Support Justice!
Latest Entries
HEADLINES

More News

OLDER HEADLINES
Powered by Squarespace
Search


Racist Suspect Watch



Friday
Nov302012

Genocidal Goal is Mass Confinement: More Non-White Children Growing Up With Parents Behind Bars 


From [HERE] The number of children with parents behind bars in the United States is growing. And a Latino child is more than twice as likely to have an incarcerated parent as a white child.

An infographic created by sociologist Becky Pettit in her new book,Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progressillustrates a five-fold increase in the number of children with parents behind bars from 1980 to 2005.

While interpreting the graph, it's important to keep in mind that the Hispanic population has grown much faster than the white and black populations since 1980, meaning there are simply more Latino children and parents in the U.S. However, taken as a percentage, Latino children are still more much more likely than white children to grow up with their parents behind bars. One in 42 Latino children has a parent in prison, compared to 1 in 111 white children, according to a 2009 report from The Sentencing Project, a research and advocacy group, which used data from the U.S. Department of Justice. And, when it comes to black children, one in 15 have a parent in prison.

Click to read more ...

Monday
Nov262012

Leveling Gaza: Israel Aggression to cost Gaza over $1.2 billion

In photo, Palestinians school girls climb over the rubble in a classroom, damaged during last week's Israeli "self defense" offensive. According to the UN, 47% of the Palestinians injured were children and 52% of the Palestinians killed were children.[MORE]  From [HERE] The eight-day Israeli assault on Gaza has resulted in at least $1.2 billion in economic damage, the territory's government says. Earlier, a report by the Palestinian Chamber of Commerce called for Gaza to be recognized as an economic disaster area.

­Direct damage caused by the Israeli airstrikes will cost $545 million to repair, while indirect damages are estimated at some $700 million, Hamas spokesman Taher al-Nunu said Sunday.

"The total cost of damages caused by the Israeli aggression is $1.245 billion,” al-Nunu said.

The eight-day Israeli operation, officially called Pillar of Defense, completely destroyed 200 homes and damaged another 8,000. The attack also destroyed 42 non-residential buildings, including the Hamas government headquarters, three mosques and a health center, Nunu added. Israeli forces are also known to have targeted the offices of local and international media outlets.

Click to read more ...

Monday
Nov262012

Chomsky on the Gaza Dungeon: "Those who Disobey the Master Must Suffer for this Misdeed" 

The events in Gaza took place in a developing context. In January 2006, Palestinians voted in a carefully moni­tored election, pronounced to be free and fair by interna­tional observers, despite U.S.-Israeli efforts to swing the election toward their favorite, Palestinian Authority presi­dent Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah party. But I lamas won a surprising victory.

The punishment of Palestinians for the crime of vot­ing the wrong way was severe. With U.S. backing, Israel stepped up its violence in Gaza, withheld funds it was le­gally obligated to transmit to the Palestinian Authority, tightened its siege and even cut off the flow of water to the arid Gaza Strip.

The United States and Israel made sure that Hamas would not have a chance to govern. They rejected Hamas's call for a long-term cease-fire to allow for negotiations on a two-State settlement along the lines of an international consensus that Israel and United States have opposed, in virtual isolation, for more than thirty years, with rare and temporary departures.

Meanwhile Israel stepped up its programs of annexa­tion, dismemberment and imprisonment of the shrinking Palestinian cantons in the West Bank, always with U.S. backing despite occasional minor complaints, accompa­nied by the wink of an eye and munificent funding.

Click to read more ...

Saturday
Nov242012

Poll: Israelis dissatisfied with cease-fire/ UN says Israel's "Self Defense" Massacre Killed & Injured Mostly Palestinian Children  

From [HERE] According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs:

An Egyptian-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas came into effect at 21:00 hrs, 22 November

• Since 14 November, 158 Palestinians are reported to have been killed; this includes 103 civilians, of whom at least 33 are children and 13 women. 1,269 Palestinians were injured (MoH), the majority civilians.

• Six Israelis (four civilians and two soldiers) were killed and 224 were injured, the vast majority civilians.

• The UN and partner agencies are working to quickly assess and respond to immediate needs and fully resume regular distributions and services

• Priorities include ensuring proper treatment for the wounded; psycho-social support for those traumatized, especially children; and addressing the shelter needs of those families whose homes have been destroyed.

