Expert for the World Council for Health says 'It's Indisputable that COVID Injections are Dangerous and Ineffective but Big Pharma has Inexhaustible Resources and Control our Governments and Media'

From {HERE] Defending the cause of justice was centre of attention at the World Council for Health’s (WCH’s) virtual conference on understanding vaccine causation, on Saturday.

Experts from around the world in the field of medicine, law and science explored the advocacy routes in cases where there are adverse effects on the human body due to the administration of vaccines.

They attempted to draw causal conclusions on the link between vaccines given to the general public and a variety of negative health effects.

In introducing the conference, the WCH’s Dr. Mark Trozzi said it was important in terms of de-monopolising the information bubble around Covid-19 vaccines.

“For those of us who have done extensive research over the last two years, it is difficult to imagine that there is still a dispute regarding forced vaccine injections. It is my submission that they are both dangerous and ineffective,” said Trozzi.

“Big pharma and its allies, on the other hand, appear to have inexhaustible resources, especially given the record profits they have garnered from their Covid-19 vaccines. They have gained control over governments and institutions. The aim of the conference is to ensure there is not a monopoly on information, and that the law is equal to all, protect human rights and ensure institutional integrity.”

Advocate Sabelo Sibanda said there was an “unholy alliance” between governments and private corporations shutting down justice voices in the vaccine debate. 

He cited the example of the South African vaccine injury fund, where manufacturers required that the government protect them, at least in part, from liability and future lawsuits if the shots caused serious adverse effects.

“The unholy alliance between the government and the private sector is shutting the people down through the law of which in itself is designed to perpetuate unlawfulness,” Sibanda said.

“In the South African context, in April 2021, the government gave the nation approximately five days to comment on a vaccine compensation scheme proposal that was going to be made law. On proper analysis, the government was at a point of doing a mass roll-out of vaccines. In doing so, anyone who suffered injury or harm upon taking the vaccine is perceived to have recourse and therefore can be compensated, which sounds good on the surface. But, the scheme was to exonerate all the people who were in the thick of the decision-making in the administering of jabs against any public claims that have been occasioned by the jab.

“Also, the causation element, in the scheme, becomes problematic in law and science when the person who is injured must prove how the vaccine is to be blamed for injury, ultimately, closing them out while pretending to open the door for them to receive compensation. It makes the causation aspect impossible for them,” Sibanda added

He said schemes such as the Workman’s Compensation Fund were being used to advance the making of vaccines mandatory. 

“You find that even the Workman’s Compensation Fund has now been structured in such a manner that people who take the jab as a result of pressure from the employer may be compensated through that fund, which was never designed for that, it is now being tailored in that way because governments know that there is no law that gives them the authority to mandate the vaccination of anyone. They are subsequently using internal processes to lure employers to vaccinate people. This needs to be challenged as fraud and corruption,” said Sibanda.

The one-day marathon conference featured 18 global speakers.

Lawyer and convenor at CHO, Shabnam Mohamed, said research done by various organisations had shown the adverse effects of the vaccine, adding that the conference would help understand and prove vaccine causation.

“From research, victim and expert interviews, and our work at the World Council for Health, I realised that people are experiencing adverse effects from Covid-19 injections. Vaccine adverse effects reporting systems like VAERS, MHRA, Eudravigilance, and South Africa's SA VAERS show a range of adverse effects most people don't know about,” said Mohamed.

“Only 1-10% of adverse effects are reported. Many people do not connect the dots, don't bother reporting to governments, or are convinced that the adverse effect post-vaccine is unrelated. This means they do not seek the medical and psychological care they need, nor do they apply for compensation for negative effects, injury, or death.”

COVID Advisory Group Calls for Immediate Stop to COVID Injections for Kids Pending Urgent Review. Docs Claim the Shots Cause Death and are the Reason for Significantly Higher Amount of Excess Deaths

From [HERE]

To: Professor Wei, JCVI

Professor Sir Chris Whitty, CMO

Rt Hon Sajid Javid, Secretary of State, DHSC

cc Rt Hon Boris Johnson, Prime Minister

Dear Professor Wei, Professor Whitty and Mr Javid,

We wrote to you and also the MHRA last month regarding urgent investigation of the acknowledged increase in all-cause mortality in males aged 15-19, since the Pfizer covid vaccine rollout commenced in this age group in May 2021. ONS have acknowledged in the High Court in London, that the figure of 402 excess deaths is significantly higher than the previous 5 year average of 337 deaths. It has proved impossible to get the actual data.  Indeed, they stated it is probably an underestimate because of delays for coroners’ cases.  This equates to at least two additional teenage boys dying each week of the roll-out, possibly more.   It is thus very disappointing not to have received any response.

We are writing further to ask you to pause the vaccines for children while you undertake and publish an urgent review of the risk/benefit analysis. In August 2021 you concluded that there was no medical justification for vaccinating healthy 12-15-year-olds, with the authorisation based on an aim to reduce school closures. But this new safety signal and the impact of this uncertainty must affect your assessment of the risk to benefits.

Since that date, much has changed. The latest omicron variant has been shown to have a much lower risk of serious illness, hospitalisations and deaths than the previous alpha and delta variants circulating at the time of the decision.  This is true for childrenas well as adults, so given the extremely low risk for children in previous waves, any potential for benefit must surely have dwindled to virtually zero. Also, in your analysis you failed to take due regard to naturally-acquired immunity, now demonstrated and widely accepted to be superior to vaccine acquired immunity. Children have had high rates of infection throughout recent weeks with at least 80% now estimated to be immune. In addition, the efficacy of Pfizer against omicron compared to previous variants is reduced to the point where infection rates are now higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated removing any potential indirect benefit to immune-compromised family members and perversely creating an increased risk to contacts of the vaccinated.   

On the risks side of the balance sheet, we have further information regarding myocarditis, with an occurrence rate of 1/2680 young men in Hong Kong, where unlike the UK, this was sought systematically from the start of their rollout. Indeed they paused their second dose, just as the UK moved from one to two doses. Data from the US also confirm high rates of 1/9443 in males aged 16-17 after their second dose. We still have no follow-up data on the increasing number of children reported from the US with significant abnormalities on their cardiac MRI scans. We also have worrying information on all-cause mortality by vaccination status, which even from the original adult Pfizer trial showed a higher mortality for the vaccinated group. Side effects are higher when vaccinating those already immune. Other side effects such as increased blood clots will all be playing a part in this balance of risk. Non-fatal adverse events, particularly neurological, have the potential to blight the lives of affected children. 

