. A pandemic of the vaccinated does not motivate people to get the jab or booster shots.

Withholding data, as recently reported, is terrible. But how CDC has manipulated data is even worse; it is a big lie compared to a lie of omission.

February 25, 2022

As the COVID Tyrant Paradigm Unravels [assent to false memes such as ‘covid case,' ‘covid death,’ ‘positive test’ or ‘vax Stops the Spread’] CrimethInc Redirects Sheeples’ Minds to a War Paradigm

February 25, 2022/ Tron Nick

**According to** **FUNKTIONARY**:
tyrant-paradigm - the assertion or assent to certain concepts, idea, memes, words, patterns of thinking, attitudes, beliefs, and convictions that give rise to coercive political systems. It includes the notion that the tyrants (territorial gangsters) are so omniscient and omnipotent that they can prevent natural persons from living free. The words that constitute the tyrant paradigm are enemy outposts in your mind. Tyrants "own" the minds of their oppressed victims to the extent that victims hold contents of the tyrant-paradigm in the minds. The tyrant-paradigm consists of the "construction of systematic thought" and "the systematic pattems of thought" that give rise to coercive political systems. (See: The OCTOCON, Territorial Gangsters & Reactions)
Tyrants - there are none; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind-control and word-conditioning control? "Find out the exact amount of injustice any people accept, and you will find out the exact amount of injustice they receive." -Freddy D. *"The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it."* -John Jay, Castilian Days II, 1872. (See: Tyranny, Terms, "The Law," Dictatorship, Corporate State & Fascism)

From [HERE] “Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes… known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.… No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” — James Madison

War is the enemy of freedom.

As long as America’s politicians continue to involve us in wars that bankrupt the nation, jeopardize our servicemen and women, increase the chances of terrorism and blowback domestically, and push the nation that much closer to eventual collapse, “we the people” will find ourselves in a perpetual state of tyranny.

It’s time for the U.S. government to stop policing the globe.

This latest crisis—America’s part in the showdown between Russia and the Ukraine—has conveniently followed on the heels of a long line of other crises, manufactured or otherwise, which have occurred like clockwork in order to keep Americans distracted, deluded, amused, and insulated from the government’s steady encroachments on our freedoms.

And so it continues in its Orwellian fashion.

Two years after COVID-19 shifted the world into a state of global authoritarianism, just as the people’s tolerance for heavy-handed mandates seems to have finally worn thin, we are being prepped for the next distraction and the next drain on our economy.

Yet policing the globe and waging endless wars abroad isn’t making America—or the rest of the world—any safer, it’s certainly not making America great again, and it’s undeniably digging the U.S. deeper into debt.

Indeed, even if we were to put an end to all of the government’s military meddling and bring all of the troops home today, it would take decades to pay down the price of these wars and get the government’s creditors off our backs.

War has become a huge money-making venture, and the U.S. government, with its vast military empire, is one of its best buyers and sellers.

What most Americans—brainwashed into believing that patriotism means supporting the war machine—fail to recognize is that these ongoing wars have little to do with keeping the country safe and everything to do with propping up a military industrial complex that continues to dominate, dictate and shape almost every aspect of our lives.

Consider: We are a military culture engaged in continuous warfare. We have been a nation at war for most of our existence. We are a nation that makes a living from killing through defense contracts, weapons manufacturing and endless wars.

We are also being fed a steady diet of violence through our entertainment, news and politics.

All of the military equipment featured in blockbuster movies is provided—at taxpayer expense—in exchange for carefully placed promotional spots.

Back when I was a boy growing up in the 1950s, almost every classic sci fi movie ended with the heroic American military saving the day, whether it was battle tanks in Invaders from Mars (1953) or military roadblocks in Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956).

What I didn’t know then as a schoolboy was the extent to which the Pentagon was paying to be cast as America’s savior. By the time my own kids were growing up, it was Jerry Bruckheimer’s blockbuster film Top Gun—created with Pentagon assistance and equipment—that boosted civic pride in the military.