• The sustained opening of the crossings into Gaza, particularly Kerem Shalom, is critical to facilitate the movement of people and essential supplies. [MORE

Poll Finds Israel Should Have Continued Killing

From [HERE] A poll shows about half of Israelis think their government should have continued its military offensive against Palestinian militants in Hamas-ruled Gaza.

The independent Maagar Mohot poll released on Friday shows 49% of respondents feel Israel should have kept going after squads who fire rockets into Israel. Thirty-one percent supported the government's decision to stop. Twenty percent had no opinion. Twenty-nine percent thought Israel should have sent ground troops to invade Gaza.

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Nov222012

War is Peace to Psychopathic White Supremacist Wannabes in Israel 

Promentalshitbackwashpsychosis Enema Squad. "Talking sh** a mile a minute. Can't think of nothing but sh**." - George Clinton. White supremacy is carried out through violence and deception.

Join the Gang. According to Hitler, Jewish people were not white people- they were an inferior race, an alien threat to racial (white) purity and community. In Nazi Germany (1933-1945}, a genocidal imperative was declared when the Semite and gypsy populations were classified as non-white and therefore were deemed worthy of destruction. (The word Semite is from the Latin prefix, semi meaning "half' - half Black and half white, and that means mulatto (non-white).[MORE] Nevertheless, today Israeli Jews seem willing to do anything to become full fledged honorary members of the 'white family' and to demonstrate their commitment to white supremacy/racism.

Psychopaths 

In their relationship with Non-white people, Whites are psychopaths and their behavior reflects an underlying biologically transmitted proclivity with roots deep in their evolutionary history. The psychopath is an individual who is constantly in conflict with other persons or groups. He is unable to experience guilt, is completely selfish and callous, and has a total disregard for the rights of others. This premise is supported by overwhelming scientific evidence. 

Behavioral scientists generally agree that the outstanding characteristics of the psychopathic personality are the almost complete absence of ethical or moral development and an almost total disregard for appropriate patterns of behavior. This characteristic has led to a misunderstanding of the psychopath as someone who does not know the difference between right and wrong. This belief is not true; psychopaths simply ignore the concept of right and wrong.

Unlike other extreme pathological syndromes, only a very small percentage of psychopaths are committed to mental hospitals with another small percentage ending up in penal institutions. The majority of psychopaths function very well in society. [MORE

A body is carried away from the Shifaa hospital morgue in Gaza City.

From Criminal Jury Instructions For the District of Columbia (2009): 

Self Defense?

Every person has the right to use a reasonable amount of force in self-defense if (1) s/he actually believes s/he is in imminent danger of bodily harm and if (2) s/he has reasonable grounds for that belief. The question is not whether looking back on the incident you believe that the use of force was necessary. The question is whether [name of defendant], under the circumstances as they appeared to him/her at the time of the incident, actually believed s/he was in imminent danger of bodily harm, and could reasonably hold that belief. 

A. NONDEADLY FORCE A person may use a reasonable amount of force in self-defense. A person may use an amount of force which, at the time of the incident, s/he actually and reasonably believes is necessary to protect himself/herself from imminent bodily harm.

B.--DEADLY FORCE A person may use a reasonable amount of force in self-defense, including, in some circumstances, deadly force. "Deadly force" is force that is likely to cause death or serious bodily harm. A person may use deadly force in self-defense if s/he actually and reasonably believes at the time of the incident that s/he is in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm from which s/he can save himself/herself only by using deadly force against his/her assailant.

C.-- EXCESSIVE FORCE (TO BE USED WITH EITHER DEADLY OR NONDEADLY FORCE) Even if the other person is the aggressor and [name of defendant] is justified in using force in self-defense, s/he may not use any greater force than s/he actually and reasonably believes to be necessary under the circumstances [to prevent the harm s/he reasonably believes is intended] [to save his/her life or avoid serious bodily harm]. In deciding whether [name of defendant] used excessive force in defending himself/herself, you may consider all the circumstances under which s/he acted. A person acting in the heat of passion caused by an assault does not necessarily lose his/her claim of self-defense by using greater force than would seem necessary to a calm mind. In the heat of passion, a person may actually and reasonably believe something that seems unreasonable to a calm mind.