The latest information from the CDC is very worrying, that of 4149 injured children, 100 (2.41%) had a serious adverse event, 15/4149 (0.36%) had increased troponin (12 confirmed to be myocarditis), 12/4149 (0.29%) had seizures, 2/4149 (0.048%) died (being evaluated). This in itself is a reason to review. To clarify, this is 4149 non-serious adverse events and 100 serious adverse events reported in a total of ~8 million doses to this age group which is 1 in 80,000 but we know that VAERS is a gross underestimate.

Furthermore, there is increasing evidence of impairment of immune function particularly following multiple doses of vaccine. Israelis now seeing serious illness and death after the fourth vaccine dose. There is also new bio-distribution data showing that mRNA and spike protein, far from being eliminated within a few days, are still persisting for 60 days or more. We have no knowledge of the long-term implications of vaccinating children against what is now acknowledged to be a very mild illness for them, indeed with 50% having no symptoms whatsoever. 

With the arrival of omicron, SARS-CoV-2 has moved from pandemic to endemic. If the current situation had existed six months ago, there would have been no case made for commencing routine rollout for healthy children. Now, it is proposed that even those testing positive for omicron do not need to isolate. If omicron is no risk to others, why vaccinate? The prospect now of widening the coverage to 5-11s would be all the more ludicrous. We should, like Norway & Sweden, make clear that vaccination for this age group is simply not necessary.  

The time has now come to pause and acknowledge that there is no emergency for children and that for them the balance of benefit and risk now clearly favours natural immunity. On that basis the routine programme could and should be halted. Failure to act will lay you open to liability for ongoing harms.

We would like to meet with you urgently, in order to support you in taking stock of all of the pertinent new and emerging data. 

Yours sincerely,

  • Dr Rosamond Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician, convener CCVAG (Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Group)

  • Professor Keith Willison, PhD, Professor of Chemical Biology, Imperial, London

  • Professor David Livermore, BSc, PhD, Professor of Medical Microbiology, University of East Anglia

  • Professor Anthony J Brookes, Professor of Genomics and Health Data Science, University of Leicester

  • Professor Richard Ennos, MA, PhD. Honorary Professorial Fellow, University of Edinburgh

  • Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Professor of Oncology, St Georges Hospital, London

  • Professor John Fairclough FRCS FFSEM retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon

  • Professor Norman Fenton, CEng, CMath, PhD, FBCS, MIET, Professor of Risk Information Management, Queen Mary University of London

  • Professor Anthony Fryer, PhD FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry

  • Lord Moonie, MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former parliamentary under-secretary of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine

  • Dr Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath

  • Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD. Retired Director of Safety Evaluation, Beecham Pharmaceuticals

  • 1980-1989 and Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery 1990-92 SmithKline Beecham

  • Dr Roland Salmon, MB BS, MRCGP, FFPH, Former Director, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre Wales

  • Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology

  • Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD. Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology

  • Katherine MacGilchrist, BSc (Hons), MSc, CEO/Systematic Review Director, Epidemica Ltd.

  • Mr James Royle, MBChB, FRCS, MMedEd, Colorectal surgeon

  • Dr Livia Tossici-Bolt, PhD, Clinical Scientist

  • Dr Elizabeth Evans MA(Cantab), MBBS, DRCOG, Retired Doctor

  • Dr Rohaan Seth, Bsc (hons), MBChB (hons), MRCGP, Retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Emma Brierly, MRCGP, General Practitioner

  • Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

  • Mr Malcolm Loudon, MBChB, MD, FRCSEd, FRCS(Gen Surg), MIHM,VR, Consultant Surgeon

  • Dr Alan Black, MBBS, MSc, DipPharmMed, retired pharmaceutical physician

  • Dr David Cartland, MBChB, BMedSci, General practitioner

  • Dr Peter Chan, BM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine practitioner

  • Dr Greta Mushet, MBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy

  • Dr Samuel McBride, MBBCh, BAO, BSc, MSc, MRCP (UK) FRCEM, FRCP (Edinburgh), NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics

  • Mr Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant ophthalmologist

  • Dr Branko Latinkic, BSc, PhD, Reader in Biosciences

  • Dr Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

  • Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

  • Mr Anthony Hinton, MBChB, FRCS, Consultant ENT surgeon, London

  • Dr Tanya Klymenko, PhD, FHEA, FIBMS, Senior lecturer in Biomedical Sciences

  • Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

  • Dr Carmen Wheatley, DPhil, Orthomolecular Oncology

  • Dr Charles Lane OBE, Molecular Biologist

  • Mr Angus Robertson BSc (Med. Sci.) MB ChB FRCS(Ed) FFSEM(UK) Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

  • Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB MRCGP Retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Jayne LM Donegan, MBBS, DRCOG, DCH, DFFP, MRCGP, General Practitioner

  • Dr David Critchley, BSc, PhD in Pharmacology, 32 years’ experience in Pharmaceutical R&D

  • Dr Keith Johnson, BA, D.Phil (Oxon), IP Consultant for Diagnostic Testing

  • Julie Annakin, RN, Immunisation Specialist Nurse

  • Rev Dr William J U Philip MB ChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow, formerly physician specialising in cardiology

  • Dr Jonathan Rogers MBChB (Bristol) MRCGP DRCOG Retired NHS General Practitioner

  • Dr Pauline Jones, MB BS, Retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Emma Brierly, MBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner

  • Dr Elizabeth Burton, MB ChB, Retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Franziska Meuschel, MD, ND, PhD, LFHom, BSEM, Nutritional, Environmental and Integrated Medicine

  • Dr Michael Bazlinton, MBCHB MRCGP DCH

  • Dr Holly Young, BSc, MBChB, MRCP, Consultant Palliative Care Medicine

  • Dr Julian Tomkinson, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner, GP Trainer, PCME

  • Dr David Bramble, MBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist

  • Dr Christina Peers, MBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Menopause Specialist

  • Dr Chris Newton, PhD, Biochemist working in immuno-metabolism

  • Dr Christopher Exley, PhD, FRSB, Bioinoganic Chemist

  • Dr Sarah Myhill, MBBS, Retired General Practitioner

  • Jessica Righart, Senior Critical Care Scientist

  • Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Angharad Powell, MBChB, General Practitioner

  • Dr Stephen Ting, MB CHB, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Physician

  • Mr Ahmad K Malik, FRCS (Tr & Orth), Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon

  • Dr Catherine Hatton, MBChB, General Practitioner

  • Dr Kulvinder S. Manik MBChB, MRCGP, MA(Cantab), LLM, Gray’s Inn

  • Dr Stefanie Williams, MD, Dermatologist

  • Kim Bull, Foundation Degree in Paramedic Science, Paramedic

  • Margaret Moss, MA (Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire

  • Dr Haleema Sheikh, MRCGP, General Practitioner

  • James Cook, NHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health (MPH)