Now it’s my grandkids’ turn to be awed and overwhelmed by child-focused military propaganda. Don’t even get me started on the war propaganda churned out by the toymakers. Even reality TV shows have gotten in on the gig, with the Pentagon’s entertainment office helping to sell war to the American public.

It’s estimated that U.S. military intelligence agencies (including the NSA) have influenced over 1,800 movies and TV shows.

And then there are the growing number of video games, a number of which are engineered by or created for the military, which have accustomed players to interactive war play through military simulations and first-person shooter scenarios.

This is how you acclimate a population to war.

This is how you cultivate loyalty to a war machine.

This is how, to borrow from the subtitle to the 1964 film Dr. Strangelove, you teach a nation to “stop worrying and love the bomb.”

As journalist David Sirota writes for Salon, “[C]ollusion between the military and Hollywood – including allowing Pentagon officials to line edit scripts—is once again on the rise, with new television programs and movies slated to celebrate the Navy SEALs….major Hollywood directors remain more than happy to ideologically slant their films in precisely the pro-war, pro-militarist direction that the Pentagon demands in exchange for taxpayer-subsidized access to military hardware.”

Why is the Pentagon (and the CIA and the government at large) so focused on using Hollywood as a propaganda machine?

To those who profit from war, it is—as Sirota recognizes—“a ‘product’ to be sold via pop culture products that sanitize war and, in the process, boost recruitment numbers….At a time when more and more Americans are questioning the fundamental tenets of militarism (i.e., budget-busting defense expenditures, never-ending wars/occupations, etc.), military officials are desperate to turn the public opinion tide back in a pro-militarist direction — and they know pop culture is the most effective tool to achieve that goal.”

The media, eager to score higher ratings, has been equally complicit in making (real) war more palatable to the public by packaging it as TV friendly.

This is what professor Roger Stahl refers to as the representation of a “clean war”: a war “without victims, without bodies, and without suffering”:

“‘Dehumanize destruction’ by extracting all human imagery from target areas … The language used to describe the clean war is as antiseptic as the pictures. Bombings are ‘air strikes.’ A future bombsite is a ‘target of opportunity.’ Unarmed areas are ‘soft targets.’ Civilians are ‘collateral damage.’ Destruction is always ‘surgical.’ By and large, the clean war wiped the humanity of civilians from the screen … Create conditions by which war appears short, abstract, sanitized and even aesthetically beautiful. Minimize any sense of death: of soldiers or civilians.”

This is how you sell war to a populace that may have grown weary of endless wars: sanitize the war coverage of anything graphic or discomfiting (present a clean war), gloss over the actual numbers of soldiers and civilians killed (human cost), cast the business of killing humans in a more abstract, palatable fashion (such as a hunt), demonize one’s opponents, and make the weapons of war a source of wonder and delight.

“This obsession with weapons of war has a name: technofetishism,” explains Stahl. “Weapons appear to take on a magical aura. They become centerpieces in a cult of worship.”

“Apart from gazing at the majesty of these bombs, we were also invited to step inside these high-tech machines and take them for a spin,” said Stahl. “Or if we have the means, we can purchase one of the military vehicles on the consumer market. Not only are we invited to fantasize about being in the driver’s seat, we are routinely invited to peer through the crosshairs too. These repeated modes of imaging war cultivate new modes of perception, new relationships to the tools of state violence. In other words, we become accustomed to ‘seeing’ through the machines of war.”

In order to sell war, you have to feed the public’s appetite for entertainment.

Not satisfied with peddling its war propaganda through Hollywood, reality TV shows and embedded journalists whose reports came across as glorified promotional ads for the military, the Pentagon has also turned to sports to further advance its agenda, “tying the symbols of sports with the symbols of war.”

The military has been firmly entrenched in the nation’s sports spectacles ever since, having co-opted football, basketball, even NASCAR.

