Contrary to Media DisInfoTainment, the Federal Trial Court's Obamacare Order Did Not Grant an Injunction, which Means the ACA Remains in Effect & the Ruling Does Not Affect Non-Parties to the Case

media disinfo obamacare.jpg

From [JD SUPRA] As has been widely reported over the past few days, the federal district court for the Northern District of Texas has issued an order declaring that the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA, commonly referred to as “Obamacare”) is unconstitutional, that the remaining provisions of the ACA are not severable from the mandate provision, and that the entirety of the ACA (which includes the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) provisions that set out a biosimilar approval pathway) is therefore invalid.

The order grants only a declaratory judgment that the ACA is unconstitutional and invalid; it does not grant an injunction (which means that it does not prevent the ACA from having effect at this time) and does not affect non-parties to the litigation.

At least a few of the states that intervened to the defend the ACA have declared an intent to challenge the ruling (see press releases here, here, and here, and news coverage, e.g. at   The case would be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and is expected to end up at the Supreme Court.

The case was filed by 20 Republican attorneys general and governors and two individuals, Neill Hurley and John Nantz. Defendants are the US, the Department of Health and Human Services and its secretary Alex Azar, the IRS and David Kautter in his capacity as its Acting Commissioner. The States of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington, and the District of Columbia also intervened as defendants. [MORE]

We will continue to monitor developments in this case to report on any effect it may have on the BPCIA.