  • Dr Jonathan Engler, MBChB, LlB (Hons), DipPharmMed

  • Dr Clare Craig, BMBCh, FRCPath, Pathologist

  • Dr David Bell, MBBS, PhD, FRCP(UK), Public Health Physician

  • Dr Ruth Wilde, MB BCh, MRCEM, AFMCP, Integrative & Functional Medicine Doctor

  • John Collis, RN, Specialist Nurse Practitioner

  • Dr Damien Downing, MBBS, MRSB, private physician

  • Mr Lasantha Wijesinghe, FRCS, Consultant Vascular Surgeon

  • Dr Claire Mottram, BSc Hons, MBChB, Doctor in General Practice

  • Dr Ali Haggett, Mental health community work, 3rd sector, former lecturer in the history of medicine

  • Dr Jenny Goodman, MA, MBChB, Ecological Medicine

  • Suzanne Tomkinson BSc MSc CSci FIBMS Senior Biomedical Scientist (Clinical Biochemistry)

  • Dr Felicity Lillingstone, IMD DHS PhD ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow

  • Dr Marco Chiesa, MD, FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist & Visiting Professor, UCL

  • Anna Phillips, RSCN, BSc Hons, Clinical Lead Trainer Clinical Systems (Paediatric Intensive Care)

  • Dr Jason Lester, MRCP, FRCR, Consultant Clinical Oncologist

  • Dr Sue de Lacy MBBS MRCGP AFMCP UK Integrative Medicine Doctor

  • Dr David Morris, MBChB, MRCP (UK), General Practitioner

  • Dr Andrew Isaac, MB BCh, Physician, retired

  • Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, General Practitioner

  • Dr Noel Thomas, MA, MBChB, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, Retired Doctor

  • Dr Fiona Martindale, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner in out of hours

  • Dr Zac Cox, BDS, LCPH, Dental Practitioner

  • Mr Colin Natali, BSc(hons) MBBS, FRCS (Orth), Consultant Spinal Surgeon

France, Italy, Germany and Spain Suspend Use of AstraZeneca COVID Injection Amid Blood Clot Fears

From [HERE] France, Italy, Germany and Spain suspended the rollout of the AstraZeneca-Oxford COVID-19 vaccine on Monday, March 15, amid reports of blood clots in people who received the shot.

French President Emmanuel Macron said during a press conference that the country decided to halt the use of the AstraZeneca-Oxford jab as a precaution. He added that the rollout will resume immediately once the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the European Union‘s regulatory authority for drug safety, deems the vaccine safe.

The German Ministry of Health also suspended vaccinations with the shot due to reports of blood clot cases emerging in connection with the vaccine. “The European Medicines Agency will decide whether and how the new findings will affect the approval of the vaccine,” the ministry said.

In Italy, thousands of doses in the northern province of Piedmont were seized on Sunday, March 14, after a man passed away hours after vaccination. Reuters reported that the 57-year-old man fell ill and died hours after receiving the jab, for unclear reasons.

“It is therefore important to ensure that continued administration of the drug throughout the country does not lead to further consequences (harmful or fatal) … until we are completely sure that (the man’s) death cannot be attributed to the above-mentioned inoculation,” prosecutor Teresa Angela Camelio said in a statement on Monday.

The Italian Medicines Agency confirmed that it temporarily stopped administering the vaccine as a precaution.

Also on Monday, Spain’s Health Minister Carolina Dias announced that the country will pause the use of the shot for two weeks as a precautionary measure. Prior to the announcement, only people under the age of 55 had been receiving the jab in Spain. (Related: Top vaccine scientist warns the world: HALT all covid-19 vaccinations immediately, or “uncontrollable monster” will be unleashed.)

AstraZeneca stated that there were 37 reports of blood clots out of more than 17 million people vaccinated in 28 European countries, including France, Germany, Italy and Spain. The pharmaceutical company added that there is no evidence that its COVID-19 vaccine carries an increased risk of blood clots.

The EMA also reassured people about the vaccine. “Many thousands of people develop blood clots annually in the European Union for different reasons,” the agency said, adding that the incidence in vaccinated people does not seem to be higher than what’s seen in the general population.

More countries suspend AstraZeneca vaccine rollout

Many other countries also decided to pause the rollout of the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine over safety concerns. The Netherlands announced on Sunday that the jab will not be used until at least March 29 as a precaution.

The move is expected to cause delays in rolling out shots in the country, which pre-ordered 12 million doses of the AstraZeneca-Oxford jab and scheduled around 290,000 injections in the next two weeks. But Dutch Health Minister Hugo de Jonge said that the government could not “allow any doubts about the vaccine.”

“We have to make sure everything is right, so it is wise to pause for now,” de Jonge added.

The decision is based on reports from Denmark and Norway of people who developed blood clots after receiving the shot. Danish officials announced on Sunday that a 60-year-old woman who recently got vaccinated with the jab had blood clots, a low blood platelet count and bleeding before dying.

Three health workers in Norway were also hospitalized for similar symptoms shortly after getting the vaccine, Norwegian health authorities said on Saturday.

Both Denmark and Norway have suspended the use of the shot.

Other countries that put off the rollout of the jab included Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg and Romania. Outside of Europe, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia and Thailand have also halted the rollout of the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Dr. José Luis Gettor says COVID Swab Tests Aren’t Plastic Sticks with a Cotton Tip; It's a Bundle of Hollow Nylon Fibers Containing a Military Developed Substance Called "DARPA Hydrogel"- A Poison

From [HERE] Dr. José Luis Gettor an emergency physician in Spain has warned the population about the damage caused by PCR test swabs.

“Swabs are a weapon. They contain a substance developed by military intelligence called ‘DARPA hydrogel’. And the little tip of the swab isn’t plain cotton. Those swabs come from China. It’s not a plastic stick with a cotton tip. It’s a bundle of hollow nylon fibres that contain, among other things, ethylene oxide.

“Ethylene oxide is a poison that’s retained by the hydrogel. But when the swab penetrates the mucosa at 30ºC, the hydrogel melts. And keep in mind that ethylene oxide boils at 10.4ºC. That’s why it’s so painful. That’s why it’s so stinging. Because once the hydrogel melts, ethylene oxide is released and generates an ulcer at the bottom of the rhino pharynx.

“Far from making a diagnosis, what they’re doing is much, much harm. So, please, people, stop getting swabbed,” Dr. Gettor warned.

Warnings from the United States

In late April 2021, Natural News published a series of nearly 40 microscope photos showing strange fibres, structures and even “hooks” that are embedded in the fibres of Covid nasal swabs and masks.  Mike Adams explained all the photos and how they were taken, using iodine stains and ultraviolet light in certain cases in his Situation Update video HERE.