This is how you sustain the nation’s appetite for war.

No wonder entertainment violence is the hottest selling ticket at the box office. As professor Henry Giroux points out, “Popular culture not only trades in violence as entertainment, but also it delivers violence to a society addicted to a pleasure principle steeped in graphic and extreme images of human suffering, mayhem and torture.”

No wonder the government continues to whet the nation’s appetite for violence and war through paid propaganda programs (seeded throughout sports entertainment, Hollywood blockbusters and video games)—what Stahl refers to as “militainment“—that glorify the military and serve as recruiting tools for America’s expanding military empire.

No wonder Americans from a very young age are being groomed to enlist as foot soldiers—even virtual ones—in America’s Army (coincidentally, that’s also the name of a first person shooter video game produced by the military). Explorer Scouts, for example, are one of the most popular recruiting tools for the military and its civilian counterparts (law enforcement, Border Patrol, and the FBI).

No wonder the United States is the number one consumer, exporter and perpetrator of violence and violent weapons in the world. Seriously, America spends more money on war than the combined military budgets of China, Russia, the United Kingdom, Japan, France, Saudi Arabia, India, Germany, Italy and Brazil. America polices the globe, with 800 military bases and troops stationed in 160 countries. Moreover, the war hawks have turned the American homeland into a quasi-battlefield with military gear, weapons and tactics. In turn, domestic police forces have become roving extensions of the military—a standing army.

We are dealing with a sophisticated, far-reaching war machine that has woven itself into the very fabric of this nation.

Clearly, our national priorities are in desperate need of an overhaul.

Eventually, all military empires fall and fail by spreading themselves too thin and spending themselves to death.

It happened in Rome: at the height of its power, even the mighty Roman Empire could not stare down a collapsing economy and a burgeoning military. Prolonged periods of war and false economic prosperity largely led to its demise.

It’s happening again.

The American Empire—with its endless wars waged by U.S. military servicepeople who have been reduced to little more than guns for hire: outsourced, stretched too thin, and deployed to far-flung places to police the globe—is approaching a breaking point.

The government is destabilizing the economy, destroying the national infrastructure through neglect and a lack of resources, and turning taxpayer dollars into blood money with its endless wars, drone strikes and mounting death tolls.

This is exactly the scenario President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned against when he cautioned the citizenry not to let the profit-driven war machine endanger our liberties or democratic processes. Eisenhower, who served as Supreme Commander of the Allied forces in Europe during World War II, was alarmed by the rise of the profit-driven war machine that, in order to perpetuate itself, would have to keep waging war.

Yet as Eisenhower recognized, the consequences of allowing the military-industrial complex to wage war, exhaust our resources and dictate our national priorities are beyond grave:

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete highway. We pay for a single fighter with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This, I repeat, is the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.

We failed to heed Eisenhower’s warning.

The illicit merger of the armaments industry and the government that Eisenhower warned against has come to represent perhaps the greatest threat to the nation today.

What we have is a confluence of factors and influences that go beyond mere comparisons to Rome. It is a union of Orwell’s 1984 with its shadowy, totalitarian government—i.e., fascism, the union of government and corporate powers—and a total surveillance state with a military empire extended throughout the world.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, this is how tyranny rises and freedom falls.

The growth of and reliance on militarism as the solution for our problems both domestically and abroad bodes ill for the constitutional principles which form the basis of the American experiment in freedom.

As author Aldous Huxley warned: “Liberty cannot flourish in a country that is permanently on a war footing, or even a near-war footing. Permanent crisis justifies permanent control of everybody and everything by the agencies of the central government.”

February 24, 2022

Dr David Martin: There was No COVID Emergency. Fauci/Others Weaponized a Man-Made Virus and Hyped the Public into a Science-Free Hysteria, in a Conspiracy to Create Human Dependency on Deadly Vaccines

February 24, 2022/ Tron Nick

The following is an excerpt from the Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier by Dr. David Martin

While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Dr. Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below. Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public.

In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:

“This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that ‘persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state…”

The Moderna and Pfizer “alleged vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. Therefore, the basis for the Massachusetts statute and the Supreme Court’s determination is moot in this case.

Further, the USPTO, in its REJECTION of Anthony Fauci’s HIV vaccine made the following statement supporting their rejection of his bogus “invention”

By no later than April 11, 2005, Dr. Anthony Fauci was publicly acknowledging the association of SARS with bioterror potential. Leveraging the fear of the anthrax bioterrorism of 2001, he publicly celebrated the economic boon that domestic terror had directed towards his budget. He specifically stated that NIAID was actively funding research on a “SARS Chip” DNA microarray to rapidly detect SARS (something that was not made available during the current “pandemic”) and two candidate vaccines focused on the SARS CoV spike protein.7 Led by three Chinese researchers under his employment – Zhi-yong Yang, Wing-pui Kong, and Yue Huang – Fauci had at least one DNA vaccine in animal trials by 2004.8 This team, part of the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID, was primarily focused on HIV vaccine development but was tasked to identify SARS vaccine candidates as well. Working in collaboration with Sanofi, Scripps Institute, Harvard, MIT and NIH, Dr. Fauci’s decision to unilaterally promote vaccines as a primary intervention for several designated “infectious diseases” precluded proven therapies from being applied to the sick and dying.9

The CDC and NIAID led by Anthony Fauci entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with EcoHealth Alliance Inc.) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq National Institutes of Health Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights. This research was known to involve surface proteins in coronavirus that had the capacity to directly infect human respiratory systems. In flagrant violation of the NIH moratorium on gain of function research, NIAID and Ralph Baric persisted in working with chimeric coronavirus components specifically to amplify the pathogenicity of the biologic material.

By October 2013, the Wuhan Institute of Virology 1 coronavirus S1 spike protein was described in NIAID’s funded work in China. This work involved NIAID, USAID, and Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance. This work, funded under R01AI079231, was pivotal in isolating and manipulating viral fragments selected from sites across China which contained high risk for severe human response.10

By March 2015, both the virulence of the S1 spike protein and the ACE II receptor was known to present a considerable risk to human health. NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and numerous researchers lamented the fact that the public was not sufficiently concerned about coronavirus to adequately fund their desired research.11

Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance offered the following assessment:

“Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.”12

Economics will follow the hype.

The CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Shi) through U19AI109761 (Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Shi) et al. 2015-2016. These projects took place during a time when the work being performed was prohibited by the United States National Institutes of Health.

The public was clearly advised of the dangers being presented by NIAID-funded research by 2015 and 2016 when the Wuhan Institute of Virology material was being manipulated at UNC in Ralph Baric’s lab.

“The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk,” agrees Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefence expert at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Both Ebright and Wain-Hobson are long-standing critics of gain-of-function research.

In their paper, the study authors also concede that funders may think twice about allowing such experiments in the future. "Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue," they write, adding that discussion is needed as to "whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved”.

But Baric and others say the research did have benefits. The study findings “move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger”, says Peter Daszak, who co-authored the 2013 paper. Daszak is president of the EcoHealth Alliance, an international network of scientists, headquartered in New York City, that samples viruses from animals and people in emerging-diseases hotspots across the globe.

Studies testing hybrid viruses in human cell culture and animal models are limited in what they can say about the threat posed by a wild virus, Daszak agrees. But he argues that they can help indicate which pathogens should be prioritized for further research attention.”13

Knowing that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (through CDC, NIH, NIAID, and their funded laboratories and commercial partners) had patents on each proposed element of medical counter measures and their funding, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gao (China CDC), and Dr. Elias (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) conspired to commit acts of terror on the global population – including the citizens of the United States – when, in September 2019, they published the following mandate:

“Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements. Donors and multilateral institutions must ensure adequate investment in developing innovative vaccines and therapeutics, surge manufacturing capacity, broad-spectrum antivirals and appropriate non- pharmaceutical interventions. All countries must develop a system for immediately sharing genome sequences of any new pathogen for public health purposes along with the means to share limited medical countermeasures across countries.