Below is an example of one of the 40 microscope photos.  Natural News took a time-lapse photo series and aggregated the photos to reveal strange sparkles coming off the synthetic swab strands when exposed to UV light:

Health Ranger posts new microscopy photos of covid swabs, covid masks and mysterious red and blue fibres, 25 April 2021

Warnings from Slovakia

In May 2021 a Slovakian report revealed that “covid tests” are contaminated with nanotech hydrogels and lithium. Lithium is used in the lipid compound coating nanobots which are inserted into the hydrogels for ballistic delivery of biological agents.

Mark Sexton, a retired UK police officer, went public with the Slovakian report knowing full-well that mainstream media would not touch the story. At the time, Sexton also pleaded with the public to take the PCR “test kits” to a local police station and remove the so-called “tests” from circulation at once.

Click on the image below to watch the video on Brand New Tube.

Report from Slovakia: PCR Tests are contaminated and therefore an act of bioterrorism, 18 May 2021 (13 mins)

Warnings from Cyprus

In October 2021, a union in Cyprus, Isotita, representing the rights of public-sector workers called for the suspension of rapid tests for the coronavirus, after media reports showed a swab contained multiple times the permissible trace level of ethylene oxide.

Citing the European Chemicals Agency, the union said ethylene oxide – a substance used to coat and sterilise PCR and rapid test nasal swabs – is toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic even when inhaled.

The use of EO is banned in food production in the EU. Under EU Regulation No. 2015/868, the maximum residue level for the sum (of ethylene oxide and the conversion product 2-chloroethanol), referred to as ethylene oxide, has been specified at 0.05 mg/kg.

Isotita’s concerns come after a report aired two days before on media channel, Pronews TV, about a rapid test swab found to contain 0.36 mg/kg of ethylene oxide.

Warnings from the United Kingdom

More recently, concerns have been expressed by Mike Watson. The Telegram channel for Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar shared a post from Watson on 15 January 2022 which reads:

ETHYLENE OXIDE

Check the swab packet and you will find letters EO in a black square box.

I work on refineries with “Ethylene Oxide” catalyst reactors and wear full breathing apparatus because it’s a major carcinogen.

One swab in the nose and back of the throat forces EO ppm into your mucus membrane where unknown ppm remains in the body.

However multiple swabs, every few days over time, increases one’s critical ppm exposure levels that exponentially increases cancer risk, from now until one’s immune system naturally deteriorates with age (this goes with any carcinogen we put into our bodies e.g., smoking) BUT EO massively increases cancer risk to all in medical and other industries (jabbed or not) who are forced to test by employers, every 3 days (ca.120 x per year!!) Their PPM exposure level is through the roof.

http://www.msds-al.co.uk/assets/file_assets/Ethylene_oxide.pdf

There is no discernible, empirically measured benefit between a swab up the nose/throat -V- Saliva test to measure results of an already flawed PCR method.

Current MSDS (material safety data sheet) / COSHH (care of substances hazardous to health) uses an average mean PPM value, typically based on double blind exposure trials of a few hundred people who naturally would all have varying health conditions, done over 5 years before FDA approval.

By exposing billions of people to ever increasing EO exposure levels by forced swabbing will only show increased cancer levels (hopefully not) between now and 5/10 years. Providing a non-suppressed, global process can be implemented which can accurately follow up, measure, monitor and record data that is then shared with a decentralised, non-corrupt, “trust less” database management entity. Thinking specifically blockchain!

That said ALARA (as low as reasonably acceptable) shouldn’t really come into it. Should swabs be deemed absolutely necessary (many countries are now abandoning this entire protocol and living with it all) I’d recommend to Senate, should you get another opportunity, that all such tests revert to saliva based and not nasal/throat swabs, which to most is extremely uncomfortable, extremely stressful and wilfully and unethically inserts a known carcinogen more times than has ever been tested into the bodies of all ages! Why, when saliva works just as well!

Govt/Media Continue to Lie About "Safe" "Vaccines" While CDC's Own Underreported Data Shows COVID Injections Have Caused: 3,573 Fetal Deaths in Pregnant Woman and 1,103,893 Injuries and 23,615 Deaths

From [HERE] The U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was updated this past Friday, February 11, 2022, and it is now reporting that there have been 1,103,893 cases of injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines since December of 2020, when the FDA issued emergency use authorizations for the COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)

The data included a total of 23,615 reports of deaths — an increase of 466 over the previous week — and 188,135 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,824 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 753,482 adverse events, including 10,747 deaths and 70,746 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 4, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS. [MORE]

By way of contrast, there were 918,856 cases of injuries and deaths following all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30+ years, from 1990 through November of 2020. (Source.)

So there have been more injuries and deaths recorded in VAERS during the past 14 months following COVID-19 vaccines, than there were for the previous 30+ years combined following all vaccines recorded in VAERS.

Fetal Deaths Increase by 1,867% Following COVID-19 VaccinesThis most recent update of VAERS shows that there have now been 3,573 fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)

To arrive at the number of fetal deaths recorded in VAERS I had to test several different searches on listed “symptoms” and then see if the search results documented fetal deaths, since there is no demographic for “fetal deaths.”

The following is the current list of “symptoms” in VAERS that reveals fetal deaths:

  • Aborted pregnancy

  • Abortion

  • Abortion complete

  • Abortion complicated

  • Abortion early

  • Abortion incomplete

  • Abortion induced

  • Abortion induced incomplete

  • Abortion late

  • Abortion missed

  • Abortion of ectopic pregnancy

  • Abortion spontaneous

  • Abortion spontaneous complete

  • Abortion spontaneous incomplete

  • Ectopic pregnancy

  • Ectopic pregnancy termination

  • Ectopic pregnancy with contraceptive device

  • Foetal cardiac arrest

  • Foetal death

  • Premature baby death

  • Premature delivery

  • Ruptured ectopic pregnancy

  • Stillbirth

This list may not be exhaustive. But if we use the exact same search using these symptoms, we can compare “apples to apples” in examining fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines as compared to fetal deaths following all non-COVID vaccines.

Using this search for all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30+ years before the COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorization in December of 2020, we find 2,519 fetal deaths, the vast majority of which followed vaccines produced by Merck, which would include the Gardasil vaccines. (Source.)

Here are the yearly averages:

  • 82 fetal deaths per year following non-COVID vaccines

  • 3063 fetal deaths per year following COVID-19 vaccines

I arrived at these averages by taking the total number of fetal deaths following non-COVID vaccines and divided by 31, and for the fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines I divided by 14 to get the monthly average, and then multiplied by 12.

To get a more accurate percentage of how many more fetal deaths are following the COVID-19 vaccines than all other FDA approved vaccines, we have to also factor in the number of doses administered.