Progress indicator(s) by September 2020

• Donors and countries commit and identify timelines for: financing and development of a universal influenza vaccine, broad spectrum antivirals, and targeted therapeutics. WHO and its Member States develop options for standard procedures and timelines for sharing of sequence data, specimens, and medical countermeasures for pathogens other than influenza.

• Donors, countries and multilateral institutions develop a multi-year plan and approach for strengthening R&D research capacity, in advance of and during an epidemic.

• WHO, the United Nations Children’s Fund, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, academic and other partners identify strategies for increasing capacity and integration of social science approaches and researchers across the entire preparedness/response continuum.”14

As if to confirm the utility of the September 2019 demand for “financing and development of” vaccine and the fortuitous SARS CoV-2 alleged outbreak in December of 2019, Dr. Fauci began gloating that his fortunes for additional funding were likely changing for the better. In a February 2020 interview in STAT, he was quoted as follows:

““The emergence of the new virus is going to change that figure, likely considerably, Fauci said. “I don’t know how much it’s going to be. But I think it’s going to generate more sustained interest in coronaviruses because it’s very clear that coronaviruses can do really interesting things.””15

18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens

Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover "domestic," as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act "dangerous to human life" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion;

Dr. Anthony Fauci has intimidated and coerced a civilian population and sought to influence the policy of a government by intimidation and coercion.

With no corroboration, Dr. Anthony Fauci promoted16 Professor Neil Ferguson’s computer simulation derived claims that,

“The world is facing the most serious public health crisis in generations. Here we provide concrete estimates of the scale of the threat countries now face.

“We use the latest estimates of severity to show that policy strategies which aim to mitigate the epidemic might halve deaths and reduce peak healthcare demand by two-thirds, but that this will not be enough to prevent health systems being overwhelmed. More intensive, and socially disruptive interventions will therefore be required to suppress transmission to low levels. It is likely such measures – most notably, large scale social distancing – will need to be in place for many months, perhaps until a vaccine becomes available.” 17

Reporting to the President that as many as 2.2 million deaths may result from a pathogen that had not yet been isolated and could not be measured with any accuracy, Dr. Fauci intimidated and coerced the population and the government into reckless, untested, and harmful acts creating irreparable harm to lives and livelihoods.18 Neither the Imperial College nor the “independent” Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (principally funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation)19 had any evidence of success in estimating previous burdens from coronavirus but, without consultation or peer-review, Dr. Fauci adopted their terrifying estimates as the basis for interventions that are explicitly against medical advice.

 The imposition of social distancing was based on computer simulation and environmental models with NO disease transmission evidence whatsoever.
 The imposition of face mask wearing was directly against controlled clinical trial evidence and against the written policy in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
“Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”20
 In both the Imperial College and the IHME simulations, quarantines were modeled for the sick, not the healthy.

Insisting on vaccines while blockading the emergency use of proven pharmaceutical interventions may have contributed to the death of many patients and otherwise healthy individuals.21

Using the power of NIAID during the alleged pandemic, Dr. Anthony Fauci actively suppressed proven medical countermeasures used by, and validated in scientific proceedings, that offered alternatives to the products funded by his conspiring entities for which he had provided direct funding and for whom he would receive tangible and intangible benefit. [MORE]

February 24, 2022

New Study: All Persons Under 50 are at Greater Risk of Death after Getting a COVID Shot than an Unvaccinated Person is at Risk of a COVID Death. COVID Shot Found to Have No Benefit for Anyone Under 80

February 24, 2022/ Tron Nick

From {HIRSHORN] Below are excerpts from a new analysis by two great people; the title is “COVID-19 and All-Cause Mortality Data by Age Group Reveals Risk of COVID Vaccine-Induced Fatality is Equal to or Greater than the Risk of a COVID death for all Age Groups Under 80 Years Old as of 6 February 2022.”