The U.S. Government’s Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) complies data on the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and a report that they published on 12/01/2021 shows that there were over 4 billion (4,092,757,049) doses of vaccines administered in the United States between 1/01/2006 through 12/31/2019, a year before the COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorizations. (Source.)

Using that date range I repeated the exact same search for fetal deaths recorded in VAERS during that time, and VAERS reports 1,369 deaths from among those 4 billion+ doses administered between 1/01/2006 through 12/31/2019. (Source.)

The CDC reported this past week that there have been 543 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered as of February 3, 2022. (Source.)

So from 2006 through 2019, there was 1 fetal death recorded in VAERS for every 2,989,596 doses of vaccines administered.

From December, 2020 through February 4, 2022, there has been 1 fetal death recorded in VAERS for ever 151,973 doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered.

That’s a 1,867% increase of fetal deaths recorded in VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines.

I’ve run out of superlatives to use in the English language to describe this. And this is just using the U.S. Government’s own reported statistics, without even trying to figure out what the unreported factor is.

Here are two recent stories from young mothers who lost their unborn babies just after receiving a second COVID-19 vaccine. Perhaps their words and their experiences, which obviously represent, at least, many thousands of others, can better communicate just how truly horrible this is.

To Silence Speech Puppetician Orders Disobedient Truckers to Obey Authority or Go to Jail [Revealing the True Basis of All Government Regardless of Ostensible Form; the Initiation of Force/Coercion]

The Fake Vaccines are Bioweapons that are Designed for Depopulation and Greater Control Over Populations in a Free Range Prison. ALL Individuals in Government, Big Tech, Big-Pharma, Medicine, Education Institutions and Dependent Media promoting COVID injections are the permanent enemies of humanity, complicit with genocide and the destruction of freedom. Said representatives of authority have drawn a line in the sand; they don’t care if you know that they are trying to kill you. Hopefully, they will soon lose their right to to sleep well at night.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

authority - (from the root word author)—which means to originate. Only you have authority over your Self...anything else. i.e.. to accept any authority external to one's Self once of discriminating age, is the very definition of irresponsibility. There is no freedom in the presence of so-called authority, i.e. outside of one's Self and Self-Nature.) 2) the handmaiden of autonomy. 3) internal power. 4) Nommo. All authority, like the kingdom of heaven, is within. Be an authority unto yourself as all authority should come from your own authentic experience—that is the only source or wellspring of authority. Authority is the means by which society uses to control its population. Ignoring or belittling authority does not mean people are either good or bad, whether or not they are punished for their insubordination. Healthy people do not need authority figures to tell them what to do, but only the knowledge of themselves. You can teach a parrot to quote from either scripture or statute, but a parrot is not an authority. Only by you becoming truth do you have authority to speak—and then only on your behalf (i.e., your inner truth), your innerstanding. An authority is an eyewitness or an I-witness. and to picture the dynamic truth no proofs or negatives are needed nor possible—as reality isn't certain or static. When you are dead to sin and Alive to the God-Self-Divine, you become the Buddha, the Christ, the true authority within. (See: Obedience, Predictive Programming. Autonomy, Anarchy, Nommo, Sin, Alive. Authentic, Responsitivity, Dharma, Follower, Spontaneity, Conditioning, Conditions, Freedom & Responsibility) [MORE]

Freedomination - the liberty to choose the commitments, ideologies, covenants, contracts, judgments, and relationships that bind or restrain you within the Matrix. (See: The Matrix, Phfreedom, Freedom & Liberty)

"Government" - Latinized Greek ("Gubematlo" = control; and from the Latin "menre" = mind; "The control of the mind." 2) an abstraction (hoax) created for the sole purpose of making theft respectable and mind-control acceptable. 3) the societal manifestation of mass individual psychological reversal, i.e., the statutes, regulations, agencies, and agents (so-called bureaucrats) needed to threaten and shrink one's comfort zone. 4) a granfalloon. 5) a fiction supported by those who kill on command and steal on demand under the guise of "protecting" their victims.

The outworking of history consistently demonstrates that government will, in spite of the Bill of Rights, arrogate all power to itself eventually, if the people don't act to prevent it. You have rights alright, just don't get caught exercising them, O.K.? "Government" is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else.

Official "government" is disorganized, politicized; centralized; canonized and revered initiation of force, but it is no less initiation of force and coercion than any unofficial singular action of the same offensive or violent content.

"Government" is an abstract infinite entity acting as a possessive noun. There is not a single line in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any governmental document that states that a natural person will be left alone as long as she or he does not impose upon another or others.

By commission and omission, all official decrees make clear that a human is regarded as owned property or resource of the god called "Corporate State." It is controlling the lives, energy and property of others that requires coercive force and this is its sole function. Endorsing the lie of an imagined abstract collective interest supports the very concept that gives rise to all covert and overt oppression. [MORE]

Force - the source or sources of all possible actions of the particles or materials of the universe(s). 2) the manipulation of a man or woman in disregard of its own volition or nature. 3) the use of an outside physical coercion of any kind by one or more humanoids against another or others in order to make him/her or them obedient and compliant to higher or their will. 4) the basis of all social evils and can only be used in the sense of attack not defense. 5) You must! In the way I say! 6) the social disease. "Force (coercion) and fraud are the foundation of all social systems and the source of the aroma which they exhale." --Max Nomad. "Force" operates to remove personal volition from opportunity to act or not act. Someone '`makes" you behave in a certain way by threatening to injure or enslave you, someone you love, or something you prize, if you do not behave in that way. Force operates to obtain an intended behavior when the forced party would otherwise have exhibited a different behavior. Punishment, pain, suffering, and discomfort characterize force. Unfortunately, governments only function by force. Once established, they put laws into effect by threatening persecution, imprisonment, fine, or death against all who don't comply with those laws--including the use of the force continuum. (See: Autonomy, Fiction, Fraud, Corporate State, Freedom, Forgery, Authority, Violence, Coercion, Deception, Language, Punishment, Capital Punishment, Gerp & Government)

Tyrants Own the Minds of Its Victims thru Their Assent to Certain Concepts [vaccine, COVID case, COVID death, variant, positive test] which Gives Rise to Coercive Control [The COVID Tyrant Paradigm]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

tyrant-paradigm - the assertion or assent to certain concepts, idea, memes, words, patterns of thinking, attitudes, beliefs, and convictions that give rise to coercive political systems. It includes the notion that the tyrants (territorial gangsters) are so omniscient and omnipotent that they can prevent natural persons from living free. The words that constitute the tyrant paradigm are enemy outposts in your mind. Tyrants "own" the minds of their oppressed victims to the extent that victims hold contents of the tyrant-paradigm in the minds. The tyrant-paradigm consists of the "construction of systematic thought" and "the systematic pattems of thought" that give rise to coercive political systems. (See: The OCTOCON, Territorial Gangsters & Reactions)

Tyrants - there are none; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind-control and word-conditioning control? "Find out the exact amount of injustice any people accept, and you will find out the exact amount of injustice they receive." -Freddy D. "The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it." -John Jay, Castilian Days II, 1872. (See: Tyranny, Terms, "The Law," Dictatorship, Corporate State & Fascism)

democracy - a commercial form of "government" (exploitation and theft via force, deception and involuntary participation) of the mob, by the mob, and/or the mob, i.e., Mob-Rule. 2) a guise rubber stamping of an alternative royalty into overruling power. 3) the worst possible form of government because the majority rules whether they be good, evil, or misled by a minority. 4) slavery of the people, by the people, for the people. 5) equality achieved through force. 6) a system where only the majority need to befooled. 7) advertised equality. 8) a parody of a free society that only ethical anarchism or voluntaryism can usher into existence.

"Democracy has always been seen (and is still seen today) as equality of rights (granted privileges), not conditions. To the hypothetical equality of rights there has always corresponded a substantial inequality of conditions. And instead of being related to the nature of their individuality, differences between people have always been those marked by the different basic conditions they live in as they struggle against the suffocating artificial divisions imposed on them by power." —Alfred M. Bonanno. Democracy is a euphonious term created mainly to serve as sheepskin for Leviathan, Doggy and the Crimethlnc. All-Stars. 9) Dictatorship camouflaged as freedom 10) a whitewashed plutocracy with a pastel eggshell finish. Democracy, next to "monetized debt," and direct taxation (on labor) is the biggest con-game perpetrated on a population. Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain and sustain power over people is to assure the people that they are ruling themselves. Once they believe that lie, they make wonderfully submissive and self-maintained slaves.

"There are those who maintain that at bottom what is called democracy, (whenever and wherever it is supposed to have existed), is merely the mask for the rule of capitalist and/or bureaucratic minorities over an ignorant and deceived majority whose franchise signifies only the right to choose or tc change its masters." -Max Nomad. As long as mob rule is allowed through secret ballots, operational and organizational transparency will evade us and vice (vested interests controlling economies) will continue to forsake us and break us. Democracy is a powerful synthetic ideology of recuperation. Democracy goes against the emancipation of desire. Democracy allows for A to band together with B (majority rule) to rip off C. Democracy and citizenship are the chains that filter your pursuit of happiness and the happiness in your pursuit. Democracy in America has been checked and balanced, or gone unchecked and unbalanced—depending on one's indoctrination—to the point (extent) of collapse. Only the improper is left to prop it up aright as if it were still standing on its own ideological efficacy and edifice. "Democracy (the political ideal) is just a dream, it has not happened anywhere, it cannot happen. And wherever it happens (in practice), it creates trouble, the medicine proves more dangerous than the disease itself." -OSHO. "If the people of a democracy are allowed to do so, they will vote away freedoms that are essential to that democracy." -Snell Putney. As H.L. Mencken so aptly observed, "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard." In a democracy, scum rises to the top; otherwise it starts there. Democracy is a specific instance of stationary rogue State power. Under the rubric of democracy, justice can be attained only by begging, buying, milking and taking. [MORE]

Public Input/Review Excluded as DoGooder Boston Mayor Used Uncontrollable Emergency Authority to Mandate Deadly COVID Injections, Destroying Rights to Bodily Autonomy. Citizens Blow Up Fake Town Hall

From [InfoWars} Boston Mayor Michelle Wu’s social media town hall got highjacked this week by fed-up city residents and labor unions fuming over the new mayor’s strident vaccine and mask mandates – even as other cities and states around the US are loosening pandemic restrictions.

Wu, who took office just three months ago, upset many of her constituents with her vaccine passports and mandates for indoor dining, bars, businesses, schools, and city workers. 

She announced she does not plan to lift mask mandates for public schools at the end of February.

The mandate, which Wu announced in December and came into effect late last month, has been highly controversial sparking teachers union strikes, complaints from restaurants and local businesses, and unrest among Bostonians.  

Some of those angry Beantowners expressed their frustrations this week when Wu held an social media town hall on InstagramLive – and welcomed comments from her constituents, telling them ‘I will answer any questions that you have.’

‘Why do you hate kids? Teachers? Cops? Firemen?’ one commenter immediately demanded to know. 

‘Please stop the indoor vaccine requirement mandate,’ wrote another. ‘It does nothing but discriminate and rob people of freedom.’

Despite her promise to answer questions, negative queries were ignored. 

Wu instead cooed about a tiger emoji that someone posted in honor of the Chinese Lunar New Year.

Do You Live Near a Cell Tower? Small Town Threatens Verizon to Cease-and-Desist. Residents ill After 5G Activation. Radiation Causes Brain Problems, DNA Damage, Cancer, Alzheimers, infertility,

From [CHD] In what may be the first such move by a city health department, members of the Pittsfield, Massachusetts Board of Health on Feb. 2 voted unanimously to issue a cease-and-desist order to Verizon if the company refuses to discuss removing or relocating a cell tower residents said is the source of multiple illnesses.

The order would require Verizon to turn off the tower unless it commits to resolving issues raised by residents of the Berkshire Mountains community.

Following the vote, Verizon told WAMC Northeast Public Radio:

“Verizon telecommunications equipment and networks comply with all health and safety standards established by the FCC [Federal Communications Commission]. We have met on multiple occasions with the Pittsfield Health Department and members of the community to address their concerns with this site. All of Verizon’s equipment at the Pittsfield tower operates well under the FCC’s conservative limits, as confirmed by the city’s own RF study from last summer.”

Susan Foster, a medical writer who organized a SPECT brain scan pilot study of California firefighters in 2004, said Verizon and other telecom giants, championed by the FCC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, hide behind the illusion that their cell towers produce only a small fraction of what the FCC allows.

“The truth is the FCC set those limits extraordinarily high for several purposes, and one is to offer the illusion of safety,” Foster said.

She added:

“Every time one of the carriers wants to come in and place a cell tower near your child’s school or in the midst of a residential neighborhood, telecom representatives come before a local planning board and present carefully orchestrated routines in which they say, ‘The cell tower we are proposing for this site measures at 1/1000 of what the FCC allows.’

“Of course, that sounds reassuring. What they don’t tell you is that thousands of studies by some of the world’s leading physicians and scientists have found radio-frequency radiation is linked to acoustic neuromas and glioblastomas, oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, male infertility and electrosensitivity (EHS) at a small fraction of what the FCC allows.”