From the abstract:

As of 6 February 2022, based on publicly available official UK and US data, all age groups under 50 years old are at greater risk of fatality after receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than an unvaccinated person is at risk of a COVID-19 death. All age groups under 80 years old have virtually no benefit from receiving a COVID-19 inoculation, and the younger ages incur significant risk.

From the conclusions:

The benefits of vaccination against COVID-19 have not lived up to expectations. There has been a rapid drop in vaccine-induced antibody levels over time and the rapid emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants that are resistant to the vaccinal antibodies to the spike protein. When COVID-19 death data by vaccination status from early 2022 are analyzed to estimate the degree of protection from mortality afforded to the vaccinated population, the protection from COVID-19 death falls far short of the risk of dying from the vaccine, for anyone below 50 years old.

With Omicron now the dominant strain, the vaccinated population are still catching the disease in large numbers and spreading it. The mRNA vaccines were designed to target the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, and the arrival of variants like Delta and Omicron have changed the risk/benefit ratio. With such a large percentage of the population catching omicron and recovering, we now have a much larger base of 11 a naturally resistant population, whose immunity is much longer lasting and robust than that achieved with the vaccine. With Omicron being both less deadly and more resistant to vaccine antibodies, the benefits of vaccination are further weakened, while the risks of dying from the vaccine remain unaltered.

Even if we roll out new versions of the vaccines, the virus will continue to mutate in a futile cat-and-mouse game. According to the data analysis presented in this paper, all age cohorts under 50 years old are at greater risk (from 5 to 51 times higher) of vaccine-induced fatality within the same or subsequent month of receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than they are at risk of a COVID-19 death within 60 days of a positive test if unvaccinated. All age cohorts have less than ¼ of 1% benefit of absolute risk reduction of a COVID-19 death from receiving a COVID-19 inoculation. Children under age 18 years have 51 times higher chance of fatality after a COVID inoculation than risk of dying from COVID if unvaccinated.

Vaccinations in the under 18 age group are more likely to increase the number of COVID deaths in this age group rather than prevent any. Young adults age 18 to 29 have an 8 times higher risk of fatality from the inoculation than from COVID if not inoculated. This analysis is conservative because it ignores the inoculation-induced risk increases of later fatalities and shortened life spans from thrombosis, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, and other known vaccine-induced injuries and ignores the 90% or more decreases in risk of COVID-19 death if early, effective treatments were provided to all symptomatic high-risk persons. Mandates of COVID inoculations are ill-advised because the alleged vaccines result in higher death rates than COVID itself.

February 24, 2022

Dr. Josef Thoma Discusses the Inflammation of the Heart Caused by COVID Injections. Even if Myocarditis Heals, there is a Lifelong Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death, Diminished Stamina and Quality of Life

February 24, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [HERE] By now, everyone has heard that the COVID vaccines cause myocarditis, particularly in the young; however, the significance is downplayed in the media and even in officious medical publications. In the 11-minute video posted below, Josef Thoma MD/PhD, a general practitioner from Berlin, explains what a diagnosis of myocarditis really means: even if it has apparently healed, the patient is left with a lifelong risk of sudden cardiac death, and often also with diminished stamina and quality of life. Thoma presents some recent observations on autopsy materials from vaccine victims, made by professors of pathology Burkhardt and Lange, which drive home he serious nature of vaccine-induced myocarditis. He ends with an appeal to us to protect our children. Please take a look at this important video and share it.

February 24, 2022

CDC Refuses to publish data it has collected on booster effectiveness for 33 Million Americans aged 18-49 over fears it might show the Injections as ineffective

February 24, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [HERE] Two weeks ago the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published data about the effectiveness of boosters against COVID-19

The CDC failed to publish a tranche of their data, however – omitting the impact on those aged 18-49, who are least likely to benefit from boosters

The CDC are also being criticized for failing to publish their information about child hospitalization rates and comorbidities

A spokeswoman for the CDC said they were concerned that the data would be misinterpreted, pointing out that it was incomplete and not verified

Critics said that it was always better to publish the information rather than withhold, and allow scientists to analyze and explain what they could

February 24, 2022

Oklahoma AG declares medical boards cannot punish doctors for prescribing ivermectin

February 24, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [NN] Even though federal bureaucrats have arbitrarily decided that Americans should not have access to it, Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor says that doctors in his state, at least, are well within their professional rights to prescribe ivermectin to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) patients.

The same goes for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), another blacklisted drug that the federal overlords have decreed should never go into an American’s body because it might actually help to prevent a serious infection.

“The Attorney General’s office finds no legal basis for a state medical licensure board to discipline a licensed physician for exercising sound judgment and safely prescribing an FDA-approved drug – like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine – for the off-label purpose of treating a patient with COVID-19,” O’Connor’s office said in a February 8 statement.

“Healthcare professionals should have every tool available to combat COVID-19,” the statement goes on to read. “The Attorney General’s office neither condones nor condemns a specific course of treatment for COVID-19. Our office maintains that proper healthcare decisions are to be made between a patient and his or her physician, and the government should not interfere with their relationship.”

Both ivermectin and HCQ have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for many decades, by the way. Only recently have they been maligned by the government as “horse dewormer” and “aquarium cleaner,” respectively.

February 24, 2022

Boston Puppetician Mayor Ends Deadly Indoor COVID Injection Mandate but Has Uncontrollable Authority to Reinstate It Whenever She Wants

February 24, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [HERE] Boston Mayor Michelle Wu just lifted the city’s proof-of-COVID-19 vaccine mandate for indoor businesses, effective immediately. The city’s February 18 announcement was based on public health data, citing a recent drop in COVID-19 cases and hospitalization rates and improved hospital capacity.The mandate’s end means Boston businesses are no longer required to verify the vaccination status of people — patrons, employees, contractors, and all other individuals — before they enter indoor spaces.

Early End to Vaccine Mandate

The mandate, which took effect January 15, required proof of COVID-19 vaccination for entry into indoor dining, entertainment, recreation, and fitness establishments (we discussed the phases and requirements of the mandate in this December insight). It was intended to be a long-term strategy, rolled out in phases through May, to combat high rates of COVID-19 cases while preserving indoor gatherings. But fast-moving developments over the past month have altered those plans and relieved businesses of their compliance obligations when it comes to vaccination status.

Notably, the repeal follows news that the Massachusetts Appeals Court temporarily blocked Boston’s vaccine requirement for city employees on February 15. Several unions, including the Boston Police Superior Officers Federation, the Boston Police Detectives Benevolent Society, and the Boston Firefighters Union Local 718, challenged the policy in December as violating the city’s contract obligations and state collective bargaining law. In light of this decision, Boston cannot enforce the municipal employee vaccine mandate until the final resolution of the dispute. Mayor Wu’s administration expressed disappointment in the decision and stated it intends to review it carefully.

Mask Mandate Remains in Place…For Now

Boston’s indoor mask rule remains in place. However, Mayor Wu has indicated the Boston Public Health Commission will review this in the upcoming days.

February 22, 2022

Pandemic of the Unvaccinated or Plandemic of People Coerced and Tricked into Getting Injected w/Poisons? Canadian Data Shows Nearly 70% of Recent COVID Deaths, Hospitalizations were among VAXED people

February 22, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [NN] and [GR] Data from the Canadian government revealed that deaths caused by the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) mostly occurred among fully vaccinated people. With seven out of 10 fatalities happening among the fully vaccinated, Canada appears to be experiencing a “pandemic of the fully vaccinated.”