In fact, in December 2019, Verizon warned investors, in documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, that it could be the target of litigation that could require the company to pay significant damages or settlements:

“[O]ur wireless business also faces personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits relating to alleged health effects of wireless phones or radio-frequency transmitters. We may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay significant awards or settlements.”

Foster has studied the health impact of wireless technology for nearly two decades. She organized a firefighters pilot study at a small station in central California where she chronicled previously healthy firefighters suffering cognitive impairment to the point they got lost responding to 911 calls in the same town they grew up in.

The study, published in 2004, was conducted by Gunnar Heuser, M.D., Ph.D., then of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. It found brain abnormalities inconsistent with the profile of previously strong, healthy men in the prime of life.

The study served as the basis for state and national lobbying on the part of the firefighters which resulted most recently in an exemption to 5G towers on fire stations throughout the state of California — the first such exemption in the world.

“If the firefighters, the strongest of the strong among us, sustained brain damage at 1/1000 of what the FCC allows, and this was 2G when we did the study in 2004, what are we doing to pregnant women, developing children, the immunocompromised, the elderly and to society as a whole?” Foster asked.

Foster said the symptoms she found in firefighters correlate with the symptoms reported by Pittsfield residents.

Pittsfield residents have been reporting symptoms to city leaders and the Board of Health for at least 18 months.

For some, the symptoms appeared immediately after the August 2020 activation of the cell tower.

For others, the headaches, nausea, vomiting, rashes, vertigo and foggy thinking — and in some cases, more severe medical conditions — came on in the days, weeks and months later.

Residents invited medical and scientific experts to speak to city officials. Some residents sold their homes and left Pittsfield because they were no longer able to live with the radiation raining down on them. Others lived in their cars or moved in with relatives.

Courtney Gilardi, whose family moved to a small cottage several miles away, has been active in the fight against the 115-ft Verizon tower ever since it was lowered into a clearing of trees in the midst of her neighborhood.

Gilardi and her 13-year-old daughter spoke at the recent Pittsfield Board of Health meeting, along with eight of their neighbors.

The two also testified before a subcommittee of the Massachusetts legislature as lawmakers were considering establishing a 5G commission patterned after that of neighboring New Hampshire.

Foster called Pittsfield a microcosm of the country.

“We are literally trapped in a web of laws and FCC directives that take away our rights when it comes to fighting these towers,” Foster said.

One year after Verizon activated the tower in Pittsfield, a victory in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals found the FCC’s regulatory limits were “arbitrary and capricious.”

In a case brought by Children’s Health Defense and Environmental Health Trust, the court ruled on Aug. 13, 2021, that the FCC failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its current guidelines adequately protect against the harmful effects of exposure to radio frequency radiation.

Foster said there’s growing outrage at the encroachment of cell towers into every corner of people’s lives including outside their children’s bedroom windows.

With 5G beaming from hundreds of thousands of satellites orbiting Earth, and global petitions by scientists and physicians calling for a halt to the 5G rollout until it can be studied for health effects, the world might be rooting for Pittsfield to win its battle against Verizon, she said.

RichCraft: AstraZeneca Sees $4B in COVID Sales [Sheeple Continue to Believe Shots are "Free" and Offered by Do-Gooders as a Public Service. Death $hots are Only Free of All Liability for Harm Caused]

From [HERE] AstraZeneca recorded a big jump in revenue on Thursday as it begins to take a profit from its coronavirus vaccine for the first time.

The company recorded full-year revenues of $37.4 billion, an increase of 38% from the year before at constant exchange rates. Part of the boost came from $4 billion in sales of its COVID-19 vaccine, developed with the University of Oxford.

Despite rising revenue, AstraZeneca reported a pre-tax loss of $265 million due to costs from its purchase of U.S. drug company Alexion Pharmaceuticals and new drug research.

The Anglo-Swedish drugmaker said in November it would begin to take a “modest” profit from the COVID-19 shot, which it had been providing “at cost” — around $2 to $3 —following an agreement with Oxford. Other COVID-19 vaccine producers, such as Pfizer and Moderna, have been booking hefty profits on their shots all along.

In the three months to September, the company said revenue jumped by about 50%, to a record $9.9 billion. The increase was due to sales of more than $1 billion in COVID-19 vaccines and the inclusion for the first time of some $1.3 billion worth of revenue from its rare disease business unit following the recent acquisition of Alexion. [MORE]

Unelected Rulers at FDA Postpone 2/15 Meeting to Decide Whether to Give Genocidal COVID Injections to Infants and Toddlers After Pfizer Says Not Enough Data

From [CHD] Pfizer today said it will delay applying for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of its COVID vaccine for infants and children 6 months to 4 years old stating there’s not enough data on the efficiency of a third dose.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in response postponed a meeting that had been scheduled for Feb. 15 to review Pfizer’s application for the pediatric vaccine.

Two separate clinical trials of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine for the younger age group are in progress: one involving children between the ages of 6 months to 2 years old, the other involving children between ages 2 and 4.

CNBC last month reported two shots did not induce an adequate immune response in children 2 to 4 years old in Pfizer’s clinical trials, leading Dr. Anthony Fauci to predict children in that age group would need a three-dose regimen of the vaccine.

In what the New York Times described as a “highly unusual move,” the FDA urged Pfizer to apply for EUA of the vaccine, even though two doses failed to produce the hoped-for immune responseamong children 2 to 4 years old and the vaccine maker did not yet have data on the efficacy of a third shot.

Pfizer had planned to submit its application to the FDA next week, then provide additional data in the coming weeks on a third dose, NBC reported.

The FDA did not say when the Feb. 15 meeting would be rescheduled, and Pfizer did not indicate when it would submit the application. [MORE]

US Government data reveals the COVID fake Vaccines are over 49 times deadlier than the Flu Vaccines per No. of doses administered

From [HERE] The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) hosted by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) contains historical data on adverse reactions reported against every vaccine that has been administered in the United States of America. 

A quick search of the CDC VAERS database on the number of adverse events reported against the Covid-19 injections since they were first rolled out in the USA, reveals that between December 2020 and 28th Jan 2022, a total of 743,179 adverse event reports were made in just 1 year and 2 months. 

Performing a similar search of the VAERS database on the number of adverse events reported against the Flu vaccines, reveals that between 2008 and 2020 there were a total of just 137,533 adverse events reports were made in a period of 13 years. 

Taking these numbers at face value you could assume that the Covid-19 injection have proven to be at least 5.4 times more harmful than the Flu vaccines. But if you were to then make this claim you would most likely be shot down with cries of “yes but hundreds of millions of people have been given the Covid-19 vaccine at once so this is normal and just a tiny percentage”. 

So we decided to dig into the number of Flu vaccines administered in the USA between 2008 and 2020, and the number of Covid-19 vaccines administered in the USA between Dec 2020 and 28th Jan 2022, and work out how harmful each vaccine has really proven to be, to see if the horrendous number of adverse reactions reported to the Covid-19 vaccines are in line with the expected norm for other vaccines. 