A report by LifeSiteNews looked at the numbers published in the government’s COVID-19 Daily Epidemiology Update. It scrutinized data between Jan. 16 and Jan. 22, where the surprising findings emerged.

During that time frame, 4,231 individuals were hospitalized across Canada. Hospitalized individuals who received two COVID-19 vaccine doses comprised 63 percent of the cases (2,656 people), while those injected with only one dose comprised nearly five percent (208 people).

Unvaccinated individuals who were hospitalized only numbered at 1,367, which was 32 percent of all hospitalizations. Those injected with the COVID-19 vaccine constituted a bigger portion of hospitalizations at 68 percent in all.

Canada also recorded 692 deaths due to COVID-19 during the same period. Just like hospitalizations, majority of COVID-19 fatalities between Jan. 16 and Jan. 22 were from those injected with at least one vaccine dose.

Of these 692 fatalities, 66 percent or 458 people were fully vaccinated, while three percent or 20 people received one vaccine dose. All in all, the vaccinated accounted for 69 percent of COVID-19 deaths. Unvaccinated Canadians only made up 31 percent of fatalities with 214.

The LifeSiteNews article pointed out that based on these numbers, the claim that COVID-19 injections can prevent 95 percent of hospitalizations and deaths appears to be false. “This does not make sense if the COVID-19 vaccines allegedly reduce the risk of death by 95 percent. But as seven in every 10 hospitalizations and deaths are among the vaccinated population in Canada, it’s becoming quite clear that the injections do not reduce the risk of death as alleged.”

Same pattern seen in Australia’s New South Wales

A similar observation was made in the eastern state of New South Wales (NSW) in Australia. Based on a report from its state government, about four of five COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths occurred mostly among those who were vaccinated. (Related: Report: 4 of every 5 COVID deaths in Australia are among VACCINATED people.)

An article by the Daily Expose shed light on this observation, using data from the Feb. 8 edition of the NSW Weekly COVID-19 Surveillance Report. The outlet looked at cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the state between Nov. 26, 2021 and Jan. 22.

In that span, NSW recorded a total of 540,330 COVID-19 cases. Vaccinated people amounted to 467,558 cases while the unvaccinated only comprised 72,772 cases. This equated to almost 87 percent of fully vaccinated residents contracting COVID-19, a stark contrast to only 13 percent of unvaccinated people who got infected.

Hospitalizations due to COVID-19 in NSW amounted to 6,475 – with 5,653 of those individuals sent to hospital being fully vaccinated. They comprised 87 percent of all hospitalizations, compared to only 13 percent or 822 unvaccinated individuals being hospitalized. Of the 421 deaths due to COVID-19 in the eastern Australian state, 323 people or 77 percent were vaccinated. Only 98 people or 23 percent of COVID deaths were unvaccinated.

Incidentally, both Canada and Australia are experiencing a surge in COVID-19 deaths – which appear to be driven by the vaccines themselves. COVID-19 deaths in Canada are at the same levels as the pandemic’s early days, when the vaccines had not been developed yet. Meanwhile, Australia’s COVID-19 fatalities peaked around the end of January and only started to drop recently.

February 22, 2022

UK Data Demonstrates that Adults who have Had 3 COVID Injections are 3 Times More Likely to be Infected with COVID than Adults who are not Vaccinated

February 22, 2022/ Tron Nick

From [HERE] Adults in England who have succumbed to three doses of the Covid-19 injections are now up to three times more likely to be infected with Covid-19 than adults who are not vaccinated, with the latest UK Health Security Agency showing the Covid-19 injections have a negative effectiveness among the triple vaccinated as low as minus-206%.

Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –

During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).

In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.

Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.

Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).

Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)

In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –

They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.

0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%

Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.

0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.

Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.

We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.

The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.

Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.

Table 10 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published 17th February 2022, shows the number of recorded infections by vaccination status between week 3 and week 6 of 2022.