We should however mention that the following numbers we are about to present to you for the Flu vaccines are actually overly generous and paint the flu vaccine in a slightly more harmful light than what it has actually proven to be. 

This is because we have extracted the number of adverse reactions reported against the flu vaccines from the very beginning of 2008 to the very end of 2020, but the number of doses of Flu vaccine administered only includes part of 2008 and part of 2020 due to the CDC data only telling us the number of doses administered in a Flu season rather than a full year. 

The other factor that paints the flu vaccines in a slightly more harmful light is that they are generally only administered to young children, the elderly, pregnant women, and the vulnerable, and this demographic contains a high proportion of people who are likely to suffer ailments or die in general. Whereas the Covid-19 injections have been offered to every single person over the age of 5 in America. 

The following chart shows the total number of flu vaccine doses administered in 13 full flu seasons all the way from the 2008/2009 flu season to the 2019-2020 flu season. The data has been extracted from the CDC info found here.

COVID fake “vaccines" are causing micro blood clots in millions… and there’s no medical solution

From [HERE] The millions of health impacts being reported in conjunction with Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” have one common link: microscopic blood clots triggered by spike proteins.

It is now known that the jabs damage blood vessels throughout the body. They are far worse, in fact, than covid itself.

While the full extent of what these spike proteins and micro blood clots do is not yet fully known, it is clear that they cause nothing but harm.

“Blood clots that occur in the tiniest blood vessels are referred to as microvascular thromboses and reduce blood flow,” reported LifeSiteNews. “The clinical symptoms depend on the organs that are most strongly affected.”

The problem with micro blood clotting is that it is not visible to the naked eye or even to normal scans. And yet the damage it causes is prolific.

When pumped into the lungs, for instance, spike protein-induced micro blood clotting can lead to pulmonary embolisms. If they reach the brain, confusion or stroke can ensue.

“If they lodge in the heart, they can cause a heart attack or promote inflammation,” LifeSiteNews added. (Related: One possible solution for spike protein damage is broccoli sprouts.)

“If they lodge in the smaller blood vessels that provide oxygen to the hands or feet, they can cause those limbs to go numb and possibly require amputation. Clots in other organs, such as the liver or the kidneys, could cause those organs to fail.”

Covid “vaccine” spike proteins were designed to destroy the human body

Since spike proteins can lodge almost anywhere in the body, the resulting damage can take many forms. This explains why the “fully vaccinated” are developing all sorts of health problems, some of them seemingly unrelated.

As of this writing, more than one million reports of covid jab-caused adverse events have been reported to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). Hundreds of thousands of deaths have also been reported.

Medical expert Dr. Peter McCullough has repeatedly warned about micro clots, only to be ignored by the establishment. He stated early on in the plandemic that the spike protein itself is causing coagulation and blood clotting, though few listened.

Spike protein-induced coagulation is unique in that it causes red blood cells to stick together, as well as platelets. This is a very different type of blood clotting that one would expect to see with major blood clots in the arteries and veins.

Canadian doctor Charles Hoffe went public last summer with evidence showing that 62 percent of his hundreds of vaccinated patients showed high numbers on the d-dimer test, suggesting the presence of micro blood clots.

“A d-dimer test measures the amount of degraded fibrin in the blood,” LifeSiteNewsexplains.

On top of releasing this finding, Hoffe warned that mRNA (messenger RNA) injections, which program the body to produce its own spike proteins, would “kill most people through heart failure,” either immediately or later on down the road.

In the next few years, Hoffe says, nearly everyone who got stabbed with an mRNA needle will die from heart failure. Time will tell if his assessment comes to fruition.

Anyone who took the mRNA shot from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna will eventually, if they have not already, see their capillaries get plugged up. At some point, this will result in a major cardiovascular event possibly leading to death.

“In plain language, he said that the mRNA shots are programmed to turn a person’s body into a spike protein ‘factory,’ and that over time these mass-produced spike proteins cause progressive blood clotting.”

Heart Problems After COVID Are Much Worse for the Vaccinated, Nature Study Shows – But It’s Hidden in the Appendix

From [HERE] Nature published a comprehensive study this week on cardiovascular risk including a total of over 11 million patients that has made a few headlines. The aim was to identify the cause of increased cardiac pathology. It should have been a very simple study comparing four groups:

  1. Not infected and never vaccinated

  2. Not infected and vaccinated

  3. Infected but not vaccinated

  4. Infected and vaccinated

It is hard to believe the authors did not look at these groups, but whatever was found when comparing them remains a mystery.

Instead, the following groups were compared:

  1. Not infected and never vaccinated data from 2017

  2. Not infected, including vaccinated and not vaccinated

  3. Infected but not vaccinated

  4. Infected with vaccinated people included but using modelled adjustments

When studies with huge datasets use modelling and fail to share data prior to their adjustments alarm bells should start ringing. Therefore, I took a deeper dive to see what else was questionable.

There were serious biases in the paper which need addressing but first let’s look at the critical question of myocarditis (heart inflammation).

Because of the known risk of myocarditis from vaccination it is worth looking particularly closely at the data presented on this. Oddly, for the issue of the day, the data on myocarditis was all hidden in the supplementary appendix to the paper.

The risk of myocarditis appears to be an autoimmune (the immune system attacking the heart after interaction with the spike protein) rather than direct damage by the virus/vaccine spike protein. Therefore, myocarditis could result from the virus or the vaccine. The key question that needs answering is whether vaccination protects or enhances the risk from the virus.

The authors report 370 per million risk of myocarditis after Covid infection in the unvaccinated. The contemporary control rate was 70 per million and the historic one was 40 per million. What was wrong with the contemporary controls?

They made it clear they removed those who had been vaccinated from the calculation in the Covid arm but they did not state they did this for the control arm. Did vaccination lead to a 30 per million increase in myocarditis in the control arm? Given the cohort appears to be old and we know myocarditis incidence is worse in the young a one in 30,000 incidence is significant.

What about those who were vaccinated and had Covid? Once vaccination (and modelling) were included, the rate rose to 500 per million. It is not entirely clear whether supplementary Table 22 excludes those who were not vaccinated, but given that it does not state the unvaccinated were excluded from this data it is fair to assume the 500 per million relates to the whole population.

Given the higher risk of myocarditis after vaccination one might wonder whether this study showed protection from infection due to vaccination, as this would lower risk from the virus. Hidden in the legends of the supplementary tables the authors reveal that 62% of the Covid patients had been vaccinated compared to 56% of the non-infected controls (not a great advert for vaccine effectiveness against infection). [MORE]